Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
It's a watermarked stock photo that has been deleted before. Sumanuil (talk) 07:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a week due to uploading copyvios after warnings and will delete all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
This file is mentioned in red Sabuj website. Copyright infringement link [1]
Wikipediansouravhalder (talk) 08:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy. ~ Nahid Talk 10:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake კოლხი (talk) 09:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination housekeeping. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
non-free image, no info on where this came from Lugnuts (talk) 10:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a week due to uploading copyvios after warnings and will delete all his/her uploads. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. CptViraj (📧) 05:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme at 08:35, 22 Dezember 2019 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 13:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
This is my Father's Picture and The Daily Inquilab News was his workplace.
@Dion ishtiaq: image was reported in the Daily Inquilab News, that is, copyright infringement link[2]Pictures from News may not be provided because the work is copyrighted by that news authority.You can use the image that you take in your own hands.~'Sourav 11:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy; copyvio. ~ Nahid Talk 14:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
The license is not correct. Does DC release its content as public domain? Template:DCGovWork refers to content on their website, but I don't know about a police report.. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Apparently we used to have a tag for this, but it was deleted... by me[3]... for reasons that I don't remember. I've restored it and applied to this file. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake. Surelyshubham (talk) 17:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:25, 22 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: Low resolution. Metadata shows that the file was sourced from Facebook or Instagram. --Krdbot 01:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Arthur Crbz at 18:13, 24 Dezember 2019 UTC: No license since 2019-12-24. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information. --Krdbot 19:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Non-free artist's concept of SpaceX Starship
[edit]- File:BFR at stage separation 2-2018.jpg
- File:BFR at stage separation-2018 design.jpg
- File:BFR in flight (close-up)-2018 version.jpg
- File:BFR in flight (cropped)-2018 version.png
- File:BFR in flight-2018 version.jpg
- File:Starship passing the Moon-2018 version.jpg
- File:BFR 2018-7identicalEngines.jpg
- File:A performance inside Starship.jpg
- File:Artist’s rendering of the approach to Mars.jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343821794).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343822854).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343823534).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343823914).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343824424).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343824934).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343825184).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29343909374).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29937257476).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29937257986).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29937258496).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29937260386).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29937260776).jpg
- File:ITS Interplanetary Spaceship, in orbit near the rings of Saturn.jpg
- File:ITS Interplanetary Spaceship, landed on Enceladus (cropped).jpg
- File:ITS Interplanetary Spaceship, landed on Enceladus.jpg
- File:ITS Interplanetary Spaceship, landed on Europa.jpg
- File:ITS Tanker (cropped).jpg
- File:SpaceX-InterplanetarySpaceship-back quarter view-transparency.png
- File:SpaceX-InterplanetarySpaceship-back quarter view-with solar extended (cropped & retouched).jpg
- File:SpaceX-InterplanetarySpaceship-back quarter view-with solar extended, at Jupiter-cropped.jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29937259586).jpg
- File:Interplanetary Transport System (29937258946).jpg
When these images were uploaded, they were under the CC0 license. However, SpaceX changed that to CC-BY-NC license. According to the policy, such images should be deleted. I am requesting to withdraw this nomination because the CC license cannot be revoked. Soumya-8974 (talk) 04:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose – Creative Commons licenses cannot be revoked, and Wikimedia Commons' guidelines support this. I'm not sure what "policy" you're referring to in this situation. The procedure in this situation would simply be to add {{Flickr-change-of-license}} instead. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk) 23:37, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- PTG sorry, I thought that all of the non-commercial and/or non-derivative images should be deleted. I am requesting to withdraw that deletion request. Soumya-8974 (talk) 03:56, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Amada44 talk to me 21:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
There is another version of this image at [4] with an acceptable license but I am unable to upload it to commons because it is the same image, even though this version is posted with Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0). I don't know how to straighten this out. MB (talk) 02:43, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Just change the source and license here? It's the same image by Bill Morrow, not the image linked in the source on the description page. Kingsif (talk) 04:07, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- I think I was confused when I uploaded the photo and entered the url to a similar but different photo. I have corrected to Author and Source URL now. I believe this photo is correctly licensed. MB (talk) 03:15, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: issue resolved. --Amada44 talk to me 08:41, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope
- File:Blk6can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo finesse.jpg
- File:Blk6can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo girls.jpg
- File:Blk6can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo show.jpg
- File:1 blk20can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk19can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk17can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.png
- File:1 blk18can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk16can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk15can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk14can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk13can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk12can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.png
- File:1 blk11can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk6can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:1 blk7can black mexican negro mexicano negro mexa fllw x rlls indigo.jpg
- File:Black mexican live blk6can negro mexicano sick.jpg
- File:Black mexican live blk6can negro mexicano finesse gawd.jpg
- File:Black mexican live blk6can negro mexicano.jpg
- File:Black mexican live blk6can negro mexicano negro mexa.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Said alhattali 89 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope
- File:الزبير سعيد صبيح الهطالي مدرسة جابربن زيد الخاصة.jpg
- File:صبيح بن مسعود بن مريض الهطالي.jpg
- File:ايوب بن صبيح بن مسعود الهطالي.jpg
- File:تيمور بن خليفة بن صبيح بن مسعود الهطالي.jpg
- File:أبناء صبيح بن مسعود الهطالي واحفادهم.jpg
- File:الفاضل مسعود صبيح مسعود الهطالي.jpg
- File:الزبير سعيد صبيح مسعود الهطالي وعبدالوهاب سعود خلف الهطالي.jpg
- File:اولاد المرحوم صبيح بن مسعود الهطالي.jpg
- File:فريق الرامي الرياضي الثقافي.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:36, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
out of scope and low resolution. claimed {{PD-old-1923}}, but unlikely to be own work. Vycl1994 (talk) 01:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Extremely low quality image of an otherwise unidentified "Otto in 1917". Even if we knew who this "Otto" is and ignored the questionable licensing, the image quality is so low that it's probably not usable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
