Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 20th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist (Lovell) served in the military for 2 years. It is possible that he created this painting during that time, but I have been unable to find information at the source site that would confirm this. Based on his Wikipedia article, en:Tom Lovell, he created many works that illustrated historical events, and this painting may have been gifted to the MCHC without being a commission during his time in the Marine Corps Reserve during World War II. (talk) 03:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Lovell joined the Marine Corps in 1944[1] and this painting was published as cover illustration of "Marine Corps Gazette" in October 1944.[2] It seems that he painted it according to the duty for the military. I added explanation to the file.--Y.haruo (talk) 14:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Neat research, thanks. -- (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first page is suspicios. My plan is to remove it and upload again. So please wait a bit, if the second upload will be broken too, then I nominate it for deletion. -- VadimVMog (talk) 11:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi VadimVMog, You can upload over this file, then we can close the request. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, I uploaded new version and it's OK now. Thanks for reminding me about this file, I almoust forgot about it. -- VadimVMog (talk) 16:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, ok now. --Yann (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a test for https://tools.wmflabs.org/panoviewer/. Please delete. Freddy2001 talk 10:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: test page only. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ok now. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ok now. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded the new version of this file – Senapa (talk) 19:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok now. --Yann (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a new version of this file — Senapa (talk) 18:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok now. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 10:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ok now. --Yann (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file is hereby re-uploaded and now it is fine. Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 08:32, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok now. --Yann (talk) 08:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category Gungir1983 (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb (talk | contribs).   — Jeff G. ツ 00:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bot-uploaded personal photo. Too much COM:SELFIE to be of educational use. HyperGaruda (talk) 16:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se generó por error al intentar ordenar mi discusión/archivo, pido disculpas por el error. Palameida Palameida (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I mistakenly uploaded it in the wikicommons, please delete. Its a personal file. Thankyou. Leum Steller (talk) 01:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Zhuyifei1999 as no permission (No permission since) CCTV, so permission probably not required, but is it in scope? Yann (talk) 23:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Nick: Copyright violation: WP0 Abuse

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality unused selfie Apocheir (talk) 02:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant spam with large advertising watermark. Unusable for any other purpose. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah.

Ras67 (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Saudi Arabia, while this building was only completed in 2011, i.e. too new for PD.

HyperGaruda (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia, the copyright belongs to Dar Al-Handasah.


Ras67 (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vhacker Vicky kadian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:51, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vhacker Vicky kadian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

collection of self-advertisement material with no education value

Herbert Delvig (talk) 20:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Agreed. Also note that with the exception of the signature, the subject is the uploader, so these cannot be "own work" as claimed and they violate the copyright belonging to the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (one image used but was copyvio). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vhacker Vicky kadian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, obviously not own work. Uploader has a history of removing deletion tags and is indefblocked at enwp.

  — Jeff G. ツ 06:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looking to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 06:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jacksuck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 15:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Érico (msg) 04:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jacksuck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality images of com:PORN, out of com:Scope

Pippobuono (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NASA is only one of the four image credits given for this image on the NASA website. The others restrict image use. CSX, the Chandra X-Ray Observatory, specifically restricts use to "non-commercial educational and public information purposes." StarryGrandma (talk) 16:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This a NASA and only NASA image because NASA is the first organization in the credit line and there are no additional credit statements separated by a comma or semi-colon. All other organizations are only mentioned to give an intellectual credit for their participation. They do not effect the copyright. Further details can be found on Category:Chandra images. Ruslik (talk) 18:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information. I withdraw the nomination. I've replaced the "This file may not have the correct information on its copyright status" license information with the proper NASA license. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; withdrawn. --Guanaco (talk) 00:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1488840337809669&set=a.152772614749788.29720.100000511504781&type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful 46.147.161.124 11:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful 46.147.161.124 11:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful 46.147.161.124 11:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful 46.147.161.124 11:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1456041694462916&set=t.100001712975927&type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1431796976887388&set=t.100001712975927&type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description ("Photo given to Juan Bastos by Richard Harrison") makes clear that the underlying image is not the uploader's own work, even though they may have created the digital capture many years after the picture was taken The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 12:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unclear copyright statut+Richard Harrison is likely not the photographer and likely can not give this photo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bonos379 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Some logo and stuff of a industry consulting firm / website established 2016, found here: [3]. Probably one out of thousands of consulting companies.

Zaccarias (talk) 13:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Pure advertising. Zaccarias (talk) 13:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... related images added to this request. --Zaccarias (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement, the uploader's nick name is advertisement too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leokand (talk • contribs) 2017-08-17T15:37:46‎ (UTC)


Deleted: copyvios : previous publications in the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of very low quality, out of scope. Achim (talk) 13:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/9/6/4500697-v46245d28559-15.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/778004075468034048/QRwCHQ9n_400x400.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minimany (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+maybe out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fitfazil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santiago Chimaltenango (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+almost have "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+source provided not free. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JsusMontero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:33, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JsusMontero (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.noticias24carabobo.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Ejercicio-zamora-11.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanchojuan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images uploaded as "own work" which seems unlikely. To uploader: please follow the procedures set out in COM:OTRS.

