Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/18
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_Cooper_S_Chilli_convertible_(2010-07-10)_02.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_profile_picture.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Sánchez_Márquez,_J.jpg){kind=link}
ΔΕΝ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΙΚΗ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ 85.73.154.150 14:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's a fictitious/proposed flag clearly labeled as such; a better reason for deletion should be offered than offending against Greek nationalist sentiments... AnonMoos (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Even the patriotic sentiments of the Greeks is not a very strong reasoning, we have a lot of offensive stuff on Commons. Considering it is marked fictitious and is not claiming to be an "official" flag, I see no harm in it being here. Fry1989 eh? 05:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
There is no any flag of muslim Greece. this fake. 46.198.115.12 23:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Keep -- Everybody is aware that it's not official, and it's clearly labeled as such. That's not usually a valid reason in itself for deletion on Commons, unless there's also some hoaxing or hatemongering component which does not seem to be present here...AnonMoos (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete Krd 16:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Kephir hasn't offered any arguments that weren't already mentioned in previous deletion discussions, and found insufficient then. There are many hundreds of "Special and fictional" flags on Commons, and there's been a de facto practice for many years that such flags are not usually deleted just for being special or fictional, but rather only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering).
- By the way, some of your former nominations, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png were rather useless and non-productive, so I hope you're adjusting your modus operandi accordingly... AnonMoos (talk) 16:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- The same arguments were sufficient to delete at least 50 other such phoney flags. I guess it can be called an established practice. Shall I post the list again? Also, I have no idea why you keep bringing up that one file ad nauseam. It is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether the file nominated here is within project scope, which you failed to explain. I hope you are adjusting your modus operandi accordingly. Keφr (keep talk here) 17:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Too bad for you that you nominated this file as part of a spree of "revenge" deletion nominations aimed personally at me. You should keep in mind User:Pieter_Kuiper, who caused much turmoil and was eventually banned because of his incorrigible addiction to revenge deletion nominations. And Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png is highly relevant, since your nomination there (on the same basis as your nomination of this file) was inappropriate and firmly rejected, yet you still haven't said whether or not you'll take into account "lessons learned" from your just rebuff there when formulating future deletion nominations... AnonMoos (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have never made a single "revenge deletion nomination". I nominate files on their merits. Cease these baseless accusations immediately. Keφr (keep talk here) 06:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Too bad for you that you nominated this file as part of a spree of "revenge" deletion nominations aimed personally at me. You should keep in mind User:Pieter_Kuiper, who caused much turmoil and was eventually banned because of his incorrigible addiction to revenge deletion nominations. And Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png is highly relevant, since your nomination there (on the same basis as your nomination of this file) was inappropriate and firmly rejected, yet you still haven't said whether or not you'll take into account "lessons learned" from your just rebuff there when formulating future deletion nominations... AnonMoos (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately for you, you have sometimes been less than perfectly straightforward in these discussions -- and the fact that there are thousands of Special or Fictional Flag images on Commons and you nominate some of them for deletion at a fairly low rate, yet after I opposed several of your proposed deletions, you all of a sudden nominated my most recently-uploaded Special or Fictional Flag image, and then a cluster of Special or Fictional Flag images uploaded by me, strains credulity as a "coincidence"... AnonMoos (talk) 13:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have not even looked at your uploads list, ever. If you keep baselessly accusing me of ulterior motives, you will be the one reported to administrators. Can you go back to explaining how File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png meets COM:EDUSE? Keφr (keep talk here) 15:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately for you, you have sometimes been less than perfectly straightforward in these discussions -- and the fact that there are thousands of Special or Fictional Flag images on Commons and you nominate some of them for deletion at a fairly low rate, yet after I opposed several of your proposed deletions, you all of a sudden nominated my most recently-uploaded Special or Fictional Flag image, and then a cluster of Special or Fictional Flag images uploaded by me, strains credulity as a "coincidence"... AnonMoos (talk) 13:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per last DR. Furthermore, this flag has been discussed on articles off-site, making it notable. Fry1989 eh? 20:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Where exactly? Keφr (keep talk here) 05:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have to explain that to you, you would not accept it either way. Your previous statements have made that much clear. Your little war against fictional files NEEDS TO END NOW. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well, given that you were not so kind to actually provide a proof of that statement, then yes, I am not going to accept it. And please calm down. Keφr (keep talk here) 19:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- The issue is not the matter of notability, but your lack of proper reasoning for deletion. Fictional status alone is not grounds for deletion, I've said it enough times that you should at least consider the possibility that you are wrong. Fry1989 eh? 19:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- I did not mention notability, but possible educational use, of whose existence I am yet to be convinced. Mere repetition does not make a claim justified. Keφr (keep talk here) 20:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- The issue is not the matter of notability, but your lack of proper reasoning for deletion. Fictional status alone is not grounds for deletion, I've said it enough times that you should at least consider the possibility that you are wrong. Fry1989 eh? 19:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well, given that you were not so kind to actually provide a proof of that statement, then yes, I am not going to accept it. And please calm down. Keφr (keep talk here) 19:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have to explain that to you, you would not accept it either way. Your previous statements have made that much clear. Your little war against fictional files NEEDS TO END NOW. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Where exactly? Keφr (keep talk here) 05:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. And no don't come complaining at my talk page since everyone knows that DR's like this can be closed as kept or deleted and since it is still not clear if this flag is in scope or not I am saying keep. Natuur12 (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
This a direct insult to the Greece flag as the user uses the Greek flag that symbolize Democracy and freedom with entering the Turkey’s middle east flag character 107.143.96.81 22:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- See the comment of "15:14, 28 June 2014" up there near the top... AnonMoos (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete. No educational value; as a made-up flag, it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose, fails COM:Project scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)- Keep Offence is not a reason for deletion, per last. Fry1989 eh? 16:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per above DR: there is no particular reason to delete this specific made up flag, and we don't have actually a policy against them. Ruthven (msg) 19:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.177.252.97 08:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yet again?? AnonMoos (talk) 08:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Θα πρεπει να πατε ολοι στην φυλακη που παραποιησατε την Ελληνικη σημαια.Ντροπη σας!Η Ελληνικη σημαια ειναι Ιερη και δοξασμενη και εσεις την μολυνατε με τα μουσουλμανικα συμβολα,αισχος.
- Oh my! This level of racism in 2017?! Please delete the file before IPs from Athens begin another Nazi era in Europe... --E4024 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Reason of deletion : it is a manipulated national symbol and therefore illegal to be advertised as such. It is already transferred in several police departments across the country (There is laws about the national symbols and they should be respected). The moon symbol is representing the Chinese turtle/dragon God and all mongoloid countries represent that in their flags, it is irrelevant to our history, ethics, beliefs and insult in every manner.
