Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/03/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 28th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I (author of the file) forgot to clear the meta data of the image, which may exposes my real location. KumaTea (talk) 05:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @KumaTea: I uploaded a version without EXIF (it's lossless, don't worry) and requested a revision deletion of the version which has EXIF. Is it possible for you to upload a version which contains the EXIF except the GPS coordinates? The metadata could be useful to prove the photo is your own work. You can just clear the location. Thanks, pandakekok9 05:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EXIF Without GPS Version

[edit]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request of own uploader because exist a better version of the same photo. Ecummenic (talk) 06:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, Greetings!

I want to inform you that, One of my Image is marked for speedy deletion. This picture is mine only.

The reason is quoted for speedy deletion is - This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.wfmj.com/story/41889393/hacker-404-error-happiness-not-found-by-bhanu-srivastav-becomes-fastest-bestseller-in-india Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Screenshot - https://ibb.co/cLwjWnN

BUT

wfmj.com has taken this image from me see credit given to me by them, at bottom of same article here - https://ibb.co/w0Vd9Ff

Kindly guide me what to do??

I have all proofs that this image is mine, I purchased the license from Adobe and get it used for book cover through edits by a hired freelancer. I got it created from a freelancer from fiverr.com totally 3 versions were made by the freelancer I selected this one finally. I can provide the receipts and date of creation and screenshots of my fiverr.com page along with adobe license.

Thanks and have a nice day

Ashish Verma 9891Ashish Verma 9891 (talk) 10:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio per COM:CSD#G4. --Achim (talk) 11:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation report in ticket:2020032810002321 Ankry (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most this user uploads look like screenshots, see eg. File:Ataghf.png. Ankry (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The original image seems to be available here (however published in Dec 2019, but a bit wider to the right and not shadowed at the top). Ankry (talk) 12:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied as obvious copyvio.  JGHowes  talk 13:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non mi piace Rino chillemi (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yanlışlıkla telif hakkı ihlali uygulanmış silinmeli 03batuhan03 (talk) 21:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 187.113.110.133 17:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:20, 29 März 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.facebook.com/honicli/photos/a.100382604929569/100382568262906/?type=3&theater --Krdbot 07:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Forgot to supress redirect - no reason to retain this redirect The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:12, 29 März 2020 UTC: error with redirection --Krdbot 07:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Forgot to supress redirect - no reason to retain this redirect The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:12, 29 März 2020 UTC: error with redirection --Krdbot 07:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Most of the users other uploads have been copyright violations. --Green Giant (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Scaled down duplicate of File:Ahmednagar fort 2.jpg. --Green Giant (talk) 12:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danila Malcev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 17:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:47, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dlkobe80 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos. Out of project scope.

pandakekok9 02:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 06:00, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr rqasimzade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

screenshot

Ankry (talk) 12:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Most uploads of this user are blatant copyright violations. IMO, we should not keep also those per COM:PCP unless original versions with full camera info are uploaded or authorship verified through COM:OTRS. Note the shadowing at the top of most images which is likely intended to make searching by an image fail.

Ankry (talk) 15:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 07:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soy Daniel leal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Daniel Leal).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:42, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}, but the design of the leaf is far too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. ƏXPLICIT 04:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:49, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

ƏXPLICIT 04:24, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

ƏXPLICIT 04:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 19:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

ƏXPLICIT 04:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

plicit 14:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

ƏXPLICIT 04:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 04:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:12, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

ƏXPLICIT 04:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

ƏXPLICIT 04:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 04:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 04:39, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 04:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nathaniel2256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Given that the Nathaniel2256's six other uploads were blatant copyright violations, there is little reason to believe the remaining three files are his own work. They should be deleted per COM:PCP.

ƏXPLICIT 04:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, small, no EXIF data. --Ahmadtalk 21:49, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader attributes image to Amazon and Momastery, therefore cannot be the copyright holder. Beginning (talk) 06:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Small, no EXIF, can be found on many websites by using Google search by image and TinEye (e.g. here). --Ahmadtalk 21:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:34, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:51, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 08:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 08:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test image with no purpose Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 10:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SamieSmith06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promo on en.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Noun_Project_encyclopedia_icon1069603_cc.svg A. Gharbeia أحمد غربية (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, not a duplicate; just similar. --Ahmadtalk 00:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Risk of copyright violation, this photograph is included in a video uploaded to YouTube before upload here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJ-AidulVS8 at 00:18:17. The image may be a screengrab from this video. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Even if it's not a screengrab from the video, I would expect a bit more information for this 1985 photo to be "own work" as the only upload by uploader Cymruambyth1400. It seems too likely that it was taken from the video or from somewhere else, so deleted per COM:PRP. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 04:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Drawing of unclear purpose. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks a lot like http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_qzRuYBXf3RA/TPZu4ShWLPI/AAAAAAAAALg/Acaia6Uwzy4/s1600/Photo+3.jpg Sphilbrick (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Longtime a redirect to one of the millions authors portrayed in Commons. Nothing against Mr. Cheung, but nothing against the many other ones, as well. g (talk) 17:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not a meaningful redirect, deleted per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 00:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 23:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS and COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - - FitIndia Talk 07:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: https://images.fandango.com/ImageRenderer/0/0/redesign/static/img/default_poster.png/0/images/masterrepository/performer%20images/p283318/deepkatdare-sway-1.jpg B2Belgium (talk) 20:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 speedy: Terms of use @ fandago.com: "Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by Fandango, you agree that you will not use the Services, or duplicate, download, publish, modify or otherwise distribute or use any material in the Services for any purpose, except for your personal, non-commercial use." --Achim (talk) 07:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Storkk 9 April. --Achim (talk) 07:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works.

