Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/08/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 21st, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should not be deleted because I'm Philippe Poppe who owns the copyright of this image. It has been uploaded as "own work" to illustrate newly described seashells. Indici (talk) 02:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Procedural close. Created by accident by uploader. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Indici. --Majora (talk) 02:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Info/Música/artista Isaias moises cossa (Lionde, agosto de 1998) mais conhecido como Bay. Isaias ou mesmo King moz é um cantor, produtor moçambicano.<ref>{{Citar web|url=https://bayisaias.wordpress.com Bay isaias king (talk) 11:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7). --Achim (talk) 11:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obvious cases may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 22:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
{{Delete
 |reason  = eroor
 |subpage = 
 |day     = 21
 |month   = August
 |year    = 2018
}}
Yoshihito987 (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7 - Author request. --Majora (talk) 02:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not "own work". Looks like a screenshot. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by RP88 at 07:33, 22 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web ([1], etc.) - --Krdbot 13:11, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keep OTRS permission (with COM:CONSENT) now received. Mike Peel (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ConstantEditor126 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image taken in the US where there is no COM:FOP for sculptures. No indication the sculpture itself should be in the public domain.

GMGtalk 16:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are Public Domain - read the NYTimes (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/arts/design/nina-simone-house-birthplace.html) and This from the University of North Carolina stating it is a public site (https://docsouth.unc.edu/commland/monument/341/), Not sure how else to define it.

Also, the artist (here) said this, “I am delighted to share in the creation of a lasting tribute to jazz legend Nina Simone. In addition to being a fan of her work, as an artist, it is especially pleasing for me to be given this opportunity to honor another artist. With this statue, her hometown will claim its own and inspire children who like her were born and raised in Tryon to realize their potential.”SethT [[User:ConstantEditor126|SethT]] (talk) 16:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, just because it is in a public space (with regard to its physical location) doesn't mean it's in the public domain (with regard to intellectual property rights). We would need something from the artist to indicate that they have freely licensed the work. GMGtalk 17:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weird POV, but OK. I just emailed Zenos Frudakis (http://www.zenosfrudakis.com/) for that permission. SethT [[User:ConstantEditor126|SethT]] (talk) 17:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As a space saver, I just talked to Mr. Frudakis' wife and she confirmed that it is their pleasure to allow the photos, and that Zeno will be sending in permissions. SethT [[User:ConstantEditor126|SethT]] (talk) 17:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That works just fine, but they need to specify a license and not just that they will allow them in a generic sense. See the instructions at COM:CONSENT. GMGtalk 18:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[Ticket#2018082210005834] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Nina Simone) SethT [[User:ConstantEditor126|SethT]] (talk)
OTRS ticket received, but COM:CONSENT is still needed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ARCHONIAN LORE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fair-use (photography coming from a magazine or screenshot)

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. Photo uploaded without permission from copyright owner. Pachidensha (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very blurred main subject, & no location data, makes species unidentifiable and image of no educational use. MPF (talk) 00:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:44, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sports logo published here with copyright claim " © 2018 North Adams SteepleCats" Thuresson (talk) 00:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bobkat88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. {{Nopenis}}

Majora (talk) 01:06, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copywrighted content without metadata and self promotional - IndrajitDas 08:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover of the book. No proof of free license GAndy (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:48, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found at lower resolution at https://www.forbes.com/sites/mfonobongnsehe/2018/07/11/meet-dieuveil-malonga-the-congolese-chef-whose-startup-is-taking-african-cuisine-to-the-world/#2d104b1b27b7 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly remove this file, an error has been made. 82.243.54.22 20:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly remove this file, an error was made. Thank you. Selfsells (talk) 20:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Deleted by User:Túrelio. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Deleted by User:Túrelio. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Deleted by User:Túrelio. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality image. Niridya (talk) 12:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1.  Delete --Niridya (talk) 12:44, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jon souza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Deleted by User:Ronhjones. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carolinetjen48 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ae118 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All claimed as own work but at least one has author Rene Volfik/FOTOREPO.cz in exif

Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mar GLCT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted images taken without authorisation from JoseAlbaladejoRos (http://www.regmurcia.com/servlet/s.Sl?sit=c,204&r=ReP-7105-DETALLE_REPORTAJES)

