Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/05/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![144 File:"Three sisters" Mascha.jpg](#File:"Three_sisters"_Mascha.jpg){kind=link}
![145 File:"Tres hermanas" Mascha.jpg](#File:"Tres_hermanas"_Mascha.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
_(11902236284).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2018-02-06_(39424672554).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
I changed my mind Seanmiller222 (talk) 07:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination speedied as nominated on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
the will of the photos creator Stan old (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
This page contained defamatory and inaccurate information about stock photography agencies and photographers. The page contained offensive language and demonstrated opinion rather than fact. I would therefore ask that this page be deleted to prevent further upset and accusations for all parties involved. Lauragil23 (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
It was for a project in college and I no longer wish to have my picture turn up in google search 106.51.111.58 13:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the image for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
This image is a copyright violation - it belong to Pacemaker Press International ScrapIronIV (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
False claim of "own work" - copyrighted image published in 2012 ScrapIronIV (talk) 13:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Not copyrighted image is in public domain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doublemint2017 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Proof of this image being in the Public Domain is required. Clearly not "own work" as specified, pulled from the web (along with others of this user's contributions). Image is less than 30 years old, and previously published. ScrapIronIV (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
False claim of "own work" - image published in 2016 ScrapIronIV (talk) 13:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
it is not useful Sunny.skiller (talk) 02:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Own userspace. --Achim (talk) 19:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Changed my mind Seanmiller222 (talk) 09:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Changed my mind Seanmiller222 (talk) 09:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Changed my mind Seanmiller222 (talk) 09:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Changed my mind Seanmiller222 (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
This image is a copyright violation - it belong to Pacemaker Press International ScrapIronIV (talk) 13:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 17:01, 4 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see COM:L. - --Krdbot 18:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 14:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Keep: in use on zh:北京穆斯林大厦. Uploaded in January so not eligible for speedy courtesy deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 14:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 14:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 14:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Request for deleting my own work. Hal 15:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Changed my mind Seanmiller222 (talk) 09:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Changed my mind Seanmiller222 (talk) 09:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not a toy. E4024 (talk) 09:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty gallery. --Achim (talk) 19:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Padlock with e is a non trivial logo element - w:File:IDrive logo.gif was non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 21:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 47.151.26.64 19:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 11:58, 5 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Javier Fake --Krdbot 18:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo of user who is on his way to becoming long term abuser (if didn't reach there already). Had several blocked spam/sock accounts. His master account Auwall (talk · contribs) and many are globally locked. Using the image for cross-wiki spamming. Ammarpad (talk) 16:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Should be speedied per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Auwall (re-upload of previously deleted material per community consensus). See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Auwall. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 18:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know speedy criteria for Commons. But all sockpuppets of the user are now subject to global lock.Ammarpad (talk) 04:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Not free use, see http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/uDvNoJZQ5xU/France+v+Iceland+Quarter+Final+UEFA+Euro+2016/XWux8HSI_AP/Aron+Gunnarsson. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:54, 7 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: hardly own work: https://www.google.com/search?q=aron+gunnarsson+iceland+2017&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlgEJ0B8fw2UFu4EaigELEKjU2AQaBAgVCAMMCxCwjKcIGmEKXwgDEifjBK8Qev0aog6-GZAFsxClEMAVhS-uK4QvgC-BL6Al_1y6eJYIvjC8aMH8sKIvCZcTB91eSvMo1twWfLncUCABBOUJ_1nXVDCerJjjDME7X7K1SY79pS2GmKEyAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEE5-LgQw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjIwM6HgvPaAhVLb5oKHaUJBNkQ2A4IJigB&biw=1280&bih=956 --Krdbot 12:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Authorship and Source information added. Copyright situation already included. Luiz187 (talk) 21:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jcb (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
By size and content, these images are unlikely own work of uploader.
- File:Velasca.jpg
- File:Branca Tower.jpg
- File:Duomo Church.jpg
- File:Galfa.jpg
- File:Torre E.jpg
- File:Breda Tower.jpg
- File:Pirelli Tower.jpg
- File:Torre Mediaset.jpg
- File:Torre Rai.jpg
- File:Bnp Tower.jpg
- File:Solaria Tower.jpg
- File:Palazzo Lombardia.jpg
- File:Pwc Tower.jpg
- File:Generali.jpg
- File:Allianz Tower.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: I nuked the user's uploads as they were almost all copyvios. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ron Galperin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: done. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adolfinho707 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexmartinezau (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Purchaser declaration 2018v1.jpg
- File:Installer decl 0-002.jpg
- File:Accredited Certificate Provider details-page-001.jpg
- File:Page 5 transformer compatibility.jpg
- File:Page 6 transformer compatibility.jpg
- File:Page 4 transformer compatibility.jpg
- File:Page 1 transformer compatibility.jpg
- File:Page 3 transformer compatibility.jpg
- File:Page 2 transformer compatibility.jpg
- File:Installer decl 0000001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:PRP - likely copyvio; all other user uploads copyvios (see talk/deleted contribs), including images of similar subject matter (e.g., Russian memorials/statues) taken from Google maps giving the (false) appearance of self authorship - e.g. File:Скульптурная композиция «После боя».jpg was taken from here. Эlcobbola talk 15:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmad Alhomsi 11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotional uploads. Out of Commons:Project scope
- This is Commons not your private photoalbum. Commons is not a social network. If you don't make any project contributions you don't have the right to host a personal portrait here.
- File:أحمد الحمصي.jpg
- File:Ahmad Alhomsi.jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
COM:PENIS Эlcobbola talk 15:53, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- "Erect penis with upward curve"? I'm voting without looking at the image, sorry. I trust and join admin Elcobbola, and my argument is Delete per nom. --E4024 (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Obvious screenshot, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
![17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/05/04#c-Ellin_Beltz-2018-05-04T17:00:00.000Z-File:"Three_sisters"_Mascha.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
![04:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/05/04#c-Christian_Ferrer-2018-05-11T04:31:00.000Z-File:"Three_sisters"_Mascha.jpg){kind=link}
Obvious screenshot, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
![17:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/05/04#c-Ellin_Beltz-2018-05-04T17:00:00.000Z-File:"Tres_hermanas"_Mascha.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
![04:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/05/04#c-Christian_Ferrer-2018-05-11T04:31:00.000Z-File:"Tres_hermanas"_Mascha.jpg){kind=link}
No educational value. Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
NOTGALLERY KOLI (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot. Likely not own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
The subject depicted in the image is claimed to be author. Mhhossein talk 17:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Domi mouillot (talk · contribs)
[edit]The subject depicted in the image is claimed to be author.
