Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/05/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 18th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to submit it to wiki love earth contest, but I haven't put the coordinates EnzoBontia (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy-deleted per nomination, as it was filed on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image from panoramio, unusable Joanbanjo (talk) 01:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 12:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 12:50, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is an old version of an image (File:Express 4.30.18.jpg) that has been updated by the original uploader (myself). It has been supplanted by the newer version and should be replaced. Chumash11 (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation: Not "Own work". Content is owned by Washington Post. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stormy_Daniels_2015.jpg 71.42.254.2 18:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: frivolous request. --Green Giant (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock photo from iStock and others; https://www.istockphoto.com/photos/mosquito?excludenudity=true&sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=mosquito; probably uploaded as means of advertising a pest control link Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 14:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, found as early as March at https://fifa55bonus.com/%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%AA%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A5%E0%B9%87%E0%B8%87-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, found as early as March at https://www.cmjornal.pt/desporto/detalhe/carlos-carvalhal-e-alvo-de-brincadeira-da-bbc Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posted in error Retro101 (talk) 17:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal document, out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG Ballonicon2

[edit]

There are only 36 Ballonicon2 icons (all exist in SVG format) under CC-BY-3.0 license (https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2014/06/freebie-ballicons-2-icon-set-png-psd-svg/). 24 others (PSD and PNG formats) are released as "free" (to quote the License.pdf included : "You do not have rights to redistribute, resell, lease, license, sub-license or offer this resource to any third party «as is»." https://pixelbuddha.net/ballicons2/). The other icons are under commercial license. --Thomas Linard (talk) 09:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pranjal INDIA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Perumalism (talk) 10:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused person file; inappropriate Finavon (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pablo Vicab.jpg. OoS. E4024 (talk) 06:25, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pablo Vicab.jpg. OoS. E4024 (talk) 06:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pablo Vicab.jpg. OoS. E4024 (talk) 06:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable. Out of Project scope. Hanooz 12:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 19:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 20:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is copyrighted. Violates COM:COPYVIO. --Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Talk to me) 02:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free poster for TV series Verbcatcher (talk) 03:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the French Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in April 2015 via deletion discussion. Out of project scope. xplicit 04:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in June 2016 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 04:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know where this comes from but I doubt very much it is "own work" and the uploader has a history of misattribution and outright fake images Sitush (talk) 04:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mobinet2012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the French Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in April 2013 as spam. Out of project scope.

xplicit 04:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 04:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why?--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unlikely to be own work - as per metadatas ("FBMD") the image have been grabbed from facebookd. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on Harshika Poonacha's twitter page: https://twitter.com/actressharshika/status/996343790766981122 Jim1138 (talk) 05:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

por ser mal intencionados 190.167.227.109 06:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Discasto as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from here
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as the external hit (http://ppgalapagar.es/files/2017/05/Daniel-Perez-Mu%C3%B1oz-2-300x241.jpg) was published later than our image. Anyway, the external version is uncropped and of higher resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope. Picture of non-notable person to use in his autobiography on Wikipedia that is up for deletion. Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: User page images are permitted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permitted before as user page image, but I see only 7 global edits by her. Maybe I'm wrong somewhere. E4024 (talk) 07:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - not an active contributor. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't see the purpose of this joke. Unused image; Out of COM:SCOPE? Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotional pic. Out of scope. Godric ki Kothri talk 07:41, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нет энциклопедической ценности Eg0rk0t323 (talk) 07:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of clearly 3D works like these books and seals cannot be PD-art. Same goes for many other uploads of the uploader. All real 2D works are ok, but the 3D ones are not. Some may be possible to crop back to the 2D portion, though. Anvilaquarius (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no tiene contenido Cesarwrestling (talk) 09:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original upload log attributes this to http://www.flickr.com/photos/arayil_p_das/2407293778/ which has been deleted.

