Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_при_вручении_жезла_епископу_Донату_(Щёголеву)._КП-26152_Фот.-6152_(1).jpg){kind=link}
![167 File:"Большой Тылль и Пирет".jpg](#File:"Большой_Тылль_и_Пирет".jpg){kind=link}
![171 File:Административный корпус завода "Вольта", 1966 год.jpg](#File:Административный_корпус_завода_"Вольта",_1966_год.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_80.jpg){kind=link}
![242 File:Лого АО "Вольта".jpg](#File:Лого_АО_"Вольта".jpg){kind=link}
Wikipedia Zero abuse documentation/how-to TJH2018talk 02:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: not humoring this. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. unused, blurry not useful. -- Geagea (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as uploader request in his he.wiki talk page. -- Geagea (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charlotte Tilbury.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harris Pastides.png
Files in Category:Hashemite University
[edit]Commons:Freedom of panorama#Jordan
- File:الجامعة الهاشمية 01.jpg
- File:الجامعة الهاشمية 02.jpg
- File:الجامعة الهاشمية 03.jpg
- File:الجامعة الهاشمية 04.jpg
- File:الجامعة الهاشمية 06.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 03.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 07.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 08.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 09.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 10.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 11.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 13.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 14.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 15.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 17.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 18.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 19.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 20.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 22.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 23.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 24.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 25.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 26.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 27.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 28.jpg
- File:الجامعة-الهاشمية 29.jpg
ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please don't listen to this user cause he doesn't know what he is doing, and had a history of privocative and wrong actions both here and on ar.wik. These photos have been published by permission of the Jordan Hashmit University as its cleary shows--باسم (talk) 18:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: There is a ticket on OTRS. --Tarawneh (talk) 20:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by SnapSnap as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Reason=Image is possibly non-free in its home country, the United Kingdom. Dschwen (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Text only. I don't think this is copyrightable. But the Speedy was made by the uploader, so maybe we should just go with it. --Dschwen (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, Dschwen. The Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pet Shop Boys - Bilingual.jpg (JPEG version) was closed as "delete". Also, the uploader requested speedy deletion, which was contested. Same goes for PNG. If insufficient, see COM:TOO#United Kingdom, which says that originality standards are very low. --George Ho (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per descision on the quasi identical JPEG version. --Dschwen (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
unused copyvio dvd cover Sakhalinio (talk) 19:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Blatant ad. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Blatant ad. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Panam2014 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=http://www.mobilekart.co.uk/contract-phones/samsung-galaxy-note-7-deals Yann (talk) 22:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
A very small pic, uninteligible. I'm not sure if this can be considered a reason for deletion, but "what will this pic serve"? E4024 (talk) 14:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Великий_герб_Львова.png MarioBolo (talk) 10:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate processed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
duplicafe of File:Великий герб Львова.png MarioBolo (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate processed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
this is duplicate file of File:Coat_of_arms_of_Lviv.svg MarioBolo (talk) 09:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
duplicate file of File:Lviv_coat_sov.png MarioBolo (talk) 10:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Великий герб Львова.png MarioBolo (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: merged into one request. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
this is duplicate file of File:Coat_of_arms_of_Lviv.svg MarioBolo (talk) 10:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann: Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Coat_of_arms_of_Lviv.svg
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository; no educational value
- File:Asdasdadag.jpg
- File:Adsadasd.jpg
- File:Asddasdassd.jpg
- File:Ratatouile.jpg
- File:Dsaasdsdasda.jpg
- File:La virgnidad.jpg
- File:Asdasdasdasdsda.jpg
- File:Asdsdaasdsad.jpg
- File:Maricas.jpg
- File:Inferrior.jpg
- File:Superrior.jpg
- File:Autismocronico.png
- File:Seres inferiores.jpg
TJH2018talk 02:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 15:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Burnakligenc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship. Probably derivative works. In such poor quality they may be also out of scope.
XXN, 12:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
out of scope; non-notable person, small quality image, and no evidence that they are the photographer — billinghurst sDrewth 12:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Probably out of scope - some promotional banner. Questionable authorship. XXN, 12:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of a movie title screen. Due to the special effects used this should be copyrighted. XXN, 12:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. XXN, 12:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by حميد يوسفي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Wrong authorship data. Photos by Fars News Agency, see the watermarks. No evidence of permission; copyright violation.
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي شوي زنده لباس توسط برند چرم پارس در تالار وحدت-اسفند ٩٢.jpg
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي شوي زنده لباس توسط برند چرم پارس درت الآر وحدت- اسفند ٩٢.jpg
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي شوي زنده لباس توسط برند چرم پارس در تالار وحدت -اسفند ٩٢.jpg
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي شوي زنده لباس توسط برندمحبوب چرم پارس در اسفند ١٣٩٢.jpg
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي شوي زنده لباس توسط برند محبوب چرم پارس در اسفند ١٣٩٢.jpg
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي نمايش زنده لباس توسط برند چرم پارس در اسفند ٩٢.jpg
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي شوي زنده لباس توسط برند چرم پارس در اسفند ١٣٩٢.jpg
- File:مراسم اولين اجراي رسمي شوي زنده لباس توسط برند چرم پارس در اسفند ٩٢.jpg
XXN, 12:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Overexposed private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saltrabook (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:17, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saltrabook (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Occup Med Study Plan Universidad de Panama April-June 2017.png
- File:Time table OM teaching UP.png
- File:Module scheme 9 weeks.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saltrabook (talk · contribs)
[edit]imagevios again, false "own source" claims
- File:Tractor remolque.png
- File:Top Loader container.png
- File:RTG Rubber tyred gantry crane.png
- File:Reach Stacker.png
- File:Montacarha de 30 toneladas para carga suelta.png
- File:Montacargas.png
- File:Grúas porticas.png
- File:Empty Container Handler Panama Port 2021.png
- File:Área de reefer Puerto Panama 2021.png
— Draceane talkcontrib. 07:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Likely taken from http://aujourdhui.ma/societe/zineb-el-adaoui-parmi-cinq-laureates-du-prix-allafrica-leadership-feminin Ytoyoda (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused infobox. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Snapknife00 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bastianquills (talk · contribs)
[edit]All photos credit © Lionel Moreau, connection to uploader not explained.
- File:Tancrède concert.jpg
- File:Tancrède chanteur.jpg
- File:Tancrède à la Cigale.jpg
- File:Tancrède.jpg
- File:Tancrede sur la scène de la Cigale.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 18:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs OTRS permission Jianhui67 talk★contribs 13:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bastianquills (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Tancrede D060125 064 M.jpg
- File:Tancrede D060125 009 M.jpg
- File:Tancrède chanteur.jpg
- File:Tancrède chanteur Trianon Magasine PREF.pdf
- File:Tancrède chanteur Arnys mannequin.jpg
- File:Tancrède lehman.jpg
- File:Tancrède.jpg
- File:Tancrède mannequin chanteur.jpg
- File:TANCREDE pour SOL's.jpg
- File:Tancrède par Robertino.jpg
- File:ARNYS 5.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Image moved due to incorrect title. This redirect is misleading as Hans Finkelstein is another person. Rollingcontributor (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
nur ein test Rolli91 (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos and sound recording. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Intro da Bleck musik.wav
- File:Landrik na Tv kianda.jpg
- File:Boss na Tv Kianda.jpg
- File:Publicidade na tv kianda.jpg
- File:Yola semedo na Tv kianda.jpg
- File:Festa de Salu b.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajaykaransharma9211 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos out of project scope. COM:NOTHOST.
