Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/06/25
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![25 File:"Curves" - Mercedes Ambrus at Erotica Tour Millennium 2009 - B&W by Filippo Parisi.jpg](#File:"Curves"_-_Mercedes_Ambrus_at_Erotica_Tour_Millennium_2009_-_B&W_by_Filippo_Parisi.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(48853078278).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(48853082158).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_with_stethoscope.jpg){kind=link}
Also unfortunately the wrong license Rumblerumble33 (talk) 04:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Procedural close: Merged with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Naked man on the beach.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 05:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Deleted: Uploader's request one day after upload, unused. --Achim (talk) 18:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation from the source ShohagS (talk) 03:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from https://photogallery.indiatimes.com/events/mumbai/hope-aur-hum-trailer-launch/Virti-Vaghani/articleshow/63890230.cms. --Túrelio (talk) 10:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
delete information RISC - The Research Institute for Security and Crime (talk) 07:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
delete this page it spam RISC - The Research Institute for Security and Crime (talk) 07:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete users' talk pages. --Achim (talk) 10:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
This looks fun! @Tm: bend over bitch and let me see your hole! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:18BD:E1DF:69F1:61D1:B431 16:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Ongoing vandalism by a twit from the UK. --Achim (talk) 16:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism; DR tag already removed as vandalism. @Achim55: FYI. Brianjd (talk) 14:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Ready to be plucked and fukked! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: sitting in a tree, k i s s i n g! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Photo has no encyclopedic value, see Commons:Nudity.--NL19931993 (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept, normal quality. I blocked the nominator indefinitely as sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 21:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Ready to be plucked and fukked! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: sitting in a tree, k i s s i n g! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ready to be plucked and fukked! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: sitting in a tree, k i s s i n g! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ready to be plucked and fukked! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: sitting in a tree, k i s s i n g! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ready to fukk and sukk! Eh @Achim55, Tm, and Hasley: I slept with your momma... and your poppa! Oh your momma squealed like a pig last night! 92.40.182.4 22:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Non administrator closure. Usual vandal, making his lockdown childish routine. Tm (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Does not provide additional educational value above the current images in Category:Nudism Category:Naturism, appears to be a personal photo and therby out of scope. Not used Captain-tucker (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Captain-tucker (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Ready to be plucked and fukked! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: sitting in a tree, k i s s i n g! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Hands in hair, ready to give you a blowjob! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use in 3 Wikimedia projects.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Fixpol (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep immediately. Fixpol seems unaware that Commons is not censored and can also illustrate adult topics such as sexuality or eroticism. So the deletion requests s/he launched are probably all invalid and abusive. See Commons:Project scope (and particularly COM:CENSORSHIP) and Commons:Sexual content. Also note that s/he should have launch a mass DR instead of a separate DR for each file. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per TwoWings. Green Giant (talk) 19:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ready to be plucked and fukked! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: sitting in a tree, k i s s i n g! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyright holder: COCO COXX. I marked the page for copyright violation. It was reverted because uploaded by a one-time visitor who used the nickname COCO COXX. Not even the care to open a DR ...(There has been an absurd DR in the recent past which I had not noticed before.) I do not know if enough time passed in between my marking and the wrong revert for an admin to see this, but to play the game honestly I want to see our admins deleting copyright violations of nude females as fast as other copyvios. Returning to the file, we all know that the username (who is not a user BTW, just a visitor) is a simple nick and we have seen many cases of people adding copyrighted pages simulating to be the copyright holder by nickname (which means nothing at all). The file is only 114 KB and being uploaded by a one-time visitor everything becomes dubious. Even if nothing I wrote above were due, this is an art photograph and we need OTRS from the photographer in any case. As I have opened my mouth let me take the opportunity to say a few words. We have no obligation nor right to make a positive discrimination for beautiful, nude, blond, gorgeous etc women or for beautiful pictures like this one. As I have observed several times the nudity lobby in Commons enjoy accusing people who propose for deletion nudity images let me add this. I do have my own taste of erotic art. Unless there are problems like in this case, you will never see me proposing to delete an aesthetic art picture like this or, for example, File:Nude in nature 10.jpg. I have a few more things in mind but do not wish to take the issue further. It is a simple case of copyright violation and I want this beautiful picture to be deleted because of that reason, and for our precautionary clause. I would, for an exception, like to see some admins, for example those who delete many other files I have marked for F10, G10 or copyvio like this one to come and say a word. I know you are busy, but not that much. E4024 (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment Photo looks to me not particularly explicit, photo of buttocks of nude female model, low resolution, poorly lit, overly processed. A quick google shows there was a London based model using the name "Coco Coxx" in the early/mid 2010s; I presume this is them. This deletion request is IMO rambling and not much to the point. Note that images should only be marked as copyright violations to be speedy deleted if there is specific evidence that showing it to actually be a copyright violation. Image is currently in use in vi.w. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- "Copyright holder: COCO COXX" is sufficient for speedy deletion. It is very much to the point, IMO. --E4024 (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Why? Seriously, I don't follow. Apparently someone using the professional name "Coco Coxx" uploaded a photo which they state they are the copyright holder of. Why do you think this qualifies for speedy deletion? Do you think they are not the actual copyright holder? Based on what? Who do you think is the actual copyright holder? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seriously? I do follow. Tomorrow add a pic of Donald Trump using the nickname Donald Trump. We will suppose you are Donald Trump. --E4024 (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- If that was intended to clarify something for me, I fear it has had not. Does anyone else know what E4024 is trying to talk about? If so, perhaps you might have better luck explaining it to those of us who don't? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Seriously? I do follow. Tomorrow add a pic of Donald Trump using the nickname Donald Trump. We will suppose you are Donald Trump. --E4024 (talk) 19:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Why? Seriously, I don't follow. Apparently someone using the professional name "Coco Coxx" uploaded a photo which they state they are the copyright holder of. Why do you think this qualifies for speedy deletion? Do you think they are not the actual copyright holder? Based on what? Who do you think is the actual copyright holder? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- "Copyright holder: COCO COXX" is sufficient for speedy deletion. It is very much to the point, IMO. --E4024 (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep Username COCO COXX (not a visitor) and exif says that the copyright is hold by COCO COXX. Proofs that this is a copyright violation? Tm (talk) 03:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Delete Clearly not speediable, but absent confirmatory evidence (license at source, OTRS, etc.) we can't accept a bald assertion of the right to license based solely on the uploader's username. Making a user name based on an artist's name is a common practice for both publicists and fans, so that means nothing. Case in point: this is clearly not a selfie, so if the subject is "Coco Coxx" then "Coco Coxx" is not the author of the photo. They may conceivably be the legal owner of the copyright, or have a sufficient license to the photo, but that's the sort of supposition that takes paperwork to establish. --Xover (talk) 15:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Image not found anywhere else, the uploader's name equals to the author stated, no reason to delete. --rubin16 (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Blonde nude woman sitting on a chair spreading her legs at Nudes-A-Poppin' 2009 crop color.jpg
[edit]
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ready to fukk and sukk! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: I slept with your momma... and your poppa! Oh your momma squealed like a pig last night! MayfieldKings (talk) 16:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism by a kid or a retarded from the UK. --Achim (talk) 17:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Holy moly! Look at those melons! 2A04:4A43:4CFF:2D86:493A:2F16:7D5B:2F2C 06:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy kept, anon inappropriate comment, not a reason for deletion. (Image is currently in use) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:44, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
--- blanked content --- 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Ready to be plucked and fukked! Eh @Achim55 and Tm: sitting in a tree, k i s s i n g! And they want us to believe this is not soft porn! You’re having a laugh butches! 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:9CDC:793:5A8B:1702 13:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Lo sentimos, esta imagen no es interesante para una enciclopedia ReyOsc (talk) 14:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality image 2605:6000:1526:450B:A110:7966:8022:C2B6 23:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 23:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
File appears to be plagiarised - found at https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/cambridge-news/gallery/prime-ministers-newly-painted-plane-18488081 attributed to Leon Neal/Getty Images while uploader is claiming as own work. LostCause231 (talk) 21:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Further evidence: Original Getty Source: https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/voyager-the-aircraft-used-by-the-prime-minister-and-members-news-photo/1252392418 - Image is subject to a commercial license and is not Creative Commons as claimed by the uploader. LostCause231 (talk) 09:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily per nomination. --Achim (talk) 10:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
No evidence this is a free image. Just taken from an election commission website. Number 57 (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Copied from internet. No explicit information on copyright usage. Dead.rabbit (talk) 17:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy, copyvio. ~ Nahid Talk 11:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PARTHASARATHI.N (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text documents of unclear notability. Out of project scope.
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம்!.pptx.pdf
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம்அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமினடனம் அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம் --- அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம் - அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம் அன்பு.jpg
- File:CONCLUSION 3.jpg
- File:Conclusion 4.jpg
- File:CONCLUSION 1.jpg
- File:REFERENCES.jpg
- File:CONCLUSION 2.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:26, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PARTHASARATHI.N (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused diagrams of unclear notability. Out of project scope.