Takeaway (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+one of the two 3d photo have "FBMD", the other is small without EXIFs. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:XAVIERSANTOS

[edit]

Photos of the uploader; will require credits to the photographers and permission to license and distribute their photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe eine bessere Bildversion hochgeladen Coyote III (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy-delete per nomination by uploader on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Habe eine bessere Bildversion hochgeladen Coyote III (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy-delete per nomination by uploader on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perhaps the scan from the old newspaper is "own work" the image surely not, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 00:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Significantly inferior to File:FOE Building, Richmond, VA, May 2013 (2).JPG, which was taken seven seconds later by the same person looking at the same building from the same location. Nyttend (talk) 00:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name of the author and copyright holder is in the metadata; does not seem to match the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Lailakhandoll

[edit]

Photos of the uploader, requires credits to the photographers and permission to distribute their work. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Michael0986

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request The photos are licensed as being in the PD but lacking dating and proof of PD status. They're taken from fan pic sites, blogs and similar websites. The 2 of Robert Montgomery and 1 of James Mason were taken from Getty. We hope (talk) 00:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No foreseeable usage, no need for this image to exist Brobra694 (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a news image Ytoyoda (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Ytoyoda. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is stolen from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-20/leaked-documents-reveal-pine-gaps-crucial-role-in-us-drone-war/8815472 Nick-D (talk) 01:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Credited to a photo agency: http://www.lukaszzygadlo.pl/dossier Ytoyoda (talk) 01:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Torskpoll

[edit]

These images are photos of a painted mural. We don't know the identity of the artist who created the mural; we don't known when the artist died; and we don't know when the piece of art was actually created. As such, the copyright status of these pictures can't be established and should be deleted.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Edinburgh Castle is ancient. This doubt is a bit far fetched. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC) Deleted: reclosing as per this statement. Natuur12 (talk) 11:20, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The date 1938 refers to the year that the painting was painted (not the year of the artists death). Since we don't know when the artist (H.C. Ellsby) died, we don't know if the painting is out-of-copyright. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://fcbayern.com/es/terms-and-conditions Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 02:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"8. Data protection, intellectual property rights

8.2 All of the logos, photographs and other images on FC Bayern’s internet presence are protected by trademark/copyright. Any use thereof without consent of FC Bayern, in particular the unauthorised downloading of images, is prohibited and FC Bayern will pursue violators under civil law/criminal law."


Deleted: Complex logo. (Arrangement of those shape is copyrighted(). --Natuur12 (talk) 13:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality photo of user who uploaded it. Apocheir (talk) 02:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly photoshopped photo of user who uploaded it. Apocheir (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably only used for self-promotion. The uploader's userpage on the Spanish Wikipedia is his only contribution, and is tagged as "posible promocional"... I don't know what the rules of the Spanish Wikipedia are, but if they're like English Wikipedia his userpage there probably qualifies for deletion too. -Apocheir (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see where that userpage is tagged as "possible promotion." Than again, I can't read Spanish. Doing a translate, it is all about his career in journalism. That Blogger link doesn't exist. The other link is to a newspaper website. A strong case could be made that it is promotional. I'm not against it being deleted. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 18:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Can be deleted if es-wiki deletes the user page. We do not dictate which user pages are legit in other wiki's. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unused photo of user who uploaded it. Apocheir (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality, distorted, unused photo of user who uploaded it. Apocheir (talk) 03:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unused photo of user who uploaded it. Apocheir (talk) 03:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality photo of user who uploaded it. Apocheir (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use logo - should not be on Commons Raymie (talk) 05:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The CC license looks incorrect to me. This artwork is either old enough for i.e {{PD-old}} or should be deleted. JuTa 06:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality.See also File:Donald Trump in Paris - Day 2 (cropped).jpg Cjp24 (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture is blur and no educational importance. Out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are taken from Flickr which indicates that the author of the file is Narendra Modi (Prime minister-India) . There are possibility of Flickrwashing.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:14, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2 files Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 17:08, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realitically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by another admin. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HafizWong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Mostly Logos/Coat of arms likely copied from elsewhere.