Mhhossein talk 17:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
La foto tiene derechos en el sitio x10host.com
También ver las consideraciones morales
Iusnaturalista (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: anyway a derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- No existen tales derechos de un tercero como afirma Iusnaturalista. Y las implicaciones morales tampoco, dado que las personas en cuestión son parte de una sentencia judicial de amplísimo interés público. Ni siquiera bajo el entendido de las propias leyes españolas la foto viola ningún principio moral. El trabajo derivativo concluido por el administrador no aplica, debido a que el contenido supuestamente derivado no está sujeto a ningún principio autoral tampoco. --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
El interés público es sobre el caso judicial, no sobre las caras y los nombres de los enjuiciados. Precisamente las consideraciones morales hacen hincapié en la privacidad. Wikimedia tiene obligación de acatar las leyes, pero no está obligada a usar una foto en particular.
Al igual que los periódicos respetables podrían aplicar una prueba del interés público para determinar el uso de las imágenes dubitativas, en Commons nuestro alcance del proyecto será considerado con respecto al contenido de una imagen en cuestión. En caso de duda, no hay ningún requisito para Commons alojar obligatoriamente a cualquier imagen de una persona. (Consideraciones morales) --Iusnaturalista (talk) 11:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- El caso judicial implica ambas cosas, nombres y caras de las personas sentenciadas. Ninguna ley ni de la jurisdicción que aloja a Commons o incluso la española (y/o disposiciones de la Unión Europea misma) están en conflicto con la fotografía eliminada. No se está publicando ningún dato personal, ni se está vulnerando la privacidad de unas personas que están en el curso de un hecho extraído o suscitado en un ámbito privado, ¡muy por el contrario!. Son las fotografías de a) cinco personas que según las leyes españolas cometieron un delito en un caso de alcance nacional e internacional b) fueron reproducidas por una manifestación pública como resultado de una repulsa por la sentencia de las leyes españolas y c) fueron tomadas en un espacio público. El contenido en cuestión, justamente, está en total consideración al contenido de los artículos en cuestión. --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 06:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ghafoorbalti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Twelve files, nine without metadata. P.e. File:Khaplu fort.jpg via google search [1] is from 2001 or older, not from 2017. Three files with metadata, three different cams. File:Autumn season in skardu (pakistan).jpg found elsewhere on the web [2].
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Cold desert on earth.jpg
- File:Autumn season in skardu (pakistan).jpg
- File:Uppr kachura lake.jpg
- File:Satpara-Lake.jpg
- File:Khaplu fort.jpg
- File:Harikon 5.jpg
- File:Harikoni.jpg
- File:Harikonk.jpg
- File:Ghafoor.jpg
- File:Harikon.jpg
- File:Deosai e3.jpg
- File:Harikon3.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 17:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan w jaramillo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. All available on Google Images - e.g., File:Leslie Grace Martínez.jpg is [3]; File:Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio.jpg is here, etc.
- File:Leslie Grace Martínez.jpg
- File:Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio.jpg
- File:Juan Carlos Ozuna Rosado.jpg
- File:Enrique Miguel Iglesias Preysler.jpg
- File:Elmer Figueroa Arce.png
- File:Zion-y-lennox.jpg
- File:Rebbeca Marie Gómez.jpg
- File:Austin Santos Arcangel.jpg
- File:De-La-Ghetto.jpg
- File:El Dúo del Sex.jpg
- File:Carlos Efren.jpg
- File:El capitan Yandel.jpg
- File:Wisin El sobreviviente.jpg
- File:TEMERARIOS.png
- File:Wisin-Victory-Album-2017.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan w jaramillo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-free sports club logos with bogus self claims. All above COM:TOO.
- File:Puebla F.C..png
- File:Tijuana xoloitzcuintles .png
- File:Club Lobos BUAP.png
- File:Chivas de Guadalajara.png
- File:Tiburones de Veracruz.png
- File:Gallos Blancos de Querétaro.png
- File:FC León.jpg
- File:Club Tigres UANL.png
- File:Club Pachuca.png
- File:Club de Pachuca.png
- File:Monarcas Morelia.jpg
- File:Pumas de la UNAM.png
- File:Tigres de la UANL.jpg
- File:Santos-laguna-escudo-aniversario-2018-c.jpg
- File:135607a.jpg
- File:Tit2.png
- File:Club Puebla FC.jpg
- File:Deportivo de Toluca.jpg
- File:Logotipo de Toluca.jpg
- File:Deportivo Club de Toluca.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 18:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Index with no context Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not a place to advertise. ℯxplicit 02:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LatentView (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope logo (the logo is not Google Maps logo).
Дима Г (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There is no public domain message in the youtube channel page. Wolfch (talk) 04:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please help add the right tag for this picture. The picture is just used under rational use purpose (fair use). --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- As far as I know, fair use files are not allowed in Wikimedia Commons--Wolfch (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Many companies' logo are on Wikimedia Commons under fair use purpose. Not to mention that the Kites is not a commercial organization. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- 要不要看一下Commons:Licensing/zh及Commons:Fair_use確認一下？--Wolfch (talk) 05:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- I read. Thanks for that. I saw many trade marks were uploaded with {{PD-textlogo}}, thus, I gonna change the tag.--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 05:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- In addition, the resolution of this mark of the Kites is also low. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 05:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- 這張圖不止簡單的幾何圖形與文字吧, 下方的稻穗感覺上不止簡單的幾何圖形, 而且還有顏色及漸層在內, 應該已有達到原創性門檻--Wolfch (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- How about looking to content in Category:PD_ineligible? --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 05:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- 我會建議您看一下zh:Category:合理使用图像--Wolfch (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Well, thank you but I am confused now. @@--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 06:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- 我會建議您看一下zh:Category:合理使用图像--Wolfch (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- How about looking to content in Category:PD_ineligible? --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 05:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- 這張圖不止簡單的幾何圖形與文字吧, 下方的稻穗感覺上不止簡單的幾何圖形, 而且還有顏色及漸層在內, 應該已有達到原創性門檻--Wolfch (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- 要不要看一下Commons:Licensing/zh及Commons:Fair_use確認一下？--Wolfch (talk) 05:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Many companies' logo are on Wikimedia Commons under fair use purpose. Not to mention that the Kites is not a commercial organization. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- As far as I know, fair use files are not allowed in Wikimedia Commons--Wolfch (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --胡葡萄 (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Dw no source since (dw no source since). It seems to properly source everything, but it is out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 16:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Dw no source since (dw no source since). It seems to properly source everything, but it is out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
COM:Penis & Low quality images.
