Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 11th, 2018

Commons:Deletion requests/File:VermontVandalism.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trival logo - Non free per -en:File:NepalAirlines.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly album cover-art - Non-free per File:Korn let the guilt go.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

motivo pessoal Veronicabelli (talk) 07:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bookcover. Fairuse is not allowed on Commons Father of Lies (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia pages that describe books reproduce the covers, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_for_Future_Presidents — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkalas (talk • contribs) 06:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The English Wikipedia accepts Fairuse; Here on Commons covers aren't allowed. Father of Lies (talk) 08:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CD cover. Fairuse is not allowed on Commons Father of Lies (talk) 05:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising Kanisfluh (talk) 21:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 夢想之聲 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claims

SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 20:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:57, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 21:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:32, 11 September 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): film poster --Krdbot 01:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Pablo Picasso (d. 1973). Not sure it's covered by FOP. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:05, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 21:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo no longer in use Cmspellman (talk) 21:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Logo is in use in ru.wikipedia.org. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: What new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials> EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, due to vandalistic content. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 14:20, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files claimed as own work but without any compelling appearance thereof: small sizes, low resolutions, a collage, historical figures, blurry historical figures, modern hip hop artist, etc. Unlikely that anyone but a professional photographer would have this kind of access and produce such low quality images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Almost every upload by this user is copyvio, and it's hard to take any of the self-made claim seriously. Fortunately, none of these images are used on Wikipedia.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:52, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Please include these in the discussion above. Lack of sourcing, description or categories make these images useless for Wikipedia.

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

Unused maps.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by EMK2020 (talk · contribs) 7

[edit]

Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history and prior DRs above.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:22, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:17, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small picture (155x164): is it really usefull? BarnCas (talk) 00:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Unused personal image Helmy oved 01:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with copyright. Soccer/football team logo. Vareloco (talk) 02:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published photo—this is from Facebook and has also appeared at http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/news/20170717/queens-young-leader-abrahim-simmonds-making-impact. Requires OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erro Cmendozac (talk) 04:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of page (G7). --Hystrix (talk) 06:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kemdad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused primitive drawings - out of project scope.

Art-top (talk) 12:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 22:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kemdad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎.

~MOHEEN (keep talking) 04:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:21, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source found ~MOHEEN (keep talking) 04:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 05:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:26, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no permission. Yann (talk) 05:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sjkeller18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work, no permission.

Yann (talk) 05:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sjkeller18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Name in photo EXIF data does not match uploader, nor does the EXIF camera match that of the uploader's iPhone uploads. The provenance of these two promo headshots is unclear and the uploader needs to show that they hold the copyright to license as stated.

czar 15:30, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 15:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material Missvain (talk) 05:17, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MCDrake47, uploader says they got it from the DIFF web site - so it's not own work Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover. Fairuse is not allowed on Commons Father of Lies (talk) 06:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I want to include several other uploads by the same user since they may need OTRS requests to know the images are released under a Creative Commons license:

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, missing Exif metadata, user has a history of uploading copyvios. 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mferenac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely screenshots, need better source info

Ytoyoda (talk) 10:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small size, low resolution, inconsistent (if any) metadata, user has a documented history of uploading copyvios.

4nn1l2 (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook download, needs source info and OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 10:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata --> Author: Stephan Bednaic; Copyright holder: Stephan Bednaic © 2018 www.stephanbednaic.com. Alos smaller versions can be found on the web using Google Images. User has a history of uploading copyvios. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif metadata shows FBMD string which means the photo has been grabbed from Facebook. Furthermore, user has a histoty of uploading copyvios. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to File:Summer Sea Polo - Split (1).jpg and File:Summer Sea Polo - Split (2).jpg. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 06:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AJP426 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader has a long history of uploading copyvios. 11 of the 17 uploads have already been deleted. There is currently no accepted permission at Ticket:2018042010005514, just wild allegations of agency for various news and railroad organizations, yet the uploader chose to pretend that ticket had been accepted.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 08:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ä book cover from 1997. Missing permission. -- Hystrix (talk) 03:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by @Patrick Rogel: as no permission (No permission since) Why is this file tagged with "no permission"? Metadata looks ok, file not found via google-search or tinyeye. Hystrix (talk) 05:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hystrix: There's a copyright at the bottom right. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by אמרי אביטן (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution. Missing metadata. Missing permission. --

