Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_-_09950.jpg){kind=link}
_-_09951.jpg){kind=link}
_-_09952.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![143 File:"Abner" is finished! ) (6432151469).jpg](#File:"Abner"_is_finished!_)_(6432151469).jpg){kind=link}
_-_09949.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Caversham,_Spring_2007_-_geograph.org.uk_-_814143.jpg){kind=link}
User page (and entire account) being used for promotional purposes. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete as out of scope. --Rrburke (talk) 13:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio and unused personal photo.
~Moheen (keep talking) 04:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Himanshu Singh7786.jpg
- File:Akshara Singh.jpg
- File:Singh himanshu.jpg
- File:Singh Himanshu Arvind.jpg
Ies (talk) 07:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Note that this user reuploads the same private and previously deleted images again and again and again!
- File:हिमांशु कुमार.jpg
- File:Himanshu Kumar at street.jpg
- File:िहमांशु सिंह.jpg
- File:Himanshu Singh 1.jpg
- File:Himanshu Singh(boy).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 10:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment File:Himanshu Singh(boy).jpg it's in use in en:WP. It's obviously a young user, with (I guess) no many idea of the risk of the net and the real purpose of Wikimedia Commons (not social network). Perhaps a little chat about instead some automathic templates could help? --Ganímedes (talk) 11:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the files which are in use. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 05:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Nearly identical to main part of File:Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions.svg, deleted as copyvio of [1]. User:Brucevdk claims on IRC he's seeking permission for all images derived from that page, but they may fail to respond. Dcoetzee (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- I just sent the e-mail to the author, waiting for a response now. --Brucevdk (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- The guy who put that image on his webpage linked above? Did he draw that particular rendition or did he just copy it from somewhere else? Anyway, wouldn't it still be a derivative from Plutchik's model? Plutchik died in 2006. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware that this rendition is in fact "Plutchik's wheel of emotions". I am now...
- I just got a response back from the owner of fractal.org saying as much (he says he himself asked and received permission to publish it from Robert Plutchik himself some 10 years ago).
- Looks like we aren't going to be able to get copyright clearance in this case then?
- I am still willing to research if somebody else happens to hold the rights to relicense the rendition (APA perhaps), because I absolutely love the diagram and would be quite happy for it to become part of the realm of free knowledge today and not in 70 years. But then again, maybe I shouldn't bother? Everybody can still look at it, just not on Wikipedia.
- What do you guys think? --Brucevdk (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- As mentioned on IRC, after Plutchik's death his heirs would have inherited the rights, so you would have to contact them to solicit a release under a free license (unless he transferred rights by contract to some other entity). Dcoetzee (talk) 16:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Just wanted to let you (and everybody reading this) know that I've decided not to bother with this. I've recreated the diagram in SVG for personal use and (at least for now) that's good enough for me. --Brucevdk (talk) 00:23, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
If this picture is on his book cover, why not just upload a picture of said cover? Maybe we could contact the person who published it numerous other places on the internet? It seems that many people have uploaded without problems, so why not Wiki? —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.84.27.16 (talk) 07:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- The person who printed it on the book cover either did so illegally or had a contract with the diagram creator. Such a contract would not give us (or our content reusers) a license to use the work. Many others on the Internet have used the image, but almost all of them are illegal uses, except for the one use with permission mentioned above, which again does not extend to us or our content reusers. This kind of widespread illegal use is commonplace on the Internet. Dcoetzee (talk) 23:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep: "Nearly identical to main part of File:Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions.svg" is not a copyvio in any way. Surely 30 words is fair-use (especially when it would be inappropriate to paraphrase them for the encyclopedia), and as for the graphic art, I created it myself, by hand, in Inkscape. I didn't copy the website, the book, or the file. Plutchik's wheel is simply the subject. Unless it's trademarked, I don't see an IP problem, — and certainly no copyright problem, I've licensed it cc-by-sa-3.0/GFDL.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- The essential question here is whether the wheel diagram shown at [2] is copyrightable, or whether it's just "basic facts/shapes", devoid of any creative spark. I maintain that it is copyrightable, based on the complex arrangement of different shapes and colours. Others may disagree on this point. Dcoetzee (talk) 23:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think the thing to do is transfer it locally to English and Chinese WPs.
- re: "I maintain that it is copyrightable, based on the complex arrangement of different shapes and colours." No one's suggested that? A strawman, if you'll forgive me saying, copyright presumptively applies. No use speculating about a ruling that will never be made... A quick look at Google Images shows it's become popularized and the Doctor's heirs or assigns would do much better to sue about the tee shirts etc. etc. It's trivially fair-use for the encyclopedia. It's a flower shape and a 4-shaded color wheel; to call it a "complex arrangement of different shapes and colours" is utterly ridiculous and frankly I didn't use any of the same colors (or even a proper spectrum) nor did I depict the floating bud/acorn objet. I don't believe "creative spark" is in the legal language and although I wasn't trying to be transformative, unlike www.fractal.org, I didn't just pinch a graphic from American Scientist. The diagram at www.fractal.org (and most of the text on that page) is just a straight-up copy of the graphic and text from the July-August 2001 issue's online coverage of Plutchik's textbook The Nature of Emotions published by the APA (it's not actually identical with the book's cover art)... Not sure why people have focused on www.fractal.org, with so many variations out there... Anyway, I find it very hard to believe Plutchik gave (or could give) www.fractal.org permission to simultaneously publish American Scientist's assets... I don't mean to imply bad faith from any of the editors here, but when I create a work, copyright (FWIW) presumptively shines for me too, regardless of what you inexplicably maintain to be "the essential question here".—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
- You may very well have created the diagram without looking at the previously published work, but I'm reasonably sure that republishing a previously published work with no awareness of that work still constitutes copyright infringement, albeit with a somewhat lesser penalty. I don't believe the act has to be committed willfully or knowingly. Unintentional plagiarism has been the subject of more than one infringement case in popular music. Dcoetzee (talk) 12:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- We all make mistakes
- I've spent a little time looking through your contributions and I see you're an admin here and on English wp and you do some work with copyright issues. I'm at a loss to explain your actions here... "You may very well have created the diagram without looking at the previously published work" A miracle? What were the license terms I violated when I miracled it? GFDL? what part is somehow "nearly identical" to a (GFDL?) mystery file you mistook to infringe the non-existent copyright of www.fractal.org which you're leveraging, as if it were credible? Do you just consider the GFDL void when you do that? Obviously, I'll be needing to see the evidence for myself, including the license information, and the full edit history. but I'm reasonably sure that republishing a previously published work with no awareness of that work still constitutes copyright infringement, albeit with a somewhat lesser penalty. I don't believe the act has to be committed willfully or knowingly. Unintentional plagiarism has been the subject of more than one infringement case in popular music. Dcoetzee (talk) 12:01, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Pretty sure? "republishing" what previously published work? the (GFDL) mystery file... partially nearly republished? Ghost stories about music copyrights... Orwellian fairy tales... For your edification: copyright doesn't apply to ideas (among other things)... "plagiarism" in music copyright? Bullshit. You best come clean. "I maintain that it is copyrightable, based on the complex arrangement of different shapes and colours." Your justification when you were coherent was weak... You seem to lack the competence needed to opine on copyright issues. You need to stop removing free content and stop making shifty accusations. The person who printed it on the book cover either did so illegally or had a contract with the diagram creator. Such a contract would not give us (or our content reusers) a license to use the work. Is that what your crystal ball says? Stop spouting nonsense! Ya think you'll piss 'em off? The APA doesn't go around exposing their printers to litigation.
- Comedy of manners
- AGF is priceless sometimes. For your edification, like photography, there are special rules in music copyright law, (but more complicated, and more lucrative, by many orders of magnitude). Likewise, characters in film have very special considerations that tend to skew peoples superstitions about copyright. You mention penalties... I think you're good guy, and maybe you're just trying to give me some good advice. I'll return the favor, with better advice: don't give that kind of advice. I'm a nice guy too, but it's distressing when you tell people they can expect to pay for the crime you're creating the appearance of... don't do that.
- Mission Impossible
- I think you're a good guy and you'll educate yourself. You seem to think it's impossible to author a scientific diagram without a license from some secretary in Plutchik's office pool or a graphic artist at www.fractal.org. Research:
- it is NOT IMPOSSIBLE to author free content WITHOUT A LICENSE;
- COPYRIGHT DOESN'T APPLY TO CONCEPTS and similarities are expected;
- the use of color and shape WERE NOT ARTISTIC CHOICES, (think scènes à faire);
- COPYRIGHT IS NOT ABOUT PLAGIARISM; and
- soliciting non-free "licensed" content to replace free content is the DOING THE WRONG THING (I'll help you hold yourself accountable.)
