Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Bollywood Hungama does not own the rights to the poster next to Alia. This image cannot be hosted here unless the copyright parts are removed. FredWalsh (talk) 14:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep now as I've cropped the image to remove the excess non-free component. The closing admin can just delete the older version from the history. —SpacemanSpiff 15:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: done Basvb (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT George3331 (talk) 03:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, speedily as blatant spam. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kofi asmah (talk · contribs)
[edit](1) Image exclusively used on user page which is being used for advertising/publicity purposes rather than appropriate use of user page for Wikimedia project related purposes. (2) Unlikely educational reuse given that the subject otherwise has no coverage currently in Wikimedia projects. (3) Appearance of the image at http://tuscanyprogh.com this business website suggests the image may have been acquired commercially and so its free license here is not likely to be accurate
seb26 (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
copyied from https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/wong-fu-productions-first-feature-film#/ specifically https://c4.iggcdn.com/image/fetch/fl_progressive:semi,q_auto,f_auto/https%3A%2F%2Fimages.indiegogo.com%2Ffile_attachments%2F337814%2Ffiles%2F20140129191150-ML-WongFuProductions-104a.jpg%3F1391051510 Jim1138 (talk) 01:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
derivative work Life has teeth (talk) 21:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Josve05a at 22:06, 8 Oktober 2017 UTC: Derivative of non-free content --Krdbot 00:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
unclear what this even shows - no educational value Life has teeth (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Possibly redundant file to the jpg version. B dash (talk) 02:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as creator of file, redundant. Jdcomix (talk) 03:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, author also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Though the photograph is indeed licensed under CC-BY-SA by the museum, the underlying work has not fallen in the public domain, its creator having died in 1955. — Racconish ☎ 16:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Racconish, I had a look at the Museum's Licence before I uploaded it, but haven't thought about it and did not realize the problem. I won't protest if the photo was to be deleted... Best regards, --Pierrette13 (talk) 17:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep- As far as I know: If the license is CC BY SA, it doesn't matter that the photographer didn't die 70 years ago or more. The text on that website is not used here on Wikimedia. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- See here (in dutch, nothing about PD: Creative Commons.org - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Richardkiwi, I think we have a misunderstanding and I apologize for any confusion. This is a photograph of a stained glass artwork by Marius Richters who died in 1955. In that respect, the license on the photograph should be irrelevant, per COM:DW. On the other hand, the stained glass is a permanent part of the Zuiderkerk, therefore {{FoP-Nederland}} can apply. In view of this, I withdraw my nomination. — Racconish ☎ 17:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- See here (in dutch, nothing about PD: Creative Commons.org - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept. Nomination withdrawn as permanent part of a building per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Netherlands. — Racconish ☎ 17:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Grafik fehlerhaft Dr.Ingo Grafe (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by uploader, error in image. --Leyo 20:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete I do not want any of my files on any sites. Marck Gibbs97 (talk) 00:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Oppose: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Nominator's uploads are within project scope and realistically educationally useful. The uploads have been uploaded a considerable amount ago (in August 2017), so courtesy deletions don't apply easily. The quality of uploaded images – while not on the level of valued images – are also good enough to be useful. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 01:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The person responsible for the image sent me a message saying that it is to remove this image as soon as possible from the Internet, please I need help. OPS: The source was taken from Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marck Gibbs97 (talk • contribs) 2017-09-30T22:21:57 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Failed license review. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete I do not want any of my files on any sites. Marck Gibbs97 (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Nominator's uploads are within project scope and realistically educationally useful. The uploads have been uploaded a considerable amount ago (in August 2017), so courtesy deletions don't apply easily. The quality of uploaded images – while not on the level of valued images – are also good enough to be useful. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 01:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:59, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The person responsible for the image sent me a message saying that it is to remove this image as soon as possible from the Internet, please I need help. OPS:The source was taken from Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marck Gibbs97 (talk • contribs) 2017-09-30T22:25:29 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Failed license review. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete I do not want any of my files on any sites. Marck Gibbs97 (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Nominator's uploads are within project scope and realistically educationally useful. The uploads have been uploaded a considerable amount ago (in August 2017), so courtesy deletions don't apply easily. The quality of uploaded images – while not on the level of valued images – are also good enough to be useful. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 01:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
The author would not imagine that the images are exposed on the internet so I ask that you take as much heat as possible the source is Facebook. OPS: The source was taken from Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marck Gibbs97 (talk • contribs) 2017-09-30T22:23:12 (UTC)
Copyrights Contribuidor da Wikipédia (talk) 19:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Failed license review. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
_-_Jérémie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_p008_Hetman_Żółkiewski.jpg){kind=link}
![29 File:"Танец" Матисса в Главном штабе Эрмитажа, Санкт - Петербург.jpg](#File:"Танец"_Матисса_в_Главном_штабе_Эрмитажа,_Санкт_-_Петербург.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![262 File:Glass Sculpure "Vitae" by Denise Gemin - Murano, Venice, Italy - April 18, 2014.jpg](#File:Glass_Sculpure_"Vitae"_by_Denise_Gemin_-_Murano,_Venice,_Italy_-_April_18,_2014.jpg){kind=link}
_-_J%C3%A9r%C3%A9mie.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_J%C3%A9r%C3%A9mie.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_Jérémie.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Jérémie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
_p008_Hetman_%C5%BB%C3%B3%C5%82kiewski.jpg){kind=link}
_p008_Hetman_%C5%BB%C3%B3%C5%82kiewski.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is NOT ŻÓŁKIEWSKI. It is bad copy of the File:M.V. Skopin-Shuyskiy (17th c., Tretyakov gallery).jpg. Удивленный1 (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_p008_Hetman_Żółkiewski.jpg){kind=link}
_p008_Hetman_Żółkiewski.jpg){kind=link}
- Deutsch: Nachtrag: Das Bild [M.V. Skopin-Shuyskiy (17th c., Tretyakov gallery).jpg] ist mit einem russischen Copyright © 2007 nearyou.ru versehen, somit liegt dann ebenfalls ein triftiger Löschgrund für das bessere Bild vor - siehe Bildbeschreibung der Quelle.--Metilsteiner (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep - The images are not the same, there are multiple differences. One has a large extended collar while the other doesn't, the collar design under the chin is also different, the pinstripe that frame the image also have a different design along with many many more differences throughout the painting (hair, eyebrows, coat, the list goes on). They aren't the same illustration, they may have likenesses to each other but aren't the same. Offnfopt(talk) 19:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
_p008_Hetman_Żółkiewski.jpg){kind=link}
Keep They are different, but even if they were the same we do not delete images because of the wrong description: We fix the description. Or document that some published this image claiming that it depicts
Żółkiewski, while others claim that the same image depict someone else. --Jarekt (talk)
02:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Anyway the name and description on this file are wrong. The text on the painting: "БЛ(а)Г(о)ВЕРНЫЙ КН(я)ЗЕ МИ----ХАИЛЪ ВАСИ(л)ЕВИЧЪ скопинъ". It means: "faithful prince Mikhail Vasilevich Skopin". Here are all versions. O'k. I'll suggest rename.--Удивленный1 (talk) 06:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep {{Duplicate}} doesn't apply, no reason for deletion apparent. --MB-one (talk) 13:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep ich kann keinen Löschgrund erkennen. --Ralf Roleček 10:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
_p008_Hetman_Żółkiewski.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Jarekt (talk) 21:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
_p008_Hetman_Żółkiewski.jpg){kind=link}
keine Lizenz Mehlauge (talk) 10:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Doubtful about license Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:Screenshots. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
This is a screenshot of a Windows 10 weather app. It is unclear if the image can be hosted here on Wikimedia Commons under the present license.
