Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Chief_of_Naval_Personnel,_shares_a_pizza_with_Seaman_Recruit_Kolby_Zipperer_during_Pizza_Night_at_the_Recruit_Training_Command_(RTC),_Great_Lakes,_Ill.,_on_Jan_080110-N-IK959-007.jpg){kind=link}
_1942_algéroisementvotre.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_001.jpg){kind=link}
_004.jpg){kind=link}
_007.jpg){kind=link}
_005.jpg){kind=link}
_003.jpg){kind=link}
_008.jpg){kind=link}
_006.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Azhar Abbas Desy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:ڈیسی برادران.jpg
- File:محمد عبدالرافع ڈیسی.jpg
- File:اظہر عباس ڈیسی.png
- File:1932رسالہ پیغام ترقی.png
- File:”تواریخ ضلع ملتان“ مطبوعہ 1884ء.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). -- FitIndia Talk Mail 12:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kondazillaelqaluopy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). -- FitIndia Talk Mail 14:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Forgot the Category CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a crop of Peter Leibings photo "Sprung in die Freiheit". Leibing died in 2008 and was not a CIA employee. For the full photo, see https://www.lempertz.com/de/kataloge/lot/1058-2/207-peter-leibing.html Magnus (talk) 10:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:50, 7 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This is a crop of Peter Leibings photo "Sprung in die Freiheit". Leibing died in 2008 and was not a CIA employee. For the full photo, see https://www.lempertz.com/de/kataloge/lot/1058-2/207-peter-leibing.html --Krdbot 20:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by User:Northernrailwaysfan
[edit]- File:Southern Railway Class 171 arriving at Uckfield, Tuesday 6th October 2015.png.
- File:Southern Railway Class 171 at Buxted, Tuesday 6th October 2015.png
- File:Tfl Rail 360 205 next to a GWR Class 387 at Ealing Broadway.png
- And many others uploaded by the same user.
Reasons for deletion request --ElshadK (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC) They are suspiciously blurry and seem to be screenshots taken from other people's videos on YouTube. I have been able to confirm this in the case of the two images listed. They are both taken from the following video see here at 0:15 and 8:50 respectively. The username of the YouTuber who uploaded them is similar (but not identical to the Commons uploader). It may be a case of stealing someone else's work and passing it off as "own work". In the case of the third file listed there is even a YouTube watermark in the bottom right corner.
Deleted: speedy deletion: copyvio. --Mys_721tx (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniyar Kurmanbay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some seem to be screenshots from http://www.qazelectrical.kz while others can be found on various websites.
- File:QazElectrical.kz-ElStan 1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Elsnabj 1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Elsnabj1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Balamaly 1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-ElStan1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Elappar 1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Elappar1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-ESIS 1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-ESIS1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Electrotex 1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Electrotex1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Electronica2.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Elmash.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Balamaly1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-Electronica1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-22.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-23.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-21.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-20.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-19.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-17.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-18.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-16.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-14.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-15.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-13.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-12.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-11.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-10.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-9.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-7.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-8.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-6.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-5.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-4.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-1.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-3.jpg
- File:QazElectrical.kz-2.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 11:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Blurry Lolpro99090 (talk) 21:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Frivolous reason for deletion. Go find another screenshot first and then you'll be more than welcome to replace it. Opencooper (talk) 12:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, DR created via Android app. --Achim (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation (photo by Infinity Nine Media, no authorization). See https://i1.wp.com/www.en24.news/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/matthew-strazel--9-points-en-euroleague-a-17-ans---selon-mitrovic---il-represente-l-avenir-du-basket-francais-.jpg?fit=1867%2C1245&ssl=1 for full version Skimel (talk) 13:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Russell Ferdous Nur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo images. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Singer & Actor - Russell Ferdous Nur.jpg
- File:Singer - Russell Ferdous Nur.jpg
- File:Singer & Actor Russell Ferdous Nur.jpg
- File:DSC00112 - Copy.jpg
- File:কন্ঠশিল্পী এবং অভিনেতা - রাসেল ফেরদৌস নূর.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10, G10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Deepa87malani (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request, quality is not the best. Courtesy deletion. Everybody is allowed to take a better photo about computer mouse. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
See also this post at the Help Desk. It is listed as own work, but it does not appear that the uploader is claiming to be the person who painted the picture, but only the person who took the photo. This would therefore be a COM:DW of a 2007 work, which would remain copyrighted and non-free unless released under a suitable license. GMGtalk 16:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per GreenMeansGo. Unless the uploader provides some evidence showing the painting itself (and not the photo uploaded to Commons) is published under a suitable license, we can't keep it here. The post at the help desk is another evidence showing this is in fact a derivative work of a non-free painting. Ahmadtalk 20:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This qualifies for speedy deletion as a derivative work of a non-free original. --De728631 (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
wrong size Joonas07 (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Obviously revoked by Joonas07. Image replaced by correct one. --Achim (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Achim (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Image has errors Sunilvrma (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
This photo has been posted elsewhere under the license of Shin Kong Group (e.g., in [1], the photo was provided by Shin Kong Financial Holding Co., Ltd.). The uploader must provide proper authorization from the group, even if he/she took the photo. Poem (talk) 04:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
This person was identified as a hoax on several Wikipedias (e.g. en:Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Tim Verfaillie) – BMacZero (🗩) 17:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahulsharmatiwariwst (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Rahuls sharma tiwari acharya balkrishan.jpg
- File:Interview of devi chitralekhaji in direction of rahul sharma tiwari .jpg
- File:Rahul sharma tiwari is with devi chitralekhaji n madhav prabhuji.jpg
- File:Rahul sharma tiwari and devi chitralekhaji.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). - FitIndia Talk Mail 14:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Omeedan mohammedreshid mohammed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.