- File:Ajaykaransharma3.jpg
- File:Ajaykaransharma (3).jpg
- File:Ajaykaransharma (2).jpg
- File:Ajaykaran.jpg
- File:Ajaykaransharmas.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma(jogindernagar).jpg
- File:Ajay Karan Sharma(Joginder Nagar).jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma 24.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma( joginder nagar ).jpg
- File:Ajay Karan Sharma-2.jpg
- File:Ajay Karan Sharma-1.jpg
- File:Ajay Karan Sharma.jpg
- File:Ajaykaransharma.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rrburke (talk) 18:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ajaykaransharma9211 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons n'héberge pas de selfies. Et je rajoute que ce contributeur semble confondre Wikipédia et Facebook.
- File:Aks3.jpg
- File:Aks22.jpg
- File:Aks12.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma 6.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma16.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma15.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma14.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma11.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma12.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma13.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma90.jpg
- File:AKSme.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma9.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma5.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma1.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma3.jpg
- File:Ajay karan sharma2.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lethiernois (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF (FBMD), per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Lethiernois. All files uploaded in 04.2016 for (mostly) fr:Thiers (Puy-de-Dôme), a French commune.
- File:Baruptel.jpg
- File:Four a pain le nohat.jpg
- File:Logo iloa.JPG
- File:Jeux d'iloa.jpg
- File:Plage d'iloa 1.jpg
- File:Stade de Thiers.jpg
- File:Falaise de borbe.jpg
- File:Vue de la Rn89 a Thiers (2).jpg
- File:Vue de la RN89 a Thiers.jpg
- File:Vue du centre-ville de Thiers depuis les margerides.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 07:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 22:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lethiernois (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, mostly copied from Facebook, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Maurice Adevah-Pœuf.jpg
- File:Claude Nowotny.jpg
- File:Thierry Déglon.jpg
- File:Annie chevaldonné.jpg
- File:Le bout du monde thiers.jpg
- File:Intérieur église saint genès.jpg
- File:Ruelle thiers.jpg
- File:Façade sud église saint genès.jpg
- File:Vallée des rouets.jpg
- File:Vue de l'église saint genes.jpg
- File:L'église saint-genès thiers.jpg
- File:Extérieur chapelle saint roch thiers.jpg
- File:Chapelle saint roch thiers 2.jpg
- File:Pont de Seychalles Thiers.jpg
- File:Escaliers thiers.jpg
- File:Intérieur chapelle saint-roch.jpg
- File:Vue depuis la chapelle saint-roch.jpg
- File:Usine du pont de Seychalles.jpg
- File:Jacqemart de Thiers.jpg
- File:Chapelle à Thiers.jpg
- File:Arrière du pedde.jpg
- File:La varenne 2 (4).jpg
- File:La varenne 1 (4).jpg
- File:La varenne 1 (5).jpg
- File:La varenne 1 (3).jpg
- File:La varenne 1 (2).jpg
- File:La varenne 2 (3).jpg
- File:La varenne n°2.jpg
- File:La varenne 1.jpg
- File:La varenne 2.jpg
- File:Centre commercial la varenne thiers 63.jpg
- File:Centre commercial la varenne.jpg
- File:Centre commercial la varenne thiers.jpg
- File:Lycée Montdory.jpg
- File:Collège audembron.jpg
- File:Église de vertolaye.jpg
- File:Ancien hôpital vue de la vallée des usines.jpg
- File:Centre-ville Thiers.jpg
- File:Usine du may et forges mondières.jpg
- File:Vallée des usines.jpg
- File:Panoramique de Thiers vue des remparts.jpg
- File:Faubourg de la vidalie.jpg
- File:Tour du château fort de Thiers.jpg
- File:Centre ville de thiers.jpg
- File:Rue du bourg de Thiers.jpg
- File:Route nationale 89 à Thiers.jpg
- File:Hopital de thiers.jpg
- File:Ancien hopital de thiers.jpg
- File:Chapelle de l'hospice thiers.jpg
- File:Chapelle de l'hopital de thiers.jpg
- File:Ancienne usine thiers.jpg
- File:Ancien hopital thiers.jpg
- File:Église saint jean Thiers.jpg
- File:Eglise saint jean Thiers.jpg
- File:Rue de la coutellerie Thiers.jpg
- File:Chapelle de l'ancien hôpital de Thiers.jpg
- File:Lycée Jean-zay.jpg
- File:Ecole du fau à Thiers.jpg
- File:Ecole du Fau de Thiers.jpg
- File:Panneau entrée Thiers.jpg
- File:Ferrier usinage.jpg
- File:Interieur usine Ferrier.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lethiernois (talk · contribs)
[edit]False dates. Why are these images public domain ?
- File:Ancien hôpital Thiers.jpg
- File:Sœur de l'hôpital de Thiers.jpg
- File:Sœurs hôpital de Thiers.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour Patrick, je connais personnellement l'auteur de ce livre (Georges Therre) et celui à qui appartient ces photographies (Jacques Ytournel). Je les ai contactés pour travailler sur l'article de l'Ancien Hôpital de Thiers et ces deux personnes, passionnées par l'histoire de la ville n'ont pas hésité à m'autoriser à les utiliser sur Wikipédia. D'après eux, qui ont aujourd'hui plus de 80 ans, seul internet permettra de partager ces vieilles photos, sinon, elles resteront dans leur cave sans que personne ne les voie. Désolé de vous répondre en français, je ne parle pas bien l'anglais. Amicalement, --Lethiernois (talk) 10:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Lethiernois: . Jacques Ytournel doit envoyer une permission via COM:OTRS/fr. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ai-je une date limite pour lui dire? Parce qu'il est en maison de retraite donc il faut que je vienne avec un support numérique pour qu'il puisse le faire.--Lethiernois (talk) 12:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Lethiernois: . Jacques Ytournel doit envoyer une permission via COM:OTRS/fr. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lethiernois (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, some copied from Facebook. Upload the original images, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Ancien hôpital toit.jpg
- File:Ancien hôpital chapelle.jpg
- File:Hoshi thiers.png
- File:Pré des archers.png
- File:STGENES.png
- File:LIMANDONS.png
Yann (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour Yann, pour les photographies sans EXIF, il s'agit bien de mes photographies. D'ailleurs, si je les rajoute sur Common, l'EXIF réapparaîtra. Pour les autres, ce sont des gens qui me les ont envoyées sur l'application "Messenger" appartenant à Facebook. Je ne peux pas "uploader" l'image originale puisque c'est par Facebook que je les ai reçues... Désolé de vous répondre en français, je parle très mal l'anglais. Cordialement, --Lethiernois (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Lethiernois: Il faut une autorisation écrite formelle pour importer des images dont vous n’êtes pas l'auteur. Merci de importer les images originales avec les données EXIF. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
"Own work" ???? 91.66.153.214 10:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 11:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Delete Taken from the source indicated (https://www.residentadvisor.net/dj/regis), and specifically cropped from this image, without any indication on the site that the image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 02:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Very likely a copyrighted statue. No evidence of a free release. Seattle (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
This photo was taken by me (Themom51 - Debbie Tegtmeier) personally in Reedsport, Oregon with my own camera, Kodak EasyShare M580 Digital Camera. There is and was no copyright infringement as all statues created at the annual chainsaw carving event were on public display, up for judging, and for sale.
