Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/05/10
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
The file would be a candidate for speedy deletion per "8. Exact or scaled-down duplicate" if File:Marinus van Reymerswale - The Banker and His Wife - WGA19323.jpg wasn't the newer file. Obviously they come from an identical source. The size is somewhat different, but the pixel counts are identical. This file comes from a more dubious source and even had an obviously wrong description (that I changed), that's why I propose to delete this file, not File:Marinus van Reymerswale - The Banker and His Wife - WGA19323.jpg. Marsupium (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate processed. Daphne Lantier 05:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
not needed Jan Paweł II (talk) 07:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, user's request in own nameroom. User is indefinitely blocked for vandalistic uploads and all uploads are now deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Please kill this datas. The correct file is here: File:Zeichen 141 - Tiere (spiegelbildlich), StVO 1970.svg Mediatus (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
A collage of present-day and historical photos from http://retromap.ru/show_pid.php?pid=52728 -> not "own work". Retired electrician (talk) 09:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The subject is copyrighted. acagastya 📷 21:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The subject is copyrighted. acagastya 📷 21:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The subject is copyrighted. acagastya 📷 21:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France + subject is copyrighted. acagastya 📷 21:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Old building, there is no need for FoP in this case. Culex (talk) 09:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The subject is copyrighted against de minimis. acagastya 📷 21:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The subject is copyrighted against de minimis. acagastya 📷 21:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Subject is copyrighted against de minimis. acagastya 📷 21:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:10, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The subject is copyrighted against de minimis. acagastya 📷 21:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted subject. acagastya 📷 21:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted subject. acagastya 📷 21:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Subject is copyrighted against de minimis. acagastya 📷 21:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
no educational value -- vacation pic Daphne Lantier 22:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I didn't fully understand the math involved. This image is useless and possibly misleading. SharkD Talk 18:42, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
page without sense: vandalism or mistake Paperoastro (talk) 10:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Test page or page with no valid content. --Achim (talk) 17:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope (unused personal picture) Commons is not a social media. ·×ald·es 05:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Page is out of project scope
Likely scan of a magazine or book. Also likely violates the artist's rights. Storkk (talk) 09:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE Storkk (talk) 09:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Pornographic image, from a uploader whose other uploads were all porn taken from the internet. This one does not appear in image searches, but is almost certainly a copyvio. - Reventtalk 12:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Protest gegen Putins Vorgehen auf der Krim, Moskau, 15. März 2014 212.88.148.226 15:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Die Bezeichnung der Datei lautet: Protest gegen Putins Vorgehen auf der Krim, Moskau, 15. März 2014 212.88.148.226 15:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Das Foto ist von 2013 und enthält mehr russische Symphatisanten als ukrainische (Anzahl Flaggen) Außerdem ist die Bezeichnung:Protest gegen Putins Vorgehen auf der Krim, Moskau, 15. März 2014..Bitte diese falschen Informationen löschen 212.88.148.226 15:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- I hope I got the reason right, so my answer is similar this [1]. dhārmikatva 16:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Incorrect metadata can be fixed. That's no reason to delete the image, though. clpo13(talk) 16:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 06:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio: photographic reproduction of a work (completed 1972) by en:w:Abul A'la Maududi, who died in 1979, so still far from PD-70 and -50. Pakistan uses PD-50, according to Template:PD-Pakistan. HyperGaruda (talk) 18:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @HyperGaruda: Book belongs to Maududi. I will upload better version of image, and i purchase this book. BukhariSaeed (talk) 18:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @BukhariSaeed: No, you are not allowed to photocopy other people's books in any way unless, in Pakistan's case, the book's author died more than 50 years ago; see Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Pakistan. --HyperGaruda (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- What should I do? How do I save it from deletion?..BukhariSaeed (talk) 19:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @BukhariSaeed: No, you are not allowed to photocopy other people's books in any way unless, in Pakistan's case, the book's author died more than 50 years ago; see Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Pakistan. --HyperGaruda (talk) 19:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chetan K Singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal content. Please see our project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope: description states that this file is a self-portrait made in Microsoft Paint. ·×ald·es 05:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
No usage, out of scope: Commons is not a social media. ·×ald·es 05:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
No usage and out of scope. Commons is not a social media. ·×ald·es 05:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
