Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/08/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![103 File:"Rongrong" in Chating Station.jpg](#File:"Rongrong"_in_Chating_Station.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_secret_coach_park.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_icon.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_The_Witches'_Sabbath.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geo.hlipp.de_-_28624.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
UCB MaSsoud Naderee (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 21:00, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
self promo on bn.wp Minoraxtalk 13:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Why has this been nominated? --I99pema (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 17:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 17:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Бессмыслица Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 17:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Размыто Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Бессмыслица Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user. --Achim (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
I put a photo of myself by mistake Leqzz (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Mitsubishi_Fuso_Rosa_2019_Unión_AQP_S.A..png}} Leonar25 (talk) 17:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Mitsubishi_Fuso_Rosa_2019_Unión_AQP_S.A..png}} Leonar25 (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Yutong_ZK6118HGA_Megabus_AQP_SAC.png}} Leonar25 (talk) 17:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Volare_W9_Fly_urbano_agrale_MA_9.2_Unión_Grau_SAC.png}} Leonar25 (talk) 17:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Bus_Cono_Norte_C_-_02.png}} Leonar25 (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; as not a duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Bus_Cono_Norte_C_-_02.png}} Leonar25 (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as files are no duplicates. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Cotum_Express_11_HD.png}} Leonar25 (talk) 17:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as no duplicates. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
{{duplicate|File:Cotum_Express_11_HD.png}}Leonar25 (talk) 17:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as no duplicates. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
non libre de droit 86.75.251.144 12:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Next time just use {{Duplicate}}. -- CptViraj (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Rino ap Codkelden as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: there is a law collision between Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights and Article 25 of the Law of Ukraine on Standartization This sounds like a complex issue not worthy of speedy deletion to me. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
ETA: File:Color coordinates measuring scheme from DSTU 4512.svg and File:Color areas chart for State Flag of Ukraine stripes (DSTU 4512).svg have now been nominated for the same reason. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Support Yes, I uploaded this file, because according to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain because it is a official document (State standard). But later I found that State Standards are copyrighted due to the Article 25 of the Law of Ukraine on Standartization, so law collision take place. -- Rino ap Codkelden (talk) 21:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, if that was you, Rino ap Codkelden, then should this be a COM:CSD#G7, or would you want to keep this if found to be public domain? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have not know about this reason for deletion, I will edit this page immediately. If this file will be public domain, I'll uploaded it again. -- Rino ap Codkelden (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, if that was you, Rino ap Codkelden, then should this be a COM:CSD#G7, or would you want to keep this if found to be public domain? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request <7 days. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 22:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 04:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 19:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Rajanarora95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Collection of promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Pitstop.JPG
- File:Parikram.jpg
- File:Para960.jpg
- File:KYLogo.jpg
- File:Kavi2.jpg
- File:JavedAli.jpg
- File:Indian ocean.jpg
- File:Euphoria.jpg
- File:Euphoria 456x217.jpg
- File:Coke Studio.jpg
- File:Bigg-Boss-8-Kumar-Vishwas-Rejects-Participation.jpg
- File:Kashiyatra15.jpg
- File:Dancerragh.jpg
- File:Abhi.jpg
- File:Ehud.jpg
- File:Sunburn14.jpg
- File:Indian saber.jpg
- File:466203-lucky-ali-live-at-crescendo.jpg
- File:445543-lucknow-mahotsava-2013-javed-ali-live.jpg
- File:Brochure-KashiyatraXV.pdf
- File:KY15 Logo.png
- File:Mirage1.PNG
- File:Fusion Nite.PNG
- File:Crosswindz.PNG
- File:Natraj.PNG
- File:Kavi Sammelan.PNG
- File:Antarnaad.PNG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajanarora95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own-work claims, uploader has a history of uploading files with questionable licensing. COM:PCP applies.
- File:KYprofpic16.jpg
- File:Natraj2.PNG
- File:Natraj3.PNG
- File:Enquizita.PNG
- File:Ehud segev.PNG
- File:Abhinay.PNG
ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faridfaraji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promo on wikidata.
Minoraxtalk 08:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Caso Young Lennon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion by a non-contributor, out of scope.
- File:Single " Lo Mio " ( Lp ) La Activite.jpg
- File:Caso Yong Lennon - MI cheque.png
- File:NEW COVER 000.jpg
- File:LA ACTIVITE.jpg
_La_Activite.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim (talk) 10:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jratulnishad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:Polish 20191211 130648885.jpg
- File:Polish 20200109 232820613.jpg
- File:Polish 20200109 224304144.jpg
- File:Polish 20191213 122951792-01.jpg
- File:Polish 20200307 104053481~2.jpg
- File:Polish 20200306 000010878.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Self promo on id.wp Minoraxtalk 12:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saraguzman1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope. 1 file used for self promo on wikidata.
- File:Oscar santiago roldan hernandez.jpg
- File:Cancion Todos Iguales.jpg
- File:Oscar Santiago Roldan.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yep, delete 'em. Quakewoody (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Praaatikkxxx (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Lovepraaaatikkkxxx.jpg
- File:Picartpraxxxtikkkk.jpg
- File:Praxxtixxx.jpg
- File:Praxxtikxxx.jpg
- File:Xxxpratikkxx.png
Minoraxtalk 13:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Myusril.st (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 13:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused logo AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sandro Lomadze (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader appears to be the subject depicted in these photos. Requires COM:OTRS from the original photographers.
_Lomadze.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ƏXPLICIT 01:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 06:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Dr. Robert Ostfeld and Dr. Walter Willett on 2017-03-26 at 6th Ivy League Vegan Conference at Harvard.jpg
[edit]
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 06:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Image has no EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Inside of True Bistro in Somerville's Teele Square before diners arrive, 09-10-2013 02.jpg
[edit]
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo, contributor was blocked on the Russian Wikipedia in January 2018 for repeatedly creating articles about the pictured subject. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 07:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
no evidence of how this photograph is in scope — billinghurst sDrewth 08:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
no evidence to how this photograph is within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 08:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim, appears to be a picture of a modeling picture. ƏXPLICIT 08:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of how image is within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 08:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of how image is within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 08:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
no indication of how this work is within scopee — billinghurst sDrewth 08:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot, permission needed. Minoraxtalk 12:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Above COM:TOO UK, permission needed. Minoraxtalk 12:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The sahil raj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a personal photo album. Out of scope.
- File:During seconf vlog.jpg
- File:When started bodybuilding.jpg
- File:Ranchi high street.jpg
- File:This picture is from konark temple.jpg
- File:First vlog cafe coffee day ranchi.jpg
- File:The hot coffee.jpg
Minoraxtalk 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:25, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabab Ador (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.
- File:Dr sattar.jpg
- File:অধ্যাপক ড. মোঃ আব্দুস সাত্তার.jpg
- File:অধ্যাপক আব্দুস সাত্তার.jpg
- File:Professor Sattar.jpg
Minoraxtalk 13:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amitavanath12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Bird photographer Amitava Nath.jpg
- File:Ramdhura.jpg
- File:Amitava nath.jpg
- File:Kanad Bhattacharya.jpg
- File:Rufous sibia at Singling.jpg
- File:Chestnut-tailed Starling, Kolkata.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samovarov S.I. (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samovarov S.I. (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Russia for sculpture.
