Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/02/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 11th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is an image of a police document regarding doctor Li Wenliang, and it is declared as a scan. However, apparently the file is actually a photograph, the photographer (Li Wenliang) also held separate copyright regarding this photograph. As a result, we will need the photographer heir's permission regarding the file. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nominationSorry about my mistake. It seems that per Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., as a faithful reproduction of this public domain file, the image itself will also be in public domain, get it wrong.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keep the original but delete my bungled cropping attempt which distorted but did not crop TedColes (talk) 12:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no need to delete, just revert to original. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; and part of advertising uploads.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 17:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 06:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 17:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete MD. Ariful Islam Taiob Sujoy (talk) 06:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Avdel Amo (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty gallery page. --Achim (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Smtfamilygroups (talk) 07:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted yesterday. --Achim (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

העליתי בטעות Idro10 (talk) 23:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better resolution is available (and it have categories) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:U%C5%82an_Stanis%C5%82aw_Paszkiel.jpg Jakub T. Jankiewicz (talk) 13:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: solved as dupe. -- Darwin Ahoy! 19:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{delete | [page is not a true representation of the author who created it. subsequently, a new page has been created]}}


Deleted: per nomination, own user space. --Achim (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TA-PCR.png 109.106.233.98 22:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There's a Disney copyright notice in the image's EXIF. Alex Cohn (talk) 04:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source is https://www.flickr.com/photos/disneyabc/48613744128/ where it is licensed CC-BY-ND 2.0. --Achim (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily: Given license not sufficient. --Achim (talk) 11:10, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BLK55 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The licensing here seems questionable however above all I cannot see how so many images of someone can fall within the project's scope.

Herby talk thyme 16:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Likely copvio, need proof via OTRS that uploader is author. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

A mess of photos of copyrighted books, photos of photos and scans of old photos. no permission

Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

No COM:FOP in France.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VERCEIL (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality, nonsense personal photos primarily of random place settings at cafes. User indef'ed on Commons and fr.wiki for NOTHERE/scope issues.

Эlcobbola talk 16:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inthu falak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinodbhardwaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vacation photo, out of scope. Also included:

P 1 9 9   17:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE — Ирука13 18:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is copyright Chuck Nacke and I am Chuck Nacke, I would never allow any image of mine to be "free to download." contact chucknacke@comcast.net or chuck@chucknacke.com 24.63.224.190 19:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: No reliable source, no permission. --Achim (talk) 20:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 20:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request Sova 23 (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request Sova 23 (talk) 20:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW with no source for each part specified, out of COM:SCOPE (promotional content).

Ahmadtalk 21:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HfedBo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small photos with no real EXIF. If they are too old to be protected by copyright, then the appropriate license tag and evidence is needed.

Ahmadtalk 21:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photoshop fake Jbergner (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure, correct version available in File:Lycopsamine.svg. Leyo 21:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality HassanOucheikh (talk) 22:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2016/01/19/leila-alaoui-ouagadougou-attaque-photographe-les-marocains_n_9013834.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found as early April 2016 at https://www.popsugar.co.uk/fashion/Elizabeth-Olsen-Alexander-McQueen-Dress-Captain-America-41086512?utm_medium=redirect&utm_campaign=US:FR&utm_source=www.google.com, COM:LL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Toruńskie Stowarzyszenie Harmonii Ciała i Umysłu Aikido - Ikeda Dojo. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone — Ирука13 14:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vaniaporto.nm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test videos.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipsych81 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional shots, no evidence that the user has the necessary permission to release the photographs under a free license. The user is claiming here that the copyright holder transferred the copyrights to him but there is no evidence. As per COM:PCP a written COM:OTRS permission is needed.

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:Ali Kilic Canan Kaftancioglu.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:Ali Kilic Canan Kaftancioglu.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google search 3.10.2001-10.05.2010.

Also: uploaded by a participant with a dubious contribution, including a deleted image on a similar topic (S. Seagal). — Ирука13 16:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the Flickr links suggest the licensing we would be happy with I think this is more likely to have originated from 1 or 2 pro images. This may be a case of Flickr washing Herby talk thyme 16:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The whole album on Flicrk looks like a fan scrapbook. The user doesn't seem to have any actual ownership on the original content.--QTHCCAN (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused - possibly private photo Hjart (talk) 07:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 08:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cinthyalincoln (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (hu:Cinthya Lincoln).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of an unknown person without any explanation or statement supporting its relevance Schlosser67 (talk) 09:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Blurred photo of people of unclear identity. Without further information is of no educational value. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Unexplained screenshot of no educational value. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Unexplained screenshot of no educational value. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Unexplained screenshot of no educational value. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 11:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Private photo Hjart (talk) 11:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. No explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph. Looks to be part of personal project. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Private photo Hjart (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: оut of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Private photo Hjart (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: оut of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Looks like a test page. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Looks like a test page. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Looks like a test page. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 14:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain text article-like page, out of project scope. Achim (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valemu94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fake map. Sakhalinio (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: оut of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fake flag. Sakhalinio (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: оut of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daveyflavin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maggyero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can delete these files. — Maggyero (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC BY-SA 3.0 must be explicit in the file description (https://wiki.beeldengeluid.nl/index.php/Bestand:FTA001040063_011_con.png#filelinks). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Eurovision Song Contest 1980 photo sessions. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, and no useful information contained to determine scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the page where the image is used by the uploader. It seems to me the user is trying to write an article, where this image is used as illustration. I'd wait and see what comes out from that effort. It seems to be a new user, so let give Wikipedia a chance to educate them before deleting their uploads based on the quality of their contributions. --Alpark (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: As above, copyright concerns (missing permission) combined with description that doesn't explain scope. ~riley (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From http://fbis.kiev.ua/category/kiev-baseball-school/page/2/ Ytoyoda (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From http://fbis.kiev.ua/category/kiev-baseball-school/page/2/ Ytoyoda (talk) 02:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata, previously published at Facebook or Instagram and requires an OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Certainly taken from some publication: printing artifacts and pixelization visible in some. --P 1 9 9   17:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Photo Yasuo Mizui, De Witte Vlam, 1975.jpg is taken in the Middelheim museum, by me. I don't understand why you think it was taken from a book. No reason to mark it for deletion.Funkyxian (talk) 13:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. It's my mistake. I canceled about File:Yasuo Mizui, De Witte Vlam, 1975.jpg. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Certainly taken from some publication: printing artifacts and pixelization visible in some. --P 1 9 9   17:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptures created by Yasuo Mizui. He died in 2008. These sculptures are in France. No FoP in France.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 06:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are from books, maybe. Seems like not own work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:46, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A sculpture created by Yasuo Mizui. He died in 2008. This sculpture is in Japan. No FoP in Japan for artistic works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

