Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/04/22
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
deletion request as this was created by mistake--Nattes à chat (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
jkkopkopok Sidlerbj (talk) 19:21, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bioexalhum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely claim of own works on these tiny headshots of people and a pdf document.
- File:Luis julian.jpg
- File:Jose telleria.jpg
- File:Manuel gonzalez valle.jpg
- File:Manuel Torres Serranía.pdf
- File:Manuel Torres Serranía.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, by Ellin Beltz. —Vercelas (quæstiones?) 01:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bioexalhum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-resolution images, unlikely to be own work.
- File:Ricardo Magdaleno Rodríguez.png
- File:Luis Julían Ugartechea Begué.jpg
- File:José Antonio Tellería Beltrán.jpg
- File:Jesús Hinojosa Tijerina.jpg
- File:Enoch Araujo Sánchez.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bioexalhum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from the internet (google images or elsewhere), not own work, low resolution
- File:Jesús María Elizondo.jpg
- File:Juan Antonio Martín del Campo.jpg
- File:Rolando García Ortíz.jpg
- File:José Raúl Hernández Ávila.jpg
- File:Ricardo Magdaleno Rodríguez.png
- File:Victoria Isabel Rincón Carrillo.jpg
- File:Rosendo Villarreal Dávila.jpg
- File:Margarita Alicia Arellanes Cervantes.jpg
- File:Luis Julían Ugartechea Begué.jpg
- File:José Antonio Tellería Beltrán.jpg
- File:Jesús Hinojosa Tijerina.jpg
- File:Gabriel Hinojosa Rivera.jpg
- File:Enoch Araujo Sánchez.jpg
- File:Roberto Ugo Ruíz Cortés.jpg
- File:Fernando Alejandro Larrazábal Bretón.png
- File:Manuel González Valle.jpg
- File:Norma Villarreal de Zambrano..jpg
- File:Margarita alicia.jpg
- File:Luis julian.jpg
- File:Jose telleria.jpg
- File:Manuel gonzalez valle.jpg
Triplecaña (talk) 21:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: All copyvios. All deleted. --Majora (talk) 21:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Author: Robert Weldon Copyright holder: GIA E4024 (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:22, 22 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Productskoltso-iz-serebra-s-vyrashchennym-aleksandritom-natali-pdk25al-47823202651407 small6.jpg
[edit]No EXIF + user behaviour. E4024 (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:22, 22 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
No EXIF + user behaviour. E4024 (talk) 18:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:22, 22 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING? Yann (talk) 04:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 09:49, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Not relevant Caprald (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Own user space. --Achim (talk) 18:15, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 02:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, copyviol, seen posted online earlier at [1] "Copyrights reserved © with Bacha Khan Markaz Peshawar" -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
News photo found at Boston Herald, elsewhere: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTmWOsGeTQCG5mTHS21lsLJwg7pDIE0SvzQf5AZsEAlx5hU8lhR Ytoyoda (talk) 03:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted copyviol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
© Slovo i Dilo Andrei (talk) 14:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Old photo, obviously altered within the last 30 years. Out of Commons scope, and possibly not free anyway. Abzeronow (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
© 1992-2019, Interfax Ukraine Andrei (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
© 2019 Кинопортал filmix.co Andrei (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Spammy description and no use for this file. --AldnonymousBicara? 09:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal images (pt:Matheus Hesi).