- File:Omeedan h.png
- File:Omeedan with his mother.jpg
- File:Mutasim.jpg
- File:Humaidan.jpg
- File:Omeedan.jpg
- File:My friends in hischool.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 23:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Geometric nonsense, both conformation (atoms in near-collision distance) and atomically (4 bonds would be tetrahedral) DMacks (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, totally incorrect, such files should be deleted as fast as possible. Wostr (talk) 07:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 20:52, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
© All rights reserved AlbanGeller (talk) 01:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, it would appear the image's owner on Flickr has changed the rights on the original image. --Philip Stevens (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept, the license was automatically reviewed on uploading day by FlickreviewR. Free licenses are irrevocable. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by La Grotte de la Salamandre (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Grand Rappel à la Salamandre.jpg
- File:Visite Guidée dans la Grotte de la Salamandre.jpg
- File:Coulisses à la Grotte de la Salamandre .jpg
- File:Concrétion Orgue avec personnage.jpg
- File:Article de la découverte 1965.jpg
- File:Calcite .jpg
- File:Orgue avec personnage.jpg
- File:Stalagmite Athéna.jpg
- File:Topographie et cheminement de la Salamandre.pdf
- File:Colonne et draperie.jpg
- File:Draperies.jpg
- File:Descente dans l'Aven.jpg
- File:Accès à l'Aven.jpg
- File:L'équipe de spéléologues lors de la découverte.jpg
- File:Vue du belvédère.jpg
- File:A l'échelle de la taille humaine.jpg
- File:Concrétion en pile d'assiettes.jpg
- File:Concrétion sous forme de calcite.jpg
- File:Topographie de la Grotte de la Salamandre.jpg
- File:Roche composée de fossiles.jpg
- File:Plaque commémoration 50 ans.jpg
- File:Travaux d'aménagement de la structure d'accueil.jpg
- File:Creusement d'un tunnel.jpg
- File:Travaux dans la grotte.jpg
- File:Photographie de 1965..jpg
- File:Entrée naturelle avant aménagement.jpg
- File:Vue d'ensemble de la Grotte depuis le Belvedère..jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 13:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
No source/permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farrokh Shayesteh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Farrokh Shayesteh copy.jpg
- File:Chess2.jpg
- File:Chess03.jpg
- File:UNtitle02.jpg
- File:Pomo13.jpg
- File:UNtitle11.jpg
- File:R1A3458.jpg
- File:Cat. B.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
- File:F.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
- File:FF.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
- File:K.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
- File:P.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
- File:Cat. E.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
- File:P6.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
- File:Cat.C.FARROKH SHAYESTEH.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:55, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farrokh Shayesteh (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are apparently paintings and therefore require a free license from the painter. They are also probably out of scope.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farrokh Shayesteh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Sakura-shayesteh.jpg
- File:Popcrn 1-shayesteh.jpg
- File:Popcorn 2-shayesteh.jpg
- File:Shodo-shayesteh.jpg
- File:Selfie-shayesteh.jpg
- File:Kamal al Mulk-shayesteh.jpg
- File:Anar-shayesteh.jpg
- File:Chess-shayesteh.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Regardless of scope issues, they are modern arts by a living author or old photos claimed to be selfies, so COM:OTRS is required for them. User warned not to reupload. They can be hosted here, once both: COM:SCOPE issues are resolved and an OTRS permission is send by the artist / protographer(s). Note: as they seem to be from Iran, no US copyright issues is likely present. I suggest speedying. Ankry (talk) 13:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Most deleted by Ankry. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot. + watermarked. permission needed 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, and possibly from Instagram. description translates to " Image from Instagram account". Permission needed if in scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:57, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:51, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules GAndy (talk) 19:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Deepa87malani (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Useless. Just another unidentified user (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:49, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
no license Mehlauge (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Comment There is a license on the photo page. Image is in use. Deletion request is by uploader. Explain please? (Whatever language you prefer.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept. False rationale for deletion. In use. No explanation offered. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
no license Mehlauge (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Didym (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Northernrailwaysfan (talk · contribs)
[edit]The resolution suggests those are screenshots from videos. This combined with past behaviors (see deleted contributions) makes the {{Own}} claims questionable.
- File:The new livery of a Northern Railway Class 323.png
- File:Newly refurbished interior of a Northern Railway Class 323.png
- File:The review of inside the standard class of a Class 365 (Great Northern).png
- File:LNER Azuma passing Peterborough.png
- File:Class 350-1 arriving in to Tamworth (still in London Midland livery, but with LNR branding).png
- File:A TfL Rail Class 360 at London Paddington.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mys_721tx (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't have any particular evidence, but the user's past behaviour, both here and on en.wp, suggests they do not understand the concept of copyright and free licensing. Delete per COM:PRP. I would also note that it is clear they are taking photos from Commons and passing them off as their own work elsewhere. (thanks to Superalbs for finding this) -mattbuck (Talk) 21:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Agree, the resolution of the images is likely a sign that they are screenshots stolen from other people's videos. ElshadK (talk) 21:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Axieinfinity (talk · contribs)
[edit]The user name of the uploader indicated that it is an official account affiliated with the developer, however, we will need confirmation of this via OTRS according to instructions available at COM:CONSENT.
GMGtalk 21:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
kein Inhalt BrunoBoehmler (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:34, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wiki talker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Tk-swag and a fan.jpg
- File:Tk-swag abuja.jpg
- File:Tk-swag conquers abuja.jpg
- File:Tk-swag with public address system.jpg
- File:Tk-swag nerd unit.jpg
- File:Tk-swag purple and green.jpg
- File:Tk-swag swag swag.jpg
- File:Tk-swag fashion 101.jpg
- File:Tk-swag in customised nike Air force 1.jpg
- File:Tk-swag rocking boy a london jacket.jpg
- File:Tk-swag in black and white.jpg
- File:Tk-swag a unique artist.jpg
- File:Tk-Swag is a prolific and sought-after song writer who has written many songs for numerous African and foreign artistes.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:31, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Даннателла (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Импортозамещение 001.jpg
- File:Победитель конкурса "Национальная инициатива".jpg
- File:Диплом участника выставки.jpg
- File:Национальная экологическая премия.jpg
- File:Green-capital.ru.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 23:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 23:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:29, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Looks similar to File:Preity Zinta 2019.jpg for which copyright ownership has already been queried. David Biddulph (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Taken from the web at https://www.ariosh.com/images/assets/oshe-honmi-banner.jpg . Would need to go through the COM:OTRS process to confirm permission from the company. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
This is extracted from a PDF file from https://www.ariosh.com/downloads/oshe3-brochure.pdf . Would need to go through the COM:OTRS process to confirm permission from the company. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Obviously an official poster, and no evidence that the uploader owns the copyright. David Biddulph (talk) 14:57, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:26, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Really unsure what's going on in this picture. Doubtful that this has editorial value. Badzil (talk) 15:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Probably from Facebook; same uploader of other files from Facebook File:En campaña.jpg, and File:Pablo y Maria Eugenia.jpg Frodar (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Probably from Facebook; same uploader of other files from Facebook File:En campaña.jpg, and File:Pablo y Maria Eugenia.jpg Frodar (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Kaufen Sie den deutschen und österreichischen Führerschein, wie man einen registrierten Führerschein kauft, einen gültigen Führerschein kauft, einen belgischen Führerschein kauft, einen Führerschein in Polen kauft,.jpg
[edit]
This upload seems a commercial advertisement ("Buy a valid driver's license…"). Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is the uploader's only contribution, except for adding more languages to the description. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo, newspaper, logo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Belaruski kamitet u Belastoku 1941.jpg
- File:Piachatka belaruskaga tavarystva dapamogi achviaram vainy.jpg
- File:Sialianskaia gutarka.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot (per EXIF), no source/permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Permission from José Ramón Ladra needed via OTRS 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Artwork, no permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Fair use. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 17:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
2025 : fantasy digram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:57, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file with unknown importance, maybe out of project scope. Google translates file description as "Tree of lightning". Taivo (talk) 12:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Seems like not totally own work, but derivative work of photo with unknown origin and copyright status. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A.esmaeilkhah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Some used on a promotional draft on WP only intended to promote the user
- File:Ahmad Esmaeilkhah02.jpg
- File:Ahmad Esmaeilkhah01.jpg
- File:Ahmad Esmaeilkhah.jpg
- File:IMAG0458-A.Esmaeilkhah.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Barthax123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Suspected flickrwashing. Account has no followers and its only content is these photos. Mix of cameras and missing exif. PCP
- File:Dorothy Marshall.jpg
- File:Anne-Robertson-Hunterian (47757557282).jpg
- File:Barbara cropped (47020330744).jpg
- File:CWickhamJones (40843309243).jpg
- File:CWJ at Mar Lodge 2015 Shannon Fraser (47020331084).jpg
- File:CWJ in 1978 (47020330614).jpg
- File:Cwj working in Bay of Firth march 2010 (40843309793).jpg
- File:Image 14 - Barbara Crawford (47020330954).jpg
- File:CWJ isbister pic F bugge (32866114067).jpg
- File:Image 15 - Marion Campbell at desk (40843308893).png
- File:Image 22 - Dr Rachel Pope (40843308803).jpg
- File:Image 16 - Marion Campbell plaque (47020330534).png
- File:Image 27 - Olwyn Owen, May 2008 (40843309633).jpg
- File:L579-4 (46893324605).jpg
- File:Lecture (32866114627).jpg
- File:Margaret simpson (32866113867).jpg
- File:Marion Campbell 1997 working (46893324495).jpg
- File:Marion Campbell field 1968 (40843309503).jpg
- File:Marion Campbell home1997 (32866114487).jpg
- File:Marion Campbell SNP Dunoon (46893324425).jpg
- File:MayaHoole (40843309423).jpg
- File:Marion Campbell Wrens 1942 (47020330844).jpg
- File:Medal (47020330464).jpg
- File:R 5 49 14 ASRobertsonii (40843308693).jpg
- File:TK3990 (46893324315).jpg
- File:Image 8 - Margaret Tushingham and Dorothy Marshall in Jericho (33932927888).jpg
- File:TK3991 (47020330384).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
2025 : fantasy digram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:57, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake 103.38.15.19 02:42, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I'm going to assume that 103.38.15.19 is the uploader, Kamalvengara, and was not logged in when filing this request due to lack of Commons experience (it's their only upload). We could be strict and require them to log in, but I don't think that's needed in this case. Upload is recent enough that COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
This picture depicts a statute in France. There is no freedom of panorama in France. The statute seems to have been installed in 1997 and if the same Vivien Mallock by an artist who is still living. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Acropi isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in az.wiki. Seems out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
likely derivative of non-free content (3d artwork, published 1984) FASTILY 03:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maruti1989 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope.
