Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_--_from_SA_Liberal_Party_transport_policy_2018.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![141 File:"She Told Me Chapulines Were Tasty" (17078409787).jpg](#File:"She_Told_Me_Chapulines_Were_Tasty"_(17078409787).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
For birds eye view made from drones at a high of 100 meters or above you need a special permission to do so. (see: [1]) I can't see that this permission is given. The author has to prove that this extra permission is given, otherwise this image is to delete. Alabasterstein (talk) 06:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
This photo was made using the German laws. All necessary regulations were met and necessary preparations were kept. The notification of cancellation relies solely and solely on the lost democratic vote of the author of this message and has no factual reference. Reference: [[2]] --FabianHorst (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please PROVE that all permissions are given, here are TWO (a common permission to fly drones, a special permission for shooting with the drone at 100 meters and above because this images was made of a high at 100 meters over ground) permissions necessary. --Alabasterstein (talk) 07:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am holder of a promotion permit for the federal state of Schleswig-Holstein. The photo was not taken over 100 meters from the ground and therefore does NOT require a separate ascent authorization. All documents you can look at in a personal conversation like the original. Please try to stay factual and refrain from vandalism and slander. --FabianHorst (talk) 07:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- If this is so send the permission and the detection that this image is not above 100 meters taken (for example the EXIF of this image) to the support team. Because the tower pod is at 108,2 meters it looks so that the drone has the same high as the tower pod. So please stay polite and don't insult me to be a vandal because I'm the only one that works substantial on this article. --Alabasterstein (talk) 07:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Awaiting reply from the Support Team --FabianHorst (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I am holder of a promotion permit for the federal state of Schleswig-Holstein. The photo was not taken over 100 meters from the ground and therefore does NOT require a separate ascent authorization. All documents you can look at in a personal conversation like the original. Please try to stay factual and refrain from vandalism and slander. --FabianHorst (talk) 07:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Permisson for the drone sent to the Support Team, ticket 2018062110004126. --Raymond 08:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
den moaresis Mamengeorgos (talk) 16:38, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion "I do not like you". --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Θέλει ξανα δουλεμα Varriemai (talk) 09:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. "he wants to work again" --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
ghthtyj gdfh Georgios Gianno (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
non-free image, not taken by the author Lugnuts (talk) 08:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Branyel Baeza Montreal (talk · contribs)
[edit]pissible copyvios, images are all available on the web.
- File:Elvis presley.jpeg
- File:Archivo- Elvis mugshot.jpg
- File:ElvisAronPresley.jpeg
- File:Elvis presley cantante.png
- File:Anexo-Artistas que alcanzaron el número uno en el Billboard Hot 100.png
- File:Elvis presley.png
Migebert (talk) 13:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Regis alexandre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Getty Images, https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/613207/British-Jack-Oconnell-Nicholas-Hoult-Beatles-roles Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: per EXIF data: (C) SIDDHARTH SIVA HR with EXIF, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 17:31, 21 Juni 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Sunil John-Photo.jpg --Krdbot 00:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://business.facebook.com/GoSportsFoundation/photos/a.166617967930.122403.132984462930/10156087699632931/?type=3&theater, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/taipeicathyyu/photos/a.725502360978585.1073741826.725501890978632/809634882565332/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook images, missing permission.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Seems to be a sandbox from its author. Olivier LPB (talk) 08:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 20:37, 22 Juni 2018 UTC: Test page or page with no valid content --Krdbot 00:42, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
si Linoh Cabrera (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as dupe. --JuTa 03:49, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, this photo is of Dov Kolani, which was the Legal Counsel of the Israeli ministry of tourism. Among his activities, Kolani has formulated international agreements (including tourism agreements with arab representatives). the photo of Kolani is intended to be used in a value which describes his activity. Shoshil37 (talk) 17:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Can be used in article about Kolani, Dov. Shoshil37, in this page it's mentioned that article about דב קולני is needed. May be it is time to creat an article. -- Geagea (talk) 10:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Unnecessary duplicate of File:Kleineh Oscar (1846-1919).jpg. My mistake. Mlang.Finn (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:31, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded a low-res version of the photo and would like to upload a hi-res version. Unirico41 (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:56, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: not own work: https://www.mediamoves.com/2018/06/hernandez-named-president-of-combate-americas.html --Krdbot 12:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Blatant copyvio. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 15:04, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: copyrighted Sports footage screenshot --Krdbot 18:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 09:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for testing purposes of Commons Android app. Could be deleted. Not necessary any more. Kaartic (talk) 17:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - self request and duplicate. --whym (talk) 07:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Norev model cars
[edit]These are photographs of model cars, which are copyrightable according to US law. COM:CSM#Models, COM:TOYS
- File:Norev Citroen C4 Gendarmerie (39715295320).jpg
- File:Norev Citroen C4 Gendarmerie (39715295330).jpg
- File:Norev Peugeot 308 I Police (41524421231).jpg
- File:Norev Peugeot 308 I Police (41524421271).jpg
- File:Norev Peugeot 308 II Police (40811216084).jpg
- File:Norev Peugeot 308 II Police (40811216134).jpg
- File:Norev Peugeot Boxer Pompier (27827194167).jpg
- File:Norev Peugeot Boxer Pompier (27827313087).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Kangoo III Mission Vigipirate (26654659717).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Kangoo III Mission Vigipirate (27653840988).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Master Ambulance (26654611687).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Master Ambulance (26654611707).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Mégane coupé Gendarmerie (41778629975).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Mégane coupé Gendarmerie (42677787401).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Scenic 2 Police (27653798718).jpg
- File:Norev Renault Scenic 2 Police (40630873285).jpg
- File:Norev Subaru Impreza WRX Gendarmerie (41778581625).jpg
- File:Norev Subaru Impreza WRX Gendarmerie (42629388312).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
clpo13(talk) 23:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: I'm not sure we actually care (in practice) about US law in this case because Norev is French. The policy says we care though, but when it comes to FoP we don't care. Commons is happy to host photos of statues from Hong Kong or paintings in public places from China. I'm not sure if we handle toys differently. In this case it's a complete no-brainer though: PD-mark is not a license, the photos have no other reason (like PD-old) to be PD, so
Delete. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC) - In addition, the background is a poster or something. (derivative work) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- I should have made my original rationale clearer. Since these items are considered copyrightable under US law (per COM:TOYS), photographs of them wouldn't be okay on Commons even if the Flickr uploader gave them an appropriate license, such as CC0. This DR was meant to clarify that point in case anyone was going to contact the original uploader and have them fix their Flickr license. clpo13(talk) 15:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Alexis Jazz. These files would also have been deleted because PD-Mark 1.0 is not a license. --Green Giant (talk) 12:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
"Userpage image" not used by any user. E4024 (talk) 11:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please see the TP of this DR also. --E4024 (talk) 12:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Photo of very low quality, no usage, similar photo of much better quality is available, also the source photo from where it's cropped is still available. A.Savin 00:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm the uploader and I don't care. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 14:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Likely copyright violation: the photo was published on https://www.kp.kg/daily/26725.4/3751537/ some months before its upload on Commons and "AO Stroytransgaz" is the credited author of the photo on that page. And also available on many other webpages (see Google search) A.Savin 00:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Most files comes from Jetphotos.com, Airliners.net, Flickr and other sources. No evidence that authors authorized to publish these images under a free license.
- File:T-50TH RTAF.jpg
- File:S-70B Brazilian Navy.jpg
- File:EC 725 Brazilian Navy.jpg
- File:PC-6 Armada Argentina.jpg
- File:T-34C Armada Argentina.jpg
- File:Lynx Mk. 99A RoKN.jpg
- File:AW159 Republic of Korea Navy.jpg
- File:F406 Caravan II Republic of Korea Navy.jpg
- File:RE-3A RSAF.jpg
- File:RE-3A RSAF.webp
- File:RSAF A330 MRTT.jpg
- File:RoKAF A330 MRTT 2.jpg
- File:EC 725 FAM.jpg
- File:Bell 407GX FAM.jpg
- File:Mi-17 FAM.jpg
- File:Mi-8MTV-1 FAM.jpg
- File:Rockwell 690A Turbo Commander FAM.jpg
- File:C-27J FAM.jpg
- File:C-295M FAM2.jpg
- File:PC-9M FAM.jpg
- File:Hermes 450 FAM.jpg
- File:Citation I FAM.jpg
- File:King Air 350i FAM.jpg
- File:Mexican Air Force Embraer EMB-145MP.jpg
- File:Mexican Air Force B 737-800NG.jpg
- File:North Korean Su-25.jpg
- File:North Korean Air Force MiG-29.jpg
- File:North Korean Air Force MiG-21.jpg
- File:RoKAF A330 MRTT.jpg
- File:H-50 FAB.jpg
- File:FAB UH-1H.jpg
- File:Airbus H225M Caracal Força Aérea Brasileira.jpg
- File:Mi-35M FAB.jpg
- File:Harbin Y-12 Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:Challenger 605 Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:Cessna 208B Grand Caravan Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:Cessna 206 Stationair Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:Beechcraft B300 King Air 350 Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:Beech Super King Air 350 Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:MFI-17 Mushshak Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:Sa 316B Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:SA 315B Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:IAR 330L PUMA PAKISTAN ARMY.jpg
- File:Bell 412EP Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:Bell 206 Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:AW139 Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:UH-1 Huey Pak Army.jpg
- File:MI-35M Pakistan.jpg
- File:AH-1zZ Pakistan Army.jpg
- File:G550 CAEW A.M.jpg
- File:Bell 206L-4 Long Ranger IV Bangladesh Air Force.jpg
- File:Nanchang PT-6A BAF.jpg
- File:Yak-130 Bangladesh Air Force.jpg
- File:RAF Grob G-120 TP-A.jpg
- File:RAF T-6C TEXAN II.jpg
- File:Liaoning CV16 PLAN.jpg
- File:TH-57A SeaRanger FAE.jpg
- File:B 737-236 FAE.jpg
- File:Boeing 727-134 FAE.jpg
- File:Falcon 7X FAE.jpg
- File:King Air 350 FAE.jpg
- File:C-295M FAE.jpg
- File:A-150L FAE.jpg
- File:DA20C-1 FAE.jpg
- File:Ecuador Air Force Atlas Cheetah C.jpg
- File:FADSchweizer 333.jpg
- File:FAD OH-58.jpg
- File:Bell UH-1H FAD.jpg
- File:Dominican Republic Air Force Rockwell 690B Turbo Commander.jpg
- File:FAD PA-31-350.jpg
- File:C-212-400 FAD.jpg
- File:FAD T-35 PILLÁN.jpg
- File:Dominican Air Force P2006T.jpg
- File:Schweizer 300C El Salvador - Air - Force.jpg
- File:MD-500 FAS.jpg
- File:B412 FAS.jpg
- File:BT-67 FAS.jpg
- File:IAI Arava 201 Fuerza Aérea Salvadoreña.jpg
- File:T-35A Pillán El Salvador.jpg
- File:Tu-154M China Air Force.jpg
- File:Xian Yunshuji Y7-100C.jpg
- File:PLAAF Il-78.jpg
- File:Chinese Boeing-737 Airborne Command and Control Aircraft (1).jpg
- File:Bombardier Challenger 870 PLAAF.jpg
- File:An-30 PLAAF.jpg
- File:Tupolev-Tu-154MD ELINT.jpg
- File:PLAAF GX 3 Y-8G EW ECM.jpg
- File:Su-35 PLA-AF.jpg
- File:J-16 PLAAF.jpg
- File:China - Air Force Shenyang J-11.jpg
- File:J-7H PLAAF.jpg
- File:ItalianMQ9 081012.jpg
- File:G550 CAEW Aeronautica Militare Italiana.jpg
- File:Congo Mi-35P-Hind.jpg
- File:Congolese Air Force Mi-8T.jpg
- File:Congo Brazzaville CN-235.jpg
- File:Dassault Falcon 7X République du Congo TN-ELS.jpg
- File:JGSDF V-22B.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Helmy oved 04:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Uploader :
- Mumohdunais (talk · contribs)
All uploads from this user are copyvios with "own work" claims. The source for this photo was not found (else it woudl have been deleted with the rest of the copyvios). "Own work" claims from this user can't be trusted. I asked for further permission/informations to be provided via OTRS, but i was told by OTRS member to rather nominate this file for deletion. --Lilyu (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Aude (talk) 02:24, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by De staerke philippe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused files, artworks without obvious educational use
- File:La multiplicités des visages de l'homme (2). 20150314 143044(1) (2).jpg
- File:La fin du mondee.jpg
- File:La multiplicités des visages de l'homme N 2.jpg
- File:La multiplicité des visagees de l'homme N 2.jpg
- File:La multiplicité des visagess de l'homme N 2.jpg
- File:La multiplicité des visages de l'homme 2.jpg
- File:La fin du monde.jpg
- File:-l'apocalypse.jpg
- File:La multiplicité des visages de l'homme N 2.jpg
- File:20150214 144444-l'apocalypse.jpg
- File:20150214 144327-la fin du monde.jpg
- File:20150214 144040-La multiplicité des visages de l'homme N 2.jpg
- File:20150214 144002-La multiplicité des visages de l'homme N 2.jpg
- File:Faite par moi.jpg
- File:Multiplicité des visage de l'homme 2 a l huile et en pointillé sera fini en 2015.jpg
- File:Jésus c'est le partage.jpg
- File:Multiplicité des visages des hommes Le clown.jpg
._20150314_143044(1)_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hindu works of art, and small picture without EXIF data. Unlikely to be own works, no permission.