- File:Matheushesi, arquivo pessoal 2018.jpg
- File:Arquivo pessoal, matheushesi.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi - arquivo pessoal.jpg
- File:Arquivo pessoal - matheus hesi.jpg
- File:Matheushesi, 2018, @babimbs.jpg
- File:2018, matheushesi.jpg
- File:MATHEUSHESI 2018.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi, 2018.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi por barbara.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi, 2017 (2).jpg
- File:Matheus hesi, 2017.jpg
- File:Matheushesi para recife sem lixo.jpg
- File:Campanha de carnaval, matheus hesi .jpg
- File:Matheus hesi, flavio montenegro.jpg
- File:Matheushesi por Maria .jpg
- File:Matheushesi...jpg
- File:Matheushesi by Maria .jpg
- File:Matheushesi..jpg
- File:Matheus hesi by glovo.jpg
- File:Matheushesi, postagem do instagram.jpg
- File:Instagram- @matheushesi.jpg
- File:@matheushesi @matheushesi .jpg
- File:Matheushesi, Instagram .jpg
- File:Matheushesi ✩.jpg
- File:Matheushesi @matheushesi.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi (arquivo pessoal) 2.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi (arquivo pessoal).jpg
- File:Arquivo pessoal, matheus hesi.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi, carnaval - 2019.jpg
- File:Carnaval, matheus hesi.jpg
- File:Matheushesi, Carnaval .jpg
- File:Matheus hesi para recife sem lixo.jpg
- File:Matheus hesi - campanha .jpg
- File:Matheus hesi - infância (3).jpg
- File:Matheus hesi - infância (2).jpg
- File:Matheus hesi - infância .jpg
- File:Matheus hesi (6).jpg
- File:Matheus hesi (5).jpg
- File:Matheus hesi (4).jpg
- File:Matheus hesi (3).jpg
- File:@matheushesi by @babimbs .jpg
- File:Matheushesi 2.jpg
- File:Matheushesi .jpg
- File:Matheus hesi by @babimbs 2018 ©.jpg
- File:Matheus Hesi by @babimbs.jpg
- File:Matheus Hesi - Arquivo pessoal.jpg
- File:Matheushesi storie.jpg
- File:Matheus Hesi.jpg
- File:Matheushesi.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:58, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 23:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Press image ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, Articseahorse (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
replaced by File:Digital Flag.jpg. Achim (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 20:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Please see speedily deleted File:Michael Dickinson. Tyrant's Pants.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael Dickinson. Good Boy.jpg. Same case. E4024 (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vadim Gogo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images (ru:Вадим Цагарейшвили).
- File:Автограф Вадима Цагарейшвили.png
- File:Vadim Tsagareyshvili 4.jpg
- File:Vadim Tsagareyshvili 5.jpg
- File:Vadim Tsagareyshvili 3.jpg
- File:Vadim Tsagareyshvili 2.jpg
- File:Vadim Tsagareyshvili.jpg
- File:Вадим Цагарейшвили в 2019 году.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; dubious claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vadim Gogo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images (ru:Вадим Цагарейшвили).
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted album covers. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:محمد رباط (صورة).jpg
- File:محمد رباط في كوميك كون جدة.jpg
- File:غلاف أغنية أضحكني الحب.png
- File:محمد رباط.jpg
- File:محمد رباط .jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvios, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
(c)Kate Kondratieva, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
There is a carbonyl group missing at the position between the nitrogen atom and the chlorine-substituted ring. Compare with File:Ochratoxin A.svg. Ed (Edgar181) 16:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There is also another structural mistake: the methyl on the lactone ring is attached to the incorrect carbon. Per the proposed replacement and the rest of Category:Ochratoxins, it should be on the carbon that has the ring-oxygen, not one away. DMacks (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete @Edgar181: @DMacks: Since the file is used in ru.wikipedia.org as well as in sr.wikipedia.org, I think we should replace this file before deletion. I tried to create an accurate high-quality 3D model. Here is a little preview. What do you think about it? Anything else to improve? Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:43, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- I tried to remove it from the Russian article, linking this discussion. But it kept getting restored without explanation. A replacement image would be great. Comparing your image to File:Ochratoxin A.svg, I think the stereochemistry at both stereocenters is reversed. Ed (Edgar181) 13:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Edgar181: Yes, you are right. I reversed the stereochemistry. Here is an adapted file: preview (new). Is is correct that way? Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- It looks good to me now. Thanks for creating it. Ed (Edgar181) 15:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- With pleasure. I have already uploaded it in full resolution under File:Ochratoxin A 3D ball.png and replaced the uses of File:OchratoxinA 3D.png. Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- It looks good to me now. Thanks for creating it. Ed (Edgar181) 15:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Edgar181: Yes, you are right. I reversed the stereochemistry. Here is an adapted file: preview (new). Is is correct that way? Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- I tried to remove it from the Russian article, linking this discussion. But it kept getting restored without explanation. A replacement image would be great. Comparing your image to File:Ochratoxin A.svg, I think the stereochemistry at both stereocenters is reversed. Ed (Edgar181) 13:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:31, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ghahdhdhd11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope; promotional
- File:حسین رحمانی منش.png
- File:Hoseinrahmanimanesh-hashtag.jpg
- File:Hoseinrahmanimanesh.png
- File:Hoseinrahmani.png
4nn1l2 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 14:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 04:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 06:42, 29 April 2019 UTC: No permission since 17 April 2019 --Krdbot 19:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
http://www.cristianabaldassari.it/roberto-palazzolo.htm
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cami de la cruz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without metadata. Files with "Partykingwear" --> COM:ADVERT? GQ magazine --> copyvio?