Triplecaña (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gaellelita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 10:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pepe is a copyright violation, see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Donald_Trump_alt-right_supporter_(32452974604).jpgSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 01:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete it from Wikimedia ASAP, so that I can upload it to English Wikipedia (which does allow for fair use). (((TPG))) (stalk) 01:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@That's Pretty Good: Fair use is not allowed on wikipedia for personal pages. If you wish, you can reupload this image without Pepe, and with a freely licensed marijuana leaf.—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 02:20, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Pepe is a copyvio. While this didn't influence my decision to delete, I think this is an inaccurate compass. Left-libertarian politics are often in support of gun ownership, and even more authoritarian socialists do not necessarily want to criminalize cannabis. Pepe is more associated with the alt-right, which is definitely not a libertarian movement. --Guanaco (talk) 07:59, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. Arthuracastro (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Guanaco (talk) 08:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Virginia is not federal and PD-USGov does not apply here. There might be some leeway according to Harvard but I'm not seeing any indication that the governor's office has taken the "appropriate" steps to make their images under a free license. Majora (talk) 03:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:24, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author request WEP11 (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shane Royle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is copyrights status for works of police in Nevada? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martin191234 (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Very unlikely "own work": 3 different cameras, 1 image credited to "Maurizio_Rigato", and 1 image already deleted as copyvio (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:GT3 Ferrari.jpg).

P 1 9 9   17:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is difficult to value images where the head is cropped away Wildone.dk (talk) 11:28, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PORN Mjrmtg (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not educational Alek01913 (talk) 05:59, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality COM:NUDE photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy Smruti Ranjan Ghadai (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Requested by uploader on day of upload. No license since 24 August. --Majora (talk) 00:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнение в авторстве и лицензии: малый размер файла, отсутствие метаданных, фото похоже на студийное Dogad75 (talk) 01:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнение в авторстве и лицензии: малый размер файла, отсутствие метаданных, фото похоже на студийное Dogad75 (talk) 17:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the TV screenshot B dash (talk) 02:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Incnis Mrsi: most of the T-shirt is PD-textlogo. Only the circle-shaped part may or may not be eligible, but it's DM anyway. Not sure about the eclipse image now. While simple, so is a photo of a nail. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The screen shows nothing copyright could be applied to. --Sealle (talk) 22:00, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright ([2]). Sæn 02:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1936 photos are not own work. Probably copyright violation. Who is the photographer and when (s)he died? When and where the photo was first published? Taivo (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 22:04, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 22:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality pic that cannot be realistically used on commons - if it was straighter or if the subject was clearer then maybe Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal document, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   13:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 15:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 15:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork? not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work by uploader, considering her upload-history. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