Hystrix (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except one with metadata. --Yann (talk) 10:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vector version available here File:Balakong DUN, Bangi.svg *angys* (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sources states: All Rights Reserved Father of Lies (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The movieposter is released in 1973. Not sure about the current status for PD, but its not own work for sure. Father of Lies (talk) 06:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a simple logo, look coat of arms in background. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

motivo pessoal Veronicabelli (talk) 07:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality photo of an unknown person without context Schlosser67 (talk) 08:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copie récent d'une page imprimé, origine? copyright ? Licence ? Havang(nl) (talk) 08:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal photo B dash (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This man has an article on WP. --Yann (talk) 11:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is non-trival , Not simple as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A star, 1 line in shape of a tower and letters are non-trivial? Really? Xgeorg (talk) 09:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-simple logo design... ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate}} Draid (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considered Non-free by English Wikipedia , More information as to why this is PD appreciated. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Unknown photographer, 1930s - Dutch Copyright Act, art. 38.1. Vysotsky (talk) 09:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vysotsky: don't we need a source that says that no one knows who took this photo, per Commons:Anonymous works? Finnusertop (talk) 13:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Vysotsky. --Yann (talk) 11:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS: low qulity 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

غير اخلاقي Med saghou (talk) 18:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused tourist photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover; not "own work" Arjayay (talk) 10:33, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the person pictured, and it was used without my permission 212.250.240.129 10:38, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif Metadata shows FBMD string. User has a hisory of uploading copyvios. The file is small in size and low in resolution. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF file with a text inserted to cs.wikipedia as cs:Expozice hudebních nástrojů Harold (talk) 11:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Related to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skiland Wiki.pdf. --ŠJů (talk) 23:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF file with a text inserted to cs.wikipedia as cs:Areál Skiland Ostružná Harold (talk) 11:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Related to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Expozice Wiki.pdf. --ŠJů (talk) 23:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif Metadata shows FBMD string which means the photo has been grabbed from Facebook. The file is very small in size and low in resolution. If this is indeed your own work, please upload the original file. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:21, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file was captured with my phone while my residence at KAIST and might have also been uploaded on Facebook under my account. As this was an uploading test for my first engagement in the Commons file upload, this can be deleted from the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Borisu0815 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please upload the original file. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with the current amount of information. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We can locate the picture, and the quality is acceptable. This is some gouvernment institution in Pune, Maharashtra. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pharmattila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:03, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 11:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:25, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:26, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of previously published photo, copyright partly belongs to Netflix. Needs OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits Mathieu Bitton. If this is the uploader, it's not entirely obvious and unclear why we're only seeing the low-res version. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped, low res screenshot with unclear source Ytoyoda (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality photo of unidentified fish. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:32, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no COM:FOP in France; recent building and park. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image; doubtful if it can be of any use anywhere because it is too small and data is not visible. Muzammil (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope and not used on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 16:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:34, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of Nina Kandinsky (1899-1980). Not trusted source of publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webaugust (talk • contribs) 19:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Webaugust (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. the [Category:Undelete in 2051]] is at the moment of no help for the case, because Nina Kandinsky is not the author of the painting. --Goesseln (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
2. who is the author of the portrait?
It is not the problem of untrustable source but there is a problem of the author.
If it can be proven, that Wassily Kandinsky was the painter, than the photo of the picture is Wikimedia-PD-art and PD-old-70. If this reproduction is found in an untrustable source, so what?
But it seems, that it can't be proven.
I took a quick look at
Hans Konrad Röthel; Jean K. Benjamin: Kandinsky : Werkverzeichnis der Ölgemälde. 2. 1916 - 1944. München : Beck, 1984 ISBN 3-406-08892-9
there seems to be no such portrait.
And, this portrait has never been mentioned by none, never been shown in a publication, except now in two (untrustable) Internetsources
until 1-1-2015 (W.K. was PD-old-70 then), when it was uploaded in Commons, by me, my fault, so far.
therefore deletion would be quite ok, unless someone finds out about the authorship.
3. the picture shows N.K., is that right?
--Goesseln (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you understand the problem. It would be nice if you will remove both files of unproved Nina Kandinsky image. Also off topic. The year of birth (1899) of Nina Kandinsky was provided by Nina Kandinsky in her book "Kandinsky und ich". Anybody's opinion about her age is not legit. Lets keep Wiki platform lawful and transparent Webaugust (talk) 23:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ Webaugust : you are wrong
it's not me, who is doing the deletion.
and concerning the year of birth, feel free to improve informations with a source:
author, publication, year, page.
it's a wiki.
--Goesseln (talk) 16:38, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The date of birth of Nina Kandinsky with reference to Nina Kandinsky provided by copyright owner: Centre Pompidou, Paris. Link Thank you. Webaugust (talk) 20:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the date of birth is not a question concerning the photo of the portrait-painting. Please discuss that topic elsewhere. --Goesseln (talk) 14:44, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Provenance