- File:Partyking wear. Com.png
- File:Partykingwear. Com http.jpg
- File:Partykingwear.jpg
- File:Partykingwear. Com.jpg
- File:Partyking wear.jpg
- File:Partykingwear. Com.png
- File:Cami hollywood.png
- File:Gq magazine.png
- File:Gentalmens enquire.jpg
- File:Gq magazine.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cami de la cruz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images and other copyrighted stuff.
- File:Mercedez benz Cami.jpg
- File:Camino de La cruz.jpg
- File:CAmi de la cruZ.jpg
- File:Cami De la cruz.jpg
- File:Cami de La cruz.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruZ.jpg
- File:Cami de la cruz.jpg
- File:Partykng.com partykingwear.jpg
- File:Party king partykingwear.jpg
- File:Party kngwear.jpg
- File:Part king wear.png
- File:Partykingwear designer cami king.png
- File:Designer cami King.jpg
- File:Party king wear.jpg
- File:Partykingwear.jpg
- File:Partyking wear.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:21, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cami de la cruz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Already deleted, out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Party king wear.jpg
- File:Party king Wear.jpg
- File:Party KingWear.jpg
- File:Party King wear.jpg
- File:Ty sheridan.jpg
- File:PartykingWear.jpg
- File:PartyKingWear.jpg
- File:PartyKingwear.jpg
- File:Partykingwear.jpg
- File:Partyking wear.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cami de la cruz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional spam
ManniLo (talk) 13:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Crappy images of Category:Tramadol I created solely to discuss a flaw in another image of this compound (has only ever been used on an en.wp talkpage). DMacks (talk) 00:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Also:
DMacks (talk) 00:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Also, I propose COM:SALTing File:Untitled ACS Document 1996-1.png, as this is the default that ChemDraw uses when starting an un-named file from standard template. That would be one way to encourage uploaders to use better filenames. DMacks (talk) 02:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete for both File:Untitled ACS Document 1996-1.png and File:MarvinSketch-stereo.png. Low quality or incorrect/broken files, also: original uploader´s request. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, file is protected too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
The depicted murals/graffiti are obviously recent and thereby still in copyright. New Zealand's FoP provision does not cover 2D graphic works. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 14:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 18:21, 30 April 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused and not very large, with non-standard angles. Category:Alpha hydroxy acids has several higher-quality png alts DMacks (talk) 02:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; unused & orphaned. Have File:2-Hydroxyisobutyric acid.svg as proper replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 16:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Small and with unusual visual angle at N. Category:Spiroxamine has higher-quality png at same level of detail and also a more 3D represenation. DMacks (talk) 02:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I fully agree to DMacks´s reasoning. Have File:Spiroxamine structuur.png as high-quality replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 16:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Please see User talk:Anonymous1008. They have never uploaded a real "own work". This one is not an exception. E4024 (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019043010002971 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 07:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- User:Anonymous1008 is a newcomer to Wikipedia. After I saw this Deletion request, I wrote about it on his talk page on He.wiki, and instructed him what to do. He sent an Email. Best wait until processing. Assayas (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Amiga.jpg” under ticket:2019043010002971. -- Geagea (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 12:07, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Unnecesary redirection Macucal (talk) 01:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept this title was used for two years. Since 11 feb 2014 to 1 may 2016. Harmless and useful to some extent (external uses). Strakhov (talk) 20:59, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 06:55, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, OTRS-permission from producing company is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Per COM:PACKAGING, OTRS-permission from producing company is needed. CerveceriaBruger (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
- Per nom. --E4024 (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
This photo is from the former headquarters. The current head office is located elsewhere. 153.156.180.24 05:07, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The file is in use on ja:アルファクス・フード・システム. Under COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete a file that's used by a Wikipedia just because it's alleged to be inaccurate. In any case, historical pictures can be educational. Of course, if you want to update the description to indicate its historical nature, you are free to do so. --bjh21 (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per bjh21. --whym (talk) 14:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
MD says: "Copyright holder Copyright (C) reserved" E4024 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
There is no copyright restrictions concerning this icon. Image was taken from a not copyrighted internet page and its free for sharing. Georgios86 (talk)
- Hi. Would you mind kindly providing a direct link to the exact location where that liberty is stated? --E4024 (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No indication this work is PD. — Racconish 💬 05:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep at least File:Pitt logo 2005-15.png which was a logo for the University of Pittsburgh sports. Has educational use. Others could be keeped if below ToO. Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
2 files deleted by Jcb. 大诺史 (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
unknown person Adelfrank (talk) 15:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
The interest lies in the fact that Bracciano Station reflected in sunglasses Notafly (talk) 17:38, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
