Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_acrylic_on_canvas,_48x36_inches.jpg){kind=link}
_oil_on_board,_26x33_inches.jpg){kind=link}
_acrylic_and_ink_on_canvas,_40x30_inches.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Spam (see file name/description text) El Grafo (talk) 11:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:42, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
this must n't excist....muslim of Greece are Greeks and must respect the real Greek Flag. Ask the ministri....what if i made a flag that is not real and i do not respect the real turkish flag...will you publish it? 2A02:214C:8228:7D00:8CCF:F76D:9FF3:2DD6 07:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC) This is an offencive image of Greece's flag and MUST be deleted immediately. I am dissapointed it was even allowed to be published in the first place. Continuing the display of this image may result in legal action against the creator of the image as well as wikimedia too.
Kept: No plausible reason to delete the talk page independently of the file. This needs to stop. Guanaco (talk) 22:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png
Copyright infringement Bhojpuriya (talk) 00:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader admits copyright violation. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:43, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
ΔΕΝ ΥΠΑΡΧΕΙ ΜΟΥΣΟΥΛΜΑΝΙΚΗ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ 85.73.154.150 14:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's a fictitious/proposed flag clearly labeled as such; a better reason for deletion should be offered than offending against Greek nationalist sentiments... AnonMoos (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Even the patriotic sentiments of the Greeks is not a very strong reasoning, we have a lot of offensive stuff on Commons. Considering it is marked fictitious and is not claiming to be an "official" flag, I see no harm in it being here. Fry1989 eh? 05:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
There is no any flag of muslim Greece. this fake. 46.198.115.12 23:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Keep -- Everybody is aware that it's not official, and it's clearly labeled as such. That's not usually a valid reason in itself for deletion on Commons, unless there's also some hoaxing or hatemongering component which does not seem to be present here...AnonMoos (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to delete Krd 16:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 13:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Kephir hasn't offered any arguments that weren't already mentioned in previous deletion discussions, and found insufficient then. There are many hundreds of "Special and fictional" flags on Commons, and there's been a de facto practice for many years that such flags are not usually deleted just for being special or fictional, but rather only if there's some additional aggravating factor (such as being hoaxing or hatemongering).
- By the way, some of your former nominations, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png were rather useless and non-productive, so I hope you're adjusting your modus operandi accordingly... AnonMoos (talk) 16:49, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- The same arguments were sufficient to delete at least 50 other such phoney flags. I guess it can be called an established practice. Shall I post the list again? Also, I have no idea why you keep bringing up that one file ad nauseam. It is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether the file nominated here is within project scope, which you failed to explain. I hope you are adjusting your modus operandi accordingly. Keφr (keep talk here) 17:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Too bad for you that you nominated this file as part of a spree of "revenge" deletion nominations aimed personally at me. You should keep in mind User:Pieter_Kuiper, who caused much turmoil and was eventually banned because of his incorrigible addiction to revenge deletion nominations. And Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png is highly relevant, since your nomination there (on the same basis as your nomination of this file) was inappropriate and firmly rejected, yet you still haven't said whether or not you'll take into account "lessons learned" from your just rebuff there when formulating future deletion nominations... AnonMoos (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have never made a single "revenge deletion nomination". I nominate files on their merits. Cease these baseless accusations immediately. Keφr (keep talk here) 06:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Too bad for you that you nominated this file as part of a spree of "revenge" deletion nominations aimed personally at me. You should keep in mind User:Pieter_Kuiper, who caused much turmoil and was eventually banned because of his incorrigible addiction to revenge deletion nominations. And Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bandera Gay Reino Unido.png is highly relevant, since your nomination there (on the same basis as your nomination of this file) was inappropriate and firmly rejected, yet you still haven't said whether or not you'll take into account "lessons learned" from your just rebuff there when formulating future deletion nominations... AnonMoos (talk) 04:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately for you, you have sometimes been less than perfectly straightforward in these discussions -- and the fact that there are thousands of Special or Fictional Flag images on Commons and you nominate some of them for deletion at a fairly low rate, yet after I opposed several of your proposed deletions, you all of a sudden nominated my most recently-uploaded Special or Fictional Flag image, and then a cluster of Special or Fictional Flag images uploaded by me, strains credulity as a "coincidence"... AnonMoos (talk) 13:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have not even looked at your uploads list, ever. If you keep baselessly accusing me of ulterior motives, you will be the one reported to administrators. Can you go back to explaining how File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png meets COM:EDUSE? Keφr (keep talk here) 15:25, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Unfortunately for you, you have sometimes been less than perfectly straightforward in these discussions -- and the fact that there are thousands of Special or Fictional Flag images on Commons and you nominate some of them for deletion at a fairly low rate, yet after I opposed several of your proposed deletions, you all of a sudden nominated my most recently-uploaded Special or Fictional Flag image, and then a cluster of Special or Fictional Flag images uploaded by me, strains credulity as a "coincidence"... AnonMoos (talk) 13:33, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Per last DR. Furthermore, this flag has been discussed on articles off-site, making it notable. Fry1989 eh? 20:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- Where exactly? Keφr (keep talk here) 05:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have to explain that to you, you would not accept it either way. Your previous statements have made that much clear. Your little war against fictional files NEEDS TO END NOW. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well, given that you were not so kind to actually provide a proof of that statement, then yes, I am not going to accept it. And please calm down. Keφr (keep talk here) 19:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- The issue is not the matter of notability, but your lack of proper reasoning for deletion. Fictional status alone is not grounds for deletion, I've said it enough times that you should at least consider the possibility that you are wrong. Fry1989 eh? 19:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- I did not mention notability, but possible educational use, of whose existence I am yet to be convinced. Mere repetition does not make a claim justified. Keφr (keep talk here) 20:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- The issue is not the matter of notability, but your lack of proper reasoning for deletion. Fictional status alone is not grounds for deletion, I've said it enough times that you should at least consider the possibility that you are wrong. Fry1989 eh? 19:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well, given that you were not so kind to actually provide a proof of that statement, then yes, I am not going to accept it. And please calm down. Keφr (keep talk here) 19:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have to explain that to you, you would not accept it either way. Your previous statements have made that much clear. Your little war against fictional files NEEDS TO END NOW. Fry1989 eh? 17:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Where exactly? Keφr (keep talk here) 05:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. And no don't come complaining at my talk page since everyone knows that DR's like this can be closed as kept or deleted and since it is still not clear if this flag is in scope or not I am saying keep. Natuur12 (talk) 13:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
This a direct insult to the Greece flag as the user uses the Greek flag that symbolize Democracy and freedom with entering the Turkey’s middle east flag character 107.143.96.81 22:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- See the comment of "15:14, 28 June 2014" up there near the top... AnonMoos (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete. No educational value; as a made-up flag, it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose, fails COM:Project scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)- Keep Offence is not a reason for deletion, per last. Fry1989 eh? 16:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per above DR: there is no particular reason to delete this specific made up flag, and we don't have actually a policy against them. Ruthven (msg) 19:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.177.252.97 08:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yet again?? AnonMoos (talk) 08:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Θα πρεπει να πατε ολοι στην φυλακη που παραποιησατε την Ελληνικη σημαια.Ντροπη σας!Η Ελληνικη σημαια ειναι Ιερη και δοξασμενη και εσεις την μολυνατε με τα μουσουλμανικα συμβολα,αισχος.
