Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
wrong image uploaded Circlenet (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
no parece el Alberteam01 (talk) 02:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Owner Wants it down FreshMoneyEntertainment00 (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by مينا مرزق الفي حنا (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of com:scope
Wvdp (talk) 08:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Falsche Datei hochgeladen Parangaricutirimícuaro (talk) 09:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The source, the YouTube video is compilation of videos from other platform, which are not under free license. The uploader (on YouTube) is not th author, and can not grant a license. acagastya 08:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Spam. No clear permission. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Created as an adverisement and so speedy. --Herby talk thyme 12:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Advertising. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Created as an advertisement and so speedy. --Herby talk thyme 12:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fetish clothing
[edit]Nominated for deletion on privacy grounds (unless specific participant consent for Wikimedia use has been documented) as photo subject may involve an expression of sexuality, where a critical reaction against the participants or practices shown is a possibility.
File:00-Ponyplay Event Ukraine.JPGFile:A man smelling the crotch of white men's briefs while masturbating.jpgFile:Bizarre Live 14-05-2009.jpgFile:Classic Fetish.jpgFile:Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2014 Parade-32.jpgFile:DexxAmsterdam2016.jpgFile:DexxPupOutdoors.jpgFile:Diaper fetishist.jpgFile:Diapered Woman 2.jpgFile:Fantasy Fest Nudity.jpgFile:Farmer and pig (6183244666).jpgFile:Fetish Burlesque Costume.pngFile:Fetishist wearing lingerie.jpgFile:Folsom Street Fair IMG 6259 (cropped).jpg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Keep A mass deletion is disruptive. If there is a specific privacy concern raise it via OTRS or create a specific DR. Nominating photographs from the Folsom Street Fair on privacy grounds is fundamentally silly; people go there to be seen and photographed in their fetish outfits. Even worse are the deletion on privacy grounds for photographs where nobody could possibly ever be identifiable, like the edible panties. Not intrusive = no possible privacy concern. --Fæ (talk) 14:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Fæ: Are you saying that for 'public' events like Folsom, Commons should just assume 'participant consent for use of images featuring them on Commons' unless indicated otherwise? If so that should ideally be documented in policy. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- If so could you (or another contributor) provide a list the other images in this DR which would be considered to be at public events? I have some thoughts on what those may be already, but would like a second opinon ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Fæ: Are you saying that for 'public' events like Folsom, Commons should just assume 'participant consent for use of images featuring them on Commons' unless indicated otherwise? If so that should ideally be documented in policy. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm considering 'withdrawing this DR, if certain policies are amended to provide gudiance on where 'particpant consent' can reasonably be assumed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Rather than getting into public/private, which is actually a tangent, the key issue should be whether the photograph was intrusive or not. Someone posing happily in their fetish gear, especially in a timed selfie, or posing for a photographer, cannot (in the legal sense) be called intrusive.
- On Commons we have the potential for a courtesy deletion, and there have been many cases via OTRS where this happened for people who did pose for a candid shot, but later changed their minds; a DR is not a good process for those cases, especially when the deletion cannot literally be based on copyright grounds.
- For clarification, intrusion under EU and US law can apply in public spaces, the question is whether the model had a reasonable expectation of privacy. The classic examples being someone eating a meal in a public square, or someone exceedingly drunk or unconscious in public when the photograph was taken. None of that reasoning seems to apply to these photographs. --Fæ (talk) 17:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm considering 'withdrawing this DR, if certain policies are amended to provide gudiance on where 'particpant consent' can reasonably be assumed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Fæ Abzeronow (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- The file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:A_man_smelling_the_crotch_of_white_men%27s_briefs_while_masturbating.jpg is a picture of me which I took myself. Deisenbe (talk) 15:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- And you are OK with this image potentially being used in a circumstance which may provoke critical or negative reactions? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - but renominate individually if deemed necessary. (Although I think that would result in nothing more than lots of individual "Keep" votes as well.) Some images are indisputably at public attended events in public places where people specifically go to be seen, and as such the rationale for deletion is invalid. Additionally, saying things are "scare quotes" public is deceptive, implying that such events are not public at all, which (as noted above) is plain and obvious silliness. Curved Space (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Curved Space, how come this is your "first" contribution months after becoming a user? You opened this account in case you needed to do something under a different name? Better edit without signing in. --E4024 (talk) 15:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- You need to assume good faith a bit more. This is my "first" contribution months after becoming a user because it's the "first" time I've felt the need to make an edit on Commons. My WP page is perfectly transparent on the matter. Curved Space (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Happy to read that. I did not assume any bad faith, BTW. I was just curious. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- You need to assume good faith a bit more. This is my "first" contribution months after becoming a user because it's the "first" time I've felt the need to make an edit on Commons. My WP page is perfectly transparent on the matter. Curved Space (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Curved Space, how come this is your "first" contribution months after becoming a user? You opened this account in case you needed to do something under a different name? Better edit without signing in. --E4024 (talk) 15:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Whether it was made on private ground or not, if the photographer say it is under a free license then we should believe it. Otherwise you have to delete a huge among of pictures, my one on my ground too, because it was private ground and you do'nt have to trust me as photographer (or do you?). The only reason to delete images like this is if there are requests from users that say that the photographer is not trustfully. --Slick (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- I've struck a number of these under the public event rationale , Fæ indicated. I'm also minded to withdraw the others where Commons can assume 'participant consent' because they are self-uploaded, if others here think that would be the correct policy interpretation. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Having reviewed on the basis of Fæ's 'intrusiveness' test comment, I've stuck out all the images in the nominations. There is nothing left. If an admin would thus likely to speedy close this embarrassment of mine. The assistance of an experienced contributor such as Fae in reviewing some previous related DR's I'm also minded to withdraw would be appreciated ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn. (Non-admin courtesy closure.) --E4024 (talk) 19:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Film poster : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Ronhjones (Talk) 19:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 21:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Salvador Dalí
[edit]- Link to previous discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Salvador Dali A (Dali Atomicus) 09633u.jpg
Dali's works of art are not in the public domain. How does US law apply here?