- File:Sayasha happy day.jpg
- File:Sayasha.jpg
- File:My family photo.jpg
- File:Sayasha Birthday.jpg
- File:Mjha Katta Group.jpg
- File:P 20150917 163645 1 1.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabriel Peredo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of user’s uploads are obvious copyvios. Highly unlikely that these are the uploader’s work either.
- File:Estadio-cosmos-79-800x420.jpg
- File:Estadio Fabian Tintilay Bermejo.jpg
- File:Estadio Samuel Vaca Jiménez.jpg
- File:Estadio de Futbol de Villa Tunari.jpg
- File:Estadio Hugo Chavez.jpg
- File:Estadio Evo Morales Ayma de Villa Pagador.jpg
- File:Estadio Orlando Quiroga.jpg
- File:Estadio Manuel Flores.jpg
- File:Estadio Tahuichi.jpg
- File:Estadio Tahuichi-aguilera.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 05:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:46, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabriel Peredo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, no source/permission.
- File:Logo UMSS.png
- File:Logo UTO.png
- File:Escudo Uajms.png
- File:LOGO UATF.png
- File:Logo UNIVALLE.png
- File:Logo UPSA.png
- File:Logo Universidad Privada Boliviana.png
- File:Logo UAGRM.png
- File:San Jose de Oruro.png
- File:Always Ready.png
- File:Club Industrial Aviles.png
- File:Club Nacional Potosi.png
- File:Sport Boys.png
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 04:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Very blurry image of flashlights, unused and unusable. Many better alternatives in its categories. P 1 9 9 ✉ 05:26, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Has been deleted before as a copyright violation. Sumanuil (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
screencap from TV Magnus (talk) 08:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram : fascists and nazis in the duma of the USSR ? Out of project scope, Commons is not an external hosting tool for vkontakte jokes or nationstates.net Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram : fascists and nazis in the duma of the USSR ? Out of project scope, Commons is not an external hosting tool for vkontakte jokes or nationstates.net Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:19, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
A DW of this photo https://gourd.com/nealpromophoto.HTML No permission Gbawden (talk) 09:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:18, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
The uploader claims to have permission from the author to "use this picture on Wikipedia", but there is no OTRS tag. -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 09:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Suspected flickrwashing. Flickr account has 3 photos, no followers. Photo taken by Pirhana photography per exif Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Annemarie Graupner-Baumgartner died 2004 - copyright still applicable Bahnmoeller (talk) 11:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC) The photo of this artwork "Sirens", 1971 by Annemarie Graupner-Baumgartner was taken by photographer Kai Arndt who gave permission to publish this photography.--Serafina Archivista (talk) 19:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, watermark. Out of project scope due to bad quality, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
copy from exhibition catalogue - who is Victor Gorge? He might be still living Bahnmoeller (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Victor Gorgé was the cousin of Annemarie Graupner-Baumgartner (the wife of Ernst Graupner) and took a lot of photos of the couple. He gave the photos and the permission to publish them to the son of Ernst and Annemarie Graupner (Stefan Graupner), so they could be printed in the artist catalogue "Annemarie, Ernst, Hans, Quirin Graupner", (Kunst-Pavillon im Alten Botanischen Garten, München 2002; Städtische Galerie Harderbastei, Ingolstadt 2004). Having this information of Stefan Graupner (as well as the permission to publish these photos on the Internet), I uploaded these photos on Wikimedia Commons. As I'm new on Wiki, I do apologize for not being sure how to sign this correctly...(I hope it will be correct)--Serafina Archivista (talk) 19:08, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 16:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
copy from exhibition catalogue - who is Victor Gorge? He might be still living Bahnmoeller (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Victor Gorgé was the cousin of Annemarie Graupner-Baumgartner (the wife of Ernst Graupner) and took a lot of photos of the couple. He gave the photos and the permission to publish them to the son of Ernst and Annemarie Graupner (Stefan Graupner), so they could be printed in the artist catalogue "Annemarie, Ernst, Hans, Quirin Graupner", (Kunst-Pavillon im Alten Botanischen Garten, München 2002; Städtische Galerie Harderbastei, Ingolstadt 2004). Having this information of Stefan Graupner (as well as the permission to publish these photos on the Internet), I uploaded this photo on Wikimedia Commons. --Serafina Archivista (talk) 19:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 16:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
This photo was uploaded without the consent of the person. The upload therefore violated his right to his own picture: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recht_am_eigenen_Bild 194.94.134.245 11:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Clemens Cording gave his consent to publish his foto. Please tell me, how I could proof this assertion; next week I will meet Clemens Cording again.--Luckyprof (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- "Normally it is sufficient that the uploader asserts that appropriate consent was given." Image has also been published here [2] --MBq (talk) 11:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 23:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Марлен Маматалиев (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to bad composition: no educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
From looking at the uploader's limited contributions to Wikimedia projects, it's possible that this could be a good faith contribution that's resolvable through OTRS verification. What's revealed on the surface, however, is a different story. They uploaded this and File:Charles Wohlforth .jpg as their own work, yet the two are credited to separate photographers. Erik Hill worked as a newspaper photographer for many years, which further casts doubt on its status as free content. RadioKAOS (talk) 05:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Es una prueba Evmi 88 (talk) 02:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested deletion within first week after uploading. --Strakhov (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
es una prueba Evmi 88 (talk) 03:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Vandalismo Aitorembe (talk) 05:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of the project scope. --Strakhov (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Lord Gorden (talk) 13:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
@Strakhov: You forget to remove the del req templates Encik Tekateki (talk) 11:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Encik Tekateki: Thanks, done. Strakhov (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC) Indeed, I didn't. Problem was... there was two of them. Strakhov (talk) 11:47, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation: Non-free logo above threshold of originality (F1) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- All fonts are standard, the orientation of the words is bog standard. So we are talking about the stylized fox tail only. Is that element alone sufficient grounds for deletion? --Minderbinder (talk) 08:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyrighted element of the logo is not COM:DM nor COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:28, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Stolen Image from https://www.crossed-flag-pins.com/animated-flag-gif/flags-Kurdistan.html without credit or permission BlinxTheKitty (talk) 01:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk
Adapted from a resource provided by user:alexmar983 that I thought was cc by, but it turns out was not. Awaiting confirmation that original will be released cc by, but in the meantime it's probably safer to remove. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 01:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Well it might simply take few days to get a reply from author User:Mascha2013 if she is fine because she is busy. I suspect however that you can simply add to the description she is the author, but now that you started a deletion procedure we might need OTRS? This sounds even more complicated. Whatever, I can speak to her properly probably only on Saturday to make her upload the original file here (which was my plan, a sufficient amount of days to have final revision before doing so). She will o.k, I was simply worried to be respectful of her work.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
