Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/03/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 21st, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image incorporates a copyrighted logo. Whpq (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adamgerber80 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from her [1]. It was uploaded on flickr by an author called salman khan.
Converted by me to DR, as the external hit is not convincing. It is from June 2017, whereas our image was uploaded in September 2016. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This file is copied from Facebook, no permission. --Yann (talk) 07:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wazeygffdd 74.215.29.90 14:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User page from a what looks like a Tor account. Unlikely to be used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: Test edit, contains the word 'BITS' only. --Achim (talk) 18:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found at https://www.dicv.csic.es/arxius/29-10-2015%20NP%20IN%20Juan%20Lerma.pdf Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:55, 21 März 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: copied from https://www.dicv.csic.es/arxius/29-10-2015%20NP%20IN%20Juan%20Lerma.pdf --Krdbot 01:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier en doublon. Thesupermat (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier en doublon. Thesupermat (talk) 14:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirect. --JuTa 21:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ahmet Turhan as Copyvio (copyvio) Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 07:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now are we waiting for him to explain us why it would be a copyvio? (I know little about Flickr things.) --E4024 (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there is no explanation why it is a copyvio (but seeing the size and the absence of EXIF data, it is probably) . Regards, Yann (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"All rights reserved" - also ne EXIF. People many times put it on Flickr from others, than puting on newssites. Probalby copyvio. --Mile (talk) 13:56, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mile: The image was under a free license on Flickr, that's why we have a license review system. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann: O, that's problem in one case, if Author didnt undesrtand licensing. But if he put it just for upload here and then back, then is OK. Otherwise picture is fine, showing all but Syrians which are "liberating" Syria. --Mile (talk) 17:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, is there a bigger or older version than the Flickr one? Regards, Yann (talk) 04:05, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In licence section;
"This image was originally posted to Flickr by Kurdishstruggle at https://www.flickr.com/photos/131986175@N03/40873768331/. It was reviewed on 18 Mart 2018 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0." 
That account Kurdishstruggle not posted them. User Mohamadrsk may copy from another "Kurdishstruggle" image for free licence I think. For expampe this, this, or this. All posted from Kurdishstruggle are CC 2.0. But This image link (Turkish Army Captured Afrin 04.jpg) posted by "Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri" and not have free licence. We can see "All rights reserved". Not CC 2.0. --Ahmet Turhan (talk) 09:41, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol, not free Arbalete (talk) 04:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. In my opinion it is still free, because threshold of originality in Italy is quite high. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Changed the license to PD-simple. Ruthven (msg) 14:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol palese Arbalete (talk) 12:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per previous DR. @Arbalete: do not remove license templates!. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smart Bajrangi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal photos. File:Csk.jpg looks like a photoshopped picture making it a DW and probable Copyvio.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smart Bajrangi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope: unused personal images of non-wikipedian

George Chernilevsky talk 16:35, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete reuploaded Taylor 49 (talk) 20:49, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcio Barros de Freitas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal selfies/photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupted: Bad upload unfortunately, can't distinguish subject Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete taken from [2], with no apparent release under the license stipulated nor any reason to believe this is the property of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 01:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; copyviol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol, not free Arbalete (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:56, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ramonpazos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal artworks without obvious educational values : likely out of scope. Otherwise, and in case the artist is notable enough, then we need an OTRS permission from the artist

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This are my Pictures, created by me why you are requesting deletion without even reach to me. tis are personal picture for LARPING Game on the MES WIKI Section.

Please Stop — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramonpazos (talk • contribs) 07:32, 21. Mär. 2018‎ (UTC)

@Ramonpazos, "without even reach to me" - wrong. He notified you on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All this pictures are of my self portraying a Vampire called Mr T for MES WIKI page please use the below link to see.

https://wiki2017.mindseyesociety.org/wiki/Mr._T

This Pictures were taken on games of myself in custom. This character represent the struggle of the Meztizo population trying to hold the new and old traditions as well our heritage. Basically if you ever read Yo soy Joaquin by Corky Gonzalez you may have a glimpse of what im talking and what im trying to portray with this LARP character for Vampie the Mascarade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramonpazos (talk • contribs) 07:57, 21. Mär. 2018‎ (UTC)

 Delete all. No educational value, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. Yann (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this the same file that was recently deleted? E4024 (talk) 07:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 15:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-upload. E4024 (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol, not free Arbalete (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol, not free Arbalete (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol, not free Arbalete (talk) 04:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS. Yann (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS. Yann (talk) 05:19, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, at uploader's request Prateek Pattanaik (talk) 05:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alagusenthil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small files without EXIF data. Please upload the original images, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 07:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of Kazakh website, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture. No credit on IMDB for him as actor. Picture found here. Harlock81 (talk) 10:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Seif shereen

[edit]

As Commons:Deletion requests/File:SeifShereen 01.jpg, unused, personal pictures. No credit on IMDB for him as actor. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 16:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, above TOO Krd 08:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Sorry french) Probablement un copyvio Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Je suis sure that it is a copyvio, Monsieur. --E4024 (talk) 09:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo de famille sans intérêt. Thesupermat (talk) 09:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo de famille sans intérêt. Thesupermat (talk) 09:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo de famille sans intérêt. Thesupermat (talk) 09:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

his is a screenshot of copyrighted computer software, and the copyright for its contents is most likely held by the author(s) or the company that created the software Nik Deleter (talk) 10:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the source website does not contain an acceptable licence Wvdp (talk) 10:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the source website does not contain an acceptable licence. and there is a (c) in the discription Wvdp (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - already published http://silke-heimes.de/beispiel-seite/. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism (attack on a slain person)  samee  .com  10:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: anyway copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Marco Verch, used as an extorsion scam.

