Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 15th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader states OTRS has been sent, as of August. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused cropped version of File:Carl Elliott teaching a class.jpg, which has valid OTRS permission.  JGHowes  talk 13:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.Too blur, seems to be some kind of a screenshot. Cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blur, seems to be some kind of a screenshot. Cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blur, seems to be some kind of a screenshot. Cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The uploader isn't the author of original photo. Yellow Horror (talk) 05:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 15:30, 15 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) - --Krdbot 20:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a political party that was founded in 2015. The image description page claims it is ineligible for copyright but doesn't give an explanation of why it would be. B (talk) 13:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: It's a PD image with texts above, which is ineligible for copyright. Ueutyi (talk)
@Ueutyi: Can you please provide documentation of what public domain image it is? Obviously, if that's a public domain painting, then the logo is public domain. (I believe that Haiti is similar to the US in terms of threshold of originality.) --B (talk) 17:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@B: File:Jean-Jacques-Dessalines.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ueutyi (talk • contribs) 19:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded a number of pictures claiming them as their own work. Some are clearly not, like the one done by the New York Giants' front office. This one is more ambiguous. C.Fred (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded a number of pictures claiming them as their own work. Some are clearly not, like the one done by the New York Giants' front office. This one is more ambiguous. C.Fred (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded a number of pictures claiming them as their own work. Some are clearly not, like the one done by the New York Giants' front office. This one is more ambiguous. C.Fred (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User uploaded a number of pictures claiming them as their own work. Some are clearly not, like the one done by the New York Giants' front office. This is the only I'm inclined to think the uploader might have taken; nonetheless, I'm nominating the whole set. C.Fred (talk) 21:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover copyright [1] O-ring (talk) 14:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright http://www.tzen.org/all-my-nationalities/ O-ring (talk) 14:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:15, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright http://www.tzen.org/manifesto-i-am-art/ O-ring (talk) 14:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright http://www.tzen.org/monochrome/ O-ring (talk) 14:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright http://www.tzen.org/molbeing/ O-ring (talk) 14:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright http://www.tzen.org/monochrome/ O-ring (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyright}} Ταπυροι (گپ) 21:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:19, 16 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: --Krdbot 14:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User:Honorio Henriquez

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient license SecretName101 (talk) 03:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KLYCE-music (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in self-promotion draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong photo Martom31 (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 00:34, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei leer --Dguendel 09:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: empty category. --JuTa 00:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my image and I don't want to be under free license anymore. I already deleted it from the source (Unsplash). Thanks. Dreamypixel (talk) 10:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is possible because CC licences are not revocable.[2] --Sporti (talk) 10:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to delete it from Unsplash, even though it's licensed under the same license. I can't prevent people to use it (the ones that already downloaded it) and I have no problem with people using it. I just don't want it to be shared on this website from now on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamypixel (talk • contribs) 13:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It says: "As a licensor, you may stop distributing under the CC license at any time, but anyone who has access to a copy of the material may continue to redistribute it under the CC license terms". --Sporti (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I honestly don't understand why are you so defensive about this image? I see that you are the one that uploaded it. It's a good school for me for sure, to never ever share anything for free. I even tried to upload a similar image, but got refused also. Bad practice here on Wiki for sure. It's much better on Unsplash, where you can do whatever you want with your images. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.248.82.14 (talk) 12:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like this image to be deleted from wikimedia since the one in the kayak is me and I do not want to be featured here. Please, I would kindly ask you to delete the image. 93.103.94.204 10:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is a valid reason as well, per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people "The subject's consent is usually needed for publishing a photograph of an identifiable individual taken in a private place". --Sporti (talk) 11:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Dreamypixel, I appreciate your work, but as my colleague Sporti said, CC licenses are irrevocable and you are not identifiable on this picture, so I see no valid, objective reason for deletion. It's the core principle of Creative Commons licenses that they are not vulnerable to licensors' whims, and we would send the wrong message by deleting this image on your whim. — Yerpo Eh? 13:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep License is irrevocable. Yann (talk) 14:04, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the good school session. :) I guess I will just never share anything for free again. I was trying to do something good but it just backfired. I did not know that I have no rights anymore in CC as that was not the case on Unsplash where the image was originally uploaded. I could easily delete it there. It's good that they changed the license a year back so images from there are not freely shared here anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.248.82.14 (talk) 15:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This CC licence is irrevocable. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keditz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tom1gill (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heralune (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo by Julia Dunlop, autorization of the author needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 13:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour c'est le service media de la société CLIMEWORKS qui m'a donné accès à leur PRESS MEDIA KIT et c'est libre de droit d'après ce que j'ai compris, puisque c'est la société qui le met à disposition, je vous copie l'email : Good morning Laurence,

