Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
CC-BY-ND is not permitted in Wikipedia Seriesphile (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 05:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gay_flag.svg Ritarisk (talk) 01:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Demisexual_Flag.svg Ritarisk (talk) 01:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
No permission from w:Iowa State Daily N-C16 (talk) 08:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - Max Goldberg, photographer from Iowa State Daily, posts his pictures on Flickr under a Cc-BY license. He requests attribution, but other than that they are free to use. MB298 (talk) 08:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Kept: As per MB298, thanks for clarifying. --N-C16 (talk) 10:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Wrong license, Agatha Christie died in 1976, This is PD US by date, but won't be PD-UK until well into the 2050's ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- So... move it to english WikiSource? --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 10:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, moved to enWS. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Agatha Christie died in 1976, this work maybe PD-US, but it is certainly not PD in the UK yet. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, mv to enWS. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
http://synchroduett.ch/sophie-giger/ Cjp24 (talk) 15:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jianhui67: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.
Advertising and likely copyright violation Whpq (talk) 17:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It's blatant advertising (and, indeed, likely copyright violation). Ed (Edgar181) 21:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
because its not appropriate with wrong information 69.194.190.19 20:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The file is perfectly appropriate, the source has been pointed to the right page. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 22:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Source website states 'all rights reserved' and does not credit US Navy. Jcb (talk) 21:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Is this proof that it is not a work from the US Navy? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- It's the other way round. We need to have evidence that it is from the US Navy. Jcb (talk) 23:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. The hyperlink does not provide any helpful information. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. Jcb (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has no source information at all, and while it looks old, looking old isn't enough to keep it on Commons. We also have a much better image of the monument at File:Thombrez.JPG. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep On the basis that this rapidly re-raised DR was created by an admin-only discussion on a page that was protected from edits as sysop-only. This is in direct breach of Commons:Protection policy, which states "This ability is usually only used to combat vandalism and edit wars and the protection is usually temporary. Some exceptions include heavily used templates and archived user right request pages." The administrators involved have given no good reason for an exception to be made to this specific policy which governs the correct use of sysop rights. I am saddened that this context of a self-selected admin group pre-agreeing to raise this DR was not mentioned or linked in the nomination, and they have made a pre-agreement with the previous DR closer to not write on this DR. With regards to this specific image, the claim of pre-revolutionary, and therefore public domain by default, I would accept in good faith. --Fæ (talk) 20:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep if the photo is PD the source information is irrelevant. The nominator did not raise any doubts that the photo is PD. IMO, invalid renomination using the reason pointed out as invalid. Ankry (talk) 21:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep low risk - fix source do not delete. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I think. The tag seems to be valid, provided the file was published back in that era. Normally we do assume publication unless there is reason to believe otherwise (we know it comes from a photographer's archive, etc.). The pictured monument was destroyed in the late 1920s or 1930s from what I can find, and if published before then it would seem to also qualify for {{PD-Russia}}. I believe File:Thombrez.JPG is a 2007 reconstruction of the original. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Ignoring the political arguments, kept per Carl Lindberg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
No source. No indication that this picture taken in Germany would be USgov work Jcb (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
This file's description does not offer any proof that the photographer was a Federal employee whose job it was to take photographs. The source description is wrong on its face because it says, "Image source listed as United States Army Air Forces via National Archives". The United States Army Air Forces went out of existence in 1947, while this is an image from 1968-1991. It could be an official US Air Force photo, a photo by the plane's pilot or crew chief, or a photo by someone else. