Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![4 File:"The woman of my life doesn’t yet love me" (1999) by Daniel Knorr.jpg](#File:"The_woman_of_my_life_doesn’t_yet_love_me"_(1999)_by_Daniel_Knorr.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_fr_--_cor.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_copie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No information pre existing. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
{speedydelete|<Immediate change in copyright. Objection by models in photograph to likeness being used>} Decigallen (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: 'all rights reserved' in EXIF. --Jcb (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
No information. preexisting online Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: spam
_by_Daniel_Knorr.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Daniel_Knorr.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission from the artist. Yann (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
![13:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/08/17#c-Yann-2017-08-17T13:22:00.000Z-File:"The_woman_of_my_life_doesn’t_yet_love_me"_(1999)_by_Daniel_Knorr.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, the subject of the photograph would be copyrighted, and no permission, reference site is by -ND anyway. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
![10:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/08/17#c-Billinghurst-2017-08-18T10:39:00.000Z-File:"The_woman_of_my_life_doesn’t_yet_love_me"_(1999)_by_Daniel_Knorr.jpg){kind=link}
Advertising article. Achim (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Unambiguously promotional therefore speedy. --Herby talk thyme 07:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved by uploader in the meantime. --Jcb (talk) 08:21, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Herkomst foto: familiealbum van mijn Zarrense grootouders. Ingescand rond 2000. Auteur David Verbanck, overleden te Zarren op 09.03.1934. Origin of the picture: family photo album of my grand-parents living in Zarren. Scanned around 2000. Author David Verbanck, died at Zarren 09.03.1934.
- Thanks, then it's fine. Bedankt, dan is het prima. Jcb (talk) 08:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Herkomst foto: familiealbum van mijn Zarrense grootouders. Ingescand rond 2000. Auteur David Verbanck, overleden te Zarren op 09.03.1934. Origin of the picture: family photo album of my grand-parents living in Zarren. Scanned around 2000. Author David Verbanck, died at Zarren 09.03.1934.
- Thanks, then it's fine. Bedankt, dan is het prima. Jcb (talk) 08:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved\. --Jcb (talk) 08:18, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
pankajkumarmixing Pankajkumarmixing (talk) 11:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: You're welcome. --Achim (talk) 12:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Delete |reason=Duplicate of File:Tatiana Yagunova Watercolor.jpg |subpage=Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taran Lighthouse Kalinigrad Oblast Tatiana Yagunova Watercolor painting.jpg |day=17 |month=August |year=2017 Niklitov (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: files merged together (different resolution), redir. --Wdwd (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
There is no information given from which data or original this map was derived from. AFBorchert (talk) 17:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by De728631: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: https://www.viamichelin.com/web/Maps?address=Bellingham%20WA&addressId=31NHJhbTExMGNORGd1TnpVME9RPT1nTFRFeU1pNDBOemd4TWc9PQ==
artefacts about porn, out of com:Scope
- File:Asahi Mizuno.jpg
- File:Ai Sayama Enjoyed This.jpg
- File:Anri Okita Enjoyed.jpg
- File:Yui Hatano Good.jpg
- File:Maki Hojo Eager.jpg
- File:Miku Ohashi.jpg
- File:Reiko Kobayakawa Cowgirl.jpg
- File:Minori Hatsune Started.jpg
- File:AV Mako Oda.jpg
- File:Nana Ogura Ready.jpg
- File:Hitomi Tanaka enjoyed this.jpg
- File:Hibiki Otsuki with cowgirl position.jpg
- File:Mkia thumbup.jpg
Pippobuono (talk) 05:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Personally I fail to see how these images lie within the scope of our project. I'm at a loss to image what project that might reasonably be used on. Thanks
- File:Nanao In A Good Mood.jpg
- File:Dan Mitsu Is Ready To Talk.jpg
- File:Anri Okita Nudity.jpg
- File:Reiko Kobayakawa Nudity.jpg
- File:Lisa Ann Nudity.jpg
- File:Ruri Saijo Nudity.jpg
- File:Hibiki Otsuki Nudity.jpg
- File:Mia Khalifa Nudity.jpg
- File:Asahi Mizuno Nude.jpg
- File:Sora Aoi Nudity.jpg
- File:Sora Aoi nude.jpg
- File:Asahi Mizuno.jpg
- File:Ai Sayama Enjoyed This.jpg
- File:Anri Okita Enjoyed.jpg
- File:Yui Hatano Good.jpg
- File:Maki Hojo Eager.jpg
- File:Miku Ohashi.jpg
- File:Reiko Kobayakawa Cowgirl.jpg
- File:Minori Hatsune Started.jpg
- File:AV Mako Oda.jpg
- File:Nana Ogura Ready.jpg
- File:Hitomi Tanaka enjoyed this.jpg
- File:Hibiki Otsuki with cowgirl position.jpg
- File:Mkia thumbup.jpg
Herby talk thyme 11:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: 
speedily deleted as near-certain copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
may copyvio, Commons:DR
- File:Pamela Anderson.png
- File:Pro Kobayakawa.png
- File:Enjoy the table.png
- File:So Big.png
- File:Hitomi Game Over.png
- File:Hey! Not enough.png
- File:She is so good.png
- File:Shoot Hitomi Tanaka (Grey).jpg
- File:Kang So-ra OL.jpg
- File:Shoot Hitomi Tanaka.png
- File:Bit Mako Oda.png
- File:Go Hibiki Otsuki.png
- File:Lov Akari Asahina.png
- File:Inoue Mao ride on Saori Yoshida's shouldersride pickaback.png
- File:Pixie of beach volleyball.png
- File:Painting Koike Eiko.png
- File:Blue Girl.png
- File:Painting Lisa Ann.jpg
- File:Ready?Ayumi.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
shizhao (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 15:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 05:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (reuploaded). --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:19, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Twitter account logo https://twitter.com/IrinaMironova/status/855099705621069824 Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted pic re-uploaded. I don't see if the problem was solved. E4024 (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:28, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
ппррравпирени25а345354та3в4ив34 109.252.93.43 16:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
еике424тттн4кнтт3нкт3прнирпимн1еы 109.252.93.43 16:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed due to unauthorized access. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Nick: Copyright violation: WP0 Abuse