- Oh my! This level of racism in 2017?! Please delete the file before IPs from Athens begin another Nazi era in Europe... --E4024 (talk) 09:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Reason of deletion : it is a manipulated national symbol and therefore illegal to be advertised as such. It is already transferred in several police departments across the country (There is laws about the national symbols and they should be respected). The moon symbol is representing the Chinese turtle/dragon God and all mongoloid countries represent that in their flags, it is irrelevant to our history, ethics, beliefs and insult in every manner.
- Find a place more fit to your personal interests, where you can kill people from mongoloid countries on the screen, video games for instance... --E4024 (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Για παραποίηση εθνικού συμβόλου!! Δεν υπάρχει μουσουλμανική σημαία! Να ακολουθηθούν οι διαδικασίες του άρθρου 188 του ποινικού κώδικα. 2A02:587:5C04:4300:24E5:2A65:B2C3:8F8 17:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
παραπιιηση εθνικου συμβολου 2A02:587:2403:AB00:B947:8F7E:D15A:1F1F 18:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
ΠΡΟΚΛΗΤΙΚΗ ΦΩΤΟΓΡΑΦΙΑ!!! 2A02:587:7411:DD00:1B9:5E4:EC6:FE49 18:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
There is no this flag in Greece! 109.242.166.71 18:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
I filed a report in the electronic crime department of police.
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.176.124.212 18:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 46.12.237.248 18:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 2A02:587:8402:7900:5854:2810:3874:E609 19:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Γιατι ειναι παραποιηση εθνικου συμβολου και θα ακολουθηθουν οι νομιμες διαδικασιες και παραπομπη των υπευθυνων στην ελληνικη δικαιοσυνη! 79.130.42.11 19:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 88.13.173.157 19:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Manipulation of a national symbol (Hellenic flag) - this picture is fictional and provocative. Article/bill 188 Greek constitution violation/trespass/manipulation of national symbols. It is punishable up to two years of prison and compensation for all of those who may appeal to the courts. 88.13.173.157 19:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
ΓΙΑ ΠΑΡΑΠΟΙΗΣΗ ΕΘΝΙΚΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΛΟΥ 94.65.62.251 19:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Παραποίηση εθνικού συμβόλου 141.255.92.141 21:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Η ΣΗΜΑΙΑ Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΜΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΑΥΤΟ ΠΡΟΣΒΑΛΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΣΗΜΑΙΑ 2A02:2149:8155:7400:C9CC:C763:F7D4:3199 21:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- What the flock of anonymous IPs is doing (including the recursive deletion requests to delete the deletion request!) borders on nonsensical vandalism, and won't make this file any likelier to be deleted. AnonMoos (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per above DRs. This swarm of redundant requests is ridiculous and disruptive, and I intend to revert any more that appear in the near future. The flag is clearly marked as a fictitious flag. Guanaco (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Παραποίηση Εθνικού Συμβόλου 2A02:587:9402:E100:585:1278:6AD1:E167 00:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Geez. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Modern artwork. I notified uploader at NL Wikipedia to ask permission. Please allow 2 weeks Elly (talk) 10:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Copyvio - Modern artwork. I notified uploader at NL Wikipedia to ask permission. Please allow 2 weeks Elly (talk) 10:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
Incorrect usage of the creator template, results in the entire user page being shown on the file page Elisfkc (talk) 18:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I think I fixed it now. --Jarekt (talk) 03:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't have an original source and license for the map. --ghouston (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't have an original source and license for the map. --ghouston (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, clearly promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Same problem with File:Mis sold Corbyn2.jpg.
Deleted: per nomination; COM:DW of copyrighted advertising, therefore breach of copyright. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
"Допускается цитирование материалов РИА «Новый День» без согласования не более 50% от объема оригинального материала, с обязательной прямой гиперссылкой на страницу, с которой материал заимствован." Permission appears to be granted to quote the source material, but it isn't necessarily extended to copying images.
Guanaco (talk) 00:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, that was clearly my mistake, I've included only the shortened and somewhat misinterpreted permission from the 2008 source article but according to the site's rules it really cannot be used the way I did. Therefore, both images should be deleted.--CS92 (talk) 13:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Selfie, not good enough quality to use in People categories seb26 (talk) 01:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Comes from this facebook post on Colombian military facebook page. No evidence of the CC license anywhere and government works or works by government/military officials are not explicitly excluded from copyright seb26 (talk) 01:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong scheme. Right here: File:Shema kofemolki.png. ПростоУчастник (talk) 03:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong scheme. Right here: File:Shema kofemolki.png. ПростоУчастник (talk) 03:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Advertising, and dubious claim of "own work" (appears to be ad copy from a company, which further contains their own possibly non-free product designs) DMacks (talk) 04:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
License does not permit modification. Guanaco (talk) 04:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Taken in 1939, subject to EU copyright rules. Unknown author, but there is nothing to suggest the copyright was transferred to World Jewish Congress. Neither the PD nor attribution license appears to apply. Guanaco (talk) 04:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be under any free license. Guanaco (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-commercial license
Guanaco (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete NC restriction....and not by the copyright owner but by a third party uploader. Too risky for Commons to keep this image. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Benjammin801
[edit]- File:Future Culture Keepers.jpg
- File:Future Culture Keepers (milk).png
- File:Organization Motivation.png
- File:FCKoriginalGRN.jpg
- File:FCKlogo.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Personal logos uploaded only for self-promotion; no potential educational value; none of the files are in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
"Feel free to use any of those logos on your web site or product using Tcl/Tk:" This is not a free license grant. The software itself is under a BSD-like license and would be acceptable, but the logos are not included in the source package.
Guanaco (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
The files are coming from here. This is a BSD licensed source distribution. The eps files contain an extra readme. I think of Wikipedia as a clear way to promote Tcl/Tk, and to thereby fall within the mentioned license terms. If you folks don't agree, get rid of them. --Alcotor (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Alcotor: I disagree that Wikipedia is a good place to promote anything, but that's a different matter. I see now that they're included in the source package, so
I withdraw my nomination. Guanaco (talk) 22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 05:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Permission from the site owner but not the photographer (who is likely a spouse or relative). No contact information available to clarify this. Guanaco (talk) 06:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo, likely out of scope. Guanaco (talk) 06:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Conflicting license information. One license is clearly unfree, and the other is likely unintended by the uploader (first and only contribution). Guanaco (talk) 06:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Probably copyrighted poster. Mr. Smart LION 06:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
violazione di copryright Bart ryker (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". Probably copyrighted poster. Mr. Smart LION 06:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
violazione di copryright Bart ryker (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of "Own work". OTRS required from Deepti Sati. Mr. Smart LION 06:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Low quality and nonsense name. Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk) 06:43, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files look like private snapshots. IF in scope, OTRS required.