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:50, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep On the basis that this rapidly re-raised DR was created by an admin-only discussion on a page that was protected from edits as sysop-only. This is in direct breach of Commons:Protection policy, which states "This ability is usually only used to combat vandalism and edit wars and the protection is usually temporary. Some exceptions include heavily used templates and archived user right request pages." The administrators involved have given no good reason for an exception to be made to this specific policy which governs the correct use of sysop rights. I am saddened that this context of a self-selected admin group pre-agreeing to raise this DR was not mentioned or linked in the nomination, and they have made a pre-agreement with the previous DR closer to not write on this DR. With regards to this specific image, no mention has been made in the repeat nomination of the society or CD-ROM that was declared as the source before the file was transferred to Commons, and can and should be accepted in good faith. --Fæ (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It has a source from the National Archives, which means it came from the Air Force most likely, and seems like PD-USGov is the license beyond a significant doubt. The National Archives gets material in bulk, often from decades of records being compiled, and will often name a record group with all of the material -- so while yes, the USAF was created in 1947, that was mostly an administrative and name change at that point -- the units which were compiling records in offices continued to exist and compile records, so when given to the National Archives those records would likely span the administrative change. See for example here, which is USAF records from 1900 to 1985. And it's possible the person creating the CD-ROM simply misread the series they took the photo from -- there would be USAAF material nearby, almost certainly. I don't think that creates a doubt as to the National Archives sourcing. I can't find this image in particular (though similar ones are there like this), but the NA has gobs of undigitized records, and this is the sort of thing you'd find there, so the sourcing rings true to me. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the notion that a private photographer got access to a flight line during the cold war is fanciful. fix source - do not delete. i will point you to the Archives II shelf to go searching on. we have millions of photos we could be scanning. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Ignoring the political arguments, per this discussion, no reasonable doubt that the source and therefore license is correct. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
No source. Jcb (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
No source to support that this is indeed an official government version. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 23:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient information to determine copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 23:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. Where does the included paprika picture come from? Jcb (talk) 21:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. Where does the included paprika picture come from? Jcb (talk) 22:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Too blurry and nondescript to be of any use. Takeaway (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
invalid copyright Ritarisk (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, DC Comics is not your own work. I translated uploader's userpage and Google Translator says: "Batman the night hairdresser ascends". Taivo (talk) 11:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)
Deleted, author's request on creation day. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Twitter profile image: https://twitter.com/TaylerBuzak MKFI (talk) 09:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Valencia.magi (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. Edit summary in en.wiki "I created this shit" is not a good sign. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
The low resolution and counterclaim in otrs:9521900 suggests that this image was not actually made by the uploader as claimed. Effeietsanders (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Panoramio files without useful description, categories, but syntax errors
[edit]These Panoramio files are not usable, because there are no useful description, no categories, but syntax errors.
- File:Most bridge brücke - panoramio - t.przechlewski (1).jpg
- File:Most bridge brücke - panoramio - t.przechlewski (2).jpg
- File:Most bridge brücke - panoramio - t.przechlewski (3).jpg
- File:Most bridge brücke - panoramio - t.przechlewski (4).jpg
- File:Most bridge brücke - panoramio - t.przechlewski (5).jpg
- File:Most bridge brücke - panoramio - t.przechlewski.jpg
- File:Most bridge brücke - panoramio.jpg
Leyo 10:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep pl:Most drogowy w Tczewie, pl:Most kolejowy w Tczewie. --Insider (talk) 11:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep syntax errors fixed. File does contain GPS location, so we could know the object. Description is often missing in Commons files. No need to delete. --Arnd (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: photo of persistent self-promoter, see en: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dinesh Meena92. JohnCD (talk) 10:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Has was is probably the watermark of a professional photographer. Not own work, no evidence of permission to license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, watermark "Federica Girardi Photo". Source is Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate - already uploaded see File:ARW 30th Anniversary - 4478069963.jpg by User Sanandros on 17 October 2014. Although different Flickr URL is same file. Melbguy05 (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Same file and actually it is the same Flickr file too. Actually it would have been better to delete the original because this one is in use and the original is not being used. Ww2censor (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I replaced the use. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate - already uploaded, see file:An ARW team in a Tactical Assault Craft..png by User Sanandros on 17 October 2014. Same Flickr URL. Melbguy05 (talk) 13:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, scaled-down duplicate. I replaced the file use. Taivo (talk) 14:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate - already uploaded, see file:ARW 30th Anniversary - 4478687688.jpg by User Sanandros on 17 October 2014. Flickr URL is same file. Melbguy05 (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, scaled-down duplicate. Taivo (talk) 14:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Widely varying or no exif. Most images seem copied from the internet but uploaded as own work. Probable copyright violations.