Yann (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per previous nomination : Files by Marco Verch, used as an extorsion scam.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep for both lists (and undelete those already deleted on this basis). There is no problem with these files' licenses. They are under perfectly free licenses. The licenses are apparently being very strictly enforced, but going down any route of "we only host files whose copyright holders are not too strict about enforcing their copyright" would be a very fundamental redefinition of what Commons does and does not host. We regularly (and rightly) keep hosting files whose copyright holder is no longer distributing them under a free license (e.g. changing the license on Flickr to "all rights reserved"). It is likely that many such copyright holders, since they no longer want their files to be reused, will also very strictly enforce their licenses. It's the whole point of accepting only irrevocable licenses that we don't care about how nice the copyright holder might (now or at a future point) want to be about enforcement. So either we should delete all of these files if we worry about copyright holders not being nice about enforcement, or we should keep these files too. Tokfo (talk) 20:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your reasoning, but this is in no way a typical case, because it appears that the uploader explicitly uploaded the images here in order to encourage misuse of them by innocent parties, in order to extort money from them using their own website http://www.plaghunter.com/en/. The way that after being blocked, the user has seemingly paid editors to add photos to high-trafficked WP articles e.g. [3] [4] makes this especially clear. How can we stand by and let them use the project in this way? Smartse (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 01:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as the above RfD's + Commons:Deletion requests/Remaining files uploaded by Wuestenigel + Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedMarco Verch: indefblocked user, many copyvios, lots of out-of-scope stuff, and heavy misuse of Free licensing. This are the remaining search results for "Marco Verch" and (hopefully) the last portion of his uploads on Commons.

A.Savin 18:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as in the previous deletion requests for this Flickr account: indefblocked Commons user, notorious licence laundering and prone to copyright extortion. Flickr account is blacklisted at Commons:Questionable Flickr images.

De728631 (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I consider this a form of recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus as the community decided about all content from this author. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted per Alexis Jazz. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New Flickr account: https://www.flickr.com/people/160866001@N07.

Can also be speedied. I made a DR because it's a new account.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- Banned user. --A.Savin 16:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only nominating so they can be deleted as "Per (link to this DR)". Speedy please. A.Savin?

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 20:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But isn't there actually a possibility to prevent Marcho Verch's transfers in general for the future? Abuse filter or sth.? @Steinsplitter: Maybe you can help? --A.Savin 20:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: one of these was uploaded before the bad-author list was updated with his new Flickr account, the other was uploaded using UploadWizard with self-review which doesn't check the bad-author list. (another reason UploadWizard should insert {{Flickrreview}}) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Savin: @Alexis Jazz: @Abzeronow: I don't upload images to WP (/Commons) often, but i don't get it. The images came with the proper license as far as i could tell. What did i do wrong? What does "link to this DR" mean? PizzaMan (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaMan: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 68#Out of process deletion of files by User:Hystrix
Long story short, if you as much as misspell Marco Verch's name in the attribution, he'll threaten you with a lawsuit. Link to this DR (Deletion Request) is a link to the page you are reading right now. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But isn't the whole deal of CC licenses to be redistributed in a manner specified by the author? For all legal purposes these images are all irrevocably released under free licenses so why delete them? I don't want any re-users to ever be harmed by anything they wish to use from Wikimedia Commons, but can Marco actually win any lawsuit? You can't claim that the images you legally stated are free are suddenly unfree, is there any evidence that it was in fact the person of Marco Verch and not an impersonator making all these threats? I can see someone claiming to be a photographer and demanding money and then banning the photographer would ban an additional victim. I'm not advocating undeletion, but I don't see the benefit of deleting free educational content. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explaining, @Alexis Jazz: . Still sounds a bit odd to me that Flickr does allow his images to stay online, with open license, but a good faith usage of such a picture on this site would be met with legal action. I wonder: who would he sue? Me? Wikimedia? Did he ever actually sue someone? Under what law does he think he would stand a chance? Would he really risk having to pay the legal fees of Wikimedia as a defending party? Please understand that people put quite some effort into finding an acceptable picture and uploading it with all details filled in properly, which is cumbersome enough, and that it's quite disappointing to suddenly see it deleted even when you've done everything right. I feel WP/wikimedia editors should be protected from such disappointment. Me, I'll think twice before trying to cheer up a marginal WP entry with a picture again.PizzaMan (talk) 23:07, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Donald Trung: I don't really feel like going over all these discussions, much of which is in German.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaMan: if you had used Flickr2Commons you would have been warned. Marco Verch is really an exception. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaMan: I just read these discussions and apparently in Germany and Austria you could threaten someone out of court with a kind of "cease and desist" scheme where a person has to pay around 400 (four-hundred) Euro's or be taken to court, German and Austrian copyright laws are crazy stupid and breed copyright trolls, this is really sad for the re-users, too many that we lost over 10.000 (ten-thousand) useful educational images simply because someone likes to abuse the law, maybe one day when the physical person behind Marco Verch dies ☠ we could see an undeletion request for those images but as long as this person keeps misusing the German legal system I don't see much chance at that. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well if that's the German law and discussions on the German site led to the conclusion that nothing can be done about it, i guess we'll have to accept this situation. At least now it's clear what's going on for anyone who lands on this page. I didn't use the flickr tool, because i didn't know of it's existence. Again i don't have experience. Next time, I'll just try to make a picture myself and hope that process goes smoother. And may i be struck with a horrible disease if i threat legal action against anyone who wants to reuse a picture i upload here, for something as trivial as a typo.PizzaMan (talk) 07:50, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another two.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: can be speedied. This was the easiest way to explain the problem to the uploaders. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:12, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 14:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by Marco Verch, used as an extortion scam. Pinging @A.Savin.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:55, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please blacklist the name to prevent future uploads?--Roy17 (talk) 12:56, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: these files were uploaded manually. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AbuseFilter. Source code includes [Mm]arco [Vv]erch? Blocked.--Roy17 (talk) 14:22, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: AF won't be deployed for at most a couple of files a month. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:46, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Boo

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my upload, I did not know about it. Bencemac (talk) 15:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite understand this particular case. At the source page the author states:

The image Velogorod bikes in Russia by Marco Verch can under Creative Commons license be used.