r Commons:Photographs of identifiable people; THIS IS A PHOTO OF ME and i was stalked after the photographer took it. I remember screaming to stop following me after an hour. You have had several other photos taken down for the same reason. im recognizable because of my career and get constant emails about it. Im asking to delete it out of respect for my humility . I also asked years ago from a chinese website cause I know your asian. 2601:602:880:E200:348A:9581:6294:7B06 07:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per this UDR discussion. Privacy related requests should be authorized using OTRS. Ankry (talk) 06:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thomascw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos and scans. Not own work. Needs permission from each photographer

Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thomascw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no indication of own work on any image in this gallery: including photos of the Pope, several cardinals, priests, educators, old photos of churches, logos, religious icons and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarie Abdeslam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smtfamilygroups (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stantrollip (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://michaelstanleybooks.com/media-kit/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by İsi laboratory (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, probably taken from the Internet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BethewordSmith (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly PD-Army but no source too prove it. Need a source and PD status for each - these are definitely not own work

Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden, Hi, these are my photos. I took them as I'm the General's photographer. How do I prove it? Thanks much. BethewordSmith (talk) 20:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There is now OTRS correspondence. Accordingly, I've speedied File:Army Lt. Gen. Eric J. Wesley speaks at The Brookings Institute to a crowd about Army modernization.jpg as a duplicate of ‎File:LtGen Eric J. Wesley.jpg, for which we have OTRS verification.  JGHowes  talk 21:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per request of uploader, OTRS ticket 2020021810007972.  JGHowes  talk 15:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is "Suman Föchstæg" ? I got absolutely no result on Google except this page. It seems to be a fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eboroshia Garavil does not seem to exist, party names are unrealistic (Hunt Lodge ? Underdark League ?). Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is "FACEBOOK". This meme has no a proper atribution. Luisalvaz (talk) 04:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:25, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sapierce56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sapierce56 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all the image were uploaded to promote these people on wikidata items (which has been deleted now).

‐‐1997kB (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:47, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 00:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These statues were not permanently situated. So, FoP in Germany does not apply.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by George G Milford (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence of permission. Files taken with different cameras, inconsistent EXIF data.
The user also uploaded other files (5 in total) which have been deleted yet.

Affected files:

Steinsplitter (talk) 11:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph. Looks to be part of personal project. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graph. Looks to be part of personal project. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 12:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted map. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Also see: COM:CRT/United Kingdom#Freedom of panorama : Section 62 of the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is much broader than the corresponding provisions in many other countries, and allows photographers to take pictures of buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public) without breaching copyright. Such photographs may be published in any way.
The practical effect of the broad Freedom of Panorama provisions in the UK and in other countries with similar laws is that it is acceptable to upload to Commons not only photographs of public buildings and sculptures but also works of works of artistic craftsmanship which are on permanent public display in museums, galleries and exhibitions which are open to the public. According to Copinger and Skoane James, "The expression "open to the public" presumably extends the section to premises to which the public are admitted only on licence or on payment". Again, this is broader than 'public place' which is the wording in many countries. Electron   20:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The photo taken in the UK is only File:Stormtrooper Portrait.jpg. This photo was taken at Star Wars exhibition. Not permanently. FOP-UK does not apply to this. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in UAE.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:20, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character / works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: one per nomination; kept one as DM, low-res image, no copyrightable elements. --P 1 9 9   18:54, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 00:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not public domain in Georgia yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the picture's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient license info, as already noted. Seems to be a YouTube screen grab. cubic[*]star 18:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:מגדל הקרייה Migdal HaKiriya (13).JPG, both files are not in use. 89.144.222.205 11:30, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "not in use", and why is this a reason for deletion? Chenspec (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct that a lack of use is not a reason for deletion, however, the reason for the deletion nomination appears to be the image's redundancy to the other, almost duplicate image. A future need/use of both of these images for educational purposes is hard to imagine. GFJ (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This issue came up in the past and I asked what was right to do. I was told that because you cannot anticipate user needs, you should give all the options to choose from Chenspec (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 14:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly redundant to File:תל אביב Tel Aviv-Yafo (42).JPG and File:תל אביב Tel Aviv-Yafo (40).JPG, not in use. 89.144.222.205 11:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "not in use", and why is this a reason for deletion? Chenspec (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct that a lack of use is not a reason for deletion, however, the reason for the deletion nomination appears to be the image's redundancy to the other, almost duplicate images. A future need/use of all of these images for educational purposes is hard to imagine. GFJ (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This issue came up in the past and I asked what was right to do. I was told that because you cannot anticipate user needs, you should give all the options to choose from Chenspec (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:22, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:14, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. No FoP in France.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nome sbagliato Giacomella 10 (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 12:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of early enough publication to be public domain

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Russia. Ruthven (msg) 12:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of pre-1946 PUBLICATION required for public domain status in both Russia and US. Previous admin who ruled on the case demonstrated incompetence left vague comment that demonstrated lack of undertsanding of the meaning of early enough legal PUBLICATION under PD-Russia and is being education about the terms of PD-Russia they were very ignorant of.