- File:Памятник Владимиру Ивановичу Герье.jpg
- File:Ушинский Константин Дмитриевич (памятник).jpg
- File:Бюст Николая Баумана в Саду имени Баумана (Москва).jpg
- File:Памятник борцам с COVID-19.jpg
- File:Маршал Казаков В.И. (мемориальная доска).jpg
- File:Памятник Гордееву Б.С. на Новодевичьем кладбище Москвы.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Quick1984 (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Photos of coins need OTRS-permission from photographer. Taivo (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:अर्चना जी.jpg
- File:अर्चना सिंह प्रधानमंत्री मोदी के साथ.jpg
- File:अर्चना सिंह.jpg
- File:अर्चना सिंह छतरपुर.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Магомед Касумов.jpg
- File:Запир Алхасов.jpg
- File:Dzhago Yakhyaeva.jpg
- File:Muhtar Medzhidov.jpg
- File:Guseynova.jpg
- File:Lukmanov.jpg
- File:Bagand15px.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
The crown, shape, and lighting push this logo above the TOO. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Delete clear cut case. --El Grafo (talk) 12:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pictures by Hedda Morrison
[edit]Photographs taken by German photographer Hedda Morrison (1908 – 1991). The term of copyright for Germany is life + 70 years. Not PD until 2062.
- File:Bird fancier, North China, ca. 1930 - Hedda Morrison (15427135628).jpg
- File:Fisher Families With Junks In Aberdeen Harbor, Hong Kong Island (c1946) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4176560986).jpg
- File:Hk1946-kai-tak.jpg
- File:House Interior Showing A Woman At A Brick Stove, A Bucket & A Ladle Made From A Gourd In The Lost Tribe Country (1936) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4177646070).jpg
- File:House Interior Showing Woman With Bound Feet Tending A Stove In The Lost Tribe Country (1936) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4176573014).jpg
- File:Pedestrians & Vendors On Pottinger Street, A Stepped Street, Central District, Hong Kong Island (c1946) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4172217394).jpg
- File:Produce & Wares From Shops Along The Sides Of A Typical Backstreet, Western District, Hong Kong Island (c1946) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4170370548).jpg
- File:Seated Man Amid Baskets Of Fish & Hanging Dried Fish, Eastern Districts, Hong Kong Island (c1946) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4169611255).jpg
- File:View Of An Old Village, Kowloon Peninsula, Hong Kong (c1946) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4111430885).jpg
- File:Young Mother Carrying A Child On Her Back In The Market, Hong Kong Island (c1946) Hedda Morrison (RESTORED) (4170369548).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4176560986).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4177646070).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4176573014).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4172217394).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4170370548).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4169611255).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4111430885).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hedda_Morrison_(RESTORED)_(4170369548).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Wcam (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pictures by Hedda Morrison
[edit]Photographs taken by German photographer Hedda Morrison (1908 – 1991). The term of copyright for Germany is life + 70 years. Not PD until 2062.
Wcam (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
I found new BurakKucukgoz (talk) 00:11, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: the uploader requested deletion, recently uploaded, not in use, possibly out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 23:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS Larryasou (talk) 03:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
![03:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/29#c-Larryasou-2020-08-29T03:26:00.000Z-File:"Rongrong"_in_Chating_Station.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
![23:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/08/29#c-Ahmad252-2020-09-05T23:06:00.000Z-File:"Rongrong"_in_Chating_Station.jpg){kind=link}
"Diario el Tiempo"? Is this file taken from a newspaper? E4024 (talk) 01:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Can't find on google images, if you have proof of copyvio please provide it. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
unknown persons Reinhardhauke (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep Not unknown. See description: Monica Rial -- Common Good (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
From https://sonichu.com/cwcki/File:CWCMonica.jpg (SITE IS 18+), does not appear to be released under a free license PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Image appears to not be released under a free license, I've seen this image circulate over the Internet as a meme but cannot find the source PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 21:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation? Joschi71 (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
sourced to a pin on Pinterest, not sure of the original license Hyperik (talk) 23:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Tiny image, not suitable for use on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 23:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Poor-quality & incorrect chemical structure. Sulfur dioxide molecule is a bent/angled molecule with an angle of about 119 °. Have File:Structural formula of sulfur dioxide.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete More correct, and not worse in any way. DMacks (talk) 19:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment We had a pre-existing File:Sulfur dioxide.svg as well, in same orientation, style, format. But comparing that to Chem Sim 2001's new one, that one is very-slightly graphically inferior because it has curved strokes for the bond-lines. Maybe replace it with the new one and DR? DMacks (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @DMacks: I fully agree with this procedure. File:Sulfur dioxide.svg is an SVG version, but something went wrong with the bonds. I think there was some kind of auto-tracing mistake. I try to replace all its uses. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @DMacks: I have now replaced all its uses with File:Structural formula of sulfur dioxide.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 17:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @DMacks: I fully agree with this procedure. File:Sulfur dioxide.svg is an SVG version, but something went wrong with the bonds. I think there was some kind of auto-tracing mistake. I try to replace all its uses. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Sreejithk2000 at 03:56, 6 September 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: FBMD01000ac5030000032c00005e67000021730000177e000042a8000081060100830d0100431801006722010066d70100 --Krdbot 14:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Newer image that is content-equivalent but graphically inferior (smaller and opaque bg) compared to existing in same format. Not literal dup in policy sense:( DMacks (talk) 19:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete no reason to keep low quality image while better replacement like File:Sulfur-dioxide-ve-B-2D.png can be used. Wostr (talk) 10:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Poor-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background, pixelated bonds and weird red colouring at the oxygen atoms. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 21:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RVFA as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Yo el autor de este archivo solicito inmediatamente la eliminación rápida. (I, author of this file, ask for its immediate speedy deletion), but the file is already used in various places... AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 22:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, logo of en:TCL Technology with changed colors (red on white). Uploader's request, unused files, no oppose votes, courtesy deletion. If somebody considers the file useful, please recreate and re-upload the file yourself. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright vio? Joschi71 (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Это постер от египетского документального фильма про арабо-израильский конфликт начала 70-ых.--Yan.gorev (talk) 06:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation? Joschi71 (talk) 21:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Fails COM:FOP US. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per above, this is just a photo of a mural.--Williamsburger26 (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Not COM:DM: Spongebob is the focus. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per above. 1989 (talk) 23:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete @Williamsburger26: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States#Freedom of panorama, the unrestricted photography and reproduction of photos for any purposes (including commercial usages of such photos) only covers buildings. Sculptures and artwork are not covered under the freedom of panorama provisions in the United States copyright law, and such photos are considered infringing the copyrights of the creators (the designers or the sculptors, whoever created such copyrighted works of art). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Child pornography? This picture's title is "Japanese high school student erecting penis" in Japanese. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 02:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would delete it for you and for the good of Commons but there are people who prefer Commons to be a porn paradise, child porn included. I pray to God I am wrong though. --E4024 (talk) 02:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @運動会プロテインパワー: Sometimes high school students are over 18 years old (but I don’t know if that’s true in Japan). What about File:Teenager Penis Erection.jpg and File:Pénis adolescent.jpg, neither of which indicate the age of the subject? Brianjd (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- re I think age information should be opened in the pages. --運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 21:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
アップロードは間違いです Brent3001 (talk) 08:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete Translation: Uploaded in error. That makes it an uploader request within a day of upload, for a file that is not in use. (And the metadata and resolution suggest it’s a screenshot (copyvio?).) Brianjd (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)- Delete Unused low quality per COM:PENIS—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 17:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. ƏXPLICIT 12:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Non free image 2001:56A:F889:FC00:A512:DEF3:2018:80FD 08:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jean Vimenet
[edit]Jean Vimenet died in 1999. No OTRS.