—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 05:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- 03:33, 3 October 2010 NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions.svg" (Copyright violation: Essentially an exact reproduction of the figure in at http://www.fractal.org/Bewustzijns-Besturings-Model/Nature-of-emotions.htm (though redrawn)) (global usage; delinker log)
- Take a wild guess
- It's impossible for me to check the license information, history information, or to see the deleted (GFDL?) SVG file in question. Essentially, if it was obvious to NuclearWarfare that it was redrawn, it was not an "exact reproduction". Perhaps the best one could say is a "poor slavish reproduction"? (My heart goes out to the poor slaves enticed to contribute). If, by any chance, it was similar to the now-vanished non-English (GFDL?) PNG file (an historical version?) that prompted me to research a new English version in SVG, (Google Books), it merely depicted, without artistic embellishments, one of the two scientific diagrams, depicted as overlapping in an image file-copy at www.fractal.org (no reason to believe American Scientist would permit www.fractal.org the use of these graphic and text assets is apparent). Typically, scientific diagrams aren't pretty, so it's understandable that NuclearWarfare and Dcoetzee mistook the visual elements (which are theoretically analogous to aspects of the "spectrum of emotion") for artistic choices. Plutchik's various diagrams are virtually iconic in the field of Emotion Theory. Textbooks and academic literature are usually printed in black and white for economic reasons, but for example, a color depiction of the exact same diagram ("exact" meaning "accurate") graces the cover the APA textbook mentioned above (albeit with a minor artistic embellishment, a light blue drop shadow). I shouldn't be made to guess like this, free content authors shouldn't be subjected to lurid bullshit, and admins shouldn't be burdened with the collective ignorance, but everyone should be aware of fundamentals like the difference between copyright and plagiarism. WP:BEANS, but the standard way to deal with potential copyright issues involves take down notices, etc.—Machine Elf 1735 (talk) 01:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Kept: mostly plain information, which is correctly sourced to Plutchik, the simple lines and colors are not eligible for copyright Jcb (talk) 09:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
It is outdated because a newer version was uploaded by me Doomdorm64 (talk) 11:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
accidental creation HHI-Fraunhofer (talk) 15:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
_-_09950.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_09950.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo is blurred Norman.seibert (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
_-_09951.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_09951.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo is blurred Norman.seibert (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
_-_09952.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_09952.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo is blurred Norman.seibert (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme at 15:16, 9 Januar 2019 UTC: Content created as advertisement; see COM:ADVERT (G10) --Krdbot 20:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Here's a photo
from me from the same day, but from a completely different place! I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. Tm (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place! I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Also as you say, this image is completely different from the other. Tm (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo 
from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo Milan Bališin (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use, deletion reasion probably made up, user has done earlier attempts to revoke their contributions. --Jcb (talk) 20:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons! Milan Bališin (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Tm (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place! I'm not the author of the photo! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Also as you say, this image is completely different from the other. Tm (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. And these weren't taken at the same time , as the exif says one was taken in 10:42:46 and the other at 12:42:10Tm (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
I'm not the author of the photo! Here's a photo from me, from the same day, but from a completely different distant place! I could not be on the same day at these remote places at the same time! Please promptly delete the photo! Milan Bališin (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Files has almost 4 years and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, so there is no possibility of "withdrawal from licensing terms". Author has tried to delete this and other files under the same pretexts. And these weren't taken at the same time , as the exif says one was taken in 10:42:46 and the other at 12:42:10- Tm (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
License violation. Copyright infringement. I'm not the author of this photo. Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place. I could not be in these two places on the same day, because it's impossible, they are miles away. In addition, only the descent from the Vihorlat peak takes some 3-4 hours in the winter, and then it moves to the next mountain range (1,5-2 hours in the winter with car transport) and gets to the top to peak (Pľaša) in the winter these are many hours, it is unrealistic. Please check exif information and GPS location of peaks. Another thing was a completely different camera. Please delete photos are not mine. Milan Bališin (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
License violation. Copyright infringement. I'm not the author of this photo. Here's a photo from me from the same day, but from a completely different place. I could not be in these two places on the same day, because it's impossible, they are miles away. In addition, only the descent from the Vihorlat peak takes some 3-4 hours in the winter, and then it moves to the next mountain range (1,5-2 hours in the winter with car transport) and gets to the top to peak (Pľaša) in the winter these are many hours, it is unrealistic. Please check exif information and GPS location of peaks. Another thing was a completely different camera. Please delete photos are not mine. Milan Bališin (talk) 19:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete File:Ďurkovec 01.JPG, File:Pľaša 02.JPG, File:Pľaša 01.JPG, and File:Riaba skala 03.JPG. This user's other photos were all taken with a Nikon Coolpix. These alone were taken with a Canon Powershot. It's perfectly reasonable that someone who is now an experienced Wikimedian might have, early in their Wiki-career, uploaded something that someone else created not realizing that this wasn't okay. Milan Bališin (talk · contribs) has hundreds of photos and is asking to delete four that were taken with a different camera and he or she claims are copyright violations. I don't see a reason not to accept the user at their word. Milan Bališin, it would be nice if this could be consolidated rather than having four separate discussions for each of these files. --B (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Did you look at the other photo that Milan Bališin linked? This image was taken in Poland an hour after the other image was taken in Slovakia. Granted, Slovakia and Poland border each other, it seems more likely that the user is telling the truth - that when he first signed up for Wikipedia he didn't know any better and uploaded someone else's image. I'll let you in on a deep, dark, secret - I did the same thing - 13 years ago when I first signed up for Wikipedia, I uploaded a photo from the website of an organization of which I am a member, not knowing that this was not okay, and without permission from the photographer. Some time later, the photographer complained to me about it (I had long since forgotten it) and I apologized and had it deleted. --B (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- This user has repeatedly made up statements in an attempt to revoke their contributions. I don't believe a word of what they say. I am closing this again, because the user started this nomination just ours after they got warned not to do that. I had to close a large number of their repeated nominations today, enough is enough. Jcb (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Did you look at the other photo that Milan Bališin linked? This image was taken in Poland an hour after the other image was taken in Slovakia. Granted, Slovakia and Poland border each other, it seems more likely that the user is telling the truth - that when he first signed up for Wikipedia he didn't know any better and uploaded someone else's image. I'll let you in on a deep, dark, secret - I did the same thing - 13 years ago when I first signed up for Wikipedia, I uploaded a photo from the website of an organization of which I am a member, not knowing that this was not okay, and without permission from the photographer. Some time later, the photographer complained to me about it (I had long since forgotten it) and I apologized and had it deleted. --B (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: and blocked - this user keeps mass nominating their contributions for deletion and is changing their statements all the time in an attempt to revoke their contributions. This has been going on for about a year now, enough is enough. --Jcb (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DhewySartika (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense upload (seemingly a copyvio), not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DhewySartika (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense upload (seemingly a copyvio), not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DhewySartika (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense upload (seemingly a copyvio), not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios from mobile websites. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios from mobile websites. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios from mobile websites. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:18, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
https://mon-vso.ru/events/320 КОПИРАЙТ Панн (talk) 17:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 20:10, 9 Januar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: --Krdbot 08:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes Mrtskzxpc (talk) 18:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 20:00, 9 Januar 2019 UTC: Content created as advertisement; see COM:ADVERT (G10) --Krdbot 08:09, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Exact duplicate of File:Talyllyn Flail mover.JPG NearEMPTiness (talk) 09:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keine ordnungsgemäße Lizensierunf gemäß cc Lutheraner (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
http://www.vsuwt.ru/news/detail.php?ID=1025&sphrase_id=509627 копирайт Панн (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
https://innoscope.ru/analytics/members/2356/ КОПИВО Панн (talk) 14:06, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
copyvio: source=http://art.nouveau.world/ivan-buenosaires — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marassa (talk • contribs) 13:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC) It's NOT licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. "All rights reserved - copyrighted images - Photos may not be used for any purposes without the express written permission - Ley 11.723" http://art.nouveau.world/ivan-buenosaires Marassa (talk) 13:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Marassa (talk) 13:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
copyvio: source=http://art.nouveau.world/ivan-buenosaires It's NOT licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. "All rights reserved - copyrighted images - Photos may not be used for any purposes without the express written permission - Ley 11.723" http://art.nouveau.world/ivan-buenosaires Marassa (talk) 13:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Marassa (talk) 13:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
copyvio: source=http://art.nouveau.world/ivan-buenosaires — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marassa (talk • contribs) 13:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC) It's NOT licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. "All rights reserved - copyrighted images - Photos may not be used for any purposes without the express written permission - Ley 11.723" http://art.nouveau.world/ivan-buenosaires Marassa (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Marassa (talk) 13:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Nanbanvijay.jpg
- File:Vijaysuit.jpg
- File:Cskdhonivijay.jpg
- File:Vijaydhoni.jpg
- File:Iaravijay.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, oos. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 12:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PCP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
poniewaz nie dziala poprawnie 31.0.66.108 02:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 00:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Lanlan0122
[edit]All files uploaded by Lanlan0122 (talk · contribs) are copyvios from various websites. --Smooth O (talk) 08:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS dealt with that. There are a couple of questionable cases (probably honest mistakes) but the majority turned out to be fine. --whym (talk) 03:38, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
http://kinoamator.ru/peoples/1334/photos/full/page/20/ копирайт 2011 Панн (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sadath Shimoga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Saada Junior Da'wa College Logo Launching.jpg
- File:Sadath Sir.jpg
- File:Sadath Shimoga with KB Prasanna Kumar.jpg
- File:Sadath Shimoga.jpg
- File:SADATH SHIMOGA 8453204039.jpg
Ies (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sadath Shimoga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Shimoga Sa adi.jpg
- File:Shimoga Sa'adi.jpg
- File:Latheef Sa adi Shimoga. (Manager, Markaz Sa'ada, Shimoga.).jpg
- File:Saada Junior Da'wa College Logo Launching.jpg
- File:Markaz saada.jpg
- File:Sadath Sir.jpg
- File:Sadath Shimoga with KB Prasanna Kumar.jpg
- File:Sadath Shimoga.jpg
- File:SADATH SHIMOGA 8453204039.jpg
- File:GLOBAL LOGO.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
I uploated these a while ago to serve as my user photos (or something), now they're just redundant. Both current and previous versions of the image have nothing to do on WikiMedia. Igor Hoshuk (talk) 00:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Promotional. Is being used to 'create a movement'. See also creator's username. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
The audio is one of my bad 1st recordings. It has been substituted and has no links. Sarri.greek (talk) 07:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
The audio is one of my bad 1st recordings. It has been substituted and has no links. Sarri.greek (talk) 07:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
The audio is one of my bad 1st recordings. It has been substituted and has no links. Sarri.greek (talk) 07:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine, this plaque was made in 1990's or 2000's. Regasterios (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
The audio is one of my bad 1st recordings. It has been substituted and has no links. Sarri.greek (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
The audio is one of my bad 1st recordings. It has been substituted and has no links. Sarri.greek (talk) 07:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chandra Dwi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE personal images (id:Membuat Darwito).