- File:SIMULATION OF CANCER DIFFERENTIATION THERAPHY FOR COVID-19 REMOVAL.gif
- File:Covid-19 transformation.gif
Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PARTHASARATHI.N (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம்அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமினடனம் அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம் --- அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம் - அன்பு.jpg
- File:சிவகாமி னடனம் அன்பு.jpg
- File:CONCLUSION 3.jpg
- File:Conclusion 4.jpg
- File:CONCLUSION 2.jpg
- File:REFERENCES.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- User:EugeneZelenko, note that the files (or at least most of them) already were listed in the first section on this page. The uploader removed the {{Delete}} template from a number of files, so this might not have been obvious to you. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't dig into files history. Anyway, additional notice to user would be educational. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:28, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PARTHASARATHI.N (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text document of unclear notability. Out of project scope. The JPG appears to be identical to the first page of the PDF.
Stefan2 (talk) 08:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Obvious copyright infringement. Lifted from Facebook with owner's imprinted tag clearly visible Crep171166 (talk) 16:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Jdx at 19:35, 27 Juni 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 02:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
OoS. E4024 (talk) 21:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
The legislative (congressional? provincial board? city council districts? what?) districts have not been determined as of yet. This also shows fictitious depiction of regions. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Content intended as Vandalism (G3). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:28, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This map is fictitious. The Philippines provinces in 1898 did not look this way. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:31, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Official? Nope. This is a fictitious map. This is not how regions look like right now, with 17 regions as opposed to 23 in this one. We don't even know how many regions will there be in 2022. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Content intended as Vandalism (G3). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
main subject = copyrighted material (not de minimis) TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; speedy. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep I made this as a proposal in the height of the controversy surrounding the current state flag. I had to mark it with a fictional flag tag. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 02:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep There are Thousands of Proposed and Fictional Flags on Commons. no need for deletion --BlinxTheKitty (talk) 18:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I made this just for my userpage as I am against the current design. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 01:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep That brings it within the "small numbers of images ... for use on a personal user page" exception to COM:EDUSE. I apolgise for my failure to check this earlier. --bjh21 (talk) 12:38, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21's comment; since it's been used on the userpage of the uploader, who is an active contributor, it falls within the project scope. --Ahmadtalk 01:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Out of project scope 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 01:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: above US:TOO given shading and shadows FASTILY 09:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Not any more complex than the examples at COM:TOO US -FASTILY 09:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Fastily: On second thought the News icon seems below COM:TOO US --17jiangz1 (talk) 09:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:28, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Legoland Discovery Center Chicago.
- File:Entrance (2171132570).jpg
- File:Entrance (2171133534).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108044437).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108044741).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108046417).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108849248).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108875656).jpg
- File:Legoland (6016582591).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5471282635).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5471282791).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5473687229).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5474286502).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion per above criteria. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 21:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks.
- File:Lego Giraffe (3838127607).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108836132).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476541859).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5477144578).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494340187).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494342099).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494933480).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494933690).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494933958).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494934222).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5494934494).jpg
- File:Legoland San Diego 2.jpg
- File:Legoland San Diego 3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion per above criteria. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 21:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:47, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks.
- File:Legoland (3108004183).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108004415).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108881170).jpg
- File:Legoland (3108881304).jpg
- File:Legoland (6017131860).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5476538929).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5477140924).jpg
- File:Legoland California (5477141988).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion per above criteria. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 21:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
COM:TOYS, and No FoP in US for artworks.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Addition,
- File:Lego Deap Sea Diver (3838133307).jpg - (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sea Life Aquarium (Legoland California))
- File:Legoland California (5471539285).jpg - (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sea Life Aquarium (Legoland California))
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support deletion per above criteria. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
All files taken from different websites without stating source and permission.
- File:Soraya Aghaee4.jpg
- File:Soraya Aghaee3.jpg
- File:Soraya Aghaee.jpg
- File:Soraya Aghaee2.jpg
- File:Iran National Badminton Team.jpg
- File:SaminKhojasteh.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 14:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MiniPictures (talk · contribs)
[edit]On which grounds aren't these not simple at all logos copyrighted?
- File:Mini Free Logo Jaguar v3.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Andretti.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Venturi.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Dallara.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Brabham.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Yamaha.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Mugen.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Peugeot.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Jaguar.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Spyker.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Toro Rosso.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Red Bull.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Ferrari.png
- File:Mini Free Logo OFI.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Villa Teresa.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Villa Española.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Sportivo Italiano.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Rampla Juniors.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Río Negro City.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Conmebol.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Racing.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Progreso.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Paysandú.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Parque del Plata.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Los Halcones.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Liverpool.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Fénix.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Durazno.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Deportivo Colonia.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Defensor Sporting.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Coraceros.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Cerro Largo.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Canadian.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Bella Vista.png
- File:Mini Free Logo Albion.png
Discasto talk 21:05, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MiniPictures (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:White identification color.png
- File:Yellow identification color.png
- File:Turquoise identification color.png
- File:Red identification color.png
- File:Purple identification color.png
- File:Pink identification color.png
- File:Orange identification color.png
- File:Light blue identification color.png
- File:Gray identification color.png
- File:Gold identification color.png
- File:Green identification color.png
- File:Dark green identification color.png
- File:Dark red identification color.png
- File:Dark blue identification color.png
- File:Brown identification color.png
- File:Black identification color.png
- File:Blue identification color.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:51, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SKM SAIFUL ISALM TAREK (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Sk taerk.jpg
- File:Dear man.jpg
- File:Sk tarek.jpg
- File:Saiful sk.jpg
- File:Sk saiful.jpg
- File:Saiful.jpg
- File:Ak 2.jpg
- File:বড়শালঘর ইউ এম এ উচ্চ বিদ্যালয় (Barashalghar UMA High School).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo Cárdenas Barajas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various football club logos with bogus self claims by serial copyvio uploader - may or may not be below TOO, but actual COM:EVID and discussion needed
- File:Ijuh.png
- File:Kjhbop.png
- File:Hygtrd.png
- File:Iuh.png
- File:Cfv.png
- File:Uytr.png
- File:Iuyg.png
- File:Nbgf.png
- File:8uyg.png
- File:Iuh0.png
- File:98u.png
- File:Hyte.png
- File:Hgfd.png
Эlcobbola talk 16:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:56, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo Cárdenas Barajas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Redundant to their respective jpg/svg counterparts
- File:Iuygv.png
- File:7y.png
- File:Hg87y.webp
- File:Rjfghb.jpg
- File:Hgf6.jpg
- File:Kjhgf.png
- File:7vjc.png
- File:Oi0i.jpg
- File:Weldkf.jpg
- File:Yjthgrf.png
- File:Weldkfj.jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eduardo Cárdenas Barajas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fair use files.
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ngabo Clement (talk · contribs)
[edit]At least two low res, no camera EXIF, and from social media (e.g., File:Ingabire Foundation team.jpg from here) and all COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable persons.
- File:Manager of Ingabire Foundation.jpg
- File:Ingabire Foundation team.jpg
- File:Maniraguha Clement.jpg
- File:Ubwo Ngabo yaagiye muri Local n'ikipe ya Aigle star.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 16:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
oiut of scope Mindmatrix 16:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Antonia Di Francesco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Either low res with no camera EXIF or with EXIF that says "Copyright Holder Rocco.Casaluci" which ≠ uploader (Antonia Di Francesco)
- File:Il gruppo del progetto LEF167 muove i suoi primi passi.jpg
- File:Passeggiata del sorriso.jpg
- File:Brainstorming LEF167 hub idee 1.tif
- File:Partecipanti e partners del progetto LEF167.tif
- File:LEF167 laboratori d'arte.jpg
- File:Piccola Diana figlia Lydia.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wilhelm Buschulte
[edit]Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (W. Buschulte died in 2013), no freedom of panorama in german churches.
- File:K Gereon Buschulte 01.JPG
- File:K Gereon Buschulte 02.JPG
- File:K Gereon Buschulte 03.JPG
- File:K Gereon Buschulte 04.JPG
- File:K Gereon Buschulte 05.JPG
- File:K Gereon Buschulte 06.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei298.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei299.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei300.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei302.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei303.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei306.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei307.JPG
- File:Kornelimünster-Abtei310.JPG
- File:Linnich St.Martinus726.JPG
- File:Linnich St.Martinus727.JPG
- File:Linnich St.Martinus731.JPG
- File:Linnich St.Martinus739.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:10, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Abridged wholesale catalgoue of the Cherry Hill Nurseries, West Chester, Pa. for the autumn of 1864, and spring of 1865 (IA abridgedwholesal1864hoop).pdf
[edit]Not PD-US Gov, Commerical publication or Catalog ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Nomination in error. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope, replaced by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:17, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: web size 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete IMHO the MD shows it is the photo (taken on 24-25 June) of another photo. E4024 (talk) 22:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
out of the project scope. Sort of a placeholder from 123RF (see watermark). It's used to upload a biography in the description. That site has not compatible license at all. Strakhov (talk) 02:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation: book cover. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. OTRS permission is needed from the copyright holder. --pandakekok9 03:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of the scope of the project (logo of some insignificant business project). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of the scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
All claimed as own work, yet mixed resolutions, meta data, twice user has uploaded unfree stock images as own work, see talk page. I am unconvinced any of the user uploads are own works.
