Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 23rd, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

元ファイルを改めてアップロードしたため。 Masoranosora (talk) 08:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dharmadhyaksha: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ページにて使用しなくなった為。一旦削除をお願いします。 Masoranosora (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dharmadhyaksha: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it in error Ke4roh (talk) 13:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted – accidental creation. --jdx Re: 13:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it in error Ke4roh (talk) 13:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted – accidental creation. --jdx Re: 13:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it in error Ke4roh (talk) 13:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted – accidental creation. --jdx Re: 13:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits "JPRADERO" Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; obvious copyvio. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Came from same Flickr profile as File:Belottitraining.jpg, a Getty Images photo. Likely that this image is a copyvio as well. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikram jha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of scope

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 09:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vikrammaithil. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikram jha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear what to do with these images. Crop out the adverts and then re-upload? Or just delete?

Takeaway (talk) 13:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and blocked. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loksa108 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loksa108 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is considerably blurred, and there are more photos of the same subject. Schlosser67 (talk) 14:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published on other websites like this one, and cropped from this coloured picture. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 20:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée sur d'autres sites web non libres de droits, comme fr.academic.ru, et qui semble avoir été extraite de cette photo couleur. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 20:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: here nominator withdraw the request. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:56, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own author's request Triplecaña (talk) 14:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [[1]]

G I Chandor (talk) 04:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hachiemon

[edit]

Copyrighted character. 2 Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hachiemon

[edit]

Copyrighted character. 2 Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Hachiemon

[edit]

Copyrighted character. 2 Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No good result of quality Samuel Long BRD (talk) 16:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of the picture Samuel Long BRD (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no use for Samuel Long BRD (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no use for Samuel Long BRD (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

wrong quality of picture Samuel Long BRD (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

must be replaced and deleted soon to place a better version of Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   23:55, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Model and me the copyright owner want to use their legal rights and now wish the deletion. Thanks to all, Samuel Long BRD (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Samuel Long BRD: you can use COM:OTRS to do a formal request. XXN, 11:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Kept in 6 previous deletion requests. Tm (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Im Nachgang machen das Fotomodel und der Fotograph vom geltenden Recht gebrauch, ein Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Tm (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modell und Fotograph möchten die Löschung des Bildes bzw. der Varianten, da Fragen zu den umfänglichen Rechten offen sind und deshalb eine vorsorgliche Löschung optimal wäre. Samuel Long BRD (talk) 13:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-admin closure): No new arguments brought after 7 previous deletion requests. Tm (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope advertisement, unlikely to have any educational use. Sunmist (talk) 23:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope advertisement. Sunmist (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope advertisement. Sunmist (talk) 23:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Capitalstars02 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope advertisements.

Sunmist (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anderson008 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope advertisements for lists of e-mail addresses.

Sunmist (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Olympic pictograms are copyrighted VateGV taper la discut’ 00:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+no source for the map. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too poor quality to be of educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotional purpose only Triplecaña (talk) 00:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was created by 新谷英子 (Eiko Shintani). [2] Her death year is 2017. [3]

G I Chandor (talk) 00:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan.

G I Chandor (talk) 00:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Priyarrt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope advertisements.

Sunmist (talk) 00:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope advertisement. Sunmist (talk) 00:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [4]

G I Chandor (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2006. [5]

G I Chandor (talk) 02:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-educational material. Out of Scope. Kkairri (talk) 03:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. Non-educational material. Kkairri (talk) 03:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 12:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Scope. --Mys_721tx (talk) 18:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 06:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itsarshadhasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 07:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniely9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose. Not used.

George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with current amount of information. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File without file Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupt or empty file, per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikiwasim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photographs.

~ Nahid Talk 13:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, only use was in article deleted as self-promotional czar 15:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused pdf file full of unattributed images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution, in my opinion not suitable for stock photo. Depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, dubious own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Savhñ 11:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Morning (talk) 23:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 20:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable person, not used. (Many pics of the building is in Category:Palace of culture in Pripyat.) Kulmalukko (talk) 20:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 20:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 20:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 20:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Daphne Lantier 20:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aarontyson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal pics, not within project scope

Daphne Lantier 20:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 20:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit blurred private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, distorted. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NewsReports (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Will be never used for any project.

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 21:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, rubbish descriptions, sources etc Slangcamms (talk) 18:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by almost similar image. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jatin.mittal06 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Redundant images with motion blur. Superseded by almost similar image with less motion blur: File:Vishram Vada 05.JPG.

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally valuable, because it's so dark. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work due to age. No source or copyright details. --ghouston (talk) 00:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the digital version of one photo from a series of photos of my great grandfather that have been floating around my family for decades. I have done searches on national and local levels and have not found any claim to them anywhere. I have discussed the use of these images of my grandfather Louis with intellectual, copyright and trademark attorneys who advised me that using them, even in commerce and trade, would be acceptable as the photographer who took therm has surely long since passed away and appears to have them to the public domain. --Louis Diemert (talk) 15:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So it seems to be an unpublished photo by an anonymous photographer, from the US. In that case it will be in the public domain 120 years from date of creation, according to [6], which would be 2068. In the meantime, the copyright is held by the heirs of the photographer. --ghouston (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not {{Own}} work as claimed, no proof of prior publication, no proof of public domain status. This has to be deleted per COM:PRP. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was erected in 2005. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 02:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 02:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was erected in 1995. G I Chandor (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1987. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 02:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1982. [9] G I Chandor (talk) 02:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue was erected in 1989. [10] G I Chandor (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was created by 松野伍秀 (Matsuno Goshu) [11] (1915-1986) [12].

G I Chandor (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely own work, as stated from the movie BloodRayne. TherasTaneel (talk) 02:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio from here. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely own work, as stated from the movie Toni Erdmann. TherasTaneel (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio from here. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely own work, as stated from the movie Outbound. TherasTaneel (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely own work, watermark included. TherasTaneel (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio from here. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not likely own work, as stated from IMDb TherasTaneel (talk) 02:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected not own work, based on other files uploaded by user TherasTaneel (talk) 02:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio from here. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior pixel dupe of SVG File:Armoiries_Owen_Tudor.svg, same author. -- User: Perhelion 03:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused, superseded by superior SVG image. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poster of 2014 film. obviously copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 03:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Snowflake" is a short film I directed and I own all the copyrights, including the poster's. I am Francesco Roder (username Capricorn83 since I was born in January 83). There is no copyright violation as I declared when I uploaded the picture. User:Capricorn83

@Capricorn83: Thank you for your reply and uploading the photo. But we can't identify particular person with user name. Please read Commons:OTRS and send e-mail, then confirm that you're Mr. Francesco Roder, thank you.--Kkairri (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No corresponding ticket found in OTRS. This needs to be confirmed in contact with the support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for a British company which has a very low COM:TOO#UK. More than meets this threshold Mungoola (talk) 03:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outfit7 is based in Cpyrus (1), and the new buyers are from Asia which are represented by a Hong Kong-based company (2). It does have an office in the UK, but I don't think that this makes it a British company. Despite that - this logo is not simple enough to be copyright-free.--Carniolus (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Appears to be sufficiently complex for most legislations. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for a British company which has a very low COM:TOO#UK. More than meets this threshold Mungoola (talk) 03:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Outfit7 is based in Cpyrus (1), and the new buyers are from Asia which are represented by a Hong Kong-based company (2). It does have an office in the UK, but I don't think that this makes it a British company.--Carniolus (talk) 15:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Regular type face, two colors. This appears to be below COM:TOO. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo no evidence of permission. Mungoola (talk) 03:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No documented permission, beyond COM:TOO. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a graphical issue WDCDECDCDC (talk) 03:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No description, no categories, unused. Appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation here MohammadtheEditor (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD, the author died in 1977. Sealle (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (TV capture) Oxe (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Oxe: I took this picture from the stadium, if you want I can also upload the match ticket to prove it. Cheers, MYS77 13:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MYS77: My bad. Sorry. Oxe (talk) 13:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Uploader's claim appears to be trustworthy. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible promotion Tropicalkitty (talk) 06:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably the same guy loaded up this file: File:A Plumber Tools San Jose.jpg. Yes, that's advertisement both.--ProfessorX (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the guy uploaded this file File:A Plumber Tools San Jose.jpg. I am appealing not to delete my file. It's not for promotion. 24hourplumbingSanDiego