- File:Nrarsimha01.jpg
- File:Varaha 01.jpg
- File:Kurma01.jpg
- File:Kalki01.jpg
- File:Rama01.jpg
- File:Parshuram01.jpg
- File:Vamama01.jpg
- File:Phat Sopheak.jpg
Yann (talk) 09:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:01 prostate massage.jpg
- File:0 prostate massage.jpg
- File:0 Close up of scotum and anus.jpg
- File:02 naked male buttocks.jpg
- File:0 Close up of male urination.jpg
- File:0 Close up of urinating men.jpg
- File:01 naked male buttocks.jpg
- File:0 Crawling nude men fingering his anus.jpg
- File:0 Crawling nude men spreading buttocks.jpg
- File:01 Male anus.jpg
- File:0 Nude crawling men.jpg
- File:0 Nude standing men at the beach rear view.jpg
- File:0 Nude standing men at the beach front view.jpg
- File:01 Close up of the frenulum of a human penis.jpg
- File:0 Open male ureathrae.jpg
- File:0 Tanned male genitalia.jpg
- File:0 human male urination.jpg
- File:0 Close up of male nipple.jpg
- File:0 Pre-ejaculate between glans and finger.jpg
- File:0 Close up of the frenulum of a human penis.jpg
- File:0 Nude recumbent men with flaccid penis.jpg
- File:Close up of human glans penis.jpg
- File:0 Flaccid penis front view, spread legs.jpg
- File:0 Flaccid penis side view.jpg
- File:0 Flaccid penis front view.jpg
- File:0 Nude male with flaccid penis.jpg
- File:0 Nude recumbent men with erect penis.jpg
- File:Frenulum of a flacid human penis.jpg
- File:0 Glans of the penis.jpg
- File:0 View from below of nude standing male.jpg
- File:0 nude kneeling male.jpg
- File:0 Close up of male anal fingering.jpg
- File:0 Close up of the scrotum of a recumbent male.jpg
- File:0 Sitting nude male with flaccid penis.jpg
- File:0 Scrotum of a recumbent male.jpg
- File:0 Close up of naked male buttocks.jpg
- File:0 Naked male buttocks.jpg
- File:0 Frenulum of the human penis.jpg
- File:0 Sitting nude male with semi-erect penis.jpg
- File:0 Semi-erect penis.jpg
- File:0 Penis head with pre-ejaculate.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/yPJbqgTJqeA2 Gz260 (talk) 11:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/FcU5z1G1QX12 Gz260 (talk) 11:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/7ThVQYXNsm72 Gz260 (talk) 11:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/atdTQhywYuS2 Gz260 (talk) 11:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/KEE4rmv6wVP2 Gz260 (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/FxEVi1VFcBR2 Gz260 (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/ESpM7XpY9Yx And there is a "© 2013 Google" watermark. Gz260 (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/XUiX5YvBwGv Gz260 (talk) 12:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/pSyLg84vs5t Gz260 (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/yodQgSFtYm12 Gz260 (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Neerajyadav6392 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from toys.
- File:Hungry kitty for lego bird (34607285643).jpg
- File:Le Mans Racers of the GTE PRO class (42023580714).jpg
- File:LEGO® CMF Series 13 Habitats (16278019841).jpg
- File:LEGO® Doctor Who No Sir, All 13 (Take Two) (16278020841).jpg
- File:LEGO® Doctor Who TARDIS Console (16313409018).jpg
- File:LEGO® Doctor Who TARDIS Console (16313694350).jpg
- File:LEGO® Doctor Who TARDIS Console (16475143846).jpg
- File:LEGO® Metroid Prime Teaser (16226989100).jpg
- File:LEGO® Micro-birds Are Go! (15949702287).jpg
- File:LEGO® Micro-birds Are Go! (16258677002).jpg
- File:Old Cassette Recorder From Early 80’s MK 232 (26645011869).jpg
- File:Old Cassette Recorder From Early 80’s MK 232 (39423610164).jpg
- File:Patrolling the Mojave (14796763829).jpg
- File:Porsche 70 Year Anniversary Liveries for Le Mans 2018 (41835554955).jpg
- File:Porsche 70 Year Anniversary Liveries for Le Mans 2018 (41835555095).jpg
- File:Rambo lego (34751378453).jpg
- File:Reactive storm (37056597763).jpg
- File:Snake Plissken (35698005835).jpg
- File:Unit 37 - Barricade Transporting Van (24406656278).jpg
- File:Unit 37 - Barricade Transporting Van 2 (38277561991).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16278020841).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment Seems like the majority of images in Category:Lego should be listed as well. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - and for having no license after 7 days. --Jcb (talk) 11:55, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Not clear who the uploader is (but it's not the photographer), also the alterations are probably copyrighted. (not actually failing COM:SCOPE because it could be used for w:Snapchat) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 00:36, 1 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 06:37, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. This looks like old. Yann (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 11:40, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lauwiner Empire
[edit]Images for hoax empire/business/foundation. See discussion at Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/06/Category:Lauwiner Empire for more details. Note the rather strange support for the category in that discussion by brand new commons users, User:Parzival.Knight and User:Alfred.Delmore - Lauwiner Empire . The category was created and editted by anonymous IPs. The images were (all?) uploaded by User:Steve.Hudgens, User:Michael Chabot, User:Alastrina Leftwich. Some of Chabot's images have already been deleted as hoax images here The images are only in use at User:Alfred.Delmore - Lauwiner Empire, and that user as only made edits to his own user page.
- File:"01A Lauwiner Empire Coin 1st. Press LE01 Year 2017.png
- File:"A- Jonas Lauwiner I Emp. Lauwiner Empire Portrait.jpg
- File:Coat of arms of the House of Lauwiner.png
- File:Coat of arms of the Lauwiner Family.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion Flag Desert Sand Combat.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion Flag Olive Green Combat.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion Flag.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion OF-1 Lieutenant.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion OF-10 Field Marshal.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion OF-2 Captain.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion OF-3 Major.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion OF-5 Colonel.png
- File:Lauwiner Empire Legion OF-9 General.png
- File:LE Enterprises & Co. Logo.png
- File:The Flag of Lauwiner Empire.png
Themightyquill (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please note that User:Michael Chabot just deleted his name and two of the files listed from this request without comment. I have since restored them. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:54, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as a hoax per nom and OOS. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax and mis-use of Wikimedia as a free host. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Kathisma (talk) 22:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Uploaded, used and defended by sockpuppets: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Alastrina Leftwich. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:39, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 11:42, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image - I can do the full lotus bitch! Time4ARevolution 05:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
{{Vsk}}, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 06:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete the file and also the last word of the nominator. --E4024 (talk) 14:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Probably not own work. Uploaded for COM:ADVERT purposes for use in en:Draft:Vishalbhai Pandya, since deleted as en:WP:G11, unambiguous advertising or promotion. OOS. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
"The cover of a sales brochure", so © image; no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 02:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Only used on the Russian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in October 2010 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 04:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
사진속 당사자(동생)이 싫어 합니다. 라성민 (talk) 20:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 10:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
사진 저작자 입니다. 사진을 삭제해 해주세요 라성민 (talk) 06:28, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- The closed DR says "I hate the party (brother) in the picture"
- The new DR says "Photo Creator. Please delete photo"
- Am I missing something or is this the uploader? I don't understand why they want to delete this. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:19, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:%EC%82%AD%EC%A0%9C_%EC%A0%95%EC%B1%85&diff=prev&oldid=307441876 maybe you want a {{Personality}} tag on it? I can do that. I can also make the guy go away, probably. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:24, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Please keep COM:OVERWRITE in mind if you do. Storkk (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Storkk: if it's done in a non-noticable way and this is actually what the uploader wants I think it would be within the limits of OVERWRITE as the guy is not the main subject of the photo. In fact, for educational purposes it would probably be better if both people were removed from the photo. But before I proceed, I want to hear from the uploader if this is actually what they want. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- I see it won't matter, the file has indefinite upload protection now. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:57, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Please keep COM:OVERWRITE in mind if you do. Storkk (talk) 09:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment All DR messages (and one image note):
- 사진속 당사자(동생)이 싫어 합니다. (I hate the party (brother) in the picture.)
- 잘못올린 사진입니다 삭제 해주세요 (Please delete the photo is wrong)
- 사진 저작자 입니다. 사진을 삭제해 해주세요 (Photo Creator. Please delete photo)
- 사진삭제 해주세요! (Please delete photos!) (image note that selected most of the photo)
- 사진을 빨리 삭제해 주시기 바랍니다. (Please delete your photos quickly.)
- I'm not deleting my photos! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Uploader requested deletion because uploader's brother, which is the subject of the photograph does not want this photo to be shared online. – Kwj2772 (talk) 16:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Questionable notability, these looks like violating COM:ADVERT.
Yann (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Philippe Samyn (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mathematic formulas. Should render with the Math extension if useful.
- File:Fig--4--FR.jpg
- File:Fig--5--FR.jpg
- File:Fig--3--FR.jpg
- File:Fig--6--EN.jpg
- File:Fig--5--EN.jpg
- File:Fig--4--EN.jpg
- File:Fig--3--EN.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted the globally replaced ones, but kept those still in use. --Storkk (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adarsh(ideal) Kushwaha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Kushwaha.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ies (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romário Dantas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grafikmusic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Rogers Endorsement Letter for James "Jimmy" Johnson.jpg
- File:James "Jimmy" Johnson Action Shot 2.jpg
- File:James "Jimmy" Johnson With Sy Oliver.jpg
- File:James "Jimmy" Johnson at the Apollo Theatre.jpg
- File:Duke Ellington Newport Jazz Festival Pamphlet Snipping.jpg
- File:James "Jimmy" Johnson Action Shot.jpg
- File:Jimmy Johnson With Al Sully.jpg
- File:Jimmy Johnson Trio Newspaper Ad.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zachkaihan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used.
- File:Kaihan Jacket0689-Edit.jpg
- File:Kaihan-krippendorff-leading-strategy-speaker-headshot.jpg
- File:Kaihan headshot2-0809.jpg
- File:Kaihan Speaking.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:54, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:55, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Scanning of an Israeli newspaper article. Clearly, a copyrights violation that has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 14:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, proper licence needed if it's free. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:55, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahrukh javed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Dr.AamirJaved.jpg
- File:Shahrukhjaved.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed10.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed2.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed 9.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed 8.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed 7.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed 6.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed 5.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed 4.jpg
- File:Click by shahrkh.jpg
- File:Shahrukh javed 3.jpg
- File:TJIT LOGO.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused personal images. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
False date, https://www.facebook.com/AlbertoStefaniCameraDeputati/photos/a.1256014481164987.1073741825.1256014324498336/1256085931157842/?type=1&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission needed if the uploader has the rights. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Private picture. Out of project scope. Not used. Schlurcher (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Private picture. Out of project scope. Not used. Schlurcher (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Moraine Lake
[edit]Unused private photos of non-notable person. Out of project scope. Many other useful photos present in this category
- File:By ovedc & anat - Moraine Lake - 01.jpg
- File:By ovedc & anat - Moraine Lake - 02.jpg
- File:By ovedc & anat - Moraine Lake - 22.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Moraine Lake - 09.jpg
- File:By ovedc - Moraine Lake - 10.jpg
George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:59, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Surendr tarai (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope personal images
- File:Surya edit34.jpg
- File:Surya edit.png
- File:Suriya edit.jpg
- File:Suriya samir.jpg
- File:Surendra tarai.jpg
Perumalism (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictional maps of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]All fictional and personal test maps, some are used in a personal sandbox as a test. No educational value, out of scope.
- File:Nova Scotia Election 2017 Results Map (Test Map Only).png
- File:Liberalsurge.png
- File:Scandal2030.png
- File:Scandal2026.png
- File:MapofCanadainbahamas.png
- File:1990vs2014.png
- File:Mayor2014.png
- File:Testmapcanada2010.png
- File:YukonLiberal.png
- File:Greenparty2019.png
- File:Northern Territory in Canada.png
- File:Canada2019.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ocean912345 (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Fictional test maps, no educational value, out of scope. Some only used on a personal sandbox.