- Find a place more fit to your personal interests, where you can kill people from mongoloid countries on the screen, video games for instance... --E4024 (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Για παραποίηση εθνικού συμβόλου!! Δεν υπάρχει μουσουλμανική σημαία! Να ακολουθηθούν οι διαδικασίες του άρθρου 188 του ποινικού κώδικα. 2A02:587:5C04:4300:24E5:2A65:B2C3:8F8 17:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
παραπιιηση εθνικου συμβολου 2A02:587:2403:AB00:B947:8F7E:D15A:1F1F 18:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
ΠΡΟΚΛΗΤΙΚΗ ΦΩΤΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ!!! 2A02:587:7411:DD00:1B9:5E4:EC6:FE49 18:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
There is no this flag in Greece! 109.242.166.71 18:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
I filed a report in the electronic crime department of police.
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.176.124.212 18:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.12.237.248 18:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 2A02:587:8402:7900:5854:2810:3874:E609 19:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 79.130.42.11 19:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 88.13.173.157 19:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 88.13.173.157 19:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
ΓΙΑ ΠΑΡΑΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΕΘΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΟΥ 94.65.62.251 19:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Παραποίηση εθνικού συμβόλου 141.255.92.141 21:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Η ΣΗΜΑΙΑ Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΜΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΡΟΣΒΑΛΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ 2A02:2149:8155:7400:C9CC:C763:F7D4:3199 21:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- What the flock of anonymous IPs is doing (including the recursive deletion requests to delete the deletion request!) borders on nonsensical vandalism, and won't make this file any likelier to be deleted. AnonMoos (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per above DRs. This swarm of redundant requests is ridiculous and disruptive, and I intend to revert any more that appear in the near future. The flag is clearly marked as a fictitious flag. Guanaco (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Παραποίηση Εθνικού Συμβόλου 2A02:587:9402:E100:585:1278:6AD1:E167 00:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Geez. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright notice at the bottom left. Minimal resolution, but watermark. jed (talk) 07:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art, no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Not used, very small, intrusive watermark, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: OK now. --Yann (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
this is not an official logo PeeJay2K3 (talk) 10:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, or copyvio. --Yann (talk) 14:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Part of long-term cross-wiki spamming... Randykitty (talk) 12:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Stock photo occurring on several commercial websites, such as this; the name of the author can be found in the metadata. Not own work. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 21:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
{{copyvio|http://berd.benesse.jp/application/ Doripoke (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
{{copyvio| Doripoke (talk) 15:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Likely an image found on the Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 13:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
This image with EXIF and my copyright registration is showed on the page. Dugführer (talk) 16:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- no valid reason. --B dash (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rnnjeff009 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused extreme low resolution images.
- File:Download (7).png
- File:Download (8)8.png
- File:Downloaddd.png
- File:Download (6).png
- File:Download (5).png
- File:Download (4).png
- File:Download (3)3.png
- File:Download (1)2.png
- File:Download (2)2.png
.png){kind=link}
8.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
3.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Sexually explicit images should not be allowed. This image of GorillaWarfare is revealing her tank top strap and bra strap, and is also revealing a little cleavage. This, therefore, should be deleted 73.142.103.7 22:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete as nominator. 73.142.103.7 22:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Double vote striken: nom. itself is {{vd}} by default. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, and kill off this repugnant creepo. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep What the hell is this nomination??? First i cant even imagine what women like GorillaWarfare and others have to suffer at the hands of online anonymous cowards and biggots, and for that they have my simpathy and respect and fortunately they are fighting back against the prejudice like yours. Second you 73.142.103.7 couldnt be a better example of patriarchy bravado, as you are a narrow minded biggot and a pretty good example of the type of patriarchy discourse and male chauvinist. Second this image is not a "sexually explicit image" (except in countries that repress the rights of women) and your description is the one that is creepy and like the one of a sexual prevert. Fourth, i doubt that you would had the courage to say something remotely equal to this garbage that you wrote to a women in real life instead of being a "keyboard warrior" in here. Please go back to a cesspool like the ones in 4chan, where your anti-women vitriol is appreciated. Tm (talk) 01:37, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Let's stop hurling insults at each other. 73.142.103.7 15:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept (non-admin closure): Someone with common sense would see this image was nominated as a trolling attempt or worst as harassment. As 73.142.103.7 already noticed misogynic comments and trolling are not tolerated in Wikimedia Commons, and even tried to close this nomination eralier. Closing this nomination as despite being one of the voters to keep, anyone in its right mind would see that this image has zero problems be it copyright, personality rights or others. On a personal note to 73.142.103.7, if you claim that we should "stop hurling insults at each other", if you have a sample of dignity, as you were the only one that insulted someone, you should think a lot about your attitudes and language to women and change genuinely them for the better. Tm (talk) 20:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
friend destroys information GeorgDerReisende (talk) 09:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Innico as no license (No license since), but it can be viewed as a "Text logo". Ruthven (msg) 20:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: finally, the uploader himself requested the deletion. See Revision #252280538. Ruthven (msg) 06:31, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
به اشتباه نام پدید آورنده را ثبت کردم . این اثر از من نیست.از شخص دیگریست . Shilownak (talk) 08:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyvio, name of author is wrong and no permission. (speedy?) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". OTRS required from Monica Dogra. Mr. Smart LION 09:22, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
User images, out of scope
- File:THE K STAR.png
- File:DOING IT THE K WAY.jpg
- File:230PXK2IMG.jpg
- File:The story of k2.png
- File:Half of k.jpg
- File:K2 or mogwanzi.jpg
- File:MOGWANZI 2014.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 00:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} (at least, unused anywhere correctly); out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Now to prevent deletion added to an irrelevant Wictionary page. E4024 (talk) 11:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:21, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Shekarsuresh
[edit]- File:Suresh wiki.jpg
- File:Suresh s.jpg
- File:Suresh the creator.jpg
- File:Suresh the unbelievable.jpg
- File:Suresh suresh suresh.jpg
- File:Tolleywood.jpg
- File:Banglore international airport.jpg
Reasons for deletion request: Out of scope, Wikimedia is no social network --Steinfeld-feld (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sviatlana Paklina (LASMA) (talk · contribs)
[edit]as per COM:ADVERT
- File:Lasma - Without you.ogg
- File:Lasma - Marie.ogg
- File:Lasma - Boy.ogg
- File:LasmaElectroRockShow.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto25.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto24.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto23.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto22.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto21.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto20.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto18.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto19.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto17.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto16.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto15.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto14.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto13.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto12.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto10.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto11.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto8.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto9.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto7.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto6.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto4.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto3.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto2.jpg
- File:Lasmaphoto1.jpg
Daphne Lantier 18:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:29, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:27, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Image uploaded to be used for vandalism/nonsense article. TherasTaneel (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Image uploaded to be used for vandalism/nonsense article. TherasTaneel (talk) 21:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
One of 200 m Indonesians. Not known 176.239.67.100 21:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
irrelevant, out of scope Steinfeld-feld (talk) 17:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, unused Pibwl (talk) 17:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Nelibermudez36
[edit]- File:Suma de angulos.JPG
- File:BISECTRIZ.JPG
- File:T. equilatero.jpg
- File:T. RECTANGULO.jpg
- File:Elemento.JPG
- File:Elementos de triangulos.JPG
Unused, low-quality geometry with blank infoboxes. --Apocheir (talk) 17:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, unused, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Film poster, "own work" claim is patently false Salvidrim! 16:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
ouf of scope, unusable thumbnail quality, unused, no cat., unclear subject, along with
- File:Acciones benefactoras estudio.png,
- File:Acciones benefactoras insectos.png,
- File:Acciones benefactoras mort.png,
- File:Acciones benefactoras planta.png,
- File:Acciones benefactoras casas.png,
- File:Acciones benefactoras suelo.png,
- File:Acciones benefactoras cafe.png. Few others are used in a strange sub-quality es.wiki article Pibwl (talk) 16:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This a screenshot of a copyrighted piece of software – Gadu-Gadu communicator. 185.122.172.10 16:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Virajmishra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Definitely not own work. All looks screenshots of films.