JuTa 06:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How you came on that conclusion?--Sanandros (talk) 06:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bharatiya29 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The images are claimed to be taken from Flickr. (source) . Which states that the account is official of Prime minister of India (Narendra Modi)(no evidence of official). The images from flickr are found to be taken from http://www.pmindia.gov.in/ which allows Fair use. Commons doesn't allows Fair use images. These images are possibility of Flickrwashing.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 06:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: On searching the personal website on this domain info searchengine it shows that the website is run by the political party of the Minister and there is no indication that the Minister has that flickr account or the images have been released under Creative Commons License. In such case OTRS can prove effective --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:28, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • My comment is not a pro or a against, it is just a fact that 1 is linked to 2 that is linked to 3. 1 being www.pmindia.gov.in and 3 being the Flick account (our source). That is not an opinion nor a vote, it is just a fact. I'm neutral. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR since we now have {{GODL-India}}. Please feel free to re-nominate any file if GODL-India does not apply. I have left all the files in the GODL-India review category. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reason as the other images deleted previously. Some of these images are in a high-security setting which would mean that Narendra Modi's personally-employed photographer (if such a person exists) might not be allowed access to them. Other images have logos in prominence whose copyrights rest with either the Government of India or Bharatiya Janata Party. The images of Anandiben Patel are again cropped from images in which the Prime Minister is himself present.

Rahul Bott (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claimed author is part of the photographs:

Suspicious or no metadata available for

Most of these files have unbelievably low resolutions to be a 21st century original image.

Files like

are either official Indian government events where the Prime Minister is unlikely to be sitting as a mere photographer while the Finance Minister presides or an international event like the East Asia Summit where his personal photographer will hardly be allowed. These can at best be Government of India works which cannot be in public domain so soon as per Template:PD-India. Also

has a clear Indian Government art work (the calendar) in prominence which is certainly not copyfree.

Other images in this category have been previously deleted by sysops User:Jcb and User:Daphne Lantier. In summary, we need a thorough review of files coming from this Flickr user and should immediately suspend further uploads from this account pending the completion of such a review.

Rahul Bott (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reasons as the previous nominations. Some of the files have very suspicious metadata and low file sizes.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For similar reasons as in previous nominations from the category (all deleted). Also, File:Indian medal winners at the Special Olympic World Summer Games 2015.jpg has image credits to "Special Olympics Bharat Facebook page" while File:Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi in Rajya Sabha.jpg is a grab of official television recordings of Rajya Sabha.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it before! Cannot agree more. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- acct blacklisted as well. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as for previous nominations. Many files have suspicious metadata and very low filesizes. Some others are derivative works with no proper attribution/reference to the original work and their copyright status.

Rahul Bott (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as before. Few files are screen grabs of Lok Sabha Television footage while others are screenshots of private apps like Instagram, Weibo etc.

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep majority of them. Most of their previous images were low-res screenshots or instagram pics but a majority have exif information which means they were taken by actual cameras and thus they should be kept, delete the low res ones that don't look like they were taken with a camera or lack exif information, keep the rest.--Stemoc 22:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stemoc: With due respect, the mere presence of EXIF data itself does not make the copyright ownership clear. More so, if these happen to be works of a Government of India employee(s) in which case the Prime Minister himself/herself does not have the power to release the files into public domain without bringing necessary changes in Indian laws. There is also the issue of false claim of authorship with most of these files. Best Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More. Many are rightly unused with just some text and an uncredited portrait photograph as substantial part. Some are crops from already deleted files.

Rahul Bott (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files have no evidence of their copyright owner as Narendra Modi (Prime minister-India). There is clear Flickr washing. Most of the images have been deleted before for the same reason. Another set of deletion can be found at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bharatiya29 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Except for files like File:Constituent Assembly of India logo.jpg which are clearly PD-India. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR since we now have {{GODL-India}}. Please feel free to re-nominate any file if GODL-India does not apply. I have left all the files in the GODL-India review category. Jcb (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the user is indeed the portrayee then it can't be own work as it clearly isn't a selfie. And so far photo was only used on Wikidata on a talk page to promote the portrayee. Mbch331 (talk) 07:28, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misupload (private images) 최광모 (talk) 09:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misupload private image 최광모 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misupload private image 최광모 (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW: Photo of 3d artwork without author's permission.

Sealle (talk) 09:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free image + image for died person (fair user image) --Alaa :)..! 09:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file. Yann (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format. Yann (talk) 10:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Support ~nmaia d 13:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 10:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag zusammen, dies ist meine erste Teilnahme an einer Diskussionsrunde. Möglicherweise antworte ich auch auf der falschen Ebene. Das oben genannte zur Löschung vorgeschlagene (leere) Bild, wurde sicherlich von mir hochgeladen. Erst jetzt stelle ich fest, dass das Bild leer ist. Es kann somit gelöscht werden.

Danke an Yann für den Hinweis. Weiterhin viele gute Beträge im Wikipedia wünscht sich das Weltgetriebe!

 Comment Can it be corrected? Yann (talk) 16:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 10:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prerak vora (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These would appear to be outside the scope of our project - I cannot see what Wiki they would be useful on for example.

Herby talk thyme 10:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken file, wrong format, not used. Yann (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal and promotional images. Out of Commons scope.

