Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/01/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![153 File:Michael Beutler - "Ballenernte" at FIAC 2014.jpg](#File:Michael_Beutler_-_"Ballenernte"_at_FIAC_2014.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE, private image of girl friend with dog Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This logo is trademarked by ContactOffice Group. Ctktman (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep Trademarked does not mean copyrighted. I can't imagine this is above TOO. Fry1989 eh? 01:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
This logo is indeed a copyrighted trademark of ContactOffice Group. Ctktman (talk) 12:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous DR. Nominated by the same person. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
The logo is trademarked by ContactOffice Group. Ctktman (talk) 16:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Upon double checking, I acknowledge the copyrights of this logo being owned by ContactOffice Group - and therefore have no arguments to place against its deletion.
M Salman Nadeem (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Trademarked does not mean copyrighted. I can't imagine this is above TOO. Fry1989 eh? 01:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
This indeed is a copyrighted trademark of ContactOffice Group. It can be further verified from Mailfence homepage, and the official blog. Ctktman (talk) 12:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy kept per previous DR. Nominated by the same person. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Photo sous copyright Asmoth (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Marzia Bisognin on Instagram.jpg has a OTRS for 640x640. This one not and I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by User:FDMS4 as Speedy with reason: CSD G4 (recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus): File:Talisay City.jpg. Not the same file. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- But it is a recreation of File:Talisay_City_Hall-Cebu.jpg. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per my last comment. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
The little mermaid still copyrighted. Not covered by freedom of panorama Pugilist (talk) 09:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
author photo from author's website, http://www.chandrapubl.com/author.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chandra (recent).jpg: author photo from author's website, http://www.chandrapubl.com/author.html
.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:AuburnTigers.svg. Corkythehornetfan 02:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note. The two images differ in a small ® near the bottom right corner. The smaller file is the one without it. -- Gauss (talk) 22:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Please use {{Duplicate}} template instead. --Sreejith K (talk) 00:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by John.doe37 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata and copyright issues with the user's other uploads.
- File:WWBK1752.jpg
- File:Subject1.jpg
- File:Ehrenorden.jpg – hoax based on this non-free photo by Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press. Blatant copyright violation.
- File:WVES8691.jpg
- File:Mind control soldier.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 19:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
speedydelete Meteorix (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
too blurry/low quality, out of scope. Holger1959 (talk) 15:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work; the uploader uploaded a file with embedded data (CSD#F9). jdx Re: 16:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A1free.ogg: Unlikely to be own work; the uploader uploaded a file with embedded data (CSD#F9).
COM:SCOPE unknown person in private context Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
vacation pic lNeverCry 23:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Bot-uploaded personal image without any proper educational value. De728631 (talk) 18:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.
low quality image of shit Pippobuono (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: LTA Vhaslhv
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inderjeet kaushik.jpg
Files uploaded by Pavelshavrov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - photos of non-notable persons and likely copyvios (user has many copyvio-warnings on talk page)
- File:XG8uFDt496A1.jpg
- File:X 31ed11d2.jpg
- File:X 36156409.jpg
- File:X 8b3c8c9b.jpg
- File:XG8uFDt496A.jpg
- File:PS9F80cQjdg.jpg
- File:Q-NgkHY CK8.jpg
- File:Shu.jpg
/St1995 16:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
A screenshot and its cropped version. Non-free content.
--XXN, 16:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
The "cc-by-nc-sa-3.0" statement contradicts the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} licensing tag. If it was the author's intention to impose {{noncommercial}} restrictions, we cannot keep the photo on Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- I've adapted the license. Andy1982 (talk) 08:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Wonderful, thank you! —LX (talk, contribs) 10:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept, resolved. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Apparently doctored image rather than own work. Fæ (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Support The file was uploaded by a user who is blocked on Indonesian Wikipedia. -ArdiPras95 (talk) 21:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy: copyvio. --ArdiPras95 (talk) 04:31, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Disputing {{PD-logo}} license. The design on the left is far too complex to claim it is below the threshold of originality. — ξxplicit 06:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 1clubmahindra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/01/81/c1/96/kanatal-resort.jpg.
- File:Club mahindra (snow peaks), Manali.jpg
- File:Club-mahindra-goa-varca.jpg
- File:Club-mahindra-emerand-palms.jpg
- File:Club mahindra - Kandaghat.jpg
- File:Club mahindra kanatal.jpg
- File:Club Mahindra - kanatal.jpg
- File:Club mahindra mussoorie.jpg
,_Manali.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: spamming/copyvios : speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
No copyright Info Caerdiffian123 (talk) 18:50, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 1 January 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ladylight78 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Williemuse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saliusphono (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:27, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jadiel el ciclon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mafaz Galle (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. User has been blocked on en.wp for sockpuppetry (other accounts: Actor Mafaz, MohamedMafaz, Mafaz729, MafazOfficials, EngineeringMafaz) and abusing Wikipedia as a social networking site.
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (22).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (21).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (20).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (18).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (17).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (16).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (15).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (14).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (12).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (13).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (11).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (10).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (7).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (8).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (4).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (5).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (6).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (3).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle (2).jpg
- File:Mohamed Mafaz Galle.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MER-C 08:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:05, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal files
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
/St1995 14:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kudryashov va (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - photos of non-notable persons with questionable copyright status
- File:Экскурсия для активистов в Госдуму.jpg
- File:Заседание Депутатов МО Бибирево.jpg
- File:Прием населения Бибирево.jpg
- File:Прием населения.jpg
- File:Встреча с молодежью.jpg
/St1995 14:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
The use of this file is not in order to create a private album, its use is based on being preserved encyclopedic. Raiser4flickr (talk) 06:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Low quality photo of common subjects. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
This image is taken from http://www.hirugoldenfilmawards.hirutv.lk/nominated-popular-film-actor-2014.php in breach of copyright provisions Dan arndt (talk) 16:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Request by uploader (using an incomplete deletion process). I agree, out of scope. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of some commercial. Non-free content. --XXN, 16:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:02, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmedkhabeertmb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal pictures - out of scope.
--XXN, 16:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
not own work; probable copyvio, see anywhere on the web Pippobuono (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, hardly own work Pippobuono (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmad94shebli (talk 2
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jojotadados2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
/St1995 17:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, but also probably copyright violation (photo of a photo) Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo if bad quality, only used outside the main namespace. Has an unresolved {{Consent}} template. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be from http://www.thejournal.co.uk/business/business-news/northumbria-university-helps-tass-build-4396542 Ytoyoda (talk) 17:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's work - thumbnail resolution, blurry photo. Probably is a screenshot. --XXN, 17:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file Politics suck! (talk) 06:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
random mass-upload panoramio streams, two enormous watermarks, hence doubtful educational usefulness, and file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
random mass-upload panoramio streams, enormous watermark, hence doubtful educational usefulness, and file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
random mass-upload panoramio streams, bad quality and enormous watermark, hence doubtful educational usefulness, and file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:41, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Image credits Getty Images and Manchester United Ytoyoda (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
non free image (fair use) --Alaa Najjar :)..! 18:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Hystrix (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Hystrix (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Hystrix (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Hystrix (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Personal file used in autobiography, Commons isn't not a personal host. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 19:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Hystrix (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Hystrix (talk) 19:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MrDanielleonardo2010 (talk · contribs)
[edit]More hoax images.
EvergreenFir (talk) 23:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image uploaded improperly to Commons TAnthony (talk) 23:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Baabarrmalik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 23:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 23:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 00:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Almost certainly a copyvio of the photos that are the only thing that gives the image interest; also, motion-blurred. Jmabel ! talk 04:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, image is widely available, one example: http://www.kathima.com/v/229721 MKFI (talk) 07:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 07:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination: Statue dedicated 2004-05-21 in the United States, so copyrighted in the United States. Unlikely that this would be {{PD-CAGov}}. --Closeapple (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination: Statue dedicated 2004-05-21 in the United States, so copyrighted in the United States. Unlikely that this would be {{PD-CAGov}}. --Closeapple (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the USA for works of art Lymantria (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Is not covered by freedom of panorama in the USA for buildings only Lymantria (talk) 08:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
not own work, see anywhere on the web... Pippobuono (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio. The strange marking of the street name on the ground makes it plausible that this image was ripped from Google StreetView. Henxter (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:47, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
found elsewhere: http://www.lexpressiondz.com/actualite/197415-des-mots-pour-raconter-matoub-lounes.html Dacoucou (talk) 16:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works, no permission.
- File:Reflex arc signal.jpg
- File:Sarcomere.png
- File:Hydrolysis of peptide bond.png
- File:Gram + vs. gram - cell.png
- File:Glycolipid cerebroside.png
- File:Maltose formation and sucrose formation.png
- File:Isomer table organic chemistry.png
- File:Leading strand vs. lagging strand.png
- File:TCA and glycolysis regulation.png
- File:Table of Substitution vs. Elimination Reactions Organic Chemistry.png
- File:Eukaryotic membrane all components.png
- File:Doppler effect with ambulance.png
- File:Light Ray Diragrams all lenses and all mirror types.png
Yann (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- File:Hydrolysis of peptide bond.png was cropped from a Wikibooks image [1] which has a dubious licence itself: PD-self and US Public Domain.
Delete - File:Maltose formation and sucrose formation.png was copied from this image, (c) 2011 Pearson Education Inc.: speedily deleted.
- File:TCA and glycolysis regulation.png is a redundant raster version of the valid File:CellRespiration.svg: Delete
- File:Table of Substitution vs. Elimination Reactions Organic Chemistry.png is trivial and should perhaps be kept.