ƏXPLICIT 04:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:47, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubbel uppladdning FredN (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Where is the duplicate? Gestumblindi (talk) 16:19, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I was uploading this from "Commons" android application, the picture was shown to be uploaded twice. But now I cannot see that. So this picture should not be removed. Thanks. FredN 11:21, 11 April 2020


Kept: per uploader's explanation, not a duplicate. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, nothing to do with that. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joaopaulo21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear what country this is in, so unclear whether FOP covers school playground painting or not.

-mattbuck (Talk) 20:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:33, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joaopaulo21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   19:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joaopaulo21 (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   19:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LAB19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LAB19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Gary Concepcion, en:Gary Concepcion (youth politician)), COM:SPAM.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy. And probably out of project scope. pandakekok9 02:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. See also the uploader's talk page. Didym (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Htpt2507 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 00:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Danger iof probably copyright violation, appears to be Verbcatcher (talk) 01:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Correction, my intended reason was: Danger of copyright violation, probably a screen grab from a non-free video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIkMBOTIDGM&t=64s Verbcatcher (talk) 01:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further note from nominator: I have not identified an exact frame in the YouTube video that matches our image. However, it is clear that it was taken on the same occasion and probably from the camera that took the video. It might have been extracted from another version of the video. This was taken in a radio studio that presumably was not open to the public. There is no metadata and the pixel size is consistent with a video grab. Unless an OTRS permission email is forthcoming we should observe the precautionary principle and delete this image. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

professional portrait of a notable individual, uploaded by an account with a single edit. Dubious self-work claim FASTILY 01:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted subject A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted mask A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Without the three posters, there is nothing of interest left in the photo. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zyc1100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various images of buses in Shanghai, in which most of the images contain a watermark stating that "上海交通百科 版权所有 盗用必究", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Encyclopedia-All rights reserved, copyright violations will not be tolerated." So most of the files are copyrighted and unfree. For File:734R404NOTFOUND.jpg, the file also contains another watermark stating "魔都交通论坛" (Shanghai Transportation Forum), indicating that it also comes from an external source, and may be copyrighted.

廣九直通車 (talk) 05:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JOHNLEWISLILEI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are images of buses in Shanghai, in which they all contains watermarks stating that "Studio Original All Rights Reserved" and/or "上海交通百科 版权所有 盗用必究", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Encyclopedia-All rights reserved, copyright violations will not be tolerated.". As a result, the files are copyrighted and unfree.

廣九直通車 (talk) 05:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yukino Lu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various images of buses in Shanghai, in which most of the images contain a watermark stating that "上海交通百科 版权所有 盗用必究", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Encyclopedia-All rights reserved, copyright violations will not be tolerated." So most of the files are copyrighted and unfree.

廣九直通車 (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also include File:734路Z0A-0404,摄于云锦路丰谷路。SYXG.jpg, as duplicate of File:734路Z0A-0404,摄于云锦路丰谷路。.jpg without watermark.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BobLiu0518 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various images of buses in Shanghai, in which most of the images contain a watermark stating that "上海交通百科 版权所有 盗用必究", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Encyclopedia-All rights reserved, copyright violations will not be tolerated." So most of the files are copyrighted and unfree.

廣九直通車 (talk) 05:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gkxdavid99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various images of buses in Shanghai, in which they contain watermarks stating that "上海交通百科 版权所有 盗用必究", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Encyclopedia-All rights reserved, copyright violations will not be tolerated." So most of the files are copyrighted and unfree.

廣九直通車 (talk) 05:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xiao Ming Steve (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are various images of buses in Shanghai, in which they contain watermarks stating that "上海交通百科 版权所有 盗用必究", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Encyclopedia-All rights reserved, copyright violations will not be tolerated." So most of the files are copyrighted and unfree.

廣九直通車 (talk) 05:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is an image of a bus in Shanghai, in which it contains a watermark stating that "魔都交通论坛", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Forum", with unclear copyright status. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a panoramic view of Nanjing, in which in its original version, it contains a watermark stating "yuhongspace", possibly indicating its author. Moreover, there is another watermark of "龙虎社区", which is probably an Internet forum. As a result, the file was published on an external site before, and its copyright status is unknown. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lullabying (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Arcade game screen and characters are copyrighted.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with deleting it on the grounds of copyright; is it better if I reupload some of the photos under fair use on the articles page instead of Commons? Lullabying (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Yes, fair use is OK on WP:EN. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag is not for public use 36.79.246.164 07:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alex Cohn as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted book cover. Comment: It may pass under the COM:TOO. Or it may not. Strakhov (talk) 07:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made a picture of the physical book I have in my shelf. The picture itself was taken by myself. Sorry if it violates some copyright laws. Emil Engler (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nothing on the cover has a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near-duplicates of File:Grafting From 2.png

[edit]

These are unused duplicates of File:Grafting From 2.png with minor errors. Uploader seems to have been unaware that they could re-upload to the same filename and so created a new file for each revision they uploaded.

GKFXtalk 08:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.38.101 08:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.38.101 08:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Similar problems as with cars. Picture of a car is OK. Painting of a car by someone else is a problem. Execpt for the pinballmachine and avatar, these are all original tools to make the copyrighted movie. Problem is people just recognize it more. Will a phaser pistol from Star Trek be OK? Will a plasmarifle from Terminator Judgement Day be ok? (Sorry for the Spelling, I'm low on time)--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 18:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - A car is utilitarian and therefore does not have a copyright. And yes, unless the phasor is an actual weapon, it is not utilitarian and therefore does have a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion request also applies to:

I doubt that this image is an own work.
My relevant crteria:

  • Logo is included in the image (if you take an image with that high quality you usually don't)
  • User has three contributions, that are the listed three uploaded images
  • Two of his 5 total contributions ( Transcend PF830W.jpg and Transcend Industrial USDHC10I.jpg) were deleted for beeing copyvios.
  • By looking at Google's image search it's hard to argue that the image is really the uploader's own work