Please take a good and detailed look into this case, since it is a featured image on at least on Wikipedia. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The uploader in Wikipedia and the uploader in flickr are the same. See the user names. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by me Arayilpdas both at [1] and flickr. Arayilpdas (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since). But it doesn't appear to require permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Magog the Ogre: This file was not tagged for no permission but for Facebook image, missing permission. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:44, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: pictures from Facebook, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 20:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since), but it doesn't appear to require permission. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: pictures from Facebook, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 20:56, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to SVG file 75.67.58.188 00:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- The SVG file has frequent rendering problems (see the SVG file upload history and talk page)... AnonMoos (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; in use;. --Wdwd (talk) 20:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since). But it doesn't appear to require permission Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: pictures from Facebook, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Als Urheber stelIe ich den Löschantrag, da es in derselben Kategorie "Bremer Straße 1 (Wuppertal)" das File:"Wuppertal Bremer Straße 2013 007.JPG" gibt, das von der Ost- statt der Südseite des Gebäudes aufgenommen ein fast identisches Relief in wesentlich besserem Zustand zeigt. Meiner neu hochgeladenen Aufnahme messe ich daher keine Relevanz mehr zu. Im Fokus (talk) 01:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a better version with no stroke Fulwar Skipwith (talk) 03:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 21:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Copyright violation; not "Own work by the original uploader" as stated in the description by user Harry Gouvas. It is someone else's photo found somewhere on the net, that Gouvas maniputated it, and added his personal logo and a caption; to compare, see this version [2]. ——Chalk19 (talk) 09:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (poor quality). -- DCKH (talk) 10:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality does not affect scope. We seem to have very few pictures of Seattle metro buses. // Liftarn (talk) 10:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Liftarn: You call 100 "very few"?--DCKH (talk) 10:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly enough I got an off-site message about this saying "you are a fucking looser not to have the inner greatness deleting your own shitty file". It was signed "charto88" (obviously fake name). // Liftarn (talk) 06:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, foggy, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possible copyvio, per CPM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. 1967 photograph without source. Probably under copyright. BrightRaven (talk) 11:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 11:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source Google. E4024 (talk) 11:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source: Ane Tang. No evidence that it was released under an acceptable licence by the photographer. Published before the upload: https://www.weibo.com/anetravel?is_all=1#_rnd1526642164142 BrightRaven (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of Commons:Project scope Fayenatic london (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 21:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/qbc6/ - COM:OTRS permission necessary. Tokfo (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Less cropped version of photo also found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/qbc6/ - COM:OTRS permission necessary. Tokfo (talk) 11:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo without metadata, original uploader into en.wiki is globally locked and has problems with copyright (look his/her talk page in en.wiki). I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a poster, and contained derivative work. OTRS permission from the author is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 13:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work improbably, see history of Dominik95~hrwiki, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical postcard and not the own work of Dominik95~hrwiki. We need information when and where it appears to assess if it is in PD! Ras67 (talk) 13:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work allegation. There's no EXIF Mhhossein talk 13:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I carelessly uploaded an identical file. Please kindly help me delete it. Thanks! 胡葡萄 (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 21:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obsolete PNG reupload of existing SVG file — Draceane talkcontrib. 14:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 21:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, foggy, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Odysseus1479 and Nilfanion's explanation.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my personal image and please delete it 151.242.88.69 15:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 21:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope Kalbbes (talk) 15:33, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own images uploaded as own works. Scanned images. No Permission. And see others uploaded files.

