Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
www common sense 105.137.3.96 19:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC) www common sense 105.147.95.49 15:44, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
www common. mozik.amazir mo. . commozik.amazir Google play store that has the price of the most important thing is that the 154.151.201.23 19:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, 13th DR by IP within 1 month. Going to protect the page. --Achim (talk) 15:40, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
the first to review 196.71.20.209 00:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Vandalism by IP, see history of that page. --Achim (talk) 17:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Vlcsnap-2018-11-21-12h08m51s698אודי בתפקיד ששי הס בפרק הראשון של "מה בכריש?" לפני שוטפו אביעד.png
[edit]Screenshot. Is done by a user who frequently violates copyright in the Hebrew Wikipedia. דגש חזק (talk) 10:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 12:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot from a copyrighted movie: w:en:File:Skaro.jpg Titore (talk) 10:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screenshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot from the tv series w:Caprica Titore (talk) 10:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screnshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hardly own work (see http://ru.caprica.wikia.com/wiki/Скорпия), probably a copyrighted screenshot Titore (talk) 10:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination- unfree screnshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hardly own work (https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/File:Leonis.png), probably a copyrighted screenshot, also Titore (talk) 10:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screnshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hardly own work (http://caprica.wikia.com/wiki/Canceron), probably a copyrighted screenshot Titore (talk) 10:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination- unfree screnshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot Titore (talk) 10:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screenshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot from Battlestar Galactica 4x10: https://www.slantmagazine.com/house/article/bsg-saturdays-season-4-ep-10-revelations Titore (talk) 10:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screenshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hardly own work (https://en.battlestarwikiclone.org/wiki/New_Caprica), probably a copyrighted screenshot Titore (talk) 10:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screenshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hardly own work (https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Lantea), probably a copyrighted screenshot Titore (talk) 10:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screenshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hardly own work (https://stargate.fandom.com/wiki/Asuras), probably a copyrighted screenshot Titore (talk) 10:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unfree screenshot. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Requested by the subject 77.14.75.14 13:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as author of the image, I summarily delete such portraits when requested by subjects as a courtesy. Rama (talk) 13:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Hardly own work, seems taken from http://caprica.wikia.com/wiki/Picon Titore (talk) 10:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Blackcat at 12:24, 21 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): unfree screnshot --Krdbot 20:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot from w:Battlestar Galactica (miniseries) Titore (talk) 10:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Blackcat at 12:38, 21 November 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:-Nukes in Miniseries.jpg --Krdbot 20:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by DinoDrawer66 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC) |reason=Duplicate
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
This Is deleted as This JPg was not working as I wanted to so I deleted it myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DinoDrawer66 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
This file has been uploaded wrong / converted wrong by me! It can be deleted! It´s not implemented in an Wikipedia article! The new file is already uploaded by me! File:Synthese von Essigsäure-n-propylester.svg --Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: As requested by the uploader as accidental upload which has been superseded by File:Säurekatalysierte Veresterung von Essigsäure mit n-Propanol.png. --AFBorchert (talk) 12:34, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
I have uploaded a new file (in .svg-format) and so this can be deleted. The new one has also a way better resolution! The new file can be found here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ethinylierung_von_Acetylid_mit_Formaldehyd_(SVG).svg
--Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:42, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: On request by the uploader as this has been superseded by File:Ethinylierung von Acetylid mit Formaldehyd (SVG).svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio. I've check : the author is Albert Harlingue (1879-1963). Guise (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
An inappropriate picture Matankic (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no license for 7 days. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:How Nelson Mandela Fought for Equality and Freedom.webm
[edit]nomination is over 73.92.132.7 02:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused request page. --JuTa 09:18, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
http://www.hocakworak.com/article.aspx?headline=Sharice+Davids%27+new+TV+ad+focuses+on+life+story Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 03:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted as copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Twitter without permission. Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 06:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation: Taken from her Twitter account. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Twitter without permission Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:36, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
This is http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Daniela+Pestova/2015+Victoria+Secret+Fashion+Show+Pink+Carpet/Dz5y1xDhjzQ where it is credited to Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images North America GRuban (talk) 16:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:16, 25 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Obvious copyvio, from Zimbio, sourced to Getty --Krdbot 19:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Not properly licensed; the source is stated to be from a newspaper. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:36, 26 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Non-free image --Krdbot 13:57, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Photo is by Aleksandr Ustinov, not unknown. No explanation about a pre-1943 publication without attribution that resulted in author not being known for 50 years; in other words, no reason to think it is PD in country of origin. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sakshamkalra.2000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probably not own work. Low resolution. Missing metadata.
Castillo blanco (talk) 07:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Background doesn't seems to be trivial. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Euryales80 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to existing collection of explicit images? Not used,
- File:Uncircumcised penis2.jpg
- File:Uncircumcised male penis.jpg
- File:Male penis erect uncircumcised.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
- File:Gymnasia .jpg
- File:Weight and cardio space.jpg
- File:Weight and cardio space at the WSRC..jpg
- File:Aquatic facility at the Western Student Recreation Centre. .jpg
- File:Western Student Recreation Centre.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: I've left a note for the student on Wikipedia about this. Also, it looks like Gymnasia and Aquatic facility are taken from this source. Weight and cardio space is taken from here, the weight and cardio space at the WSRC from here, and the rec center from here. I've let them know that this is unacceptable. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted material of other person Olga Byrjukova (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploaders request. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
copyroghted work, stolen from the net, please delete 84.59.179.185 18:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Author can't be dead for 70 years bc the photo has to be from 1969 at the earliest (see the medals) (and no later than 1984). In other words, copyright violation --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes
[edit]Derivative works of copyrighted photographs at an art exhibition.
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (1).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (2).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (3).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (4).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (5).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (6).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (7).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (8).jpg
- File:HIM - Right Here in My Eyes (9).jpg
kyykaarme (talk) 20:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
According to only available archive, available under a noncommercial license, not that stated. —innotata 06:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 06:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 06:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 06:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pratyushkumarvikky (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
All of the user's other uploads came from the web. No evidence to show this these are any different.
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Image artifacts suggest these are screenshots, not original photographs, and geotag places the camera nowhere near a stadium.
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Large batch of such documents was deleted recently. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from poster and toy, EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bobbernaut123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
- Delete. This image is used on their own website. Blatent copyvio. Markvs88 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. This image is used on their own website. Blatent copyvio. Markvs88 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. This image is used on their own website. Blatent copyvio. Markvs88 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
This presumably German photo (it shows a German historian), taken from a 2018 publication, is said to be from the 1920s, the author is said to be unknown, yet it is claimed to be in the PD because the author has been dead for at least 70 years.