- File:Eukaryotic membrane all components.png looks like it was derived from content at Rule of 6ix which is CC non-commercial: Delete
- File:Light Ray Diragrams all lenses and all mirror types.png was derived from here: speedily deleted.
- File:Hydrolysis of peptide bond.png was cropped from a Wikibooks image [1] which has a dubious licence itself: PD-self and US Public Domain.
- Given that the uploader has the habit of using a new name for each new "author" field of their files, I think we cannot trust them with regard to any remaining files. De728631 (talk) 21:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- File:Doppler effect with ambulance.png is found on Twitter plus several colour versions are found online, so we cannot determine its copyright status - Delete Ww2censor (talk) 10:18, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- File:Doppler effect with ambulance.png is found on Twitter plus several colour versions are found online, so we cannot determine its copyright status -
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Original image appears to be from http://www.michelin.it/IT/it/passione-alla-guida/motorsport/competizione-Italia/storico-mille-miglia.html Ytoyoda (talk) 17:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
− Crop of image found at http://mywhatsappimages.blogspot.com/2016/07/kristen-gutoskie-profile-dp-pics.html Ytoyoda (talk) 18:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
− −
- To be honest the original one is https://www.pinterest.com/pin/496099715183356569/ Lunanol (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2017
−
- Okay, here's a post with more complete source info: https://www.facebook.com/CWContainment/photos/a.976528595725572.1073741829.941912885853810/976528792392219/?type=3&theater Caption says "2015 WBEI. All rights reserved" so I think it's an obvious copyvio. Ytoyoda (d) 21:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oh I didn't see it thanks. So you win. Have a nice day Bye :) (ps: sorry I erased :s)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Image looks like it was taken from a magazine and Flickr washed Elisfkc (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
It was not Flickr washed. The image is actually from subject's website with download option. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 23:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: We need the url to that website and a statement from that site saying that it was released under the stated license, in this case public domain. Otherwise, the image will be deleted. Elisfkc (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: http://www.gincooley.com/ is URL. Licensing is on bottom right of page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 04:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: That's the model's page. We need the photographer to release it. Elisfkc (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: They are public ads... and magazine editorials. The model owns the rights to all her own images. A photographer gives the model all rights to his/her own images. They go in the models portfolio and are his/hers. A photographer from 12 years ago in another country is probably not going to surface to tell us that the model owns the rights to her own portfolio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 14:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: I'm pretty sure that the photographer and the magazine still own the copyright. And your argument that "A photographer from 12 years ago in another country is probably not going to surface to tell us that the model owns the rights to her own portfolio" is the second one listed under the precautionary principle as being against Commons aim. As such, this file should be deleted. Elisfkc (talk) 15:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: How are you pretty sure? Have you ever been a professional international model? Have you ever worked at a modeling agency? Have you ever been an agent or manager of fashion models around the world? Do you know anything about the fashion industry? Pretty sure does not seem like a solid argument. If the model does not own her own images from her own career.. then what is she? Just a mannequin who has no rights? That makes no sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 20:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: No, but the as stated on Commons:Licensing, "A copyright license is a formal permission stating who may use a copyrighted work and how they may use it. A license can only be granted by the copyright holder, which is usually the author (photographer, painter or similar)". So, in most cases, the photographer, not the model, owns the picture and its rights. Elisfkc (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Image looks like it was taken from a magazine and Flickr washed Elisfkc (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
It is from the subject's website with a download option by the subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 23:17, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: First, please do not delete someone else's comments. Second, we need the url to that website and a statement from that site saying that it was released under the stated license, in this case public domain. Otherwise, the image will be deleted. Elisfkc (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: http://www.gincooley.com/ is URL. Licensing is on bottom right of page. CCO public domain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 04:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: That's the model's page. We need the photographer to release it. Elisfkc (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: They are public ads... and magazine editorials. The model owns the rights to all her own images. A photographer gives the model all rights to his/her own images. They go in the models portfolio and are his/hers. A photographer from 12 years ago in another country is probably not going to surface to tell us that the model owns the rights to her own portfolio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 14:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: I'm pretty sure that the photographer and the magazine still own the copyright. And your argument that "A photographer from 12 years ago in another country is probably not going to surface to tell us that the model owns the rights to her own portfolio" is the second one listed under the precautionary principle as being against Commons aim. As such, this file should be deleted. Elisfkc (talk) 15:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: How are you pretty sure? Have you ever been a professional international model? Have you ever worked at a modeling agency? Have you ever been an agent or manager of fashion models around the world? Do you know anything about the fashion industry? Pretty sure does not seem like a solid argument. If the model does not own her own images from her own career.. then what is she? Just a mannequin who has no rights? That makes no sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 20:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: No, but the as stated on Commons:Licensing, "A copyright license is a formal permission stating who may use a copyrighted work and how they may use it. A license can only be granted by the copyright holder, which is usually the author (photographer, painter or similar)". So, in most cases, the photographer, not the model, owns the picture and its rights. Elisfkc (talk) 21:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Youngayoung (talk · contribs)
[edit]obvious flickrwashing
- File:Gin Prada.jpg
- File:Gin Louis Vuitton.jpg
- File:Gin Cool Dior.jpg
- File:Gin LV.jpg
- File:Gin Cooley 1.jpg
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Files are on the subject's website with a download option. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 23:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: First, please do not delete someone else's comments. Put your comments after theirs, followed by
~~~~. Second, we need the url to that source where the images were downloaded and a statement from that site saying that they was released under the stated license, in this case public domain. Otherwise, the images will be deleted. Until that information is provided and verified, I say Delete. Elisfkc (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC) - @Elisfkc: http://www.gincooley.com/ is URL. Licensing is on bottom right of page. Public Domain (CC0) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 04:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: That's the model's page. We need the photographer to release it. Elisfkc (talk) 05:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: They are public ads... and magazine editorials. The model owns the rights to all her own images. A photographer gives the model all rights to his/her own images. They go in the models portfolio and are his/hers. A photographer from 12 years ago in another country is probably not going to surface to tell us that the model owns the rights to her own portfolio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 14:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: I'm pretty sure that the photographer and the magazine still own the copyright. And your argument that "A photographer from 12 years ago in another country is probably not going to surface to tell us that the model owns the rights to her own portfolio" is the second one listed under the precautionary principle as being against Commons aim. As such, this file should be deleted. Elisfkc (talk) 15:20, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: How are you pretty sure? Have you ever been a professional international model? Have you ever worked at a modeling agency? Have you ever been an agent or manager of fashion models around the world? Do you know anything about the fashion industry? Pretty sure does not seem like a solid argument. If the model does not own her own images from her own career.. then what is she? Just a mannequin who has no rights? That makes no sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 20:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Youngayoung: No, but the as stated on Commons:Licensing, "A copyright license is a formal permission stating who may use a copyrighted work and how they may use it. A license can only be granted by the copyright holder, which is usually the author (photographer, painter or similar)". So, in most cases, the photographer, not the model, owns the picture and its rights. Elisfkc (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Elisfkc: I have worked in the fashion industry for 20 years. A portfolio like this is worth tens upon tens of thousands of dollars. The model owns it or there would be no need for a model to elevate to this sort of professional level because she would have no rights and make no money, and the photographer could give or sell her work to anyone without her release. The model owns the rights to her own professional portfolio.. and that is how it works. This site makes no profit off the images she has released on her site. This is a non profit organization. I do not see the issue of a subject releasing a portfolio that she owns on a website that she owns.
- @Elisfkc: Another way to put it is if the model does not own her own portfolio which is "her work" then another person could steal it and say it's them and use it to get work. Therefore the model owns her own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngayoung (talk • contribs) 23:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence for copyright transfer from photographer to model. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As both a model and a photographer, what was stated here was not correct. The models do not own rights to the photographs, the photographers own rights to the photographs except in very few cases covered by private contracts. By the way I was with Eileen Ford agency for over 10 years and worked internationally, thus providing the answer as above. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Mukundxg
[edit]- File:Shane theriot by greg vorobiov 1 NV8A3590 (1).jpg
- File:Shane Hotel Cafe Hollywood Feb 2015 (1).jpg
- File:Shane at the Hotel Cafe Hollywood Feb 2015.jpg
- File:Shane theriot by greg vorobiov 1 NV8A7586 (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The metadata states "Author: Greg Vorobiov, Copyright holder: © Greg Vorobiov." Not clear that the uploader is that person or that they have permission to license copyrighted photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:40, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
A photo of the uploader with the name of the photographer watermarked right on the image. No indication of permission to license the photo is given. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Band press photo probably owned and/or copyrighted by the band and/or record label, posted to various blogs such as this and this long before it was uploaded to Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Last remaining files, small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 21:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
http://www.dailydot.com/via/steven-moffat-sexism-sherlock-doctor-who/ EvergreenFir (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, seems like copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
EXIF credits "Alex Delfanne" as the photographer. Would need documented permission of the photographer's re-license under Creative Commons. czar 23:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Image is "courtesy the artist"—was it supplied by the author and who owns the copyright? Would need documented permission of the photographer's re-license under Creative Commons. czar 23:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Qlarivia
[edit]Only used on the English and Romanian Wikipedias, where the subject's two articles were deleted via deletion discussion in February and August 2015, respectively. Out of project scope.
— ξxplicit 07:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Photo of an unknown person, no further description given, no perceptible use. Schlosser67 (talk) 07:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Qingxuansong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Macrotellect company marketing images, widely available: [2], [3]. OTRS permission needed.