у SergioRio602 (talk) 20:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 22:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work. Image was present on the internet before date of upload. —Gazoth (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 21:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sculptured tombstones are definitely copyrighted regardless of whether their author is known or not and have nothing common with garden design. --Sealle (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, exists elsewhere on the web. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:53, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Category:Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial. The statue is copyrighted. Stefan4 (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the U.S. See COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial for deletion discussions concerning similar images of this memorial. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 23:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this user has shoot this photo, it was made during an interview session in South Tyrol, see https://budspencermovie.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/unser-interview-mit-terence-hill/ with the original photo. It is more or less supposeable that the uploading user found this photo in the internet an uploaded a cropped version of it. there is no proof, the original photo is free of copyright, see f. e. http://www.allocine.fr/personne/fichepersonne-2796/photos/detail/?cmediafile=21055735 Queryzo (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 21:40, 1 September 2018 UTC: In category Media_missing_permission_as_of_21_August_2018; no permission --Krdbot 00:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated Pleycor (talk) 21:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:54, 1 September 2018 UTC: In category Media_without_a_source_as_of_23_August_2018; no source --Krdbot 00:58, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Waggie as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly a promotional/marketing image for the subject, but no COI has been declared and no evidence of permission
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. COI and promotional aspects are not relevant IMO, as image is used on 2 projects. However, the authorship/copyright might be questioned.-- Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, thanks for doing that, Túrelio. It really does appear to me that this image was not taken by the uploader. I seriously doubt that someone not connected to the project could've taken this photograph. Either we have an undeclared conflict of interest, a copyright violation, or both. Either way, I obviously believe that it's suspicious enough that we need to address the issue or delete the image. Waggie (talk) 15:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
AFAIK, "coi" wasn't ever an issue on Commons, as opposed to the Wikipedias, or didn't I notice some recent change? Of course, merely advertising or promotional images are another thing, which are indeed considered to be out-of-scope of Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Túrelio, thanks for your reply! I must admit that I am certainly inexperienced on Commons and welcome any advice or knowledge you can impart. It's been my understanding that undisclosed COI editing is a Terms of Use issue for all Wikimedia sites, Commons included. I refer to the ToU section here. However, after researching the question some more, I see that in 2014 Commons decided to have an alternative policy which did not require disclosure. Now that I've been educated a bit (thank you!), back to the matter at hand. I do believe it's copyvio for the reasons I pointed out above. This image appears to be a professionally taken image intended for use in marketing material and has not been correctly released by the copyright holder. I just don't see your average Commons contributor up in a plane taking a shot of this just to write some articles on Wikipedia. Waggie (talk) 08:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Update: After some discussion with the uploader on my en-wiki talk page, the uploader states that they downloaded and edited it, not originated it. What's quite curious is that the source they claim to have downloaded it from clearly isn't where they got it from, as the Commons image is clearly higher quality. Waggie (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unless we get OTRS permission from someone who is authorized to release this image it is pretty clear that there is not enough information there to confirm that it is under a free license. Especially considering they admitted to taking it from the Internet on Waggie's talk page. --Majora (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim, given data in Exif: author Anjoescha Odufre, copyright holder Studio 20, taken with a Hasselblad camera. Also uploaded with a very small size and doesn't compare to User:Budding's only other surviving upload at File:Kees_Bos_001.jpg. --ghouston (talk) 02:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small size, missin EXIF, could be found with Google Images or Tineye 4nn1l2 (talk) 04:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image. Unlikely to be the own work of the uploader as meta data is missing. Vensatry (Ping me) 08:17, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, {{copyvio}}. False authorship claims by persistent serial copyright violator. Grabbed via http://khabarelyom.com/16925-myriam-fares-pictures/. The uploader has been given multiple "final" warnings. Time to do something. LX (talk, contribs) 10:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low quality, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Guanaco (talk) 07:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete with this --Alaa :)..! 21:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user confirmed as a sockpuppet for أليكس (talk · contribs) --Alaa :)..! 21:47, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per sockpuppetry issue. --Nick (talk) 22:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ileanafess as Speedy (Speedy Deletion) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrights violation. Not sure. EXIF exists, author's name matches author's firld in infobox. One week for discussion is allowed. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Taivo: Ileanafess above also globally locked now as a sock for the same user (أليكس) --Alaa :)..! 09:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 19:17, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake and insulting image for a known singer. There was an obsessed user who kept adding sexual content to her article on ar. wiki باسم (talk) 21:03, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 06:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Demba NGOM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no repository, no purpose,

Triplecaña (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 16:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I uploaded a better picture of this place and already used it in an article. HotMusicFan (talk) 16:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably non-free screenshot. – Kwj2772 (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:14, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, similar to https://e27.co/stefano-virgilli-blockchain-slow-neither-safe-reliable-already-finished-20180711/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken upload; and copyvio; use google image search Hystrix (talk) 22:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful: Made-up flag for the made-up ideology "Juche Capitalism". Previously used on de:Juche-Kapitalismus Belegfreund (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Nom. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

lol, because you never heard about Juche-Capitalism and because you deleleted Juche-Capitalism, it doesn't mean that Juche-Capitalism doesn't exist. I am a Juche-Capitalist. Juche-Capitalism is very real. The only made up thing about Juche is the Juche article on wikipedia at the moment. All ideologies are made-up. Juche-Capitalism is Kim Il Sung's true Juche idea. THe idea he used to create himself. What communist ideology would use capitalist symbols like the Juche-tower with the Juche-flame? I am the SUPREME authority on JUCHE. I say as a follower of the only true Juche-idea that wikipedia is turning into a ANTI-TRUTH ANTI-LIBERTY COMMIE SITE just like youtube. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KimYaJong (talk • contribs) 23:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about "me not hearing" of this. It's about you not understanding that you need to provide reliable sources and a proof for notability for your claims. A single youtube video certainly does not meet these conditions. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:34, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:49, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Belegfreund (talk) 10:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright. Sæn 11:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a copyrighted work. Hanooz 11:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

kein Bedarf 5.90.83.88 12:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 16:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. Zinnmann (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website https://arotinserghei.com/ Erika H. List (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Théo Tobiasse (d. 2012), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I don't know why you think it's unlikely to be my work. The only matching image on Google Images is this one. Just to confirm it is my own work— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gfamily (talk • contribs) 15:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You could upload photo in original resolution with EXIF to proof your authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:39, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright violation 2601:647:101:D030:C808:6A9:82DE:3823 18:59, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