 Keep It's a nice photograph and I deleted the advertisement/promotion information.--ProfessorX (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Has been published before at here. Hence, this needs a permission through our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because David Nilsson does not approve of this photo as he is working with a perfesional team and there are much better ones to be seen and advertised to the public Tj14 (talk) 09:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. No valid reason for deletion. The photograph appears to be a photo of a public person taken in a public place with no expectation of privacy. The photograph is in use on multiple projects, and we're not about to censor them based on some supposed preference of the subject. Furthermore, as the files you uploaded are likely copyright violations (please understand that you cannot upload non-free photos you grabbed from the Internet and just make up some bogus licensing claim), we do not appear to have any other genuinely free photos of the subject, much less any others that depict the subject playing for the Peninsula Padres. LX (talk, contribs) 14:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:LX. P 1 9 9   14:39, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To small, not used and probable uploaded as the advertisement camaign. Juandev (talk) 09:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Wikimedia is not an advertising nor travel company, it need not to fight against hypothetical "competitors". Any possible "campaign" is not our worry. The image is small, a larger image would be better. However, the item of the image is fully distinguishable and in scope. It is usable in the basic thumbnail resolution (even though not for enlargement). Images as displayed in Wikipedia articles are usually not larger. --ŠJů (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you are not right. Missuse of Wikimedia Commons scope is our worry.--Juandev (talk) 11:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A misuse is to upload files out of scope. Or even assaultive files. These files are in scope. The fact that images of sites, events etc. can inspire somebody to visit the sites or events or the fact that information about organizations, authors, companies etc. can cause someone's concern is certainly not a problem for us. The quality of the image is weaker but acceptable. That's all. No reason to delete, no reason to endless flames. --ŠJů (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope, no obvious advertising. P 1 9 9   14:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality (CA, small resolution), it havent been used in the projects for years, the original idea of the uploader was to advertise their company.--Juandev (diskuse) 09:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Juandev (talk) 09:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image is used in project Wikimedia Commons (categorized by item). The resolution and technical qualities are poor but the composition is not so bad to waste our time with useless discussions about possible deletion. In a small resolution, it can be a good illustration or symbol of rock climbing. Original idea of the uploader is quite uninteresting for us. --ŠJů (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original idea of the uploader is to advertise themselves, while the scope of Wikimedia Commons is to collect free media for educational purpose. Do you think we will not find better images on commons to ilustrate climbing?--Juandev (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not an elimination tournament based on principle that every file should be deleted as soon as another image of something similar can be from some view considered as better. That's a criterion to choose the file for an article or for a gallery, not to delete all momentally unchosen files. Usability in the Commons categories is also a valuable usage.
Maybe, some of the uploader's or other descriptive information can have some advertising effects, but it's not a reason to censor it. It's an additional factual information and such information are generally requiered and welcomed. The image itself is not negatively affected nor depreciated by the information. --ŠJů (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are other reasons for deletion so in insist.--Juandev (talk) 14:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: poor quality, but in scope. Any advertising/promotional items can be removed. P 1 9 9   14:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I desagree with the creation and existence of this category. The uploader of files abused commons trying to advertice their business. The advertisement was everywhere (filename, description, username). So creating a special category for them would be another help how to advrtise them. Note that these files lies here 3 years and for 3 years they havent found a use. Morover, personal categories are usually hidden and category about the company usually includes files of the companny itself--Juandev (diskuse) 10:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Juandev (talk) 10:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia projects are fundamentally independent, i.e. they categorize their content by items, sources and other attributes independently on the fact whether the information will cause any profit or any detriment to anybody. Wikimedia is not their competitor. Some of the included images can be illustrative to some items, even though they are of low quality and very poorly described (without any location). However, the fact that they depict activities of the mentioned subject is a real, relevant and objective information (which can also enable to suppose their probable localization as Český ráj area). The category helps to find a context of the files, that's a benefit for Commons. A possible advertising (or discouraging) impact to the company or their clients is not our worry.
I see no strong reason to delete all the files. And if the files are kept, I strongly support to keep them categorized by all relevant criteria, including the category of the affected company. --ŠJů (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Btw., before start of this discussion, the category was vandalized by removing of 4 from 7 uploaded images belonging there. --ŠJů (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly lets clarify something:

  • try to be calm (the category was not vandalized, the category lost 4 files)
  • note, this request is not about the deletion of files, but the category itself
  • The problem is a scope. Wikimedia Commons scope is to collect edcuational pictures, the scope here was to advertise one small company
  • you are sayin "to ilustrate their activities", but it is not sure that pictures depict their activities, most of that additional information was added by you. --Juandev (talk) 11:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly was added by me? I only put back the factual information removed by you. Generally, the author's (uploader's] informations about location and other facts about the photographed scene is supposed as true if there is no reason to question it. There at Commons are not required "published sources" to prove it. Information which is not directly clear from the image is often even more valuable than a pure description of the image.
Generally, categories of Commons are intended to organize files, e.g. group related files together. It is usefull to create categories also for small creeks, streets, settlements, companies, even for individual buildings, even when the creek, street, settlement, company or building has not separately an encyclopedic importance. In case of these files with insufficient localization, the relation to a company operating in small specific area is very important and irreplaceable to keep any localizing context of the files.
Please, don't waste our, my and others's time with needless deletion proposals and discussions. These images are of weak quality and description, but all in scope. Try to focus your energy and time to more than 1 million of quite uncategorized media. There are among them many good images which are unusuable due missing categorization. And many really unusable and uncategorizable files out of scoope. Try to be more constructive and not to initiate quite needles flames and discussions. --ŠJů (talk) 11:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, you keep to be offensive here and you dont need to (e.g. Please, don't waste our, my and others's time with needless deletion proposals and discussions - is a lack of respect that everbody may present his POV by the deletion proposal).
These images are of weak quality and description, but all in scope. --> I repeat myself again, this deletion discussion is not about images. When this category is deleted, those images will stay. This proposal is about deleting of the category itself.--Juandev (talk) 12:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This category name is clearly promoting a website/company, against policy. If User:ŠJů wants to categorize his images in one place, he is free to create a {{User category}} such as Category:Photos by ŠJů. P 1 9 9   14:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thutaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely user's own work, watermarked as "Htin Aung Kyaw", no EXIF data

NinjaStrikers «» 11:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Thutaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely user's own works, grabbed from a Facebook page (BEHS 16 Mandalay)

NinjaStrikers «» 12:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Thutaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

grabbed from a Facebook page ([13] & [14])

NinjaStrikers «» 12:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Thutaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sufficient quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sufficient quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sufficient quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 12:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sufficient quality, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising Takeaway (talk) 13:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is uploaded as the user's own work, but it includes a company logo and appears to be a product advertisement. Anne Delong (talk) 13:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DM for character, but personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eyal Elron (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the NSDAP (1920–1945).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Peru.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized, watermarked, possibly COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: watermark is consistent with user's other uploads, in scope. P 1 9 9   15:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, blurry, unused diagram of no apparent educational purpose. Source is a publication Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be some form of unused animated diagram. Perhaps a POV edit. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be some form of humor edit, but contains derivative images which are not sourced. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused animated map, containing apparently incorrect and unsourced POV information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per file's description: "An exceedingly simplified map". Unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:20, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused page of Arabic calligraphy which appears to be old. However, not in use, uncategorized, claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused and uncategorized image which is likely not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amae21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some images of a place called "14 Pews" but unused and uncategorized, no location information. Seems promotional.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, promotional and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

says (C) right on the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unusable because of watermarking. P 1 9 9   15:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better image is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sninský_kameň_014.JPG CaptainClawHE (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better image is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sninský_kameň_014.JPG CaptainClawHE (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   15:24, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better image is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sninský_kameň_074.jpg CaptainClawHE (talk) 19:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not the same, one is taken in the winter, the other in summer. P 1 9 9   15:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better image is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sninský_kameň_086.jpg Milan Bališin (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. I'm not the author of the photo. Milan Bališin (talk) 18:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: please go through OTRS to clarify this mass deletion request. Ruthven (msg) 12:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons Milan Bališin (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Withdrawal from licensing terms. I do not want that file to be used. Personal reasons Milan Bališin (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello Ellin, it was my mistake, that this picture has been posted here. Please delet it. Thanks --- Gerhard Haubold 20:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello Ellin, it was my mistake, that this picture has been posted here. Please delet it. Thanks --- Gerhard Haubold 20:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of a telegram, but without copyright permission from the person who wrote it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