- File:Darwito ( promotion ).jpg
- File:Darwito ( Kata Mutiara 2 ).jpg
- File:Darwito ( Promotion ).jpg
- File:Darwito ( Kata Mutiara ).jpg
- File:Darwito ( kata mutiara ).jpg
- File:Darwito ( Kata Mutiara 1 ).jpg
- File:Gelar Darwito Meraih S3 Di UNDIP.jpg
- File:Dr. H. Darwito, SE., MM.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Found at https://twitter.com/kjujula/status/928200969351041025 Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
http://www.klub.senior.pl/roznosci/t-historia-rocznice-pamietajmy--page36-17561.html?langid=6&nojs=1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, some copied from Facebook, unlikely to be own works.
- File:With Honorable President and Chancellor of University of Chittagong .jpg
- File:With Chief Justice of Bangladesh.jpg
- File:With Honorable Prime Minister of Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Pro-vc-shireen-akhter.jpg
- File:Museum-building.jpg
- File:DS-31-18-12-2015.jpg
- File:Professor Iftekhar Uddin Chowdhury with ICT Director.jpg
- File:Professor Iftekhar Uddin Chowdhury .jpg
Yann (talk) 12:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
False dates, not own works, no license.
- File:Ələkbər Süleymanov.jpg
- File:Müslüm Hacımətov.jpg
- File:Seyid-rza Mir Kərim oğlu.jpg
- File:Cəlil Cəlilov.jpg
- File:Noqayev Viktor Antonoviç.jpg
- File:Ağa Nemətulla.jpg
- File:Yusif Səfərov 1.jpg
- File:Ismayıl Əliyev neftçi-iqtisadçı.jpg
- File:Zöhrab Məmmədov neftçi-iqtisadçı.jpg
- File:Allahverdi Cəfərov.jpg
- File:Saida Allahverdiyev.jpg
- File:Cavid Səfərov.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Old photos of people: unlikely to be own work + other derivative works.
- File:Abbaszadə Nəzmiyyə 1.jpg
- File:Məmmədağa Sərdarov.jpg
- File:Elbrus Əlizadə Dövlət Mükafatı Laureatı.jpg
- File:Elbrus Əlizadə AMEA-nın müxbir üzvü.jpg
- File:Budaq Budaqov akademik.jpg
- File:Arif Abbasov (etnoqraf).jpg
- File:Valeh Cəfərov.jpg
- File:Azərbaycan Respublikasının Prezidenti Ilham Əliyev professor Ramiz Məmmədova Respublikanın Dövlət Mükafatı Laureatı Fəxri adını təqdim edərkən.2006-ci il.jpg
- File:Müzəffər Əsgərov.jpg
- File:Həsən Əliyev 1.jpg
- File:Vahid Gülmalıyev.jpg
- File:Budaq Budaqov Şöhrət ordeni ilə təltif olunması.jpg
- File:BUdaq Budaqov Tur Heydarla görüşü.jpg
- File:Sel ekspedisiyası.jpg
- File:Budaq Budaqov Minsk.jpg
- File:Budaq Budaqov Izmir Quş adası.jpg
- File:Beynəlxalq əməkdaşlıq.jpg
- File:Külək enerjisi.jpg
- File:Ramiz Məmmədov akademik.jpg
- File:Ramiz Məmmədov.docx 1.jpg
- File:Neftçala rayonu Flora və faunası.jpg
- File:Ağcabədi rayon Kiçik qarabatdaq.jpg
- File:Ağcabədi rayonu flora və faunası.jpg
- File:Beyləqan Çərkəz Peyğəmbərin Türbəsi məzarı.jpg
- File:Hacıqabul Pir Hüseyn.jpg
- File:Hacıqabul kolları.jpg
- File:Imişli hörümçək.jpg
- File:Nurəddin Hümbətov.jpg
- File:Nurəddin Bəndəliyev 1.jpg
- File:Nurəddin Bəndəliyev.jpg
- File:Bendeliyev nureddin.jpg
- File:Sahib Gülmalıyev.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all 43 files – no own works here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE (:es:Maniako Bañuelos S') Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Qris Prints (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Qris Prints.jpg
- File:JUST SMILE FOR QRIS PRINTS.jpg
- File:BRANDED SWEATERS.jpg
- File:FELLOW MODELS.jpg
- File:MY TALENT.jpg
- File:QRIS PRINTS FACIAL ART.jpg
- File:QRIS PRINTS SHIRTS.jpg
- File:QRIS PRINTS QP.jpg
- File:Qris prints.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grace Xiao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload (seemingly a copyvio), not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:27, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheJhops96 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:2018 Access to Information and Protection of Privacy online course Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Hopkins (1).pdf
- File:2018 Environmental Health and Safety online course Environmental Health and Safety Hopkins.pdf
- File:Student Environmental Health and Safety Awareness at Ryerson University EHS Awareness for Students in an external placement Hopkins.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheJhops96 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Profile light green pictogram.png
- File:White arrow.png
- File:Clicked find friends.png
- File:Find Friends pictogram.png
- File:Integr8logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by José Nicolás Arrieta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of of questionable notability. Tools photo is low quality.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Enzo Finger (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very unlikely to be own works, where does them come from? missing license.
- File:40 Anders Tiedemansen.jpg
- File:39 Håkon Thorstein Thorsteinsen.jpg
- File:38 Finn Richard Thorbjørnsen.jpg
- File:37 Sigurd Sølvig.jpg
- File:36 Gustav Adolf Spångberg.jpg
- File:35 Georg Petter Samuelsen.jpg
- File:34 Alf Gustav Lehman Røer.jpg
- File:33 Halvor Sverre Rødaas.jpg
- File:32 Johan Henry Olsen.jpg
- File:31 Erling Olaussen.jpg
- File:30 Olaug Anette Nyhus.jpg
- File:29 William Nilsen.jpg
- File:28 Kåre Hjalmar Nilsen.jpg
- File:27 Josef Emanuel Nilsen.jpg
- File:26 John Henrik Nilsen.jpg
- File:25 Olaf Nannestad.jpg
- File:24 Bjarne Sevald Langseth.jpg
- File:23 Kjell Segelcke Koren.jpg
- File:22 Jan Segelcke Koren.jpg
- File:21 Elioth Kristian Karlsen.jpg
- File:20 Kristoffer Johansen.jpg
- File:19 Henry Johannessen.jpg
- File:18 Rolf Jahnsen.jpg
- File:17 Charles Jacobsen.jpg
- File:16 Arthur Marthinius Flåm Jacobsen.jpg
- File:15 Søren Odvar Haagensen.jpg
- File:14 Ole Petter Henriksen.jpg
- File:13 Sverre Helmersen.jpg
- File:12 Ernst Thor Hekkelstrand.jpg
- File:11 Anette Marie Hansen.jpg
- File:10 Kåre Anton Iversen Hafstad.jpg
- File:09 Hans Oluf Frisnes.jpg
- File:08 Anders Julius Hansen.jpg
- File:07 Karl Eugen Engen.jpg
- File:06 Johannes Ellefsen.jpg
- File:05.2 Otto Bråthen.jpg
- File:05-Otto-Kristian-Marius-Baltzersen.jpg
- File:04-John-Martin-Bakke.jpg
- File:03-Arne-Austeen.jpg
- File:01-Anders-Kristian-Andersen.jpg
- File:02-Olaf-Andersen.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Enzo Finger (talk · contribs)
[edit]Very unlikely to be own works, where does them come from? missing license.
- File:46 Lars Henry Aas.jpg
- File:45 Jens Conrad Westerby.jpg
- File:44 Alexander Dugan Ugland.jpg
- File:43 Hans Gunnar Valberg.jpg
- File:42 Johan Eivind Olsen Tro.jpg
- File:41 Ole Tornes.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment User send me an email saying that "The pictures represent the names of fallen civilians on a newly erected WW2 Memorial place in Drøbak" so I suppose {{PD-Norway50}} applies. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:EVID, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 16:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
No FOP for such artwork in the USA.
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 1 (7488700490).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 2 (7488700392).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 3 (7488700260).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 4 (7488700692).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 5 (7488701260).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 6 (7488700162).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 7 (7488701502).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 8 (7488701704).jpg
- File:"Brooklyn Seeds" 9 (7488699986).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 15:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tiroler2.1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical document and coat of arms. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki Graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical book. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Achterhaalde en onnauwkeurige kaart. Inmiddels zijn veel betere kaarten beschikbaar. Eriksw (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Metro Amsterdam Map.png. Multichill (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Wil je ook alle foto's van paardentrams weggooien, omdat die vervangen zijn door veel betere trams?. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Achterhaalde en onnauwkeurige kaart. Inmiddels zijn veel betere kaarten beschikbaar. Eriksw (talk) 15:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- I can't understand what you say, but I assume you say that it's outdated and inaccurate. Instead of requesting to delete it, you could also just ask either the author (me, by the way) someone else to update it. Not the nicest move, @Eriksw: . Cheers, --Jcornelius (talk) 15:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Outdated maps may not show how is the Metro Amsterdam now, but it shows how it was in previous times. Tm (talk) 21:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Being outdated is not a reason for deletion, obviously. It being inaccuarte, if true, then it’s possible to request improvements to be made instead, since the author is an actve user. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason for deletion. Multichill (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Wil je ook alle foto's van paardentrams weggooien, omdat die vervangen zijn door veel betere trams?. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shrilaraune (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Detail person (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Irish Rovers final note copy.jpg
- File:The Irish Rovers 2015.jpg
- File:ExtrasOfficialIrishRovers.jpg
- File:GeorgeMillarKicksIt.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Joaquin Sosa. Retrato sor Juana Antonia de Santa Catalina de la Peña. Óleo sobre tela.jpg
- File:Rafael de la Cova-Detalle Colón en el Golfo Triste. Bronce.jpg
- File:Rafael de la Cova. Monumento a Colón en el Golfo Triste2. Bronce.jpg
- File:Rafael de la Cova. Colon en el Golfo Triste.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mondall Mohammad Arif (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Mondall Mohammad Arif....jpg
- File:Arif pic.jpg
- File:চট্টগ্রাম বিশ্ববিদ্যালয় প্রতিবন্ধী কর্নার.jpg
Ies (talk) 11:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mondall Mohammad Arif (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo, out of scope
- File:তালহা জুবাইর.jpg
- File:মন্ডল মোহাম্মাদ আরিফ ছবি (2).jpg
- File:মন্ডল মোহাম্মাদ আরিফ ছবি (3).jpg
- File:মন্ডল মোহাম্মদ আরিফ (১).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:ZAQ Logo.png
- File:Universe jersey.jpg
- File:Frankfurt Galaxy American Football Helmet.jpg
- File:Frankfurt Universe Helmet.jpg
- File:Frankfurt Universe vs Nürnberg Rams.jpg
- File:Francfort Universe Logo.jpg
- File:Frankfurt Galaxy Uniforms.jpeg
- File:Frankfurt Universe Uniform.png
- File:Frankfurt Universe Helmet & Logo.png
- File:Frankfurt Universe Helm & Logo.png
- File:Universe Helmet.gif
- File:AFC Universe Logo.png
- File:Frankfurt Galaxy Logo.gif
- File:Frankfurt Galaxy Helm.jpg
Didym (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal Photos, unused, out of scope
- File:Mockingvbhvhhvb.jpg
- File:Mocking19.jpg
- File:Mocking18.png
- File:Mocking17.jpg
- File:Mocking16.jpg
- File:Mocking15.jpg
- File:Mocking14.jpg
- File:Mocking13.png
- File:Mocking12.png
- File:Mocking11.jpg
- File:Mocking10.jpg
- File:Mocking9.jpg
- File:Mocking8.jpg
- File:Mocking5.jpg
- File:Mocking7.jpg
- File:Mocking4.jpg
- File:Mocking1.jpg
- File:Official cloth.jpg
- File:Official.jpg
- File:Official mocking.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 19:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope, personal photos. warned before.