How can you claim that for a 1920s photo if you know so little else? Unless it is clearly shown who the author is and that (s)he has indeed died at least 70 years ago, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Aufgrund der Informationen im Aufsatz konnte ich die Entstehung der Fotografie auf das Jahr 1922 einschränken. Dementsprechend änderte ich die Lizenz in PD-old-70-1923. Das Bild verfügt also über eine Lizenz, die es für den Verbleib in Commons qualifiziert. --Mewa767 (talk) 01:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Nein. Das "70" bezieht sich darauf, dass der Urheber seit mindestens 70 Jahren tot ist. Der Urheber ist aber nach wie vor gar nicht angegeben. -- Rosenzweig τ 06:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
unused "out of scope" image of a single-edit acount, likely not own work (see the miniature inscription at the right border of the image, wrong date info). Te750iv (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
This presumably German photo (it shows a German historian), taken from a 2018 publication, is said to be from about 1931, the author is said to be unknown, yet it is claimed to be in the PD because the author has been dead for at least 70 years.
How can you claim that for a 1931 photo if you know so little else? Unless it is clearly shown who the author is and that (s)he has indeed died at least 70 years ago, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist 1931 oder eventuell noch 1930 entstanden. Die von mir ursprünglich angegebene Entstehungszeit "circa 1931" war weniger präzise. Das Bild scheint mir auf jeden Fall alt genug zu sein, um in Commons bleiben zu können. Für diesen Fall fand ich die Lizenz "PD-EU-no author disclosure" und dementsprechend änderte ich die Beschreibung. --Mewa767 (talk) 01:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- "No author disclosure" heißt nicht "Ich kenne den Urheber nicht" oder "Die Veröffentlichung, aus der ich das gescannt habe, hat den Urheber nicht angegeben". Es heißt für deutsche Werke vor 1995, dass der Urheber niemals in irgendeiner Weise öffentlich bekannt wurde, niemals bei einer Veröffentlichung des Fotos oder auf einem Abzug in einem Archiv genannt wurde, niemals in einem Vortrag genannt usw. Da man das de facto nicht beweisen kann, ist dieser Lizenzbaustein für deutsche Werke vor 1995 nicht anwendbar. -- Rosenzweig τ 06:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kundan Sharma bhumi (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image, out of scope
Migebert (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio - from named website Eingangskontrolle (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio - from named website Eingangskontrolle (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio - from named website Eingangskontrolle (talk) 22:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio - from named website Eingangskontrolle (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
oeuvres non libres : voir http://www.anthonyvella.fr/
- File:Marianne anthony vella.jpg
- File:Mob tableau.jpg
- File:Daughter d'Anthony Vella.jpg
- File:Tchéchenne.jpg
- File:Stupéfiant.jpg
- File:Les amoureux du Grand Bassam.jpg
- File:La Fille du Bataclan.jpg
- File:Muse tableau.jpg
Habertix (talk) 21:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Book is published in 1968, not prior 1923 as stated in PD license. Smooth O (talk) 08:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Racconish as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: looks like a TV screencap. Can't possibly be uploader's own work.. Uploader is blocked, but I am not familiar with the context. — Racconish 💬 10:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Image appears to be either a video screenshot or a photo of a screen. The uploader has a history of uploading copyvios. --Wcam (talk) 18:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Categorized as "porn actor". Google finds no porn actors with that name. Likely prank. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:37, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eternally9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://www.facebook.com/pg/paknamphochinesenewyear/photos/?tab=album&album_id=1083793398447530
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eternally9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Film posters : copyrighted.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:35, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope and No educational value. --Batholith (talk) 12:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Perhaps this is an image of ordinary people's self promotion. --Batholith (talk) 09:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- modify --Batholith (talk) 11:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
No educational value: it seems to be that this 8mage should have been uploaded to facebook initially and accidently, it landed on Commons 178.7.123.24 13:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Fut déposé par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Fut déposé par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Fut déposé par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Fut déposé par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Fut déposé par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Fut déposé par accident Société d'histoire du Lac-Saint-Jean 15:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
This is part of an ongoing hoax (at least on en.wiki) about a fictitious opera called "Easter" by a fictitious person named "Link Starbureiy". There's also no way to verify the free status of the image. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 16:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
This is part of an ongoing hoax (at least on en.wiki) about a fictitious opera called "Easter" by a fictitious person named "Link Starbureiy". There's also no way to verify the free status of the image. (See also File:Easter egg.png Deacon Vorbis (talk) 16:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
This is part of an ongoing hoax (at least on en.wiki) about a fictitious opera called "Easter" by a fictitious person named "Link Starbureiy". There's also no way to verify the free status of the image. (See also File:Easter egg.png) Deacon Vorbis (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as no source (No source since). While the source is currently dead, there is an archived version of it here with a free license. The question then is whether this website is legally allowed to release these photos under said license. A previous DR at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sheikha Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) UAE Passport copy.jpg determined that {{PD-UAE}} applied to the subject's passport, so that may also be the case here.