- File:Municipio de San Rafael del Sur.jpg
- File:Panorámica del centro de Managua.jpg
- File:Panorama del centro de Managua en 2020.jpg
- File:Hacienda San Jacinto.jpg
- File:Calle Principal de la Villa El Carmen.jpg
- File:Entrada a Bienvenidos a Ticuantepe.jpg
- File:Monumento a San Rafael Arcángel.jpg
- File:Puerto Carlos Fonseca.jpg
- File:Calle Principal de Mateare en 2017.jpg
- File:Monumento Jorge Salazar.jpg
- File:Monumento Augusto César Sandino.jpg
- File:Calle Principal de la Villa Libertad.jpg
- File:Barrio Oswaldo Manzanares.jpg
- File:Rotonda Centro Comercial Managua en 2016.jpg
- File:Barrio San Judas.jpg
- File:Calle Principal de la Colonia Morazán.jpg
- File:Rotonda Rubén Darío en 2019.jpg
- File:Colegio Cristiano La Verde Sonrisa en 2017.jpg
- File:Emblem of South Korea (1997-2011).svg.png
- File:Jinotega Department in Nicaragua.svg.png
.svg.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 10:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright © 2019 BryanGibson.com | All Rights Reserved at source. No permission Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
No permission, not own work
Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:Juokutis.jpg
- File:Meilas.png
- File:Pavyzdys.jpg -- used only because "Pavyzdys" means "Sample" or "Example" in Lithuanian.
- File:ŽNM suktinius.png
Violation of COM:NOT. Unused joke files uploaded by a new user. Renata3 (talk) 13:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, seems to be not notable entity. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atlantis7807 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Based on users past upload history, it would seem likely these are also not their own works. Two different cameras, and no meta data.
- File:Arushi Nishank Award.JPG
- File:Website opening pic.JPG
- File:Arushi Nishank performing 2011.jpg
- File:Arushi Nishank 2011.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
The images depict public signages of maps in Hong Kong. These maps are copyrighted, as most of them are created by the government. Freedom of panorama in Hong Kong does not cover maps and diagrams (see description at {{FoP-Hong Kong}}).
- File:East Tsim Sha Tsui Station Exit J directory1.jpg
- File:FungTakShoppingCentre-02.jpg
- File:HK CWB 2 Tai Hang Elevated Road direction.JPG
- File:HK Disneyland Inspiration Lake 迪欣湖 20070616-00 map You are here.JPG
- File:HK Disneyland Park Promenade map.JPG
- File:HK Disneyland Park Promenade Public Transport Interchange Coach Park near Fantasy Road 2.JPG
- File:HK Hung Hom Summer Harbourfront Landmark U R Here Map.JPG
- File:HK Kln City 華人基督教永遠墳場 Chinese Christian Cemetery map Feb-2010.jpg
- File:HK Ma Wan Park Island Facility Map Directory.JPG
- File:HK MK Mongkok Skyway network map.JPG
- File:HK Sham Shui Po Fa Hui Park Floor Plan You Are Here Map 3.JPG
- File:HK Sham Shui Po Fa Hui Park Flower Fair Floor Plan.JPG
- File:HK TST East Waterfront Podium Garden Map n You Are Here.JPG
- File:HK TST Kln Park Map Shadow 2009-10.JPG
- File:HK TST Salisbury Road Middle Road Children s Playground Map 1.JPG
- File:HK TST Salisbury Road Middle Road Children s Playground Map Xmas Flowers.JPG
- File:HK TST 河內道 Hanoi Road K11 Here You Are Map.JPG
- File:HK Wan Chai Park map.jpg
- File:HK Wan Chai 灣仔 利景酒店 Charterhouse Causeway Bay Hotel floors directory.jpg
- File:HK WC Tower 2.jpg
- File:HK Wong Tai Sin 摩士公園 Morse Park No3 map sign LCSD May-2013.JPG
- File:HK YMCA TST Club Floor Directory.jpg
- File:HK 斧山道運動場 Hammer Hill Road Sports Ground floorplan.jpg
- File:HK 深水埗運動場 Sham Shui Po Sports Ground 01 Map.JPG
- File:Hong Kong Central Pak Tsz Lane Park Map.jpg
- File:Kowloon Tsai Park Map.jpg
- File:LNTK MAP.jpg
- File:Map of Cho Yiu Estate.jpg
- File:Pik Wan Road Lam Tin Park Map 3.gif
- File:Ping Shan Heritage Trail Map (Hong Kong).jpg
- File:PingShanTrail01.jpg
- File:Sai Tso Wan Park map.jpg
- File:Tsuen Wan Park layout map.JPG
- File:Tung Chung North Park, Layout Map (Hong Kong).jpg
- File:YuenChauKokPark Map.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Wylve (talk) 15:59, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation as above COM:TOO Hong Kong, COM:FOP Hong Kong only applies to "works of artistic craftsmanship", not applicable to graphic or literary works. Note that graphic works include any painting, drawing, diagram, map, chart or plan, and any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar work. Members of subcategories should also be included but I don't know how.
- File:HK 292 Tai Po Road 薩凡納藝術設計學院 SCAD Open Day directory sign stairs April-2012.JPG
- File:HK Kln Bay Clothing Industry Training Authority Floors Open Day.JPG
- File:HK Kwun Tong Road 茶果嶺道 Cha Kwo Ling Road 觀塘工業區 Kwun Tong Industrial Area sign.JPG
- File:HK Kwun Tong 茶果嶺 Cha Kwo Ling 偉發街 Wai Fat Street 偉業街 Wai Yip Street Route 2.JPG
- File:HK Lantau Island 欣澳道 Sunny Bay Road 20070616-13 to Siu Ho Wan sign.JPG
- File:HK MTR 灣仔站 Wan Chai Station map sign September 2019 SSG 01.jpg
- File:HK MTR 灣仔站 Wan Chai Station map sign September 2019 SSG 02.jpg
- File:HK Nam Long Shan Road Wong Chuk Hang Estate 1.jpg
- File:HK PUSU 香港理工大學 學生會 PolyU Students' Union VA Building red directory sign Jan-2013.jpg
- File:HK San Po Kong 旺景工業大廈 Wong King Industrial Building 2 units with 14 company door bells.JPG
- File:HK Shek Tong Tsui Market Building.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan Connaught Road West Sept-2015 DSC map Shun Tak Bus Terminus Station No Smoking zone.JPG
- File:HK TKL 調景嶺 Tiu Keng Leng 彩明街 Choi Ming Street 彩明苑 Choi Ming Court facade blue sky November 2019 SS2 04.jpg
- File:HK Tseung Kwan O Po Lam Metro City Phase 2 Estate Map.JPG
- File:HK TST Canton Road 新太陽廣場 Sun Arcade shop list directory.JPG
- File:HK TST Culture Centre Administration Building Ballet n Chinese Orchestra n Zuni Icosahedron signs Dec-2012.jpg
- File:HK TST Isquare mall 2 iFunction interior glass wall window view nearby Chungking Mansions.JPG
- File:HK TST Sheraton Hotel Shopping Arcade lobby corridor directory.JPG
- File:HK Wan Chai North Walkway Immigration Tower 7 Gloucester Road a.jpg
- File:HK 九龍 YMT 油麻地梁顯利社區中心 Yaumatei 眾坊街 Public Square Street 2009 floors directory.JPG
- File:HK 九龍城廣場 Kln City Plaza mall floors directory.jpg
- File:HK 九龍城廣場 Kln City Plaza mall shops floors directory.jpg
- File:HK 香港理工大學 PolyU VA VS Shaw Sports Complex n Amenities Building directory red sign Jan-2013.jpg
- File:HK 香港規劃及基建展覽館 Planning & Infrastructure Exhibition Gallery interior 2010.jpg
- File:Lee Theatre Plaza Directory.JPG
17jiangz1 (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Uploader request in this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Tempted to vote {{Vsk}}. But I wonder about that photo in front of the lectern (copyright?). Brianjd (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- yes, that's the problem. It's a copyright infringement and I don't want it here no more. So could you delete it now? Beacause I'm the uploader and it's okay for me for a speedy deletion. --Vincent Eisfeld (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Vincent Eisfeld: I’m not OK with speedy deletion: uploaded in October 2019. Can’t we just crop out the copyright-infringing part? (Then an admin can delete just the original version while keeping the cropped version.) Brianjd (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I just don't want my picture on Commons anymore. --Vincent Eisfeld (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Vincent Eisfeld: I’m not OK with speedy deletion: uploaded in October 2019. Can’t we just crop out the copyright-infringing part? (Then an admin can delete just the original version while keeping the cropped version.) Brianjd (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- yes, that's the problem. It's a copyright infringement and I don't want it here no more. So could you delete it now? Beacause I'm the uploader and it's okay for me for a speedy deletion. --Vincent Eisfeld (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- One could remove the poster and keep the rest, but the person in question wants a delete and it is an unused file. Therefore simply delete it. --E4024 (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Question Would anyone change their !vote if the poster was cropped out? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Yes. Definitely. I would go ahead and vote {{Vsk}}. This person is clearly notable and we do not have many images of this person. There is no widespread support for this type of courtesy deletion, as far as I can tell. Brianjd (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Vincent Eisfeld, E4024 for comment. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with Brianjd: Crop the lectern and keep. Licenses are irrevocable; wikimedia projects are not a playground: COM:NOTHOST works both ways. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I've cropped the possibly copyrighted campaign-poster on the lectern away and hidden the original upload. Would this be an agreeable solution for all involved? --Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the cropped version, thanks Túrelio. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Personnal image, out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 14:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
file not using anymore. Shohag Rana (talk) 19:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:18, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded same picture File:Shohag_S.jpg ShohagS (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete Uploader request within 7 days of upload; not in use. (Note: Last remaining upload by this user. Neither File:Shohag S.jpg nor File:ShohagS.jpg has ever existed. No idea what their nomination is referring to.) Brianjd (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)- Delete. ShohagS has uploaded (from Flickr) his own userpage image (this time changing a letter at the file name). User seems to be active in EN:WP, therefore the new upload should be kept. IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 05:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 11:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Gregorius (Burtscheid)
[edit]copyright violation contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama in german churches.