- File:Prince Mahesh Babu.jpg
- File:Mahesh-babu-srimanthudu60.jpg
- File:Ram with raashi in hyper movie.jpg
- File:Ram with raashi.jpg
- File:Mahesh babu inn Hyderabad.jpg
- File:Raashi khanna.jpg
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 17:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
no evidence the uploader has copyright, sole upload, unused Pibwl (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope thumbnail Pibwl (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Venezuela (state).svg Fry1989 eh? 17:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
it was uploaded on accident and is not the final product UnderseaResort (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:09, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Band shot, facebook size, not apparently notable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Photograph of a demo album, the design of which is not user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Logo of College of Dentistry - University of Baghdad (protected by copyright) محمد آدم (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Probably useless screenshot. Mr. Smart LION 09:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:Screenshots. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:26, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:25, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
unused, out of scope - pictures with text, as well as File:ADIOS AMIGOS.jpg, File:VALIENTESJOVENCITOS.jpg, File:CORRIDO DE FIDENCIO MARTINEZ CASTRO.jpg, File:DON ERNESTO CASTILLO.jpg, File:SAN ISIDRO.jpg and apparently others Pibwl (talk) 16:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
unknown person with blinking medal, unused, no cat. - out of scope Pibwl (talk) 16:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope advert, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 12:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Redundant. There's now a higher-resolution JPEG version at File:Cereal_fields_looking_towards_Newmarket_Hill_(geograph_1965009).jpg. bjh21 (talk) 00:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
this photo is not the 2nd Ward LDS meeting house, it is a photo of First Southern Baptist Church of Phoenix on 3rd Street and Moreland. 68.3.66.146 00:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep That's not a reason for deletion. It's a reason for correcting the description and/or renaming the file. --bjh21 (talk) 00:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in UAE. Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Arab_Emirates Ronhjones (Talk) 00:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, nominating the other uploads of this account too as out of project scope see Special:Contributions/Hasnatshabirofficial
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Image showing too much privacy info (full names and addresses, etc.); File:EMS label for goods.png can be used for the same purpose. Moonian (talk) 01:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Blurred picture of a group of unknown persons. Out of Commons:Project scope Hystrix (talk) 01:58, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - There is an article on the dutch-language Wikipedia about this. It is not just a house but a well known former 'squat' in the Netherlands, so a picture with people living there is rare. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Richardkiwi. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
probably © design, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Photograph of a two-dimensional artwork/document. This is not a federal-government work, so it's not automatically in public domain. Does the photograph of the framed document really qualify as original work? C.Fred (talk) 02:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Photograph of a two-dimensional artwork/document. This is not a federal-government work, so it's not automatically in public domain. Does the photograph of the framed document really qualify as original work? C.Fred (talk) 02:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
_Cooper_S_Chilli_convertible_(2010-07-10)_02.jpg){kind=link}
_Cooper_S_Chilli_convertible_(2010-07-10)_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is my vehicle which has been photographed and uploaded with out my permission, its also displays the number plate 203.206.175.67 02:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
_Cooper_S_Chilli_convertible_(2010-07-10)_02.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No consent is needed if photographed from a public place and number plate isn't a privacy issue and there is again no law preventing it. (Apologies to Bidgee) Eddaido (talk) 03:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not a bad picture. Though I don't see why someone shouldn't change the license plate if the owner is distressed to see it thus. Eddaido is perfectly correct in his summary of "the rules", but I humbly submit that rules do not need to preclude considerations of courtesy if someone has been inadvertently riled. Milud .... Regards Charles01 (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - If we delete this file, then thousands of files should be deleted. There is no personal information on the page, only a license plate. Only the IP-adress can be seen here, but anybody can say that, although I believe this is the owner of the car, my house door is also on a file here on Commons, of course I don't tell what file it is :-), no reason to delete it! - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
_Cooper_S_Chilli_convertible_(2010-07-10)_02.jpg){kind=link}
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I assume it is a copyvio, but I 'm not fully sure, hence a regular deletion request. I did not find the exact image, but a very similar on the producer's web site, see http://www.schwarzbeck.de/en/antennas/broadband-horn-antennas/double-ridged-horn-antenna.html#BBHA9120D or deep image link http://www.schwarzbeck.de/images/ANT/Horn/9120d/resizedimages/Schwarzbeck%20Broadband%20Horn%20Antenna%20BBHA9120D.jpg. Speravir 02:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I withdraw my request: The file is actually a duplicate of File:Schwarzbeck BBHA 9120 D.jpg. — Speravir – 22:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
If Google Translate is accurate, this is supposedly a map of ski lifts in Åre, Sweden. I don't see how anyone could possibly get any information related to that out of these red and green squiggles. Image is unused. Apocheir (talk) 02:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Taiwan for artworks. Wcam (talk) 02:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Most likely copyrighted design. Wcam (talk) 02:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Taken from Twitter: https://twitter.com/kcanz/status/332834428483162112?lang=en Ytoyoda (talk) 02:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 03:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope. Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 03:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Image is marked (c) Raspberri Pi 2015. Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope. Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope. Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope. Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EVinente as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Usage of Wikimedia Commons for non-enciclopedic purposes Daphne Lantier 04:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This file was uploaded by an user, that was creating repeatedly an article to promote a Whatsapp friend group. The article was deleted (you can see here, here and here) from the Portuguese Wikipedia, so this image is not for an encyclopedic purpose. EVinente (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted messages 2607:FB90:5914:7C1A:0:4C:CB93:AA01 05:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editor hindu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Out of scope, personal pictures - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
COM:NETCOPYRIGHT: All the given source are claiming copyrights or, at least, don't give a compatible license. "© 2001-2017 StadiumDB.com. All rights reserved." "Copyright © Nowy Styl Group 2017. All rights reserved." etc.
- File:Al Wakrah Stadium.jpg
- File:Lusail Iconic Stadium.jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium.jpg
- File:Khalifa International Stadium 2017.jpg
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
no relevant to commons and have better Webysther (talk) 07:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
no relevant to commons and have better Webysther (talk) 07:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
no relevant to commons and have better Webysther (talk) 07:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
outdated positions Webysther (talk) 07:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 08:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 08:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unintelligible. No real educational content. E4024 (talk) 08:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
friend destroys information GeorgDerReisende (talk) 08:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Partie de l'image utilisé ici et sur le site de l'intéressé, image probablement non libre et autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 09:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of scope. Mr. Smart LION 09:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Very probable copyvio, no mention of author, model dies in 1988, not a free subject, sorry. Jebulon (talk) 09:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The image looks as copyrighted by "Silvio Moresi" (see metadata) and Museo Diocesano. There is no OTRS permission from the uploader who uses a different name. Lucas (msg) 09:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The image looks as copyrighted by "Silvio Moresi" (see metadata) and Museo Diocesano. There is no OTRS permission from the uploader who uses a different name. Lucas (msg) 09:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:K.R.T.GIRLS
[edit]Copyright promotional adverts and cartoon characters not exempted by De Minimis, as they dominate the images.
