Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![30 File:Kenni "The Fox".jpg](#File:Kenni_"The_Fox".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(33744164012).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![157 File:"Crater with red figures" (350-340 BC) "Cassandra and Ajax" .jpg](#File:"Crater_with_red_figures"_(350-340_BC)_"Cassandra_and_Ajax"_.jpg){kind=link}
![158 File:"Crater with red figures" (350-340 BC) , chariot & horses.jpg](#File:"Crater_with_red_figures"_(350-340_BC)_,_chariot_&_horses.jpg){kind=link}
![159 File:"Europa on the bull" - Paestum red-figure chalice krater, signed by Asteas.jpg](#File:"Europa_on_the_bull"_-_Paestum_red-figure_chalice_krater,_signed_by_Asteas.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
The contributor What88 has been blocked and we cannot verify the authenticity of the image or that permission has been granted or that it is not a copyright violation. BigGuy (talk) 02:25, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: accidental DR JuTa 07:36, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Been hacked into 31.125.117.91 19:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Unternehmen besteht nicht mehr (Urheberrecht liegt nicht mehr bei der Firma) YouBrain (talk) 10:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
wrong AND NEED TO EDIT MORE Neena yasmin (talk) 03:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 07:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Rachitjiissisieisu (talk) 02:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 12:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be a selfie, photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
A reuploaded image. Previously deleted as originating from Facebook. No EXIF info. Speeding. OTRS permission from the photographer or with evidence of photographer's permission needed. Ankry (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; reuploaded previously deleted image. --Ankry (talk) 15:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
sujet présente des erreurs Francisco Lourenço (nowico) (talk) 14:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
-2020-01-15T14:54:00.000Z-File:Oleo_20W-50.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
عدم رضایت صاحب اثر Montazaralmahdi (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- MD: "Copyright holder khamenei.ir" --E4024 (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: fixed source and author. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
درخواست پدیدآورنده Montazaralmahdi (talk) 14:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept:
and File:A uniquely unique Player and Milestone.pdf
Out of scope for Commons Alex Cohn (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, this is promotion-only user. Taivo (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
/* File:Bahri BODUR.png */ BAHRİ BODUR (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 22:33, 15 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE --Krdbot 02:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Owen Ung in 2019.png
- File:Owen Ung Sio Cheong.png
- File:Owen Ung Sio Cheong.jpg
- File:Owen Ung.jpg
- File:Ung Sio Cheong Owen.jpg
- File:Owen SC Production.png
- File:Photo of Owen Ung.jpg
- File:Owen Ung.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cmcmunshi2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
protected Wikiloverdeepak (talk) 12:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Obviously not own work. This is from Instagram. Please check, and delete if found to be a copyrighted material. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 05:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Uploader is a proven sockpuppet, and photo is from Instagram. There is no way this is copyright-free. Please delete. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Uploader is a proven sockpuppet, and photo is from Instagram. There is no way this is copyright-free. Please delete. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source."
Keep I contest this nomination on the basis that the source page clearly states "Courtney Johnston, 2019. Photo by Daniel Rose. © Te Papa. CC BY 4.0" -- Wittylama (talk) 02:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I contest this nomination. I am the uploaded of this image. Not only does the image credit clearly state that it is licensed using Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) on the site that is the source, I am the Rights Manager at the institution that is the copyright owner of this image (Te Papa) and I was instructed by my CEO to release this image under the CC BY 4.0 copyright license. Einebillion (talk) 10:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Comment The editor who originally tagged this image as problematic has now removed the deletion tag from the file page directly (diff) and stated on their talkpage that that this was a mistake to make the original tag. Wittylama (talk) 14:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: valid CC-BY-4.0. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:26, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 03:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Music and characters are copyrighted and the focus of the video. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Needs OTRS permission, out of COM:SCOPE (promotional). Ahmadtalk 16:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Probably not a selfie, photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused file. Unexplained photo. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raL8rcQPy9c Ytoyoda (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Metadata says "Copyright 2016 adrian daniel. All rights reserved." Ytoyoda (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
The photo was taken by a personal friend and not sure how it violated copyright policy. Will replace it without further discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annieb7 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; please send permission from the person who took it. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2011. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
article associé à la photo supprimé — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dedene75 (talk • contribs) 2019-12-12T19:12:46 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 15:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Dedene75 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: la photo est la photo personnelle d'un non contributeur et utilisée sans son accord
Is in use. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE, French actor so possibly in scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Entirely replaced by File:CRS members.svg. Poor quality image. Outdated and unused. Redundant File. Ratherous (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo. Probably private Hjart (talk) 19:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
![19:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/01/15#c-Hjart-2020-01-15T19:41:00.000Z-File:Kenni_"The_Fox".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
![07:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/01/15#c-Gbawden-2020-01-22T07:51:00.000Z-File:Kenni_"The_Fox".jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo. Probably private Hjart (talk) 19:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Curved cropping indicates this is a social media photo, not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 19:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be an Instagram photo: Ytoyoda (talk) 19:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Image credit goes to MMA Junkie Ytoyoda (talk) 19:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Image comes from http://www.firststeps.de/filmkatalog/filmemacher/show-person.html?tx_e27firststepswfqbe_pi1%5BID%5D=0b8ee717-ef6d-7016-80dd-113b81b8af99 Ytoyoda (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Missing permission by the author per EXIF (Galynych Oleg galynych.com). A.Savin 20:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of File:CI Dep of SSU.png. Kwasura (talk) 08:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep it has small resolution, but hasn't sliced sides.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 14:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 20:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Far more superior version is available VileGecko (talk) 20:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Clip art previously used at https://www.vperemen.com/alkogolizm/ Ytoyoda (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ytoyoda you are right! but i add the correct author of the image and the source. And as you can see on the source page the license of the img is CC 4.0. Just click on the img on the websiteVperemen (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Vperemen: Ah, sorry, should've looked closer! I'm withdrawing the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: All is well, Thank you for your work! Vperemen (talk) 11:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Vperemen: Ah, sorry, should've looked closer! I'm withdrawing the nomination. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ytoyoda you are right! but i add the correct author of the image and the source. And as you can see on the source page the license of the img is CC 4.0. Just click on the img on the websiteVperemen (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyvio per c:COM:FOP Hong Kong. The artwork appears to qualify as a "graphic work" and is therefore not eligible for FOP in Hong Kong. Yoninah (talk) 20:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- The artwork is "situated... in premises open to the public", hence not a copyright infringement. Cypp0847 (talk) 06:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- That only applies to "works of artistic craftsmanship". This is a "graphic work". See COM:FOP UK for a more detailed explanation of the difference. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 11:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and above. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 11:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal artwork (?), out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ugurlu Sharifov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same series as File:Sharifov Ugurlu.jpg. Permission of Samir Ramazanov needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
The given source ([2]) is not CC-BY. Uploader removed a npd tag, so nominating instead of tagging for speedy deletion again. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
All of these files are duplicated to Category: Demonstration against abortion at the University of Toronto (17 November 2009) --Trade (talk) 22:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:November Demonstration Against Abortion (4112915917).jpg
- File:November Demonstration Against Abortion (4112917153).jpg
- File:November Demonstration Against Abortion (4112929931).jpg
- File:November Demonstration Against Abortion (4113688758).jpg
- File:November Demonstration Against Abortion (4113690430).jpg
- File:November Demonstration Against Abortion (4113691868).jpg
- File:Demonstration off to a good start (4112913737).jpg
- File:Handing out pamphlets (4112925817).jpg
- File:Counter-Protesters (4113693432).jpg
- File:Protest to the Protest (4112918699).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 01:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused self-promotional image Jochen Burghardt (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; G10 advertising. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vitor Bueno Music (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
This file is not PD-ineligible. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Violeta1290 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unusable image files.
Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 05:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused file. Photo of mystery object without meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused diagram without explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused diagram without explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Unused diagram without explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Eran Katz on page 2. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
No permission since|month=January|day=15|year=2020 Symbiocean (talk) 13:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Previously published on various websites, see TinEye. Permission needed. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 13:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiloverdeepak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, missing permission.
- File:Gireesh puthenchery receiving best lyricist award from Dhakshinamoorthi.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery receiving best lyricist award from bhaskaran master.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiloverdeepak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photos, missing permission.
- File:Gireesh puthenchery lyrics.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery pyarilal.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery p jayachandran.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery venugopal.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery mg sreekumar.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery vairamuthu.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery photo.jpg
- File:Gireesh Puthenchery yesudas.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery ilayaraja.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery ek nayanar.jpg
- File:Balussery image.jpg
- File:Ihrd college calicut.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery receiving best lyricist award from Dhakshinamoorthi.jpg
- File:Gireesh puthenchery receiving best lyricist award from bhaskaran master.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:41, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiloverdeepak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Thamarai Lyricist.jpg
- File:Anil panachooran lyricist.jpg
- File:Statue of gireesh puthenchery.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiloverdeepak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikiloverdeepak (talk · contribs)
[edit]This editor has a history of copyright violations, and is currently blocked indefinitely for abuse of multiple accounts. All of these images are claimed to be own work but that claim is dubious given all of the history copyright violations and the inconsistent EXIF data on the images. For example, File:Sachidanandan Puzhankara.jpg has EXIF indicating it came from Facebook. File:Uoc ems seminar complex.jpg shows it is from a realme 6i mobile phone. File:M jayachandran at Kod 2020.jpg shows it is from a Lenovo A7000-a mobile phone. File:Cltimg.jpg shosw it comes from a Nikon D3200 DSLR.
- File:Deepankuran kaithapram.jpg
- File:Sachidanandan Puzhankara.jpg
- File:Vayalar sarath.jpg
- File:Engineering dept uoc calicut.jpg
- File:Uoc ems seminar complex.jpg
- File:Uoc park.jpg
- File:Uoc calicut entrance.jpg
- File:Kaithapram-signature.svg
- File:Gireesh Puthenchery signature.svg
- File:Pareeksha bhavan uoc.jpg
- File:M jayachandran at Kod 2020.jpg
- File:Cltimg.jpg
- File:IHRD Calicut.jpg
Whpq (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 16:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2018 - 2020 | Niata.Net | All Right Reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Anyway © Texnologia.net Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Thw image is unique and that had been published in the past — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seriani (talk • contribs) 16:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2018 - 2020 | Niata.Net | All Right Reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Out Of Scope; uploaded by a vandal from nl.wiki Sint Aldegonde (talk) 15:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vickyjones123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#G10 or out of COM:SCOPE material.
