Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 12th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i dont like Dasoju Deepak (talk) 03:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted – Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7). --jdx Re: 04:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, pointless file Cuatro Remos (nütramyen) 00:36, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, also DW problem -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Tuantruong2312 (talk) 02:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, upload mistake; prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Vietnam was revoked since January 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & orphaned chemical reaction equation; small, hardly visible charge. Superseded by File:Industrial synthesis of isobutyl acetate.svg as high-quality replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 08:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:37, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project's scope. Non-free content from en:File:PfeifferCatwoman.jpg — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS FILE IS USELESS TuinkPortugalete (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: Criterion G7

Deleted: useless and copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Bombardier.svg that has an unnecessary border surrounding the text. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Withdrawn by nominator. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unnamable (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Rolf Tschierschky, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:52, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unnamable (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Rolf Tschierschky, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G4. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

restaurants near me 2001:4898:80E8:A:EA54:18F6:53FE:782A 23:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --4nn1l2 (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused & opaque chemical structure; replaced by transparent version File:Triasulfuron V5.svg by the same author. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 14:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file might come under copyright violation even though Honda may have no interest in such objection. However, since I couldn't reach Honda India (HMSI) for permission, hence I am requesting to delete it. DiscoDingo (talk) 17:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 12:19, 13 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol - official FIAT press shooting, cf. Google Images — danyele 15:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol - official FIAT press shooting, cf. Google Images — danyele 15:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) == About dr.ashish bhanot jpg ==

Deletion was by mistake. Request for undeletion REGARDS Sukh2019 (talk) 13:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sukh2019: As you have already been told, it's not a mistake. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michael Kalbrunner 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Ruth Baumann-Bantel (d. 1994), permission of her heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:18, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 06:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zoedyta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission of each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:08, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS received. --Masur (talk) 05:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elwati (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos

Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Elwati (talk · contribs)

COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:21, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused drawing with no educational value. AshFriday (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-promotional creator template Sweet kate (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete and Category:Stuka Angyali as well. --Achim (talk) 19:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unidentified artwork, probably personal. Unused file. Out of Scope Malcolma (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mathematical formula with no context. Unused file. No obvious educational value. Malcolma (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lanoisseforptrepxe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lanoisseforptrepxe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion of another famous artist, out of project scope. No contributions to any wm project. Lanoisseforptrepxe is another account of Chamaari scherzinger.

Achim (talk) 09:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lanoisseforptrepxe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 06:03, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete per nom. Already stored in Commons memory, no need to wait for a week. --E4024 (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vilnensis juvelyrika (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki score or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a not-noticeable person (Commons as hosting for personal pictures) L736E (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless drawing, more or less advertising Pippobuono (talk) 16:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image (:en:Charles Trippy). Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:07, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo of me that I would like deleted off of Wikimedia as soon as possible. IndeedSir (talk) 18:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MutatedMan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fake Eurovision logos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MutatedMan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fake Eurovision logos.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StarGoodkid Worldwide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StarGoodkid Worldwide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; speedied per COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by StarGoodkid Worldwide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST (en:Star Goodkid).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; speedied per COM:CSD#F10. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebrattsaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Damithmadhusanka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tijo888 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal files and personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?

Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Tijo888 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST (en:Tijo (Actor), en:Tijo(actor), en:Tijo Thankachan and so on).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been published in March 2012 here: https://www.giornaledipuglia.com/2012/03/lucera-al-teatro-garibaldi-il-primo.html?m=1 Ytoyoda (talk) 02:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published on Facebook, per EXIF data Ytoyoda (talk) 02:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2409:4060:2182:210:712A:1FBC:84B6:E367 (talk) 08:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Small file without EXIF data, last remaining image, unlikely to be own work. Sockpuppeter. Yann (talk) 07:37, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VDOPSIGMA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work from a new user

Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

كان مجرد تجربه ليس لها اهميه Hayam2003 (talk) 11:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 TC 10:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, looks like a screenshot Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fugjeduj rfjukogcsutgduffv datiytvkfcdybegygvdcv 5.149.15.234 13:18, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion (vandalism). --Jianhui67 TC 10:07, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:07, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexis Kessler (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:07, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VillaRex1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From google this user is spamming Miniaminiav (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not found at URL. Besides www.varzesh11.com/ is Copyright © 2013-19 Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by Elcobbola. --Jianhui67 TC 10:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to come from https://www.mnsenaterepublicans.com/senjem-update-march-29-18/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:DavidSenjem.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:DavidSenjem.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, same as File:4nAg3P1A.png 202.182.118.14 17:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 TC 10:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused self-promotional creator page Sweet kate (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sweet kate: ! It's not self-promotional. Tom Loomis is a mineralogist, the owner of Dakota Matrix Minerals, one of the greatest minerals page on the web, and the author of fantastic images like these. I was in conversations with him a few years ago because he wanted to upload a lot of files to commons, but the conversations stopped due to working reasons. Some day we'll resume again the conversations but nowadays it's stopped. If the template bothers, you can delete it, no problem! --Yuanga (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused template. Please recreate if needed in the future. --Jarekt (talk) 15:52, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above Threshold of originality. Tomer T (talk) 11:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VELVETS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, only uploads of user and all professional photos

Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rudyernst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits Instagram, previously published photos require OTRS tickets Ytoyoda (talk) 02:17, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyright violation: metadata lists Darja Stravs Tisu as the author, not Klemen Torkar as stated, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 05:18, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my photo and I wish to have it deleted from Wikimedia commons. It was uploaded in error. ViFo101 (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation of copyright : http://www.dreamshow.fr/spectacle > [2] + watermark C Lucas Xfigpower (pssst) 10:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Georg Fischer Archiv Category001

[edit]

According to the given sources: All of this images are licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0 which is not compatible with commons, license review failed. No permission for other licenses like CC-BY-SA-4.0 or CC-0. This apply to the following list of files:

--Wdwd (talk) 11:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait with deleting. All these pictures were uploaded by the owner of pictures, the Iron library, part of the Georg Fischer Company. We will tell them to send a confirmation to the OTRS-team. --Hadi (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Iron Library is a foundation of Georg Fischer Ltd. and connected with the Corporate Archives of GF. We have just sent a confirmation that we represent the owner to the OTRS-team. Iron Library (talk) 18:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 08:32, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission [1] Tyseria (d) 11:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above Threshold of originality. Tomer T (talk) 11:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:19, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Nom withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © From Left Bank All Rights Reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bochkur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant file to File:Hokuso logo.svg. Also, not used and with bad file name. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, found on https://www.41a.net/tag/myprivatechefau, not as declared "own work" by the winery trainee 2A01:E35:8B14:9F90:41A7:636B:5218:4EFD 15:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Possible copyright violation. No EXIF. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikhailDemin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Evguenia Vassilieva, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikhailDemin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© 2019 Eva Gallery

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SuperSportAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:26, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright Kapital do NordestE. Todos os direitos reservados Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:00, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Dina Yakerson, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook Metadata (FBMD) + Selfie: questionable authorship as the photographer and the subject of photography appear to be the same person (Elman Hesenli). 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD (Facebook Metadata). Unlikely to be own work, small size, low resolution, user upload history. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook Metadata (FBMD), small size, low resoluton, user hplaod history --> unlikely to be own work. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also

4nn1l2 (talk) 23:34, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamveryshy22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios - all user uploads have been blatant copyvios related to the Somali military and the uniform images, for example, appear derivative of Internet clip art, e.g. here. COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 23:06, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Iamveryshy22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios - all user uploads have been blatant copyvios related to the Somali military and the uniform images, for example, appear derivative of Internet clip art, e.g. here. COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 02:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 13:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 13:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamveryshy22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus CC claims by serial copyvio uploader. No indication of a free license on the source sites (COM:NETCOPYVIO)