- File:170608 Randen K.R.T.Girls Train, Kyoto Japan 01.jpg
- File:20170608 K.R.T.Girls Train in Kyoto, Japan.jpg
- File:20170608 Randen Emilia wrapping train K.R.T.Girls Image017.jpg
- File:20170608 Randen Siao Chung wrapping train K.R.T.Girls Image018.jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS (23388072314).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS (23389509453).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS (23389513423).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS (23389514473).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS (23908069622).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS Always with you.JPG
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS DSC00912.JPG
- File:K.R.T.Girls IMG 0248.jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0426 (21227307458).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0427 (21423537441).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0428 (21227303948).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0429 (21227061810).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0431 (21423556781).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0432 (20794046683).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0433 (20794043173).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0434 (21388880476).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0435 (21423541421).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0438 (21423529791).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0441 (20794020343).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0444 (21388851166).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0445 (21227246678).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0448 (21415079375).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0459 (21423480971).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS IMGP0460 (21404165892).jpg
- File:K.R.T.GIRLS Welcome to Kaohsiung.JPG
- File:Kaohsiung MRT MiNe-M 100-1021U (15640524018).jpg
- File:Kaohsiung MRT touch screen ticket vending machine01.jpg
- File:Kaohsiung MRT touch screen ticket vending machine02.jpg
- File:Kaohsiung MRT touch screen ticket vending machine03.jpg
- File:MiNe-IP5S 20141115-173654R (15825946225).jpg
- File:MiNe-IP5S 20151128-110003RG (23414800141).jpg
- File:MiNe-M 100-2847UG (23471150746).jpg
- File:MiNe-M 100-2848UG (23388788022).jpg
- File:MiNe-M 100-2851UG (23388786532).jpg
- File:MiNe-M 100-2861UG (23129300929).jpg
- File:Yanchengpu Station location map 2015.jpg
- File:高雄捷運 鹽埕埔站 Yangchengpu Station - panoramio (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
DAJF (talk) 09:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
_profile_picture.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_profile_picture.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is my personal picture and I don't using it on Wikimedia. Please delete. Bharat Jangir (talk) 09:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
_profile_picture.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
_profile_picture.jpg){kind=link}
I have started to creating a page behalf of this image but for some reasons I couldn't complete that. So this image is not using by me. Please detele. Bharat Jangir (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Thailand: "Thai state documents are public domain, though creative works produced by or commissioned by government offices are protected by copyright." Guanaco (talk) 10:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
non-encyclopedic, private Hugo.arg (talk) 10:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
One of the conditions of use is to email someone. [1] Guanaco (talk) 10:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GhuriWalaTv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Ad, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 10:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
there is noting on the web page from which this photo was taken that supports the statement that the author has released it into the public domain. There is even an all rights reserved statement on the web page Domdeparis (talk) 10:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Monica Martinez (Brasil) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per FBMD, grabbed form facebook
- File:João Peschanski´s lecture on Wikipedia at Uniso 03.jpg
- File:João Peschanski´s lecture on Wikipedia at Uniso 01.jpg
- File:João Peschanski´s lecture on Wikipedia at Uniso 02.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio (no exif). Look like an Amazon.com picture. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 11:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - copyvio from: http://instantrip.global/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/71RfTCey2FL._SL1500_.jpg - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope, agreement of depicted person not clear. Gumruch (talk) 12:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Flickr Crataegus monogyna duplicates set
[edit]- File:20160503--IMG 1713 (26541807060).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1714 (26541812520).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1715 (26541818280).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1716 (26541822190).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1717 (26541828430).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1718 (26814123205).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1719 (26720740782).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1720 (26720743752).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1723 (26720756232).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1724 (26720759982).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1725 (26720765302).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1726 (26209083964).jpg
- File:20160503--IMG 1727 (26209087854).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Batch Flickr upload of several nearly identical mediocre snapshots of one plant: flowers and leaf. A very common species well represented on Commons. I suggest we keep one shot of the leaf (File:20160503--IMG 1722 (26720751722).jpg) and one of the flowers (File:20160503--IMG 1712 (26541803100).jpg) and delete the rest. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Self promotion. E4024 (talk) 13:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 13:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio -- from the party website. (c) Bahujan Samaj Party at the bottom! —SpacemanSpiff 16:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Make up of fake book, out of scope. Also uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 13:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
What's the source? Who is the translator? Yann (talk) 13:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Vuonna 2014 kuolleen tekijän tekijänoikeus ei ole rauennut, kuva tallennettava suomenkieliseen Wikipediaaan ja käytettävä sitaattioikeudella Kulttuurinavigaattori (talk) 13:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Vuonna 2014 kuolleen taiteilijan oikeus teokseensa ei ole rauennut, kuva teoksesta tallennettava suomenkieliseen Wikipediaan ja käytettävä sitaattioikeudella Kulttuurinavigaattori (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Watermarks on the file. Taken from internet. E4024 (talk) 13:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
keine Pflanze Mehlauge (talk) 07:58, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: correctly categorised, you are free to modify the description to explain they are fake flowers. --Basvb (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
sinnloses Bild Mehlauge (talk) 13:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused private photographs.
- File:AMICALE MIRABELAINE DES GENS HEUREUX - ITALIE.jpg
- File:AMICALE MIRABELAINE DES GENS HEUREUX - MONACO 2013.JPG
- File:AMICALE MIRABELAINE DES GENS HEUREUX - LE LAVANDOU SEPTEMBRE 2013.JPG
- File:AMICALE MIRABELAINE DES GENS HEUREUX - ESPAGNE.JPG
- File:AMICALE MIRABELAINE DES GENS HEUREUX - VOYAGE A SANTA SUZANNA EN JUIN 2015 (ESPAGNE°.JPG
Hystrix (talk) 14:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HelloCathy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Slogan tot type.jpg
- File:CI Color Kor Eng A Type.gif
- File:CI Color Kor Eng B Type.gif
- File:CI Color Eng A Type.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.
- File:Rabeko Extra light confituur.jpg
- File:Charles Antona confituren (2).jpg
- File:Charles Antona confituren.jpg
- File:Koffie De Maan.jpg
- File:Bio Fit perziken.JPG
- File:Amaizin ananas.JPG
- File:Terra Etica litchis.JPG
- File:Terrasana augurken.JPG
- File:Noliko witte bonen tomatensaus.JPG
- File:Hooidammer schapenkaas.JPG
- File:Bootjes Bier.JPG
- File:Chimay à la Chimay Bleu 01.JPG
- File:De Lelie yoghurt.JPG
- File:Vossen met de Meynen The Beast 666.JPG
- File:St. Bernardus Christmas Ale.JPG
- File:Jambe-de-Bois.JPG
- File:Hofdraak.JPG
- File:Godisvremd.JPG
- File:Hof Korvatunturi.JPG
- File:Petit Breton.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(t) Josve05a (c) 06:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in the Netherlands for maps, photos, etc.