- File:Salvador Dali A (Dali Atomicus) 09633u (original).jpg
- File:Salvador Dali A (Dali Atomicus) 09633u (retouched).jpg
- File:Salvador Dali A (Dali Atomicus) 09633u.jpg
Yann (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as per previous discussion. --Yann (talk) 23:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)DAVID BOHRER, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)David Valdez, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
© Copyright 2019 Wasp Archery. All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
out of COM:scope Wvdp (talk) 08:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 18:29, 14 März 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file File:9-xw iVi3DM.jpg --Krdbot 01:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Autor Andrii Voloshyn
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
discussion moved from image talkpage to here:
Данное фото принадлежит семье Бориса Синкевича, кроме того, члены семьи никому не давали согласия на оформление авторских прав на данное фото. Если заявитель утверждает, что авторское право на фото принадлежит А.Волошину, то пусть подтвердит свои слова соответствующими документами об авторском праве. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Сінкевич Вероніка (talk • contribs) 21:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Шановна «руская» пані Сінкевич. Авторське право прописано в метаданих завантаженого файлу. І якщо у вас нема письмового дозволу від Андрія Волошина на передачу його прав вашій сім’ї, то не мудруйте такими репліками. --Микола Василечко (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
- Шановний пан Микола! Я прийняла до уваги Ваше зауваження. Зважаючи на те, що я дійсно власноруч не фотографувала свого батька - Сінкевича Бориса Яковича, а лише оплатила послуги фотоательє без визначення особи фотографа-виконавця, ім’я якого для мене залишилося невідомим. Ще вчора видалила інформацію про автора цієї фотографії. На реквізитах, щодо оплати фотопослуг, прізвище Волошин не фігурує. --Сінкевич Вероніка (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Шановні адміністратори Вікіпедії!
Я вважаю, що це фото повинно залишитися на сторінці, тому звертаюсь до Вас з проханням не видаляти його. Спробую аргументувати свою позицію: 1.Я особисто знала Сінкевича Бориса Яковича, неодноразово була у нього вдома і на власні очі бачила це фото, а також декілька його фотографій з членами родини, зроблених в один час. Ряд однакових ознак (фон фотографій, якість, одяг зображених на них осіб і т.п.) дає можливість стверджувати, що всі вони зроблені в один день під час сімейної фотосессії у фотостудії. Ці фотографії досі зберігаються в їх сімейному фотоархіві. 2.Зазвичай фотографії з фотостудії у нашому місті віддають у спеціальному конверті, на якому зазначається або назва фотостудії (фотоательє), або її ім’я власника цієї фотостудії, або ім’я особи, з якою ведеться фінансовий розрахунок за фотопослуги. Зважаючи на те, що в фотостудії може працювати декілька фотографів, ім’я того, хто власне фотографував, цілком може бути невідомим. Маю змогу про це стверджувати, оскільки сама маю лише кілька фотографій, на яких стоїть підпис автора із датою, а всі решта, зроблені у фотостудіях нашого міста, без будь-яких зазначень авторства. 3.На мою думку, якщо послуги були оплачені, то власниками цих фотографій є ті, хто за них заплатив. Я спробувала перевірити правдивість твердження Миколи Василечко, про автора цього фото. Але: 1.DNS address вказаного у метаданих серверу www.avoloshyn.com в мене не відкривався. 2.На жаль, я не маю спеціалізованих навичок у фотографуванні і не змогла провірити спеціальну вказівку метаданих -FBMD0f0007d5010000fa460100e81a04004e5404006c890400234a0700e0720c0088eb0c00. Тому прошу спеціалістів допомогти у цьому. 3. Пошук цієї фотографії у GOOGLE, демонструє лише фото, яке виклала Сінкевич Вероніка.
Крім того, прошу звернути увагу, що автор сторінки, Сінкевич Вероніка, дочка Сінкевича Бориса Яковича, власник розміщеного у Вікіпедії зображення, вже відредагувала інформацію про авторство даного фото, щоб уникнути подальших суперечок з цього приводу.
Ще раз прошу не видаляти цю фотографію. З повагою --Бакалець Олена (talk) 10:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Я згідна з агрументами Бакалець Олени та Сінкевич Вероніки, і з тим, щоб це фото не видаляти. Така відома і шанована на Тернопіллі людина (Сінкевич Б.Я.) і його фото заслуговують на місце у Вікіпедії. А некоректне, образливе звернення Миколи Василечка до Сінкевич Вероніки, його претензії і зауваження взагалі не зрозумілі.--Бондаренко Людмила (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, see EXIF. Discussion above seems to show that defenders of this file basically have no clue at all about how copyright regulations work. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Komalsingh123 (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 01:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete Advertising text for a coffee supplier in the Netherlands. - Takeaway (talk) 11:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio image taken from grafika.ru website. Watermark of the website is visible in the uploaded image. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- "The maps in the Map Collections materials were either published prior to 1922, produced by the United States government, or both (see catalogue records that accompany each map for information regarding date of publication and source). The Library of Congress is providing access to these materials for educational and research purposes and is not aware of any U.S. copyright protection (see Title 17 of the United States Code) or any other restrictions in the Map Collection materials."
- Source: Library of US Congress https://www.loc.gov/resource/g7050.ct000058 Craft37by (talk) 22:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: speedily: no valid reason for deletion - 1780 work. --Achim (talk) 12:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:MC RDC 2019
[edit]Out of project scope: unused private image.
