User talk:TedColes

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, TedColes!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, TedColes!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 03:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlanTuring-Bletchley.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

George Ho (talk) 05:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chadburn

[edit]

[1] seems redundant. Already has Category:Chadburns. Is there such a thing as a Chadburn that is not a telegraphic instrument? - Jmabel ! talk 17:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But "Chadburn" does not show up as a sub category of Telegraphy.--TedColes (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then Category:Chadburns is what to fix, not one particular photograph of a Chadburn. I'll do that. - Jmabel ! talk 23:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that.--TedColes (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Copyright status: File:Picture111Shopped.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Picture111Shopped.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: I am sorry if I have transgressed here, but I don't understand how, nor how to put it right. The picture is a Photoshopped version of one of a set of photos taken in 1945 which I am told are therefore out of copyright. Can you please help me. --TedColes (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like Jmabel got this already.[2] Every file must have a license tag. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Magog the Ogre: Thanks--TedColes (talk) 07:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: Thanks for correcting my mistake--TedColes (talk) 07:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No need to delete, I've just reverted to the prior version. In any event, majorly cropped images should not overwrite the originals, per COM:OVERWRITE. If you want to have another try, please upload as 5305 at Whitehall Junction (cropped).jpg. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]