- File:Asian Temperatures forecast for 26th January 2017, 11AM (32367409262).jpg
- File:Northern & middle european temperatures, forecast for 19th January 2017, 11PM (MAP of Windows 10 weather app) (31591990973).jpg
- File:Asian Temperatures (~rectangle corners- Omsk-Kabul-Sachalin-Tokyo) forecast for 26th January 2017, 11AM (MAP of Windows 10 weather app) (32479096036).jpg
- File:14th Jan- Europe Temperature Map (32252857246).jpg
- File:Northern & middle european temperatures, weather forecast for 6th January 2017 (MAP of Windows 10 weather app) (32141089982).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(31591990973).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_forecast_for_26th_January_2017,_11AM_(MAP_of_Windows_10_weather_app)_(32479096036).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(32141089982).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B dash (talk) 06:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:Screenshots#Microsoft products. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Useless without a description and categories. WP:RU has deleted an article on this man because there is no evidence of encyclopedic significance . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also small size and no metadata. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:29, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Painting by Henri Matisse ("La Danse"), who died in 1954. Not free. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Undeleted It's now 2025. Abzeronow (talk) 23:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
This appears to be an upsampled version of the picture at https://www.culture.ru/institutes/10998/istoriko-kulturniy-muzey-sela-zavrazhe, which does not have a corresponding license. Even if the uploader is the photographer, we will need to go through the COM:OTRS (COM:OTRS/ru) process. Jmabel ! talk 16:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 01:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billion Technology Laboratories Inc. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - promotional images
George3331 (talk) 01:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 01:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Binoy4ever (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 01:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 01:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 01:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ibrahim aa datti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Hope everything keep me.jpg
- File:Birthday for hanif and tarif.jpg
- File:Example of friends.jpg
- File:Example of friendship.jpg
George3331 (talk) 02:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Biswatoshsinha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Biswatoshsinha.jpg
- File:Bishu.jpg
- File:Biswatosh sinha.jpg
- File:Biswatosh.jpg
- File:Monotosh1.jpg
- File:Monotosh in Savdhaan India.jpg
- File:Monotoshstyle.jpg
- File:Monotosh sinha photo shoot.jpg
- File:Style monotosh sinha.jpg
- File:Monotosh.jpg
George3331 (talk) 02:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prancedevaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 02:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:KG1 Studio time in session.png
- File:Inner the Wilderness.jpg
- File:BLACK 22 08 2015 11 30 10.jpg
George3331 (talk) 02:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Just a copy of one of the old versions of File:World marriage-equality laws.svg. It can be found in the original file's history anyway. Otherwise is not used and most likely won't ever be used. Pointless file. Growupon (talk) 00:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Advertisment for some blog / review / shop-website. Out of Commons:Project scope. Uploaders only global contribution. Zaccarias (talk) 11:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The poster, which is nearly the entire background, is a professional photograph. The release needs to address the copyright of that portrait. Fæ (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Now cropped so the background is justifiable de minimis. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
I moved the cropped image to File:NicolasTse2005 (cropped).jpg as per the request at Commons:History merging and splitting/Requests. Now the previous reason holds. This is a derivative image and is a copyright violation. Sreejith K (talk) 15:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Sreejithk2000: The photo was taken in Taiwan, so I looked for the Taiwanese court's judgments related to portrait rights in the past (see: Case No.1000020440). Whether a public figure or not, it is illegal to use a photograph without the consent of the person being photographed. If the person being photographed can prove reputational damage or other loss, then they are entitled to compensation. For us, therefore, the real problem is that taking photos of anyone in Taiwan (especially taking photos of a public figure), the uploader must have permission from the person being photographed. If we had to do this, it would be possible to delete a very large number of photos. However, considering the circumstances, it is best to invite the Taiwanese users first as most of the photos are uploaded by them.--Kai3952 (talk) 20:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:06, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
advertising, out of com:EDUSE
Pippobuono (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violations. "...Spokane Shock.jpg" appears at this blog post dated 7 months prior to upload, and "...Champion.jpg" has EXIF data citing Jonathan Martinez as photographer. No indication from uploader user name that they are associated with the photographer.