- File:Macrotellect Second Product-Brainlink Lite.jpg
- File:Brainlink Second product-Brainlink Lite.png
- File:Macrotellect First Product- Brainlink Pro.jpg
- File:Macrotellect first product- BrainLink Pro.png
MKFI (talk) 07:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PersianFire (talk · contribs)
[edit]It is unlikely that these are the own work of the uploader, as claimed. Even if these are the own work of the uploader, as works previously published elsewhere with a non-free license, we need permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Iraqi Tu22U 01.jpg
- File:84311494 055a3093-09f2-428e-ab18-c4bdad1af98f.jpg — has Agence France-Presse watermark at lower right and appears on bbc.com ([4], [5], etc.).
- File:9868734 orig.jpg — appears to originate from here, where it is credited to the "Tom Cooper collection".
—RP88 (talk) 18:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PersianFire (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed own work / 2017, but the images are available in the net and many are quite old, some examples: [6], [7], [8], [9].
- File:Iraqi Mig-29.jpg
- File:Iraqi Tu-22.jpg
- File:Iraqi Hawker Hunter.jpg
- File:Super Etendard in Iraq.jpg
- File:Destroyed Iraqi aircraft.jpg
- File:Iraqi Super Etendard.jpg
- File:Casualties in Operation Ramadan.jpg
- File:Tank in Khoramshahr.jpg
- File:Iraqi troops in Khuzestan.jpg
- File:Iraqi special forces in Khoramshahr.jpg
- File:Src adapt 960 high Iraq 1988 82613 1377600926810.jpg
MKFI (talk) 08:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France Lymantria (talk) 08:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
CC BY-NC-SA is not the same as {{cc-by-3.0}}. {{Noncommercial}} restrictions are incompatible with our licensing policy. I'd tag it for speedy deletion, but people get upset when you do that with files that have been around for over seven years, no matter how obvious the copyright violation is. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, http://www.guregipuzkoa.eus/irudia/?pid=10848#gallery/06e49dc54795e34d5c33a8c3f7641674/10848/comments. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
no FOP in France. Thesupermat (talk) 09:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
![09:03, 4 January 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/01/04#c-Thesupermat-2017-01-04T09:03:00.000Z-File:Michael_Beutler_-_"Ballenernte"_at_FIAC_2014.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
![05:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/01/04#c-Christian_Ferrer-2017-01-11T05:50:00.000Z-File:Michael_Beutler_-_"Ballenernte"_at_FIAC_2014.jpg){kind=link}
Definitely a derivative work. Might be fair use, but doesn't belong on Commons. DatGuy (talk) 09:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chucktalbot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size except one, no EXIF data, many copyvios, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Lord of Balls.png
- File:Joe Boxer Canon.png
- File:Joe Boxer Astor Place.png
- File:Joe Boxer taxi.png
- File:Joeboxer rocket.jpg
- File:Joe Boxer Money.png
- File:Wiki dog toys.png
- File:Joe Boxer Vending Machine.png
Yann (talk) 10:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dzhena edit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Last remaining images, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Dzhena,singer.2017.jpg
- File:Dzhena in concert.jpg
- File:Dzhena singer club.jpg
- File:Dzhena2015.2.jpg
- File:Dzhena singer2015.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Promotional, not used, out of scope The Photographer 11:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status (some more than others, though all lack EXIF and are very unlikely to be © the uploader) / out of scope.
FDMS 4 13:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
See history, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious own works
/St1995 16:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works, no permission.
- File:Proyecto Capilla Alella-Seccion transversal.png
- File:Proyecto Capilla Alella-Seccion longitudinal.png
- File:Proyecto reconstruccion Alella-Seccion.png
- File:Proyecto reconstruccion Alella-Detalles Retablo.png
- File:Proyecto reconstruccion Alella-Retablo.png
- File:La Miranda-Proyecto.png
Yann (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
"Copyright Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology 2016", we need a proper copyright notification by OTRS. MKFI (talk) 07:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Residents Wusih (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
FDMS 4 12:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:12, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Verhuisboxen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:Verhuisdozen Klik Klak Klaar wit..jpg
- File:Verhuisdoos Standaar Klik Klak Klaar standaard..jpg
- File:Klik Klak verhuisgemak.png
FDMS 4 12:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Files deleted by User:Christian Ferrer. --Hystrix (talk) 13:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ehab refaat fawzy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work on this gallery of images about "Ahly" sports. Old pictures, previously printed pictures, pictures smaller than facebook, composites of unattributed images, and so on. Five photos only have metadata, they show four cameras.
- File:Ahly handball is winner of african cup 2016.jpg
- File:Wael ezzat.jpg
- File:Ahly fans while watching waterpolo game.jpg
- File:Ahly winner of egyptian waterpolo league.jpg
- File:Alahly winner of waterpolo cup2015.jpg
- File:Ahly water pool.jpg
- File:Ahly arab water polo championship 2007.jpg
- File:Waterpolo notable players.jpg
- File:Ahly finalbasket 25.jpg
- File:Ahlyhall out-view.jpg
- File:The first table tennis team in alahly.jpg.png
- File:Ahly handball africa champions.jpg
- File:Ahly hall out overview.jpg
- File:Ahly hall game main.jpg
- File:Ahly hall history.jpg
- File:Ahly hall opening cermoney.jpg
- File:Chaning room at ahly hall.jpg.png
- File:Massage room at ahly main hall.jpg.png
- File:Ahly hall concerts.jpg
- File:Ahly main hall.jpg
- File:Ahly hall 2.jpg
- File:Mokhtar eltish stadium 2.jpg
- File:Screen-shot-2014-04-27-at-18-06-27.jpg.png
- File:Mokhtar eltitsh as player.jpg.png
- File:Prince farouk stadium.jpg
- File:Renewal of mokhtar eltitsh staduim.jpg
- File:Mokhtar eltitish stadium.jpg
- File:0 TEF8750.jpg
- File:Al Ahly host ihf super globe 2007.jpg
- File:Winners-with-the-cup resize-e1426571519550.jpg
- File:Women table tennis.jpg
- File:Egypt wt1 27 07 15.jpg
- File:Egypt mt 27 07 15.jpg
- File:74152-ping.jpg
- File:Ahly handball coach.jpg
- File:Islam Hassan Ahly player.jpg
- File:Ahly champion of leagure 2015.jpg
- File:Ahly handball history.jpg
- File:Ibrahim fakr eldeen volleyball coach.jpg
- File:Foaud abd elsalam ex volleyball player.jpg
- File:Ahly womens volleyball team.jpg
- File:Mohammed badawey abdelmonaem.jpg
- File:Meselhy volleyball coach.jpg
- File:Al-ahly volleyball team.jpg
- File:Al Ahly basketball 2016 champions league.jpg
- File:Ahly egypt basketball player.jpg
- File:Egyptian basketball league champions.jpg
- File:Tarik Khairy.jpg.png
- File:Ahly basketball Joining players to team in 2017.jpg
- File:Basketball History in Al Ahly SC.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rangakuvara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Wadala(1).jpg
- File:1-Walkeshwar.JPG
- File:The Mysore Association Ganapathi.JPG
- File:Sanborn Experimental Agricultural field.jpg
- File:Mumbai metro train journey.JPG
- File:Vehicle for the visitors of Lal bagh.jpg
- File:Betel nut.jpg
- File:Trimmed(1).jpg
- File:C.T.Patel.jpg
- File:D.Taxi St..JPG
- File:Dr. Rly. Sn.JPG
- File:Kadri house (sm) Kadri natya mandir.jpg
- File:Ganapathy Prasanna Ganapathy.JPG
- File:045 (2) L&T company are the sponsors.JPG
- File:056 (2) Maheshwari udayan.JPG
- File:013 Play ground.JPG
- File:011 Palamkot hall.JPG
- File:PC Parsee Aghiyar.JPG
- File:Edited Corner Ice cream parlour.JPG
- File:G5th King George the Vth.JPG
- File:HPIM1921 Down below the water falls.jpg
- File:HPIM1891 SnowQualmie Falls, of Washington state.jpg
- File:HPIM2262 Theaters of performing arts,.jpg
- File:One of the cleanest beaches.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Kadri_natya_mandir.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_L%26T_company_are_the_sponsors.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Maheshwari_udayan.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rangakuvara (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on this series of faculty portraits, papers, pictures from meetings, pictures of awards/trophies, academic photographs and so on. Small sizes, poor quality and that I found 3/4 of the first ones I looked for (sent separately to speedy) combine to indicate this is an internet collection without attribution rather than own work.