thank you so much for your interest in Climeworks and for your work! I'd like to assist you, as much as I can.

First of all: Feel free to use one or two press images you'll find here for the Wikipedia entry: lien DROPBOX /Climeworks_Press_Kit (see Copyright in the file name). Second: We have already a German Wikipedia entry - there are some of the articles about Climeworks integrated: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climeworks More articles you'll might find in the Press-Section of the website, here: climeworks.com/press/.

So, hopefully this helps to motivate you, doing following steps. Please give us a sign, when we can review the article. We have French speaking employees, so that’s fine for us.

Thank you! .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heralune (talk • contribs) 15:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heralune (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album covers, promo photos, video clip, newspaper. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in May 2007 as non-notable. Out of project scope. Please note that the article Sky Picnic is about an unrelated service. xplicit 05:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: private holiday picture. The station in the background would have been in scope had it not been that out of focus/overexposed. Also dubious claim of own work: the second guy from the left is the uploader (see profile pic at en:w:User:M R Karim Reza), so he cannot have taken the photograph. HyperGaruda (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BrutalPeace (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where I've deleted the contributor's userpage as spam. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload. Please upload again JopkeB (talk) 05:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload. Please upload again JopkeB (talk) 05:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for vandalism only HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 05:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimika1951 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No apparent use since being uploaded in February 2017. The contents appear to have been intended for self-promotion. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:40, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent use since being uploaded in October 2015. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anurag mishra faizabad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anurag mishra faizabad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 09:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:23, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal contents (No scope) Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 10:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal contents (No scope) Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 10:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal contents (No scope) Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 10:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion / copyright issue HollandMill (talk) 10:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

extremely low quality; portait of non relevant person Stegop (talk) 12:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Preetisipanijain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Preetisipanijain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Preetisipanijain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused OOS promotional photo that violates COM:ADVERT and was probably not shot by the subject uploader.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:SCOPE; spam of non relevante person Stego (talk) 15:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:14, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:SCOPE; spam of non relevante person Stego (talk) 15:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:SCOPE; spam of non relevante person Stego (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PAOKCL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Normanbockwell (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality Adelfrank (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 17:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted image (truncated at 5 MB) MarioFinale (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted image (truncated at 5 MB) MarioFinale (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted image (truncated at 5 MB) MarioFinale (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted image (truncated at 5 MB) MarioFinale (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted as File:Reichstagshandbuch 1943 - Seite001.jpg (see TinEye results here) No permission, no provenance, no indication from source that image actually dates from 1941. Image looks like a photo of a waxwork dummy and not of a person. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catyvictorio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No apparent use since being uploaded in March 2017. The contents appear to have been intended for self-promotion. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henrikjsson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As per [3].

Yann (talk) 06:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just want to delete it ZidaneHartono (talk) 00:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to delete it ZidaneHartono (talk) 00:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just want to have it deleted. ZidaneHartono (talk) 09:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ciphers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Recent drawing/photos on panels and a reconstruction of a hut. DW without permission from the copyright holder, and there is no FOP in Japan for such works, see {{NoFoP-Japan}}.