- @Themom51: Thanks for your upload, but I'm afraid sculptures on public display are still subject to copyright restrictions. In some countries (but not the United States), if statues are permanently mounted on public domain they are allowed by Freedom of Panorama. But as mentioned, this definitely wouldn't apply in this case because it's in the USA and because it's not permanently mounted. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Statue copyrighted in US incorrectly not deleted by Ellin Beltz. Seattle (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 23:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Found the uncropped original of this image on http://www.prathamexports.com/portfolio/zoya-by-fusion-addict-salwar-kameez-wholesale-by-zoya/ - please note that the uploader shoddily and amateurishly tried to remove the watermark from the upper left corner. If this is indeed their own work, why try to remove a watermark so sloppily? Mabalu (talk) 10:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark Pippobuono (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A derivative work (a crop) of a deleted file published under false authorship information: File:Pedro Antonio Sanchez.jpg (appearing here: http://cadenaser.com/emisora/2015/06/29/radio_murcia/1435554346_833462.html ) Asqueladd (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
named "JHS Holland copyright Simon Lautrop.jpg", sourced as haugensorensen.com, which states "Photos © Simon Lautrup unless other mentioned". No permisson apparent. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Sourced as haugensorensen.com, which states "Photos © Simon Lautrup unless other mentioned". No permisson apparent. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
File:JHS1993YorkshireSculptureParkRetrospectiveVulgrOphobning199091320x120x130Rdsvenskgranitgget1990122x90x83Grportugisiskgranit1 srcset-large.jpg
[edit]
Sourced as haugensorensen.com, which states "Photos © Simon Lautrup unless other mentioned". No permisson apparent. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Sourced as haugensorensen.com, which states "Photos © Simon Lautrup unless other mentioned". No permisson apparent. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Sourced as haugensorensen.com, which states "Photos © Simon Lautrup unless other mentioned". No permisson apparent. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
there is a metadata tag that indicates that the file is copyrighted Domdeparis (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 22:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 21:15, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Commons:SELFIE. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Crop of an Instagram photo: http://www.pictaram.com/media/1367001268979258428_528997161 Ytoyoda (talk) 20:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Crop of a likely copyrighted photo: http://tunesliberia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/DenG.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 20:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded this image while trying to demonstrate the upload steps to a library patron. I'd like to be able to delete it so that she is able to upload the same image from her account and curate it as a part of her work on Wikimedia. Thank you! Hkmiller (talk) 20:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image of Donald Trump needs to be attributed if it is freely licensed. If not, it is a copyvio. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copied from Facebook, no permission. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Igho. Yann (talk) 21:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Jcb: can this article and map in it be the source? It is article from Croatian Encyclopedia, online publication of renowned National lexicographical institution Miroslav Krleža.--Ma▀▄Ga 14:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The main problem is that the source of the base map is missing. Maps may be or may not be copyrighted, to know that we have to know where the base map was taken from. Jcb (talk) 15:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, what about this files? Some of them will be deleted, some of them will not be deleted. What's the point?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I did not yet nominate all of them, but will try to do this in the next few days. Jcb (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I understand the problem, but I think that it would be some compromise, too many articles all over the wikipedias are using this pictures.--Ma▀▄Ga 15:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I see, but unfortunately usage is not a valid reason to keep files with unclear copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, what about my first question? Answer is "no"?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the answer is "no" unfortunately. Jcb (talk) 15:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, thanks.--Ma▀▄Ga 17:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the answer is "no" unfortunately. Jcb (talk) 15:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, what about my first question? Answer is "no"?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I see, but unfortunately usage is not a valid reason to keep files with unclear copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I understand the problem, but I think that it would be some compromise, too many articles all over the wikipedias are using this pictures.--Ma▀▄Ga 15:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I did not yet nominate all of them, but will try to do this in the next few days. Jcb (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, what about this files? Some of them will be deleted, some of them will not be deleted. What's the point?--Ma▀▄Ga 15:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- The main problem is that the source of the base map is missing. Maps may be or may not be copyrighted, to know that we have to know where the base map was taken from. Jcb (talk) 15:01, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
The source file, File:Slavic languages (no legend).png, has been deleted, because it had no source. Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Wrong attribution. It's not "own work" but "by Ignacio Zuloaga". This painting was created by Ignacio Zuloaga in 1918, in Spain. Zuloaga died in 1945. His works won't enter the public domain in Spain until 1 January 2026 (at that time a 80 years p.m.a. copyright protection was applied) Strakhov (talk) 22:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Delete: clear copyright violation case. --Discasto talk 08:06, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reino de Ñanday (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparently an art project where the uploader created a fictional country and its symbols. The subject matter seems connected to these uploads -> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Nalideo_Nalideo
- File:Mascota olímpica de Nagrenaledo es un Tordo.png
- File:Bandera de Ñanday.png
- File:Brinteronismo simbolo.png
- File:Palidenreko primer ministro.jpg
- File:Vestimenta para los inmigrantes.png
- File:Vestimenta Nagrenala.png
- File:Vista Satelital de Nagrenaledo.png
- File:Biodiversidad nagrenala.png
- File:Clima de Nagrenaledo.png
Takeaway (talk) 23:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reino de Ñanday (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparently, an "art" project by uploader: creation of a fictional country including flags, language, flora and fauna. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Nalideo_Nalideo who is probably the same person.
- File:Ojos de Salticidus Palidenrekensis.jpg
- File:Vientre de Salticidus Palidenrekensis.jpg
- File:Salticidus Palidenrekensis.jpg
- File:Vestimenta femenina ciudadana.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 16:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]Regarding the three "Salticidus Palidenrekensis" files above, there is no such taxon. The images probably depicts a specimen of the Frigga genus (jumping spider family, Salticidae), most likely Frigga pratensis. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 09:13, 4 April 2017 (UTC), bureaucrat @ Wikispecies.
Comment "Palidenrekensis" seems to be an invention of the uploader, part of creating a flora and fauna for their imaginary world. - Takeaway (talk) 14:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reino de Ñanday (talk · contribs)
[edit]Imagery related to a fictional country, at least two articles were deleted on Spanish Wikipedia for notability reasons (see es:Usuario discusión:Reino de Ñanday). Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Reino de Ñanday in April 2017 saw many other works about fictional countries by this user deleted for scope reasons.
- File:El color negro indica el distrito donde estallo la escaramuza.gif
- File:Alfabeto del idioma Hanerales(Haneraledo).png
- File:Escudo de Haneraledo.png
- File:Bandera de haneraledo.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
seb26 (talk) 13:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Low-rez version of File:121 Charles Street, New York City, NY, 2.jpg Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- You can delete it, I forgot I uploaded this one, and instead of updating, I uploaded a bigger size version in a new file (both are mine)--Elisa Rolle 00:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jusjih (talk) 23:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Low-rez version of File:121 Charles Street, New York City, NY.jpg Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- You can delete it, I forgot I uploaded this one, and instead of updating, I uploaded a bigger size version in a new file (both are mine)--Elisa Rolle 00:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jusjih (talk) 00:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Yo, el titular de los derechos de la imagen, no quiero que la misma este publicada Elikan (talk) 01:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
replace to File:Narita-Shinkansen Planned route map ja.svgNamemiso (talk) 01:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
does not qualify for de minimus justification SecretName101 (talk) 01:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don't know about de minimis, but it's clearly a photo of someone else's video. That's copyright infringement, as far as I know. - Themightyquill (talk) 06:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
mistakenly uploaded homework assignment Chris B. Church (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational value; not a personal photo repository TJH2018talk 02:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mamta kumari hjp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; no educational value; not a personal photo repository
TJH2018talk 02:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Statue unlikely to be free. Seattle (talk) 02:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation. Image scraped from http://www.noblealchem.co.in/ by TinEye in 2012, years before upload here. - Reventtalk 03:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
There is no free license. Maksmilian (talk) 04:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
There is no free license. Maksmilian (talk) 04:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- I second the nomination. Out of scope. Coderzombie (talk) 18:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Building after 1990. Mykola Vasylechko 05:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Building after 1990. Mykola Vasylechko 05:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kouponmedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 06:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KAAMA (World Pop-Deluxe Music) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 06:25, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
jpg version of svg drawing; unused, except on 1 user page Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope. ℯxplicit 06:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
duplicidade Liberty turtera (talk) 06:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kampsbdorg (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 06:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subjects' two articles were deleted in October 2016 via deletion discussion and speedily as non-notable, respectively. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 06:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unusued personal photo with probably copyright issues. E4024 (talk) 07:36, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- The photo belongs to a dating site, publicitiy in Wikipedia. --E4024 (talk) 09:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:51, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope; likely also copyvio, but cannot find original source (company website has similar but not identical logo) Randykitty (talk) 07:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
False license. Obviously, one cannot be both the photographer (own work) and the subject. John from Idegon (talk) 08:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Mistakenly uploaded. kindly delete this file Natashasingh6767 (talk) 09:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Mistakenly uploaded. kindly delete this file Natashasingh6767 (talk) 09:25, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE, view to Salzburg blurry and not the topic Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low resolution, no metadata, watermark, picture certainly found elsewhere on the web. Cjp24 (talk) 11:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Possibly user image have no use. Also user have no edits to specify. ~ Moheen (keep talking) 11:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 11:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 11:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused userpage image of a globally locked user account. Out of scope. XXN, 11:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Georgemakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Parrot drawing.jpg
- File:Butterfly drawing.jpg
- File:Red house on the river.jpg
- File:Jokker.jpg
- File:Parrot.jpg
Didym (talk) 03:43, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Georgemakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]If these are real-life photos, then due to a bad color adjustment/contrast and other special effects, they are somehow unclear, looks unrealistic and lacks encyclopedic value. In case these are digital paintings, they are also out of project scope. If these are photos of paintings - they are derivative works.