i dont want to expose myself any more on google Jawadsafdar97 (talk) 07:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Other, Nonsense, A selfie, Blurry 5.171.104.142 09:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: none of the given reasons apply - there's nothing nonsensical about this image, it's certainly not a selfie and also not particularly blurry. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:04, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
support deleting of the logo. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.238.179.246 (talk) 14:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:54, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: very distorted and blurry image of unknown person. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Sensual body To Body massage parlour at Green view massage @09874382581.jpg
- File:Green view Massage Parlour @ 09874382581 (2).jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: already deleted by Billinghurst. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:08, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The image has actually full metadata. According to Exif, it was taken in 2005 with a Kodak EasyShare CX4230 camera. On lowest quality setting, this camera generates images with a size of 816 x 616 pixels (I actually went to the lengths to research this), so this might be cropped or slightly reduced in size from such an already small image. Without any additional proof that it was taken from somewhere else, I don't see grounds to delete it. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 12:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE, as it's actually in use in zh-classical.wikipedia.org. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:18, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Map on which it is partly based (de:Bild:Megawal59.jpg) has been deleted due to copyright infringements. MPF (talk) 17:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The image is not directly based on de:Bild:Megawal59.jpg, this is merely where I looked up the climate zone information. I drew this map entirely by hand (obviously starting out with the public domain blank map data) back in 2006. --Dbachmann (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep OK thanks! - MPF (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:23, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shim Elbarbry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmad.alzoupi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small image without EXIF, unlikly to be own work
- File:المديرية العامة لقوات الدرك.jpg
- File:Reflect2.jpg
- File:KING ABDULLAH II 2.jpg
- File:Jordan00.jpg
- File:King abdullah II.jpg
- File:Darak.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 13:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
- File:نهج البلاغة.pdf
- File:التحقيق الشافي في علم العروض والقوافي.pdf
- File:النظام الاجتماعي في القوات المسلحة.pdf
- File:خواطر شعريه عباس شوكت طربوش العميري.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:57, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
- File:نهج البلاغة.pdf
- File:النظام الاجتماعي في القوات المسلحة.pdf
- File:التحقيق الشافي في علم العروض والقوافي.pdf
- File:خواطر شعريه عباس شوكت طربوش العميري.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Glen O'Hare (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability
- File:Reception area at Ravenhead Foyer.jpg
- File:Foyer Fitness 1.jpg
- File:Foyer Fitness 2.jpg
- File:Car Park at Ravenhead Foyer.jpg
- File:Welcome to Ravenhead Foyer.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Photo taken in 1987, it was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so it is not considered PD in USA per URAA Cavarrone (talk) 21:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo taken in 1986, it was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so it is not considered PD in USA per URAA Cavarrone (talk) 21:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
es mi biografía y alguien la ha pedido borrar Ddelgado1234 (talk) 09:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Refers to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Documento biográfico para ayudar a dalia.pdf. --Achim (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
با سلام آقایی که در تصویر هستم نمی خواهد عکس اش در صفحه من حضور داشته باشد. AMS.Amir.Mahdi.Salary (talk) 20:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --4nn1l2 (talk) 07:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE assuming w:fa:پرویز_قره_باقری is deleted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (FYI to others: w:fa:پرویز قره باقری has been tagged for speedy deletion, so COM:INUSE does not apply). --
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by P199 at 18:51, 6 Januar 2020 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 01:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Wikimedia-only permission, does not meet COM:L
- File:Kibice JKH Jastrzębie podczas meczu z Podhalem Nowy Targ.jpg
- File:Pożegnanie Leszka Jaszkiewicza.jpg
- File:PP GKS Katowice - JKH Jastrzębie 1.jpg
- File:PP GKS Katowice - JKH Jastrzębie 2.jpg
- File:PP GKS Katowice - JKH Jastrzębie 3.jpg
- File:PP GKS Katowice - JKH Jastrzębie 4.jpg
- File:PP GKS Katowice - JKH Jastrzębie 5.jpg
- File:PP GKS Tychy - Podhale Nowy Targ 1.jpg
- File:PP GKS Tychy - Podhale Nowy Targ 2.jpg
- File:PP GKS Tychy - Podhale Nowy Targ 3.jpg
- File:PP GKS Tychy - Podhale Nowy Targ 4.jpg
- File:PP GKS Tychy - Podhale Nowy Targ 5.jpg
- File:PP JKH Jastrzębie - Podhale Nowy Targ 1.jpg
- File:PP JKH Jastrzębie - Podhale Nowy Targ 2.jpg
- File:PP JKH Jastrzębie - Podhale Nowy Targ 3.jpg
- File:PP JKH Jastrzębie - Podhale Nowy Targ 4.jpg
- File:PP JKH Jastrzębie - Podhale Nowy Targ 5.jpg
- File:PP JKH Jastrzębie - Podhale Nowy Targ 6.jpg
- File:PP JKH Jastrzębie - Podhale Nowy Targ 7.jpg
- File:Puchar dla zwycięzcy Pucharu Polski w Hokeju na Lodzie 2017-18.jpg
- File:Puchar Polski w Hokeju na Lodzie 2017-18.jpg
- File:Superpuchar Polski 1.jpg
- File:Superpuchar Polski 2.jpg
- File:Superpuchar Polski 3.jpg
- File:Superpuchar Polski 4.jpg
- File:Superpuchar Polski 5.jpg
- File:Superpuchar Polski 6.jpg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 21:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- There is a proper author's agreement for these files for CC By-SA 4.0 just sent to OTRS. ticket:2020010510003368 Polimerek (talk) 20:52, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: complete permission provided. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pialhuseyinturkmen (talk · contribs)
[edit]This is my personal photo I dont need permisson and nothing is fake! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pialhuseyinturkmen (talk • contribs) 15:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC) No explicit permission. Possibly fake EXIF, data generated in 2003 when the camera is produced in 2009.
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 15.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 14.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 13.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 12.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 11.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 10.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 08.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 09.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 07.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 05.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 06.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 04.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 01.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 02.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var CD 03.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen 6.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen 5.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen 4.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen 3.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen 2.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen.jpg
Minorax (talk) 11:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pialhuseyinturkmen
[edit]No explicit permission. Fake EXIF, data generated in 2003 when the camera is produced in 2009. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pialhuseyinturkmen (talk • contribs) 00:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pialhuseyinturkmen
[edit]No explicit permission. Fake EXIF, data generated in 2003 when the camera is produced in 2009. Pialhuseyinturkmen (talk) 00:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: looks like uploader is the same as photo subject, but these are not selfies, so copyright belongs to photographer. And promotional, no related WP articles, therefore out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pialhuseyinturkmen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader appears to be the subject depicted in his uploads, seemingly all but one being professional portraits. Requires COM:OTRS permission from original photographers.