No usage and out of scope. Commons is not a social media. ·×ald·es 05:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Bank account screenshot? ·×ald·es 05:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of project scope. ·×ald·es 05:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep judging from several of your out of scope nominations, you don't understand what our scope is. File was nominated and kept before. Multichill (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:49, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. Additional likely copyright issues: photographer should confirm license via OTRS if the photo is indeed in scope. Storkk (talk) 09:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo: out of scope Storkk (talk) 09:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Contains copyrighted material Oppashi talk 13:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. The photo of the Kim Jong-un is certainly a copyright violation. BabelStone (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 20:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository TJH2018talk 17:54, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. TJH2018talk 17:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; used on promotional userpage on en.wiki. TJH2018talk 18:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamaarishkhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:09, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:10, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Temoorkhatti (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
- File:Temoor Khatti.jpg
- File:Mohammad Siraj Khatti.jpg
- File:Shafiq ur rehman khatti.jpg
- File:Abdul Haseeb Khatti.jpg
- File:Abdul Rehman Khatti.jpg
Daphne Lantier 21:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:51, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdurrahmanbysln (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abeltoure25 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
- File:Abel toure 5.jpg
- File:Abel toure 4.jpg
- File:Abel toure 3.jpg
- File:Abel toure 2.jpg
- File:Abel toure 1.jpg
- File:Abel toure.jpg
Daphne Lantier 22:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abinash1a1panda (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 22:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. (Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
This is a personal essay that appears to be for a Spanish-language high school class; it's out-of-COM:SCOPE and should be deleted as such. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:31, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Unidentified essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Personal image? Missvain (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 16:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
This is a very low resolution image with nothing special in comparison to other better images of Rottweilers that we have. Not in use and unlikely to be in future. Rahul Bott (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal picture, out of scope. ·×ald·es 04:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Advertisement; no use; Commons is not an advertisement website. SimmeD (talk) 08:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of COM:SCOPE Pippobuono (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
No usage and out of COM:SCOPE. This is not a social media. ·×ald·es 17:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:20, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository; used on promotional article on en.wiki. TJH2018talk 18:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:21, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Picture used as a profile pic on social media (example), and on this copyrighted website http://qgdesartistes.fr/victor-gingembre/ - No OTRS authorization - Titlutin (talk) 20:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Playstation3ps3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from book.
- File:Merci acdqqq.jpeg
- File:Merci acd.jpeg
- File:Merci ac.jpeg
- File:Merci a.jpeg
- File:Merci.jpeg
- File:Mntg.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Playstation3ps3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
no educational value Daphne Lantier 21:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Syedrahathasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 22:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I was myself going to nom these for deletion. --Saqib (talk) 13:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
no educational value -- low quality image with watermark in the middle Daphne Lantier 22:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 21:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 05:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Sculpture "Kihlaus / Engagement" by Dennis Oppenheim [3], unveiled in 2000. No FOP in Finland for sculptures. Oppenheim died in 2011, so this is not PD. Htm (talk) 00:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture "Kihlaus / Engagement" in Helsinki, Finland by Dennis Oppenheim [4], unveiled in 2000. No FOP in Finland for sculptures. Oppenheim died in 2011, so this is not PD. Htm (talk) 01:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
see [5]: "opyright © 2012-2015, Dinas Penataan Kota Pemprov DKI Jakarta Jl. " maybe copyvio? shizhao (talk) 02:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
and File:Wakil Gubernur DKI Basuki TP.jpg--shizhao (talk) 02:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Illustrator: fr:Raylambert, died 1967. Non-free in France until 2038. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, out of scope, and perhaps a copyright violation since it's available at http://www.quebakan.com/v15/ursula-strenge-presento-su-linea-de-ropa/ ·×ald·es 04:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure about Australian policies, but even if the picture is own work, the logo is not. Either way, en:File:Western Sydney University logo.png has a higher quality and could be transferred here. ·×ald·es 05:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Applying almost any nation's TOO, that logo would definitely fall into the public domain, but given that the logo is Australian I'm afraid there's no way we can keep or transfer any version of it here. FDMS 4 18:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Werison1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files are unlikely to be own work, with no metadata at all, and show a Brazilian singer posing for the camera. Possibly copyvio.