- File:Rocks Fall.jpg
- File:Fantsy Island.jpg
- File:Falls on the river.jpg
- File:Big Tower.jpg
- File:Falls Green.jpg
- File:Cloudy Day.jpg
- File:House On The Fall.jpg
- File:Green Earth Moon.jpg
- File:Red Leaves Tree.jpg
XXN, 11:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Georgemakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]All stolen images that have had filters applied, and cropped. File:BIG wave.jpg, File:Sweet Home.jpg original images available online 2 years before this upload (see Tineye), and File:Fog Light.jpg originally available 1 year before upload (see Tineye).
- File:White Move Flower.jpg
- File:Yellow Tulip Symbol.jpg
- File:Sleeping Beauty Glow.jpg
- File:Sun Under The Mountain.jpg
- File:Rain Blue.jpg
- File:Pollution Red.jpg
- File:On The Road.jpg
- File:Lizard Move.jpg
- File:Fog Light.jpg
- File:Sweet Home.jpg
- File:Day In December.jpg
- File:Coral Reefs.jpg
- File:Boat On The River.jpg
- File:Cloudy Day.jpg
- File:BIG wave.jpg
- File:MyBridge.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:17, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship [for photo], see watermark on image and the file title. Anyway this is a derivative work. XXN, 12:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
exact duplicate in PNG (Range of horn.png) available HerrAdams (talk) 12:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image - out of project scope. XXN, 12:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot. XXN, 12:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot. XXN, 12:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability. It may be above COM:TOO and thus copyrighted. XXN, 12:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Retouched version of File:Will Petrik.jpg; out of scope. XXN, 12:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files of Rajkumar Mishra sockpuppets
[edit]- File:Rajkumar_Mishra_TV_Actors_2.jpg
- File:Rajkumar_Mishra(Musical).jpg
- File:Rajkumar_Mishra_(actor).jpg
- File:Rajkumar_Mishra_TV_Actors.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
User has been uploading photos of himself for the sole purpose of self-promotion. He has been repeatedly: spamming articles at English Wikipedia with his photos (often replacing well known actor's photos with his own); creating articles about himself which include these photos; adding photos to his many sockpuppet account userpages, using Wikipedia as a webhost; and more. See RAJ KUMAR MISHRA for sockpuppet investigations, including the accounts used to upload photos here.--First Light (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
There is no lisence for the individual pictures in this montage. They are not wikicommons works themselves either. Found5dollar (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manel Martins (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manel Martins (talk · contribs)
[edit]Text documents by the uploader, out of scope.
- File:Al fin del camino.pdf
- File:No mentirás.pdf
- File:Fria venganza.pdf
- File:Breve historia del sigo XX español.pdf
Yann (talk) 12:18, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.z6consulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/F4-1024x745.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:E-edition.jpg
- File:The Fiji Times Online.jpg
- File:NL.jpg
- File:Shanti Dut.jpg
- File:Fijitimes wiki.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Test; konnte nicht mehr hochladen Svema (talk) 15:04, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no permission to use photo at the sourse Testus (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Слово Святейшего Патриарха Алексия (Симанского) при вручении жезла епископу Донату (Щёголеву). КП-26152 Фот.-6152 (1).jpg
[edit]_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%B2%D1%80%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%83_%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83_(%D0%A9%D1%91%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%83)._%D0%9A%D0%9F-26152_%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%82.-6152_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%B2%D1%80%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%BB%D0%B0_%D0%B5%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%83_%D0%94%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83_(%D0%A9%D1%91%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%83)._%D0%9A%D0%9F-26152_%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%82.-6152_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no permission to use photo Testus (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Promotional, no real use in any wikimedia project. MarioFinale (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-free photos of 3D objects. Photographers' permissions required.
- File:Знак мастер парашютного спорта СССР 500.jpg
- File:Знак мастер парашютного спорта СССР 600.jpg
- File:Знак мастер парашютного спорта СССР 700.jpg
- File:Знак мастер парашютного спорта СССР 800.jpg
Яй (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- User:Jameslwoodward, it was impossible to delete immediately? NBS (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- That's correct. You cannot simply add a whole category to an existing DR. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete These all violate the photographer's copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
No indication at the source that the author has released the file under a compatible license Victor Lopes (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Not in Commons scope. No source or description. Defianta (talk) 17:25, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
I don't think its appropriate to have minor childrens photos on Commons unless we can verify the source is a parent or Guardian Defianta (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Es una marca registrada Victorafa (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a photo of a TV screen. Possibly copyvio. Wcam (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia Dogad75 (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
![18:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/29#c-Dogad75-2017-03-29T18:38:00.000Z-File:"Большой_Тылль_и_Пирет".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
![00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/29#c-Daphne_Lantier-2017-04-05T00:55:00.000Z-File:"Большой_Тылль_и_Пирет".jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Liilia Moroz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Главное_здание_завода_Вольта.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liilia Moroz (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Аллея академиков ТТУ.jpg
- File:Корпус Таллинского технического университета.jpg
- File:Оформление первых панельных домов в Таллине.jpg
- File:Мустамяэская красавица.jpg
- File:Пятиэтажный панельный дом в Мустамяэ, Таллин.jpg
- File:Административный корпус завода "Вольта", 1966 год.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 18:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Kauplus ABC-8.jpg and other unfree files
[edit]
Per source each of these individual files is licensed under one of these unfree licenses – BY-NC-SA, BY-NC, BY-ND, BY-NC-ND, or has generic "copyrighted" status (kaitstud autoriõigustega) – that doesn't meet COM:L.