- File:Pro.H.R.Ramakrishna rao.jpg
- File:Mr. H.R.Laxmivenkatesh.jpg
- File:Wikipedia celebrates 10th year at Sophia College, Mumbai.jpg
- File:Shri. H. R. S. Rao is very fond of Bhagawatha purana.jpg
- File:In the presence of Sutturu swamiji,.jpg
- File:Dr. Kambar, relasing the 2 books.jpg
- File:Lokarpana of Karnataka bhagawatha.jpg
- File:Dr.Chandra with Jayaram alva couple.jpg
- File:Dr. B. R.Manjunath being felicitated.jpg
- File:Kulkarnijpg.jpg
- File:Dr. G.V. Kulakarni.jpg
- File:K. Manjunathayya.jpg
- File:Shrinivas Jokatte.jpg
- File:Dr. H. R .Shripad.jpg
- File:G. T. Felicitation.jpg
- File:Dr. B R. Manjunath felicitated.jpg
- File:Dr. Girija shastry's book was released.jpg
- File:Dr. Bharath kumar polipu felicitated.jpg
- File:B. N. K. Sharma, Sanskrit scholar.jpg
- File:Dr.Meera chandrasekhar in her UMC cabin.jpg
- File:Dr. Chandras and Dr. Meera.jpg
- File:Dr Meera chandrasekhar is in her class room.jpg
- File:Dr. V.Santhanam,.jpg
- File:Raghavendra swamyji, With surdasji.jpg
- File:Swamiji is perfforming Puja.jpg
- File:Arthur James Turner.jpg
- File:Dr. William Lawrence Balls.jpg
- File:Suneeta Shetty.jpg
- File:Prof. H.R.R.Rao, standing near the NSA centre, USA.jpg
- File:Dr. C.T. Patel, Cotton Scientist.jpg
- File:Prof. H.R.Ramakrishna rao.jpg
- File:Dr. Rao releasing the KB at the Houston kannada sangha, USA.JPG
- File:Dr. kambar, relasing the 2 bks.jpg
- File:Chandra with friends at Houston kannada sangha, USA.jpg
- File:Hari and Friends.jpg
- File:Houston-1.jpg
- File:Mum U Kan(Dn).JPG
- File:Dr. Pavanaja, with Dr. Upadhye.JPG
- File:'AKKA conference at USA.jpg
- File:With Dr.G.S.S.jpg
- File:Home (hsv).jpg
- File:Dr.Karki award.jpg
- File:Dr.H.S.V.jpg
- File:Kn.(Audio).jpg
- File:H. V. Ranga rao, Astrologer, and Auditor.jpg
- File:Nala Charitrye Sahitya, written in kannada way back in 1930s.jpg
- File:Shrimati. Radhamma R. Rao.jpg
- File:Nala Charithre.jpg
- File:Prestigious Savitramma awardee.jpg
- File:Uma Rao, During College days.JPG
- File:Udaya bhanu puraskar.jpg
- File:Pro. HRR Rao, speaking.jpg
- File:At Karnataka sangha, The Central college, Bengaluru.jpeg
- File:With Vidushi Shyamala bhave.jpg
- File:Felicitations ceremony.jpg
- File:Dewan, Sir. M. Vishveshwaraiah, visited MA.jpg
- File:Bungalow type.jpg
- File:R.D.Char, one of the prominent Mysorean.jpg
- File:Prizes and Shields.JPG
- File:Balamuri Ganesha.JPG
- File:J.kaikini.JPG
- File:On the final day.jpg
- File:President at the function.jpg
- File:Jastice Shri krishna.jpg
- File:At the campus of Purdue university.jpg
- File:Smt. Lata pada, at The Shanmugananda sabha, Mumbai.JPG
- File:H. R. Chandrasekhar, Pardue University.jpg
- File:Shyamala madhava.jpg
- File:TH06 SHARDA DWIVEDI 915636e.jpg
- File:Prof. H.R.R.Rao being felicitated on his 80th birth day.jpg
- File:Mythili prakash's Bharata natyam program.JPG
- File:Entrance of the Hall.jpg
- File:Meera Chandrasekhar The best teacher awardee(2014).jpg
- File:With Dr. RLN Iyengar, The Director,.jpg
- File:Dr.NB.jpg
- File:In Dellhi kannada conference.jpg
- File:DrBSShylaja (f).jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. De728631 (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Also nominated:
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (12).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (14).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (15).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (16).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (17).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (18).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (19).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (20).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (21).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (22).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (23).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (24).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (25).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (26).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (27).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (28).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (29).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (31).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (32).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (33).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (34).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (35).jpg
- File:Italian Graffiti - panoramio (36).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
De728631 (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep per COM:GRAFFITI. 4ing (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please see the closing statement of the second discussion at Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:Non-free_graffiti: "Any graffiti that is not verified by some credible source to be illegal (and/or taken in a country restricting FOP) cannot be uploaded to Commons, because as a (likely) sanctioned work, it becomes a derivative of non-free content" (emphasis mine). De728631 (talk) 12:56, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per De728631. --Sealle (talk) 19:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Arkaitz1974 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All appear to be photographs of copyrighted broadcasts
- File:Alberto Tarantini. Mundial de España, 1982.jpg
- File:Osvaldo Ardiles. 10 de junio de 1978. Copa Mundial de Fútbol de Argentina 1978.jpg
- File:Jorge Olguin. 10 de junio de 1978. Copa Mundial de Fútbol de Argentina 1978.jpg
- File:Osvaldo Ardiles of Argentina during the world cup final match against Holland. 1978.jpg
- File:Manuchar Machaidze, Captain of Dinamo Tbilisi. 1979.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arkaitz1974 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not public domain in Georgia. COM:LL
- File:Avtandil Gogoberidze (1922–1980) FC Dinamo Tbilisi Forward (1945–1961).jpg
- File:Gela Ketashvili (USSR). 1988 Olympic Champion.jpg
_FC_Dinamo_Tbilisi_Forward_(1945%E2%80%931961).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._1988_Olympic_Champion.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arkaitz1974 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
- File:Gary Qiqava (born 5 April 1947) — Georgian Footballer, FC Dinamo Batumi (1965–67, 1971–75), FC Dinamo Tbilisi (1967–1968) and FC Torpedo Kutaisi (1969–70) Midfielder and Forward.jpg
- File:Vladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009) Georgian Footballer and Manager, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Defender (1949–1959).jpg
- File:Leovegildo Lins da Gama Júnior (born 29 June 1954) Brazil NFT Midfielder (1979–1992).jpg
- File:Luis Adolfo Galván (born 24 February 1948) Argentina NFT Defender (1975–1982).jpg
- File:Alexander Antonovich Dorokhov (1911–1978) Georgian and Soviet Footballer, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Goalkeeper (1928–1939).jpg
- File:Ruben Pagnanini (born 31 January 1949) Argentina NFT Defender (1978).jpg
- File:Santiago Santamaría (1952–2013) Argentina NFT Winger (1980–1982).jpg
- File:Rubén Galván (1952–2018) Argentina NFT Midfielder (1974–1978).jpg
- File:Andriy Biba (born 10 August 1937) FC Dynamo Kyiv Midfielder (1957–1967).jpg
- File:Algeti National Park (14 October 2007). 030.jpg
_%E2%80%94_Georgian_Footballer,_FC_Dinamo_Batumi_(1965%E2%80%9367,_1971%E2%80%9375),_FC_Dinamo_Tbilisi_(1967%E2%80%931968)_and_FC_Torpedo_Kutaisi_(1969%E2%80%9370)_Midfielder_and_Forward.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Georgian_Footballer_and_Manager,_FC_Dinamo_Tbilisi_Defender_(1949%E2%80%931959).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Brazil_NFT_Midfielder_(1979%E2%80%931992).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Argentina_NFT_Defender_(1975%E2%80%931982).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Georgian_and_Soviet_Footballer,_FC_Dinamo_Tbilisi_Goalkeeper_(1928%E2%80%931939).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Argentina_NFT_Defender_(1978).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Argentina_NFT_Winger_(1980%E2%80%931982).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Argentina_NFT_Midfielder_(1974%E2%80%931978).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_FC_Dynamo_Kyiv_Midfielder_(1957%E2%80%931967).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._030.jpg){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
About the deletion request for file File:Gary Qiqava (born 5 April 1947) — Georgian Footballer, FC Dinamo Batumi (1965–67, 1971–75), FC Dinamo Tbilisi (1967–1968) and FC Torpedo Kutaisi (1969–70) Midfielder and Forward.jpg
Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
Gary Qiqava (born 5 April 1947) was a Georgian and Soviet Footballer. This image have been shot and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?
This image have been shot and first published in 1968 and is public domain in Georgia since 1993
This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.
Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.
Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Encik Tekateki: Hi. First, it's useless to ping me 5 times for the same message. I don't know what you are talking about: I'm the nominator here and I've never asked Administrators to contact the website(s). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
About the deletion request for file File:Vladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009) Georgian Footballer and Manager, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Defender (1949–1959).jpg
Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
Vladimer Eloshvili (1927–2009) was a Georgian and Soviet Footballer. This image have been shot and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?
This image have been shot and first published in 1959 and is public domain in Georgia since 1984
This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.
Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.
Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
About the deletion request for file File:Luis Adolfo Galván (born 24 February 1948) Argentina NFT Defender (1975–1982).jpg
Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina — during the National Team pre-World Cup 1978 Photo Session and has been published in 1978 by El Gráfico and other sports magazines of Argentina and is public domain in Argentina since 1998, because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired (date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given).
This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.
Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.
Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
About the deletion request for file File:Alexander Antonovich Dorokhov (1911–1978) Georgian and Soviet Footballer, FC Dinamo Tbilisi Goalkeeper (1928–1939).jpg
Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
Alexander Antonovich Dorokhov (1911–1978) was a Georgian and Soviet Footballer. This image have been shot and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?
This image have been shot and first published in 1936 and is public domain in Georgia since 1961
This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.
Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.
Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
About the deletion request for file File:Ruben Pagnanini (born 31 January 1949) Argentina NFT Defender (1978).jpg
Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina — during International Friendly match Argentina v Bulgaria in 29 March 1978 and first published in 6 April 1978 by El Gráfico — an sports magazine of Argentina.
This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina and is public domain in Argentina since 1998, because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired (date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given).
This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.
Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.
Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
About the deletion request for file File:Rubén Galván (1952–2018) Argentina NFT Midfielder (1974–1978).jpg
Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
This image have been shot in Buenos Aires, Argentina — during the National Team pre-World Cup 1978 Photo Session and has been published in 1978 by El Gráfico and other sports magazines of Argentina and is public domain in Argentina since 1998, because the copyright of this photograph, registered in Argentina, has expired (date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it, and clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given).
This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Gia Mindadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Gia Mindadze yourself to ask them directly.
Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation.