- File:Autoportrait au chapeau de paille.tif
- File:Jean Vimenet, Autoportrait à la cravate jaune, gouache sur papier, Paris, 1934 2.tif
- File:Jean Vimenet, Le Bouquet, huile sur toile, Cachan 1962.jpg
- File:Timbre émis, avec le concours de La Poste, en 2016 (Jean Vimenet, Femme aux narcisses n°1, 1965).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Chassipress (talk) 21:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Ticket:2020090210006829 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 00:33, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
no licence (taken from the presentation) Nickel nitride (talk) 17:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Popular meme GIF, doesn't appear to be released under free license PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 21:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Поскольку Логотип Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Fair use media files are not allowed on Commons. --Regasterios (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW. No permission. 85.212.195.223 05:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Agree, unfortunately we do not have the necessary permission from the rightsholder to use the photographs on this record cover. --Gnom (talk) 14:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Logo. Does this pass COM:TOO? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: simple design. ƏXPLICIT 14:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work, freedom of panorama most likely is inapplicable. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete 2D types of artworks are being excluded under COM:FOP US. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Please proceed with deletion of the Meridiana @ Iowa Colony image. It was not the intention to violate any copyrights associated with the Meridiana community trademark. 2C2KPhotos (talk) 05:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
_-_Flickr_-_secret_coach_park.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Flickr_-_secret_coach_park.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless image - The photo essentially is of a random guy as he covers the entire front of the coach, Wont ever be used internally or externally, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
_-_Flickr_-_secret_coach_park.jpg){kind=link}
- Thanks for looking into the backlog of photos. I don't understand the comment though: only some 5 % of the bus is covered; the face can be blurred if it's distracting. This seems to be the only photo we have for this company, Category:Henshaw's Executive Travel, so it's clearly in scope. Nemo 07:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- No worries, Thought I'd slowly make a start, That's a shame however we have to think realistically - Is the image really in scope ? ... No IMHO,
- As I said above the image won't ever be used in or outside of Wikimedia, If he was at the side of the vehicle then sure it could be used/would be in scope (and he could possibly be photoshopped out),
- Also due to the guy blocking the number plate it also means the vehicle can now never be identified as there's 3 models of this vehicle all with different names,
- IMHO SCOPE and USE trump "only image in this category", Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 10:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- There is File:HENSHAWS Moreton-in-Marsh - Flickr - secret coach park.jpg. Peter James (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above image linked by Peter is the exact same coach taken on the exact same day (same location, same position, same car behind) so as such there's now no reason to keep, Thanks Peter James for finding this gem!, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
_-_Flickr_-_secret_coach_park.jpg){kind=link}
Поскольку Размыто, Бессмыслица Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AtomCrusher as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No indication that this commercial logo was created by the user, or is released under the specified CC license. Filename suggests a hurried upload without understanding.
The logo appears to be below COM:TOO (COM:TOO Canada) and, in my opinion, it can be tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}. Ahmadtalk 00:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Just a comment: This file is an exact copy of File:YQB New logo.png, but with a transparent background. It appears to me that the uploader does not know one can just update files and has consequently uploaded a new one (this one) under a gibberish name. I think this file page should be deleted regardless of copyvio for formatting reasons or merged with the original file under the proper name. CentreLeftRight ✉ 22:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:CentreLeftRight, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
{{PD-old}} removed by Asybaris01 (talk · contribs) without comment. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I have updated the permission to PD-Art|PD-old-100, as the painting was produced in 1848. I have also updated the author, who is Costache Petrescu (1829-1910). --Alex:D (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{PD-old-70-1923}} removed by Goesseln (talk · contribs) with comment Lorenz Fränzl 1878-1951. Der PDD ist 2022. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright holder requests deletion in ticket:2020082810003053 citing that he did not consent to these photos being uploaded and they have been uploaded without his permission. These files are currently in use.
~riley (talk) 01:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete File:Petronas-01.JPG per courtesy, Keep two others as they are still used. Ankry (talk) 00:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: based on the request above and the inconsistencies of images (all different cameras, captions, etc.), it is safe to assume that the uploader User:2013m was not the rights holder. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
No metadata, likely professional photo based on background, likely also out of scope AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
{{PD-old}} removed by Timk70 (talk · contribs) with comment please use correct license, PD-old can't be correct because author is unknown, also a United States public domain tag is missing. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: new copyright templates have been added. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
{{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} removed by Axel.Mauruszat (talk · contribs) with comment wrong source, wrong author, wrong date, wrong persmission AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: old enough, license changed to PD-old-assumed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. This implies that the uploader (MaynardClark) may have took a screenshot from a nonfree video. Uploader (MaynardClark) has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 03:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Please delete the following larger version as well:
FunnyMath (talk) 03:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: 17:34, 25 March 2021, by Didym. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No proof that Daniel Raphael is an employee from US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
No proof that Daniel Raphael is an employee from US Federal Government A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
{{PD-self}} removed by SamsonBVB (talk · contribs) with comment the uploader is not the author of a state insignia of the NVA AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep License tag
{{PD-GermanGov}}added. -- MaxxL - talk 05:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC) - Keep--SamsonBVB (talk) 14:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4415164/mediaviewer/rm3767872256 E4024 (talk) 04:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, article deleted on en.wp as non-notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Per request SpinnerLaserz (talk) 06:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Small image without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 06:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, distorted image of another photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
I want to change it Armenh40 (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Armenh40: What do you want to change? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe he wants to upload a picture in scope. Who is the man here? Why would we have his picture in Commons? --E4024 (talk) 03:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: The man is probably Robert Ashot Hakobyan, the photo from family archives per Google Translate of some user pages. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:29, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe he wants to upload a picture in scope. Who is the man here? Why would we have his picture in Commons? --E4024 (talk) 03:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 03:02, 6 September 2020, by Fitindia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Likely false authorship claims. Previously published in much higher resolution at climatetracker.org. The filename there suggests the image may have been previously published here on Wikimedia Commons, but I have not been able to locate it. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Contains a watermark; previously deleted. Larry Hockett (talk) 07:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Werner von Basil as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Augenfällig stellt dieses Bild kein Selfie dar, wie der Hochladende = der Abgebildete vorgibt. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Most likely not own work. Similar image uploaded by the same user has no EXIF data. See File:2018-02-21 Michael 'Mick' McIntyre.jpg. Uploader has a history of copyvios. We should apply precautionary principle and delete this image. FunnyMath (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution. Unlike own work. Larryasou (talk) 09:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nondescript holiday snap? 2001:A61:34D1:7A01:BF73:5870:2D44:355E 11:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- They are seamen, not people in holidays. I am not sure if there is any EDUSE here, though. --E4024 (talk) 00:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Holiday snap, no encyclopaedic relevance. 2001:A61:34D1:7A01:BF73:5870:2D44:355E 11:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I agree. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 02:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
non libre de droit 86.75.251.144 11:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
non libre de droit 86.75.251.144 12:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Also:
Newspaper is usually protected by copyright. Larryasou (talk) 15:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
no permission أمين (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
no permission أمين (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
origin/existence is questionable. articles have been deleted. Wikidata items have been deleted numerous times (another currently pending), all users (including the image uploader) are globally blocked sock puppets. If commons has a use for it, that's one thing. But given the 'guilt by association' history of the image and the subject it represents, it is best we discuss it. Quakewoody (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- image is no longer in use because all related articles and items have been deleted for the spam it was. Quakewoody (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Small file without camera info; dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
probably copyvio Patriccck (talk) 19:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
There's already a map for this. TylerKutschbach (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:32, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Image's source is this. It does not appear to be released under a free license by the copyright holder. Also, the image appears to NOT be uploaded by an educational purpose, being used on a troll's sandbox. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 20:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Diese Datei soll nicht gelöscht werden, da die gesamten Recht (Urheber und Nutzungsrechte) bei mir liegen. Mein realer Name und mein User Name stimmen nicht überein. Ikonclick (talk) 20:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment In diesem Fall, siehe: "Ich bin der Inhaber des Urheberrechts, aber meine Datei wurde zuvor ohne freie Lizenz auf einem Medium veröffentlicht, das ich nicht ändern kann" at OTRS. — JGHowes talk 21:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too blurry. Any use this photo could have is better covered with this other: almost identical, but acceptably sharp. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Obvious not own work, no permission and source.