Mjrmtg (talk) 00:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This image is not found on the given source. Leoboudv (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep source found. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This image is not found on the given source. Leoboudv (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Leoboudv, I fixed the source links. Thanks Iñaki LL (talk) 14:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: source found and verified. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo and out of project scope. User repeatedly added this image to enwiki article that is not about himself. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 01:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, self exhibition
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 13.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 12.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 11.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 10.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 09.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 08.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 07.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 06.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 05.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 04.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 02.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 03.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe nude, flaccid and erect 01.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (49), erect penis.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (50), erect penis.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (48), erect penis.jpg
- File:Nude male, model and drawing, pen and ink (model, Richard Crowe) 01.jpg
- File:Nude male, sleeping (model, Richard Crowe) 02.jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (11).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (10).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (9).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (6).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (8).jpg
- File:Richard Crowe (7).jpg
- File:RICHARD CROWE NUDE BUSH & SMOOTH (9).jpg
- File:RICHARD CROWE NUDE BUSH & SMOOTH (8).jpg
- File:Self portrait, nude in mirror 02.jpg
- File:Self portrait, nude in mirror 01.jpg
,_erect_penis.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_erect_penis.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_erect_penis.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pippobuono (talk) 09:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
unused one-file-upload, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 00:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:52, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
unused, rather small-sized upload missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 00:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:52, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
No evidence for appropriate licensee, claim of copyright also received on OTRS Ticket#2018050210006224 Ziad (talk) 02:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
No evidence for appropriate license, claim of copyright also received on OTRS Ticket#2018050210006224 Ziad (talk) 02:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
nearly thumbnail-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 02:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Logo of an out of scope retail business, see entry here Zaccarias (talk) 03:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Srittau as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Exactly the same issue as before. This is the image on the subject's website; per its url there -- https://i1.wp.com/gregmarchandmd.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/edit-IMG_0024a.jpg?w=1000 -- it was uploaded there in August 2016. This has been deleted at least once before; the uploader was instructed to email proof they own it and have the rights to release it. All they have done now is upload it to some other site, and cite that. Jytdog (talk) 02:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Deletion was contested by uploader. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete First, we need permission via our OTRS system, as explained here. Second, i doubt this is in scope on Commons. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It was in a wikipedia article. here's the cc0 banner as well: | cc0 banner politely eabod ClaraBell89 (talk) 07:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete First, we need permission via our OTRS system, as explained here. Clarabell89 this is not the wild west; you need to follow the protocol so that the project is protected. These protocols exist for very good reason. Jytdog (talk) 12:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: Paolo Valentini, Copyright holder: Paolo Valentini Photography." Also the photo was on this website in 2012, but not on Commons until 2015. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused of non notable person Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 07:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused of non notable person Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 07:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused of non notable person Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 07:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:NahidSultan. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Files of User:TronHopper
[edit]- File:Restoration services of Water Damage in Miami Florida.png
- File:Florida Water Leak Detection services -waternfirerecovery.png
- File:Restoration of Fire Damage in Miami Florida.png
Advertising. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit images?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit meterials?
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
is there not enough of this kibnd of stuff ?
Pippobuono (talk) 09:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
{{Nopenis}}. Out of scope. We have enough of these images already.
- File:Uncircumcised pumped penis.jpg
- File:Pumped cock.jpg
- File:Uncircumcised cock oozing precum.jpg
- File:Cumshot.gif
Majora (talk) 01:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 07:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. 1.164.195.246 10:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by R.Choudhury (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality no exif data unlikely to be own work
Perumalism Chat 11:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Maybe this Mao photograph is in the public domain. Otherwise, this is simply a derivative work Discasto talk 13:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 13:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Obvious derivative works
- File:Agur Belén González.jpg
- File:Ibon Iparraguirre kalera.jpg
- File:Kepa del Hoyo poster in Pasaia.jpg
- File:Kepa del Hoyo poster in Gasteiz 01.jpg
- File:Kepa del Hoyo poster in Gasteiz 02.jpg
- File:Poster CE Europa pigs.jpg
Discasto talk 13:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Metadata shows the image has been taken from Facebook + Small size with no usable EXIF data 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Not own work of the uploader. Larger resolution image published here. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imranbharti1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Unused personal photos.
4nn1l2 (talk) 14:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Error de imagen Ruben Dario Pizarro (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Also an "error" uploading a complex logo without OTRS. --E4024 (talk) 15:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gaelenarmstrong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Litwak WalterDay.png
- File:Walter with guinness award.jpg
- File:Walter Day in Iconic Referee Uniform.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AdamNovotny (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danielhendling (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RobertSward (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Robert and his daughter, Hannah.jpg
- File:Hannah Sward, Jonathan Alford, Kamala Joy, Heidi Alford, Robin Austin, Elissa Alford, Robert Sward, Kelsey Alford.jpg
- File:Book Launch at Bookshop Santa Cruz.jpg
- File:Robert Sward and Gloria Alford renewal of vows.jpg
- File:Robert Sward, Gloria Alford, and Cosette.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Single upload. Low resolution, no geo location. In project scope? Hystrix (talk) 18:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
2 files uploaded by Annapurneshwari (talk · contribs)
[edit]two unused uploads, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?
Roland zh (talk) 18:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Someone is playing the hoax game. Achim (talk) 18:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. out of COM:SCOPE. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. out of COM:SCOPE. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. out of COM:SCOPE. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. out of COM:SCOPE. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sajibkhan20 (talk · contribs)
[edit]User created autobiography which is now deleted; Unused personal photographs.
~ Nahid Talk 21:19, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
wrong name Imrul.kader (talk) 19:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- do you know Imrul.kader the accurate one so we can rename the file ? --PierreSelim (talk) 06:55, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no alternative name given. --Wdwd (talk) 11:19, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
The pronunciation in this file is incorrect, and was possible made by a non-native speaker. It is misleading to have this used on Wikipedia. — Hugh (talk) 03:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In use. You're welcome to add {{Factual accuracy}}, but Commons does not delete files that are in use on Wikimedia projects just because someone disagrees with them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
This file is extremely misleasing -- is it not the actual Maori pronunciation and they didn't even try to say it correctly. The previous discussion was closed with only one person saying "Keep" and that Commons does not delete files that are in use on Wikimedia projects just because someone disagrees with them (???). This file should not be used on Wikipedia and should be replaced with a Maori pronounciation or deleted completely. Any New Zealander knows that this pronunciation is incorrect and this is blatantly offensive to Maori as this is displayed as the actual pronunciation. Nixinova (talk) 05:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep In use. You're welcome to add {{Factual accuracy}}, but Commons does not delete files that are in use on Wikimedia projects just because someone disagrees with them. No, nothing has changed; we're not going to go around deleting files because someone disagrees with them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? This is not a "disagreement" -- the file is objectively not how "Aotearoa" is pronounced. I'm not just saying "hurr durr I don't like this" -- the file is actually the wrong pronunciation and is frankly offensive. The file is very misleading and should at least be removed from the Aotearoa article. Nixinova (talk) 23:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- You're welcome to edit Wikipedia if you want. That's not a Commons issue.