Related files:
- File:Sheikha Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) UAE Identity Card (back).jpg
- File:Sheikha Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) UAE Passport copy.jpg
- File:Sheikha Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) UAE Identity Card-cropped.svg
Additionally, File:Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) selfie in Oman.jpg and File:Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) photo.png came from that same site. Again, there's the question of whether they were allowed to license these images, since they were created by Latifa Al Maktoum herself. clpo13(talk) 18:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Tagged as no source as the images have since disappeared. This, in conjunction with the fact that the uploader was a single purpose account that did nothing else, makes these look dubious and potentially intrusive. Copies of identity documents like this are routinely used for fraud, and without anonymisation are best avoided. --Fæ (talk) 18:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Given the uploaders comments at the previous DR, I wonder if they're associated with Escape from Dubai/Free Latifa. The full images are archived, though many don't show up on the linked permissions page because their thumbnails weren't. I don't have any objection to deleting the identity documents on privacy grounds, but what do you think about File:Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) selfie in Oman.jpg and File:Latifa bint Mohammed Al Maktoum (II) photo.png? The source claims that they were granted permission by the subject to publish and license them. However, the new website still offers some downloads featuring these images, but they're apparently no longer freely licensed. clpo13(talk) 18:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete Per COM:PCP. Reasonable doubt about the freeness of these files Abzeronow (talk) 22:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Keep if they could be proven to be free, and I would advise the names and eyes to be barred out for privacy reasons. Images of identity Documents like these are very useful if the document itself isn't copyrighted, the photograph is free, and the personal data is retracted. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:52, 22 November 2018 (UTC)- DeleteI think personal content shouldn't be posted at Commons.--√Tæ√ 13:23, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: I delete these according to the precautionary principle. If there are new arguments that the files are free and are not privacy violation, an undeletion request can be fild. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Unuesed image of unidentified woman. Was categorized as "Nude or partially nude porn actresses". World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Utterly worthless. AshFriday (talk) 23:43, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of unidentified woman. Was in category "porn stars". World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - as per reasons outlined in nom. AshFriday (talk) 23:45, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
トリミング無しで投稿ましたので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 00:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (author request). --whym (talk) 13:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Please delete version dated 01:01, 8 October 2010 ONLY. This was clearly an error by someone experimenting with uploading files Mercy11 (talk) 17:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
* NOTE: Please be sure to not delete the valid versions of this file, including the current version! This request is ONLY for the older version dated "01:01, 8 October 2010". The upload was clearly an error by someone experimenting with uploading files. Thanks! Mercy11 (talk) 17:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 13:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the web. Old material. Gloomracer (talk) 12:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the web. Old material. 137.61.48.20 16:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the web. Old material. Gloomracer (talk) 09:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Probably not an own work. Am I right? E4024 (talk) 20:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted,
Low res image of an unnamed sport team (presumed Swedish). No image meta-data present. Uploaded from an unspecified source. The portrait names are not known on either Swedish or English wikipedia. --Krinkle 15:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
No longer needed on the sight Gloomracer (talk) 12:35, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the sight 137.61.48.20 16:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
REASON (mandatory) Gloomracer (talk) 09:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the web. Old material. Gloomracer (talk) 12:35, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the web. Old material. 137.61.48.20 16:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the web. Old material. Gloomracer (talk) 12:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
No longer needed on the web. Old material. 137.61.48.20 16:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
REASON (mandatory) Gloomracer (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 19:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
PD in China, but not in US. Cannot tag for Template:PD-old-auto-1996 (1949+50 > 1996) and Template:PD-US Matthew hk (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:52, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Possible FOP issues (Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Freedom of panorama) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:56, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: Do not restore because: w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 May 11#File:Rcbc plaza.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Who is the painter ? Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Painter is Aida Lisenkova-Hanemayer.Олег Черкасский (talk) 11:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Олег Черкасский: She must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Roge: O'k, I'll call shi, shi can send.Олег Черкасский (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:FOP in poland only for works are permanently exhibited. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:44, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- To jest panorama. A w Polsce jest wolność. Także wolność panoramy. MOs810 (talk) 07:08, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
duplicate uploaded in error. File already exists as File:William Roberts-The First German Gas Attack at Ypres.jpg Labattblueboy (talk) 00:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
http://teribloom.com/, All photographs and articles copyright © Teri Bloom 2018, all rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- This photo was taken at the Freelancers Union 2010 annual benefit and was posted by the Freelancers Union under a Creative Commons 2.0 attribution license. https://www.flickr.com/photos/27408618@N07/5259043842 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hollidaysburg (talk • contribs) 16:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Theorically the Freelancers Union hasn't the right to relicense it since Teri Bloom's pictures are generally copyrighted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Patrick, if Ms Bloom has given the images to the the union for release under that license that is suitable. That is not much different from her following our OTRS process, and if there is an issue it is between the photographer and the union. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Theorically the Freelancers Union hasn't the right to relicense it since Teri Bloom's pictures are generally copyrighted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Still protected by copyright by the IOC. Banana19208 (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It does not meet the threshold of originality as it consists of letters and numbers, see en:Wikipedia:Public Domain#Fonts and typefaces and
. --Hans135797531 (talk) 17:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hans135797531 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
![4 File:Vlcsnap-2018-11-21-12h08m51s698אודי בתפקיד ששי הס בפרק הראשון של "מה בכריש?" לפני שוטפו אביעד.png](#File:Vlcsnap-2018-11-21-12h08m51s698אודי_בתפקיד_ששי_הס_בפרק_הראשון_של_"מה_בכריש?"_לפני_שוטפו_אביעד.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card_(front).jpg){kind=link}
_station_1949.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14576114500).jpg){kind=link}
![159 File:ד"ר אור כהן-ענבר.jpg](#File:ד"ר_אור_כהן-ענבר.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_YOUTH_FROM_TURKEY_DURING_A_HEBREW_LESSON.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card_(front).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card_(front).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_UAE_Passport_copy.jpg){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card_(back).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_UAE_Passport_copy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card-cropped.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_selfie_in_Oman.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_photo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card_(front).jpg){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card_(front).jpg){kind=link}
_UAE_Identity_Card_(front).jpg){kind=link}
_station_1949.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_station_1949.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_station_1949.jpg){kind=link}
_station_1949.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment I believe you find that they vigorously protect their trademark. If we are dealing with the rings, we need to deal with the whole category, not an image at a time. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; Category:Olympic rings in logos. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roy17 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:PACKAGING label has a photo background, some shapes, an artistically designed font, and clearly arrangement of shapes and texts, which should be artistic enough for copyright.