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 05:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept few o'them, followinf Dharmadhyaksha advice. Ruthven (msg) 11:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photographs with no encyclopedic value

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 11:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. Out of scope 2. Personal images 3. Not uploaded by original creator of work 4. Images from web with no valid copyright information 5. Promotional

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 14:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. Out of scope 2. Personal images 3. Not uploaded by original creator of work 4. Images from web with no valid copyright information 5. Promotional

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 15:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Prosím smazat soubor File:Hogs of War types of hogs.png, jelikož soubor není nikde použit a třídy jsou popsány špatně.

Please delete file File:Hogs of War types of hogs.png, because file isn't used anywhere and the classes' names are writen incorrectly.

Chybně popsané třídy/Incorrect classes' names Awewewe (talk) 08:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. PD-ineligible?. --Yann (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I think there is no reason to keep this thing. It is not used on any Wikipedia (it was in Czech Wikipedia previously, but now it isn't), the classes are incorrect and the classes are described in the Hogs of War article on Czech Wikipedia. Please delete this file, it is unuseful. Awewewe (talk) 18:18, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author request Wikipedie15 (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is under copyright — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leokand (talk • contribs) 2017-08-16T11:35:05‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

solicito borrado de imagen subida por mí — Preceding unsigned comment added by JersyJacob (talk • contribs) 2017-08-15T06:38:41‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

solicito borrado de imagen subida por mí — Preceding unsigned comment added by JersyJacob (talk • contribs) 2017-08-15T06:37:29‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image. Jc86035 (talk) 13:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cross-wiki spam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Bowman (talk • contribs) 2017-08-19T09:25:56‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to user page if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That doesn't make this file out of scope. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of release by the original copyright hodler(s) Andy Mabbett (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://celebritiesgallery.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/15-August-Parade-Ground-Images-2016-580x358.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aldermanmuhammad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://res.cloudinary.com/crowdpac/image/upload/d_avatar_m/v1467564999/candidates/cand56fde95f2e0b69ec7fe60a24.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dwayne Cecil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karomi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s). all images below are copyrights of theophy esuike and can be used for publicly.

  WP:IUP#COPYRIGHT
WP:IUP#COPYRIGHT

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(CC BY-SA 4.0)

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anhdonald (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://hoahao.org/images/file/8pdsJcfg0QgBAKUy/dscn3416-533x400.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JOSE PALACIOS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://bertrandroulet.ch/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/bertrand.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://bertrandroulet.ch/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/bertrand.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 201.215.141.30 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo under Chilean law. Author died less than 70 years ago. I'm not sure. Should be compared with threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Petr Srnec (2)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Duplicate files created in order to propagate Mr. Srnec using Wikimedia sites. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the category itself should be deleted too. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Cat is deleted as well. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Duplicate files created in order to propagate Mr. Srnec using Wikimedia sites. Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

totally out of project scope, promo of Mr. Srnec Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfpromo, commons isn't a place for images in front of Czech television Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most media from the Smithsonian is copyrighted, see the copyright information at the link. It doesn't necessarily count as "works of the US government". Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DONT NEED IT Hussain11211 (talk) 15:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bernard Bouyon was still alive in 2000. Copyright violation. 83.204.245.66 15:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bernard Bouyon was still alive in 2000. Copyright violation. 83.204.245.66 15:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork; contains no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete Smartmohanx's son in law, too young to get married. 141.196.193.9 16:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abel Chrétien died in 1972. No freedom of panorama in France. 83.204.245.66 16:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; of no value to anyone except the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is not at the link given. On this article, however, the image is credited to "Giliola Chiste". Would require permission from that person to keep the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the corporate website listed, which owns the copyright to the photo, as indicated in the metadata. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a fake news and clickbait blog, which is obviously not a reliable source for freely licensed media. This is apparently a screenshot of television and there is no way to know where it came from. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file of anonymous person Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 17:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover, which is the property of the publisher. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. Recent building.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of scope. Achim (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is attributed to another person and that person's copyright information is available in the metadata. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : one-file-upload, family album content and/or potentially personality right isusses, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
{comment}}: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 18:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:07, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : one-file-upload, rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo (selfie), hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double bonds almost invisible at smaller sizes; many better alternatives available in Category:Nicotine. Leyo 18:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious licensing, not PD (the author died in 1965). Sealle (talk) 18:50, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Macedonia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low likelihood that it can or will be used for educational purpose, which I believe places it out of Commons:Scope. Izno (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING. Artichoke drawing meets threshold of originality. Plus, this alcool has been created in 1952 so the drawing is unlikely to be under PD in Italy.

File:Étiquettes à la brocante de L'Isle-sur-la-Sorgue.jpg same thing for the woman drawing, unlikely to be under PD.