- I see no reason to doubt the claim of the uploader that he is a New Zealander and that this is how he pronounces Aotearoa. Everyone claims objective fact, and Commons refuses to get in these arguments. This is not the Maori pronunciation; this is the English pronunciation (cf. the "en" at the start of the file name).--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- This is not the "English pronunciation" -- this is the "butchered pronunciation". Articles are also displaying this as the actual pronunciation, which it is not. Nixinova (talk) 04:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The file is used in multiple projects and is ineligible for deletion on any other reason than copyright violation. I do not see here copyright problems. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. If really so bad, then first create a new file and replace every instance of it. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Clearly invalid public domain notice; " This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1923." (Photo taken in 2017.) SummerPhDv2.0 (talk) 03:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio (flickr PDM is not a valid license). --Wdwd (talk) 11:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 05:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Newspaper clippings with photos, assume are copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:11, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Graphic made of clippings of publications, contains images that assume are copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:30, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
A photograph of a photograph of a person who died in 1954. It could be in the public domain by now but need information about the original photographer. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for the original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 11:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
From this Cornell website, the metadata states "Author: Jason Koski (University Photography), Copyright holder: © Cornell University Photography." Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:32, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
According to the metadata (and acknowledged in the title): "Author: Chris Elise, Copyright holder: © Chris Elise." Not the uploader; need permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Not at the direct link but the website has very obvious copyright information: " The texts and images on this website are protected by artists’ copyright. The downloading and reproduction of any part of this website without the express written authorization of the author will be prosecuted by law." Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Photo of a newspaper article with a photograph, assume it is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - Seems like captured from TV screen - own work claim doubtful. Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 06:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, used on different web sites, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Test upload, stock photo, not at the direct link but the website credited has clear copyright information. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Photo of the uploader, the actual author of the photo is listed in the metadata, need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:49, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Available for download on a main Deutsche Bank website here, but copyrighted and not available under any usable license. The author is also listed in the metadata. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
A photo of a magazine cover, which is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect license and date, no author information. Leyo 07:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
The image is a small resolution and was used on the web before upload here. See http://innoculous.com/2016/08/will-2016-election-hacked-yes/ Jarekt (talk) 13:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copvio of Shutterstock PhotoID#256143787. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
blurry, other files from the interior are available JiriMatejicek (talk) 08:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:01, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, blurry. Taivo (talk) 18:03, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As the original uploader, it accidentally uploaded twice. I would like to delete the first due it's lower resolution/size. Loyolla.c (talk) 03:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep keep File:Janella Salvador.jpg as the real image. Delete File:Janella in 2017.jpg as the photoshopped one (look at the nose). 4nn1l2 (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Reupload. Please delete this one, keep the most recent one File:Janella Salvador at Mano Po 7 press con.jpg Loyolla.c (talk) 04:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per the keep argument above. --E4024 (talk) 16:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
COM:NUDE: Low quality 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Mimi Abebayehu
[edit]
The files are statues in a university at Sodo, Ethiopia. However there is no FOP in Ethiopia, thus the files may be unfree.--廣九直通車 (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there is no Freedom of Panorama exception to Ethiopian copyright law, and statues appear too modern to be PD. --Storkk (talk) 15:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private room photo from Flickr. Out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio - missing permission Czeva (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Madhav Pengoria (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality no exif data unlikely to be own work.
Perumalism Chat 11:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GOPALBARAI (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality single upload no exif data unlikely to be own work.
Perumalism Chat 11:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
low quality out of scope
Perumalism Chat 12:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://skoobadesign.com/product/laptop-weekender-v-3-bag/ Pinkbeast (talk) 12:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Lower def duplicate of File:Nourida Gadirova Ateshi.jpg Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Low quality unused Perumalism Chat 13:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Low quality unused Perumalism Chat 13:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Scope unused Perumalism Chat 14:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 14:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Also unused, now that I've speedy-deleted w:User:RB ARYANA and w:User:RB ARYANA/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 16:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality JPEG, redundant to vector version. GKFXtalk 14:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality JPEG, redundant to vector version. GKFXtalk 15:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality JPEG, redundant to vector version GKFXtalk 15:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrong image uploaded Navidcyir (talk) 15:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality JPEG, redundant to two vector versions. GKFXtalk 15:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Duplicate to File:Troccas-13-der-tod.jpg. --Migebert (talk) 22:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Selfie-style portrait of an unknown person without any description. Therefore the image is out of Commons:Project scope Zaccarias (talk) 18:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A scan from copyrighted book ("source = W. John Koch "Daisy Princess of Pless 1873–1943. A Discovery". Edmonton: Brightest Pebble Publishing Co. 2002." Michał Sobkowski (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE: It's so blurry, that no educational use seems possible. Eatkarus (talk) 18:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Not true at all. The picture is good enough to understand what is inside the plant: pipes, corridors, steel axles, etc. The writing which indicates the section of the plant can be read. If the image was not blurred, for sure it would be more beautiful to look at, but we would not disguise nothing more than the things I said before. It's a general view, and there's no detail or writing which can't be disguised because of blur. So the picture is in fact useful (note that it is even used on it.wiki). Also remember that access to the plant is restricted (we should treat these pictures as rare) and we have only a pair of pictures of the interior. As a matter of fact this one is way more useful and significant than the other two picture we have of the interior, even if not blurred. Deleting the more useful of a rare set of pictures looks silly to me. --Una giornata uggiosa '94 · So, what do you want to talk about? 20:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Comment The photo is in use; thus not out of scope actually. --Ruthven (msg) 13:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. If better images are ever uploaded, then renominate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Basic text advert for a website, no use to the project. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
one-file-upload, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not found on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Upscaled and poor quality version of File:Tisvildeleje town1 2008.jpg clpo13(talk) 19:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
duplicate of Eurydema ornata 47.151.26.64 19:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: and just redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed166 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No description ; Unknown location ; Personal images ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 9 photos whose the subject is himself and friends.
- File:Dddg.jpg
- File:Mohamad 65.jpg
- File:Mohamad 45.jpg
- File:Mohamad 2.jpg
- File:Mohamad 9.jpg
- File:Mohamad 1.jpg
- File:Mohamad 7.png
- File:Mohamad 4.jpg
- File:Mohamad 5.png
Civa (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Unclear object ; Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 20:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
What is this normalization ? The photo before is OK and the photo after underexposed and too dark ; no descriptions (identic to file names) ;Unknown location ; No use ; Out of project scope
Civa (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Not free use, see https://sputnik.by/fifa_2018/20171201/1032276401/sbornaya-island-2018.html. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 20:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Not free use, see https://www.sportskeeda.com/football/euro-2016-what-cristiano-ronaldo-told-aron-gunnarsson-asked-swap-shirts. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
A higher resolution ersion of the same image is avaliable at FIle:LCU 51 MILAN 2018.jpg Adamgerber80 (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Not free use, see https://www.blick.ch/life/mode/flanken-mit-vollbart-an-dieser-em-kicken-die-hipster-id5185803.html. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahulbedre (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Rahulgoa.jpg
- File:Rahull.jpg
- File:Rahul dad.jpg
- File:Rahuls.jpg
- File:Rahulbedre.jpg
- File:Rahulbedre2.jpg
- File:Rahul photo.jpg
eurodyne (talk) 00:43, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahulbedre (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos and selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment File:Rahul bedre.jpg is now used as a user page image but the users only contributions to the en:wp are user page changes. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rahulbedre (talk · contribs)
[edit]The user has recreated at least 1 photo (see his talk page) deleted in august 2017 and april 2018. Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 2 photos whose the subject is himself.