-- D-Kuru (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.38.101 08:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.38.101 08:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Типовая стела, оригинальными можно было бы считать таблички, но на фотографии они плохо видны. -- COM:TOO. --Avsolov (talk) 15:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found similar image as early as 2013 at https://www.amazon.es/New-Gipsy-Swing-Coco-Briaval/dp/B00FBLG9ZS Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis le photographe qui a pris cette photo... Je ne sais pas ce que vous avez tous, à attaquer ces photos, elles ne violent aucun copyright ! Merci. Hérisson7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hérisson7 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Hérisson7: Merci de la téléverser à nouveau directement depuis votre appareil-photo (et non Internet) à haute résolution et avec les métadatas incluses. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - now large, with EXIF. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Metadata of camera. No high resolution. Also this image looks like cropped from another photo. Clear copyright violation of the image. Suggest to delete. Also there is good chance to get a photo of this living person with clear metadata. Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.38.101 08:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP for monuments in Russia // 176.59.38.101 08:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel Ventura (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos or of touristic boards. Unfortunately there is no FOP in Italy for such works. In particular, those boards are PD 20 years after creation because made by the city council, meaning in 2035.

Ruthven (msg) 09:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Landowski died in 1961 and Henri Bouchard in 1960. No freedom of panorama in France. 83.204.164.125 15:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt that this image is really the own work by the uploader. It looks way to much like your typical advertising D-Kuru (talk) 23:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, a derivative of the non-free artwork, no FoP. VLu (talk) 07:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Yuraily Lic: , Is there no exception if it is in an exhibition, like in this convention? Thank you in advance for your answer.--CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @CoffeeEngineer: , I think it's better to ask a question at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Yuraily Lic: , Thank you for your answer. Here it is: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Photgraphies_of_sculptures_during_the_2011_Toronto_Fan_Expo

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not "own work"; seems to be above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of the picture, I wish to delete it because it lack some information ℹ️, I want it to be deleted so that I will upload the real file 📎, which contain the necessary information ℹ️ required by the Wikimedia Commons. Anasskoko (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Anasskoko: You can just edit the file description and fill in the information needed. If you're talking about EXIF data, you can always overwrite the image with the "real file" which contains the said data. No need to delete here. pandakekok9 13:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Canal Historia website says (in Spanish):
3. La Web puede contener elementos protegidos por la legislación sobre Propiedad Intelectual e Industrial. No se permite modificar, reproducir, distribuir o de otro modo usar la Web o cualesquiera de sus contenidos sin la expresa autorización por escrito de los correspondientes titulares de derechos.
(English translation: 3. The Web may contain elements protected by the legislation on Intellectual and Industrial Property. It is not allowed to modify, reproduce, distribute or otherwise use the Web or any of its contents without the express written authorization of the corresponding rights holders). PePeEfe (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stavroula93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Car-man08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of modern artworks, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 12:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvios. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Car-man08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some more uploads with the same violations as above (copyvio + no FoP)

Quick1984 (talk) 07:55, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Здание Моркинского литературно-краеведческого музея им. Н.И. Казакова.jpg — that's a house! It's covered by FoP-Russia. Nakonana (talk) 22:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you read the entire nomination carefully? This file has low resolution and no EXIF, can be found elsewhere [1], so probably it's a copyvio as almost all user's uploads, see his talk page. Hope you will refrain from transferring these copyvios to other projects. Quick1984 (talk) 08:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I missed that one. Crossing out my Keep vote.
The transferring is only for statues and sculptures because buildings fall under FoP. Nakonana (talk) 17:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominated for speedy deletion by user:Fabian RRRR with the reason The cited socurce states a copyright of APA and TU WIEN / DWH.

 Keep Does IMHO not reach the required threshold of originality for a copyvio. --Count Count (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep According to w:de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Schöpfungshöhe_von_File:COVID-19_Austria.svg  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 DeleteThere are three reasons for deletion:
  1. Much more simpler graphical structures are protected, for example Nike logo. Here we have a diagramm with three gauss curves, exactly with the same proportions and positions, several text blocks at the
  2. Drawing it by yourself, but reproducing significant features, doesnt free you from copyright. E. g. if you draw mickey mouse, with is recognizable as mickey mouse, you have to respect Disneys copy right.
  3. Further more, it is not educational (Commons:Project_scope) or 'edukativ' (Commons:Willkommen) because it shows the research of TU Wien in a wrongly manner.
JoKalliauer, you have already done an improved version in all three respects, so we are better stay with the improved one.
BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think we can close this discussion and delete the file.

We should do the same with the other two graphics with the same problem (File:COVID-19 Austria with Health care limit.svg and File:COVID-19 Variante.svg).