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:24, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattbuck: I already brought it to their talkpage BEFORE I reopened it for deletion. But fact of the matter is, just because someone is an admin does not mean their ruling on a copyright is in line with Russian law in any way. Lack of knowledge about Russian copyright law and falsely assuming creation date is lawfully equal to publication date is a prolific problem on Commons that plagues admins and regular users alike. Admins are in no way immune to ignorance or willfull blindness to copyright terms and conditions that are unfortunately standard here.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Question @Mattbuck: Is that a personal attack that I read above? --Ruthven (msg) 15:58, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: I made no personal attack on you. This is not about you. This is about the Wikimedia COMMUNITY'S longstanding problem of ignoring the huge backlog of copyright violations in the PD-Russia category. (The vast majority of which lacking clear publication dates, and most users being unaware of the copyright situation in Russia due to their incredibly complex copyright law situation) "Ignorant about Russian copyright law" is not a slur or insult. It is easier to explain calculus to a toddler than teach Russian copyright law to a rocket scientist. I do not expect every Wikimedia administrator to understand Russian copyright law - I only expect those who make rulings on matters involving Russian copyright law to understand it. It is merely a factual statement that you misunderstood the requirements for a photo to be public domain under Russian law (information about a publication before the cut-off date must be present to prove the file is PD, these files lack such information, yet you ruled them as PD-Russia anyway. I do not know why, but there are several possible reasons, most frequently being the confusion of the publication date requirement with assuming when the photo was created, or occasionally, the assumption that because the photo is of a famous person it "probably" was published before the cut-off date) Whatever your reasons for ruling against what is required by PD-Russia, that does not fundamentally alter the fact that the files LACK the required publication information. If my dry tone offends you, sorry. But until early enough publication is found (if it exists), we cannot assume these works to be PD and they must be deleted, and as an admin you are morally obligated to delete them to comply with Wikimedia policies.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. Copyright laws in Russia are relatively simple (much simpler than e.g. in Germany or US). Uncertain publication is a global issue that extends beyond this site. For example, copyright laws in nearly all countries admit that many photographs have unknown author, and count their copyright period starting from the publication date. Materialscientist (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright law of Russia is complex due to the retroactive nature and varying periods of extensions applied (50, 54, 70, 74, as well as the vague and long debated exemptions of PD-RU-exempt, etc) when combined with the URAA (a Russian work PD on the URAA date of 1996 could become copyrighted after the next batch of retroactive laws.) But this case isn't too complicated. What matters is if these photos were published before 1 January 1946 without attribution as required for them to be PD in both Russia and the US. There is currently NO indication they were PUBLISHED by then, so these must be deleted. Just becase they were created before 1946 doesn't mean they were published by then. Because there is no pre-1946 publication indicated here, the photos must be deleted--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No new arguments brought forward. Prior publication likely enough to satisfy the PCP. Also, insults of our volunteers like in this DR disqualify it automatically. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The nominator has not made a solid case for deletion and needs to show (1) the supposedly original banner which is supposedly (2) copyrighted and (3) that this particular version violates that copyright. Further the words How many more? are not copyrightable to begin with -- only three words. It's not used to sell anything or promote any particular product. The creators (drawings and words) of this particular banner gave me their full permission, verbally, to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons under the public domain license. A google image search using the terms "How many more? #Enough" (including the hashtag and quote marks) turned up only one other usage, on Facebook (scroll down), which looks like it was uploaded from Wikimedia Commons. So the nominator needs to prove their case.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a copyright work — JJMC89(T·C) 03:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: There are lots of DVD, music albums, poster photos on commons. I saw a few today, even, where they were definitely the focus of the photo. Are only some acceptable? Are you going to delete them all? Or can we also see that this image, more than others, is looking at the fact it's covered in signatures and representing a different format of home media release, so it's not actually looking at the cover art, which is hard to see anyway. (For that reason also, I say keep.) Kingsif (talk) 06:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete @Kingsif: I have looked through the respective categories for the types of files you mention and all of them either had an OTRS notice in the permission field, were published under a free license by the copyright holder elsewhere or the artwork was too simple (only text or basic shapes) for copyright to apply. All others should likely be deleted, yes. The cover art is not hard to see, only some details are obscured. The entire character cast and the background would have to be covered, leaving only the original text, signatures and the combo pack sticker for it to be OK for Commons without a permission from the author.--TFerenczy (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TFerenczy: thanks for your input; since the cover art is (IMO, based on the other functions of the image) not the focus and not massively in focus, is it covered by any part of de minimis? I also feel there's some grounds for this deletion request to be closed no matter what because of JJ assuming bad faith – I've noticed over the past year or so, JJ seems to be following my image uploads actively looking for things to delete. I know they run the bot that reduces files, but before this past year, JJ themself hasn't been watching what I do. You could then prod it yourself. Kingsif (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingsif: I am afraid de-minimis doesn't apply here, it is rather strict. The covers would probably be de-minimis if, for example, the Flickr uploader took a picture of one of the actors holding them from 10 feet away – the items would still be recognizable, and you could probably make out the signatures but not much of the copyrighted material. Even some other images from the same album (like this one), where the cover is even less in focus, could be problematic.--TFerenczy (talk) 21:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I've mentioned it, JJMC89 - I have noticed this behavior mentioned where only over the past year or so (not before) you seem to be watching my uploads specifically wanting to delete things I upload. I don't like it. I assume it's because you've identified me as a bad uploader or something (obviously not true anymore) and want to keep things clean, but every time I see you (not the bot) tagging my uploads and stuff (half the time for half-baked reasons that even you don't dispute when I remove), it feels intrusive, so I'd rather you didn't. Leave it to other users to notice, as and when they might see it, rather than constantly look over my shoulder. I'm not saying keep all the bad files I upload (obviously), but I'd rather you didn't just assume everything I upload will be bad (how I feel from your actions). I'm not making personal attacks, I'm trying to openly approach an editing behavior that's making me not want to be involved on commons, as it makes me feel negatively targeted. Kingsif (talk) 16:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: copyrighted CD cover. Ruthven (msg) 12:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A cropped version of this photo was published here in 2010: https://m.cooperativa.cl/el-gimnasta-felipe-pina-se-prepara-en-brasil-con-la-ilusion-de-lograr-el-oro-en-los-juegos-sudamericanos/prontus_nots/2010-01-19/124514.html, needs OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 02:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The nominator has not made a solid case for deletion and needs to show (1) the supposedly original banner which is supposedly (2) copyrighted and (3) that this particular version violates that copyright. Further the words Loving arms not firearms are not copyrightable to begin with -- only four words. It's not used to sell anything or promote any particular product. The creators (drawings and words) of this particular banner gave me their full permission, verbally, to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons under the public domain license.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: the banner is a recent artistic work, thus copyrighted. It is forbidded by the law to publish a derived work of this banner, e.g. a photograph. Ruthven (msg) 12:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image's copyright does not belong to Link Picture and has not been licensed freely. The image is actually the subject's profile picture on Apple Music, as seen here. Versace1608 (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unreferenced logo of a TV Channel. Authordom (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: maybe complex logo. "unreferenced" makes no meaning. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not-notable person, Wikipedia articles were deleted from various projects (please see the Wikidata item).