Civa (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 20:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
duplicity with File:The British Army in Norway April - June 1940 N228.jpg RomanM82 (talk) 21:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, this can be deleted. Thanks.--Mylhaine C. (talk) 07:27, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: very few images of this lake; high quality and not an identifyable person. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:40, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zikoba socks (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused images from blocked user in en:WP, files grabbed from Ebay (see exif-comment), Not sure if uploader is the copyright holder.
Migebert (talk) 21:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and blatent advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Complex logo without OTRS. E4024 (talk) 13:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
_(11902236284).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(11902236284).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be photo of a photograph still under copyright. Mindmatrix 14:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
_(11902236284).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
_(11902236284).jpg){kind=link}
SThis photograph is copyrighted and is NOT under a free license. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Grace_Longwell_Coyle.jpg C3r4 (talk) 14:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
hay error en el texto Jichenl0903 (talk) 19:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination and out of scope anyway. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio and obvious joke. Lordtobi (✉ 21:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 22:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not for personal images. Lordtobi (✉ 22:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not for personal images. Lordtobi (✉ 22:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not for personal images. Lordtobi (✉ 22:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not for personal images. Lordtobi (✉ 22:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not for personal images. Lordtobi (✉ 22:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not for personal images. Lordtobi (✉ 22:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Any permission, out of COM:SCOPE (ru:DJ Stretch). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Any permission, out of COM:SCOPE (ru:DJ Stretch). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Any permission, out of COM:SCOPE (ru:DJ Stretch). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://skoobadesign.com/product/khaki-type-s-4-laptop-brief/ Pinkbeast (talk) 12:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Hystrix at 22:32, 29 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Plainjane344 --Krdbot 00:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong PD, Emil Bieber died 1962 Goesseln (talk) 18:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Nobody claimed that it's in the public domain. According to the file description, it's published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license by the author's heirs. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_2018-02-06_(39424672554).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2018-02-06_(39424672554).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I don't know if this file also has to be deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:FemismHerault 01.jpg. Yann? E4024 (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
_2018-02-06_(39424672554).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
_2018-02-06_(39424672554).jpg){kind=link}
North Koreans can not access the outside internet, and if reunification happens, this "Juche" version of Korean will probably be abolished in favour of the South Korean version. Lojbanist (talk) 04:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Core classes and scientists of North Koreans CAN access the outside internet, and if reunification happens, regardless, then North Korean Version CAN'T be abolished in favour of the South Korean version in immediate period at the least. Because, North Korean is different in any part, and in any case North Koreans can't understand Sourth Korean language.
- ("Juche version" expression is not appropriate, because North Korean and South Korean is different at Language side, is't different at principle side., Juche is ideology, North/South Korean is language.)
- 북의 과학자 및 핵심계층은 바깥 인터네트로 접속할수 있으며, 혹시 통일이 이뤄졌더라도 이 북녘말 판본은 적어도 당면간은 삭제할수 없다 할것입니다.
- 왜냐면 북녘말과 남녘말은 여러부분들에서 달라(특히 기술용어는 북에서 한자말을 많이 쓰는 한편 남에선 영어를 많이 씀) 남녘말로 쓰인 문장은 북측 주민들한테 리해가 못할수 있기 때문입니다. --Gminky (talk) 07:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Most North Koreans can also understand South Korean. This orthography is pretty much only used by the North Korean government. Lojbanist (talk) 21:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- >Most North Koreans can also understand South Korean.
- See w:North–South_differences_in_the_Korean_language#Problems. (By the way, do you understand North and/or South Korean? It's impossible to debate about any Language without ability of the Language.)
- 근데 진짜 《대부분 북조선사람들이 남조선말을 리해한다》는 얘길 어디서 들으셨는지.. 《이만갑》따위 보시면 북남 어휘 차이나 발음 차이 때문에 남조선온지 문제 생기고있음을 알수나 있지요. 그치 않더라도 조선말만 안다면 얼마나 찾을수 있지요..
- 물론, 북남의 현행 표준어는 제2차세계대전 이전에 만들어진 《사정한 조선어 표준말 모음》을 기초로 했기에 북조선 주민들 역시 남조선말을 어느 정도 리해하긴 하죠. 당연히.
- 하오나, 통일부 북남조선 언어비교표에서 1000개를 넘는 말투들이 수록되여있듯이 북남조선말은 적지 않아 차이가 있는거고 그 때문에 실체로 문제가 생기고도 있죠.
- 특히 정보기술용어는 북조선에서 중국말을 기초로 한자말을 많이 쓰는 한편 남조선에선 영어를 기초로 외국말을 많이 쓰다보니 북조선 정보기술용어를 남조선사람이 리해할수 있을 가능성은 어느정도 있다 하여도 북조선사람이 남조선말을 리해하는데에는 어느정도 장벽이 있을수 밖에 없지요.
- 그런 의미에서 적어도 통일후 당면간은 북조선 정보기술용어로 쓰인 대면부가 필요할것입니다.--Gminky (talk) 19:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- These problems were caused by use of "Konglish" by the South Korean team. Lojbanist (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
>These problems were caused by use of "Konglish" by the South Korean team.
그게 아니랍니다.
북남 정보기술용어들 중에는 남쪽말에서 외래어로만 나타낼수 있는 어휘들로서 북쪽말에서 한자말로만 나타낼수 있는것들도 있는 바, 이들 어휘는 단순한 번역 문제가 아닌 북남조선말의 언어적 차이로 봐야 할것입니다.
례를 들어 북조선사람들이 쓰는 《판형콤퓨터》는 남조선사람들이 리해하기 곤난할거고 거꾸로 남조선사람들이 쓰는 《태블릿》은 북조선사람들이 리해하기 곤난할것입니다.
이런 어휘들이 좀좀 있음을 전제했을 때 북남말은 적어도 사투리정도의 차이가 있어 독일어에서 사투리를 위한 문서가 있음을 고려하면 존족시키는것이 타당합니다.--Gminky (talk) 08:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- English, please. I can't read Korean, and Google sucks at translating Asian languages. Lojbanist (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- > I can't read Korean...