- And what is the benefit of that „interest“? Would this picture seriously be an appropriate illustration of Bracciano Station? --Gretarsson (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable person. No one would use such an image to illustrate a railway station. That's the most ridiculous keep reason I've ever came across. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 15:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- DeleteNo educational purpose, see COM:SCOPE "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative". Nothing of this is the case (the image must be informative, not the description!), this pic is clearly out of scope.--Chianti (talk) 10:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep kein Löschgrund, wir löschen nicht alle Fotos unbekannter Personen. --Ralf Roletschek 20:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Personal foto, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- In use now. Keep. Insider (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Insider; in use in multiple pages. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:20, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept, obvious educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Personal foto, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept, but I like it. Potential educational value exists. Taivo (talk) 20:00, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Personal foto, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- This can be useful to illustrate hairstyles. This, I think, we have not. Insider (talk) 08:25, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept, per Insider. Taivo (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
outdated logo Jenhobbs (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say keep it -- even if for historical value.842U (talk) 02:04, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
This is an outdated logo. 184.179.17.76 14:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
possible privacy violation (personal photo without permission) Jimmyhs (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Template:回復,圖片有授權[2],來自立法院
Description |
中文(臺灣):盧秀燕第九屆立法委員肖像。 |
Date | |
Source | https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=1907 |
Author | 立法院 |
--葉又嘉 (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- 立法院的版權開放宣告[3]--葉又嘉 (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
並沒有privacy violation--葉又嘉 (talk) 08:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 05:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1989 at 14:03, 12 August 2019 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
This photograph is a derivative work of a glass bird designed by Oiva Toikka (1931–2019; Q11885212). The original work is not in Public Domain yet. The bird is not a "useful article", so it does not fall under the exemption in U.S. copyright law. Apalsola t • c 19:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
No permission for use under claimed license. File is copyrighted by the Arakan National Party. (Deletion requested by original uploader) CentreLeftRight ✉ 07:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
This photo has been tagged for speedy deletion; however if I remember correctly all photos by SpaceX are CC0 licensed (certainly all photos available on their Flickr account; unfortunately this one is one of the few that doesn't appear there). Maybe someone can review if that's a copyright violation. Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 10:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Image is by private photographer Ben Cooper, per http://www.launchphotography.com/Arabsat_6A.html. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
This file is obviously a low quality scan from a printed source. Therefore I consider the declaration "own work" as very dubious, and the licence deed completely unconvincing. That being said, I regard this file as a copyright violation, unless significant further evidence is provided that the uploader had the rights to the file. Gżdacz (talk) 08:20, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
This printed source is in my author's book under the title "Mechanika budowli" (Structural mechanics), vol.1, page 182 - edited in Cracow by Cracow University of Technology in 2010 year. It is really a low quality scan. Unfortunately. I understand your objections. This source is really my own. ISBN 978-83-7242-541-6 NazwaNr1 (talk) 09:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Did you transfer the copyright to the publisher? If you did (and the book has (c) Cracow University of Technology or similar notice), then it is still a copyright violation. Gżdacz (talk) 09:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
In this book on the back side of the front page there is a notice as follows: Copyright by Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków 2010. What I have to do in this case to obtain rights for publishing this foto? Is it possible? It is quite new problem for me. NazwaNr1 (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- It means that the copyright to the whole book is owned by Politechnika Krakowska. The simplest solution is perhaps that you redraw the diagram in some graphical program. First of all, it is by far simpler than asking the rector, that he licences this single piece of the book under a creative commons license. Next, the quality will be much better than this scan. Gżdacz (talk) 13:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for explanations. I have already prepared new simple drawing made by my own hands and please delete my unfelicitous file "Simple model.jpg". NazwaNr1 (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- This is most probably {{PD-ineligible}}, so no copyright issue. However it is of low quality, and not used, so out of scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
This file you can delete without any objections. It is useless for me. NazwaNr1 (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Appropriate deletion procedure is too difficult for me. Why it is so comlicated? My useless files undoubtedly litter Commons and this is why I dedicate them to deletion. Can you help me? NazwaNr1 (talk) 09:17, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless NazwaNr1 (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
My request for deleting this file is caused by introduction the new more adequate illustration. NazwaNr1 (talk) 10:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was replaced by another one more adequate and actual NazwaNr1 (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: See above. --Yann (talk) 17:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Self-promotion JorgeGG (talk) 03:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:47, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Self-promotion. --Achim (talk) 19:37, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
No description, no categories, nonsense filename, unused. That way the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Fixed. --Yann (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope fake micronation cruft and likely copyright violations uploaded for use on es:República virtual de CdeCountry, which has been deleted.