Roy17 (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Official mocking (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality images of non-notable person. Some duplicates of images uploaded by user's sock - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aashish jaatav.
- File:Mocking 102.jpg
- File:Holi 2019.jpg
- File:Mocking 188.png
- File:Mocking 99.jpg
- File:Mocking 66.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 22:26, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Владимир Васютченко has no right to give permission to use the image from the film Guest from the Future. His permission is invalid. According to the Civil code of the Russian Federation, the Director of the film (Pavel Arsenov), the author of the script (Pavel Arsenov & Kir Bulychov) and the producer (none) have copyright to the footage from the film. More precisely, their heirs. Владимир Васютченко such permission can not give. There are big doubts that he legitimately used footage from the movie in his clip. GAndy (talk) 23:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, license laundering. The Guest from the Future must be copyrighted yet. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be Own work of uploader.. Sole image uploaded, low quality thumbnail, previously published online as early as 2014 (seen here in a column of portraits about 3 fifths down the page). --Animalparty (talk) 19:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Outside of project scope - fake maps and diagrams that do not correspond to any real-world election or notable work of fiction.
- File:ElectoralCollege1864D'Hondte.svg
- File:Texas Senatorial Ross Perot 1993 Blanket Primary.svg
- File:DuopolyForever1936Electoral.fw.svg
- File:German Election Map - Proportional - 1953.svg
- File:StateOfNewYorkJuly311980Poll1980Presidential.svg
- File:2000USPresidentialAsRussia200Presidential.svg
- File:Democratic Party presidential primaries results, 2016 A Party Divided.svg
- File:ClintonVsBush1996.svg
- File:CarterVsBush(AsFord)1976.svg
- File:CarterVsBush1992.svg
- File:McCainVsMondale2008.svg
- File:LASen72IndependentCounties.fw.png
- File:USAasUK1924Presidential.svg
- File:USAasUK1920Presidential.svg
- File:DirnanForPresident1980.svg
- File:ControversialMcGovernWin1972.svg
- File:2002CloseFrenchPresidentialResults.svg
- File:1860D'HondteHouseVoteFirstBallot.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege1860D'Hondte.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege1856D'Hondte.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege1852D'Hondte.svg
- File:ElectoralCollege1848D'Hondte.svg
1976.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KnightOfInfiniteMehsignation (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of project scope - fake maps and diagrams that do not correspond to any real-world election or notable work of fiction.
- File:Soviet Parliament.svg
- File:FictionalElectoralCollege2020.svg
- File:Fictional US Congress Diagram.svg
- File:Electoral College 1892 socialist usa.png
B (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Bertalan Árkay died in 1971. This drawing made by him. Source of the drawing is here (need purchase). Regasterios (talk) 18:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Created by mistake, no File: prefix Alexkom000 (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Marked as {{PD-textlogo}}, but the design of the dragonfly looks complex enough to be above the threshold of originality. ℯxplicit 05:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, only used in sandbox articles. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
The artist has not released his artwork using OTRS.
- File:Hermann Segelboote 04.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Tänzerin 01 1998.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Stadt 02 1991.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Segelboote04 2001.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Stadt 01 1988.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Segelboote 03.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Segelboote 02 - 2009.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Segelboote 01-2005.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Portrait 07 - 1996.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann See 01 2017.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Portrait 08.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Portrait 06 2017.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Portrait 05 2017.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Portrait 04-1998.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Portrait 01.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Menschen 05.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Menschen 02-1993.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Menschen 01.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Landschaften 25 2018.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Landschaften 18 2013.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Landschaften 12-2018.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Landschaften 13-2017.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Winterlandschaften 11-2018.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Landschaften 09-2018.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Landschaften 06 - 2017.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Landschaften 01-1997.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Kathedrale- 2010.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Garten 01 1990.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Blumen 03-2018.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Don Quijote 1991.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Blumen 02-2018.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Akt 01-2017.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Akt 02-2012.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann Blumen 01-2017.jpg
- File:Der Künstler Hermann Bergmann in seinem Atelier in Neusiedl am See 09.jpg
- File:Der Künstler Hermann Bergmann in seinem Atelier in Neusiedl am See.jpg
- File:Selbstbildnis von Hermann Bergmann.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann in seinem Atelier in Neusiedl am See 04.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann in seinem Atelier in Neusiedl am See 03.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann in seinem Atelier in Neusiedl am See 02.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann in seinem Atelier in Neusiedl am See.jpg
- File:Hermann Bergmann in seinem Atelier in Neusiedl am See 01.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Hermann_Segelboote_04.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019010910006941. --FitIndia 16:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Hermann_Bergmann_Tänzerin_01_1998.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019010910006941. --FitIndia 16:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Hermann_Bergmann_Stadt_02_1991.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019010910006941. --FitIndia 16:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Hermann_Bergmann_Segelboote04_2001.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019010910006941. --FitIndia 17:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Hermann_Bergmann_Stadt_01_1988.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2019010910006941. --FitIndia 17:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for all the images of artworks but not those of the artist himself found in Category:Hermann Bergmann (artist) under ticket:2019010910006941. --Ww2censor (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per above (files with portraits of the painter have been deleted and artworks kept). @Ww2censor: Please confirm it's correct. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hunney Mallick (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:DW of Aquaman. Doubt filmmakers released these shots under a free license.
Abzeronow (talk) 17:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: Please check Hunney Mallick's contributions, he/she has since uploaded several more copy protected images.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 19:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tip. Some are blatant copyvios with a copyright notice in lower right: "Warner Brothers Ent, All Rights Reserved" Abzeronow (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
complex logo, needs OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation: http://glazunov.ru/uploads/image/image/70/59.jpg Turkmen talk 19:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of companies
[edit]Unused logo, out of project scope.
- File:131 Amor & Esperança.png
- File:14 06 28 Duke Energy Sign Clearwater FL 02.jpg
- File:140527 - 150 px Logo with Tag,R transparent-Small.png
- File:1577Logo.JPG
- File:19 entertainment logo-antigo.png
- File:1x1 color 1 ЛОГО ІУМ 02.jpg
- File:2-150F31513302Z.png
- File:200x119.png
- File:2014-05 Logo MSuP rgb.png
- File:24-7 Home Rescue Logo.jpg
- File:26711 BECLOGO1.jpg
- File:2nd story brewing logo.png
- File:360 Logo.pdf
- File:3Teresas.jpg
- File:4 - Copy.png
- File:41 logogram.png
- File:42Gears-Company-Logo.png
- File:479x144 FoxBit Logo.png
- File:4digitallogo.jpg
- File:5W Logo.JPG
- File:5W Public Relations New Logo.jpg
Willy1018(talk) 19:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of companies 2
[edit]Unused logo, out of project scope.
- File:97pLogoBig.png
- File:9imagine logo.png
- File:@XiComputer Metal Logo.png
- File:A-Blok-logo-N-fond blanc-RVB-HD.jpg
- File:AAD Site Logo.png
- File:AAEAAQAAAAAAAAPNAAAAJDU0MTZjNDg2LTYyZTQtNGM4OS05YjY2LTJlZTY1N2IwNjIxOQ.png
- File:Aalborg CSP logo small.jpg
- File:Aaron'sGadgets.png
- File:AAW 25th Anniversary logo.pdf
- File:AAY.png
- File:AbD Serotec logo.png
- File:AbelCine Logo.jpg
- File:Abelco.jpg
- File:ABM Works.jpeg
- File:Abrar.jpg
Willy1018(talk) 20:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Logos of companies 3
[edit]Unused logo, out of project scope.