- File:Joelma Avante.jpg
- File:Joelma Solo.jpg
- File:Joelma.jpg
- File:13701153 153022621790643 2649537556240580997 o-1.jpg
·×ald·es 06:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
NO COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Work of art, likely still copyrighted. Per a recent Supreme Court ruling freedom-of-panorama exception of Sweden does not allow storage of such images in the internet. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. ·×ald·es 06:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete per COM:SELFIE, i mistakenly upload this. The calligraphy is not related to a saint (user calligraphic name)-----BukhariSaeed (talk) 07:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. the file is used on another userpage. Uploader's request is valid reason during 1 week after upload. Here more than month have passed. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per COM:INUSE. Daphne Lantier 00:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pedro Luis Guerra (talk · contribs)
[edit]According to both Spanish and German Wikipedias, those are paintings made by Martín Simón, a Spanish painter who is still alive and therefore, his paintings are not in public domain nor the uploader's original work. Please visit Commons:OTRS and Commons:Licensing for more information.
- File:Signo positivo.jpg
- File:Convergencia123.jpg
- File:Resolucion123.jpg
- File:Divergencia.jpg
- File:Altamira123.jpg
- File:Noche y mancha roja.jpg
- File:Desde la cueva.jpg
- File:Gruta esmeralda.jpg
- File:En recuerdo de Guernica.jpg
- File:Che Guevara dos.jpg
- File:Barroco martin simon.jpg
- File:Monje ocasiano.jpg
- File:Medusa voladora.jpg
- File:Mandril en ágape.jpg
- File:Laidy Godiva caribena.jpg
- File:Los dioses.jpg
- File:Urogallo martin simon.jpg
- File:Labrador comiendo migas.jpg
- File:Signora Portinari.jpg
- File:Paisaje etapa vasca.jpg
- File:Orduña etapa vasca.jpg
- File:La ría.jpg
- File:Al estilo de Arteta.jpg
- File:Estudio de cabeza.jpg
- File:Martin Simon 02.jpg
- File:Martin Simon 01.jpg
- File:Familia martin simon.jpg
·×ald·es 07:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Autoportrait With Diadem of flowers 2005 oil canvas 90 105 cm Gryte Pintukaite Valeckiene.jpg
[edit]Author of artwork is alive, current license doesn't provide sufficient information about copyright status of artwork SubRE (talk) 08:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
--Eurialo444 (talk) 10:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)I already sent the request for this file. I sent again today. I am the representative of the creator of the painting. Ticket is 2017051010008638 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurialo444 (talk • contribs) 09:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
In the letter to "Permission" Wikipedia commons we write : I hereby affirm that I represent...., the creator and/or sole owner....
"creator OR..." it means that if museum has this work they have not the exclusive copyright on the painting which belongs also to the creator of the work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurialo444 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Eurialo444: Thanks for sending a permission through OTRS. Unfortunately, there currently is a huge backlog in the system and new tickets have to wait in line for more than a month before they are processed. Quite frankly, that sucks for everyone involved. But please keep in mind that everything there is handled by volunteers in their free time. OTRS team currently lacks the manpower to process all the incoming requests right away. Please be patient and don't worry too much if your uploads are temporarily removed from Commons in the mean time. --El Grafo (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Author of artwork is alive, artwork belongs to museum, current license doesn't provide sufficient information about copyright status of artwork SubRE (talk) 08:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
I already sent the request for this file. I sent it again today. I am the representative of the creator of this painting. Ticket is 2017051010008941 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurialo444 (talk • contribs) 09:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
In the letter to "Permission" Wikipedia commons we write : I hereby affirm that I represent...., the creator and/or sole owner.... "creator OR..." it means that if museum has this work they have not the exclusive copyright on the painting which belongs also to the owner of the work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eurialo444 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for sending a permission through OTRS. Unfortunately, there currently is a huge backlog in the system and new tickets have to wait in line for more than a month before they are processed. Quite frankly, that sucks for everyone involved. But please keep in mind that everything there is handled by volunteers in their free time. OTRS team currently lacks the manpower to process all the incoming requests right away. Please be patient and don't worry too much if your uploads are temporarily removed from Commons in the mean time. --El Grafo (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of ... something. Does not correspond to the requirements of COM:SCOPE. Codename Lisa (talk) 08:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Now in use. It has now been added to en:Microsoft Press and zh:微软出版社. Although one could argue that adding the image to a wiki page by the uploader after the start of the DR might be improper, at least for en:Microsoft Press it obviously does make sense for this page. --Rotkraut (talk) 18:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per COM:INUSE. Daphne Lantier 00:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- The uploader uploaded a Falcon Crest logo twice in 2010 as well, and it was twice deleted. --ErikvanB (talk) 18:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Likely studio portrait. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Book cover. Copyright holder (likely publisher, possibly the illustrator) must confirm the license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Small size, missing camera metadata. Unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Photographer should confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Likely professional portraits. Photographers/rights holders should confirm license by following the instructions at OTRS.