- File:Kempense stal 03.jpg
- File:Schildehof badhuis.jpg
- File:Eikelberg.jpg
- File:Eikelberg (6).jpg
- File:Eikelberg (5).jpg
- File:Eikelberg (3).jpg
- File:Hegte Heyde 1.jpg
- File:Maagdentoren 3.jpg
- File:Maagdentoren 2.jpg
- File:Maagdentoren.jpg
- File:Beeltjens en Kwarekken.jpg
- File:Beeltjens en Kwarekken 2.jpg
- File:Peerdsbos 1.jpg
- File:Peerdsbos 4.jpg
- File:Peerdsbos 3.jpg
- File:Peerdsbos 2.jpg
- File:Olens Broek 3.jpg
- File:Olens Broek 1.jpg
- File:Olens Broek 2.jpg
- File:De Elzen, Kessel, Natuurpunt.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of original artwork in food packaging
- File:ROM koffie.jpg
- File:Miko koffie 02.jpg
- File:Fort koffie.jpg
- File:Boter Diksmuids Boterhuis 02.jpg
- File:Boter Diksmuids Boterhuis 01.jpg
- File:Rombouts koffie.jpg
- File:Jean Baptiste Van Mons.jpg
- File:Boerinneke wit.jpg
- File:Elixir de Spa 05.jpg
- File:Elixir de Spa 03.jpg
- File:Elixir de Spa 02.jpg
- File:Elixir de Spa 01.jpg
- File:Chimay Automne.JPG
- File:Pié d'Angloys.JPG
- File:Hooidammer schaap.JPG
— Racconish 💬 14:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Alfurqan first batch students.jpg
- File:Alfurqan greenland students.jpg
- File:Proposed building for alfurqan.jpg
- File:Unaisvt.jpg
- File:From an interview.jpg
- File:Arts festival by year.jpg
- File:Quiz programme.jpg
- File:Arts Alive.jpg
- File:Grand Fest.jpg
- File:Smart Projector Programme in Nusrath Arts alive.jpg
- File:Nusrath Campus.jpg
- File:Nusrath Arts Alive.jpg
- File:Nusrath Dawa Students.jpg
- File:Unais.jpg
- File:Jamia Nusrathul Islam Randathani.jpg
- File:Unais VT.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AzadshahGanjali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical drawings, document and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Kəllə skleti.jpg
- File:Məqalə.jpg
- File:Virtouz.jpg
- File:Fikrət Əmirov.jpg
- File:Orta məktəb riyaziyyatdan not dəftərim.jpg
- File:İlk musiqi əsərim.jpg
- File:Cinayət yoxsa Ədalət.jpg
- File:Adsız Qaranlıq.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AzadshahGanjali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i1.wp.com/foodsafety.suencs.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/5539379416_35df24a3e9_m-1.jpg.
- File:Azadshah Ganjali.jpg
- File:Qara-reng.jpg
- File:İnsanlar.jpg
- File:Las-Veqas.jpg
- File:Baliq.jpg
- File:Gence-goygol.jpg
- File:Paxlavalar.jpg
- File:Kostyum-salvar.jpg
- File:Ozu hazirladigi.jpg
- File:Vaxtim yoxdu.jpg
- File:Kitab refi.jpg
- File:Gecə lampasi.jpg
- File:Foto sesya.jpg
- File:Əsgərlik.jpg
- File:Azadshahganjali.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Book without information about authors. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos and song. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Raga Behag - 01 - Fast Composition in Teen Taal.ogg
- File:Anupama-playing-sitar-along-with-guru-ji.jpg
- File:Acharya Bimalendu Mukherjee.jpg
- File:Anupama Bhagwat.jpg
- File:Anupama Bhagwat at Jashn-e-Deccan.png
- File:Anupama Bhagwat performing at the Prestigious Darbar Festival.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russian for statues and billboards.
- File:Персонажи мультсериала Маша и Медведь скульптура в Екатеринбурге.jpg
- File:Щит о Платоне в Екатеринбурге.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Не понимаю. Тут нет ничего производного от музыки. Просто видеозапись танца, причем сделанная мной лично.
- У песни есть композитор и автор слов. Вы являетесь им? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- User:EugeneZelenko, Если верить Википедии - w:Тарантелла, музыку и слова сочинили в XV веке, наверно, произведение в общественном достоянии, нет?--Леонид Макаров (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
- Это надо выяснить, оригинальная ли это Тарантелла. Или же есть более современные вариации, как, например, мазурки, полонеза, вальса и т. д. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- User:EugeneZelenko, Если верить Википедии - w:Тарантелла, музыку и слова сочинили в XV веке, наверно, произведение в общественном достоянии, нет?--Леонид Макаров (talk) 18:23, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by El Pantoja B (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.lapatilla.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2015/11-11/Fernando-Ochoa-Antich.jpg.
- File:Venus de tàcarigua .jpg
- File:Transcarabobo.jpg
- File:Clinica popular simon bolivar.jpg
- File:5colegio630ev3.jpg
- File:DivinoNjesus-496x346.jpg
- File:Rio kamo.jpg
- File:Chavez en el psuv.jpg
- File:Fernando Ochoa Antich.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Teluk-bintuni.jpg
- File:Kri-bandaaceh.jpg
- File:Kri-surabaya.jpg
- File:Kri-telukmandar.jpg
- File:Kri-telukbone.jpg
- File:Kri-pulaurengat.jpg
- File:Kri-pulaurusa.jpg
- File:T43-class.jpg
- File:Kri-badik.jpg
- File:Kal-bawean.jpg
- File:Kri-nanggala-wtr.jpg
- File:Kri-nagapasa-kor.jpg
- File:Kri-fatahillah-upgrd.jpg
- File:Kri-bgtomo.jpg
- File:Kri-abdulhalim.jpg
- File:Kri-martadinata-dmn.jpg
- File:Kappitan-patimura-cor.jpg
- File:Kal-pulau-karakelang.jpg
- File:Kal-biereun.jpg
- File:Kri-cucut.jpg
- File:Kri-kobra.jpg
- File:Kri-tenggiri2.jpg
- File:Kri-tenggiri.jpg
- File:KRI-tatihu.jpg
- File:KRI-torani.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from award. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dossantostheu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Madre Vitória penitente.jpg
- File:Madre Vitória restituidora de pessoas, animais e objetos desaparecidos.jpg
- File:Madre Vitória restituidora do que está perdido.jpg
- File:A caridade da Madre Vitória da Encarnação.jpg
- File:Transfiguração da Madre Vitória.jpg
- File:Triunfo da Madre Vitória.jpg
- File:A caridade da Madre Vitória.jpg
- File:Tranfiguração da Madre Vitória.jpg
- File:Triunfo da Madre Vitória sobre a tentação do demônio.jpg
- File:Madre Vitória e São Miguel.jpg
- File:Santinho Madre Vitoria (frente).jpg
- File:Santinhos da Madre Vitória da Encarnação.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anil998800 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata (the two photos that have metadata were taken with two different cameras), and the fact that all the other uploads by the user were copyright violations with false authorship claims.