The image itself is rather important for the w:ru:Система совместного использования велосипедов as it's the only free image found so far of the Velogorod bike sharing system in Saint-Petersburg, Russia.--Vаdiм (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Vadim, our problem is not with this special image, but with the Flickr-user in general. So, per former community-decision it cannot stay on Commons. Feel free to upload it locally, if your project allows that. But, if you do, mark it clearly with "do not move to Commons". Otherwise, might File:Sezamki Halo.JPG be a suitable replacement? --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Probably not, because that shows a cracker instead of a bike. Neither were deleted. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:55, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and based on former community-decision. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MarcoMarcoMarcoMarcoMarco

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied, as there are enough replacements: Category:Wilson American football balls. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missed one I guess. Thanks BevinKacon for alerting me. Pinging @Srittau.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Adding these newly uploaded images to the list - from a blacklisted Flickr account. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marco verch.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the uploads, I didn't know about this situation. Should've paid attention to the blacklisted users list. Q-Wert-273 (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Pitke 2020-06-26 --Achim (talk) 20:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from a blacklisted Flickr user accused of copyright trolling. See other examples above.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. I would support even speedy deletion for such cases. --Off-shell (talk) 16:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Community have decided to ban Marco Verch per this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with marco verch. --MGA73 (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per previous DRs. I have placed Category:Images by Marco Verch as a subcategory for speedy deletion requests, hopefully there will be no need for further DRs on this matter. --Pitke (talk) 09:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Martiros Saryan (d. 1972), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Anatoly Nikich (d. 1994), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Marc Chagall (d. 1985), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Antonyo Marest (b. 1987), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Patrick Rogel,
La foto “Tropicalismo” está realizada a una lámina del pintor Antonyo Marest.
Esta lámina es de mi propiedad y está firmada y dedicada por el autor.
Yo he realizado una fotografía a dicha lámina y después he realizado algunos ajustes para cuadrarla y quitar los márgenes blancos.
Es una lámina de mi propiedad y la fotografía ha sido realizada por mí.
Saludos cordiales.--Lariob (talk) 15:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Patrck Rogel,
The photo "Tropicalismo" is made with a sheet of the painter Antonyo Marest.
This sheet is my property and is signed and dedicated by the author.
I have taken a photograph of that sheet and then I made some adjustments to square it and remove the white margins.
It is a sheet of my property and the photograph has been made by me.
Best regards.--Lariob (talk) 15:54, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - physically own a painting does not grant you the copyright on it, if you have a permission of the painter then this permission must be sent to our permission system. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not encyclopedic : personal picture found on a deleted user page Luk (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cover of a book written by a man who runs a diploma mill, uploaded by an account claiming to represent that same diploma mill. There is no article about this book. There will never be an article about this book. It is not within project scope. DS (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope and possibly a copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see a reason why the image should be CC. Website states a copyright. Avron (talk) 18:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mediaman770 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various derivative works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2018 Lenaleestore.com All rights reserved.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-textlogo, but JPEG and not used, out of scope. Should be SVG if useful. --Yann (talk) 06:47, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission added by non-OTRS member √Jæ√ 05:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK. Perhaps I'm loading the wrong files from davecskatingphoto.com. But OTRS-permission from the author is and it is valid, it is modally possible to check the members of OTRS member.

Tell me please, how do I correctly upload files from this site the next time? --Luu (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The photographer was asked to confirm the permission on October 11th, 2017. No answer since then. --Yann (talk) 06:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

xwiki self promo, out of scope Chrissymad (talk) 12:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by George Chernilevsky at 02:38, 29 März 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by HannahBeth01 --Krdbot 06:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This media file is missing evidence of permission. Siddiqsazzad001 (Talk) 17:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a cropped view of a magazine article published in 2012 and I think that means it does not have a compatible license for Commons Ca2james (talk) 02:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 "On appeal, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found in favour of the defendant, Arriba Soft. In reaching its decision, the court utilized the statutory four-factor analysis. First, it found the purpose of creating the thumbnail images as previews to be sufficiently transformative, noting that they were not meant to be viewed at high resolution as the original artwork was. Second, the photographs had already been published, diminishing the significance of their nature as creative works. Third, although normally making a "full" replication of a copyrighted work may appear to violate copyright, here it was found to be reasonable and necessary in light of the intended use. Lastly, the court found that the market for the original photographs would not be substantially diminished by the creation of the thumbnails. To the contrary, the thumbnail searches could increase the exposure of the originals."
 "In June 2011, Judge Philip Pro of the District of Nevada ruled in Righthaven v. Hoehn that the posting of an entire editorial article from the Las Vegas Review Journal in a comment as part of an online discussion was unarguably fair use. Judge Pro noted that "Noncommercial, nonprofit use is presumptively fair. ..."