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Festival Ödülü.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas beşinci Albüm Kapağı.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas dördüncü Albüm Kapağı.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas üçüncü Albüm Kapağı.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas 2.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen KapakResmi.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen 7.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 08:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please note that the uploader has continuously removed the DR tag from the files, which resulted in the DR request below. He has also added the review template {{FlickreviewR}} and triggered the "License review by non-image-reviewers" filter. The Flickr account does not resolve the issue at all, and I suggest listing said account on User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors. ƏXPLICIT 00:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pialhuseyinturkmen (talk · contribs)
[edit]These would simply seem to be images promoting an individual musician/artist. While an odd image might be within the scope of this project this number of personal images seems excessive
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen - Ama Bana Var Dendi.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen - Evlilik Teklifi.png
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen - Kör Makas.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen - Aşk Olsun Yar.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Ne Gereği Var.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas beşinci Albüm Kapağı.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas dördüncü Albüm Kapağı.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas üçüncü Albüm Kapağı.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas 2.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen Kör Makas.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen KapakResmi.jpg
- File:Pial Hüseyin Türkmen 7.jpg
Herby talk thyme 13:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Branch in front of subject bird; low resolution; not sharp - there are better images in the category and this one has no unique features. GRDN711 (talk) 00:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Most likely taken from [5] The image doesn’t have an immediate permission for free reuse. Jarash (talk) 02:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
doubtful to be own work considering it is upload by new user and very old photo (mid 20th) century PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
False source Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Sourcing issues that can be easily picked aside, it’s a simple logo that does not cross the threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ytoyoda (talk • contribs) 05:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Bombaykatze — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs) 2019-12-15T08:17:14 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Bombaykatze — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs) 2019-12-15T08:16:57 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Bombaykatze — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs) 2019-12-15T08:17:06 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
not own work https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00z8v18/Grand_Prix_The_Killer_Years/ — billinghurst sDrewth 04:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
clearly not own work PlanespotterA320 (talk) 04:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Sayyed Myan Hussain (talk) 05:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Metadata credits Nelson Pulido. Has this person given permission? Ytoyoda (talk) 05:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Batholith (talk) 05:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: photo of photo, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 06:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
non-used file/author's request shiro524 (talk) 06:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- This is used, so will it be replaced by a vector file? Leutha (talk) 09:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Self nomination: Not sure that this is of Peter Jefferson, cannot find the artist or info about it... may be of Thomas Jefferson CaroleHenson (talk) 06:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
We have many leaves already. Hard/impossible to figure out what kind of leaf it is. Location is clear: Bennekom (Netherlands) Ketil3 (talk) 07:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep Quality of the image is quite good, not a bad example of leaves in autumn. Some kind of maple? I think a botanist should be able to identify it. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:02, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Gestumblindi. (Looks like oak leaf to me...) --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Commons has much better photos about Paris and Eiffel Tower. Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
because united states is using this as blackmail 149.135.69.44 09:54, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio - map layer is old but the overlay is from https://history.wiltshire.gov.uk/community/getcom.php?id=195 Wire723 (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Slavishly tracing a boundary on a public domain map and shading it in either involves no creative input whatsoever or if it does, it is below the threshold of originality. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Rodhullandemu. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
No permission/source.
- File:JakandDaxter.jpg
- File:TRILOGIA.jpg
- File:Biplanet.png
- File:Ratchet Clank.jpg
- File:GOD OF WAR.jpg
- File:UNCHARTED.png
- File:Gran turismo.png
Minorax (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Jupp Heynckes ganador del histórico triplete con el Bayern Múnich en la temporada 2012-2013.jpg
- File:Heynckes.jpg
- File:Jupp Heynckes entrenador del Bayern Munich en 4 etapas, logrando 9 títulos, incluyendo el histórico Triplete del 2013.jpg
- File:Estrategia-competitiva-cinemex-e2-1-638.jpg
- File:900x600.jpg
- File:CINEMEX.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
The file is an image of Kenyan police vehicle, in which it is found in this Flickr page, with all rights reserved. Some images listed on this account have also been screened, and it seems that there are no Flickrwashing. Therefore, the file may be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Not usable anywhere in an encyclopedia: so horribly non-neutral that it can be seen to incite communal violence (why isn't there a speedy deletion critertion for that?). Also, creation of a sock (blocked on the English wikipedia). Uanfala (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Please provide evidence that file has been published before 1987. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: simply, Mohamed Abdel Ghani el-Gamasy was a Minister of Defence of Egypt (1974–1978) then he retired from military service, this is the official photograph and logically this picture taken before 1987, another reason: his rank (in the picture) was general officer (insignia), and in 1978 he become a Field marshal, so this picture must be taken between (1974-1978), I know the source link is bad (from blogger) so I add another reliable source --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 00:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Ibrahim.ID: Conclusive explainations. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation of https://music.apple.com/us/album/through-my-eyes-the-acoustic-sessions-vol-1-acoustic/1485217136 Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation of https://music.apple.com/us/album/through-my-eyes-the-acoustic-sessions-vol-1-acoustic/1485217136 Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted work. Ubcule (talk) 12:23, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment It's a very short factual description of the computer system MERA 7900. I would tend to consider this short text to be below the threshold of originality (no creativity involved), but I'm not familiar with copyright/TOO in Poland (where this seems to be from). Gestumblindi (talk) 22:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
- If it can be clearly shown that this is likely to be the case, I've no problem with keeping it. (Though the rationale probably should have been on the image in the first place). Ubcule (talk) 19:27, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: text-only, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
No educational purpose. Was used for vandalism on the English Wikipedia at en:Eric and Gahn. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook according to source; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 12:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikly to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: based on entire upload history of user: unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikly to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 13:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: based on entire upload history of user: unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without adequate EXIF, unlikly to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 13:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: based on entire upload history of user: unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Who is the painter ? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Facebook metadata. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Schoolwork; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Poor quality (blurry, maybe "digital zoom"), and there are better Duden Waterfall photos in Wiki-Commons. AntonioK talk 14:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused selfie. Solomon203 (talk) 05:05, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Fuera del alcance del proyecto (es:Fabio Moschella) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
It is a short death notice, and not of any use to Wikipedia. Ketil3 (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:44, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. NOT found elsewhere using Google Images and TinEye. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose unreasonable claim. Photo uploaded for use on the site ge.wikimedia.org. Kindly, --Mehman 97 19:04, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
PDF of a tiny portait of rather unknown person is not needed. If needed in the future, it is better to upload an image file of the same person. Ketil3 (talk) 15:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruben Morales Galicia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:51, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Ich bin mir nicht sicher, den richtigen Gebäudeteil fotografiert zu haben XoMEoX (talk) 15:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Non-free artwork, creator alive, and are incorrectly claimed as uploader's "own work".