Старое фото из семейного архива (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Сакина_Расизаде.jpeg), автор неизвестен, дата обнародования неизвестна, лицензионный статус установить невозможно Dogad75 (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Догад75, я исправил указанные вами недостатки и привёл всё в соответствие с правилами Википедии. Прошу снять шаблон на удаление. = Rasizade (talk) 02:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ввиду того, что представивший файл на удаление не отвечает на мои запросы, прошу арбитров вмешаться и положить конец произвольному удалению одного и того же файла во второй раз подряд: в первый раз он был представлен к удалению из русской Википедии 11 октября 2014 года (что отражено на моей странице обсуждения в русской Википедии) и, после выполнения необходимых формальностей, шаблон на удаление был снят. Теперь тот же участник принялся за старое и представил файл на удаление вторично как из русской Википедии, так и из Викимедии. Файл полностью отвечает всем требованиям Википедии, поскольку его создатель умер до 1947 года и обнародованный им в 1928 году файл перешёл в общественное достояние по законам всех стран. Я, как правопреемник, передал фотографию в общественное пользование, что отражено в нескольких лицензиях. Какие ещё имеются претензии к авторским правам? Прошу положить конец этому произволу и крючкотворству хотя бы потому, что данный файл используется в двух серьёзных исторических статьях русской и азербайджанской Википедий. = Rasizade (talk) 17:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Rasizade! Прошу прощения, что не смог сразу ответить на Ваш комментарий. На момент вынесения в описании файла было указано: «автор: Rasizade», «источник: собственная работа», «дата: 1928», а в русскоязычном разделе в тот момент было: «автор: неизвестно», «источник-Семейный архив Расизаде». С такими данными лицензионный статус, указанный Вами не мог не вызвать другой реакции, как вынесение на удаление. Викисклад принимает только файлы с не вызывающими сомнение лицензией. Но на данный момент, надеюсь, все недоразумения устранены. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ввиду того, что представивший файл на удаление не отвечает на мои запросы, прошу арбитров вмешаться и положить конец произвольному удалению одного и того же файла во второй раз подряд: в первый раз он был представлен к удалению из русской Википедии 11 октября 2014 года (что отражено на моей странице обсуждения в русской Википедии) и, после выполнения необходимых формальностей, шаблон на удаление был снят. Теперь тот же участник принялся за старое и представил файл на удаление вторично как из русской Википедии, так и из Викимедии. Файл полностью отвечает всем требованиям Википедии, поскольку его создатель умер до 1947 года и обнародованный им в 1928 году файл перешёл в общественное достояние по законам всех стран. Я, как правопреемник, передал фотографию в общественное пользование, что отражено в нескольких лицензиях. Какие ещё имеются претензии к авторским правам? Прошу положить конец этому произволу и крючкотворству хотя бы потому, что данный файл используется в двух серьёзных исторических статьях русской и азербайджанской Википедий. = Rasizade (talk) 17:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 17:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Означает ли это некий длительный процесс или шаблон можно сразу снимать? = Rasizade (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP: random description, no verifiable source, no dates of creation / first publication. --Sealle (talk) 19:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
автор неизвестен, дата обнародования неизвестна. Лицензионный статус установить невозможно Dogad75 (talk) 20:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep. I have changed a license to {{PD-RU-exempt}}, becuse this photo is an official document, a part of case of Javid who was arrested by NKVD in 1937. --Interfase (talk) 21:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Interfase! Фото из следственного дела — это не официальный государственный документ. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, обсуждение здесь. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 22:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Не согласен. Фотография из следственного дела это самый настоящий официальный документ. Он выполнен государственным служащим и прикреплен к делу. На Викискладе такие фотографии публикуются именно под этой лицензией. К примеру эта или эта. --Interfase (talk) 06:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Это редчайшая фотография великого азербайджанского драматурга в сталинских застенках и удалить её под надуманным предлогом было бы вторичным преступлением после его расстрела. Вместо того, чтобы гордиться появлением уникальной фотографии в Википедии, вы её удаляете и лишаете информации читателей сразу нескольких страниц в трёх Википедиях. Как участник проекта, прошу администраторов Википедии покончить с этим крючкотворством. = Rasizade (talk) 16:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Ещё два файла из той же серии, которые преспокойно живут себе на Викискладе: снимки из следственного дела Азефа в фас и в профиль. Наверное, достаточно просто поставить аналогичную лицензию и изменить дату снимка на 1937 год в описании обсуждаемого файла. = Rasizade (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Это редчайшая фотография великого азербайджанского драматурга в сталинских застенках и удалить её под надуманным предлогом было бы вторичным преступлением после его расстрела. Вместо того, чтобы гордиться появлением уникальной фотографии в Википедии, вы её удаляете и лишаете информации читателей сразу нескольких страниц в трёх Википедиях. Как участник проекта, прошу администраторов Википедии покончить с этим крючкотворством. = Rasizade (talk) 16:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Не согласен. Фотография из следственного дела это самый настоящий официальный документ. Он выполнен государственным служащим и прикреплен к делу. На Викискладе такие фотографии публикуются именно под этой лицензией. К примеру эта или эта. --Interfase (talk) 06:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый Interfase! Фото из следственного дела — это не официальный государственный документ. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, обсуждение здесь. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 22:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Sourced to watermarked image with no evidence of Creative Commons license. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Full version of this photo is found here, published not under a free license and prior to the provided source. Very likely license laundering. --Wcam (talk) 22:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted: obvious copyright violation. --Érico (talk) 04:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurred image, of no importance in keeping it. IndianBio (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurred image, of no importance in keeping it. IndianBio (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:49, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image is from a component of Windows 10 and is non-free. The claim of "own work" and the CC-BY-SA license are both bogus. Codename Lisa (talk) 15:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:Screenshots#Microsoft products. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Spam, del. on DE, out of scope Nolispanmo 10:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE: self-created artwork Takeaway (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Likely copyright violations, lifted from various sources. Photographers should confirm licenses by following the instructions on OTRS.