--Wright Streetdeck 12:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: {{Wikipedia screenshot}}. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete：无多少实际价值，违反共享资源的宗旨（提供优质文件）。@小猴子0921: 下次请上传到zhwiki本地。 (Although copyrights is OK, per the deletion policy, they should be deleted) Herobrine303 (talk) 14:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Own work? Maybe not, but users that were involved signed properly. No permission? CC-BY-SA 3.0. No source? Isn't that a wp screenshot? Commons don't have a "reliable source" policy. --Super Wang (talk) 02:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Add File:你在教我做事?.jpg. --02:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Apparently created for attacking other user on zhwiki. Per the deletion policy, they should be deleted. --Sun8908 (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- No. These screenshot are just for reminding other user. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Then they should be moved to zhwiki, not on the commons. Herobrine303 (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- File:你在教我做事?.jpg file name direct translation is "Are you teaching me to do things?" in a questioning tone. And the file is put in the uploader's user page and administrators' noticeboard. The another file was also put in the administrators' noticeboard. If the files are just for reminders of users, they should not have been used as reporting and put in user page.--Sun8908 (talk) 02:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- No. These screenshot are just for reminding other user. --DavidHuai1999 (talk) 03:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, personal dramatic communications. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:00, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Helppublic (talk · contribs)
[edit]The ownership of the copyright on these files confuses me, so I have brought them here for wiser heads than mine to examine.
The Extended details all have no camera details. All mention Google as the software used, but no camera details. yet the shots appear to be pretty run of the mill shots. I would like to see a better declaration of sourcing for each of this uploading editor's files, including permission where required
- File:Vasanth & Co Chennai India.jpg
- File:Pandian Stores Super Market Chennai India.jpg
- File:Pandian Home Appliances Chennai India.jpg
- File:43rd Chennai Book Fair 2020 Y.M.C.A. College of Physical Education grounds Nandanam Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Keezhadi and Thirukkural 43rd Chennai Book Fair 2020.jpg
- File:Revathi Stores Super Market Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Revathi Home Needs at Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Revathi Home Needs Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Revathi Grand Readymades and Textiles Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Revathi Readymades and Textiles Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:RmKV Wedding Silks Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:RmKV Silks Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:RmKV Silks Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Lifestyle Stores Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Puma (brand) multinational shoe and sportswear.jpg
- File:Crossword Bookstores Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Funskool Store in Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Funskool Store Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Sundararaja Perumal temple Agaram Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Sundararaja Perumal Temple Agaram Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:VIP World.jpg
- File:WildCraft Retail outlet.jpg
- File:WildCraft Retail stores.jpg
- File:WildCraft Retail Clothing and Footwear.jpg
- File:43rd Chennai Book Fair 2020.jpg
- File:House of Candy Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Hamleys Toy shop Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:At FORUM VIJAYA Shopping Mall Vadapalani Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:43rd Chennai Book Fair 2020 Nandanam Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:43rd Chennai Book Fair 2020 Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:43rd Chennai Book Fair 2020 Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Chennai Book Fair 2020.jpg
- File:Shopping Malls India.jpg
- File:FORUM VIJAYA Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Buddhist temple Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:St. Mary's Co-cathedral Church Armenian street Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Cultural Stage top Risen Christ Church Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Display at Hamleys Toy shop at VIJAYA FORUM Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Anandan Park Agaram Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:The FORUM VIJAYA Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:At Railway Stadium Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:St.Mary's Co-cathedral Church Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:St. Mary's Co-cathedral Church Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:St.Mary's Co-cathedral, Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:St. Mary's Co-cathedral, Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Venus Park Perambur Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:AG-DMS metro station Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Metal craft Ayanavaram road ICF Colony Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Model of a Lamp of metal ICF Colony Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Famous Flowering plants Perambur Flyover Park Murasoli Maran Flyover Park Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Beautiful Flowering plants Perambur Flyover Park Murasoli Maran Flyover Park Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Flowering plants Perambur Flyover Park Murasoli Maran Flyover Park Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Risen Christ Church Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Gautam Buddha Philosopher India.jpg
- File:Perambur Flyover Park (Murasoli Maran Flyover Park) Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Perambur Flyover Park Chennai Tamil Nadu India.jpg
- File:Our Lady of Lourdes Shrine Chennai Tamil Nadu.jpg
- File:Our Lady of Lourdes Shrine, Tamil Nadu.jpg
- File:The Risen Christ Church, Tamil Nadu, India.jpg
- File:At Risen Christ Church, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.jpg
- File:Entrance Nameboard at 'Perambur Railway Station', Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.jpg
- File:Hamleys Toy shop, India.jpg
- File:Railway Stadium, Southern Railways, Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.jpg
- File:Blessed Sacrament chapel, Perambur.jpg
- File:'தூய லூர்து அன்னை திருத்தலம்', பெரம்பூர், சென்னை, தமிழ்நாடு, இந்தியா.jpg
- File:'தூய லூர்து அன்னை திருத்தலம்', பெரம்பூர்.jpg
- File:'Max fashion', Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.jpg
- File:Don Bosco Nursery and Primary School.jpg
- File:Adyar Ananda Bhavan.jpg
- File:St. Mary's Anglo Indian Higher secondary school.jpg
- File:Murasoli Maran Flyover Park, Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.jpg
- File:Perambur (Murasoli Maran) Flyover Park.jpg
- File:CSI WESLEY CHURCH.jpg
- File:Shri Venkatesa Perumal temple.jpg
- File:Shri Gangadeeshwarar temple.jpg
- File:Shri Venugopalaswamy temple.jpg
- File:Vasanth and Co.jpg
- File:Risen Christ Church, India.jpg
- File:St. Mary's Co-cathedral Church, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, in India.jpg
- File:During the annual feast celebrations, flooded with lights ; 'Our Lady of Lourdes Shrine', Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, in India.jpg
- File:120 year old 'Our Lady of Lourdes Shrine', Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, in India.jpg
- File:Annual feast celebrations; 'Our Lady of Lourdes Shrine', Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, in India.jpg
- File:Buddha, a philosopher , who formulated Buddhism, born and lived in India.jpg
- File:Statue of Gautam Buddha at South India Buddha Vihar, Perambur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, in India.jpg
_multinational_shoe_and_sportswear.jpg){kind=link}
_Chennai_Tamil_Nadu_India.jpg){kind=link}
_Flyover_Park.jpg){kind=link}
Timtrent (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I express my support for deletion, if the contents are not useful for WikiProjects. Helppublic (talk) 15:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Helppublic It is not the usefulness that concerns me. What is of concern is whether the photographs are pictures where you are the copyright owner, or, if not, whether you can demonstrate that you have the copyright owner's permission. Please will you start by commenting upon that matter? Timtrent (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Timtrent !
All the images uploaded by me, were snapped by me by my mobile phone camera and previously used for Google products. My data are requested to be downloaded and used for WikiProjects. Clarified . Okay ?
Helppublic (talk) 07:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Helppublic: I doubt that simple statement itself is ok. I am not an admin here, nor a copyright expert. You need advice from someone who is a copyright expert. I have no idea what is meant by ...phone camera and previously used for Google products and there are no camera details on any of the files. It is wholly unclear who the copyright owner is, although you do declare All the images uploaded by me, were snapped by me, because, if used for Google products then you may have photographed under contract to Google and thus they would be the copyright owner. Commons is very particular over what it will accept. I think your getting advice here is imperative. I imagine there is help desk to ask for advice. The discussion here is not 'mine'. I simply started it. Someone else will judge the correct outcome. Please ask for expert advice. Timtrent (talk) 09:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- The contents mentioned are my own works.
According to Google Privacy Policy (page 10/28) dated 28th August, 2020, anyone with a Google account can export his data or back up details, of his own, who uses them out of Google Services. Please go through it and finalize.