Converted by me to DR, as this case seems to be borderline. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Image has been inserted specifically for the purpose of the article, so is not incidental to the image. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Not own work as stated in the descriprtion (Πηγή/Source + Δημιουργός/Creator = "Χαράλαμπος Γκούβας") by its original uloader user:Harrygouvas at el-WP (in Greek: Χαράλαμπος Γκούβας), cf. this uploaded in 2009, who also "signes" the image ("Χαρ. Γκούβας"). ——Chalk19 (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Copyright violation. Another product of forgery by user:Harrygouvas ("Δρ. Χαράλαμπος Γκούβας" = Dr. Harry Gouvas), who presents as his own ("own work by the original") someone else's image. Cf. the original copyrighted image, published in p. 97 of vol. 6 of The Netter Collection of Medical Illustrations, ISBN 9781416063797. ——Chalk19 (talk) 08:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Scaled down duplicate of File:Pierre de Fermat (F. Poilly).jpg Papuass (talk) 08:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Scaled down duplicate of File:Fermats will.jpg Papuass (talk) 08:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Per rules on scope, fails test requiring files to be realistically useful for an educational purpose HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 09:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE at en:User talk:INeverCry/Archive 1. Small numbers of personal images can be uploaded to Commons for use on other projects by regular editors of those projects, and deleting this image would be detrimental to understanding the archived discussion it was used in. Additionally, this image could be used to show the deficiencies of machine translation, as it is a nonsensical translation of en:Template:User ru-1. clpo13(talk) 18:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 09:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Facebook photo according to FBMD in metadata. ~Cybularny Speak? 10:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Agata_Diduszko-Zyglewska.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018112910004763. --Polimerek (talk) 14:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Agata_Diduszko-Zyglewska.jpg” under ticket:2018112910004763. The real author of the picture accepted licence and upload. --Polimerek (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
This image has every appearance of being from a catalogue or other marketing material. It is improbable that it is genuinely freely licensed by its owners as claimed. (Even the inclusion of ™ in the file title adds to the improbability.) JamesBWatson (talk) 11:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; image spam. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Same as File:Timothy H. O'Sullivan (American - A Harvest of Death - Google Art Project.jpg Sammyday (talk) 13:27, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:36, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Clearly a screenshot Ytoyoda (talk) 14:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Obviously a TV screenshot Ytoyoda (talk) 14:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Same as File:Pennsylvania, Gettysburg. A Sharpshooter's Last Sleep - NARA - 533314.jpg, but with a lower resolution. Sammyday (talk) 14:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Different scans of the same decaying negative. --Fæ (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- So, you think we could use the both in others projects, or you think this one has to be kept because Commons missed it ? Sammyday (talk) 15:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Same as File:Antietam church.jpg, but with a lower resolution. Sammyday (talk) 14:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Different scan, probably a different print. @Sammyday: you have done several of these, with haphazardly incorrect rationales, please stop. --Fæ (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- I will stop when contributors will think about the meaning of having several files representing the same pictures, with random resolution. "Different scan, probably a different print" - and for what use ?Sammyday (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Different prints and different scans have value for digital restoration. Different prints may even be held in different institutional archives and have be seen to have different damage, like scratches or artefacts from the negative film decaying over time. It is common practice to keep variations, so long as they are more than just variations in resolution of the same original scan. --Fæ (talk) 15:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- I will stop when contributors will think about the meaning of having several files representing the same pictures, with random resolution. "Different scan, probably a different print" - and for what use ?Sammyday (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Fæ. Abzeronow (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
File:The photographic history of the Civil War - thousands of scenes photographed 1861-65, with text by many special authorities (1911) (14576114500).jpg
[edit]_(14576114500).jpg){kind=link}
_(14576114500).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same as File:DeadatFredericksburgMay1864.jpg, but with a lower resolution. Sammyday (talk) 14:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep You have marked these the wrong way around. Please use {{Duplicate}} on the lower resolution file (i.e. the other one) if you wish to. HOWEVER, these are different crops and there is value in keeping this version with the copyright statement on it, even if a derivative crop is made. --Fæ (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Not cropped, except you prove it. Sammyday (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Same as many others (File:Battle of Gettysburg.jpg, File:The photographic history of the Civil War - thousands of scenes photographed 1861-65, with text by many special authorities (1911) (14576169200).jpg, File:Timothy H. O'Sullivan (American - A Harvest of Death - Google Art Project.jpg, File:Incidents of the war. A harvest of death. Gettysburg, PA 00168u original.jpg, File:Incidents of the war. A harvest of death. Gettysburg, PA 12557u original.jpg, File:Timothy H. O'Sullivan - A Harvest of Death, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania - Google Art Project.jpg) but with a very lower resolution. Sammyday (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
_(14576169200).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Batch raising poorly thought out DRs should be avoided. Please use {{Duplicate}}, but only on true duplicates, not alternative scans or different prints of the same very old photograph. --Fæ (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's not a batch. If you can tink about a good use for this file, please explain it. Sammyday (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Same as many others (File:Battle of Gettysburg.jpg, File:The photographic history of the Civil War - thousands of scenes photographed 1861-65, with text by many special authorities (1911) (14576169200).jpg, File:Timothy H. O'Sullivan (American - A Harvest of Death - Google Art Project.jpg, File:Incidents of the war. A harvest of death. Gettysburg, PA 00168u original.jpg, File:Incidents of the war. A harvest of death. Gettysburg, PA 12557u original.jpg, File:Timothy H. O'Sullivan - A Harvest of Death, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania - Google Art Project.jpg) but with a very lower resolution. Sammyday (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Batch raising poorly thought out DRs should be avoided. Please use {{Duplicate}}, but only on true duplicates, not alternative scans or different prints of the same very old photograph. --Fæ (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's not a batch. If you can tink about a good use for this file, please explain it. Sammyday (talk) 15:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- You would need to give a rationale, like which file this is an identical duplicate of. --Fæ (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's not a batch. If you can tink about a good use for this file, please explain it. Sammyday (talk) 15:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Same as many others (File:The photographic history of the Civil War - thousands of scenes photographed 1861-65, with text by many special authorities (1911) (14576141200).jpg, File:Confederate Dead at Devil's Den Gettysburg.jpg, File:Confederate Dead at Devil's Den Gettysburg V2.jpg, File:Alexander Gardner (American, born Scotland - Home of a Rebel Sharpshooter, Gettysburg - Google Art Project.jpg, File:Rebel sharpshooter, Gettysburg. July 5, 1863. (On Nov. 19, same year, the photographer again visited this spot and... - NARA - 530476.jpg), but with a very lower resolution. Sammyday (talk) 14:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
_(14576141200).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Please raise a specific deletion request. Files which are different crops, or different prints, or different scans of the same negative but where the negative film is degrading over time, may have reasons to keep. True duplicates can be handled with {{Duplicate}}. --Fæ (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Please raise a good reason to keep this particulary file. Or admit it's useless for Commons. Sammyday (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- DRs work the other way around. I have uploaded 4 million images of which 1 million are probably photographs over 80 years old. I will not be alive long enough to justify each one, just because someone feels like challenging them. --Fæ (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Please raise a good reason to keep this particulary file. Or admit it's useless for Commons. Sammyday (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Fæ, not duplicates and we can have redundant copies on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 15:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Envie de retirer la photo sur wikimedia - travail personnel MERANGER François (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Envie de retirer la photo sur wikimedia - travail personnel MERANGER François (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Envie de retirer la photo sur wikimedia - travail personnel MERANGER François (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Envie de retirer la photo sur wikimedia - travail personnel MERANGER François (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Envie de retirer la photo sur wikimedia - travail personnel MERANGER François (talk) 14:53, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Envie de retirer la photo sur wikimedia - travail personnel MERANGER François (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Envie de retirer la photo sur wikimedia - travail personnel MERANGER François (talk) 14:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
something has gone wrong, i must edit it again from scratch Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
I am unsure about the validity of the license claimed for File:International tidyman.jpg. Please close my nomination, as per below. -84user (talk) 21:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
File:International tidyman.jpg has the text "This file is in the public domain, because an ENCAMS representative certified it is", without any further evidence. Is this sufficient for Commons? Several derivative images have been created from this one, see Category:Trash container icons.
http://www.encams.org now redirects to http://www.keepbritaintidy.org/ and their Copyright & Trademark page has a restrictive permission.
Copyright & Trademarks |
In 2006-09-01 the now-archived http://www.encams.org site had this archived page with another restrictive copyright section at the end.
Copyright and Trademarks |
Both statements appear to strongly forbid the free use of these images.
Can someone via OTRS contact http://www.keepbritaintidy.org/ and obtain confirmation that a free license is indeed intended?