- File:AmcfKis1.jpg
- File:AmcfKis2.jpg
- File:AmcfKis3.jpg
- File:AmcfKis4.jpg
- File:BOSENGI NGOLU Samuel.jpg
- File:Collationatwc.jpg
- File:Familleatwc.jpg
- File:Forêt Onane.jpg
- File:Getvictoire.jpg
- File:Image pat et trez.jpg
- File:Kap1.png
- File:La femme forte.jpg
- File:Les femmes.jpg
- File:Liesse Fidel Théohile (1).jpg
- File:MOI.png
- File:Pat à IFA Yangambi.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir10.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir2.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir3.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir4.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir5.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir7.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir8.jpg
- File:Photos souvenir9.jpg
- File:Tony Vision.jpg
- File:Wilthiney.png
Cjp24 (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Please delete, because Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg has changed its terms of use on March 13, 2019 , see https://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/helios/digi/nutzung/Welcome.html (means: Allowed is only non commercial use) Mutter Erde (talk) 11:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The source page says on March 13, 2019: "Die Nutzung ist gemäß den Bedingungen der Creative Commons-Lizenz CC-BY-SA 4.0 erlaubt. Im Rahmen dieser Lizenz können Sie die Seiten kostenfrei herunterladen, bearbeiten und unter gleichen Bedingungen wieder veröffentlichen. Der Bildnachweis muss folgendermaßen gestaltet sein: Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg, "Signatur oder Titel", Seitenangabe - CC-BY-SA-4.0." OR "Use is permitted under the terms of the Creative Commons License CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Under this license, you can download the pages for free, edit and publish again under the same conditions. The image credits must be designed as follows: Heidelberg University Library, "Signature or Title", page reference - CC-BY-SA-4.0." This seems still free Mutter Erde . --Leoboudv (talk) 09:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete As of today the source page does have a disclaimer "Wahrnehmung der Rechte durch die VG Wort" (All rights exercised by VG Wort), and no CC tag any more [1]. However, if it was originally published under a commercial CC licence, the latter licence cannot be revoked unless the library was never in a position to release the image under such a CC licence. This new invoking of rights by VG Wort (which is the intellectual property collecting society for German writers) appears to be a correctional move by UB Heidelberg, so it looks indeed like they were not allowed to CC this work in the first place. De728631 (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per De728631's clarification. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work nor in use. E4024 (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
COM:PENIS 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 00:03, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete GMGtalk 13:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kingjoker2019 (talk · contribs)
[edit]4nn1l2 (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, redundant images of limited educational value. AshFriday (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete GMGtalk 13:52, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:43, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 02:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Cropped version at https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/artur-piperkov-poses-during-the-official-team-presentation-news-photo/480184850, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 05:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
From https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/artur-piperkov-poses-during-the-official-team-presentation-news-photo/480184850 Ytoyoda (talk) 05:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Redmanutd7 (talk · contribs)
[edit]EXIF credits Jana Chytilova/Freestyle Photography, unlikely to be own work
Ytoyoda (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Personal images, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of COM:scope Wvdp (talk) 08:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of COM:scope Wvdp (talk) 08:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of COM:scope Wvdp (talk) 08:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of COM:scope Wvdp (talk) 08:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vishal3100 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krishnaprasath20 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of com:scope
Wvdp (talk) 08:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Picture taken from company website. Likely copyrighted. Vauxford (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Picture taken from company website. Likely copyrighted. Vauxford (talk) 10:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
YouTube account is probably not the copyright owner of this. Yann (talk) 11:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
en:Kashmir Monitor was deleted due to non-notability. Its logo is that case out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:52, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, promotional. Prongs31 12:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Advertising. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M Ssamiullah Khan Maswal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:CH. GHULAM HUSSAIN KHAN MASWAL.jpg
- File:M HAYAT MASWAL LILLA TOWN.jpg
- File:CH. FATH E KHAN MASWAL LILLA TOWN.jpg
- File:M Khan Lilla.jpg
- File:M. SAMIULLAH KHAN LILLA MASWAL.jpg
- File:Bhai khan.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eleditorprofesional234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely all copyright violations. File:Henri-Falcon-Twitterr.jpg, for example, was Tweeted on March 9. Two of the images have giant watermarks on them. The others are combinations of studio photos and logos and highly unlikely to be the original work of the uploader.
- File:Monaga4.jpg
- File:Tarjeton municipio bolivariano libertador.jpg
- File:Javier Bertucci ELCAMBIO.jpg
- File:Reinaldo Quijada Cervoni UPP89.jpg
- File:Hfmovev.jpg
- File:Hfmas.jpg
- File:Hfcopei.jpg
- File:Hfap.jpg
- File:Apc.jpg
- File:Oraluisreyes.jpg
- File:Nmtupamaro.jpg
- File:Linaronupv.jpg
- File:Orejamorada.jpg
- File:Podemos.jpg
- File:Nicolas Maduro PPT.jpg
- File:Nicolás Maduro - MSV.jpg
- File:PSUV.jpg
- File:Henri-Falcon-Twitterr.jpg
- File:Henri-Falcon-Twitter.jpg
- File:Copei.jpg
- File:32867-696x408.png
B (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eleditorprofesional234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mishra.divyanshu25503 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mishra.divyanshu25503 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sureshsdaoo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:ग्रहलाघवम् करण ग्रन्थातील पचांग साधन.pdf
- File:"फलज्योतिष्यातील राजभंग योग".pdf
- File:वर्षाकालीन वृष्टि मेदिनीय ज्योतिष्यानुसार.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sureshsdaoo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:संस्कार प्रकरणांतर्गत उपनयन संस्कार.pdf
- File:अष्टकवर्ग पध्दतीमधिल प्रसताराष्टक ,त्रिकोणशोधन व एकाधिपत्यशोधन.pdf
- File:स्त्री हस्त परीक्षा.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 09:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:56, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Success Maake (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in South Africa. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mr.sulimankhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sunil shakya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 12:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Polygar hound so called the grey land race mandai dog of ramnthapuram tamilnadu from grey wolf.png
[edit]Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suraj kumar sherwal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. Please note that I have not proposed for deletion all their files at once, to give the uploader time to react (defend or correct) but to no avail. Therefore let's delete them all. E4024 (talk) 14:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unauthorized collage. E4024 (talk) 14:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)glenn duffus photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:01, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gary Goh Emeritus Professor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images (:en:Draft:Gary Goh).