Thank you.
Helppublic (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- I see no reason why not take the uploader's word that he/she is the photographer here. So Keep most. There are some images that include copyrighted works not covered by Indian FOP (as I understand it), but many are de minimis. Delete the following:
- Keep most or possibly all. I haven't examined them all for non-de minimus copyright violations, obviously if there are any those should not be kept. As for taking the photographer's word: We usually do. If there is a SERIOUS or BLATANT reason to think the uploader does NOT own the copyright on the photograph (I'm not talking about the contents of the photograph, but the photo itself) then that would be a good reason to "delete all." If there is a LESS SERIOUS, NON-BLATANT concern that is "MORE THAN TRIVIAL," then using the OTRS process to have the photographer give the Commons OTRS staff additional information to alleviate those concerns should be sufficient. If the only concerns are trivial or just a "hunch" then "keep most or possibly all." Davidwr (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Davidwr! and Rhododendrites!
The above files are my own works.
Helppublic (talk) 16:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Work is consistent. Uploader clearly states they're his. If you disagree, please nominate in very small batches, not in a giant nomination. Thank you. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Incorrectly licensed, and numerous other full versions of this engraving available in Category:John Gregory (physician). Unlikely this will be used. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Uploads by Doc Taxon
[edit]
_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
For the same reason as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Fiend Bray Wyatt.jpg. P.S. When someone puts the OTRS reqeust template like in first picture, you cannot just remove it without sending OTRS permission. Someone who is OTRS team member himself like you should know it.--Piotr Bart (talk) 16:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- it seems to make something wrong ... Delete it in close time! Doc Taxon (talk) 16:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
la subiré en otra categoria Itziar Gares (talk) 18:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
...or "I will upload it in another category" (Spanish to English) --Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 19:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
la subiré en otra categoría Itziar Gares (talk) 18:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Same reasons as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Il-Sung's cross portrait.png though I don't support the current Iranian government. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 20:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Cancel request The nomination is a mistake. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 20:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Per Commons:Derivative works. Njzjz (talk) 00:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose as uploader The image is not just of the painting (a small portion of which is obscured) but of the room where the painting is and the artifacts on exhibit with it which take up more of the space in the image than the painting. The reason for this is to illustrate the following text in en:The Founding Ceremony of the Nation, "Wang admired how, in Moscow museums, Lenin's career was chronicled and made accessible to the masses through artifacts accompanied by oil paintings showing crucial moments in the Communist leader's career. He and higher-level officials decided to use a similar technique as they planned the Museum of the Chinese Revolution. Thus, they sought to chronicle the Party's history and showcase its accomplishments." It is to show the use of this technique with the painting The Founding Ceremony of the Nation, and this is pointed out by the caption in the en:wp article, "The Founding Ceremony of the Nation on exhibit along with artifacts of the October 1, 1949 ceremony. National Museum of China. Seen in 2018." In fact, I took the image myself after writing the article and getting it to FA on my visit to Beijing in February 2018 for this very purpose. It is not derivative because there is considerable originality and judgment. Note that the painting occupies only a small portion of the image (about the same amount as one of the cannons) and is obscured in part and is a bit shadowed and slightly out of focus.--Wehwalt (talk) 00:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Per COM:FOP China, China will allow freedom of panorama for indoor artworks since June 1, 2021. I think I can withdraw the request at present or at that time.--Njzjz (talk) 18:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: ok now. --rubin16 (talk) 14:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused image with no encyclopedic value. AshFriday (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Johnny has an agenda. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:NUDITY. Low photographic quality amateurish depiction of female genitalia that is redundant to a whole swath of files we have on the subject. Commons is not for people to show off their genitals. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 02:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:CENSOR and Tgeorgescu. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete low quality, with a noticeable haze. Would (IMO) damage the image too much to repair it. MjolnirPants (talk) 20:01, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Poorly framed, has defects per MjolnirPants. Cullen328 (talk) 03:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per the discussion at COM:AN/UP - The nominator is on a one man crusade to delete all "smut" images, No objections to renomination by any editor in good standing. –Davey2010Talk 14:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
no longer wanted in my file 198.210.90.210 02:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per previous section. This is not the nominator's file. This is a fatuous nomination. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete and for the same reasons stated at the previous DR where it was kept. (Bad quality, one of too many etc.) BTW User:Tom Marquez seems to have confused Commons with something else, and people who oppose deletion of "certain" images seem to be confused about "mind reading". There is no crusade here. There are people who use the camera between their legs and we have a page with an illustration on that phenomenon, remember? Regards. --E4024 (talk) 02:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: (omg what I was doing) Category:Nude recumbent women (supine) with legs wide open has other images but this one has good angle and light, I would keep it anyway. --rubin16 (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{self|cc-zero}} removed by Gozalov Parvin (talk · contribs) with comment Я Парвин Гезалов являюсь полноправным автором. И мне принадлежит авторство издания данного знамени. Во время использования должны ссылаться на мои книги. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: seems to be PD-Old but haven't found a good source for that. --rubin16 (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{PD-old-70-1923}} removed by Goesseln (talk · contribs) with note Lorenz Fränzl 1878-1951. Der PDD ist 2022. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Goesseln: What source is being used for Fränzl's date of death? --Fæ (talk) 03:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
{{User:Jnn/C}} removed by Omotecho (talk · contribs) with comment Updated details. Confirmed the original image before trimming, and it shows a wall (in public space?) with an enlarged image of a postcard, with caption along the top edge. The postcard itself is a reproduction of a woodblock print made in the 1870s, which a municipal art museum in Kobe had reproduced into a set of postcards, perhaps as a merchandise to sell at their gift shop. Painter of the wall mural unknown: location of the wall not identified, but could belongs to a public facility. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment I am not quite sure if we decide the right of the artist who painted /mechanically reproduced a derivative art/postcard of the original woodcut into a mural. As you see with the older file before trimming, this is a wall painting on an unknown location, but presumably the poster is not the owner of the facility, nor claims to be the creator of the mural.
- The mural derives a postcard reproduced from a woodcut print by Hasegawa Sadanobu II (d.1940);
- The Kobe Namban Art Museum (ja: 神戸市立南蛮美術館) had issued those postcards resizing Hasegawa’s woodcuts in a set of six pre-1982;
- that museum was amalgamated into w:en:Kobe City Museum in 1982.
- Postcard source: NCID BA90975023.
- Location where the photo was taken unknown;
- FYI, not the same mural, but a branch for JRA, or the public horse race organisation’s bookie WINS Kobe, seems to have had the same woodcut printed on their shutter, which looks quite different from this Kobe-keiba6379.JPG.
--Omotecho (talk) 07:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted based on PCP. --rubin16 (talk) 14:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Creator:Hans Rudolf Schulze}} died 1951, not yet PD assuming postcard was first published in Italy. 1951 + 70 = 2021, file becomes PD in 2022. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Based on Raphael Tuck & Sons, the "Oilette" series would have most likely been printed in Germany and exported as there was apparently no printing outsourced to Italy c.1900s/1910s. The life+70 reasoning would stay the same. --Fæ (talk) 03:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: to be undeleted next year. --rubin16 (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted since Hans Rudolf Schulze copyright has now expired. Platonides (talk) 00:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Creator:Hans Rudolf Schulze}} died 1951, not yet PD assuming postcard was first published in Italy. 1951 + 70 = 2021, file becomes PD in 2022. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{PD-old}} removed by Goesseln (talk · contribs) with note http://verlag.fraenzl.it/ http://sterbebilder.schwemberger.at/picture.php?/42348 Lorenz Fränzl 1878-1951. Der PDD ist 2022. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Undeleted per Goesseln dating of Lorenz Fränzl. Platonides (talk) 00:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
_icon.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_icon.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Files from individual U.S. states are copyrighted unless otherwise noted A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
_icon.jpg){kind=link}
- Not an expert editor on these matters, but...it is a graphic representation of a federal route marker. Many of this graphic representations of federal routes are used across Wiki.VikingB (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Here’s an explanation that the image is a widely used representation of a federal route marker sign. VikingB (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_icon.jpg){kind=link}
Borderline TOO logo, not quite sure what the country of origin even is. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: "It is incorporated in Dublin, Ireland, and has operating subsidiaries in Argentina, Australia, China, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States". Seems to use UK standards here, so, deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 16:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Creator:Hans Rudolf Schulze}} died 1951, not yet PD assuming postcard was first published in Italy. 1951 + 70 = 2021, file becomes PD in 2022. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 16:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted since Hans Rudolf Schulze copyright has now expired. Platonides (talk) 00:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 93.147.251.157 as Copyvio (copyvio).