-84user (talk) 04:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- We need to separate copyright & trademark issues here. We'd note a trademark issue, but can host the image unless there is also a copyright issue. Also, are these images of UK origin, or are they just saying they hold exclusive UK rights? I ask because I've seen either this symbols or something extremely close in the U.S. - Jmabel ! talk 06:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- If I correctly recall the discussion with Keep Britain Tidy's representative I had when uploading this picture, there are in fact two images -- the Tidy Man and the International Tidy Man. The second one is freely licensed, as noted. Please do contact them via OTRS to sort this out. But do not delete before there is an answer from them, please. --TOR (talk) 08:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep vote by nominator. I have just seen the copyright free declaration at http://www.keepbritaintidy.org/GetInvolved/UsingTheTidyman/Default.aspx so I now wish to withdraw this nomination. I have removed the {{Delete}} tag from the image's page description and expanded same. -84user (talk) 19:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept. – Kwj2772 (msg) 10:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
The copywrite for this file in the UK is owned by Keep Britain Tidy and is not available for public use and permission has not been granted for free use. The file and all related derivatives should be removed from Wikimedia commons. 82.42.3.147 17:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- See ticket:2018112110008309 --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: care to tell us about the ticket? Otherwise I would like to see the evidence for copyright for what is an international symbol, and I understand in international standards. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
DR reopened, as per [1]. The ticket is essentially about the trademark, not the copyright. Nothing changed since the first DR. Yann (talk) 06:14, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=358403741#File:International_tidyman.jpg){kind=link}
- In my opinion this is a not very new idea, but w:copyright does not protect ideas, only creative works, here is nothing really creative. Habitator terrae 🌍 14:09, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- The TIDYMAN symbol is being used for many many years. It is part of the Israeli Maintenance of Cleanliness Regulations (Marking Beverage Containers), 5787–1987, as published in Regulation Public Gazette No. 5052 (pg. 1256). The symbol is part of the regulations and therefore is Public Domain according to the Israeli Copyright Law. See {{PD-IsraelGov}}. – Fuzzy – 16:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per above; I have added {{Trademark}} to the image description page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep "The international tidyman logo is copyright free" doesn't get much clearer than that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I assumed the discussion was closed. Apparently I was mistaken. – Fuzzy – 16:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per user:Alexis Jazz. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
seems to be an exact duplicate of File:Fasanenweg, Pirna 121620024.jpg, which had been here early. both from Panoramio Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. They're the same resolution, but File:Fasanenweg, Pirna 121620024.jpg was here first. clpo13(talk) 18:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; higher resolution, merged to this version. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Source: Az:WP. Not an own work as stated. E4024 (talk) 18:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Noting that this image is used in the User: ns and is unlicensed at azWP. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:33, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; different uploader at https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9E%C9%99kil:%C4%B0stifad%C9%99%C3%A7i_Elg%C3%BCn_M%C9%99nsimov.jpg. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
very blurry & no ID Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is in use in a current discussion in the project entomology of wikipédia. Keep until the participants in that project tell that it has served its purpose and that they will not need it anymore. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
very blurry & no ID Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
very blurry & no ID Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:26, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
very blurry & no ID Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Girl with a Pearl Earring" -pdf
[edit]Redundant low res versions, and crops of low res versions.
- File:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring (detail) - WGA24667.jpg
File:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring (detail) - WGA24668.jpgin useFile:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring (1660s) after restoration (802 × 923).jpgin use- File:Snapshot 20140501 32.JPG
_-_WGA24667.jpg){kind=link}
_-_WGA24668.jpg){kind=link}
_after_restoration_(802_%C3%97_923).jpg){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: ?? two of them are used ?? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that is the problem, they are accidentally used, when higher resolution ones are available.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: You said "None used.", please explain to me using small words how that was not a lie. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Moved to correct DR.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- @BevinKacon: You said "None used.", please explain to me using small words how that was not a lie. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that is the problem, they are accidentally used, when higher resolution ones are available.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring (detail) - WGA24667.jpg (no alternative available in the category)
- Keep File:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring (detail) - WGA24668.jpg (no alternative available in the category and in use)
- Keep File:Johannes Vermeer - Girl with a Pearl Earring (1660s) after restoration (802 × 923).jpg (in use, the projects using it should decide which version suits them best, also, with deletion we harm COM:InstantCommons)
Neutral File:Snapshot 20140501 32.JPG don't see any obvious use for it, but I could be missing something. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the first three per Alexis Jazz. Abzeronow (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, and we probably should create like a template or "a dumping category" for "variant works" including low-quality usable(!!!) versions of a file, not all variants are useless but the preference should always be given for an "untouched" original of the highest quality when/if available, unless "the variant" is the subject being discussed, of course. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- User:Donald Trung, this is a good idea, and would be less disruptive to projects than deletion. Maybe Template:Bad extraction can be updated to do this? I have struck the ones in use from this nomination.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:47, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: keeping first three appropriately named, deleting fourth in list; lower quality and poorly named. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Files on User:BevinKacon/Badstock6
[edit]Personal images and selfies uploaded by Panoramio bot, all unused, nothing useful.
- File:Abrar - panoramio.jpg
- File:Abu Dubai Air Port - panoramio.jpg
- File:Beli Potok, Serbia - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Chrichtian A. Neal - panoramio.jpg
- File:Cilopadang, Majenang, Cilacap Regency, Central Java, Indonesia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Frente a la Parroquia de San Miguel Arcangel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Friends at Dubai - panoramio.jpg
- File:Geheinah, Markaz Juhaynah Al-Gharbyah, Sohag Governorate, Egypt - panoramio.jpg
- File:Habersiz çekim - panoramio.jpg
- File:Karen concentrates on King Street, 2015 08 03.JPG - panoramio.jpg
- File:Me stesso....a Catanzaro Lido - panoramio.jpg
- File:Poranwala, Pakistan - panoramio.jpg
- File:Poranwala, Pakistan - panoramio - tahirabbas34.jpg
- File:Robinmollen - panoramio.jpg
- File:Ronaldo paralejas - panoramio.jpg
- File:San Marco, 30100 Venice, Italy - panoramio (1025).jpg
- File:Santa Lucia, Vitória - ES, Brazil - panoramio.jpg
- File:Swat Tehsil, Pakistan - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:TAPI RESTAURANT. - panoramio.jpg
- File:VISHAL GARMENTS, MUKERIAN - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BevinKacon (talk) 11:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 09:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Files on User:BevinKacon/Badstock6
[edit]Personal files of no use from users with no productive contributions, F10 speedy declined @Racconish: Bo Luellen.jpg, and @Túrelio: the remaining 3.
BevinKacon (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; 1 in use and retained; others unused and deleted. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Files on User:BevinKacon/Badstock6
[edit]Personal images in use only on uploaders own user page, and users have no productive contributions outside of their own user space. Non-contributor accounts.