- File:Postkaart. Kalevipoja võitlus Sarvik-taadiga. Moskva, 1966.jpg
- File:Piilupesa lasteaed, Kirovi kolhoos Haabneemes.jpg
- File:Illustratsioon eeposele KALEVIPOEG. I lugu.jpg
- File:Illustratsioon eeposele KALEVIPOEG. XIV lugu. 2016.jpg
- File:Tallinna Kaubamaja arhitektuurivõistluse töö "City Break" (I preemia).jpg
- File:Tartu õmblusvabrik Sangar, päevasärkide mansettide valmistamise masin. 1971.jpg
- File:Maardu Keemiakombinaat.jpg
- File:Tallinna Teenindusmaja.jpg
- File:Klementi nimeline Tallinna Õmblustootmiskoondis.jpg
- File:Kalurikolhoosi "Hiiu Kalur" Kõrgessaare konservitsehh.jpg
- File:Vimpel "Hiiu Kalur".jpg
- File:ABC kauplus.jpg
- File:Kauplus ABC-8.jpg
- File:Mustamäe ABC-8 kaubanduskeskus.jpg
- File:Tallinn ABC-tüüpi kauplus.jpg
- File:Korterelamu Kalamajas Vana-Kalamaja 10.jpg
- File:Tallinn eramu ja korterelamu Kalamajas.jpg
- File:Korterelamu Kalamajas Vana-Kalamaja 28b.jpg
- File:Kirovi nimelise kalurikolhoosi baaslaev "Miidurand".jpg
- File:S.M.Kirovi nimelise kalurikolhoosi kalurid kalapüügil.jpg
- File:Kirovi kalurikolhoosi keskusehoone Haabneemel.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2001:7D0:81DA:F780:7DFE:81F0:65F4:DE28 18:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Да, на сайте muis.ee — несвободные лицензии. Lesless (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Пожалуйста, объясните точнее. Я не понимаю, как, например, такая лицензия https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ может быть причиной удаления файла. Или уж скажите сразу, что НИ ОДНОЙ ФОТКИ с muis.ee "моложе", чем 70-летнего возраста, нельзя копировать? Liilia Moroz (talk) 20:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Да, все файлы на этом сайте, которые я посмотрел, распространяются на условиях НЕСВОБОДНОЙ лицензии. ND и NC - это несвободные и не совместимые с Википроектами лицензии. Lesless (talk) 07:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Пожалуйста, объясните точнее. Я не понимаю, как, например, такая лицензия https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ может быть причиной удаления файла. Или уж скажите сразу, что НИ ОДНОЙ ФОТКИ с muis.ee "моложе", чем 70-летнего возраста, нельзя копировать? Liilia Moroz (talk) 20:54, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
На данное фото распространяются авторские права, так как оно создано в 1966 году, автор, скорее всего неизвестен, дата обнародования неизвестна. Не является государственным документом, всего лишь находится в государственном архиве, что не соответствует указанной лицензии. Dogad75 (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Александр Гуняков (talk · contribs)
[edit]Логотипы и значки защищены авторским правом, так как при создании автором осуществлял интеллектуальный вклад. Разрешения авторов нет. возможно, некоторые изображения тривиальны.
- File:Gazprom badge.jpg
- File:Газпром Shell.jpg
- File:ПриватБанк Отвечу за все!.jpg
- File:ПриватБанк Люблю клиента, как самого себя!.jpg
- File:ПриватБанк Расскажу, что делать. Узнаю кто виноват!.jpg
- File:Сбербанк 65 лет Победы! Мы помним ваш подвиг!.jpg
- File:МТИПП.jpg
- File:Тамбов ТВВКУХЗ.jpg
- File:СЗ Кл.Ворошилов ХХХ години.jpg
- File:Ивот 1785-1985 200 лет ИЦЗ.jpg
- File:Мосэнерго ГОЭЛРО 50 лет.jpg
- File:Завод ми. Жданова Почетный ветеран труда г.Владимир.jpg
- File:ТЭЦ-5 Красный октябрь 1922-1972.jpg
- File:ДП-9 КМЗ.jpg
- File:Русское национальное единство.jpg
- File:Инспектор охраны труда.jpg
- File:Госстрах Страхование жизни.jpg
- File:ЛМЗ ЦХП 1979 Отделение покрытий.jpg
- File:ХВЗ 60 лет.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
licence non valable, marque déposée Presse82 (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
source improbable, licence surement non valable Presse82 (talk) 19:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
exif gives different author MB298 (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pushpita piku 1995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Falsified licensing data provided by uploader. Images were obtained from the internet from various websites without authorization, there is no indication that the images have since been released as {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} as claimed. EXIF data has been removed. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation Lordtobi (✉) 19:32, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons is not for trivia or personal advertisment. Lordtobi (✉) 19:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Crop of image at https://www.sports.ru/profile/144647803/statuses/ Ytoyoda (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time. Leoboudv (talk) 20:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope; not a selfie repository and unused personal image. -- Bagas Chrisara (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, not used in any articles (part of a promotional walled garden on enWP that has been completely deleted). Randykitty (talk) 14:44, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use in WD. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- No it's not. Note that this SPA editor also vandalized my talk page. --Randykitty (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal Image without EXIF Meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Image could be copyrighted as no source has been provided and also without EXIF meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:Dibujo robot triste.png
- File:Dibujo robot pensar.png
- File:Dibujo robot izq.png
- File:Dibujo robot concartel2.png
- File:Dibujo robot.png
- File:Dibujo robot concartel.png
Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Image can be copyrighted and no proper source has been provided. Also missing EXIF Meta data. - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Another 6 images by this user are copyvio. — putnik 16:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia Dogad75 (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
no evidence of public domain Daryona (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
no evidence of public domain Daryona (talk) 18:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:49, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially personality right issues, but also rather posing/profiling and commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started as commercial advertisements, unused as two other related uploads, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially personality right issues, but also rather commercial advertisements, file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, potentially copyright isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', potentially copyright issues, but also rather profiling (see EN-WP), file not in use within Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Comment: see also File:Harsh Agrawal.jpg and en:Harsh Agrawal, Roland zh (talk) 21:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR as per File:Harsh Agarwal.jpg: personality right issues, see also en:Harsh Agrawal, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also rather 'profiling', and missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked: rather 'posing/profiling' or 'family album' content, but also personality rights isusses, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file (was) not in use at Wikimedia projects, see also en:User:Snprasenjit/sandbox, Roland zh (talk) 22:17, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Fictional map, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of unknown source, probable copyvio, and out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete the exact same image but cropped much tighter is attributed in The Hamilton Spectator to Jon Wells the reporter of the story on this source page. Ww2censor (talk) 22:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- The image was provided to the Hamilton Spectator by HMCS Star Public Affairs --HamOnt (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- HamOnt can you verify that? Do you have a source url? Otherwise we cannot confirm the copyright status of the image. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- I deleted the picture until I can get PAO to give me some --HamOnt (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks but I presume you mean you removed it from the enwiki artjcle w:HMCS Star. Ww2censor (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes --HamOnt (talk) 04:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- I deleted the picture until I can get PAO to give me some --HamOnt (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: низкое качество, нет метаданных Dogad75 (talk) 22:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. But maybe somebody wants to keep it as stock photo? Taivo (talk) 10:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Lviv coat small.gif MarioBolo (talk) 11:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
wrong version of File:Coat of arms of Lviv.svg MarioBolo (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
affected File:Nimesh Kumar at Jhandewalan Temple.jpg and File:NimeshKumar.jpg: imho rather 'posing/profiling' and/or 'family album' content, but also personality rights isusses, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:51, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
affected File:Nimesh Kumar at Jhandewalan Temple.jpg and File:NimeshKumar.jpg: imho rather 'posing/profiling' and/or 'family album' content, but also personality rights isusses, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright issue: You see clearly it is a scan from a textbook (background), so impossible "own work" 155.91.64.15 09:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- That's obvious violation since it's not uploader's work, bot the image may be considered {{PD-ineligible}}. Mithril (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly copyrighted work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
This image is targetting and racist in nature. The billboard has been removed. There is no educational value for this image. This is nothing more than an attack. Mattsrealm (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
The fact that this billboard once existed is unquestioned. Wikipedia provides factual information, and while many might wish this billboard was never deployed, the fact that it was should be presented.Wbaron (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep There is absolutely educational value in this. clpo13(talk) 23:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Encyclopedic value is irrelevant. The billboard actually existed, and represent exactly racism (categorised under White supremacy). No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Absolutely educational, but I'm a little concerned about the copyright status of the image in the lower billboard. The family could be blurred, I guess? - Themightyquill (talk) 06:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: While I agree that this should be kept as snapshot of unfortunate recent history, it is a clear copyright violation of both signs. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Everything is 'de minimis'. If you disagree, should no be more constructive to crop it yourself instead of nominating? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note, I uploaded the cropped version under a new file instead of overwriting. If this file became deleted, the cropped version should be moved here. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brianmfkelly (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-trivial logos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Unless the artist is Brian Kelly, the uploader? Isn't that the case? - Themightyquill (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is possible, maybe even probable, that the uploader is the artist, but that must be proven using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Includes its sources File:Barry Docks12.jpg and File:Barry Docks13.jpg. These are still copyrighted in the source country (UK) because the photographer Heber Shirvington died in 1961. These will not enter the public domain until 2131. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- 2131 or 2031? 2131 strikes me as a bit much. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- 2031. The 70-year rule should be so well-known here that a typo is easily spotted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, unless pre-1923 publication can be shown. If pre-1923 publication can be shown, migrate to the English Wikipedia. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:10, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Photograph of identifiable people : missing appropriate consent from the subject 82.244.37.163 17:05, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- La seule chose qu'il faut c'est le consentement du titulaire des droits (en général le photographe). Nous n'avons rien à faire du consentement de la personne sur la photo. A étudier, plus en détail... --Shev123 (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- In fact you're wrong, since you seem to ignore the existence of the right to control one’s image ("le droit à l'image", in French). This is described there, in Commons:Country specific consent requirements for France (adding the bold):