- File:William-Tucker-Civil-law.jpg
- File:Tina-Gehres-Small-Business-Law.jpg
- File:Karen-trademark-lawyer.jpg
- File:Lux-litigation-Law.jpg
- File:Employment-Law.jpg
- File:Commercial-Law.jpg
- File:Business-Litigation.jpg
- File:BusinessFormation.jpg
- File:LegalServices.jpg
- File:Business-Law.jpg
- File:Mediation San Diego.jpg
- File:Estate-Planning.jpg
- File:Trademarklaw.jpg
- File:Estate-Planning Attorney.jpg
- File:Civillaw.jpg
- File:EmploymentAttorney.jpg
Storkk (talk) 14:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - no realistic educational purpose. Additional possible copyright issues with all except "Depleted Uranium", which is likely {{PD-textlogo}}
- File:Elisa test.jpg
- File:Elisa testing.jpg
- File:Elisakits.jpg
- File:Elisakit.jpg
- File:Elisa testing kit.jpg
- File:Depleted-uranium.jpg
- File:Alanrowthseoservices.png
- File:Engage the Crowd Logo.png
Storkk (talk) 14:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:39, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:43, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:عمر كاسب البدران - السيرة الإعلامية 2017-05-29.pdf
- File:عمر كاسب البدران السيرة المعمارية.pdf
- File:السيرة الذاتية لعطاء الرسالة.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:47, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal artwork. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This is an inaccurate photo of what this person looks like and it should be taken down. Sd8888888 (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- One of the stranges causes I've ever seen for a deletion request. Obviously the person had looked like she looked. I would suggest a fast closing of the request. Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Please close this erroneous request ASAP. Gage (talk) 03:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I think it is the actress herself -or a fan perhaps- that did not like how she looked in the pic. Never mind honey, you look gorgeous. --E4024 (talk) 12:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral It is a sucky photo of her. Having a microphone obscuring any part of the face of an article subject is never a good idea, specially when it's in the infobox. Deletion isn't really appropriate but replacing the infobox photo with something much better is. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 00:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oh look who it is, the Wikipedia pariah! Guess your mentor isn't doing a very good job at mending your behavior. Also recall that you were blocked once for stalking my edits. I'd suggest avoiding doing that again as you most likely did to find this discussion. Gage (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Let's clear up some things. I'm not a "pariah" at Wikipedia. I don't have a mentor at Wikipedia. I was never blocked for "stalking" you.
- Oh look who it is, the Wikipedia pariah! Guess your mentor isn't doing a very good job at mending your behavior. Also recall that you were blocked once for stalking my edits. I'd suggest avoiding doing that again as you most likely did to find this discussion. Gage (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- It would seem you're not aware that Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are separate entities with different policies. One thing that remains the same between the two, however, is that threats and personal attacks are verboten. It seems from your post here, you are doing both. FYI: I had the image watchlisted and was aware of this discussion because of a bot-notification. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 15:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Not free from copyright in the UK until 2029. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 2004. [1] Y.haruo (talk) 03:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 2004. [2] Y.haruo (talk) 03:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 2004. [3] Y.haruo (talk) 03:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 2004. [4] Y.haruo (talk) 03:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was erected in 2004. [5] Y.haruo (talk) 03:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:46, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This book is distributed with NC (Non-commercial) and ND (non-derivative) Creatives Commons which is incompatible with Open licences. See page 3 of PDF. Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 02:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur, only 32 views. Dispenser (talk) 02:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Found on Imgur Dispenser (talk) 02:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur Dispenser (talk) 02:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Found on Imgur (103 Views) which links to Standard YouTube License video Dispenser (talk) 02:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Found on Imgur, very weak PD-simple Dispenser (talk) 02:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Found on Imgur Dispenser (talk) 02:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur. 2 view, but looks to be copyrighted game screenshot. Dispenser (talk) 02:52, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake by me just now Mikejames182 (talk) 03:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Pictures of Jakarta
[edit]- File:Treasury Tower Jakarta.jpg
- File:Treasury Tower focus.jpg
- File:Pakubuwono Signature Tower.jpg
- File:Treasury Tower.jpg
- File:GrandITCPermataHijau.jpg
- File:BellezaSuits.jpg
- File:JendSudirmanSkyline.jpg
- File:FairmontJakarta.jpg
- File:Pakubuwonosignature.jpg
- File:KompasMultimediaTower.jpg
Indonesia doesn't even allow picture for Wikipedia per COM:FOP#Indonesia. Deleting my own before somebody else do. --JahlilMA (talk) 04:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Disputing the {{PD-textlogo}} claim. This is a derivative of the EP cover, which is clearly above the threshoold of originality. ℯxplicit 05:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 06:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mar del Este (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derived works of museum exhibits (mainly relative to the 18th May uprising). The photographed material is to recent to be in Public Domain.
- File:Korea-Gaya Inter-relations Gaya and Wa(Japan)2.jpg
- File:Korea-Gaya Inter-relations Gaya and Wa(Japan)1.JPG
- File:Kim Dae-jung Nobel Prize Memorial Hall2.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives10.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives9.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives6.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives5.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives4.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives2.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives3.jpg
- File:May 18th Movement Archives1.jpg
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guuniqlo77
[edit]- File:Satomitadayoshi.jpg
- File:Kohnoichiro88.jpg
- File:Hatakeyamatakanori.jpg
- File:Ayabekentaro.jpg
- File:Nishimura-eiichi77.jpg
- File:Kanemarushin.jpg
- File:Abejoji77.jpg
- File:Kawadajun.jpg
- File:Furutashunnosuke.jpg
- File:Onotadaaki.jpg
Copyright violations. Guuniqlo77 (talk · contribs) < JAWP 利用者:Guuniqlo77 > was identified as the long-term abuser Masato Koizumi in JAWP. this copyright violator used Sock puppet Flyingdutchman in Commons. -Katsura Roen (talk) 10:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raidriar171 (talk · contribs)
[edit]hardly own work, seems probable copyvio to me : drawings or screenshots
- File:1445435782 a random dunmer by velena gorosama(1).jpg
- File:C1b0ecda6c8d550c2cfa6aaee20cfddb(1).jpg
- File:Varyn Khatar.png
- File:Tea still(1).png
- File:Volund.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pippobuono (talk) 10:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
low quality image of com:PENIS, little educational value... there is enough of this in category:male ejaculation Pippobuono (talk) 10:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 10:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wilheminaherpetina (talk · contribs)
[edit]A mixture of old photos with actual date claimed, album covers and similar. Very likely not own work of the uploader as (mostly) claimed. Would need a confirmation through Commons:OTRS.