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works. Other uploads wer copyright violations
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Likely a photo found on Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 07:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Likely a photo found on Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 07:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Poor unused image quality. B dash (talk) 07:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of projet scope. Unused food photo.
- File:Soy Chicken Leg.jpg
- File:Red Bean Ice.jpg
- File:Seafood Risotto.jpg
- File:Purple Rice Soup with Coconut Milk.jpg
- File:Pulled Pork Shoulder Burger.jpg
- File:Fried Full Chicken Wing.jpg
- File:Mini Pizza in Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Lingonberry Soda.jpg
- File:Pan-fried Beef Tongue.jpg
- File:Baked Rice with Chesse and Black Pepper Sauce.jpg
- File:Chicken Soup in Chinese Style.jpg
- File:Dry-fried Beef Ho Fan.jpg
- File:Choy Sum with Soy Sauce.jpg
- File:Swiss Sauce Chicken Leg.jpg
- File:Katsudon in Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Mixed Grill Rice.jpg
- File:Hong Kong-style Burger with Egg Salad & French Fries.jpg
- File:Baked Duck Leg Rice with Mushroom Sauce and Cheese.jpg
- File:Curry Lamb in Hong Kong.jpg
B dash (talk) 07:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion /St1995 07:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Yummy food pics. --E4024 (talk) 07:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned/replaced scheme with two spelling errors (Mißbildung → Missbildung; Allergiesierung → Allergisierung). Leyo 07:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Looks to me failry out of scope. JuTa 08:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Looks like taken from the internet. E4024 (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Image en doublon Kev22 (talk) 09:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete (with redirect), scaled-down {{duplicate}} of File:Aalst vanhoolbus.JPG. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
I doubt if this logo can be published with the CC-BY-SA4.0 licence. I think it is an original design with the colors an blocks. Elly (talk) 09:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sidra Memon memon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 04:42, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sidra Memon memon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Commons is not a social media site. User has been notified before but yet continue to upload such images
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete; same editor has uploaded same or very similar images and these have been deleted and they have been warned about uploading copyvios (see their talk page). Only one image uploaded to Flickr and licence changed from ARR to freely but no verification. Image file states: Camerman and school staff took this photo. This need an OTRS especially per comments by 2 admins on my talk page discussion: User talk:Ww2censor#File:Shivanshu Srivastava.jpg. Ww2censor (talk) 09:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright problem: It is not the work by the uploader. This is a photo of a leaflet, which is a copyrighted work by a Hong Kong political party. Carrotkit (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
author's stale request page - I uploaded several myself Ww2censor (talk) 10:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Etienne Morillon died in 1949. This will be under copyright until January 1, 2020. There is no evidence of permission from the painter's heirs. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC) ːYes, you're right, sorry. I have read the date of his death too quickly.--Pierre Tribhou (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Self nominating, poor quality image that does not accurately depict the article it was intended for and has been removed from the article EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 11:02, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
error on uploading Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution, also available here. Uploader doesn't even claim to be the author, linking to a non-existing account instead. Suspect copyright violation? El Grafo (talk) 11:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 11:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a stock image of a generic wine bottle by Michaela Stejskalova (part of a series) with a label added. Aside from potential copyright issues (does the uploader actually own any rights to this?), the wine shown in the glass is most likely not the one suggested by the label. El Grafo (talk) 11:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 11:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
private photo of non-notable person Agora (talk) 11:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
no permission --Sauri-Arabier (talk) 12:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
uploader request - watermark Carrotkit (talk) 13:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be law. In such case proper license tag should be used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Spino nero.jpg
- File:Testa di Spino Sicano o Spino Siciliano.jpg
- File:Testa di Spinotto.jpg
- File:Spinotto al lavoro.jpg
- File:Spinotto.jpg
- File:Cuccioli di Varbutu.jpg
- File:Cucciolone di Varbutu.jpg
- File:Barba di Varbutu.jpg
- File:Varbutu.jpg
- File:Cane Pecoraio Varbutu in tipo.jpg
- File:Spinusu 5.jpg
- File:Spinisu Sicano.jpg
- File:Studio di testa.jpg
- File:Spinusu Sicano 2.jpg
- File:Spinusu 4.jpg
- File:Spinusu 3.jpg
- File:Spinusu Sicano nero.jpg
- File:Sicano.jpg
- File:Spinusu.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.ultrahdwallpapers.net/images/7.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of simple text, easily replaceable by wikitext or TeX DMacks (talk) 14:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of simple text, easily replaceable by wikitext or TeX DMacks (talk) 14:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of simple text, easily replaceable by wikitext or TeX DMacks (talk) 14:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of simple equation, easily replaceable by TeX (only use is in a discussion of the quality of this image, which led to its replacement) DMacks (talk) 14:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused crop of File:Pongo pygmaeus (orangutang).jpg EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Very low resolution; variety of alternatives including File:U+21CC.svg, File:Equilibrium rl.svg, File:Biochem reaction arrow reversible NNNN horiz med.svg, and ⇌ (U+21CC). GKFXtalk 14:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused; Unuseful for an encyclopaedie. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 14:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
,_acrylic_on_canvas,_48x36_inches.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_acrylic_on_canvas,_48x36_inches.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright Violation WO1977 (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
_oil_on_board,_26x33_inches.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_oil_on_board,_26x33_inches.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright Violation WO1977 (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
_oil_on_board,_26x33_inches.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
_oil_on_board,_26x33_inches.jpg){kind=link}
_acrylic_and_ink_on_canvas,_40x30_inches.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_acrylic_and_ink_on_canvas,_40x30_inches.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright Violation WO1977 (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
_acrylic_and_ink_on_canvas,_40x30_inches.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 17:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
_acrylic_and_ink_on_canvas,_40x30_inches.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Sky Sports F1.png
- File:Sky Sports Football.png
- File:Sky Sports Golf.png
- File:Sky Sports Cricket.png
- File:Sky Sports Action.png
- File:Sky Sports Main Event.png
- File:Sky Sports Arena.png
- File:Sky Sports 2017.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from ticket. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
From Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2534730/Never-mind-fizzy-drinks-sweets-junk-food-diet-acorns-pine-nuts-caused-ancestors-teeth-rot-decay.html Ytoyoda (talk) 14:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.municipios.com.co/foto/534.
- File:Iglesia San Carlos Borromeo.jpg
- File:Caño de Aguas Prietas .jpg
- File:Vieja Casa de los laza.jpg
- File:Cerro Colosima desde la distancia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdallahhany01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/0q1gQcyy7nqzkL2wNDIrbDotmF1y-HoyC_LIryJXiCwBnOwb4KB99B-W149kyj6TP3pC_YncpxI=w1440-h810-no.