the file is here, she took care of some of the changes, except manly the logos. In any case now it can be listed a correctly derivative work. Sorry but again, she is quite professional, she deserves the credit. it's the most correct thing I can give to all people who work at WSC for free...--Alexmar983 (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Excellent, thank you Alexmar983 for getting that. In that case, I withdraw the deletion request. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 01:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Ruthven (msg) 14:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
File:U.S. Navy Vice Adm. John C. Harvey Jr., (left), Chief of Naval Personnel, shares a pizza with Seaman Recruit Kolby Zipperer during Pizza Night at the Recruit Training Command (RTC), Great Lakes, Ill., on Jan 080110-N-IK959-007.jpg
[edit],_Chief_of_Naval_Personnel,_shares_a_pizza_with_Seaman_Recruit_Kolby_Zipperer_during_Pizza_Night_at_the_Recruit_Training_Command_(RTC),_Great_Lakes,_Ill.,_on_Jan_080110-N-IK959-007.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Chief_of_Naval_Personnel,_shares_a_pizza_with_Seaman_Recruit_Kolby_Zipperer_during_Pizza_Night_at_the_Recruit_Training_Command_(RTC),_Great_Lakes,_Ill.,_on_Jan_080110-N-IK959-007.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My name is on this page. I'm a State Farm agent now, and I've complained about it in previous years. My customers search for my name, and I'd like to have a little say in what gets posted about me.. Can my name be removed, as I have never given consent, and I truly just don't want this picture being pulled up in searches for my business? 2601:281:CC00:2B10:EC9A:F23A:DAB7:5E11 03:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The file page is editable and you can remove your name yourself. Ruthven (msg) 14:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
File:U.S. Navy Vice Adm. John C. Harvey Jr., (left), Chief of Naval Personnel, shares a pizza with Seaman Recruit Kolby Zipperer during Pizza Night at the Recruit Training Command (RTC), Great Lakes, Ill., on Jan 080110-N-IK959-007.jpg
[edit],_Chief_of_Naval_Personnel,_shares_a_pizza_with_Seaman_Recruit_Kolby_Zipperer_during_Pizza_Night_at_the_Recruit_Training_Command_(RTC),_Great_Lakes,_Ill.,_on_Jan_080110-N-IK959-007.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
It's my picture, and I really wish it could be removed. I am a State Farm agent now, and I'd like this picture taken down. 2601:281:CC00:2B10:B16C:EF4F:F3B6:FA2E 02:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Deletion request is not necessary, if you have further privacy related requests these can be considered as courtesy actions and may be raised at COM:AN. As the uploader I have gone ahead with the requested move to trim the unnecessary name as it has no specific educational value. This will in the longer term significantly reduce the Google ranking on name searches. --Fæ (talk) 08:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: file moved (done by user:Fæ), redirection deleted. --Wdwd (talk) 07:32, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Vandalismo Aitorembe (talk) 04:59, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of Crystal Project app kllckety.png. Thomas Linard (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Thomas Linard: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of Crystal Project Kreversi.png. Thomas Linard (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Thomas Linard: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of Crystal Project konquest.png. Thomas Linard (talk) 07:49, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Thomas Linard: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of Crystal Project Kbattleship.png. Thomas Linard (talk) 07:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Thomas Linard: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of Kbibtex.svg. Thomas Linard (talk) 08:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Thomas Linard: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of KTurtle logo.svg. Thomas Linard (talk) 08:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Thomas Linard: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 14:28, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
_1942_alg%C3%A9roisementvotre.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1942_alg%C3%A9roisementvotre.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cropped copy without permission of this site : http://algeroisementvotre.free.fr/site0301/guer3945/debafn00/afn42004.html. Sammyday (talk) 08:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_1942_algéroisementvotre.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
_1942_algéroisementvotre.jpeg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by J.palacios.jean (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to Wikibooks if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: files are in use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photos doesn't include in the PD in Spain A1Cafel (talk) 10:37, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Only texts are within the PD of Spanish Government. --219.79.96.51 12:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Livonian culture centre
[edit]Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, and the architect, Erkki Huttunen, died in 1956, so that we have to delete these filed and undelete them in 2027. Note that I only nominated the filed where I believe there are issues with the freedom of panorama.
- File:Livonian culture centre, 2015 05.jpg
- File:Livonian flag folkhouse.JPG
- File:Livonian flag, 2015.jpg
- File:Lībiešu tautas nams.JPG
Ymblanter (talk) 11:27, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Artist still alive, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, and the architect, Erkki Huttunen, died in 1956, so that we have to delete these filed and undelete them in 2027. Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
This file name should be kept, but since it uses the same exact version as File:ISR-FW-7.svg it should redirect to it and use the same file. The FW-7 version was created based on the official document specifications and is of much higher quality. Again, the name (path) should be kept as it is being used, Gonnym (talk) 14:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- אני נגד באופן נחרץ! השינוי שנערך בתמונה ובו שונה הצבע מאדום לכחול שגוי מיסודו! כביש 7 אינו כביש מהיר. ראו בויקיפדיה מהי הגדרת כביש מהיר. עפ"י תקנות התעבורה בישראל, כביש מהיר הוא כביש שבתחילתו מופיע תמרור "דרך מהירה". שילוט הכוונה כחול או היותו ממוחלף לכל אורכו לא מלמד על היותו של כביש כמהיר. אם מופיע שלט כזה שלא בכביש מהיר (והוא מופיע לצערי פעמים רבות) מדובר בטעות של מהנדסי התנועה שבעצמם לא מכירים את תקנות התעבורה ולא מתכננים נכון את השילוט, וכך גם המפות כמו גוגל מפות, ווייז ואפילו אתר המפות הממשלתי - מסמנות סתם כבישים כמהירים מתוך בורות והעתקת הטעות כמו אש בשדה קוצים. דברים אלו קורים בגלל הבירוקרטיה הרבה בישראל בכל הנוגע לתכנון תשתיות וכבישי, הכולל תכנון התמרורים והשילוט. לא אפרט, אך אני מתמצא יחסית בשיטות התכנון פה ומצבנו לא טוב התכנון מתבצע טלאים-טלאים ואין אחידות בשילוט ובתימרור. על כל פנים - כביש 7 אינו מהיר. לכל אורכו. בנוסף, למי שעדיין מתעקש לחפש את הסימון האדום בכביש 7 (לפעמים באופן מוזר עם רקע כחול ולפעמים כמו שצריך עם רקע ירוק) יכול למצוא סימון אדום זה לכל אורך הכביש למעט בכניסה אליו ממזרח מכביש 3. יש סרטונים עדכניים ביוטיוב שמתעדים זאת. אני קורא לכם לוודא נתונים לפני שעושים שינויים ומוחקים. אם אינכם מבינים משהו אל תזדרזו לשנות ולמחוק. בנוסף אני מבקש לאחר ביטול המחיקה לשנות בחזרה את הסמל לצבע אדום. Arikriff (talk) 16:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: original file has a different color and file was reverted to that version. --Amada44 talk to me 21:34, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
no indication of pre-1946 publication required to be PD in Russia+US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur 2.13.33.129 16:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8671443645/in/photolist-edgq64-dQsHUA 92.135.108.238 12:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, evidence of permission to publish under CC license must be provided 141.44.236.223 08:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep Looks like under the ToO to me. --Ruthven (msg) 14:29, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:15, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
personal files, out of project scope
- File:AKA$H with Blue Hair.jpg
- File:AKA$H in Sepia.jpg
- File:AKA$H with Guitar.jpg
- File:AKA$H in White.jpg
- File:AKA$H RAINBOW.jpg
- File:AKA$H Summer Fashion.jpg
- File:AKA$H.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment S_Kahn, the uploader, told nominator, on User talk:Jon Kolbert, that the individual in the images is an author.