- File:Coursd’anglais à lyon.jpg
- File:Préparation au test IELTS.jpg
- File:Préparation au test TOEIC.jpg
- File:Placa solar en Las Palmas.jpg
- File:Affordable dentist services in virginia.jpg
- File:Grief counseling washington dc.jpg
- File:Orange county window cleaning.jpg
- File:Orange county pavers.png
- File:Health First Weight Control Image 3.jpg
- File:Brookline Locksmith.jpg
- File:San diego calibration services.jpg
- File:Oakland Painters.jpg
- File:China products ! chinashipshop.jpg
- File:Parcel china.jpg
- File:Event Planner in Singapore.png
- File:Physical therapy commack.jpg
- File:Long beach carpet cleaning.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; most deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vickyjones123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]More spam from this account
- File:Premium sex toys.jpg
- File:Formation d’anglais à Lyon.jpg
- File:Préparation au test TOEFL à Lyon.jpg
TFerenczy (talk) 10:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:03, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Avishek Bhattacharjee Initial Signature.jpg
- File:Avishek Bhattacharjee At Belur Math..jpg
- File:Amarkrishna Result Between- 2014-19.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope for Commons Alex Cohn (talk) 16:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
No commercial use (https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/pages/Copyright--Conditions-of-Use.aspx). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Support - clearly not own work as claimed. Marcnut1996 (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Arorareshma
[edit]- File:Insights,and structures of withdrawing.jpg
- File:Tranquil, words.jpg
- File:Calm in Your presence.jpg
- File:Thoughts, shapes and dimensions.jpg
- File:Life (2).jpg
- File:Tempered by Humaneness.jpg
- File:Renewed.jpg
- File:Round and Square.jpg
- File:Currents of skies.jpg
- File:Fresh Everlasting.jpg
- File:Days of earth on Earth, Days of Heaven in Eternal Light.jpg
- File:Resistance to Suffering.jpg
- File:HeavenHeld.jpg
- File:Near The Words.jpg
- File:Subtle.jpg
- File:Free Structures.jpg
- File:Sky , Wind, Soil, Water.jpg
- File:Positoned.jpg
- File:Valued.jpg
- File:With Light.jpg
- File:The Beauty of Our Closeness.jpg
- File:Caressings of dew.jpg
- File:Day with the Ocean.jpg
- File:Blow , Flow, Glow.jpg
- File:Dense thinking.jpg
- File:Enclosing only You, Life.jpg
- File:Vision of the Abstract.jpg
- File:Space for Art.jpg
- File:Chose, Depth.jpg
- File:Sprawling, winds.jpg
- File:Sun's Hem.jpg
- File:In a dot, waves unlimited.jpg
- File:Pleasures.jpg
- File:On the Heart.jpg
- File:Hemisphere,, still.jpg
- File:Clay Breathing.jpg
- File:Glorious love.jpg
- File:Together , Limitless and Breathing.jpg
- File:Flows from Veins lit.jpg
- File:Faithful, friend.jpg
- File:Uploading the Tidy Strain.png
- File:Art bringing in Repose.png
- File:The Rest of Words, and The Movements of the Words.jpg
- File:Tied from Auras.jpg
- File:Loved.png
- File:They could not devour or burn the soul.png
- File:The Caring One, always along from day to day.jpg
- File:Imperfections.png
- File:I like your presence, and I don't like geometry.jpg
- File:The 'Just Positioning'.jpg
- File:Not, Rocks.png
- File:Not pebbles, not stones, not gems.........not trees, not buds, not roots.png
- File:Titled.png
- File:Without the excesses.jpg
- File:Yours, the Marble broken.jpg
- File:Held close enough to disperse, soil and plant.png
- File:Exactness.png
- File:Soul Mates.jpg
- File:Mud not to mud, but held where you placed your gaze and studies.jpg
- File:Gathering of your Meet with a broken-ice.jpg
- File:Let It Stay ABSTRACT.jpg
- File:Placement as a sun's curve -to have close, the scattered rays.jpg
- File:Within folds, and with unfolding of wings.jpg
- File:CLAY Glow.jpg
- File:Etched-1.png
- File:Crystal heaven , permanent love rotates ,,reflection of Good forever.jpg
- File:Veins ,glorious. resurrected.png
- File:Held together.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
randomly categorised, unused. Art by unknown person. Commons is not the private media repository. --Estopedist1 (talk) 12:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Dylan chevez previously, albeit incompletely, nominated this image for deletion 3 days ago with the reason: "I want to delete all my personal information, for the security of my private life". The original author was Dylan Rene Centeno Chevez. Furthermore, the only usage of this file is User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2014 January 28 00:00. –ToxiBoi! (contribs) 04:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not used; depicted person request. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alomgir Hossain Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a private photo album nor your personal free web host.
File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (973).jpg(revoked)- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (33).jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (527).jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (52).jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (48).jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (1).jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (703).jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (704).jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Agree for all files except (File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (973).jpg) this one. Because he is with famous film actor w:Omar Sani, and there is no image of him in commons.--Afifa Afrin (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Agree, struck out. --Achim (talk) 20:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- CptViraj (📧) 08:58, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alomgir Hossain Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a photo album. Out of scope.
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 10.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 09.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 08.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 07.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 06.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 04.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 05.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 03.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 01.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan 02.jpg
- File:Khan Saheb.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan (973).jpg
Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 02:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Pre previous nom...!. --Herby talk thyme 15:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alomgir Hossain Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Simply using Commons as a hosting platform after warnings
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan .jpg
- File:Make-Alomgir-Hossain-Khan.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan01.jpg
- File:Alomgir Hossain Khan.jpg
Herby talk thyme 15:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alomgir Hossain Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Procedural listing of file tagged for deletion per above, but never listed. ƏXPLICIT 12:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: All files already deleted. --Minoraxtalk 11:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
doesn't look like own work, was used for spamming at meta.wikimedia.org Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:03, 29 Januar 2020 UTC: CSD G10 (files and pages created as advertisements) --Krdbot 13:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
File:'Go Wellington'-trolley bus in green fern livery at Courtenay Place on the last day of service (31 Oct 2017).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Permission from the author's partner is needed A1Cafel (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:'Go_Wellington'-trolley_bus_in_green_fern_livery_at_Courtenay_Place_on_the_last_day_of_service_(31_Oct_2017).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020012610005095. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 08:49, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
File:'Go Wellington'-trolley bus in green fern livery crossing Taranaki Street on the last day of service (31 Oct 2017).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Permission from the author's partner is needed A1Cafel (talk) 11:07, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:'Go_Wellington'-trolley_bus_in_green_fern_livery_crossing_Taranaki_Street_on_the_last_day_of_service_(31_Oct_2017).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020012610005095. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 23:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 08:50, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
File:The Ladies of Shaheen Bagh poster as Shaheen Bagh protests anti nrc caa New Delhi 7 Jan 2020.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 16:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 16:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: very small size, no Exif, user upload history 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:PCP. --Ahmadtalk 16:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Choikwangmo9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparently no Commercial, no Derivatives.