- File:صوره خالد.jpg
- File:اثناء العمل.jpg
- File:خالد اثناء العمل.jpg
- File:خالد محمد حفنى.jpg
- File:مكتبه معهد القناه العالى للهندسه والتكنولوجيا.jpg
- File:قاعه ندواه (معهد القناه العالى للهندسه والتكنولوجيا).jpg
- File:معمل الكهرباء (معهد القناه العالى للهندسه والتكنولوجيا).jpg
- File:Canal High Institute of Engineering and Technology .jpg
- File:معهد القناه العلى للهندسه والتكنولوجيا.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copy from here. No permission. Yann (talk) 15:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
doubtful own work, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 15:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martha Isabel Castrillón Betancur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Purely uploaded for self-promotion at User:Martha Isabel Castrillón Betancur (which should probably be deleted as well). I doubt the claim of "own work", since the user seems to appear as a subject in most of the images. We would need written permissions from the copyright holders (photographers, record company, television network, ...) to keep these.
- File:Con el maestro Jorge Velosa.webp
- File:Gran Moncada de Oro.webp
- File:Festival internacional del bolero.webp
- File:Segunda Producción discográfica "Sabor a mi Tierra".webp
- File:Festival Nacional del Pasillo Colombiano.webp
- File:Concierto Con la Sinfónica de Pereira 2.webp
- File:Ganadora Gran Moncada de Oro.webp
- File:Concierto Con la Sinfónica de Pereira.webp
- File:Martha Isabel y Laura Cristina Castrillón.webp
- File:Dueto murmullo y canción.jpg
- File:Colombia tiene talento.webp
El Grafo (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, along with other uploads File:Abdul Sufa 2.jpg, File:Abdul Sufa 1.jpg (and File:Abdul Sufa.jpg used in user's sanbox) Pibwl (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused collage, unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 15:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused, not an own work Pibwl (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused, out of scope, along with rest of uploads:File:Ebinsena.gif, File:Schoolpic.gif, File:اسم مدرسة.gif, File:School 9.gif, File:اسم المدرسة.gif, File:JQN3Y.gif, File:Heja4532.JPG Pibwl (talk) 15:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope cartoon, along with File:Https--2F-2Fpadlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com-2F51641069-2F6d53272342a4a104fc072c61fd4cbf4e6709693f-2F6a0cdf42d04cddcfc4b7fc2f0b1eb6c3.jpg Pibwl (talk) 15:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
1) "www.imgur.com" is not an approprioate source. 2) how do we know that the author has been dead for >70 years if s/he is "unknown"? El Grafo (talk) 15:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image El Grafo (talk) 15:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
violazione di copryright Bart ryker (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Author self-nominated RaviC (talk) 16:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
author request-my own text at upload reads "MOCKUP MADE FOR EN:GRAPHICS LAB ONLY. I INTEND TO HAVE THESE DELETED AS SOON AS THE BETTER IMAGE IS CREATED" Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused promotional image, super poor quality, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused text-only book cover, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
No permission since|month=July|day=17|year=2017 Artem Ponomarenko (talk) 16:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo of text-only page, out of scope and likely copyvio as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:12, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by URSS bajo el árbol (talk · contribs) 1
[edit]Likely not own work, wide variety of sizes, quality, and composition, no EXIF.
- File:7 de URSS bajo el árbol.jpg
- File:Urss bajo el árbol once tv.jpg
- File:Roger URSS bajo el árbol.jpg
- File:Jonathan urss bajo el arbol.jpg
- File:Cristobal en el franz mayer.jpg
- File:Exael Salcedo y Samuel Cervantes en el Vive Latino.jpg
- File:URSS bajo el árbol live.jpg
- File:Vl14.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Looks like screengrab actually, so likely copyvio as well. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unusable low quality image with little educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unusable low quality with little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - family picture with young kids (privacy) - Name of file is promotional also and according to Dodoman this is the wrong picture. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures - (promotional, wrong picture and privacy (young kids)) Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (privacy of children/family and promotional title of image)- Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Email shown is not enough to change the license for Commons. The user should have also gone through OTRS to prove the license, rather than trying to upload an email screenshot to Commons itself. Elisfkc (talk) 18:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'll request the image authors to send a permissions-text email to Commons. Hopefully they'll do that. Thank you. @sikander (talk) 00:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete please. Wikipedia Article for Billie Flynn has been deleted and image is no longer needed. @sikander (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I don't understand the nomination reason. Why is this the "wrong picture"? Mbch331 (talk) 19:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- This are a lot of pictures from a woman (sometimes with her (very) young children), maybe 'wrong picture' is not a valid reason, but it's more that someone took a lot of personal pictures and uploaded them to Commons. Some pictures do have promotional titles. So:
- Delete - see above - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Once again, the email shown is not enough to change the license for Commons. The user should have also gone through OTRS to prove the license, rather than trying to upload an email screenshot to Commons itself. Elisfkc (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'll request the image authors to send a permissions-text email to Commons. Hopefully they'll do that. Thank you. @sikander (talk) 00:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete please. Wikipedia Article for Billie Flynn has been deleted and image is no longer needed. @sikander (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Once again, the email shown is not enough to change the license for Commons. The user should have also gone through OTRS to prove the license, rather than trying to upload an email screenshot to Commons itself. Elisfkc (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'll request the image authors to send a permissions-text email. Hopefully they'll do that. Thank you. @sikander (talk) 00:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete please. Wikipedia Article for Billie Flynn has been deleted and image is no longer needed. @sikander (talk) 18:32, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - The title of this pictures implicates that there is a need for good bus stops in the city of Spijkenisse. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Admitted copyvio Arjayay (talk) 18:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a publicly available image of a public personality --Pllbks123 (talk) 22:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
admitted copyvio Arjayay (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a publicly available image of a public personality. Pllbks123 (talk) 22:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
admitted copyvio Arjayay (talk) 18:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a publicly available image of a public personality. --Pllbks123 (talk) 22:39, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Admitted copyvio Arjayay (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a publicly available image of a public personality. --Pllbks123 (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Admitted copyvio Arjayay (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a publicly available image of a public personality. --Pllbks123 (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Previously published here: http://elsoldeoccidente.com/enlinea/2013/07/ramonense-da-victoria-a-alajuelense-en-super-clasico/ Ytoyoda (talk) 18:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - PS: the man (photographer) is never on the pictures, we don't know of all this pictures of the woman and her children are used for the right reason Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - see other pictures (set of personal pictures) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:39, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright Violation WO1977 (talk) 18:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Three contributions, including his own photograph 176.239.80.172 18:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright Violation WO1977 (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright Violation WO1977 (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Only uploaded his picture and his signature 176.239.80.172 18:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi This is my picture please add my mail under this picture if you need ceo@geliyoo.com (Hakan Atabaş (talk) 21:57, 19 August 2018 (UTC))
Copyright Violation WO1977 (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Only uploaded his picture and his signature 176.239.80.172 18:39, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:Charles medeiros - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Charles medeiros - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Charles medeiros - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Charles medeiros - panoramio.jpg