- File:Help help help help help.jpg
- File:Help help help help.jpg
- File:Help help help.jpg
- File:Help help.jpg
- File:Img 9589ssss.jpg
- File:P1010728sssss.jpg
- File:12ssss.jpg
- File:America-1425221 960 720.jpg
- File:4sssss.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 14:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, all photos have small size. Only 5 files have camera data with 4 different cameras. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
This file, although allowed as German CoA, has no sufficient source ("Mail") and an unknown author. Starting this DR to determine whether the current state is OK or whether we would need the direct author of the recreation of the weapon's version. Basvb (talk) 09:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- The Wappen was sent to us via OTRS by Gemeindeverwaltung Fischerbach as replacement of an outdated one. I uploaded it for them, because our precedures are too complicated for just one Wappen. Please see Template:OTRS ticket for further information. Thanks --Sargoth (talk) 12:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- The ticket is not in a queue I can access, if somebody can verify it we can update the source and change it to the OTRS permission. Basvb (talk) 23:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: can be restored if a valid permission is processed. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrija1ss (talk · contribs)
[edit]Concept artwork for buildings planned or currently under construction. Not own work, taken from various websites, eg: http://www.wsp-pb.com/en/High-Rise/Our-Projects/Entisar-Tower/, http://www.dezeen.com/2016/02/09/santiago-calatrava-dubai-creek-harbour-observation-tower-competition/, http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=135893423.
- File:Entisar-Tower.jpg
- File:Dubai-creek-harbour-tower-calatrava-dezeen-936.jpg
- File:6b78285bjw1e6q9s1rhvnj20d90iuab9.jpg
- File:Project296 41264652632l.jpg
- File:037515930-big.jpg
- File:Wuhan2 web.jpg
- File:China-Zun-CHK6.jpg
- File:FOREIGN201406100807000597867859153.jpg
- File:Newa-new.jpg
- File:Stgr9 render.jpg
MKFI (talk) 12:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrija1ss (talk · contribs)
[edit]Skyscraper images taken from various sources, not own work. Most of these are copyrighted concept artwork for planned or proposed buildings.
- File:Ep07 2.jpg
- File:Jumeirah-emirates-towers-exterior-hero.jpg
- File:Diamond General Photo.jpg
- File:346ADCCF00000578-3600814-image-a-5 1463744904479.jpg
- File:Marina-101-1.jpg
- File:Branding-2 small-1053x1500.jpg
- File:314p3pj.jpg
- File:BN-GM237 SKYSCR JV 20150116120340.jpg
- File:Shenyang-baoneng-330.jpg
- File:Hermitage-Plaza-pa 2163437k.jpg
- File:Suzhou-Zhongnan-Center.jpg
- File:51113 394222 Vincom-Landmark-81-T8.jpg
- File:Landmark-81-Vinhomes-Central-Park-1.jpg
- File:AR-160419202.jpg
- File:Strojarska-zgrada-680x367.jpg
- File:20150413 Wanda-Vista Courtesy-of-Studio-Gang1.jpg
- File:572305250af6d o.jpg
- File:Akhmat 12.png
- File:145931btftriqmq7w4agbp.jpg
- File:Moving-Up-in-the-World-2.jpg
- File:Central-park-tower.jpg
- File:Gc03.jpg
- File:1 s.jpg
- File:COIL2PoWcAAtNne.png
- File:1438761732 05aug15-meydan-one-tower.jpg
- File:Wuhan2 web.jpg
- File:China-Zun-CHK6.jpg
- File:FOREIGN201406100807000597867859153.jpg
- File:Newa-new.jpg
- File:Stgr9 render.jpg
MKFI (talk) 09:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete for all files. File:346ADCCF00000578-3600814-image-a-5 1463744904479.jpg still has a copyright mark on it, but all of the above appear to be copyvios. I tagged another file for speedy deletion earlier today, and the same editor's uploads have been tagged on English Wikipedia for speedy deletion by bots, so this might simply be a case of en:WP:CIR with the user either unable to understand or unwilling to follow relevant policies regarding uploading copyrighted content. For reference, this editor has been indefinitely blocked on Commons by Ellin Beltz. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Files on User:4ing/Sandkasse
[edit]Background according to this discussion: These photos were uploaded from Europeana to Commons in good faith, as they used to be marked with CC0 (according to User:4ing). However, the CC0 marking on Europeana was later changed to "Rights Reserved - Free Access", and explicitly "No Re-use". I assume not a license retraction (which we wouldn't accept) but a correction (no base for CC0 to start with), therefore this deletion request. Still, some old photos might qualify as {{PD-Norway50}}. 4ing made a list consisting of two parts: Listed under PD-Norway are photos taken in Norway more than 50 years ago, and where more than 15 years have passed since the photographer's death or the photographer is unknown. In these cases, the template was changed from CC0 to PD-Norway50. Under Free access - no reuse are the photos discussed here. Some, like File:Altair ( NSM.2100-365).jpg, are old but might still be protected if not taken in Norway, some are recent and PD-Norway50 certainly isn't applicable, such as File:H.J. Bull whale catcher model (NSM.04337).jpg. As per the previous discussion, individual decisions need to be made.