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식11.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식10.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식9.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식8.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식7.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식6.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식5.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식4.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식3.jpg
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식2.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- File:독도 헬기추락 순직 소방항공대원 합동 영결식1.jpg: Listing unlisted file. – Kwj2772 (talk) 14:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: KOGL Type 4: NC & ND. – Kwj2772 (talk) 09:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Apparently no Commercial, no Derivatives. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Kwj2772 at 09:57, 8 Februar 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Choikwangmo9 --Krdbot 13:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Image fails COM:WHERE LICENSE under 'show more'. No evidence of free license. Leoboudv (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Sorry for the mistake in the source link, the screenshot was actually extracted from this video which is provided under the appropriate Creative Commons license. I've made the correction in the file metadata. --George2etexte (talk) 03:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Source corrected and is CC BY 3.0 under the free Youtube license. George2etexte for free youtube images, you should type {{Youtube}} rather than CC BY 3.0 so people know it is from Youtube. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:15, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
There exists already an nearly identcal map File:ROC_2020_Presidential_Election_Township_level_en.svg, I was not aware of, when uploading this map. We do not need two maps. Furfur ⁂ Diskussion 00:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted drawing A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- A1Cafel The drawing is copyrighted? DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep -- no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיקע פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndike preferentsn talk contribs 07:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any potential violation of any kind of derivation of copyrighted materials. Dey subrata (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a single poster used in the protest is copyrighted, they are created and freely distributed and are in public domain. no one claims copyright to these posters. Secondly, it a independent work depicting how Shahen Bagh protest using posters for protest. Poster protest is used in everywhere in the world and those posters always in public domain as are widely distributed. Not a derivative work. Dey subrata (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Dey subrata: Can you prove that all these posters are in the public domain by sending an email to the OTRS system? Please note that these posters being available to public doesn't necessarily mean that they are in the public domain. Ahmadtalk 16:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- I need not to prove that but you need to prove that these are derivative works. Indian Copyrights Act 1957 does not describe what you are describing, there is no such law on this kind of work.
- What is the work- A photgraph of street where posters are hanged for a protest used by hundreds of people during the protest.
- No name of creator on any of the posters.
- Around 80 pecent of the posters are sloganeering and some sloganeering which are also dervied from other similar slogans from past are not copyrighted.
- In the photograph not only one poster is photographed, but multiple posters, which is again cannot be called as derivative work.
- If we talk about pictures or animation, for example Gandhi that is not a copyrighted, the Nazi Hitler, thats too in public domain already derived from Nazi world war posters.
- Anyone can put anything on street but for that it can be called that one cannot take photographs of a shop/steet/colony, thats not how its described in copyright laws.
- I need not to prove that but you need to prove that these are derivative works. Indian Copyrights Act 1957 does not describe what you are describing, there is no such law on this kind of work.
- @Dey subrata: Can you prove that all these posters are in the public domain by sending an email to the OTRS system? Please note that these posters being available to public doesn't necessarily mean that they are in the public domain. Ahmadtalk 16:28, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
I don't see any reason for deletion, untill and unless any creator if ever object to this with prove can be considered for deltion. Dey subrata (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep Not a single poster used in the protest is copyrighted, they are created and freely distributed and are in public domain. No one claims copyright to these posters. Secondly, its an independent work depicting how Shahen Bagh protest using posters for protest. A photgraph of a street/colony where certain posters put to be used by 1000s of protesters to represent their voice cannot comes under copyright laws. There is no such laws described in the Indian Copyright Act, 1957. Only if someone who is the creator of the poster if ever object with certified proofs can be considered for deletion. Dey subrata (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Clear copyright violation copied from instagram. Low resolution. No metadata. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
sorry - definitely not "own work" Bahnmoeller (talk) 06:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No Metadata. Low resolution image. Clear copyright violation. Good chance to get a good picture of this living person. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 06:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
notability? Hoax? See en:User:Bunny Mast/sandbox/Bunny Mast Estopedist1 (talk) 09:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
This was uploaded so I could practice creating Wikipedia articles. Please leave my files alone. - Bunny Mast
- Also on soundcloud in lower res: https://i1.sndcdn.com/avatars-000707656285-bikjjm-t500x500.jpg --Achim (talk) 15:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Again. This was uploaded so I could practice creating Wikipedia articles in my sandbox. My sandbox is my personal creation page. Why are you nominating the deletion of my content that is being used for learning purposes? - Bunny Mast
Wikipedia sandbox reads, "This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft." Please refrain from nominating content within my sandbox for deletion due to doubts of its reliability. My sandbox is a work-in-progress page. - Bunny Mast
Estopedist1 Please read the above - Bunny Mast
Deleted: questionable educational value. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Dupliate of File:Mari Arroka - Olazti.jpg Theklan (talk) 10:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: redirected by Túrelio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Composite of two images, of which one has been deleted from Commons. Lymantria (talk) 11:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- The content of the image is important, but wwe have the better quality File:Sanchi Ashoka Capitol reconstitution.jpg. the file should be redirected there, as it used in various wikis. Johnbod (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 11:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Seems to be a screen capture of a live performance, possibly a YouTube video. According to TinEye, it first appeared here. No record of it on Internet. Royalbroil (talk · contribs) not known to violate copyright. Will ping editor on the English project. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Neutral I moved the file from the English Wikipedia to Commons. Nothing about the image worried me at that time or else I wouldn't have moved it. Zooming in to look at the image in the light of it possibly being a photograph of video feed, I think it looks possible (thus a copyright infringement). It's not definitive either way. Royalbroil 13:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of another file with vector version also available VileGecko (talk) 20:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of another file with vector version also available VileGecko (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of another file with vector version also available VileGecko (talk) 20:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Inferior duplicate of another file with vector version also available VileGecko (talk) 20:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Inferior duplicate of another file with vector version also available VileGecko (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:36, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Inferior duplicate of another file with vector version also available VileGecko (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
See here for more info. Not "own work", no permission. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:39, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F1, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work Frodar (talk) 23:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Public Domain Mark 1.0 of Flickr is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 00:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No source/permission to image found, uploaded by user unrelated to author Nightfury (talk) 08:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC) Nom withdrawn, looks like I overlooked a member rename. Would be nice for users to take care over uploaded images though... :/ Nightfury (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr PDM 1.0 is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Datei mit falschen Maßen hochgeladen, Datei ist doppelt und wird nicht mehr gebraucht Mamas bauchladen (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