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is claimed as own work, however, this appears to be from the Indian Super League. See this image whch although oddly stretched, is clearly the same image, and credited to ISL (Indian Super League). Article was published Dec 21, 2015, well before the upload to Commons. Whpq (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image incorporates a copyrighted logo for the Chennaiyin FC and as such is not fully free. Whpq (talk) 02:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, Author: ©Jens Book. Would need OTRS permission to keep on Commons under a free license. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Claimed "Own work", per Metadata: Author: Patrick Becher Copyright holder: P. Beche Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Claimed "Own work", per Metadata: Author: OLIVER THOMAS Copyright holder: OLIVER THOMAS Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image was taken circa 1936. - Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-old-80. --Yann (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appeared in the press on 11 May, uploaded on 18 May, dated as 19 May, all this happened in 2015. E4024 (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Daniel Gordo-Extremenos- Caceres EDIIMA20150511 0315 17.jpg, in case that one is deleted. E4024 (talk) 06:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope unused personal image of not notable spamming model. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2016 UNC Coastal Studies Institute. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:46, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With telephones, e-mail, net etc looks like personal promotion to me. E4024 (talk) 11:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio (https://tineye.com/search/34a8a47acb8da2e0c98e7722327c67148eeb70f0/?sort=size&order=desc) Afifa Afrin (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User with 6 edits in more than a year. Two of them are to upload and add into his user page this image. E4024 (talk) 11:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small upload by a one-time visitor. Kept in a draft page. Dubious own work and dubious future (as part of an article). E4024 (talk) 11:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, derivative work of https://twitter.com/Djmaringlen/status/877665688839749632 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:13, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo with unclear importance, maybe out of project scope. In addition, complex logos can be in Commons with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2016 UNC Coastal Studies Institute. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:15, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2016 UNC Coastal Studies Institute. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:24, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Anyway Copyright © 2016 UNC Coastal Studies Institute. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any mertadata, false date, found at http://www.kino-teatr.ru/acter/album/40167/797871.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, false date, found at http://www.kino-teatr.ru/acter/album/40167/797872.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an unknown person, used only in a vandalism page on English Wikipedia, now deleted. Unlikely to have any legitimate use. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File by Marco Verch, used as an extorsion scam. Yann (talk) 12:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like personal image and commercial promotion at the same time. E4024 (talk) 12:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion of Happy Ending tours. E4024 (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found elsewhere (https://www.facebook.com/fortuandmendoza/photos/a.832269493505825.1073741825.832264366839671/1576184039114363/?type=1&theater). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, found elsewhere (https://www.facebook.com/fortuandmendoza/photos/a.838484379551003.1073741829.832264366839671/1517410588325042/?type=3&theater). Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file. No data, no coordinates, no legend, will not serve any educational purpose; therefore out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm still an active user but you are right it is an unused and non-objective file. I was using this for my profile page once upon a time I suppose. However, it isn't being used currently. It could be deleted, there are no any problems with it. Best regards... JohnWayKen (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely license washing. The image seems to have been originally published in here (2012) Discasto talk 13:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Eusko Ikaskuntza, the author of the website and the author of the image, has modified the caption of the image in its website here, assigning to it the CC-BY-SA licence. I think it is enough to maintain this image in Commons. Thanks. Ksarasola (talk) 12:36, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not an own work. Find a better license please. E4024 (talk) 14:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Filezilla_12.jpg Psaldarriagae (talk) 14:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Túrelio. --Yann (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

By a one-time uploader. Metadata "photoshop". Probably not own work. E4024 (talk) 14:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:27, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This person looks out of scope. Does anybody know him? E4024 (talk) 15:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Renombrado hacker peruano". Self promotion. E4024 (talk) 15:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG - bad format, not his own work and PNG version uploaded Zuissii (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected copyvio; Photo claims: "Fotograf: THOMAS GRUNER"; Uploader claims: "own work; Maxxloh" Foreign Species (talk) 18:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Taivo. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not useful for educational purposes (personal award of a not noticeable person) L736E (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate use of userpage. P 1 9 9   19:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo appears to serve as a self promotion of non notable people. Would be appropriate with the sign only. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright photo with no OTRS Theredproject (talk) 19:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not clear that the author has permission to publish the image XanaG (talk) 20:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-old. --Yann (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film shot in Spain : any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was shot in Italy (Mario Bianchi was an Italian director). Tajotep (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're wrong : the picture was intirely shot in Toledo and Madrid, Spain. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:10, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Italy is still valid wherever the rule of shorter term is used. --Yann (talk) 16:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a 1958 film : unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a 1958 film : unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a 1958 film : unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a 1958 film : very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a 1958 film : very, very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still from a 1958 film : very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still from a 1958 film : very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still from a 1958 film : very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still from a 1958 film : very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still from a 1958 film : very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still from a 1958 film : very unlikely that author died before 1952. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film shot in Spain : any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a Spanish film, it's Italian (Duccio Tessari was an Italian director). Tajotep (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tajotep: The film (which is an Italy-Spain coproduction) was entirely shot in Andalucía, Spain (as many spaghetti westerns), so "not created" in Italy as the template PD-Italy states. The Spanish law doesn't allow works to be in public domain so early. So we'll have to wait a few years. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: A film is Spanish whent it's directed by a Spanish director, so in this case, Una pistola per Ringo is an Italian film. It doesn't depend on the place where it was shot. Tajotep (talk) 23:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The nationality of a film depends on the nationality of the productions company involved in it and this one is a Spanish-Italian feature. Please read again the PD-Italy digest and the entire Italian law : to pretend to public domain in Italy the picture should have been taken there, but it has not. So Italian law can't apply. Now let's wait for the Administrator's decision. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:06, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It has two productions companies: Balcázar Producciones Cinematográficas (Spanish) and Produzioni Cinematografiche Mediterranee (Italian), so... let's wait to the Administrator, ok. Tajotep (talk) 00:11, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Italy is still valid wherever the rule of shorter term is used. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film shot in Spain : any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same like this This film isn't a Spanish film. Tajotep (talk) 23:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Italy is still valid wherever the rule of shorter term is used. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film shot in Spain : any reason for Italian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was shot in Italy. Tajotep (talk) 23:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Italy is still valid wherever the rule of shorter term is used. --Yann (talk) 16:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I disagree : this is not a PD text logo, the letter "o" is creative enough to be protected by copyright Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an exact {{Duplicate}}, but given that we already have this version from Wellcome and This one from the Library of Congress: Do we really want/need another low-resolution version with incomplete and incorrect (date) meta data? El Grafo (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality duplicate of File:Cross daGama2.jpg, and without attribution. Yann (talk) 08:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorized image of -I guess- an Indonesian actress. Uploaded by an occasional user who has two pics here. I DR'ed the other one because it was grabbed from internet. I could not find this image in the net but given the above, it is also a dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 08:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hema03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; photo of a non-notable person on enwiki.

theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio, probably lifted from Instagram. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicki Minaj Brings Out Meek Mill in Paris.jpg Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work claim is dubious given editor has other copyright violations. See also this article which includes the photo and predates the upload of the photo to Commons. Whpq (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, author is not unknown. Now clear that it is still in copyright. --99of9 (talk) 13:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 13:23, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and [[5]]. --99of9 (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, and [[6]]. --99of9 (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Padaung-girl_in_Pekong.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Padaung-girl_in_Pekong.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Padaung-girl_in_Pekong.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Padaung-girl_in_Pekong.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, His only child, the daughter is dead, about 2013. Then the state is possible heir. And they have not taken advantage of this opportunity.-Haabet 21:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
How do you know? Where is the evidence? Actually his photographic Nachlass is with the de:Fotostiftung Schweiz who claim copyright[7]. --Túrelio (talk) 21:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Every year a book is published about the works that have become PD. It's the 2013 or 2014 edition you'll need. info@fotostiftung.ch Is this address that has contacted you? -Haabet 22:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Nobody has contacted me so far. --Túrelio (talk) 22:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Many claim copyright, even on my pictures. And maybe this claim was right before 2013.-Haabet 22:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

The photos are from this page https://www.flickr.com/photos/54729153@N07/albums/72157626659856756/

Well, also many claim "PD". Why should the Flickr-account "collection of old photos" have any rights in Hürlimann photos? Anyway, I've contacted the Fotostiftung Schweiz, as they officially hold Hürlimanns Nachlass. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
BTW: according to de:Bettina_Hürlimann#Leben Hürlimann had 4 children with his wife Bettina. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As of today I have received a reply from the Fotostiftung, in which they claim to represent the copyright of Martin Hürlimann since 1991 and state that his work is copyrighted til end of 2054. I've forwarded the reply to OTRS. So, this and all the below listed DRs should be delete-closed. --Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can confirm that this reply is documented in OTRS. // Martin K. (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Padaung-girl_in_Pekong.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Padaung-girl_in_Pekong.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author en:Martin_Hürlimann died in 1984, whereby his works are protected til end of 2054. So, this image needs a permission or to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Padaung-girl_in_Pekong.jpg. --99of9 (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old images; may be PD by date, but more information needed.

Yann (talk) 07:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files recently uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyright violations. Some are watermarked, some are so old that I doubt "own work". Sources for the others:

I haven't checked all of Zaydbinumar's earlier uploads; some, at least, seemed genuinely "own work" to me.

Huon (talk) 23:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Where the photos are old enough to be PD, evidence should be provided of that. For the others, the original photographer(s) should confirm the license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 09:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaydbinumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unclear copyright status.

   FDMS  4    13:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in iceland. Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:47, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier en doublon Thesupermat (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 22:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a useful image - small, blurry, and poorly lit. We have plenty of better images of this station. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weirdly angled photo that doesn't illustrate anything useful. We have plenty of better images of this station. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the copyright notice on the image, we need an OTRS email to verify that Santi2000003 is the owner of the copyright (or that it is released by the owners under a free license). Kaldari (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining file, small image with incomplete metadata, all other files deleted as copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining file, small image without metadata, all other files deleted as copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Socialist Workers Party logo Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yann (talk) 06:43, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo's author is László Bérci. He is dead in 1997. Source: [10], or [11], or match 129. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 07:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It also applies to this version:


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload by a one-time uploader. I saw this pic in Pinterest also. Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 08:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marred duplicate of File:The web of empire - a diary of the imperial tour of their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and York in 1901 (1902) (14577460779).jpg Broichmore (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Broichmore: for duplicates, please use {{Duplicate}}. Ruthven (msg) 06:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marred duplicate of File:The web of empire - a diary of the imperial tour of their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and York in 1901 (1902) (14577535639).jpg Broichmore (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marred duplicate of The web of empire - a diary of the imperial tour of their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and York in 1901 (1902) (14741139656).jpg Broichmore (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marred duplicate of The web of empire - a diary of the imperial tour of their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and York in 1901 (1902) (14577544028).jpg Broichmore (talk) 11:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low scaled version of file:SventojiRiver002.JPG Hugo.arg (talk) 11:43, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Hugo.arg: next time use directly {{Duplicate}}. Thx. Ruthven (msg) 06:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted content.    FDMS  4    13:50, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry to be of encyclopedic value Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:02, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SS of copyrighted works.

+

SlowManifesto (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--Shams bahari (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC) دلیلی برای حذف وجود ندارد احتمالا حساسیت بی‌مورد. همه عکس‌ها از صفحه دسک‌تاپ گرفته شده بنابر این مالک قانونی آنها همان بارگذار است[reply]

@Shams bahari: As COM:SS "Screenshots from audiovisual works (such as films, television broadcasts, video clips) are often the property of its producer or creator and they may not be uploaded to Commons unless the work itself is in the public domain or released under a free license or unless the copyright holder is willing to release the screenshot under a free license." SlowManifesto (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shams bahari (talk) 16:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)-- اگر اینطور فکر می‌کنید و اعمال نفوذی صورت نگرفته است همه حذف گردد. سانسور شاخ و دم ندارد[reply]

 Delete per Nominator.--Mbazri (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. Could it be PD, for more than 50 years? E4024 (talk) 15:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 06:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: my mistake: the photo wasn't shot in Italy and we have no proof that the author is Italian. --Ruthven (msg) 06:31, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file. E4024 (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Should have been speedy deleted. Ruthven (msg) 06:32, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer =/ Helmut Reinalter Eingangskontrolle (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author/copyright holder. Ruthven (msg) 06:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omar yusuph (talk · contribs)

[edit]