speedydelete: Fair User Image, Possible Copyvio. 49206561742062616e616e6173 (talk) 19:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 22:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of two pages of which higher resolution images are available (File:A crowned crane. Etching with engraving. Wellcome V0022241EL.jpg and File:A secretary bird. Etching with engraving. Wellcome V0022241ER.jpg. Also incorrectly named. I don't foresee any use. -- Deadstar (msg) 20:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.ferroviario.com.br/downloads/ferroviario-distintivo.zip — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:7F7:E18D:2A75:E928:CD66:325E:8E80 (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This file is the official logo of the Ferroviário Atlético Clube from Fortaleza - Ceará - Brasil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leofvidal (talk • contribs) 21:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: currently in use in a Wikipedia article, so that it cannot be deleted for scope reasons (also PD-textlogo, no copyright problem either). --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

site fermée par le créateur Bkkillianb2015 (talk) 19:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

site fermée par le créateur Bkkillianb2015 (talk) 19:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

site fermé Okazill (talk) 19:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: minor logo, not in use, no future educational use. czar 15:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: repeat nomination. czar 15:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: repeat nomination. czar 15:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The drawings of Kuxumuxu are protected by copyright. Ruthven (msg) 06:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Not covered by FoP in Spain. Strakhov (talk) 02:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Digital reproduction of a photo in a North Korean pamphlet, not {{Own}}. Mys_721tx (talk) 02:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:52, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request, lower quality duplicate of Quarry at Flossenbürg. I tried to upload the second image as a new copy but could not due to incompatible file extensions. Catrìona (talk) 15:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:52, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please suppress. I just uploaded the very same pic - without the superfluous black spots on upper right corner. Thanks. Pueblopassingby (talk) 19:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The replacement version is File:Nermont, Saint-Moré-planche I Parat- poteries series I et II.jpg.png. --bjh21 (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 18:53, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not certain this should be deleted, but I think it should at least be discussed. It would seem to me that without Freedom of Panorama for artwork in the U.S., this almost certainly violates the copyrights of the artists of the work on the walls. Jmabel ! talk 02:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: we have {{Non-free graffiti}}. But I'm not sure this would be in scope anyway. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:07, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: That template specifies "illegal graffiti". These are authorized works decorating a bus corridor. - Jmabel ! talk 03:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: I wouldn't know how to see the difference, but in that case it seems like a clear  Delete. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: I don't claim to be able to determine the difference by the visual, but by knowing exactly where this is (along a corridor used by buses and light rail in Seattle's Sodo District) and that this is part of a set of authorized works of art on the walls there. - Jmabel ! talk 03:17, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Generally we delete graffitis, unless it's a special case, because of COM:PRP. Ruthven (msg) 14:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Various derivative works of Disney characters.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Cartoon murial Montrèal 2017 small.jpg is oviously not a derivative work, but an original piece of art, citing popocultural elements. a) within scope b) FOP c) ><(((> Sargoth (talk) 08:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
More  Keep as it was made by the Artist Benny Wilding during the Festival Mural 2015! Sargoth (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Sargoth: and did Artist Benny Wilding release his work with a free license? You've just provided another reason for deletion. And COM:FoP#Canada doesn't cover murals. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Panoramafreiheit. Die folgende Graffiti ist lediglich eine abgeleitete Zeichnung der Comicfigur durch den Künstler Patrik Wolters alias BeneR1 (siehe die Künstlersignatur). Die Graffiti im öffentlichen Raum installiert und unterliegen damit der Panoramafreiheit:
Behalten. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 09:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bernd Schwabe in Hannover:
  1. Go to Germany.
  2. Spray paint Donald Duck on the wall of a police station. (why a police station? German jails are fun I hear)
  3. Take photo.
  4. Upload photo to Commons.
OMG I can't believe we never thought of this before! We'll never need fair use rationales on English Wikipedia again as long as we have Wikipedians with spray paint in Germany! (sorry for the sarcasm, but Panoramafreiheit really doesn't cover works that were never licensed in the first place) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:47, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cartoon murial Montrèal 2017 small without Mr D.jpg
Mural in Montréal without Mr. D.
I uploaded a new file if you think it's better,  Keep it. The filename says Mr. D, because i'm unsure if it is lawful to name the character.--Sargoth (talk) 10:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious {{De minimis}} claim.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:49, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the description:

"The Public Domain film The Spirit of '43, which is in public domain due the fact that was created for the US Government."