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:51, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused and outside of Commons' project scope. en:DJ Many has been deleted 11 times. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo —Andreitalk 11:21, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Extremely low resolution, no exif, unlikely "own work" Wcam (talk) 11:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Pictures of Nicole Madeleine Aurdahl
[edit]- File:Nicole Madeleine Aurdahl - 1.jpg
- File:Nicole Madeleine Aurdahl - 2.jpg
- File:Nicole Madeleine.JPG
Per ticket:2019042210003994; these files were uploaded “(...) without my consent. The pictures are mine, and I have not given anyone permition to put them online”. The subject asks their deletion. Bencemac (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Higher resolution: File:Portrait of Abbas Mirza (?).jpg Hanooz 14:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work — Racconish 💬 14:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
See uploader's comment here. IMO, the "bullet holes" are a graphic illustration, not a font design. — Racconish 💬 20:18, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. A few white dots don't create a copyright. --Yann (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Conflicting author and CC licensor. Author is "Anne Arundel County Government", uploader/CC release attestation is from someone else. 138.163.106.71 16:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal coat of arms of a pseudo country + suspicion of copyviolating https://www.deviantart.com/fennomanic/art/Liechtenstein-768138604 90.79.65.119 16:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete obvious copyvio Kathisma (talk) 20:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
No proof of free licence in source. FunkMonk (talk) 17:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
de:Oskar Graf (Maler) (1873-1958 ), German painter, copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Not own work. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW: 2D copy of painting. 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation. NMW03 (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: --NMW03 (talk) 11:51, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-textlogo, but unused JPEG logo, should be SVG if useful. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Very low quality. This photo should not be used anywhere. Andrzej19 (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, suggest close as Speedy Keep. Yes, image quality is below what we'd wish, but image is currently in use in some 16 different Wikimedia projects. (I observe that File:8_481_z_6.05.1958_zespół_rezydencjonalny._Wałbrzych_-_Książ,_ul._Piastów_Śląskich_1_jass_sw.jpg seems a similar view at higher resolution; it might be a useful substitute in some projects - but the nominated photo is in wide use NOW.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
this file is unless NazwaNr1 (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
The request for deleting of this file is caused by introduction of the new more adequate illustration. NazwaNr1 (talk) 10:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This file is useless because the new actual file is created NazwaNr1 (talk) 15:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
quite unclear copyright status (uncluded text and logo) Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:EDUSE: unlikely to be used in a project Takeaway (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:22, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Photo with copyright. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
1977 pic presented as "own work". Dubious ow. E4024 (talk) 19:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I have photos that predate 1977, and I'm hardly the oldest Wikimedia contributor. Such a date is hardly problematic by itself. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per Infrogmation: 1977 is not particularly old; there are quite a few Wikipedians / Wikimedia contributors who are old enough to have taken pictures in 1977 and much earlier. That it is a scan (EXIF data from a Canon scanner) is also consistent with a photo that would have been taken with a regular camera (photographic film, remember? ;-) ) back then, and scanned now. Without any other reasons given, "1977 pic" alone is not grounds for deletion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
It's maybe a bit uncommon that I nominate this picture for deletion after I decided to keep it in the last deletion request. But I hadn't noticed that the uploader has changed the authorship in the meantime, after the deletion request by E4024. Originally, the uploader SchmiAlf had stated "Own work" which I was ready to accept, as it would have been plausible enough (see last deletion request). But now the author is Ursula Gröttrup, and SchmiAlf states on the talk page: "Changed source and author to Ursula Gröttrup, the daughter of Helmut Gröttrup. I asked her to sign and send the license agreement." So, that means that now we need Ursula Gröttrup's permission via COM:OTRS (SchmiAlf, du findest die Vorgehensweise hier auf Deutsch beschrieben). If the OTRS team receives that permission, we can keep the image (again), of course. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Helmut Gröttrup in Bremen 1958.jpg has an OTRS permission; therefore it must not be difficult to get another for this one. --E4024 (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Helmut_Gröttrup.jpg” under ticket:2019042610003772. --Stepro (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Permission added. --Yann (talk) 11:19, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
no longer needed Gveve (talk) 19:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
21 KB dubious own work. Is the previous version PD? E4024 (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Very small, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. --Yann (talk) 11:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
New user w/o contributions. Let's see him this week. E4024 (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 11:17, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Wrong license. Some works are not free. For example, photographer Л. Бернштейн died in 1968[4]. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 20:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Uploader User:Cecile pozzo di borgo has claimed to be the subject of this photo here but according to EXIF data Nelly Gravier is the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernando aumada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos: Paulo Vitale, missing permission.