Ruthven (msg) 14:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images show a building in France (w:CMA CGM Tower) from 2011. The architect, w:Zaha Hadid, is still alive. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in this case.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture depicts a monument designed by Zaha Hadid (1950-2016), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and, as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be freely shared before 1st January 2087. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The building was completed by architect Zaha Hadid (1950–2016) in 2011. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term in the country lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2087.

A1Cafel (talk) 02:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I vaguely recall that it's OK when the building isn't finished yet, like with File:Le Port (3635833798).jpg? Vera (talk) 05:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The building in the image already displays most of the permanent exterior architecture, IMO they are subject to copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP France: recent structures.

RZuo (talk) 20:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whatever this is, it's not a "Modern Building in Quito, capital city of Ecuador". Calton (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and Joshua Bruce Bradford. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Photo of a photo. The author of the original photo is professional photographer Liliana Reyes. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1971 copyrighted book cover. Pseudonymous author, unknown artist. Unlikely own work of uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Merész Müller Gyula died in 1949. Not free until 2020. http://www.kieselbach.hu/artist/meresz_-gyula-_meresz-muller-gyula__3533 Abzeronow (talk) 16:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

you can see here that the current owner, the Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen, placed the image under a Namensnennung 4.0 Deutschland (CC BY 4.0 DE) license. We have to trust that license and that they have the right to do so... --Concord (talk) 16:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't on the source page. But I will trust that. OK  I withdraw my nomination Abzeronow (talk) 16:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Concord (talk) 16:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC) PS: I changed the source page. --Concord (talk) 16:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no metadata, probably a copyvio like the other uploads : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lukhantui u20QLD.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kane Douglas.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taniela Tupou.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pete Samu.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:-Photo-credit-Idris-Erba-Mayweather-Promotions.jpg - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 16:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of permission from the presumed copyright owner, Seong Moy. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of permission from the heirs or representatives of the presumed copyright owner, Oronzo Vito Gasparo. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privacidad digital Verónica Vilte (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|Privacidad digital, Página de prueba}} Verónica Vilte (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC) De acuerdo[reply]