Wcam (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Edward Zigma (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:53, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
The CC licence of this photo is questionable. While the uploader did indicate this was from a family archive on the Russian Wikipedia version, it does not appear to have been taken by a family member who copyright could be inherited from (looks like a formal portrait, ie, the kind taken my military academy or such, where copyright would not be inherited). Since it was published here in 2016, we can list it in a future year undeletion category. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Unusable personal image without any encyclopaedic content, blurry, was used as a kind of self promotion. Grand-Duc (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Image is clearly out of scope, not used as part of any article or on any of the wikimedia projects nor does it have any realistic educational purpose, and seems to be uploaded for the purposes of self promotion. The only place it is currently is DE-WP's version of ANI. Should be speedied under CSD F10 and CSD G10. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 18:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This gif has been on the internet for years. Doubt that this is created by the uploader in December 2019 Teemeah (talk) 16:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- "The computer-generated three-dimensional simulation, originally created by medical artist and animator John Lieber" https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/what-happiness-looks-like Teemeah (talk) 20:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't seem very useful to me. Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Image of Thomas Moore's headstone at Arlington National Cemetery is significant to the history of the 1935 Labor Day hurricane in that Moore was one of only three of the 259 veterans killed in the storm who received burial at Arlington. President Roosevelt ordered the VA on September 4, 1935 to bury all unclaimed bodies at Arlington.
Bcrford (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Bcrford: I agree, but it would be better to upload the image of the grave rather than a low resolution screenshot of the webpage. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Adarsh-anii (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from an NES game and therefore is not public domain. Furthermore, this image is extremely poor quality and is not suitable as the main image on a wikipedia page. Waxworker (talk) 18:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This image has a copyright infringement link[6] ~'Sourav 19:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Diana Verweien is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in nl.wiki. Unused photo about non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This is a derived work of a presumably non-free photo. De minimus wouldn't apply since the photo is the main feature, and the poster wouldn't meet the "permanent" status requied for freedom of panorama in Belgium. --ghouston (talk) 21:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I fail to understand these arguments. Using the same logic, this photo of a poster of J.P Bemba also taken in Brussels, which includes non-free photos, would have to be removed as well. And yet it's been shared here for nigh over ten years, and is used widely across Wikipedia, without eliciting any recrimination or challenge as to its usage on the Commons over ten years. Likewise, this photo, again in Brussels, and this time containing not only a non-permanent poster, but also a commercial logo. Also unchallenged. I find it difficult to understand why panorama rights are of a concern here, when there is a whole album on the Commons devoted to the Brussels Cycling Classic 2014, replete with photos of commercial logos on vehicles (highly non "permanent") as well as official posters of the event. As an aside, we are talking about the image of a journalist who was murdered for free speech here, and her likeness has taken on a meaning of its own in Malta, with protesters carrying that photo and others like it with them in their protest, as a symbol of the 2019 Maltese protest movement. And that poster attached to the doorway of the Maltese embassy to the EU is even more meaningful. Zugraga (talk) 21:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Zugraga: It's no surprise that there are other files on Commons with the same problem. They can all be nominated for deletion if desired. Logos on vehicles are permitted on Commons if they are de minimis: they are only incidentally captured in a photo which is showing other things. The significance of the photo itself or how widely its used on Wikipedia isn't going to change anything: there are lots of non-free photos in the world that are also highly significant and could be used widely on Wikipedia, but Commons doesn't host them because it's an archive of free images, not an archive of everything. It would of course be useful if any photo could be made free by printing it on a poster and taking a photo of the poster: but the concept of "derivative works" prevents that. --ghouston (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- For consistency, I also nominated the first poster you pointed out at Commons:Deletion requests/File:J.P.BembaPoster.JPG. I'm not sure about the second, since it's a photo of a couple of windows and the poster may be de minimis. It's also looks like a permanent sign, so FoP may apply. --ghouston (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Kaldari (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prophetelishahn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a presumably non-free poster. --ghouston (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joel Marco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
I mispelled Category (Categoty) during creation GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
False claim of ownership of picture and illegal use of image......... Copyright has been removed/cut out of actual image. Actual image belongs to Ingve/Wielheesen Sleddog Image Archives and no permission was asked nor given to use this image. 76.25.118.159 21:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Photograph taken sometime between 1913 and 1929. Depending on country, publication date and author, this might be in the public domain. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Proof of rightful ownership and copyright submitted to legal department of Wiki Foundation. This Togo photograph was cropped from an photograph that is NOT in public domain, but belongs to a private collection and was digitally restored and enhanced. Therefore, there is a legimate copyright holder. Not only was Togo image stolen from this copyrighted photograph, but also its ownership is falsely claimed by Wynland Morris, who posted it on WikiMedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.118.159 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- The source photo might be placed into the public domain due to age, and faithful reproduction (digital restoration) of such 2D-works is also in the public domain. But this image might have gotten some artistic reconstructions done to the "snow" by the gallery, which could be copyrightable. Please read Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/12#File:Togo the dog 2014-06-17 22-40.jpg: OTRS copyvio report. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- The information on the file description page is clearly wrong, I think we can all agree there. The only source I could find that provided more information than what's on the file description page is https://www.baltostruestory.net/togo.htm. That claims that the photo was taken in 1925, after the serum run. Assuming that is correct and that the photo was published in the US soon after it was taken, the original photo will enter the public domain on 1 January 2021. For that full length of protection, the copyright holder would have had to renew the copyright. While renewal is unlikely, US Copyright Office records for the time at hand are not digitized, so it is difficult to verify that protection has expired until next year. As far as any restorations go, I don't have access to the ticket at hand, so I can only speak generally. Restorations that don't involve colorization typically aren't original enough to recieve copyright protection. If there was detail added, that might qualify, if it makes the new image distinguishable from the [preexisting] work in some meaningful way.” Schrock v. Learning Curve International, Inc., 586 F.3d 513, 521 (7th Cir. 2009). The last person to look at it couldn't see a significant difference, but I'll leave it to those who can see both images to determine that. Delete the image for now per COM:PCP (no author, copyright protection may not have expired),