- Nominator's response included the assertion the images: "...are not realistically useful for an educational purpose. The person is not considered notable by Wikipedia's standards and thus images of them would likely fall out of scope."
- If a wikipedia AFD discussion concludes an individual does not measure up to the wikipedia's inclusion standards, then we could say that individual was "not considered notable by Wikipedia's standards". But can this assertion be made, so definitively, if no one had ever tried to start an article on this individual? There are lots of potentially notable individuals, maybe tens of millions of individuals, who have never had anyone write about them. This is all covered in the english language wikipedia's wikidocument OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.
- A google book search does confirm at least one book by the individual depicted here - [3]. This book may be from a vanity press, and thus very likely unnotable, but even if, for the sake of argument, it was a book from a vanity press, surely a more helpful reply wouldn't have hurt? Geo Swan (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for you opinions, but here are some prove from internet sources [1] [2] [3] I don't know are those enough for deletion, and I also don't know how to provide such information or this type of things. If it is OK then keep the files or you can delete the photos of that writer. The writer's name is Salman Aziz a.k.a. AKA$H. --S Kahn (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- S Kahn, there is already an OTRS ticket, from March, which implies you already sent an acceptable proof that you are your father's literary heir.
- I am very sorry this process has been so frustrating for you. This is not how we should treat generous literary heirs.
- I am not one of those trusted volunteeers entrusted to look at those OTRS tickets, but I strongly suspect you already proved your bona fides, in March.
- Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 13:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for you opinions, but here are some prove from internet sources [1] [2] [3] I don't know are those enough for deletion, and I also don't know how to provide such information or this type of things. If it is OK then keep the files or you can delete the photos of that writer. The writer's name is Salman Aziz a.k.a. AKA$H. --S Kahn (talk) 12:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much Geo Swan (talk) for reaching me, but I don't understand about what you said. Is that meaning that the photos are going to be deleted? Or not? Cause I don't know about the wikimedia thing OTRS ticket. Please conform me. If the photos are going to stay then please contribute on those things and edit it to provide resources to make the photos real and yes untag the deletion process. --S Kahn (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ http://www.librarything.com/author/azizsalman
- ↑ https://openlibrary.org/authors/OL7403438A/Salman_Aziz
- ↑ https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/17071167.Salman_Aziz
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 22:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope.
- File:AKA$H with Blue Hair.jpg
- File:AKA$H in Sepia.jpg
- File:AKA$H with Guitar.jpg
- File:AKA$H in White.jpg
- File:AKA$H RAINBOW.jpg
- File:AKA$H Summer Fashion.jpg
- File:AKA$H.jpg
~Moheen (keep talking) 06:56, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment No OTRS ticket was found under S Kan, AKA$H or any possible combination. I found no mention in Internet of this artist, and all files have no metadata; only available information it's that copyright holder is AKASH, but we have no permission from him (or the photographer), so I agree with the idea of Delete at this point. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for checking the tickets. Based on this information I agree that these files should be deleted because of insufficient copyright status. De728631 (talk) 23:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Greetings, Ganímedes (talk) and De728631 (talk) Thank you so much for communicating with me! Basically the author name is Salman Aziz and AKA$H his stage name [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] . I already have got the permission from the writer to upload his photos. Would you kindly help me to fix this process? Because I don't know where and how to get OTRS ticket! I would be helpful if anyone help me! Regards --S Kahn (
- ↑ http://www.librarything.com/author/azizsalman
- ↑ https://openlibrary.org/authors/OL7403438A/Salman_Aziz
- ↑ https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/17071167.Salman_Aziz
- ↑ https://www.google.com.bd/search?q=salman+aziz+akash&newwindow=1&sxsrf=ACYBGNRDE-IX8hhEyJjmkQf97DYw2MNBLA:1573981935618&ei=7w7RXcy7Jc6d4-EPyrWokAs&start=0&sa=N&ved=0ahUKEwiM757R8_DlAhXOzjgGHcoaCrI4MhDy0wMIcQ&biw=1366&bih=625
- ↑ https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8857432/bio
- Ask the copyright holder to send permission to COM:OTRS. They will be replied back with a ticket number. After they do so, tag the file with {{OTRS pending}} template. Masum Reza📞 09:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment S Kahn: Not permission under Salman Aziz neither, even when permission should come from the photographer, not the subject. Besides, still exist the problem of notability. And, in that case, OTRS permission won't help. We only verify authorship and copyrights, but we don't grant notability to the subject. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much Ganímedes (talk) for replying. But I am the photographer. I have taken the photos of Salman Aziz. Those were mobile photography! Please help me! I don't know how to fix it. I would be grateful if you help me.
Regards
--S Kahn (talk) 12:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Masum Reza📞 Thank you for reaching me! But I don't know how to do it! I really can't understand how to fix this problem. I am the photographer of this author (Salman Aziz) and with his permission I have uploaded this photos. Please help me! I would be grateful. Regards, --S Kahn (talk) 12:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please see COM:OTRS. This page contains instructions how to send an email in order to verify your authorship and grant a free licence for your uploads. Once you have sent such an email please add a string of code
{{subst:OP}}to each of those file pages at Commons. De728631 (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2019 (UTC)- OTRS can't help if notability is not set. But... If you're the photographer, please be ready to send the original, unmodificated file, in order to verify information of the camera, in addition to the permission template. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. files can be restored if an OTRS ticket is approved (and notability established). Ruthven (msg) 15:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
By Jancy Buffington, not own work, no permission
- File:New Candys 2018 photo by Jancy Buffington.jpg
- File:New Candys 2018 by Jancy Buffington.jpg
- File:New Candys 2018.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- From uploader on DR talk page - "The band had and still have the permission, Jancy Buffington is the wife of Andrea Volpato, guitarist of the band New Candys. In the official website of the band the picture is used too."
- @Newcandys: Please post your comments here. Can you please provide that permission via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. files can be restored whenever a permission is validated by OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 15:44, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- It is my own work and I found the EXIF version of the file that I uploaded.--Janitoalevic (talk) 14:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: higher resolution uploaded. Ruthven (msg) 15:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no source (No source since), but I consider it has no copyright violation so it was scanned from Mundo Deportivo, an Argentine sports magazine founded in 1949 (some samples can be viewed here or here. As taken in 1970, the photo is PD in Argentina and the US. - Fma12 (talk) 14:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I don't know why you are talking on behalf of Juanmariokd, the original uploader but everybody can see that the images contained in your links are not the same that the one we are talking about! --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I don't talk on behalf of anyone but myself... moreover, it was you who left the notification on my talkpage despite I'm not the original uploader of this photo. I'm just leaving my feedback convinced that the image was published in the date indicated (1970). Beyond of that, there are some other images of Carrascosa here to use. Fma12 (talk) 18:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Fma12 : source was provided. Ruthven (msg) 15:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sayyedrizwanahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Smaller, low res version of File:Wallponame170.png. Software can do the sizing, no need to keep the files of different size.