- I think we can't discuss about the language without that's ability.--Gminky (talk) 10:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: We won't keep this DR alive until the Koreas are united again. Kept per en:North–South differences in the Korean language. --Achim (talk) 18:44, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Juandev as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: bad quality no data}}=={{int:filedesc. The file can be cropped. Maybe it is usable after that? Taivo (talk) 20:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Tuto fotografii je nutno přepracovat a nahrát znovu. Pohled 111--Pohled 111 (talk) 11:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File corruption was fixed and the image is still usable and in scope. --Ras67 (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be freely licensed for all purposes. "Image is eigendom Vandenbrink Design (www.vandenbrinkdesign.com). Gebruik online is toegestaan.", translation: Image is propery of Vandenbrink Design (www...). Online use is permitted. --ghouston (talk) 04:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be freely licensed for all purposes. "Image is eigendom Vandenbrink Design (www.vandenbrinkdesign.com). Gebruik online is toegestaan.", translation: Image is propery of Vandenbrink Design (www...). Online use is permitted. Also, I can't find any license like that on that site from around that date [4] --ghouston (talk) 04:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to be freely licensed for all purposes. "Image is eigendom Vandenbrink Design (www.vandenbrinkdesign.com). Gebruik online is toegestaan.", translation: Image is propery of Vandenbrink Design (www...). Online use is permitted. Also, I can't find any license like that on that site from around that date [5] --ghouston (talk) 04:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Not located at the direct link given but the University of Costa Rica website has copyright information, so assume the photo is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
old logo please delete it 2.84.214.55 05:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 白布飘扬 as Fair use (non-free) and the most recent rationale was: Original creation was in 1974. Copyright in Malaysia will last for 50 years until 1-1-2025. This merits more discussion than a speedy deletion. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: It didn't meet the threshold of originality. --WQL (talk) 07:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep – Does not meet the threshold of originality. Furthermore the user who nominate this file for deletion controversially adding the {{PD-Malaysia}} file license without explanation as the file originally using a normal license of {{PD-textlogo}}. Molecule Extraction (talk) 08:35, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per keeps above. I have questioned the initial tagger @白布飘扬 in this edit. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: The original logo is much more complicated than a text-logo, and there has no official document to prove it so. --白布飘扬 (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- @白布飘扬: If you read {{PD-textlogo}}, there is an inclusion of "geometric shape" although the template is named as PD-textlogo. So this file passed under that unless the license did not mentioned anything related to geometric shape. Also if you see File:PPBM Bersatu 10000x10000 px.svg + File:Bendera PPBM Bersatu 10000x5000 pixel.svg + File:Logo PPBM Bersatu 6000x3000 svg.svg, this file also controversially released under a public license of CC-BY-SA-4.0 and I don't think the account who upload the file with the name of User:Ppbmbersatu does really representing the party because anyone can create any Wikimedia account representing any business, companies, etc though they actually don't have a real connection to representing any involved parties in order to claim that the related parties are willing to release their symbols without any copyright restrictions. Molecule Extraction (talk) 21:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- If the PPBM logo was really uploaded by its copyright holder and released under that public license, that is OK. Because the copyright holder has right to do so. But, there was no document to prove BN has released its logo into public domain or other free license. And for me, it's not a simple geometric shape also. 白布飘扬 (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- That is the case if the PPBM logo is really released under a free license by the party. I will be glad too for their willingness to gave permission like that. But the question is how can you be so sure that the account does really come from the party administration representative? As you said, there is also no document to prove. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Molecule Extraction: They could post the license on http://www.barisannasional.org.my/ or email OTRS from barisannasional.org.my. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Yes, that is the case if they want to release the symbol freely. But for PPBM, I don't see any evidence linked to the file neither I see any OTRS ticket template been used alongside the license template. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Molecule Extraction: If so, let nominate PPBM logo for deletion, until we get their confirmation.白布飘扬 (talk) 16:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- FYI, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Barisan Nasional.PNG. Commons had decided to delete it in 2008. 白布飘扬 (talk) 19:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- @白布飘扬: Thanks for helping to tagging those files too. You can tag any complex political parties symbols if you have any doubtful on the license they using but be remember to bring along strong reason for deletion. Molecule Extraction (talk) 04:11, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Yes, that is the case if they want to release the symbol freely. But for PPBM, I don't see any evidence linked to the file neither I see any OTRS ticket template been used alongside the license template. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Molecule Extraction: They could post the license on http://www.barisannasional.org.my/ or email OTRS from barisannasional.org.my. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- That is the case if the PPBM logo is really released under a free license by the party. I will be glad too for their willingness to gave permission like that. But the question is how can you be so sure that the account does really come from the party administration representative? As you said, there is also no document to prove. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- If the PPBM logo was really uploaded by its copyright holder and released under that public license, that is OK. Because the copyright holder has right to do so. But, there was no document to prove BN has released its logo into public domain or other free license. And for me, it's not a simple geometric shape also. 白布飘扬 (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- @白布飘扬: If you read {{PD-textlogo}}, there is an inclusion of "geometric shape" although the template is named as PD-textlogo. So this file passed under that unless the license did not mentioned anything related to geometric shape. Also if you see File:PPBM Bersatu 10000x10000 px.svg + File:Bendera PPBM Bersatu 10000x5000 pixel.svg + File:Logo PPBM Bersatu 6000x3000 svg.svg, this file also controversially released under a public license of CC-BY-SA-4.0 and I don't think the account who upload the file with the name of User:Ppbmbersatu does really representing the party because anyone can create any Wikimedia account representing any business, companies, etc though they actually don't have a real connection to representing any involved parties in order to claim that the related parties are willing to release their symbols without any copyright restrictions. Molecule Extraction (talk) 21:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. We don't know the threshold of originality in Malaysia. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ruff tuff cream puff as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.placeful.org/border_portfolio/matos-rodriguez/
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. Deep link for the external hit is http://www.placeful.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/president-matos-rodriguez-headshot.jpg, which suggest upload/publication in September 2015, whereas our image was uploaded already in July 2015. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no EXIF, small size, only global contribution, COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Based on observations? Is it free to invent so-called flags "based on observations"? In Commons we have another -somewhat different- flag for the same illegal ("terrorist" in simple language) entity, File:MKP-FLAG.svg interestingly made by the same user; and of course again "based on observations". (I frankly wonder where they observe these illegal organizations, somehow I never see them, living in Turkey, where this organization -according to the same user- is "a political party". I'm a quiet involved citizen of Turkey and never saw these things before.) For some reason I tend to believe our understanding of "freedom" here, in Commons, causes abuse of our good-will for propaganda of illegal formations which may use arms against civilians. E4024 (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: The picture is in use on multiple Wikipedias. Commons should not delete used files just because they're incorrect. See COM:NPOV for details. --bjh21 (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- NPOV? I know what it is. I learned it with previous WP experience. In Spanish there is a saying, "la letra entra con sangre". I paid a lot with my own blood to learn "neutrality". Three days after you wrote here I did not even enter to see who you are, what you upload to Commons, which other contributions you make etc, simply not to be influenced by "who you are" but only to deal with your current edit (opinion). (You can ask an admin or checkuser to check this for you; they know my IPs.) Before I close this introduction, I take -and believe everybody should also do so- "neutralism" as "being objective" (sticking to facts and sources). I have lost two members of my greater family and at least one friend to terrorism -not of these PKK-related guys, other terrorists- and escaped myself twice of PKK bombs in Ankara in 2016. I have no sympathy to people who kill civilians for whatever their motivation is. I write ("confess :) all this, because my feelings have nothing to do with the DR rationale; I just like to share my feelings and honestly.