- File:Time Out .jpg
- File:Graduate Gary Goh.jpg
- File:Photo 3 - Gary Goh.jpg
- File:Photo 2 - Gary Goh.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal fantasy. You can use it on your Facebook if you wish so. I see no positive contribution to Commons in this image. E4024 (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)OSIEL BRITO ZAVALA, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- "Source: mi PC" implies it is not an own work, either. Delete --E4024 (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
(c)ArtChick LLC, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope and repetitive personal image. E4024 (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:39, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thanks eugene ....i am new at this ....went 2 mit and know whats true or not ,...is big deal as u willl c ....interested in any critique and validation Majikman8 (talk) 22:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCIOPE personal images (:es:Paola Giraldo).
- File:Giraldo paola.jpg
- File:Pao giraldo.jpg
- File:Paogiraldo.jpg
- File:Paolgiraldo.jpg
- File:Paola giraldo.jpg
- File:Paolagiraldo.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
unknown persons Adelfrank (talk) 20:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
unknown person Adelfrank (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
unknown person Adelfrank (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Laberinto Mágico (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (:es:Laberinto Mágico).
- File:Día del Niño en Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Salón Laberinto Mágico para festejar cumpleaños.jpg
- File:Show de la Ana de Frozen, Cenicienta y Súperheroes.jpg
- File:Laberinto Mágico y sus juegos extremos.jpg
- File:Laberinto Mágico salón de fiestas infantiles.jpg
- File:Ciudad Mágica de Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Descubre la magia de Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Niños enojados y Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Nuevo hermanito en casa crianza con amor.jpg
- File:Ejercicio para infantes Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Zona de bebés de l salón de fiestas infantiles Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Ludoteca de Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Laberinto Mágico Azcapotzalco.jpg
- File:La base del cerebro es la bondad Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Me enamoré de Laberinto Mágico.jpg
- File:Imagina un cumpleaños mágico.jpg
- File:Logotipo Salón de Fiestas Infantiles Laberinto Mágico.svg
- File:Logotipo Laberinto Mágico.svg
- File:Laberinto Mágico Instalaciones.jpg
- File:Fachadas Cd Mágica 2.jpg
- File:Laberinto Pequeños.jpg
- File:Laberinto Peques y Cd Mágica.jpg
- File:Laberinto Peques.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Laberinto Mágico (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (:es:Firmante Coberturas Jurídicas de Arrendamiento).
- File:Polizas juridicas de arrendamiento seguro.jpg
- File:Polizas juridicas de arrendamiento.jpg
- File:Polizas juridicas de arrendamiento en México.jpg
- File:Fianza de Arrendamiento y las Pólizas Jurídicas.jpg
- File:Firmante es la firma que te Respalda en Pólizas Jurídicas.jpg
- File:Arriendamiento Seguro con Pólizas Jurídicas.jpg
- File:Póliza de Arrendamiento.jpg
- File:La póliza jurídica.jpg
- File:Qué son las Pólizas jurídicas de arrendamiento.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused private image. Cjp24 (talk) 22:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:30, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dashrathgoyal85 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:दशरथ गोयल भवरानी से कश्मीर भर्मण Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour.jpg
- File:Dale Lake kashmir tour दशरथ गोयल भवरानी Dashrath goyal bhavrani jalore rajasthan 2018.jpg
- File:दशरथ गोयल भवरानी Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour 2018.jpg
- File:दशरथ गोयल भवरानी Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour dkg bhavrani.jpg
- File:दशरथ गोयल Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour.jpg
- File:दशरथ गोयल भवरानी Dashrath goyal, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour.jpg
- File:दशरथ गोयल भवरानी Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour.jpg
- File:दशरथ गोयल भवरानी Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore Dale Lake kashmir tour.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour दशरथ गोयल.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhavrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour दशरथ गोयल भवरानी.jpg
- File:Dashrath kumar goyal bhawrani jalore rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour by dkg bhavrani.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhavrani jalore rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour by dkg bhavrani.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhawrani jalore rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour by dkg bhavrani.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhawrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour by dkg bhavrani.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhawrani Dale Lake kashmir tour - dkg bhavrani.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhawrani, jalore, rajasthan Dale Lake kashmir tour.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhavrani Dale Lake kashmir tour दशरथ गोयल भवरानी.jpg
- File:Dashrath goyal bhavrani, Dale Lake kashmir tour दशरथ गोयल भवरानी Dashrath goyal.jpg
- File:DASHRATH GOYAL भवरानी.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:29, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Songs and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Dolna Marinna látható a képen.jpg
- File:Dona Marinna szerepel a képen.jpg
- File:Dolna Marinna - Ez az a lány 2018 Music Video.ogg
- File:Dolna Marinna - Hazugság 2018 Music Video.ogg
- File:Dolna Marinna - Stílus 2018 Music Video.ogg
- File:Dolna Marinna - Úgy érzem 2018 Music Video.ogg
- File:Dolna Marinna - Még nem késő 2018 Music Video.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:لعبة كرور.jpg
- File:لعبة الظامة تقليدية.jpg
- File:القفز الحر مع التشغلب.jpg
- File:سباق الجمال.jpg
- File:التشغلب الحر أو مايعرف محليا بزرگ كليبيت.jpg
- File:كرة القدم في البادية في فصل الخريف.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from photo. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Roberts Aboltins, missing permission. http://va.lv/sites/default/files/ViA_brosura2018_v6.1.pdf Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:24, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 09:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
no fop, copyvio Martin Sg. (talk) 18:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo:JESSIELYN PALUMBO, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by UninvitedCompany as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Apparent copyvio. The image appears to be the work of a commercial portrait studio, and the uploader's claim that it is a self-portrait seems farfetched. — Racconish 💬 18:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Wyshmaster.jpg could be deleted. An updated photo was added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leslieamelia (talk • contribs) 00:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 18:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete again please. (What else can I add?) E4024 (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
- Closing admin, please read the TP of the file before acting. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 18:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