- File:Gene-misty-mountains.jpg
- File:Gene-pierson-quieter-life.jpg
- File:Gene-pierson-fans-nz.jpg
- File:Gene Pierson at home.jpg
- File:Gene-Pierson.jpg
- File:Gene-Pierson-Metromedia-LA-square-1970.jpg
- File:Gene Pierson on Blind Date.jpg
- File:Gene-Pierson-citylife.jpg
JuTa 10:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
copyright Violation. Foto can be found on several places online. Official foto of the youtuber, no CC-licence Jensbest (talk) 03:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Blurred beyond usefulness. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete RSLlGriffith (talk) 07:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Ordinary people Newnewlaw (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek user:Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek user:Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. The only issue I see is whether the uploader's claim to ownership of the graphic design is credible. It is unclear whether this inscription is on display in the w:en:Zografeion Lyceum school in Istanbul. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:03, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "Biros Ionnis" is a transliteration of the Greek user:Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek user:Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:57, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Wrong licence. There is a copyright sign on the bottom. Texniths (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Wrong licence. There is a copyright sign on the bottom. Texniths (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. The image size and metadata suggest that this image was not copied from the Internet. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Wrong licence. There is a copyright sign on the top. Texniths (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Wrong licence. There is a copyright sign on the bottom. Texniths (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license is not wrong. The assigned {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} is compatible with the in-image copyright notice. Google Translate indicates that the name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek name Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the name of the uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No use, better versions are available. Smial (talk) 11:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo of a user with no edit outside user space. Using as social site. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 13:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iliteentgroup (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PeterCrombecq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:P. CROMBECQ. KBRmsGoethals834. Edegem januari 2006. v4.0.pdf
- File:P. CROMBECQ. Het Tiegemse geslacht Moreels. Edegem 2 september 2007. v2.1.pdf
- File:P. CROMBECQ. Afstamming Leuvense tak De Vadder van Hertogen van Brabant.Edegem 20 februari 2010. v3.0.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brayancampos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used.
- File:BRAYAN A CAMPOS C.pdf
- File:Constancia 10673280 BRAYAN ATAHUALPA CAMPOS CASTILLO.pdf
- File:BRAYAN ATAHUALPA CAMPOS CASTILLO.pdf
- File:Constancia de trabajo brayan atahulpa campos castillo.pdf
- File:ESPECIALIZACION EN SALUD PUBLICA GERENCIA DE HOSPITALES BRAYAN ATAHUALPA CAMPOS CASTILLO.pdf
- File:Magister en gerencia brayan atahualpa campos castillo.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AkhandRamayan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused userspace images - out of scope.
XXN, 15:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 18:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Self promotional and No EXIF Meta Data Present - IndrajitDas 18:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Self promotional and No EXIF Meta Data Present - IndrajitDas 18:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Low quality. Bot upload. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
advertisement for a blog (btw there are enough banana pictures).-- Țibrin (talk) 21:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo from the "MTV Unplugged" show back in 1993. Kigsz (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Jodanse malditos maricones.
I doubt if the ToO declaration in the licensing is correct, but am sure admins with more experience than a commoner will not consider my DR if I'm wrong. Just look into the "simple design" please. E4024 (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - although this one might be borderline. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
sorry, this is a duplicate of a photo I already uploaded. My apologies. Daderot (talk) 10:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
sorry, this is a duplicate of a photo I already uploaded. My apologies. Daderot (talk) 10:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kosal varady (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo's uploaded as "own work" but taken from "all rights reserved" website -> https://www.bangsuejunction.com/
- File:Bangsue Junction Logo 02.png
- File:Bangsue Junction Logo 01.png
- File:Bangsue Junction Logo 04.png
- File:Bangsue Junction Logo 03.png
Takeaway (talk) 11:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Only File:Bangsue Junction Logo 03.png is above TOO, but the files are out of scope anyway. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Trzech Budrysów - bracia Wędziagolscy- Karol, Paweł, Bronisław.jpg
- File:Paweł Wędziagolski.jpg
- File:Bronisław Wędziagolski 1919.jpg
- File:Jaworów Pałac realizacja.jpg
- File:Jaworów Pałac projekt.jpg
- File:Wolna Wszechnica Polska.jpg
- File:Karol Wędziagolski.jpg
- File:Tadeusz Kowalski.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Roger Baron died in 1994. Copyright violation. 90.43.163.217 15:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Roger Baron died in 1994. Copyright violation. 90.43.163.217 15:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
lower quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bike_road_-_panoramio.jpg Panek (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Not the same image, in use. --Yann (talk) 18:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This image is almost identical to file "Church in York (8469).jpg", to be renamed into "Parish Room of St Crux, York (8469).jpg", and is of a lower resolution. Unless all images imported from geograph.org.uk are to be retained, this may be deleted from Commons. Schlosser67 (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. I see no point in deleting this image. Yes, it's similar to File:Parish Room of St Crux, York (8469).jpg, but not identical. I'm not aware of any policy that supports deletion of photos just because they're similar to others. Also, the file proposed for deletion has location information that is absent from the file proposed for retention. Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.. 0 .. .. 203.87.156.125 08:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
rotazione non fatta Runner79 (talk) 09:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
rotazione non fatta Runner79 (talk) 09:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:11, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
There is a copyright sign on the bottom Texniths (talk) 09:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the name of the uploader in Greek, user:Ιωαννης Μπυρος. The image size and metadata suggest that this image was not copied from the Internet. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:13, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This is a small image. The author is "Herwald Ramsbotham" (supposedly the father of the subject). I doubt of this authorship and I doubt the uploader has the permission of the actual photographer. BrightRaven (talk) 09:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 12:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Wrong licence. There is a copyright sign on the bottom. Texniths (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The license does not appear to be wrong. The in-image copyright notice is compatible with {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multi-licensing is allowed, see Commons:Licensing. The name in the copyright notice "IOANNIS BIROS" is a transliteration of the Greek Ιωαννης Μπυρος, the uploader's username. Appears to be allowable under {{FoP-Turkey}} (this is an inscription on the w:en:Church of St. Mary of the Spring (Istanbul)). Verbcatcher (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- However, the text shown on the sign may be subject to copyright, see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Noticeboards and signs. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Text very simple. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pkbwcgs as no permission (No permission since). Statue would be covered by OCM:FOP#India... is there real doubt about the photo itself? Storkk (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Keep Tineye finds hundreds of versions of this image, mostly without the watermark, so it is unlikely the work of the uploader as claimed. PCP applies Ww2censor (talk) 10:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