- File:Passionszyklus (Ausschnitt).JPG
- File:Passionszyklus St. Gregoius-Aachen.JPG
- File:St. Gregorius Aachen - Noach-Bilder.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:45, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Josef, Aachen
[edit]Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (by Schaffrath who died in 2011 / by Lausberg who is born in 1965), no freedom of panorama in german churches.
- File:Empore St. Josef Aachen.JPG
- File:Kirchenschiff St. Josef, Aachen (2).JPG
- File:Kirchenschiff St. Josef, Aachen.JPG
- File:StJosefAachenInnenWest.jpg
- File:Triptychon St. Josef Aachen (links).JPG
- File:Triptychon St. Josef Aachen (mitte).JPG
- File:Triptychon St. Josef Aachen (rechts).JPG
- File:Tryptychon St. Josef, Aachen.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Josef, Aachen
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks (stained glass windows; sculpture; painting); no freedom of panorama.
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 01.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 03.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 04.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 05.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 06.jpg
- File:20200904 St. Josef Aachen 07.jpg
- File:Mittelschiff St. Josef Aachen.JPG — hier träfe m. E. de:Beiwerk zu ArthurMcGill (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- File:Schiff des Lebens St. Josef Aachen.JPG
- File:StJosefAachenInnenOst.jpg — hier träfe m. E. de:Beiwerk zu ArthurMcGill (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Martin Sg. (talk) 22:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- bei zwei Bildern (oben markiert) lege ich Einspruch gegen eine Löschung ein, da ich diese Fälle als "de:Beiwerk" ansehe, denn Schwerpunkt der Bilder sind die Totalaufnahmen des Kirchenschiffes ArthurMcGill (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. de minimis is always a bit subjective, but I consider the presence of the large hanging object not de minimis. Therefore, all have been deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 17:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CameliaGrigoras27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scores by Jean Sibelius (d. 1957).
- File:Teme simfonii.jpg
- File:Poem simfonic.jpg
- File:Jean Sibelius poem simfonic.jpg
- File:Simfonii Jean Sibelius.jpg
- File:Simfonii, exemplu .jpg
- File:Jean Sibelius, simfonii.jpg
- File:Simfonii.jpg
Gikü (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope – non-notable individual (ro:Giuliano Sabau) Gikü (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ludwig Schaffrath
[edit]copyright violation, artist died in 2011, no freedom of panorama in german churches.
- File:Breinig St. Barbara260.jpg
- File:Breinig-St.Barbara258.JPG
- File:Breinig-St.Barbara259.JPG
- File:Breinig-St.Barbara261.JPG
- File:Breinig-St.Barbara268.JPG
- File:Fenster St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Fenster Freie Komposition, Ludwig Schaffrath, 2004.jpg
- File:Linnich St.Martinus729.JPG
- File:Linnich St.Martinus730.JPG
- File:Linnich St.Martinus736.JPG
- File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Chor.jpg
_Fenster_Freie_Komposition,_Ludwig_Schaffrath,_2004.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Chor.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis Andaur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 14:46, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Too dark to be of any use. Almost indiscernible. BriefEdits (talk) 01:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Better photo at File:Homeless Crisis 16.JPG — BriefEdits (talk) 01:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Only unclear shapes in darkness, nothing meaningful to make of this picture. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:27, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Too dark to be of any use. Almost indiscernible and blurry. BriefEdits (talk) 01:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Better photo at File:Homeless Crisis 16.JPG — BriefEdits (talk) 01:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Only unclear shapes in darkness, nothing meaningful to make of this picture. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
this map belongs to Yandex, this is not a free image. Khinkali (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
No FOP in Italy.
- File:MI M S N Miscellanea (15).jpg
- File:MI M S N Miscellanea (16).jpg
- File:MI M S N Paleo fossili (10).jpg
- File:MI M S N Pterodonte (1).jpg
- File:MI M S N Pterodonte (2).jpg
- File:MI M S Nat Paleo (1).jpg
- File:MI M S Naturali ricostruzioen triceratopo.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
These photos are
 |
This is a photo of a monument which is part of cultural heritage of Italy. This monument participates in the contest Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018. See authorisations. (wiki-ID: 03F2050050)
|
--Bramfab (talk) 15:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- It does not show that these photos do not fall under "No FOP in Italy". --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- If you took your time to follow the links starting from
This is a photo of a monument which is part of cultural heritage of Italy. This monument participates in the contest Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018. See authorisations.(wiki-ID: 03F2050050)you will find the correct licenses received for WLM 2018.--Bramfab (talk) 10:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- In the linked archive ther is the authorization Wikimedia Italia got from the Milan municipality; all the natural history museum is in it, and its collections. --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: as you can see from the links, there are authorizations for those files. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 08:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: I can confirm that the Civic Museum has been authorised since 2018 in the Wiki Loves Monuments framework (monument #49 in the list). We can close the discussion here, I think. --Sannita (WMIT) (talk) 09:05, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: as you can see from the links, there are authorizations for those files. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 08:28, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- In the linked archive ther is the authorization Wikimedia Italia got from the Milan municipality; all the natural history museum is in it, and its collections. --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Photos and free license publishing are authorisaed by the museum itself. Ruthven (msg) 09:24, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- If you took your time to follow the links starting from
File:Flickr - …trialsanderrors - Knights' hall, la Merveille, abbaye de Mont-Saint-Michel, Normandy, France, ca. 1895.jpg has a better resolution and is cropped. Birdie (talk) 10:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The Flickr crop is not "better", it is the same digital resolution as the LoC original. In archive/research terms it is worse because of the heightened contrast which has removed detail that is in the darker range, like the ceiling mortar lines. It is convention to keep both archive originals and crops or digital 'enhancements' as separate files as often 'improvement' is entirely subjective and should not be just what looks better in a Wikipedia article thumbnail. --Fæ (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:46, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
No COM:EDUSE due to extremely poor colorisation of a grayscale. Such crap will never be linked from Wikipedias. Achim (talk) 18:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete Achim may have right but I must bring a different thing in here. The licensing is a free Creative Commons license which may be applicable for colorization but not for the colorized base image which is from Getty/LIFE: Time Life Pictures/Mansell/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images. Very likely that this one is a copyright violation unless an special PD license can be found. --Mosbatho (talk) 13:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:54, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
delete this page it spam MusicFm (talk) 07:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Sorry, we don't delete Users' talkpages. --Achim (talk) 20:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
in ticket:2020062410006767, author claims this to be copyright violation (the claim was not, and cannot, be verified by the OTRS team) Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete
No realistic educational value.Edit: Copyright issues per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 10:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)- AshFriday, it's in use so therefore has educational value. And this discussion is not about scope, it's copyright related. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:03, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Martin Urbanec: Considering this is in use, so by default is in scope, exactly what is the copyright violation? The uploader used an own work statement, and considering the other 3 uploads over a period of a year, and that this photograph was clearly in the sequence shown at archive.org, in fact taken within minutes of the other shots, but does not seem to have been published there, seems to indicate that the uploader had access to the original files, not just the blog. The other photographs illustrating naturism are not up for deletion. --Fæ (talk) 08:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- The OTRS customer claimed a) they're the copyright holder b) the image was not uploaded by them (ie. claimed the image is a copyright violation). There is no way to verify the claim, but I felt it's worthy starting a discussion. I asked the OTRS customer to follow the discussion, so it is possible they'll follow up here. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- The four photos the user uploaded were taken by two different camera models (two each). The subject is the same in each photo. Did they make any mention of the other images? -mattbuck (Talk) 15:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- The OTRS customer claimed a) they're the copyright holder b) the image was not uploaded by them (ie. claimed the image is a copyright violation). There is no way to verify the claim, but I felt it's worthy starting a discussion. I asked the OTRS customer to follow the discussion, so it is possible they'll follow up here. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Info Here are the different files as a table to make things clearer, along with a comparison photo in the archive. --Fæ (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
| File | Camera | Date |
|---|---|---|
| File:Brighton World Naked Bike Ride 2017.jpg | DMC-TZ60 | 12:12, 11 June 2017 |
| File:World Naked Gardening Day 2017.jpg | DMC-TZ60 | 10:58, 7 May 2017 |
| Close comparison archived photo | DMC-TZ60 | 10:51, 7 May 2017 |
| File:Costa Natura Resort.jpg | Canon PowerShot A560 | 13:12, 30 May 2014 |
| File:Costa Natura Beach.jpg | Canon PowerShot A560 | 08:28, 30 May 2014 |
Deleted: per OTRS ticket and indication from uploader that they made a mistake in uploading this file. --Nick (talk) 18:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality rendering of File:Cyrillic letter Ghayn.svg taken, as per description, from Google (why?!). 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 03:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
File:The combined effects of heat and noise on audio vigilance in a simulated helicopter environment. (IA combinedeffectso00eyre).pdf
[edit]Not clear from IA metadata if this is in fact by a US Gov employee, cannot assume it as NPS may have students that are not fedrally funded. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I'd rather presume the reverse, that these appear in the library and have been scanned for good reason. There's no copyright issue here, per page 3. --Fæ (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Withdrawn : See page 5 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, no location given, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Photo of book covers, taken from a now-inaccessible blog and uploaded by a contributor with a long list of inappropriate file uploads RL0919 (talk) 00:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Bad quality, not in use. Larryasou (talk) 04:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted file. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 04:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Support no permission. Syman51 (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