Bencemac (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep : Ahlem Fekih est une actrice et chroniqueuse tunisienne . Elle est notable . --Hamdi van buuren (talk) 01:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep : As notable --Chdondon1990 (talk) 01:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Info The mentioned users have (re)created promotional pages across many projects, e.g. about the subject. Could be socking as well. Bencemac (talk) 18:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - cross wiki spam Quakewoody (talk) 13:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's clearly cross-wiki spam. In the previous nomination, the keep votes came from User:Chdondon1990, who is globally locked and blocked in many projects, and from User:Hamdi van buuren, who is very likely a duck of the puppetmaster. Please delete these pictures and end this spam here. Pinging User:Ruthven who closed the previous nomination.

Bencemac (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, only lists are using these pictures. When we remove them and the category, we will be able to finally delete the Wikidata item and they will be gone from the lists. Bencemac (talk) 08:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Perhaps in the future the actress will gain relevance and be relevant enough to have an article on wikipedia. You never know. Also, it is a very good quality photo. --I Mertex I (talk) 22:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, maybe not. You or I could become famous one day but that doesn’t mean we need a Commons category. FredWalsh (talk) 15:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keep the image delete the cat. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official site under copyright http://gabriellamartinelli.it/gabriella-martinelli-eventi/ Caulfield (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contained unformatted text "copyright by GG" while templated CC0, and the uploader may not be the author or a licensor. May be invalid license, copyvio or misunderstanding. Also the uploader seems to be French only. grin 08:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contained unformatted text "copyright by GG" while templated CC0, and the uploader may not be the author or a licensor. May be invalid license, copyvio or misunderstanding. Also the uploader seems to be French only. grin 08:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is called a selfie. I doubt. Small size, no metadata. Probably not own work. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; neither the date semms correct. Ruthven (msg) 16:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is PKeenan1, but the metadata of the file mentions "Kaye Cooksey" and "KayeKaye Photography" as author, so the uploader does not seem to be the author. The permission of the author is needed. BrightRaven (talk) 09:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: we need an COM:OTRS permission by Kaye Cooksey. Ruthven (msg) 12:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of http://www.sympatico.ca/actualites/decouvertes/science-techno/planetes-type-terrestre-decouvertes-12-annees-lumiere-1.3249984 Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See this note. No FOP for modern buildings, sculptures, etc in the UAE. The architect could not be dead for 50-60 years here. Leoboudv (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it's a panorama of Dubai, not centred on a single building. considering that de minimis rule applies. Ruthven (msg) 12:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the linked YouTube video was ever licensed under {{YouTube CC-BY}}. ƏXPLICIT 10:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PermaLiv_Nessundet_bro_11-02-20.jpg Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not exact duplicates. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PermaLiv_Sn%C3%B8tekstur_over_jordene_i_Lensbygda_11-02-20.jpg Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 12:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate (I would have rather deleted the second file). Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by German sculpturer Max Ernst, dead 1976. No FOP for sculptures in Denmark. Pugilist (talk) 12:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by sculpturer/artist Olafur Eliasson, still alive. No FOP for sculptures in Denmark. Pugilist (talk) 12:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by Alexander Calder, dead 1976. No FOP for sculptures in Denmark. Pugilist (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by Alexander Calder, dead 1976. No FOP for sculptures in Denmark. Pugilist (talk) 12:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of Polish National Bank copyrights Gonzuchna (talk) 13:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS should be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed. Might be used on Wikisource if it's a published work. Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmikell18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright-infringing screenshot of unfree softwares. TechyanTalk16:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Both Orphan and Unencyclopedic 87.213.41.58 18:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). Per "PD-Thailand" "This is a photographic work, audiovisual recording, motion picture, sound recording, or broadcast work, and at least 50 years have elapsed since its first publication or it was not published within 50 years of authorship. This is a work of applied arts, and at least 25 years have elapsed its first publication or it was not published within 25 years of authorship." So  Keep this file. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 15:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). I am contesting deletion as this file was originally produced in the 1900's and can fully fall under "{{PD-Thailand}}". Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 16:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. If the author is unknown it is not possible to use the '70-year' licence. 2. Image doesn't appear on the linked page, so no licensing info 3. The inclusion of the Life watermark is suggestive of a possible claim by the magazine SchroCat (talk) 07:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD_old assumed is fine enough. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Canary Islands location 86.163.174.173 15:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Entrenando Aikido - Blog de Carina esta licenciado bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Unported License. — Ирука13 15:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And I also doubt that the blog is the rightful copyright holder. Ruthven (msg) 16:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's own work that just spent some time on Instagram. The Google images hits are all from Instagram on websites that aggregate or otherwise work with Instagram content. It's a currently unused personal image so still  Delete. Similarly, File:Od srdce.jpg isn't a derivative work with a permission issue but rather an out-of-scope poem written by the uploader.--TFerenczy (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of major upload of strangely underexposed photos. No educational value and out of scope Pugilist (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad Anmol1311 (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 16:13, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used and censored version of Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1983-0815-302. I see no educational value in this mutilated version! Ras67 (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). This file was produced around 1890, it obviously falls under "{{PD-Thailand}}", so  Keep. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Donald Trung. Ruthven (msg) 16:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure "Free to reuse" is a valid license. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick Rogel, I added the label because I took the picture myself when I was a student at Syracuse during one of the policy briefs. Adding more pics of these briefs soon. Hope you can stop them from nominating for deletion.