All these buildings are quite recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Same aplies, also, for the statue in the middle of the picture. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Buildings are de minimis. --Yann (talk) 18:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Buildings are too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Buildings are de minimis. --Yann (talk) 18:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Claimed "Own work". Missing EXIF. Seems Copyvio. ~Moheen (keep talking) 12:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright artwork. Not the own work of the uploader as claimed, and too large to be exempted by de minimis. DAJF (talk) 12:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Because i am the owner Apaleutos25 (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is or seems to be the center of attention in this picture. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Sorry, but "in the center" can only be correct in physical terms; I had to put on my glasses and approach the screen to see what statue you were referring to. Indeed I think there are a couple of football players in there or should I see my ophthalmologist again? :) --E4024 (talk) 11:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: General view. --Yann (talk) 18:18, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Because i am the owner Apaleutos25 (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is or seems to be the center of attention in this picture to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: General view. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Because i am the owner Apaleutos25 (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is or seems to be the center of attention in this picture to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: General view. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is or seems to be the center of attention in this picture to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: General view. --Yann (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The square and its monuments/statues are too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: General view. --Yann (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
The square and its monuments/statues are too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: General view. --Yann (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
mauvais calque Salsero35 (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, broken file. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
An exact crop of this photo was previously published as {{Own work}} by another user in 2014 (File:Fitness Trainer, Lawrence D- Marbury 2014-07-14 06-57.jpg). This fact, combined with the lack of metadata and 960x640 image size make it likely that this is a copyright violation, possibly a still from a video. Photographer should confirm the license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 14:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Due to the lack of any source evidence. --Fæ (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Very low quality picture of the painting which makes the artwork impossible to recognize (I guess it's File:Mand met appels - s0151V1962 - Van Gogh Museum.jpg but could be File:Mand met appels - s0150V1962 - Van Gogh Museum.jpg). Maybe another educational value can be found ? Léna (talk) 15:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
definitely not own work BuschBohne (talk) 15:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Picture already published on other non free websites, like this one since December 2009. No authorization. Titlutin (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Français : Photo auparavant déjà publiée d'autres sites web non-libres de droits, comme celui-ci depuis décembre 2009. Il faudrait donc une autorisation officielle du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image. Voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image--Titlutin (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Copy of https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=100437273982130&set=a.100437320648792.1073741826.100020475721223&type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Picture published in better quality on this non free website (direct link to the pic). Not sure if the uploader is the photographer. No authorization. Titlutin (talk) 16:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Non free and copyrighted image; no wiki use Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This is an original work and not in the claimed source (The World Factbook). The source material is publicly searchable at cia.gov and this map is not part of their data. CIA does not label regional cuts of countries in Europe. 170.74.231.21 16:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The map is based on en:The World Factbook. It's conterpart is File:Europe subregion map UN geoscheme.svg. --Kolja21 (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- The map itself is not in the Factbook, but all the information is. This is a graphical illustration of the Factbook's labelling of the states of Europe. If such an illustration is not admissable, most of the maps in Commons would have to be removed. --TU-nor (talk) 16:50, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Modern art, suspicious authorship Gikü (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Automated Flickr upload, low-quality image of people doing nothing, illustrates nothing about the US Fish and Wildlife Service or anything related, no longer even exists at the Flickr address where it came from. No potential educational value and no context. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Of no encyclopedic value. Uploaded by a teenager to promote a non-notable web cartoon. Wikipedia pages that used it have been deleted. GretLomborg (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This could be copyrighted !! No EXIF Meta data present - IndrajitDas 18:03, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Copy righted content and no proper source defined - IndrajitDas 18:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
IMO above COM:TOO. jdx Re: 18:05, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No EXIF Meta Data present - IndrajitDas 18:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: CCTV, no copyright. --Yann (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No EXIF Meta Data present - IndrajitDas 18:12, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: CCTV, no copyright. --Yann (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Self promotional and No EXIF Meta Data Present - IndrajitDas 18:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Memes are not for Commons 176.239.98.17 18:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyright. --Yann (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No proper source defined and No EXIF Meta Data Present - IndrajitDas 18:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Could be Copyrighted and No EXIF Meta Data Present - IndrajitDas 18:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Self promotional and No EXIF Meta Data Present - IndrajitDas 18:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted and no proper source defined - IndrajitDas 18:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Photo credits Hernan Giles Jadli. Probably needs OTRS ticket. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a video screenshot, there's a web file that predates this upload; https://www.clubamericanista.com.mx/martin_zuniga_se_estrena_como_goleador-noticias_del_club_america-ispyp-520843.htm Ytoyoda (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hasbro logo indicates this may be copyrighted by someone other than the uploader. The low quality and amateur nature of the image suggest it is something the uploader made up and thereby out of scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC) IronGargoyle (talk) 19:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of likely copyrighted automobile brochure/manual. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Small and unused, have multiple better raster and svg in Category:Benzofuran DMacks (talk) 19:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
If this is the company logo, it is likely copyrighted and there is no evidence of Creative Commons license. Image is low quality and the company website suggests this is not the actual logo, which would put this out of scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted poster. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Unfree logo, unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Excellent own work tattoo 176.239.86.216 19:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Another own work from internet 176.239.86.216 19:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
License details needed or concession. Copy violation Brgesto (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
If this is the company logo, it is likely copyrighted and there is no evidence of Creative Commons license. Image is low quality and the company website suggests this is not the actual logo, which would put this out of scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Privacy violation, no explicit permission of the lady Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC) This image slipped trough by the upload. I normaly dont upload personal pictures of my travel compagnions. These I share via other means. This inocent picture does little harm, but it is the principle.Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: very low quality & unused.-- Țibrin (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support as uploader. I uploaded this back when it was the only free file of the subject available but subsequently, much better images have become available. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 15:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