I see no evidence of PD at source (archive) since at least 2012, but unknown about 2010. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted based on the talk page of uploader. --rubin16 (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Also other files from the same source
Terms of use in deed says that content can be used, reproduced and distributed without explicit consent, however they do not explicitely mention modyfing nor name any license. Therefore, we need to assume that modifying is not allowed and therefore this statement is not comptabile with our template (and rules): The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose. Masur (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
I have changed the license, please check if it is okay now. I have also checked another Croatian politician Zdravko Marić, he used the same licensing as me previously and his upload got approved. Elserbio00 (talk) 21:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- OK, but could you please point to where Croatian government says that this image is released under Creative Commons license? Masur (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: checked and haven't found a license there. --rubin16 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
copyvio of http://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/static/tribun/14/photos/1214.jpg Rhadamante (talk) 07:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
This picture is copyright by Nat Finkelstein (https://www.flickr.com/photos/30379212@N03/6454354367) and (https://natfinkelstein.com) Anton L. (talk) 09:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:02, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
This photo was created after 1943. This fact contradicts the text of the license. Regasterios (talk) 09:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
A közzététel 1944-ben történt, a Fotófilm tette közzé a hivatkozoott albumot. Ismeretlen szerző esetén a közzétételt követő évet követő 70 év elteltével már megszűnik a szerzői jog. A cimke szövege nem lett aktualuzálva. Ezért nem én vagyok felelős. --Elekes Andor (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Az URAA alapján még nem tölthető fel a Commonsba, Delete Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Az Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) hatása a szerzői jogra: az egyezmény kiterjeszti az Egyesült Államok szerzői jogvédelmét néhány olyan alkotásra, melyek korábban köztulajdont (public domain) az Egyesült Államokban angolul "its effects is to give United States copyright protection to some works that had previously been in the public domain in the United States"
1. A magyar szerzői jog egyértelműen köztulajdonná nyilvánítja az ismeretlen szerző alkotását az annak közzétételétől számított 70 év elteltével. Itt ez megvalósul, mivel a fényképet 1944-ben tették közzé és azóta több mint 70 év eltelt. 2. Magyarország szuverén ország, szerzői jögát maga szabályozza. Magyarországra nem vonatkoznak más országok szerzői jogi törvényei. 3. Magának az Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA)-nak nem tárgya a magyar joghatóság alá eső alkotás szerzői jogi szabályozása. --Elekes Andor (talk) 10:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- My opinions follow:
- The "unknown author" (árva mű) status requires a hefty fee and a permission from the government (which they never give). Not a way to go.
- The author death+70 years is low probability on less than 100 years old images so we do not assume that.
- The probable author is Szabó Dénes (1907-1982).
- According to A romániai magyar irodalom fotódokumentációja lots of the images from Mr. Szabo were gifted to the Library of University of Kolozsvar, and it worths pursuing whether these were indeed offered to the public or not. (I would assume they were.) If that is true the images from Fotofilm shall be kept.
- It is expected that in the case of keeping the image there will be no heirs to come and complain, so they can be temporarily kept while someone clears the status with the library, or they can be kept on the opinion of assumed permission.
- (Andor: amit emailben írtam azt foglaltam itt is össze angolul.) --grin ✎ 17:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not free in US, see Template:PD-HU-unknown/doc. We need both PD in Hungary and US. --rubin16 (talk) 17:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
The map is a tracing of the map produced by Sebők László, consequently is a derivative work. The IP is owned by the Teleki László Institute and László Sebõk and László Sáry according to http://www.geog.port.ac.uk/hist-bound/project_rep/proj_eurograph.htm.
Though the map appears to be released for non-profit use, this does not comply with COM:L nor is it equivalent to the GNU and CC-BY-SA licenses currently displayed. Fæ (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: why do we assume that map was received by tracing of the non-free map? I zoomed in and checked borders line - they are not equal in terms of how lines were put there. I suppose the non-free map was used as a source of data, not just a basis of something redrawn. --rubin16 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as no source (No source since) rubin16 (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Some sort of incorrect appeal by placing speedy template while it should be done in a different way. Converted to appealed DR myself rubin16 (talk) 21:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- The correct process was followed for obviously derived works with no source.
- The above DR that you closed has failed to supply any evidence for where the underpinning map has come from. There never was any claim that the map was own work, it just never has had a source.
- Deletion is required per COM:PRP, COM:L and COM:DW. From a technical point of view, it was never clear why this is a PNG file, a format that throws doubt on how it was sourced, and unfortunately, the original metadata shows nothing helpful. --Fæ (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep What nonsense. There can be no copyrights to the reproduction of state and other political borders, as well as the location of places on maps. These inevitably always look the same, because they are historical and political in origin and thus cannot represent an artistic work with any copyrights. The same applies to the graphic reproduction of collected data such as, in this case, census data. This data is also not a work of an author worthy of copyright, but the mere reproduction of the result of a census. Thus, no author has any personal influence on the reproduction of these facts as a marked area on a map. These will have to look inevitably always the same. Same numbers, same areas. The only design possibility is the choice of colors. But this is like a children's coloring book and has no creative power. Thus, any question in connection with a source is also superfluous.--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 16:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 14:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING & COM:TOO China Larryasou (talk) 09:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- I moved this file along with thousands of other files from Wikivoyage to Commons and I have no strong feeling about it. But to me it look like this is just a text. --MGA73 (talk) 10:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- But I'm afraid that this is a calligraphy protected by copyright in China. See COM:SIG#China,_People's_Republic_of --Larryasou (talk) 10:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah but I think that a signature is different from writing a text. A signature does not have to look like text or even be readable. Sadly I do not read Chinese so I can't tell if this looks like standard writing or if it is very special. --MGA73 (talk) 12:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
- But I'm afraid that this is a calligraphy protected by copyright in China. See COM:SIG#China,_People's_Republic_of --Larryasou (talk) 10:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not much activity here but as files is still unused we can stick to PCP and delete. --rubin16 (talk) 17:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Frans Francken (II) - Witches' Sabbath.jpg WikedKentaur (talk) 12:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: processed as {{Duplicate}}. --rubin16 (talk) 17:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_-_The_Witches%27_Sabbath.jpg){kind=link}
_-_The_Witches%27_Sabbath.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of File:Frans Francken (II) - Witches' Sabbath.jpg WikedKentaur (talk) 12:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
_-_The_Witches'_Sabbath.jpg){kind=link}
- Will someone be sure to switch the file to the other one on the pages it's used on? Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: processed as duplicate. --rubin16 (talk) 17:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_-_The_Witches'_Sabbath.jpg){kind=link}