Look, my DR rationale, reasoning or whatever in another paragraph: We cannot make flags "based on observations". There are four very different "flags" in Category:Maoist Komünist Partisi; all made by the same user. Three of them say the source is "based on observations", while another one is more modest: "Source: Own work". We cannot accept as "source" so many differing observations. I cannot make a flag "based on my own observations". This is like saying "I saw it somewhere" or "I saw it in a dream" or better "I have one of these home-made flags in my bedroom, I kiss the kalashnikov every night before I go to sleep"; therefore "I have looked at it from a close distance"... Why did you see it different in every case then, uploader? Does this so-called party use a more "calm" flag by the day and use the one with a "kalashnikov at the centre" by night? You can love or hate or be indifferent to any flag here, but we are bound with the responsibility to give "correct" information. Therefore I will soon DR the other flags also, I'm informing here; so that you may find the reliable sources we need for one or the other of those flags and we can keep that "really/duly sourced" one. If not, we are not here to respond to the personal/political/ideological whatsoever aims of people who invent more and more insignia for their so-called organizations. (Is this party registered in any country, has entered any elections, have ever got even one hundred votes are questions I pose only for people to understand of what kind of propaganda we are talking here, and in parentheses. Let's call this "blah blah by E4024".) Before I finish: We have some very capable admins here, they do filter all the "blah blah by E4024" or blah blah by anyone and see the merits of each and every DR no matter they are presented with or without blah blah or even how much POV (sure not only one user's) could be hovering in the air. I trust them more then I do with myself.
The problem is "flag-inventing" (at times for propaganda of armed bands) and "flag-inventing" cannot be permitted in Commons. This is an education project. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 08:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
The metadata has very detailed copyright information crediting the photo "Copyright© 2012 Hardy Mendröfa", who doesn't appear to be the uploader. A version can also be found on this website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: potentially screenshot as per tag "Lovely School of..." ?? Not a clear copyright violation. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SLV100 as (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope per COM:NOTUSED. File not in use after w:Christopher D. Porter and wikidata:Q5112187 were deleted.
Converted by me to DR, does not qualify for SD. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It's a properly licenced "non private" portrait of a record producer. IMHO in scope. --Ras67 (talk) 11:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Meets "Advertising or self-promotion" example of file that is not realistically useful for an educational purpose under COM:NOTUSED, IMO. -- SLV100 (talk) 14:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- As of Ras67: Clearly in scope. All the time, most files are not in use and in some context almost all are "self-promotion" as well. Nothing special here. dftt --Jotzet (talk) 07:08, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: depicted person has some released albums, so in scope in my opinion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Permission (Check this link) UnitedPowersTalk 08:00, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:12, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Provided that the coat of arms was created upon the foundation creation (1949) and that it's an anonymous work, it won't enter into the public domain until 2029 (80 years pma) Discasto talk 08:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Ashantee Medal, with clasp Coomassie.png Hsq7278 (talk) 08:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This cannot be in the public domain in country of origin (Malta). Firstly, it does not (now) appear in the source given: [6] Secondly, it is claimed that the photo was taken in 1905, but the ship did not look the same then - this is after the 1951 refit. In reality the date was 10 July 1960 and it was taken by Anthony Grech, the grandfather of Captain Lawrence Dalli, whose name is mentioned as the "author" and on whose website it appears, with protective watermark [7]. Of course, since Capt Dalli is alive and well in this mid-40s and running his photographic business, he may have licensed the photo appropriately, but the page says nothing about that. A small profile: [8]. 47.151.26.64 19:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:El Horria aka Mahroussa (1865).jpg. --JuTa 02:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Aus meiner Sicht könnte / sollte: "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Friede_sei_mit_Dir" gelöscht werden, da es "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Friede_sei_mit_Dir" gibt. Beide Seiten verweisen aufeinander und haben nahezu identischen Inhalt. Wenn es einen nachvollziehbaren Grund für beide Seiten gibt, können natürlich beide Seiten erhalten bleiben. Molgreen (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC) 47.151.26.64 19:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: cat and gallery can happily co-exist. --JuTa 02:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: despite this being a US government photo which I uploaded this to get a halfway decent image of Megan Brennan, which I cropped from this image, it features a post-1977 copyright USPS stamp that I doubt can be considered de minimis. Ww2censor (talk) 08:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:59, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The image is taken from https://archive.is/CCyql#selection-327.0-327.8 where it is indicated as a copyrighted image. The photo was taken in 1933. There is no proof - and it is not very probable, either - that the photographer has died more than 70 years ago, that means before 1948. --Bjs (talk) 09:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Non tirival logo element - w:File:Optiarc.svg was non-free.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Procedural Withdrawl - Wrong equivalent given in original nomination.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation -- there is no indication that we have pemission to use this image Sardaka (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrongly oriented duplicate of File:Norman Mdue Dale Afroe the Poet.jpg Lacrymocéphale (talk) 10:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COPYVIO from https://www.berkarya.id/ Bagas Chrisara (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Possible COPYVIO from https://www.partainasdem.id/ Bagas Chrisara (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
1964 medal, not free. Sammyday (talk) 11:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of probably copyrighted painting. Source country USA has no freedom of panorama for 2-dimensional art. Crop without painting exists. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uncertain copyright status: uploader claims it as "own work", which it clearly isn't GrindtXX (talk) 12:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:04, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
The file is an essay about crimes in the UK, which may be out of project scope according to COM:PS. Moreover, the file does not have enough information to prove that the uploader is the author (The author column only stated "Student Name"). 廣九直通車 (talk) 12:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:05, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
File:DBP 1992 1617-1619-R.JPG wurde wiederhergestellt; die "hässliche Zwischenlösung" braucht es nicht mehr. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:46, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:06, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Данное изображение охраняется авторским правом (проекты гербов и флагов не являются официальным символами). Его настоящий автор - В. В. Махно. Изображение предположительно могло быть заимствовано отсюда: https://web.archive.org/web/20121222235128/http://www.sludyanka.ru/images/upload/articles695/291.doc Александр Танчугин (talk) 13:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Official coat of arms can be seen here: http://www.sludyanka.ru/. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
неправда Tyvyaa (talk) 13:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Invented (out of scope) symbol used only in two discussions at FR:WP. E4024 (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