Kept: per Ceneirro Igor. Ruthven (msg) 16:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is not useful because there is given no explanation for the colours and it is outdated (brexit). It is not in use and there exists a svg version. --2A02:908:C31:C260:D5C7:7C0D:ABD1:E1CE 17:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is outdated (brexit), incorrect (does not show Kosovo) and not updated for four years. It is lacking a precise source as well. --2A02:908:C31:C260:D5C7:7C0D:ABD1:E1CE 16:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: outdated maps are in scope. Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly redundant to File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (72).JPG, not in use. GFJ (talk) 11:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "not in use", and why is this a reason for deletion? Chenspec (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The comment "not in use" is just a side note, not the reason for deletion. The reason for deletion is the image's redundancy to the other, basically duplicate image, see the link above. A future need/use of both of these images for educational purposes is hard to imagine. GFJ (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This issue came up in the past and I asked what was right to do. I was told that because you cannot anticipate user needs, you should give all the options to choose from Chenspec (talk) 11:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly redundant to File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (72).JPG, not in use. GFJ (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "not in use", and why is this a reason for deletion? Chenspec (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The comment "not in use" is just a side note, not the reason for deletion. The reason for deletion is the image's redundancy to the other, basically duplicate image, see the link above. A future need/use of both of these images for educational purposes is hard to imagine. GFJ (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This issue came up in the past and I asked what was right to do. I was told that because you cannot anticipate user needs, you should give all the options to choose from Chenspec (talk) 11:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 15:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly redundant to File:Azriely Towers מגדלי עזריאלי (77).JPG, not in use. GFJ (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "not in use", and why is this a reason for deletion? Chenspec (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The comment "not in use" is just a side note, not the reason for deletion. The reason for deletion is the image's redundancy to the other, basically duplicate image, see the link above. A future need/use of both of these images for educational purposes is hard to imagine. GFJ (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This issue came up in the past and I asked what was right to do. I was told that because you cannot anticipate user needs, you should give all the options to choose from Chenspec (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 15:00, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Shanze1 (talk) 05:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: from where? what? No reasons exposed. Ruthven (msg) 12:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37LcbYW0-10 Shanze1 (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Here is even watermark "indiaglitz.com", what kind of own work is it? Taivo (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Previously published at https://www.reverbnation.com/page_object/page_object_photos/artist_6616763?photo=32256131 if not other locations Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reverbnation is an online music distributing company. The copyright of photo doesn't belong to the company. It belongs to the Musical Artist discussed in Draft:Ore Clarke. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.210.47.205 (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:03, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+ see files.  Delete --Микола Василечко (talk) 06:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by 1989. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.isi.az/az/content/168
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion/more research, as external hit has markedly lower resolution than our version. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP, no exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1992. No Permission from the sculptor К. Сікорський. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1992. No Permission from the sculptor К. Сікорський. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 2002. No Permission from the sculptor Юліан Савко. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, Lex Tollenaar (user: ARTol) the uploader of this file, made a terrible mistake. The file is useless and nerds to be removed. ARTol (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). I am concerned due to a lack of EXIF data, so the "Own work" description can be called into question, but I also wanted more eyes on this file to see if it's really a copyright violation or just possibly a crop. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). This file is old enough to fall under "{{PD-Thailand}}" as its author is unknown, so  Keep. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Donald Trung. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). I don't see any reason why this file would be a copyright violation so  Keep, it's old enough to fall under "{{PD-Thailand}}". Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Donald Trung. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grigiorosso48 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Team and other photos, unlikely to be own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The sports club Unione Sportiva La Torre holds the rights to all the images mentioned and, through its president, is the owner of the Grigiorosso48 user. The images can be found on the Wikipidia page of Unione Sportiva La Torre in Italian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grigiorosso48 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Grigiorosso48: Potrebbe, in qualità di presidente, scriverci a permissions-it@wikimedia.org da un indirizzo email ufficiale del club Unione Sportiva La Torre, per dare i diritti di pubblicazione nei termini della licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal? Se non ci arriva un'autorizzazione ufficiale, i file saranno verosimilmente cancellati. Grazie --Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and no permission was sent. - FitIndia Talk 19:48, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thuthignr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re vintages images. Please explain why public domain in India.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:23, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the original work is from a Dunhuang mural, the producer still holds the copyright. Thyj (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 05:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by R23wilson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Everything by user is copyvio, the last ones are likely too.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:13, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this discussion, taking photographs in bus interchanges is not allowed under law. It might not infringe on copyright, but via COM:PCP, let not allow such illegal photos to be circulated and to be reused. This is a test-case request for deletion, there are many other such images. Let use this to establish some consensus. cc User:Jianhui67 as the only (I think) Singaporean sysop on common. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Inappropriate application of COM:PCP; see COM:NCR. --King of ♥ 06:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File on pixabay is from 2015 and is a mix of a photo and some art. The photo seems to be from 2008 https://www.taringa.net/+arte/megapost-homenaje-a-carl-sagan_g4pi4 and the art is unknown. NASA have a version from 2008 https://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/sagan-20080903.html but it is unclear if they have the copyright. MGA73 (talk) 18:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative work of a copyrighted photo. See [1]. FunnyMath (talk) 20:05, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 06:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map shows EU (including UK) and Western Sahara in green but Western Sahara is obviously not part of the EU! --2A02:908:C31:C260:D5C7:7C0D:ABD1:E1CE 16:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And Greenland is not part of the EU either.  Delete --Pugilist (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Inaccurate to the point that there is no foreseeable educational use. --King of ♥ 06:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS, the depictions on the Matryoshka Dolls are not free to use, they are from GCTC's photographs! Ras67 (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нарушение авторских прав Barbarian (talk) 17:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source, the photo was taken around 1951. However, knowing neither the date of the author’s death nor the date of publication, it cannot be argued that it is in the public domain. — Ирука13 09:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Walter Tiemann died 1951, by that it will be in PD in 2022 Goesseln (talk) 16:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file was uploaded with the claim that the author of the book (Rainer Maria Rilke, 1875-1926) holds the copyright, and that it was published in 1899. I assume the gounds for this dispute are that you believe that 1) the illustrator was Walter Tiemann, 2) Tiemann died in 1951, 3) that the illustration was not a work for hire where the rights were transferred, and 4) that the work was published in 1920. Did I summarise that correctly? --Krinkle 17:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
almost
today I ordered the first edition of 1905 in the UB Tübingen (signature : Dk XI 4409 ca)
@4: the book is from 1905
@1, 3: de:Walter Tiemann is mentioned in the book as the creator of the cover, title and some more
see the text of 1905 at another place in the edition of 1918: https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Seite:Das_Stundenbuch_%28Rilke%29_108.jpg
--Goesseln (talk) 17:59, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Walter Tiemann's year of death 1951. According to German copyright law, the duration of copyright is always for 70 years after the year in which the person who created the work died; neither the date of first publication nor any rights transfers or "work for hire" change that. German copyright law has the concept that the "Urheberrecht" and thus the duration of protection as such always remains bound to the person who created the work, even if made for hire, and even if the full rights of use were transferred. Undelete in 2022. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted as Walter Tiemann works are now in Public Domain. Platonides (talk) 23:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per File:Ajda Pekkan introducing Süperstar 83 Transparent LP, Hürriyet 19.03.1983.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image from a Turkish newspaper published in 1983. Description says "The photo of the page was taken by me"; I think that just means that the uploader has photographed that page of the newspaper, not that it's their original photograph published in the newspaper. --Gestumblindi (talk) 11:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Used in a draft on enwp, but it's not advancing since january. Still, it's used in an article [draft]. grin 08:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused now, likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, http://eduonline.hbionline.org/moodle/, please explain why public domain in India. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - historical image, bogus license. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, http://eduonline.hbionline.org/moodle/, please explain why public domain in India. Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - historical image, bogus license. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, a scan per exif Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image comes straight from the Grauer School website. This account is "owned (for lack of a better term)" and operated by the Grauer School. So we are using a photo we own and have full rights to, in Stuart's bio image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosielee3 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