with a good possibility of being able to Undelete in 2021. I'd like to have a better original source before doing that though. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- I've now had a chance to review some of the additional information. The restored image does contain some new copyrightable elements, but none of them appear to have made it into the Commons image due to cropping. They date the image to 1926, which would put us to 2022 at the earliest. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This photo is most likely from 1926-04-26, meaning the original might be protected by copyright until at least 2022-01-01, unless the author died prior to 1950 and it was unpublished prior to the archive's publication. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. False license, false source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
No permission. Reproduction is not authorized by https://www.tate.org.uk/about-us/policies-and-procedures/website-terms-use except for personal non-commercial usage kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 21:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 16:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Bad quality, In conflict with COM:PORN. CptViraj (📧) 06:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 12:53, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of altar painting Elämän lähde by Finnish visual artist Lennart Segerstråle, who died in 1975. Not in PD yet, no Freedom of Panorama for parintings in Finland. Photo is uploaded in FiWiki. Htm (talk) 10:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Курочки Ухейилюй.jpg
- File:Lueyang Wuji.jpg
- File:Lueyang Wuji 1.jpg
- File:Курка суссекс в господарстві Катерини Касаткіної.jpg
- File:Півень суссекс в господарстві Катерини Касаткіної 1.jpg
- File:Півень суссекс.jpg
- File:Півень суссекс в господарстві Катерини Касаткіної.jpg
- File:Легбар яйце.jpg
- File:Курка породи Легбар.jpg
- File:Півень породи Легбар.jpg
- File:Добові карликові кохінхіни Lesya Tkachenko 3.jpg
Small size, no metadata, found in Internet. Most probably the uploader is not the author. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
For examples: here and here. --Regasterios (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 13:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
And also
- File:Braekel, 2 days 3.jpg
- File:Braekel, 2 days 1.jpg
- File:Курчата Брекель, 2 дні.jpg
- File:Braekel, 2 days.jpg
- File:Шульга Світлана Миколаїна 2.jpg
- File:Шульга Світлана Миколаїна 1.jpg
- File:Шульга Світлана Миколаїна 3.jpg
Most probably the uploader is not the author. In metadata sign Facebook. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 13:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The photograph is a derivative work of Pekka Vesainen memorial, a 1940 statue by Kalervo Kallio (1909–1969; Q5898122), located in Ii, Finland. The original work (the sculpture) is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 11:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 13:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Harpa (concert hall)
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iceland and/or COM:DW.
Josve05a (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC) I´d uploaded Harpa Feb 2014 1.JPG, unfortunately I didn´t know about this problem, I first read afterwards about it...So if it will be deleted would be sad, but what else could we do? I´d also uploaded 2 more, should they not also be deleted? --Schnuffel2002 (talk) 12:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Expect File:Main hall (5719867951).jpg as the pic doesen't show anything architectural. Sanandros (talk) 21:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
It is with considerable regret that I nominate these files for deletion, as I think that Harpa is a great building, really stunning architecture, and there should be images of it on Commons. Unfortunately, Iceland has only non-commercial FoP, and therefore we can't accept images of modern architecture in Iceland where the architect(s) died less than 70 years ago. Some pictures in the category I didn't nominate, such as File:Amazing Show (6074007822).jpg (I think the architecture is incidental in this case, it's about the show), File:Byggeplads i Reykjavik.jpg (not much of the actual architecture recognizable in this photo of the construction site), or File:C Arrival of Thor - Icelandic Coast Guard 2011-10-27 Reykjavik.jpg (it's about the arrival of the coast guard ship "Thor" with Harpa in the background).
Gestumblindi (talk) 17:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
It seems that people are uploading Harpa images all the time, and I'm not surprised, as it has become a kind of iconic building, but unfortunately, nothing has changed in Icelandic law since the last bunch of deletions - Iceland has only non-commercial FoP, and therefore we can't accept images of modern architecture in Iceland where the architect(s) died less than 70 years ago.
Gestumblindi (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC) Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
— JJMC89 (T·C) 02:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Another bunch. Iceland has only non-commercial FoP, and therefore we can't accept images of modern architecture in Iceland where the architect(s) died less than 70 years ago. I nominated images from the category where the Harpa concert hall is the main subject, but not more general views of the area or photos where the architecture of Harpa isn't prominent (such as of performers in the hall)
Gestumblindi (talk) 01:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC) @Gestumblindi: Seriously. I'm no involved in this case, but I'm very sad seeing pictures massacred like this in Commons. You may strangle a hundred pictures today, but tomorrow you may strangle a million pictures just to obey the multi-interpreted law. I've contacted the designer of Harpa in order to ask him for the licensing of the photographs. Next time, if you want to deal with the FoP law and the designer is still alive, please, I beg you. Please attempt to contact the author first. This way, we would know the exact license of the installation, rather than using your own hands to execute the FoP. Thanks.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 10:28, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The concert hall was completed in 2011 by Olafur Eliasson (1967–). Unfortunately, there is no Commons-acceptable FoP in Iceland, thus permission from the architect is required
A1Cafel (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The concert hall was completed in 2011 by Olafur Eliasson (1967–). Unfortunately, there is no Commons-acceptable FoP in Iceland, thus permission from the architect is required
A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Harpa (concert hall)[edit]Time for another "Harpa cleanup", I'm afraid. As usual, several of the images in the category where the architecture of the concert hall is not the main subject are fine (such as those focussing on performers with elements of Harpa in the background), but there are now again many uploads where the architecture (outside or inside) dominates the image; those we can't keep as there is no FoP for commercial use in Iceland. Several were transferred recently from flickr with a CC-BY license, but I don't see any evidence that this applies to the copyrighted building (and not just to the photographs).
Gestumblindi (talk) 20:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted some, kept others. This turned into a bit of a w:en:WP:CLUSTERFUCK. No prejudice to renominating the kept ones in smaller, more similar batches. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
-2018_version.jpg){kind=link}
-2018_version.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Harpa (concert hall)
[edit]Despite the warning template in the category, people still often upload images of the copyrighted Harpa building which aren't acceptable on Commons as Iceland has no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama that allows commercial use. Before the list gets too long again, I'm nominating the IMHO more blatant and clear-cut cases from recent uploads (so, no borderline cases this time, only images dominated by Harpa's architecture).