- "According to case law and legal doctrine, photographs taken of (one or more) individuals require authorisation. Just taking someone's photo without consent (in private or public space) can be considered as an invasion of privacy and gives them the right to claim for cessation of the wrongful conduct. Everyone is legally protected from unauthorised distribution, publication or commercialisation of a picture of himself. The permission has to be interpreted in a strict way (only to the extent expressly consented to by the subject)." 82.244.37.163 11:36, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. The subject is identified as Frédéric Schiffter, but so is the uploader. This would suggest consent is freely given. If the uploader is not really Frédéric Schiffter, then it's a problem of abuse. However, unless we have some indication that this was a self-portrait, I'd suggest deletion based on copyright because the photographer is likely not Frédéric Schiffter. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, not a selfie. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
_-_80.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_80.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Meaningless photo of an unknown man, bad quality, no educational purposes Stolbovsky (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
_-_80.jpg){kind=link}
- This photo is used in Russian Wikinews. COM:INUSE: "if it is in use, that is enough." --Klausvienresh (talk) 17:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, this photo is used on gallery page you created with more than 100 photos taken by you. It does not have any educational purposes, you've just taken dozens of photos and uploaded them and used in your article. You could make 1000 of such images, it doesn't mean that they are needed. It will never be used anywhere.--Stolbovsky (talk) 18:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- This photo isn't used on gallery page. It is included to article (Main space). In Wikinews all articles have 100% premodeartion by independent editor, who publishes their. According to Project scope, Wikimedia Commons is a "common repository for all Wikimedia projects". That's why this question should be discussed in local project - Russian Wikinews. Not here. --Klausvienresh (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, this photo is used on gallery page you created with more than 100 photos taken by you. It does not have any educational purposes, you've just taken dozens of photos and uploaded them and used in your article. You could make 1000 of such images, it doesn't mean that they are needed. It will never be used anywhere.--Stolbovsky (talk) 18:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Klausvienresh. Effectively used in Wikinews. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Meaningless file. We may use anything in this article, but where is a sense? I think that we must use in articles such files witch close related with subject. /St1995 14:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The cited page is certainly a "gallery" page, even though it is in mainspace. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
_-_80.jpg){kind=link}
this is duplicate of File:Coat_of_arms_of_Lviv.svg MarioBolo (talk) 10:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: File is widely in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Великий герб Львова.png MarioBolo (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: File is widely in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:08, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Attention, œuvre d'un artiste toujours vivant donc il faut son autorisation Shev123 (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Je supprime le lien depuis l'article à défaut d'avoir compris comment supprimer l'image pour le moment et j'essaie de revenir avec ladite autorisation, le cas échéant ... une fois que j'aurai compris en quoi consiste une autorisation en bonne et due forme. Merci.
- @Alegildo: voir Commons:OTRS/fr, pour avoir une idée de texte pour le consentement.--Shev123 (talk) 08:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Shev123: J'ai trouvé une adresse postale de l'artiste - 96 ans - ... au Chili ! Je tente le coup :-)
Deleted: Certainly a copyvio, but since there is no WP article on the subject, it is also questionable whether the image is in scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
reviews nominatae filiae 87.206.138.155 21:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- what do you mean? --Nux (talk··dyskusja) 19:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion (vandalism?). --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
No permission from C Ford Jcb (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- File was originally uploaded to the English Wikipedia and manually transferred to Commons in 2005. Should be a good idea to ask to the Wikipedia admins for the original uploader (since Dodo retired long time ago). --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: We have several very similar images, so there is not much point in keeping one that has a copyright question. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Некорректная лицензия. Возможно, логотип тривиален. Dogad75 (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
![18:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/29#c-Dogad75-2017-03-29T18:47:00.000Z-File:Лого_АО_"Вольта".jpg){kind=link}
- В лицензии указано, что авторское право ЭР не распространяется на эмблемы организаций (insignia of organisations). Что означает характеристика "тривиален"?
С уважением,Liilia Moroz (talk) 09:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
![09:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/29#c-Liilia_Moroz-2017-03-31T09:23:00.000Z-File:Лого_АО_"Вольта".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: fair use prohibited on Commons. --Sealle (talk) 22:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
![22:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/29#c-Sealle-2017-04-05T22:23:00.000Z-File:Лого_АО_"Вольта".jpg){kind=link}
edicion persoanl por parte de el autor no tiene derechos reservados BISMARCK ERIC TORRES VAZQUEZ (talk) 04:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I declined speedy deletion, because the file is used in en.wikiquote. Uploader's request more than year after uploading. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio in any case, from some TV show. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as a series of artworks using different photography methods, refer to the background at Category:Kargaltsev deletion requests. --Fæ (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Fæ. Fæ can you please add some category related to photographic effects?. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal file, out of project scope. Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Please read the last DR and refer the category full of DRs for Kargaltsev's works.
- Kargaltsev's photographic artworks sometimes include video stills from his video productions, snapshots of rehearsals and behind-the-scenes events for stage productions and gallery exhibitions, or a series of polaroid photographs and published test shots, later used for higher quality photographs. The apparent quality issue, along with the fact that many photographs attract attention as they are explicitly homoerotic or include nude models, means that some of the images have been put up for deletion, or speedy deletion, based on appearance without an investigation into the background of the artist. Often they are thought by nominators to be out of scope as they look like selfies or trashy nude snapshots, rather than creative works from an established LGBT artist. Being deliberately provocative photographs by a professional, there is no doubt about the model release, especially for works with nude models.
- Kargaltsev often uses himself as a model, along with casual photographs taken by polaroid or camera phone to give an insight into his life and work in New York. These photographs range from intimate personal shots to posed compositions and are often homoerotic, political, or provocatively sexual. All types and quality of photograph feature in his gallery exhibitions and publications.
- --Fæ (talk) 07:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's a dude posing in front of a camera. Whether the subject/photographer is a member of the LBGT+ community or not is irrelevant to why the file was nominated for deletion, and any suggestions contrary to that are plain irresponsible. This file is not within scope, as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Deriding Kargaltsev's work is unnecessarily offensive. Read the category and the many references demonstrating that this is not a random "dude" and my keep opinion is not based on simply him being "a member of the LBGT+ community". This is a representative work for an internationally recognized artist, who specializes in homoerotic photographs and alternative media formats such as polaroids and mobile phone shots. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Who is this dude, then? If not a random one... Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- The file is likely in scope as part of en:Alexander Kargaltsev photography art. There where multiple DR's on Kargaltsev files and they are found as being in scope. Just one cent... --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Examine the image page, look at the last DR, and as said several times, read the DR category. It is the nominator's responsibility to understand the image they are raising a DR for and stick to a factual assessment of realistic value, not the uploader's problem to defend themselves from an allegation that they vote keep because the artist is gay. --Fæ (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Who is this dude, then? If not a random one... Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Deriding Kargaltsev's work is unnecessarily offensive. Read the category and the many references demonstrating that this is not a random "dude" and my keep opinion is not based on simply him being "a member of the LBGT+ community". This is a representative work for an internationally recognized artist, who specializes in homoerotic photographs and alternative media formats such as polaroids and mobile phone shots. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's a dude posing in front of a camera. Whether the subject/photographer is a member of the LBGT+ community or not is irrelevant to why the file was nominated for deletion, and any suggestions contrary to that are plain irresponsible. This file is not within scope, as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, I understand, that the photographer is famous, but quality of the photo is bad. I would kept it, if the quality was better. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Bellow the COM:TOO in Japan? Amitie 10g (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 23:59, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Youry Zhelyabuzhsky died in 1955, so these will not be PD until January 1, 2026.