File:Amaro Averna bottles at retail.jpg could be cropped to keep the rest of the image.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Julien Granier. The uploader's name seems to be Tagir Jcb (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient source, because the edition of the work, the exact publication year of this image, or artist is not stated. This needs to be provided, or it can not be verified with specificity that the information is correct. Cold Season (talk) 20:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. I found the source, but not from the little information originally provided. This is corrected now. --Cold Season (talk) 20:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's freedom of panorama in Russia only for architecture, but not for sculpture.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы только для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Taivo (talk) 20:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Messer Galeazzo

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request These photos are mainly of various celebrities in tuxedos, smoking jackets or trenchcoats. They have been taken from various websites, including Corbis, BBC, the Daily Mail, Vanity Fair, Vogue and Pinterest Italy. All have been licensed with various CC licenses; some are images from copyrighted films like Casablanca, etc. There's no proof of public domain status. We hope (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some unknown software screenshot Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information provided as to the date or manner of original publication; therefore its PD status cannot be reliably established. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information provided as to the date or manner of original publication; therefore its PD status cannot be reliably established The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information provided as to the date or manner of original publication; therefore its PD status cannot be reliably established The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no source information allowing to know whether this drawing was actually made in 1905 Discasto talk 21:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from blog. No information provided as to the date or manner of original publication; therefore its PD status cannot be reliably established The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo found on ebay. No evidence regarding the date or manner of original publication, or even that it was published at all (at least in the time frame cited). The fact that the subject's agent privately sent an unknown number of copies of the photo is not sufficient to demonstrate publication. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown copyright status of the pictures on the wall Discasto talk 21:25, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found on ebay. No information provided as to the date or manner of original publication; therefore its PD status cannot be reliably established The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 21:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Statement in description field conflicts with chosen license. Jcb (talk) 21:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.facebook.com/muammer.fr/photos/a.1523114277966581.1073741825.1523113481299994/1523114474633228/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:41, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No exif, probably not own work. Jcb (talk) 21:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work, no EXIF, low resolution. Jcb (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of plain-text chemical equation. TeX is given, and all uses if there were any have been replaced. DMacks (talk) 22:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of https://www.nawaret.com/img1/2017/02/Zainab-nefzawiya-620x372.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused not-very-high resolution and has in-image caption text; Category:Dppf has multiple better alternatives DMacks (talk) 22:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professionell studio photograph, this highly similar photo is property of leemageopaleblog.com, COM:PCP or a permission of the copyright owner via OTRS! Ras67 (talk) 22:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://t1.hespress.com/files/_img/samirakadiri005.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.atlasinfo.fr/photo/art/default/5102144-7614134.jpg?v=1357606321 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is alexcellier.ch, which isn't free. Titlutin (talk) 22:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bgelo777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, low resolution, very low quality, out of project scope.

Sealle (talk) 04:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Celeb photos uploaded by Bgelo777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status (no EXIF, low resolution, uploader's extensive copyvio history).

   FDMS  4    22:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should we host automatic translation by Google? I don't think so. Yann (talk) 23:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvaise qualité (photo personnelle : j'en suis l'auteur) ! Sg7438 (talk 08:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private images 최광모 (talk) 09:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file shows peeple and street life in Paris. That is allowed. Maybee it will help, if we take away the Category "Museum Branly". Zabia (talk) 07:26, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep For File:Musée du quai Branly, 4 July 2017.jpg, there is nothing but green plants and ordinary windows. We are under the treshold of originality. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Plant wall (made by Patrick Blanc) is part of the architecture of the building[4][5]. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Despite being at the foreground, architecture is clearly visible and is the main topic of this image. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:Musée du quai Branly, 4 July 2017.jpg per Arthur Crbz.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ːI was told I had a right to take pictures within the museum. --Als33120 (talk) 14:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Als33120: Please have the architect tell us that via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:44, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: Sadly there is no FOP in France. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:06, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Musée du quai Branly showing the building of the museum

[edit]

There is no Freedom of Panorama in France for buildings. Architect from Musée du Quai Branly is Jean Nouvel (1945 - ?) and is not yet dead.