- File:Election 2011.svg
- File:Albertamap2015.svg
- File:Quebec general election 2018 (test map).svg
- File:Canada 2023.svg
- File:Canada 2019.svg
- File:Election 2014.svg
- File:2015UKElectionMap (Alternate).svg
- File:Canada 1997 Federal Election (NDP Surge).svg
- File:Turkish National Assembly (TEST PURPOSES ONLY).svg
- File:ElectoralCollege2012-2.svg
- File:2014 Quebec (TEST MAP).svg
- File:Cambodia General Election, 2013 copy.png
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
All sandboxes were deleted, images are now unused. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in December 2017 via deletion discussion. Out of proejct scope. ℯxplicit 04:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:00, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in February 2018 via proposed deletion. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 04:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
because I did a mistake. I am not the author of this picture. Sorry Lu Brito (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal photo with intent to promote a service Gikü (talk) 06:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
i do not need this file Ramyareddy24 (talk) 07:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, we don't need it either. Look, when you upload a file here, in a reasonable time you can ask for it to be removed, and for that reason I imagine it will be removed. However, "i do not need" is not a deletion reason, FYI. When something is on Commons, it is the Commons community which decides if "we" need it or not; this is why we have these discussions. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 07:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per E4024. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:00, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
it was an mistake and it is not our file Ramyareddy24 (talk) 07:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: (deleted file this was about). --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/AFKfW7SsgzE2 Gz260 (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/C1jMvk36DGP2 Gz260 (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
File:We are talking to Eric Trump, son of GOP candidate Donald Trump. Join us LIVE at http ift.tt 1NtUC1A (24776573092).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Postcard, not uploader's own work. Ubcule (talk) 13:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
We don't need this version and the original File:Oxygen480-mimetypes-application-rtf.svg. If the text needs to be darker, then do it at the original location. The original location text seems too light, and this text seems too dark. Compare http://www.iconarchive.com/show/oxygen-icons-by-oxygen-icons.org/Mimetypes-application-rtf-icon.html Glrx (talk) 21:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- No, the original is part of the Category:Oxygen icons set. I don't think we should make any visible changes to those icons. (other than fixing errors) It is a bit dark, but it can be adjusted. (this is a rather strange way to make such a request though) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:51, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- What purpose is there in making an Oxygen icon that is not similar to the original icon? Commons does not need slightly different versions of synthetic icons. Glrx (talk) 22:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- It was (kind of) requested by @JoKalliauer: "How could you get the text visible in this svg? Maybe you could help me a bit?" - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- I've uploaded a more subtle version. Looking at the PNG from KDE I'm starting to think the text is maybe supposed to represent the imprint of the text that was written on the other side of the paper. This alternate version is made to show the text on the page that is viewed. Some users may prefer that and I see no real reason why that wouldn't be allowed. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- What purpose is there in making an Oxygen icon that is not similar to the original icon? Commons does not need slightly different versions of synthetic icons. Glrx (talk) 22:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Google Street View https://goo.gl/maps/fgNW3xypprz Gz260 (talk) 13:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 16:21, 30 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image http://www.leparisien.fr/ablis-78660/il-va-falloir-lever-le-pied-sur-l-a12-et-la-n-10-03-07-2016-5936821.php (© Le Parisien) Gz260 (talk) 13:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 16:21, 30 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjCpvo8MPno https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IjCpvo8MPno/maxresdefault.jpg Gz260 (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 16:21, 30 Juli 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Snapchat filters are copyrighted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:51, 1 August 2018 UTC: In category Media_without_a_source_as_of_23_July_2018; no permission --Krdbot 06:23, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
This is an official logo of a political youth group and probably copyrighted. Unlikely to be "own work" of the uploader. kyykaarme (talk) 07:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:47, 3 August 2018 UTC: That is true, this is a logo of a political youth group and copyrighted. It is not my own work as I mistakenly marked when uploading. I am a new user of Wikimedia Commons and I am having trouble with finding where to delete this file - would anyone be able to help me out how to delete this? --Krdbot 00:22, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Promotional picture used only user page (which I have deleted). Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 19:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Picture of non-notable person not used anywhere. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 19:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
_--_from_SA_Liberal_Party_transport_policy_2018.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_--_from_SA_Liberal_Party_transport_policy_2018.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image was prepared by a political party for an election. It is equivalent to maps prepared by government agencies, which would automatically be licensed as CC BY 4.0 international (Australian government policy). However, 6 attempts to get a response addressed to the Liberal Party have gone unanswered. I have therefore done my own artwork, which is now uploaded as "Adelaide's tram routes 2018.png". Since approval of this image seems unlikely I request that it be deleted. SCHolar44 (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:06, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bodvar Antonio Gregersen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and newspaper. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:El TelegrafoDelHomenajeGenMorales.pdf
Probably keep See below, 1901 newspaper. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC) - File:Colonel Juan Francisco Morales Llerena.jpg
- File:Gen. Juan F. Morales Llerena.jpg
- File:General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Historical books and document. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:LBNCCE-Alfaro-2313-PUBCOM (1).pdf Keep Properly licensed now. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:Gatazo.pdf.pdf Probably keep See below. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- File:GeneralMoralesLlerenaProclamationTo General.jpg Keep Extracted from File:LBNCCE-Alfaro-2313-PUBCOM (1).pdf - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and PCP unless the deficiencies are corrected so that we may properly determine copyright status. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- N.B. User:Bodvar Antonio Gregersen and COM:HD#My images are nominated for deletion also appear to concern these files. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Probably keep File:El TelegrafoDelHomenajeGenMorales.pdf as it is a newspaper from 1901. I added some information, it only needs a license for Ecuador now. (PD-1923 also applies) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- "Art. 81. – Where the holder of rights in a work from the time of creation of the work is a legal person, the period of protection shall be 70 years from the making, disclosure or publication of the work, whichever is the later."
- I can't remember the template for that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: can we take a closer look at this? This is all so old it's more likely to be than not be PD. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment File:Gatazo.pdf.pdf pages from appendix III from 1976 book by Elías Muñoz Vicuña Hathitrust Google books, "Parte oficial de la batalla de gatazo". Seemingly written/signed by Juan Francisco Morales who died in 1901. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment More info can perhaps be found at w:es:Usuario:Bodvar Antonio Gregersen/Taller. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment For the photo and painting, is there any hope we could ever figure out who made those? Could we consider them to be anonymous? (anonymous works from Ecuador also expire 70 years after creation) If not, considering they are roughly 120 years old (at least), I think we need to put some "Undelete in.." category on this before deleting it. I don't know how we determine that. Is this what {{PD-old-assumed}} is for? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Yes, we could consider them to be anonymous and this is what {{PD-old-assumed}} is for. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:45, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: looks like license issues have been resolved, images are old enough. See also Commons:Help desk/Archive/2018/06#My images are nominated for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bodvar Antonio Gregersen (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Historical book pages. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Mensaje del Presidente about GenMoralesPagina274.pdf
- File:Mensaje del Presidente about GenMoralesPagina275.pdf
- File:Mensaje del Presidente about GenMoralesPagina276.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
{{Vd}} per nom, PRP. Opinions on the previous section welcome. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:41, 3 August 2018 (UTC)- @EugeneZelenko and Jeff G.: Probably keep, appears to be a letter from Eloy Alfaro. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:34, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Alexis at 17:34 above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure why @Bodvar Antonio Gregersen: didn't reply here:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexis_Jazz&diff=853565892&oldid=853181069 :
- "The above three files were taken from the book entitled "Recopilation De Mensajes Dirijidos Por Los Presidentes Y Vicepresidentes De La Republica: Jefes Supremos Y Gobiernos Provisorios A Las Convenciones Y Congresos Nacionales Desde El Ano De 1819 Hasta Nuestro Dias, Volumes 4-5... This book was published in 1901. Hence by U.S. and Ecuadorean copyright law, the book is out of copyright protection.
- As to the images of Juan Francisco Morales Llerena, those photos were made no later than 1901 because he died in 1901. That means that the files of General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena are not protected by U.S. and Ecuadorean copyright Ecuadorean copyright protection ends 70 years after the copyright's holder's death."
- - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:42, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Restored: per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-10#File:Mensaje del Presidente about GenMoralesPagina276.pdf. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bodvar Antonio Gregersen (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Who is author of cover?
- File:La Illustraction Militar de Gen.Juan Francisco Morales Llerena.pdf
- File:La Illustraction Militar de Gen.Juan Francisco Morales.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- I don't know, but this completely unrelated book uses the same cover image. Need to remove the first page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Done - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep now that the cover is gone. @P199: I see no evidence you deleted the files in the second section; please conform your words to your deeds. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: They did. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
Private holiday snapshot. Not depiicting person or item of encyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Yes but we don't have so much pictures of this artwork. --Sanandros (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Private holiday snapshot. Not depiicting person or item of encyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Yes but we don't have so much pictures of this artwork. --Sanandros (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader not a credible owner - other high quality studio images of famous people GreenC (talk) 01:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader not a credible owner - other high quality studio images of famous people GreenC (talk) 01:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader not a credible owner - other high quality studio images of famous people GreenC (talk) 01:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio of The Hunger Games. --Majora (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader not a credible owner - other high quality studio images of famous people GreenC (talk) 01:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader not a credible owner - other high quality studio images of famous people GreenC (talk) 01:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Uploader not a credible owner - other high quality studio images of famous people GreenC (talk) 01:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Mögliche Urheberechtsvetzung, siehe Metadaten; keine Freigabe - Possible copyright, see metadata; no release Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete eine juristische Person kenn kein Urheber sein. --Ralf Roleček 10:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Mögliche Urheberechtsvetzung, siehe Metadaten; keine Freigabe - Possible copyright, see metadata; no release Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete eine juristische Person kenn kein Urheber sein. --Ralf Roleček 10:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
[3] many matches on the net, pattern new user - single upload, unlikely to be own work Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope, because text is too small to be readable. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete All other uploads have similar issues. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no such thumbnails please. --Zaccarias (talk) 18:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not required 94.196.189.39 11:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 03:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image https://routes.wikia.com/wiki/Fichier:A13a_autoroute.jpg (see the licence) Gz260 (talk) 13:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by another. --Majora (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image https://actu.fr/ile-de-france/plaisir_78490/plaisir-rd-30-mise-service-dans-totalite-ce-mercredi_15803129.html (©78actu.fr) Gz260 (talk) 13:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by another. --Majora (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
File:East From Tunis - a record of travels on the North Coast of Africa.- Richard Carrington (6241468733).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obviously not own work as claimed. Ubcule (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Flickrwashing. --Majora (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Bogus license. Author died in 1991, not PD-old. No permission. Jcb (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:09, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
No use, Out of scope Ronhjones (Talk) 16:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of the scope: cram school advertisments. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 21:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of the scope: cram school advertisments. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 21:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of the scope: cram school advertisments. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 21:47, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of the scope: cram school advertisments. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 21:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 21:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 21:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, keine Freigabe durch Urheber erteilt bzw. im OTRS gemeldet - Copyright infringement, no release by author or reported to OTRS Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
RIC EVANS/SWANSON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2018-05/uop-crs053018.php Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - clear copyvio Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
This image, a logo of an Israeli college, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 23:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Source file was deleted for copyrights violations. Perumalism (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:01, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ชนิตา พงษ์เจริญกิจ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 14:37, 20 June 2018 (UTC) + out of COM:SCOPE (https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%9E%E0%B9%8C%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%81_%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%81%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B8%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%A1%E0%B9%83%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%8D%E0%B9%88). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ชนิตา พงษ์เจริญกิจ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 13:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Much of this is text, with no creative input; but the logo appears sufficiently complex to deserve protection. The "own work" claim is clearly spurious. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+maybe out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted logo still in use Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
{{FoP-Ireland}} probably doesn't apply to 2D artwork. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- The use of the term "probably" here is troubling. It is opinion rather than evidence. We have the text of the law to answer the question. O'Dea (talk) 16:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment previously discussed at w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 17#File:Castle sign small.jpg
- Courtesy ping User:O'Dea who opined for keep in that discussion. It is my belief that FOP doesn't apply to 2D works in Ireland, since artistic craftsmanship was always a very specific term referring to 3D works in UK law and other countries based upon it. Since Ireland's law is based on the UK's, I think we should defer to UK's interpretation unless we can refer to a ruling by an official body that states otherwise. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In this area, Irish and UK legislation seem to be identical. Paintings are explicitly treated as a distinct category from works of artistic craftsmanship in section 2 of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000 (under the definition of "artistic work"). FoP only applies to the latter. --bjh21 (talk) 11:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Britain and Ireland are distinct countries with distinct laws. The basis of Irish law was heavily defined during a long British occupation, but has been developed by the Dáil since Independence. There are similarities and differences, but reliance on British law as a guide to Irish questions is a dubious procedure, and introduces guesswork instead of citation of actual Irish law (evidence). O'Dea (talk) 16:16, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It is exasperating that this has raised its head again. The FOP language is very simple and very clear on this point: "Irish copyright law permits photographers to take pictures of sculptures, buildings, and works of artistic craftsmanship that are permanently located in a public place or premises open to the public, and to publish such pictures in any way." (My italics.) O'Dea (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I quote, below, the relevant sections of the Copyright and Related Rights Act, 2000:
- Section 2 of the Act defines artistic work as "photographs, paintings, drawings, diagrams, maps, charts, plans, engravings, etchings, lithographs, woodcuts, prints or similar works, collages or sculptures, works of architecture, being either buildings or models for buildings, and works of artistic craftsmanship." [My emphasis]
- Section 93 states that for "works of artistic craftsmanship, where permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public" the "copyright in a work to which this section applies is not infringed by ... making a photograph or film of it." [My emphasis]
- Thus, the photograph of the sign does not infringe any copyright. This is Irish "Freedom of Panorama". O'Dea (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- @O'Dea: I will respond to you the same thing I did last time: your first sentence describes artistic work, of which works of artistic craftsmanship and paintings are two different subsets. It never says the latter is a subset of the former. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thus, the photograph of the sign does not infringe any copyright. This is Irish "Freedom of Panorama". O'Dea (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Your comment is unclear and confusing because of ambiguity or missing punctuation. I cannot be sure which, since I do not know what you intended to mean. In any case, the Act permits the photography of both artistic craftsmanship and paintings displayed in public places. I do not understand how any question arises about this. O'Dea (talk) 23:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @O'Dea: I added the missing word, and hopefully this clarifies my statement. To reiterate: section 93 (FOP) seems to apply only to works of artistic craftsmanship. Section 2 in fact lists works of craftsmanship separately to paintings, which implies the two are different. This jives with historic common law practice which holds that craftsmanship only applies to 3D works. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
- Your comment is unclear and confusing because of ambiguity or missing punctuation. I cannot be sure which, since I do not know what you intended to mean. In any case, the Act permits the photography of both artistic craftsmanship and paintings displayed in public places. I do not understand how any question arises about this. O'Dea (talk) 23:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre:The question of how to define this sign may be beyond the scope of Wikimedia to decide, as it is a matter for Irish legislators and experienced Irish lawyers. Wikimedia contributors are neither.