High-resolution images with inconsistent EXIF. In itself I'd consider this genuine, but considering the user's upload history, copyright violations are likely.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:39, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be their own work, problematic user at cs.wiki Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: cannot find other copies on the Net. Assuming COM:GOODFAITH. Ruthven (msg) 06:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be their own work Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Probably scan of a magazine. Ruthven (msg) 06:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pro level image with No OTRS of supposedly notable person, added by first time user, and added into wiki page. Theredproject (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: cannot find other copies on the Net. Assuming COM:GOODFAITH. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image, author and uploader don't match IJReid (talk) 21:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 06:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image, watermark, author and uploader don't match IJReid (talk) 21:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, unlikely to be a selfie, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The picture has been published by the creator/copyrightholder with a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license here. 83.223.29.23 10:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not notable person, apparently. Out of SCOPE. Ruthven (msg) 06:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Did Martin Frick license this image copyright free on a CC BY 3.0 license. This needs COM:OTRS permission Leoboudv (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   15:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://topsport.bg/tennis/dimitar-kuzmanov-ne-sam-igral-s-zhoao-sousa-no-imam-golemi-shansove-za-pobeda.html, credits LAP.bg Ytoyoda (talk) 22:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shot to Head Photography, missing pertmission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that author died before 1952 (anyway seems a screenshot). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture made by "Frank Hanswijk" according to EXIF, permission from that person is needed. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author Frank Hanswijk. Ruthven (msg) 06:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use file, that appears in several pages on the web (such as this one). The Commons cannot be a repository for just anything and it is not an online photo album. Ldorfman (talk) 23:31, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 06:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be removed as it is a horrible representation of the city! Holtfarms (talk) 23:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Um, no. Perhaps read about editing on Wikimedia before nominating anything, or frankly anymore improper edits. M.O. Stevens 23:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, Promotional image Godric ki Kothri talk 14:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. This uploader has given us only three images of himself and one copyvio.


 Deleted, small unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work of art. Rapsar (talk) 08:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too similar to a pic on her Facebook page. Possibly taken from there. E4024 (talk) 08:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.abuissa.com/ May be above PD-textlogo, but borderline. Let's have a proper DR. In use. Yann (talk) 08:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:42, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Following discussion here and here, I feel I must nominate this file for deletion. Summary of objection: photo of 1930, the photographer may not be unknown [althought unmentioned by source] and date of first publication is unknown, so not allowed to see as PD in Germany, therefor should not be on Commons. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Following discussion here and here, I feel I must nominate this file for deletion. Summary of objection: photo of 1930, the photographer may not be unknown [althought unmentioned by source] and date of first publication is unknown, so not allowed to see as PD in Germany, therefore should not be on Commons. Jürgen Eissink (talk) 14:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Smithy (Rozanova, 1912).jpg Stolbovsky (talk) 21:23, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please use {{Duplicate}} template on the file page. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:جبران الغافري

[edit]

The following file had been taken from: nadialarab.com. At the end of each page is stated: "© 2018 نادي العرب كافة الحقوق محفوظة" that is: "© 2018 Arab Club. All rights reserved". So, these files should be considered copyrighted:

Furthermore, the following pictures had been taken from: http://www.basilrathbone.net/

The website is copyrighted: "All original content is © Marcia Jessen, 2018". The following files are not "original content", but their copyright status is then unclear and surely User:جبران الغافري can't license them as cc-by-sa.

Finally

are taken from the Library of Congress. Tag them as cc-by-sa is, again, an error. --Harlock81 (talk) 23:06, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:34, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double Upload. I am the owner of this picture and I uploaded a smaller version of this file. So please delete it. Thanks! TKlingberg (talk) 21:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Okuda San Miguel (b. 1980), any permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Patrick Rogel,
La foto “El Lago del Deseo” está realizada a un póster del cuadro del mismo título del pintor Okuda San Miguel. El póster fue la imagen o cartel público de la Feria MadridArt'18 que tuvo lugar en Madrid en febrero de 2018. Este póster se regalaba y también se podía adquirir por unos 15-20 euros. En mi caso me lo regalaron al hacer una compra en la feria.
Yo he realizado una fotografía a dicho póster y después he realizado algunos ajustes para cuadrarla y quitar los bordes blancos.
Es un póster público y la fotografía ha sido realizada por mí.
Saludos cordiales.--Lariob (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Patrick Rogel,
The photo "The Lac of Desire" is made to a poster of the painting of the same title by the painter Okuda San Miguel. The poster was the public image or poster of the Feria MadridArt'18 that took place in Madrid in February 2018. This poster was given away and could also be purchased for 15-20 euros. In my case they gave it to me when making a purchase at the fair.
I have taken a photograph of that poster and then I have made some adjustments to square it and remove the white edges.
It is a public poster and the photography has been done by me.
Best regards.--Lariob (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Lariob: . There's no doubt you own a copy of this work but it doesn't give you the right to copy it ("copyright") or desseminate it by putting it under a Creative Commons licence. Only Okuda San Miguel may abandon his rights by senting a permission via COM:OTRS. Kind regards, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Patrick Rogel. Intentaré contactar con Okuda San Miguel, transmitiéndole tu mensaje, para que él o quien sea propietario del "copyright", lo libere si les parece correcto. Gracias y saludos cordiales.--Lariob (talk) 09:19, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above, If you get OTRS permission from the copyright holder, please nominate for undeletion request. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2008 - 2018 Offers.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo, per Yann. --Storkk (talk) 10:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2018 Goodsearch LLC. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo, per Yann. --Storkk (talk) 10:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: © 2018 Lenaleestore.com All rights reserved. PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 06:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo, per Yann. --Storkk (talk) 10:37, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright © 2017-2018 | Droid Turf PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo, per Yann. --Storkk (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier en doublon. Thesupermat (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 03:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fichier en triple Thesupermat (talk) 10:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thesupermat: Quelles sont les autres versions? --Ruthven (msg) 06:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier en doublon. Thesupermat (talk) 14:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier en doublon. Thesupermat (talk) 14:59, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier en doublon. Thesupermat (talk) 15:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adamgerber80 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from a public forum here [12]. It was posted there in 2013 much before it was uploaded here in 2015.
Converted by me to DR, as I don't see this image on the skyscraper page. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turelio Sorry in a hurry I pasted the wrong link. The correct link is the authors flickr page here [13] where it is not released under any license. You can also find the authors mark on the bottom right which matches the authors name on Flickr. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:51, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Now, the image on Commons is indeed identical to the highest resolution of the image on Flickr. However, the username of the uploader on Commons AhmedAli17 is rather similar to the username on Flickr Ali Ahmed. So, it's quite possible that they are the same person. Someone should ask the Flickr-user for confirmation. --Túrelio (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Túrelio I have a strong suspicion that the Wikimedia user is nto the real Ali Ahmed but only trying to ape their identity. There are 2 reasons behind it, (1) The uploaded image does not have the correct metadata which makes me believe that the Wikimedia user copied the image from flickr rather than upload a real image (2) the Wikimedia user has only uploaded 2 images (both CR Ahmed Ali, and the second one also seems to be a CR violation) and not uploaded all the other images on their flickr account. If it indeed was the same user then why not upload all images vs just random two. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of permission, all rights reserved at Flickr. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by GreenMeansGo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Apparently copyrighted image taken from online