- File:Comunicação Eletrobras - panoramio.jpg
- File:Elivandro Alexandre Memória - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Elivandro Alexandre Memória - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Elivandro Alexandre Memória - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Elivandro Alexandre Memória - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Elivandro Alexandre Memória - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hot Dog Anaco - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Hot Dog Anaco - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Hot Dog Anaco - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Hot Dog Anaco - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Hot Dog Anaco - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Hot Dog Anaco - panoramio.jpg
- File:Jason Final Curso de Atendimento ao Cliente - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Jason Final Curso de Atendimento ao Cliente - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Jason Final Curso de Atendimento ao Cliente - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Jason Final Curso de Atendimento ao Cliente - panoramio.jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:Pacaraima - State of Roraima, Brazil - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Pacaraima - State of Roraima, Brazil - panoramio (12).jpg
- File:Santa Elena de Uairen, Bolívar, Venezuela - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Santa Elena de Uairen, Bolívar, Venezuela - panoramio.jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (20).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (21).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (22).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (23).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (25).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (26).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (27).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (28).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (29).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (30).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (31).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (32).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (33).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (34).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (35).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (36).jpg
- File:São Francisco, Boa Vista - RR, Brazil - panoramio (37).jpg
- File:Working Jason - trabalhando - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Working Jason - trabalhando - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Working Jason - trabalhando - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Working Jason - trabalhando - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Working Jason - trabalhando - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Working Jason - trabalhando - panoramio.jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:Working Jason Trabalhando - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rodrigolopes (talk) 18:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Libelling montage. Achim (talk) 19:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Photo taken in 1951 in China and were still copyrighted on the URAA date for China (January 1, 1996); not PD in the US. Wcam (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
a) Obviously by AppolloSoft, b) out of scope. Achim (talk) 19:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
lookslike screenshot from tv Sakhalinio (talk) 19:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in France
- File:Pizza Planet restaurant, Disneyland Paris.jpg
- File:Buzz Lightyear Laser Blast, Disneyland Paris.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in France
- File:Orbitron.jpg
- File:Fantasyland station, Disneyland Paris.jpg
- File:Discoveryland station, Disneyland Paris.jpg
- File:Pizzeria Bella Notte, Disneyland Paris.jpg
- File:Walt's - An American Restaurant.jpg
- File:Lucky Nugget Saloon.jpg
- File:Fuente del Oro restaurante, Disneyland Paris.jpg
- File:Hakuna Matata Restaurant, Disneyland Paris.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
self-claim own work but without much prove Matthew hk (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- probably a stock photo of news agency, see http://radiogoal24.it/2017/06/22/juventus-visite-mediche-in-corso-per-patrick-schick/ Matthew hk (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Clear copyvio. Attributed to LaPresse here — Dudek1337 (talk) 18:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Montparnasse
[edit]There is no FOP in France, see COM:FOP#France. I have selected pictures where the tour is the subject of the picture.
- File:La Tour Montparnasse - panoramio.jpg
- File:La Tour Montparnasse vue de la rue de Rennes - panoramio.jpg
- File:La Tour Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Montparnasse - panoramio.jpg
- File:Necker, Paris, France - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Necker, Paris, France - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Paris 2008 Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris 2009 Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris 75015 Tour Montparnasse 20111231 (02).jpg
- File:Paris Centre Commercial Maine-Montparnasse 003.JPG
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Paris Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Paris Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:PARIS Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris Montparnasse - Bienvenüe - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris Tour Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Petit-Montrouge, 75014 Paris, France - panoramio.jpg
- File:Pixel Art - Tour Montpanasse - Téléthon 2015.jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse (6170039633).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse (8128925808).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour montparnasse 2011 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse 2011 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour montparnasse 2011 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour montparnasse 2011, vue par la gare - panoramio.jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse @ Paris (31226504251).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse icon 1.svg
- File:Tour Montparnasse.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep Hi PierreSelim, you state that you have selected pictures where the tour is the subject of the picture. Here the subject is Galeries Lafayette, the tour is/was only part of the picture. Regards Alfvanbeem (talk) 09:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- It is also a no FOP case ... and the Tour is also the subject (it's the title of the picture and it's the main description). --PierreSelim (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
PierreSelim (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Montparnasse
[edit]The building was completed in 1973 by architect Eugène Beaudouin (1898–1983), Urbain Cassan (1890–1979), Jean Saubot (1906–2002), and Louis de Hoÿm de Marien (1920–2007). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright terms of France lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2078.
- File:Juin 2008 003.jpg
- File:Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Paris (75015) Tour Montparnasse 03.jpg
- File:Paris 75014-75015 Rue du Départ towards Tour Montparnasse 2017-12-22.jpg
- File:Paris DSC 1453 (49630640776).jpg
- File:Paris Montmartre Blick auf den Tour Montparnasse.jpg
- File:Paris Tour Montparnasse 1.jpg
- File:Rue de Renne with the Tower in Montparnasse, Paris.JPG
- File:RuedeRennes.JPG
- File:Tour Montparnasse @ Rue du Commandant René Mouchotte @ Train station @ Montparnasse @ Paris (31226510471).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse seen from Arc de Triomphe.jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse1.JPG
- File:TourMontparnasse VueDeLux.jpg
- File:Vue Tour Montparnasse depuis Parc St Cloud Paris 2.jpg
- File:Панорама Парижа на закате - panoramio.jpg
_Tour_Montparnasse_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Given the lack of discussion, I have kept a few marginal ones that could plausibly fall under COM:DM and deleted the rest. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Montparnasse
[edit]COM:FOP France only allows non-commercial use; building is not yet in the public domain.
- File:Night @ Tour Montparnasse @ Montparnasse @ Paris (30106952203).jpg
- File:Parijs 2005 (2843374501).jpg
- File:Parijs 2005 (2843375103).jpg
- File:Parijs 2005 (2843375717).jpg
- File:Tour Montparnasse @ Paris (31060547566).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan for works of art Elisfkc (talk) 19:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan for works of art (this is a scene inside the queue) Elisfkc (talk) 19:31, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Possible Copyright violation. Creator unclear. Can be found on several other pages on dates prior to this upload. 1. http://www.mormonmatters.org/2009/07/23/enos-envy/ 2. https://www.lds.org/manual/book-of-mormon-student-manual/chapter-17-enos-words-of-mormon?lang=eng 3. http://www.oneil.com.au/lds/bom.html Qaswed (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Redundant similar views from Panoramio. Superseded by the photo File:Images from the window of a 504 King streetcar, 2016 07 03 (56).JPG - panoramio.jpg, in which is not backs of the bypassers.