Barny22 (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep This file is made by JoKalliauer based on the same data as the original, and with the same curves, which, however, are a very basic, standard way to visualize data, so I think I agree with Count Count that it doesn't meet the threshold of originality. On the other hand, TOO specifically in Austria seems to be pretty low, so it's only a "weak keep" from me and I leave this for the next admin to decide. Note to Fabian RRRR: Adding three {{Vd}} votes to your post isn't going to make deletion more likely. Your third point isn't valid, by the way, as the file is currently in use in German Wikipedia articles, which makes it automatically in scope per COM:INUSE. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been not aware of COM:INUSE, thanks for pointing it out.
But please do not suggest I try to achieve some kind of likeliness for deletion. There has been raised two arguments for keeping, which is contradicted by two arguments. And each point is a valid reason to delete the file, so each point has to be considered on its own and is marked with a {{Vd}} - and please do not skip the addional texts and text positions in your judgement: What we have here is a fictional relation between 10 % weniger Sozialkontakte and 1.2 Mio as well as 25 % weniger Sozialkontakte and 360.000 and a further relation with TU WIEN which has been created by APA / diePresse
It is trying to be a Bildzitat (and is clearly intended in this way) which is not allowed at commons (de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Bildzitate) (To cut objections: you can do a Bildzitat even by redrawing it)
Finally, the file has been already tagged [2] with Disputed diagram. To emphasis the point: It states if you skip one out of ten parties, you reduce the peak by 40% and if you skip one out of four parties only 18% is left. That is misleading, i.e. non educative. In fact it threatens life if you downplay what is needed to be done.
And if you follow COM:INUSE a little bit down the page, there is the mention of realistically useful for an educational purpose and legitimately, which has been contradicted several times now and the result has been accepted (e.g. follow the link in disputed diagramm) but without consequences.
Best regards, Fabian RRRR (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's not customary here to pepper votes with several {{Vd}} templates; usually, if you look at deletion discussions, people use only one to summarize their view, so it seemed a bit strange to me. It looks like "delete! delete! delete! I WANT to have this deleted!"... - and I do not think that this is supposed to be a Bildzitat. Finally, arguments resting on the accurateness (or lack thereof) are not relevant as long as a file is in use, that's where COM:INUSE comes into play again, and also COM:NPOV. {{Disputed diagram}} is not a deletion template as such. Category:Disputed diagrams is quite full of diagrams that are widely used nonetheless. If German-language Wikipedia's community should decide that this illustration is, after all, useless and removes it from the articles, an argument that it's not realistically useful for an educational purpose could be considered, however. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The creater of the file JoKalliauer added the file to the article. I think COM:INUSE makes no sence in such a case. We also had some discussions de:Diskussion:COVID-19-Pandemie_in_Österreich/Archiv/2020#Grafik_Ausbreitung_des_Virus_in_Österreich_entfernt, de:Diskussion:COVID-19-Pandemie_in_Österreich/Archiv/2020#Grafik_Ausbreitung_des_Virus_in_Österreich_eingefügt to remove the file with the conclusion to remove it with other graphics, but nobody made it.Barny22 (talk) 16:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If there's local community consensus to do so, you are of course free to remove the file from German Wikipedia's articles (I'm myself active in German Wikipedia, but not in this subject area, so I don't want to interfere). Gestumblindi (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the File more than once. I also dont touch it again.Barny22 (talk) 17:25, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I tried to show the meaning of the three {{Vd}} by the title There are three reasons for deletion: - Schwamm drüber!
Let us look at TOO more closely. It might be a good starting point to summarize the copied graphical elements:
a) A digramm with positive arrows in horizontal and vertical,
a1) A gauss-like curve,
a11) transparent underfill
a12) in the same size
a13) and in the same position
a14) in the same orientation
a2) A second gauss-like curve,
a21) transparent underfill
a22) in the same size
a23) and in the same position
a24) in the same orientation
a3) A third gauss-like curve,
a31) transparent underfill
a32) in the same size
a33) and in the same position
a34) in the same orientation
b) seven identical text blocks
b1)a first text block
b11) with the same size
b12) and same position
b13) same text Keine Einschränkung der Sozialkontakte Höhepunkt: ca. 2Mio. Ende Mai
b14) same linebreaks
b2) a second text block
b21) with the same size
b22) and same position
b23) same text 10 % weniger Sozialkontakte 1.2 Mio
b24) same linebreaks
b3) a third text block
b31) with the same size
b32) and same position
b33) same text 25 % weniger Sozialkontakte 360.000
b34) same linebreaks
b4) a fourth text block
b41) same position
b42) same size
b43) same text Zahl der Infizierten
b44) same linebreak
b5) a fifth text block
b51) same position
b52) same size
b53) same text Tage seit der ersten bestätigten Infektion
b6) a sixth text block
b61) same position
b62) same size
b63) same text Coronavirus - "Worst Case Scenario" Annahme: 60-70% der Bevölkerung in Österreich betroffen
b64) same linebreak
b7) a seventh text block
b71) same position
b72) same size
b73) same text basierend auf TU Wien/dwh
The level of TOO is in Austria low as already stated above. And it has already been discussed as mentioned under w:de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Schöpfungshöhe_von_File:COVID-19_Austria.svg where it is considered to be above TOO in Austria, but where the opionion arised that this could be circumvented by copy-drawing it.
This has been done, so it is not a new diagramm on available data as wrongly assumed above.
The objection is still held, that by copy-drawing you do not free it from copyright.
BR, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 09:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

content

[edit]
@Barny22:
  1. w:de:Räumliche Distanzierung The File was added by an IP (not me!) see w:de:Spezial:Diff/197896874 (I just replaced the jpg [which was a derivative of the svg] by the original SVG since the jpg-derivative contained mistakes and misleading informations (As removing worst case scenario).)
  2. w:de:COVID-19-Pandemie in ÖsterreichI removed the image in w:de:Spezial:Diff/197779679 on my own and because of new arguments I reininsered it, since my removement had wrong assumptions and I had to undo my own edit.
Please be more carefull in your allegations.
I noticed in the german wikipedia that you are quite new (and do not know the rules/processes); you could ask for a w:de:Wikipedia:Mentorenprogramm in the german Wikipedia.
@Fabian RRRR: I had added {{Disputed diagram}} on my own see Special:Diff/404426764 because the trustworthy newspaper DiePresse did not cite all sources, but I later I found the original source: http://www.dwh.at/de/neues/corona-worst-case-szenario-und-gegenmassnahmen/ (w:de:Niki Popper, prof at TU Wien (University) and he is part of the Coronavirus-Taskforce in Austria)
As @Gestumblindi: said it is a decission of de.wikipedia not of commons (and imho should not be a part of a deletionrequest, I just wanted to rectify incorrect messages).
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer: here you added the file w:de:Spezial:Diff/197778073. And I said "The creater of the file JoKalliauer added the file to the article". Learn to read.Barny22 (talk) 11:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And here you added on the second page w:de:Spezial:Diff/197916998. Barny22 (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TOO Austria