From Facebook (see metadata): Some images from FB are accepted, I know, but not sure which. (If I made a mistake close speedily please.) E4024 (talk) 14:13, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Kurdistan (Khoiboun).png and then have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of the Republic of Ararat.png. Please also spare some time for having a look at the DR notifications at the TP of the uploader. They are working like a flag factory, no matter the flags conform to history or not: the more beautiful the different designs get in time, the better. (Maybe they are preparing a flag for some future entity, but now presenting their very different designs as historical symbols for various past entities, without much consideration. In other words, symbols and entities make an endless dance, IMHO of course.) Now please also spare some time to read an old discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Republic of Ararat.svg. (Please see the relation between Hoibun or Hoybun organization and that formation known as "Ararat Rebellion".) Where do I reach? The user made various totally different symbols as coat of arms of the Ararat Republic (one of them later came into Commons also as a flag, but as the previous variations of the deleted file were also deleted, we cannot see the creative process anymore; closing admin/s know/s very well what I'm referring to.) and or its flag. Please let's not get confused about the "current" (legal) regional flags at the Category:Flags of Iraqi Kurdistan: They belong to an autonomous entity within Iraq and have their national-international legitimacy. I'm not saying anything about them. I am attracting your attention to creating "historical symbols" which vary day by day and travel between entities, and of course without being duly referenced. (It looks like "la Ligue Nationale Kurde Khoyboun" is a Republic, a Kingdom, a future State, everything at the same time.) The rest is not my responsibility any more. You may help WPs (and others) to use invented things or not. I'm only one Commoner and as such I wish we only keep reliable images here. E4024 (talk) 14:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg)
- Let me add something visual to make life a little easier for people who are not that involved in this issue: This is a file "kept" in one of the discussions I refer above. (I did not touch its description other than bolding it.) Now let me write here what the description of this (DR'ed) file says, also in bold: Kurdish flag of the Republic of Ararat (Khoiboun). Were there 2 (two) "Republics of Ararat", one with the word "Khoiboun" in parentheses? I think propaganda should be made more seriously. --E4024 (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep: Commons' policy here is clear: we don't delete used images just because they're inaccurate. This image is in use on 45 mainspace pages across 15 Wikipedias. --bjh21 (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This flag is on the brochures published by Xoybûn in the 20s and 30s: Publication de la Ligue Nationale Kurde (n°2), The Case of Kurdistan Against Turkey, By authority of Hoyboon, Philadelphila, Sureya Bedr Kahn--Ghybu (talk) 08:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Gradient that should be expressed in CSS. Unused on both the nl and it Main Pages, despite the claim on the page. GKFXtalk 16:08, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Removed in this edit. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Go to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mianvar1 - Alexis Jazz 18:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per referenced DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Go to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mianvar1 - Alexis Jazz 18:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per referenced DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
nao quero meu nome aqui 2804:431:9705:4F43:80ED:4884:96D3:BC42 18:52, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work, small resolution, missing exif and source is stated to be "archive" Jcb (talk) 22:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:25, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Lordtobi (✉) 09:18, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This image is said to be from 1938, the author is said to be unknown, yet it is also claimed that the image is in the PD because the author died at least 70 years ago. Obviously, this doesn't match, if the author is "unknown" and the image is indeed from 1938 the author easily could have lived beyond 1947. So the image should be deleted per the precautionary principle, unless a really convincing rationale is presented why it should be in the PD or under a free license. Rosenzweig τ 22:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No indication this falls below the threshold of originality in Spain, where we have no evidence the concept even exists. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- KeepReally, there isn't the concept of originality at spanish law, but at Commons is widely assumed that logos created with text and simple shapes are at Public Domanin. Additionally, at Ley de Propiedad Intelectual, (Spanish Copyright Act), it's stated that the work needs to comply with the originality and creativity requirements in order to deserve copyright protection, including both objective (known as "objective novelty") and subjective (i.e. the work being an expression of the author's personality) originality. In addition, a recent sentence of Tribunal Supremo (26 de abril de 2017) (Supreme Court of Spain) has developed the concept of origanility: "aunque en ciertas épocas prevaleció la concepción subjetiva de originalidad (...), actualmente prevalece el criterio de que la originalidad exige un cierto grado de altura creativa. Esta concepción objetiva permite la diferenciación de una obra respecto de las preexistentes (…) y requiere que la originalidad tenga una relevancia mínima suficiente." (Attemp of translation: "Although in some periods prevailed the subjective conception of originality (...), at present prevails the criterion that the originality demands a certain degree of creative height. This objective conception allows the differentiation of a work concerning the pre-existing (...) and it requires that the originality have a sufficient minimum relevance."). Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 10:59, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Still, the threshold of originality in Spain is not established. Deleted per the precautionary principle. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No indication this falls below the threshold of originality in Spain, where we have no evidence the concept even exists. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Si existe el tal concepto en España es irrelevante. Se utiliza en wikipedia en español tanto para empresas españolas como para las que no lo son. --193.144.61.240 16:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Idea Pro vectorial.svg. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
No indication this falls below the threshold of originality in Spain, where we have no evidence the concept even exists. In fact, this item would be copyrightable in almost any nation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Idea Pro vectorial.svg. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Anarchyte as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. Might be PD-textlogo, although that small figure might prevent that. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
*. -- Geagea (talk) 05:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep as {{PD-textlogo}}
- Delete not just text. Per en:Sweat_of_the_brow#Israel possibly eligible. --Martin H. (talk) 14:08, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- Does en:Sweat_of_the_brow#Israel speaks about de minimis? -- Geagea (talk) 08:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Commons:De minimis#Israel says in part: "An incidental use of a work by way of including it in a photographic work, in a cinematographic work or in a sound recording". Apart from the fact that this is not photo, inclusion of that element is deliberate, not incidental. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Israeli law does not subscribe to the "sweat of the brow" doctrine. The logo is copyrighted (it has choise of color, specific font. and location of text, and the image of the person). I do not think this "does not meet the threshold of originality". Having said that it is more a "trademark": החוק החדש קובע שני מבחנים מצטברים לקביעת הכשירות להגנה על מוצר כמדגם - עליו להיות חדש ובעל אופי ייחודי. Deror avi (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Does en:Sweat_of_the_brow#Israel speaks about de minimis? -- Geagea (talk) 08:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The person in the logo is above COM:TOO when standing on the letter. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:27, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