- File:Rajputana college.jpg
- File:Raj putana.jpg
- File:20150815-075802 e001.jpg
- File:20150815-074816 e001.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
3 different image credits—Atlantic Records, photographer Steve Russell and www.sean-paul.net—with no obvious relationship to the uploader. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Not de minimis: Copyrighted photos are a key part of the subject (it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing them would make the derivative work useless. Wcam (talk) 15:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Copy of https://scontent-cdg2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/18581902_10211514018499459_8065139134436755644_n.jpg?oh=6f0c97fc0612a97a2426b93604653b30&oe=59F3D341 Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
lignes tracées erronées Crijam (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Fake license. A photocopy of a page from the book cant be free & own. Bilderling (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Actual license terms are in the EXIF data, and they appear to constitute a non-free license. Website usage is permitted but not resale or any other use. Guanaco (talk) 16:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blank/black image with no content, was the automated thumbnail that the Flickr bot pulled from this video which is now at File:100 años revista Policía Nacional de Colombia, 2012.webm seb26 (talk) 16:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
License for "Presse und Privatpersonen". Not free to use commercially.
Guanaco (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
doubtful own work - small size, no useful description, no cat. Same for File:Fatima Bernardes.jpg and possibly others. Pibwl (talk) 16:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The linked terms of use appear to place heavy restrictions on commercial use and derivative works. Guanaco (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
unused game screenshots, along with File:AccessComputer3.jpg, File:AccessComputer4.jpg, File:AccessComputer.jpg and apparently rest of uploads Pibwl (talk) 16:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
License requires notification Guanaco (talk) 16:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused file with onerous licensing terms. Requires a full page image description, near the image, in any medium. This would make it unacceptable for print Wikipedia books, etc. Guanaco (talk) 16:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
From Macedonian Heritage, a site which publishes a lot of content without attributing the author. No reason to believe they own the copyright, and there's no way this image is public domain. Guanaco (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
unused, no useful description, bad quality, unknown encyclopedic value - apparently as other uploads Pibwl (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Venezuela.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Published on multiple other websites, like this one. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 17:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Français : Photo déjà publiée sur d'autres sites web non libres de droits. Il faudrait donc une autorisation officielle du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image. Voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image--Titlutin (talk) 17:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The copyright holder requires notification through a registration form. Guanaco (talk) 17:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The copyright holder requires notification through a registration form. Guanaco (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
autopromo, along with other uploads file:ESRagencede communication.jpg, file:Fichiers de prospection Email B2B.jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Illegible, unused map Apocheir (talk) 17:51, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused image with lots of artifacts and superior vector version available. Apocheir (talk) 18:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by khaleddaman (talk · contribs)
[edit]The first one seems not own work as per meta data and another one is from Facebook, OTRS needed.
~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The category is not important, it's just a Hebrew translation בר (talk) 19:33, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Since the subject died in 1975, seems... unlikely to be an original work. It's available from this website]. Maybe it's Italian gov? I don't know, nor whether that would make it public domain. Otherwise, currently no reason I see to think it's appropriate licensed. TimothyJosephWood 20:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
User Čtenářa88 is not the author Goesseln (talk) 20:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I just realized that I do not own copyright to the image I uploaded even though I own the painting. Artist has been dead only 50 years not 70 so this is not in public domain. Gumperts (talk) 20:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
According to the Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey site "All images on this site are Copyright 2011 The Carnegie-Irvine Galaxy Survey. All rights reserved. They may not be reproduced, published, copied or transmitted in any form, including electronically on the Internet or World Wide Web, without written permission of the authors." C messier (talk) 21:20, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio. I lied when I uploaded these files and falsely/wrongly claimed copyright ownership for these images. They are the work of 4 different photographers, none of whom I had/have permission from.
- File:Amadéus Leopold and the orchestra (Lincoln Center).jpg
- File:Amadéus Leopold playing Danse Macabre.jpg
- File:Amadeus Leopold.jpg
- File:Amadéus Leopold, backstage at Lincoln Center.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Milomohr (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
I assume copyright violation, but did not find an exactly matching source file, hence a regular deletion request: I only found RА-2400/R. Антенна стационарная направленная Wi-Fi 2400-2500 MHz / 12 dBd, but there the image is a bit smaller/cropped. This may have been different some years ago, though. TinEye finds a match I cannot open, it seems this has meanwhile been deleted . Speravir 21:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Alcmaeonid as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: notability|date=July 2017 Yann (talk) 22:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
self promotion (see page history) Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Self promotion, see history. A non-encyclopedian person. Uploaded a few weeks ago and today filled with spam and contact information and things like that. (simple: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused file) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by محمد أمين الطرابلسي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos and small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:الشبيبة الرياضية.png
- File:النجم الرياضي الرادسي.jpg
- File:الإتحاد 2001.jpg
- File:أشرف الدريدي.jpg
- File:الاتحاد الرياضي بجبل جلود.jpg .jpg
- File:1512546 2444855n09044131 1852164839.jpg
Yann (talk) 22:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2016/01/14/2016011402365.html copyright violation Slfsp3645 (talk) 00:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Likely PD (and possible dupe). Converting from speedy to DR to allow time to clarify. Storkk (talk) 07:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- See File:WalterRaleighandson.jpg, appears to be PD-old-100. It would be nice if we had a better version than either of these. Storkk (talk) 17:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep When I read that I have some doubts, but my opinion is that it's just PD-old-100, like User Strokk says. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: File identified, is public domain. --Guanaco (talk) 08:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion /St1995 18:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 08:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
I am the original uploader and I can't seem to get the version I updated on 08:58, 18 July 2017 to show up as the current one. I would like that version to show up and to keep only that version, I'm not sure how I'm supposed to do that. 8obis (talk) 09:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- @8obis: You need to refresh your browser, and clear your cache if that doesn't work. Try hitting CTRL-F5. Guanaco (talk) 08:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 08:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is FOP OK in Angola? Mhhossein talk 12:59, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep What research have you done to establish this? My guess is none. But if you look at Article 29 of the Angolan Law on Authors' Rights (No. 4/90 of march 10, 1990) you'll see that it states "Uses lawful without authorization: (c) reproduction of ...works shown permanently in a public place". There are later amendments to this law, but none alters that article. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Would you mind giving us the url to the mentioned law? --Mhhossein talk 06:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- I checked the law, thanks to your url. However, there's still a major condition which I don't think you had paid attention to. The article reads: "...on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected." --Mhhossein talk 14:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK, let's be clear on what we're talking about here. I presume you query the buildings in the background of the photograph, which would be protected as "works of ... architecture" in Article 6(i) of the linked law. I don't think the image could be construed as disrespectful. They constitute about 50% of the image, so a de minimis argument would probably fail. However, we have numerous images in Category:Buildings in Luanda, and if this one goes, so must all the others. I think it would be an undue burden to expect photographers to make enquiries as to the names and architects of every building they photograph, and we should therefore read the law as if the words "where known" were included. If you ask the legislators or judiciary of Angola whether they intended such an onerous burden to prevail, I'm sure they would say not. However, I have sent an email to the cultural affairs section of the Angola Embassy in London and hope they can clarify this for us. As I pointed out to them "We would hate to lose all our images of buildings in Angola". Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- We never keep a bunch of violating files, do we? So, if needed, we'll remove all of them. The words of law are selected precisely verbatim and we'll never alter the law by reading it "as if the words 'where known' were included". We must act based on what we have at hand, not based on what we expect or guess. Moreover, we can't accept the work as de minimis; Just see that the car and the bus make less than a quarter of the whole surface area. I'm sure that you hate to keep files in violation of copyright. Thanks for the email, although I think written law is priored over other things. --Mhhossein talk 07:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- OK, let's be clear on what we're talking about here. I presume you query the buildings in the background of the photograph, which would be protected as "works of ... architecture" in Article 6(i) of the linked law. I don't think the image could be construed as disrespectful. They constitute about 50% of the image, so a de minimis argument would probably fail. However, we have numerous images in Category:Buildings in Luanda, and if this one goes, so must all the others. I think it would be an undue burden to expect photographers to make enquiries as to the names and architects of every building they photograph, and we should therefore read the law as if the words "where known" were included. If you ask the legislators or judiciary of Angola whether they intended such an onerous burden to prevail, I'm sure they would say not. However, I have sent an email to the cultural affairs section of the Angola Embassy in London and hope they can clarify this for us. As I pointed out to them "We would hate to lose all our images of buildings in Angola". Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- I checked the law, thanks to your url. However, there's still a major condition which I don't think you had paid attention to. The article reads: "...on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected." --Mhhossein talk 14:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Would you mind giving us the url to the mentioned law? --Mhhossein talk 06:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
De minimis does not apply here. Wikicology (talk) 06:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Comment The issue here isn't de minimis, it's Freedom of Panorama in Angola and until that issue is decided, dm is irrelevant. Rodhullandemu (talk) 07:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)- Comment I don't know about Angolan copyright law but usually the work has to be above a certain Threshold of originality. I really don't see that in this generic buildings. --Magnus (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As I said before, the work is violating Angloa's copyright law by not crediting the author. It's certainly somewhere above TOO. --Mhhossein talk 13:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons FOP page says Angola has FOP. We have a long standing practice not to act on a specific file. If the information is wrong, please discuss that first on the appropriate venue, before nominating any file for deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Angloa has FOP? Did you know that Angola's FOP law has a major 'if'; "...on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected." Now, which of the title or author is stated? The best action was to nominate this violation for deletion and you closed the discussion without knowing/reading the comments. --Mhhossein talk 17:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment --- FoP exception does not eliminate the need for a license from the photographer. BTW....FoP exception vary from country to country. There is a freedom of Panorama in Nigeria and Angola (for example) but the terms and conditions are not the same. In the case of Angola, the copyright law state that "reproduction of "works shown permanently in public" is allowed "without the authorization of the author and without payment of remuneration on condition that the title and the name of the author are stated and that the work is respected.". Can anyone point me to where the architect was credited? Unless the architect is credited, that image remain a copyright violation of the architect's work. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment That's not a valid reason for deletion. It would be easy to fix if we know the location. However seeing the poor composition, and the lack of a useful description, I don't mind if this is deleted as "out of scope". Currently not used. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:59, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yann, Angola's copyright law requires that authors be credited for FoP exception to apply. Your personal opinion is not useful here. The author is not credited and this exclusively violates Angola's copyright law on FoP. "It would be easy to fix if we know the location" is not a valid reason to keep this image. BTW... Out of scope does not apply here as the image may be used on Luanda/Angola related articles. Please, note that every images on Wikimedia Commons don't have to be used on Wikipedia articles to be realistically useful for educational purpose. This image is a copyvio and should be deleted per our precautionary principle and not because the image is out of scope. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yann, that's good. You seem to have move a step forward and have accepted that there's a problem which needs to be fixed; "It would be easy to fix if we know the location"??? See COM:PRP. --Mhhossein talk 11:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yann, Angola's copyright law requires that authors be credited for FoP exception to apply. Your personal opinion is not useful here. The author is not credited and this exclusively violates Angola's copyright law on FoP. "It would be easy to fix if we know the location" is not a valid reason to keep this image. BTW... Out of scope does not apply here as the image may be used on Luanda/Angola related articles. Please, note that every images on Wikimedia Commons don't have to be used on Wikipedia articles to be realistically useful for educational purpose. This image is a copyvio and should be deleted per our precautionary principle and not because the image is out of scope. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Before we talk about FOP we need to find something in the picture that is eligible for copyright. I am not familiar with Angolan case law but in the background we have just regular apartment buildings with standard features and design elements that are functionally required. Buildings like these wouldn't be eligible for copyright in the United States and many other countries. --AFBorchert (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Flickr license has been verified, and there is nothing above ToO in this photo. Ruthven (msg) 12:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Uploader affirms to have permission from the copyright holder, but the license template doesn't seem correct (the sprite comes from a video game released in early 2017, it can't be yet in the public domain according to the 50-year rule in China) Andycyca (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. First of all, sorry. When I uploaded this file, I wanted to say that I had direct permission from the owner of the file, but I could not find how to do it. So yes, I have talked with members from LR Studios (the Owners of the file) and they gave me permission to use them. But I still don't know how to tell it officially in Wikipedia.
Aunque pensándolo mejor y, viendo que eres nativo, te hablo en español. Como he intentado decirte aquí, estuve hablando con miembros de la compañía propietaria de las imágenes, y obtuve su permiso de uso. Pero a la hora de subirlas a Wikimedia, no encontraba la opción de alegar eso, por lo que, desesperado, busqué la opción más cercana a la real para alegar. Perdón por las molestias ante todo, pero he de aclarar que poseo permiso de parte del creador para utilizarlas.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Uploader affirms to have permission from the copyright holder, but the license template doesn't seem correct (the sprite comes from a video game released in early 2017, it can't be yet in the public domain according to the 50-year rule in China) Andycyca (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. First of all, sorry. When I uploaded this file, I wanted to say that I had direct permission from the owner of the file, but I could not find how to do it. So yes, I have talked with members from LR Studios (the Owners of the file) and they gave me permission to use them. But I still don't know how to tell it officially in Wikipedia.
Aunque pensándolo mejor y, viendo que eres nativo, te hablo en español. Como he intentado decirte aquí, estuve hablando con miembros de la compañía propietaria de las imágenes, y obtuve su permiso de uso. Pero a la hora de subirlas a Wikimedia, no encontraba la opción de alegar eso, por lo que, desesperado, busqué la opción más cercana a la real para alegar. Perdón por las molestias ante todo, pero he de aclarar que poseo permiso de parte del creador para utilizarlas.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Uploader affirms to have permission from the copyright holder, but the license template doesn't seem correct (the sprite comes from a video game released in early 2017, it can't be yet in the public domain according to the 50-year rule in China) Andycyca (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. First of all, sorry. When I uploaded this file, I wanted to say that I had direct permission from the owner of the file, but I could not find how to do it. So yes, I have talked with members from LR Studios (the Owners of the file) and they gave me permission to use them. But I still don't know how to tell it officially in Wikipedia.