File:(Acoustic Sessions) - EP.jpgFile:.info logo.png- File:0 e8543 140a9938 orig.png
File:01 Netmarble CI.pngFile:01RegulonDB.pngFile:04. NEPIC Main Logo White on Blue.jpg- File:1 to use Kornfeld-Logo (nur Haus).tif
File:1-logo-BH-general.jpgFile:1000x300-Primary-Red-RGB.pngFile:12 channel Cherepovets.jpgFile:128x128.jpg- File:131 Amor & Esperança.png
- File:14 06 28 Duke Energy Sign Clearwater FL 02.jpg
- File:140527 - 150 px Logo with Tag,R transparent-Small.png
- File:1577Logo.JPG
File:160725 buw convergys logo web.png- File:19 entertainment logo-antigo.png
File:19 entertainment-novo.jpgFile:1928 Jewelry Company (logo).pngFile:1e company logo.pngFile:1oT Logo - SVG.svg- File:1st logo of AEON CINEMA.jpg
- File:1x1 color 1 ЛОГО ІУМ 02.jpg
- File:2-150F31513302Z.png
- File:200x119.png
File:2011 01 10 die medienanstalten logo pfade.png- File:2014-05 Logo MSuP rgb.png
- File:2016 KORE (r) Logo.png
- File:2016 Metro Wireless Logo.jpg
- File:24-7 Home Rescue Logo.jpg
- File:24hbc-logo.png
- File:24option-logo.png
- File:26711 BECLOGO1.jpg
File:280x100-trans.pngFile:2929 Entertainment Logo.jpg- File:2nd logo of AEON CINEMA.JPG
- File:2nd story brewing logo.png
- File:360 Logo.pdf
- File:3651 P5 Logo.jpg
- File:37coins Logo.png
File:3ality Digital Logo.jpg- File:3B Behaviour Based Business.jpg
- File:3BL Holdings.png
File:3CX logo.svgFile:3D Systems Logo.png- File:3DVHS logo.jpg
- File:3i Infotech New logo.jpg
- File:3Teresas.jpg
- File:4 - Copy.png
- File:4041×4285+PNG+B&W+Logo.png
- File:41 logogram.png
- File:42Gears-Company-Logo.png
- File:479x144 FoxBit Logo.png
- File:4digitallogo.jpg
- File:4DXOfficialLogo.png
- File:4Licensing Corporation logo.png
- File:4LicensingCorporationLogo.png
- File:5W Logo.JPG
- File:5W Public Relations New Logo.jpg
- File:6rounds2010Logo.jpg
File:888sport-logo.png- File:97pLogoBig.png
- File:9imagine logo.png
- File:@XiComputer Metal Logo.png
File:A&D DiscoverPrecision Logo.svg- File:A-Blok-logo-N-fond blanc-RVB-HD.jpg
- File:A.T. Cross Firmenlogo.png
- File:AAD Site Logo.png
- File:AAEAAQAAAAAAAAPNAAAAJDU0MTZjNDg2LTYyZTQtNGM4OS05YjY2LTJlZTY1N2IwNjIxOQ.png
- File:Aalborg CSP logo small.jpg
- File:Aaramshop logo.png
- File:Aaron'sGadgets.png
- File:AAW 25th Anniversary logo.pdf
- File:AAY.png
- File:AbD Serotec logo.png
- File:AbelCine Logo.jpg
- File:Abelco.jpg
- File:Abellonlogo.jpg
- File:ABM Works.jpeg
- File:Abminor.jpg
- File:AboutUs Logo.png
- File:Abrar.jpg
- File:Abso Lutely Productions Logo.png
- File:Abstergo.png
- File:Academy Mortgage.png
- File:Acces 2 advocacy logo.png
- File:Access America Transport logo.png
- File:Accessgreen copy.jpg
- File:Accessgreen-copy.png
- File:ACMA S.p.A. logo.jpg
- File:ACME Grupė logo.png
- File:AComp.FE.Logo.png
- File:Acorn-facebook.jpg
- File:Acquire BPO Logo.png
- File:Actavis-logo-flat.png
- File:ACTC logo - small size.jpg
- File:ActioNet Logo.png
- File:Active 1 High.png
- File:Active Intelligence.png
- File:ActiveEon logo 500px.jpg
- File:Ad Marginem Logo.svg
- File:Ada-aerospace-logo.png
- File:ADAM Audio HiFi Logo.jpg
- File:Addersen International Limited.jpg
- File:Addison Whitney Logo.png
- File:AddToAny logo PNG.png
- File:Aderco-Company-Logo.png
- File:Adi logo.gif
- File:Adiant logo.png
- File:Adloonix logo2.png
- File:ADO Logo.svg
- File:ADticket.jpg
- File:Advantech logo2.jpg
- File:Adventtraininglogo.jpg
- File:AEDesign logo.jpg
File:Aerodata-Logo.jpg- File:Aeron-by-GAM-logo.jpg
- File:AERTEL.png
- File:AESC Logo.jpg
- File:Aesm.png
- File:AEWaxpoRGB.jpg
- File:AFCONS Infra Logo.png
- File:Agent Provocateur Logo.png
- File:Agnitum.jpg
- File:Agrilogo.png
- File:Agronic R.gif
- File:AGS logo.jpg
- File:AGS-Titel-Logos DE AT CH NL BE FI.jpg
File:AH Belo Corporation logo.png- File:AhavaLogo.png
- File:AHCCINC.png
- File:AICelluloids Logo.jpg
- File:AIF COLOUR LOGO Colour Logo.jpg
- File:AIKE logo.png
File:AiP logo eng horizontal.svgFile:AiP logo rus horizontal.svgFile:Air Alsie Logo.jpg- File:Air Macedonia.jpeg
- File:AircraftSupply Logo.png
File:Airpaz.png- File:Airvana 2015 logo.png
- File:Airwave Logo.svg
- File:AIS.png
- File:AIT Therapeutics Logo.png
- File:Ajit TCS.JPG
- File:Ajit TCS1.JPG
- File:AJKENTECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED.png
File:AKA Logo.png- File:AKAN.jpg
_-_EP.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_Logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Willy1018(talk) 21:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Willy1018: Looks like you're wrong. The File:12 channel Cherepovets.jpg file is used at ru:Канал 12 and d:Q4454116. Please be more careful next time. Evs (talk) 21:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not sure why logos of companies would be automatically out of scope. Some of them are even used on other wikis, which according to the policy makes them automatically in scope. It's possible that certain unused logos of very obscure companies are out of scope, but that doesn't appear to be what the requester is suggesting here. BMacZero (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am fixing.Willy1018(talk) 21:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Abso Lutely Productions Logo.png is used on 3 different articles, why was it tagged for deletion? Vistadan 21:55, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
(1 and 2) Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC) (3) Kept or Deleted: I have deleted the unused logos and kept the used ones. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Arthur Crbz: What about the 2nd & 3rd sections? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.:
Done Takes time to handle the whole request ;) --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Willy1018: Hey! Next time, please take time to check if the file is used or not. It took me ages to check each file individually... --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Arthur Crbz: Sorry for making you uncomfortable.Willy1018(talk) 13:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Willy1018: You can click the white on red question mark "?" in VFC (seen in this screenshot) to show you global usage numbers for all files shown. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thanks for telling me that:)Willy1018(talk) 13:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Willy1018: You're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Thanks for telling me that:)Willy1018(talk) 13:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Willy1018: You can click the white on red question mark "?" in VFC (seen in this screenshot) to show you global usage numbers for all files shown. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Arthur Crbz: Sorry for making you uncomfortable.Willy1018(talk) 13:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Willy1018: Hey! Next time, please take time to check if the file is used or not. It took me ages to check each file individually... --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.:
Files in Category:Logos of companies 4
[edit]Unused logo, out of project scope.
- File:Affect Digital.jpg
- File:Afghan estate agents.png
- File:Afrizap logo.JPG
- File:Afzone-facebookl.jpg
- File:Agaram Infotech Private Limited Logo.jpg
- File:AGCO-K-Big.png
- File:AGCO-K-Small.png
- File:Agency1903Logo alternate.jpg
- File:AGGA Web logo.jpg
- File:Al Fajer Re logo.JPG
- File:Albayrak Law Logo.jpg
- File:Alberto Croozo logo.png
- File:AlldayPA Logo.png
- File:Allena Auto Industries Logo.png
- File:Allenhouse Group of Colleges.png
Willy1018(talk) 06:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, COM:OOS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Original uploader's request. No longer use it. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Original uploader's request. No longer use it. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Original uploader's request. No longer use it. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Original uploader's request. No longer use it. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Original uploader's request. No longer use it. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Original uploader's request. No longer use it. Cangjie6 (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Does not look like an own work. E4024 (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Yilku1 (talk) 22:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete – degraded w:File:Logo_Justicialista.png (it’s this image that should be transferred here, if any), lies about source and authorship. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:24, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Blank video uploaded by accident Sgerbic (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cyril Pasquet (talk · contribs)
[edit]A picture of a picture, a derivative work. There is no author or licensing information regarding the underlying photo.
ℯxplicit 23:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Likely to be own work. But dates were wrong indeed, I changed it for "unknown". --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture that seems to be copied as it appears in several places on the web. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:40, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please provide permission to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Non-free logo; does not belong in Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This seems (at least to me) to fall below COM:TOO United States, which means OK as {{PD-textlogo}}. If this isn't acceptable to be uploaded to Commons as such, there are probably many more files in Category:Logos of television channels and networks of the United States which would require reassessment as well. Is it possible that the nominator is mistaking being en:trademarked for being en:copyrighted. They are often used interchangeably by many even though they represent different concepts. The file just appears to have been licensed incorrectly, and it should be changed to "PD-textlogo". -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: below COM:TOO. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:Profile picture .jpg
- File:YouTube award .png
- File:Movie recording.jpg
- File:Recording of movie.jpg
- File:Proeee with Ivan Penezić.jpg
- File:Adrian with Jacques Houdek.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:44, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
blank photo Snowdawg (talk) 16:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:10, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/RealOfficialMaymayEntrata/photos/a.1827613870833643/2187346768193683/?type=3&theater Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with this. This is not Maywardjedi's work. Photographer is Andrea Beldua. Original photo was posted by Maymay on her Instagram account: https://www.instagram.com/p/BsLOd3-HBc7/. Andrea's works can be seen here: https://www.instagram.com/p/BsLF4Vqg8Iy/ Subwaymuncher (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:15, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
عدم رضایت صاحب اثر Montazaralmahdi (talk) 21:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Being "approved for public dissemination" is not the same thing as being released into the public domain. No indication that I can see that Interpol is somehow special about releasing their works into the PD, and it's not clear that even if they were, this is actually a work of Interpol and not Spanish law enforcement. GMGtalk 22:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete Appears over an ARR copyright notice, which the “approved for public dissemination” statement is insufficient to override, in particular WRT modification & commercial use.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 17:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comparable in intent to File:P-steric.jpg but with labels floating off their bond-positions and stray lines across the image DMacks (talk) 18:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; it's obviously "broken". Ed (Edgar181) 14:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
OTRS pending since August 2018, still no permission. Sealle (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- I asked to send permission. Twice. They said they did.I will ask them to send permission again. If they do not do it again, you can delete it.Skepsiz (talk) 19:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - No OTRS received - 20 days after last notification. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/SinghAmberdeep/photos/a.1542544186012439/2196062130660638/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
The image is not a work of the U.S. Government as claimed, and it is not in the public domain. It is lifted from a State of Colorado website and is therefore copyrighted. There is no evidence of any permission having been given for its reproduction. The image was lifted from here: https://www.colorado.gov/governor/gov-polis Jeffrey Beall (talk) 12:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support Should be deleted. No copyright release.Pharexia (talk) 16:45, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Corky 19:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - website clearly shows copyright. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
blank photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Bristell RA-0146A (14078295128).jpg Snowdawg (talk) 19:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
File not use anywere Serieznyi (talk) 21:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Might be copyrighted. The free use rationale, death of author, is inconsistent with the claim that the author was unknown. I could not find any information online proving that it is PD. Buidhe (talk) 04:12, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Four different images in the history, all seem to be above TOO. Sealle (talk) 12:58, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small image without EXIF data, may not be own work B dash (talk) 15:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Dubious own work, like several other uploads by the same user. E4024 (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
_(6432151469).jpg){kind=link}
_(6432151469).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work. — Racconish 💬 15:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
![15:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/01/09#c-Racconish-2019-01-09T15:18:00.000Z-File:"Abner"_is_finished!_)_(6432151469).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
![08:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/01/09#c-Christian_Ferrer-2019-02-09T08:51:00.000Z-File:"Abner"_is_finished!_)_(6432151469).jpg){kind=link}
The photo with the frame is very possibly copyrighted (while the painting itself isn't).