===Hello Ellin, it was my mistake to edit this telegram. It has to be deleted. Gerhard Haubold


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a rephotograph, thus the photographer cannot license the subject. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized image of letter, unlikely created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Letter unlikely to be written by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Troll atempt, falsely linked to an active politician cubic[*]star 19:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Βρείτε αλλού τα τρόλλ σας, αγαπητέ κυριε cubicstar. Πάντως, θα διαγραφεί από κάποιον άλλον, και όχι εσάς.Ούζα και Κρασιά Θεσσαλονίκης (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

maybe castle illustration is under copyrighted. Takumiboo (talk) 17:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Termolar S.A (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A gallery of small images of Thermal Pots (note uploader's name), all in meta have different named author. Also please see that these are linked to an essentially promotional sandbox page which was last touched two years ago. I suggest this/these are here to drive up hit counts.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, promotional, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent educational utility on this photo of some kind of fabric tag. Not in use, not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:35, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tangent erine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused and uncategorized images of ? ... Looks like plastic tubes with dust.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:37, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo Sakhalinio (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:37, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamping on the photo suggests this is not the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamping on the photo suggests this is not the uploader's work Ytoyoda (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   15:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   15:46, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   15:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unremarkable image of vegetation. P 1 9 9   15:49, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: over-exposed as well. P 1 9 9   15:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unremarkable image of vegetation. P 1 9 9   15:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   15:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. P 1 9 9   15:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination,unremarkable image of vegetation. P 1 9 9   15:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, provides some context/setting instead of only focussed on animal. P 1 9 9   15:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:08, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: borderline. P 1 9 9   15:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:57, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, acceptable quality and composition. P 1 9 9   15:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   16:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, acceptable quality and composition. P 1 9 9   15:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   15:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, acceptable quality and composition. P 1 9 9   16:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover, probably copyvio https://g-eazy.com/music/ --Michal Lenc (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:03, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope scenery. P 1 9 9   16:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope scenery. P 1 9 9   16:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it will be never used for any project and in addition, I don't know for what to use this file. Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 21:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate, in scope. P 1 9 9   16:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   16:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, utterly unremarkable. P 1 9 9   16:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate, in scope. P 1 9 9   16:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope scenery. P 1 9 9   16:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope scenery. P 1 9 9   16:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A blurred image of a coffee cup. Maybe no need to keep this, because there is many non-blurred images of coffee cups in Category:Cups of black coffee. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate, in scope. P 1 9 9   16:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Sanders'.png Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 21:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:20, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   16:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate, in scope. P 1 9 9   16:21, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. P 1 9 9   16:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 23:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: The image is well in scope of Category:Hanuman. Did you have any other concern? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   16:24, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date of upload and abuse of file. Skillsameh1 (talk) 23:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:24, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [15] G I Chandor (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [16] G I Chandor (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. [17] G I Chandor (talk) 04:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. [18] G I Chandor (talk) 04:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character. [19] G I Chandor (talk) 04:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims to be in the photo so it cannot be the uploader's own work. EXIF info also indicates this image is from Facebook. Wcam (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ridingupthehill (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Klement.actor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Photo focused on another photo. No information about the author and license of that photo. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 22:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad nonphotographic JPEG superseded by PNG. Unused. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 20:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unsued; replaced by File:United States Navy Special Warfare insignia.png. --Wdwd (talk) 11:45, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be cropped version of this image Msaynevirta (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source not free, OTRS is needed Ezarateesteban 21:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:40, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it isn't an own work and not licensed Ezarateesteban 21:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from http://www.brisbaneroar.com.au/photo-gallery/gallery-our-squads-new-training-kit-from-1-to-33-14zip2qcia0gh1pnim43bbte8r/20-shannon-brady---attacker-12, EXIF credits a photographer but unclear if it's the same person as the uploader. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by presumably living painter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by presumably living painter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from https://twitter.com/penpower_fc/status/690024676203065347?lang=en Ytoyoda (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a screenshot Ytoyoda (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 19:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio. uploader says "own work of 2015", metadata say 2012 Siwibegewp (talk) 19:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; (insufficent justification: Wrong data could be a typo). --Wdwd (talk) 11:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Diixstyle

[edit]

All these images were uploaded by User:Diixstyle. They were originally uploaded here, here, here and here. They don't have the appropriate licenses and are suspected of copyvio. --Vermeer 9 (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: allready deleted files; See deletion log for details. --Wdwd (talk) 11:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Yuexi Tan

[edit]

These files were uploaded by User:Yuexi Tan. The first two are promotional images of group BTS (see here and here) and the third was originally uploaded to their Twitter account here. They are all suspected of copyvio. --Vermeer 9 (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used photo. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probabile copyviol da https://parigisozzi.wordpress.com/ Emmepici (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:58, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isaaccontrerasd (talk · contribs)

[edit]
  • Subject =Azul etcheverry
  • Author = Azul etcheverry (in the first image. In the second, the author line is blank)
  • Uoploader = Isaaccontrerasd

These are the only two images by this new user. They are large, have EXIF, and do not appear in Google, but they both appear to be studio portraits, not selfies. Therefore the first claim, that Azul etcheverry is the photographer, does not appear to be correct. Since they both appear to be from the same session, that casts doubt on the second.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & COM:PCP; Need permission via OTRS. --Wdwd (talk) 12:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work", photographer Jonas Ekströmer, Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=114&artikel=6413661 Skivsamlare (talk) 17:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 24 February 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Utilisation abusive, image publiée sans autorisation Jpwery (talk) 22:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpwery: Quand on regarde, c'est pourtant vous qui avez chargé l'image et cédé vos droits selon la licence GFDL/CC-BY-SA. Celle-ci autorise la modification et la création d'autres oeuvres dérivées tant que l'auteur de la publication initiale est mentionné (ce qui est le cas). BAV. Vascer (talk) 13:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vascer: C'est effectivement moi qui ai chargé l'image mais je constate que je n'avais pas le droit de la publier sur Wikimedia selon la législation belge. Merci donc de la supprimer dans les plus brefs délais! BAV Jpwery

J'ai publié cette photo par erreur (je n'ai pas bien compris le fonctionnement de Wikimedia en 2008) -> Je viens d'être averti que je n'avais pas d'accord de publication sur le web. Merci de supprimer ce fichier (je ne trouve pas de fonction me permettant de le faire sur Wikimedia) Jpwery (talk) 14:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpwery: Êtes vous l'auteur de l'image (Jean-Philippe Wéry) ? Si oui, mentionner la législation belge n'est pas pertinent étant donné que vous avez cédé volontairement ces droits selon la licence mentionnée ci-dessus (prétendre l'ignorer me paraît assez mince étant donné que c'est mentionné avant le transfert et la publication). Les licences Creative Commons ne sont toutefois pas révocables. La procédure doit se poursuivre. BàV. Vascer (talk) 18:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:Bonsoir Vascer, vous me semblez particulièrement pénible ou arrogant. Je vais faire très simple et tenter une nouvelle foi de me faire comprendre : En 2008 je réalise cette photo pour un mouvement de jeunesse belge (GCB) dans un magasin de Namur (Belgique). Je publie cette photo sur le site (www.nalux.be). Découvrant Wikimedia, je publie dessus cette photo de foulards afin d'illustrer les informations sur les mouvements de jeunesse. Je publie également une photo de ma vieille Mini Cooper (immatriculation belge XBT-896 dont je suis propriétaire). Les procédures de publications sont assez complexes pour moi et je trouve le site wikimedia difficilement utilisable. En 2011 je suis hospitalisé durant plusieurs mois pour un AVC (hémorragie cérébrale) . Après revalidation de cet avc, le temps s'écoule et j'ai vraiment autre chose à foutre dans la vie que de m'inquiéter d'une putain de photo de foulards que j'ai photographié et publié en 2008! Il y a quelques jours je suis contacté via ma messagerie Facebook pour m'informer que cette photo circule sur internet et que je n'avais pas le droit de la publier même si j'en suis l'auteur. Après vérification je constate que cette photo circule bien sur les réseaux sociaux pour une publicité dont je n'ai pas connaissance. Je fais la demande aux différentes personnes qui l'ont publiée de bien vouloir la retirer dans les 24h conformément à la législation belge en vigueur et qu'à defaut des poursuites judiciaires seront entamées. Une des personnes qui a publié cette photo m'envoie par email un lien avec la source de la photo qui est Wikimedia. Alors oui, je suis bien Jean-Philippe Wéry, domicilé en Belgique, né le 12 mars 1975, adresse email jpwery@yahoo.fr . Oui je reconnais que je n'aurais pas du publier cette photo. Après vérification dans vos conditions générales, je suis EN DROIT de demander le retrait d'une photo publiée par erreur. J'ai vraiment autre chose à foutre que de passer deux jours de correspondance avec vous pour faire retirer cette photo de wikimedia et j'ai vraiment autre chose à fouttre que d'étudier vos putains de codes et de parcourir ce putain de site pour chaque fois chercher le liens pour vous écrire. AURIEZ VOUS L'AMABILITE DE SOIT RETIRER CETTE PHOTO QUE J'AVAIS OUBLIE SUR CE SITE, SOIT ME COMMUNIQUER LES MODALITES POUR LA RETIRER et ainsi pouvoir me conformer à la législation belge qui m'oblige à retirer cette putain de photo!!!!