screen capture of Windows non-free GUI Drummyfish (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I find it a little hard to trust that this widely used image of Al Capone is own work as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Requested by Author Mr Francois Boulet (talk) 20:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
No proof of license Ariam (talk) 20:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
While Randall Munroe has released a few of his xkcd comics under a free license, this doesn't appear to be one of them. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: CC-NC. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
While Randall Munroe has released a few of his xkcd comics under a free license, this doesn't appear to be one of them. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: NC license. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be own work, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 22:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright status? Yann (talk) 22:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Salvador Dali - La Conquete de l'Irrationnel - Museo Reina Sofia - Madrid, Spain (4607649702).jpg
[edit]COM:DW. Flickr account is not the copyright holder. Yann (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Jean Mascii (d. 2003), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality (pixelated); replaced by File:2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-hexandiol.svg. Leyo 22:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Low-quality & pixelated chemical structure; already replaced by File:2,5-Dimethyl-2,5-hexandiol.svg as high-quality vector graphic. I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
already in Commons under his used name: Auguste Clésinger Ecritures (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Sophie Gorman, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I have doubts about the PD status of this file due to the map. I asked the license reviewer about it but did not receive a satisfactory answer. (Perhaps I did not understand their explanation.) That's why we're here now. E4024 (talk) 01:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: The background map looks to me very much like the old Google Maps "terrain" view. --bjh21 (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
It is look like screen shot from video Sakhalinio (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Datei wird bearbeitet und erneut hochgeladen Joerg Zenner (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept: kein Löschgrund, kann bei Bedarf als neue Version hochgeladen werden Didym (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Weil ich es so will! Joerg Zenner (talk) 09:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Weil ich es so will! Joerg Zenner (talk) 09:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly not own work. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Incomplete upload... also the uploader has uploaded a full photo of the same name and of greater size, on the same day. Acabashi (talk) 14:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
My own work. Superceded by File:Comparison_of_symmetric_and_periodic_triangular_window_functions.svg. Nothing links to this version. Bob K (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by URIEL PABLO JIMENEZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
not needed for the articel it was intended for; its only a scan and not a photo or something similiar; want to get it deleted Teewurzler (talk) 15:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
not needed for the articel it was intended for; its only a scan and not a photo or something similiar; want to get it deleted Teewurzler (talk) 15:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
not needed for the articel it was intended for; its only a scan and not a photo or something similiar; want to get it deleted Teewurzler (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:35, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
not needed for the articel it was intended for; its only a scan and not a photo or something similiar; want to get it deleted Teewurzler (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
not needed for the articel it was intended for; its only a scan and not a photo or something similiar; want to get it deleted Teewurzler (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
not needed for the articel it was intended for; its only a scan and not a photo or something similiar; want to get it deleted Teewurzler (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
not needed for the articel it was intended for; its only a scan and not a photo or something similiar; want to get it deleted Teewurzler (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alla Druzhenets (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGING
- File:Kronenbourg 1664 Blanc with cheese.jpg
- File:Kronenbourg 1664 Blanc Picnic.jpg
- File:Kronenbourg 1664 Blanc CAN 0,33.jpg
- File:Kronenborg 1664 Blanc Bootle.jpg
- File:Kronenbourg 1664 Blanc bootle 0,46.png
- File:Kronenbourg Blank CAN 0.33L.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 14:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 12:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; doubtful claim of own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Similar to http://www.twipu.com/mosdotcom/tweet/1098991088856154112, permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Amira Yahyaoui, founder of Mos.com, in her San Francisco office.jpg
- File:Amira Yahyaoui in the Mos.com office.jpg
- File:Amira Yahyaoui.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Regardless of issue of notability (founder may be, company might not, in its own right, as per en:Draft:Mos_(civic_tech_company)), the logo is arguably above threshold of originality/copyrightability, and it's not clear that uploader has permission to license it on these terms.
Ubcule (talk) 14:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
(c)Jeff Ross Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Without context, the picture falls out of project scope. We need an explanation about the location and the visible person's activity. Ras67 (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
35 edits in two years: I am not sure if he deserves to keep a personal image here. E4024 (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I opened regular deletion request because of this warning: "If you think that the file does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please open a regular deletion request and remove this template." Dreamer14513181 (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious Flickr-washing. Image was published already in 2017[2], whereas it was uploaded to Flickr the same day it was uploaded to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Yes, I read on wikipedia's article that if i add image in flickr, wikipedia will let me use this image, so i added the picture for wikipedia,
yes, you can find picture on other websites early times, in 2017, because I let other websites use this image. What can i do now for solving this problem.--Dreamer14513181 (talk) 12:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader admitted to flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vidzemes Augstskola (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission of Roberts Aboltins and Viesturs Lacis, needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Vidzemes University of Applied Sciences.jpg
- File:Study in ViA.jpg
- File:ViA Activities.jpg
- File:Why choose ViA.jpg
- File:ViA.jpg
- File:ViA studijas.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 04:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
It's my image?