not used Yychoi (talk) 06:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- What sign is it? Why did you upload it? Do you think it could never be used? --E4024 (talk) 16:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation - press cutting claimed as "own work" PamD (talk) 07:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded from the person's website. 58.145.185.251 08:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: changed to no-permission, uploader needs to send proof of permission to OTRS. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Useless blurry picture (how could anyone upload such a file??) TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - private photo with unknown boy - This is not Canserbero - See the other cat.s - I think only a fan of Canserbero, Mister Nobody. Adelfrank (talk) 09:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Harold (talk) 10:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorised piece of personal artwork. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical image, "own work" my assumption is that it is impossible. E4024 (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo and clearly not an "own work". E4024 (talk) 19:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
uploader request Milićević (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted magazine cover uploaded improperly to Commons 204.128.192.31 20:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
vandal only derivative work only used for vandalism Ed6767 (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Came across this while looking at vandalism on en.wiki. I don't see a purpose served by preserving it. Vanamonde93 (talk) 22:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Yogwi21 (talk) 22:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Support copy violation Syman51 (talk) 18:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyvio Fma12 (talk) 20:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Sem fonte de licença creative commons Paladinum2 (talk) 22:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 23:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
File was taken from IMDb (see [1]) and was uploaded with an inaccurate license Rosguill (talk) 23:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
The file has been copied from a scientific article at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/423079v1.full. Copyright violation. Rsk6400 (talk) 05:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- No copyvio - The license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license can be found here. Sorry, I saw that too late and now would like to withdraw my request. --Rsk6400 (talk) 14:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: CC-BY-NC-ND is incompatible with Commons. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. No FoP in US for artworks. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Ridicolous, it is photo of a scientific reconstraction, it is not an Artworks. Otherwise even any photo of skeleton of dinosaur exposed, being "creatively" assembled to suggest something should be banned. --Bramfab (talk) 11:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Reconstruction of fossils involves no creativity because they are trying to get the "right answer". Here, the color of the dinosaur's skin is not known so it can only be an artistic interpretation. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: above US:TOO FASTILY 09:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Just simple geometric shapes/numbers. Not any more complex than the examples at COM:TOO US -FASTILY 09:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:58, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Likely stock photo, previously published at https://www.foodbev.com/news/nestle-to-track-palm-oil-and-milk-through-blockchain-technology/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=0aeb138ed8d4af57db802d5e4fb4803566ac852b-1593097464-0-AY9sXy437WSn-7ROhrbuMvkx638PLiXWvU1hqap-TFHRQ8GdjKL0p3aUlcPW-yD4iWOmTDRx333-LkLfWxdqUNqanFQdW8_yK74-AGeM2vfh9UgQ8H7LZzg1wnvIhr8JIjWu3QX-gphOi7GNuHw3MrTNbGm_CSHMjoSZJmzEIvoZg0yXnCVH31fgZ_A1xu2Lr8rGPuOz9sqTlgCbJClYz0St63g-OAcRKacSmi9LoZ4mrzmMtal8kMZaLb_JuGzrUlCNfISLqAOwv6jboKunI5HYX7Gas8LYywbkvUNt3muuz5GC8TeXKe3tmfK3g3vM76ExfP3xyO-PFCPsrEyr2Kjf4KYKWf_uu6Gt_WuNlYms0IkhMy-nKCP9hsMNT1gQCQ Ytoyoda (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Low quality and no location, nearly unusable. Either spam or the trials of a newbie. Olybrius (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Copied from internet. no copyright information. Dead.rabbit (talk) 17:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture, and a whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving holiday pictures with my car in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Labrang (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(48853078278).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(48853078278).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture. A whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving holiday pictures with my car in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Thank you in advance for understanding and further action. Labrang (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture. A whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving holiday pictures with my car in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Thank you in advance for understanding and further action. Labrang (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture. A whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving holiday pictures with my car in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Thank you in advance for understanding and further action. Labrang (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture. A whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving holiday pictures with myself in it, in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Thank you in advance for understanding and further action. Labrang (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom, OoS. --E4024 (talk) 21:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture. A whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving holiday pictures with my car in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Thank you in advance for understanding and further action. Labrang (talk) 20:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture. A whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving random holiday pictures in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Thank you in advance for understanding and further action. Labrang (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(48853082158).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(48853082158).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not relevant for Wikimedia. I am the owner of the picture. A whole range was automatically added. No problem as such with that. But archiving holiday pictures with my car in a site that I don't control wasn't really my intention. I have upgraded the restriction on this picture in Flickr, and will do so in the future as a lesson. Thank you in advance for understanding and further action. Labrang (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope due to the inclusion of private people and/or automobiles. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Not PD US Gov. Seed Trade catlog from the 1970's . ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Mdaniels5757; I see no notice.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Updated license. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:04, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnnaShengelia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Слишком поздно, чтобы умереть молодым.jpg
- File:Сука-сука.jpg
- File:Жизнь - веселое путешествие.jpg
- File:K.Latyshev "Moscow is resort".jpg
- File:Konstantin Latyshev.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Not an own work as declared. E4024 (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Taken from Facebook. This user uploads as "own work" which are not. Needs a good warning. E4024 (talk) 17:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical image. This user uploads as "own work" photos which are not so. E4024 (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Historical pic taken from somewhere. This user uploads as "own work" photos which are not. Needs a good warning. E4024 (talk) 17:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
349 KB pic taken from somewhere. This user uploads as "own work" photos which are not. E4024 (talk) 17:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
no permission أمين (talk) 20:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 00:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
my personal information, I have the right to be forgotten Research.Institute.for.Crime.and.Security (talk) 06:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
legal name and face appears RISC - The Research Institute for Security and Crime (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
delete info MusicFm (talk) 07:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
{{Delete}} MusicFm (talk) 10:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. Non-notable and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
deletionResearch.Institute.for.Crime.and.Security (talk) 06:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
deletion RISC - The Research Institute for Security and Crime (talk) 07:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
{{Delete}} MusicFm (talk) 09:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of personal photo. Non-notable and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Produced by the Nepali Government. According to the Copyright Act, 2059 (2002), "Government of Nepal shall have the copyright over the work prepared by Government of Nepal." Chipmunkdavis (talk) 07:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, source website states "All rights reserved.". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Produced by the Nepali Government. According to the Copyright Act, 2059 (2002), "Government of Nepal shall have the copyright over the work prepared by Government of Nepal." Chipmunkdavis (talk) 07:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW of File:Nepal 1M N LD.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
File has copyright infringement, this file will be replaced by private posting on English Wikipedia Thienhau2003 (talk) 03:55, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Where exactly is the copyright infringement, Thienhau2003. I removed it. Repeatedly I might add as you kept putting it back. --Majora (talk) 03:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:50, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
The Coc Coc browser is a property of Coc Coc that has been copyrighted and never released as free software or free license. According to Coc Coc terms of use website [2], users are not allowed to use any Coc Coc property including it's logo, symbols and other recognised forms of any typical products for commercial purpose unless with permission from Coc Coc. WPSamson (talk) 08:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: its logo is deemed below TOO. Other than that, there are no copyrightable elements on this image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Looks like a low quality screenshot from a video. This is the only file uploaded by the user and is quite likely to be someone else’s work. FredWalsh (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This map is fictitious. There are 17 w:Regions in the Philippines, not 22 (or 21 or 23, depends on this user on how many there are). Also, is there a way to block this user who keeps on uploading falsehoods such as this? Howard the Duck (talk) 10:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: redirect deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
1) I don't see any relevance for this, it is not used anywhere
2) own work, maybe. I highly doubt that this QR code is eligible for copyright
3) I highly doubt that it is a good idea to have a QR code linking to an unchecked page. Unlike links to free or open source projects these websites may be sold and used in the future to spread maleware and spam.