- File:Bhargavnv.jpg
- File:Bhargavreddy.jpg
- File:Gyani Sharma.jpg
- File:Gyani Sharma 00.jpg
- File:Gyani Sharma 02.jpg
- File:Gyani sharma 9.jpg
- File:Liushaogui.jpg
- File:Liushaogui1.JPG
- File:Priyanka.M.jpg
- File:Revels Drumming.JPG
- File:S R Khichar.jpg
- File:Saurabh bhardwajofficial.jpg
- File:Saurabh singh gaur.jpg
- File:Shabeeb.jpg
- File:Shivratan Khichar.jpg
- File:Sspulinux.JPG
- File:Wikipedian Das.jpg
- File:सुमेर जाट फ़ोटो.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 09:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- @1989: as admin who declined speedy delete of many of these.--BevinKacon (talk) 10:46, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- I see some of them are using on Kannada Wikipedia userpage. ~Moheen (keep talking) 15:27, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE applies, deleted those that aren't. --Gbawden (talk) 13:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of El Salvador.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Very poorly edited version of File:Pole dancer 02.jpg (person removed). Unused. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Then edit this derivative, instead of deleting it. File is in scope. Tm (talk) 02:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's not worth anyone's time to fix this. We have the original version. We don't need to keep junk just because it is in scope. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment But is worth the same time to delete it? Curious and funny, to open an DR to try to delete an file in scope. Tm (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- It's not worth anyone's time to fix this. We have the original version. We don't need to keep junk just because it is in scope. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, more in scope than the original because it doesn't include a disinterested person. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:37, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that person has been replaced by a smudge. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 19:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: within scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
This version of the image clearly has copyright information at the bottom: www.suicidegirls.com. The image was from Flickr under a false release. This image is copyrighted and not a suitable copyright release. They uphold their copyright and it is not GFDL compliant. --Ottava Rima (talk) 00:08, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- Is the girl of concentual age? Looks like a minor? At least rename image. Nothing to do with w:suicide --Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 21:52, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- As Ottava Rima have stated the picture clearly belong to somebody else, that be web site SuicideGirl, and can not be released at Commons without a real consent from the original copyright holder. Speedy delete. --Finn Bjørklid (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep There is nothing wrong with this picture at all. Trycatch (talk) 17:34, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- Delete SuicideGirls is a softcore porn company, and this is likely copyvio if it was just posted on Flickr outside of any official company account. Steven Walling 19:22, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
- ?? It was posted by the official company account. Trycatch (talk) 05:47, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep The image was posted by the official company account. Garion96 (talk) 21:44, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Posted on SuicideGirls's Flickr account. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept - there is no problem (non-admin closure). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
PNG version of File:SuicideGirl—Evan.jpg. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This jpg file is an derivative of the png, uploaded 4 years before, as stated in the jpg filepage. As can be seen some details of the image are different like exposure. Tm (talk) 23:29, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- It seems unlikely that the png was the source of this image. See the color blocks where the walls meet? I suspect the original Flickr image was the source of the jpg. Neither one of these is in use, so why keep the poor quality copy? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- You claim that is "unlikely that the png was the source of this image". Where did you get it? The jpg version has, since the upload, the template {{Derived from|SuicideGirl_-_Evan.png}}, that points to the png version. So the original one is the png and the jpg is a derivative. 01:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
- I don't know why it matters which is the original. The png image is of lesser quality and no one is using either of them. @Nicoli Maege: did you use the png image as your source or did you use the Flickr image? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment What part of {{Derived from|SuicideGirl_-_Evan.png}} you have doubts? It says jpeg is a derivative of the png, and yet you ask that question, albeit that clear being marked? It matters in question that the png image is the original one, different than the jpeg version, in questions of sourcing, etc. So different versions with the same quality, that you have yet to proof that "png image is of lesser quality". Tm (talk) 06:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- I have asked the uploader to clarify the source. Let's agree to disagree on which is lesser quality. Why is it so important to you that we keep two versions of this image? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment At the very least do to the comment below and see Commons:Licensing and Commons:License review. Tm (talk) 19:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- I have asked the uploader to clarify the source. Let's agree to disagree on which is lesser quality. Why is it so important to you that we keep two versions of this image? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know why it matters which is the original. The png image is of lesser quality and no one is using either of them. @Nicoli Maege: did you use the png image as your source or did you use the Flickr image? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- You claim that is "unlikely that the png was the source of this image". Where did you get it? The jpg version has, since the upload, the template {{Derived from|SuicideGirl_-_Evan.png}}, that points to the png version. So the original one is the png and the jpg is a derivative. 01:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
- It seems unlikely that the png was the source of this image. See the color blocks where the walls meet? I suspect the original Flickr image was the source of the jpg. Neither one of these is in use, so why keep the poor quality copy? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, at least this one had a license review before the license on Flickr changed to cc-by-nc-nd-2.0. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Redundant. AshFriday (talk) 23:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- This file is not redundant. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- That's what COM:DUPE calls it. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- @World's Lamest Critic: I added a gallery and {{Original}} to this file. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Did that improve the quality of the png file in any way or is it still as blocky? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- @World's Lamest Critic: It improved the file description page, but I see the blockiness now. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Did that improve the quality of the png file in any way or is it still as blocky? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- @World's Lamest Critic: I added a gallery and {{Original}} to this file. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- That's what COM:DUPE calls it. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- This file is not redundant. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment So what ? Same file but different format... ---TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; multiple copies in alternative formats are acceptable. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
False date, photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:35, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Much worse than other images in Category:Yuri Anatolievich Alexandrovsky. Газета «Больница» (talk) 23:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; within scope, photographs of different years. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:39, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Is it old enough to be PD? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as no permission (No permission since)
I'd say the cover is simple enough to keep it on commons as below TOO. Sanandros (talk) 23:16, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- I would have said that the cover has design element with text, and was Delete. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: text is also an issue. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Doublon avec File:A55 plaine 4.jpg Fr.Latreille (talk) 23:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Doublon avec File:A55 la Mède 1.jpg Fr.Latreille (talk) 23:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Doublon avec File:A55 la Mède 2.jpg Fr.Latreille (talk) 23:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
![00:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/21#c-Ldorfman-2018-11-21T00:01:00.000Z-File:ד"ר_אור_כהן-ענבר.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
![20:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/21#c-Ellin_Beltz-2019-01-01T20:50:00.000Z-File:ד"ר_אור_כהן-ענבר.jpg){kind=link}
Abuse of copyright. I - www.schlick.ch (as quite obviously to be seen on the image!) - am the copyright owner. Neither was I asked to allow the use of the image file nor did I ever allow somebody to use the image. (And of course I was not the user "Cingulus".) 212.90.196.209 14:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
it is in large size, I will later upload small size 45.115.96.48 00:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Green Giant (talk) 01:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Disc cover. Uncertain CR status. E4024 (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - appears to be some sort of self-promotion. --Green Giant (talk) 01:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by James5Smith (talk · contribs)
[edit]All stolen uploads claimed as own work, yet meta data different on almost all.. low res, meta data also missing etc. None used.