No real indication that this uploader has rights to this image from https://hitwicket.com/superstars/ or that he is the creator. Acabashi (talk) 11:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Not made from easily accessible place. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
на фото Дома шоссе в Лаврики, а не дома Нового Девяткино 84.204.171.102 12:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC) in the photo - houses in Lavriky, not houses of New Devyatkino
- No. This photo was taken in Devyatkino. Even if not, this is not grounds for removal. Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 04:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I updated the logos of the sponsors, and when I tried to upload the new version of the poster, the file remained the same. So, I uploaded the new poster as a new file. GLAMHacker (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I updated the logos of the sponsors, and when I tried to upload the new version of the poster, the file remained the same. So, I uploaded the new poster as a new file. GLAMHacker (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I updated the logos of the sponsors, and when I tried to upload the new version of the poster, the file remained the same. So, I uploaded the new poster as a new file. GLAMHacker (talk) 13:09, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I updated the logos of the sponsors, and when I tried to upload the new version of the poster, the file remained the same. So, I uploaded the new poster as a new file. GLAMHacker (talk) 13:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I updated the logos of the sponsors, and when I tried to upload the new version of the poster, the file remained the same. So, I uploaded the new poster as a new file. GLAMHacker (talk) 13:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I updated the logos of the sponsors, and when I tried to upload the new version of the poster, the file remained the same. So, I uploaded the new poster as a new file. GLAMHacker (talk) 13:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
copyright Gunofficial1998 (talk) 13:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
copyright Gunofficial1998 (talk) 13:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
{{Duplicate}} Symbiocean (talk) 13:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Symbiocean: Which image is this a duplicate of? Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sebari, This image is a duplicate of File:Aquariums_CSM.jpg --Symbiocean (talk) 15:09, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. Flickr PDM 1.0 is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Title (web) suggesting that this image may have COM:NETCOPYVIO A1Cafel (talk) 07:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion: "web" in this context likely means that the image was resized to typical web size. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Sándor Légrády
[edit]- File:Hungary, Budapest Fortepan 71650.jpg
- File:Hungary, Budapest Fortepan 71748.jpg
- File:Hungary, Budapest Fortepan 71992.jpg
- File:Hungary, Budapest Fortepan 71998.jpg
- File:Poster, Sándor Légrády-graphics Fortepan 72031.jpg
- File:Poster, Sándor Légrády-graphics Fortepan 72462.jpg
- File:Poster, Sándor Légrády-graphics Fortepan 72495.jpg
- File:Poster, Sándor Légrády-graphics Fortepan 72496.jpg
- File:Poster, Sándor Légrády-graphics Fortepan 72497.jpg
- File:Poster, crest, Sándor Légrády-graphics Fortepan 72526.jpg
- File:Poster, Sándor Légrády-graphics Fortepan 72556.jpg
- File:Poster, crest, church, sword, double crest, Sándor Légrády-graphics, territorial gain, national emblem, Kossuth coat of arms Fortepan 72589.jpg
- File:'We will live!' poster by Sándor Légrády 1944 Fortepan 72885.jpg
- File:'For Hungarian hero, Hungarian land!' poster by Sándor Légrády, 1944 Fortepan 72902.jpg
These posters were made by Sándor Légrády (1906–1987). Regasterios (talk) 13:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission. Uploader (a PR agency) is not identical with copyright holder. According to the agency's homepage, they started doing PR work for the person shown in the photo (austrian actor Robert Stadlober). Photographer is Christian Pitschl who is not associated with the PR agency. There is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license. Blutgretchen (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
_(33744164012).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(33744164012).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. Flickr PDM 1.0 is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I am against deleting the photo, as it is in the public domain. Raphael Figueira (talk) 08:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Raphael Figueira You did not see 2016 RfC on PDM images. Commons doesn't accept such licensed images unless it is clearly in the public domain under US Federal Government law and some US state laws such as Massachusetts, Florida, North Carolina, Indiana and New Jersey per this wikipedia paper on US state laws on copyright Nothing about Brazil state laws. The license is not CC0 or 'public domain dedication' in this flickr license table which Commons accepts. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:19, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
See Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. Flickr PDM 1.0 is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
درخواست حذف از طرف پدید آورنده Montazaralmahdi (talk) 14:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Too late for a deletion request by the uploader (COM:CSD#G7).
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused photo of non-notable person, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Photo copied from social media Nirjal stha (talk) 14:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, this image is original and that had been published in the past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seriani (talk • contribs) 15:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: previously published images need COM:OTRS. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Not found at URL.
- File:Fractals love and half.jpg
- File:Fractals happy thought.jpg
- File:Fractals abstract art.jpg
- File:Fractals optimism.jpg
- File:Fractals harmony.jpg
- File:Fractals art.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
False date, photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Not the author's own work, missing metadata. Edjoerv (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from FB per EXIF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio certain. Cela ne peut être en aucun cas un travail personnel Hyméros {◕◡◕}✌ 16:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyméros (talk • contribs) 16:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
It has been a mistake Voiper2010 (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted work by Jean-Claude Meynard, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
because Lego1965-logo.svg is not original...doesnt exist Leonel Sohns (talk) 19:15, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Invalid author and source. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Diese Wappendatei bitte löschen, hier handelt es sich um eine Wappendublette und wurde von mir entlinkt. Kann also gelöscht werden. Ollemarkeagle (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Superseded by File:DE-MV 13-0-74-016-01 Damshagen COA.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Silver chromate is an ionic bond, not a covalent bond --Hoa112008 (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jean Droit
[edit]Copyrighted work by Jean Droit (d. 1961), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Birth of Adonis by J.Droit.jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578541799).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578571479).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578575729).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578579248).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578579799).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578658738).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14578755237).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586549970).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586639229).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586646618).jpg
- File:Curiosités médico-artistiques (1907) (14586822177).jpg
- File:Jean Droit - Courcelles Verrerie 1930.jpg
- File:LES BOUES DE LA SOMME.jpg
_(14578541799).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578571479).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578575729).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578579248).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578579799).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578658738).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14578755237).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586549970).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586639229).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586646618).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586822177).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Keep Published before 1924. Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 20:11, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr.Nostalgic: American law is irrelevant since the works are French and France has 70 years p.m.a. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- File:No 3906 page 45.jpg
- File:Paris 1924 Olympics poster.jpg
- File:Somewhat homoerotic poster for the 1924 Olympics in Paris (5773831073).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete As the works were first published in France, the copyright term is +70 since the death of the author. - Fma12 (talk) 15:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, every Commons file must be free in two countries: source country and USA. This file is free from copyright in USA as pre-1924 publication, but copyrighted in France per Patrick Rogel. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jean Droit
[edit]Jean Droit is a French artist. This is not in the public domain in France or in Italy.