This file was first asked about at COM:VPC#File:Sir David Edward.jpg before starting this DR. The en:provenance of the portrait depicted in this photograph is unclear; if it is protected by copyright, then the photo would be a COM:DW and probably can't be kept. The person pictured in the photo, en:David Edward is still living. He seems to have served on the en:European Court of Justice from 1992 to 2004,; so, the portrait was likely painted sometime time during that 12-year-period. It, therefore, seems unlikely that the portrait is PD just based upon it's age or because of en:post mortem auctoris (p.m.a). It's possible this could be PD for some other reason, but that's not clear and if not, then the file probably needs to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: I bet it was author name stated under the portrait in the bottom side of the picture but it is not clear. The uploader was active in en.wiki in the articles connected with the subject of the painting and I think it is a case where a portrait is owned but copyright is not. --rubin16 (talk) 17:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Obviously above COM:TOO China . Larryasou (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Поскольку Размыто Ĩŵąŋ (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Cover is from here • 2003:DE:73D:2C4D:F0A7:E856:846F:6109 15:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
{{PermissionOTRS|id=2020083110004788}}
Kept: kept per OTRS. --rubin16 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Cover is from here • 2003:DE:73D:2C4D:F0A7:E856:846F:6109 15:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
{{PermissionOTRS|id=2020083110004788}}
Kept: kept per OTRS. --rubin16 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Cover is from here • 2003:DE:73D:2C4D:F0A7:E856:846F:6109 15:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) {{PermissionOTRS|id=2020083110004788}}
Kept: kept per OTRS. --rubin16 (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adelfrank as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: F2 Maybe this is considered textlogo. Borderline case. Discussion is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: haven't found much info about TOO in Spain. Agree that it is a borderline but not much discussion here and I would probably think it is more non-free than ineligible. --rubin16 (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Cover is from here • 2003:DE:73D:2C4D:F0A7:E856:846F:6109 15:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC) {{PermissionOTRS|id=2020083110004788}}
Kept: per OTRS. --rubin16 (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
This is a procedural nomination only, per instructions for over-ruling a speedy BINZIYAARUMULK (talk) 16:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note. The rationale for the previous request was derived from its similarity to a pre-existing file online. However, the creation of this file by me was produced via the usage of a combination of the software coreldrawl and kassaba 3.0, despit ethe fact that part of my insight was procured from look at previous samples from various sources. I do not believe that this constitutes an infringement per the common understanding of such within the wikimedia community. As such, just to be clear, I do not think this file ought to be deleted. Thank. you. BINZIYAARUMULK (talk) 16:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Weak delete On one hand I'm pretty sure that the writing itself (to which the original rationale was referring) is below the threshold of originality, but on a second hand I'm not sure we need such a low quality picture with messy pixelated background. You can easily make SVG file with transparent background. Piotr Bart (talk) 16:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Convenience link: https://www.facebook.com/ahl.quraniat/photos/a.113416443396085/113416416729421. Either the decorative markings elevate this above the ToO and so is copyvio, or this is too simple and therefore out of scope as purely textual Arabic. --HyperGaruda (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment These aren't decorative markings, but a diactrics, part of and Arabic text and they are definitely below ToO. COM:OOS clearly states that such media as this can be hosted on Commons if they're used in at least one Wikimedia project. So I'm only voting delete because it should be a SVG file without background. Piotr Bart (talk) 11:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, the only diacritics here are the diamond dots/i'jam. The curls below and to the left of the letters أهل القرآن(which are ironically missing diacritics like hamzah and maddah) are mere decorations, but we digress. --HyperGaruda (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Actually, the only diacritics here are the diamond dots/i'jam. The curls below and to the left of the letters
Deleted: per nomination. I think it should be either reworked to be saved as illustration or, if it is a mere text, it could be just used in Wikimedia projects directly. --rubin16 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271101788).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Speedy deletion (tagged by 182.239.85.21 as Copyvio) declined in favor of DR. Although not a U.S. government work, the U.S. State Dept. attributes the photo to the Royal Court of Bahrain as Public Domain. See also:
- File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271767256).jpg
- File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271101678).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— JGHowes talk 16:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Media from Royal Court of Bahrain is copyrighted and no way to be in Public Domain. Probably U.S. State Dept. attributed them wrongly. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271101678).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Speedy deletion (tagged by 182.239.85.21 as Copyvio) declined in favor of DR. Although not a U.S. government work, the U.S. State Dept. attributes the photo to the Royal Court of Bahrain as Public Domain. See also:
- File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271767256).jpg
- File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271101788).jpg
— JGHowes talk 16:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271767256).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Speedy deletion (tagged by 182.239.85.21 as Copyvio) declined in favor of DR. Although not a U.S. government work, the U.S. State Dept. attributes the photo to the Royal Court of Bahrain as Public Domain. See also:
- File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271101678).jpg
- File:Secretary Pompeo Meets with Bahraini Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa (50271101788).jpg
— JGHowes talk 16:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
own work? I do'nt believe - Geschütztes Firmenlogo ist keine einfache geometrische Form - Protected company logo is not a simple geometric shape Adelfrank (talk) 17:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Of course, not own work. But similar logos have been regularly kept for being textlogos:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:2015 Disney Channel logo.svg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Two Disney Channel logos
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Channel wordmark.svg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Disney Channel 2014 HD.png
Taivo (talk) 19:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. --rubin16 (talk) 18:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3 I think showing off entire displays as such have been considered de minimis. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: I would agree it is DM. --rubin16 (talk) 18:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3 I think this needs more discussion, as I think one could argue over whether the image is meant to be derivative of Mickey Mouse as such. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep - Commons:De minimis applies, It's simply a picture of random tshirts, Title should IMHO be changed tho. –Davey2010Talk 20:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete The title actually indicates clearly that the photographer didn't intend to took a photo of "random tshirts" but that the very reason this photo was taken was the (quite funny) "KICMEY" (instead of "MICKEY") mouse rip-off, as also reflected in the file description. So, without "Kicmey" Mouse, it loses its purpose, and therefore it can't be de minimis. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Not to be one of those people but despite the photographers intentions this is still just a picture of 3 tshirts. The "Mickey Mouse" t shirt wasn't taken up close so De minimis would apply here. That being said there isn't a lot of background here so one could still argue it actually still fails De minimis.