Bonjour,
Cette situation est en effet embêtante, je comprends que votre désarroi et votre souhait de demander le retrait de cette photographie pour en finir avec cette situation.
Toutefois, quelque soit votre niveau de détresse, je vous invite à garder votre calme et une certaine courtoisie dans vos échanges. Notamment, cette photographie ayant été réutilisée, publiée il y a 9 ans, et retouchée par Vascer, celui dispose d'un intérêt légitime pour être intrigué de votre demande de suppression, il y a donc lieu d'éviter de qualifier vos interlocuteurs de pénible ou d'arrogant.
La question principale ici n'est en effet ni la prétendue pénibilité de vos interlocuteurs, ni vos antécédents médicaux, mais le droit d'auteur.
En droit, vous disposez de la plénitude des droits patrimoniaux et moraux sur cette photographie.
Vous avez apparemment effectué deux cession de cette photographie :
  • une première cession, à une date inconnue, dans des conditions inconnues, à GCB ou à un de leur représentant ;
  • une seconde cession perpétuelle sous une licence libre sur Wikimedia Commons.
Il convient en effet de régulariser cette situation.
Pour cela, la toute première chose à faire est d'examiner le contrat de cession de vos droits patrimoniaux sur l'image effectuée à GCB. Vous pouvez vous mettre en rapport par mail avec moi, et nous regarderons ensemble si vous le désirez ce qu'il en est.
Ensuite, nous aviserons le choix le plus approprié en fonction de ce contrat, notamment la possibilité pour GCB d'octroyer une licence libre, puisqu'ils sont partie intégrante à l'affaire si et seulement si la cession de droit était à titre exclusif.
Dans le cas contraire, nous analyserons dans un second temps ce que nous pouvons faire pour votre exercice du droit moral de retrait. --Dereckson (talk) 23:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This image is widely used on WMF projects. As I understand it, it was previously published on a site -- www.nalux.be -- which apparently no longer exists. Although Jpwery has not stated his case clearly, I think perhaps that the GCB is claiming that he gave them an exclusive license and then, subsequently, he gave a non-exclusive CC-BY-SA license here. In the nine years between then and now, the image has been put into use in 98 places, according to Google. Although the GCB might like to have exclusive rights, with so many users out there, there is no way to undo this. Although Jpwery may be in breach of contract with GCB, the license here is valid and the possible breach is not our problem. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete categories

Overcategorized by a now blocked user. Thanks. --Frze > talk 14:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Frze > talk 14:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

Extended content

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  •  Keep any images listed here uploaded by me. This bot mass deletion based on a category makes proper review unnecessarily complex, and is a way of bypassing the normal DR process. -- (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Betty Ages photo. It's worrying that crosswiki photos like this are being unthinkingly deleted out of process. Please stop creating these crazy large automatic DRs for potentially controversial in scope images. -- (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files which are in use on other projects must not be deleted, please remove from this DR before considering any action. An example is the photograph of Arnab Roy Chowdhury. This DR is obviously hastily prepared using automation rather than actually looking at the images nominated. -- (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: You really want to create dozens of thousands single DRs for all personal files, hosted on Commons? /St1995 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before talking about the number of DRs, you should check if there is really a need for a deletion. Then, some of these may not be in scope, but that has to be decided on individual basis. A mass DR of hundreds of images is not the right way to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The files, as this automatic and massive DR of files of different authors, provinances, scopes (or lack of) and sources is itself out of scope. So  Delete this category as out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private playground of someone, wasting other peoples time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
  • The problem is not in this category. @Apocheir: Please do not add files in this category which may be notable for Commons. This cat is only for personal files! /St1995 21:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Can someone enlighten me what is a Unused personal file, as i tought it was about out pf scope images of people, but it seems that it includes images of cars, logos (and several others logos by the way). Tm (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Speaking as someone who's been adding a lot of files to this category lately... My conception of "personal file" includes not just pictures of the users, but pictures of the user's friends and family, promotional material for the user's musical projects, logos of the user's personal business, or anything else that is really only of interest to the uploader. Basically anything where someone's trying to use Commons as their own personal photo hosting site. There was no definition of "personal file" on the category, so it's up to individual interpretation. That said, as I stated on the Talk page, I was under the impression that there would be some sort of automated review before those files were nominated for deletion. At the very least, someone needs to clean out the files that are in use! -Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now, and created separate DRs for individual files or groups thereof, based on some actual work. And, per Tm,  delete this useless and nonsensical category. It may be necessary to discuss long to reach an understanding of what a “personal image” is: One’s gut feeling is not enough. -- Tuválkin 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think there is nothing wrong with the category in and of itself, but I would ask that someone please delete two files that I uploaded with regards to Alessandro Safina and Laura Maria Calefeteanu. I am very new here and did not read the policy on public domain photos closely enough. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. GrammerCracker96 (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment While this discussion is continuing (?) here, the DR template has been removed from the relevant page. If a majority is against these mass deletions, simply close this discussion so we can DR the files (those which are here I mean) individually or for uploader. In this situation the process is stalled and that is not correct. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - note that there are a significant number of copyvios (more than 1/3)- a few are kept (from user who made a few useful contributions, or image in scope). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal images that are of no educational use.

 Keep I think this fits fine under Category:Holi in the United States and other categories. It doesn't need to be a personal file. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This has been cropped so that it's just an image of the sign, not a personal image. In scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most per nomination, kept a few which are in use/could be potentially used. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not clear to me why these are licensed creative commons. The author is listed as kenhub, but the uploader is not. Maybe there is something on kenhub.com listing these videos as cc, but I don't see anything. No OTRS tickets, as far as I can see either. Thanks.

Themightyquill (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Listed on youtube at time of upload as CC. Unlicensing not possible. CFCF (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Great - I'm glad they won't be deleted. But shouldn't there be some indication/explanation of that on each file? I see now that at least some of them have statements to that effect, but not all. At the moment, it looks as though someone took someone else's videos and uploaded with with a CCBY license, which would make them subject to deletion. - Themightyquill (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete CFCF, when uploading from Flickr, Youtube, or similar sources, the file description on Commons must have a link to the source page on which the image appears and must immediately have a {{Licensereview}} tag added by an Admin or License Reviewer who is not the uploader. These have neither, so unless you add the source page at YouTube immediately and they are then promptly reviewed, they will be deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Kenhub terms of service explicitly say: "The Website and its entire content, features and functionality (including look!), are owned by Kenhub and are protected by german and international copyright, trademark, patent, trade secret and other intellectual property or proprietary rights laws. Kenhub is about learning anatomy, not copying the anatomy drawings, website design or illustrations. So you agree to not copy, modify, create derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, republish, any of our copyrighted material, except to the extent permitted by the Website itself.". Ruthven (msg) 12:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Journal under server migration

[edit]
Attempt to contact the journal
[edit]

Dear @Taivo: ,

Thanks for your attention. The journal is migrating its server, thus the link is no longer available. The new link is: V. 6, Supl. 2(2015). When I have taken the image, it was creative commons. I shall contact the journal and ask them if they can add again the creative common license as before, or ask them to provide me with a letter, then I can send it to wikimedia commons.