Storkk (talk) 09:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JeanBono as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: recent building in France, built in 1989, architect Louis Manavella : http://www.pss-archi.eu/immeubles/FR-69123-2143.html Wdwd (talk) 10:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused image of unknown people Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, wiggly Hiddenhauser (talk) 10:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 11:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 11:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry there is no copyright. This jam was hand made by monks in a monastery of Senegal..
User:Ji-Elle
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 11:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 11:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 11:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted product packaging. Kelly (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
website not free. Pitpisit (talk) 11:54, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в тривиальности логотипа Dogad75 (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
not required as of now Naveendangi99 (talk) 12:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC){{Delete
|reason=not a good image
|subpage=File:Purshottam Dangi biaora.jpg
|day=15
|month=May
|year=2017
}}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
not required as of now Naveendangi99 (talk) 12:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
not required Naveendangi99 (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
On fr.wikipedia the legend finish with : "source : DNA That means this picture comes from the newspaper Dernières Nouvelles d'Alsace, that don't apply free licence on its content.
See the removal diff and http://www.dna.fr/e-services/cgu
Hercule (talk) 12:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
bullshit, del on de, blocked on DE Nolispanmo 13:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
False license. Poster copyrighted. Kamolan (talk) 14:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s480x480/e35/c0.50.1080.1080/15538955_226331747821087_1733627351046029312_n.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/86/a1/88/86a1887a952fa79cfa901b60fd9e5162.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://farm1.staticflickr.com/416/31241482133_493d895a27_b.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
and File:Mano en cara.jpg. Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Taken fromhttps://techcrunch.com/2012/09/12/techcrunch-disrupt-sf-2012-winner/. Now, a lot of TechCrunch Disrupt photos have Creative Commons license on Flickr and available here, but there's no real source cited for this particular image. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
and File:Evanescence Tecnópolis 2017.jpg, File:Evanescence Argentina Tour 2017.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.skyrock.net/7702/26987702/pics/3293713840_1_11_7TvWTTU6.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- unlikely doesn't prove anything, do you have an actual proof that this image is not own work? If so, then it can be deleted.–Lost Whispers (talk) 23:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/COM:PCP. Daphne Lantier 00:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
and File:Raja-Gopi.jpg, File:Gopi-Aachi.jpg, File:Cho-Gopi.jpg. Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/sziyw38nv1oMWat4WRBEA6QLegZuxzvFiHhXyBHIv9kyA6L4X_VMijGkzIiydoygnYMQQ-QFSCryomwcPHffycg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
and File:Competitive Advantages.png. Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of com:Scope Pippobuono (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:43, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://static.pexels.com/photos/40796/chess-strategy-chess-board-leadership-40796.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Auteur : Benoit Linero, no sign of permission Shev123 (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Auteur : Benoit Linero, no sign of permission Shev123 (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
not own work, cropped from copyrighted picture http://worldmusicba.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/marcos-mundstock-3.jpg Triplecaña (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
another phot of some public councert ? with few informations... and maybe copyvio of the logos on the banner Pippobuono (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
©Benoît Linero (professionnal photographer), no sign of permission Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 14:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No permission. With archive.org I could not find a CC license at the 2007 versions of the source websites, see e.g. here. Jcb (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Auteur NATACHA COLMEZ, autorisation nécessaire Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yuroks12654332 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files are unlikely to be own work and possible copyvios since they show Ukraine's Next Top Model models and covers.