- File:Alar (NSM.2100-302).jpg
- Ship in active service in Norway with this name between April 1940-1945. It was renamed in October 1951. The photo only may be taken in this period because before and after it had another name. Ergo: photo taken in Norway between 1940-1951.ref. Note: the ship only Norway abandonment in 1966 to be destroyed.
- File:Alaska (NSM.2100-301).jpg
- Ship in service with this name in Norway between 1940-1945. The photo only may be taken in this period because before and after it had another name. It was alone in active service until 1942 because that year was torpedoed. Ergo: photo taken in Norway between 1940-1942. ref Note: the ship was in Germany from 1945 and it was sunked in 1958. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 07:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Altair ( NSM.2100-365).jpg
- Ship in active service in Bergen, Norway with this name between 1935-1937. It was renamed in January 1939. The photo only may be taken in this period because before and after it had another name. Ergo: photo taken in Bergen, Norway between 1935-January 1939.Ref. Note: the ship was sunked in 1940. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 08:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Anatina ( NSM.2100-563).jpg
- The M/S Anatina made many trips around the world, during and after the Second World War. It was renamed in September 1962. Many documents were lost and it is not easy to know where and when this photograph was taken. There are pictures of this ship taken in different parts of the world. The ship left Norway at most in 1940 (it was built in Sweden in 1939). Ref. It was destroyed in Taiwan in February 1972. Ref. I can further research because it is known who took some of the known photos, I could find info about this. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 08:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Aramis ( NSM.2100-823).jpg
- The ship never was renamed. It was built in 1931 and sunked in July 1942, but it was not in Norway during most of the war. When the war began, the ship was traveling to Norway, but I don't known if the end did. More information is needed.Ref 1, Ref 2. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 09:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Aramis ( NSM.2100-824).jpg
- File:Askepot (NSM.2101-085).jpg
- The ship had this name between 1940-1950, Ref 1 but it left Norway in 1942 Ref 2. More info in needed. The date can be closed, but not the place. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 09:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Atle Jarl (FTTF.TSM.0003).jpg
- The ship had this name between 1939-1955, but it was not the entire war in Norway. Much information is lost, I can not say anything more for now. Ref 1, ref 2. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 09:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Atle Jarl (FTTF.TSM.0004).jpg
- File:Augvald (NSM.2100-171).jpg
- This is confuse. The ship had this name between May 1923-August 1929, but aparently it was known as D/S Augvald between 1939-1941, when it was sunked. Ref 1 --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 09:51, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Balla (NSM.2101-380).jpg
- File:Bañaderos (NSM 2101 417).jpg
- File:Beau (NSM.2101-830).jpg
- File:Bello (NSM.2101-973).jpg
- File:Bidevind (NSM.2104-097).jpg
- File:Bidevind (NSM.2104-098).jpg
- File:Bill (NSM.2104-109).jpg
- File:Boreas (NSM.2105-049).jpg
- File:Boreas (NSM.2105-050).jpg
- File:Borgestad (NSM.2105-075).jpg
- File:Borgestad (NSM.2105-076).jpg
- File:Borgestad (NSM.2105-077).jpg
- File:Borgestad (NSM.2105-078).jpg
- File:Brott (NSM.2105-552).jpg
- File:Brush (NSM.2105-602).jpg
- File:Brønnøy (NSM.2105-628).jpg
- File:Brønnøy (NSM.2105-629).jpg
- File:California Express ( NSM.2105-812).jpg
- File:Chr. Th. Boe (NSM.2106-075).jpg
- File:Christian Krohg (NSM.2106-091).jpg
Gestumblindi (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Several of the photographs have been credited to Per Erik Johnsen, also pre WWII photographs. Erik Jacobsen & Per Erik Johnsen issued a book in 1999, named "Skipsfarten på Oslo - bilder gjennom 50 år" (Shipping in Oslo - pictures during 50 years), showing some of Johnsen's 10000+ photographs he had taken of ships since 1950. Johnsen was awarded a mark of distiniction in 2008 from "Norsk skipsfarthistorisk selskap" (The Norwegian society of shipping history). I don't know when he was born, but photographs taken before 1950 are probably not taken by him. Affected files: File:Aramis ( NSM.2100-823).jpg and File:Aramis ( NSM.2100-824).jpg (lost 1942), File:Bañaderos (NSM 2101 417).jpg (prob. 1930), File:Bello (NSM.2101-973).jpg (lost 1942), File:Bill (NSM.2104-109).jpg (1939), File:Boreas (NSM.2105-050).jpg (bef. 1933, but in UK), File:Borgestad (NSM.2105-078).jpg (lost 1941), File:Brott (NSM.2105-552).jpg (lost 1943), File:California Express ( NSM.2105-812).jpg (prob. 1934), File:Christian Krohg (NSM.2106-091).jpg (lost 1941). - 4ing (talk) 22:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment I'm doing photo by photo comments annotating the likely dates when these were taken. The names of the ships are based on the original descriptions by the time these were taken. In some cases the first name is mentioned, but none of those were later renamed mention it. So the dates cited by me are highly probable. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 08:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - {{PD-Norway50}} cannot savely be applied, because we don't know whether the authors died before 2001. Most pictures have a named author, but without date of death, so we cannot call the author 'unknown' either. --Jcb (talk) 13:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Files on User:4ing/Sandkasse
[edit]This is a follow-up to the previous request. The same as for the pictures deleted there applies for these remaining files: Originally uploaded from Europeana to Commons in good faith, as they used to be marked with CC0. However, the CC0 marking on Europeana was later changed to "Rights Reserved - Free Access", and explicitly "No Re-use". I assume not a license retraction (which we wouldn't accept) but a correction (no base for CC0 to start with). Note: This request is only for the files listed under "Free access - no reuse" on the Sandkasse page; the "PD-Norway" images should be fine. For more information, see also the previous request.
- File:Diana (NSM.2106-745).jpg
- File:Dokka (NSM.2106-798).jpg
- File:Drillship model (NOMG 01066).jpg
- File:Duffelcoat fra Brager Konfeksjonsfabrikk (BMF 03555 D 1).jpg
- File:Dunlin A (NOMF 02511 001).jpg
- File:Edda platform in the North Sea (NOMF 02701 028).jpg
- File:Eikhaug (NSM.2100-179).jpg
- File:Erviken (NSM.2100-175).jpg
- File:Ferm (NSM.2100-789).jpg
- File:Finnhval III whale catcher (FTTF 068224).jpg
- File:Friggfeltet (NOMF 02617 07).jpg
- File:Frøy platform in the North Sea (NOMF 02619 10).jpg
- File:Gullfaks C model (NOMG 01054).jpg
- File:H.J. Bull whale catcher model (NSM.04337).jpg
- File:Kos 31 and 32 whale catchers (NF 25985 002).jpg
- File:Kos 31 whale catcher (NF 25985).jpg
- File:Kos 32 whale catcher (NF 25985 009).jpg
- File:Kosmos II modell (NSM 02859).jpg
- File:LN-BRH Boeing 737-500 Braathens S.A.F.E. at Oslo Fornebu airport.jpg
- File:LN-ORD Bell 47J (NTM 17020).jpg
- File:Statfjord B (NOMF 02774 565).jpg
- File:Statfjord C in tow 1984 (NOMF 02774 526).jpg
- File:Veslegut (DF.3676).jpg
- File:Yme-plattformen ferdigstilles ved Bergen Group Rosenberg Verft (NOMF 02765 004).jpg
Gestumblindi (talk) 22:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Die Gruppe heißt offenbar "The Word Alive" und die Fotos sind auch in einer Cat dieses Namens zu finden. Und im übrigen verstehe ich den Löschprozeß hier nicht. -- smial 17:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty, bad name. --Achim (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Physicists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, biologists, scientists aerospace, engineering and technical experts, inventors, writers, philosophers, thinkers, religious scientists-fangruida.jpeg
[edit]Speedy please, blank image with a lot of self-promotional words in the description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 20:34, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Physicists, astronomers, cosmologists, geologists, biologists, scientists aerospace, engineering and technical experts, inventors, writers, philosophers, thinkers, religious scientists-Fangruida,.jpeg
[edit]Speedy please, blank image with a lot of self-promotional words in the description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 20:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy please, blank image with a lot of self-promotional words in the description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 20:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, please read COM:SCOPE before making more uploads. Administrators note the description and file template which accompanies this unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: sock spam
Speedy please, blank image with a lot of self-promotional words in the description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: sock spam
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Barros_Enrique.jpg Ritarisk (talk) 02:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: converted to redirect by INC. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
invalid copyright Ritarisk (talk) 02:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- sorry, please close this nomination. user ReebokUSA upload this file --Ritarisk (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per nom. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marthaceciliaorozcoospina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Video screenshots.