[edit]
@Fabian RRRR: I understand @Regiomontanus: in w:de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Schöpfungshöhe_von_File:COVID-19_Austria.svg differently: I understood it is below TOO for scientific diagrams in Austria.
PS: I know it does not make any differences, but Niki Popper agreed per mail very informally to use his graphs, but he did not send a mail with a finial decission containing license,... (I assume he is too busy, and has too many requests.)
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please not that facts, and data cannot be copyrightprotected.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be shure: I was referring to [3] or [4] copyrighted by APA.
There a lot more identical elements, as I listed above already.
PS.: Just my curiosity: What dataset are you referring to?
BR --Fabian RRRR (talk) 11:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Info To avoid confusion: My original comments on Fabian RRR adding multiple "deletion" templates to his vote no longer apply, as the formatting was changed by JoKalliauer. I agree with this change. And yes: When it comes to the scope question, it's German Wikipedia's call - as long as the file is in use there, it is in scope for us per COM:INUSE. We can still discuss the copyright question, and it could be deleted despite being in use if deemed a copyright violation. It depends, I think, on how low Austrian TOO for such cases is. It's certainly not a particularly original visualization. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:08, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a graphic de:Datei:COVID-19 Health care limit.svg without the copyright question and without the criticized values. It shows the idea of Social distancing as good as the currend graphic.Barny22 (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Fabian RRRR: I refered to http://www.dwh.at/de/neues/corona-worst-case-szenario-und-gegenmassnahmen/ and yes there are assuptions behind the data of the simulation.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 14:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer: but the assuptions are not the 60-70% infections and the results dont forecast the peak with the end of Mai.Barny22 (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
He also wrote the valiation of the modell is very weak for such early date ("Es ist aktuell noch zu früh für seriöse, exakte Prognosen zum weiteren Epidemieverlauf.").Barny22 (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@JoKalliauer: Please undo your modifications to my statements! That is an absolute no go!

The data you mentioned only relates 2 Million to 100% peak, 10% reduction of contacts to 60% peak, 25% reduction to 19% of peak. No data about the curve-shape etc. You copy-drawed the image of APA / die Presse. You state this by yourself in the first line of w:de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Schöpfungshöhe_von_File:COVID-19_Austria.svg. This is not the image from Niki Popper. Do not mix things up.

Btw. you should state, if you are using the image of Niki Popper that it is not a general opinion, but a result of a special simulation, which is at the moment not even scientificly reviewed and puplished nor a preprint. It does not seems to be a work of TU Wien (authored by TU Wien), if you look at the dwh page.

--Fabian RRRR (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JoKalliauer only changed the formatting to be less confusing (without the repeated vote templates), not the content of your statement. I think that's okay. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:18, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Fabian RRRR: Regarding editing your post, I answered on User_talk:Fabian_RRRR#editing_foreign_comments, since I consider it as off-topic.
w:de:Niki Popper is the first author at http://www.dwh.at/de/neues/corona-worst-case-szenario-und-gegenmassnahmen/
The picture is COM:INUSE therefore it is in the scope even it is not scientificly reviewed.
The source decales it as a work of "TU Wien/dwh" see https://www.facebook.com/DiePressecom/photos/a.59623667363/10156677668942364
FYI: Everything done by w:de:Niki Popper and his research-group is marked with "TU Wien/dwh".
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 12:04, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion This is a simple graph which could easily have been drawn by MS Excel or another graphing program -- indeed it almost certainly was as no one draws curves that perfectly by hand. Far below ToO anywhere. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alex Cohn as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Pan Am promotional drawing, likely created between 1935 and 1945 per dates at en:China Clipper. Without more information on the source (possibly a brochure of some kind?), it's impossible to determine if there was a copyright notice or if the copyright was renewed. GMGtalk 12:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not saying the deletion rationale is wrong here. It's exactly right, but it's probably better to send this to DR in the case that the uploader actually can find the additional information regarding the nature of the source, that is, the original source and not the Flickr upload. GMGtalk 12:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not able to pinpoint exactly what the source of this is, but it is a low resolution thumbnail with no meta data from a user where it looks like everything else they've ever uploaded has been a copyright violation, save one file that looks to be pretty much accidentally PD-text-logo. GMGtalk 13:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the license really correct? Where the photo exactly was published more than 50 years ago? Taivo (talk) 13:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - USA person. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barãoerick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in unapproved draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also several copyvios. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NikolaSkuridin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Ukraine. Who are the painters and when did they die?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NikolaSkuridin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Ukraine. Sculptor's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubayyat J (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images, missing permissions.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thecrasher83 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Vintage photos of photos, no metadata: unlikely to be own works. Almost all other uploads by user are copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thecrasher83 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Vintage images. Please explain why public domain in Spain.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich finde, es sollte nicht gelöscht werden. Es werden immer nur Penisse von älteren Männern gezeigt. Deswegen sollten auch mal jüngere rankommen, da es sonst einseitig ist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimHi04 (talk • contribs) 17:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jassown33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files were initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The files are various images of buses in Shanghai, in which most of the images contain a watermark stating that "上海交通百科 版权所有 盗用必究", which means that "Shanghai Transportation Encyclopedia-All rights reserved, copyright violations will not be tolerated." So most of the files are copyrighted and unfree. Could be own work, but unusable with the watermark.