No more the case, another version uploaded. But still dubious authorship; see file talk:Dannykangoo.jpg. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:

  • Licensing: The uploader has claimed to be the person shown in the photograph and also insisted to own the necessary rights and gave permission. (file talk:Dannykangoo.jpg) The fact that this person appears to be a fitness model and knows somebody who is able to make professional photographs is no reason to assume dubious authorship. We should assume good faith and keep it.
  • Project scope: As a user image uploaded by someone who didn't violate any policies, didn't do anything what would exploit our ressources or misuses Wikipedia for self-promotion such an image is clearly in scope. (This account has uploaded two personal images which is acceptable.) Either this image is used on the user page or not it has to be kept. We can't just delete every single personal file of any new user. If we act this way we scare away potential contributors. This person may never become a "power" user but might provide some valuable contributions in the future. This should be enough reason to keep this file. --Zaccarias (talk) 17:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no OTRS permission from photographer. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild ist in besserer Qualität bereits vorhanden, siehe Datei:Հայկական անձնագիր.jpg Datei wurde von mir hochgeladen und wird nicht verwendet.

Picture already exists in better quality, see file:Հայկական անձնագիր.jpg File was uploaded by me and is not used yet. JoeHard (talk) 20:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pjefts as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I don't have copyright}} Pjefts ([[User talk:Pjefts|{{int:Talkpagelinktext
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. Image had originally been uploaded by uploader in 2014 to :en as "Uploading a self-made file using". -- Túrelio (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low res, no exif, probably not own work. --Jcb (talk) 22:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work from the Spanish government, parliement or other public and official administrations. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID), a state branch of the Government of Spain, contributed on it. Tajotep (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - even if this would be a government work, it's still not a law or resolution. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work from the Spanish government, parliement or other public and official administrations. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo (AECID), a state branch of the Government of Spain, contributed on it. Tajotep (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway it's a Colombian film so any reason for Spanish law to apply. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source URL provided to confirm authenticity. Unless the uploader is in fact Underwood herself (which I highly doubt), the "own work" claim is false and the risk of keeping around a fake signature just isn't worth it. SNUGGUMS (talk) 23:37, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: I'm confused. Where is the "own work" claim? I see "Author:Carrie Underwood, Digitalization by Syfuel" which would seem to suggest the uploader got the autograph and digitized it. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I must've misread the file or confused it with some other upload for "own work", my bad on that, but it either way still is suspicious how no URL containing this signature is provided and there's no evidence indicating the uploader is in fact Underwood. SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There's no suggestion the uploader is in fact Underwood. There's an explicit claim that the uploader digitized the signature from one on paper... you know, where most signatures originate. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: copyright information seems fine. As for the 'fake signature' concern, that's not the domain of Commons administrators, local Wikipedia projects have to decide whether they want to use the file. --Jcb (talk) 22:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stephencdickson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A great shame to flag these for potential deletion as clearly a lot of work has been put into them over the years, and they'd be very useful to the project if permissible, but per recent pump threads here and here, consensus seems to be that these are derivative works, being modified versions of original artworks and photographs, and cannot be freely licenced and reused solely as User:Stephencdickson's "own work".

Example: File:Pastel portrait of Sir William Gray by Stephen C Dickson (after Alan Sutherland).jpg is derived from this 1977 portrait. I haven't tracked down sources for all images, but checking many of the files below at random, a Google image search for the subject's name turns up an original portrait which was its derivation.

The user hasn't explained their working process in detail, but it appears to involve printing a digital image onto paper, and applying pastel and pencil over the top to cover most of the original detail, while retaining the same artistic depiction, before scanning it back in. It sounds as if the creator may have been acting on bad advice from others that an editing process such as this would remove any copyright and allow the final result to be freely CC-licenced.

(Thanks to User:Clindberg for checking and flagging the potential copyright status of most images below, I've also flagged some of the others.)