Deleted: the person does not seem to be notable, thus out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is listed as the "State of California" (which seems likely correct), but if that's the case, it would not be PD-USGov, since that only applies to employees of the federal government, not state governments. Legoktm (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark all over the image Bodhisattwa (talk) 19:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undistinguished photo of unidentified location, part of bulk bot-upload from Panoramio. No evident in scope usefulness Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a wrong drawing. Mistake. Borvan53 (talk) 21:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The City Council of Cartagena is the owner of all rights of the contents on its website, and does not establish a license for which they release them for free use (https://www.cartagena.es/avisolegal.asp). P4K1T0 (talk) 13:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cecilia Rosario Claros (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unrecognizable.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio because the painting is probably copyrighted with no license. Fnielsen (talk) 22:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request from subject at OTRS Ticket:2018100910009735, as per Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Removal_requests - Subject has stated "I did not authorize the use of this photo or know the photographer." Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:21, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Slowking4: it was in use, but an IP vandalized Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q32860554&action=history. Now it's in use again, this time on d:Q58759398. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, but not notable enough for english. i do not find fighting with authors to be attractive. ip editing is not vandalism. acquiescence is not affirmative consent. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm torn. On one hand, not very notable (despite claims of being award-winning), but on the other hand, I don't think Commons should acquiesce to deleting photos taken in public places especially in places where consent to take photographs is not required. So I wouldn't feel terrible if this was deleted for being out of scope. Abzeronow (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Slowking4, the IP simply removed information for no obvious reason without explaining why, that's either a test edit or vandalism as far as I'm concerned.
@Abzeronow: the photo is now (once again) COM:INUSE on Wikidata, so "out of scope" deletion is no valid option here. Also, she may not be notable enough for Wikipdia today, but it's not unthinkable she'll write a bestseller in the future. If that happened, would we undelete the photo? That would be strange. There have been some cases before of people who were likely not even notable enough for Wikidata with their photos taken inside a pub. I can understand deletion requests for such cases. But if you are a moderator (not just a visitor) at a book festival, you shouldn't be surprised if someone takes a picture. It's also not a case of protecting her privacy: her website and social media contain plenty of photos of her. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:10, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. I guess it comes down to Commons interest in being a useful archive versus the wishes of the subject and the uploader. I can see merits in arguments in both sides. My personal inclination would be a weak keep. Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations, you are plenty notable enough for Commons, plenty notable enough for Wikidata, possibly notable enough for Wikipedia, your photo was not just taken in a public place but at a book festival where you could have expected people to take pictures, it was taken in the United States (no consent required) and finally: we have zero other pictures of you. Send a better photo with proper license to OTRS and I would reconsider. As it stands, keep. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the subject seems to be notable, her request has no merit as we do not need her autorization. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terribly titled photo of an identifiable person that has no educational value with the description and categorization containing blatant lies.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 10:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kfeue041 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram. Should be in SVG or music score if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I find both files educational. We even have a cat: Category:Instrument ranges. converted both to svg. --Amada44  talk to me 12:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tomato price tag. Small photo, bad quality. In my opinion the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: keept. We have a pupulated cat with images like this: Electronic shelf labels. --Amada44  talk to me 15:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adrianyounge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 15:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristiano Amaral (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 15:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More than likely taken off of the Zara website –Davey2010Talk 17:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Davey. It was not taken from the Zara website. I photographed this myself. This is all my own work and I own the rights to it. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.84.95.135 (talk) 18:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 188.84.95.135, Do you have any proof of this ?, A few UK stores tend to have videos of the product(s) hence why I assumed it was taken off of Zara but ifcourse if it's not I'd be happy to withdraw pending any sort of proof, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Davey, You are asking me to prov a negative [4] which is almost impossible. The only thing I could suggest is a Google reverse image search which will show you where that image exists or existed elsewhere on the internet. I do many demo animations that never get used commercially and occasionally I throw them up on Wikipedia of they are of good quality and they help the community. It's not that big of a deal for me if you keep it off. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.84.95.135 (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Lets assume good faith. Animations of author include a drill in exactly the same animation style. So likely not from Zara. --Amada44  talk to me 15:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Korean.noodles-Mul.naengmyeon-01.jpg 社会我佩奇 (talk) 02:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent use since being uploaded in July 2015. The contributor's account was globally locked in April 2016 for spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44  talk to me 19:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a published book, which is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise, not seeing where on the source website the Creative Commons license is indicated. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 02:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Canada stamps are Crown Copyright - Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Canada Ronhjones  (Talk) 04:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It appears to be a PDF pamphlet about a musical group. If it's uploaded by the creator, it's likely not notable enough; if not, it's a copyrght violation. JesseW (talk) 04:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article and userpage were speedily deleted in May 2007 and August 2007 as non-notable and spam, respectively. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice photo and not obviously out of scope. // Liftarn (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This photo was only used on pages of the band created by the band to promote itself. What foreseeable encyclopedic purpose could this possibly have? xplicit 23:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The part of the picture that we have got is plausibly useful if cropped. --bjh21 (talk) 12:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The part of the picture that we have got is plausibly useful if cropped. --bjh21 (talk) 12:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo grabbed from Facebook, no permission from the author. jdx Re: 08:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delation request by the author, not representative Guillaumb (talk) 09:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a good image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai téléchargé le fichier par erreur en disant que c'était mon propre travail, ce qui est le cas de la peinture représentée mais pas de la photographie. Le photographe est Laurent Thareau et je n'ai pas son autorisation. Je propose donc la suppression de cette image. Guillaumb (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 02:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michaeelaln (talk · contribs)

[edit]

only File:Super 78 Studios DarKastle.jpg states that the picture has been taken from ultimaterollercoaster.com, but I think it's very likely that the other low-res pictures uploaded by this account have been taken from that website.