- File:Vladimir Lenin plays chess with Alexander Bogdanov during a visit to Maxim Gorky (April ,10 (23) - April, 17 (30) 1908).jpg
- File:Vladimir Lenin plays chess with Alexander Bogdanov during a visit to Maxim Gorky (April, 10 (23) - April, 17 (30) 1908).jpg
- File:В. Ульянов на Капрі, 1908.jpg
- File:Владимир Ленин у А. М. Горького на Капри, 1908 год.jpg
- File:Владимир Ленин у А. М. Горького на Капри, Италия, 1908 год.jpg
- File:Ленін на Капрі фальс.jpg
- File:Ленин за шахматами.jpg
- File:Ленин23.jpg
_-_April,_17_(30)_1908).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_April,_17_(30)_1908).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Фотографии предположительно принадлежат Желябужскому. Они не подписаны "Желябужский", никогда не публиковались от его имени при его жизни, он никогда не заявлял, что они сделаны им. До 1923 года они были уже опубликованы, правда, потом "забыты", возможно, из-за персонажей рядом с Лениным. Есть данные в источниках в моих статьях в Википедии. Сейчас просто нет возможности с этим разбираться. Могу заняться, но - потом. Mrkhlopov (talk) 12:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Mrkhlopov: Вот здесь можно скачать I том двухтомника «Ленин. Собрание фотографий и кинокадров» 1970 года, там для каждого снимка указан его автор, дата и место первой публикации. --Яй (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Большое спасибо! (Mrkhlopov talk) 13:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- См. на стр. 11: Фотографии эти были сняты известным кинодеятелем Ю. А. Желябужским, в то время молодым фотографом-любителем, они хранились в его личном фонде в Музее А. М. Горького. Сами снимки - на стр. 33-39. --Яй (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Большое спасибо! (Mrkhlopov talk) 13:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Mrkhlopov: Вот здесь можно скачать I том двухтомника «Ленин. Собрание фотографий и кинокадров» 1970 года, там для каждого снимка указан его автор, дата и место первой публикации. --Яй (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Young Yuri Zhelyabuzhsky took these photos in 1908 on Capri, Italy. There are typically plain household photos of family and friends. In sources they are called as "series of amateur photographs" (for example see book above and other). Italian law protects copyright of simple non-creative photographs 20 years since creation. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:13, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- sasha, are you sure these are subject to Italian copyright law, even though never published in Italy? I'm afraid we have photos, which are non-free in the country of first publication - Russia. --Яй (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- There's no word "published" in this part of the Italian legislation. I looked at biography of Zhelyabuzhsky. During this period, young Yuri Zhelyabuzhsky constantly lived in Italy with his mother Maria Andreyeva and her boyfriend Alexei Peshkov (Maxim Gorky) who moved there from the US. Andreyeva and Gorky supported the Russian revolutionaries. Vladimir Ulyanov (Lenin) was one of them and at that time he was a completely unnotable person. The only way to "publish" such pictures is family album and similar family albums of friends. Such poor quality amateur family photos of unknown people are not interesting to anyone else. That is why the Italian legislation counts the term of copyright protection from the moment of their creation. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Кажется, произведения отечественного изобразительного искусства (следовательно и фотографии), созданные до революции 1917 года, можно свободно публиковать в Википедии (надо найти ссылку в правилах). Желябужский не менял подданства, будучи в Италии в 1908 году, а позже стал советским кинодеятелем. То, что он создал, по праву "принадлежит советскому народу". Mrkhlopov talk 22:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Увы. Не созданные, а опубликованные до революции. --Яй (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Аргумент Доры Лазуркиной на XXII съезде " Мне явился ночью Желябужский и сказал, что гордится присутствием своих фотографий в Википедии", - сработает? Mrkhlopov talk 15:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- Увы. Не созданные, а опубликованные до революции. --Яй (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- sasha, are you sure these are subject to Italian copyright law, even though never published in Italy? I'm afraid we have photos, which are non-free in the country of first publication - Russia. --Яй (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
If these were published before 1923, they can be uploaded to English wikipedia under en:Template:PD-1923, even if they are not PD in the country of origin. If the decision to to delete, please let me know and I'll so before they are deleted.- Themightyquill (talk) 06:52, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: dates of first publication are:
- File:Vladimir Lenin plays chess with Alexander Bogdanov during a visit to Maxim Gorky (April ,10 (23) - April, 17 (30) 1908).jpg - first published: журн. «Работница», 1931, № 3, стр. 10 / Rabotnitsa magazine, Moscow, 1931.
- File:Vladimir Lenin plays chess with Alexander Bogdanov during a visit to Maxim Gorky (April, 10 (23) - April, 17 (30) 1908).jpg - first published: журн. «Работница», 1931, № 3, стр. 10 / Rabotnitsa magazine, Moscow, 1931.
- File:В. Ульянов на Капрі, 1908.jpg - first published: журн. «Пролетарская революция», 1926, № 1 (48), стр. 28 / Proletarskaya revoliutsiya magazine, Moscow, 1926.
- File:Владимир Ленин у А. М. Горького на Капри, 1908 год.jpg - first published: газ. «Труд», № 255 (13752), 6 марта 1966 г., стр. 4 / Trud newspaper, Moscow, 1966.
- File:Владимир Ленин у А. М. Горького на Капри, Италия, 1908 год.jpg - first published: "LENIN. COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND STILLS IN TWO VOLUMES" Vol. 1, p. 39, Moscow, 1970.
- File:Ленін на Капрі фальс.jpg - derivative of file #3, first published: журн. «Пролетарская революция», 1926, № 1 (48), стр. 28 / Proletarskaya revoliutsiya magazine, Moscow, 1926.
- File:Ленин за шахматами.jpg - first published: "LENIN. COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND STILLS IN TWO VOLUMES" Vol. 1, p. 35, Moscow, 1970.
- File:Ленин23.jpg - first published: "LENIN. COLLECTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND STILLS IN TWO VOLUMES" Vol. 1, p. 37, Moscow, 1970.