- The sign does not truly count as art, as normally understood, since it has no higher aesthetic content or purpose, but is merely informational. It is a work of craftsmanship because a castle and cross are, rather simply, depicted, but without any serious artistic or aesthetic merit or intent. It would be amazing if the creator claimed it to be art, as normally understood. It would also be surprising if the creator of the sign ever considered copyright for a mere commercial sign, created to provide directions and information.
- Nor is the sign adequately defined as a painting, since most of it is text, with two sketches, almost, of a castle and cross. The sign signals to motorists "This way to the castle, and here is a list of facilities there." It is more list than painting, if you study it.
- You argue that craftsmanship and paintings are two subsets of artistic work, but I do not see that the wording of the Act prohibits photography of paintings in a public place. I am not persuaded by reference to "historic common law practice" since this resembles arguments I have seen about Irish FoP that attempt to say that when a matter is unclear, we may refer to British law, an invalid, sweeping assumption. All we can legitimately do is read the wording of the relevant Irish Act, and remain within the wording of the Act, without invoking Wikimedians' presumptions or guesswork outside of current Irish law.
- Further, I have not seen anywhere in the Act an explicit and unambiguous prohibition of photography of artwork, howsoever defined – paintings, signs, works of artisitic craftsmanship (highly ambiguous term) – that are displayed in a public place. The key to the legislative intent, as I read it, is to permit photgraphy of a wide variety of items that are displayed in public — precisely because they are in public, which removes copyright protection. The legislative thinking appears to be be that if a thing is displayed in public, particularly the outdoors, the creator surrenders some control (photography of the work) and, further, that it would be impossible as well as unreasonable to prevent or police photography of items in a public place. O'Dea (talk) 06:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment In answer to points above. In section 2 when the Irish law want to talk about "drawing" they says "drawing", for "map" they says "map", ect, ect...... And when they talk about artistic works on public display, they clearly and explicitly says "buildings", sculptures, ..works of artistic craftsmanship", and in no way about potential 2D works they themselves consider to be clearly defined, described and potentially subject to protection (see list at section 2). Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per my comment above, there is clearly no execption to the copyright protection for this kind of "artistic works". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Footage by LeakSource and not RT SecretName101 (talk) 02:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Split and delete the previous file which involves two identifiable youngsters, who are not public personalities. E4024 (talk) 06:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: anyway not really an active user, personal image : out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I cannot see the scope. Chapulines? What are they? E4024 (talk) 08:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
![08:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/21#c-E4024-2018-06-21T08:53:00.000Z-File:"She_Told_Me_Chapulines_Were_Tasty"_(17078409787).jpg){kind=link}
- We have a Category:Chapulines, but whatever in the "cucurucho" is, I cannot device. --E4024 (talk) 08:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep grasshoppers --Fæ (talk) 09:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Well, the only one of them I know is El Chapulín Colorado; who has made me laugh for many years now. I will add the cat (which I found a minute late) for you. Best. --E4024 (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope as quality does not allow us to see what is in bag.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:03, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: weak keep as per above, but still a bit informative about one of the ways this is consummated. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
![17:09, 20 October 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/21#c-Christian_Ferrer-2018-10-20T17:09:00.000Z-File:"She_Told_Me_Chapulines_Were_Tasty"_(17078409787).jpg){kind=link}
- also file:Tanya Drouginska.jpg (found at https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/tanya-drouginska?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=tanya%20drouginska)
Small photos without camera data, uploader is twice blocked for copyvios. I suspect copyright violation again. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Olivier LPB as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo, no proof of public domain.
- Keep {{PD-textlogo}} Yann (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: if there was just the text ok, but the form around is not compatible for me Olivier LPB (talk) 11:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Olivier, the form around is not ok IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:"fotki.yandex.ru" insource:"Ghirlandajo"
[edit]There were all uploaded to ruwiki by the same person and then to Commons and as far as I can tell there is no evidence whatsoever that these were ever under a compatible license. I don't even see any copyright license on any of these source pages. Unless I am missing something, which is completely possible.
- File:Усадьба Вороново.jpg
- File:Nadezhdino Ruins.jpg
- File:Volynshchina.jpg
- File:Polivanovo Church.jpg
- File:Никольское-Гагарино.jpg
- File:Бынево-Михайловское.jpg
- File:Герб Долгоруковых.jpg
- File:Vvedenskoye Church.jpg
- File:Мамонова дача.jpg
- File:Prozorovskoye.jpeg
- File:Valuevo House.jpg
- File:Ershovo Winter.jpg
- File:Сабурова дача.jpg
- File:Усадьба Смоленское.jpg
- File:Ельцы.jpg
- File:Валуево.jpg
- File:Поливаново.jpg
- File:Vvedenskoye House.jpg
- File:Glinki Bruce.jpg
- File:Усадьба Знаменское-Садки.jpg
- File:Pokhvisnev House.jpg
- File:Воробьёво.jpg
- File:Ostashevo Tower.jpg
- File:Никольское-Обольяново.jpg
Majora (talk) 23:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Приветствую, Majora! Эти файлы висели на Википедии, как свободные, их загрузил в неё участник w:ru:Ghirlandajo (talk | contribs) 3.08.2013. Стало быть, он каким-то образом смог добиться разрешения от автора данных файлов. Подобных файлов он загрузил туда, как видите, множество, и у них была такая же лицензия и все они там числились, как свободные! А я просто перенёс на Викисклад, руководствуясь правилами, что Википедия — НЕ ГАЛЕРЕЯ, НЕ ХОСТИНГ И НЕ АРХИВ. Ваш Monoklon!! (Для заметок/Касса) 23:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sorry Monoklon, but I don't speak Russian so I hope you can translate this somehow. It looks like they were improperly uploaded to ruwiki without any evidence that they were actually under a free license. It was just that no one caught them until you transferred them over here. We would need proof that they are under the license stated or a different free license. Without that there is really nothing we can do. Sorry. --Majora (talk) 01:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Majora says we need clear evidence of permission and I can't see any mention of a license anywhere either. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yandex-photos, like Panoramio, are now closed. Therefore, the photos moved to the Yandex-disk. I will assume that during the move the comments were removed, in which permission was given for free use of photographs (see the link "переписка" in the field "Author"). Also ping @Ghirlandajo: . --Insider (talk) 05:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for providing a correct summary of the situation. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- I looked at both of those links in the author field, Insider and I didn't see anything there. I even looked through archives of those pages. I found nothing. I'm not saying that they were never under an acceptable license but there is no way to actually prove that. Without proof I don't see how we can keep these. We can't really assume that the upload to ruwiki was correct in the first place. --Majora (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Majora, Leoboudv, then all these downloads are to be deleted from the Wikimedia Commons! Delete Ваш Monoklon!! (Для заметок/Касса) 23:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- I don't understand why I have the notification about possible deletion File:Воробьёво.jpg. It's not my foto and I have nothing to say about it. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 11:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- You were the one who transferred it to Commons. Therefore, you get the notification. That is how the mass deletion script works. --Majora (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Ah! Now I see. Sorry for not to pay much attention to the possible copyright problems of this foto. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
- Поддерживаю удаление с Викисклада. Очередной пример того, как бездумные улучшайзеры уничтожают контент (видимо, полагая, что после 300 000 правок я не в состоянии понять, что нужно грузить на склад, а что не нужно). --Ghirlandajo (talk) 19:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Краткий экскурс для неофитов. Перед тем как создавать статьи об указанных усадьбах я специально открыл обсуждение на общем форуме на предмет того, насколько допустимо загружать отдельные файлы при наличии согласия их автора (со ссылкой на текст соответствующей лицензии), данного на общедоступном ресурсе fotki.yandex.ru. Если бы не было соответствующего консенсуса, статьи попросту не были бы мною созданы. При загрузке специально просил ничего не перегружать на Викисклад, где такие вещи удаляются безголовыми ботами. В этом году яндекс убил обсуждение фотографий и перезалил файлы на какой-то левый ресурс. Потом улучшайзеры убили локальные файлы, не позаботившись даже поставить меня в известность. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Категорически не согласен с такой постановкой вопроса! Выступаю на стороне Ghirlandajo! Именно так и было, как он и пишет. Совершенно не согласен с тем, кто выступил на стороне, требующих изъять эти фото из Википедии. У Ghirlandajo были все документы от авторов фото на тот момент, которые ему позволяли их фото размещать в Википедии. Это произвол!!!! Вы что творите, господа????
- Краткий экскурс для неофитов. Перед тем как создавать статьи об указанных усадьбах я специально открыл обсуждение на общем форуме на предмет того, насколько допустимо загружать отдельные файлы при наличии согласия их автора (со ссылкой на текст соответствующей лицензии), данного на общедоступном ресурсе fotki.yandex.ru. Если бы не было соответствующего консенсуса, статьи попросту не были бы мною созданы. При загрузке специально просил ничего не перегружать на Викисклад, где такие вещи удаляются безголовыми ботами. В этом году яндекс убил обсуждение фотографий и перезалил файлы на какой-то левый ресурс. Потом улучшайзеры убили локальные файлы, не позаботившись даже поставить меня в известность. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Немедленно оставить!!!! C.caramba2010 (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Вот Екатерина Борисова, объясните мне, пожалуйста, чем вы руководствовались, перенося фото, например, File:Воробьёво.jpg? Я немного не в теме, но приблизительно представляю, о чём идёт речь, поскольку многие мои! фото были изъяты из Википедии. И самое главное: где документы, подтверждающие разрешение авторов фото Ghirlandajo размещать их в Википедии? Куда они пропали? И ещё: у меня таких статей немало, в которые входят иллюстрации фото Ghirlandajo с разрешения их авторов. Что прикажете с этим делать? Висяком висят уже более года. Все попытки откатить такие фото назад ни к чему не привели. Ваши предложения выхода из такого неприятного положения? C.caramba2010 (talk) 20:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Дружище Ghirlandajo, я не знаю, что делать в этой конкретной ситуации. Предлагайте выход. Это нужно технически сделать, даже не представляю, что нужно сделать. C.caramba2010 (talk) 06:20, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Скоро буду в Ярославле на машине старшего. Немного недоехали от Москвы до Ярославля-остановились в Переславле-Залесском. Там приняли участие в форуме "Александрова гора". Извините. — Preceding unsigned comment added by C.caramba2010 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Да, спасибо. Это писал я. На выходных ничего не выйдет, нужно младшего забрать из Президентского полка, где он служил. Брат поедет за ним на машине. C.caramba2010 (talk) 07:15, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ghirlandajo, не знаю что делать. Принимайте решение самостоятельно. Фотки очень хорошие, жаль их потерять. C.caramba2010 (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: the author's permissions are not available now. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:21, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image, self promo only Migebert (talk) 13:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, COM:SCOPE ? Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Found at https://twitter.com/HectorSulaimanS/status/1008795074715500544 Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richardvallance (talk · contribs)
[edit]Journals. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Mycenaean Linear B Rosetta Stone for Lin.pdf
- File:APN Volume 11 Richard Valance Janke.pdf
- File:Volume 10 - RICHARD VALLANCE JANKE.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work as claimed. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions at OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
The information of this picture is included in CLR Fig 1.jpg Mdkbbsluanxieweiji (talk) 19:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Extracted images are fine and potentially useful. --Majora (talk) 02:19, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The information of this figure is included in CLR Fig 3.png Mdkbbsluanxieweiji (talk) 19:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Extracted images are fine and potentially useful. --Majora (talk) 02:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The information of this figure is included in CLR Fig 3.png Mdkbbsluanxieweiji (talk) 19:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Extracted images are fine and potentially useful. --Majora (talk) 02:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
This image was created after June 4, 2017 on unsplash and is not free due to unsplash's change of license. Leoboudv (talk) 20:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
This image was uploaded on unsplash after June 4, 2017 and is not PD due to unsplash's change of license. Leoboudv (talk) 20:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
The file is a PDF file of various links of the uploader's photos and poems, which is probably a violation of COM:WEBHOST. The photos may be separately uploaded to Commons. 廣九直通車 (talk) 11:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. --Majora (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I think we've got several of this image; although this and another one seem to have a sky "lighter" in blue. Can someone kindly check the files in the cat and help the closing admin to delete the worst image, please? E4024 (talk) 12:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. You gave no reason to delete this image. Starting a DR to ask to look at the entire category for one image to delete is not really a good use of our time. --Majora (talk) 17:05, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Superceded by File:Window_function_and_frequency_response_-_Bartlett-Hann.svg. and a name is misspelled in the filename. The svg version has larger font and better frequency resolution. There are no links to this file. Bob K (talk) 12:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No source, Copyright © Eichendorffschule Kelkheim, https://www.eichendorffschule.net/Schule/Schulprofil/Schulprofil-E11801.htm Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Die Datei wurde von der Schulleitung und dem Fotografen (der ehemalige Schulleiter der gleichen Schule) für Wikimedia Commons unter den genannten Lizenzbedingungen freigegeben. Bearbeiter: Rappenfelsen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rappenfelsen (talk • contribs) 10:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Rappenfelsen: This image has appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here. Commons policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Das Bild war bereits veröffentlicht vor dem Hochladen auf Wikimedia Commons auf der Website der Eichendorffschule (Kelkheim) Ouelle: https://www.eichendorffschule.net/Schule/Schulprofil/Schulprofil-K263.htm Der Fotograf Horst Ackermann hat die entsprechende Freigabe für Wikimedia Commons erteilt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rappenfelsen (talk • contribs) 17:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. I'm sorry but we need proof. Please see COM:OTRS/de for more information on how to get the image restored. --Majora (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fernando César Pessoa Duarte (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational ourpose: out of project scope.