Also applies to:
- File:1766-queen-charlotte-britai_med.jpg
- File:Jeremiah_Meyer_-_Queen_Charlotte.jpg
- File:Gainsborough_–_Queen_Charlotte.jpg
- File:Ozias Humphry - Queen Charlotte, c.1766.jpg
-- Ruthven (msg) 15:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
_-_09949.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_09949.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo is blurred Norman.seibert (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:02, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Dimorphodon macronyx illustration - Pterosaurs Flight in the Age of Dinosaurs (45758949401).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2D artwork in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 11:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Tupuxuara leonardii illustration - Pterosaurs Flight in the Age of Dinosaurs (43941192760).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2D artwork in US museum. FunkMonk (talk) 11:11, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
From Facebook, no permission. Yann (talk) 12:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h12GsgFyEe8 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - or from elsewhere. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Marked as {{PD-textlogo}}, but the background designs of these logos are complex enough to be above the threshold of originality.
- File:Operation Phoenix Logo.jpg
- File:Haerte 10 Logo.jpg
- File:Inspektion Lauenstadt Logo.jpg
- File:Das Geheimnis der weissen Masken Logo.jpg
- File:Das Kurheim Logo.jpg
- File:Liebe ist Privatsache Logo.jpg
- File:Die grossen Detektive Logo.jpg
- File:Am Abend ins Odeon Logo.jpg
ℯxplicit 05:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Who is really able to decide, if the background of a logo is too complex? I can not do so. This decision should be done by a group of specialists and should not depend on the feeling of a single person.
For my opinion, the background of File:Haerte 10 Logo.jpg, File:Das Geheimnis der weissen Masken Logo.jpg, File:Das Kurheim Logo.jpg and File:Am Abend ins Odeon Logo.jpg is really simple. No reason to delete.
Would it help to "simplify" the background of the remaining logos? Or would that cause other problems? Is it really necessary?
I see a lot of logos on Wikipedia pages, which really are complex but are out of discussion since years (e.g. de:Das Traumschiff).
--Aguetul (talk) 07:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I see nothing copyrightable in the background of any of these. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
These logos consist of a complex background and they may exceed COM:TOO
- File:Zwei Herzen zwoelf Pfoten.jpg
- File:Herzschlag Logo.jpg
- File:Tournee Ballett Logo.jpg
- File:Maenner sind was Wunderbares Logo.jpg
- File:Die Melchiors Logo.jpg
- File:Kurklinik Rosenau Logo.jpg
- File:Ein Chirurg erinnert sich Logo.jpg
- File:Unsere heile Welt Logo.jpg
- File:Golden Zeiten Logo.jpg
- File:Jetzt erst recht Logo.jpg
- File:Kalle kocht Logo.jpg
- File:Unternehmen Rentnerkommune Logo.jpg
- File:Typisch Mann Logo.jpg
- File:Alexander und die Toechter Logo.jpg
- File:Direktion City Logo.jpg
- File:Alarm im Schlossmuseum Logo.jpg
- File:Die Inselaerztin Logo.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I only see simple backgrounds and letters not above COM:TOO, but de minimis.
--Aguetul (talk) 05:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The motive is the text and to me it looks too simple to be above TOO.
- The backgrounds are mostly too blurred to see anything. One of the "best" photos are File:Ein Chirurg erinnert sich Logo.jpg and if the text were not there I would think it was a problem. But since the text is what is in focus I think the photo de minimis per Aguetul.
- If anyone wanna see a gallery with the files check out my sandbox. --MGA73 (talk) 16:11, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. A fundamental misunderstanding of how COM:DM applies. The complex backgrounds just don't "happen to be there", they are part of the entire work. Make the backgrouond transparent and then these can be kept, but not the current versions. ƏXPLICIT 12:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:Explicit. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Trumpie Photography (http://www.trumpiephotography.com/) is a private venture so it's very unlikely that Dave Trumpie is an employee of the U.S. government. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support This should be deleted. Does not provide proper release rights. Pharexia (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Corky 19:43, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Trump.idol (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
unidentified selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
http://www.vsuwt.ru/news/detail.php?ID=1025&sphrase_id=509627 копиво Панн (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
useless and private -- Xfigpower (pssst) 18:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is a very dated and not current image. Dallasfarmersmarket (talk) 18:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; dated makes it historical. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Note: now renamed to File:Flag of the Soviet Union (dark version).svg
.svg){kind=link}
The changes of 1980 were related only to the reverse side[3]. The shades of red were not revised in 1980, they are simply uncoordinated versions of different users of Commons. In en:Flag of the Soviet Union we can see citation needed request. In Russian Wikipedia template for this flag was removed in 2012, since no information on changing colors in 1980 was found.
Deletion means turning this link into a redirect to File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep: I think so long as English Wikipedia claims that the shade of red was changed, Commons should keep the corresponding file. This is by analogy with COM:INUSE, which technically applies here (but might reasonably be ignored if the difference between the files were actually insignificant). --bjh21 (talk) 18:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- The existence of this file is only a consequence of an mistake in English Wikipedia. In Russian Wikipedia the question was carefully studied, the front side of the flag in 1980 did not change, a separate file for the period from 1955 to 1980 is not needed. The differences between the two files are not due to anything but inconsistency of Commons user actions. Because of this file, the authors have to do additional checking of the correctness of the choice of file flags of articles, and in some articles the files of 1955 and 1980 are side by side, demonstrating a false difference between. I believe that there will be no problems with the COM:INUSE if we make this file redirect to File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg like it was with File:Flag of the Soviet Union (1938-1980).svg. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- I think you may have mistaken the role of Commons here. Commons is here to host files that other projects require. It is not here to impose its editorial will on other projects. Thus so long as English Wikipedia (and other projects) want to show a change that they allege happened in 1980, Commons should keep the file. It would be explain the situation in the description of the file, and maybe even to change its name (e.g. to File:Flag of the Soviet Union (dark version).svg, but so long as some projects want to show both colours side-by-side, we should host them both. --bjh21 (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- On the contrary, I believe that the idea of a color change in 1980 arose precisely because of the presence of two inconsistent files at the Commons. Existence of a file with a mark "1955-1980" is misleading. The assumption that we are dealing not with confusion, but with the desire to show the differences of the reverse side of the flag using shades of red, seems absurd to me. I just use Occam's razor. One of the two colors is wrong, there is no reason for this option to be present on Wikipedia and on Commons without explicitly indicating its fallacy as it would be for the option with a blue, pink or any other random background. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 20:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- The colour change was first mentioned in English Wikipedia on 2004-04-09. Commons started on 2004-09-07). Otherwise, you still seem to be misunderstanding Commons' role, but I don't think I can find another way to explain it. --bjh21 (talk) 23:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Well, first of all, I meant the existence of two files with different shades of red, which could mislead the authors of Wikipedia. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- The colour change was first mentioned in English Wikipedia on 2004-04-09. Commons started on 2004-09-07). Otherwise, you still seem to be misunderstanding Commons' role, but I don't think I can find another way to explain it. --bjh21 (talk) 23:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- On the contrary, I believe that the idea of a color change in 1980 arose precisely because of the presence of two inconsistent files at the Commons. Existence of a file with a mark "1955-1980" is misleading. The assumption that we are dealing not with confusion, but with the desire to show the differences of the reverse side of the flag using shades of red, seems absurd to me. I just use Occam's razor. One of the two colors is wrong, there is no reason for this option to be present on Wikipedia and on Commons without explicitly indicating its fallacy as it would be for the option with a blue, pink or any other random background. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 20:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- I think you may have mistaken the role of Commons here. Commons is here to host files that other projects require. It is not here to impose its editorial will on other projects. Thus so long as English Wikipedia (and other projects) want to show a change that they allege happened in 1980, Commons should keep the file. It would be explain the situation in the description of the file, and maybe even to change its name (e.g. to File:Flag of the Soviet Union (dark version).svg, but so long as some projects want to show both colours side-by-side, we should host them both. --bjh21 (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- The existence of this file is only a consequence of an mistake in English Wikipedia. In Russian Wikipedia the question was carefully studied, the front side of the flag in 1980 did not change, a separate file for the period from 1955 to 1980 is not needed. The differences between the two files are not due to anything but inconsistency of Commons user actions. Because of this file, the authors have to do additional checking of the correctness of the choice of file flags of articles, and in some articles the files of 1955 and 1980 are side by side, demonstrating a false difference between. I believe that there will be no problems with the COM:INUSE if we make this file redirect to File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg like it was with File:Flag of the Soviet Union (1938-1980).svg. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: There was a request to delete this file last year, closed Keep. --bjh21 (talk) 23:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Remove I even included a source on the page from the Russian Centre of Vexillology and Heraldry, which says the no changes were made to the flag in the update in 1980, only an appendix on how the hammer/sickle were removed reverse side. This file is wrong and unsourced and adds confusion. At least rename it to something else.--Havsjö (talk) 22:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- I have, with a fair amount of trepidation, renamed the file to File:Flag of the Soviet Union (dark version).svg. I hope this name is neutral enough. --bjh21 (talk) 00:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per this and former discussions. @Bjh21: Of course you're aware of Commons' file renaming policy that states that files in DRs (-> with copyright issues) shouldn't be renamed. Right?. Ruthven (msg) 20:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