To uploader: if you are the photographer or know them, can you please read and follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS, we will need a statement from Jonathan Martinez releasing them under a free Creative Commons license in order to keep the photos. Otherwise we can't be sure they were uploaded with permission. Thanks
- File:Adam Juratovac Arena Bowl XXIII Champion.jpg
- File:Adam Juratovac Arena Bowl XXIII Spokane Shock.jpg
seb26 (talk) 13:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio / missing authorization. Copied from the facebook site of the organization. Take Mirrenberg (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright infringement. The photo is from a website without statement of free use: https://hotelschool.nl/en/education/our-bachelor-programme?_url=/en/education/bachelor-programme oSeveno (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of background photo, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Even if the background image is remvoed, the logo is above TOO. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope : personal photograph. VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 16:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
low quality pics of com:PENIS
Pippobuono (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE, exhibitionnism
- File:000 Ejaculation Exemplar.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar2.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar1.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar3.gif
- File:Naked man cock erection5.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection4.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection6.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection2.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection3.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection1.jpg
- File:Old man sperm.gif
- File:Black cock erection.jpg
- File:Old man erection.gif
Pippobuono (talk) 10:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE
- File:00 Naked man Semen overflows from the bulging glans6.jpg
- File:00 Naked man Semen overflows from the bulging glans5.jpg
- File:00 Naked man Semen overflows from the bulging glans4.jpg
- File:00 Naked man Semen overflows from the bulging glans3.jpg
- File:00 Naked man Semen overflows from the bulging glans2.jpg
- File:00 Naked man Semen overflows from the bulging glans1.jpg
- File:000 Ejaculation Exemplar.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar2.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar1.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar3.gif
- File:Naked man cock erection5.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection4.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection6.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection2.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection3.jpg
- File:Naked man cock erection1.jpg
- File:Old man sperm.gif
- File:Black cock erection.jpg
- File:Old man erection.gif
Pippobuono (talk) 10:45, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think these images and videos are very different from what was already available on Wikimedia Commons. To my knowledge there are no other videos/images of old men ejaculating. Also a large amount of mixed grey and black pubic hair is shown in this series which is also rare to non-existant on Wikimedia Commons. The combination makes them unique. Alice2Alice (talk) 11:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Per com:nudity. These are out of our scope.
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar12.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar11.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar10.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar7.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar9.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar8.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar6.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar5.gif
- File:00 Ejaculation Exemplar4.gif
Mhhossein talk 16:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Identical to image on official website at http://www.revbilly.com/mobile_church, no claim of permission. Gapfall (talk) 17:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:nudity. They're out of scope.
Mhhossein talk 17:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
It's out of scope, per nudity. See this nomination, too.
Mhhossein talk 17:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shivam Deori (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE
- File:Selfie with my Cute Guitar.jpg
- File:At NHPC.jpg
- File:Shivam at Likabali 2017.jpg
- File:Shivam at Gerukamukh 2016.jpg
Eurodyne (talk) 21:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bloggersshay (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Life has teeth (talk) 22:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
File:YOUR PERCEPTIONS OF YOURSELVES HAVE BEEN NEGATIVELY DISTORTED BY WHITE MEDIA DECEPTION.pdf
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
private vacation pic --Solomon203 (talk) 07:09, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
private vacation pic --Solomon203 (talk) 07:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
no educational value George3331 (talk) 01:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The source webpage is Getty Images. The source photo at their webpage is watermarked as taken by Underwood and Underwood of the United States, so there's no reason to assume that Australian copyright rules apply. Rather, the image appears to be the property of Getty Images. Diannaa (talk) 01:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep There's no reason to assume that Australian copyright rules don't apply. It's an official portrait of an Australian prime minister in office. Photographs taken by Underwood & Underwood appear frequently in contemporary Australian newspapers, so it's pretty safe to say they had a branch / studio in Australia. Copyright depends on where the photo was taken, not on the place of origin of the author – if that were the case, then virtually all images in Category:Stanley Bruce (and hundreds more across Commons) would still be copyright! The fact that Getty Images has slapped a watermark on it is irrelevant. Note also that Template:PD-Australia states "owned means where a government is the copyright owner as well as would have owned copyright but reached some other agreement with the creator" Ivar the Boneful (talk) 09:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- The fact that the image is on the Getty website at all is likely because they have bought and paid for the image and now own all rights. The onus is on you to prove that the license you attach is the applicable one, not the other way around. Diannaa (talk) 11:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- keep Any photo taken before 1955 has had copyright expired in Australia, and if before 1946 the expiry is recognised in USA too. So this image will be public domain. All that is required is to show that the image is from 1926 and Australian. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:03, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Getty Images cannot claim copyright on a PD image. Getty Images is well known for false copyright claims. --Jcb (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of release under a free license by the subject or heirs C.Fred (talk) 02:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful George3331 (talk) 02:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
too low in quality for encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT George3331 (talk) 02:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. It doesn't seem to be Nicolás Millán Carrasco. --ghouston (talk) 02:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Osvaldo Tilson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Tonilson smith.jpg
- File:Osvaldo esponsavel.jpg
- File:Totilson.jpg
- File:Blaquiro.jpg
- File:Famosinho.jpg
- File:Osvalddd.jpg
- File:Osvaldo.jpg
George3331 (talk) 02:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlos intriago (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal images, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
per uploader's source of pinterest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/676102962778964656 and author - vandalism Jim1138 (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Newcoco123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]non-notable company, out of project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
personal photos, commons is not a webhost
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:YouTube
[edit]compilation of personal files and logos that are out of project scope
- File:Alexelcapo.jpg
- File:AMAZINGNESS.jpg
- File:Badfrog.png
- File:Benja Merani.jpg
- File:BenJoLe!.jpg
- File:Brazy boyz.png
- File:Brazy boyz1.jpg
- File:BYjermaIN.jpg
- File:Claufrans78.jpg
- File:Clominito Studios.png
- File:DMG DiegoMagicGamer.jpg
- File:Dosogas Team.jpg
- File:Ericrazytv1.jpg
- File:F5sal.jpg
- File:Farzat Amin.jpg
- File:FelTV.png
- File:FelTV2.jpg
- File:FelTV3.jpg
- File:FelTV4.jpg
- File:Gercrux.jpg
- File:Gril.jpg
- File:Iikinghenryii.png
- File:Iikinghenryii2.jpg
- File:Iikinghenryii3.jpg
- File:Iikinghenryii4.jpg
- File:Imanolrivasphotoshoot1.jpg
- File:Internet Support Group Thumbnail.jpg
- File:JackThomasYT.jpg
- File:Jay Simpsons.gif
- File:Kayden1702.jpg
- File:MineWarriorBoss.jpg
- File:MWPProfil.jpg
- File:Octavio Luna.jpg
- File:OgLouisMann.jpg
- File:Oliver Šimkovský.jpg
- File:Pablo Pineda Marin.jpg
- File:Salvatore Lertora Perfil de Youtube.jpg
- File:Screen shot YouTube 16 November 2015.png
- File:ShipShipMaya.jpg
- File:Susa's Welt.jpg
- File:Trasheurs.jpg
- File:TripleJay.png
- File:TubeHeads.jpg
- File:XXL TuberDay Logo.png
- File:YourServerPromo Logo.jpg
- File:YouthTube (ЮС).jpg
- File:Φωτογραφία .jpg
- File:سنة اولى مطبخ.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
corrupted photo Artix Kreiger (talk) 04:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
i would like to take this picture down as it is inaccurate and not used on the site GusCaplan (talk) 05:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons' scope. jdx Re: 05:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Misuse of user namespace for creating / displaying an advertisment. Little to no other contributions Zaccarias (talk) 08:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Advertisment. No educational value. out of scope. Zaccarias (talk) 08:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
After categorizing hundreds of sunsets of Venezuela I feel, that the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
probable copyright problems SecretName101 (talk) 01:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Very likely copyright violations. Three total different images all claimed to be "own" work. I don't believe that a single person is that versatile to self-create such different stuff.