Didym (talk) 17:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NQCethos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos with highly unlikely claim of own work. Accurate source and permission information is needed.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Duckduckgo icon is non-free per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DuckDuckGo_logo.svg Didym (talk) 18:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I put in a request for a free replacement at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing#Got a macbook pro?. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd find it strange if this is not fair use, but I'm not an expert on this kind of thing. For now I have uploaded a modified version with another duckface pasted over the favicon, so for now the issue should be moot. If experts decide this use of the duckduckgo favicon on a screenshot is fair use, please revert.  --Lambiam 14:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lambiam: Just FYI, fair use is not acceptable on Commons. --17jiangz1 (talk) 20:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The DuckDuckGo logo should qualify as de minimis as long as the {{De minimis}} template is used. — Newslinger talk 05:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV Channel logo. Fair use Khinkali (talk) 18:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Логотип телеканала. Добросовестное использование Alfa-ol (talk) 09:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This request applies only for first version, not for whole file. It consists screenshots with unknown copyright status and I cropped the image. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- hid first version. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 19:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture shows Everett McGill as Stilgar from the 1984 movie. It's highly unplausible that this image has been cc-llicensed. Probably just copied, see the link at "source". Scantasyundfiencefiction (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope (promo for deleted article in ru-wiki) Khinkali (talk) 20:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video from Agencia EFE, not from La Prensa Gráfica Noticias de El Salvador, as the beginning of the video shows Frodar (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is public domain in the United States, it is not public domain in the country of origin - Austria - until 2039. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is public domain in the United States, it is not public domain in the country of origin - Austria - until 2039. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is public domain in the United States, it is not public domain in the country of origin - Austria - until 2039. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is public domain in the United States, it is not public domain in the country of origin - Austria - until 2039. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the owner of this file and uploaded it on accident. Buildwitt (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All rights owned by BuildWitt Media Group. -- requires a free license from an officer of BuildwittMedia Group. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Aaron McCracken Photography, not Northern Ireland Office A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Photographer Aaron McCracken agreed via Twitter DM to send permission text to OTRS team. See ticket 2020032810004703. // sikander { talk } 🦖 19:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Tagging with OTRS received to give one final chance. --Green Giant (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Aaron McCracken Photography, not Northern Ireland Office A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Photographer Aaron McCracken agreed via Twitter DM to send permission text to OTRS team. See ticket 2020032810004703. // sikander { talk } 🦖 19:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Tagging with OTRS received to give one final chance. --Green Giant (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Aaron McCracken Photography, not Northern Ireland Office A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Photographer Aaron McCracken agreed via Twitter DM to send permission text to OTRS team. See ticket 2020032810004703. // sikander { talk } 🦖 19:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Tagging with OTRS received to give one final chance. --Green Giant (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Aaron McCracken Photography, not Northern Ireland Office A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Photographer Aaron McCracken agreed via Twitter DM to send permission text to OTRS team. See ticket 2020032810004703. // sikander { talk } 🦖 19:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Tagging with OTRS received to give one final chance. --Green Giant (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Aaron McCracken Photography, not Northern Ireland Office A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Photographer Aaron McCracken agreed via Twitter DM to send permission text to OTRS team. See ticket 2020032810004703. // sikander { talk } 🦖 19:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Tagging with OTRS received to give one final chance. --Green Giant (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Aaron McCracken Photography, not Northern Ireland Office A1Cafel (talk) 06:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Photographer Aaron McCracken agreed via Twitter DM to send permission text to OTRS team. See ticket 2020032810004703. // sikander { talk } 🦖 19:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Tagging with OTRS received to give one final chance. --Green Giant (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. More than 31 days have passed since the last email on the ticket with no resolution of the license question. --Green Giant (talk) 12:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Provide evidence that "This painting is in the public domain as all copyright has expired." Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The archives are no more the authors than Wikimedia Commons is the author of its hosted content. Metadata suggests © 2010 Intelligent Design / John Ongaro Photography. --Green Giant (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blitz The Ent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://voyageatl.com/interview/meet-marshabryant-of-poni-capri-in-metro-atlanta/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 10:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Pieceofmetalwork: please use the {{Speedy}} template for these kinds of images. --Green Giant (talk) 12:55, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software. Possible copyvio. pandakekok9 13:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Icons/Wallpaper are copyright Apple Inc. 17jiangz1 (talk) 16:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prior unfree publication on flickr, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/plutinc/10269560125/in/dateposted/ Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate file created in error Goldsztajn (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sheila1988 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I believe we would need reason why these documents themselves are freely licensed. If not, then these images would be derivative of non free works.

GMGtalk 18:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status of the background image; can be found elsewhere on the web (e.g. here or here). Ahmadtalk 18:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Similar images may exist but its not the same graphics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexGWU (talk • contribs) 01:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused book cover; can be out of COM:SCOPE. No COM:TOO Iran. Ahmadtalk 18:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I believe it was being used in an article about the book — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexGWU (talk • contribs) 01:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Apple Inc. Didym (talk) 18:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 17jiangz1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Icons/presentation are copyright Apple Inc. Didym (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and original tagging. --Green Giant (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo montage of photographs with unclear copyright status. There's no freedom of panorama in Lithuania, even if this wasn't located inside a building. Although some of the photographs may be free, "Doew" (Döw) is a private archive and photographs from it are likely still under copyright. Buidhe (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Elsa Bienenfeld

[edit]

