Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 10th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license. Photo from http://www.pravoslavie.ru/96976.html Anaxibia (talk) 09:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{copyvio|source=[1]}} Zy26 (talk) 08:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This file was speedily deleted on 14:48 10 July 2017. (non-admin close) seb26 (talk) 16:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work 2003:45:5C3C:F11C:7C5C:AAE2:D4DC:504 16:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; it's quicker to use {{Copyvio}}. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a website https://www.smilesdental.com.au/implant-supported-dentures/, which is listed as Copyright. In use on uploader's self-promotional user page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 10:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: movie poster -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 10:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Screenshot of non-free content: Movie

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Изображение загружено с неправильной лицензией и описанием Arteless (talk) 07:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Изображение загружено с неправильной лицензией и описанием Arteless (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Картинка была загружена в личных целях и её нужно удалить из-за ненадобности Pplex.vhs (talk) 08:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Картинка была загружена когда у меня не было опыта с лицензиями, и нарушает АП Pplex.vhs (talk) 08:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the unfree album cover. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That is the official photograph, but nothing on the Elysée website or elsewhere says that it is under a Commons-compatible license, so by default it is not. The fr-wp has requested a release of rights with the photographer, but it apparently has not been done yet. Tigraan (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Daphne Lantier: Commons:Deletion requests/File:EMMANUEL-MACRON-PORTRAIT-OFFICIAL.jpg: That is the official photograph, but nothing on the Elysée website or elsewhere says that it is under a Commons-compatible license, so by default it is not. The fr-wp [[:fr:Disc...

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; Unknown location ; No use Civa (talk) 09:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; Unknown location ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 10:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 10:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus, not propably notable people. Htm (talk) 12:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus, not propably notable people. Htm (talk) 12:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus, not propably notable people. Htm (talk) 12:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope. A blurred image of a text. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 11:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake uploaded Famousbaske (talk) 18:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without educational of useful purpose. Possiblement used for autopromotion on Wikipedia. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 09:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones: Commons:Deletion requests/File:IgnacioPurcell.jpg: Image without educational of useful purpose. Possiblement used for autopromotion on Wikipedia. re-uploaded

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information, copyright violation 114.124.200.200 10:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal information, copyright violation 114.124.200.200 10:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:08, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandeep m (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images not of use to Wikipedia.

Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 08:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 09:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 09:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:39, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal selfie - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tagger2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Yann (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tagger2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, probably all copyright violations, COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:20, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selvam HYm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 16 photos whose for 13 of them, the subject is himself and friends

Civa (talk) 08:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selvam HYm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Воркаут164 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos. Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 12:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just personal travel photos?

Stolbovsky (talk) 20:19, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No valid reason. Araz Yaquboğlu encyclopedic person. The name of the files more accurately are as follows:

Cekli829 10:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: They might be useful, but the subject is the uploader and they are not selfies, so the actual photographer owns the copyright and these are copyvios. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos. Maybe not notable persons.

Kulmalukko (talk) 13:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, photos of unsuccessful photos of Moscow, which potentially cannot be used in Wikmedia projects.

Brateevsky {talk} 13:07, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculptures by alive sculptor (Tsereteli). No FoP for scultures in Russia

Stolbovsky (talk) 10:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ozcanulass (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Unused personal and self-promotional images, out of scope. Non-notable painter.

P 1 9 9   13:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trentcpierce (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: text document and diagrams of questionable notability. Used only on user page.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image. acagastya 14:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed 2005 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.travelnostop.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/unpkh_tirrenia.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bowiewagen1979 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings and book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrotic9gerian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Patrotic9gerian. Also per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 05:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrotic9gerian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in meta shows this was in and out of Facebook before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Edjan111

[edit]

Low-quality, unused equations that could be better represented in TeX if needed. --Apocheir (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leominaopiedadjunior34 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads about "Topboss Plastic", it's products and designs without COM:OTRS permission from the company, the figurative materials are COM:COPYVIOs, the entire upload is promotional in nature and Commons is not here to promote businesses.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ファイル名変更のため Kshoony0222 (talk) 03:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission. --Yann (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no permission. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sergio Enrique Martinez Lopez.jpg Sergiowalkerymasseries (talk) 22:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image Σύμμαχος (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly implausible. Image already seen on the web before (e.g. vulture) 92.213.15.186 00:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly implausible. Image already seen on the web before. 92.213.15.186 00:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect attribution - this is not Ms Winfrey's house, it is a B7B building on her estate. See added comments in discussion 2605:E000:D549:7900:AC97:C305:3342:F2B0 00:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Rename}} instead. Daphne Lantier 18:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad license, but possibly public domain. In any case, it's unused and seems out of scope. Guanaco (talk) 01:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG with very bad artifacts, and a possibly questionable license. Unsure if this is in scope; needs review by a German speaker. Guanaco (talk) 01:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FalscheBew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

License requires permission for reuse.