- File:EkJEJ0LFHKI.jpg
- File:-ZQVubxEn48.jpg
- File:L8wuLlfIQv0.jpg
- File:Modeli mini 0010 DSC0663.png
- File:TyD6mP3j4r0.jpg
- File:4wd0sh ajXY.jpg
- File:N63VGvOgXN4.jpg
- File:1455978887 supermodel-po-ukrainski.jpg
·×ald·es 16:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 16:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
unimportant image SecretName101 (talk) 16:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
low quality could be everywhere forest photos
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (102).jpg Done
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (56).jpg
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (58).jpg
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (59).jpg
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Gemeinde Litschau, Austria - panoramio (90).jpg
Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep 1. In scope/in use. /St1995 21:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: 1 kept as per above -- others deleted. Daphne Lantier 00:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Attributes the image on Panoramio to: "Foto: Shutterstock". COM:License laundering. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:08, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- It is Shutterstock ID #42517294 by Eric Gevaert. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of release under CC license C.Fred (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: singer album cover. ·×ald·es 17:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
The website of the label [6] has clear copyright notices, so this is not able to be released under a free license without evidence of permission to do so. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
What do you need from me to prove that I have permission from the label to use this image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apedflair (talk • contribs)
- Commons does not allow "fair use" so what would be needed would not be permission for you, specifically to use it, but rather that it be released under a free license so that anyone can use it for any purpose they wish, including for profit. On the other hand, you could upload it locally at Wikipedia (which does allow fair use of logos) with an appropriate fair-use rationale, there is an upload wizard that can help you through that process there. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/OTRS permission from copyright holder needed. Daphne Lantier 00:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Ahonc and NickK: Could you please ask the uploader what did they mean by this and some below? Sealle (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Sealle: I believe he did not want to submit this photo for Wiki Loves Earth, and presumably uploaded it by mistake — NickK (talk) 08:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:46, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture '"Pikes song" and tvo other sculptures in Helsinki, Finland [7] by finnish sculptor Reijo Hukkanen (born 1946 and living). Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю — конкурс фото природоохоронних територій. Зосередьмося ж на природному! Зисько Сергій (talk) 18:49, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 19:04, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bryan bruno (talk · contribs) and Bruno bryan (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Federer indian wells 2017.jpg – by Bryan bruno
- File:Djoker winner at doha 2017.jpg – by Bruno bryan
- File:Djokovic-madrid-2016.jpg
- File:Serena williams 23rd slam title.jpg
- File:Federer perth 2017.jpg
- File:Rafael-Nadal-2015-Shanghai-Rolex-Masters.jpg
- File:Rafael-Nadal-Miami-2017.jpg
Found elsewhere on the web, eg. Rafael-Nadal-2015-Shanghai-Rolex-Masters, professional photos. Metadata missing or with citation of authors. Copyright violation.
Again users from Italian Wikipedia!
Note the connection between the Bruno bryan / Bryan bruno and BrianTrumpello. They all are from Italian Wikipedia, the files have been added on Italian Wiki. All accounts uploaded files of Federer, Nadal, Williams (BrianTrumpello's deleted files). BrianTrumpello was blocked on 2 April 2017 by Magog the Ogre. Account Bruno bryan was created 9 April 2017 and Bryan bruno on 24 April 2017. It will be the only user. As I wrote recently: In my view it's time to indef block. --Kacir (talk) 18:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Kacir: 3 accounts blocked indef. Daphne Lantier 00:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:58, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of Brodhead-Main-Street-ky2.jpg, but shows plate numbers. My error in botching the uploads. BrineStans (talk) 20:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:59, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Fake license. Draa kul (talk) 20:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
POR QUÉ NO DEBERÍA ESTAR EN LA RED Dakota397 (talk) 03:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Dakota397: visita Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu. Un saludo, ·×ald·es 05:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. --PierreSelim (talk) 05:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
The French WP article indicates these studios have been created in 1941. There's nothing about the building but it seems that it has been built at that time. Therefore it may be too recent (who's the architect ? did he die more than 70 years ago ?) and there's no FoP in France. But it may be moved to French WP where fair use in admitted for buildings. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/COM:PCP. Daphne Lantier 01:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Medal 1897 Bar Jubilee Queen Victoria.png Hsq7278 (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Multiple versions already on Wikicommons. Hsq7278 (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
The subject is copyrighted and it is not and can not be the case of de minimis. acagastya 📷 21:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France - the buildings are protected against FoP which constitute significant portion of the image. acagastya 📷 21:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The buildings are not the main subject, and the posters are sufficiently not visible to be acceptable. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I'm the creator. The building are a little part of the image, the posters too (not really visible). Celette (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep comme Yann.--Classiccardinal (talk) 07:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This debate is ridiculous and probably without any connection with this other desorganizing debate Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument morts Servignat 2.jpg. Can we still contribute quietly here? --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The monument is very simple and below threshold of originality. cf: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument morts Servignat 2.jpg.--Classiccardinal (talk) 05:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No need for FoP here. Culex (talk) 08:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep There is no reason to delete this file. Election posters of French presidential election are not the main subject. Chabe01 (talk) 11:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Posters are de minimis, and copyritable items in the monument are also be de minimis. Yann (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment let me reply one by one: Benoît Prieur's remarks points to other nomination, which makes no sense. Same with Classiccardinal's remarks. I don't know why Culex thinks there is no need of FoP here. Chabe01 did not even read what I wrote, did they? I said not a since word about poster, I am talking about the building, not that pillar. So, @Yann: that building "not the subject in this photo" is de minimins?