copies of the allegedly portrait of N.K. are on sale on several internet-sales-platforms, for instance:

1. http://www.culture-images.de/ci-bildansicht-ci01585084/wassily-wassiljewitsch-kandinsky-wassily-wassiljewitsch-kandinsky-portraet-von-nina-kandinsky-frau-des-kuenstlers.html
description
Kandinsky, Wassily Wassiljewitsch (1866-1944), Porträt von Nina Kandinsky, Frau des Künstlers, Öl auf Leinwand, 67x60, Abstrakter Expressionismus, 1917, Russland, Museum der Privatsammlungen im A. Puschkin Museum für bildende Künste, Moskau, credit: culture-images/fai author: 91900
so they say, the picture is by W.K.
but there is any proof given
2. en:Getty Images: Portrait of Nina Kandinsky, the painter's wife, 1917. Found in the collection of Museum of Private Collections in A. Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow.) 1917

I don't know, if there is a description of the picture by the en:Pushkin Museum. --Goesseln (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only trustable source for subjects of Wassily and Nina Kandinsky is Society Kandinsky, Center Pompidou, Paris. The image of Nina Kandinsky is a subject of copyright. No matter who is the author of this painting, as long as it described as Portrait of Nina Kandinsky it should be authorize by Center Pompidou. Webaugust (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yes and no
The "Société Kandinsky, association loi 1901" (Kandinsky Society) is not the Centre Pompidou, it's seated there.
A commentary of the K.S. concerning the alleged portrait of N.K. could be of much help, a commentary of the Pushkin Museum could be of help, a commentary of Getty Images would be of little to nil.
By that imho we could finish this, keep the discussion in mind, just in case of a revival..., and delete the two objects.
--Goesseln (talk) 13:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the author died in 1944. --Yann (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (seems to be a screenshot from the film "Il pugile di Detroit" Kanisfluh (talk) 21:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 21:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NILBER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2070), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion. Already has speedydelete, just need a regular deletion request in undelete category PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2070), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion. Already has speedydelete, just need the regular deletion request in undelete category. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2070), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion. Already has speedydelete, just need the regular deletion request in undelete category. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a "pre-upload" (copyright expires in 2070), ready for current deletion and pre-listed for later undeletion. As uploader I request deletion. Already has speedydelete, just need the regular deletion request in undelete category. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE for non-notable individual. Article deleted multiple times on en.wiki and create protected. Draft declined due to lack of notability. Spam articles created xwiki on about a dozen different projects. Now in the process of nominating all for deletion. GMGtalk 12:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps they could use the photo for their personal page if they succeed at introducing themselves in a way relevant for the wiki -- without an excessive number of commercial references? (w:Help:User page) --Gryllida (chat) 22:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC) 22:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Saeedkhanbozdar786/Archive. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion: see Commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism/attack, the speedy-deleted nl:Michiel-Désiré Reynaers and nl:Overleg gebruiker:Michielreynaers Wikiwerner (talk) 19:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saeedkhanbozdar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promotion