PierreSelim (talk) 20:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK by uploader, sorry for the inconveniences Triplecaña (talk) 08:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:32, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画像が垂直で無いため 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 23:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader's request. --Y.haruo (talk) 22:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published on multiple other websites, like the official Facebook page of the person. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 16:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo auparavant déjà publiée sur de multiples autres sites, dont le Facebook officiel de Bruce Grannec, qui n'est pas libre de droits. Il faudrait donc une autorisation officielle du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image. Voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image--Titlutin (talk) 16:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this picture comes from Italy, the athlete has performed in several countries. Jcb (talk) 20:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, because the image was transferred to Commons using CommonsHelper directly from this immage of the Italian Wikipedia because this was allowed. Evidently the error was at the origin, however I now look for the source of the image that can prove it is a PD Italy. --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
done. tell me if now is ok? ;) --Kasper2006 (talk) 04:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, your argumentation in the description field is mistaken. If this picture e.g. has been taken in Berlin (where he was at the Olympic Games in 1936), by a German photographer, the copyright would last 70 years after the death of the photographer. Now the photographer is unknown and even the location where this picture was taken is unknown, it's not possible to determine the copyright situation. There is no evidence at all that this would be PD-Italy. Jcb (talk) 14:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You're wrong, that's the club's shirt. The shirt with which Maffei competed at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin is the national one, as seen in this photo. --Kasper2006 (talk) 16:38, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anyhow, it's still completely unknown when it was taken, where it was taken and by whom it was taken. If e.g. a German photographer takes it in Italy and first publishes it in Germany, it's still not PD-Italy. There is insufficient information to determine copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 12:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Überflüssige Weiterleitung Benutzer:WvB (talk) 10:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty file, not used. Yann (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Corrupted, infected by a virus, unintentionally blank, etc. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy this photo - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Walpurgisnacht_Special._Die_Harzquerbahn,_Wernigerode,_DDR._Apr_30_1990._Sludgeulper_Flickr_3620482774_4ff96a70bc_o.jpg Chapsromes (talk) 15:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicates. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy this photo - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Walpurgisnacht,_1990._Wernigerode,_DDR_Sludgeulper_3292983821_aaed11e5a5_o.jpg Chapsromes (talk) 15:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicates. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistake in attribution of the panel content (My mistake). Please delete पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 07:04, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 21:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image and pretty much is a "duplicate" of (File:Greg 2017-07-21 1835Z.jpg) another image. Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: not duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 21:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given CC license is obviously incorrect. Maybe {{PD-old}} or similar applies. JuTa 13:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: last living author died in 1938. Ruthven (msg) 21:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given CC license is obviously incorrect. Maybe {{PD-old}} or similar applies. JuTa 13:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-old it is. Ruthven (msg) 21:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that the Desert Sun newspaper was published without a copyright notice. Moreover, even if it were, its republication of a copyrighted image from an external provider would not be properly authorized, and would not imvalidate the legitimate copyright holder's rights The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 13:05, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Halvorsen brian. Ruthven (msg) 06:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deutsch: das ist eine Folie aus einer PowerPoint Präsentation, siehe den Foliennamen unten rechts
2003:DE:3E1:CEBE:9985:9518:4F5D:CA5 05:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyrighted, not own work. P 1 9 9   13:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deutsch: das ist eine Folie aus einer PowerPoint Präsentation, siehe den Foliennamen unten rechts
2003:DE:3E1:CEBE:9985:9518:4F5D:CA5 05:31, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: slides generally are in scope. Ruthven (msg) 22:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deutsch: das ist eine Folie aus einer PowerPoint Präsentation, siehe den Foliennamen unten rechts
2003:DE:3E1:CEBE:9985:9518:4F5D:CA5 05:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deutsch: das ist eine Folie aus einer PowerPoint Präsentation, siehe den Foliennamen unten rechts
2003:DE:3E1:CEBE:9985:9518:4F5D:CA5 05:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Deutsch: das ist eine Folie aus einer PowerPoint Präsentation, siehe den Foliennamen unten rechts
2003:DE:3E1:CEBE:9985:9518:4F5D:CA5 05:35, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edelseider (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are Flickr Public Domain Mark 1.0 images, which is not accepted on commons. The images were tagged as having no license. The uploader changed it to {{Cc-by-sa}}.