- File:Aperitivo Rossi - Jean Droit. LCCN2008680278.jpg
- File:Aperitivo Rossi - Jean Droit. LCCN2008680278.tif
Yann (talk) 20:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, also adding File:Smiling sun art detail, Aperitivo Rossi - Jean Droit. LCCN2008680278 (cropped).jpg Nutshinou Talk! 19:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The trailer from which this screenshot was taken is viewable at https://www.imdb.com/video/vi247005465?ref_=tt_ov_vi. The copyright notice appears from the two minute mark and remains on screen for over seven seconds SchroCat (talk) 07:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Light show, the uploader, gave a response, saying that the notice applies to only the film. I say delete. How can the notice apply to only the film if the trailer contains the notice? I do not think any court (federal, local or any other) would agree with Light show's rationale. Indeed, common sense would say that the trailer is copyrighted because the notice at the end of the trailer can make the trailer copyright as well as the film itself. --George Ho (talk) 03:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, in my opinion main reason for last 7 seconds of the trailer is to show, that not only the film, but also the trailer is copyrighted. Would be simple to remove the © sign or remove last 7 seconds. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
license of en:The Television Pool of Thailand not license of NBT and other digital tv use license of TVPool for on-air. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: The youtube license is valid - if they dont have permission to upload please prove. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This poster is still copyrighted in the US, unlike the UK, which is restored for 95 years p.m.a. 119.94.160.112 03:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I'm the uploader. It's true that the film advertised by this poster, The Third Man, "is still copyrighted in the US" (though in fact the film remains copyrighted in the UK as well). However, the poster art seen here is a distinct work from the film itself. As two distinct works, their copyright statuses are independent of one another and must be assessed separately. Furthermore, this poster is not a UK work at all (even though The Third Man is a British film). The UK poster art—which presumably remains under copyright (though I am no expert in UK copyright law)—features a totally different design. The poster I uploaded was an original design and was first published in the US by an American distribution company; it entered the public domain because it was published pre-1964 and not renewed on time.
- Finally, the poster art does not infringe on any copyrighted characters because the characters' appearances are not visually distinctive. All the characters on the poster are shown wearing commonplace, everyday clothing for the historical period without any special defining traits. One of the characters is depicted only as a close-up of a woman's face with shoulder-length hair. Compare the theatrical release poster for Gone With the Wind, which the Eighth Circuit in Warner Bros. v. AVELA (2011) found to be public domain and not a derivative infringement on the underlying characters from the (still-copyrighted) film. According to the court, the Gone With the Wind characters lacked "cartoonishly unique physical attributes" or "consistent, unique outfit and hairstyle"—think along the lines of Superman's signature costume, or Harry Potter's unique and recognizable combination of several distinctive visual traits (tussled black hair, lightning bolt scar, round glasses). Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small resolution image missing EXIF data, unlikely to be own work
- File:A participant being interviewed.jpg
- File:Anti CAA NRC poster.jpg
- File:CAA NRC being compared to Swachh Bharat on Placards.jpg
- File:Conglomerating protesters.jpg
- File:Defiant Poster.jpg
- File:Ladies carry pro-constitution placards.jpg
- File:Men and women with placards and Indian flags.jpg
- File:Men with placards.jpg
- File:Millineum March at Dharna Chowk near Indira Park.jpg
- File:Mother with kids and protest placards.jpg
- File:Muslim matters placard.jpg
- File:Procession with Indian flags.jpg
- File:Protester holding a victim grandmother's image.jpg
- File:Protester joining other protesters.jpg
- File:Protesters calling for upholding constitution.jpg
- File:Protesters maintaining discipline.jpg
- File:Protesters moving forward.jpg
- File:Protesters moving to the corner to allow traffic.jpg
- File:Proud to be Indian banner.jpg
- File:Two ladies carry Indian flag.jpg
- File:Unity in diversity poster.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 05:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- I wonder what made this nomination! I was uploading these pics with low internet bandwith, hence the EXIF is missing after image were edited. Some of the leftover event images I uploaded later pertaining to the event do carry EXIF, eg: Banner calling for secular values instead of NRC & NPR and Poster calling for equal constitutional rights in India for all.
- An example for edited images earlier is my upload multilingual Autograph of Rajendra Prasad, former president of India, and subsequent reupload of the autograph in only one language for showcasing the autograph in only that language.--Muzammil (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- KeepFaismeen (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep--Faranjuned (talk) 08:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep--- AaqibAnjum (talk) 08:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep--Arif80s (talk) 09:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep What made the proposer to nominate for deletion? I don't feel its a wise nomination. Ahmed Nisar (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The person proposing the deletion (see the history) stated in the edit summary: "Starting mass deletion request". My guess is that a big fraction of images that are uploaded without exif data are copyright violations. But I agree that @A1Cafel: should have been more careful - there could be other cases of honest non-exif-data photos where nobody reacts fast enough to prevent deletion (e.g. photos uploaded by Wikipedians who are no longer active). Given the lack of evidence for this being a copyright violation, the explanation that the poster didn't have the luxury of high bandwidth at that particular time, especially when the world's biggest democracy is playing with fire - censorship/internet cutoffs - is easily a sufficient explanation against a "wikt:fishing expedition". Boud (talk) 00:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Hindustanilanguage: In many of the file descriptions you use the language, "Picture taken from the camera of my friend." Does this mean your friend took the photos? –Juliancolton | Talk 00:32, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Juliancolton: It only refers to the use of his camera while I was taking the photographs. Both of us hail from the same city and witnessed the event. --Muzammil (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Nominated by A1Cafel with rationale "Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required".