Cabayi (talk) 08:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good picture Anubhav009 (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality low Med saghou (talk) 09:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission of the author of the original 3D artwork is needed. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. logo of Austrian football club, with which the uploader did not prove to have any connection, being null the chance to be allowed to upload it here. Leon saudanha (talk) 14:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate photo: I am person who took this photo and incorrectly added it when there another one exists already from me. Articseahorse (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced with a redirect. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: Colombian newspaper from Girardot, Cundinamarca. BrightRaven (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:40, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: clip from a Colombian newspaper. BrightRaven (talk) 15:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: clip from a Colombian newspaper. BrightRaven (talk) 15:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol (photo by Gianfranco Carozza), cropped from here. Danyele (talk) 15:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded by long-term vandal in Thai Wikipedia (account is sockpuppet and now permanently blocked). Contains copyright violations (see watermarks on left image, logo in upper-left corner of center), false information (claim that celebrities on the middle/right is belong to the band on the left) Lerdsuwa (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнение в авторстве и лицензии: автор неизвестен, малый размер файла. Dogad75 (talk) 15:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image should be deleted. It has American flag (stars prominent) in the background. Any image used with flag should only show flag of DPRK not USA. Regardless of recent state meetings, image should be independent and neutral of any world nations and only represent it's own sovereignty. 185.161.200.10 17:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Distribution aux Consommateurs logo.jpg, not used 108.171.207.109 17:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1998. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising. out of scope. Kanisfluh (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 20:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS & low quality. Kanisfluh (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 21:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PositivEnergies (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Amos CINCIR).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 21:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 21:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 21:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Triplecaña as no source (No source since) Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source: self-made photograph of my car --Keita.Honda (talk) 04:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sairaju Gandhe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Commons:Derivative works. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google maps copyrighted, de minimis not applicable Triplecaña (talk) 22:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). Hiàn (talk) 23:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France (looking at the skull rock specifically) Elisfkc (talk) 14:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabrielsalanava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs dated 1970. I doubt these images are own work.

BrightRaven (talk) 15:17, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The age of the photos itself wouldn't be reason enough for me - there are other active Wikipedia/Commons users of an age where it's absolutely possible to have taken photographs in 1970. But the first file shows the name of a photographer embossed in the lower left corner; it's not quite legible, but something like "Fernando ...cayar"; definitely not the name given by the uploader. Also, other uploads by this user have already been deleted as copyvios. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no prove given, that the pic has been published in US before 1923 Goesseln (talk) 17:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Goesseln - this is a puzzler to me. I am not an attorney and do not understand the complexities of copyright law. But here are my thoughts. First, as to the point you raise, I myself do not know of any proof that the picture was published before 1923. Second, the Wikimedia criterion is not that it was "published in the US" but rather "published anywhere before 1923 and public domain in the U.S." [1]. Third, an attorney working for the Wikimedia Foundation states that "art installed in a place open to the general public prior to 1978 are likely in the public domain if they do not comply with copyright formalities." [2]. Here I cannot find any record that the painting was copyright with "formalities". If this is correct, then the question becomes whether the painting was shown in public before 1978. Again, I do not know the answer to this question. However, I think there is reasonable doubt that this is a copyright violation. I do wish we had attorneys to advise us.... with best wishes, Daderot (talk) 21:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Looks like this was published in Vienna so should be deleted and then undeleted in 2051 (Kokoschka died in 1980). The painting is public domain in the United States, but not in its home country of Austria, which would be needed for being on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and Comments. I've re-uploaded it locally on en.wiki as PD-US-Only for further use there: en:File:Portrait of Alma Mahler by Oskar Kokoschka, 1912, oil on canvas - National Museum of Modern Art, Tokyo - DSC06553 local.JPG. Finnusertop (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Abzeronow. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC) Hi Kanisfluh, Which part of the image are you referring to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manu5 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image is actually licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 at the given source "Scientific Animations", so it's only needed to correct the attribution to "Scientific Animations" instead of the uploader. But I'll ad a {{LicenseReview}} for good measure, so that another pair of eyes can confirm the license. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of Nina Kandinsky (1899-1980). Not trusted source of publishing. Webaugust (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