acagastya 13:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- The pillar is a war memorial (monument aux morts), maybe from the 1920s. The architect being anonymous it is not concerned by the Freedom of Panorama. Same for the building behind (the town hall), obviously from the end of 19th century (1890 in fact). In the case someone could prove its architect died less than 70 years ago (after 1947), then it could be supposed under copyright. In the meantime, it is more probable then that all that is on this photo is under public domain. Culex (talk) 13:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No need for FoP in this case as this building is obvioulsly not any more under copyright. User:Culex
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand why these files should be deleted as election posters of French presidential election are not the main subject. Chabe01 (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No need for FoP in this case as this building is obvioulsly not any more under copyright. User:Culex
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:07, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand why these files should be deleted as election posters of French presidential election are not the main subject. Chabe01 (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Stop! --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No need for FoP in this case as this building is obvioulsly not any more under copyright. Culex (talk) 08:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand why these files should be deleted as election posters of French presidential election are not the main subject. Chabe01 (talk) 11:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The posters are not the main subject. Yann (talk) 13:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No indication of permission from the living artist, Deb Lawrence Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please see also File:Deb lawrence.jpg, same problem. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Good evening, what precisely is the problem in this picture? Is this because of the election posters? I can blur them, if necessary (the main interest of this photo is the town hall, after all). KiwiNeko14 (talk) 21:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- There is no freedom of panorama in France, besides, modification to something that is copyrighted is also copyrighted, if I am not wrong.
acagastya 📷 23:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)- That would be sad… And that would mean that » that other picture « would also breach the French copyright laws. So I don't understand, if I blur the posters enough or if I replace them by grey spaces, where would the problem be, unless the Louvre Pyramid picture I linked is a problem too. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- I am not sure how things work on Commons about the DW of the copyrighted work.
acagastya 📷 04:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- I am not sure how things work on Commons about the DW of the copyrighted work.
- That would be sad… And that would mean that » that other picture « would also breach the French copyright laws. So I don't understand, if I blur the posters enough or if I replace them by grey spaces, where would the problem be, unless the Louvre Pyramid picture I linked is a problem too. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- There is no freedom of panorama in France, besides, modification to something that is copyrighted is also copyrighted, if I am not wrong.