- File:Maria Cândida Damasceno de Barros Araújo .png
- File:Maria Cândida Damasceno de Barros Araújo.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
duplicated MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:11, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Uploader is a sock and now blocked John from Idegon (talk) 00:00, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Fotograf war de:Carl Eberth (1882-1955), siehe Original: [5] Nicola (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
same as File:Teatro del Popolo 03.JPG, only lower quality LigaDue (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
same as File:Teatro del Popolo 01.JPG, only lower quality LigaDue (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
same as File:Teatro del Popolo 02.JPG, only lower quality LigaDue (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Same file. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
same as File:Monumento ai Caduti Serre di Rapolano.jpg. LigaDue (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I deleted the other file: same quality, this one is used, the other one is not. --Yann (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this otherwise free logo for Team17 fails Commons:TOO United Kingdom. I am sure that the user who changed its license and moved the file to Commons was familiar with the US law and used that in good faith, which indeed is free under the US law. However, they need to use the law of the country of a work's origin. In this case, this Team17 logo is significantly above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection because it uses font and outlining effects imaginative to the human mind, and in the UK, any hint of such creativity is copyrightable, regardless of familiarity. Sadly, this file should be taken off of Commons and kept or reuploaded on Wikipedia locally with the PD-ineligible-USonly tag. Gamingforfun365 (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. This is clearly a PD-textlogo, simply the words "team17" coloured and with an outline. Even British TOO is not low enough for this. I originally uploaded the file to enwiki, but was notified to move it here because it did not meet said TOO. Lordtobi (✉) 04:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Notified by whom? Maybe they know more about the UK copyright law than I thought I did. If so, I would like to know what I am missing. Gamingforfun365 (talk) 20:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, in use. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Insufficient copyright rationale, without stating when photograph was first published or death of author. No PD-US rationale. One source (Sputnik News) claims copyright. Buidhe (talk) 23:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- The photo is published on thousands of the websites and the author is not specified anywhere. Therefore the author is unknown more than 70 years. The Sputnik News cannot have any relation as it was created in 2013 to authorship, and the picture was taken in 1941. --KSK (talk) 16:51, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as per KSK. --Yann (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Андрей Гребенников
[edit]Insufficiently described, uncategorized, unused private photos of an unknown man of unclear notability. Out of project scope. --ŠJů (talk) 23:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 03:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of a not notable individual. Mys_721tx (talk) 06:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of a not notable individual. Mys_721tx (talk) 06:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of a not notable individual. Mys_721tx (talk) 06:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused image of a not notable individual. Mys_721tx (talk) 06:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Unused so-called selfie, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Depicted Clara Silvina Deck isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in it.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
It was originally posted here https://www.flickr.com/photos/100074734@N06/46026474302/in/album-72157700817598142/ with that poster retaining copyright 82.2.63.41 10:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
This is a/multiple logo(s) of an organization, item, or event, and is protected by copyright. Premeditated (talk) 11:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- File:Cvisionlogo.png
- File:Coyhaiquevision.png
- Keep All PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mohammad Abdullah (politician)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work of the uploader.