Deleted: per nomination; looks like a screenshot. Uploader to reupload with exif. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.francescofranchi.com/infographic-thinking-workshop-in-singapore Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission statment to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org. Please read COM:OTRS for more information. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:40, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; needs permission. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Picture is clearly used as a way to mock him. 209.152.44.213 21:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete dubious "own work" license too. Abzeronow (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Eleakis & Elder Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
The exact source for this image is not given. The source shows a set of other images. Leoboudv (talk) 08:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Source info corrected should link to the image now. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: source found and image reviewed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
一部ナンバープレートが Jogungagon (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested deletion on the day of upload. --Yasu (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please delete, because Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg has changed its terms of use on March 13, 2019 , see https://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/helios/digi/nutzung/Welcome.html (means: Allowed is only non commercial use) Mutter Erde (talk) 11:06, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep CC verified before that.--Roy17 (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Achim (talk) 19:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
wrong CC Goesseln (talk) 10:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept. Correct CC. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Please delete, because Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg has changed its terms of use on March 13, 2019 , see https://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/helios/digi/nutzung/Welcome.html (means: Allowed is only non commercial use) Mutter Erde (talk) 11:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep CC verified before that.--Roy17 (talk) 17:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Roy17. --Achim (talk) 19:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
wrong CC, the artist Kesting died 1970 Goesseln (talk) 09:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- What has changed since the previous DR ? Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete @Clindberg: The Universitätsbibliothek might be the creator of the COM:DW (but per PD-art we don't care about the creator of such 2D-DWs). The real artist of the artwork is not the Universitätsbibliothek (translated: Univerity Library), but Edmund Kesting. There is no evidence that the Library has "taken over" the copyright from the artist, or his heirs. The previous DR only discussed the library's change of license on their website, not if they actually were to copyright owners, to begin with. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. We need permission from Artists estate. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
confusing redirect: en:Eliza doesn't mention anything related to churches Jochen Burghardt (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, I didn't know that. Do you suggest to close the discussion and keep the page? - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:39, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. Thanks and best regards.--JT Curses (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --Achim (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
This coat of arms never existed. It is simply the product of Glide08's imagination and thus has no practical use on any Wiki. Alex:D (talk) 07:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a product of my Imagination. As per [www.cjmures.ro/Eng/Insemne/stema.htm], "the first symbol of the revolution was the whole[sic] in the flag, from which the communist star was removed.". Glide08 (talk) 07:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- That is just a bad translation in English. The emblem was ripped from the flag, that's all! Like this: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Where did you ever see the emblem you created? --Alex:D (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- I assumed that immediately after the 1989 Revolution, and until the current arms were restored in 1992 - which is a three year period with no apparent Romanian coat of arms - Romania used the RSR's emblem with the red star and "Republica Socialista" removed. Thanks for informing me this was a mistaken assumption, Alex:D. However, after doing research, I found that the 1990-92 10-lei coins had a "flag-and-olive-brach" emblem where the post-1992 ones had the Romanian coat of arms, so I'll remake this file as that. Glide08 (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Also, I requested to rename this file as "Presumed Emblem of Romania, 1989-1992". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glide08 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Update - I remade the 10-lei coins' de facto emblem in SVG form:
Glide08 (talk) 17:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)- The coin had that emblem because there was no coat of arms established until 1992. They had to put something on the other side of the coin. The coins of 10 lei issued thereafter had the coat of arms instead of the flag and olive branch. The emblem on 10 lei coin was not the emblem of the country, however, and should not be treated as such!. Simply put, Romania had no coat of arms between 1989 and 1992. --Alex:D (talk) 08:22, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Also, the renaming of the emblem you created as "presumed" is misleading because it is just your presumption, not the one of independent, reliable sources. This misleading information already started spreading on wiki pages, so you can understand what I mean when I say it should be deleted. --Alex:D (talk) 08:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- That is just a bad translation in English. The emblem was ripped from the flag, that's all! Like this: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Where did you ever see the emblem you created? --Alex:D (talk) 13:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a product of my Imagination. As per [www.cjmures.ro/Eng/Insemne/stema.htm], "the first symbol of the revolution was the whole[sic] in the flag, from which the communist star was removed.". Glide08 (talk) 07:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The file is in use on es:Escudo de Rumania, sk:Štátny znak Rumunska, zh:羅馬尼亞國徽, and zh:社会主义纹章. Thus, under COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV, Commons should presume that it is useful. We should not pre-empt content decisions on individual Wikipedias. --bjh21 (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- I will remove those, and then the file can be deleted, per policies you cited, "If an author has made a clear factual mistake about which there is no serious dispute, an unused file (as-is) may fail the test of being useful for an educational purpose and can be deleted on that basis". That emblem never existed before Glide08 imagined it. --Alex:D (talk) 10:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- Once it's out of use (and assuming it stays that way), I have no further objections to deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 11:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- I will remove those, and then the file can be deleted, per policies you cited, "If an author has made a clear factual mistake about which there is no serious dispute, an unused file (as-is) may fail the test of being useful for an educational purpose and can be deleted on that basis". That emblem never existed before Glide08 imagined it. --Alex:D (talk) 10:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.svg)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_ca._1914.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_09633u.jpg){kind=link}
_09633u_(original).jpg){kind=link}
_09633u_(retouched).jpg){kind=link}
_09633u.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://style.news.am/static/newsimg/2017/12/12//24301230_1278019282343972_974122291343711457_n.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus Ymblanter (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: A corridor can be safely considered below the ToO. Ruthven (msg) 12:36, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
_ca._1914.jpg){kind=link}
_ca._1914.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Kept: licenses fixed. Ruthven (msg) 12:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
_ca._1914.jpg){kind=link}
Logo likely copyrighted Vauxford (talk) 10:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope anyway. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- -- Fixed --VerbaGleb (talk) 13:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @VerbaGleb: Website is not under cc-by-sa-4.0 so you can upload it there like that. Permission of the copyright holder is needed via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chengtozun (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from music.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Per {{FoP-Singapore}}, Singapore freedom of panorama does not apply for text and the photo violates text author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:17, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Small image, no place, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 22:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; found at [3]. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that Rankin published this photo under a free licence. I believe that the deleted file:PORTRAIT JEAN CLAUDE JITROIS PHOTOGRAPHED BY RANKIN.jpg was identical.