I shall come back hopefully soon, Please, do not delete the image, it is being used in the article Revista Eletrônica Gestão & Saúde

All the best, Jorge

Attempt to contact the journal failed
[edit]

Dear @Taivo: ,

I was unable to contact the journal regarding the figure. What can be done is eliminating the current one, and after I am able to get the permission, or they set it again as creative commons, I can upload again. I must stress that I have not uploaded a figure protected by copyright, which is a clear issue in wiki commons, at the time they were operating in the creative commons, I am an author on the journal, they changed the server, maybe they had to change as well the copyright policy.

All the best, Jorge


Deleted: per nomination. @Jorge: if you have news from the journal, please forward them to COM:OTRS. thanks. Ruthven (msg) 12:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Leonardo da Vinci - self portrait №1.jpg

Leonardo da Vinci - self portrait №1.jpg Frze > talk 11:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 12:42, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better version File:Leonardo da Vinci Self Portrait №2.jpg From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Frze > talk 11:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Go t[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not PD - see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Gerd_Aretz & Commons:WikiProject_Public_Domain/German_stamps_review Ke4roh (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to description, the source of this image seems to be this book, and there is no indication that its content is free in any way. —Andrei S. Talk 16:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The initial description of this file is:

English: The "thinkers" of Hamangia (Chalcolithic culture) 800x634 (111 KB) Español: "Los pensadores" de Hamangia, V milenio a.C. Français : les "penseurs" de Hamangia (civilisation du Chalcolithique) 800x634 (111 KB) Date december 21, 2008 Source Romanian Wikipedia Author uploaded by Vyck since Istoria României Vol.I – Moştenirea Timpurilor Îndepărtate Academia Română; Secția de Ştiinţe Istorice şi Arheologice, Editura Enciclopedică București 2001 Anexe Plansa 13. The image nr. 13 in this book is anonymous and the author of the original prehistoric sculptures are unknown and dead since more of 70 years. --86.241.164.212 17:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:56, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jscamaro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos come from http://www.jjyosh.com/view-project/colorado-stock-shoots-2014/ and http://www.jjyosh.com/portrait-shots/, no information on photographer provided. If the subject owns the copyright, there's no explanation given

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Website has "© JJ Yosh - All Rights Reserved ". COM:OTRS authorization needed. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (still image from movie). Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Mexico water allocation map.png ~nmaia d 17:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 1

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Benoît Prieur: If it is not in France, what was it doing in Category:Disneyland Paris? Also, according to the GPS tag on the image, it is in France. Elisfkc (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did not say it is not in France: I said the topic and what it is represented is not concerned by the lack of FoP. --Benoît Prieur (d) 21:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Dunderklumpen: I would presume so, but that is a better question for someone on French Wikipedia. Elisfkc (talk) 00:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This building has been destroyed in december 2010 and it seems that «The destruction of the work extinguished copyright.» Is that correct? - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, un éventuelle suppression des fichiers est à voir au cas par cas. En effet, certains équipements photographiés ne constituent pas une œuvre de l'esprit originale, lorsqu'il s'agit par exemple de la reproduction de bateaux ou de constructions anciennes. Concernant spécifiquement File:Plaque de rue Auguste-Gusteau à EuroDisney.jpg, il n'y a aucune raison de le supprimer, il s'agit de la simple reproduction à Eurodisney des milliers de plaques de rue qui existent à Paris, il n'y a aucune création originale pour cette plaque. Concernant File:Espace Euro Disney 2008.JPG, je ne vois aucune œuvre de l'esprit du point de vue architecturale à protéger ; à moins que ce soient les droits d'auteurs sur les graffitis qui justifiraient la suppression du fichier. O.Taris (talk) 10:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
J'ajoute que l'Espace Euro Disney a été détruit en 2010 (lire plus haut) et il semblerait que la destruction entraîne l'extinction des droits d'auteur. Cependant, dans l'exemple donné plus haut, il est question de peinture murale et non d'architecture. Merci @Benoît Prieur: d'avoir relevé cette exception. - Dunderklumpen (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour,
Je reproduis ce que je viens d'écrire sur le bistro de #WpFr.
Quand le bâtiment est détruit le droit d'auteur ne semble plus s'appliquer et apparemment l'image est acceptable sur Commons :
"The destruction of the work extinguished copyright." => [20] sur un exemple équivalent File:Maison sur friche Bouchayer-Viallet.JPG).
--Benoît Prieur (d) 11:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Destruction of art never ended a copyright on the art itself ! Loreleil (talk) 10:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: I would rather have open a deletion request in order to facilitate a discussion and decision on such files that may be on the edge than to have them be sitting around and being used by others. Elisfkc (talk) 01:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 2

copyrighted site plans.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at them, File:Disneyland Resort Paris Kaart.png looks like there might be a chance that it came from Disney or somewhere else. The other two look like they were done in Paint. Elisfkc (talk) 01:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it all. The first and the third are the same pictures and they seem to be based on a road map and the real land. There is no derivative work. - Bzh-99 (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep own work, not copyrighted. Multichill (talk) 09:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 3

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DLRP schema.png was accidentally included. Withdrawing nomination for that image only. Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@O.Taris:
English: The topiary and the fact that there is no FOP in France. Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Français : Le topiaire et le fait qu'il n'y ait pas de FOP en France. Traduit avec Google Translate Elisfkc (talk) 22:44, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Si on considère que les jardins et plantation sont en général soumis au droit d'auteur, on va devoir supprimer beaucoup de photos de commons... La plantation représentée sur la photo ne me parait pas particulièrement originale pour pouvoir justifier un droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If we consider that the gardens and plantation are generally subject to copyright, we will have to delete many photos of commons ... The plantation shown in the picture does not seem to me particularly original to be able to justify a copyright. O.Taris (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 5

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 20, 22 et 6 : je ne vois pas d'oeuvre pour laquelle le droit d'auteur serait enfreint, il s'agit de simples photos de rue ou de parking. O.Taris (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 6

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2, delete the rest. Yann (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boats with artistic designs have previously been deleted, if I remember right. Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These pictures were not deleted because of "boat of artistic design", but for the other elements of the settings. BTW in only two of them there is a boat. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 7

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, les arbres et autres plantations, les lampadaires quelconques, les bateaux ou les trains dans un paysage ne sont pas des bâtiments soumis au droit d'auteur dans le cadre de la liberté de panorama. On se demande même pourquoi une pauvre guitoune peut-être proposée à la suppression pour une question de droit d'auteur ! En revanche, le respect du droit d'auteur architectural se pose effectivement pour File:Sleeping Beauty's Castle Disneyland Paris - panoramio.jpg et File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (15).jpg. O.Taris (talk) 21:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per O.Taris above. Yann (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Topiaries have been found to be copyrightable in the past. I try to nominate files like these to have a precedent set for them later. I would rather nominate 50 files that are fine and have a decision made about them than to have one that is not ok left alone. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:01, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not in France, AFAIK. Your practice doesn't help admins. It pass the burden of review to them, and they are already overbooked. It would be much more useful to carefully review your nominations before making them. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Pretty sure Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris was an example of topiaries that were deleted because of copyright in France. If not, I remember having another case at some point, I'd just need to find it. --Elisfkc (talk) 20:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Most of them show some copyrightable element, and IMO, File:DLP Maze View.JPG was deleted by error. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go, the example of topiaries in France being deleted that I was thinking of was Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris. Elisfkc (talk) 22:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 8

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (3).jpg et File:Disneyland - panoramio (15).jpg : les camions ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions,  Keep File:Disneyland - panoramio (18).jpg, l'élément principal est la montagne et le HOLLYWOOD, qui ne sont pas des oeuvres architecturales soumises aux droits d'auteur des constructions. O.Taris (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is  kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 13

Copyrighted characters

Elisfkc (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Sealle (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 15

No FOP in France. Moving files to correct categories, as this is too high up for most.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:53, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 16

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 17

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 20:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete all as derivative work copyright violations ({{France-cv}}). The Flickr photographers and uploaders here did not obtain permission from the architects, sculptors, graphics artists, and other authors of the copyrighted works of Euro Disney. Such permissions must be sent via COM:OTRS. French FOP doesn't suffice Commons standards because it is noncommercial, and thus doesn't adhere with COM:Licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 18