Hangman'sDeath (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Potentially useful graphic seems to be based on reliable statistical sources--Headlock0225 (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Headlock0225. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, FBMD, no scope, what else? --E4024 (talk) 20:04, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Low quality and no location, nearly unusable. Either spam or the trials of a newbie. Olybrius (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The person in the image may be in scope but as there is no use and weak categorization I'm not sure. Is he? E4024 (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Shish kebab? Who is he? Why would he be in scope? E4024 (talk) 18:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
no educational value Veliensis (talk) 18:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Uhm, well, it shows tones of blue and has more educational value, IMHO, than a woman riding a bike naked but alas let's delete it; we have better ones. --E4024 (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. And suspicious EXIF-data, where is "Google"? Estopedist1 (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- if this headgear is in scope, I will withdraw my nomination--Estopedist1 (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- We have so many of that headgear. If we took "scope" in that sense, everybody can take a picture of his/her own shoes and they will be in scope as shoes are in scope. IMHO delete it. --E4024 (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, no! Suddenly I realise, I did not make any parallels to people taking a photo of their own genitals and we have to keep them as they are in scope. No. I am just talking about clothing. A normal number of varieties is enough for everything, from chadors to panties. Rest are not needed. (The same for my food images, I feel I uploaded a little bit too many of them.) --E4024 (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not private media repository. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. It is possible to put this image into cat "Shops in Somalia", but probably this image is out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
"Close friend" as source does not look acceptable to me. Was it a published image? Who is the photographer, "close friend"? E4024 (talk) 22:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- One of late Ishaq Madni's listeners and cousin.— Hammad (Talk!) 02:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Shukrie. That means we do not know the photographer and we do not have his/her permission. Sorry, delete. --E4024 (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- indeed i know.— Hammad (Talk!) 01:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Then tell him/her to read OTRS. --E4024 (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- indeed i know.— Hammad (Talk!) 01:11, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Shukrie. That means we do not know the photographer and we do not have his/her permission. Sorry, delete. --E4024 (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Image taken from the web, not the uploader's own work. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:DemiLovato-AngeloKritikos-04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 E4024 (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Why does it take so long to delete the crop of a deleted file? --E4024 (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Billinghurst. --Minoraxtalk 06:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Can you please upload the original file to see EXIF? This one is too small for own work. E4024 (talk) 22:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Tom? No answer. Those were the first words of Tom Sawyer. In this case Hammad? No answer. Therefore Delete. --E4024 (talk) 13:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Taken from here (http://indiancolumbus.blogspot.com/2016/01/shanti-stupa.html) or somewhere else? E4024 (talk) 18:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: I don't copy others work, or publish anyones work without permission. It is against the policy of Wikimedia. I'm declaring that i'm the owner of this photo and if required i can prove it, i have the original photo with me. My photo is used by that blogger, giving me no credit. I should contact him, thanks for tagging. Rocky 734 (talk) 19:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- So they used your photo before you took it? Interesting. --E4024 (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes@E4024: , you are right, they posted on January 8, 2016. After close examination i found that both photo are different they are miraculously same, so i decided rather not to contact. See their photo they are little brighter than mine, is it i took this photo on Sunday - 24 July 2016, i was on trip to BBSR. I want to ask you whether it is not possible that we both have taken the photo of statue at the same angle and position, as i have seen many people taking photos at the same position for better view as the statue was little bit big and very crowdy,so taking photos was difficult. So people used to take photos in line 😂😂 , like photo shoot. So i did...
- So they used your photo before you took it? Interesting. --E4024 (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Hindi -- देखो दोस्तों एक फोटो जो मेने ही घीचा था, लेकिन अब मुझे इसके लिए लड़ना पड़ रहा हे क्या जमाना आ गया है --😂😂😂Rocky 734 (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Images are similar but not the same. The photographer's position differs as to be seen at the Buddhas head and feet. --Achim (talk) 11:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Na prośbę rodziny zmarłego - At the request of the deceased's family Archi74 (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Na prośbę rodziny zmarłego Archi74 (talk) 08:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Source information does not have a link but MD says it is taken from Facebook. E4024 (talk) 17:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 18:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- As the uploader of this picture to Wikimedia I request to recall the deletion request. This picture was uploaded considering the Creative Commons license agreements and was provided to me by the artist itself. Naturally she didn't take the picture herself but has assured me that she has all the rights for this content.
- I did ask her to ask the original photographer to upload it to wikimedia and was requested to do it for her. I did explain this puts me in a situation in which I have to declare ownership of this picture and once uploaded, it will have a commons license associated with it and will be free for use by the public.
- I've never handled a deletion request, but there's absolutely no cause for deletion and if there's anything I can do further to clarify etc. please let me know.
- Obviously it's not your own work. Please ask copyrights holder to send permissions to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permissions review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 18:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Prominent depiction of Nazi attribution without obvious educational and/or critical background, hence probably a violation of the laws of the country where the pictures were taken. Out of COM:SCOPE too.
- File:Jánské Koupele main building 2020 17.jpg
- File:Jánské Koupele main building 2020 08.jpg
- File:Jánské Koupele main building 2020 05.jpg
- File:Jánské Koupele main building 2020 06.jpg
A.Savin 12:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. There is an entire category of swastika graffiti by country, and "probably a violation" is not a violation yet. --Andrei (talk) 12:32, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. It is primarily intended as the documentation of the devastation of spa areal (including the church). The usage of Nazi symbols is punishable only if intended to promote Nazism.--Qasinka (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from advertisement.
- File:Protective masks vending machine in Karviná (April 2020) 06.jpg
- File:Protective masks vending machine in Karviná (April 2020) 03.jpg
- File:Protective masks vending machine in Karviná (April 2020) 02.jpg
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The first two, since they are utilitarian objects you cannot make them copyrighted just by putting advert on them. Weak delete File:Protective masks vending machine in Karviná (April 2020) 02.jpg since the advert is way too prominent part of that photo (alternatively apply blur/mosaic to protectable elements) and undelete at an appropriate date. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. All three featured the Advertisement, regardless of what was inside the machine. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Tree plantation penguins 1st programme bvk college Dolphin Nature Conservation Society Visakhapatnam.jpg
[edit]
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 22:25, 16 März 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bmantha --Krdbot 01:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Watermarked for an organization that is not a copyright holder. We have the version without watermark: File:Daminik Siamaszka.jpg; however, it is of worse quality. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
no FOP in Estonia Estopedist1 (talk) 05:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Pikne: this file (and also File:Suur Toll and Piret - panoramio.jpg) should be moved to Estonian Wikipedia, where is special template for these cases. Maybe we can use User:Commons fair use upload bot?--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:22, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Above TOO in Japan. Thibaut (talk) 05:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
no FOP in Estonia Estopedist1 (talk) 05:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Maurice Boudot-Lamotte died in 1958, copyright violation. 90.43.83.243 10:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. これは霊波之光で使われていた画像です。この宗教の信者と思われるアカウントが「写真が古い印刷物からのものであったため、新しいものと差し替えました。」と要約欄に書いていきました(詳しくは履歴[3]をご覧ください)。従って私はこの画像を著作権侵害の画像と判断します。(Japanese language) Batholith (talk) 10:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Russia#Freedom_of_panorama, no FoP in Russia for sculptures.. Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Official picture from the French national assembly (see http://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA721996) 131.176.243.9 12:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Looks like a photo of a photo Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Calligraphy is protected by Copyright Act in Taiwan. per COM:TOO Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 14:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete “本授權範圍僅及於著作權保護之範圍，不及於其他智慧財產權利，包括但不限於專利、商標、及機關標誌之提供。”（"The scope of this license is limited to the scope of copyright protection, not to other intellectual property rights, including but not limited to the provision of patents, trademarks and agency logos."）--听风吹过的声音 (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Image widely available on the web, unlikely to be own work: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisV8ponBCQtZHsTI7SpWYSraq_1s1heJkFQ9AuUxOzpk16H1jX_1QqdNtUsVsjRvmv3ocrpXZ6Oc9VuUzCW-YwuDVosLIYSvWb3QGJ1LmiZGT2lmLVmII9cfPqUpkbGzNnaDNQrAUdDnTiAsdfL2U5o0VwIBKzydt4gxcOcjDxDJypDOv_1D5rh89zK3Tg8s3o11vSwmvDbpAkopcRAZhzeUgFZrJZ-RhbChaG0wmDfV5izzuye965mxk-ZCxJApR29Xl7Bl3sLUCygaAhJFcPz1xE1NgIIX0VcffyLj4etKIF33d4rK815mlSBDgwbPOaMii6p9ur5A_14Oi9QoYmNDlFEZohNhA Ytoyoda (talk) 15:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
aparently by Anton Jan Cozijnsen, so not own work Joostik (talk) 15:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The page and images are drawn up by the heirs of Anton Jan Cozijnsen. The rights lie with them. Jvwerven
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
aparently by Anton Jan Cozijnsen, so not own work Joostik (talk) 15:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The page and images are drawn up by the heirs of Anton Jan Cozijnsen. The rights lie with them. Jvwerven
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
book cover, dubious claim of own work Joostik (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
The page and images are drawn up by the heirs of Anton Jan Cozijnsen. The rights lie with them. Jvwerven
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Image previously published at https://hopquysanpham.com/lap-tuc-kiem-tra-chat-doi-voi-nguyen-lieu-thuc-pham-anhydrous-milk-fat/ Ytoyoda (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Image is not owned by User:Russelx1900, Image is owned by Israel Bardugo, bardugo.com 84.229.184.198 15:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Здоровое питание (talk · contribs)
[edit]Previously published at https://www.themanual.com/food-and-drink/magicalbutter-mb2e-tabletop-botanical-extractor/, unlikely to be own work
Ytoyoda (talk) 15:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at https://yoldash.ru/news/ABUBAKR_S_ABAKAROV_THE_WINNER_/ Ytoyoda (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anupriya0123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:12, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
This is not only an old photo that should not be accepted as "own work" but also seems to be taken from some book, magazine or maybe poster. I have seen the other uploads of the user, and they are being used. I am sure (without knowing who they are) this image would be in scope but we need a correct license to keep it. There are people here who know the region (former Soviet Union) that can save the file; if not we will have to delete it for precaution. E4024 (talk) 15:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:11, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I added an FB copyvio tag to the file, simply to attract attention to a months-long DR where there is no discussion (therefore no reason not to close). Keep or delete but time to say good-bye to this DR. E4024 (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This is anonymous and over 70 years old. As the only photo we have of a WP:N biog subject, it would also likely pass fair-use on en:WP. It is likely that we can't put an author to do (more information, or clearly free images are always welcome) but that alone is no reason to delete (we can date this, as the subject died in 1948 and this appears to be much earlier).