JuTa 14:30, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep — I really don't see JuTa (talk · contribs)'s problem. The author of the photographs on Flickr has waived the rights: anybody can use them freely. The objects in the photos are many centuries old and are already shown in a lot of Commons files in the categories Cannons in the Haut-Koenigsbourg castle and Salle d'armes, Château du Haut-Kœnigsbourg. There is no copyright issue whatsoever. --Edelseider (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years. A license change to one of the three licenses mentioned is needed here. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    More accurately, PDM is a statement that the uploader thinks the image is in public domain, but the reason of the uploader thinking so is not stated. It does not imply that the uploader is the copyright holder and/or is able to release the image into public domain. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Then how come the Flickr2Commons tool allowed that I upload these images? --Edelseider (talk) 06:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Because someone forgot to close that loophole at Flickr2Commons . But if the copyright owner notices his/her images being used, he/she has a legal basis to sue Wikicommons unfortunately. The people at flickr created this problem and many users think that PDM is equivalent to CC0 but they're totally different and PDM is unenforceable. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Very well. I have no reason to doubt your comments. Go ahead with deleting the files, then (or ask the Flickr guy to change their licence, which would be much nicer). Cheers, --Edelseider (talk) 07:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, PDM images may actually be accepted here if there is a valid proof that they are public domain. See {{Remove this line and insert a public domain copyright tag instead}} --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: these are nor PD-old, nor (explicit) PD-user. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the source identifies the image's subject as a US government employee, he was not the photographer The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 20:58, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The photographer is Everett unknown, as mentioned. This is most probably {{PD-US-no notice}} or {{PD-US-not renewed}}. I can't find any information about Everett. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:17, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, but that's not a valid argument. We don't have any information about the original publication. We don't have any information about the photographer, except perhaps their name. And "Everett" is apparently not the actual photographer, but the name of the overall collection -- look at the other images included, which clearly don't share common authorship. This is an old photo found on a website selling images and image merchandise, and that's really all we know about. That's not enough for us to reasonably claim public domain status. Collier's father was well-known and published a memoir in 1963; it's perfectly reasonable to surmise, for example that this is a family photo used in that book, and plausibly still under copyright. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 22:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Everett is not the photographer. As you can see at the source page when you click the weblink on "Back to Everett" (upper left edge), this piece is from the Everett Collection instead, where Everett is the collector's name. The original description is "John Collier, Jr. (b. 1913), American photographer with the Farm Security Administration, seated on lawn with boys in the background. 1943". This could have been made Collier himself using a timer but since the Everett Collection is focused on films this could as well be a still from a documentary film. Neither is it known when and where this was first published, so the Everett Collection could even hold the copyright now. De728631 (talk) 00:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Everett is not a photography or film studio either as Yann might want to imply with his edit. It is a private "collection of entertainment photography", i. e. the photographs were made by third parties. The image might be PD now but we would need to know the original publication date. De728631 (talk) 14:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, changed again. Yann (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hrrrm. This is available at the Library of Congress here. That mentions nothing of Everett, so either Everett got it from the Library of Congress (likely), or prints were available even earlier (which would basically prove PD-US-no_notice). The LoC entry has a note of "Paul Vanderbilt; 1998; (DLC/PP-1998:032)", which is also mentioned here on a collection of 8 prints and 2 negatives. Paul Vanderbilt was an FSA employee hired to organize all of their photos; he moved to the Library of Congress when the collection moved over there, and was there into the 1950s before moving on. He died in 1992. That sure sounds like these were prints that he had at home, and were donated by his estate to the Library of Congress. He apparently did become a photographer himself, but not at the time of his USGov employment. The photo in question seems to be one of those prints (not the original negative). Vanderbilt apparently tended to not simply group all photos by film roll, or on a single day, but grouped them more in to photo essays (these are the LOTs that you see at loc.gov).[6][7] So, it would not be surprising that he would have different prints lying around. It's *possible* these were photos taken by himself, in which case they would be unpublished until 1998 and still under copyright, but I think it's far, far more likely that these were just extra photos taken by FSA photographers but were not used as part of the actual work product, and he kept prints of them. Unfortunately, the Library of Congress has not processed these in terms of rights management, so they do not supply large images until they make a determination. The fact that Everett has copies of them is irrelevant -- they are almost certainly obtained from the Library of Congress in the first place. I think the odds are beyond COM:PRP that these were also just PD-USGov-FSA photos which Vanderbilt had copies of, so  Keep for me under the current license. The second most likely situation is that they were taken by Vanderbilt as personal photos, but then donated to the Library of Congress, which then may be given to the public domain as well. The fact that Everett is fine selling these photos without further credit would mean they are likely public domain one way or another, as well. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep given Getty v. Highsmith, using photos for sale is a flawed workflow: you end up being an enforcer for some copyfraud. and thank you Clindberg, apparently nobody else can do an image search. it is great that we can spend this time together debating low risk orphan works in use, when higher risk items abound, like FoP Sweden, or UK unknown. given the lack of metadata it is a wonder we have a photo subject. and why be encyclopedic when we can play out just how "diligent" we are? Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 14:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Carl Lindberg and Slowking4. Ruthven (msg) 22:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C-SPAN has revised its copyright policy since the original upload: "Under C-SPAN's copyright policy a license is generally not required to post a recording of C-SPAN's video coverage of federal government events online for non-commercial purposes so long as C-SPAN is attributed as the source of the video...C-SPAN does NOT permit unlicensed commercial use of any of its video programming (including coverage of federal government events) whether or not C-SPAN is attributed as the source of the video." Arbor to SJ (talk) 22:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That hardly works retroactively. Once something is PD, it cannot be revoked. This should only apply to media created from the date it was changed. FunkMonk (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, the license for this video is only non-commercial. As C-SPAN policy stated at the time of upload: "C-SPAN permits non-commercial use of its video coverage of federal government-sponsored events so long as C-SPAN is identified during the use as the source of the video." While C-SPAN video from the chambers of the US House or US Senate is in the public domain because C-SPAN doesn't hold its copyright - it's not the case for video of Congressional committee hearings, as the newer C-SPAN copyright policy clarifies. Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can't retroactively change the license of something that was once PD. If this was PD at the time of upload, it doesn't matter if they changed the licence for later material. In any case, look above, you've already nominated this before on the same grounds, and it was already kept then. Nothing has changed since. FunkMonk (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