- @Krassotkin: your refs to the Italian law look rather tempting, but what particular "Italian" template do you find suitable for these? {{PD-Italy}} (and it's subpage {{PD-Italy/US}}) both speak of because it was first published in Italy. Sealle (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Sealle: And what is your opinion on this matter? --sasha (krassotkin) 05:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- 1. Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law: If the material is in the public domain, it must normally be in the public domain in all these jurisdictions (plus in the country of origin of the work) for it to be allowable on Commons. 2. Berne Convention, Articles V and II (2): For published works, the country of origin was the country in which the work was first published. For unpublished works, the country of origin was the country of which the author is a national. So, there's no even a word about the country of creation. Delete. Sealle (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- You're right. But the expression "published works" means not only a publication in a newspaper or book. One way to publish is "manufacture of the copies" "with the consent of their authors". See Berne Convention Article III (3). This is the only way to publish for amateur works. Therefore, Italy is the country of origin for these works. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
And why don't you go on quoting? ...manufacture of the copies, provided that the availability of such copies has been such as to satisfy the reasonable requirements of the public... Public, Karl, public... not the requirements of their authors. Sealle (talk) 17:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- The word "public" does not mean "immediately available to all people in the world". In this case, it means "without restrictions on distribution" or in other words the author does not mind that any person can see it. Since our previous discussion of this topic, I came across an interesting case that confirms my interpretation (from Russian Copyright Village pump): "Решение Бердянского суда (апрель 2013 года): В 2010 году бердянский краевед Зиновий Борисович Коган опубликовал в своей книге фотографию солдата российской императорской армии Хаима Мошковича Гуревича, сделанную в 1914 году в фотоателье Герша Розенфельда. После публикации книги в суд обратилась правнучка Розенфельда, Мария Васильевна Козаченко, заявив о нарушении авторских прав, так как фотография не публиковалась в печати. Впоследствии к делу присоединился правнук Гуревича, Микола Иванович Остапенко, заявив что права на фото принадлежат ему, так как его прадед выкупил у Розенфельда права на фото, заплатив тому за работу. В решении суда в удовлетворении иска было отказано, так как датой публикации была установлена дата, когда Розенфельд показал (опубликовал) готовую фотографию Гуревичу, то есть август 1914 года". Briefly in English: "the Ukrainian court recognized as the time of publication the date when the author first showed (published) a photo". --sasha (krassotkin) 08:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Too many assumptions. 1) What if Mr. Zhelyabuzhsky showed these photos to someone 2) in Italy, and what if Russian [strictly not judge-made] legislation 3) would somehow be curious about 4) a single decision of a single 5) Ukrainian court... Sealle (talk) 12:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- This is the usual turnover of amateur photos. We have to prove only something unusual. Mr. Zhelyabuzhsky permanently lived in Italy at this time. His mother had problems with the Russian government. If you have other judicial precedents please let us know. But Ukraine is a member of Berne Convention. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The typical destiny of an amateur photograph is to remain unpublished for a long time. Exactly like in this case. Sealle (talk) 15:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- This is the usual turnover of amateur photos. We have to prove only something unusual. Mr. Zhelyabuzhsky permanently lived in Italy at this time. His mother had problems with the Russian government. If you have other judicial precedents please let us know. But Ukraine is a member of Berne Convention. --sasha (krassotkin) 14:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Too many assumptions. 1) What if Mr. Zhelyabuzhsky showed these photos to someone 2) in Italy, and what if Russian [strictly not judge-made] legislation 3) would somehow be curious about 4) a single decision of a single 5) Ukrainian court... Sealle (talk) 12:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The word "public" does not mean "immediately available to all people in the world". In this case, it means "without restrictions on distribution" or in other words the author does not mind that any person can see it. Since our previous discussion of this topic, I came across an interesting case that confirms my interpretation (from Russian Copyright Village pump): "Решение Бердянского суда (апрель 2013 года): В 2010 году бердянский краевед Зиновий Борисович Коган опубликовал в своей книге фотографию солдата российской императорской армии Хаима Мошковича Гуревича, сделанную в 1914 году в фотоателье Герша Розенфельда. После публикации книги в суд обратилась правнучка Розенфельда, Мария Васильевна Козаченко, заявив о нарушении авторских прав, так как фотография не публиковалась в печати. Впоследствии к делу присоединился правнук Гуревича, Микола Иванович Остапенко, заявив что права на фото принадлежат ему, так как его прадед выкупил у Розенфельда права на фото, заплатив тому за работу. В решении суда в удовлетворении иска было отказано, так как датой публикации была установлена дата, когда Розенфельд показал (опубликовал) готовую фотографию Гуревичу, то есть август 1914 года". Briefly in English: "the Ukrainian court recognized as the time of publication the date when the author first showed (published) a photo". --sasha (krassotkin) 08:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, sasha, are you trying to say
black is whitecreation is publication? Stanford University Libraries. Copyright Basics FAQ. 3.0.1 Is the Work Published?: A work is considered published when the author makes it available to the public on an unrestricted basis. For example, Andres Miczslova writes an essay called “Blood Bath” about the war in Bosnia, and distributes it to five human rights organizations under a non-exclusive license that places restrictions on their right to disclose the essay’s contents. “Blood Bath” has not been “published” in the copyright sense. --Яй (talk) 17:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)- The keywords in this explanation are: "that places restrictions on their right to disclose". This is not our case. When we distribute amateur material, we usually do not impose such restrictions. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- But was it distributed? Simply showing the photos to someone is definitely not publication. The performance of a dramatic, dramatico-musical, cinematographic or musical work, the public recitation of a literary work, the communication by wire or the broadcasting of literary or artistic works, the exhibition of a work of art and the construction of a work of architecture shall not constitute publication. Giving away copies to people, outside of family, with no restrictions on further publication can be (U.S. case law was similar in that regard). If the photographer handed out copies to neighbors etc., that could be publication. But if he limited copies to just family and close friends, under condition they don't distribute any further, that is likely not publication. And simply showing his own copies to people is definitely not publication. For the case of a studio photographer, they are giving copies (for payment) to someone they don't know at all, with no restrictions on further distribution -- that can indeed be publication. But in this case, given Lenin's sensitivities and the likelihood of the photographer to respect them, it seems likely that copies were not given out freely. Was the source of the eventual publications mentioned above Mr. Zhelyabuzhsky himself, or someone that he had given copies to? Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- The keywords in this explanation are: "that places restrictions on their right to disclose". This is not our case. When we distribute amateur material, we usually do not impose such restrictions. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
- You're right. But the expression "published works" means not only a publication in a newspaper or book. One way to publish is "manufacture of the copies" "with the consent of their authors". See Berne Convention Article III (3). This is the only way to publish for amateur works. Therefore, Italy is the country of origin for these works. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- 1. Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law: If the material is in the public domain, it must normally be in the public domain in all these jurisdictions (plus in the country of origin of the work) for it to be allowable on Commons. 2. Berne Convention, Articles V and II (2): For published works, the country of origin was the country in which the work was first published. For unpublished works, the country of origin was the country of which the author is a national. So, there's no even a word about the country of creation.
- @Sealle: And what is your opinion on this matter? --sasha (krassotkin) 05:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Article 3 says: The expression “published works” means works published with the consent of their authors, whatever may be the means of manufacture of the copies, provided that the availability of such copies has been such as to satisfy the reasonable requirements of the public, having regard to the nature of the work. The important part there is "availability of such copies has been such as to satisfy the reasonable requirements of the public". If these were private photos which were not distributed beyond family and close friends, I don't think that counts as publication. Given that Lenin apparently did not like to be photographed at that time, and the photographer was likely to be respectful of those wishes, and also that the photographer was a temporary visitor there who returned to Russia, it seems unlikely that the photos were actually distributed to the public in Italy at the time. So, I don't think we can say that Italy is the country of origin. Under Russian law, it would have expired in 1970 or so, but was apparently retroactively restored in 1993.
- Now, "country of origin" can be rather tortured for Soviet Union works -- you can argue that it was simultaneously published in all successor nations of the Soviet Union, meaning the "country of origin" is the one among those countries with the shortest term. Unsure if any other former soviet republic countries have a shorter term for photographs, but using that logic you can end up with somewhat illogical "country of origin" definitions, yet that is exactly what the treaty says so it could well be accurate. For the URAA though in this situation, and thus U.S. copyright status, the "source country" is the one with the "greatest contacts with the work", which is a more common-sense definition, and for a Moscow-based author that would certainly be Russia -- so if not published until 1923 or later, the URAA then most likely restored the works and they are still under U.S. copyright (as well as Russian copyright). The only way out was if the photographer was not identified within the first 50 years of publication, I think. Now, multiple stock photo agencies have copies of these and dubiously claim them as "rights managed" -- they were likely simply collected. That does make it difficult to stand up for copyright, as these are famous historical photos (and apparently often altered by the Soviet government before publication), and most everyone seems to ignore it because they will likely get away with it. But, it does seems as though there is a likely a valid copyright on it in both Russia and the U.S. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - can be undeleted in 2026. --Jcb (talk) 17:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, in 2030: 70+4 for those who worked during the Great Patriotic War or participated in it. Sealle (talk) 18:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)