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 14:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sayyedrizwanahmed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Smaller, lower res version of File:Wallpologo220.png. Software can do the sizing, no need to keep the files of different size.
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 14:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --odder (talk) 10:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
_001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_001.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Typo in the name, unlikely to be reproduced — bertux 19:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_001.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
_001.jpg){kind=link}
_004.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_004.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Typo in the name, unlikely to be reproduced — bertux 19:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_004.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
_004.jpg){kind=link}
_007.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_007.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Typo in the name, unlikely to be reproduced — bertux 19:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_007.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
_007.jpg){kind=link}
_005.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_005.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Typo in the name, unlikely to be reproduced — bertux 19:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_005.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
_005.jpg){kind=link}
_003.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_003.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Typo in the name, unlikely to be reproduced — bertux 19:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_003.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
_003.jpg){kind=link}
_008.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_008.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Typo in the name, unlikely to be reproduced — bertux 19:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_008.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
_008.jpg){kind=link}
_006.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_006.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Typo in the name, unlikely to be reproduced — bertux 19:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
_006.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
_006.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded 39.45.3.211 22:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded Hamzaok (talk) 22:06, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:IDENT, COM:PS. Mitte27 (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: com:NUDE. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no indication of early enough publication to be PD in Russia and US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
External source, no license, no permission
Wcam (talk) 04:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Permissions granted
See permissions at http://caaus.org/ footer
“CAA grants permission to copy, distribute and/or modify contents on this website under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License v.3.0 and GNU Free Documentation License. --Majxuh (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Majxuh. License verified. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File was removed from the source, undetermined copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:42, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Please provide where the image was first published and who created it. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Such information is irrelevant, as this is a Finnish photograph more than 50 years old (copyright has expired). It is in Public Domain now. The photographer is anonymous, and the photograph was first published in Nya Pressen newspaper, Helsinki, in 1967. No reason to delete. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @Mlang.Finn: As I have already notified you, Commons:Essential information#Source requires to "provide at least a link to the web page (i.e., the url) on which the image or file is displayed (that is, not the web address of the file itself, but rather the web page containing the file)". I.e. a mere URL to a CDN is not sufficient source information.
- So, there is no reason to delete this photograph if the source information is updated. ––Apalsola t • c 15:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- As the required source information has been added, this photograph probably can be kept. ––Apalsola t • c 14:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: appears resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Because it contains wrong information, this painting is not by artist Carl Gustaf Hellqvist, but by Ernst Josephson. Proof: https://digitaltmuseum.se/021046642920/konung-gustaf-vasa-anklagande-biskopen-peder-sunnanvader-infor-domkapitlet 83.251.231.103 14:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- How about renaming the file in question? --Taterian (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, but how do you do that? Can you do it Taterian? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.251.231.103 (talk • contribs) 10:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use {{Rename}}. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dorleac-Caine-1967-Helsinki.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Repeat: Such information is irrelevant, as this is a Finnish photograph more than 50 years old (copyright has expired). It is in Public Domain now. The photographer is anonymous, and the photograph was first published in Nya Pressen newspaper, Helsinki, in 1967. No reason to delete. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: source was kept, therefore this crop can be kept. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not found at the provided source. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bonobobo10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no Freedom of Panorama exception in either Guinea or Gambia, so these images infringe on the architects' copyrights and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the architects.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
No source. Please provide evidence that image has been published 20 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Keep As Atilio Fruet (right, #10) played his last basketball game in 1971 (as indicated on here –Clarín newspaper–, this photo is PD in Argentina. The link does not indicate where the photo was scanned from, I guess it was El Gráfico, a popular sports magazine (1919-2018) in my country renowed for its photographs.- Fma12 (talk) 22:41, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Fma12. Ruthven (msg) 16:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that image has been published before 2018 (date on the Facebook account of Asociación Bahiense de Básquetbol.). So mention of Clarín or El Gráfico is irrelevant. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC) @Patrick Rogel:
- I won't repeat my arguments. You're going too far with some DR - Fma12 (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No proof of the other way around. Renominating a file with public license makes no sense and hurts the project. --Ruthven (msg) 18:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: It's a strange reversal of the official policy about evidence: it's up to the uploader to prove that the so-called license PD-Argentina is valid ("For photographic works, the duration of the right of ownership shall be 20 years from the date of first publication")... I prefer not to comment the last part. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: So, you are nominating for deletion a photo from the '70s[4][5] because you are sure that it was published in 2019 for the first time? Do you have evidences of that? Otherwise, it's a violation of assuming good faith (something that every good wikimedian should assume) and a -as written above- an abusive DR. It should be useless to repeat that, but I do so: if you have no proof of that first publication in 2019, you're nominating files for deletion without really knowing why, a behaviour that is very close to vandalism... --Ruthven (msg) 08:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- The date of shooting is not sufficient: "Both at least 25 years have passed after the photograph was created, and it was first published at least 20 years ago." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: : Keep as obvious as it sounds... my talk page is full of DR (like this) by user @Patrick Rogel: , who has been (IMO) abusively nominating files and doubting uploader's good faith, even when all files have a proper source indicated, and even when the sources themselves include dates of (previous) publication; most notably with images from El Gráfico official IG page, which compiles photos from the magazine's archive and (obviously) previously published on paper editions. – Fma12 (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Fma12: Indeed your talk page is full of deleted images (Fma12 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)) beginning back in 2014 and you are still (mis) or (ab) using PD-Argentina. If you think there's an "abuse" from me and that you "good faith" is not recognized, you can report it to the Administrators. I'll be glad to do it too. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Of course I have "a lot" (really so many?) of deleted images (as you glady described), most of them first discussed on their respective deletion requests, but all of them uploaded in good faith for my part. When you have more than 66,500 edits since 2008, of course you may have commited mistakes. So your statement about my (ab)using of PD-AR-Photo template is absolutely falacious and tendentious, unless you have proof of such behaviour... Do you?