- File:MONSTRUOS DE RIO.png
- File:PREVALECER LA ESPECIA.png
- File:CURIOSIDADES MARINOS.png
- File:250 LIBRAS.png
- File:CAPAZ DE CAMBIAR DE SEXO.png
- File:JEREMY WADE.png
- File:RIVER MONSTER.png
- File:AUSTRALIA.png
- File:CURIOSIDADES MARINAS.png
- File:TIBURÓN TORO.png
- File:CRIA DE TIBURÓN TORO.png
MKFI (talk) 09:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted advertisement. MKFI (talk) 09:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Stock image, very widely available in net, one example: https://www.countyofamherst.com/department/index.php?structureid=19 MKFI (talk) 09:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
저작권 침해(Copyright violations), https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en-GB&q=%ED%91%B8%EB%A5%B8+%EB%B0%94%EB%8B%A4%EC%9D%98+%EC%A0%84%EC%84%A4&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSkwEJw0pT2lrkayEahwELEKjU2AQaAAwLELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKOgRmwXXCtoZ2groG7kX5RHYCusR1i3VLfEs1y3wK_1criS7mLK0l7y8aMA35OWpkHyUFVHpfqPIvhTLTEPJxJuKTWXSArmOaA7Tw_1wb_1GEGR538XlxNYJy3bFiAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIE6vwqRgw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiku8WK_KfQAhUIvLwKHUIjC5oQ2A4IISgB&biw=1400&bih=935#imgrc=UDMRez2wtAzJ9M%3A -- 메이 `토론 09:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Labsmm
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Labsmm (talk · contribs):
- File:Cadeia de sustentabilidade.gif
- File:Ducoco - 1979.jpg (279×179)
- File:Ducoco - 1982.jpg (279×179)
- File:Ducoco - 1994.jpg (279×179)
- File:Ducoco - 1995.jpg (279×179)
- File:Ducoco - 2007.jpg (421×184)
- File:Fabrica Itapipoca.jpg (403×241)
- File:Fabrica-linhares-es.jpg (403×241)
- File:Fazenda Itapipoca.jpg (600×450)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Eduardo P Cabanerio
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Eduardo P Cabanerio (talk · contribs):
- File:Eduardo p cabanerio.jpg (149×150)
- File:Eduardo cabanerio.jpg (107×124)
- File:Eduardo pastor Cabanerio.png (559×200)
Small unused personal photos without metadata. Copyright violations and out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JennaLim
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of JennaLim (talk · contribs):
- File:AnnatHermes.jpg (640×640)
- File:AnnLouieLiElieSaab.png (370×699, Paris)
- File:CANDIESSHOWANN.jpg (poster)
- File:Captureals.png (353×414)
- File:Dernier.png (magazine cutout)
- File:DNA runway.jpg (636×960, Manila)
Small photos without metadata, taken in different ends of world, one poster and one magazine cutout. Copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This image does not appear to be own work of uploader, a real source is required for this picture with date range 1879 - 1916 as it's obviously not possible to be 'own work'. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- There is correspondence from my talk page (from Cbyd and Lamiot) which pertains to this image. Summary: Volunteers associated with a project are promising to work on their licenses and I will work with them on it, so
I withdraw my nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per nom. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on these images of sporting teams and trophies.