- File:My face with brown eyes.jpg
- File:My face with brown eyes 3.jpg
- File:My face with brown eyes 2.jpg
- File:My face with brown eyes 1.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Let's do it, Mr. Administrator. Delete the files uploaded by Fernando César Pessoa Duarte (talk · contribs) selected by you above. No problem. I would have done it myself if I had known how. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.54.208.4 (talk) 15:05, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 17:16, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
perché è un doppione da me introdotto per errore Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 10:37, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate of File:2015VisureAcatastaliaTorpignattara24marzo07.jpg. --Majora (talk) 03:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 1972. [4] Y.haruo (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Support. No FoP in Japan.--そらみみ (talk) 11:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 1985. [5] Y.haruo (talk) 14:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
![[5]](http://livedoor.blogimg.jp/s_yossy/imgs/a/9/a9ad0744.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, according to Iwakuni city hall, This sculpture was erected in 1981. Y.haruo (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Alba Pacheco Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
File:"Magnetic Fields", Do Not Exist! Electric Force, is the Only Force in the Electric Universe!.webm
[edit]The immediate source of this video does have a CC BY 3.0 license as the uploader claimed, but according to its description, it was mirrored from this one, which uses the non-free Standard YouTube License and is incompatible with Wikimedia Commons. clpo13(talk) 21:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Superceded by File:Window_function_(blackman-nuttall).png. and a name is misspelled in the filename. The newer version has larger font and better frequency resolution. There are no links to this file. Bob K (talk) 13:32, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Will recreate as a redirect just in case it is in use somewhere external. --Majora (talk) 01:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickrwashing- wrongly licensed and not Flickr user's own work to license as CC in the first place. No clear evidence showing either if or why these images might be free on any other basis. (#) Part of an album which states "*These photos were given to me as a train-obsessed 3-year old in Lancashire. They appear to be original photographs with a few brief notes on the back. If they have been published I will take them down. They were given to my father by a work contact (I think) and date from the mid-late 1950s.*" Ubcule (talk) 13:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Similar to https://fr.azvision.az/news/58948/giuseppe-conte-nomm%C3%A9-premier-ministre-italien.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
File:James Riviere, Razionale Jewel for Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican Museums, 2007, Vatican State.png
[edit]
They look much a copyright violation: no exif data, relatively low resolution, used only in articles of the pt.wikipedia created by suspicious IP's that created a bunch of poorly written articles of themes of much doubtful relevance that don't exist in any other wikis. Stego (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - http://www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/Default.htm?http%3A//www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/artista.htm. --Majora (talk) 02:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
And also:
- File:James Riviere historical poster of Jewels Design Exhibitions at The Louvre Museum, Paris, 2004-2013, designerd by James Riviere.jpg
- File:James Riviere, Razionale Jewel for Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican Museums, Vatican, 2007, Vatican State.png
- File:James Riviere, Razionale Jewel for Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican Museums, 2007, Vatican State.png
They look much a copyright violation: no exif data, relatively low resolution, used only in articles of the pt.wikipedia created by suspicious IP's that created a bunch of poorly written articles of themes of much doubtful relevance that don't exist in any other wikis. Stego (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - http://www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/Default.htm?http%3A//www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/artista.htm. --Majora (talk) 02:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
File:James Riviere, Razionale Jewel for Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican Museums, 2007, Vatican State.png
[edit]They look much a copyright violation: no exif data, relatively low resolution, used only in articles of the pt.wikipedia created by suspicious IP's that created a bunch of poorly written articles of themes of much doubtful relevance that don't exist in any other wikis. Stego (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - http://www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/Default.htm?http%3A//www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/artista.htm. --Majora (talk) 02:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
File:James Riviere, Razionale Jewel for Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican Museums, 2007, Vatican State.png
[edit]They look much a copyright violation: no exif data, relatively low resolution, used only in articles of the pt.wikipedia created by suspicious IP's that created a bunch of poorly written articles of themes of much doubtful relevance that don't exist in any other wikis. Stego (talk) 23:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio - http://www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/Default.htm?http%3A//www.jamesriviere.it/webENG/artista.htm. --Majora (talk) 02:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
EXIF says FBMD, meaning taken from Facebook. Latest version should be deleted and original should be restored Ytoyoda (talk) 13:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Turns out this version is from Facebook as well. Sorry for the repeat DR. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : small-sized upload, unusual view, missing EXIF data to verify claimed own work, hence, potentially copyright issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 19:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Potential copyright issues indeed. --Majora (talk) 21:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
low quality image Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused, much better images available (File:Zdeněk Klauda.jpg). --Majora (talk) 21:54, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
This image was created after June 4, 2017 on Unsplash and is not free. Leoboudv (talk) 20:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: Unsplash changed their license on that day. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:54, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo or personality rights issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. --Majora (talk) 21:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. A reproduction of a catalogue created by an organization. Darklanlan (talk) 11:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The same material appears on other pages. [6] [7] [8] Darklanlan (talk) 03:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 22:18, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Cadburys - Official treat provider, 2012 Olympic games - rear advert no 8 bus LX04 FWU, Bow E3. (7706043578).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photograph of presumed-copyrighted artwork, clearly the raison d'etre for this photograph. I can't say 100% for sure, but I'd assume this is a copyvio in either or both the UK or the US. Ubcule (talk) 13:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – You presume too much to describe it as a "raison d'etre" motive. While I don't like this kind of visual pollution myself, this is what buses look like these days. I see "no harm here to the interests of" Cadbury's. However this is on the very margins of acceptability; too close. Unless the design is insignificant enough to be ignored, a photograph of the vehicle may not be uploaded without the designer's permission. Best to get the designers permission for this... Broichmore (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Even the UK has limits on what is allowed via FoP. This doesn't seem to meet those requirements. --Majora (talk) 22:05, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Work is apparently protected by copyright. Văn Cao died in 1995. According to our guidance, apart from "cinematographic works, photographic works, works of applied art and anonymous works" (none of which this is), "all other works are protected for 50 years after the death of the last surviving author". Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Copyrighted until 2045. --Majora (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
From Licencing: ineligible for copyright, because it "contains no original authorship". I doubt it really is. An artist's personal signature is the highest form of originality. WTM (talk) 10:36, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Other signatures have the same license. File:VNMsignature.png File:Pejasignature.png, File:ZeusKamil Rutkowski.png, File:Libersignature.png, File:Manfred von Richthofen Signature.svg, File:A A PEJOVIC SIGNATURE LOW RES.svg, File:Alexander III of Russia (signature).png. ElCet (talk) 20:58, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- I completed my knowledge. For signatures template {{PD-signature}} should be used instead. But not every time - see When to use the PD-signature tag. --WTM (talk) 22:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It is believed that this signature falls below TOO in both the US and Poland. PD-signature. --Majora (talk) 05:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Superseded by File:Z.B.U.K.U signature.svg. ElCet (talk) 14:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
perché già presente e introdotto da me per errore Giorgio Pietrocola (talk) 10:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 05:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I have the permission to use this photo! DO NOT delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Souldierfi (talk • contribs) 13:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Souldierfi: . Facebook images are not free of use. This image has appeared on the Internet without a free license (https://iphone.facebook.com/erjalyytinen/photos/a.439876868777.215223.104025908777/10155670779943778/?type=3&source=54 ) prior to being uploaded here. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS permission required. Please follow the steps outlined at COM:OTRS. --Majora (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not Flickr user's own work. Please amend license to indicate if and why this is free, or delete. Ubcule (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work with unclear status on individual parts. --Majora (talk) 05:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Looks quite out of scope to me. Nothing special about the women, their haircuts (I speak by cats of the file) etc. E4024 (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non free images copied from en-wiki en:File:Dion Fortune.jpg. Not old enough to be certain it's PD in UK Ronhjones (Talk) 17:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This image is of the person in question and in the UK follows the international rule (+70 years of the person's death in it) --Agronopolos discussão 21:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agronopolos (talk • contribs) 21:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Agronopolos: The rule is not 70 years post subject's death, it's 70 post photographer's death. If truly unknown, then it would have to be {{PD-old-assumed}}. but you will have to wait 8 years to use that template. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Ronhjones: Berne_Convention - The United Kingdom is a signatory to this convention and it includes the copyright portion of photos and images. And the person in question has already died more than 70 years, including that this image is of low resolution, for reference only.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention --Agronopolos discussão 15:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agronopolos (talk • contribs) 15:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Agronopolos: But the photographer gets the copyright not the subject. Low resolution has no bearing on commons - that only applies on non-free fair use images on en-wiki. As the author is unknown, then the image is too young for {{PD-old-assumed}} Ronhjones (Talk) 19:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Ronhjones: Berne_Convention - The United Kingdom is a signatory to this convention and it includes the copyright portion of photos and images. And the person in question has already died more than 70 years, including that this image is of low resolution, for reference only.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention --Agronopolos discussão 15:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agronopolos (talk • contribs) 15:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Agronopolos: The rule is not 70 years post subject's death, it's 70 post photographer's death. If truly unknown, then it would have to be {{PD-old-assumed}}. but you will have to wait 8 years to use that template. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and a misunderstand of copyright law. The photographer is the copyright holder not the subject. --Majora (talk) 05:39, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no source (No source since)
I believe this is a USGov work, despite being deleted from Flickr. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Clearly USGov work. Photo by USDA Photo Ken Hammond, USDA Office of Communications Photography (from EXIF). --Majora (talk) 05:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not uploader's own work. No clear indication that this is a free image. Ubcule (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 17:30, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by AR. RAVINDRA BHAN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Ayodhya Ghat.jpg
- File:Shakti Sthal , New Delhi.jpg
- File:Landscape at Golden Temple Amritsar.jpg
- File:Landscape at Golden Temple.jpg
- File:Tara apartments ,Delhi.jpg
- File:ISKON Temple New Delhi.jpg
- File:Site plan of Ayodhya Ghats.jpg
- File:Chambal Fertilizer Kota.jpg
- File:Prof. Ravindra bhan with Ian.McHarg.jpg
- File:Mughal Sheraton Hotel.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: After looking at them it is highly unlikely that these were ever under an acceptable license. --Majora (talk) 22:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Dw no source since (dw no source since).