Эlcobbola talk 18:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above threshold of originality. See also COM:Philippines. Tomer T (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above threshold of originality. See COM:TOO India. Tomer T (talk) 11:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:39, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above Threshold of originality. Tomer T (talk) 11:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:38, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above Threshold of originality. Tomer T (talk) 11:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:41, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above Threshold of originality. Tomer T (talk) 11:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asafabir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Asafabir: It doesn't change very much to the issue: you have received an error message (picture 2) while trying to upload this image and it has been published in Facebook (Facebook images are not free). Since an OTRS permission has been sent please now wait until it is processed and granted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: It changes to me. I will appreciate the accuracy. --Asafabir (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anam1221 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader is a sock of user:Selim Shaikh. This user tried to create article about him several times. Every time article got deleted from bnwiki & enwiki & wikidata. As a part of that, this user uploaded those photo on commons. Previously those photo also got deleted but user reuploaded. So i'm re-nominating: Personal images, commons isn't photo hosting service. Out of project scope. have no educational value.

আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 09:43, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NEGUS1010 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sock blocked. --Yann (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no source, no evidence that this photo was ever published in United States and was in the public domain in these countries on the URAA date. RichardsEllis (talk) 17:19, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete No source indicated and it violates copyright--James Davies11 (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Reason for the nomination: No source/no COM:EVID - country is determined by first publication: 1) no source to determine where first published (indeed, images appear to have been taken in Ethiopia, not Italy as implied) and 2) no source to determine when first published (i.e., could have been private photographs that sat unpublished in an album until recently) and 3) no source to determine author. The source indicated is the fascist archive, it is not clear what the source is and if it exists and who is the owner of the copyright, delete it.--James Davies11 (talk) 14:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Italy + PD-1996. --Yann (talk) 09:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

間違えて入力いたしました。 Kamatora (talk) 09:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copied from the actress' official website (according to claim). --Yasu (talk) 15:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elman Həsənli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the nature of several of the images, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history of knowingly grabbing non-free photos from the Internet and falsely claiming to be the author and copyright holder.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elman Həsənli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elman Həsənli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ulikely to be own work. Small size, low resolution, missing usable EXIF, user upload history. 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.foggiareporter.it/gli-appuntamenti-del-weekend-con-babbo-natale-a-lucera.html Ytoyoda (talk) 02:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work of the uploader, most likely copyright violation. jdx Re: 09:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudiocecchi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work. At least one has a photographers name in exif

Gbawden (talk) 12:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why should this picture be public domain? Too young for some pd-120-reasons, as its only about 90years old Quedel (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es sollte pd sein weil es im Sinne der historischen Bildungsarbeit / Andenken an Person der Zeitgeschichte (Opfer des Nationalsozialismus) (siehe Lizenzbaustein) verwendet wird.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
--Erich Mustermann (talk) 11:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Es sollte pd sein ist keine Rechtsgrundlage. Siehe / see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fritz Faust (1880-1939), 1924.jpg --Quedel (talk) 11:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no reason given, why this picture from about 1930 should be public domain Quedel (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist sehr wohl ein Grund angegegebn, nämlich im Sinne der historischen Bildungsarbeit / Andenken an Person der Zeitgeschichte (Opfer des Nationalsozialismus) (siehe Lizenzbaustein).
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
--Erich Mustermann (talk) 10:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist kein Ausnahmetatbestand im Sinne des deutschen Urheberrechts, sondern eine rein private Meinung. Ausführliche Begründung / see also on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fritz Faust (1880-1939), 1924.jpg. --Quedel (talk) 11:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture is younger than 100years and no reason is given for public domain. Quedel (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist sehr wohl ein Grund angegegebn, nämlich im Sinne der historischen Bildungsarbeit / Andenken an Person der Zeitgeschichte (Opfer des Nationalsozialismus) (siehe Lizenzbaustein). Des weiteren befindet sich das Bild im Besitz des Stadtmuseums Bonn, welches das Foto zu eben diesem Zweck einsetzt und keinen Urheber für das Bild angibt.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
--Erich Mustermann (talk) 10:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo @Erich Mustermann: . Deine Angabe ist jedoch nur ein Verwendungszweck, jedoch kein urheberrechtlicher Ausnahmetatbestand. Selbst für Bildungszwecke gibt es enge Schranken $60a UrhG, für Museen die Einschränkung der musealen Arbeit und Beschränkung auf rein nichtkommerzielle Nutzung ($60f UhrG), wobei hier eine Vergütungspflicht besteht (60h). Das alles ist hier nicht gegeben, zumal wir hier weder Museum sonst noch ein Bildungsbetrieb sind, gemäß Projektregeln alle Dateien auch kommerziell nutzbar sein dürfen. Im Übrigen: hast du das Museum angefragt, wer der Urheber des Bildes ist? Wenn du nachweisen kannst, dass der Fotograf länger als 70 Jahre tot ist, wäre das Bild behaltbar. Aber dafür brauchts Namen und Todesjahr vom Urheber.
There is no reason in german copyright law for educational purposes from private people, there is only a noncommercial right to use reproductions for official educational institutions that work noncommercial, and they have to pay for this use. This all applies not to any wikimedia-project, and noncommercial-restrictions are not allowed here. Do you have asked the museum for the name of the creator? --Quedel (talk) 11:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted artwork from 1965, no FOP in germany within buildings Quedel (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo zusammen, dann gebe ich hier mal eine Stellungnahme ab. Im Artikel zur Panoramafreiheit lässt sich Folgendes nachlesen:

„Werke, die sich bleibend an öffentlichen Wegen, Straßen oder Plätzen befinden, mit Mitteln der Malerei oder Graphik, durch Lichtbild oder durch Film zu vervielfältigen, zu verbreiten und öffentlich wiederzugeben sowie solche Werke durch Fernsehfunk zu senden. [...] Eine Vergütungspflicht wurde unter Verweis darauf abgelehnt, dass die Ausnahme gerade an die Widmung an die Allgemeinheit abstelle, die durch die Ausstellung an öffentlichen Orten vorgenommen werde, sodass die freie Abbildbarkeit und Verwertbarkeit der Abbildungen gerade dem Normzweck entsprächen. )

Das Wandrelief befindet sich zwar in einem Gebäude, allerdings nicht in einem Museum oder sonstigem zulassungsbeschränkten/entgeltpflichtigen Raum sondern in einer öffentlich zugänglichen Eingangshalle eines Krankenhauses. Somit ist die Widmung an die Allgemeinheit gegeben und das Relief mit den sonstigen Kunstwerken im öffentlichen Raum (z.B. diesen hier) gleichzustellen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
--Erich Mustermann (talk) 10:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ein Eingang eines Krankenhauses ist aber weder ein Weg, noch eine Straße oder ein Platz. Und um dein Rechtszitat zu ergänzen, der letzte Satz lautet: „Bei Bauwerken erstrecken sich diese Befugnisse nur auf die äußere Ansicht.“ Hier gehts aber im konkreten Bild um eine Innenansicht.
English: The entrance of a hospital is not a way, nor a street or a place. The last sentence at §59 UrhG (de) said, that only the outer view is allowed, but the photo is taken within the building.
--Quedel (talk) 11:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date: person pictures died 1959, no permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer want to have it available Figurestudy (talk) 16:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer wish to have this available Figurestudy (talk) 16:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer want to have this available Figurestudy (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer wish to have this available Figurestudy (talk) 16:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A low-quality version of [2], needs permission. AhmadTalk 20:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image under a CC BY-ND licence. Thibaut (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Le pictogramme en bas à gauche indique que l'image est libre de droit (à l'identique). «— copier, distribuer et communiquer le matériel par tous moyens et sous tous formats pour toute utilisation, y compris commerciale.»--Adri08 (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Et que les modifications sont interdites (ND, celui avec le =), donc pas acceptable sur Commons (voir COM:L).
Pour information, il ne faut pas confondre « libre de droits » (
royalty-free
), licence libre et domaine public. Une image sous licence libre Creative Commons n’est pas « libre de droits ». —Thibaut (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne confonds rien du tout et ne vois pas où est le problème si même l'utilisation commerciale est acceptée et qu'elle peut être utilisée à l'identique. -- Adri08 (talk) 19:52, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Adri08: Une licence libre implique que tout le monde pourra utiliser le fichier, modifié ou non, pour tout usage y compris commercial. Les Creative Common ND et NC ne sont pas libre et donc pas admises sur Wikimedia Commons. Rama (talk) 14:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JDCAIntern (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not found at URL.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax image (see EN.wiki contributions) ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is too too similar to me. Please remove 151.51.247.43 10:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, in use, dubious listing by anon. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears that this file is only slightly bigger than File:KLM logo.svg. Should this be deleted and all the file usage will go to KLM logo.svg? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: They have differing amounts of white space around the logo, so they're not precise duplicates. Since this file is in use on several other projects, it should be kept under COM:INUSE until those projects have finished using it. --bjh21 (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keepper bjh21  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Close as kept per discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: this is a derivative work of a Liechtenstein postage stamp which according to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Liechtenstein#Stamps is copyright so would require the permission of the government or the designer. Ww2censor (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:56, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Indonesia.svg before I uploaded the flag with the color based on the Indonesian law. The red color used here (RGB 206-17-38) originally from SKopp who first uploaded File:Flag of Indonesia.svg and File:Flag of Monaco.svg on the same day with the same exact red and white color and different ratio. The law itself only defined that the flag should be RGB 255-0-0 and 255-255-255. Hddty. (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This version is in use on several Wikipedia pages (th:ประเทศอินโดนีเซีย, th:ธงชาติอินโดนีเซีย, vi:Indonesia, and vi:Quốc kỳ Indonesia) and on wikivoyage:vi:Indonesia. Under COM:INUSE, that means it shouldn't be deleted for inaccuracy. If they want to carry on using this version, it's not Commons' place to stop them. See COM:NPOV for more explanation. --bjh21 (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: The current version of the flag is used because of User:Bonthefox1. See 1 2 3 4 5. Hddty. (talk) 05:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your research, but it's not really relevant. Bonthefox1 and BonTheFox13 seem to have made those edits in good faith, and neither account has ever been blocked on those projects. COM:NPOV explicitly lists "the colours are not officially-approved" as an example of a content dispute that Commons will not adjudicate on. --bjh21 (talk) 10:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: Well it seems that one account already blocked as a sockpuppet of another already blocked account (see Global account info: Bonthefox1 & BonTheFox13). COM:NPOV says that "If you feel strongly that a map, emblem, flag or other file hosted here is "wrong" in some way, please try to persuade your local wiki community to make use of the version you prefer instead", except that it only one person who causing it without apparently create a discussion about this. I'm trying to notify those account hope that they would comment here: @Bonthefox1: @BonTheFox13: . Hddty. (talk) 20:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't talking about being blocked on Commons, but on Vietnamese Wikipedia, Vietnamese Wikivoyage, and Thai Wikipedia. Those sites are where this file is used, and if you want to stop it being used, those are the sites where you need to take action. --bjh21 (talk) 20:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The user who linked this flag in various Wikipedia and Wikivoyage language apparently has unlinked this flag. Hddty. (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral, aha we are talking about UU 24/2009 right? The law itself is nonbinding, but I do agree with Hddty basing it on the law itself.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 06:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: still in use. --JuTa 07:10, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Indonesia.svg before I uploaded the flag with the color based on the Indonesian law. The red color used here (RGB 206-17-38) originally from SKopp who first uploaded File:Flag of Indonesia.svg and File:Flag of Monaco.svg on the same day with the same exact red and white color and different ratio. The law itself only defined that the flag should be RGB 255-0-0 and 255-255-255. Hddty. (talk) 02:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indonesia flag Кирилл Телегин (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This flag should be deleted Кирилл Телегин (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This flag should be deleted Кирилл Телегин (talk) 15:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image is mislabeled as own work, and was previously deleted Кирилл Телегин (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio. No permission has been given to Berta1987 to upload on Wikimedia Commons. Pachidensha (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:57, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture of myself when I was 14 years old without permission of the photographer who holds copyright (Sarah Romantic Photography) and would now like it deleted to protect my privacy. Lukedalygroves (talk) 10:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the reasons stated for deleting this photograph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocknrollthunder (talk • contribs) 10:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:CN Railway logo.svg