- File:His father.jpg
- File:MA Personal Details.jpg
- File:Mohammad Abdullah in 40th Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference as Member of Parliament (October,1994).jpg
- File:On his London days.jpg
- File:Secondary Modern School(Original Photo).jpg
- File:With His In-Laws.jpg
- File:With other Presidium Members of Liberal Democratic Party (Bangladesh).jpg
jdx Re: 13:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除を依頼します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
投稿画像の整理のため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
投稿画像の整理のため Rebirth10 (talk) 17:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: images is clear enough and in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmadmemarianw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo and diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Biofert Agri Life Science (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Grapes-2715711 340.jpg
- File:Fresh-tomato-lettuce-nontoxic-vegetable-450w-605432222.jpg
- File:Field-of-rapeseeds-474558 340.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, sorry if this wasn't the proper place to upload it. Maybe should be wikisource? But I am a bit lost trying to do so. could you please help me? Kataiesoun (talk) 21:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
This picture was requested by Margaret Martonosi for a wikipedia page she is making about me so that she could link to it. - Fred Chong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred Chong (talk • contribs) 15:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work: uploader is also subject of the image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
this file is useless NazwaNr1 (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Above ToO? Not used. E4024 (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Nehodící se fotografie AnnaStrass (talk) 21:28, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I've corrected the licence. Details can be seen at http://nzetc.victoria.ac.nz/tm/scholarly/Cyc02Cycl-fig-Cyc02Cycl0160b.html.-gadfium (talk) 21:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
All uploaded here without the knowledge of the author. I contacted him - he is against free use of his photo.
Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 20:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of permission on the site. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolasgros.montagut (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising/promotional content, out of scope.
Wcam (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work. Could be PD-art if it really is a 16th Century Safevid painting, but we need to see a source for that. E4024 (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Too small to be an ow. Please also see MD. E4024 (talk) 18:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:35, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Historical book page. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Q1q2q3qwertz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Licensed at the source as "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License" or "Attribution-NoDerivs License", which is not a free license.
- File:Aloe Blacc The Dome.jpg
- File:Die Atzen live.jpg
- File:Wham!.jpg
- File:Mike Candys.jpg
- File:Mike Candys live.jpg
- File:Dvbbs live.jpg
McZusatz (talk) 12:03, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- The images are from flickr and the authors gave out the premission to use and share the pictures. Look in the description please--Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 12:09, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Please read com:Licensing non derivative and non commercial licences are not allowed. Natuur12 (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Q1q2q3qwertz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted image http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/sonybmg/images/britney-spears-12325 Copyright © 2014 mynewsdesk. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
Ies (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Green Giant. --JuTa 16:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Q1q2q3qwertz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not a font, above the (rather low Dutch) TOO.
FDMS 4 01:48, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Q1q2q3qwertz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation by the Flickr uploader.
FDMS 4 01:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Q1q2q3qwertz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status (license laundering).
FDMS 4 22:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Why? It's released under public domain what i acltually filled in, so where is the problem?--Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 09:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Q1q2q3qwertz: It's a practice called license laundering and there's a link in my nomination rationale explaining it. FDMS 4 16:36, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - probably license laundering, but in any event the Flickr license is PDM which we do not allow. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Q1q2q3qwertz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Stills from unfree videos.
- File:Atmozfears @ Q-Base 2018.png
- File:Brennan Heart @ Qlimax 2015.png
- File:Da Tweekaz Jägermeister Trailer.png
File:W&W Logo 2018.pngFile:Sound Rush in Q-dance Aftermovie.pngFile:Hardwell in Mysteryland promo video 2018 - 1.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- The videos that show Atmozfears and Da Tweekaz were both not free and were mistakes, i am with you regarding those. But the other show in the description a Creative Commons tag. Where is the problem with those?. And regarding W&W, isn't that a logo, which "consists only of simple geometric shapes or text"? And why does there stand "from unfree video"? The source is not a video, as you can see. --Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 16:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- I corrected the link for the Brennan Heart video. It‘s also Creative Commons. —Q1q2q3qwertz (talk) 05:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: most, license verified. Deleted 2 as license review failed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Canada for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Source country is apparently South Africa. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Although I nay not understand the reason for the deletion request on this file, I nonetheless do not contest against this. Therefore if it does go against copyright rules, let it be deleted. However, the file be replaced with another file that still hold the same function of the one nominated for deletion. ThatXhosaFromSA (talk) 22:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:50, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Based on a schreenshot from Adobe Lightroom, I'm afraid we'll have to delete it Podzemnik (talk) 00:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for indicating this mishap. This image was made in response to technical assistance I had provided to support promoting another user's quality image in order to explain the method I had used in great enough detail for even a casual user. I'm sorry that the depiction I had chosen had inadvertently included more proprietary imagery than Wiki Commons allows. I would of course immediately delete this image myself had I but the appropriate rights, and replace it with the light grey shaded area only, excluding all the areas that can be attributed to Adobe Lightroom. This would hopefully be an acceptable solution. In short: feel free to delete this image. Franz van Duns (talk) 08:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
I have now removed all pixels belonging to Adobe Lightroom and have replaced the relevant items with non-proprietary frames and text, leaving only a rough indication as to where to find the corresponding functions. I regard these changes as an appropriate remedy to avoid the pending request for deletion. Should these alterations still not suffice to prevent the deletion process, then feel free to proceed. Franz van Duns (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I version deleted the version containing Adobe Lightroom elements. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:56, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
画像が不鮮明なため削除依頼を出します Rebirth10 (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
No indication that this image is indeed a {{Nasim}} work. Nasim usually gives credit to its photographers. This is most probably a YJC work [6] which does not publish its content under a free license. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:17, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- ok,delete it..i replace another...but when we get this from {{Nasim}},we must not search the creation of the picture! it's so wasting time..when the home page of site says all the content it means that all content from news,media,voice and so on..that's the site's problem i think..--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- No, Nasim may have been authorised to use YJC works, but it is not in a position to license such works for other entities. The copyright notice reads All Content by Nasim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. That means all content created by Nasim is free. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:03, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sun Hung Kai Properties
[edit]Complex logo per Commons:TOO Hong Kong.