Guanaco (talk) 01:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Eiffel Tower in the 1930s by Henri Baranger

[edit]

Copyright is claimed with a non-free license on these images' description page. They could possibly be public domain but I can't verify this.

Guanaco (talk) 01:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:27, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License may restrict use to Ukranian-language web pages. Guanaco (talk) 01:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nomination is for the old revision only.

The old revision had non-free license terms, then it was overwritten with a higher-quality free image. Guanaco (talk) 01:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: old revision deleted. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free: "The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that he or she has an affiliation with the Gesellschaft für Australienstudien e.V.." Guanaco (talk) 02:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused non-notable logo, out of scope. Guanaco (talk) 02:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is specficially excepted from the terms of use which grant permission to use their content. Guanaco (talk) 02:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, non-notable logo; out of scope. Guanaco (talk) 02:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo; out of scope. Also possibly non-free. Guanaco (talk) 02:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This has been on the internet since 2016. Not own work in 3/17. http://thevikingage.com/2016/02/22/nfl-free-agency-2016-alshon-jeffery-chicago-bears/ EricEnfermero (talk) 03:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, unused in article nor on user page, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a screenshot Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no EDUSE Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azat Sakulyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. No EXIFs but "FBMD" (comes from facebook). Copyvio uploader.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zacariajamesllc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claim of authorship, small size, no related metadata.

— Racconish ☎ 05:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of the 007 logo SchroCat (talk) 05:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

12 copyright violations of stills from different Bond films, all of which are still under relevant copyright SchroCat (talk) 05:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

typo in template description Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with the current amount of information. Castillo blanco (talk) 06:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per E4024. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 06:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imprecise source, no proper author, no proove that the image is CC0 Magnus (talk) 07:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imprecise source, no proper author, no proove that the image is CC0 Magnus (talk) 07:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imprecise source, no proper author, no proove that the image is CC0 Magnus (talk) 07:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified location in the Louvre. Unknown photos. Collection of what ? It is even doubtful that this photo was taken in the Louvre, because in the Louvre, there are paintings, sculptures, furniture but not photos. So, no encyclopedic value. Civa (talk) 07:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description explicitly says that it comes from "Exhibition magazine of the German Shepard," no author SilverbackNettalk 07:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

people without permission Webysther (talk) 07:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

people without permission Webysther (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is up-to-date and does not reflect the correct reality Jemmyx (talk) 08:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smbaker79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 6 photos whose for 4 of them the subject is himself and family.

Civa (talk) 08:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons and copy vio Webysther (talk) 08:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons and copy vio Webysther (talk) 08:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, no permission mentionned, please look at http://www.leprogres.fr/lyon/2017/07/02/un-courant-nouveau-apparait Do not follow (talk) 08:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons and copy vio Webysther (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons and copy vio Webysther (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons and copy vio Webysther (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate to higher resolution File:Wolfgang-welsch.jpg Joschi71 (talk) 08:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same pic in IMDb. Own work? E4024 (talk) 08:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is copyrighted promo artwork for a TV series but is wrongly marked as "Own work." Hammill Ten (talk) 08:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Удаляю чтобы загрузить на рувики и поставить копирайт Pplex.vhs (talk) 08:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - there is no freedom of panorama in Russia for monuments Pplex.vhs (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Основной элемент изображения - логотип под копирайтом Pplex.vhs (talk) 08:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons and no people permission Webysther (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 09:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement and promotional photo Civa (talk) 09:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; Unknown location ; No use Civa (talk) 09:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image Dad and daughter... ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 09:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used on different web pages, e.g. http://villaalferes.com.br/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/thumb/Produ%C3%A7%C3%A3oVillaalferes_Abril2015_TiradentesMG%20%28113%29.jpg No permission. Wdwd (talk) 09:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without a educational of useful purpose. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 09:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mountaflou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims. Some of these may be old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source, authorship and publication details are required to determine that. Note that the dates provided are not reliable either.