Thank you for your assistance and consideration. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @Patrick Rogel: There are no reasons that the admins should contact the website admins whereas these responsibilities lies upon the uploader themselves. If Arkaitz1974 already have permission, well he should attach it inside OTRS tickets months ago. The final straw, if the website owner really allows it, the website admins should put up the CC logos somewhere on the sites. Speedy delete until OTRS received by Arkaitz1974 - Encik Tekateki (talk) 14:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
About the deletion request for file File:Andriy Biba (born 10 August 1937) FC Dynamo Kyiv Midfielder (1957–1967).jpg
Reason for the nomination: Please provide evidence that images have been shot and first published in Argentina.
Andriy Biba (born 10 August 1937) was a Soviet and Ukrainian Footballer, FC Dynamo Kyiv Midfielder (1957–1967). This image have been shot in Tbilisi — during the Soviet Top League match between Dinamo Tbilisi and Dynamo Kyiv in 20 July 1964 and first published in Soviet Georgia, what kind of relation it may have with Argentina?
This image have been shot and first published in 1964 and is public domain in Georgia since 1989.
This photo is posted on the website FootballFacts.ru by Mirian Kavsadze. He allowed its free copying. All permissions were obtained beforehand. For evidence You can contact this website and Mirian Kavsadze yourself to ask them directly.
Please undelete this photo; there is no copyright violation. --Arkaitz1974 (talk) 09:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ghano-jskiste (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation: Low-resolution photographs, some with different copyright notes [10] [11], uploaded as "own work" by new user.
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Djaout.jpg){kind=link}
![[11]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ali-amran-un-soir-en-kabylie-44.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Alemass temdint iwadiyen.jpg
- File:D-un-nouveau-portrait-de-lounes-matoub-inaugure-d628d.jpg
- File:Mohand aarav bessoud.jpg
- File:Djaout.jpg
- File:Makabylie liberté.jpg
- File:Amiruc at hamudda .jpg
- File:Tala nni.jpg
- File:Ouyahyou di taddartis.jpg
- File:Ali-amran-un-soir-en-kabylie-44.jpg
- File:Ferhat imoulla imazighen.jpg
- File:Oulahlou--4-.jpg
- File:Guermah massinissa45.gif
- File:Bouaziz l'orateur du MAK.jpg
- File:AliA.jpg
- File:Bouaziz-Ait-Chebib-600x3381-600x338.jpg
- File:Massinissa Guermah.jpg
Sitacuisses (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
no photographer, no PD-Old Goesseln (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Ricardo Daniel Bertoni. 10 de junio de 1978. Copa Mundial de Fútbol de Argentina 1978.jpg
[edit]
Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen, no useful source information Ytoyoda (talk) 19:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Arkaitz1974: COM:DW - Using VisualFileChange.
Copyright violation (see this instagram post) Andycyca (talk) 03:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:53, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Websize, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. If you are the photographer, could you confirm via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 13:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.durnitibarta.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/bishwori-johir-sir-600x336.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes, please delete
[edit]
I'm the newbie that composed the image when my username was drdfp. @Boghog: has explained to me why it shouldn't be used, so delete it. Thanks, DennisPietras (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:55, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Printed material, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Greece, sculptor (Ευθύμιος Καλεβράς) died in 2011.
- File:Onasis LM.jpg
- File:Onassis Aristotle statue 6254.JPG
- File:Onassis Aristotle statue 6255.jpg
- File:Onassis Aristotle statue 6256.jpg
Geraki TLG 17:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this image, very small, no meta, notable subject. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Greece, sculptor is still living...
- File:20140412 lefkada146.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada147.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada150.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada151.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada152.JPG
- File:Malamou-Dipla Kleareti 6172.jpg
- File:Monument to Kleareti Malamou-Dipla1.JPG
Geraki TLG 17:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
listed as own work, definitely not own work. You can find it in Britannica! Aṭlas (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:56, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Disputing {{PD-textlogo}} license. This design is far too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. — ξxplicit 05:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the German Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted via deletion discussion in October 2016. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 05:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Itcwikipedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be collection of promo photos by educational institution. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Lab Géotechnique.png
- File:Entry exam to ITC.jpg
- File:Foreign students at ITC.pdf
- File:Consortium meeting of ITC.jpg
- File:ITC Ranking.jpg
- File:Lab XRD and XRF at 3G.png
- File:Lecture at ITC.jpg
- File:Lecturer inbasic science.jpg
- File:ITC student at école polytechnique, France.png
- File:ITC Multimedia Room.jpg
- File:Agreement with Institutut pasteur.jpg
- File:PhotosITC.jpg
- File:Foreign students at ITC.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment Indeed it could be from a student of Institute of Technology of Cambodia. We need an extra permission via OTRS! --Ras67 (talk) 14:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Juan Manuel Sánchez Marcos y Pilar Ruiz Madrid años 50.png
- File:Juan Manuel Sánchez Marcos y Pilar Ruiz Madrid en el año de su boda (1920).png
- File:Años 30.png
- File:Años 30.pdf
- File:Año de la boda 1920.pdf
- File:Años 50.pdf
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's draft was declined in January 2016 for being non-notable and deleted in July as abaondoned. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 05:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture by Memos Makris, who died in 1993. We do have photos from other works by him (Category:Makrisz Agamemnon), mostly from Hungary, but this one is located in Greece where there is no Freedom of Panorama.
- File:20140412 lefkada199.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada200.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada201.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada202.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada203.JPG
- File:20140412 lefkada204.JPG
Geraki TLG 17:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
No indication that consent for the creation and publishing of this photo was given by depicted person. (Previous DR was about copyright issues.) Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
random mass-upload panoramio streams, enormous watermark, hence doubtful educational usefulness, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality and unused: has nonstandard geometry, replaceable by File:Peroxy acids (acid-base-rxn).svg. And "+H+" over the arrow is chemically dubious: if it's a catalyst ("over the arrow" role) then it's merely present, not really "added" in a chemical equation sense (this is written in a more standard way in the svg replacement) DMacks (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 02:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted and still in use Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded it again when I uploaded an entire book. The new file goes with the rest of the pages in the uploaded book pages. Level C (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Almost certainly a copyright violation of the poster photographed, and motion-blurred to boot. Jmabel ! talk 04:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Almost certainly a copyvio of copyrighted sculptures; no FOP for sculpture in the United States. Jmabel ! talk 04:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Not sure what this is exactly, but it seems unlikely to be a free image created entirely by the author. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
very blurry and very low resolution better files: File:Fra Angelico - San Marco Altarpiece - WGA00509 02.jpg, File:Altar sm-1.jpg, File:Angelico san marco.jpg, File:Fra Angelico - San Marco Altarpiece - WGA00509.jpg, File:Fra Angelico 060.jpg Oursana (talk) 05:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
While the standard 1950s Oreo design may be not protected by copyright, the Halloween embosses on Oreo cookies may be copyrightable. The cookies were discussed at COM:VPCOPY. Some editors decide the same thoughts as mine. George Ho (talk) 06:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC); My mistake: views would vary. 11:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- I commented there that the cookies are utilitarian, and so they cannot 'as a whole be copyrighted'. This was disagreed with, and I would on general principle agree with that, except that there is case law that seems to state otherwise. See http://www.law360.com/articles/345928/is-food-art-the-copyrightability-of-food and the mentioned legal case, https://casetext.com/case/kim-seng-company-v-j-a-importers. The legal case addresses many unrelated matters as well, but the court states that "The food items cannot be separated from their utilitarian function, which is to be eaten" and also states (as the result of a separate chain of argument) "Accordingly, a bowl of perishable food is not "fixed" for the purposes of the Copyright Act." I think the same logic applies to cookies, which are perishable food items, even if mass produced. - Reventtalk 06:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- This isn't really an accurate description of the VP discussion. There is no disagreement that cookies are utilitarian; the comments were merely that Halloween characters, by virtue of appearing on utilitarian objects (the cookies), do not necessarily themselves become utilitarian (the conceptual separability doctrine, which is not address by the case(s) above.) Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- @George Ho: I wasn't trying to describe the VP discussion, I figure people would read it. I have no doubt that the actual 'designs' embossed on the cookies are themselves copyrightable, if depicted in some other manner (such as drawn on paper). I just don't think, based on the sources I've found about this, that the depiction of them 'on food' like this would be protected... that it would be considered de minimis, as the photos are of the 'entirety' of utilitarian objects, just as something like File:4X-AHC Martin Harrison.jpg is DM. - Reventtalk 18:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- The judgement does not use the actual term 'conceptual separability', but the ruling seems to be clearly addressing the point when it says, regarding the item being considered there, "The food items cannot be separated from their utilitarian function, which is to be eaten". - Reventtalk 18:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- To address the cookies specifically, I don't see that the designs themselves are intended to serve any function 'as art', that is separate from the function of the cookies themselves 'as food'. They are mere decoration of utilitarian objects, in this context, as so 'incidental' when showing the entire objects..... I know that this is somewhat counterintuitive, and rather expect the consensus to be to remove these (on the PRP if nothing else) but I do think the photo is actually okay. - Reventtalk 18:48, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- This isn't really an accurate description of the VP discussion. There is no disagreement that cookies are utilitarian; the comments were merely that Halloween characters, by virtue of appearing on utilitarian objects (the cookies), do not necessarily themselves become utilitarian (the conceptual separability doctrine, which is not address by the case(s) above.) Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The cited case concerned the claim that a bowl of cereal was a copyrightable sculpture. I think we can all agree that there is no creativity in filling a bowl with cereal and milk. It does not speak to the question here. It seems to me that if a coin, which is also a utilitarian object, can have a copyright by virtue of the design embossed on it, then a cookie, similar in size and shape to coins, can also have a copyright based on the design embossed on it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Original reason given by User:Macassar: 'Commons is not pub album'. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Copyright : collection Société française de photographie (coll. SFP), Paris - Droits réservés 82.66.244.97 11:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Author died 130 years ago. Reproductions of 2D works does not give new copyright. --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Droits réservés : collection Société française de photographie (coll. SFP), Paris. 31.36.229.28 17:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Already kept, copyright already expired. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Not own work. 1942 photograph. Not old enough to assume it is in the public domain without information about the source and/or author. BrightRaven (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the professionnal quality, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader. This official website is a possible source. I do not think that {{PD-Art}} can be used here, because the walls of the cave are not flat, so the painting is a 3D-object. BrightRaven (talk) 11:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