- Anyway if an admin believes this fails minimis I'll blank Mickeys face out. –Davey2010Talk 22:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- This is getting absurd. If you actually read COM:DM, it should be clear that de minimis is not about the amount of space the subject in question takes in the image. To quote from that policy page (boldening by me): "So, for example, if the poster forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area." So, the photographer's intentions are actually a main element in judging whether something is DM or not! It's about what the essential part of the picture is. In this case, they wouldn't have gone there and thought "oh, I'm taking a photograph of three random t-shirts", they saw "Kicmey Mouse" and wanted to take a picture of it. Therefore, if you "blank Mickeys face out", we're left with a ridiculous result that serves no purpose anymore (who would need such a low-quality picture of three random t-shirts?). Gestumblindi (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Like I said it's 3 random tshirts so DM applies. there's no need to get so defensive and worked up over a reply which was made in entirely in good faith. My blanking suggestion was due to the fact we don't have a lot of images in Category:T-shirt_designs and it was also a compromise - We don't need to delete entire images for the sake of one small issue that can be rectified. Like I said I firmly believe DM applies - you don't - so there's nothing else left to say that hasn't already been said. –Davey2010Talk 13:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sure that your reply was made in good faith, but it simply seems to me that you haven't read COM:DM fully. This file could even serve as a very typical example for cases where DM most certainly doesn't apply, it's that obvious. - That we don't have a lot of images in Category:T-shirt designs is probably simply due to the fact that these are often copyrighted, such as in this case - it's to be expected. (By the way, in this case I had decided to comment/vote instead of processing the deletion request as an admin because the case didn't seem fully discussed to me; leaving for another admin to make a decision). Gestumblindi (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- We'll have to agree to disagree. Have a nice day. –Davey2010Talk 19:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sure that your reply was made in good faith, but it simply seems to me that you haven't read COM:DM fully. This file could even serve as a very typical example for cases where DM most certainly doesn't apply, it's that obvious. - That we don't have a lot of images in Category:T-shirt designs is probably simply due to the fact that these are often copyrighted, such as in this case - it's to be expected. (By the way, in this case I had decided to comment/vote instead of processing the deletion request as an admin because the case didn't seem fully discussed to me; leaving for another admin to make a decision). Gestumblindi (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Like I said it's 3 random tshirts so DM applies. there's no need to get so defensive and worked up over a reply which was made in entirely in good faith. My blanking suggestion was due to the fact we don't have a lot of images in Category:T-shirt_designs and it was also a compromise - We don't need to delete entire images for the sake of one small issue that can be rectified. Like I said I firmly believe DM applies - you don't - so there's nothing else left to say that hasn't already been said. –Davey2010Talk 13:19, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- This is getting absurd. If you actually read COM:DM, it should be clear that de minimis is not about the amount of space the subject in question takes in the image. To quote from that policy page (boldening by me): "So, for example, if the poster forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area." So, the photographer's intentions are actually a main element in judging whether something is DM or not! It's about what the essential part of the picture is. In this case, they wouldn't have gone there and thought "oh, I'm taking a photograph of three random t-shirts", they saw "Kicmey Mouse" and wanted to take a picture of it. Therefore, if you "blank Mickeys face out", we're left with a ridiculous result that serves no purpose anymore (who would need such a low-quality picture of three random t-shirts?). Gestumblindi (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- Unless the clearly non-free derivative work is removed, Delete. 1989 (talk) 01:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Done, removed the offending image from the shirt and shorts. –Davey2010Talk 14:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Well, then I stand by my delete vote even more strongly as the image has lost its purpose through that manipulation. The connection of the "KICMEY" lettering to Mickey Mouse is now unclear. It is now more or less out of scope. That's the dilemma we face with that image: It is only meaningful if its main subject is left in there, the T-Shirt with the KICMEY lettering *and* the Mickey Mouse image. That's why the image was taken, that's what it is supposed to show. But we can't keep it in that version because it's a copyrighted derivative work. On the other hand, by altering the image to remove Mickey Mouse from it, we get a blurry picture that is now also a fake - it shows a t-shirt that doesn't exist in this form in reality. The description in Norwegian Wikipedia's article no:Anagram, where this picture is in use referring to Mickey Mouse, is also no longer fitting the image - I would say that COM:INUSE in that case isn't applicable, as it was meant to use the original, unaltered picture there. But I do see an option to keep the image, if you really think it's that extremely important: Censor the Mickey Mouse picture visibly, e.g. with a black square and the word "CENSORED" over it, so that it is clear that it's a manipulated picture, not pretending that it's just a red t-shirt with the word KICMEY and nothing else, that doesn't exist in this form. And add in the description that it shows Mickey Mouse but that it has been obscured for copyright reasons. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Adding a black square is silly because that's intentionally making the image unusable - My way has still made the image usable, I don't know why you're making such a big issue over something so small, You believed the mouse image failed DM/DW - I've removed the offending image.... and you're still unhappy. You're also beginning to bludgeon this discussion so would respectfully ask you stop further replying. Let the discussion continue and let people have their say. –Davey2010Talk 20:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- Well, then I stand by my delete vote even more strongly as the image has lost its purpose through that manipulation. The connection of the "KICMEY" lettering to Mickey Mouse is now unclear. It is now more or less out of scope. That's the dilemma we face with that image: It is only meaningful if its main subject is left in there, the T-Shirt with the KICMEY lettering *and* the Mickey Mouse image. That's why the image was taken, that's what it is supposed to show. But we can't keep it in that version because it's a copyrighted derivative work. On the other hand, by altering the image to remove Mickey Mouse from it, we get a blurry picture that is now also a fake - it shows a t-shirt that doesn't exist in this form in reality. The description in Norwegian Wikipedia's article no:Anagram, where this picture is in use referring to Mickey Mouse, is also no longer fitting the image - I would say that COM:INUSE in that case isn't applicable, as it was meant to use the original, unaltered picture there. But I do see an option to keep the image, if you really think it's that extremely important: Censor the Mickey Mouse picture visibly, e.g. with a black square and the word "CENSORED" over it, so that it is clear that it's a manipulated picture, not pretending that it's just a red t-shirt with the word KICMEY and nothing else, that doesn't exist in this form. And add in the description that it shows Mickey Mouse but that it has been obscured for copyright reasons. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: the Mickey's face was deleted, no copyright issue anymore. It is still in use in no.wiki as Anagram, so, can't claim it OoS. --rubin16 (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio. This picture is opyrighted by the Assemblee nationale. Rhadamante (talk) 19:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This version is a bad resolution of a better file, (File:Page_8_of_Fairy_tales_and_stories_(Andersen,_Tegner).png) Penneyless (talk) 20:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: {{Duplicate}} processed. --rubin16 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Rheintal bei Koblenz-Kesselheim, Autobahn A48-E44 (Rhine valley near Koblenz-Kesselheim, Motorway A48-E44) - geo.hlipp.de - 28624.jpg
[edit]_-_geo.hlipp.de_-_28624.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geo.hlipp.de_-_28624.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
nothing to see, no educational value Joschi71 (talk) 20:16, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture taken from a copyrighted website with no indictation of permissions 174.254.194.67 20:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nidhhi-Agerwal-snapped-in-Mumbai-3.jpg. --rubin16 (talk) 18:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image is clearly a copyright violation, because it is identical with the image
https://suna-sd.net/images/496944_47O77RFuAE0BeDHPaNKFByzJ-YED39mJ.jpg
embedded at https://suna-sd.net/en/single?id=689416 .
The copyright written at https://suna-sd.net/en/single?id=689416 is ALL Rights Reserved © 2018 Sudan News Agency (SUNA).
Unless we have info about all SUNA images being by default CC-BY-SA compatible, this image has to be assumed to be under the standard Berne copyright convention.
Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Sudan#Government_works seems to say that official Sudanese government documents are more or less PD (public domain), but publications by a state-funded (and controlled?) news agency (like the BBC) don't count as official documents. Boud (talk) 20:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
copy vio? Joschi71 (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Support: I honestly don't know whether or not it's a copyright violation (author the photo was their own work; as for the status of the copyright on the Moroccan currency itself, Commons:Currency doesn't have details for Moroccan law and a quick Google didn't turn anything up)--but, regardless, it seems to satisfy the "Out of Scope" clause of the deletion policy, since it's a relatively poor quality image that's duplicative of the much higher quality file at File:100 dirham 2013 (averse).jpg. This file isn't used on any other wikis, and I frankly have trouble seeing a case in which it would help the project to keep hosting it on our servers. CogitoErgoSum14 (talk) 15:52, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: deleted as unused while better version available. --rubin16 (talk) 18:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Watermarked by Charter 97, so it is not gonna be a CC photo. 178.120.71.185 22:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- No. The autor Ivan Mezhui shared this photo on Flickr as a CC. Watermark is irrelevant. Tomasz Bladyniec (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 18:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Outdated. New file linked to article. JohnAnkerBow (talk) 23:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
It is copied from a copyrighted website and does not include any OTRS permission. Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Cropped from an imaage at [1] © 2020 Springer Nature Limited. SpinningSpark 23:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep @Yoninah: be serious. OTRS permission is not needed for Creative Commons works. Read the following chapter on the source link. Thanks.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Also consider, that the whole Scientific Reports https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Reports is published under the Creative Commons Attibution 4.0 license. --Snek01 (talk) 11:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 18:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