- File:Facebook's co-founder Marc Zuckerberg at CHINICT.jpg, uncropped online and years before upload[2]
- File:Kaiser Kuo & Kai-Fu Lee at CHINICT.jpg badly cropped from somewhere
- File:Quincy Jones & Franck Nazikian.jpg over 2 year difference from upload to production
- File:Franck Nazikian speaking at WSJ D.Live.jpg who is Nikki Ritcher..?
- File:Franck Nazikian speaking at WSJ D.Live.jpg
- File:Quincy Jones & Franck Nazikian.jpg
- File:Kate Hudson & Franck Nazikian.jpg
- File:Franck Nazikian + Kaifu Lee.jpg
- File:Fleur Pellerin, Franck Nazikian, Sir Michael Rake, Pascal Negre, Sir Peter Ricketts at DEVELOPNEUR CHINICT.jpg
- File:Kaiser Kuo & Kai-Fu Lee at CHINICT.jpg
- File:CHINICT Stars, Rising Stars & Hackathon Award Winners.jpg
- File:Dave McClure + Franck Nazikian.jpg
- File:Daniel WU + Franck Nazikian.jpg
- File:Facebook's co-founder Marc Zuckerberg at CHINICT.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
This isn't the user's own work, as is claimed in the description, but a recording from a Google Translate's text-to-speech feature. As such, the recording is probably copyrighted by Google and should not be on a free license. What's more, it's not pronounced by a genuine Dutch person and is therefore dubious. Allenrealms (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nominator. odder (talk) 08:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Exact copy of File:Geibeltbad Pirna 2015 Filled 121265927.jpg, which was upladed here much earlier. Both from Panoramio. Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo (https://music.yandex.ru/album/4206441/track/34235603), unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
non-free content, copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 22:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- La fotografía cumple con todas las normas de Wikimedia para ser conservada y publicada. Dyego Senesi (talk) 23:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep note that the uploader is verified via OTRS User:Dyegos and the link provided above go to "Dyego Senesi" website. I've no OTRS access, but if Dyego Senesi is the uploader, IMO, that should be fine. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Per Christian Ferrer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Own work? Metadata? E4024 (talk) 13:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; only upload of new user. PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
This is a Derivative work of a copyrighted product package which cannot be freely licensed unless the origional copyright holder consents. Mifter (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Questions.
- Could it be replaced by an image of several or all of the cards but without the 'cover'? As far as I know, the actual card designs are traditional ones and are probably not themselves copyrighted. That's why there are so many images of traditional cards at Commons.
- Is it okay to use the image with articles that are directly relevant e.g. "Skat" (the game) and the "ASS Altenburger" (the company) under "fair usage"? Bermicourt (talk) 07:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Bermicourt - if the traditional card faces are old enough to be public domain (or are otherwise freely licensed) then they should be fine to upload here. For fair use, that is fully allowable for local uploads on Wikipedia (and quite commonly and correctly used for copyrighted media), but Commons only allows freely licensed images. Best, Mifter (talk) 03:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Mifter Thanks, that's helpful. In which case we should remove the other images of actual card deck covers from Commons as well. Bermicourt (talk) 10:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
No es la verdadera imagen , de la señora Consuelo Gonzales , es la ultima persona zona izquierda de la foto fernando (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept, if depicted person is not Consuelo Gonzales Posada, then it is Elena Ceaușescu. She is notable too. We can always change filename and description. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Fake. The woman in this picture is Elena Ceaucescu Ravave (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- You're right. We should rename the file. Is there any valid reason for its deletion? --E4024 (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Don Fernando, cuando dice "No es la verdadera imagen de la señora Consuelo Gonzales, es la ultima persona zona izquierda de la foto" en la anterior discusion, quiere decir "Consuelo Gonzales está a la izquierda de la foto" o "Consuelo Gonzales está a la derecha de la foto"? Gracias. --E4024 (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- At E4024 My point of view is that the file may lead to confusion cause the name, although, if you suggest to rename it, it could be fine for me. --Ravave (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Rename
Done to file:Elena Ceaucescu.png — billinghurst sDrewth 12:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Collage of pictures missing details of individual image sources and licenses. Please refer to Commons:Collages for details. DAJF (talk) 11:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Sources now have been provided. --115ash (talk) 11:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn. Details of individual image sources and licenses have been added and verified, so there now appears to be no problem with this montage image. --DAJF (talk) 13:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Already an existing collage image has been uploaded, and that image is used widely. Kkm010 (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete this one. --JuTa 20:47, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Several revisions contain File:Hon. Gurbax Malhi.jpg (second from right, bottom row) that has been deleted as copyvio. Finnusertop (talk) 07:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Copyvio revisions removed from history and image reverted to original. --Majora (talk) 19:24, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
copyrighted in use, should only be hosted locally Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
B-PSA official logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akela-Perry (talk • contribs) 16:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Kintetsubuffalo: what evidence do you have for the copyright? The components come from heraldry, and there is little specifically as a design element to the construct. This is also used by multiple scouting organisations each independent legal organisations, so you would need to demonstrate that there is a licensing agreement for the copyright, which I doubt. I am happy to see evidence to the contrary. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- I would also comment that the Scouts Association has used that form of emblem and the motto "be prepared", so the components to demonstrate intellectual property to the design would be quite slim IMNSHO. Any google image search of scouts association shows hundreds of like images. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:19, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: The fleur-de-lis is extremely old and has fallen out of copyright. The additional of simple text and a banner does not push this back over TOO. --Majora (talk) 01:39, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
There is uncertainty as to whether the image was properly placed under Creative Commons as 3rd party rights were not cleared. The image can not be guaranteed to be properly under CC license and should therefore be removed from Wikimedia. The creator has also requested that it be removed from general use and other OSR logos are being introduced to replace it. Stuarthrobertson (talk) 02:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- I know next to nothing of copyright legislation and cannot comment that matter. However, if the creator wishes to remove the logo from general use, then his request should be respected. --Miihkali (talk) 11:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
*Speedy Keep* - I know we are supposed to assume good faith but there are a lot of issues with this nomination. 1. The username is a play on the creator of the file Stuart Robertson. 2. This is the first edit of this account, so obviously set up to just do this Deletion Request. 3. The timing is suspect given it was right after the controversy began on this logo online, the nominator here is pushing an agenda. 4. It is not for the nominator to decide what is or what is not done properly under the Creative Commons License. More proof should be provided. Webwarlock (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Maybe I don't want to get involved in this dram after all. Webwarlock (talk) 18:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)- Speedy Delete* - I spoke to that logo's creator and he wishes it to be removed. I support his reasons. Webwarlock (talk) 19:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Logo is probably over TOO anyways. --Majora (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chernoskulov chm 2018 (cropped).jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- But on site of UGMK with Creative Commons «Attribution-ShareAlike» 4.0 International--Леонид Макаров (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photo credit line on right side of photo indicates that this does not belong to UGMK. --Majora (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chernoskulov chm 2018 (cropped).jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- But on site of UGMK with Creative Commons «Attribution-ShareAlike» 4.0 International--Леонид Макаров (talk) 11:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photo credit line on right side of photo indicates that this does not belong to UGMK. --Majora (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A low res version, a large croP without reason, and a very low res stamp, when we have one 5x the resolution.