According to this link https://historiadelfutbolboliviano.com/terminos-y-condiciones-de-uso/ ("La única condición es que el material no se modifique de ninguna forma y que se cite al comienzo de cada articulo") the image does not comply with a free license, since the image cannot be modified Strakhov (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- De acuerdo a ese link, también dice y cito: "(...) no tenemos ningún problema en que esta información se utilice parcial o totalmente en otras publicaciones de formato digital y/o impreso". Entonces, ¿cuál es el problema? Además, la imagen no ha sido modificada de ninguna forma, se ha citado la fuente y se publicó con fines de investigación. De acuerdo al artículo 24 de la Ley 1322 del 13 de abril de 1992 de Derechos de Autor en Bolivia: "Es permitido citar a un autor, entendiéndose por cita la inclusión, en una obra propia, de cortos fragmentos de obras ajenas, siempre que se trate de obras ya divulgadas, se indique la fuente y el nombre del autor de la obra utilizada y a condición de que la inclusión se realice a título de cita o para su análisis, comentario o juicio crítico, con fines docentes o de investigación, de conformidad a usos honestos, en la medida justificada por el fin que se persigue y no resulten abusivas." Por último, la etiqueta en la que demuestro su licencia dice claramente: "(...) without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law." Es requerido por nuestra ley citar la fuente, siempre es necesario citar la fuente. No le veo el problema a que esta imagen esté publicada en Wikipedia si el autor garantiza su uso con condiciones que siempre son necesarias de cumplir. --GRop5t (talk) 21:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- El problema es que toda imagen alojada en Commons debe permitir la publicación de obras derivadas (modificaciones) a partir de ella, además de poderse usar con propósito comercial. Se puede leer esta política oficial al respecto. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 22:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Según el autor, se puede utilizar el contenido parcial o totalmente, no creo que con "no modificarse" se refiera a que no se pueda utilizar en obras derivadas, ya que resultaría contradictorio. --GRop5t (talk) 01:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- "La única condición es que el material no se modifique de ninguna forma" -> Only condition is that the content is not modified in any manner. To me is pretty clear what that does mean. If it is contradictory with other statement (I think "no se modifique de ninguna forma" is the most explicit one, though), maybe the owner of that webpage should make his mind clearer before licensing stuff. Contradictory licenses are frequent. Files affected are frequently deleted. (Para mí está bastante claro lo que significa. Si es contradictorio con otra afirmación (pienso que la de "no se modifique de ninguna manera" es la más explícita y clara, sin embargo), quizás el propietario de esa página web debería aclararse antes de licenciar material. Las licencias contradictorias son frecuentes. El contenido afectado es frecuentemente borrado.) Strakhov (talk) 10:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Podría ser que "no modificarse" sea que el texto derivado no se aleje del tema central del contenido de la página, afirmo esto porque el autor permite usar el material en publicaciones de formato digital y/o impreso. ¿Por qué escribiría que estarían felices de que se utilice esta información si no permitiera su uso? --GRop5t (talk) 04:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is clear that the license language amounts to an ND license. It is also questionable whether the source actually has the right to license the image at all. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
No indication of own work. HerrAdams (talk) 13:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I have no idea what we are seeing on this image. Part of a backyard with a temporary fence? Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:33, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
a general term redirecting to a very specific invasion, nothing links here Burumbátor (talk) 13:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete I think these billboards are too prominent to be de minimis and too complex to be PD Ww2censor (talk) 15:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Thw presse as Speedy (Löschen) with reason: 'Keine Zustimmung der abgebildeten Person.' Not a criterium for speedy deletion. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep
- Es handelt sich nicht um eine diffamierende Darstellung der Person
- Es handelt sich hierbei um eine Person von Öffentlichen Interesse (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albrecht_Broemme), daher ist eine ausdrückliche Zustimmung nicht Nötig.
- Mitglieder des THW stimmen mit Ihren Eintritt zu, das Bildmaterial von ihnen im Rahmen Ihrer Dienstlichen Tätigkeiten ohne weiter Rückfrage veröffentlicht werden dürfen.
- the picture show no kind of defamation agains the person.
- the person is a public figire, its the president of the w:Technisches Hilfswerk (THW). That means is not needed that he confirm to publish the photo.
- members of the THW confirm with her membership, that's allowed to publish photos without explicit confirmation.
--Thiemo Schuff (talk) 18:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Also unlikely claim, considering that the depicted person is posing for a photograph and the photo is used on the person's Wikipedia page. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep - Begründung: Person des öffentlichen Lebens / Reasoning: Person of public awareness; Mag sein der Herr hat ein paar Neider. / Maybe that person has a few envys. --Alexander.stohr (talk) 21:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep - Begründung: Es ist eindeutig für das Foto posiert worden. Dies reicht als Zustimmung zum Foto. Ausserdem liegt kein Beleg für einen Wiederspruch von Herrn Bromme an den Fotografen vor. Reasoning: Posing and missing proof of disagree. HBR (talk) 01:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep - Begründung: Person des öffentlichen Lebens / Reasoning: Person of public awareness; --Stephan_Herz (talk) 07:54, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
There is no permission from the photographer here. Pinging @Natuur12: who added the permission. Yann (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Subject is a YouTube celeberty who is pretty good with the camera and is also known for her selfies. See the en-wiki article Marzia. Any reason to believe this is not one of her high quality selfies? Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- This doesn't look like a selfie. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- One of her YT-vids taken on the exact same spot. Making a selfie like this is a piece off cake for YT stars off her caliber. (Ironycly this vid is related to the TV serie selfies). Not the only pic taken at this location. Have you already taken a look at het selfies at Instagram Yann? Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose you know this case better than me. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- One of her YT-vids taken on the exact same spot. Making a selfie like this is a piece off cake for YT stars off her caliber. (Ironycly this vid is related to the TV serie selfies). Not the only pic taken at this location. Have you already taken a look at het selfies at Instagram Yann? Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- This doesn't look like a selfie. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Document given to tourists; Not own work. http://farm1.static.flickr.com/108/302180906_bde67fd61d.jpg Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
(Copied here from the file talk page Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)): Borgund Stavkirkje Plan is an image of a touristic leaflet which is largely and freely offered at the Borgund Stavkirkje Center office. It is a public document that anybody can use at the condition that the source be mentioned what I did. I could draw this plan and it would be my original creation but there is no sens to do it when you can use an official and free document. The same arguments are due to the other suspected file: Borgund Stavkirjke Elevation. If you delete the file I can delete the text I wrote from the same leaflet which is quite interesting for the topic. Shame Thanks to moderate this matter. With best regards Pmmy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmmy49 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 04 January 2017 (UTC)
- Being public doesn't mean it's free to use.
anybody can use [it] at the condition that the source [is] mentioned
Deleted: "Free of charge" is not the same as "Freely licensed". . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded here last month, but used on this blog in 2013; unclear authorship, source, and copyright status. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Dear Ruff: It's alright that Molly Remer featured this image in her blog; she is a friend of the family and has also written a book that expanded on Shekhinah Mountainwater's (woman in the picture) Womanrunes. Molly was very heavily influenced by Shekhinah in her faith and career path, so it makes perfect sense for her to blog about her mentor.
As for the ownership of the photo, I am Shekhinah's birth daughter, Angel Brandwein. My mother is now deceased and my brother and I manage her intellectual estate. We grant permission for others to use photos of our mother so long as their projects honor her memory and art, and they are not selling her work without our permission.
I DO want photos of Shekhinah to remain in the Commons on Wikipedia because we need to be able to upload photos of her to her Wikipedia page. If you need any additional information, do not hesitate to contact me: shekhinahmemories@gmail.com or direct to petalsinthedark@hotmail.com.
Best, Angel Brandwein
- Great, thank you; in order to clarify that you own the rights to the pictures, Commons will ask you to use the Commons:OTRS process; just send your permission to the email address provided. This is how Commons prevents copyright violations and unauthorized use of photographers' work. However, you state " We grant permission for others to use photos of our mother so long as their projects honor her memory and art, and they are not selling her work without our permission." Unfortunately, photos submitted to Commons are licensed for use by anyone for any purpose. The license tag you put on the photographs has the details: people can use your photos for commercial purposes if they wish, and they can change and alter the photos in any way, as long as they credit you. They also do not need to ask your permission to do these things, the license tag gives them permission. If that is not acceptable, you might not want to share the photos on this site; just a heads-up. Thanks. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Per User_talk:Josve05a#Tagging_licensed_files_for_deletion.3F It is an artwork by someone named "Bruce Von Stetina" acording to description. COM:OTRS COM:PERMISSION is needed.