Wcam (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: All consists of only simple texts, and so conform the rules of COM:TOO ("Not OK for most logos" does NOT automatically mean "Not OK for all logos").
- P.S. If the nominator's reasoning had been OK, then they should have nominated ALL Hong Kong logos uploaded to Commons, NOT JUST these three. --Moonian (talk) 01:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Even very simple text logos can be copyrightable under the UK law (see COM:TOO UK), and COM:TOO Hong Kong explains why the UK rule applies to Hong Kong. --Wcam (talk) 01:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- You didn't give response to my PS - You should have nominated EVERYTHING under Category:Logos of Hong Kong, NOT JUST these three. --Moonian (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- My response would be en:WP:WAX, although I do believe most of these logos should be deleted. --Wcam (talk) 11:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- You didn't give response to my PS - You should have nominated EVERYTHING under Category:Logos of Hong Kong, NOT JUST these three. --Moonian (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Even very simple text logos can be copyrightable under the UK law (see COM:TOO UK), and COM:TOO Hong Kong explains why the UK rule applies to Hong Kong. --Wcam (talk) 01:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The Chinese font (or as a calligraphy), may be or may be not reaching original threshold. But in fact even most Chinese computer font are actually copyrighted and not sure any Chinese text logo can pass PD or not. While File:SunHungKai logo (no text).svg, without the bilingual name , seem passing PD as simple shape (and to be declared, i have no idea on Hong Kong law regarding copyright on simple shape). Matthew hk on public computer (talk) 07:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per the low TOO of the UK, and the low TOO of China for calligraphy. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Изображённый на фото и автор-один и тот же человек Dogad75 (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Так и есть - я у него специально попросил селфи. --P.Fisxo (talk) 08:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per User:P.Fisxo, looks a lot like a selfie, too. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Clearly wrong position is marked. OpenStreetMap has Julianehøj marked, and the wikipedia articles about Julianehøj have right coordinates, outside top left corner of the current map. No need for wrong map. Macuser (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Alex, this is the property of Toonbox Animation Studio company. Please, call off the claim. The rights are not opened to use for everyone (this is correct, it has to be changed, the pics are not for free to use), but the pictures were placed on Wiki with the Toonbox Studio's permission.
Greenmoon (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I call off the claim. The terms of use needs to be corrected. The copyright owner has not provided GNU license
Alex Toonbox (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete unless OTRS specifies a free license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Alex, this is the property of Toonbox Animation Studio company. Please, call off the claim. The rights are not opened to use for everyone (this is correct, it has to be changed, the pics are not for free to use), but the pictures were placed on Wiki with the Toonbox Studio's permission.
Greenmoon (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I call off the claim. The terms of use needs to be corrected. The copyright owner has not provided GNU license
Alex Toonbox (talk) 20:56, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Alex, this is the property of Toonbox Animation Studio company. Please, call off the claim. The rights are not opened to use for everyone (this is correct, it has to be changed, the pics are not for free to use), but the pictures were placed on Wiki with the Toonbox Studio's permission.
Greenmoon (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I call off the claim. The terms of use needs to be corrected. The copyright owner has not provided GNU license
Alex Toonbox (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)