Vera (talk) 10:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+some derivative works issues+maybe out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kbonalm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://tekstiil100.wixsite.com/tekstiil100/viivi-merike-manni

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) wrong map: Tuscan language does not extends until Rome or Adriatic Sea!

2) bad title: it refers to tuscan dialect only. Jumpy01 (talk) 12:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is correct indeed: Italian Median dialects are closely related to Tuscan and they extend till Ancona and Rome (and include also Corsican, at least Corso cismontano).Some small corrections should be done, though.--Carnby (talk) 12:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A possible solution would be: Idioma toscano e dialetti affini.png. Umbro, Marchigiano centrale (Anconetano), Laziale settentrionale (including Romano/Romanesco) and Corso cismontano are mutually intelligible with Tuscan.--Carnby (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The image was part of a set in Spanish language. I have corrected the map and added "dialectos mutuamente inteligibles".--Carnby (talk) 20:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:27, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ficher obsolète, de mauvaise qualité, non vectoriel, utilisé nulle part. Une bien meilleure version existe. D'autre part, j'en suis l'auteur et je souhaite sa suppression. Sbouss (talk) 13:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web-resolution photo uploaded by user whose other uploads have been deleted. The user is (or was in 2010) a school student and it's highly unlikely that he would be in the secretary of state's office taking a photo. B (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical coat of arms. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:LL. Inappropriate source. Uploaded onto http://ukrainka.org.ua/ by user:Perohanych. Authors' permissions needed.

Sealle (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The images are properly attributed at http://ukrainka.org.ua and in fact that website is itself using the images with proper permissions from authors. That website is created and maintaned not by unonimous peple, but by me – known public person Yuri Perohanych --Perohanych (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Oral permissions are not allowed anywhere in copyright law. In order to restore these the actual photographers must send free licenses to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Ukraine.

List of 61 Files
* File:Пам'ятка в Пустотиному 08.jpg

Sealle (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As for File:Arise Pysanko 01.jpg — this is photo of two persons, who are in the Ukrainian Wikipedia, and the buildings are used only as a backgroundd, which is allowed in Ukraine. See art. 21, 4) of the law --Perohanych (talk) 09:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Скумін Віктор Андрійович 02.jpg was not taken in Ukraine

For File:Хрест біля входу на кладовище у Тимках.jpg the author will send rhe necessary letter to OTRS. --Perohanych (talk) 09:53, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete


Deleted: per nomination and my comments above. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and political poster. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about File:Агітаційний плакат Анатолія Погрібного.jpg, but picture at File:Orthodox priest Ioan Chekan.jpg was taken more than 100 years ago and is in Public Domain. --Perohanych (talk) 20:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Perohanych, so why don’t you fix description and license tag? Sealle (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)

[edit]

2019 © Еліта. Ми поважаємо вашу приватність.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: Thank you for attention to the files. On http://elita.org.ua/erc-magazine/ you can find text in Ukrainian «Авторські права на фото належать групі компаній ERC. Текст і фото опубліковані на умовах CC BY 4.0 International». Rights for fotographs belong to the ERC group of companies. The text and photos are published on the terms of CC BY 4.0 International. --Perohanych (talk) 15:55, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Has license on website. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perohanych (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ahonc as no permission (No permission since). Complex case per discussion on User talk:Perohanych.

King of ♥ 03:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Author should send copy of copyright transfer agreement to VRT.--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 13:17, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Оскільки така угода була укладена усно, буду вдячний за письмовий зразок такої угоди, або посилання на такий зразок. --Perohanych (talk) 08:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
А текст з ВП:Дозволи вам чим не підходить?--Anatoliy 🇺🇦 (talk) 22:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicaten van File:Toshogu shrine.jpg, niet in gebruik.