- There is no need for FoP for old buildings which are in public domain (architect which died more than 70 years ago or unknown architect), which is the case here. Culex (talk) 09:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
After a bit of reading about the "de minimis" principe, I have found this. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:De_minimis#France_-_Freedom_of_Panorama_.22de_minimis.22_exception Does this apply, and is this okay? If it's not okay, as I wrote earlier, I can blur the electoral posters to the point they're not recognizable anymore. KiwiNeko14 (talk) 15:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per COM:DM. Daphne Lantier 01:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Old buildings, no need for FoP here. Culex (talk) 09:01, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Old buildings, no need for FoP here. Culex (talk) 09:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Old buildings, no need for FoP here. Culex (talk) 09:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:05, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Old bridge, no need for FoP here. Culex (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Are you talking about the building in the background? It doesn't feel like it's the subject of the picture, rather just a general view of the election posters. I'm in favor of keeping this picture. Badzil (talk) 06:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Old building, no need for FoP here. Culex (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. acagastya 📷 21:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No need for FoP here. Culex (talk) 08:55, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Culex. --Benoît Prieur (d) 10:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 01:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Since 2011 a VectorVersionAvailable, and the quality is really bad; below Threshold of originality — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:57, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
no educational value
Daphne Lantier 22:09, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Moheen Reeyad. Daphne Lantier 01:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Given source provides no indication that the work is released under the stated license, and that website would be unable to release the work under any license anyhow (it's clearly fair use there). - Reventtalk 22:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete Non-free image; not from National Assembly in Korea. Also National Assembly in Korea #1 only made available under the Template:KOGL (Type from 1 to 4), not made available under the "CC0". --Idh0854 (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as the one to request checking for the file.
acagastya 05:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as the one to request checking for the file.
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
For me main object of the photo seems to be screenshot with unknown copyright status. Maybe derivative work of copyrighted content? Taivo (talk) 19:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Bellini - Trois histoires de Drusienne et de saint Jean l'Évangéliste - Berchtesgaden, Schloss museum.jpg
[edit]Dieses Bild ist nicht im Schloss Berchtesgaden ausgestellt, sondern im Louvre! 185.19.199.199 07:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Read the webpage in source : everything is explained and correctly indicated, no reason to delete this file and to change anything. Mel22 (talk) 07:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Bellini - Trois histoires de Drusienne et de saint Jean l'Évangéliste - Berchtesgaden, Schloss museum.jpg
[edit]Nicht im Schloss Museum Berchtesgaden vorhanden! 185.19.199.199 06:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- bis repetita placent. No reason to delete this file. Mel22 (talk) 11:24, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: An error in the file name is not a reason to delete, but this appears to be OK. Do not make the same nomination again. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:19, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- The uploader only had two uploads, the other one was deleted as a personal photo. In particular, the uploader did not have any copyright issues before. The resolution of the image (1200x800) is indeed not very large, but still much larger then what is usually found on web pages. It might be a crop from a larger image, in this case it could very realistically be the original resolution of the photo. This might also explain the missing EXIF data. I did a web search for the image and found it on some sites, all of them credit it to Wikipedia, Wikimedia, or the apparent name of the uploader, see [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Of course, all this does not prove that the images is own work by the uploader. But we also do not have a proof for a copyright violation, not even any strong hint. As a summary, I don't see any reason not to COM:AGF and conclude as Keep --Rotkraut (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Policy requires that images that have appeared elsewhere without a free license must have a free license from the author via OTRS. AGF does not apply. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Species (Sitta europaea) does not occur at location claimed; strongly suspect copyvio, though no google image search results for this photo. MPF (talk) 15:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, see File:Sitta europaea distribution map.png (Sitta europaea occur near Bagdad). /St1995 21:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: 6000x4000px, EXIF, -- AGF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Прошу прощения, но это моя работа. Камера и таймер. Aglarion Glirdan (talk)
Kept: AGF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. If artist is Ferdinand Hodler as claimed, this may well be PD. Storkk (talk) 20:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Je suis l'auteur de cet ajout. Je n'ai plus les références de l'image, probablement trouvée sur un blog qui a disparu car je ne trouve plus trace de cette image sur le web. Je conserve les images d'oeuvres de Hodler par goût personnel et pour illustrer mes cours d'enseignement. Il me semblait utile de l'intégrer à la page Armailli. Je l'ai donc déposée sur Wikimedia et ajoutée à la page Ferdinand Hodler ou figure déjà un autre timbre-poste. J'ai aussi des images de timbres édités à partir de ce dessin. Elles sont de mauvaise qualité, mais je pourrais aussi les ajouter à la liste. Crob
- This version of the stamp has a clear attribution to Hodler, so I think the file is OK. Storkk (talk) 08:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- J'ai trouvé ce papillon consacré à une exposition sur Hodler qui relie explicitement l'image importée par Crob avec Hodler. Hodler étant mort depuis plus de 70 ans, son oeuvre est aujourd'hui dans le domaine public. Cordialement.--Bounè rodzo (talk) 08:44, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: artwork is PD. Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)