User talk:Omotecho
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Omotecho,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Trans format samples
[edit]Preference
[edit]- gadgets tl
== Localization of [[MediaWiki:Gadget-VIAFDataImporter]] for ja ==
{{Gadget-desc|self=MediaWiki:Gadget-VIAFDataImporter/ja|name=VIAFDataImporter|典拠管理用のデータインポートツール。テキスト形式でクエリをかけ、VIAF (viaf.org) から必要なデータを選んで簡単に取り込む。 |talk=User talk:Inductiveload|doc=Help:Gadget-VIAFDataImporter|example=:File:AddVIAFdata - step 2.png}}
{{tl|edit request}}
--Omotecho (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Special:MyLanguage/
[edit]- [[c:Special:MyLanguage/Commons:File captions|多言語のキャプション]]
- →多言語のキャプション トナル
- [[mw:special:MyLanguage/Help:File captions|MediaWikiのヘルプページ]]
- →MediaWikiのヘルプページ トナル
--Omotecho (talk) 22:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
[edit]Dear Omotecho,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Translated page/ja
[edit]
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
[edit]Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for nominating this file for deletion. However, for apparent copyright violations, please use {{Speedydelete|1=F2}}
. Cheers. -Green Giant (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Flow, thank you for tip, and yes, noted. FYI, I encountered that deletion information on Village Pump, if not here on translatewiki. As a translator who has worked on 20% or so of those strings, quite keen to know if you would share the news with translation group, on-Commons and off-Commons. What would you point me to, the most handy method and double check if the translation target exists/Speedydeleted per copyvio? Cheers, --Omotecho (talk) 19:19, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Curious
[edit]Hi, Omotecho, would it be hard work to translate the text of the image into English? I 'am curious in what it says. Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 05:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Lotje Hi there, those scribleon ukiyo-e is written in archaic Japanese, a bit similar to Latin to European languages. I am happy you pointed me to it, and I sense the text talks about sophistication... Surely there might be transcription avail on the web, while my confession is I have been wishing to study them and decipher... (-m-;)A Just give me a few days, would you? Cheers, --Omotecho (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you every so much, take your time. I am glad to see you are also curious btw, a few seconds ago, I made an interlanguage link on the Hand fan article and a wikilink to Suzume Odori, but I do not really see the connection there. Would you have an idea as to an image really depicting what is meant with the suzume orodi? Thnks! Have a nice day. :-) Lotje (talk) 06:08, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hey, @Lotje: , for Suzume dance and hand fan, belated response; I have updated enwiki with two pics. Does it make sense to you? --Omotecho (talk) 07:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC) indented / Omotecho 07:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the update . Maybe a Category:Japanese traditional dance should be created here? Lotje (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Great idea! As Japanese traditional dance links to Kabuki actors/plays, as each Kabuki play is highlighted with dance scenes. Schools of Japanese traditional dances such as female masters of Fujima and others. I guess we will have a huge “herbarium” in a matter of time. Kabuki - Ukita-e woodcut prints - shamisen three stringed guitar players. ;)
- BTW, I have been discussing with a very eager newbie editor on jawiki who wishes to have Kamigata-e article on enwiki expanded with their jawiki article. I am a bit worn out by July with “definitions” or citation favs/unfavorites on jawiki, but still hoping to contrast with images how the taste/trends among Edo and Kamigata-Osaka/Kyoto are unique east vs west maybe here; so far, I discovered 19th century Ukiyo-e artists need to have their works sorted out from GLAM donated batches. Well, have done much reading homework, and it is fresh to learn that the patrons to Osaka-Kyoto Kabuki actors/theaters had such big purses to buy off the first day premier each season, that even print makers were very sensitive to who was the most popular actor. Homecoming kabuki actors would gain much fame after performing a few years in Edo, or off-off Broadway to speak, very peculiar but reasonable way to the top... --Omotecho (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC) indent / 14:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Kobe-keiba6379.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
If the copyright status of a file is in doubt, please correct the issue or nominate the file for deletion instead of removing the license template. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Please test new feature on the ISA Tool (computer-aided tagging)
[edit]Hello
We have just released a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.
We are currently looking for feedback with regards to the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place. In a second stage, we will be testing the quality of the recommandations provided.
We deeply appreciate your feedback, since it will help us determine the next steps of the project.
Please sign-up to indicate interest, test the tool, and simply provide feedback in the talk page.
More information on the new feature and test campaign: Commons:ISA Tool/Image to Concept
Thank you in advanceǃ
- Comment Friday, 7 October 2022年10月7日 at 21:36 (UTC)
ISA Tool Workshop - Dec 12th 2022
[edit]Greetings.
We released a few weeks ago a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.
Now we are looking for feedback with regards to
- the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place.
- and most importantly, the quality of the recommandations provided.
This is why we are organizing an online workshop on Monday 12th of December, 16h-17h30 UTC+1 (on zoom). We will be very happy if you find the time to join us.
More information and sign-up : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:ISA_Tool/Image_to_Concept#ISA_Workshop_-_Dec_12th
Thank you in advanceǃ
- Comment received with gratitude! Tuesday, 6 December 2022年12月6日 (火) at 00:38 (UTC) (: --Omotecho (talk) 04:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Help with translation
[edit]Hello @Omotecho. Could you be so kind to help revise the following translation regarding the sound logo contest? We had to update that sentence, that you had previously translated. Thank you,
CalliandraDysantha-WMF (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Translation assistance
[edit]Hello @Omotecho, I noticed you attempted translating the Wiki Loves Africa main page. I am writing you to provide a guide to the correct translation process: the page was created using a collection of templates. To make a succesful translation, you have to translate the individual templates here first.
Let me know if you need any help with this. Thank you! Wilson (talk) 00:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- @OtuNwachinemere, yes, the point we share here is what Meta still lacks as guidance.
- Would you care raising your guiding texts somewhere please? Since I have learnt the “tricks” the hard way, with bumps and blisters, and that is unnecessary for the future translators/editors.
- I meant to thank you reaching out. I guess it’s the compliment you meant to note, see, I have worked on those templates a couple of weeks ago, and on top of that, ppl are beginning to finish the task. Yey! Thank you inviting me to the wider circle of translators 翻訳者. Cheers, Omotecho (talk) 05:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Do not remove licenses. In addition, there is no reason to doubt it is valid. Yann (talk) 14:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- No, valid or not shall be with reference to the original work. How have you compared the derived work with the original? I am talking about the accuracy that encyclopedia can rely on. Give me hint please. -- Omotecho (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)