I messed up the licencing / copyright of this image. Its a logo and should be correctly attributed as such ie not my own work Frankdup (talk) 09:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Frankdup: : The "Edit" link at the top of File:Barrick logo RGB.jpg should allow you to correct that. --bjh21 (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I fixed the license. Ruthven (msg) 20:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Vorrei cancellare la mia propria opera dal sito. Annalia.brunetti (talk) 15:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Immagine caricata più di un anno fa con licenza libera. Ruthven (msg) 20:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Io, proprietaria della foto, la vorrei far togliere dal sito Annalia.brunetti (talk) 08:06, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Uploaded for Wiki Loves Earth 2018 with free license. There is not reason to delete. --Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 16:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: maybe own work, but "license = no" looks fishy. Ruthven (msg) 20:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 16:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, can be own. Ruthven (msg) 20:35, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of a sign, COM:DW 1989 (talk) 16:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I, too, suspect this to fall afoul of the derivative work principle. (One has got to say, that plane is something out of a horror novel. I mean, just look at it while you have the chance.) Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 02:29, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:35, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no permission Papuass (talk) 16:43, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: RFC LIVONIA © 2016. Ruthven (msg) 20:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader not photographer SecretName101 (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: personal unused file. Ruthven (msg) 20:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Je me suis trompé de nom de fichier et aussi de titre dans le graphique (devrait être Championnat d'Europe). Une nouvelle version corrigée a été uploadée "Evolution du score - Euro féminin de handball 2018.svg Wenflou (talk) 20:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The subject came to us (OTRS - ticket:2019010910007547) claiming the media was obtain without her consent and that she explicitly asked the photographer not to take one. According to Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Canada, this should be removed. AntonierCH (d) 21:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @AntonierCH: I can't see tickets in that queue, but she is looking at the camera and doesn't look like she is objecting to the photo. Can you please clarify the "Québec-specific part" of COM:CONSENT? I don't see anything there that mentions Quebec. A possible option would be to ask if she or her organization has a photo that they own the copyright to and would prefer that we use (and if they would provide it under the terms of an acceptable license). --B (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your remark @B. She just wants to take down the picture and it is unlikely she would provide another one: it wouldn't work. She is explaining that the picture was taken without her knowing, at the exact moment when she noticed it was happening, and that she then went after the photograph to clarify that she didn't want here picture taken and had an argument with him. I agree that it looks like she is posing, this is also why any comment are welcomed =)
- Also, I have corrected the link to Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Canada. --AntonierCH (d) 21:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Well, under the Quebec rule you linked, it seems like a pretty clear Delete since we can't prove there was consent (even though I don't necessarily believe her). --B (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @AntonierCH: ; Regarding a number of Bull Doser's previous images of people- those I'd seen *before* I came across this discussion- I've had the distinct impression that their attention has *just* been caught (intentionally or otherwise) and they're aware that someone is about to take their photo, but haven't had time to get ready or respond properly.
- I wouldn't read anything into Ms. Lalonde's supposed "pose" or expression- the
latterformer could be coincidence, and theformerlatter doesn't look overly pleased to me. (Or maybe *I'm* projecting what I know into it). - That said, my opinion on all that is irrelevant. All that matters is that in the absence of clear consent this has to be a Delete. Ubcule (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Well, under the Quebec rule you linked, it seems like a pretty clear
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
This file apparently has no real source apart from having been transferred from en.wp. Also quite unclear: who is actually the author and why it should be under the GFDL and CC licenses given? If those licenses are bogus, is the file alternatively in the PD for some reason? Unless some satisfactory answer to those questions can be found, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 22:18, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Vorrei cancellare la mia propria opera dal sito. Annalia.brunetti (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Domanda della proprietaria Annalia.brunetti (talk) 09:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Immagine caricata più di un anno fa con licenza libera. Ruthven (msg) 20:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Vorrei cancellare la mia propria opera dal sito. Annalia.brunetti (talk) 15:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Domanda della proprietaria Annalia.brunetti (talk) 09:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Immagine caricata più di un anno fa con licenza libera. Ruthven (msg) 20:29, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Лицо на видео и автор видео-одно и тоже лицо. Сомнения в авторстве файла. Dogad75 (talk) 12:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Does South Ossetia have copyright law? It's not state symbol according to Georgian law, because Georgia doesn't recognize South Ossetia. Abkhazian copyrights law is irrelevant. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence this is out of copyright in Georgia. Abzeronow (talk) 16:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is an official anthem of the Georgian province of South Ossetia, adopted as such in (independent) Georgia in 1995. It is almost certain that its author has agreed to place the work in public domain, provided such concept existed in the then Georgian law. Still, this is my educated guess only, so I recommend researching the matter further. — kashmīrī 23:04, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete In 1995 according to the Georgian law there was no "South Ossetia" at all [On 11 December 1990, the Georgian government abolished South Ossetia's autonomous status altogether.].--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 23:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- South Ossetia has different opinion on this matter as well as countries that recognize it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Any factual proof? Reliable sources?--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 17:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- You could read w:en:South Ossetia as well as references used in article. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The United States does not recognize South Ossetia as a nation-state, and therefore it would likely not be free from copyright in the United States under given rationale. Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- You could read w:en:South Ossetia as well as references used in article. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Any factual proof? Reliable sources?--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ★ 17:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- South Ossetia has different opinion on this matter as well as countries that recognize it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Copyrights law was accepted at December 12, 2012 (news site), but there is no text on parliament site. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: related rights violation. The performers' and phonogram producer's permissions are needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
The head of Anastasia Meshcheryakova is the main object of this image. As described in Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Russian Federation it requires consent from appropriate person for publication. There is straight forbiddance of presumably girl's mother to publish image of her daughter regarding other image: w:ru:Википедия:Сообщения об ошибках/Архив/2016/03#Убийство Анастасии Мещеряковой. Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- This photo may not be subject to the requirements of the legislation on the consent of the person depicted, since this person had died before this photo was taken. The right of parents and heirs to give or not consent to the distribution of photographs applies only to lifetime images, rather than to posthumous ones. Раммон (talk) 13:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people/checklist: «are those people still alive? NO: you can stop reading this guide: COM:PEOPLE only applies to identifiable living people». Раммон (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- COM:PEOPLE «Certain legal and ethical issues may remain if the person is dead or if they cannot be identified». I insist there is legal issue with the photo, as described above. Russian law (article 152.1 of Civil Code of Russia) mentions children, spouses or parents of dead person as only persons for mandatory publication approval (see exceptions in Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Russian Federation). --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- The right of the murdered girl to her image ceased at the time of her death. The right of heirs (parents) to dispose of their daughter's images applies only to her lifetime images. No one has the right to prohibit the dissemination of posthumous images of people, since the deceased person himself has no right to those photographs showing his corpse. The heirs also have no rights to these images. The norms of the Russian legislation to which you referred, refer to living people only, rather than to the dead. Раммон (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Seems you right. I see no legal restrictions on publishing images of dead people. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, corpse is not a legal person. Раммон (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Their relatives are. But there is no law to protect relative's rights. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 09:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Relatives have no rights to corpse's images. Раммон (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Besides, as I understood it was not confirmed that relatives are really expressed their protests in Russian Wiki. Can somebody show me such protests? KOT-TOK (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Relatives have no rights to corpse's images. Раммон (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Their relatives are. But there is no law to protect relative's rights. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 09:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, corpse is not a legal person. Раммон (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Seems you right. I see no legal restrictions on publishing images of dead people. --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- The right of the murdered girl to her image ceased at the time of her death. The right of heirs (parents) to dispose of their daughter's images applies only to her lifetime images. No one has the right to prohibit the dissemination of posthumous images of people, since the deceased person himself has no right to those photographs showing his corpse. The heirs also have no rights to these images. The norms of the Russian legislation to which you referred, refer to living people only, rather than to the dead. Раммон (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- COM:PEOPLE «Certain legal and ethical issues may remain if the person is dead or if they cannot be identified». I insist there is legal issue with the photo, as described above. Russian law (article 152.1 of Civil Code of Russia) mentions children, spouses or parents of dead person as only persons for mandatory publication approval (see exceptions in Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Russian Federation). --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Photographs may be deleted on courtesy grounds on Wikimedia Commons. However, this image is currently in use on several Wikipedias which makes it far less likely to be a deletion candidate solely on a courtesy rationale. As suggested above, a case for removal would be much stronger were there a request from a relative (second party, rather than third parties) and were there legal precedent for the source country on, say, grounds of expectations of privacy. --Fæ (talk) 15:10, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Question What about the rights of the living person Gulchekhra Bobokulova who is pictured holding the head of Anastasia Meshcheryakova? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 18:15, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Good question. She may be crazy but we cannot behave like one. Therefore if a vote is needed I say delete. --E4024 (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- In accordance with Russian laws Bobokulova's permission is not required as this photo was taken in a public place. Раммон (talk) 07:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Good to know that. However, Commons is not subject to Russian law. It considers the laws of the place of origin and those of the US, but not only them; it has its own laws also. --E4024 (talk) 12:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Specifically these legal relations are governed by the country of origin. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Good to know that. However, Commons is not subject to Russian law. It considers the laws of the place of origin and those of the US, but not only them; it has its own laws also. --E4024 (talk) 12:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- In accordance with Russian laws Bobokulova's permission is not required as this photo was taken in a public place. Раммон (talk) 07:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Good question. She may be crazy but we cannot behave like one. Therefore if a vote is needed I say delete. --E4024 (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Раммон: Now we do not violate the laws and rules of the Commons. + This is a very valuable and unique photo. We should not be guided by censorship or abstract courtesy if we strive to save objective knowledge. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- I do not know what you prefer us to be guided by, but if you are so keen on using an image of this horrible crime you have a less visible one here: File:Bobokulova 29 02 2016.png. Delete --E4024 (talk) 14:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- I do not know what you prefer us to be guided by, but if you are so keen on using an image of this horrible crime you have a less visible one here: File:Bobokulova 29 02 2016.png.