C-SPAN has always distinguished between "federal government events" that include congressional hearings and video from the chambers of the main House & Senate - specifically, "legislative proceedings" means hearings of the full House and Senate NOT committees. I've had a screenshot I uploaded from a C-SPAN video of a Senate cmte hearing deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Sowell testifies at Bork hearings.jpg, because it was understood at the time (2011) that video the cmte hearing was only for non commercial use.
How do you know that C-SPAN videos of Congressional cmtes were "once PD"? Arbor to SJ (talk) 17:20, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Your own nomination rationales imply this. "C-SPAN has revised its copyright policy" and "as the newer C-SPAN copyright policy clarifies". When I uploaded these videos, the website indicated they were PD. Therefore, the change has happened since, and is irrelevant when it comes to footage from 1985. The old text said "Although C-SPAN is the only news media organization that regularly televises the legislative proceedings of the U.S. House and U.S. Senate, it does not hold a copyright in that video coverage. That government-produced video is in the public domain which means that it belongs to the American people and may be used without restrictions of any kind. (http://www.c-span.org/about/copyright.asp)" Don't go around nominating files for deletion that were created prior to this change in policy. FunkMonk (talk) 22:47, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I mistakenly thought the distinction between video from the main floors of the U.S. House & U.S. Senate and other "federal government-sponsored events" was a new thing after the upload. Turns out that video of specific committee hearings has always been produced (and copyrighted) by C-SPAN, not the US government. Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Their old copyright disclaimer I pasted does not have this caveat. Can you demonstrate that this was "always" the case? FunkMonk (talk) 11:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The main US House [8] and US Senate [9] have had their own cameras since the late 1970s. Because Congress operates those cameras, C-SPAN's broadcasts of the resulting video is in the public domain. Keep in mind the Congress-operated cameras are for chamber proceedings, not committees: "Committees in each chamber often allow video coverage of public hearings or other proceedings, and have discretion to adopt additional rules to govern video coverage, which can include allowing media outlets to film using their own cameras" [10].
In other words, Congressional committee video is copyrighted property of C-SPAN, not the US Congress. Arbor to SJ (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is not explicitly stated at all. I think we need much more views on this before anything can be determined. Again, at the time this was uploaded, C-span indicated it was PD. FunkMonk (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) That's not at all what C-SPan said.They simply stated that they did not beleive they held any copyright. Saying that they do not hold any copyrights (despite acually doing so), and signing away their legally protected copyrights are two distinct different tings. It is like a PDM. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC) (Can I ask Hedwig in Washington to re-open the discussion in order to continue discussing this part? --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Josve05a: OK --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:58, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Who are we to second guess them and retroactively determine on their behalf what they knew or what they didn't know? All that matters is that their website said it was PD when the video was uploaded, and that their policy was only specifically changed later. Whether their policy was somehow the same as the current one before without it being written anywhere is just interpretation (and potential revisionism), and doesn't reflect these facts. FunkMonk (talk) 06:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - copyright situation remains unclear. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid use for this template. It's essentially an argument that the image should be allowed on Commons even though the information necessary to assess its copyright status has not been provided. While sometimes used in good faith, it has commonly been used by editors who do not comply with policy requirements The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 20:55, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to me this should be discussed at the policy page; the real world considers publicity stills either public domain or freely usable without attribution, so "follow the sources". Sweeping the matter under the rug via a template deletion won't resolve the issue. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 05:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As the information here is misleading. This photo from behind the scenes was ovbiously taken to promote the Dean Martin film; you can see the "C" in circle at the bottom of the photo. Universal wasn't the only one marking their photos as copyright. RKO most commonly stamped their photos on the back, so if only the front of an RKO photo is uploaded, the copyright information is missing and the photo certainly can't truly be licensed as PD-pre-1978 no notice.

There was no problem getting newspapers and magazines to print the publicity photos because most contained a rider waiving copyright when the image was published in print media. The Universal photo linked above has one "Permission granted for newspaper and magazine reproduction only". This template leads someone to believe all that needs to be done is to find a photo, describe it as a publicity photo and there's no need to ascertain anything; no need to try to determine who took the photo if that isn't listed, when it was taken, or that there needs to be a look at front and back (for PD-Pre-1978 no notice) to be sure there are no copyright marks front or back.

HW, you and I have been through many, many DRs and PUFs here and also at en:WP; many copyright discussions at en:WP ANI and AN as well as those discussions held here at Commons AN-User. One editor in particular was a regular user of the wording of this template. A look at the user's talk page here shows how well the wording of the template stands up to what is actually required for image PD status here or at en:WP. We hope (talk) 22:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If you are concerned about misuse of this language, keeping the template allows you to quickly check Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Publicity_still. --Guanaco (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]