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:35, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Use the template {{Duplicate}} instead. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9   14:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly duplicate of File:DHL Express.svg (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this one and redirected the other one. P 1 9 9   14:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vladua8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical painting and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality 2804 (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   14:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work by uploader, and no clear evidence given of release under stated licence by copyright holder. In context (proprietary and commecial software logo), such a licence release seems decidedly improbable (although not impossible). (Also unlikely to fall under {{PD-textlogo}}.) Hence, unsuitable for Commons. HarJIT (talk) 15:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further note: the uploader's contributions seem to include several additional logos under the same status (e.g. File:Logo Corel Painter.png), but also some own-work images (which seem from a preliminary check to be genuine). Notably, the uploader does not seem to be falsely claiming attribution anywhere, merely not understanding the relevant laws and policies, and so seems to be acting in good faith. -- HarJIT (talk) 15:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Our corporate logo shouldn't be available in a high-res and transparent picture like this for download. Please remove this. ARKU Maschinenbau GmbH (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Initially marked for speedy deletion by Patrick Rogel; original reason was: "Still from an unfree video". Pbroks13 (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Pbroks13. Compatible license verified. P 1 9 9   14:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no source, no evidence that this map is truthful and public domain and that there is copyright MatthewsBarnes (talk) 22:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: map background is plain map, no copyright; no sources needed for data; and image is in use. P 1 9 9   14:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject in the picture is a public person and claims that this picture damages her public image. Susomoinhos (talk) 20:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtes deletion/uploader request. --Martin H. (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:48, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. References indicate that original map styles are by user Mtcv who has released their work to public domain and documented it here. While borders itself are non-creative and shouldn't matter copyright-wise, there doesn't seem to be restrictions related to non-copyright rights (subject to COM:NCR) either, besides attribution requirement, as indicated by permission info added to some files like this from the same map set. Pikne 12:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is OBVIOUSLY not own work and the underlying base map is obviously not too simple to be eligible for copyright. Jcb (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My response is here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:LocatieBussum.png. Pikne 16:13, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the base map was uploaded in 2004 by Mtcv in nl.wiki. Those ancient times OTRS-system did not exist yet and it is now grandfathered own file, where no special permission is needed to confirm own work. Jcb said, that the base map obviously isn't own work of Mtcv. Why not? I consider this possible. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

living artist, no Freedom of panorama in France Havang(nl) (talk) 16:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 06:55, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am a communications specialist for the US Public Health Service. This IS NOT the official seal of the USPHS. This is an enhanced version of the seal for online esthetics and should not represent the actual seal. The official seal is displayed at USPHS.gov TLA13 (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Which traler? And why it is public domain in UK? Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, wrong license. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CelStrzel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:FOP in Poland only for outdoors permanently exhibited works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Response

[edit]

@Patrick Rogel: I agree that part of indicated photos should be removed. Please leave the following photos. There are hospital items on them, not exhibitions:


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 1976, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 09:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission, https://hitlerparody.fandom.com/es/wiki/Luis_Carrero_Blanco?file=Luis_Carrero_Blanco.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a photo of photo, it's a cropped photo of
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Luis_Carrero_Blanco_,_premier_en_vice-president_van_Spanje_die_bij_een_bomontplo,_Bestanddeelnr_926-9072.jpg
http://proxy.handle.net/10648/ac3f9e68-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84 --Baprow (talk) 21:37, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Baprow: But the Anefo image is (a photo of a photo) besides cropped from this one. It's then very likely that the original image is a Spanish work not old enough to be public domain. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: A photo of a photo, cropped from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luis_Carrero_Blanco_,_premier_en_vice-president_van_Spanje_die_bij_een_bomontplo,_Bestanddeelnr_926-9072.jpg - we would need permission from the person who took the original photo pinned up to the wall. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yashvats08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader.