Likely public domain in US and country of origin (usually UK)
Under copyright in UK
Under copyright in US via URAA


Still not enough information

Lord Belbury (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
 Delete If the source is under a copyright, these are copyright violations. If the source is in the public domain, there isn't copyright issue, but there isn't any point of not using the picture. In these cases, these works are out of scope, as personal art. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, except in PD cases: There is a problem with bad underlying copyrights, but we may not have any other picture for some of the works with underlying PD copyrights, and for certain uses these drawings may be superior to the original; old newspaper photos can be pretty bad.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What does not make sense in deletion is that these are largely 19th c people and the original images are non-copyright or copyright expired. This to me should be self-evident. My intention is to fill gaps on Wikimedia/pedia and to improve the quality of available images. My image of John Primrose Ure is based on a 5cm high blurry photo in the Glasgow Herald and whilst it has reappeared in more modern sources (notably without copyright issues raised) my own work whilst necessarily "derivative" (otherwise being pointless) is my own grey pastel work and my own intellectual property. If you were to do an electronic analysis you will find it different in almost all respects from the original but (as I am a reasonable artist) reasonably recognisable. The nature of the creation and lack of copyright on the originals makes this whole issue quite bizarre. I am at least glad that some see that this is a LOT of effort and it would be heart-breaking to remove it. Short of creating a video to show how I create each (which would be a long video) I do not how to prove these are my own works and "derivation" is deliberately minimised whilst trying to keep a meaningful likeness. Ironically the John Primrose Ure image which began the whole debate I consider one of my artistic best... which is perhaps a lesson in itself... If the pastel images were more remote from source (and less identifiable) they would then (by the theories above from complainants) be more acceptable. A ridiculous catch 22--Stephencdickson (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody with a better understanding of copyright than me give some guidance for which source images are and aren't public domain here? It looks like the majority of these pictures are of people who died in the 20th century, and at least one (the 1977 William Gray portrait mentioned above) is derived from the work of an artist who is still alive today. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For the UK copyright status, you can follow this chart. For the U.S. status, COM:HIRTLE can help. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep ones based on PD sources,  Delete ones where the source is still under copyright. I think these are in scope, if the licensing is OK, even if the PD original would be better on the Wikipedia articles. Determining PD status can be difficult for works from the late 1800s and on. The John Primrose Ure image... is almost certainly PD-1923 for the U.S. side of things, and it may be PD-UK-unknown, but as it is likely an early 1900s photo we may need to know the source and if a photographer was mentioned in the original publications. The Malcolm X photo is possible due to U.S. formalities but we would need to know its publication history. File:Dr Henry Marshall by Stephen C Dickson, after Daniel Macnee.jpg should be fine -- that artist died in 1882. In all cases, it's best to note the underlying work so that author is credited as well. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep or  Delete according to the status of the original photo, per Carl and others above. I think those that are OK regarding copyright are likely in scope: where the original photo is poorly reproduced (low resolution, nth-generation rescreen, or the like), a redrawing might well be superior as an illustration of the subject, per Prosfilaes. And where the drawings can be paired with the originals they would serve as useful demonstrations of the artistic technique itself.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 16:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I can't be objective here, as I requested the uploader to do some of these portraits (after coming across some of his earlier work). See the discussion here. I was made aware (through a ping) of the two recent discussions here and here. I am not convinced that the approach taken by Stephencdickson does actually breach the underlying copyright (if you look closely at the examples, the changes are actually quite substantive). The only way to 100% test this would be if one of the holders of the copyright to the original photographs did take some sort of action. I think that would be unlikely to occur (except in the case of the painting where the artist is still alive). I can understand, though, that Commons takes a very conservative approach to avoid the risk of any infringements. It is likely that a lot of these images will be deleted, but can I please make a plea for those participating in this discussion to try and work with and encourage Stephencdickson to try again and see if it is possible to come up with a style that is acceptable? It is incredibly rare to find someone willing to do artistic renderings of people, and this should be encouraged and guided, rather than discouraged (I hope people participating here can see that this deletion discussion is likely to have a discouraging effect).
    See also the comments I made here and here. Also note the guidance at: Wikipedia:Donated artwork/Artists' welcome page (does this guidance apply at Commons or not)? "You are encouraged to create a portrait in the medium of your choice and then upload it to Wikimedia Commons under a compatible license. [...] The image should be realistic and may be based on multiple photos found using search engine results. [...] It is extremely important that the piece is original and can not be considered a derivative of any existing work. Therefore, it must not be copied from any other image(s), as that would likely constitute a copyright violation." If there is an example where more than one photograph or painting is available, maybe try again with that example and see if the resulting portrait by Stephencdickson is acceptable here at Commons? Carcharoth (talk) 08:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Carcharoth: : Commons_talk:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Drawings has a couple examples which were kept, plus some further discussion and links. This court case also has a very good discussion about what constitutes expression in photographs, and derivative works of them. That case was between two photographs, where the second was ruled to be a derivative work of the first (shown at the end of the PDF). Many of the principles will still hold when it comes to drawings of photos. The Artists' welcome page mentions the need to avoid derivative works, but does not get into the detail needed. There is enough gray area that reasonable people can differ, of course. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe "weird" is too judgmental. I don't mean to criticize the art, I just find it disconcerting or jarring to come across a Victorian-age persona represented by a clearly anachronistic, artistic representation. I much prefer to see a contemporaneous photo portrait (and I believe it's more "encyclopedic").Glendoremus (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but that is a decision made by the editors on the projects. Commons tries to have as many options as possible -- so to me, if the drawings are fine copyright-wise, we should keep them. But that does not mean that someone can't upload the PD source image and switch to that on the Wikipedia article. That is part of why identifying the source can help. Maybe someone writes a Wikibook at some point though and likes the drawing style for their particular purpose, especially if consistent for a series of people, and so uses those instead. Commons should be about giving more options. Also, I think a few of these were made from very small source thumbnail photos, so the larger drawing may still be better than the low-resolution source photo. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I came across John Sturgeon Mackay today, at the very end of a massive trawl to discover the connection between Sir Henry Savile (he of the Savilian Professorships at Oxford) and Euclid's Elements. Mackay's article on Euclid in 1911 Encyc. Britt. finally made the link clear, and I wanted to find out who JMS was. I was immediately struck by the quality of the artwork, and I very hope that some sort of compromise can be reached. I am happily ignorant of the niceties of this sort of copyright problem, but I will try to get in touch with some knowledgeable people who may be able to help. >MinorProphet (talk) 10:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the ones based on a clearly PD picture, deleted the rest. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: a few {{PD-UK-unknown}} Yann (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]