- File:مدال های قهرمانی جعفر کاشانی.jpg
- File:تیم فوتبال پرسپولیس .jpg
- File:تیم شاهین.jpg
- File:جعفر کاشانی.jpg
- File:AFC Asian Cup 1956 - 2004-361.jpg
- File:جام ملت های آسیا 1347.jpg
- File:خدا حافظی جعفر کاشانی.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.businessadministrationinformation.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/bigstock-Young-Boy-In-Home-Office-With-4136868-min-1-750x420.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
A two image collage, the upper one clearly has overprinting showing real source is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shadychiri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-EtC8teoSTxE/TjLJIruY-cI/AAAAAAAAAHc/h-WltXWMu_0/s1600/IMG_1394.JPG.
- File:Pouring mursik.jpg
- File:Britam tower.jpg
- File:Shanghai-Skyline.jpg
- File:Medical and Diagnosis Labs.jpg
- File:Food and nutrition students.jpg
- File:Labs and library.jpg
- File:Keiyo.jpg
- File:Cherangany.jpg
- File:Marich Pass.jpg
- File:Skyline of Eldoret.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:26, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Posters. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:New-Year-2018-Wishes-in-3D-Balloon-Image.jpg
- File:New-Year-Image-2018-Classic.jpg
- File:New-Year-2018-3d-Image.jpg
- File:New-Year-Images-2017.jpg
- File:New-Year-Images-2018.jpg
- File:Happy-New-Year-2017-Wallpaper-HD.jpg
- File:NewYear2017WallpaperinBlue.png
- File:New-Year-2017-Image-in-Red.jpg
- File:New-Year-2017-Wallpaper-in-Italian.jpg
- File:New-Year-2017-Image-in-Italian.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2017inItalian.jpg
- File:New-Year-2017-Wallpaper-in-Italian.png
- File:New-Year-2017-Image-in-Italian.png
- File:New-Year-Wallpaper-With-Lord-Ganesha.jpg
- File:New-Year-Lord-Ganesha-Wallpaper-HD.jpg
- File:New-Year-2017-With-Bright-Stars-Wallpaper-HD.png
- File:New-Year-2017-Wishing-Quotes-Image-HD.png
- File:New Year 2017 Wallpaper With Wishing Quotes.png
- File:New-Year-2017-Wallpaper-With-Shining-Stars.png
- File:New Year 2017 Monkey Wallpaper HD.png
- File:New-Year-2017-City-Wallpaper-in-HD.png
- File:New-Year-2017-Purple-Wallpaper.png
- File:NewYear2017WallpaperHD.jpg
- File:NewYear2017HDWallpaper.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2017Images.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2017WallpaperHD.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2017HDWallpaper.jpg
- File:NewYearWishesFor2017.jpg
- File:NewYearGreetingsFromLordGanesha.jpg
- File:NewYearWallpaperfor2017.jpg
- File:NewYearGanesha.jpg
- File:NewYearBlessingsFromLordGanesha.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2017Greetings.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2017Wishes.jpg
- File:NewYear2017Wallpaper.jpg
- File:NewYear2017Greetings.jpg
- File:HAPPYNEWYEAR2017IMAGE.jpg
- File:NewYear2018WishesImageInSpanish.jpg
- File:NEWYEAR2018WISHESWALLPAPERINSPANISH.jpg
- File:NEWYEAR2018DIGITALWALLPAPERINSPANISH.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2018WallpaperInSpanish.jpg
- File:New-Year-2018-Wallpaper-In-Spanish.jpg
- File:HAPPYNEWYEAR2017WALLPAPERINSPANISH.jpg
- File:New-year-2018-Wallpaper.png
- File:Newyear2018.png
- File:Happy New Year Ganesha Image.jpg
- File:Happy-new-year-2018-images.jpg
- File:HappyNewYear2018.jpg
- File:Happy New Year 2018 Wishes.png
- File:Happy New Year 2018 Quotes.png
- File:Happy New Year 2018 Pics.png
- File:Happy New Year 2018 Photos.png
- File:Happy-new-year-2018-messages.png
- File:Happy-new-year-2018-Pictures.png
- File:Happy-new-year-2018-images.png
- File:Happy-New-Year-2018-wishes.jpg
- File:New Year 2017.jpg
- File:Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by User:Hedwig in Washington. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
repinaciunaize 131.72.222.132 17:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- I dont get it. As far as can notice, this deletion request is just a vandalism. Regards, Sturm (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
From Getty Images, license doesn't appear to be valid: http://www.gettyimages.com/license/534516180. That said, it was taken in 1984 so may be in public domain. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
copyright poster for serial Sakhalinio (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Has the watermark of a professional photographer, the uploader's only contribution, an unused personal photo. No potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Exact duplicate of Shaun le Mouton logo.svg Carniolus (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad naveed akhtar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image gallery. Used on en:User:Muhammad naveed akhtar, but uploader hasn't made other contributions to wikipedia. Out of scope.