LX (talk, contribs) 09:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 09:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 10:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep illustrative portrait, pro quality. -- (talk) 10:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 10:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 10:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 10:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yesterday I uploaded a set of photographs of Sonidos Líquidos 2017 but, in the process, I realized that I have upload a photograph duplicated. I try to delete in the UploadWizard but when I click the button it doesn't work. The "correct" file is Entrada del Festival de Música Sonidos Líquidos 2017.jpg. I say the "correct" because I fill the description fine, it's the difference, because the photographs are the same. Ivanhercaz (talk) 10:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of unknown people. Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal selfie - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:L for Laboratories Redefining GLAM by partnering with a medical school.pdf, already uploaded two years ago by the same user Netha Hussain (talk) 10:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 20:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 15:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 10:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 10:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly third party film poster art, Equivalent mediat at English Wikipedia under non-free fair use w:File:Kickboxer poster.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily, blatant copyvio from sockpuppet of blocked user. --Storkk (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Ciacho5 (talk) 10:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OK, so first of all the uploader is not a copyright holder. The question is, whether this is below the treshold of originality, so PD could be applicable. In my opinion not really, as it represents pretty complex design, brush-like line drawing, and shapes beyond simple geometrical figures. Therefore I'd delete it. Masur (talk) 10:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Poyekhali as no permission (No permission since)

This file is probably a copyvio. Also, this photo seems to be used for trolling (in fact this has been in Philippine local news). Poyekhali 11:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nach Rücksprache mit dem Urheber muss die Inventarnummer Gelöscht werden BlümchenXY (talk) 12:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The dog is hardly seen. No educational contribution. We have better pics. E4024 (talk) 12:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. There is almost identical image: File:Moscow, Tulskaya - panoramio (21).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.elcinema.com/person/1064523/gallery/123528465 E4024 (talk) 13:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal pic. OoS E4024 (talk) 13:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image - out of scope Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 13:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 2000. No Permission.

See also:

See also: No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created after 1980. No Permission.

Микола Василечко (talk) 13:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know if the bishop has any notability. E4024 (talk) 13:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucas Louis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Look like TV screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by X RaaM x (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/633025244.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DQMrMoney (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cs272.vk.me/u4183752/46777767/x_0e0801c1.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Delton Melgarejo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo, painting and coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://milashak.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/milalouboutins-768x1024.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perazzi thar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://dc-cdn.s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/dc-Cover-vo9fccp1fjkvqr3bbvdjm2j7q3-20160718202216.Medi.jpeg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and nature of the photo. LX (talk, contribs) 14:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo marked with Purepeople copyright tag, license not explained Ytoyoda (talk) 18:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 04:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:18, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted (again). --P 1 9 9   01:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BLM Flickr Marmot Dam Set

[edit]

Automatic bot upload from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management Flickr stream. I am nominating some files from this set for deletion because of low quality: they are blurry, out of focus, awkward to the point of being useless, or contain no content of potential educational value. If you need a bad snapshot of people halfheartedly digging holes in a forest, we have a good supply. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, random photos from BLM set; not educational. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same [2] Pitpisit (talk) 23:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same [3] Pitpisit (talk) 23:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no relevance to commons Webysther (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 楊過007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely user's own work, low resolution and missing EXIF data

NinjaStrikers «» 14:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - not likely own work. Some photos are grabbed from facebook.

These photos may meet criteria for speedy deletion for obvious copyright violations. Phyo WP (message) 07:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image acagastya 14:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published agency photo, even if the uploader is the photographer, requires evidence of permission Ytoyoda (talk) 15:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

football crest, not a free file. Danyele (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In order to have a photo of yourself as a Wikipedia contributor, you have to contribute more than one copyvio and one over edited school picture with your name on it. Out of COM:SCOPE as only contributions from editor. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, from panoramio. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of no apparent notability Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this sepia toned image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate to File:Figurenbildstöcke und Pavillion, Mariengasse 12, Statue 2 .jpg Liberaler Humanist (talk) 15:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of a shaggy haired man in front of a projected image without copyright release. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a room ful of the backs of people's heads. Not educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of the posters next to which this group shot was taken. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a poster, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of posters from event. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, third party logo of a non-trival nature, equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:2019 Rugby World Cup (logo).svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free logo from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:35, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There appears to be no educational purpose for this image, of which nearly 1/5th is the side of someone's head and ear. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, third party logo equivalent at English Wikipedia non-free w:File:Spacetoon logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:38, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata indicates that GNA University asserts copyright. The photographer can't therefore release the image that they don't own. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found the user's other uploads were all copied from the internet. There is no reason to believe this is an exception. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HSD-Pressestelle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of "own work" on these images which appear to be collected from a Company Website, and/or to have been uploaded here for promotional purposes. Three photos by one camera, one each by two other cameras and one photo without any metadata at all.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BOA-WEB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotionalism. Notice the account name, the four copies of a logo and one photo of a man, copied from http://www.baltagroup.com/media/img/pics/_original/Tom-Debusschere-CEO-120717_3.jpg.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a photo foung on the Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by کیان.حسینی3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unattributed collages between the background images and the person's face that has been superimposed on the background.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khajek1980xxx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious fan gallery, not own work, images too small, without metadata and of a "celebrity".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User did not create the book, there is not enough information to know what to do about the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MARVEL COMICS copyright Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use on April 17 of 2017 at http://общество-хирургов.рф/publikaci/obraschenie-glavnogo-hirurga-departamenta-zdravohranenija-moskvy.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In use prior to this upload at http://mosgorzdrav.ru/ru-RU/staff/default/card/14.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unattributed collage, in use on a use page which seems to imply they're a bot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image out of COM:SCOPE. This would be a great facebook picture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this watermarked image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm able to demonstrate that this image is mine, I have the one without the publisher logo. Maybe shall I upload it? Please help me in creating my first wikipage correctly. Lamichael83