Both files are listed as being in the public domain in Austria under {{PD-Austria-1932}}, which has been determined to be invalid. The author's year of death is stated to be unknown. Therefore, I doubt these files may be kept here as-is. --BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I discovered this deletion domination while working on a backlog, and since it's almost two months old and unresolved, I relisted it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorization from the author. Exemple of utilisation before the upload [5] Tyseria (d) 21:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a scaled-down duplicate of c:File:Greater Anglia 745010 Colchester.jpg with incorrect license - since the original is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0, any derivative must bear exactly the same license to be valid; it also has improper attribution (it does not mention User:SavageKieran at all) contrary to the terms of all CC BY licenses Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 21:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 13:18, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 80.215.69.240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: original file from it.wiki is copyrighted and fair-use licensed. Not for commons. Didym (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is an own work by User:Dixy52, as you can also see on it:Progetto:Laboratorio_grafico/Immagini_da_migliorare#Stemmi_città_metropolitane. As any other coats of arms of cities and countries on Commons. --Gambo7 (talk) 16:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PS: the file itself is copyrighted on it.wiki (the .png image) because in fair use from araldicacivica.it, but this image is just a SVG own work. --Gambo7 (talk) 17:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Question I am trying to clarify this on it.wiki a well (you can answer me there if you prefer). @Gambo7 and Didym: From where the crown and all the other elements used (the castle, the eagle, ...) are coming? The crown is clearly got from a no-SVG file, but are the other elements drawn from scratch? --Ruthven (msg) 15:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
we should ask @User:Dixy52, I think they are taken from other coats of arms from Commons, or just own works. --Gambo7 (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dixy52 and Gambo7: That's exactly the point here. These other files must be sourced. --Ruthven (msg) 15:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~ Delete. The crown seems to come from araldicacivica.it. => copyvio. Kathisma (talk) 22:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info I have replaced the crown from File:Crown of Italian Province.svg. A selective history clean could be done if necessary. --Gambo7 (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion (deleted version with copyvio). Ruthven (msg) 16:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Phtographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as uploader admitted it's not own work. --Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dbianchir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE? (es:Friedrich von Luxburg). Multiple SD since 2014 on Spanish Wikipedia, speedied and deleted after discussion on the English one, twice.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered from talk page) Estimado Patrick Rogel, podrias explicar que politicas de wikipedia fueron violadas, al publicar las imagenes, siendo yo el unico autor, propietario y contando con la autorizacion para publicar las mismas, para el uso posterior en un articulo en el cual colaboro en wikipedia.--Dbianchir (talk) 16:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)--[reply]
 Keep  Neutral at least the Luxburg related ones for being in scope. The others I can't rate. --Achim (talk) 20:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Achim55: Frankly I'm surprised: Friedrich von Luxburg is the most deleted of both. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't dive deeply, I think the Luxburg are a notable family. And there is en:User:Dbianchir/sandbox which looks OK. --Achim (talk) 09:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Achim55: I don't think so: the German ancestries may be notable but the only last notable Luxburg (according to the draft of the same user) seems to be the Argentinan ministry es:Karl von Luxburg whose notability comes from his role on WWII and not his nobility and who is apparently not related with this Venezuelan one. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, changed to neutral. --Achim (talk) 17:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 青山一三郎 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Hassan II Mosque 32

Nominating all files where the mosque's architecture is the main subject. Per previous deletion requests: no COM:FOP Morocco, so copyrighted until 2070 (architect Michel Pinseau died in 1999).

HyperGaruda (talk) 16:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent work of architecture by Michel Pinseau, not allowed in Commons because no FOP in Morocco.

Darwin Ahoy! 19:56, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Three photos showing mosaics and two showing interior architecture. Commercial freedom of panorama is not allowed in Morocco. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg Per COM:FOP Morocco:"It shall be permitted, without the author’s authorization or payment of a fee, to republish, broadcast or communicate to the public by cable an image of a work of architecture, a work of fine art, a photographic work, or a work of applied art which is permanently located in a place open to the public, unless the image of the work is the main subject of such a reproduction, broadcast or communication and if it is used for commercial purposes." The main subject of File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg is the person. Also, Michel Pinseau is not the author of the mosaics. إيان (talk) 05:08, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@إيان: Commons does not host files that are not resuable for commercial end-users. Per COM:Licensing#Forbidden licenses, non-commercial licenses are not allowed. Moroccan FOP is simply unacceptable. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What about File:زائرة تتأمل في زخرفة مسجد الحسن الثاني.jpg? If its main subject is the person, then the image can be used also for commercial purposes, if I understand the quote correctly (I cannot see the image as the file was deleted a few days ago). –LPfi (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Morocco

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore File:MOSQUEE HASSAN II.jpg is previously published and would need a separate VRT permission from the photographer even if we obtained a general permission for the mosque. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Krd. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:59, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Morocco

--Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jameslwoodward. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Picture Out of Scope Schlurcher (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 09:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: indentified persons, used for vandalism on fr.wp Gyrostat (talk) 23:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 07:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne comprends pas très bien la remarque de l'autorisation. La photo est bien placée sous licence libre CC-BY-SA. Ce qui est bien indiqué sur la page commons de la photo. --mikani (to talk) 16:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above. Licensed by the photographer under CC-BY-SA. --Cavarrone (talk) 15:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorization from the author. Exemple of utilisation before the upload : [6] Tyseria (d) 21:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorization from the author. Exemple of utilisation before the upload :[7] Tyseria (d) 21:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorization from the author. Example of utilisation before the upload : [8] Tyseria (d) 21:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:52, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture may be a private picture. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 22:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --ƏXPLICIT 00:04, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be taken by subject SovalValtos (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is happening here? Who are the people? Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 13:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Teratix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Company logo, highly unlikely to be own work. Didym (talk) 16:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --ƏXPLICIT 00:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 轻语者 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://twitter.com/NesiaNet/status/1237361257805746176/photo/1 Didym (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:19, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crops of an all rights reserved photo at Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/184729801@N02/49409818942/ Ytoyoda (talk) 21:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission; this is a scaled down and cropped duplicate of https://d1c4d7gnm6as1q.cloudfront.net/Pictures/980x653fitpad%5b0%5d/9/8/8/22988_tn_gb-greateranglia-class745_1-stanstedexpress.jpg which is displayed at https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/first-new-stansted-express-trainset-delivered/48120.article - a page which states © 2020 DVV Media International Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 22:08, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:18, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I loaded another picture about AC power plugs and sockets and learning how to delete pictures Aguilus (talk) 13:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Sunjang Baduk starting position.png, which is much nicer Reyk (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use, not the same. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and redundant to File:Sunjang_Baduk_starting_position.png, which shows the same board position but is better quality because it is larger and in colour. Reyk (talk) 15:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rashid Aghamaliyev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lasr remaining files by uploader: everything is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. If OTRS was OK, then this should have been tagged and closed. If I'm wrong, just let me know, but I am not an OTRS admin and this has sat here since April 2020. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:09, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not published early enough to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francesco Correggia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sem fontes O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:Andrés de Pes Marzaraga 2.jpg. Source is a dead link to Flickr. As I understand the text it is a painting created in 1997 as a copy of an old painting from 1700-something. I used google translate so it could also just be a copy of an old painting. Either way the file had a failed Flickrreview for more than a year so we should either delete or if we keep then just remove the failed flickrreview. MGA73 (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & desc: "Copia de Antonio Torres Bru (1997) de un anónimo del siglo XVIII.". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion request also applies to:

I highly doubt that this image is really the own work by the user D-Kuru (talk) 23:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it was made back to 2014 by me with my colleagues. Vermin_mg (talk) 29 March 2020 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aucune autorisation de ma part 90.2.16.62 16:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Qui êtes-vous ? Nono ? Kergourlay (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY 09:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of viewing File:Google Search Result Page.jpg in a browser, not in use. Not educationally useful and redundant to File:Google Search Result Page.jpg. GFJ (talk) 09:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In my humble opinion, Google is a respected and trusted search engine. Many content creators toil hard to get the first position in Google search. So this image is an inspiration for many aspiring content creators. I feel this image should stay in Wikimedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohan Babu V (talk • contribs) 17:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that this deletion nomination is not for the original screenshot File:Google Search Result Page.jpg, but for the "screenshot of a screenshot" found at File:Google Search Result 1st Page.jpg. GFJ (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The different folder icons (Contacts, Music, Pictures, etc.) and icons for the drivers (C:\) are above COM:TOO in my opinion, and having a collection of multiple of these icons next to each other makes a larger derivative work. The OTRS permission is regarding the software, but the properties displayed in the screenshot is not created by the person releasing it, but rather by Microsoft. They can also not be COM:DM since they are intentionally included in the screenshot and not in the background and can be blurred/cropped. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I'm not inclined to see this as an issue - still looks like de minimis to me. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior version of File:Blanka von Castilien, Prinzessin von Bourbon.jpg with questionable sourcing. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is alive, so the copyright statement is incorrect. While it is a work published by the US armed forces, I don't see that the work could be published as {{PD-USGov}}. If delete is the decision, please notify English Wikisource at s:WS:CV to ensure that clean up can be undertaken first, separate conversation taking place there.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

w:Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (established in 1862) published series of books of good teaching value for medical persons. The Institution is closed in 2011. Some of their publications are available in Archives under Public domain licence. They are published by USGovernment. Hence may be considered as {{PD-USGov}} to be used in Wikisource. I am interested in this work, and would like to upload the other books in the series, if it is acceptable to Wikimedia foundation.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Except it is not the publisher that determines the copyright of the book, it is the author, and there is no evidence that the book has been put into the public domain by the author.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:47, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hang on… This scan was uploaded to IA by an archivist at the National Institutes of Health Libraries and is included both in the NIH Library collection and the Federal Collections collection at IA (and the NIH links to it and a copy on Google Books from their catalog). The work contains no independent copyright statement (which is not required by the copyright act but is common practice in publishing all the same, when copyright applies). The series has been published in multiple editions (at least three that I've found), all of which by AFIP, but with different editors. The edition preceding this one has multiple scans fully available on HathiTrust (who are notoriously even more Catholic than Commons on copyright). All of which strongly suggests that this is a product of the AFIP that just happened to be produced as a work-for-hire: that is, the "author" is listed for academic credit, not copyright purposes. The history of the work, which is given in a preface, also describes it as a product of the AFIP, in particular due to drawing on the expertise of their employees and the materials in their archives.
    Bottom line, the balance of probabilities here strongly favours this being a {{PD-USGov}} work. --Xover (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Discussion was compelling that it is PD-Gov. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Langebiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

its for me i take photos i cant write english well but that photos from me Langebiz (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Langebiz: شما عکس‌هایی آپلود کرده‌اید که حداقل با چهار دوربین مختلف گرفته شده‌اند. در این باره چه توضیحی دارید؟

4nn1l2 (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

من عکاس و خبرنگار هستم دوربین های مختلف زیادی را تست کرده ام حتی برخی دوربین ها متعلق به خبرگزاری ، سازمان یا نهاد های مختلف بوده است Langebiz (talk) 20:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Langebiz: تشکر از پاسختان. اگر دوربین مال سازمان یا نهاد بوده، پس احتمالا عکس‌هایی که شما با آن گرفته‌اید هم متعلق به آن سازمان بوده است. آیا اینطور نیست؟ 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

با تشکر از حساسیت شما، حق مالکیت معنوی عکس و محتوای تولید شده بعهده خبرنگار و عکاس هست و حتی اگر مسئولیت حقوقی هم داشته باشد عکاس جوابگو خواهد بود. با ان حال معمولا این عکس ها و خبر ها با هدف انتشار گسترده و خبری تولید میشوند و در واقع سازمان ها تجهیزات خودشان را به منظور تولید محتوا و انتشار آن بنفع سازمان متبوع در اختیار خبرنگاران قرار می دهند. یعنی سازمان های مطبوع نه تنها مشکلی از انتشار این عکس و محتوی ندارند بلکه خوشحال هم میشوند Langebiz (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2020 (UTC) @4nn1l2: [reply]


Deleted: per nomination + "Author Mesut Naseri Copyright holder IRIS ADS GROUP" on several, others social media sized, subject matter, location, etc. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]