The uploader username matches the name of one of the staff listed at devonlive.com/contact-us/. This DR is an opportunity to provide some evidence of the the user being that person. If so, please contact us after reading COM:OTRS and COM:ET, using the email address listed on that contact page. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS was received but was insufficient so at this time there is no choice but to delete it. If and when permissions are confirmed the image can be restored. --Majora (talk) 03:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
This image looks likely to be plagiarism of https://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/rboz_05/GALLERY/show_image_v2.html?id=https%3A%2F%2Fblog-001.west.edge.storage-yahoo.jp%2Fres%2Fblog-0e-c1%2Frboz_05%2Ffolder%2F1033981%2F58%2F34406058%2Fimg_0%3F1397471469&i=1 or https://twitter.com/GET_AWAY_TRIKE/status/604658619297067008 . 126.165.58.226 13:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Apparent derivative work. --Majora (talk) 03:44, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not Flickr user's own work as license incorrectly indicates. Can the person who imported this or anyone else who wishes to see it kept please indicate the basis on which it belongs here and amend the license accordingly? Otherwise, delete. Ubcule (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I assume by "own work" it meant "own photo". The work is actually by Post of the Soviet Union and Post of Russia (or Goznak or Marka). I have attempted to fix the licence by adding {{PD-RU-exempt}}, I kept the CC licence in case in the future the copyright of the USA will change and allow the person to claim copyright of the photo of the public domain 2D image. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 13:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: ; Own work is effectively implied by it being CC licensed, otherwise they wouldn't be in a position to grant that in the first place. (Pedantically speaking, there may be cases where this doesn't apply on Flickr- but while the image *could* (AFAIK) be CC licensed if the user owned the copyright without being the creator, we'd need clear evidence to that effect).
- The basis you give for it being free ({{PD-RU-exempt|type=stamps}}) implies that it isn't CC licensed, so I've deleted the latter. Thank you for your help. Ubcule (talk) 11:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Let's imagine that tomorrow US Congress will pass a law that states: "In cases with the work is in public domain in another country copyright of image/motion picture/etc is held by the person who scans or digitises the public domain work." That will, of course, be a stupid law, and that is why I chose to keep more restrictive licences when the work is in public domain or under a less restrictive licence. Of course, in this case, you have removed the licence, but kept the Flickr review template; I am satisfied in this case that it should be sufficient. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 12:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: I see where you're coming from, but that isn't the situation at present, and leaving the CC license in place is misleading in the context of the current law. Really, it's not practical to try and second guess every vague future possibility in this manner without getting completely bogged down.
- Ideally we'd have a different tag for that that reflected the origins of the image without being misleading about its current status.
- (I've actually complained about this issue for countries where it *is* the case that the (re-)photographer can claim additional copyright. Although those often include either only one (the CC) or both licenses, it's not possible to be sufficiently clear how and why both apply with the current template setup, it just looks like it's dual-licensed, which isn't really the case.)
- It looks like this user is in the UK, which (IIRC) has a lower, but not clearly-defined threshold of originality, so I'm still not sure if that would apply here. It's really just a scan, about as uncreative and mechanical a copying method as you can get. Ubcule (talk) 18:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Ubcule: , perhaps a more interesting case would be in the opposite direction. Let's say I take an image under CC-BY-SA and the author has already died and perform some super creative alteration of it. I am unable to release the resulting image into the public domain, since I am not the original copyright holder, but now the copyright counter will not start until I die as well. But what if I want the image to go into the public domain once the original copyright expires? If I put the public domain tag, that actually is significantly more misleading than CC-BY-SA tag on a public domain image, as it creates a huge potential to copyright violation. Anyhow, maybe this should be discussed somewhere else, because this single DR will probably go unnoticed by everybody else in the community. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 20:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Let's imagine that tomorrow US Congress will pass a law that states: "In cases with the work is in public domain in another country copyright of image/motion picture/etc is held by the person who scans or digitises the public domain work." That will, of course, be a stupid law, and that is why I chose to keep more restrictive licences when the work is in public domain or under a less restrictive licence. Of course, in this case, you have removed the licence, but kept the Flickr review template; I am satisfied in this case that it should be sufficient. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 12:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-RU-exempt}} per COM:STAMPS#Russia. --Majora (talk) 03:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Superceded by File:Window function and frequency response - Planck-taper (epsilon = 0.1).svg. The newer version has larger font and better frequency resolution, and can be generated by an available Octave script. There are no links to this file. Bob K (talk) 13:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Newer version seems superior, there is no reason to keep this one BobQQ (talk) 21:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and acceptance by uploader. --Majora (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
As far as I know "Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content (images, sound and video clips) to all. It acts as a common repository for all Wikimedia projects, but the content can be used by anyone, anywhere, for any purpose."
I've decided to use Wikimedia Commons to share the image per se with the community since many colleagues were asking me for this image to use in the slides of their classes. The image was originally used in the following presentation: https://www.slideshare.net/LuisCruz429/data-cleaning-delix-winter-school
I have used the PDF format since it can be used as a vector image and I don't a way to export it as SVG. If you prefer I can upload in PNG or JPEG format.
If you think this goes against the Wikimedia Commons policy feel free to remove it and please accept my apologies. -- Luis Cruz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luismirandacruz (talk • contribs) 15:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Appears to be out of scope to me. --Majora (talk) 01:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I made a few errors with this, especially with the scale and inadvertently applying a CC BY 4.0 licence (should have been CC0). Following a state election, the file name became misleading too. I have uploaded "Adelaide's tram routes before March 2018 election.png" in its place. SCHolar44 (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: Unfortunately you waited too long to qualify for G7 and the file is still in use. Errors or not that means there is no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 04:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Looks a bit like a case of Flickr washing. The name of the photographer doesn't match the name on the Flickr account, and it's the only photo the account has ever uploaded. The photo appears to be the subject's professional headshot -- Google reverse image search shows that it's used on the websites of various conventions he's attended. IagoQnsi (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Confused by the formatting here. Haven't discussed anything on Wikimedia before. The picture was uploaded by someone who works with Gray G. Haddock and contacted me requesting I update the photo on his Wikipedia bio. I told her I'd update it on the bio on Wikipedia but it had to be uploaded via Wikimedia and she needed to post it on Flickr. It's all above board and based on the posted rules but I don't know how that needs to be presented on Flickr to satisfy your concerns. Flxr (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
It looks like they've replaced the image on the Wikipedia bio with another image so I don't care what you do with this though I would like to know how to handle this situation in the future.
Flxr (talk) 22:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not Flickr user's own work as license incorrectly indicates. Can the person who imported this or anyone else who wishes to see it kept please indicate the basis on which it belongs here and amend the license accordingly? Otherwise, delete. Ubcule (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 03:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This seems to be a screencap from the following video: https://vimeo.com/66235484
Either the uploader is Paulo Bitencourt himself (as it seems, from a previous upload by the same user), or else the photo is not properly licensed (and attributed). If kept, it should be renamed to properly identify the musician. —capmo (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 05:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
No evidence of when or where this was originally published. It's obviously from a newspaper or similar print source, but how do we know it is from before 1923? Gann died in 1955. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nominationm, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW, no permission. No FoP for 2D art. Yann (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Could be considered COM:DM because the function is similar to File:Walden, NY, welcome sign.jpg. We don't care about the art, picture would be here just the same without it. I'll see if it can be blurred though. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- COM:DM doesn't depend of the function, but on the display. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: The function of the image as a whole I mean. The art has no function, it is an unwanted copyrighted work that's obscuring what we really want to see: the welcome sign. I blurred the art (which was, as I expected, not easy), is it blurry enough? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- OK for me like this. Yann (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: The function of the image as a whole I mean. The art has no function, it is an unwanted copyrighted work that's obscuring what we really want to see: the welcome sign. I blurred the art (which was, as I expected, not easy), is it blurry enough? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- COM:DM doesn't depend of the function, but on the display. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz and Yann: Given that this is used on sister projects for illustrative purposes, it would seem to be a bad idea to falsify the look of the sign and then upload it over the original. IMO it should have been uploaded under a different filename, globally replaced, and the old version deleted. As such, it does not actually demonstrate what the sign looks like, so is probably out of scope.... that it's currently in use would seem to be irrelevant, since it was stealthily replaced by overwriting (I know this wasn't your intention, Alexis, but it would seem to be the outcome). Thoughts? Storkk (talk) 10:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why I nominated it. I will let others decide about its use on Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Storkk: being an administrator you should know that what you just proposed is impossible. If this file page is deleted, the new file would not be able to properly source and attribute the original. (also, sooner or later somebody will nominate it for deletion "because the original was deleted") To me, the background art is DM. This photo is not added to articles because of the decorative value of the background art.
- What could be done, I guess, is to rename the file (and put "blur" in the filename) without leaving a redirect, letting the Wikipedias decide for themselves if they wish to re-add it. (this does leave the question: what to do with Wikidata and wikis that obtain file names that way..) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:12, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Being a long-time contributor, you should know that... phrases like that are useless and purely antagonistic. All attribution can easily be accomplished. This is routine. And no, I don't believe simply renaming the file is sufficient notice for a wikipedia that is currently using the photo to demonstrate how the sign looks that they are now not actually demonstrating how the sign looks (what do you mean by "re-add it"? you mean rename it and not globally replace it, i.e. leave redlinks?) Storkk (talk) 11:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Long-time is relative, I may have registered over a decade ago but never been very active here until roughly half a year ago. And yes, that's exactly what I meant. Rename it, leave no redirect, no global replacements. I will probably re-add it myself to enwiki with a note in the caption. Wikidata does support image captions so I suppose that can be fixed as well. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Being a long-time contributor, you should know that... phrases like that are useless and purely antagonistic. All attribution can easily be accomplished. This is routine. And no, I don't believe simply renaming the file is sufficient notice for a wikipedia that is currently using the photo to demonstrate how the sign looks that they are now not actually demonstrating how the sign looks (what do you mean by "re-add it"? you mean rename it and not globally replace it, i.e. leave redlinks?) Storkk (talk) 11:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why I nominated it. I will let others decide about its use on Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: So I tried to split the difference here. I don't believe that the blurred image is totally out of scope as it can still show the basic sign. So I split that version off into a renamed copy and deleted this one with a log entry that will carry over to the projects informing them of the new version. If they wish to replace it with that that is ok but we aren't then forcing it upon them with an overwrite. --Majora (talk) 05:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Well it should have carried over to the other projects but unfortunately the delinker bot took the first log entry instead of the last one 
. So...not entirely sure what is the best course of action now but I tried. --Majora (talk) 05:56, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by Felix O
[edit]Clearly *not* Flickr user's own work and/or derivatives of copyrighted works. It's quite possible some of these are free for other reasons (e.g. out of copyright in country where they originated), but such reasons have not been indicated here as required and the current license (CC own work) is incorrect- these must be corrected, or the images should be deleted.
This is a somewhat conservative selection from this bulk-uploaded category, and I've probably missed many more images than I've spotted (e.g. postcards not clearly labelled).
- Edit; My apologies, I was under the impression this category had been bulk-uploaded by a single user and none of the images modified from their original CC licensing, but it appears that some of these images were uploaded by other users and include the correct information. These have been struck out below and should not be deleted.