@Rosielee3: You will need to get permission from the photographer who took the image Gbawden (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is a protected trademark of the of the Austrian Fire Brigade Association - uploading the image to wiki is illegal. MathiasSeyfert (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Die Trademark wird auch nicht berührt, denn die Markenrechte gelten weiter, es wird nur zur Darstellung verwendet. --K@rl (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Das Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf hier nicht veröffentlicht ("Darstellung") werden.--MathiasSeyfert (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Und wer ist der Urheber, der ÖBFV kann es ja nicht sein, da der Urheber nur eine natürlcihe Person sein kann. --K@rl (talk) 07:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Das neue Korpsabzeichen wurde 1970 von Bezirksfeuerwehrkommandant Friedrich Diemmer für den ÖBFV entworfen. (Unterlagen und Beschlüsse liegen uns vor, siehe unter anderem "Jahrbuch 2010 Sonderausgabe 120 Jahre ÖBFV")--MathiasSeyfert (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aber das ist bei Darstellung wie bei jedem Gemeindewappen auch bei den Körperschaften nach dem Wappengesetz. --K@rl (talk) 07:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Im Wappengesetz steht nichts davon, dass das Korpsabzeichen dargestellt werden darf.--MathiasSeyfert (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Interessant ist dass der OÖ LV sein Logo insgesamt unter CC-BY stellt, das dürfte er gar nicht wenn es tatsächlich so wäre. --K@rl (talk) 07:58, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dazu habe ich keinen Hinweis gefunden. Der LFV weiß davon nichts.--MathiasSeyfert (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oder sagst es dem AFK Großgerungs, wo du das siehst http://www.afkgrossgerungs.at/cms/index.php?style=ser_downloads --K@rl (talk) 08:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AFK Großgerungs wurde informiert. Die können nichts unterlizensieren, was ihnen nicht gehört.--MathiasSeyfert (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wie funktioniert nun die Löschung? Wer kann die Löschung genehmigen? Muss man sich per Anwalt an legal@wikimedia.org wenden? --MathiasSeyfert (talk) 09:10, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wie du meine Fragen nicht beantwortet hast, kann ich dir da leider auch nicht weiterhelfen. die Mailadresse kenn ich nicht. --K@rl (talk) 10:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geht dieses Anliegen vom Urheber (= Gestalter dieses Symboles) aus, oder vom ÖBFV, weil das Benutzungsrecht vom Urheber nur ausdrücklich dem ÖBFV übertragen wurde und dieser Verein über die LFKDOs an die einzelnen Feuerwehren weiter übertragen wurde? Gut Wehr! --GT1976 (talk) 11:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vom ÖBFV, weil Dritte (z.B. Firmen) durch die Zurverfügungstellung auf Wiki glauben, dass das Korpsabzeichen von User Amada44 erstellt wurde und nun unter "public domain" steht. Der User Amada44 kann aber hier kein geistiges Eigentum hochladen und veröffentlichen, wenn er nicht die Berechtigung dazu hat.--MathiasSeyfert (talk) 11:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aus meiner Sicht wäre dann zu klären, wer diese Berechtigung hat. Der ÖBFV kann nicht Urheber sein, sondern jene Person, die das Symbol erschaffen hat. Da der Verein das Korpsabzeichen kommerziell verkauft, gehe ich davon aus, dass er auch weiß, wer der Urheber ist. --GT1976 (talk) 13:05, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Die Entstehungsgeschichte ist hier schön beschrieben, ab Seite 30: https://www.noe122.at/feuerwehrgeschichte/fg_publikation_prometheus_1991-2.pdf Im Gegensatz dazu würde ich nun auch gerne von Amada44 wissen, worauf sich seine / ihre Rechte an dem Bild begründen - die Nachweise fehlen.--MathiasSeyfert (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Auf Seite 32 steht, dass das Zeichen gesetzlich nicht geschützt ist. Interessant ist hier jedoch die Urheberrechtsfrage. Ist der Urheber nicht bekannt, dann würde nach meiner Ansicht auch der ÖBFV, oder jemand anderer, der das Symbol kommerziell oder aus anderen Gründen veröffentlicht, das selbe Risiko tragen, wie Benutzer Amada44, falls sich ein Urheber (z. B. jemand, der Nachweisen kann, dass er das Werk um 1970 geschaffen hat bzw. ein Rechtsnachfolger) meldet und Forderungen anstellt. :-) . --GT1976 (talk) 13:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Auf Seite 32 steht, dass es 1991 nicht als Marke angemeldet war. Aber ich spare mir hier die weitere Diskussion, weil es Zeitverschwendung ist. Ihr schützt eine fragwürdige Veröffentlichung und schadet damit der Wikipedia. *kopfschüttel* --MathiasSeyfert (talk) 14:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ich schütze niemanden., es geht um Fakten. Ein sinnvoller Dialog und eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema wäre zielführender, als Emotionen. --GT1976 (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Könnte es nicht sein, dass armada das Logo selbst gezeichnet wenn auch nicht selbst entworfen hat. Ich werde auch ein Foto hochladen, wo ich das Logo gestickt habe, damit bin ich der Urheber auch wenn es nach dem Markenrecht eben nur zur Anschauung verwendet weren darf. Ich finde es auch bedauerlich, wenn zahlreiche Feuerwehrleute Fotos aus Wikipedia verwenden und sie auch Urheberrechtsvergehen damit machen, würde aber nicht mit dem Anwalt drohen. --K@rl (talk) 15:20, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Durch das Nachzeichnen (oder auch: Abfotografieren) wird man aber nicht zum Urheber. Für die deutschsprachige Wikipedia haben wir die Problematik unter de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte#Logos zusammengestellt, ich kenne jetzt die rechtliche Situation in Österreich nicht genau, würde aber "geringe Schöpfungshöhe" verneinen. Ebenso sehe ich nicht, wie man sich auf das Wappenrecht zurückziehen könnte - es ist ja nun kein Wappen einer österreichischen Gebietskörperschaft. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
aber einer Körperschaft --K@rl (talk) 17:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Das Markenschutz besteht ist mir schon klar, zumindest für Österreich - ob sie weltweit gilt, kann ich nicht sagen. Aber werde der Urheber ist um anzufragen, wurde leider noch immer nicht angegegen. Und unverständlcih ist mir in diesem Zusammenhang, dass der OÖ Landesfeuerwehrverband das Wappen unter CC-BY stellt. siehe https://wiki.ooelfv.at/public/index.php/Datei:BOS_OOE.PNG --K@rl (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen @MathiasSeyfert: . Das Wappen ist sicher nicht richtig lizensiert. Das ist ein Fehler meinerseits. Meine Zeichnung basiert auf dieser Datei von Benutzer @Ch.baumi: welche in der Zwischenzeit (2013) gelöscht wurde wegen einer fehlender Lizenz da nur {{Wappenrecht}} unter der Datei stand. Ich habe dies in der Datei korrigiert. Ich bin kein Experte Österreichischen Urheberrechts aber würde dieses Werk nicht unter Amtliches Werk fallen und somit nicht geschützt sein? Im Österreichischen Urheberrecht steht dass: ... sowie ausschließlich oder vorwiegend zum amtlichen Gebrauch hergestellte amtliche Werke der im § 2 Z 1 oder 3 bezeichneten Art genießen keinen urheberrechtlichen Schutz. . Amada44  talk to me 10:45, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noch eine Kleinigkeit, das Logo ist in der Zwischenzeit auch Teil eines österreichischen Kraftfahrzeugkennzeichens. Also kann man es als offizielles Wappen einer österreichischen Körperschaft bezeichnen. siehe hier --K@rl (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Amada44 comment, the original file were deleted, copyright status unclear. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio (https://www.facebook.com/JMalacova/photos/a.991822954317554/1391117574388088/?type=3&eid=ARBSbhshSwiEy-PkhFbSFcUkLpd1TMxQe_01sfIN7T3ca86Syc_lveY1VLvNB3fpWYqiy81ndc2j9pPY) Patriccck (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Fotografie neporušuje autorská práva. Autorka fotografie Nina Vránová je zaměstnankyní Ministerstva práce a sociálních věcí ČR a fotografie byla uvolněna s jejím výslovným souhlasem na osobní žádost ministryně práce a sociálních věcí Jany Maláčové. https://www.mpsv.cz/web/cz/media-a-verejnost — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filip Kůt Citores (talk • contribs) 14:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per the uploader comment above, author is Nina Vránová, a permission must be sent to com:OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia. — Ирука13 13:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The info should be corrected, yes, probably with a {{Scan}} in the source field. But deletion on that ground seems dubious. I don't read Farsi, but the year is clearly given as 1890. Don't we expect works of that age to be PD unless there is reason to believe otherwise? --LPfi (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it is in scope? "Persian text" is quite vague, and this cover is just a text that can be rendered in any other way. --Ruthven (msg) 16:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Geagea. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MHIRM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP in Turkey only for Works of fine arts permanently placed on public streets.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, I think that these photos are suitable for the conditions of COM:FOP in Turkey also. "Photographic works and slides" and "graphic works" are also "works of fine arts" according to the law as it is stated in the policy page, COM:FOP Turkey. I believe these images are under these categories. Regards. - MHIRM talk 16:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep No problem about permanently displayed photographs and FoP in Turkey. If you want to create that kind of deletion requests you can try your luck with this one which is not on a permanent display and therefore a DW. E4024 (talk) 17:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - not permanent. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is reason to believe that the uploader is not the owner of the copyright for the photo: the file description says that a professional photographer was hired, but even a month or even a year of production is unknown. Also a photo of low quality for such a situation. And its extension (GIF) also adds doubt. The sections "author" and "source" also contradict each other. — Ирука13 18:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no pemission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded on pixabay in 2014 but similar images can be found on Tineye from before that date. For example https://evitnews.blogspot.com/2010/05/top-10-moments-from-2009-10-school-year.html - question is if its a COM:DW or PD-ineligible. MGA73 (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many hits on Tineye. Some before upload date on pixabay and some in bigger versions. For example https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-iJDKFmcnJVc/WF3gn5oFECI/AAAAAAAAQKk/TedP64NNXJYb0mitb6GUQPUNOn3SyYBAACJoC/w1920-h855/santa-1862411_1920.jpg MGA73 (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image on pixabay is a mix of photos. The background seems to be this file from Flickr license ARR https://www.flickr.com/photos/danielnebreda/30542606843/in/pool-tuviajecuentaloconfotos/ MGA73 (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:56, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe die Grafik durch eine neue bessere mit Quellenangabe ersetzt. Diese ist redundant geworden. Sciencia58 (talk) 06:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. However there is a draft on enwp (not yet linking the image) and the image is released by the personality rights holder so it may not be easy to replace. I cannot judge the importance of the person himself (some petrol related leader, may be important for local people). I cannot judge whether to delete it or not, but I disagree that it's a speedy. -- grin 07:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Grin: You shouldn't disagree because draft has been refused on English Wikipedia so person is COM:CSD#F10 for Commons. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC) Draft has nothing to do with image, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I see that the draft was refused, but still it's there, the author is still actively trying, therefore the image is (technically) being used. It may be voted to be deleted; it cannot honestly said that "it's not used anywhere at all". It is also not practical to delete the image until the newest draft is rejected and I notice the author is collecting extensive amount of external references into the draft, so it may be accepted someday. --grin 08:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Grin: Please note the draft (Jouan Salem Al Dhaheri, dead at 63) seems unrelated to the image (Mohamed Jouan Al Dhaheri). I can ensure you Commons Administrators don't consider images within a refused draft as COM:INUSE and always delete them. Regarding the "practicability" a file can be undeleted at a glance by them and it's always like it works here but let's an Administrator confirm it to you. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused now, likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:34, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 There is a draft of a (one man) band using the image. grin 08:02, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Grin: Was not used at the time of the DR. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: I did not mean to offend you. If you believe it's no longer valid to delete please remove the template and associated entries. Thank you! --grin 08:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused now, likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Image is used on ruwp in the incubator. grin 08:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Grin: Was not used at the time of the DR. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: I did not mean to offend you. If you believe it's no longer valid to delete please remove the template and associated entries. Thank you! --grin 08:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused now, likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krassotkin as no permission (No permission since) VLu (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