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Images from the window of a 504 King streetcar, 2016 07 03 (57).JPG - panoramio.jpg
- File:Images from the window of a 504 King streetcar, 2016 07 03 (58).JPG - panoramio.jpg
- File:Images from the window of a 504 King streetcar, 2016 07 03 (59).JPG - panoramio.jpg
- File:Images from the window of a 504 King streetcar, 2016 07 03 (60).JPG - panoramio.jpg
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Kulmalukko (talk) 19:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
National Police of Colombia advert banners
[edit]- File:Redes sociales de la Policía Nacional de los colombianos (5743999378).jpg
- File:Redes sociales de la Policía Nacional de los colombianos (5743999424).jpg
- File:Redes sociales de la Policía Nacional de los colombianos (5743999264).jpg
- File:Redes sociales de la Policía Nacional de los colombianos (5743450121).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These were automatically uploaded by a bot from the Police's flickr, but they don't fit our scope here because they are just advertisement images containing text about the force's social media presence. seb26 (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
source: http://hobbymap.de/visitenkarte/birgit-fischer Ralf Roleček 19:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Victor P. (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Its a copy from Andrew Mollo, The Armed Forces of World War II, copyright 1981, Osprey Publishing, page 130. I own this book, and I have checked it; it's a direct copy. The Internet is full of this and other copies from Mollo's book, but that doesn't mean it can be added to the Commons. Luke (talk) 20:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant. Superseded by similar view File:Construction on Victoria, visible from Dundas Square, 2016 07 16 (2).JPG - panoramio.jpg, which is maybe a bit better straightened. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:58, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.JPG_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant. Almost identical image is File:Epipactis muelleri - panoramio (13).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright doubt. Photograph taken by Milton Diaz/El Tiempo Digital (a newspaper) as indicated by EXIF, unclear if National Police of Colombia obtained complete ownership or simply posted it on their Flickr amongst images taken by their staff. Better to delete this rather than keep it given the unlikelihood they obtained rights and the absence of any other evidence seb26 (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
1950s poster from North Korea, with no reason given why it is not still under copyright except for a spurious appeal to North Korea's Freedom of Panorama law which cannot apply here. BabelStone (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
1990s poster from North Korea, with no reason given why it is not still under copyright except for a spurious appeal to North Korea's Freedom of Panorama law which cannot apply here BabelStone (talk) 21:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Photo of a 3D object taken from the internet (Bukoushou Badge: Post War Veteran Replica VS. Original Piece) , and given a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license by the uploader (a prolific copyvio uploader over many years). There is no indication that the real copyright owner has released this image under a suitable license. BabelStone (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurred. Superseded by similar sharper image File:Lisboa - Lisbon (24483203301).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission from the sculptor Nikolay Khodov (Николай Ходов), memorial from 2004, copyvio. PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo design too complex for a Public Domain logo. Not "own work". Per en-Wiki article "Pan Books" the logo was designed by English artist Mervyn Peake (d.1968), although I didn't dig any deeper. GermanJoe (talk) 22:43, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album Acabashi (talk) 23:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album Acabashi (talk) 23:32, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright cartoon characters not exempted by de minimis as they dominate the image. DAJF (talk) 23:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please explain if this image is only on the target for deletion. others of mine and others in same categories (ad train in Japan, K.R.T.Girls) are already in commons. What is the problem? angle? license?--Tze Chiang Hao (talk) 09:19, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- This is not the only image nominated. Unfortunately a large percentage of the images in Category:K.R.T.GIRLS have had to be nominated for deletion for the same reason. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:K.R.T.GIRLS. The problem is that the copyright content (the adverts or mascots) dominate the images, and cannot be exempted under de minimis. I don't think there should be any problem with images like File:20170608 Randen K.R.T.Girls in Nishi-oji-Sanjo Station Image022.jpg and File:20170608 K.R.T.Girls Train in Kyoto Randen P1020410.jpg, where the de minimis claim is fair. --DAJF (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- How is it different from many images in Category:Anime and manga characters on rolling stock in Japan?--Tze Chiang Hao (talk) 10:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- This is not the only image nominated. Unfortunately a large percentage of the images in Category:K.R.T.GIRLS have had to be nominated for deletion for the same reason. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:K.R.T.GIRLS. The problem is that the copyright content (the adverts or mascots) dominate the images, and cannot be exempted under de minimis. I don't think there should be any problem with images like File:20170608 Randen K.R.T.Girls in Nishi-oji-Sanjo Station Image022.jpg and File:20170608 K.R.T.Girls Train in Kyoto Randen P1020410.jpg, where the de minimis claim is fair. --DAJF (talk) 09:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- It all depends on whether the copyright content dominates the image (as in the case of those I have nominated for deletion), or whether the content is more incidental. I would suggest reading Commons:De minimis, and especially the "Guideline" section. --DAJF (talk) 23:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Can't see any reason for this photo on the project... what is it supposed to be about ? Acabashi (talk) 23:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alexander Suvorov
[edit]"При перепечатке, ссылка на http://www.russia-talk.com/ ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНА" English: "When reprinting, a link to http://www.russia-talk.com/ is MANDATORY"... but no explicit permission to reprint.
Guanaco (talk) 05:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep Seems an explicit attribution request for copying, but modification isn't explicitly mentioned. --Ruthven (msg) 05:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no explicit permission for commercial using and creating derivative works. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably out of scope. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep He is a notable person : en:Gustave Eiffel who builded Eiffel tower ! Probably in a replica of his office. --Tangopaso (talk) 07:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ok, I agree. It seems to be the same replica man as this: File:Gustave Eiffel at The Eiffel Tower, Champ de Mars, Paris, France.JPG. --Kulmalukko (talk) 11:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Guanaco (talk) 07:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The pixabay and Commons uploders is same. Possibility of pixabay washing. The image is found on many sites. Possibility of copyvios ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:56, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Tiven2240: What do you mean by "pixabay and Commons uploders is same"? --Sporti (talk) 10:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