see also the same picture c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nina Kandinsky-110.jpg by a different uploader (me), three months before this one. --Goesseln (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
the discussion should be continued there. --Goesseln (talk) 14:40, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation of Nina Kandinsky (1899-1980). Not trusted source of publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webaugust (talk • contribs) 19:07, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What a mess. Can you please explain the problem? --Trzęsacz (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read: Commons:Policies and guidelines - Wikimedia Commons; Commons:Copyright rules - Wikimedia Commons; Commons:Licensing - Wikimedia Commons. The trusted source for Kandinsky art works is artist's catalogue raisonne. For further information and/or permission to use Nina Kandinsky name please contact Kandinsky Society, Centre Pompidou, Paris.Webaugust (talk) 21:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webaugust (talk • contribs) 21:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsens, the artist has been dead for more than seventy years and he created his artwork before 1923. --Trzęsacz (talk) 22:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Deletion request is about not trusted source of publishing and name/image of Nina Kandinsky (1899-1980), founder of Kandinsky Society.Webaugust (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


1. the picture shows N.K., is that right?
2. who is the author of the portrait?
It is not the problem of untrustable source but there is a problem of the author.
If it can be proven, that Wassily Kandinsky was the painter, than the photo of the picture is Wikimedia-PD-art and PD-old-70. If this reproduction is found in an untrustable source, so what?
But it seems, that it can't be proven.
I took a quick look at
Hans Konrad Röthel; Jean K. Benjamin: Kandinsky : Werkverzeichnis der Ölgemälde. 2. 1916 - 1944. München : Beck, 1984 ISBN 3-406-08892-9
there seems to be no such portrait.
And, this portrait has never been mentioned by none, never been shown in a publication, except now in two (untrustable) Internetsources
until 1-1-2015 (W.K. was PD-old-70 then), when it was uploaded in Commons, by me, my fault, so far.
therefore deletion would be quite ok, unless someone finds out about the authorship.
--Goesseln (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the author died in 1944, and the drawing is out of copyright. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from her facebook page https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156730148666337&set=ecnf.730621336&type=3&theater Md.altaf.rahman (talk) 23:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Taken from Facebook, missing permission. Strakhov (talk) 17:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the US for 3D art. Elisfkc (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, lovely dragon. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hayley Atwell, whom I work for, does not feel this photo represents her as she is today. It's a very old image and she doesn't feel happy with it being displayed especially without her permission.It's an image she really dislikes and would very much prefer another more flattering photo. When her name is googled this is the image that comes up which is very upsetting for a high profile actress. This is why this file should be deleted. I hope you will agreed. 80.229.218.178 18:17, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@80.229.218.178: Unfortunately, we are unlikely to delete an image of someone because they don't like it. However, if you set up an account and prove (not sure how best to prove, but I'm asking) that you actually do represent her, we may be able to select another image we already have of her or if you can release a picture under a free license, we may use that. --Elisfkc (talk) 18:33, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep no valid reason to delete, but I've replaced the Infobox image used on en-wiki with a different and newer one to accommodate the concern, see Hayley Atwell.  JGHowes  talk 18:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Absolutely no reason to delete, and shame on you for asking. Celebrities do not get to control pictures of them taken at public events. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Keep per above, but feel free to upload another image under the proper license.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep and no reason to delete the image in some language versions of Wikipedia.--Schraubenbürschchen (talk) 07:52, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
comment i normally honor subject deletion requests, after email verification. personality rights are wholly inadequate. acquiescence is not affirmative consent. she could also donate a better image. and why the 2007 image for wikidata? a little curation would go a long way. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque no me agrada la foto Abm300 (talk) 19:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploaders own work. Unclear copyright situation right now 188.99.123.15 20:43, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio (see source) and low quality. out of scope Commons:PS Kanisfluh (talk) 20:58, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The video I used to get the image has a reuse allowed lisence. Why do we need to delete it?