Note that I'm only raising this here as a conversion from an automatic deletion for "no licence" (which was incorrect, as a licence is claimed). Andy Dingley (talk) 19:14, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see this as a sufficient reason for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Beautiful model, but clearly requires a free lciense from Bruce Von Stetina. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
the majority of the picture only shows the nameplate of the entiteled species Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no license 178.197.237.75 20:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Part of Sibelius monument in Helsinki by sculptor Eila Hiltunen, died in 2003. Not yet PD, no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 20:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Sibelius monument in Helsinki by sculptor Eila Hiltunen, died in 2003. Not yet PD, no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sibelius monument in Helsinki by sculptor Eila Hiltunen, died in 2003. Not yet PD, no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
en:Sibelius Monument (Helsinki) by finnish sculptor en:Eila Hiltunen, who died in 2003. Not in PD, no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:56, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Sibelius monument in Helsinki by sculptor Eila Hiltunen, died in 2003. Not yet PD, no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 20:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
en:Sibelius Monument (Helsinki) by finnish sculptor en:Eila Hiltunen, who died in 2003. Not in PD, no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
en:Sibelius Monument (Helsinki) by finnish sculptor en:Eila Hiltunen, who died in 2003. Not in PD, no FOP in Finland for sculptures. Htm (talk) 19:32, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Cannot verify license at bare URL source (no evidence that image was released under this license) czar 20:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Por que si 190.160.170.221 21:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
File has been replaced because source was missing. Original upload was of dubious provenance and did not conform to historical facts. Possibly, a novelty photo taken for fun. We don't know. Blue Police of the General Government did not carry weapons. Example (one of many): https://audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/10996/
- Please delete original upload only. Poeticbent talk 20:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Old revision deleted. --INeverCry 22:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
The following deletion request was added by User:E-960 manually to the file: File Description has no relevance to the subject matter, as it does not describe the actual picture, but only provides an explanation of why an older unrelated image should have been deleted. The original uncropped image from the National Archive should be re-uploaded with the correct date and full description: "German soldier and two Polish policemen at an outdoor marketplace." Also, the Date is incorrect, as the original file source [12] has dates c. 1939-1945, not 1943. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Issues seem to have been resolved and were never grounds for deletion anyway. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Sebari. The only impulse behind this request was an apparent POVPUSH by a problem user. I shall thank Sebari for guiding me through the maze of Commons' policies. And I apologise for mistakes made in the process. Poeticbent talk 17:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the issue is that this image was uploaded over an older unrelated image, and that's against COM:OVERWRITE recommendations, a very questionable tactic because it replaced the older image on several pages at once, while if this image was upload as new, it would have to wait for actual use in an article. Also, the previous image was deleted under a false claim that Blue Police never carried weapons (mostly true, but not 100%), yet just looking at National Archive database see here: [13] there are images of policemen with rifles. --E-960 (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC) In short selective enforcement of rules. --E-960 (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please stop with your revenge editing already, User:E-960. Click on the closeup photo in your link to Zbiory NAC on-line. If you knew a bit of World War II history (which you don't), you would notice that the man with no insignia of anykind anywhere on him,(!) is also wearing an Allgemeine SS overcoat with characteristics French cuffs. Poeticbent talk 20:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- hehe… this is too much with the rude personal attacks, also not sure how you can spot all that, but here is a clue, the National Archive description reads: Policjant polski (granatowy) z karabinem (Polish Blue Policeman with Rifle). I'll go with the description first. Also, pls let me know what you think about this image [14], is anyone wearing French cuffs in that photo? --E-960 (talk) 21:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Lack of knowledge is not an excuse. The original debate was about handguns (!) which the Blue Police never had. There are hundreds of photographs of Polish Police on patrol in the General Government confirming that they did not have holsters on their duty belts as shown also in here. A ceremonial photo with the commandant (and nobody else) possibly having a handgun in a holster at at an inspection by Hans Frank does not change anything. Polish Police never carried rifles on their street patrols either (Category:Granatowa policja). I recommend reading Marek Getter (1996), Polish Police in the General Government 1939-1945. Quote: "Niemieckie władze policyjne nie dowierzały Policji Polskiej. Niezależnie od oficjalnych upomnień, nakazów i gróźb (por. aresztowania w maju 1940 roku) oraz rozciągnięcia nad Policją Polską sądownictwa SS i policji od wiosny 1943 rozpoczęło się poufne sprawdzanie jej przydatności (Überprüfung der nichtdeutschen Polizei), jak też opiniowanie jej poszczególnych funkcjonariuszy." Poeticbent talk 07:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please… when did you refer to "handguns" in your original request to delete the previous image—your reason to delete the earlier picture was dubious and questionable, just as those silly claims you made about this photograph [15] where you were somehow able to ID the subject wearing an "Allgemeine SS overcoat with French cuffs", yet the picture in the National Archive website carries a clear description of "Polish Blue Policeman with Rifle—1942" not an SS-man with rifle. And, you rudely accuse others of lacking knowledge. --E-960 (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Lack of knowledge is not an excuse. The original debate was about handguns (!) which the Blue Police never had. There are hundreds of photographs of Polish Police on patrol in the General Government confirming that they did not have holsters on their duty belts as shown also in here. A ceremonial photo with the commandant (and nobody else) possibly having a handgun in a holster at at an inspection by Hans Frank does not change anything. Polish Police never carried rifles on their street patrols either (Category:Granatowa policja). I recommend reading Marek Getter (1996), Polish Police in the General Government 1939-1945. Quote: "Niemieckie władze policyjne nie dowierzały Policji Polskiej. Niezależnie od oficjalnych upomnień, nakazów i gróźb (por. aresztowania w maju 1940 roku) oraz rozciągnięcia nad Policją Polską sądownictwa SS i policji od wiosny 1943 rozpoczęło się poufne sprawdzanie jej przydatności (Überprüfung der nichtdeutschen Polizei), jak też opiniowanie jej poszczególnych funkcjonariuszy." Poeticbent talk 07:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Overcoats of the former Allgemeine-SS from the pre-war German stock which was no longer used and kept in storage, were stripped of German insignia and passed on by the SS to the Ukrainian and Belarusian Auxiliary Battalions (or Schumas, German: Schutzmannschaft Bataillone) active in eastern Poland. The SS did not use them, the Trawniki men did. Making up stories (clear as mud) when confronted about your ignorance is not going to change that. Source of data: Gordon Williamson (2012). German Security and Police Soldier 1939-45. Osprey Publishing. p. 44. ISBN 1782000070. Poeticbent talk 18:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Overwriting this file with a different one in the first place had not been a good idea. But now that this file existed under this name for quite a while, we should keep it with this name to avoid any further disruption. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Original reason given by User:Philmarin: 'spelling'. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: empty, bad name. --Achim (talk) 22:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Original reason given by User:Philmarin: 'spelling'. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: empty & bad name. --Achim (talk) 22:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
I don't think this is an self-maded file. It seems it is a imagevio from some place. Clarification will be needed. Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio via [16]. --Sealle (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the Russian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in September 2016 as recreation of a page that was deleted via deletion discussion. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 07:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
This image is selfie. I am not sure about 1.auther is "chebimus" not Kishi Aino, and then 2.this license(CC BY 4.0) is really correct. - Tablemaker (talk) 09:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination regarding questionable copyright status. --MBisanz talk 20:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the file, but it is already available, I couldn't find it at first due to different spelling of the name. Tremendo (talk) 09:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Ya existe versión SVG Ansunando (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete universally replaced superseded file. Kathisma (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Several better quality images already exist, including a near-duplicate without cropped borders of the wooden frame Desyman (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ok for me --Sailko (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:38, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
random mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Vector version available, File:Hong Kong road sign 106.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Vector version available, File:Hong Kong road sign 106.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
listed as own work, definitely not own work. This is the source. Aṭlas (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Not own work but taken from FB as per EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 05:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DaB. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Creator:Unknown and creator is more than 70 years dead is not possible; source:internet is also problematic. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- ist von CDEC-Digital Library und laut progetto ist nutzung erlaubt http://digital-library.cdec.it/cdec-web/info/progetto.html : Salvo diversa indicazione, tutti i contenuti di questo sito sono soggetti alla licenza Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) --Gedenksteine (talk) 19:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose the deletion request as the image has been given to the public under Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) by CDEC, a project sponsored and enabled by the Italian Ministry of Culture and the Claims Conference.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- and still the creator of the picture is unknown? Does commons 4.0 work with an unknown creator? Kind regards Seader (talk) 13:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- If the author is actually unknown and if the photo has been published before 1946, then, it is already in the Public domain (and CC license cannot be applied, obviously). --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Its not known for sure if the author is really unknown. Its that the source where the picture was taken from and which licensed the picture as commons 4.0 doesnt give any information about the author. I dont assume that anyone has tried to ask the source about the authors identity if they set commons 4.0? Kind regards Seader (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- yes, the author ist unknown http://digital-library.cdec.it/cdec-web/fotografico/detail/IT-CDEC-FT0001-0000019785/eugenio-lipschitz.html --Gedenksteine (talk) 23:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC) (and for seader, here Photo Klimesch http://digital-library.cdec.it/cdec-web/fotografico/detail/IT-CDEC-FT0001-0000053570/francoforte-laboratorio-della-degussa-arminio-hasci-wachsberger-al-lavoro-come-chimico.html and here is an author http://digital-library.cdec.it/cdec-web/fotografico/detail/IT-CDEC-FT0001-0000029787/primo-levi-3.html, you see the difference???) --Gedenksteine (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Its not known for sure if the author is really unknown. Its that the source where the picture was taken from and which licensed the picture as commons 4.0 doesnt give any information about the author. I dont assume that anyone has tried to ask the source about the authors identity if they set commons 4.0? Kind regards Seader (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- If the author is actually unknown and if the photo has been published before 1946, then, it is already in the Public domain (and CC license cannot be applied, obviously). --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- and still the creator of the picture is unknown? Does commons 4.0 work with an unknown creator? Kind regards Seader (talk) 13:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose the deletion request as the image has been given to the public under Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) by CDEC, a project sponsored and enabled by the Italian Ministry of Culture and the Claims Conference.