also published at https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3525879/mediaviewer/rm4001776128, authorship is unclear Ytoyoda (talk) 16:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. Please have the copyright holder contact COM:OTRS. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tofig_Babayev
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion/research, as the external hit has markedly lower resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It appears that the actual original source is http://m.science.gov.az/en/forms/2763/, which has no indication of a free license. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

as these have been blurred out,
Delete the other 2 as non-savable. –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
People browsing through these may want to know what the building sort of looked like..... The blurred images still have some scope and value to them, You nominated these due to characters being present however I have obviously resolved that so at this point there's currently no valid reason to delete them. –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck 2 images since both of those sort of have the same view in other images, The 2 remaining images don't have that area in it and so for that reason imho those 2 should be kept,
These images IMHO still have some value to them and regardless of usage readers will want to know what the building inside looks like and the area in both images hasn't been taken in any other images in the main category. –Davey2010Talk 15:02, 13 February 2020
One image is currently not blurred due to WMF constantly bringing up server errors, Until the WMF get that fixed unfortunately for the time being the image will have to remain unblurred as there's no possible way new versions can be uploaded, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Fails DW and Out of scope anyway. (Not that it needs reiterating but these were all uploaded as part of an album and limitations at Flickr2Commons meant they all had to be uploaded IE couldn't pick and choose). –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of early enough publication to be PD

PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What would be early enough? There is at least one photo said to be from 1940. If it was published anonymously at that time, it seems it would be PD. What does "краснодонский фотограф" mean? Are the depicted persons famous? Is it probable that images at the given source were published soon after being made? --LPfi (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So it is Ulyana Gromova (executed 1943) and the photographer is simply said to be from Krasnodon, appearently anonymous. As she was a national hero, the photos are likely to have been published early. If Ukrainan copyright law applies, our guide says: "A Ukrainian or Ukrainian SSR work is in the public domain in Ukraine if it was published before 1 January 1951, and the creator (if known) died before that date." It seems likely that the photos were published before that date. --LPfi (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@LPfi: "It seems likely that the photos were published before that date" That's not sufficient. Regardless of her fame, you are required to provide proof that it was published early enough, not just assume it was published early enough bc the person was famous or whatnot. Per Commons:Burden of proof, if you do not show that they were PUBLISHED early enough, they will have to be deleted, and right now, you have not done that. And remember, photos have to be PD in both the country of first publication AND the US to be allowed on Commons, so for them to be allowed, they would have to have been published before 1946 (in line with the URAA date of likely countries of first publication Ukrainian SSR and Russian SSR).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:54, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know Ukraine, Ukrainian or Russian well enough to do the needed research, communicate with the uploader or review past discussions. I hope somebody does, so that we don't lose files just because nobody bothers. --LPfi (talk) 16:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

사진에 관계없는 사람이 모자이크없이 사용됨. 모자이크 처리하여 재등록 할 예정 김연철 (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eusebius as no source (No source since). I think that this file might be suitable for both "{{PD-1923}}" (in the United States where the photograph was taken) and "{{PD-Thailand}}", as it was published by the Thai (Siamese) government. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per DT. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunofficial1998 as no source (No source since). It has a source, I don't speak Thai so I can't verify if it's in the public domain or not. but it should not be speedy deleted. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The photograph was taken in 1963. If it was published within a few years, fifty years will have elapsed since then and it would be PD in Thailand now (but not before 1996). --Paul_012 (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]