- File:Whistler James Arrangement in Grey and Black 1871.jpg
- File:Whistlers Mother, James Abbott McNeill Whistler cropped.jpg
- File:WhistlersMotherStamp.jpeg
BevinKacon (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Support deleting the crop and the very low res stamp, no opinion on the first file. Kaldari (talk) 21:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- first replace where in use. then meh. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Usages of the painting replaced by File:Whistlers Mother high res.jpg. Usages of the stamp replaced by File:Whistler's Mother 1934 Issue-3c.jpg. --Majora (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a photo of a Wibault 8 that is already in that category Stuffy Carrot (talk) 18:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I'm not seeing what you are talking about. If this is a duplicate you have to say of what not just assume we know what you are talking about. --Majora (talk) 17:01, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
_-_YOUTH_FROM_TURKEY_DURING_A_HEBREW_LESSON.jpg){kind=link}
_-_YOUTH_FROM_TURKEY_DURING_A_HEBREW_LESSON.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is it not the same image with File:YOUTH ALIYA" YOUTH FROM TURKEY DURING A HEBREW LESSON AT KIBBUTZ MAABAROT. שיעור עברית בקיבוץ מעברות לבני נוער של "עליית הנוער" מטורקיה.D17-100.jpg? E4024 (talk) 18:22, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is, but in much better quality. matanya • talk 18:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Then we should delete the other one. Closing admin? --E4024 (talk) 18:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: this one. Other one deleted as a duplicate and redirected per above. --Majora (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
There is no evidence this is extracted from a publication from 1890, or that the map was not amended in the 20th century. Commons should not be hosting random scans from books with absolutely no information which may help verify copyright status. Fæ (talk) 15:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - nothing was presented that causes reasonal doubt about the statement of the uploader - this nomination is just part of the personal vendetta of Fae against {{PD-old-assumed}} - Jcb (talk) 15:54, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Huh? Please avoid making everything I do about yourself. There is zero evidence that this map was published in 1890. There is no good reason why an uploader would avoid giving an explanation of where this image came from. Please stick to the facts about this file in this DR. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It does look like it comes from an older book, 1890s book is possible but could have easily come from a 1940's book. That being said, perhaps @Ulrichstill: can cite the name of the actual book so it's more educationally useful? I'd be a Weak keep since no reason to doubt uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - as per the reasons outlined by Jcb. AshFriday (talk) 23:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Weak delete 1890 looks plausible for this map, but source information is insufficient: "Military map 1890", source "single leave of a book" - which book, exactly? Author, publisher, page number? Gestumblindi (talk) 01:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: It is Commons policy that evidence should be provided when asked. Just saying it is from a book with no other information (not even a title) is simply not acceptable. The uploader has been plenty active since this DR was opened and decided to ignore the request. There is no choice but to delete this but I would be happy to reverse the deletion if proper sourcing information is given. --Majora (talk) 03:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Still under copyright in US under 95-year rule Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment German photograph. An allegation that URAA applies cannot be the only reason for deletion. Abzeronow (talk) 22:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Abzeronow. The mere supposition that the URAA applies to an image is not enough to force a deletion. See COM:URAA for more information. --Majora (talk) 03:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. New uploader does not assert copyright to the photo. Dated July 16th, the same day as the subject's tweet, despite the EXIF listing July 7. czar 00:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Why can't it be the uploader's work? The brothers didn't take the photo, and it is not inconceivable that someone both tweets and uploads the photo. Remembering that EXIF data is not accessible via Twitter, so the uploader didn't download the image from there. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think the image was copied from the tweet (which is lower res and watermarked) but the uploader doesn't self-assert as the photographer/copyright owner. I mentioned the date only because it is strange that the templated date lines up with the tweet rather than the EXIF. In any event, I thought this could use clarification from the uploader. czar 16:50, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept, I believe own work. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted (see link in file source parameter) IJReid (talk) 01:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
https://www.deviantart.com/notifications/notes/#1_10/2069069252 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balifiu82 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Ignore the above, contact Retlaw095 on Deviantart: https://www.deviantart.com/retlaw095 he will tell you that I requested from him to upload his Rugops picture under the name of mark0731. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balifiu82 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Also, his Facebook: https://m.facebook.com/Retlaw095/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balifiu82 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
@IJReid: I authorize the edits on the image that I have submitted on request by Balifiu82. Retlaw095
Kept, I accept the permission. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Official publication. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, published in 1977, when CC-license did not exist. The document can somehow be in public domain, but proper license is needed for that. If you have evidence for free license, then please request in undeletion in COM:UDEL. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
A photo of a news article is not own work. Invalid tag and 1939 may be not yet old enough to make the copyright expires and release to public domain Matthew hk (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- More precise. If the photo was taken in 1939 and shown before 1996-50 = year 1946, it qualifies for
Template:PD-HKTemplate:PD-China and Template:PD-old-auto-1996. But the text below is a recent creation. Matthew hk (talk) 17:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Certainly requires better sourcing if this was from a Hong Kong newspaper. Abzeronow (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Self correct. It seem a museum display from unknown location, thus the tag should be PD-China. Since the wiki server is in US, it has to qualifies to PD for the latter. Matthew hk (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Wishva de Silva: Do you remember which museum it was? I can go to Hong Kong and see the exhibits... WhisperToMe (talk) 23:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- @WhisperToMe: Apologies for this late reply. Indeed, I think I might have wrongly attributed the work. The author obviously wasn't me--I just took that photo. The newspaper excerpt (I think it was from the Illustrated London News, sometime in March 1939) itself wasn't from any museum either, but from my own collection. Sorry for the confusion. If it doesn't fit the guidelines/relevant copyright laws please do delete it at once. Cheers. WdS | Talk 20:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, if the first publication was in London News and the photographer is unknown, then it should be deleted due to unclear copyright status, at least Chinese licenses do not apply. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