- @Fma12: Indeed your talk page is full of deleted images (Fma12 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)) beginning back in 2014 and you are still (mis) or (ab) using PD-Argentina. If you think there's an "abuse" from me and that you "good faith" is not recognized, you can report it to the Administrators. I'll be glad to do it too. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: :
- The date of shooting is not sufficient: "Both at least 25 years have passed after the photograph was created, and it was first published at least 20 years ago." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: So, you are nominating for deletion a photo from the '70s[4][5] because you are sure that it was published in 2019 for the first time? Do you have evidences of that? Otherwise, it's a violation of assuming good faith (something that every good wikimedian should assume) and a -as written above- an abusive DR. It should be useless to repeat that, but I do so: if you have no proof of that first publication in 2019, you're nominating files for deletion without really knowing why, a behaviour that is very close to vandalism... --Ruthven (msg) 08:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: It's a strange reversal of the official policy about evidence: it's up to the uploader to prove that the so-called license PD-Argentina is valid ("For photographic works, the duration of the right of ownership shall be 20 years from the date of first publication")... I prefer not to comment the last part. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't uploaded only "PD-AR-Photos" but a lot of own work, including photographs, sports uniforms and railway maps, as you can see at my user page (which you have already done, besides). The question is: why should I report you? I'm talking about your "abusive" behaviour in some punctual DRs that involve me, I didn't refer to your "whole" activity in the project (which is not my business, either). If the word "abusive" offended you I apologize for that, I don't usually tend to personal attacks to anyone. I hope you do the same with me from now on. – Fma12 (talk) 13:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Please clarify what do you mean with "I'll be glad to do it too." Are you threatening Fma12 in some sort of way? I don't want to interpret this wrongly, but you should clarify what are you aiming here. --Ruthven (msg) 17:36, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The source attribution seems to be circular since the knaw publication is a pdf version of the Wikipedia article. Vera (talk) 17:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination - the KNAW has only released the text of the life messages under this license CC BY 3.0 NL. Some rights reserved: the release explicitly does not apply to photo material, see {{PermissionOTRS-ID|2013042310011976}} Gouwenaar (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Signatures in Taiwan are considered as calligraphic work and copyright protected. This government regulation lists handwriting and calligraphy as examples of artistic works that are subject to copyright protection. Also see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Signatures of people from Taiwan.
- File:Signature of Chu Li-luan (Vector).svg
- File:Signature of Wei Te-sheng (Vector).svg
- File:Signature of Lin Chi-ling (Vector).svg
- File:Signature of Chen Chien-jen (Vector).svg
- File:Signature of Hau Lung-pin (Vector).svg
- File:Signature of Chou Hsi-wei.svg
- File:Signature of Su Tseng-chang.svg
- File:Signature of Tsai Ing-wen (Vector).svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Wcam (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Also:
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) LadyofHats (talk) 02:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- File was created for graphics lab, as a vectorization of a png excisting file i havent come along to tag it as it should. the original file isFile:Institution Notre Dame Valenciennes blazon.png and this should be the svg version that replaces it. but i havent got any answers or coments or corrections from who wanted it. i do not believe it should be taged yet.i will work on the tags for now. -LadyofHats (talk) 02:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks; I've tagged that one also. @Administrator, please keep this discussion open until Nov 14 22:55. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- I uploaded the original PNG file. One could argue that the required threshold of originality is not achieved on this one. That is why only trade mark / naming rights apply. Also: Even, if there was some sort of copyright protection for the PNG file – wouldn't the SVG recreation be free then? What about the following files: [[6]], [[7]], [[8]]. I am not very informed about copyright questions, but couldn't we find a similar solution as in the files mentioned above? --37.58.201.72 17:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Élie Moitessier: I understand why but it looks like you've uploaded to the wrong place. The three images you've linked were self-drawings based on old coats of arms. So this is copyrighted unless it's extremely old, which I'm guessing it's not, since the original (File:Blason officiel Institution Notre-Dame Valenciennes et St Saulve.jpg) was deleted. Can you comment on the age of the original coat of arms? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- I uploaded the original PNG file. One could argue that the required threshold of originality is not achieved on this one. That is why only trade mark / naming rights apply. Also: Even, if there was some sort of copyright protection for the PNG file – wouldn't the SVG recreation be free then? What about the following files: [[6]], [[7]], [[8]]. I am not very informed about copyright questions, but couldn't we find a similar solution as in the files mentioned above? --37.58.201.72 17:00, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- my opinion is that if it is an historical coat of arms then there should be no problem to have it. but if the coat is in use by an university right now is must probably copyrighted, and still be fair use to use it as long as the image has been labeled correclty. in both cases i dont think it can be label as own work-LadyofHats (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- I do not know the exact creation date of the original coat of arms. What I know is that the coat of arms consists of very old and classic coat of arms symbols, e.g. the lion of Flanders. This is by no means a new creation but a re-establishment of old elements. The lion of Flanders one can find e.g. in the coat of arms of the city of Valenciennes, the place where the school is located. --Élie Moitessier (talk) 13:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks; I've tagged that one also. @Administrator, please keep this discussion open until Nov 14 22:55. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The right half has been made using a free lion design created by the fr:projet:blason. Kathisma (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Armes_Universit%C3%A9_de_Nantes.svg){kind=link}
![[7]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_the_University_of_Reims.svg){kind=link}
![[8]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen_der_Gelehrtenschule_des_Johanneums.svg){kind=link}
Kept: seems to consist only of standard blazon elements, and free versions thereof. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
This page contained some basic and unbiased reports from the wiki commons database of the use of sysop tools which raise concerns. These reports are referenced in an Oversight request and justify why questions were being raised about the administrator's compliance with policies which constrain and guide the correct use of sysop tools.
The page contained no subjective conclusions or analysis, being limited to reports of sysop actions.
This DR is created to provide a record of the reasoning for the speedy deletion and whether it is now always going to be an "inappropriate" use of userspace on Wikimedia Commons to include reports about all specific sysop actions, regardless of whether the questions raised are reasonable and unbiased.
Quoting the related AN discussion, "All those with sysop tools accept fair scrutiny and questions based on their actions using these tools per COM:Administrators. Deleting these minor reports on a page that only has interest to those reviewing the Oversight request actually has the potential to raise suspicions that the reports contained something problematic that needed to be hidden. That is not the case, there were relatively technical issues with the use of sysop tools but no private information, nor even the equivalent of trade secrets, just issues that should be subject to fair and fact-based questioning. Deleting the facts is unhelpful if our objective with fair scruitiny is to ensure questions remain non-subjective and we are not reduced to handing out trusted user status based only on community popularity rather than evidence." (diff)
--Fæ (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: as deleting admin. I am not sure why this page needed to be deleted at all, especially not why a speedy deletion was deemed necessary. This does not seem to fit the U3 criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. After 1989 withdraw his/her request for right, the page is simply out of scope. I don't think, that the page violates policies and I would not delete it speedily, but I don't like it to be restored, because ... it's just out of scope. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- I have several similar sandbox/bot pages where old database reports to illustrate discussions, now link to a specific revision in the page history because the page itself has been overwritten. We could do the same here, updating links in the Oversight request so they still work for anyone interested in reviewing the case, but the page is not "live" and so not searchable either. To do that, obviously, the page must be undeleted.
- Consider more generically, if someone has run for advanced rights and the discussion or questions relate to reports and that case fails, but then the next year they run for other advanced rights or even the same rights, then anyone diligently trying to understand the questions and issues from past requests should be able to see the original context and content. Deleting the content so that only administrators can review it, is actively denying non-administrators the ability to review factual and unbiased evidence which may inform their opinions or vote. --Fæ (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment The page in question has been undeleted so that it can be fairly evaluated by all editors (not limited to admins) as a candidate for deletion. ~riley (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, scope be damned — this is user space, and a sandbox to boot. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see the point to have such a page targeted only about one specific administrator, or even about 2 or 3. Such pages if they concern all administrators I can understand, but if it's just about one person I think it is inappropriate and potentially unpleasant. It is clear and obvious to me that this page have to be deleted, and as an "ovious case" from my point of view then I speedy deleted it. If our community want to keep such a page then our community would be kind to do such pages for all administrators, and not a single page targeted and done, according to the goodwill of a single user. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Fair and factual reporting of any administrator's recent sysop actions is not inappropriate to support this project's mission, nor is there any indication that this is "unpleasant"; database reports are literally the epitome of neutral facts.