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of two images of a Toy, including packaging. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not appear to be own work but rephotographed from somewhere with glass on top. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be swiped from Facebook, see size, quality, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 2016, no permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I find a copyright notice on the source page, despite the claim of a 4.0 license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Turns out to be the Facebook Logo of the band depicted, Obviously not own work, photo taken by Robin Hinsch. See https://www.facebook.com/pg/leonidenleoniden/photos/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map, and accompanying images (PDF file) are not own work of uploader, but copied from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is obviously a photo of something, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nhật Tường (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://mblogthumb3.phinf.naver.net/20150804_242/parangbi__1438656743810aDh8L_JPEG/%C2%B1%C3%83%C3%81%C3%9F%C3%80%C3%9C%C3%88%C2%A4%C2%BB%C3%A78.jpg?type=w2.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nhật Tường (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Speedy requested Images of United Kingdom royalty are highly unlikely to be own work of this uploader as they include images which are easily recognized as popular images of the family.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jérémie Le Louët (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images appear to be from http://www.dramaticules.fr/spectacle/affreux-betes-et-pedants/photos

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work looks like a video game capture (also extremely small surrounded by LOTS of white space). Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems highly unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of base map Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of basemap Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With overprinting, obviously not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PRP. User's other uploads were culled from a variety of internet sources, no reason to believe this one is own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Abkhazia.svg Mahir256 (talk) 16:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of own work on this old photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this old photo of a priest. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free image, taken from source given Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shows artwork without permission of artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously from some sort of TV show, and not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Television Show promo... not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Television Show promo... not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, not useful. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Foto Joan Solé), without permission from that person. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VIKAS INSAF PARTY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work, looks like promotionalism.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photographie de Vincent Mercier" with no permision from Mr. Mercier. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy requested More promotionalism, complete with address for contact, this time for a tax prep service. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy requested more promotionalism from tax preparation company. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

either out of scope or a copyright violation, or both. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused terrible quality, facebook sized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE shows the butt end of some guy, not flattering and not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, unlikely to ever be considered educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work, title from facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another unused personal image, this one with additional problems of the images on the display board and the pink tee shirt. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-educational image of someone sticking a mic in someone else's face. Not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A very large painting, but without the COM:OTRS permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Ismael montano~commonswiki

[edit]

Unused, low-quality (downright eye-searing) images of triangles. We have much better pictures of triangles available. --Apocheir (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the heirs of Михайлов, Алексей Сергеевич, who died in 1993. The PD-RU-exempt does not wash away his copyright. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the authors of the drawings/paintings, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : DR started to verify claimed 'own work since there are no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for the base map, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : as per File:Water and sky.jpg, DR started to verify claimed 'own work since there are no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is so bad, that nobody could possibly see what this is supposed to be. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : as per File:Water and sky.jpg, DR started to verify claimed 'own work since there are no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is so bad, that nobody could possibly see what this is supposed to be. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : as per File:Water and sky.jpg, DR started to verify claimed 'own work since there are no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looking to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

use of Wikipedia to promotion of non relevant local politician. Stegop (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:33, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, too small, gif-file; meanwhile replaced by new upload: File:Luserke martin krake zk 14–grundriss.jpg Miraculamundi (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The performer asked me (the photographer) not to use this photo and delete from all the sources; it has been deleted from my flickr archive Dany kruk (talk) 18:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The performer asked me (the photographer) not to use this photo and delete from all the sources; it has been deleted from my flickr archive Dany kruk (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The performer asked me (the photographer) not to use this photo and delete from all the sources; it has been deleted from my flickr archive Dany kruk (talk) 18:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC) Dany kruk (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The performer asked me (the photographer) not to use this photo and delete from all the sources; it has been deleted from my flickr archive Dany kruk (talk) 09:04, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and/or autopromo, along with File:Iç kapak foto.jpg Pibwl (talk) 18:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful copyright for each photo, no apparent notability, unused Pibwl (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1.source URL is dead 2.authorship unconfirmed Igor Kercsa (talk) 18:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private persons, lack of quality 1rhb (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de téléversement : logo, donc à faire sur Wikipedia et non Wikimedia Ranndiniv.7(t) 19:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