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Can't be author=unknown and CC-BY. ID photo, so probably not published until much later than subject's death. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DaB. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Creator: unknow and creator is more than 70 years dead, is not possible. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Official photograph of Italian army and therefore free of copyrights.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 21:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- .and this site says free too http://ilvergante.com/stresa-pietra-inciampo-giuliano-nicolini/ (at the end of the page, commons 4.0) --Gedenksteine (talk) 21:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- You failed to give attribution to the creator. Regardless, the content is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0, "all "nc" (Noncommercial) and "nd" (No Derivatives) licenses are not acceptable". --CorrectHorseBatteryStaple (talk) 22:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: If the photographer is actually unknown, and if it was published before 1946, then, it meets the Anonymous work published more than 70 years ago. CC licenses cannot be applied to old works. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Its not known for sure if the author is really unknown. Its that the source where the picture was taken from and which licensed the picture as commons 4.0 doesnt give any information about the author. I dont assume that anyone has tried to ask the source about the authors identity if they set commons 4.0? Kind regards Seader (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- You once have been banned in deWP for non-proper behavior. I think it is better for you to abstain from further comments as someone could get the impression that you could have a political agenda in this case.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 20:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- And you have been banned as well. So what? I asked a normal question. Kind regards Seader (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- You once have been banned in deWP for non-proper behavior. I think it is better for you to abstain from further comments as someone could get the impression that you could have a political agenda in this case.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 20:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Its not known for sure if the author is really unknown. Its that the source where the picture was taken from and which licensed the picture as commons 4.0 doesnt give any information about the author. I dont assume that anyone has tried to ask the source about the authors identity if they set commons 4.0? Kind regards Seader (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- You failed to give attribution to the creator. Regardless, the content is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0, "all "nc" (Noncommercial) and "nd" (No Derivatives) licenses are not acceptable". --CorrectHorseBatteryStaple (talk) 22:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
@Meister und Margarita and Seader: This discussion is about the copyright status of the picture, not anything else. If the off-topic discussion continues, I'll report the both you to the Administrator's Noticeboard. Staying here, and to be clear, reproductions of old 2D works don't have new copyright, and cannot be relicensed under any license as it is already (supposed to be) in the PD. In the other side, proof of publication prior to 1946 may be provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: I have one question: What exactly is the meaning of this part of the licence: "In Deutschland kann diese Lizenzvorlage bei Werken, die vor 1995 veröffentlicht wurden, daher nur genutzt werden, wenn nachgewiesen werden kann, dass der Urheber in den 70 Jahren nach Veröffentlichung nicht bekannt wurde oder sich zur Urheberschaft bekannt hat. Dies ist bei verwaisten Werken häufig nicht möglich; in diesem Fall kann dieser Lizenzbaustein nicht genutzt werden.". How are we going to proof that no author claimed copyrights? And if it cant be proofed, what license will be used then? Kind regards Seader (talk) 21:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Germany. Proof of authorship should be provided, but if he/she was never known or disclosed, the right license is {{PD-anon-70-EU}} and {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} respectively. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: No proof of publication before 1947. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Whm, simple gradient and typeface, bellow the TOO for me (and the artifacts are caused by the JPEG compression). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:58, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, requires COM:OTRS confirmation. Yann (talk) 10:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Macassar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: image mauvaise qualité. Not a speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete That said, I agree. Terrible quality. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's work. Aṭlas (talk) 17:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
file not in use at Wikimedia projects since 2009, one-file upload, doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Scope may be OK, but given size and no EXIF, it's probably a copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Vector version exists at File:MUTCD R10-10L.svg Thespaceface (talk) 02:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no objections raised. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Vector version exists at File:MUTCD R10-12.svg Thespaceface (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no objections raised. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Embedded Data Bot as Speedy (embedded data) and the most recent rationale was: After 43.0B (43 bytes). Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- The file is corrupted, filename suggests copyvio from youtube --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 09:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- I was able to watch the video with
ffplay; apparently this video is from en:NoCopyrightSounds, however I'm unsure about the exact source & copyright status of this video --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 11:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete Not Own work!— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: file is somehow corrupted, and also most likely out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tm as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.pt/search?bih=759&biw=1536&q=marina+ruy+barbosa+paris+fashion+week&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlQEJR_1is1nssCs8aiQELEKjU2AQaAghDDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIo5xeyG9YXrhu_1F9ge1R7BFtceoh6RJaEh2ybDK-UuriHdJtomnCHvLhow9pg3jlsVbcFdvzlM_186e7ip8ITC9uITbY5agk2CGG2zlBMeT2EZYmUDsVCnzvfFaIAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgQt1OQwDA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5vcu2safRAhWJtxQKHQpHCmgQ2A4IGSgB Yann (talk) 09:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- All images have consistent EXIF data. And no copy on the web of the last two images. Let's try a proper DR.
- If you are the photographer, could you confirm via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Please procedurally close this DR. Google Image Search results URL is not proof of copyvio (could be a good idea to add that URL pattern to the Abuse filter?). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Amitie 10g, sorry but your message doesn't really help here. There is indeed a suspicion for professional pictures imported by a new user, where some of them appear on the web. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- @LeoFaria: Could you have a look at COM:OTRS and follow the process outlined there, if you are really the photographer? We take copyrights very seriously here on Commons, due to the high amount of copyright violations we receive, especially when professionally made photos are uploaded. You images will be restored then. Thank you! Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: awaiting OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
"FPÖ Graz" ist keine Person, daher ohne Freigabe durch den Urheber (Fotograf) wohl derzeit eine URV Jbergner (talk) 12:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same situation as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roti Island Snaked-Neck Turtle, Rotterdam.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sawfish by Forrest Samuels.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Poem by Claire (8661671562).jpg. While the machine-readable license on Flickr is indeed {{cc-by-2.0}}, the real license is {{cc-by-nc-sa-2.0}} (which is non-free), as clearly shown by the written description and the original at https://www.flickr.com/photos/fredericsalein/4803738783. Failing to retain the {{noncommercial}} restriction (which is a problem for us) and the share-alike restriction (which isn't) in the machine-readable licensing selection is obviously a mistake by the person reposting the file on behalf of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unenzyklopädische TF Carl Sack (talk) 12:36, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
+ 1, erschwerend hinzu kommt die unbeholfen-kindlich wirkende Art dieser Buntstiftzeichnung. --Phi (talk) 22:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- +1 unbrauchbar / cannot be used -jkb- (talk) 09:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Ob ein Bild als „unenzyklopädische TF“ eingeschätzen ist, wird nicht auf Commons entschieden. Solange das Bild in Artikeln eines Wikipedia-Projekts verwendet wird, bleibt es selbstverständlich auf Commons. Momentan wird es genutzt in vier Artikeln: Carnuntum (Militärlager), Limes (Grenzwall), Comitatenses und Mons Brisiacus. Beachtet also bitte COM:SCOPE#File in use in another Wikimedia project. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
And also:
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 13:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, please check out my last message, I added some link to it already — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angela001 (talk • contribs) 07:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Responded on my talkpage. FDMS 4 11:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, second image is a corrupted dupe of the first one. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
I have used this file in my book: https://es.wikibooks.org/wiki/Tecno_Recursos/Electricidad/Circuito_El%C3%A9ctrico
I don't undestand notability. Image have the standard quality of Crocodile Clips 3.5, a common tool for design and simulate circuits for children.
I haven't got SVG version.
Adre-es (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Since File:Electricidad-circuito-simbolos-02.png is in use and therefore in-scope, this likely is as well. Not being SVG is not a reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
quite the same images affected File:Munnar, meesappulimala - panoramio (5).jpg and File:Munnar, meesappulimala - panoramio (13).jpg: random mass-upload of panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Very interesting landscape in a geo-references location in a national park. While the technical problems (sensor spots) are unfortunate, this image certainly has merit. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
quite the same images affected File:Munnar, meesappulimala - panoramio (5).jpg and File:Munnar, meesappulimala - panoramio (13).jpg: random mass-upload of panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, randomly taken from car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: very close to File:Munnar, meesappulimala - panoramio (13).jpg and inferior. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The individual expression of thought required for protection is present because the photograph is given an individual character by the choice of framing. 178.197.232.248 22:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
this is definitely an art photograph, despite the bad scan quality 178.197.234.29 19:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Here, someone with very weak arguments wants to delete unpopular photographs. Greeting --Schofför (talk) 00:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Not to be treated as artwork. --Achim (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: previously kept, no new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
unused bad quality duplicate of a signature (compare File:Autograph_of_Hans_Martin_Sutermeister.JPG 178.197.227.101 21:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: While the quality is quite bad, the signature is considerably different from the other one. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
protected logo of Hans Huber 178.197.226.216 21:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: logo is de-minimis, in my opinion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The manuscript surpasses threshold of originality 178.197.232.122 20:33, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: reopened DR without new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
File:DB Deutsche Bahn Tower Berlin und Hassel Rechtsanwälte, POSTDAMER PLATZ, BERLIN Rechtsanwälte - panoramio.jpg
[edit]
Fairly random photo of Potsdamer Platz. We have hundreds of better photos of that location. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:31, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reddogsix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.vitality.co.uk/. PD-textlogo. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Whm bellow in the UK? --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- In his webpage there is that statement: " ©2017 Vitality Corporate Services Limited trading as VitalityHealth and VitalityLife. All rights reserved. " It seems to be a flagrant copyvio. --Bestiasonica (talk) 17:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