jdx Re: 09:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May not be the work of uploader but it might be coming under GODL. So why we delete this? --Ranjithsiji (talk) 07:58, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Unless the uploader works for ISRO, the original source appears to be: https://www.isro.gov.in/sites/default/files/isro_3d_videolow_res.mp4 (via: https://www.isro.gov.in/chandrayaan2-gallery). Also posted on the official ISRO YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--8ORixBXQE. The original ISRO videos are higher-res than the upload here (1080p vs. 720p). In any case, the video must be properly attributed. --Mysterius (talk) 18:38, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: I agree that {{GODL-India}} seems likely for the video, but looking at the YouTube link it seems the music is copyrighted. Even if used with permission, that would not automatically cause the music to lose its separate copyright. If kept, a fresh copy would need to be uploaded with audio disabled (which is simple to do). Huntster (t @ c) 20:16, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/3044016.Leon_D_n_il_ However, since goodreads is also a user-generated website and the text is copied from Wikipedia, it seems unlikely that we copied it from there. Rather, the opposite is true. Strainu (talk) 13:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per nomination + tineye and google image do not show this image elsewhere.--Strainu (talk) 13:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Strainu: First, it's untrue. Second, I'm sure the uploader will be able to provide a full resolution image with all the metadata. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:47, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
6 results, 3 on Wikimedia, 2 on Goodreads, 1 on a fake website that redirects to porn. I stand by my point.--Strainu (talk) 14:15, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: goodreads.com, and similar websites that copy images from the internet without crediting sources and authors, are completely worthless and useless for a speedy deletion rationale. Commons original photographers are aware that goodreads.com and other such websites copy thousands of images from Commons without attribution. (I, for one, know that they copied several of my original photographs from Commons, without mentioning attribution, license, or source). I'm not blaming their website as such. They basically have the same problem we have on Commons with users uploading copyvios. Although they don't seems to actively care about it. Anyway, the result is that a link to an unsourced image on this website is useless as a rationale for a request. Strainu is right that the goodreads.com image was probably copied from Commons. The speedy request was rightly denied as not having a credible rationale. It is unfortunate that the speedy nominator still doesn't make better researched and better documented deletion requests. Aiming for a huge quantity of deletion requests over their quality is not a good thing. However, an ordinary deletion discussion may be proper if there's a doubt about the image for some good reason, which should be specified. In this case, a quick and superficial internet search shows that the image looks like it might have been one in a series of photos from the same session, where the subject wears the same clothes in various poses in the same office. It is indeed possible that the Commons image was copied from some external source. I'm not sure if that would be enough for a PRP deletion. So, I'm not suggesting a keep nor a delete. Someone who would be motivated to make a deletion request about this image could do a deeper research and might arrive at a conclusion. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete photo of photo, DW no source.--Roy17 (talk) 17:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per nomination.Ionutzmovie (talk) 02:54, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Roy17. The original speedy deletion rationale is invalid. Goodreads most likely took the image from Commons. But it's clearly a scan or photo of a photo. Given the contributions of the uploader, a copyright violation is fairly likely, at least per the COM:PCP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per COM:TOO Netherlands. The arrangement of the shapes and the typeface reflects the personal mark of the maker. The threshold of originality is believed to be very low in the Netherlands. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:International Association of Internet Professionals.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:DOORN Records.png. Wcam (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment See Commons:VPC#Logo of Brit Air & KLM Cityhopper. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 23:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, why isn’t File:KLM logo.svg protected too? (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 01:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't aware the the Netherlands had such an exceptionally low TOO. That's my fault. Though it hasn't actually been tested in court when it comes to simple arrangements of geometric shapes (only when reproducing more complex works a la en:Bridgeman v. Corel), I guess it should be deleted per COM:PRP (along with the other mentioned by 大诺史 (talk · contribs)). – BMacZero (🗩) 01:48, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand, another TOO logo was kept at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Transavia logo 2.jpg, and the robustness of the category Category:Logos of companies of the Netherlands indicates that, largely, we have allowed images like this under TOO in the Netherlands. – BMacZero (🗩) 01:57, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the crown part of the KLM logo - while consisting of simple shaped - clearly shows a certain degree of individuality/creativity on the designer's part. COM:PCP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]