- Adding spurious copyvio tags "to hurry things along" is the very opposite of constructive. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete We have no information at all as to this photograph's provenance. It is clearly not the uploader's "own work" and the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} licensing is invalid. When and where was it first published? Before 1925? Is the photographer known? We can't just guess that the photographer has been dead for more than 70 years: let's say the photo was made in 1920 when the photographer was 30 years old; if he lived to age 70 in 1960, it wouldn't be free for another ten years. Because the photo appears to be made after 1900, {{PD-old-assumed}} doesn't apply, either. We can only keep it as Fair Use on en-wiki. JGHowes talk 18:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Imagem faltando elementos, refiz outra mais completa Paula Cassidori (talk) 16:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See caption: "2020 Press Image of Spanker. Photographer: Nikki van Toorn" COM:EVID of permission from Nikki van Toorn required, Эlcobbola talk 16:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
He made himself an article at a sandbox. Self promo. E4024 (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @E4024: That is file will be used after some time, after sufficient time that article will be published, the image will be in use. Rocky 734 (talk) 17:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Too much time has passed, I doubt it will be published. --E4024 (talk) 18:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
91 KB unused image left by a one-time visitor. Portuguese speakers may find out scope if they can spare time for this. I am also not sure if this is an "own work" either. E4024 (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Old photo, not own work. Not used either, no need to lose time. Simply delete. E4024 (talk) 18:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Frankly I do not think this is such a complicated case to wait for months. If you want to keep it keep it, but I think COM:PCP requires deletion. E4024 (talk) 22:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- "not own work"
- And you know this how? Andy Dingley (talk) 01:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Ordinary Shia imam and the pic is not an "own work" as claimed but a professional take. E4024 (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Professionally staged, all other user uploads copyvios of this subject. Duck/COM:PRP issue.
Эlcobbola talk 19:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:05, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:St. Willibrord (Euchen)
[edit]copyright violation, stained glass windows are contemporary artworks, no freedom of panorama in german churches.
- File:Fenster St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Fenster Freie Komposition, Ludwig Schaffrath, 2004.jpg
- File:Fenster St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Fenster von Rudolf Mohren, 1984 St. Bartholomäus.jpg - speedied per uploader-wish, as glas-artist, whom he had contacted, did not give permission
- File:Fenster St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Fenster von Rudolf Mohren, 1984 St. Brigida.jpg - speedied per uploader-wish, as glas-artist, whom he had contacted, did not give permission
- File:Fenster St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Fenster von Rudolf Mohren, 1984.jpg - speedied per uploader-wish, as glas-artist, whom he had contacted, did not give permission; --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) 03 von 05.jpg
- File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) 04 von 05.jpg
- File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Altar.jpg
- File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Chor.jpg
_Fenster_von_Rudolf_Mohren,_1984_St._Bartholom%C3%A4us.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Fenster_von_Rudolf_Mohren,_1984_St._Brigida.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Fenster_von_Rudolf_Mohren,_1984.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03_von_05.jpg){kind=link}
_04_von_05.jpg){kind=link}
_Altar.jpg){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- die Löschung der bisher gelöschten Bilder kann ich nachvollziehen. Der Altar von Sepp Hürten (File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) Altar.jpg) muss dann wohl auch noch weg. Die 2 ( File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) 03 von 05.jpg und File:St. Willibrord Euchen (Würselen) 04 von 05.jpg ) dann noch verbliebenen Bilder sind Ganzraumaufnahmen, bei denen man eventuell "de minimis" als Behaltensgrund postulieren sollte, was ich mit hiermit machen möchte. Zumal sind die Kunstgegenstände verzerrt.
--Qwertzu111111 (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:DM. --A.Savin 02:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Original uploader's request. I (uploader) have since uploaded more accurate and detailed maps making this redundant. Noahedits (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bonifatiuskirche, Aachen
[edit]Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (artist of stained glass windows died in 198), no freedom of panorama in german churches.
- File:Aachen Bonifatius Altarbereich.jpg
- File:Aachen Bonifatius Chor.jpg
- File:Aachen Bonifatius Orgel.jpg
- File:Aachen Bonifatius Orgelempore.jpg
- File:Aachen Bonifatius rechts.jpg
- File:Aachen Bonifatius Traeger.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_06.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (artist of stained glass windows died in 198), no freedom of panorama in german churches. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
_06.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 02:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
_06.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The cropped image will be deleted. 99.203.128.232 13:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpeg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpeg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Source: "Montreal, Canada at the Osheaga Music Festival" Enough? E4024 (talk) 19:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused crop. No decision on the original upload. --A.Savin 01:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Crop of a file which I just presented to DR and am almost sure it will be deleted. It looks like there is a process of making several crops which confuse us about the status of an original upload. E4024 (talk) 19:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep: I do not see any reason for why the file should be deleted so quickly, despite the fact that the original uploader has attached the wrong licence to it, which was most likely a good faith error. The other file which you claimed to have nominated was cropped by another editor who has recently been indefinitely blocked and is not the original file nor uploader. As per your reason on the other deletion request, the source given in the summary section would have sufficed if the file was not placed under the wrong licence and sent to Commons:OTRS. In regards to your last sentence, I do not understand how you jumped to that conclusion so quickly, given that the same rationale and summary is provided on every cropped image, while all the cropped files will be deleted on top of the original file. To make the process quicker, ask the original uploader to submit an OTRS ticket, or nominate all three files to deletion requests in the same section if they have not complied. – Angryjoe1111 (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpeg){kind=link}
- Thanks for your comment, Joe. Why angry? (I mean the nick. :) --E4024 (talk) 16:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused crop. No decision on the original upload. --A.Savin 01:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- File:Bryn-Terfel,-Lester-Lynch.jpg is copyvio (see TinEye search)
- I guess the second image is also copyvio (although TinEye search doesn't find it)
- File:Bryn-Terfel,-Lester-Lynch.jpg
- File:Slide8-899x380.jpg
Estopedist1 (talk) 19:54, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:55, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, contemporary artworks (Schaffrath as well as Ierlohe died in 2011), no freedom of panorama in german churches. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Source information claims that it was taken by "himself", but there is no indication that Dabliz actually gave permission to upload it to commons. ZLEA T\C 12:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - What does a selfie do to improve the project? Quakewoody (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, contemporary artwork, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Because it is no longer relevant Museu da Educação do DF (talk) 18:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Because this image is not supposed to be used anymore. Museu da Educação do DF (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Please use {{SD|G7}} for speedy deletion. --Larryasou (talk) 05:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Not PD-US-Gov Commercial Trade seed catlog from the 1970's ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-no notice}} --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:37, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw per Mdaniels5757 (talk · contribs) flagged as {{Review}} though. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Mdaniels5757. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
File:1972 fall catalog & guide to successful gardening nature-ally (IA 1972fallcatalogg19fwbo).pdf
[edit]Commerical trade seed catalog or publication from the 1970's ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I've corrected the copyright tag. --bjh21 (talk) 11:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
En vertu de mon droit à l'image, je demande la suppression de cette image prise par un particulier dans un cadre privé. Je vous remercie par avance. G. Robert Wouffi (talk) 22:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Je suis d’accord pour la suppression de cette image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaquetteMan (talk • contribs) 23:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: personality rights. Uploader confirms and agrees. Ruthven (msg) 13:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Not PD-US Gov Commercial publication or catalog ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Corrected to {{PD-US-no-notice}} and I think the photos at least are plausibly useful. --bjh21 (talk) 11:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 13:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Not PD-US Gov, item is a commerical publication/catalog from the 1970's ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Corrected to {{PD-US-no-notice}}. --bjh21 (talk) 11:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 13:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
double import File:Contribution Wikipédia Fromage en Bretagne groupe brestois.jpg Kergourlay (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Historical photos and coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Antarrio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antarrio (talk • contribs) 15:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC) 13:42, 28 June 2020 (UTC+2)
Regarding : *Antoine Guillaume SERENI.png* This is a photo of Antoine SERENI's passport that I took myself (Passport edit in 1956). I am his heir and I hold the rights to these objects, by inheritance law certified by a notary.