- Thank you to @Exonie: for updating the information on File:DDSG Paddle steamer Helios, Ruse ,Bulgarian Postcard 1928 (3363965066).jpg and striking out the entry below.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:12th anniversary of the Revolution.jpg
- Keep File marked with {{PD-Libya}} now. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:13th anniversary of the September Revolution (cropped).jpg
- Keep Although I thought it was useless, it is used. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:13th anniversary of the September Revolution.jpg
- Keep Copyright status fixed now. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:140th annivrsary of Tatra. Sticker from 1992 (1990) (3356575979).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2061. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:16th anniversary of the Revolution.jpg
- Keep Copyright status fixed now. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:33th (sic) anniversary of the 1969 Revolution,Libya (3003092898).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2033. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
File:75th Anniversary, the October Revolution Locomotive Works, Luhansk 1971.jpg- File:800th anniversary of Chemnitz - Karl-Marx-Stadt. DDR Postcard (3250387165).jpg
- File:Al-Gaddafi International Prize for Human Rights.jpg
- Delete Almost but not quite. If we assume that the logo existed as long at the prizes have been awarded, then Undelete in 2020. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:AUTO ALBUM ARCHIVE - Wartburg. Cover under dustjacket (3888044962).jpg
- Delete Due to the copyrighted logo in the top right (If somebody were to blur it, we could keep). I see that w:en:Wartburg 311 has been in production in 1956 and had the same logo, so the time starts counting at least then. We do not know the designer, so adding 50 years (120 year rule) and thus Undelete in 2077. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Aviation stamp miniature sheet, Lbya with Ikarus, 100 dirham (15196412567).jpg
- Keep My understanding is that for works created for public entities copyright is 30 years after publication. I fixed the copyright status and applied {{PD-Libya}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Bata advertising, Pionyr, 1945 (17118297759).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Bata-shoe-logo.jpg- Keep I concur with the public domain reasoning. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Berliner Stadtplan. c 1950 (3980140963).jpg
- Delete It will soon be public domain. Undelete in 2021. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Braukombinat Potsdam (2949723678).jpg
- Delete We do not know exact date of design of underlying object, so we assume the date of Germany's unification (worst case scenario). Undelete in 2061. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Bulgarian - Road map 1981 (6872597038).jpg
- Delete Using 120 year rule Undelete in 2102. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Bulgarian Airmail label по въздуха on Postal Stationery - 1989 Tram Letterbox (3382672519).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2060. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 10:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Mail label of Balgarski Poshti - Par Avion.jpeg Which I have just extracted under {{PD-Text}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 10:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Bulgarian bus ticket Jan. 1995 Sofia. - Flickr - sludgegulper.jpg
- Keep I believe that {{PD-simple}} may apply. I have not yet changed the licence, I will wait in case somebody will object. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree. There are additional aspects of this stamp that would make PD-simple invalid in my opinion. Bulgaria, unfortunately, does not have an exception for stamps and it is not old enough to be in the public domain. So PCP deleted. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Bulgarian postcard depicting the quay of Ruse, Bulgaria, 1940.jpg- Delete Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bulgaria states that the copyright is Life+70 years. Therefore we should use 120 year rule. Undelete in 2061. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Bulgarian railway advert, Ruse, October 1993 (3370518959).jpg
- Delete per 120 year rule Undelete in 2114. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:By Royal Appointment, coach hirers (4709929186).jpg
- Keep The company was created in 1927[1] It is reasonable to assume that this emblem was created some time around then (unless I am completely mistaken). Therefore I believe that is it {{PD-UK-unknown}}, I am going to change the description. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Charming DDR sheet - Soviet space achievements (17191593361).jpg
Neutral We can add these as extra work for Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. I would like to keep them, but I am not an expert on German copyright law at all. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted as we don't have proof that it is in the public domain. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Closure of the Greenway, Olympic Games site (7132135785).jpg
- Keep I believe these do not qualify as graphic work, therefore {{FoP-UK}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Anything in here would be de minimis regardless even if it was no covered by UK FoP (which I believe it is as well). --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Coca Cola Advert - Bow West VSA (7775096050).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2089. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:35, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Consignia plc sign on Post Office, E5. Nov 2009 - Flickr - sludgegulper.jpg
- Keep The underlying poster is {{PD-text}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:05, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree. This is UK copyright which has a very low TOO. Deleted for that reason. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Crashed Baťa Plane, Havárie Prague ? (4236475255).jpg
- Weak delete Author is unknown, but I do not believe that this would qualify as anonymous work. Assuming that this photo is taken in 1930s we play it safe and put the year around 1939. Using 120 year rule Undelete in 2060. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:CTO stamps for collectors, VEB Philatelie, Wermsdorf (16984755737).jpg
- Neutral We can add these as extra work for Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. I would like to keep them, but I am not an expert on German copyright law at all. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted as we don't have proof that it is in the public domain. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Cycling World Championships 1960 GDR (3027206351).jpg
- Neutral We can add these as extra work for Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. I would like to keep them, but I am not an expert on German copyright law at all. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted as we don't have proof that it is in the public domain. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Das Neue Berlin Stadtplan. map 1952 (3980894088).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:55, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Ansichtskarte - Postcard - HO Kaufhaus Rathenow with Five Year Plan logo (4269315371).jpg
- Delete 1951 + 70 years = Undelete in 2022 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:00, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Camping Karte (3907110105).jpg
- Weak keep I believe that it is just text and simple shapes, but I am not 100% sure, so I will hold off changing description. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- Eh...I'm a little concerned with this one. However, German TOO is a tad higher than other countries per the examples given at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany#Threshold of originality so kept. But I wouldn't oppose if someone renominates this for deletion. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Chocolate wrapper 1988 (3122233212).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2059. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Chocolate wrapper Thüringer Schokoladenwerke - Thürina - 1990 (3122235332).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2061. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Chocolate wrapper VEB Thüringer Schokoladenwerke Saalfeld,1988 (3122234660).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2059. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR HO Restaurant Rechnung, Adams Gasthof, Moritzburg,Radebeul 8 November 1989 (3121411047).jpg
- Delete I cannot figure out if the image on top has been used before, it probably has, which would make it public domain earliers. But for now Undelete in 2060. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Hotelfuehrer, 1978 (3907111295).jpg
- Delete I think that it is just creative enough. Undelete in 2049. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Intercosmos stamp sheet 1M (17006022359).jpg
- Neutral We can add these as extra work for Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. I would like to keep them, but I am not an expert on German copyright law at all. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted as we don't have proof that it is in the public domain. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Postcard c.1962. Vehicle Paradise. (3043333691).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2034. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Reise Atlas, VEB Tourist Verlag (3907112787).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-shape}}{{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR Zigaretten. Club Filter, Ramses, Orient und Montecristo c 1989 (4072574259).jpg
- Delete We do not know when the packets of these cigarettes were designed, but we at least know that these were published in Germany. Undelete in 2050. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DDR- TSW Chocolate wrapper - Das Loch. VEB Thüringer Schokoladenwerke Saalfeld. 1988 (3121407359).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2060. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
File:DDSG Paddle steamer Helios, Ruse ,Bulgarian Postcard 1928 (3363965066).jpg- File:Deutsche Lufthansa Round Trip- Barth Ostsee (3035422635).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2079 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Deutsche Lufthansa Round Trip- Berlin Ost (3035421577).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2079 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Deutsche Lufthansa Round Trip- Dresden (3035422139).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2079 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Deutsche Lufthansa Round Trip- Erfurt (3036257616).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2079 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Deutsche Lufthansa Round Trip- Leipzig I (3035420791).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2079 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Deutsche Post Werbung 1959 (3038133423).jpg
- Delete Unfortunately can only Undelete in 2030. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:DPMO,Czechoslovakia. Dopravní podnik města Ostravy - Ostrava Transport Logo, Feb 1992 (4568553681).jpg
- Delete We can see that the logo present in the centre of the image was already in use on 1949 tram and 1951 carriage[2]. The rest is {{PD-text}}. Therefore Undelete in 2020. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 21:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Elbląg Aug 1990. Transport Map on Wall (3342588156).jpg
- Keep per {{FoP-Poland}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Entry ticket to Dracula s Castle, Bran, Romania 1996 (3887251263).jpg
- Delete I cannot find (via 1 minute search) who has designed this image on the ticket. It is definitely creative enough and since Romania has 70 pma copyright we use 120 year rule. Undelete in 2087. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Eton Manor Transport Hub plan E10 (7782790060).jpg
- Keep I believe these do not qualify as graphic work, therefore {{FoP-UK}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Fish of the Jamahiriya. Sheet of stamps 16 x 25 dirham. Libya. (5843276292).jpg- File:Frank Harris Coaches Advert, 1990. (3512130855).jpg
- Keep I believe that this qualifies as {{PD-text}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree. The bus pushes this over any TOO even the much higher countries. Deleted. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Freikörperkultur - Freisonnland Nudist camp, Motzenmuhle Berlin 1930s postcard (4797176228).jpg- File:French exam paper 1967 001.jpg
- Delete It is a great file, but unfortunately there's not a way to figure out who the author was, even though it's almost certain that the author was known (if this was a school or other educational institution). We know the author was an adult and not a child, so we can use 120 year rule. Undelete in 2088. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 10:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Galați Galatz Romania, 1904 postcard (39856716171).jpg- @Exonie: You claimed that File:Galați Galatz Romania, 1904 postcard (39856716171).jpg is public domain due to the author's date of death (claimed 1958), but you admitted in the edit summary for this page that you didn't know when they actually died.
- I might be wrong, but I don't think stating a purely-guessed date of death is legitimate here. Ubcule (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Unless evidence for year of death is provided we use 120 year rule. Undelete in 2025. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I reverse my vote per {{PD-RO-photo}}, but I will crop out the text on the bottom which is most definitely copyrighted, please Delete old version and (per 120 year rule) Undelete in 2025 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Halle Riebeckplatz. Stamp Exhibition 1984 (3027189699).jpg
- Neutral We can add these as extra work for Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. I would like to keep them, but I am not an expert on German copyright law at all. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted as we don't have proof that it is in the public domain. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Henneckestadt Lugau 1953 (3035419241).jpg
- Neutral We can add these as extra work for Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. I would like to keep them, but I am not an expert on German copyright law at all. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Mail label of Deutsche Post der DDR - Mit Luftpost 2.jpeg that I have extracted from the file above. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:13, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted the full version as we don't have proof that it is in the public domain. Extracted one is fine. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Herzliche Glückwünsche - A pair of Greeting Cards DDR 1988 (3117744312).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2059 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:32, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Illustrated envelope, USSR - GAZ Volga car. (3096156852).jpg
- Comment File:Illustrated envelope, USSR - GAZ Volga car. (3096156852).jpg is something I am unsure about. It is a postcard of the Soviet Post, however it is not stamped therefore I cannot be sure that {{PD-RU-exempt|type=stamps}} applies to something like this. With my uploads I have been careful not to upload things like this, unless they are also public domain for a different reason. At the same time I am not confident enough to vote delete either. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted. At this point, PCP applies. --Majora (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Interflug 3210954606 3fb0ca23b7 o.jpg
- Keep The stamp is the biggest issue here, but I believe that it is made only of a single public domain element {{PD-GermanGov}} with the rest being {{PD-text}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Additionally please keep File:Mail label of Deutsche Post der DDR - Mit Luftpost.jpeg Which I have extracted from this here image. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Interflug Fahrplan Afrika , Naher Osten. (3196447561).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2080 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Interflug stationery, DDR 1980s (3723841667).jpg
- Delete I would like to find a reason to keep it or undelete it earlier. Unoftunately as it stands now we can only Undelete in 2060 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Interhotel Gera Menu c 1977 (16904837057).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Interhotel Gera. DDR Postcard (3231804870).jpg
- File:Jan 1990. Guest Card, East Berlin Jugendtouristhotel (2856957012).jpg
- Delete Definitely useful image. But we can only Undelete in 2061 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Junior cycling Tripoli 21-23 November 1979 Libya SPLAJ stamp sheets (8098002346).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-Libya}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Karosa publicity postcard.Czechoslovakia 1968 (3210105582).jpg
- Comment It is impossible to see it, since it was already deleted, but if 1968 is the year, it is a postcard, and Czech Republic is the law, then Undelete in 2039. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:33, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Konsum Warenhaus, Stralsund Street map, 1957 advert (4203512701).jpg
- Delete such things normally are published anonymously. Undelete in 2028. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Lage Nordparksiedlung Düsseldorf 1937.jpg
- Keep per {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Libya - 5 Dinar note (6231139349).jpg
- Keep This is an old note, therefore {{PD-Libya}} applies. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Libya 1-2 Dinar (7024393035).jpg
- Keep This is an old note, therefore {{PD-Libya}} applies. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- This is not an old note. As above. Deleted. --Majora (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Libya 1-2 Dinar (7024393469).jpg
- Keep This is an old note, therefore {{PD-Libya}} applies. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- This is not an old note. As above. Deleted. --Majora (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- File:Libya se tenant strip of stamps 3 x 200 dirham. coins (5842731091).jpg
- Keep It was already marked as public domain, but in parallel with CC licence. I fixed that bit. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:53, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Libya stamps - strip of five doorways, 100 dirham (5842729999).jpg- File:Libyan Arab Airlines Tickets 1980s (3010581169).jpg