@Sporti: I have strike through it but the image is also found on a copyrighted website https://www.ministryofvillas.com/nightlife-in-legian/ there is a possibility that the image is not free. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Well it has better res as elsewhere and it has EXIF so it looked OK to me. --Sporti (talk) 09:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: File passes license review. Pixabay appears to be the highest-quality and oldest source. No valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 08:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Seitenverkehrtes Bild / mirror-inverted picture Les Meloures (talk) 11:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: I can see no evidence that this is a mirror image? Even if it is, it provides an excellent view of the monument.--Ipigott (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Flipped horizontally now... --Jwh (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion /St1995 18:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 08:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Internet copyvio. Albertus teolog (talk) 13:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Prof. Adam Walanus agreed to use it on Wikimedia Commons. http://adamwalanus.pl/aw_contact.html See the link to his Wikimedia Commons account. --Tarnoob (talk) 20:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused file that can be replicated using wikitext. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 19:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Qualified DeleteKeep (see P.S.) The good faith nomination text is incorrect as to the ability to duplicate this with wikitext (see the original discussion for inclusion of the image), but it is unused, and for a long time, and more to the point, the image it was replaced with, File:BHentropy.svg, which to my unschooled eye is a different formula, or at least a different form of the formula. I am going to make the assumption the replacement is a better version or is a correction. However, I am going to ask at the science reference desk for confirmation of this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Question posted at w:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Better version/correction to Bekenstein–Hawking entropy formula?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- P.S.: Changed to keep above, per responses to my RD question linked above (they are both valid versions of the formula) as well as per those below. Also, I suppose I was conflating "unused" as a valid ground with various places at Wikipedia where that is a substantial ground for deletion (e.g., at TfD), when it appears that is of little relevance to the utility of Commons images.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Question posted at w:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#Better version/correction to Bekenstein–Hawking entropy formula?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The formulas are equivalent, but using h bar or h respectively. So it is not replaced. Being unused is no reason to delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Even though they reduce to the same mathematical reality, the variants themselves are not entirely reduplicative of one-another. In my opinion, there is nothing especially problematic about hosting images representing notable formulas to begin with and if it's true that even a relatively simple equation such as this (simple here referring to the complexity of the task of representing the symbols, not the mathematical significance) cannot be rendered at scale, then it's all the more appropriate to allow such images to be retained. More generally, I just don't see any policy-based argument for deletion here. Now granted, I may not be super up-to-date on the latest Commons guidelines, but the closest I can think of that applies here is COM:SCOPE, and even then, it is clear that this is not the kind of text which is meant to be governed by the exclusion criteria of that policy. Snow (talk) 13:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 08:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope image. Image has no educational value nor linked to any Wikipedia article. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I have no strong feelings about the picture but the DR attracted my attention: "Not linked to any WP article" is not, -from my point of view- a valid argument for deletion. That means we should delete tonnes of items. I have voiced this several times, especially in "artist" pictures. If we have the picture of a young actor or actress who has appeared in several films, in minor roles, although he or she may not be notable for an article as yet we should better keep their pictures, because they suddenly can become famous with one role and then it may be a hell of a difficulty to find their pictures without copyright issues afterwards. Having said that, let me turn to this file. A rural house (don't we have a cat for them?) in deep Turkey. I am attracted by the fact that they not only still use a traditional "kazan" (see Category:Kazan (cookware) please) to cook food on open fire, but they also have acquiered a "new" kazan and show their interest to continue to use this outdated cookware/cooking method. On the other hand, they've got a satellite antenna! The conflict itself is worth to keep a file. Another thing, I meyself made a similar DR recently (not that similar indeed, but alas) and the file was kept, I don't know why. (Here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Evimiz Reis Apt. - panoramio.jpg) Ah, and the pic was hastily added to some Wictionary items, as if we did not have thousands of "better" house/apartment pictures... Anyhow. Just wanted to contribute to this DR. Bye. --E4024 (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
légende tronquée Salsero35 (talk) 20:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing of value that isn't in File:Geologic map Armorican Massif FR.svg. Guanaco (talk) 07:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: redundant, unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The person on the left probably is not notable. Superseded by similar view without that person: File:Dom Bosco - State of Minas Gerais, Brazil - panoramio (14).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Cropped. Keep --Insider (talk) 07:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Insider. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
mal prosedimiento de autor al subirlo jose hernandez 21 02:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: We don't delete talk pages. --Yann (talk) 09:20, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
COM:NUDE. Images of a female body. COM:PS#Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Commons is not a porn site
- File:Genital Diversity Expanded.jpg
- File:Vulva 5b.png
- File:Aroused Vulva 4b Clitoris erection.png
- File:Aroused Vulva 3b Clitoris erection.png
- File:Coitus 1b.png
- File:Vulva 2b Mons Venus Mons Pubis.png
- File:Buttocks Anus b.png
- File:Coitus 1a.png
- File:Vulva 1a.png
- File:Female nipple 1a.png
- File:Vulva 1b.png
- File:Female buttocks 1b.png
- File:Female nipple 1b.png
- File:Vulva with vaginal fluid.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 10:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
We are not agree with this deletion request.
- Due to this request, we will immediately stop uploading any other photo. We uploaded them with the aim to illustrate certain concepts that currently lack specific pictures, but notthing more. In this sense, we ask for this evaluation to be done individually regarding each of the files, and not all together as if all of them are usell (Otherwise, most of the images in the following categories would be considered useless and for deletion as well: Category:Human vulvas, Category:Penile-vaginal intercourse, Category:Naked female buttocks, Category:Female nipples, among others).
- Some of the pictures we considered very relevant for educational purposes are:
- Keep We consider relevant for educational and diversity purposes the File:Genital Diversity Expanded.jpg (use here w:Vulva and here es:Vulva), since the previous image (File:Genital Diversity.jpg) nthat illustrates most of vulva articles is composed of 3 images of caucasian women and 1 of a black woman. The imaged we uploaded includes the images of 1 latina women and 1 asian woman, as well as shows one additional genital difference in one of them: arousal.
- Keep We consider relevant for educational purposes the File:Vulva 2b Mons Venus Mons Pubis.png, since there was not any other image that showed explicitly de Mont Pubis in a unshaved female genitalia (use here es:Monte de Venus), the current illustration is a shaved one, with is not only way to see this part of the body.
- Keep We consider relevant for educational purposes the File:Vulva 1b.png since it is currently illustrating in article w:Pubic hair and es:Vello púbico a pubic hair stiling that did not have any image before: "Natural" or "Au naturel"—no trimming and therefore no maintenance.
- Keep We consider relevant for educational purposes the File:Vulva 1a.png since it is currently illustrating in article w:Pubic hair and es:Vello púbico a pubic hair stiling that did not have any image before: "Triangle"—Hair shortened from the sides to form a triangle so that pubic hair cannot be seen while wearing swimwear.
- Keep We consider relevant for educational purposes the File:Vulva with vaginal fluid.jpg since it is a close up image of vaginal fluid and lubritcation in an unshaved genitalia (use here w:Vaginal lubrication), which is not currently illustrated in this way.
- Weak keep We leave open the evaluation of how relevant are they other images. However, we believe the are all relevant as well. And we strongly confirm that we just desired to cooperate with this project. Therefore, we hope the evaluation will we impartial and one case by one case. Thank you in advance.--Coupleabc (talk) 12:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing new here. --E4024 (talk) 12:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This seems like a bad-faith nomination. The images are not porn, and the first one in particular is just a slightly-expanded version of the long-standing lead image in the w:Vulva article on the English Wikipedia. Except for the two coitus ones (which are hard to make out what they are, so not particularly useful) the rest are just anatomical illustrations. Anachronist (talk) 20:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete too terribly /St1995 18:15, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- What sort of a rationale is that?? Anachronist (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
COM:PORN None of these images are in use.