But Donald Duck and probably even this exact screen were created before '43. It is dubious anyway. Sesame Street isn't public domain either as far as I know.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:19, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Files of The Spirit of '43 has been nominated more than once for deletion, but requests had been declined, because there is no evidence of copyright renewal. See former discussions at:
  1. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Spirit 43 - Scrooge - Oncle Picsou - Garrepa.JPG.
  2. Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Spirit of 43-Donald Duck, cropped version.jpg.
See also The Spirit Of 43.--Maher27777 (talk) 10:52, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Maher27777: this isn't entirely how it works.
User:Trycatch nailed it on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Duck - The Spirit of '43 (cropped version).jpg:
"Donald Duck is still copyrighted -- he first appeared in The Wise Little Hen (1934), which was successfully renewed in 1961. Every single appearance of Donald Duck after The Wise Little Hen would be considered a derivative work from the first cartoon, hence copyrighted. Yes, the copyright on The Spirit of '43 wasn't renewed, and a part of the cartoon fall in the public domain, but parts of it with Donald Duck are still copyrighted as a DW from the previous works. See the long discussion cited by the nominator for details."
I can't explain it any better, so I won't. I will add this: can you prove The Spirit of '43 was the first cartoon to feature this title card? I can't say for sure because title cards may have been swapped, but Donald's Nephews from 1938 seems to have the same title card. At the same time, if title cards were swapped (like they appear to have been for Don Donald), that would also put the title card of The Spirit of '43 into question. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:32, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion about the The Spirit of '43 is feared to be unfairly lost in this sea of requests. First it was made for the US Government, including its first scene. Second, there is no evidence of copyright renewal.--Maher27777 (talk) 18:46, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was talking about the title card. Was The Spirit of '43 really the first Donald Duck cartoon to feature that title card? And even if it was (it doesn't look like it), Donald Duck wasn't created for The Spirit of '43. If I draw Donald Duck, all by myself, I still wouldn't be allowed to upload it here. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Whether the title card was used before, with, of after The Spirit of '43, the cartoon as a whole is in public domain, including its title card, and it's easy to prove it is a part of The Spirit of '43. Why should we have to wait unnecessarily to 2039?--Maher27777 (talk) 15:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license from Benny Wilding. (or the creators of all the other DW for that matter)

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:37, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy. (COM:FOP) De minimis certainly won't apply here, and there's too much detail of a 1960s' gem in architecture. 84.250.17.211 08:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Architectual work has been destroyed now, so there is no copyright to defent for Italian law. Ruthven (msg) 15:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

speedydelete At the request of the author. 49206561742062616e616e6173 (talk) 19:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that this source is free as it has no youtube license, just a youtube category under show me. Leoboudv (talk) 19:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The uploader E-mailed me to say that "Hey, why are you flagging the stills I uploaded? I shot those for Jovanka and work with her campaign. We need them on wikipedia. How can I correct this I'm new to wikipedia editing. Thank you. Luke. He has now relicensed them freely for youtube after saying that these are his images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Yuotube license has been changed. @Leoboudv: Can you categorise the file please?. Ruthven (msg) 16:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some funny personal handywork but a very very low quality rendition of the real coat of arms, as described here: https://www.college-of-arms.gov.uk/news-grants/newsletter/2012/item/88-september-2013 The Banner (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Most likely it is a PD NASA picture, but missing source and lack of Exif data makes this too hard to verify (it can't be expected of the Commons community to search for the original source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (no useful description either - "Higher resolution version" of what?). --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Although it is not unlikely that this is really a PD NASA picture, missing source and lack of Exif data makes this too hard to verify (it can't be expected of the Commons community to search for the original source). --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: per Arbalete. Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: PHOTO CREDIT: DAN DOANE JR. / SIPA PRESS, https://blogs.shu.edu/nyc-history/2017/11/07/911/
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. Image is not (directly) shown at the provided source-link. SIPA PRESS is a commercial photo agency. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from HDB, and this kind of work falls in the category of drawing, FoP in Singapore dosen't cover it 182.239.90.18 11:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 02:16, 24 November 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Map of Tengah, Singapore.png: No permission from HDB, and this kind of work falls in the category of drawing, FoP in Singapore dosen't cover it --Krdbot 07:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPLOADERS WERE NOT NOTIFIED. I have no idea why. Uploaders have now been notified by hand. Hope I didn't miss anyone. I don't think I did.