トトト (talk) 15:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from RugbyCanada, as written here by the photo uploader : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MacTier_Cup&diff=next&oldid=859252045 - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 15:03, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darly.D rojas.G (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted file. I doubt this lady is in scope. Having said that, we might keep some of the files belonging to the uploader, but the rest must go. E4024 (talk) 15:34, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:13, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Domenico Laserra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own works+maybe out of scope too. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dereklinauthor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can upload a higher-resolution image of my author headshot. Dereklinauthor (talk) 3:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and subject are claimed as the same person, which is doubful. We need an OTRS permission statement to retain this image. Also, image appears to have no educational value and is not used on any userpage. A loose noose (talk) 15:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + small size without EXIFs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The CC0-statement does not apply to photographs, videos, infographics or other forms of images. It is therefore not allowed to reuse or transfer the image, unless the image explicitly states that it is permitted. Correct link missing. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:29, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without description, no purpose can be seen for this file; the image is messed up, anyway Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, the image is a preliminary version of File:Homew2 2a.svg. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agendagauchajujuy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I have some difficult to believe these are own works.

Yann (talk) 17:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Solangerecords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inferior-resolution duplicate of File:Euclid's proof on infinite prime series.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What are we looking at? Probably out of scope. Wikiwerner (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

its a card game. en:Magic:_The_Gathering and we have a cat for it. Amada44  talk to me 20:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all is copyrighted, the background and the cards. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image title says "commercial use is subject to fees" (kommerzielle Nutzung ist honorarpflichtig) Paul Ewe (talk) 18:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say this? Sionk (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In the Metadata. --Paul Ewe (talk) 22:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the picture is for Great Omari Mosque and not for Bab as Saray ! 178.135.95.10 18:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and rename. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Certainly not a reason to delete. If the remark is accurate, a reason to rename. - Jmabel ! talk 22:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also File:Cebu Pacific Air logo (non current).png

Request by logo owner at OTRS Ticket:2018101910002197. Not now the correct logo, and they would like it removed. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is using sock accounts on en-wiki to vandalise article. Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:08, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - anyway above ToO IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aditimukherji (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I doubt these images are the uploader's own work. The EXIF of File:Kailash satyarthi.jpg indicates the creator is the organisation w:Bachpan Bachao Andolan. Their website is "all rights reserved", which means an OTRS release is needed.