- File:Ilustración de Gis Pastel.jpg
- File:3dmax.jpg
- File:Ilustración Acuarela Liquida y Gis Pastel.jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 08:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Pure advertisments with no educational value. Out of Commons:Project scope -
- File:Redes Sociales New Galaxy Apps NewGalaxyApps.jpg
- File:Trabaja Para Nosotros NewGalaxyApps.jpg
- File:Los Mejores Contenidos para Vos NewGalaxyApps.jpg
- File:NewGalaxyApps.png
Zaccarias (talk) 08:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Don't seems to be near to be a valid permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Advertisment for a website. Out of Commons:Project scope Zaccarias (talk) 08:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Artix Kreiger as Copyvio (copyvio) and the rationale was: mostly copyrighted. Since this is a German logo, and German logos have a high threshold, I'm bringing to DR. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 08:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep it! It's a german logo and it's a legal one, not a copyvio! The logo does not meet the threshold of originality by german law and so it's free to use, if the origin is given in the licence tag. And as you can see, the german origin is given in the licence tag. So there is no reason given for a deletion. Lukeskywalker1978 (talk) (contribs) 16:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- This is a discussion, not a vote. Please address why this doesn't meet the TOO in Germany; don't just give a vague wave. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: above TOO. --Jcb (talk) 08:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejandro Garma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisments. No educational value. also presumably copyright violations.
Zaccarias (talk) 08:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:SEBO vacuum cleaners
[edit]Pure advertisment with no educational value.
Zaccarias (talk) 08:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Most likely a copyrighted product photograph by nokia. Various very similar photographs can be found on the web. So the image is part of a series from Nokia. Zaccarias (talk) 09:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal CV, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal portrait, out of project scope Moumou82 (talk) 09:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo with unknown purpose, maybe out of project scope. Small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
All images out of project scope
- File:Pablo Escobar Hunger Call.jpg
- File:C ME O.jpg
- File:Amateur Mechanic.jpg
- File:Mai Chillin.jpg
- File:Post Meeting Action.jpg
- File:Night out in Wonderland.jpg
- File:Office Pet Cats.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 10:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo and the uploader's only contribution, out of project scope. Depicted person isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and bad quality file, maybe obsolete. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and bad quality file, maybe obsolete. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 13:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and bad quality file, maybe obsolete. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and bad quality file, maybe obsolete. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and bad quality file, maybe obsolete. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 13:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 13:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
As a professionally created diagram it appears to be a copyright violation. Because the uploader has been warned about past copyright violation the precautionary principle also applies. Delete. Zaccarias (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LizethArellano91 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope. One image is just an advertisment. The second one is a presumed irrelevant logo with questionable license. User has a few edits on es.wikinews.
Zaccarias (talk) 09:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible violation of copyright, image from: schutterij.nl/ Rode raaf (talk) 09:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tttimtamtt (talk · contribs)
[edit]Presumed unfree commercial images. Uploaded by a new user account. These uploads are the only (visible) global edits.
- unable to check images via websearch because Google returned an error (because of tif-format?)
- who is this guy? some entrepreneur? a quick websearch gave no indication
Zaccarias (talk) 10:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope (advertisment) and also unclear copyright status (as a poster published elsewhere before, therefore OTRS permission would be needed) Zaccarias (talk) 10:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Aayush Shrivastav isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Unused photo about non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olga senyut (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata.
- File:Производство Гнезда.jpg
- File:Процесс производства макарон Роллтон - изготовление.jpg
- File:Процесс производства Роллтон 4.png
- File:Процесс приготовления Роллтон 3.png
- File:Приготовление Роллтон 2.png
- File:Приготовление Роллтон 1.png
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BouncyGlow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image
Life has teeth (talk) 22:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 22:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 22:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 22:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused user page image. Out of scope. JuTa 22:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 22:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 23:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal image, out of WLM contest scope. Sankoswal (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
I think this file was uploaded incompletely by mistake. Gnom (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: corrupt file. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Very poor quality, slightly better version is available. Sitacuisses (talk) 13:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor copy. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope: used only for promotion in an article called Red House International School, which was deleted on November 27, 2016. Francisco (talk) 14:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- DeleteCopyright violation, original from NOS (Nederlandse Omroep Stichting) about the recent death of Eberhard van der Laan, mayor of Amsterdam. Even if employees of the NOS uploaded this, it cannot be given free under CC/BY/SA (GFDL) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- As the diagram's creator, I am fine with the deletion. The diagram is out of date at this point, and, as you pointed out, it's flawed to begin with. I had forgotten that it was still up, actually. --Zaalis (talk) 05:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Mouhamed abdenour (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
No info. Seems has no relevance. Sturm (talk) 18:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 21:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
unused private image -> out of scope JuTa 21:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 22:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Life has teeth (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
either copyright violation or out of scope. JuTa 20:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, appears to be an enlarged version of a low resolution photo which was possibly edited with a studio program. B.Lameira (talk) 00:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- This picture was taken by me on November the 29th 2010 at the Porto headquarters of the presidential election of Aníbal Cavaco Silva. Yes, I edited it later in order to eliminate from it the other persons appearing there. I can post here the original (unedited) version of the picture, if it helps. JCSantos (talk) 08:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- One of the reasons why I flagged it is because there is no metadata information, which leads me to think that you found it somewhere on the Internet. B.Lameira (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per plausible statement from User:JCSantos. No evidence for a copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Also presumed irrelevant. Zaccarias (talk) 09:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Cucuragil (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
out of scope bc. bad quality (photographed through glass plate); also pornographical.. Affenschande (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's impossible take a picture without a glass because is a museum. Thousands of pictures are made in the same way. It's not a reasonable reason.