- Delete Similar reasoning to File:Postcard libya - Public Financed People's houses. (6134165032).jpg. Undelete in 2035. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Libyan Currency - 5 dinar note reverse (6231659754).jpg
- File:Libyan stamps - 6 x 200 dirham sheet, 1996 - Camels (15382610982).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2027. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Libyan stamps - 6 x 200 dirham sheet, 1998 World Cup (15379741641).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2029. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Libyan stamps - deportees 16 x 150 dirham sheet (15379740721).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2028. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Lufthansa DDR 3027786390 1efc8c9a51 o.jpg
- Neutral We can add these as extra work for Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review. I would like to keep them, but I am not an expert on German copyright law at all. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Please keep File:Mail label of Deutsche Post der DDR - Mit Luftpost 3.jpeg which I have extracted from this image. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted the full version as we don't have proof that it is in the public domain. Extracted one is fine. --Majora (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Miss Maie Ashe, actress, reclining, smoking a cigarette (postcard).jpg- File:MITROPA Magdeburg (2949723476).jpg
- Delete We do not know exact date of design of underlying object, so we assume the date of Germany's unification (worst case scenario). Undelete in 2061. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
File:National Games 10 dirham - Libya.jpgFile:National Games 15 dirham - Libya.jpgFile:National Games 20 dirham - Libya.jpgFile:National Games 30 dirham - Libya.jpgFile:National Games with Horsemen - Libya.jpg- File:New Buses on London Transport route 236 1971 - Flickr - sludgegulper.jpg
- Delete 120 year rule applies (as I can see) Undelete in 2092. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:New Crossrail platform, Shenfield (21066487523).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2086 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Official Postcard - Epsom coaches Plaxton Panorama III - Flickr - sludgegulper.jpg
- Delete Unfortunately only one side of this card is present. If we can assume anonymous creation (which for such a card is possible) we can Undelete in 2082. If we assume that it's not anonymous, use 120 year rule, then Undelete in 2132 (wow). ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:30, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Opening of the GDR-USSR ferry service, Klaipeda - Neu Mukran. Soviet printed stationery, 1986 (3096157844).jpg
- Keep {{PD-RU-exempt|type=stamps}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:45, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Orientační plán sítě městské hromadné dopravy, Opava. Roadside Route Map - Buses and Trolleybuses, Feb 1992.jpg- File:Packets of 10 Cigarettes, 1960s (3624085644).jpg
- Delete Due to the fact that we do not know which countries the packets were designed in we assume 100 years of copyright protection. Undelete in 2070. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:31, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Paperwork for a visit to the DDR, November 1989.jpg
- Keep Underlying document is {{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Park Hotel Königsberg 1935 (3027206135).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-Finland}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Party in Strasse der Befreiung, Dresden Neustadt 1982 (3021408517).jpg
- Keep {{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Postcard libya - Public Financed People's houses. (6134165032).jpg
- Delete The postcard is clearly made by some entity, be it government or not, rather than by a private individual. Therefore 30 year rule applies. We cannot be sure when this postcard was published, we only know it was bought in 2004, therefore: Undelete in 2035. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:55, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Postcard of Murska Sobota 1940.jpg- File:Postcard with Plaxton body part I (3179606161).jpg
- Delete Assuming that this card is published in 1950s (seems a reasonable assumption) Undelete in 2030. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Postcard with Plaxton body Part II (3180442922).jpg
- Delete Assuming that this card is published in 1950s (seems a reasonable assumption) Undelete in 2030. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Postcard, Galatz, Romania (24985650807).jpg
- Delete We see street with horse drawn carriages with no automobiles. The picture is probably no later than 1910, but we add another decade just to make sure and use 120 year rule. Undelete in 2040 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I reverse my vote per {{PD-RO-photo}}. I have, however, removed the copyrighted text by cropping, please delete the old version and Undelete it in 2040. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Prešov Slovakia. Linková Schéma MHD v Prešove. Roadside transport route map, March 1993.jpg- File:Progressive Youth is here to serve you. Berlin 1950 (3030725032).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2021 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park (13763794605).jpg
- Keep per {{FoP-UK}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Reichsaustellung Schaffendes Volk - Postcard 1937. Haus der Konditoren.jpg Fotograf August Exter mit Fotogeschäft Oststraße 71 in Düsseldorf tätig für den N.S. Bilderdienst noch zu finden in Adressbuch Düsseldorf 1940 S. 149, d. h. bis 1939 noch lebend. Herausgeber war der Kunstverlag J. Kalinowski Düsseldorf laut meiner Recherche von gleicher Postkarte auf Portalen für alte Ansichtskarten von 1937. Now decide yourself ... --Jula2812 (talk) 21:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3356575979).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_anniversary_of_the_1969_Revolution,Libya_(3003092898).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Auto-Translation: "Photographer August Exter with photo shop Oststraße 71 in Düsseldorf working for the N.S. Picture service still to be found in address book Dusseldorf 1940 S. 149, d. H. still alive until 1939 Publisher was the art publisher J. Kalinowski Dusseldorf according to my research of the same postcard on portals for old postcards from 1937. Now decide yourself ... "
- @Jula2812: ; I don't know- as the uploader, I'd have hoped you'd have a better idea of why it belonged here, but I can't tell whether your evidence above is the case for the prosection or the defense. (Auto-translation: "Ich weiß nicht - als Uploader hätte ich gehofft, Sie hätten eine bessere Vorstellung davon, warum es hier hingehörte, aber ich kann nicht sagen, ob Ihre obigen Beweise für die Strafverfolgung oder die Verteidigung stimmen.") Ubcule (talk) 12:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Auto-Translation: "Photographer August Exter with photo shop Oststraße 71 in Düsseldorf working for the N.S. Picture service still to be found in address book Dusseldorf 1940 S. 149, d. H. still alive until 1939 Publisher was the art publisher J. Kalinowski Dusseldorf according to my research of the same postcard on portals for old postcards from 1937. Now decide yourself ... "
- Keep Since we have publishing house listed, but not the photographer, we can assume that the photographer was not credited. Therefore {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} applies. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:33, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Romanian Banknotes (17570540212).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-RO-exempt}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Romanian modernism Bucharest Bulevardul I.C. Brătianu (now Magheru) (38981734982).jpg
- Read this carefully: Ok, this one is difficult because there are several copyright aspects to it. The photo falls under {{PD-RO-photo}}. Spamps are {{PD-RO-exempt}}. But the text written on the postcard is written by a real human being expressing oneself, it is the very definition of what copyright is all about. I have now gone and pixelised that text, please Keep the new version, Delete the first version, but (per 120 year rule) Undelete in 2059 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Read this carefully: Ok, this one is difficult because there are several copyright aspects to it. The photo falls under {{PD-RO-photo}}. Spamps are {{PD-RO-exempt}}. But the text written on the postcard is written by a real human being expressing oneself, it is the very definition of what copyright is all about. I have now gone and pixelised that text, please
- File:Romanian modernism Bulevardul I.C. Brătianu (now Magheru) (38131131005).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-RO-photo}}
- File:Romanian modernism I.C. Bratianu (24153764867).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-RO-photo}}, {{PD-RO-exempt}}, and {{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Small DDR pocket calendar IFA - reverse (3147088651).jpg
- Comment I cannot see this because it was already deleted, but if it was made in DDR we can assume we can Undelete in 2051 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tatra 140th anniversary sticker. (3121401215).jpg
- Delete Undelete in 2061. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:41, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tatra cars, magazine early 1990s? (4984363936).jpg
- Delete Exact date unknown, assuming 1999. Place unkown, assuming 100 years after death of author. Adding 50 years to that for good measure. Undelete in 2150. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Photographer was Rudy Schats who bought a car in Tanganyika in 1956, so it's reasonable to assume he must have been born by 1930s. He's based in HK and probably the UK, where the term would be life+70. So this file can be safely undeleted in 2114 together with another file.--RZuo (talk) 17:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- File:The Goldengrove Photographic 2012 Oympic mural, Stratford (7775101712).jpg
- Keep {{PD-text}} of course. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:The Great Man - River Builder.jpg
- Keep {{PD-Libya}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:The Green (stamp) Album. Libya.jpg
- Delete per COM:PRP while I personally believe that it is already in public domain. I think that this design is just slightly on the copyrightable side of things. Unfortunately (grunt) we also have no knowledge on the publication of this album, so we assume the worst case scenario that it was published in the same year as the photograph: 2013 The good thing is that we know that it was published by the ministry and not by an individual, therefore the copyright is only 25 years. Undelete in 2039 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:The last Peace race in the GDR, May 1990. Wimpel (3724648984).jpg
- Delete Assuming that there was no author of the wimpel present (reasonable assumption, I never saw one that has). Undelete in 2061 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:The lost back rivers of Bow. Pre-Olympic games map. (3084086229).jpg
- Keep per {{FoP-UK}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tom Jackson , coach operator & travel agent, Chorley (4127162719).jpg
- Delete Probably a work written by several people (common for obituaries that get written while the person is still alive and updated yearly or so by the newspaper staff) and then there is a photograph. Using 120 year rule. Undelete in 2105 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tourist Map DDR. For Tourism, Holidays and Relaxation. C. 1987 (3980891786).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-shape}} and {{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tourist map of the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.jpg
- Delete If the editor has the copyright then (life 50? + 50) Undelete in 2114, If the editor is not the copyright holder of this then Undelete in 2039 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tourists books you won't need for a while- Libyen Reise Handbuch (6248647026).jpg
- Delete The photographer is not mentioned here, but definitely was credited. Undelete in 2116 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Tram Logo, Verkehrsbetriebe Dessau. May 1990 (3717999494).jpg
- Weak keep I believe that the sign in the centre is created from the standard heraldic shapes and is not copyrightable, which then means it falls under {{PD-text}}. But I am not sure enough, so I will not update information yet. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:28, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Even if the heraldic shape is created from a blazon it would still probably have copyright belonging to whomever drew it. So to be safe, in this instance where it is apparently relatively new, PCP deleted. --Majora (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Tram terminus mural, Die Thüringerwaldbahn, Tabarz, DDR Aug 1989 (4418175342).jpg- Okay in Germany as freedom of panorama works here. -- 32X (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:VEB Elektrogeraetewerk Suhl. Komet Drinks Handmixer. (3038117695).jpg
- Delete Anonymous work. Undelete in 2079 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:VEB Fettchemie Werbung ( Rad Weltmeisterschaften 1960) (3038133419).jpg
- Delete I think that this is anonymous work published in 1960, but I may be mistaken. If I'm correct Undelete in 2031 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:VEB ROhrleitunsbau Karl-Marx-Stadt 1954 Werbung (3038133427).jpg
- Keep per {{PD-text}} ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Verkehrsmuseum Dresden Brochure 1987 (3691617518).jpg
- Delete We have the date for graphical elements 1967 (on the bottom of the image), the rest of the text is {{PD-text}}. So we use 120 year rule from that point (unless we can establish the date of death of the graphical artist more precisely). Undelete in 2088 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Wimpel Brandenburg DDR. (3724645948).jpg
- Delete No date of the wimpel design can be ascertained, using date of Germany's unification as the worst case scenario and assuming that there was no author of the wimpel present (reasonable assumption, I never saw one that has). Undelete in 2061 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Wimpel ZPL Martin-Andersen-Nexö Graal-Müritz. DDR (3723838763).jpg
- Delete No date of the wimpel design can be ascertained, using date of Germany's unification as the worst case scenario and assuming that there was no author of the wimpel present (reasonable assumption, I never saw one that has). Undelete in 2061 ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:47, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Zlin Zlín - Die Stadt der Mitarbeit (16684250563).jpg
- Delete The title and design are not copyrightable here. The photo is. Josef Vanhara is the photographer credited in this book[3], I cannot find the date of death but I have found that he was born in 1907[4]. Let's assume that he lived to 80 years old. Undelete in 2058. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Zlín transport map March 1992 (3704216693).jpg
- Keep per {{FoP-Czech Republic}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Кнежа - Knezha, Bulgaria. 1969 postcard ресторант, хотел (16947430261).jpg
- Delete We do not know the photographer's name, so 120 year rule applies. Undelete in 2090. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Универмаг, Мъдрец, старозагорско - postcard c 1969 Universal store, Mudrets, Stara Zagora district (16760689218).jpg
- Delete I would believe that it is an anonymous work. Therefore Undelete in 2040. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:Универмаг, Полски Градец, Сливенско - postcard c 1969 Universal store, district (16947421891).jpg
- Delete I would believe that it is an anonymous work. Therefore Undelete in 2040. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:النهر الصناعي العظيم Libya - paid 200 dirham postcard,Mashru` al-nahr al-sina`i al-`azim The Great Man-made river project. (5591803074).jpg
- Delete It has been designed together with the stamp sheet https://www.hipstamp.com/listing/91101-libya-1998-map-of-the-great-man-made-river-souvenir-sheet-mnh/22490327 Undelete in 2029. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- File:النهر الصناعي العظيم Mashru` al-nahr al-sina`i al-`azim The Great Man-Made River Project - miniature sheet 16x200 dirham stamps, Libya (5591364601).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_(38981734982).jpg){kind=link}
_(38131131005).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Album._Libya.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3038133419).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ubcule (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Question Why was File:النهر الصناعي العظيم Mashru` al-nahr al-sina`i al-`azim The Great Man-Made River Project - miniature sheet 16x200 dirham stamps, Libya (5591364601).jpg deleted without a statement when it should be undeleted? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:48, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, looking at the name it is probably https://www.flickr.com/photos/sludgeulper/5591802744/in/photostream/ Therefore: Undelete in 2029. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Soviet first day covers and printed envelops issued by the soviet state post should be free per {{PD-RU-exempt|type=stamps}}, for example File:Illustrated envelope, USSR - GAZ Volga car. (3096156852).jpg. --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:45, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Have already added most of the files that Gone Postal has marked as vote delete directly to "Undelete in 2XXX" categories Abzeronow (talk) 22:22, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
References
Done: In the future please do not create DRs like this. The sheer level of confusion and work it causes is not worth it. The minute you realized that your original reasoning was not going to work this should have been procedural closed and new DRs opened. Multiple, smaller, DRs that actually group problematic images into singular rationales would have resulted in this being worked though a lot quicker. In any case, all finished now. --Majora (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Undeleted File:Berliner Stadtplan. c 1950 (3980140963).jpg and File:Progressive Youth is here to serve you. Berlin 1950 (3030725032).jpg as PD-EU-anonymous after expiry of copyright term. De728631 (talk) 14:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:DDR Ansichtskarte - Postcard - HO Kaufhaus Rathenow with Five Year Plan logo (4269315371).jpg from 1951: 70 years post publication not applicable for pre-1995 German "anonymous" works (if that even is one), so undeletion category bumped to 2072. --Rosenzweig τ 22:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)