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Tube Disaster cause of non originality. Delete the others. - ~~ Bzh-99 (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted two, kept the other two per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Buildings are copyrighted. In some parts of the world, there are exceptions in copyright law for items visible from public places. These exceptions are called Freedom of Panorama. France has no such exceptions, and thus photos of architectural works in France are encumbered by the copyrights of the underlying works and can only be hosted here if the underlying architecture has fallen into the public domain or has been licensed freely itself. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion the photo of the people in line. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 05:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France & these are copyrighted characters of Marvel

Elisfkc (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 19:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and most of the above DRs.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Very, very dark photos. And there are already File:Disneyland Paris 132.jpg and File:Disneyland Paris 133.jpg very similar

--Tangopaso (talk) 20:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also if Freedom of Panorama covers an illuminated Eiffel Tower (see also Category:Eiffel Tower at night), there is no way these lights that are complex are not covered as well. --Elisfkc (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the lighting as complex enough to be copyrightable: such Christmas lighting is ordinary and can be replicated by anyone in the world, even Frenchmen, thus the lighting director of this Christmas display cannot claim copyright. With regards to usability of the photos, I leave that judgment to the closing admins. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:06, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and most of the above DRs.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: I do not see any copyright issue, as the lights are not creative enough to be copyrightable. There is no definite artistic character on Christmas lighting used. Anyone including us here can copy the lighting without lighting director's permission. And the original nomination by Tangopaso concerns COM:SCOPE issue, please do not reinstate the FOP-related category here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:56, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: How is this not a pending Disneyland Paris-related deletion request?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: because this request is not related to freedom of panorama issue. The lack of artistry in Christmas lighting means any FOP issue is moot. (And I disagree with Elisfkc's added reason for deletion). This is of scope related deletion discussion, as Tangopaso originally cited ass reason for deletion. Notice Category:Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests is grouped under "French FOP cases" (similarly, "Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests/pending" is categorized under "French FOP cases/pending", not a category about scope-related deletion requests, if there is one). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:10, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345 and Labattblueboy: I'm sorry, I did not realize until now that Category:Disneyland Paris-related deletion requests was in Category:French FOP cases (along with respective pending, kept, and deleted subpages). Why is that? If it is to stay in that category, shouldn't it have "FOP" in the name, so as not to surprise? I propose a new Category:Disneyland Paris FOP-related deletion requests (along with respective pending, kept, and deleted subpages).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: on same naming convention as Category:Burj Khalifa-related deletion requests, Category:Louvre Pyramid-related deletion requests, Category:N Seoul Tower-related deletion requests, and Category:63 Building-related deletion requests. Personally I find this impractical to group several DRs by categories as per landmark, since it covers up the real number of case pages resulting to deletions, unless one has the interest to do math, thereby reducing efforts to introduce FOP in their respective countries through complacency courtesy of "reduced" number of deletion case pages. But I assume that it helps to make future undeletions easier in case the landmarks fall public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 17:41, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kuwait's FOP status is "No information, assume 'Not OK'" Elisfkc (talk) 17:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized, whatzit. Not in use, unlikely to be educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of three SEM images, no indication of own work by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, this looks like a professional shot from catalog or webpage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: copyvio from www.fep.fraunhofer.de. Even if it's a press release, no free license is given. Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small, no meta, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked "The Vintage Angel" very small, unused and uncategorized, unlikely user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1954 image, source family archives does not state who is the original author, as such we need more evidence that this is truly freely licensable. Basvb (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Original author is Max Micol, official Pathé-Marconi photograph died in 1955. Photo is one of the private Bourgeois collection Pathé1974 (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Max Micol's pic who died in 1955. Rare colour photography of Pierre Bourgeois famous chairman of EMI Pathé-Marconi Company in France. To be absolutely conserved Presse82 (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Pathé1974 and Presse82: an COM:OTRS authorization is necessary to undelete it. The permission should come from the author of the photograph. Ruthven (msg) 13:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Utilisation abusive, image publiée sans autorisation Jpwery (talk) 22:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpwery: Même remarque que sur Commons:Deletion requests/File:Belgian Scout neckerchiefs.jpg. BAV. Vascer (talk) 13:16, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Jpwery: photo pourtant bien publiée avec authorisation du photographe. On peut savoir qui vous en a demandé le retrait?. Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is copyrighted by the photographer. The uploader is a paid contributor working on the English Wikipedia article for the photo's subject. Although it is likely that the image is released under a free license, we would need confirmation through COM:OTRS. Whpq (talk) 13:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @SusanWatts: can you provide an authorisation via OTRS?. Ruthven (msg) 21:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:42, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF data credits "Landon Speers" but we don't have Commons:Permission that the uploader is that person. czar 15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: COM:OTRS permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 21:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me equivoque al poner el nombre del fichero (el polígo en cáncavo , no convexo) jespa (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Jespa: la próxima vez usa {{Rename}}. Ruthven (msg) 21:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation per OTRS #2017022310014675; see [21]. Yunshui (talk) 16:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is said that this signed by Sultan Mahmut II and the signature (monogram) is "محمود بن عبد الحميد خان" (by باسم here) but I see that this information is wrong:the signature (monogram) is not "محمود بن عبد الحميد خان" i.e. This image meaningless ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This attribution is confirmed by the corresponding record at Sabancı University. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep it the attribution of the signature is rong, just correct it (change the attribution and the file name), no valid reason for deletion here (plus COM:INUSE). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep this user doesn't know what he is doing, neither here nor on ar.wiki. What kind of reason is this to ask for an image deletion? Sorry but i'm currently in the process of preparing my PhD Thesis in Ottoman History and i know exactly what i'm saying: this IS Mahmud II monogram as it clrealy says: Mahmud bin Abdulhamid Han = Mahmud son of Abdulhamid Han--باسم (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per باسم. Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Galaron88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A group of files unlikely to be own work. One photo is extracted from another, four pages of text and a black and white photo.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unless COM:OTRS permission is given, those are copyviols. Ruthven (msg) 22:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file that looks like a video game screenshot, check out the artificial tree shadows lower left front. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: 3D rendering. Ruthven (msg) 22:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"by Len Eaglebuger" doesn't seem to be the person who uploaded it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The only copyrightable artifact here is the logo, and it appears to date back from 1865. Ruthven (msg) 22:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-commercial license at source incompatible with Commons license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be screenshot from video game. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is most likely produced by Renault. http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2017/02/21/pictures-renaults-new-f1-car-for-2017-breaks-cover/a3_rs17_3q_right_dark_studio/ shows "Copyright Renault" on the picture. Badzil (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is of the old Church building which was substantial altered and converted into a day nursery in 2015. 88.97.98.111 16:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can supply you with a picture of the new building in Court Lodge Road. If you would like this please contact me at paul@horleybaptist.org.uk Thank you very much 88.97.98.111 16:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose with Comment. It is not standard practice to delete images of buildings simply because their use or name has changed. My intention is to change the text on this image to make it clear that the building is no longer in use as a church, to upload some images of it in its new guise (which I took last autumn), to upload some photos of the new church building which I took at the same time, and to link them all together in a category so that the old and new buildings can be cross-referenced. (I am the uploader of the June 2013 image in question.) Hassocks5489 (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been identified as missing permission by Magog the Ogre, INeverCry, KDS4444 and myself. It has been deleted twice and has been undeleted twice by H-stt for incomprehensible reasons: '"AGF"'. Not sure what AGF is supposed to mean in this case. The file is uploaded by permanently blocked user Google man, who stated that the author was a third party: Sandra Fenley, but who didn't make any statement about permission. Probably Google man just grabbed it from the web. AGF is not in place to allow apparent copyright violations. Jcb (talk) 21:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But, AGF means "Don't claim Copyvio without proof". This file has been uploaded to Wikipedia in 2005 (wich qualifies for Grandfathered file).  Keep, unless stronjg proof of copyvio provided (Google Image Search didn't returned any relevant result prior to the date of upload in 2005). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, it means that you e.g. trust an 'own work' claim if there is no indication to the contrary. In this case the (permantly blocked) uploader stated that is was not own work. The file has web resolution and no exif. And there is no indication at all that the author is even aware of the picture being here, let alone indication of permission. The file does therefore not qualify as grandfathered. Jcb (talk) 01:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
strong emphasis on keep and please keep your hands off the grandfathered old stock of files. Each and every file uploaded before 2006/7 must not be touched at all by anyone unless we have proof of a copyvio. Reason: Only in 2006 - or even in 2007 - we started to document consent when files where uploaded by someone else than the author. For everything before that date we must assume good faith unless the uploader is proven guilty. That is because a change in rules and or culture must not lead us to abandon the stock of files uploaded under the former rules / culture. I understand why you are suspicious against the uploader and the file, but suspicion is not the same as proof, and AGF is a paramount principle to protect what others did before our time. --h-stt !? 14:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't try to abuse the 'grandfathered' argument to protect apparent copyright violations from deletion. Just don't. Jcb (talk) 23:44, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On a related note: "Each and every file uploaded before 2006/7 must not be touched at all by anyone unless we have proof of a copyvio."— can you tell me where that comes from? I am very interested in reading it. Please advise. Thanks. KDS4444 (talk) 10:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am now tracking down Ms. Fenley to get her input on this. It looks like she used to work as the US contact person for a place called Tropical Woods Adventures, but they don't give any specific contact information for her on their website. I have sent emails to one of the current contact people, asking her to forward my message to Fenley, and another duplicate message to the "info@" address for the entire company as well. If I get a response from her, I will be certain to post it here. No guarantee, of course. But I think it's worth a shot. KDS4444 (talk) 20:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, on Commons:Grandfathered old files I am reading, If there are other reasons to doubt the authorship or permission of the author, attempts should be made to communicate with the named author, to better establish the situation (and preferably obtain COM:OTRS evidence). The precautionary principle still applies – if real doubt remains, the file may be deleted in a deletion request. I have not yet heard back from Fenley, though the current US contact person for the company has notified me that she has received my message and has asked Fenley to contact me. In the mean time, I think we have sufficient cause (?) for real doubt. If Fenley does respond and is willing to submit an OTRS permission statement, the file can certainly be undeleted then. KDS4444 (talk) 11:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So far no response to the five letters I sent out to addresses definitely associated with her name. Those were in the mail 9 days ago. May yet hear from her, but so far no. KDS4444 (talk) 04:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Folks, INeverCry, Jcb, Magog the Ogre, Amitie 10g, h-stt, friends, and relations: you are never going to believe this: Sandra got one of my letters, and she has responded. Her words regarding the copyright for her photos are these: "K-, You deserve an A+ for detective work. I can't imagine how you located me if Tropical Woods would not help you. I am no longer associated with them, but they certainly know where I am. The photos you refer to were sent to the Wikipedia staff several years ago and there is no copyright. They are just personal photos taken for my own enjoyment while traveling and I have absolutely no objection to their use by others. I am pretty confident there are thousands of photos out there superior to mine." I have responded by asking her if she would be willing to submit a permission statement via OTRS. I can't imagine she won't be willing. KDS4444 (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good work! Then at least leave this open for some time. Jcb (talk) 09:11, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: a good example of the grandfathered-files guideline. Don't renominate unless you actively have evidence of copyright problems, or unless you believe that it should be deleted for non-copyright reasons. Nyttend (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not what the grandfathered guideline is for. Poor closure, but the OTRS procedure will do its work. Jcb (talk) 09:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded to images by mistake was not my work Stone777u (talk) 08:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above COM:TOO, permission needed. Sealle (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot review the license, because source site is for sale. I am not sure, that the license was ever valid. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was edited, but on the sourced page there's a notice stating shake it,shakeit!!! www.19940922jy.com [禁2改去LOGO,转载注明出处] Do not edit the pictures.And take out with the full credit.:: 2차 가공 금지입니다. 퍼가실땐 항상출처를 표기해주세용 :: ChoHyeri (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 12:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That's a great example of how a lifestyle gadget is the wrong tool and where a dedicated photographic device would have made a nicely usable picture. Grand-Duc (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD, fake descriptions. These photos depict J. Stalin wearing the w:Generalissimus of the Soviet Union uniform, so made after 27 June 1945. Even the authors died the next day after making photos, these won't be PD before 2020 (1945+70+4), according to {{PD-Russia}}.