- File:Young woman vulva.jpg
- File:Vagina opening 1b.jpg
- File:Vagina opening 1a.jpg
- File:Aroused Vulva 4b Clitoris erection.png
- File:Aroused Vulva 3b Clitoris erection.png
- File:Buttocks Anus b.png
- File:Female nipple 1a.png
- File:Female buttocks 1b.png
- File:Female nipple 1b.png
—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 19:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Small files without camera EXIF; dubious "own work"s. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 19:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:59, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
mal prosedimiento de autor al sibirlo jose hernandez 21 02:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request, apparently involuntary copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 08:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
According to exif the image is from Picasa. The image is not own work. Possibility of copyvios ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:47, 17 July 2017 (UT
- Keep. Picasa automatically adding this line while someone edit files with this program /St1995 18:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per /St1995. Ruthven (msg) 08:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NicoDIVIDIDOS (talk · contribs)
[edit]According to exif the images are from Picasa they are not own work. No permission. Possibility of copyvios
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion /St1995 18:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per St1995, no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
He is not "Best Model of Turkey 2010". I will explain below. E4024 (talk) 09:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- User:Yusuffeuj claims Yusuf Kuş is "Best Model of Turkey 2010". Here you can see the results of Best Model of Turkey 2010; the name Yusuf (or Joseph) Kuş does not appear wthin the first three male models. His name doesn't give any results other than a personal blog and similar pages. No notability as a model. All the files uploaded by this user are unused personal files and therefore must be deleted. Please note that I don't know how to make mass deletion requests and please take this DR as for all the files of the same user. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 09:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 11:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The Nintendo logo is certainly not licensed CC-BY-SA 4.0 – alternative files with appropriate license tags are easily available from Category:Nintendo logos (e.g. File:Nintendo.svg) El Grafo (talk) 11:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- PD-textlogo, but bad file format. Should be SVG. Yann (talk) 15:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that's my point: we could tag it with PD-textlogo and keep it, but there's really no good reason keeping it around when we have File:Nintendo.svg. --El Grafo (talk) 16:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The Nintendo logo is certainly neither the uploader's own work nor licensed CC-BY-SA 4.0 – alternative files with appropriate license tags are easily available from Category:Nintendo logos (e.g. File:Nintendo.svg) El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- To clarify: we could of course tag it as PD-textlogo and keep it. Question is: do we need/want this png version? --El Grafo (talk) 16:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: The file is in use, hence in scope. Either replace all usage of the file with a superior one, and tag this as superseeded, or find out if ere exists a duplicte of this file, and tag it with Template:Dupe. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused fictional flag, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
“Additional [Hardee] flags from the September 1863 production may have been issued as late as 31 December 1863 to at least the 6th and 7th Florida of Finley’s Brigade and the combined 15th and 37th Tennessee Infantry of Bate’s Brigade…” http://www.confederate-flags.org/confederate%20army%20of%20mississippi-hardee.html
Research conducted and complied by Howard Madaus, Devereaux Cannon, Ken Legendre, Alan Summrall, Richard Rollins, Greg Biggs; all well known and highly regarded vexillologists. Rendering of "6th FL 4th Hardee Pattern" created by me using "PowerPoint", and information from above reference. I have provided documentation of its existence; however, if the "community", can produce references that any of the regiments of the Florida Brigade of the Army of Tennessee did not carry a Hardee pattern regimental color prior to April of 1864, then I will most willingly remove the graphic in question.--Joshua Beschutzer (talk) 00:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no problems in keeping fictional flags. Ruthven (msg) 21:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Quelle: unknown ist eine sinnfreie Angabe. Mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung. Xocolatl (talk) 19:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: "unknown" means that it is not possible to know the author. Here it is identified and died in 1977. So, not PD yet. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Above threshold of originality for copyrighted text (text of the GPL license excluded)? 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 19:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding the text of the GPL license in verbatim form (unchanged), according to https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html "Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed." — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoundupResistance (talk • contribs) 23:36, 18 July 2017 UTC) (UTC)
Kept: per Roundupresitance. --Sanandros (talk) 20:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.
(t) Josve05a (c) 14:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
All of these files have invalid permission, consisting of email correspondence after January 1, 2007 and so are not grandfathered old files. I've tagged a few of them already, but I intend to make an attempt to obtain proper permission and send it through OTRS or simply add it to the Flickr source pages.
- Zeping Yang - https://www.flickr.com/photos/zeping/ Flickr mailed 02:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Nha Le Hoan - https://www.flickr.com/photos/vietnamfriendly/ Flickr mailed 02:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
* Danielle - https://www.flickr.com/photos/habeasbrulee/ Flickr mailed 02:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Asheanar.jpgFixed on Flickr 02:28, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Biggie Mac - https://www.flickr.com/photos/mac99/ Flickr mailed 02:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Aliaghar Honarmand - http://www.flickr.com/photos/honarmand/486329909/ Flickr mailed 02:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Clara Wu - https://www.flickr.com/photos/claracasa/ Flickr mailed 02:36, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- cattoo - https://www.flickr.com/photos/cattoo/ Flickr mailed 02:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Frances Ellen - https://www.flickr.com/photos/francesbean/ Flickr mailed 02:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)- Indo Recipe - http://www.flickr.com/photos/indorecipe/ Flickr mailed 02:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Kahiltna Birchworks - http://www.alaskabirchsyrup.com/
- Kristin Hathaway - http://www.edmundwelles.com/
- Marichelle - https://www.flickr.com/photos/lifeflix/ Flickr mailed 02:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- vintageguitarz - https://www.flickr.com/photos/13379117@N04/ Flickr mailed 02:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- mune67 - http://www.flickr.com/photos/mune67/ Flickr mailed 02:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yawhann Chong - https://www.flickr.com/photos/mugenhan/1286290139/ Flickr mailed 02:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hideous L. C. - http://www.hideous.com/
- Music Maker Relief Foundation - http://www.musicmaker.org/
- Michael Lowenstern - http://www.earspasm.com/
Guanaco (talk) 00:46, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please contribute to our project in a manner that enriches, rather than depletes our content. The usage of all images was fine with the image creators and WP:Stalking is wrong. You wouldn't like it if someone did it to you, but perhaps you are one of those editors who never creates content, only attempts to needlessly remove it for some twisted reason only known to yourself. 173.88.241.33 01:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- Creating peace of mind that all of the images on Commons can be freely and commercially used without fear of legal repercussions, is, in my view, productive. I don't want to lose these files if we can help it, but the Commons copyright policies are in place for good reason. As I said, I'll reach out to these people and try to obtain the proper permission.
- If any of the images I've uploaded have copyright or policy concerns, please nominate them for deletion. I won't be offended. Guanaco (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Do that before you start sending messages to people threatening to delete the images, then. Acting in a humane (rather than inhuman) way goes a long way toward making life something truly worth living. Think about that. 173.88.241.33 02:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete This is an entirely appropriate Deletion Request and all of the files should be deleted if their status cannot be clarified according to our rules. However since some of these files are widely used, we should allow a extra time for that to happen. The remarks above by 173.88.241.33 are completely out of line and if he or she continues to make similar remarks, he or she will be blocked from editing on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Comment: This image File:Yangmei.jpg lacks clear OTRS permission but may I suggest a simple solution? That all its uses ne replaced by this image with secure copyright: File:Morella rubra - Leping, Jiangxi, China 2014.06.15 11-43-07.jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:23, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Related files
[edit]- File:Tilred.jpg, tagged no permission. License grant is from the dog owner, not the photographer. Guanaco (talk) 04:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Jim. The rules that we have, as a community, created, we have created for good reasons. Attempts at carving out exceptions through guilt tripping are unappreciated and unproductive. It would be great if any of the copyright holders respond affirmatively, at which point that can be archived through a {{LicenseReview}} if done by change of license on the source, or via OTRS (if by email) and the files restored. --Storkk (talk) 12:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)