Микола Василечко (talk) 15:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: except Константинов Тихон.tif already deleted, see log; File:Константинов Тихон.tif: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 21:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, http://www.edexlive.com/careers/2018/feb/07/beyond-the-bots-employees-will-need-a-human-troubleshooter-2038.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imho the file cannot even be "saved" by cropping. In this condition it is not suitable to illustrate the depicted object or the topic. It thus falls out of common's scope. Jotzet (talk) 16:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no crop, file is corrupt. --Wdwd (talk) 21:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to metadata Stephen Fourie is the photographer, not Babrius, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 16:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no EXIF data. There is no proof that the image is the work of the uploader. Rapsar (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is signed with King … 24.2.87, very improbable that Brabrius is the drawer, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i will upload more details New man250 (talk) 17:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 21:48, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i will upload with more details New man250 (talk) 17:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Inappropriate use of commons talk pages. --Wdwd (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the file name, this file is a screenshot and does not have Exif data. Moreover, it is not a famous person, this person's article is requested for deletion on Japanese version Wikipedia. There is no reason to hold it on the commons. Y.haruo (talk) 19:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 21:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in-use picture of an unknown person. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 20:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found everywhere such as https://zmones.lrytas.lt/muzika/2018/03/12/news/isgirskite-penkmeti-svencianti-grupe-ba-pristato-nauja-daina-5112031/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo : D. Blizniko, https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/tavo-lrt/37/121620/paskutinis-siu-metu-lrt-opus-ore-koncertas-su-indie-roko-grupe-ba Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the image description this fails a license review, since Commons disallows noncommercial and nonderivative CC-licenses. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, {{copyvio}}. The source site (archive link) clearly specified {{cc-by-nc-nd-3.0}}, not {{cc-by-3.0}}. LX (talk, contribs) 10:32, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found everywhere such as https://www.reverbnation.com/josephwooten Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 1990. Not PD.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(a) This is a of another artwork by unidentified artist.
(b) The museum's policy on taking photos are COM:HOUSERULES.
(b)(1) The museum only allows for non-commercial usage in said COM:HOUSERULES. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (a), no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. We need more information to determine the copyright status. --Podzemnik (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, we need a proof, that Babrius is the photographer, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 17:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be uploader's work. --Podzemnik (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In Commons:Project scope? Unused in wiki projects. Hystrix (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Podzemnik (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture to the German Wikipedia many years ago. It turns out I was wrong, and this picture is not public domain. Even though the picture itself is old, it comes from a publication which is recent, thus it is not public domain. I am sorry, but please delete this picture. LeonardoWeiss (talk) 03:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The person depicted died in 1903, the picture was taken before his death. Thus, the author of the photograph has been dead for more than 70 years. --Atamari (talk) 12:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for the reply. The page Help:Public_domain says either the author must have been dead for 70+ years, i.e. before 1948, or that the work must have been created 120+ years ago, i.e. before 1898. We do not know how old the photographer was when the picture was taken, so we do not know if he has been dead for more than 70 years. And we don't know if the picture was taken before 1898. Furthermore, we do not know who the owner of the picture is. It might have been the person depicted or not. I still think the picture should be deleted. LeonardoWeiss (talk) 13:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The picture is at least 115 years old, maybe older if the picture was not created in his last year of life --Atamari (talk) 14:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, it is at least 115 years old, but it needs to be at least 120 years old. That should confirm the need to delete the picture. LeonardoWeiss (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - we've decided on a cutoff of 120 years. Given there is a clear cutoff, we need to stick to it. While the photo might have been taken more than 5 years prior to the subject's death, that isn't certain and the subject could plausibly be 64 in this photo. --Storkk (talk) 10:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:PPNF

[edit]

w:User:PPNF seems to upload copyrighted content claiming 'own work'. Special:Contributions/PPNF. Doodle77 (talk) 03:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Procedural close: uploader not notified as required, and no files tagged with {{Delete}}. There do appear to be some clearly problematic files, however, and they therefore cast doubt upon the other uploads, so I will open a new DR. --Storkk (talk) 10:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD in Argentina. What about US? E4024 (talk) 09:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: If the photo is indeed first published in Argentina in the 1960s, and you're not disputing that, then it would be PD in the source country by the URAA date, so yes: PD in the US too. Given that es:Titanes_en_el_ring may be what this is referring to, and that is Argentinian, I think it's reasonably likely. --Storkk (talk) 11:02, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image extracted to File:Bolly Burger.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree. --Elekes Andor (talk) 08:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DisagreeNo deletion. This is a .pdf file. The other is a .jpg file. --DenghiùComm (talk) 09:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a marginal call, but given the image has been extracted, there would seem to be no further appropriate use case for the PDF. What pushes this over the edge is the upload agrees with deletion. --Storkk (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better SVG exists Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 23:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, clearly superseded (by File:Allopatric_Speciation_with_Reinforcement_Schematic.svg), uploader requested, no objections raised. --Storkk (talk) 11:09, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No concievable educational value given File:Short_face._Pastel_by_W._Langdon_Kihn._Wellcome_L0015091.jpg: out of COM:SCOPE. Storkk (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I agree, the other version is better. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.Nikhil98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality.