Sealle (talk) 12:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also:

Sealle (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The uniform doesn't seem the same in File:Jughashvili I., 1935.png and File:Joseph Stalin wearing Generalissimo's uniform.png; so probably the first 3 photos were really taken in 1935 and are possibly PD now. --Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: Those uniforms are a regular and a full-dress / parade ones. No way about 1935 - Stalin got his gold medal of Hero of socialist labor in 1939. --Яй (talk) 06:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anna Szczęsnowicz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Avnish123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.imgur.com/51XU9J4.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, The file listed for deletion is an image of religious ceremony performed in my village. There is a thangka in this this image which caused a problem earlier too. I must say this thangka is not old but recently made in 2016. It was made after monetary contributions from the village members including me. Does it still needs to be deleted? User:Avnish123 02:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene, Why have you listed all files uploaded by me for deletion. This is unfair. List only File:Ibex1.jpg which matches with

http://i.imgur.com/51XU9J4.jpg.

Regards User:Avnish123 02:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Who is the administrator to decide this request? Eugene hasn't responded in a while. Regards User:Avnish123 04:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Avnish123: What is the source of these images? Can you upload the original version? --Ruthven (msg) 12:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven:
Hello Ruthven,
Thanks for response.
I don't have higher resolution for these pics. Please go ahead and delete them. I'll go to the village in summer and take pictures again with high resolution and EXIF data and upload. Those pictures will not face this issue, right?
Regards, avnish
@Avnish123: Ifyou take the photos yourself with a modern camera and EXIF data, there shouldn't be any problem. --Ruthven (msg) 21:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven:
Hello Ruthven,

I noticed my phone camera also has high resolution and generates EXIF data. So will that also satisfy? Regards, avnish


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the flickr was checked, I don't think the flickr photographer has the right to release on the embedded images in this picture. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr photographer doesn't own rights to the DW images which are the point of this photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr photographer doesn't own rights to the DW images which are the point of this photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the video game in the US-Gov photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains derivative image of the Grammy award. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Moved from Discussion page Hi Ellin, This is a photograph I took of the certificate, which was supplied to me by George Marino's widow, Rose Gross Marino. It is from 1973 and there is no artist copyright on the image that I can find. What would you require in order to have use of this certificate? I can do my best to get a hold of someone at NARAS to approve my use of this image if you like. Please let me know what your issue is with this specifically. Thank you, Diane Mileson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmileson (talk • contribs) 21:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dmileson The method for obtaining 3rd party copyright approval is at COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SOHO images

[edit]

SOHO images are not completely free, see here.

Ras67 (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SOHO images

[edit]

SOHO images are not completely free, see here.

Ras67 (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, not self-evident that the photo was published pre-1981 Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

only source given is a British newspaper so not clear that this was originally published in Egypt. In addition, it is categorized as "Anwar Sadat assassination" --which took place in October 1981 -- so this image wouldn't be public domain in the US by date even if it was originally published in Egypt. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated authorship fishy, likely copyvio of individual photos. -- Tuválkin 20:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anwar Sadat assassination occurred during 1981 so this would not be public domain in the United States Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anwar Sadat assassination occurred during 1981 so this would not be public domain in the United States Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anwar Sadat assassination occurred during 1981 so this would not be public domain in the United States Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not originally published in egypt Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anwar Sadat assassination occurred during 1981 so this would not be public domain in the United States Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anwar Sadat assassination occurred during 1981 so this would not be public domain in the United States Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SOHO images are not completely free, see here.

Ras67 (talk) 20:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex logo, not simple geometric shapes and above COM:TOO; No permission Wdwd (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image of uploader's design for a new kind of car. Blythwood (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image of uploader's design for a new kind of car. Also looks like it might be a screengrab of a TV programme, so possible copyvio. Blythwood (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image of uploader's design for a new kind of car. Blythwood (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image of uploader's design for a new kind of car. Blythwood (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image of uploader's design for a new kind of car. Blythwood (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image of uploader's design for a new kind of car. Blythwood (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SOHO images are not completely free, see here.