- Keep None of the provided reasons sustain a deletion according to commons policies. The file is definitely in scope and, although the quality is not the best one, is enough to make it useful. --Discasto talk 20:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
out of scope due to low quality.. Affenschande (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's impossible take a picture without a glass because is a museum. Thousands of pictures are made in the same way. It's not a reasonable reason.
- Keep None of the provided reasons sustain a deletion according to commons policies. The file is definitely in scope and, although the quality is not the best one, is enough to make it useful. --Discasto talk 20:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
out of scope bc. of quality (reflections through glass plate).. Affenschande (talk) 09:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- It's impossible take a picture without a glass because is a museum. Thousands of pictures are made in the same way. It's not a reasonable reason.
- Keep None of the provided reasons sustain a deletion according to commons policies. The file is definitely in scope and, although the quality is not the best one, is enough to make it useful. --Discasto talk 20:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Clicking "proceed" will..........试验一下 Tyg728 (talk) 10:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Conflicting license claims. Jcb (talk) 21:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment It is used on what seems to be the official website of the municipalty (http://www.svilajnac.rs/system/svilajnac ). I do not know Serbian law enough to know if pd:serbiagov applies for official depictions of official symbols of governmental bodies, but this might be pd (though a recent depiction by a famous serbian artist). Kathisma (talk) 16:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, this will do. Jcb (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio most likely not the work of the uploader. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyright violation. --Wdwd (talk) 12:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thend~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubt if uploader is owner of these logos that are too complex, so permission is needed.
- File:Logo Plzen.jpg
- File:Logo Struis.jpg
- File:Logo Vlo.jpg
- File:Logo Zatte.jpg
- File:Logo IPA.jpg
- File:Logo Paasij.jpg
- File:Logo IJwit.jpg
- File:Logo IJndejaars.jpg
- File:Logo IJbok.jpg
- File:Logo Columbus.jpg
- File:Logo 't IJ.jpg
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logos with permission. --Wdwd (talk) 17:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
not proper gallery name 최광모 (talk) 12:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, empty gallery. --Wdwd (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
As per the uploaders request Braveheart (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see an explicit uploader's request. Braveheart, you are not the uploader and naming a file in the very way is not a deletion request. The file is ok. However, it is similar to File:Mistelbach-Paasdorf - Kellergasse Atzelsdorferstraße - 07.jpg, so imho it could be deleted without loss, but the least thing we could expect is that the uploader User:Haeferl makes an explicit request. The file was uploaded under that special file name, instead of skipping it from the UW's list (which should be possible in any step). --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Danke fürs Eintragen, Braveheart! Ja, natürlich will ich die Datei löschen lassen. Wollte sie schon beim Hochladen wieder entfernen, aber leider funktioniert der "Entfernen"-Button im Upload-Wizard nicht (jedenfalls nicht auf der Seite, auf der man die Beschreibungen einfügt) - hier hat er auch schon nicht funktioniert. Ich hab nicht den Nerv, mich durch die englischsprachigen Seiten hier zu quälen. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Häferl: Uploader request of a recent uploaded and unused image. --Wdwd (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
copyright https://www.cellnextelecom.com/quienes-somos Tarawa 13:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The flickr account is created for giving media files taken from various sources a free license. Only the copyright holder can publish something under a free license, and i dont think the flickr account is the copyright holder. The flickr account is operated by the Commons user User:Mboix (evidence: time of uploads)
File:Amelia Valcarcel.jpg is identified as a copy from http://ameliavalcarcel.es/?page_id=3341, evidence is the exact file size. The page says Copyright 2014 Amelia Valcarcel. The other files of Amelia Valcarcel (Amelia Valcarcel en la tumba de Clara Campoamor) have been taken from the subjects facebook account. The filesize (720px) is the default size of facebook thumbnail images.
For other uploads the flickr account claims copyright / licensing rights. The same time they say that they aren't the authors (File:Cartell Ferida arrel.jpg, File:Francesc Soler.jpg, File:OnaPlanas.jpg). The first copyright holder is - by law - the creator of a work, its not plausible why the flickr account should hold the copyrights. In my opinion the flickr account is abused for License Laundering.