joke? no educational value, not used Avron (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Almost identical image is File:Lisboa 20170508 204117 (34697200671).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a scan, no metadata, very poor quality, uploaded by Stephen5300 (no other contribution) 2A01:E35:2F56:26F0:204A:AB14:B29A:6265 11:14, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The uploader said it was his/her own work. It doesn't appear to be a scan to me and the quality is not bad compared to lots of other Commons photos of concerts. Absence of metadata doesn't prove much. -- WikiPedant (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per WikiPedant. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of photo found here: http://b96.cbslocal.com/photo-galleries/2016/06/28/ariana-grande-is-dangerous-at-the-b96-pepsi-summer-bash/. While the photo here is larger (albeit also grainier) than the one at cbslocal.com, the uncropped photo appears at the site of the concert promoter and predates the Commons upload. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says "Copyright: Robert Doherty", no explanation given for the "own work" claim Ytoyoda (talk) 19:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, maybe not notable persons. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is of no educational value and was uploaded for self promotion. See [8] and previous AfDs for discussion. GretLomborg (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kharat rohan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion.

Cjp24 (talk) 19:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

posible violación del copyright http://elarmariodemama.com/estilos-moda/ Tarawa 19:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This diagram of the symmetry of shapes is incorrect, confusing, low-quality, and unused. Apocheir (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statues of copyrighted characters, unlikely freedom of panorama. UAwiki (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded a similar image File:Arheo Museum of Macedonia (22).JPG, which is shaper. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 20:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemically incorrect. Per en:Asymmetric_Keck_allylation#Improvements, the intended structure has two binols, not one binol and one monodentate naphthalene. And OiPr is surely a monomeric dentate (there might be two of them, but each bonded to Ti on its own) DMacks (talk) 20:47, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unknown and unnamed person Pibwl (talk) 20:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and/or autopromo Pibwl (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (small size, bad MOS for the "R" and "S" identifier text), replaceable by File:R+S-BINOL.png DMacks (talk) 20:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred. Superseded by a sharper image: File:Bista na ulazu u Prirodoslovni muzej.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by a bit sharper image: File:Grob Oca domovine.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical mistake (R1 got lost in product), MOS mistakes (should be superscripts not subscripts for R1/R2, several typography mistakes for CH2Cl2, bond angle variations, small overall). Have [:[File:Allyl-tin allylation reaction.png]] as high quality image for generic allylation, which was the use-case of this image DMacks (talk) 21:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ya existe una versión de este archivo Yo, Ansunando (talk) 21:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a copy of en:File:WikiShia logo.png which is tagged as non-free. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and heavily blurred Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and heavily blurred Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio e.g. https://www.instagram.com/p/BP_02QGh-gx/?taken-by=vishka.asayesh says nothing about CC license 92.72.195.197 21:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, full image e.g. at http://midanam.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Vishka-Asayesh-13-600x600.jpg 92.72.195.197 21:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred and unused Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown snake, out of focus, unused file Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also out of scope. Jcb (talk) 21:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 22:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture 141.196.197.42 22:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimi dev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 22:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimi dev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I see no educational value in this closeup photos of keyboards, out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press image of film distributor: http://www.thefilmcollaborative.org/films/thefabulousallancarr 92.72.195.197 22:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of user account in VK.com. Fake license, as the photo of this person does not belong to the uploader. 94.25.228.0 18:45, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if the photographer really put his image under CC, the poster is copyrighted and this is definitely no de minimis. 92.72.195.197 22:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a copyrighted Google app! Ras67 (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of   (uexv-LSHI2r) Rowan03 (talk) 22:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of   (uv-LSHI2r) Rowan03 (talk) 22:41, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same advertisement or book. Pitpisit (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