Habertix (talk) 23:35, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Rankin is the owner of Dazed Magazine/ dazed medias. The following picture has been published by his team here : http://www.dazeddigital.com/fashion/gallery/23074/18/jitrois-through-the-years Other references : http://madame.lefigaro.fr/art-de-vivre/jean-claude-jitrois-raffinement-dans-peau-061014-982137 http://media.jitrois.com/jitrois/company/Jitrois-profile.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vision200 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- You don't give any evidence that this photo is under a free licence i.e. that this photo can be freely copied and modified, including for commercial use. -- Habertix (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
John_Rankin_Waddell photographed jean-claure jitrois. All the rights have been signed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vision200 (talk • contribs) 18 octobre 2019 à 12:30 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Hans Andreas Christian Müller (d. 1985), permissionn of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Mandala platonische Körper.jpg
- File:Mandala mit schwarzen Adern.jpg
- File:Mandala Hans Mueller.jpg
- File:Metamorphose.jpg
- File:Die Zelle.jpg
- File:Anima.jpg
- File:Wassermann Hans Mueller.jpg
- File:Mosaik Steinmetz.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- (*1898/+1985), permission of my own inheritance. changed by:--Xandra.w (talk) 23:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Xandra.w: Have you sent such a permission via COM:OTRS? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:17, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I sent twice. Thank you.Xandra.w (talk) 22:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Hans Andreas Christian Müller (d. 1985), permissionn of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Hans Müller, Natur.jpg
- File:Hans Müller, energetischer Komplex.jpg
- File:Hans Müller, ZEITALTER.jpg
- File:Hans Müller, Zelle.jpg
- File:Hans Müller, Alchemie.jpg
- File:Hans Müller, Metamorphose.jpg
- File:Hans Müller ANIMA.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I sent again to COM:OTRS and asked for unrestricted publication of my uploaded files because they are mine and the pictures shown are mine, too. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xandra.w (talk • contribs) 22:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- owning a painting does not give you the right to freely license it. That right is held by the artist's heirs. These can be restored if an heir sends a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Hans Andreas Christian Müller (d. 1985), permissionn of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:StadtbüchereiMZG Jan1979.jpg
- File:Galerie Medici München Dez1971.jpg
- File:Wochenspiegel Apr2015 Villa Fuchs.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Fréset, Parc Montmorency à Bourbonne-les-Bains sous la neige, 1961, huile sur panneau.jpg
[edit]
Copyrighted work by Georges Fréset (d. 1975), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
False date (person died 2006), unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- (transfered) Отказ на удаление фото. Фотография загружена по свободному волеизъявлению родственников. Я являются автором этой работы, и я против его удаления с сайта Википедия ! МансурХароныч (talk) 17:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- You re stating you are the author of different photos related to ru:Дуба-Юрт ranging from 1937-43 (File:Куриев Асхаб Кюриевич.jpg) to 1982-90 (File:Куйри Магомадов.jpg), which is quite impossible: what is your age, @МансурХароныч: , please? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 03:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Polska Fair Play Logo Perchein (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept. No reason to delete. 大诺史 (talk) 08:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Needless low-resolution raster duplicate of File:Ghana reich karte-es.svg (uploaded with the false claim that the authorship is unknown). —LX (talk, contribs) 06:55, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
i think it's best not to take photos of an interior of a shopping mall, just wanna be on the safe side Chongkian (talk) 08:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; Malaysia has Freedom of Panorama. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Image of an unnamed person in an unidentified place with no educational value. Richard Avery (talk) 04:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Weak keep The file name Lac tonga2.jpg and the category Category:Lakes of Algeria seems to suggest that the image was taken in the vicinity of Lake Tonga, El Kala National Park, Algeria. I don't think we have too many images of forests in Algeria, and there are only 37 images in Category:El Kala National Park. The image might also be usable to illustrate topics such as resting, recreation in a forest etc. Image quality is good. So I think I'm leaning towards keeping it, but it needs an appropriate description and additional categories. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Gestumblindi. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Official coat of arms, not free (see http://www.comune.villarbasse.to.it/, Commons:Deletion requests/Italian CoA) GJo (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kathisma (talk) 02:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: © Comune di Villarbasse - Tutti i diritti riservati. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Dali was not an American. How does US law apply here? Yann (talk) 22:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- was he in America when he made the work? i do not see any reason to question the scholarship of the art institute of chicago. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 22:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia mentions that Dali visited the USA in the 1930s, and had exhibitions there, but I don't see how US law is relevant here. At that time, Dali lived in France and Spain, so one of these counties law should apply. Anyway, Art Institute of Chicago permission is useless for us. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- the jurisdiction where the work was made has the law? do France or Spain clam Extraterritorial jurisdiction of their copyright law? -- Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- We usually assume that a work is first published in the country it was made, unless we have a different evidence. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- and the evidence from the art institute of chicago says made in america and PD. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 14:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- "made in America"? I don't see any such information. Yann (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- "These publications illustrate more artworks that are now in the public domain in the United States because the artists did not file copyright renewal applications within the one-year renewal window at the end of the 28 years following the first publication." that is asserting that American copyright rules apply to this particular artwork, and that this work is public domain. do you have any evidence that the art institute of chicago is mistaken? what evidence would you accept that an artwork is PD-US not renewed? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- "made in America"? I don't see any such information. Yann (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- and the evidence from the art institute of chicago says made in america and PD. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 14:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- We usually assume that a work is first published in the country it was made, unless we have a different evidence. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- the jurisdiction where the work was made has the law? do France or Spain clam Extraterritorial jurisdiction of their copyright law? -- Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia mentions that Dali visited the USA in the 1930s, and had exhibitions there, but I don't see how US law is relevant here. At that time, Dali lived in France and Spain, so one of these counties law should apply. Anyway, Art Institute of Chicago permission is useless for us. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Delete Per nomination --Discasto talk 20:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: work might be PD in the US, but it's copyrighted in Spain (Dali's country, where 70 pma applies). Ruthven (msg) 13:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Needless raster duplicate of File:Mapa shonghai.svg (uploaded with the false claim that the authorship is unknown). —LX (talk, contribs) 06:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Uploader is the subject of the photo. We need evidence of permission from the copyright holder. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 07:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
@T Cells: self timer, camera stand do exist in this world? right?
Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 07:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)- Tulsi Bhagat, I don't answer loaded questions. Until Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie becomes an official policy on Wikimedia Commons, this photo will remain deleted. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 10:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @T Cells: Sorry, To be honest, This is not taken by me. I didn't remember who has clicked it for me. Please proceed to delete it. I've no problem. Many thanks, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Tulsi Bhagat why did you lied in the first place? This is exactly the problem with the Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie and why it was not adopted as a policy. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @T Cells: I accept. It's my fault. I realized. I am truly sorry. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 11:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- It's Okay Tulsi Bhagat. Enjoy your day and happy editing. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:28, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- @T Cells: I accept. It's my fault. I realized. I am truly sorry. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 11:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Tulsi Bhagat why did you lied in the first place? This is exactly the problem with the Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie and why it was not adopted as a policy. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
This image is about 100 years old. It is extremely unlikely that the uploader was actually the photographer as claimed. In order to keep it on Commons, we will need more information about its source and date. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
I understand the uploading professor works in this Center. Therefore he can easily solve the OTRS issue. E4024 (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Although the painting is old, the photograph of it is taken from the Kotohira Shrine website at http://www.konpira.or.jp/museum/houmotsu/treasure_house_2015.html (the source URL given here is outdated), and the shrine, which owns the painting, claims copyright for website content at http://www.konpira.or.jp/info/0001/notice.html. The notice permits individuals to download, store, and print files, but nothing more. All of the other fine photographs in this series are presumably covered as well. Ihojin (talk) 01:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: accurate photographs of PD works are still PD. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:16, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
License and author are incorrect, this logo is trademarked. A simpler PD-textlogo version is available at File:RStudio logo flat.svg +mt 02:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
File:HK SYP 西營盤 Sai Ying Pun 中西區海濱長廊 Central and Western District Promenade yellow sign view April 2018 IX2 05.jpg
[edit]
Refferal, as the photo subjectincludes artwork, which may have a seperate copyright. Hong Kong has freedom of panorama for 3D works, but only for some 2D works, and I'm not sure the signs and mural shown here would be covered ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Parangaricutirimícuaro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of this editor's uploads have been with complete disregard for copyright. These may be PD, but we need to know exactly where they came from in order to determine that.
- File:Ordnungstruppen richten Waffen gegen Streikende - Grenchen im November 1918.jpg
- File:Blockierte Geleise am Bahnhof Grenchen Süd während des Landesstreiks.jpg
- File:Gasse von Grenchen.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- These appear to be German works from 1918. Since German copyright law is rather strict on "anonymous" works pre-1995, these probably can't be hosted on Commons until they are 120 years old. Delete 1918 is too young to say that the photographer died before 1949. Abzeronow (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for being so interested. These works are all published by the Stadtarchiv (city archive) to all media and other outlets as I cited in every of the photos. The entire public catalogue can be seen here: http://www.grenchen.ch/dl.php/de/5b45a27d1cd32/18_Verzeichnis_der_Bestande_Stadtarchiv_Grenchen_2018.pdf. If I did a mistake regarding the copyright by citing it the way I did, feel free to post here. If not, please delete the delete requests in order to keep these important historical photos online. --Parangaricutirimícuaro (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Parangaricutirimícuaro, the fact that they were published for "all media and other outlets" says nothing about their copyright status. As a general rule, an archive may own a paper or digital copy of a photo, but does not have the right to freely license the work, as that right almost always is held by the creator or his heirs. In order for these to be kept, it is up to you to prove that either (a) the photographers died more than 70 years ago or (b) that the Stadtarchiv does, in fact, have the right to freely license them. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- also file:Khan Malik Aman Khan Mastkhel while addressing a Tribal Jirga at Parachinar, Kurrum Agency in 1964 2014-08-03 14-25.jpg
This 1964 photo is not own work. By principle, it can be in public domain due to age, because {{PD-Pakistan}} demands 50 years from publication, but publication data must be given for that. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Obviously not simple enough to be below the threshold of originality in China, which is very low. Existing case see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kunming Metro Logo Image_Only.svg. Siyuwj (talk) 18:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Looks simple enough to me. You still have yet to provide any evidence for your claims about Chinese TOO. Fry1989 eh? 03:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: as per Fry1989. Yann (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
New information was added to COM:TOO China since the previous DR, indicating this image to be beyond TOO in China, especially in comparison of the "LY" company logo example. Wcam (talk) 15:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The case law from the courts in China do appear to show that the country has a much lower TOO than originally thought. --Majora (talk) 01:32, 4 August 2019 (UTC)