- File:Monira Rahman.png
- File:Clara Campoamor Tumba Corona de Laurel.jpg
- File:Clara Campoamor Tumba.jpg
- File:Amelia Valcarcel en la tumba de Clara Campoamor.jpg
- File:Amelia Valcarcel.jpg
- File:Francesc Soler.jpg
- File:Cartell Ferida arrel.jpg
- File:OnaPlanas.jpg
- File:Ona Planas.jpg
- File:Fundacion García Cugat 2014.jpg
Martin H. (talk) 17:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy Keep and close All the pics were taken by Mboix, who correctly licensed them with a compatible license. The reason given here that because a subject uses the pic in her FB profile somehow this voids the licensing or makes it suspicios is shaky at best. Mboix is well known in Spain, Commons is very lucky to have these pics being uploaded here. Exactly what kind of extraordinary proof will be required to show Mboix is the author of the works? Please explain in detail so we can get on it. I am amazed that this was not done before opening a deletion request. This is incredibly not helpful for people going out of their way to encourage high quality contributors to upload their work to Commons. Raystorm (¿Sí?) 23:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- Id like to point out that the photos have been copied from facebook to flickr to Commons. Otherwise the filesize would be different. Why should a creator of a photo copy his/her own work from someone else facebook? --Martin H. (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- The creator took the pic, and the subject used it for her FB profile. The flickr account is correctly licensed. I ask again what proof of evidente is required to prove authorship. I could probably get Amalia Valcárcel herself to come here to vouch for this, but I would like some assurance that this will be worth the trouble. Just detail what process needs to be followed, and it will be done. The pics are legit, what is required is for someone in commons to please guide this user to prove it. Raystorm (¿Sí?) 19:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Id like to point out that the photos have been copied from facebook to flickr to Commons. Otherwise the filesize would be different. Why should a creator of a photo copy his/her own work from someone else facebook? --Martin H. (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
answer on my files::
EN Replay Text translated in English. Original in Spanish below Regards Apologies first place because I do not write English well, I feel at least conditions for this dialogue but I'll try. I am a journalist and for years I have access to some people take photographs included in the wikipedia I tried for years to participate repeatedly in collaborating with the addition of pictures, always with problems. It seems that I can not figure out how. The photo of Amelia Varcarcel is a photo I took and I handed it to use. But it's mine and I thinking about it in its profile wikipedia. It is a free photo and it is logical that she has the right to use it. Also I manage account Flikcr Women in Red and I'm uploading pictures on this account that I have delivered those players for these images are released. You can confirm this personally with each of these people. The tomb of Clara Campoamor made by Amelia Valcarcel and delivered by it to Women Network for free distribution. Same for the journalist Francesc Soler or filmmaker Ona Planas. I preferred to use the Flickr account of Women in Red because it is not the first time I have erased originals Wikimedia Commons and do not want to lose them. It seems more practical to upload photos to Flickr and give them the permits required by wikimedia to be used freely. Also Monira Rahman photo is mine. I did it on my trip to Bangladesh. Also Photograph Garcia Cugat Foundation is mine and I allowed it to be used freely by the foundation. It is very difficult to work with Wikimedia and sad because I work in publishing articles on wikipedia and my desire is to accompany the text with pictures. He is proving a real problem. I understand prevention for good management of rights but in my case I've only had problems even though the contributions are correct. But all the pictures you mention have the correct license Creative Commons on Flickr for admission to Wikimedia Commons. I hope we find a solution. I have a lot of material and it is a shame that can not be shared freely and used on Wikimedia. Greetings and thanks for your time --mboix (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
ES Saludos en primer lugar disculpas porque no escribo bien inglés, me siento en menos condiciones para este dialogo pero lo voy a intentar. Soy periodista y desde hace años tengo acceso a tomar fotografías a algunas personas incluidas en la wikipedia He intentado participar desde hace años en varias ocasiones en colaborar con la incorporación de fotos, siempre con problemas. Parece que no logro encontrar la manera. La foto de Amelia Varcarcel es una foto que yo he tomado y que yo le entregué a ella para usarla. Pero es mía y la hice pensando en incluirla en su perfil de wikipedia. Es una foto libre y es lógico que ella tenga el derecho a usarla. Gestiono también la cuenta de Flikcr Mujeres en Red y estoy subiendo fotografías en esta cuenta que me han entregado las personas protagonistas para que estas imagenes sean liberadas. Puedes confirmarlo personalmente con cada una de estas personas. Las de la tumba de Clara Campoamor hechas por Amelia Valcarcel y entregadas por ella a Mujeres en Red para la distribución libre. Igual para el periodista Francesc Soler o la directora de cine Ona Planas. He preferido utilizar la cuenta de Flickr de Mujeres en Red porque no es la primera vez que me han borrado originales en Wikimedia Commons y no quiero perderlos. Me parece más práctico subir las fotografías a Flickr y darles los permisos requeridos por wikimedia para ser usados libremente. También la foto de Monira Rahman es mía. La hice en mi viaje a Bangladesh. También la fotografía de Fundación García Cugat es mía y he permitido que sea usada libremente por la fundación. Es muy complicado colaborar con Wikimedia y es triste porque colaboro en la edición de artículos en wikipedia y mi deseo es acompañar el texto con imagenes. Me está resultando un verdadero problema. Entiendo la prevención para una buena gestión de los derechos pero en mi caso sólo he tenido problemas a pesar de que las aportaciones son correctas. Y todas las fotografías que mencionas tienen la licencia correcta de Creative Commons en Flickr para ser admitida en Wikimedia Commons. Espero que encontremos una solución. Tengo mucho material y es una pena que no pueda ser compartido libremente y usado en Wikimedia. Saludos y gracias por vuestro tiempo --mboix (talk) 20:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment At least two of these images have artwork over the subjects's shoulders; another looks more like a poster. I disagree with the speedy keep and suggest an image by image review instead. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment @Ellin Beltz: Image by image review means speedy keep and starting new nominations, don't it?
- Comment @Mboix: Sugiero que mandes un correo a OTRS afirmando que eres el autor de las fotografías que sean tuyas; puedes añadir un permiso para publicarlas bajo la licencia que sea o simplemente afirmar que el usuario Mboix eres tu mismo. De las fotografías hechas por otras personas hace falta justificar que estas personas (los fotógrafos) te han autorizado a publicarlas bajo esta licencia.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- hey, the flickr pages and the uploads here are very clear that the flickr user is not the author, therefore a confirmation "afirmando que eres el autor" - would be untrue. The licenses on flickr are not granted by the copyright holders but by someone who is using a flickr account for license laundering. Permissions from the original copyright holders are required to bring transparency in this issue. --Martin H. (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- Mboix already said that some photos were taken by herself and other ones given to her by other people. In flickr, some photos are credited to "Montserrat Boix" example, which I assume to be Mboix. For these photos, an OTRS mail by herself would suffice, wouldn't it? For the images from other people, some authorisation from photographers or copyright holders is needed.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- hey, the flickr pages and the uploads here are very clear that the flickr user is not the author, therefore a confirmation "afirmando que eres el autor" - would be untrue. The licenses on flickr are not granted by the copyright holders but by someone who is using a flickr account for license laundering. Permissions from the original copyright holders are required to bring transparency in this issue. --Martin H. (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- And about the claim of a photo having been copied from http://ameliavalcarcel.es/?page_id=3341 , please notice that the post in the blog is about a year older that the image in Commons and therefore it doesn't cast any additional doubt and no other permission is required.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Delete File:Cartell Ferida arrel.jpg: derivative work --Discasto talk 23:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Policy is very clear here. We have no way of knowing who USer:Mboix is and identity theft is common here. In order for these to be restored, we will need licenses sent to OTRS by the actual copyright holders, whether that is Mboix or someone else. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Derivative works of pictures of uncertain copyright status.