newspaper scan Pitpisit (talk) 22:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, unused, unrecognizable animal Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think that website is copyright. Pitpisit (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred, unused, unrecognizable species Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred and unused Rupert Pupkin (talk) 23:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama under French law per Commons:Freedom of panorama and I don't see any indication that New Caledonia would be an exception to the general rule Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama under French law per Commons:Freedom of panorama and I don't see any indication that New Caledonia would be an exception to the general rule Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama under French law per Commons:Freedom of panorama and I don't see any indication that New Caledonia would be an exception to the general rule Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:57, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama under French law per Commons:Freedom of panorama and I don't see any indication that New Caledonia would be an exception to the general rule Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Loi n°2016-1321 du 7 octobre 2016 pour une République numérique, article 39 : "Les reproductions et représentations d'œuvres architecturales et de sculptures, placées en permanence sur la voie publique, réalisées par des personnes physiques, à l'exclusion de tout usage à caractère commercial." No commercial use here, this photo was made and uploaded by a "physical person" (Roman.b), and this is an "architectural work permanently placed on a public way". --Tharkun (talk) 10:04, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Non commercial use is not sufficient. The poster is obviously not de minimis. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC license appears to be invalid: no evidence that Photobucket freely licensed this placeholder image. RJaguar3 (talk) 01:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's impossible to find evendence for license, please let me know further about this. ThanksJoeleoj123 (talk) 06:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, another thing is that ALL images that links to photobucket are replaced with this image of the photobucket account wasn't upgraded, so I don't think they would copyright this.Joeleoj123 (talk) 04:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is it to be copyrighted here? It's just a basic information provided in a square with a very basic image of gauge, most likely the most frequent single image on the internet right now. It's practically in public domain put by Photobucket. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 21:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Practically in PD isn't good enough on Commons. Above Com:TOO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es violento Sergiowalkerymasseries (talk) 02:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos. Maybe not notable persons.

Kulmalukko (talk) 12:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Such deletion requests are currently rather pointless. The bot usually reloads the deleted image within a few days under a different name. Discussions are futile (example). It is better to wait until Panoramio and the bot will stop working in November. Until then, the images should be collected in appropriate categories. Hystrix (talk) 22:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 110, 81, 111, 110, 122 deleted -> out of scope. other files already deleted,. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope because of very low quality 12prophets (talk) 12:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Previously kept twice at Commons:Deletion requests/File:1939 World fair nude exhibition.png. I don't see any new arguments for deletion here. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now in scope. Thanks Insider!. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader did not create ticket depicted, no permission from actual creator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is true. I still have the ticket and only made a photo of it. I thought it would interesting to see a ticket from the 1980's with pesetas. If there are real problems with a copyright, the file may be deleted.--Ion Tichy (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another aspect: is there any relevant depth of added value? This not a piece of art but a ticket only. And there is no loss for the issuer of the ticket as it it already used. Please consider this aspect. --Ion Tichy (talk) 07:58, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Com:DW, copyvio. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MusicVisualisation (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these images are claimed to be "from own blog", but there is no permission from the blog-creator.

Also, there is an issue with COM:SCOPE here as all this appears to be promotionalism for "World Music Visualization" etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As image creator, I gave explicit permission to use the images. That permission is entirely sufficient: use of the images on the referenced blog is entirely incidental.

I acknowledge that the wording 'from own blog' was unfortunate. I am happy to delete all references to the blog.

Music visualization (simulation) is an emerging field of data visualization. The blog references an open-source, non-profit world music visualization aggregator platform with application across the entire field. As a potentially major' cross-cultural innovation, it was referenced in the spirit of open source work.

The images are destined for use in Wikipedia to help explain and disambiguate music visualization as a topic. Current definitions reflect only part of the story. Recent advances beg a further definition. Without this imagery, that task is made considerably more difficult. The existing definition has images. So too should the new, disambiguated definition.

Wikimedia references content relating to past and current projects in music visualization. I see no difference with emerging ideas. If Wikimedia can host images relating to Mars colonization, why not music visualization? Both have vast exploration and innovation potential.


Deleted: Not clear why this should be IN scope. Up and coming doesn't mean in scope.. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:35, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dan Nicolae 77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on these screenshots, copied logos and portraits.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
I am new to this, but I just wanted to tell you that all the multimedia stuff that you want to delete is original - part of the Romanian Baseball Federation and US Embassy in Romania project to promote baseball
All these pictures are copyright protected
If there is a way of accepting this, please tell me
Thank you for your feedback
All the best! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Nicolae 77 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Dan_Nicolae_77 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Nicolae 77 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I moved the comment above from Commons:Village pump to this page. Any further comments should be made here, as already instructed. LX (talk, contribs) 11:49, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio, grabbed from the web. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is look like screenshot from tv. Sakhalinio (talk) 20:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

include
  •  Keep We cannot delete a file, especially one that is used in many projects, with a claim such as "it is look like screenshot from tv". If you have a more sound reason expose it; if not, please do not destroy WP for reasons I ignore. --E4024 (talk) 07:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: clearly screenshots. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:PACKAGING Daphne Lantier 21:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:39, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LX as no permission (No permission since) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should be PD / CoA IMHO. @Fry1989: --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The {{Norwegian coat of arms}} license would apply for the arms. The rest is text. Odd font, but still text. Fry1989 eh? 17:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Hedwig and Fry. Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 13:01, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Publicity photo of musician Louis Cottrell, Jr., 1974, United States.