Perumalism (talk) 10:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering. Highly unlikely that the youtuber is the copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:35, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a poster, and contained derivative work. OTRS permission from the author is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 As stated: USED FOR TESTING phab:T190988. DO NOT DELETE. — therefore keep for now. BTW: User:Y.haruo did not state a valid reason for her DR since that photograph doesn't contain "derivative work". --Jotzet (talk) 18:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jotzet: This picture in the photograph is derivative work. I do not look like De minimis--Y.haruo (talk) 19:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: ...therefore keep for now and suspend this DR. When that phab-task is solved the file will get “speedied” as a duplicate of the same image. --Jotzet (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jotzet: No, if there is the same file, this file is a duplicate file. see Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#File. In addition, both users who took this photograph claim that they are the copyright holders. However, it is clear that such a thing is actually not possible and one lies to us.--Y.haruo (talk) 11:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: failed upload, duplicate of File:Simon Quendler 2016.jpg. P 1 9 9   18:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old logo version Richard.infradata (talk) 14:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value. P 1 9 9   18:39, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:43, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't realize my finger was on camera 8-| Ismael Olea (talk) 20:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   18:47, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(a) No COM:EVIDENCE that the person is the photographer (published elsewhere first). Need to go through COM:OTRS.
(b) The terms set on the description page is not in compliance with CC-Zero. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:48, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/05/Category:Categories of Taiwan by region.--Kai3952 (talk) 14:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 01:40, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source: "Hia Magazine". Does this mean this file is free to upload? E4024 (talk) 11:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:مع فرانكا سوزاني رئيسة تحرير فوغ الإيطالية.jpg and the TP of that DR. E4024 (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's a copy of it : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Artist%27s_impression_of_the_Gliese_667C_system_(eso1328c).webm ComputerHotline (talk) 07:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The other file is newer and smaller. Deleting that one instead. --Guanaco (talk) 13:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The real flag with the correct proportions is at File:Flag of the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan (1918).svg. Some user tried to invent this version there by an upgrade but was reverted. Now we have this one. Source: "Azerbaijani Democratic Republic". Author: "Parliament of Azerbaijan Democratic Republic"... E4024 (talk) 08:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

http://modern.az/uploads/news/prl11522818793.jpg On this and other historical miniatures of that time, we can see that the proportions of the crescent and the star are much larger than in the file that you threw off. Also on that file it's unclear where to get the red tint. On the flag, loaded by me, the red tint corresponds to the flag of Azerbaijan. Sebirkhan (talk) 13:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 20:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe bd-old because published 1945, but author Ernst Sprockhoff died 1967. Definitely not own work. Avron (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:05, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this work is licenced as claimed. Nthep (talk) 14:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:08, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahfuz Rahman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted image