- File:Historia del feminismo 3 - Carmen Conde.jpg
- File:Historia del Feminismo en España 2.jpg
- File:Historia del feminismo en España 1.jpg
Discasto talk 14:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 17:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:GALERI.ogg
- File:PLAK CENDERMATA.png
- File:Program waris.png
- File:Teknik voka.png
- File:Ikrar murid.png
- File:Bulan merdeka.png
- File:Bahasa.png
- File:Galeri smktsz 2.png
- File:Galeri smktsz.png
- File:Sekolah 3.jpg
- File:Sekolah 1.jpg
- File:Sekolah 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete all of them but the 3 sekolah or school images could be kept as they were taken of the same school with the same camera (iphone 5) by the euploader. That looks like own work. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per Leoboudv: all deleted as possible copyvio except File:Sekolah*.jpg (AGF). --Wdwd (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/incosnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:CONGKAK.jpg
- File:BAKUL SIAH.png
- File:SETERIKA ARANG.png
- File:KUKUR KELAPA.jpg
- File:LAMPU GASOLIN.jpg
- File:MESIN KETIK.jpg
- File:GAMELAN.jpg
- File:PLAK CENDERMATA.png
- File:Teknik dan vokasional.png
- File:Program waris.png
- File:Ikrar.png
- File:Galeri smktsz.png
- File:Galeri smktsz 2.png
- File:Bahasa.png
- File:Bulan merdeka.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The source file from where this image was extracted from was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leninmonument in Artjom.JPG --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.licdn.com/media-proxy/ext?w=800&h=800&hash=p60oXFM1Ih3GWHi5CRxEBWeFX88%3D&ora=1%2CaFBCTXdkRmpGL2lvQUFBPQ%2CxAVta9Er0Vinkhwfjw8177yE41y87UNCVordEGXyD3u0qYrdfybpcMHcframuV8Vfy4clA0yefKhFDC0D5PpK4jndNwjg5XgJI27dA4BYBI3iSdF_NQ8. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 17:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thyuga3587 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIcZREJUMAAT1fN.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 17:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Art work by living artist en:Jonathan Mwe di Malila. Permission is required. GeorgHH • talk 16:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 17:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Although the reproduction is licensed by the museum as stated, the underlying work is not PD yet. — Racconish ☎ 17:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 17:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Although the license is correctly stated (I have reviewd it accordingly), the underlying work is not PD yet. — Racconish ☎ 17:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- As far as I know, that doesn't matter if the license is correct. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The painter, Marius Richters, died in 1955. His work is not PD. The license on the photograph is irrelevant per COM:DW. — Racconish ☎ 17:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I understand, don't know why I didn't see it. :-) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 20:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Although the museum has licensed this image as indicated, the painter's work is not PD yet. — Racconish ☎ 17:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 17:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Doubtful own work 176.239.91.139 18:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 17:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kathisma (talk) 16:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Le personne qui a mis cette image en ligne user:Mimich n'est pas l'ayant droit qui la place dans le domaine public (l'Administration communale de Ham-sur-Heure). H2O(talk) 17:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - derivative work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded as "own work", it probably is from their child and therefor a copyright violation. Also per COM:NOTHOST: Wikimedia Commons is not a webhost for personal images. Takeaway (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Book's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Book's cover is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - it was overwrited but both images seems to be scans. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. Jcb (talk) 19:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused .pdf-file with unclear importance, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Album cover or similar, unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 20:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
superseded by File:Microsoft Office 2007 text logo.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as uncontroversial maintenance. Sometimes, we have to keep the PNG version to maintain a licensing chain, but this is not one of those times. —Codename Lisa (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Iran. Where the vitrage was created? If I understood Google translation correctly, then this is after-2008 artwork. Taivo (talk) 20:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Not own work (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DK2LTBIXcAExw-D.jpg) WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 21:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Je souhaite supprimer ce fichier que j'ai créer. Florianth (talk) 21:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Not used low res pic of a common view / topic... Sturm (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
j'ai coupé avec croptool mais j'ai oublié d'overwriter. Vatadoshu (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture is inappropriate Panigrahiasmitku (talk) 19:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Because this picture exist in commons I just forgot that I have uploaded before Nafie shehu (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Nipponese dog calvero Artix Kreiger (talk) 01:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Self-promotion.--Lanwi1(Talk) 16:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, en:Peter Huang is notable. The photo is big and has EXIF data. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment (revised): But 林浩生(Jason Lin) isn't still notable. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jason Lin. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 12:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, we have better images of Peter Huang, especially if Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peter Huang and Jason Lin 2015-04-10.jpg is kept. See also related DR's:
- Keep, Peter Huang and Jason Lin Participated in activities against nuclear power generation, See Category:Anti-nuclear power movement. --Glay Liou (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per above - The subject has an EN article and as such this image could be used, No valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 20:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
This file is a portrait of a user who has been Globall Banned and it's not useful to keep it and it is likely to advertise this user. A request for removal is therefore made. 維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, courtesy deletions are usually only for subjects who either didn't choose to have their images uploaded or for uploaders a fortnight or so after the original upload. This image has been up for years and is the source file for an image of a notable individual. The uploader chose to irrevocably release this file to the Wikimedia Commons where it has been for years, it would set bad precedent to delete it now simply because the subject changed his mind years later. The status of a user being globally banned doesn't change the value of the image, we shouldn't condemn the memory of globally banned users, this isn't the Roman Empire or Ancient Egypt where we remove all mentions of people we don't like so any memories of them will disappear. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank u for participating in the discussion, but note that I have also proposed the deletion of other file he has uploaded, so please focus the discussion in one page（This）.——維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 21:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- {{vk}] per discussion above, no valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 21:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bridge Capital LLC Saipan logo.jpg 176.239.91.139 18:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:35, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
撮影日が10年も前のため T.Y485 (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Actualmente.jpg
Sharyramirez (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading two personal photos, which are used only on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Isaak Papadopoulos must send a permission to OTRS Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from presentation. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: not only DW, the whole image seems to be a copyvio. --Didym (talk) 18:07, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