For a while, it was accidentally made possible to upload .mp4 files. See phab:T202208 and the administrators' noticeboard.

Uploaders: you can reupload your videos using video2commons.

Others: you can add notes to the list below. I suggest adding a ✓[OK] {{Tick}} if the video has been re-uploaded as webm with a link to the new file, add  Keep {{Vk}} if it should be converted and add  Delete {{Vd}} if the file is copyvio.

  • ✓[OK] All done!

Already done:

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded an MP4 about Tide, but it wouldn't work properly, so I converted it to a MOV file and uploaded it. The MP4 seems to have been deleted, which is OK. Bubba73 (talk) 02:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Note I've gone through and removed the ones that were marked as already being transferred over to an acceptable format as a "speedy delete" action since MP4 is once again a disallowed format. I'll check back as things progress and continue to whittle down the list of already converted files. --Majora (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:2018 Island.mp4 has to be deleted in any case. There is no freedom of panorama in Iceland like in Germany. See several sculptures from 1:30 on. --Artsfriends (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(copied from talk page) Hello,

Thank you Alexis Jazz for notifying me.

Can someone tell me which format would be best? Is there any difference?

Regards, --Daehan (talk) 09:12, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Daehan: you can upload your .mp4 using video2commons. It will automatically be converted for you. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Português: Paz e bem!

Eu não estou conseguindo recarregar os arquivos: File:103-a Universala Kongreso de Esperanto 16.mp4

Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 15:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right, there was this. Time flies. I'll check if any uploaders have made conversions themselves first.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to convert some, there are issues with V2C. VP8 works, but VP9 is broken.. I want to do the rest, but prefer to wait for phab:T209557 to be fixed so I can use VP9. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: you might try videoconvert if you haven't already. It may not have the same problems as v2c. clpo13(talk) 04:44, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Videoconvert doesn't seem to support VP9 at all and I can't add files by link, so it's not as convenient. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bummer, I thought it offered more options for configuring the conversion. It also looks like it's unmaintained, as User:Prolineserver hasn't been active on Commons since last December. clpo13(talk) 17:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: VP9/Opus on video2commons appears to be working again. I converted and uploaded File:Tour de Pologne Etap IV.webm. clpo13(talk) 01:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Clpo13: very good. Though I just had an idea for a way to convert that preserves the uploader name. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Clpo13 and Majora: I have converted a video to MPEG-2 with Mp3 (like this, patents expired) but I can't overwrite anything because ".mp4 is not a permitted file type". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It must still be reading the MIME type of MP4 so it is disallowing it. That's not totally surprising since Commons does not allow overwrites with differing MIME's anyways. I'm also not aware of any Commons support for MPEG files in general per Commons:File types. If the patents have expired for MPEG-2 then that should probably be brought up on phab so that it can be allowed for upload. It doesn't look like there are any MPEG-2 files currently on Commons either (assuming I got my file extension right), Special:Search/filemime:"video/mp2"
@Majora: yes, it is an MP4 file, but unlike most MP4 files it doesn't use MPEG-4 (this is allowed in MP4). A possible solution is to (temporarily as there is no realistic use beyond this) allow extended uploaders (that is, me) to upload MP4 files. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The types you were looking for btw: video/mpeg and video/mp2t. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently uploading Jupiter Odyssey. It will take a while. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done And for the record, I'd like to give my sincere thanks to Alexis Jazz for converting all of these back into acceptable formats. It really is appreciated and I know that that was a lot of work that you didn't have to do. So thank you again. --Majora (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indici (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own work but I've seen images like these before so depending on where they actually came from they might be under an acceptable license. DR'ing them all just in case.

169 files

Majora (talk) 02:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete These seem to all be taken from Conchology.be. Nothing there suggests that the photos are being made available under a Wikimedia compatible license. Uploader may have some association with Guido Poppe (the proprietor of Conchology.be), as they have created Poppe's biography on en.wiki and have edited many articles on species described by Poppe. However, no indication is provided with these uploads that Poppe is releasing them under a compatible license. Plantdrew (talk) 23:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the images have copyright claims by G. & Ph. Poppe on them, and as Plantdrew said, there is no indication that they've been released under a free license. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Uploader says they have ownership of all the images. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete unless uploader can provide proof they took photos. For example original image files, photos of collection with their username in the image. COM:OTRS may be the place, as there is evidence these are taken from websites.--BevinKacon (talk) 19:33, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The uploader has also submitted many other similar images not covered here, including some recent images which are similar in style but lacking the copyright text. The OTRS should not only demonstrate authorship (i.e. that the uploader is indeed G. & Ph. Poppe or an authorised agent), but that these are indeed to be released as free licence i.e. conventional copyright restrictions are waived. Dl2000 (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See also w:Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User_Indici,_uploading_copyrighted_images,_automated_creation_of_gastropod_articles.. -- Hoary (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Update Indici may have dropped out. See this (at en:WP). -- Hoary (talk) 23:04, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The editors history suggest they are officially connected to Conchology.be, so there may be a possibility to keep images from there. It would be nice to keep such quality images.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:38, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