- Delete, we don't have consent from living nanny turned terrorist murderer Gulchekhra Bobokulova as required by Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Russian Federation. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Deletion requires a basis in policy, which has not been provided. To the contrary: Commons:Country specific consent requirements is a "part of the guideline Photographs of identifiable people," which is itself a "sub-guildline" of Commons:Non-copyright restrictions (for example: "The legal rights of the subjects constitute non-copyright restrictions on use of images" (COM:IDENT) and "laws related to [...] personality rights [...] are entirely independent from the copyright status of the work" (COM:NCR)). Per NCR: "Commons considers non-copyright restrictions to be matters for photographers/uploaders or reusers and are not grounds for deletion of works from Commons." The exception is "personality/privacy laws which do not allow photographs of identifiable people which were made in a private place, unless the depicted person gives permission." This photograph (or video still) was not taken in a private place and, indeed, there otherwise would have been no reasonable expectation of privacy. The possibility of legal issues in Russia is, again, a matter for re-users and the reason {{Personality rights}} exists. --Эlcobbola talk 16:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Violations of human dignity Akhmadjan (talk) 13:39, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: This rationale is 1) invalid and 2) the one addressed by the previous DR. Per the archive note above, "If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate." Indeed, per COM:DEL: renomination of a kept file "should not be done unless you can add new information or clarification.". --Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" from a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- No EXIF, too small... --E4024 (talk) 17:48, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3800099,00.html צלום עמי גדליה. -- Geagea (talk) 14:30, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Signatures from China are not OK on Commons, per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#China, People's Republic of. Wcam (talk) 16:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 07:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
low resolution error file Warrenj22 (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ℯxplicit 07:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Photo insignificant person. Used in articles created for vandalism GAndy (talk) 17:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 07:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Smaller and poorer alignment than File:Flammarion.jpg (that latter is a "featured-picture" on en.wp, and is not cited as being a retouched version of this one as original) DMacks (talk) 19:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- per nom : Delete. Kathisma (talk) 13:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 07:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
File:Ponce Plaza Hotel and Casino, on Calle Unión, facing Plaza Las Delicias, in Barrio Segundo, Ponce, Puerto Rico.jpg
[edit]
No metadata, only upload, found online elsewhere, most likely COM:DW 1989 (talk) 05:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose. I would oppose the nomination if only because THIS other one isn't a nighttime shot and doesn't include the casino to the left either. Mercy11 (talk) 17:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- If you’re implying it may be from Flickr, then there needs to be a source to support that. -- 1989 (talk) 17:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- I wasn't implying anything Flickr. You stated that pic was found elsewhere online. Mercy11 (talk) 17:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- In which it is. -- 1989 (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:03, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
The man in the pictrue is from here and marked as the non-commercial use. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 12:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- What's wrong with this picture? What exactly is the problem? --Tomchiukc (talk) 12:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Same here. What's the problem?? The on-picture text states that "Feel free to share, all rights associated with this picture is quited." --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 15:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Tomchiukc and It's gonna be awesome: The picture is the derivative work from the man with the blue cloth. Unless the author of this picture get the free-use permission from the designer of the blue man, he/she cannot decleared that all the copyrights are quited. (為免誤會，用中文說一次，這張圖是藍色衣服男人的衍生作品，作者宣稱放棄這張圖的著作權也要經過該藍色衣服之作者同意，但目前為止沒看到作者提出相關的證據。) This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 02:39, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Tomchiukc and It's gonna be awesome: Source: "禁止している使用方法" from the right side of here. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 02:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- @It's gonna be awesome: please upload a loyalty free version? The original version prohibited redistribution of the man's picture. --Tomchiukc (talk) 03:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- The girl in the picture has the same issue: Source. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 02:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the details. But I have had been busy, would people kindly help me correct the picture by blurring part of it? Any correction would be greatly appreciated.🙏 --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 17:51, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Fixed @Taiwania Justo, Tomchiukc, and It's gonna be awesome: I've change to original characters in order to fulfill the requirements. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 06:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you a bunch!! --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 14:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Meow Meow Meow! No problem at all. -- @assanges (talk | cont | uploads) 18:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you a bunch!! --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 14:50, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Historical documents and photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Note biografice.pdf
- File:Autobiografie cronologica.pdf
- File:Autobiografie.pdf
- File:Fotografie A.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
we are waiting for a ticket from the copyright owner. Asybaris01 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- The uploader holds the copyright about the creator mentioned there, it's known from an OTRS ticket for other files about that creator. He can send a permission to OTRS for the three above.
- These three files are reproductions of administrative documents, are official statements of the person before authorities. There is no copyright, and in this case the license is {{PD-RO-exempt}}, case b).
- The uploader is not familiar with copyright tags and will proceed as we tell him. What is correct: current license and future permission to OTRS, or direct PD-RO-exempt license? --Turbojet (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- The OTRS Ticket no. is 2019010710004517. Regards, Silenzio76 (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have added for info the OTRS Ticket No. to all files. Should this not be ok, please update the permission's field, as you see it fit. Regards,Silenzio76 (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- File:Fotografie A.jpg: The photo is not by the creator whose the uploader holds the copyright. The creator is the subject of the photo, and the copyright belongs to the photographer. There is no evidence that the uploader would be entitled to license this photo. --Turbojet (talk) 18:47, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have added for info the OTRS Ticket No. to all files. Should this not be ok, please update the permission's field, as you see it fit. Regards,Silenzio76 (talk) 14:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- The OTRS Ticket no. is 2019010710004517. Regards, Silenzio76 (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
The photo was exposed to the public in the spirit of the Romanian copyright 1956 law: Ştiubei's photo is exactly the model after which this painting of Ştiubei (named „Portret ofiţer – Dimitrie Ştiubei") was painted by Adriana Pălăceanu. In order for the painting to be created, the photograph must necessarily be displayed as a model. So, the proper template for File:Fotografie A.jpg is Template:PD-RO-photo --Accipiter Q. Gentilis (talk) 22:16, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS confirmed by OTRS-member. --JuTa 11:15, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Stills from an unfree video: https://ar.tunivisions.net/44634/%D8%A5%D8%B9%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%84%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D9%84%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%A8/
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep According to the EXIF data these are photographs, in my opinion, not shots from video. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Wajihami Les Photos sont Originales et n'ont pas été capturé de la Vidéo mentionné. D'ailleurs cette meme vidéo est réalisé par mon équipe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wajihami (talk • contribs) 13:'", 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Wrong license: artwork is not below threshold of originality in Switzerland (if originated from). Signed too means that author is unknown, not anonym. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It's probably out of copyright in Switzerland. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland "If authorship is unknown, copyright lasts for 70 years after the first publication. The increase of the protection term from 50 to 70 years occurred in 1993 and was not retroactive" Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment, there is a derivative file: File:9-a UK reklambildo.svg. — Racconish 💬 14:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:56, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
imagevio (low resolution, lacking EXIF data), here in higher resolution: no permission — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:25, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:02, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Nominame acording to CopyVio template. Hope it is public domain T.Bednarz (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: looks too complicated. --JuTa 10:53, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
I would like this file to be deleted because when it was originally created my full name was associated with it and it comes up when I Google myself. I work with the public and currently am dealing with an issue which I would rather not discuss but which is causing me great distress. I am trying to remove any easily found information which links me to a location; this photo does. I lived on the street in the past. I uploaded the photo at a time when I was not fully aware of the implications for my privacy. I have now changed my name to a pseudonym on the original site (Geograph) however the Wikimedia link still refers to me by my full name. I would very much appreciate your help in removing the link to me. Clockdata (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- The username has been updated at its source, so I've updated the files here, the author would like to be attributed under another alias.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:58, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
,_Caversham,_Spring_2007_-_geograph.org.uk_-_814143.jpg){kind=link}
,_Caversham,_Spring_2007_-_geograph.org.uk_-_814143.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I would like this file to be deleted because when it was originally created my full name was associated with it and it comes up when I Google myself. I uploaded the photo at a time when I was not fully aware of the implications for my privacy and that of the child in the photo. I would very much appreciate your help in removing the link to me. Clockdata (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- The username has been updated at its source, so I've updated the files here, the author would like to be attributed under another alias.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 10:57, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license: http://lubimyczytac.pl/ksiazka/192763/telewizja-naga --Patrick Rogel
- The book was published in 1991. All photographs by Polish photographers (or published for the first time in Poland or simultaneously in Poland and abroad) published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed on May 23, 1994 are assumed to be in the public domain in Poland. -- Artur Andrzej (talk) 18:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Artur Andrzej: You can dissociate a book from his cover. If the entire book is copyrighted the back cover is as well. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Artur Andrzej. The photograph meets requirements of template:PD-Polish and is considered public domain in Poland. --Jarekt (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- It's a kind of loophole (not the only one) in the Polish law. The photo has no copyright notice (as seen on the complete image) and the article says: all photographs ... published without a clear copyright notice before the law was changed in 1994. Artur Andrzej (talk) 13:36, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete As Patrick pointed out: The book is copyrighted - which is "a clear copyright notice" - and so is its cover of which the photo is part of. While the law must always be interpreted, there are no "loopholes" of the kind Artur might believes to have found - but there is COM:BOOK. --Jotzet (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --JuTa 10:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