Afifa Afrin (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: potentiially, since seems to be a small-sized bordered upload ?? . If it's not blatant, it requires a DR. Photographer should, of course, confirm the license by contacting OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no evidence of copyvio. Released as own work. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE EL MISMO ARCHIVO EN FORMATO PNG (MÁS LIGERO) Erisgp (talk) 17:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: kept as original source (signature scan). Ruthven (msg) 20:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXISTE EL MISMO ARCHIVO (Firma rosa montero (escritora).png) MÁS LIGERO, IMAGEN MÁS NÍTIDA Y SIN FONDO. Erisgp (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Autógrafo_sabina.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 20:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation: published by Franceinfo https://sport.francetvinfo.fr/football/ligue-1/patrice-loko-avec-nantes-gagne-mais-pas-survole-comme-le-psg-318541 the day before it was uploaded here. Thus its status as own work is rather unlikely NickK (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't appear to be the work of the uploader User:Pspgo1234, as the summary claims. Some, though not all, of the images in the collage appear on the FBI website and so are presumably in the public domain. Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion: {{PD-USGov-FBI}}. Ruthven (msg) 20:12, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is copied from the internet ([3]) and we do not know who published it and when it was published. Under these circumstnaces, the Copyright act is not valid. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Although the same image appears elsewhere on the web, it's not copied from the link given (it's both larger, but more tightly cropped). Otherwise I believe the uploader's rationale and the PD Pakistan Army claim. Andy Dingley (talk) 07:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There has been a lot of problem with this rationale in the past as well. The day of publication is not necessarily the day it was taken. Plus how do we have proof that this was indeed taken by the Pakistan Army. It could have been taken by a journalist. Unless, we have a source which does indeed place this as being published by the Pakistan Army, all of the rest is based on assumptions and is not applicable here. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So you'd rather base your deletion nomination on the obvious untruth that it's "copied from" here: [4], when the one thing we do know for sure is that it wasn't. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the image is not copied from the source (per your explanation) it is still a CR violation. The uploaded has not provided any source for the image (expect claimed that this was published by the Pakistan Army). There are multiple versions of this image online and unless we can confirm that this was indeed published by the Pakistan Army (which we do not have a way to confirm), this image should be deleted. Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: there is no verifiable source. Ruthven (msg) 20:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is copied from the internet ([5]) and we do not know who published it and when it was published. Under these circumstnaces, the Copyright act is not valid. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion. Out of Commons:PS. Hanooz 12:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:مهران علمی نیا.jpg Hanooz 12:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 06:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:WikiProject Public Domain/German stamps review

— Racconish 09:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These aren't stamps? So I'm not quite sure why they are being nominated under this rationale. I'm still going to take a deeper look but I wanted to note that. --Majora (talk) 06:06, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Source for the original photograph at the National Portrait Gallery indicates that this was first published in 1987 in the US. I found no record of it ever being registered with the copyright office and therefore the images fall under {{PD-US-1978-89}}. These are not stamps but photographs made into stamps. --Majora (talk) 21:05, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fred Stein died in 1967 and his work has not fallen in the public domain. This photograph was taken in 1944, printed in 1987, and given to Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery, which displays it on its web site with a copyright notice. According to the Cornell table, a work created before 1978 and first published in the US between 1978 and 1989 with notice is protected for 70 years pma. Now it can be discussed if the gift to a museum should be considered as a publication. Ii seems the first book publication was the catalog of the French exhibition in 2011 [6] (with copyright to the Fred Stein estate, I checked). If this should be considered as the first publication, then, according to the Cornell table, the copyright length would still be 70 years pma. The photograph is also included as part of a stamp published in Germany in 2006. Germany having signed the Berne convention, if this date should be considered as the date of first publication, the copyright would also be 70 years pma.

— Racconish💬 17:18, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If your history above being correct, the question will be whether the 1987 printing is considered a publication, and if it is a publication was it with a copyright notice or without (if without then it is 5 years post pub). The tag applied says published without notice. If the first publication is after 1989 then it is a copyright violation.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. In any case, the file is culled from the website of the National Portrait Gallery where it does bear a copyright notice. This photograph is part of a portfolio which is copyrighted by Peter Stein, Fred's son [7] [8]. Here is a 1983 letter on NPG's take on Peter Stein's attempt to preserve and promote his late father's work. — Racconish💬 05:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I just found a crop of this photo was used on the cover of Elisabeth Young-Bruehl's Why Arendt Matters, published in 2006 by Yale University Press. The copyright notice in the book credits "Fredstein.com". Should this be considered as the first publication, the copyright length would still be 70 years pma. — Racconish💬 06:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note : I have contacted the uploader on his home wiki. He does not object to the deletion [9]. — Racconish💬 09:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the photographer, unknown copyright situation. The picture does not seem old enough for PD-old. Jcb (talk) 13:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]