incorrect & unused, replaced by File:South Africa 2011 Black African population proportion map.svg.-- Țibrin (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. (I am the uploader.) It's not incorrect, it just shows data from a different time. It's superseded only in cases where one is looking for the most recent information. But it's perfectly valid as a record of historical information. - Htonl (talk) 08:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Levitated Mass by artist Michael Heizer at Los Angeles County Museum of Art in California LCCN2013632453.tif
[edit]No freedom of panorama for sculptures in the U.S. Barte (talk) 21:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a COM:DW of the sculpture... should be moved to enwiki under a Fair Use claim. I'll try to do this in the coming days if nobody else does. Storkk (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep There is no "sculpture" in this installation. As per the article about the installation, the boulder was "discovered" in Stone Valley Quarry and as part of the nature of the installation has not been sculpted (the process of quarrying and in the process creating moveable chunks of rock is pragmatic engineering work, not sculpting). It is even made clear that the shelf supports were not part of the artist's intention, so the only object that has a potential copyright claim in this photograph is the natural boulder. In line with all legal understanding of what can be eligible for copyright, there must be evidence of creative work. Simply hanging a natural boulder over a walkway may be an "installation", however legally it is not meaningful to simply point out naturally formed objects, such as cliffs, boulders, trees or the moon, and to expect to be able to have a legally enforceable claim of copyright because a named artist has decided to call it their installation when the only "creative work" they appear to have done is to commission an engineering company to move it. --Fæ (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- COM:FOP guidance for the U.S. puts the restriction more broadly, saying that any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork... is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork. (italics, mine). The Los Angeles County Art Museum listing for the work says "© Michael Heizer". Just pointing this out: I'm hardly a FOP expert. Barte (talk) 16:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nobody has actually claimed anything about freedom of panorama, nor has the fact that copyright been claimed by the artist been challenged. The point is that a massive boulder discovered in a quarry and is untouched by the "installation artist", does not have sufficient creative work added to it (i.e. there is actually zero creative work) to be eligible for copyright. The artist can make whatever claim they want, that does not mean that any intellectual property exists or can be claimed in any proper legal sense. --Fæ (talk) 16:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- COM:FOP guidance for the U.S. puts the restriction more broadly, saying that any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork... is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork. (italics, mine). The Los Angeles County Art Museum listing for the work says "© Michael Heizer". Just pointing this out: I'm hardly a FOP expert. Barte (talk) 16:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- The Museum cites the copyright, thereby implicitly endorsing it. You disagree. But unless you can cite a comparable source taking your position, I think we should give the museum's stance more weight. Barte (talk) 14:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- You should find this 2012 discussion useful: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tate Britain North Gallery Jaguar.jpg
- In the Fiona Banner case, the previously manufactured object (an aircraft) where the artist commissioned (non-creative) repainting and then installed it in the gallery made it an installation, but not an artwork under copyright law. In terms of "creative" content, the aircraft had an awful lot more to discuss than a boulder found in a quarry and simply moved. The outcome, of course, was to keep the photograph on Commons, basically along the lines that if Duchamp's urinal never had a signature, it would just be a piece of mass produced plumbing, not an artwork. In this case the natural boulder has no creative elements, not even a signature, so precisely the same reasoning of being ineligible for copyright applies. --Fæ (talk) 04:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- As I read this, the decision to keep rested on the ephemerality of the installation: Freedom of panorama does not apply in this case, as the exhibition apparently just lasted until January 3, 2011, see User talk:Pieter Kuiper#File:Tate Britain North Gallery Jaguar.jpg. And there was no evidence that the Tate had recognized a copyright for the work. LACMA has done so, and the "sculpture" (that's the term the Museum uses) is arguably LACMA's most permanent exhibit. Barte (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, you seem to be raising tangents. FoP was not the reason the file was kept, similarly what the Tate had to say about copyright was also irrelevant to the DR.
- Duchamp's urinal without a signature would never be copyrightable is the key point, and a discovered hunk of rock with no creative work added to it cannot be defended in court as intellectual property. --Fæ (talk) 09:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- As I read this, the decision to keep rested on the ephemerality of the installation: Freedom of panorama does not apply in this case, as the exhibition apparently just lasted until January 3, 2011, see User talk:Pieter Kuiper#File:Tate Britain North Gallery Jaguar.jpg. And there was no evidence that the Tate had recognized a copyright for the work. LACMA has done so, and the "sculpture" (that's the term the Museum uses) is arguably LACMA's most permanent exhibit. Barte (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Fæ's analysis is persuasive. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Fae. --Yann (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No permission from Luca Fazzolari Jcb (talk) 22:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
_fr_--_cor.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_fr_--_cor.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work. Jcb (talk) 23:59, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
_fr_--_cor.PNG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
_fr_--_cor.PNG){kind=link}
Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, 24 August 2017 P199 deleted both files. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 14:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Pkbwcgs as no permission (No permission since) - I do not see the permission problem, but this seems to be an out of scope personal picture. Jcb (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Artstic works by Yayoi Kusama, Not OK for FOP in Japan. Not de minimis. 126.245.83.199 18:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, with the note applicable to this and the following files that it's not "no FOP in Japan" but that Japanese FOP is really... Japanese copyright law allows the reproduction of artistic works located permanently in open places accessible to the public, such as streets and parks, or at places easily seen by the public, such as the outer walls of buildings, only for non-commercial purposes; therefore, such photographs are not free enough for Commons. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Artstic works by Yayoi Kusama, Not OK for FOP in Japan. Not de minimis. 126.245.83.199 18:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Artstic works by Yayoi Kusama, Not OK for FOP in Japan. Not de minimis. 126.245.83.199 18:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Artstic works by Yayoi Kusama, Not OK for FOP in Japan. Not de minimis. 126.245.83.199 18:36, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Artstic works by Niki de Saint Phalle, Not OK for FOP in Japan. Not de minimis. 126.245.83.199 18:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Artstic works by Niki de Saint Phalle, Not OK for FOP in Japan. Not de minimis. 126.245.83.199 18:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot from http://www.adfp-sd.com/noticias/ian-simic-jugar-cienciano-una-oportunidad-mostrarme-mas Ytoyoda (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Artstic works by Yayoi Kusama, Not OK for FOP in Japan. Not de minimis. 126.245.83.199 18:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Johnson habarugira (talk · contribs)
[edit]These all include the uploader as a subject, and do not appear to be selfies, so they are not "own work" as claimed and the copyright rests with the photographer. Also most of them appear to be unused personal images and the other three are CD covers.