no evidence of permission. -- Bravo Charlie Delta (talk) 16:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Already in the internet with a higher resolution http://www.descubrecuenca.com/es/enclaves-y-poblaciones/la-mancha/colegiata-de-san-bartolome-belmonte-69 http://www.descubrecuenca.com/storage/contents/enclaves/fotos/img_4368rs.jpg Unlikely own work, if it actually is, OTRS permission is needed.. Strakhov (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - this edit with which it was included in the article says "Photo: Uroš Zagožen" which is not the uploader's name. — Yerpo Eh? 19:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work : small/middle size without EXIFs Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:03, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Uploader ist probably not the photographer as he has also uploaded File:Yuri Knorozov.jpg which shows a sowjet scientist and File:Kobliha František.jpg which shows a czech painter. It is unlikely that all pictures were taken by the same person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsamer Schütze (talk • contribs) 2017-09-29T17:51:38 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Uploader ist probably not the photographer as he has also uploaded File:Yuri Knorozov.jpg which shows a sowjet scientist and File:20028031 i34m.jpg which shows a french poet. It is unlikely that all pictures were taken by the same person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsamer Schütze (talk • contribs) 2017-09-29T17:49:27 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Picture was taken during the 1950ies to 70ies. Uploader is problaply not the photographer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsamer Schütze (talk • contribs) 2017-09-29T17:41:51 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
South Africa has no freedom of panorama and the building was erected in 1972. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
This image is very blurry and uninformative compared to this one so there isn't any wiki where this image would be used. Smaug the Golden (talk - contributions - file list) 09:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
This flickr account only has 2 images and they are low resolution images with no metadata. Are they flickrwashes? Leoboudv (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per precaution. Possible license washing. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
DSS images are copyrighted, as described on the linked source page Lithopsian (talk) 09:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Own work claim must be doubted. Single purpose account, no sources, no explanation of where this cropped photograph actually came from. Fæ (talk) 14:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Dénomination erronée pouvant entraîner une confusion dans l'époque de construction (18 ou 19ème siecle) Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum (talk) 15:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @TeletubAstyanax: Il est possible de renommer les images en utilisant {{Rename}}. Pas besoin de les effacer dans ces cas-ci. Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Dénomination erronée pouvant entraîner une confusion dans l'époque de construction (18 ou 19ème siecle) Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum (talk) 15:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:FourRomainPrunelli 01.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Dénomination erronée pouvant entraîner une confusion dans l'époque de construction (18 ou 19ème siecle) Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum (talk) 15:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletionper Commons:Deletion requests/File:FourRomainPrunelli 01.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Dénomination erronée pouvant entraîner une confusion dans l'époque de construction (18 ou 19ème siecle) Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum (talk) 15:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion per Commons:Deletion requests/File:FourRomainPrunelli 01.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Dénomination erronée pouvant entraîner une confusion dans l'époque de construction (18 ou 19ème siecle) Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum (talk) 15:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. per Commons:Deletion requests/File:FourRomainPrunelli 01.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chrisuknudemale (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:nudity. There's no educational use but just an "ordinary exibitionist claim."
- File:Chris ellis strapped naked to a horse 1 cropped.jpg
- File:Chris ellis in submissive pose.jpg
- File:Puppy tigger aka chris ellis naked in his cage.jpg
Mhhossein talk 16:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Can't be CC-BY-SA if author is unknown. Paul_012 (talk) 18:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
likely not own work of the uploader as claimed JuTa 21:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Logo below threshold of originality in country of origin COM:TOO#Japan. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per asahiko. Author can be changed to the firm name. Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work, low res and no exif. Jcb (talk) 21:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture by living artist Denise Gemin. Unfortunately there is still no FOP in Italy. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 22:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio most likely not the work of the uploader. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
An unclear picture. --Solomon203 (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
No information on the photographer. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jusjih (talk) 05:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. See file history. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- The author Dr.Yung-Han Kim gave me this photo. How can I prove this fact? Thank you for your concern.--칼빈500 (talk) 18:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- 칼빈500: See Commons:OTRS. The permission must come from the photographer; not the subject. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 18:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- I see. I think this one will be delete. However I am the photographer to take so many professors. So I will put file upload with new picture which I directly took soon. Thank your your kindness.. It is very difficult to upload the picture.. God bless you for your working.--칼빈500 (talk) 18:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- 칼빈500: See Commons:OTRS. The permission must come from the photographer; not the subject. Thanks, —LX (talk, contribs) 18:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Quote: The source website bears the following disclaimer: "These photographs may be reproduced by other agencies on the condition that a clear credit is provided to the HR. N1Info." Not only other agencies, but anybody needs to be allowed to reproduce this image to keep it on commons. JuTa 21:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
exist at https://www.forlaget.com/forfattare/, and very unclear if the uploader is John Grönvall (a question is put on discussionpage — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yger (talk • contribs) 2017-10-06T13:39:44 (UTC)
The photographer John Grönvall has granted me the right to upload the image on Wikipedia for the purpose of illustrating the Lena Frölander-Ulf page. The images were taken for marketing purposes for Förlaget (forlaget.com) and Förlaget also allows the uploading of the image on Wikipedia. 12:13, 12 ott 2017 Forthzine
- @Forthzine: The best thing would be to have either the photograph or Förlaget write us at OTRS giving the authorisation to publish under CC by-sa 4.0 --Ruthven (msg) 22:36, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anton Zemanek (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:NAČR-K-12459-Signatura- Z1607-5.pdf
- File:Olexandr Zovtenko.jpg
- File:NAČR-4911-K823-23-Roman-Karatnycky.pdf
- File:ГАРФ-533-3-1735-Литовченко.pdf
- File:Роман Демидович Литовченко.jpg
- File:Заголовок листа начальника ШПЗ періоду Української Держави.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko, у чому річ? Це документи з державних архівів. Строки з охорони персональних даних уже давно спливли відповідно до національного законодавства. Усі копії зроблені мною або архівом на моє замовлення. Та навіть якби й ні профільний закон усе одно дозволяє їх поширення. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anton Zemanek (talk • contribs) 16:24, October 8, 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & COM:PRP. Response from uploader provided no useful information. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Логотип ДонИЖТ изменен на другой 217.199.235.245 15:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and unable to find image at source given. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Nominating this on behalf of User:Nick-D to be consistent. He has nominated three other files with identical licences for deletion (1, 2, and 3). His rationale is as follows: "Not PD - the CC notice on the National Archives of Australia website explicitly states that it does not cover items in its collection. Per the NAA factsheet on copyright (http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs08.aspx) this image created [after 1967] is still under copyright." Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