- File:Harpa Hall, Downtown Reykjavík.jpg
- File:Harpa, Reykjavík 05.jpg
- File:Harpa, Reykjavík 07.jpg
- File:Harpa, Reykjavík 08.jpg
- File:Harpa.Rvkhofn.jpg Now deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harpa.Rvkhofn.jpg
Gestumblindi (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Harpa (concert hall)
[edit]Only yesterday my latest deletion request for Harpa images was closed and the images were deleted, but in the meantime, people have again uploaded Harpa images; is there no way to make them read/heed the warning template...? Anyway, I'll just repeat the reason from the last request: "Despite the warning template in the category, people still often upload images of the copyrighted Harpa building which aren't acceptable on Commons as Iceland has no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama that allows commercial use. Before the list gets too long again, I'm nominating the IMHO more blatant and clear-cut cases from recent uploads (so, no borderline cases this time, only images dominated by Harpa's architecture)."
- File:Harpa 01.jpg
- File:Harpa 02.jpg
- File:Harpa 03.jpg
- File:Harpa 04.jpg
- File:Harpa 05.jpg
- File:Harpa 06.jpg
- File:Harpa 07.jpg
- File:Harpa 08.jpg
- File:Harpa 09.jpg
- File:Harpa 10.jpg
- File:Harpa 11.jpg
- File:Harpa 13.jpg
- File:Harpa 14.jpg
- File:Harpa 15.jpg
- File:Harpa 16.jpg
- File:Harpa 17.jpg
- File:Harpa 18.jpg
- File:Harpa 19.jpg
- File:Harpa 21.jpg
- File:Harpa 22.jpg
- File:Harpa 23.jpg
- File:Harpa 24.jpg
Gestumblindi (talk) 19:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Permission of different photographers needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Chatham House London Conference 2019.jpg
- File:Katrín Jakobsdóttir December 2019.jpg
- File:Abdalla Hamdok at Chatham House.jpg
- File:CHPrize-0157.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: (C) at Chatham house website. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
no need here Loueshan (talk) 14:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Nudity. --Dereckson (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
dont need this file here Loueshan (talk) 14:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Nudity. --Dereckson (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dinesh rumba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use on te.wikipedia.org so in COM:SCOPE. --Dereckson (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rbrugeat93 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in France.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Dereckson (talk) 16:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aquila Leite (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad Flickr account.
- File:Cooperativa Agropecuaria de Araripina.jpg
- File:Manuel Ramos de Barros, José Ramos de Barros e Francisco da Rosa Muniz.jpg
- File:Valdemir Batista de Souza (Dr. Mimi).JPG
- File:Manoel Ramos de Barros.jpg
- File:José Deodato Santiago (Zé Bringel).jpg
- File:Dr. José Araújo Lima.jpg
- File:Maria Dionéia de Andrade Lacerda (Dra. Dionéia).jpg
- File:Luiz Gonzaga Duarte.jpg
- File:João Cavalcanti de Lima.jpg
- File:Deputado Cabo Bebeto.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk)
- Keep Images under free license at the city's memorial.--Aquila LeiteMendes 18:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
22:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The Flickr account is not the original source of most, if not all the media files in question. The provenance, therefore, is unclear and we cannot confirm their copyright status. Therefore, Delete per COM:PCP. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 19:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- However, File:Deputado Cabo Bebeto.jpg seems to be freely licensed according to the source listed. And should be reviewed to confirm. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 21:33, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - excepted the one that have another source. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aquila Leite (talk · contribs)
[edit]Facebook images, missing permissions.
- File:Araripina-noite.jpg
- File:São João Araripina.jpg
- File:Paisagem Araripina.jpg
- File:Araripina n.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator --Leoboudv (talk) 10:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Images under free license.--Aquila LeiteMendes 18:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aquila Leite (talk • contribs) 18:38, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Question @Aquila Leite: Do you have evidence that the images in question are freely licensed? Comment: If you are the copyright holder, then you must send permission via the Open source Ticket Request System. For valid permission you must provide proof that you hold the copyright. If you have permission from the copyright holder, it is the copyright holder who must send permission via OTRS (we do not accept forwarded emails). --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 03:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC)- If there is no evidence of free licence, then Delete per COM:PCP --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 16:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulo Camelo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, banknotes, publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Oscar Brandão da Rocha.jpg
- File:Nota do indio.jpg
- File:Um cruzeiro.jpg
- File:Sarrabulho.jpg
- File:JornalPequeno.jpg
- File:JornalPequeno09021907.png
- File:PasseioPonteBoaVista.jpg
- File:DP numero1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
No indication of early enough publication to meet PD-Russia requirements PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication or evidence to support PD claim. "Сеть интернет" is not sufficient sourcing PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The General in the photo is dressed in a uniform that did not exist after 1920. The order of St. George was banned in the Soviet Union after 1920.--Apr1 (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter how early the photo was taken. It matters WHEN and WHERE it was PUBLISHED.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- In the Russian academic tradition, it is not considered mandatory to specify the source of the photos. For most photos of this kind, it is impossible to find the original source.--Apr1 (talk) 17:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- But this is Wikimedia Commons, and here in Wikimedia Commons, it IS mandatory to specify to source of photos and prove that they meet Wikimedia foundation copyright requirements. If you cannot find the original source, there is no reason to think it was published early enough to be public domain, and hence there is no reason to think it is complaiant with Wikimedia Commons rules. See Commons:Licensing. A photo having Russian origin is not a valid excuse for violating copyright rules set forth by Wikimedia Commons.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, and by the way, Russian law actually requires attribution in all circumstances of fair use (while it may be common practice to violate such law, it is still a rule), and Wikimedia Commons does not allow fair-use in the first place. If this image is needed on Russian Wikipedia, it may be uploaded with a fair-use template - but a source (not nessesarily the first publication - just a source) MUST be indicated.(ru:Википедия:Критерии добросовестного использования)--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- But this is Wikimedia Commons, and here in Wikimedia Commons, it IS mandatory to specify to source of photos and prove that they meet Wikimedia foundation copyright requirements. If you cannot find the original source, there is no reason to think it was published early enough to be public domain, and hence there is no reason to think it is complaiant with Wikimedia Commons rules. See Commons:Licensing. A photo having Russian origin is not a valid excuse for violating copyright rules set forth by Wikimedia Commons.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 18:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- In the Russian academic tradition, it is not considered mandatory to specify the source of the photos. For most photos of this kind, it is impossible to find the original source.--Apr1 (talk) 17:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter how early the photo was taken. It matters WHEN and WHERE it was PUBLISHED.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