Ras67 (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work claim. Looks professional. This account, among others, are blocked on enwiki as a promotional sock ring. ~ Rob13Talk 21:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work claim. Looks professional. This account, among others, are blocked on enwiki as a promotional sock ring. ~ Rob13Talk 21:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Qatar Elisfkc (talk) 21:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vectorfile created Caventinck (talk) 08:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Этот файл надо заменить на файл от 11:26, 21 февраля 2017 Moisey (talk) 09:11, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Этот файл надо заменить на файл от 11:26, 21 февраля 2017 Moisey (talk) 09:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Jcb. --Daphne Lantier 18:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake {{Cc-zero}} license and date. It's a derivative work of a photograph by an unknown author with an unknown publishing date. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:46, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Предложение не удалять это фото, т.к., к сожалению, автор этого фото не установлен до сих пор и также не установлено время его съемки, а более подходящих фото этой персоналии для размещения в статье здесь не нашлось. Как можно оставить это фото на странице без необходимости определения его автора и времени? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Car-man08 (talk • contribs) 14:40, 23 февраля 2017 (UTC)
В Рувики по КДИ загружен файл, здесь файл можно удалять. Kalendar (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es antiguo Kovachius (talk) 13:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a reason to delete anything, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fue reemplazado Kovachius (talk) 13:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kovachius: entonces la pàgina tiene que ser separada y no borrada...? --Ruthven (msg) 12:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, newer version as uploader's request on uploading day, but  kept older version. Taivo (talk) 18:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото ищется в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад https://snob.ru/selected/entry/115472 Dogad75 (talk) 12:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • А с чего Вы взяли, что своё фото автор обязан первым делом загрузить на Викисклад? По Вашей же ссылке указано, что это фото взято с личной страницы Хомака вконтакте. Кадош (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    А к тому, что если файл размещён на разных ресурсах Интернета до загрузки в Википедию, и авторство нигде не указано, то вызывает сомнение, что автором фото является Xtender, тем более, что у файла отсутствуют метаданные. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Э, полегче. Xtender и aalien — одно и то же лицо. То есть я. Фото изначально загружено в Instagram/ВК/Фейсбук, 5 мая 2013 года, как легко убедиться хотя бы вот тут. Еще вопросы? Xtender (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Тогда следующий вопрос: изображённое лицо и участник, разместивший файл, одно и тоже лицо? Не могли бы Вы пояснить происхождение фото? С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 23:23, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Это фото впервые опубликовано в моем Инстаграме/Фейсбуке/Вконтакте 5 мая 2013 года под лицензией CC:BY (как и все, что я публикую, если не указано иное). С тех пор его много раз использовали для иллюстрации разных интервью со мной. С точки зрения авторских прав тут все чисто. Xtender (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Что касается чисто технической стороны, — фотографию, скорее всего, сделала моя бывшая жена. Но сделала на мой телефон, для моего Инстаграма и переуступила мне права — так же как я, например, очевидным образом уступил ей все права на фотографии, *технически* сделанные мной, но опубликованные в ее Инстаграме или Вконтакте. Это немного неочевидная область, но в случае assisted selfie права, очевидно, принадлежат первому публикатору фотографии.
    И чтобы закрыть эту тему. Дело в том, что у меня есть несколько других портретных фотографий; возможно — более удачных. Но вот они-то как раз сделаны специально для публикации в том или ином журнале. Это надо упрашивать фотографа выпустить фотографию в public domain, обьяснить ему, что такое public domain вообще и как это оформить на Wikimedia Commons… С залитой мной фотографией таких проблем нет. Xtender (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    ...фотографию, скорее всего, сделала моя бывшая жена... — вот ей и принадлежат авторские права, и необходимо её разрешение. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 22:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Вы это с чего взяли? Фото опубликовано в моем Вконтакте/Инстаграме, права принадлежат мне, как первому публикатору. Чисто технически я могу получить ее согласие на публикацию, хотя оно в этом случае совершенно излишне, но как вы себе это представляете, вообще? Тем не менее, вопрос стоит не так. Вопрос стоит «эта фотография была опубликована в журнале Сноб, поэтому есть вопросы насчет ее лицензионной чистоты». Этот вопрос закрыт. Можете посмотреть даты публикации в ВК и в Снобе и убедиться в этом. Xtender (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Авторские права на произведения по закону об авторском праве, возникают в момент создания произведения её автором (...фотографию, скорее всего, сделала моя бывшая жена...). Где оно было впервые опубликовано, в данном случае значения не имеет. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    PS. ...Чисто технически я могу получить ее согласие на публикацию, хотя оно в этом случае совершенно излишне, но как вы себе это представляете, вообще... — см. COM:OTRS. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 16:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Если фотографию сделала бывшая жена, то она как владетель авторских прав должна дать OTRS-разрешение. После этого файл можно восстановить. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yatrides (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yatrides (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While artworks by Yatrides uploaded by Yatrides are covered by OTRS, these Christie Catalogs, are copyright violations because they're (c) Christie's Auctions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

En réponse à votre demande de ”Deletion requests”

[edit]

En réponse à votre demande de ”Deletion requests” voici les raison de la présence sur Common les documents ci-dessous

1° Les fichiers : File:1983 Christie's 22.03.83, 'L'autre rive' Yatrides oil-paint record sale. Page 4.jpg

File:1983 Christie's 22.03.83, 'L'autre rive' Yatrides oil-paint record sale. Page 2.jpg

File:1983 Christie's 22.03.83, 'L'autre rive' Yatrides oil-paint record sale. Page 1.jpg

Ces 3 fichiers montrent la présence de l’œuvre de Yatrides à la vente record chez Christie’s Londres le 22 mars 1983, destinés à Wikipedia pour étayer les commentaires pour ceux qui n’ont pas eu le catalogue. Christie’s très connu et largement diffusé, autant que la reproduction de la Joconde. Il semble qu’aucun droit ne soit en jeu dans ce cas.

2° Le fichier : File: 1965 Collector's choice, Yatrides under contract with Samuel E. JOHNSON Director International Galleries, Chicago summer 1965.jpg

Ce catalogue n’est pas un catalogues Christie’s, il est édité par S.E. Johnson qui montre la présence du travail de Yatrides parmi les grands peintres aux « International Galleries» de Chicago, Illinois, USA, Samuel-E. JOHNSON Directeur, avec lequel Yatrides à été en contrat d’exclusivité. Catalogue dans lequel il est précisé «Yatrides surrounded by insignificant contemporaries painters » (Sic Johnson) “ définition majorée par René HUYGUE Conservateur du Musée du Louvre célèbre Historien d’art dans son discours au XVIIIè Salon de Montmorency : “Yatridès, synthèse de la peinture”.

Qu’en pensez-vous.

Sur un autre Plan, la présence des photos des tableaux de Yatridès sur Wiki-Common est-elle dangereuse. Un premier modérateur l’avait signalé.

--Yatrides (talk) 14:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your clarity. However if "This catalog is not a Christie's catalog, it is edited by S.E. Johnson who shows the presence of the work of Yatrides among the great painters at the International Galleries of Chicago, Illinois, USA," is correct, why were they titled "1983 Christie's..."? And why use both the front and back cover of Christie's catalog, claimed as own work. The foregoing shows that there is promotionalism involved. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No inidication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vgl. User talk:Christian Imboden#Frage zur Urheberschaft des Fotos Albert Gos (1852-1942) beim Malen im Nikolaital unterhalb der Riffelalp.jpg und/oder User talk:Christian Imboden#File:Albert Gos (1852-1942) beim Malen im Nikolaital unterhalb der Riffelalp.jpg Christian Imboden (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Since Gos died in 1942, the photo must have been made in this year or earlier. On the photo Gos does not appear like an 90 year-old man, so the date given by Christian Imboden (“around 1900”) seems plausible. But even if the photo would have been taken in the early 1940s, its copyright term (unpublished photo of unkown author: 70 years after taking) has expired years ago. Hence the file should be kept. --Gretarsson (talk) 15:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, the only relevant question here is: When did the author die? The fact that we at Commons do not know, does not erase copyright. Jcb (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Other files by uploader face the same problem I guess. E.g. this or that --тнояsтеn 08:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please see: [22] Christian Imboden (Diskussion|talk) 10:37, 1. March 2017 (UTC)
Please also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bergführer Josef Lochmatter mit Ehefrau und den zwei ältesten Söhnen, St. Niklaus, Schweizer Kanton Wallis.jpg Christian Imboden (Diskussion|talk) 10:55, 2. March 2017 (UTC)
OK, I see. Perhaps the photos should be re-uploaded locally, at German Wikipedia... --Gretarsson (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]