Housekeeping. @A1Cafel: you know how VFC works. Show it.
- File:Bishop's throne, 1150-1200, marble, France (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg
- File:Daniel the Prophet, c. 1325, Ugolino di Nerio, pinnacle from an altarpiece, tempera and tooled gold on panel (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg
- File:Partial solar eclipse (2017).jpg
- File:Presentation of Christ in the Temple, Benozzo Gozzoli, 1460-1461 (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg
- File:Honorius III approving the Rule of St. Francis, Bartolome del Castro, c. 1500 (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg
- File:Mass of St. Gregory, c. 1490, attributed to Diego de la Cruz, oil and gold on panel (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg
- File:Apostle Peter Released from Prison, Jacopo di Cione, 1370-1371 (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg
- File:Cloth of St. Veronica, Bernardino Zaganelli, c. 1500, oil on panel, Philadelphia Museum of Art.jpg
- File:Salvator Mundi, c. 1500, Gerard David, Philadelphia Museum of Art.jpg
- File:Dead Christ Supported by Two Angels c. 1472.jpg
- File:Medieval Portrait of Scipio Africanus (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg
- File:Cathedra, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Window, Gregory the Great, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Crucifixion, Rood Screen, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:High Altar and Reredos, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Lady Chapel, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Detail of Reredos, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Augusta French Memorial, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:St. Fiacre Window, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Baptismal Font Cover, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Columbarium and Funerary Chapel, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
- File:Chancel ceiling, Church of the Good Shepherd.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Comments from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bishop's throne, 1150-1200, marble, France (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg:
.jpg){kind=link}
- You have nominated numerous photographs that I have posted for deletion. These are photographs of artwork from the Philadelphia Museum of Art (they are medieval works, and are not themselves under copyright); others are features of my place of worship, Church of the Good Shepherd (Rosemont, Pennsylvania). As to the Philadelphia Museum, I have inquired whether it is permissible from the Museum's view that these be posted on Wikipedia. As to the Church, I am at a loss as to what you consider to be necessary. Each of the photographs both from the Museum and the Church were taken personally by me with my cell phone, and then uploaded from my phone to my facebook page, and thence to Wikipedia. I have more than 1,000 revisions or other entries of various kinds on Wikipedia and have never before had images nominated for deletion. I should mention that I have been a lawyer in the US for many years and are very sensitive to copyright issues. If I truly have misunderstood the license system required by Wikipedia, then I wish to get it right. Thanks. Scribley (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The author has photographed a public domain object / art work. --Commons2020 (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Nothing about Facebook in Metadata. 2D out of copyright image (with incidental 3D frame). What are all these dodgy noms about??? Why is this not properly categorized???? Johnbod (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment This work clearly appears to be public domain, at least in the US. Is there a specific policy on the Commons that requires permission? Should this image be instead hosted on the English Wikipedia?Zfish118 (talk) 17:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Zfish118. Scribley (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep On what grounds? This is well out of copyright. Johnbod (talk) 08:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Comments from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Apostle Peter Released from Prison, Jacopo di Cione, 1370-1371 (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg:
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. This is an out of copyright image. I can't see the reference to FB in the metadata but it is irrelevant anyway. StAnselm (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks StAnselm. Scribley (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Comments from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cloth of St. Veronica, Bernardino Zaganelli, c. 1500, oil on panel, Philadelphia Museum of Art.jpg:
- From the comment above, "Facebook image per Metadata", it looks like some automated tool detected that you had copied the images from Facebook to here. The tool doesn't have any way to know that you copied the picture from your own facebook page, since it can't verify which facebook page is yours. A1Cafel therefore presumed that you had copied the image from Facebook without permission. In the future, I recommend uploading images to Wikipedia directly rather than transferring them from Facebook.
- Additionally, the image's license tags weren't right. This image isn't your "own work". Rather, the image is in the public domain because it is a faithful photographic representation of a two-dimensional work of art that is itself in the public domain. (In the US you can't create a copyrightable image by faithfully reproducing a public-domain two-dimensional work.) I added the {{PD-Art|PD-US-expired}} tag to the image page to reflect this.--Srleffler (talk) 03:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. The poster has addressed the nominator's concern. Also, the nominator missed the fact that the image is in the public domain. I added the {{PD-Art|PD-US-expired}} tag to the image page to reflect this. --Srleffler (talk) 03:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Srleffler. I appreciate your explanations and in future will: (a) avoid uploading via Facebook, and (b) use the appropriate tags for such images. Scribley (talk)
Comments from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Medieval Portrait of Scipio Africanus (Philadelphia Museum of Art).jpg:
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Nothing about Facebook in Metadata. Johnbod (talk) 09:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Johnbod. Scribley (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
THIS IMAGE IS NOT FROM THE MUSEUM WEBSITE. I TOOK IT MYSELF AT THE MUSEUM ON MY CELL PHONE. Scribley (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It shouldn't be in copyright no. --Commons2020 (talk) 09:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks Commons2020. Scribley (talk) 01:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
New comments:
- Keep I believe the uploader. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks Alexis. Scribley (talk) 01:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Scribley, I'm not sure this in the right place to ask, but could you please upload higher-res versions of the Art Museum images, at least the ones already in articles, directly from your original phone images? They would be much more useful to readers who click on images for details. Also, what was the museum's reponse when you asked about uploading the images to Wikipedia? Thanks, Brian W. Schaller (talk) 10:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Brian W. Schaller: doesn't really matter what the museum thinks.. worst case they could ban photographers from their museum, but any photos taken are legal. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Brian, I will upload better-quality images directly from my phone as possible. My present phone isn't high-end, but I am about to upgrade so this should not be a problem in the future. I haven't heard back from the museum in Philly but as Alexis says they can`t prohibit this sort of thing. Scribley (talk) 13:21, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep all the museum images per above. However, File:Partial solar eclipse (2017).jpg needs further permission, or it may be deleted. --182.239.122.104 17:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