Oh and for Theodd1sout page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheOdd1sOut) is a screenshot of him and the video is a free use licence just like hers. Go check for yourselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdrianWikiEditor (talk • contribs) 22:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, we don't compare images with each other. So there's no copyvio but the screenshot is really bad. Soplease delete cause of low quality and out of scope. --Kanisfluh (talk) 08:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, then try to find a different picture. AdrianWikiEditor (talk) 15:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Finnusertop. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is missing a license review, but it cannot be performed as the video is private. Günther Frager (talk) 20:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:36, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Kanisfluh (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Why do you assume a copyvio? Large image, has EXIF data. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Kanisfluh (talk) 21:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author Ludovic Sanejouand. Ruthven (msg) 08:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. http://editionsalto.com/auteurs/dominique-fortier/ Kanisfluh (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author Frederick Duchesne. Ruthven (msg) 08:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pssible COM:NETCOPYVIO, the source mentioned is under "all rights reserved". Putting it for discussion, as the photo was uploaded 2 years ago. Tito Dutta (talk) 21:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: "All rights reserved" at newagebd.net. Ruthven (msg) 08:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Turboportail.net Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:31, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date : found as early as April 2018 at http://bullesdeculture.com/2018/04/litterature-critique-avis-livres-l-ardeur-abc-poetique-du-vivre-plus.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: © Murielle Szac. --Yann (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, user blocked for vandalism, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:12, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:56, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vector version available here File:Sungai Kandis DUN, Kota Raja.svg *angys* (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, original uploader request. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:18, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Хоть бы потрудились перевести, вот только зря столько энергию потратил. Ну JPG-шка ну и что с того? Там пол википедии то png то jpg. Постоянно конвертировать - это неудобно. С такими успехами вики совсем лишится активных редакторов.Архиасинквазипсевдомаг (talk) 16:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Замена тангенса.png and File:Тангенс.png are definitely notable and in commons project scope. They show the graph of a tangent function; even an own category is dedicated to this topic (Category:Tangent function). While png format not admittedly not the best one, many other function graphs are in that format (or even in jpg). - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'm unable to judge on File:Кутерьма.jpg. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:55, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion the photo of the people in line. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 05:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France & these are copyrighted characters of Marvel

Elisfkc (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 19:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and most of the above DRs.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Very, very dark photos. And there are already File:Disneyland Paris 132.jpg and File:Disneyland Paris 133.jpg very similar

--Tangopaso (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also if Freedom of Panorama covers an illuminated Eiffel Tower (see also Category:Eiffel Tower at night), there is no way these lights that are complex are not covered as well. --Elisfkc (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the lighting as complex enough to be copyrightable: such Christmas lighting is ordinary and can be replicated by anyone in the world, even Frenchmen, thus the lighting director of this Christmas display cannot claim copyright. With regards to usability of the photos, I leave that judgment to the closing admins. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and most of the above DRs.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I do not see any copyright issue, as the lights are not creative enough to be copyrightable. There is no definite artistic character on Christmas lighting used. Anyone including us here can copy the lighting without lighting director's permission. And the original nomination by Tangopaso concerns COM:SCOPE issue, please do not reinstate the FOP-related category here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: How is this not a pending Disneyland Paris-related deletion request?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: because this request is not related to freedom of panorama issue. The lack of artistry in Christmas lighting means any FOP issue is moot. (And I disagree with Elisfkc's added reason for deletion). This is of scope related deletion discussion, as Tangopaso originally cited ass reason for deletion. Notice Category:Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests is grouped under "French FOP cases" (similarly, "Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests/pending" is categorized under "French FOP cases/pending", not a category about scope-related deletion requests, if there is one). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345 and Labattblueboy: I'm sorry, I did not realize until now that Category:Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests was in Category:French FOP cases (along with respective pending, kept, and deleted subpages). Why is that? If it is to stay in that category, shouldn't it have "FOP" in the name, so as not to surprise? I propose a new Category:Disneyland Paris FOP-related deletion requests (along with respective pending, kept, and deleted subpages).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: on same naming convention as Category:Burj Khalifa-related deletion requests, Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests, Category:N Seoul Tower-related deletion requests, and Category:63 Building-related deletion requests. Personally I find this impractical to group several DRs by categories as per landmark, since it covers up the real number of case pages resulting to deletions, unless one has the interest to do math, thereby reducing efforts to introduce FOP in their respective countries through complacency courtesy of "reduced" number of deletion case pages. But I assume that it helps to make future undeletions easier in case the landmarks fall public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure about this one. It'd say CC-BY-SA is definitely wrong. But the artist is US based, so it may quality under COM:TOO if there is a general consensus that this flowery bit is alright. Currently under a claim of fair use on en.wiki. GMGtalk 14:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO IMO. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Al Badiyah Tower.jpg Marcky30 (talk) 15:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Question And the reason for deletion would be...? Gestumblindi (talk) 21:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://twitter.com/Emily_Katz/status/1033059667629420545 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This is the official press photo for Nick Jonas. It was previously used on Postmates as seen in the tweet above and is currently visible on his Spotify page and therefore should not be removed. Cynthia.parkhurst (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Cs