source indicates 2005 pubication, but we need a pre-1946 publication (which there is no evidence of) for it to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:53, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no indication of early enough publication to support claim of current PD status PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Publication source indicated here is from 2006. But we need a pre-1946 publication for it to be PD in US+Russia right now, which there is no evidence of. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of pre-1946 publication (required for PD status in US+Russia) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - I withdraw this nomination, per discovery of 1920 publication. In the future, it would be appreciation if such required publications were noted in the file description.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:25, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD in US+Russia PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:23, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:22, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of early enough publication to be PD PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
no indication of pre-1946 publication required for PD status in Russia+US right now PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Corrupt video Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
NC-ND license on Flickr, and no proof that OGL applies to the image. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump and May in Blenheim Palace, July 2018.jpg A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:39, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Photo taken in 1986, it was not PD in Italy on 1996-01-01, so it is not considered PD in USA per URAA Cavarrone (talk) 21:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adonnalisa (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Eric State Dept Visitors.jpg
- File:Eric Kennedy with Hugh M. Hefner and Steven B. Chapman.gif
- File:Eric Kennedy with Clearwater, Florida Mayor Brian Aungst.gif
Didym (talk) 21:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S38324, Tag von Potsdam, Adolf Hitler, Paul v. Hindenburg Recolored.jpg
[edit]
This subsequent coloration is not historical and not needed for education, it seems to be for propaganda! Ras67 (talk) 18:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Amateur recoloring ought to be considered non-encyclopedic and discouraged. There is no encyclopedic value added by an amateur recoloring when we already have the B&W image. Buidhe (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 11:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This image has a copyright infringement link[7] ~'Sourav 19:11, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 11:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The user is on the photo (right). It's not own work. See File:Szerelme-Odri és Vári Zsolt.jpg (Fényhozó=Zsolt Vári) Regasterios (talk) 08:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
We have OTRS permission for the reproduction of this signature. The signature IMHO is either pd-ineligible and could be kept as such, or is to be considered artwork and requires permission from the artist, which we do not have, so should be deleted as no-permisison. Krd 10:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. “reproduction only” is in conflict with CC-BY SA. --Wcam (talk) 22:47, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:36, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
No date and source of publication more than 20 years old has been provided by uploader Thuresson (talk) 11:50, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
The picture is from 10 of december of 1964, VEA magazine. It was pretty obvious the picture had more than 20 years. And it literally took me 5 seconds to figure it out. I don't understand why, instead on colaborating the logic of some guys here is deleting. You could have checked this as I did, and helped me with this content. Adannoes (talk) 17:28, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: now dated and sourced properly. --Sealle (talk) 12:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
What are author's dates of life? Who are painters? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 12:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Local government work: not own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:40, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
not authorized for publication by Staatsarchiv Basel --Parpan (talk) 10:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC) (uploader)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Unused file, no objections raised. --Storkk (talk) 11:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Ignat Bednarik (d. 1963), permission of his heirs required via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:HK WC Grand Hyatt Hotel 保利拍賣 Poly Auction exhibit Apr-2013 張大千 Zhang Daqian chinese writing n signature n red chops Lot 381.JPG
[edit]
Calligraphy is protected in China (COM:TOO China), copyright duration is life + 50 years but creator Zhang Daqian dies in 1983. Wcam (talk) 15:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/قد الدنيا
[edit]The channel appears to be stealing content, so it was deleted from YouTube
- File:هنا الزاهد-3.jpg
- File:هنا الزاهد-4.jpg
- File:هنا الزاهد.jpg
- File:Maged El Kedwany 2018.jpg
- File:هنا الزاهد-2.jpg
- File:شاهيناز.jpg
- File:شاهيناز 2.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Keep my file File:Maged El Kedwany 2018.jpg and you should remove it from the list, in the picture: there is a microphone box of "قد الدنيا" (in arabic), so it's obviously that (قد الدنيا) is the owner and they record this video. (qadeldonia قد الدنيا) was an Egyptian newspaper and I checked if before upload the picture, and I think the newspaper was closed because their website and all their social media was closed too, if you check the video link the message is "video unavailable" not deleted by youtube, the channel also "This channel does not exist", not "the channel was closed" or "this account has been terminated" as youtube does usually, so I don't know how you assume Youtube deleted their channel and they steal content! this is an incorrect accusation --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 10:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- The reason for the absence of the channel is unknown, and whatever it is, it is not certain that it is an official channel ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- this file is confirmed by a license reviewer and I'm a license reviewer too, and I checked the channel before uploading, the microphone box is enough evidence that was an official channel --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 00:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- Question The images are reviewed (excepted one, but similar to a reviewed one). Is there an evidence that the content has been stolen? or that the account have been deleted for that reason? Otherwise I tend to keep the files. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ibrahim.ID and Christian Ferrer. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Insufficient source to prove that the author is unknown. It is very likely a self-made portrait by the painter. Oszkár Glatz died in 1958. Regasterios (talk) 14:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment I've found a source that prove this is a self-portrait: here. Önarckép=self-portrait. --Regasterios (talk) 15:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Valóban? És te mivel tudod alátámasztani, hogy 70 évnél évnél régebbi a festmény, ha szerinted ismeretlen a készítője? Erre adjál nekem választ! És még véletlenül se próbáld nekem beadni, hogy a forrásban a képaláírás ezt bizonyítja, mert az csak Glatz Oszkár rektorságának időintervalluma. Ha pedig már a fröcsögésnél tartunk, én inkább ezt nevezem annak, amikor ha nincs érved, más szerkesztőket kezdesz el minden ok nélkül emlegetni, akiknek semmi közük az adott megbeszéléshez. --Regasterios (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Bár te mindent tudsz, nem gondolom, hogy nekem kellene bármit bizonyítanom. Ha törlésre jelölsz bármit, akkor neked kellene alátámasztani a törlés indokát. Nem vitatkozom veled, mivel értelmetlen szócséplésnek tartom. Mivel egyértelműen velem foglalkozol a tények helyett, én ezt a vagdalkozást lezárom. Nem tartalak alkalmasnak a feladatodra, és vállalom az ezért járó blokkot, vagy az esetleges kitiltást is. Sajnálom, hogy ilyenek meghatározóak a huwikin. Tambo (talk) 17:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Én megindokoltam a törlésre jelölést, mégpedig azzal, hogy nem láttam még festőt, aki másik festővel készítettné el az arcképét. Tudsz ilyesmire akárcsak egy példát is mutatni a művészet történetéből? Örülök, hogy lezárod ezt a vagdalkozást. Szerintem el se kellett volna kezdened. Túl nagy jelentőséget tulajdonítasz magadnak, ha azt gondolod, hogy én veled foglalkozom. Nem érdekel, mit csinálsz, de arról nem én tehetek, hogy akármivel foglalkozok éppen a Wikipédián, rendre a te képeidbe botlok. Ezzel a képpel pl. úgy találkoztam, hogy Alexander Bernát arcképe után kutatgattam a neten (ezt egy szerkesztéssel is tudom bizonyítani), de csak egy festményt találtam, amit éppen Glatz Oszkár készített róla. Arra gondoltam, feltöltöm, ha már közkincs, de a szócikkére rákeresve kénytelen voltam konstatálni, hogy még jó ideig jogvédett. Innen már, gondolom kitalálod, hogyan jutottam el ehhez a képhez. Szóval ezt értem az alatt, hogy belebotlok egy képedbe. --Regasterios (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Még egy apróság azzal a megjegyzéseddel kapcsolatban, miszerint én folyton veled foglalkozok. Miért van akkor az, hogy a hozzászólásaidban te rendre az én személyemmel foglalkozol, és azt emlegeted, mennyire alkalmatlan vagyok a feladatra? Tudod, erről ez jut eszembe: projekció. --Regasterios (talk) 10:22, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Tudok. Nem szeretném felsorolni, de például [[8]], [[9]]. Lám, lám. Tambo (talk) 10:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ball%C3%B3_Portrait_of_K%C3%A1roly_Lotz.jpg){kind=link}
![[9]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marastoni_Portrait_of_K%C3%A1roly_Lotz_1862.jpg){kind=link}
Rendben, ebben a részletkérdésben tévedtem. A sejtésem azonban beigazolódott, miszerint ez egy önarckép, magyarán Glatz Oszkár volt a festő: lásd itt. Remélem, így már nem vitatod, hogy törölni kell a képet. --Regasterios (talk) 15:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete Már törlésre jelöléskor meg lett adva a forrás, amely alátámasztja, hogy önarcképről van szó. Ezt fröcsögésként azonosítani igencsak körülményes dolog (egyébként sem világos, ha a feltöltő tudja, hogy nem elégséges fröcsögni, akkor miért fröcsög folyamatosan másokra, miközben állításait bizonyítani nem nagyon tudja). Attól, hogy voltak/vannak olyan festőművészek, akiknek az arcképét más festők megfestették, teljesen irreleváns ennek a képnek a helyzetére, hiszen itt van forrás arra, hogy jelen kép önarckép. Még ha jelen festőművésznek van vagy volna is olyan arcképe, amelyet más festő festett, az sem változtatna azon, hogy ezt a festményt viszont ő festette. Mivel önarcképről van szó így nagyon is fontos tényező, hogy mikor hunyt el. Persze meg lehet próbálni bizonyítani, hogy más festette (persze, ha valóban más festette és téves állítás az, hogy önarckép), valamint azt, hogy ha valóban más festette az több mint 70 éve meghalt, de ezt ténylegesen kéne bizonyítani, mégpedig forrásokkal. A Wikipédiában ugyanis nem elég fröcsögni (még a Commonsban sem). Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:29, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Zhang Daqian
[edit]Images of calligraphy and paintings by Zhang Daqian who dies in 1983. In both China and Taiwan, calligraphy is protected (COM:TOO China, COM:TOO Taiwan) and copyright duration is life + 50 years.
- File:Golden Horse Awards inscribed board by Zhang Daqian 20131120.jpg
- File:HK WC Grand Hyatt Hotel 保利拍賣 Poly Auction exhibit Apr-2013 張大千 Zhang Daqian chinese writing 上款 his friend 李仲乾 signs Lot 381.JPG
- File:HK WC Grand Hyatt Hotel 保利拍賣 Poly Auction exhibit Apr-2013 張大千 Zhang Daqian Lot 0326 1975年作 策杖觀瀑圖 鏡框 設色紙本 羅代永.JPG
Wcam (talk) 15:52, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment the last one is a painting, so a clear copyvio... I'm not sure about the TOO regarding calligraphy in Hong Kong. Storkk (talk) 13:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hong Kong is where the auction took place and should not be considered as the work's country of origin. Regarding File:Golden Horse Awards inscribed board by Zhang Daqian 20131120.jpg, the exhibition took place in Taipei [10], and the writing "金馬獎" refers to en:Golden Horse Awards, a film festival and awards in Taiwan. It is beyond reasonable doubt that the country of origin for this work is Taiwan. --Wcam (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Zhang Daqian
[edit]Same as above. Not PD until 2034.
Wcam (talk) 20:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Who is the illustrator? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by Stokk. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr. 06:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Géo Ham (d. 1972) Vic, permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- re: I don't think that's a picture of Geo Ham. Geo Ham has a clear signature "Geo Ham" on other pictures. This signature is not on the Coupe Mondial advertising poster. The signature "Vic" can be seen on the advertising poster. I did not find an assignment of "Vic" to an artist suitable for 1934. --Michael (talk) 17:33, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- re: Example for Geo Ham signature --Michael (talk) 18:30, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Michael32710: You're right: I've modified the credits above. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- The question is: What is "Vic"? A person? A trademark of a company? I couldn't find anything about it. The artist is therefore unknown until further notice. --Michael (talk) 14:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Authorship clearly disclosed, so this is not anonymous. The fact that we don't know who the author is is not particularly relevant. If author's deathdate can be found, and this can be deleted 70 years after that date. --Storkk (talk) 11:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 15:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 15:26, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Ferradeira (talk · contribs)
[edit]From a book published 1983 (https://www.estantevirtual.com.br/seboreleituras/a-osiris-rahal-familias-de-teresopolis-1702949985), not public domain yet in Brazil.
- File:Sebastião da Fonseca Teixeira.jpg
- File:Otávio Valdetaro Coimbra.jpg
- File:Euclydes Machado.jpg
- File:Augusto Lima da Costa.jpg
- File:Nestor Augusto Pinto.jpg
- File:Altivo Castellar Leite.jpg
- File:Pedro Jahara.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ferradeira (talk · contribs)
[edit]Shot 1950: unlikely to be own work.
- File:Celso Dalmaso discursa para imprensa.jpg
- File:Centro da Várzea em 1918.jpg
- File:Mirante da Fazendinha, 1950.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 19:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Not a valid reason to delete. per COM:DEL/Superseded Larryasou (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus to delete. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:22, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Extracted image File:Poniatowa - KL Lublin Majdanek - WC Toebbens (closeup).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
In order to be considered PD-Polish, the photograph must have been published in Poland before 1994. No publication information is given so the image may still be under copyright. Buidhe (talk) 22:37, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