- By the same complex logic would you delete the historical report about uploads of a certain type by a non-admin user as part of assessing copyright issues User:Faebot/SandboxT,
- or User:Faebot/SandboxJ which contains SQL to generate reports about an ex-administrator's deletions which was used to support an AN discussion in 2018,
- or perhaps User:Faebot/SandboxX in which the history contains a 6-year-old report supporting a de-Bureaucrat request for an ex-administrator to illustrate a potential canvassing problem?
- --Fæ (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: I think that the information on this page would have been appropriate to put directly in Commons:Oversighters/Requests/1989, except that it would have been excessively verbose. Putting it on a user subpage instead shouldn't make it any less acceptable. We don't have many rules about what's allowed in user subpages, but I think COM:CSD#U3 sets a reasonable benchmark, specifically calling out advertising, nonsense, and personal attacks. This is none of those. Christian Ferrer doesn't see the point of this page, but I think that's irrelevant. The purpose of user subpages is to provide a home for things that other users won't see the point of. --bjh21 (talk) 18:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep because of a simple reason: The page contains facts without any comments. Same info can be retrieved by anyone querying the dbs. --Achim (talk) 08:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Achim. Masum Reza📞 08:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Fæ and Christian Ferrer: I would like for us to collaborate on this and find a solution. Christian feels this should not be in the userspace, and Fae is recognizing that this provides a record tied into a request for oversight permissions. Can we move this page to Commons talk:Oversighters/Requests/1989? This would both retain the record and remove the page from the userspace. I know we won't agree on how this deletion was handled, but I think it's worth focusing on how we can move forward? ~riley (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- If check and postpone public actions of users, included administrators, is of course allowed. Pages entirely dedicated to targeting the actions of one active user, especially pages in user namespace or in a user-like namespace is of course quite inappropriate IMO, and a potential source of problems, especially between the person concerned and the person holding the page. Nobody need that. If the content is kept, it is of course at a better place in the request or in the corresponding talk page. Thank you riley for trying to find a solution. And I remain convinced that if this kind of thing is necessary and relevant, then it should be done automatically for all administrators; and the argument that it's relevant because he made a request for advanced rights is rather wobbly, as I'm not sure that the prior candidates were entitled to the same thing, and that the following candidates will also be subject to the same thing), it will be apparently at the will of some person or within their availability. I suggest that, in case it is relevant for one candidate, then it is done each time for each following candidates for such advanced permission, otherwise 1/all the arguments above to keep the content under the pretexte it is relevant are wrong, 2/ it is quite unfair towards this specific candidate. I have no regrets about what I did but now do what you want, I agree. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Christian Ferrer's defence of their actions above, and the earlier repeated refusals to examine their misuse of sysop tools in contravention of the deletion policy, should alarm everyone. Thank you for the suggestion, but let us allow this deletion request to itself follow the 7-day deletion process, and reach a credible conclusion rather than premature action which risks giving the appearance of conveniently burying something and accidentally side-stepping an open free discussion.
- Contributors must be free to neutrally list and discuss the sysop actions of any administrator in good faith on their talk pages and userspace, without the threat of character damaging allegations hanging over their heads that factual analysis may be presumed to be a personal attack against an administrator. This use of userspace and sandboxes is a normal way of conducting an analysis of all types, and has been since the start of this project. Over-indulging a faulty interpretation of policy, in this case, would undermine the most basic governance of the use of sysop privileges. Let's please avoid going to a dark place where analysis and scrutiny are only by covert direct messaging on IRC or anonymously off-wiki.
- I'm attending an early Christmas event, so have limited availability this weekend. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 18:54, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- I think there is some confusion on the purpose of this discussion. This is a deletion request with the purpose being to establish if a page should be deleted, kept and/or moved. The focus is not to establish misuse or abuse of permissions by Christian Ferrer. If you would like to continue the discussion of Christian Ferrer's use of administrator permissions, please have that discussion on the Administator's noticeboard. There is no attempt to bury a discussion and any attempt that is viewed as side-stepping appropriate discussion is redirecting you to the appropriate area to hold that discussion. Now, getting back to the point of this discussion, if voting is in favour of keeping the page, are you also willing to allow the page to be moved out of your userspace and to Commons talk:Oversighters/Requests/1989? ~riley (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- As stated, I think this DR should be allowed to follow the community agreed standard process, rather than closed after a day.
- Also stated above is what would be a suitable (keep) outcome as it has been done exactly this way before, to blank the sandbox page and swap to this existing link in the Oversight discussion. Amongst other benefits, the sandbox can be reused for something else later on and we are not creating odd talk pages for the sake of doing something. --Fæ (talk) 23:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- To clarify, nobody stated or implied that this deletion request would be closed early or against the community agreed standard of process. I am going to invite you to assume good faith, especially considering I have already given you my word that this page will receive a fair and unbaised deletion process. This request will stay open a minimum of 7 days.
- My concern with you blanking the sandbox and us linking the history to the Oversight discussion, as opposed to adding to the talk page, is that you could speedy delete the page at any point down the road per CSD#U1. It is quite common for the talk pages to be used for reports, especially on enwiki (example) ~riley (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Not a scenario that will arise per CSD "If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations."
- The worst that could happen would be a revdel, without touching the 6th November revision. --Fæ (talk) 02:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- I think there is some confusion on the purpose of this discussion. This is a deletion request with the purpose being to establish if a page should be deleted, kept and/or moved. The focus is not to establish misuse or abuse of permissions by Christian Ferrer. If you would like to continue the discussion of Christian Ferrer's use of administrator permissions, please have that discussion on the Administator's noticeboard. There is no attempt to bury a discussion and any attempt that is viewed as side-stepping appropriate discussion is redirecting you to the appropriate area to hold that discussion. Now, getting back to the point of this discussion, if voting is in favour of keeping the page, are you also willing to allow the page to be moved out of your userspace and to Commons talk:Oversighters/Requests/1989? ~riley (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Achim and bjh21. De728631 (talk) 17:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: This was used as part of a oversighter request discussion and contains only public data. As such it is a historic record for Commons Administration. I recommend to move it as suggested in this thread, though. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status (derivative work (screenshot) of copyrighted content content above the TOO). FDMS 4 13:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
If this file should be deleted then also other photographed timetables (like 
) must be deleted --Hp.Baumeler (talk) 08:28, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment It's mainly text with some graphic elements common to timetables. Really above COM:TOO? Gestumblindi (talk) 21:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear on where to put this according to COM:TOO Switzerland. COM:PCP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
no indication of pre-1946 publication required for PD in Russia+US status PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Well, this is a pre-1941 photograph made by an anonymous photographer. As I understand printing photographs from films is considered a publication. It was certainly done before 1941. Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unknown author, unknown publication history. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
The creator of the graphics on the depicted book-pages is en:Clifford Webb, who died only in 1972, whereby the original images are still in copyright and the claimed PD-anonymous-license is bogus. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
textbook screenshot Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:18, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Buenos días.
- La imagen es una fotografía de la reproducción de un texto obra original de Madhava, un matemático indio del siglo XIV. Por lo tanto, está en dominio público.
- Existen numerosos textos antiguos fotografiados que figuran sin problemas
- en Commons, como por ejemplo:
- Saludos: --Wiki LIC (talk) 10:11, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Wiki LIC: por favor, preste atención al licenciamiento. Sé que no fuiste tú quien puso el licenciamiento incorrecto, pero lo copiaste de la wiki en. Aún así, gracias por arregarlo.[9]. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Wiki LIC: ¿quién es el traductor? Éste tiene derechos también. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-old seems correct per explanation by Wiki LIC: ancient text. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