Permission details

PD-PRE1978.

The photo has no copyright markings on it as can be seen above. United States Copyright Office page 2 "Visually Perceptible Copies The notice for visually perceptible copies should contain all three elements described below. They should appear together or in close proximity on the copies. 1 The symbol © (letter C in a circle); the word “Copyright”; or the abbreviation “Copr.” 2 The year of first publication. If the work is a derivative work or a compilation incorporating previously published material, the year date of first publication of the derivative work or compilation is sufficient. Examples of derivative works are translations or dramatizations; an example of a compilation is an anthology. The year may be omitted when a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work, with accompanying textual matter, if any, is reproduced in or on greeting cards, postcards, stationery, jewelry, dolls, toys, or useful articles. 3 The name of the copyright owner, an abbreviation by which the name can be recognized, or a generally known alternative designation of owner.1 Example © 2007 Jane Doe.")


Deleted: Marked as Own work, no really information about the date and the copyright status, wich remains in doubt. Ruthven (msg) 09:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was in use from April 2016 (prior to this upload) at http://archive.fo/vfaU9. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das liegt daran, dass das meine Webseite war. Ich hab' sie aufgelöst und die Info und das Bild in die Wikipedia-Seite eingearbeitet. Es gibt also keine Copyright-Verletzung. --Mepherl (talk) 19:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ellin Beltz, I somehow missed that this page is run in English. This was my website, which I closed and subsequently moved to Wikipedia. So in this case I am the photographer. --Mepherl (talk) 11:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: GF supposing here. Ruthven (msg) 09:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mepherl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This nomination is based only on licenses given these works, some/all of which may be old enough to be kept, but are not "own work" of uploader. COM:EVID requires the uploader to provide proper information and license information. Uploader is aware of how to put on OLD licenses, as several of their other uploads are correctly licensed.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it seems as if I misunderstood the license-thing. Those were all taken with my camera, so the photograph is my artwork. In addition to that they are all out of copyright. So it should not be deleted but the license changed to something more appropriate. --Mepherl (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Mepherl, but it's the uploader who needs to provide the authors, their life dates and the sources of the images. No one else knows. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry for doing it wrong. But how can you know who does the cover of a book? Most images in question are covers of books and I always stated where they first appeared. --Mepherl (talk) 18:54, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Mepherl One example: "Deutsch: Titelblatt der Erstausgabe

Date 14 July 2016 Source Own work Author Mepherl" . The work doesn't date from 2016, it needs the date of publication, the Author, the publishing house and a proper license. It may be old enough to keep due to being out of copyright for age, but we don't know that. You're the only one who can provide that information. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:09, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ellin Beltz As those informations are all visible on the image I thought I would not have to repeat them. But I will try to go through the files now. --Mepherl (talk) 11:26, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the files in PD. Deleted the others. Ruthven (msg) 09:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Club founded 1945, could be PD by age. Could be also considered PD-CoA? @Fry1989: --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Logo may be created recently. But it may be just slightly modified city coat of arms. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As it is a football club and not an organ of the state, I think only age licenses would apply. But it does use a variation of File:POL Gliwice COA.svg, so maybe? Fry1989 eh? 17:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:PCP. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obs.: I found several uncategorized Minecraft related screenshots etc. which I categorized in this category after iniciating this DR. Please evaluate these files too. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)

Logos
Screenshots
Derivative works of Minecraft textures

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

All real buildings have copyrights, until they expire. In many countries, Commons photographs are permitted by laws which specifically exempt the photographs from being derivative works, see COM:FOP. However, that is a bad analogy. Think, instead, of drawings of real buildings, including both the architectural drawings used to construct them, renderings used to show them before construction, and post construction drawings. All of them have copyrights and you will not see them on Commons without a specific license from the creator.
The brick maker cannot sue because bricks aren't copyrighted, but the architect can sue a photographer in many countries (those with no FOP law) and can sue someone who copies his drawings in every country.
Copyright law is not stupid. If it were not for copyright laws, few people would go to the effort of writing books or creating sculptures, because they could not earn money for doing it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, you are wrong. As I noted above, there are explicit exemptions in some countries for photographs of actual buildings. Minecraft is not buildings. Your Disney block creation would be a sculpture. In any event, with limited exceptions which don't apply here, every created work has a copyright. While there are exceptions for actual buildings (and other things) in some countries, any other copy of such a work is a copyvio. Since no exception applies to computer generated works anywhere, this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]



Let's start from scratch. There is nothing international about this -- it is all US law and Commons rules. One of two things is true. Either:
  • You drew these completely from your own mind with no reference to anything on Minecraft, or
  • These are derived from or use images or parts of images from Minecraft.
In the first case, they are your personal creations and we do not keep personal art from non-notable artists, see COM:SCOPE.
In the second case, your images are derivative works of the copyrighted work of other people and therefore must be deleted as copyvios.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.

Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than "Other stuff doesn't exist", do you have a policy-based reason for deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:L. Screenshots of a non-free video game (COM:SS). Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What part of File:Discobeat Skin.png is Mojang's IP? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch on that one, I would've said the background but it doesn't appear to be Mojang's textures. However, we still can't be sure whether the background is freely licensed. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the personal player model skin used by the uploader. From the publicly available logs at de.wp it appears that this may have been used for a self-promotional article that was deleted speedily – which raises the additional question of COM:SCOPE. --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment maybe a warning message equivalent to {{NoUploads}} might help to keep new uploads to the category down a little bit? --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Skin de Diamantum576.jpg has a watermark from novaskin.me/wallpapers, a page that seems to provide a functionality where you can place your own player skin into a pre-made wallpaper. They use CC-BY-SA-NC as a license for their stuff, so even if the background image was their own (which I'm tempted to doubt based on the other clearly non-free stuff they use) we can't keep it. --El Grafo (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:The Feed The Beast Launcher.png seems to show a separate software called Feed The Beast Launcher, which is licensed {{Apache}}. The screenshot shows logos for different Minecraft modpacks which might not be part of that license, however. Don't know if these might qualify for COM:De minimis/{{De minimis}}? --El Grafo (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the page to show the Apache license, rather than the CC-own work claim. Checking the Feed the Beast modpack list the modpacks included in the screenshot are All Rights Reserved, which I would assume includes the logo too. I'm not too sure about de minimis either, especially since one of the logos cover a decent amount of the image, but in the worst case the logos could be edited out in order to keep the image. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'd like to point out that the three which are struck out and stated to be "in use" are likely all COM:COPYVIOs as they are COM:DW of copyrighted game "Minecraft". A copyvio "in use" does not become ineligible to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The last one (File:Tinkers Construct smeltery.png) is fine, I think: It doesn't contain anything from the original game, everything displayed comes from the Tinkers Construct mod which has a free license. --El Grafo (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (Edit conflict) Not all of these files were nominated as copyright violations, some were also nominated as out of scope.
-Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The head of the skin appears to me to be a derivative of the Pig that appears in Minecraft, and I'd also imagine there was some issue with the Spider-Man uniform too. Either way, out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.

Copyright violations
Out of scope

--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voglio farti notare che la dichiarazione sulla immagine File:Herobrine skin ver. mod.png, non è esatta, non risulta nessuna copyright della Mojang su questo personaggi perché il personaggio è stato creato dalla comunità di Minecraft, inoltre l’immagine non deriva dal videogioco e stata realizzata dall’autore che la pubblicata, soprattutto il personaggio è una creepy-pasta ispirato a Minecraft. Inoltre Notch ha più volte dichiarato che il personaggio non esiste nel videogioco. Per tanto Mojang non ha mai avuto copyright sul questo personaggio immaginario. Qualsiasi riferimento della Mojang su Herobrine e solamente uno scherzò che fa alla comunità. Inoltre dire che l’immagine e derivato della skin del giocatore predefinito di Minecraft, ti poso dire che è deriva solo dalle abilità del autore della immagine che la realizzato in SVG e poi la salvato su http://minecraft.gamepedia.com in formato PNG.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 08:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter whether Mojang claim ownership or acknowledge the character, as this representation of it was made by modifying Minecraft textres. The Herobrine skin is clearly a derivative work of the Steve skin. Making minor modifications by colouring the eyes white and adding a smile does not mean that the editor now owns rights to the skin, thus they are not able to release the image under a free license. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Additonally, even if it were the sole authorship of the uploader on Gamepedia, the image is only licensed CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The source has no mention of the GDFL license that you claimed when uploading the file. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Su questo ti posso dare una spiegazione, essendo che non esiste il Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) o perché non sono riuscito a trovarlo (probabilmente e stato nominato sotto un altro nome). Ho caricato immagine sotto la licenza che l’autore mia detto che era adeguata. Se mi stai dicendo che l’immagine come il colore della pelle e legata al copyright, l’immagine e composta da geometria semplice e colori che formano l’immagine non possono essere considerati come materiale protetto da copyright perché comuni a tutti, Non supera quindi la soglia di originalità. Inoltre cito il trademark.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


As the creator of File:Flag of Satigris.svg I do not object to its deletion. I don't even remember why I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, to be honest. Bowwow828 (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations

Out of scope

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Herobrine.png

Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go.

This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none.  Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]