: Delete Delete, user is unable to respond to any effort that could clarify copyright status. User is unable to respond anything; no reply on his talk page. Snek01 (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold I successfully contacted copyright holder of those images. The matter is in solution. --Snek01 (talk) 08:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I have an evidence, that the User:Indici demonstrated authorship (that the uploader is indeed G. & Ph. Poppe or an authorised agent). I did not received such information by email, but via social network. So I know, that images were uploaded legally. There is no mention about license. I consulted the case with (Czech) OTRS member User:Mates, but he found this unsatisfactory. If you will be really so strict and if you will really demand license information about every single file uploaded in the past and uploaded in the future by User:Indici, although you know that the user has rights to release those images under the any license according to the user's decision, then I can not help. Thank you for your understanding. --Snek01 (talk) 11:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I confirm e-mail discussion with user:Snek01 about this issue telling me about his findings. Opposite to him I did not find information received in such way satisfactory for verification of User:Indici authorship. I demanded a proper permission sent via OTRS mailing system containing user authorship verification and further licensing. Since the DR involves many files and user Snek01 is in contact with authors of Conchology.be, we could give him and this DR some extra time so we won't have to delete and restore 150+ files in a short time. In my opinion, the files should be deleted until their license is verified by OTRS. --Mates (talk) 15:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

这是一个低质量的地图文件,长宽比例错误。并且有更好的版本:[3]Liouzhenyu (talk) 16:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechtes BIld Ziervo (talk) 09:11, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Community, Please be advised that I'm am Michael I. Rypel, agent and public relations manager for artist Joe Petruccio. This image is owned by our agency MIR Consulting LLC under permission from Joe Petruccio Studios. It was posted to Wikimedia with full permission. Please remove the deletion request. Thank you.

--Mrypel (talk) 22:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Joe Petruccio Studios should do the same. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Community, Please be advised that I'm am Michael I. Rypel, agent and public relations manager for artist Joe Petruccio. This image is owned by our agency MIR Consulting LLC under permission from Joe Petruccio Studios. It was posted to Wikimedia with full permission. Please remove the deletion request. Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrypel (talk • contribs) 22:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. Joe Petruccio Studios should do the same. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authorː Phillip Pain 176.239.49.58 16:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request at OTRS Ticket#2018082110009494 from the subject. The subject does not consent to them being on commons.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The subject was informed by me about the purpose when I took the photos. These are clearly not my best works, but much better than the alternative in the category. Which queue is the ticket in, I can't access it? --Seewolf (talk) 12:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 23:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from copyright holder Digital Chosunilbo is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 23:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio.There's no freedom of panorama in Iceland like in Germany. Artsfriends (talk) 05:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is freedom of panorama, but only for NC licenses. And as Commons doesn't like NC licenses, they insist on the right to exploit everything, it's unfortunately impossible to further the worlds knowledge without kowtowing to the exploiters. The pics will be exported to deWP, unfortunately still not under an NC license. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No Commons-compatible (commercial) FoP in Iceland. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Datei weiter aud deWP unter de:Datei:Riesenalk 3 Island 2.jpg vorhanden. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 06:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio.There's no freedom of panorama in Iceland. Artsfriends (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is freedom of panorama, but only for NC licenses. And as Commons doesn't like NC licenses, they insist on the right to exploit everything, it's unfortunately impossible to further the worlds knowledge without kowtowing to the exploiters. The pics will be exported to deWP, unfortunately still not under an NC license. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No Commons-compatible (commercial) FoP in Iceland. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Datei weiter aud deWP unter de:Datei:Riesenalk 2 Island 2.jpg vorhanden. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 06:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio.There's no freedom of panorama in Iceland. Artsfriends (talk) 05:52, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is freedom of panorama, but only for NC licenses. And as Commons doesn't like NC licenses, they insist on the right to exploit everything, it's unfortunately impossible to further the worlds knowledge without kowtowing to the exploiters. The pics will be exported to deWP, unfortunately still not under an NC license. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No Commons-compatible (commercial) FoP in Iceland. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Datei weiter aud deWP unter de:Datei:Riesenalk 1 Island 2.jpg vorhanden. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 06:04, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio.There's no freedom of panorama in Iceland like in Germany. Artsfriends (talk) 05:53, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is freedom of panorama, but only for NC licenses. And as Commons doesn't like NC licenses, they insist on the right to exploit everything, it's unfortunately impossible to further the worlds knowledge without kowtowing to the exploiters. The pics will be exported to deWP, unfortunately still not under an NC license. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 08:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No Commons-compatible (commercial) FoP in Iceland. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Datei ist auf de:Datei:Riesenalk_Info-Tafel_Island_2.jpg weiter vorhanden. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 05:59, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nomination by author of image - low quality image superseded by File:Canon EF-S 18-55 F3.5-5.6 III front.jpg and File:Canon EF-S 18-55 F3.5-5.6 III front (2).jpg. Hiàn (talk) 15:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licenses are wrong. The "Behrensbau Ausstellungsraum" is not a public space. The creator Richard Scheibe died 1963. He or his estate did not agree to public this in commons. Artmax (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy. (COM:FOP Italy) 84.250.17.211 08:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]




Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as claimed entirely, derived from File:Ponte Morandi.jpg with failure to obey to license conditions = terminated license = probable copyvio.

Also more or less a duplicate of File:Ponte Morandi collapse.jpg. 84.250.17.211 08:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reupload for a more correct design Trajano Cabrales (talk) 09:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use in any project, useless. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 11:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.facebook.com/jonapplebaumMN/photos/a.1425627391003579/1438304479735870/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jon-applebaum1.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ileanafess as Speedy (Speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: Error lisence, this logo is a tv station logo, not a own work.
No speedy: Maybe qualify for PD-Textlogo; (below COM:TOO) Wdwd (talk) 12:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Alaa :)..! 10:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a) ticket:2015110310023822:

b) copyvio of modern artworks:

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hedwig in Washington: Could you, please, be more precise and do not mix deletion requests with different reasons? I do not see any modern artwork on File:AROTIN & SERGHEI at 50th Biennale di Venezia.jpg. Neither on File:Arotin.jpg. I strongly  Oppose such deletion procedure. Ankry (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: Yeah, makes sense. Sorry about that. I could have speedy deleted the first three. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:30, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Hedwig in Washington: So now, my opinion is:
PS. reading the OTRS ticket, I do not see a valid deletion reason there. Ankry (talk) 09:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, part b) is pretty clear. Instead of speedy deleting the files mentioned in the ticket, I thought we should have a broader audience. I petitioned the uploader for a replacement, maybe we can swap old for new. What do you think? Courtesy deletion? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Hedwig in Washington: Courtesy deletion might be OK if we have a replacement. Unfortunately, nothing freely licensed, yet. Ankry (talk) 01:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Kept two -- we do not generally delete images at the request of the subject. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Purbasha A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept one, deleted one. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Question There is a NASA logo and some code in the upper left corner - maybe enough to assume that {{PD-USGov-NASA}} is valid even if there's no source? Gestumblindi (talk) 23:35, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Source found, proper image uploaded. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the photographer of this 3D object, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:24, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A different image appears at the Internet Archive source. Perhaps that image should be used instead? Leoboudv (talk) 18:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that this source is free as it has no youtube license, just a youtube category under show me. Leoboudv (talk) 20:30, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The uploader E-mailed me to say that "Hey, why are you flagging the stills I uploaded? I shot those for Jovanka and work with her campaign. We need them on wikipedia. How can I correct this I'm new to wikipedia editing. Thank you. Luke." He has now relicensed them freely for youtube after saying that these are his images....and I have reviewed this image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Leoboudv: What is the educational use? The image is not categorised. --Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio : this is the official drawing granted by the college of arms, not an "own work" by some wiki user.

See, for instance, this article published 5 days before the upload : https://www.hola.com/actualidad/2017042593783/escudo-armas-familia-middleton/

or this one from the 20th of april : http://blog.soirmag.lesoir.be/rue-royale/2011/04/20/trois-glands-et-un-ruban-pour-kate/ (no date on the page, but the url is "2011/04/20/").

86.242.226.13 23:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Should have been deleted a long time ago. Sodacan (talk) 04:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:00, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]