- File:@johnson HABARUGIRA at IG.jpg
- File:God's glory drama team girls and media team.jpg
- File:Habarugira.jpg
- File:HIRWA Heritiear.jpg
- File:HABARUGIRA preaching.jpg
- File:Habarugira johnson.jpg
- File:Assemblies of God gatsata.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:54, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Raymond Corbin died in 2002. Copyright violation. 90.43.36.108 21:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
_copie.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_copie.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Raymond Corbin died in 2002. Copyright violation. 90.43.36.108 21:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No source. Not own work, rather COM:DW (placing a red dot doesn't mean you are the copyright holder of the base map). Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
This is a low-resolution photo of a part of Oxford of which Commons has numerous better photos. Commons also has numerous better photos of each of the types of vehicle shown in the photo. Motacilla (talk) 22:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:CTEPH PA-angiogram.tif
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader requested. The person in this photo has requested I delete these photos, and I see no reason not to do that. abbedabbtalk 06:57, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: personality rights. Ruthven (msg) 08:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader requested. The person in this photo has requested I delete these photos, and I see no reason not to do that. abbedabbtalk 06:57, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per personality rights. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Uploader requested. The person in this photo has requested I delete these photos, and I see no reason not to do that. abbedabbtalk 06:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per personality rights. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Uploader requested. The person in this photo has requested I delete these photos, and I see no reason not to do that. abbedabbtalk 06:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per personality rights. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Buildings are too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO (no notable buildings). Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Buildings are too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no notable buildings. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is or seems to be the center of attention in this picture to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: what statue?. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is or seems to be the center of attention in this picture to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:13, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is present in the right of this picture to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:27, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: sculpture is de minimis here. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the building on the left side of the picture which was newly built to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Comment It is just a general view. The neoclassical houses are more prominent than the square. --C messier (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO. Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: just a building. Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:41, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Monument too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:42, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Statue too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Statue too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Statue too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:44, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Buildings too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We don't know when the building was completed. Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Because i am the owner Apaleutos25 (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Omonoia square in Athens was rebuilt in order to be ready of the Olympic Games of 2004, so that makes it impossible for the whole square architecture and especially the statue which is or seems to be the center of attention in this picture. Glorious 93 (talk) 19:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
pour une modification GuineaMall (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; @GuineaMall: vous pouvez télécharger une nouvelle version sur cette image, sans besoin de l'effacer. Ruthven (msg) 08:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
J'ai modifié mon logo GuineaMall (talk) 17:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- The fact that you changed it doesn't matter. I've added it to Category:Old logos. However, neither this nor your new logo (File:G-Mall.jpg) is being used by any wikipedia article. I wonder if they should be deleted as out of scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- At this point I tend to agree: Delete because Out of scope for both. --Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- At this point I tend to agree:
Deleted: Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 10:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Statue too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 19:19, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:33, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Candidato José Serra.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarah Menezes 2012.jpg (and other related DR's). This is not a work by Agência Brasil, considering the credit "Logan Abassi/ONU" (ONU = "United Nations"). Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 21:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xuxa e Luis Inácio Lula da Silva.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sobrevoo das áreas atingidas pela chuva no Espírito Santo - 02.jpg (and eventually other related DR's). This is not a work by Agência Brasil, considering the credit "Roberto Stuckert Filho/Presidência da República". Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 22:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
This is https://www.ginarinehart.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/130217-header.png - so basically uploader is claiming to be (or at best work for) Gina Rinehart, one of the world's richest women. Methinks this requires just a bit of proof sent to COM:OTRS. GRuban (talk) 03:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: photographer must confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Replaced with svg NeoGeneric (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded unused file. --Storkk (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Replaced with svg version NeoGeneric (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded unused file. --Storkk (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Blurred image, of no importance in keeping it. IndianBio (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see why a picture should be deleted just because is "blurred" (which by the way, it isn't, that's how the background actually looks). Besides, no importance in keeping it is subjetive, somebody could find it useful in the future, maybe describing the background or just saying that Gaga is performing "Alejandro". And we shouldn't have any problem at keeping the picture since Wikipedia is not paper. Biagio2103 (talk) 12:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Dude it fails Freedom of Panorama, it is just a blurry shot of the backdrop which does not pass panorama and its free license. Gaga's performance shots if uploaded under CC-By-SA is fine, however the backdrop videos are all copyrighted. IndianBio (talk) 06:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- If you pay attention, you can see Gaga in the middle of the stage, a bit of zoom should be enough to face the "Freedom of Panorama" (which I don't think applies here anyway). The photo is not blurred itself, it's the background. Biagio2103 (talk) 13:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Then only Gaga's image should be uploaded. The background fails FOP and that is the only thing prominent in this image. IndianBio (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- If you pay attention, you can see Gaga in the middle of the stage, a bit of zoom should be enough to face the "Freedom of Panorama" (which I don't think applies here anyway). The photo is not blurred itself, it's the background. Biagio2103 (talk) 13:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Dude it fails Freedom of Panorama, it is just a blurry shot of the backdrop which does not pass panorama and its free license. Gaga's performance shots if uploaded under CC-By-SA is fine, however the backdrop videos are all copyrighted. IndianBio (talk) 06:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per IndianBio, "The background fails FOP and that is the only thing prominent in this image.". --Storkk (talk) 08:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Question When the building was completed? --Ruthven (msg) 08:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. We would need to know the date to keep. --Storkk (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Building too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 08:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Monument too recent in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. Glorious 93 (talk) 11:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 08:44, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 13:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Sakumacho Urakawa, Tenryu Ward, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture 431-3906, Japan - panoramio (2).