Regarding : *Famiglia di Sereni.jpg* This is a photo of the "coats of arms" of SERENI's family. This image belonged to "Antoine SERENI", my deceased grandfather : I am his heir and I hold the rights to these objects, by inheritance law certified by a notary.
I'm the creator and possesing all copyrights, for these photos that I took myself on goods / objects that belong to me (*Antoine Guillaume SERENI.png* & *Famiglia di Sereni.jpg*).
Regarding : *Francis cammaerts SOE.jpg*
You can find this picture on a simple search on Google Images. There is, to my knowledge, no copyright on this photo but can I be wrong?
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Non-PD stamp Buidhe (talk) 20:06, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Designed by Oswin Volkamer, who died 2016. So it is a Non-PD stamp . Delete --2003:6:2138:2872:F9F5:A99:BFCF:3EC3 20:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per IP. --Wikijunkie (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: above US:TOO given shading and shadows FASTILY 09:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Not any more complex than the examples at COM:TOO US -FASTILY 09:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Fastily: The shading, textures, shadow, and gradients have to be taken into account, and as such I believe establishes the necessary authorship required by the threshold of originality as established by the American airlines logo. --17jiangz1 (talk) 09:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Simple gradients and textures are not copyrightable. Example: File:Discover-it.png -FASTILY 10:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Why do you think this icon is violating Apple's copyrights? Why is it different from the Apple logo, Linux or Windows?
- Simple gradients and textures are not copyrightable. Example: File:Discover-it.png -FASTILY 10:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Fastily: The shading, textures, shadow, and gradients have to be taken into account, and as such I believe establishes the necessary authorship required by the threshold of originality as established by the American airlines logo. --17jiangz1 (talk) 09:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: for now per discussion unless there is a more compelling case against it. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Above US:TOO FASTILY 09:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Not any more complex than the examples at COM:TOO US -FASTILY 09:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Fastily: The shading/textures and shadow have to be taken into account, and as such I believe establishes the necessary authorship required by the threshold of originality as established by the American airlines logo. --17jiangz1 (talk) 09:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Simple gradients and textures are not copyrightable. Example: File:Discover-it.png -FASTILY 10:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Fastily: The shading/textures and shadow have to be taken into account, and as such I believe establishes the necessary authorship required by the threshold of originality as established by the American airlines logo. --17jiangz1 (talk) 09:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: for now per discussion unless there is a more compelling case against it. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by JalenFolf as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.cardano.org/ In my opinion the logo is too simple for copyright protection, but I am not sure. Another opinion is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The discussion in Cardano's forum on the topic was unenlightening. But this logo consists solely of text and simple geometric shapes, so it doesn't appear to meet the threshold of originality. I'll change the licensing to {{PD-logo}}. gobonobo + c 05:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per above, doesn't appear to meet threshold of originality. Grayfell (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: for now per discussion unless there is a more compelling case against it. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:31, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
_with_stethoscope.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_with_stethoscope.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright. Author dead in 1979. Laennec and the Stethoscope, from A History of Medicine in Pictures, presented by Parke, Davis & Company, directed by George A. Bender, painted by Robert A. Thom (1915–1979). Oil on canvas, creation date circa 1952, copyright 1960. Collection of the University of Michigan Health System, gift of Pfizer, Inc. 2A01:E0A:34F:69F0:14B9:5803:E19E:EE87 10:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
_with_stethoscope.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
_with_stethoscope.jpg){kind=link}
Above COM:TOO Hong Kong, FOP not applicable to graphic works. Any engraving, etching, lithograph, woodcut or similar works are considered graphic works. 17jiangz1 (talk) 13:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- This is a textual sign, not a graphic work. It is not an engraving, an etching, a lithograph, a woodcut, nor does it contain any sort of illustration. I already wrote in my last edit summary that it's not a graphic work and you failed to respond. Please stop making frivolous deletion requests. Citobun (talk) 13:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- The matter is not only with regard to the text itself, but the typeface, arrangement, and material the compose of the entire piece. Per COM:TOO Hong Kong, due to the low standard for originality in HK, most arrangements of text are copyrightable. --17jiangz1 (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Any source for this claim? Citobun (talk) 10:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- The matter is not only with regard to the text itself, but the typeface, arrangement, and material the compose of the entire piece. Per COM:TOO Hong Kong, due to the low standard for originality in HK, most arrangements of text are copyrightable. --17jiangz1 (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep this kind of plaque are allows in FOP Hong Kong and it is not a graphic work. --Wpcpey (talk) 09:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per {{PD-Text}} and {{PD-ineligible}}. --SCP-2000 00:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: for now per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
I'm not sure that this should be treated as PD-US gov as the metdata clearly states it was published by MIT NOT by a US govt agency. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Published without a copyright claim. --Fæ (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced 'submission' of thesis counts as 'publication' though. Anyone on Commons able to give an expert view? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- In Germany, theses are automatically considered 'published'. In UK & USA copyright law 'publication' includes making available to the public in an archive, just like an academic library of doctorate or other theses are. --Fæ (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced 'submission' of thesis counts as 'publication' though. Anyone on Commons able to give an expert view? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Published as a thesis. No copyright notice. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:11, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:37, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Analysis of a method for optimum design of waterjet propulsion systems. (IA analysisofmethod00krus).pdf
[edit]Publishers listed as MIT, Not the Naval Postgraduate School.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment It's dated 1973, so perhaps {{PD-US-no notice}}? There's what looks like a library checkout card on the inside of the back cover (p. 359) stamped with dates in 1973 and 1974, which would suggest publication, and I don't see anything resembling a copyright notice, though part of the title page appears to be missing. clpo13(talk) 19:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- It's not clear if these would be 'published' as they seem to be Thesis submissions. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Fæ: , It might be worthwhile tweaking the bot to exclude the NPS works until their status is more clearly determined? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:58, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As there is no copyright notice, the no notice provision works here. My reading of this from the internal page mentioning the US Naval Academy, is that they were likely to be training as part of the Navy while submitting this thesis to MIT as part of a joint programme; but that's speculative. The same writer appears to have spent his entire career in the Navy ref.
- So, can't get too excited about this debatable publication as there is no tangible copyright issue anyway. Changing upload rules would need a bit more of robust exemplar failures to get this usefully right, otherwise the debatable ones can get picked up through 'housekeeping'. --Fæ (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm. I am not convinced 'thesis' submission counts as 'publication' though. If it does, then practically ANY thesis submission pre 1978 that doesn't have an explict notice is potentially public domain. That doesn't seem correct to me. Is there someone on Commons able to give an expert view? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Published as a thesis (thesis cannot be unpublished as far as I know, it must be made available at least to the library in the higher learning institution). The fact that there are many works in public domain does not make is a bad thing. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
File:1973 spring flower and vegetable calendar and guide to successful gardening (IA 1973springflower19fwbo).pdf
[edit]Not PD-US Gov, Commercial publication from the 1970's ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Corrected to {{PD-US-no-notice}}. --bjh21 (talk) 11:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:43, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Accuracy222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Conscription-greeting-1970-09-24.pdf
- File:Kathy Boudin FBI wanted poster issued 1 May 1970.jpg
- File:Ucla-vietnam-war-teach-in-1966-03-25.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep At least the first two are documents produced by employees of the U.S. federal government in the course of their job duties ... I thought that was pretty clear. And they seem to have the desired information.
As for the third, it does not seem to have a copyright notice; as copyright in the U.S. was opt-in at the time that puts it in the public domain. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes, that's right. The first document was issued by the federal government and made public by its recipient without restriction. The second document was published by the federal government and is in the public domain. The third document was never copyrighted and is in the public domain; it was intended to be in the public domain when it was written in 1966. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Accuracy222 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Daniel Case. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:20, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in China A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Info @A1Cafel: there's an ongoing discussion about the new copyright law of China at Commons:Village pump#Copyright law change in Mainland China, which might allow images of interior artworks in China on Wikimedia Commons soon. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