MER-C 10:12, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just want to delete it ZidaneHartono (talk) 13:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Therueller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:32, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, Uploader has an other realname as the photographer. --K@rl (talk) 11:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mail was sent to the OTRS team at 2018-11-21 - so I added OTRS-pending and removes the delete remark. --K@rl (talk) 10:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS pending. --Didym (talk) 15:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a proprietary license; http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-scxml/usecases/scxml-stopwatch.html says: Copyright © 2005-2015 The Apache Software Foundation. All Rights Reserved. Beland (talk) 00:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video is stolen (you can see the copyright notice in the last seconds), also even the original video is a DW of the music. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 10:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't see why this is stolen. The copyright notice is 'Junhyun Jo' that is exactly the name of the YouTube user 'Junhyun Jo'. --Hannolans (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you are correct on that point. However, what about the music. If it is something old it just may be public domain. I do not believe that it is DM. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 05:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Normally I import such a video without sound (thins one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beautiful_Girls_Dancing_Can-Can_by_Offenbach_in_Short_Skirt.webm), but in this video the audio is in the foreground yelling and clapping with some seconds hearable musical notes in the background. I would classify this as de minimis. --Hannolans (talk) 13:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: video declared PD; de minimis use of music, composition now PD; and there are available PD performances.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture depicts a monument designed by Zaha Hadid (1950-2016), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and, as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be freely shared before 1st January 2087. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Pymouss
Totally agree with you, it's still an error on my part. While importing from Flickr, I saw the category and placed the photographs. Thank you for your vigilance. I keep the lesson to make more attention to the future. I put the template NoUploads in the Category:Pierres vives and I realized an image with the masking of the building (File:Pierres vives Montpellier 03B.jpg) to replace the one in the infobox (File:Pierres vives Montpellier 03.jpg).
Thank you for correcting me for my mistake. —— DePlusJean (talk) 04:05, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Pymouss Clin
But, I do not know whether to apply the freedom of panorama rule only for this building or all the achievements that have been made in France (Category:Buildings by Zaha Hadid‎). Its website does not mention any copyright (zaha-hadid.com), the French article mentions the achievements made in France and Commons has not applied restrictions to date. Should this building be the exception? Should we remove all of his achievements in France? or use only the template NoFoP-France?
Thank you in advance for your help for a better understanding —— DePlusJean (talk) 05:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no FOP exists for images uploaded.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous identification: this portrait is NOT Turinetti, marquis de Prié. It is the portrait of George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, painted by Peter Lely. The portrait has been electronically (intentionally?) cropped by a few centimeters to hide the name of George Villiers. Riyadi (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is also visible at Category:George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; misidentified person, existing image.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was posted on Twitter five days prior to the upload https://twitter.com/WorldOfWonder/status/1032710975869186048, direct link to image: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DlTtJr6UUAA4hhZ.jpg. The Metadata in the file here says "Screenshot". kyykaarme (talk) 09:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So WOW used my picture? What’s wrong with that? Also yes it says screenshot because I took a screenshot of the original picture and applied a filter. Dallasansel (talk) 02:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Dallasansel: Without specific evidence of ownership this file should be deleted. If you can provide data showing ownership, preferably through Commons:OTRS then we can look to keep. Original image containing metadata would suffice.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:54, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Dallasansel: how did they get access to your photograph? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Martin H. (talk) 22:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from modern art. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain the reason for nomination? Probably the author of the painting, Oksana Hrek should allow to use her artwork on the picture? --Perohanych (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You could ask painter for photo of her paintings via Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK. The job is in progress --Perohanych (talk) 15:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: I need explanation. Should the painter give permissions for «her paintings», or for «her paintings in the form as they are depicted on the photo»? --Perohanych (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think for her paintings, since derivative works from this photo may be used for other purposes. Or may be just take her photo without works? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: Are you sure? As far as I understand, if the painter gives permissions for «the paintings», that means that everyone can find «the paintings» somewere (e.g. an exhibition or a gallery), take a photo in a high resolution and use it freely. If the painter gives permissions for «the paintings in the form as they are depicted on the photo», that means that everyone can use my photo or any part of it (including a painting) and use it freely. I think that second option would be more appropriate. --Perohanych (talk) 15:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's hard to predict how photo will used. Since main goal of it to illustrate person, it'll be better to take photo person without works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is not the solution, as the article the photo ilustrates is not only about the painter, but also about her paining style. --Perohanych (talk) 09:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As for me, the following permission formulation is acceptable:

«I hereby affirm that I, Oksana Grekthe creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the paintings, depicted in the photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oksana_Grek.jpg (this photo hereafter referred to as the" Work "), and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 ...»

--Perohanych (talk) 09:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The artwork are minimal and contextual, and if the artist agrees via OTRS for the production of the photograph containing her works, I believe that is a suitable addition to PD. @Perohanych: Do note that such a release under CC-by-4.0 does allow other users to make derivative works, focusing solely on the artwork, and excluding the person from their DW.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:29, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ticket:2018112210003901 was received but I don't see how Oksana can release the photo to us when it came from Facebook, and it very clearly isn't a selfie. Exactly who took the photo would need to be known. --Majora (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical illustration. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Popoxtla: please update your upload as per above request  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence anywhere that en:William Walker (filibuster) was the author of this work. If evidence is found this can be undeleted as Walker died a long time ago. --Majora (talk) 00:48, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]