I took the partial solar eclipse photo on my cell phone standing in front of my house on the relevant day in 2017. I did, unfortunately, upload it to wiki via my facebook page. The photo is no longer on my phone. What evidence is needed to keep it from being deleted? Thanks. Scribley (talk) 19:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
- You can either
- Send a permission email to COM:OTRS, or
- Give the facebook link
- This can help resolve the possible copyright issue. --182.239.122.104 04:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Partial solar eclipse (2017).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020011810000328. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 07:48, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have accepted permission for “File:Partial solar eclipse (2017).jpg” under Ticket:2020011810000328. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; see w:en:WP:TRAINWRECK. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused text-only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:47, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 10:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 05:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Since I was a participant at the WikiSammelan (Wiki Conference), I uploaded it on my own FB account as well, just as my uploads of many other Wikimania and Wiki meetup files. --Muzammil (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per explanation. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
File:At Anti CAA NRC protests Shaheen Bagh a comparison between police brutality and the 2020 jnu attack.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep Since when such thing become derivate works, if it were the case, no one in can make movies, news or vlogs on the streets of India. Such photographs or videos on streets in which shop banners may appear does not violate copyright laws, untill and unless its an statue or a painting which is under copyright protection period. Dey subrata (talk) 21:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep We can consider this banner has a simple message. There is no originality in the design or the writing (I guess). Without originality, no copyright and no derivative, right ? Covalentin 21:43, 12 March 2020
Kept: The pictures are hardly identifiable, while the writing is below COM:TOO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
permission missing, not in public domain Gower (talk) 16:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Signatures are generally uncopyrightable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
This marker was erected in 2013 or later and is therefore under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- It's not an exact copy of the marker (it's part of a greater picture), but if it violates copyright, by all means zap it. BrineStans (talk) 21:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 06:05, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose This image was originally created by the artist Orijit Sen(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orijit_Sen). He uploaded this file without any copyright on 6th January on Facebook. [Link:https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10158123961872718&set=pb.655212717.-2207520000..&type=3&theater]. Through another post on the same day [Link:https://www.facebook.com/orijit.sen/videos/10158126242037718/?lst=100015202067384%3A655212717%3A1579113255], he emphasised that it was "humbling, liberating and exciting to be able to let go of feelings of individual ownership and credit". Che12Guevara (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Still, the user doesn't clearly say that this work is copyright-free. He just thinks that it is happy to see his work is being used in many protest. He doesn't say that he agrees this work can be freely used on Commons. --A1Cafel (talk) 13:24, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose As mentioned above also, all these posters used in Shaheen Bagh are in public domain since from start, never copyrighted. Secondly, the picture is not only poster there are various elements the RCC post and a background too, its not a copy not a derivative work, it does not violates any copyright laws. Dey subrata (talk) 18:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: No clear public domain release. --Stifle (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. No evidence that this image is in the public domain SchroCat (talk) 07:34, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
_%22Cassandra_and_Ajax%22_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%22Cassandra_and_Ajax%22_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. Flickr PDM 1.0 is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
![15:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/01/15#c-A1Cafel-2020-01-15T15:30:00.000Z-File:"Crater_with_red_figures"_(350-340_BC)_"Cassandra_and_Ajax"_.jpg){kind=link}
- I've sent the photographer an email via Flickr asking him to relicense his photo. So, please give him some time to respond, as not everyone reads their Flickr Mail regularly! --Pete Tillman (talk) 23:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 7 months is long enough I'm afraid. --Stifle (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
![15:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/01/15#c-Stifle-2020-08-19T15:58:00.000Z-File:"Crater_with_red_figures"_(350-340_BC)_"Cassandra_and_Ajax"_.jpg){kind=link}
_,_chariot_%26_horses.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_,_chariot_%26_horses.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. Flickr PDM 1.0 is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
![15:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/01/15#c-A1Cafel-2020-01-15T15:30:00.000Z-File:"Crater_with_red_figures"_(350-340_BC)_,_chariot_&_horses.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
![15:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2020/01/15#c-Stifle-2020-08-19T15:58:00.000Z-File:"Crater_with_red_figures"_(350-340_BC)_,_chariot_&_horses.jpg){kind=link}
See Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. Flickr PDM 1.0 is not a legal license A1Cafel (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have sent the photographer an email via Flickr requesting that he change his license to CC0, or another "free" CC license. Note that this photographer has hundreds of photos tagged CC-PD, so I'm almost certain he's intending to release his photos as PD.
- Please give him some time to respond, as not everyone reads their Flickr Mail regularly !Thanks, --Pete Tillman (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: 7 months is long enough I'm afraid. --Stifle (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Please add a source, author, date and license. If you are not the author, make sure this image has been uploaded to Unsplash before 5 June 2017. Commons2020 (talk) 14:31, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- To add: this has been nominated for deletion because this image is (very likely) downloaded from Unsplash. If the uploader is the author this request for deletion is invalid and may be removed. If not add the source, date, author and correct the license. --Commons2020 (talk) 14:36, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 09:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
license of en:The Television Pool of Thailand not license of NBT and other digital tv use license of TVPool for on-air. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 00:01, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
no source and wrong date Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
copyright because Cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works where the author remains unknown have a term of protection of 75 years or before 1945 from the date of first publication. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vietnam#General rules: Copyright and related rights protected under the legal documents effective before the effective date of the 2005 Law continued to be protected under the 2005 Law if they remained in term of protection on that date.[36/2009 Article 220] Therefore, cinematographic works, photographic works, dramatic works, works of applied art and anonymous works that were published 50 years or more prior to January 1, 2010 are still in the public domain. The date of first publication was 1953, so on January 1, 2010 it is in public domain according to the 2005 Law (50 years after first publication). The 2009 Law (75 years after first publication) didn’t restore its copyright (not retroactive). Tranminh360 (talk) 02:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