Aunque pensándolo mejor y, viendo que eres nativo, te hablo en español. Como he intentado decirte aquí, estuve hablando con miembros de la compañía propietaria de las imágenes, y obtuve su permiso de uso. Pero a la hora de subirlas a Wikimedia, no encontraba la opción de alegar eso, por lo que, desesperado, busqué la opción más cercana a la real para alegar. Perdón por las molestias ante todo, pero he de aclarar que poseo permiso de parte del creador para utilizarlas.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Harassment Sargoth (talk) 16:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
The source states "via Wikimedia Commons" likely from a deleted image on Commons. Naue7 (talk) 07:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: The source I believe refers to the code "via Wikimedia Commons". It says credit is to Franklin Wright (Franlink Wright/Eric Wright), before writing the licences related.--Simen113 (talk) 02:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Creative Commons and Wikimedia Commons are two unrelated entities and a condition of the license is that you have to show where the image came from that is why Wikimedia Commons is mentioned and if that is not the case then thefamouspeople.com are in breach of the license. I also recall the image being deleted from here before. Naue7 (talk) 17:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The alleged evidence of permission is an auto-generated attribution tag at a mirror of en:Eazy-E. This is clearly not an original scan, see [2] for a higher resolution version. Guanaco (talk) 08:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
![[2]](http://visionnewspaper.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Eazy-E-pic-2-1024x875.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright infringement (image gives results on reverse image engine [3] [4]) with no clear attribution or free license Andycyca (talk) 15:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, this photo is my own photograph. Taken in 2013 at a small village-party in Margraten (Province of Limburg, The Netherlands). This is in the period before Garrix' track "Animals" was released, so he wasn't famous yet. When Martin Garrix relased "Animals", he became famous in a short period of time. Because no photos of Garrix were available online, my picture here on Wikimedia is copied a lot on other websites, magazines and blogs. In summary: My picture here on Wikimedia was the first location this image was published. Jasper K (talk) 09:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per above. The links provided by the nominator: 1st is dead, 2nd is a Wikipedia mirror, and 3rd is dated after upload. A fresh reverse image search using Google instead to investigate further by me showed no results that (a) were dated prior to 2013 or (b) were in a higher resolution than this upload. I found one[5] that was higher res, but it appears to have been artificially scaled up. Given that our file here has camera metadata, I don't think there is much doubt to be had about the uploader being the author. The original file would be nice though. seb26 (talk) 01:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
![[5]](http://showbizsecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Pictures152.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Per above. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
File:CAPITÁN DE NAVÍO DE PRIMERA CLASE CECILIO PUJAZÓN Y GARCÍA RETRATO MASCULINO (1891) - Sánchez Márquez, J.jpg
[edit]_-_S%C3%A1nchez_M%C3%A1rquez,_J.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_S%C3%A1nchez_M%C3%A1rquez,_J.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Ruthven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. But the author is José Sánchez Márquez (1858-?): given the time, the painting might be in the Public Domain, unless it was a work for hire for the Gobierno de España. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte Ministerio de Defensa de España Ruthven (msg) 09:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The law in Spain at the time this was painted was pma 80, so José Sánchez Márquez would have to live only to age 80 for this to still be under copyright. That raises a significant doubt that it is PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
I am not sure about the legal facts here, but why is this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minions_(Despicable_Me)#/media/File:Minions_characters.png for example well legal?
The picture that is questioned here is not even a picture, it is made with yeast cells and does not even resemble it for 100%.
--Garnhami (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
#/media/File:Minions_characters.png){kind=link}
Deleted: The cited image is not on Commons. It is on WP:EN with a fair use rationale. Commons, as a repository, cannot permit fair use. Any representation of a copyrighted character, whether in paint, sand, ice, butter, or yeast, is a copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I've uploaded a better version in jpg. Copyright violence? (text from 1918, but uncertain when the author died) Queeste (talk) 15:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons does not generally keep PDFs of short texts -- this should be set in wiki markup as needed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works, no evidence of a free license.
- File:Capturejjjjjjj.PNG
- File:Ljjj.jpg
- File:Kksssssss.jpg
- File:Imagekksdcnsdc.jpg
- File:Kklddddddddd.jpg
- File:Vibrator.PNG
- File:Vibr.PNG
- File:Vib.PNG
- File:Dielektrik11.jpg
- File:Dielektrik1.PNG
- File:Dielektik.PNG
- File:Capture111.jpg.PNG (Attention, now redirect to File:Принцип устройства и работы диэлектрической антенны.png.)
- File:Ggggg125.PNG
- File:Gfb.PNG
- File:T6.PNG
- File:Rfrf.PNG
- File:Fx9.jpg
- File:Fy3.jpg
- File:Fx2.jpg
- File:F(x, y) = xe−(x2 + y2).jpg
_%3D_xe%E2%88%92(x2_%2B_y2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 22:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- The last four files (the oldest uploads) are poor copies of:
- File:F(x, y) = xe−(x2 + y2).jpg; note, that the function in the filename is wrong ← File:Gradient of a Function.tif
- File:Fx2.jpg ← File:Gradient2.svg
- File:Fx9.jpg ← File:F(x,y)=−((cosx)^2 + (cosy)^2)^2.PNG
- File:Fy3.jpg ← File:Градиент холма.gif
- So, the attribution could be fixed, but deletion would not hurt, I think, when the uses are switched to the original. — Speravir – 22:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
%3D%E2%88%92((cosx)%5E2_%2B_(cosy)%5E2)%5E2.PNG){kind=link}
- Not to forget this: File:Capturejjjjjjj.PNG is probably a screen capture of Линзовая антенна Иллюстрация. — Speravir – 23:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- More poor copies:
- The others are obviously screen captures or photos of illustrations in some Russian encyclopedias. — Speravir – 00:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The provided source give no statement of license and in particular, there is no CC--BY-SA 4.0- license that I can find anywhere on http://www.maaloufashford.com/john-j-maalouf.html Whpq (talk) 22:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
This picture is not in violation of copyright because I know the person who took the picture himself, and he is the one who gave it to me to use.
Please look at this URL: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AJohn_Maalouf.jpg -- File URL: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/John_Maalouf.jpg -- HTML Code: <a title="By John Maalouf (http://www.maaloufashford.com/JohnMaaloufBio.html) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons" href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AJohn_Maalouf.jpg"><img width="128" alt="John Maalouf" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/John_Maalouf.jpg"/></a>
This is the picture I am using and want to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanmardini24 (talk • contribs)
- Aside from a very minor difference in resolution, the images are the same. You should just use the already existing file. Just reference that file like this:[[file:John Maalouf.jpg]]. This image you uploaded is simply redundant to the already existing image and should still be deleted as redundant. -- Whpq (talk) 20:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion -- duplicate of File:John Maalouf.jpg. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