Unused, low-res image of non notable text logo, trivially recreatable or composable (Cs) if ever needed; deletion (improperly) requested by uploader half an hour after upload. -- Tuválkin 17:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This discussion also includes a derivative work, File:Northcarolinaareacodes1.gif. For one thing, the permission statement provided on the description page is completely inadequate. How are The State Library of North Carolina's electronic resources may be used only for purposes that are legal and consistent with the library's mission as described above and The State Library of North Carolina provides public access to the Internet in support of its mission to promote knowledge, education, and business, the value and joy of reading, and the literary and cultural history of our state a basis for deciding that this is PD-USGov, let alone free at all? We're not free to use it for any purpose; if someone wanted to use it to denigrate the literary and cultural history of North Carolina, for example, he wouldn't have permission because that's contrary to the State Library of North Carolina's mission. Moreover, even if permission could be deduced from this statement, this isn't a good area code map: area code maps are supposed to be basic, without all the county names or smaller-city names. Pick a random subcategory of Category:Telephone area code maps of the United States and you'll see that these maps are significantly different from most, because they include a lot of extraneous detail. Thus File:USA telephone area code map - North Carolina.svg has been created; it's a standard simple map, and it's an SVG, not a poor-quality GIF as these two are. Nyttend backup (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not a work of US government, but work of North Carolina state, so not in public domain. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Romania; also it was uploaded as promo; the corresponding page in Romanian has been deleted: ro:Music Depo Romania. Gikü (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:55, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same series/photographer as http://www.agencesartistiques.com/Fiche-Artiste/275765-romain-rondeau.html, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 21:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Group photographs of Argentine football teams

[edit]

Non-notable football teams of Argentina; none of the photos are in use in any project. Most of the pictures refer to amateur or children teams that seem to be personal works with no further relevance.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 22:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all by the last one per nomination. Kept: the last one since it has a derivative that is in use on eswiki so it is reasonable to believe that the entire picture could be useful. --Majora (talk) 05:16, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© David Neumayer Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel:  Question Where do you see © David Neumayer? --Ruthven (msg) 08:50, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
https://service.randomhouse.de/author/Gerhard_Langer/p621422.rhd?pub=1 --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure whether we should delete this outright, or change the name and description & keep it as an "other version" of File:Crowd in Occidental Square in front of Occidental Hotel for the visit of President Hayes, Seattle, 1878 (CURTIS 319).jpeg. I had an exchange about this with the librarian at the University of Washington, and they have opted to simply remove it from their site.

The exchange:

Jmabel ! talk 19:50, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about the tree and the stable, but I wonder if those differences can't be attributed to the camera angle. The way the ribbon in front of the stage hangs is strikingly similar between the Curtis and Peiser photos, and all the windows on the building are open the exact same amounts. BMacZero (talk) 02:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This version appears to have significantly more detail in the shadows, so should probably be left as an alternate. Description should be fixed, and the confusion noted for future reference, though. --Storkk (talk) 11:56, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]