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no Freedom of Panorama in Japan for copyrightable signs. --Storkk (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no Freedom of Panorama in Japan for copyrightable signs. --Storkk (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-free explanation board in Japan. Batholith (talk) 13:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no Freedom of Panorama in Japan for copyrightable signs. --Storkk (talk) 08:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Whether this photo - of a photo, of a building - is properly free depends on factors about freedom of panorama and accurate replicas of 2D work. I think it needs to be addressed, and I don't think I know enough to address it. DS (talk) 01:58, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, my English is not so good and I´m not sure if I understood you correctly. I made several pictures from the building and also this picture from this advertisement (sign with self-description) of the building which stands at the street and is for the public. So I´m not sure what the problem is. Because the building is going to finish the sign is probably not there anymore anyway, so it´s a kind of archive picture now, which has a worth itself I think.--Riadchikova (talk) 06:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Freedom of Panorama in Vietnam and Freedom of Panorama in Germany. --Y.haruo (talk) 12:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Could be taken from a "pniridescent.com" but not sure. E4024 (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, probably not the uploader's own work. --Y.haruo (talk) 12:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 09:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- This is not is own work, but according to the name of the editor he represent "Bait Shturman museum" see in Hebrew Wikipedia here, and in Polish Wikipedia here
- This historical and important text, was written in 1939, 9 month after the the death of Haïm Sturmann see in French Wikipedia. The license should be {{PD-Israel}}. Geagea what do you think? Hanay (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hanay, I agree about the importance of the document but {{PD-Israel}} is about photographs and work that the Israeli government owns the copyright. -- Geagea (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Geagea, this document was written before 78 years ago. I wrote to the user and I gave him my phone no. I am sure that he can send an OTRS permission. He only need to know what to do. Hanay (talk) 07:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hanay, That would be great. -- Geagea (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Geagea, this document was written before 78 years ago. I wrote to the user and I gave him my phone no. I am sure that he can send an OTRS permission. He only need to know what to do. Hanay (talk) 07:28, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hanay, I agree about the importance of the document but {{PD-Israel}} is about photographs and work that the Israeli government owns the copyright. -- Geagea (talk) 07:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 06:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
missing OTRS Bigbossfarin (talk) 14:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Non free and copyrighted image; no wiki use Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sanandros (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
"Bey featured in the Islam In America documentary" does not give much of an impression of own work to me. E4024 (talk) 11:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- This documentary can be found in You Tube, I guess. --E4024 (talk) 11:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: BBC Documentary, copyrighted. On YouTube it's with Standard YT license. Ruthven (msg) 17:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Not actually free domain - association logo. Gabriel C (talk) 17:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, the organization was founded in 1903, so by principle its logo can be in public domain due to age, but this needs evidence. If you have evidence, please create an undeletion request and present the evidence. Taivo (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Candidato José Serra.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarah Menezes 2012.jpg (and other other related DR's). This is not a work by Agência Brasil, considering the credit "Gabriel Monteiro/Riotur". Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, apparently nobody wanted to delete the photo, because it's a featured one, but at last somebody must be bold and do it. Taivo (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:47, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:48, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:50, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Candidato José Serra.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sarah Menezes 2012.jpg (and other other related DR's). This is not a work by Agência Brasil, considering the credit "Belotur/Divulgação" (Divulgação = +/- grabbed from Internet, here from Belotur). Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Nominating too:
- sourced with a 2017 link from Agência Brasil (image not found) but per https://www.flickr.com/photos/riotur/16350585078/ or http://fotospublicas.com/carnaval-rio-de-janeiro-2015-blobo-de-carnaval-bangalafumenga-que-lotou-o-aterro-flamengo/ (both 2015) a copyrighted work by "Tata Barreto/Riotur".
- per above: https://www.flickr.com/photos/riotur/15915685174/ or http://fotospublicas.com/carnaval-rio-de-janeiro-2015-blobo-de-carnaval-bangalafumenga-que-lotou-o-aterro-flamengo/
and
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 02 0.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 14-692x1024.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 12-850x566.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 11-850x566.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 10-850x566.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 09.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 06.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 05.jpg (Tata Barreto/Riotur)
- File:Desfile-do-bloco bloco-bangalafumenga rj15022015 08.jpg (Fernando Maia/Riotur)
Gunnex (talk) 17:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- I found the image http://mapio.net/o/2147579/, but no information about date/creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't look a still image of the movie. Maybe a drawing or a coloured version of a photograph taken on stage (as the description says). If it is not a stillframe, it is not PD-Italy, and thus it shall be deleted. Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
This was marked for speedy deletion as a copyvio, but it could be PD. Clearly the date, license, and claim of "own work" by uploader are bogus, but it's likely to be out of copyright. If someone can show that it is, we can keep it. Jmabel ! talk 19:03, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: the typeface it advertises, Cheltenham (typeface), dates from 1902. - Jmabel ! talk 19:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Here's a page with a cleaner version of the same broadside: http://heavenlymonkeybooks.blogspot.com/2015/03/eastern-corps-typographic-broadsides.html. No indication of the Robert Russell Reid connection. - Jmabel ! talk 19:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Looks like at the bottom of that better copy it says Copyright 1948, so this is very likely to be {{PD-US-not renewed}}. However, we'd need to demonstrate non-renewal. - Jmabel ! talk 19:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Direct link to that better version: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9euh3eEmBoM/VRBs9eF1-yI/AAAAAAAAEJA/HTBqBbZj3GQ/s1600/Cheltenham.jpg. If we can keep this, then we probably should take this better version (probably will want to crop out the wood border). - Jmabel ! talk 19:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- It's not in Gutenberg's copyright renewals, but I think that's because they were part of what Gutenberg transcribed. http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/ has renewal volumes, but at this point in time they aren't sorted. I looked through 1975, both Artwork renewals and Commercial Print renewals, and didn't see it. I also searched Copyright.gov records in various ways and didn't see it. That leaves 1976 and 1977, as well as 1974 and 1978 (to be thorough)--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Direct link to that better version: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-9euh3eEmBoM/VRBs9eF1-yI/AAAAAAAAEJA/HTBqBbZj3GQ/s1600/Cheltenham.jpg. If we can keep this, then we probably should take this better version (probably will want to crop out the wood border). - Jmabel ! talk 19:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Looks like the copyright notice was cut off of the version we have. - Jmabel ! talk 19:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Looks like at the bottom of that better copy it says Copyright 1948, so this is very likely to be {{PD-US-not renewed}}. However, we'd need to demonstrate non-renewal. - Jmabel ! talk 19:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Aside from the copyright discussion, this image is NOT the work of Robert Russell Reid. It is the work of W.A. Dwiggins. Vizzylane (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Vizzylane: How do you know "It is the work of W.A. Dwiggins"? — Jeff G. ツ 13:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- That's what the blog post listed by Jmabel says.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Cutting off the copyright info is a surefire indicator of intent to infringe. This appears to be one of a series of three. — Jeff G. ツ
- But if the copyright was not renewed, then there is no extant copyright, so such intent is beside the point. And if, as claimed, the user photographed it in a museum, that cutting off would presumably have been by the museum, not the uploader. - Jmabel ! talk 02:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