- File:Muhammad akhtar.png
- File:Muhammad naveed.jpg
- File:Img-20130823-wa0003.jpg
- File:Naveed akhtar.jpg
- File:Akhtar muhammad naveed.jpg
- File:Winter03.JPG
- File:^AD2E3D7AF3EB95FC2098063F3B725ACA3A32CAB670FBE7D717^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
- File:^C9A87BCDC6FEE7EDBCEDF91FACD593F243AE533EFC874E4774^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
- File:^FADBF1047220A4DDEC05002F51889D8765D7B500E3B6338D0C^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 09:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of BrandEvangelist
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of BrandEvangelist (talk · contribs):
- File:Farmhouse at the Farmer's Market.jpg (1080×720)
- File:MJB Building In Early Days.jpg (500×375)
- File:Old MJB Can.jpg (500×375)
- File:Unloading Rice.jpg (120×118)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Pepetex
[edit]Pepetex (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
Watermark in corner says: author is José Mijares. Evidence is needed, that uploader is the same person, or OTRS-permission from Mijares. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of DayDream Band
[edit]Here are both contributions of DayDream Band (talk · contribs):
Band DayDream isn't mentioned in en:Daydream (disambiguation). Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Inca Sol
[edit]Inca Sol (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:
- File:Inca Sol Alex Cordova con charango.jpg
- File:Inca Sol Alex Cordova con saxo soprano.jpg
- File:Inca Sol Patricio Cordova con charango.jpg
- File:Patrico Cordova con Moseño.jpg
OTRS-permission from author Rosanne is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Luisapozzoli
[edit]Luisapozzoli (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Desnudo acostado.- Manuel Martínez-.jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez.- Abstracto "Ocho".- Acrílico s tela.- 80 x 70 cm.- 2007-2014 (Foto Luisa Pozzoli).jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez.- Artista Plástico de Rosario.jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez.-"Autorretrato".- Oleo sobre tela.- 100 x 80 cm.-1977.jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez.-Bodegón.- Oleo s tela.- 60 x 50 cm.- 2013- (Foto Luisa Pozzoli).jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez-Cabeza de mujer IV.- Acrílico s chapadur.- 61 x 46 cm.- 2014 (Foto Luisa Pozzoli).jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez-Cabeza en azules.-Acrílico y óleo s tela.- 70 x 50 cm.- 2016.jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez.- Desnudo sentado.-Oleo s tela.- 60 x 50 cm.- 2013 (Foto Luisa Pozzoli).jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez.- "Maternidad".- Acuarela.- 50 x 65 cm.- (Foto Luisa Pozzoli).jpg
- File:.- Manuel Martínez.- "Retrato de Florencia".- Pastel.- 60 x 50 cm.-.jpg
- File:Manuel Martínez.- Retrato II.- Grafito.- 65 x 45 cm.- 1966.jpg
Neither en:Manuel Martinez nor es:Manuel Martínez does not mention neither anybody from Argentina nor any artist. I think, that the files are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Erlya
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Erlya (talk · contribs):
- File:Artistapapa.jpg (1782×1191)
- File:CarnetEdmundo.png (139×154)
- File:EntrevistaEdmun.jpg (690×591)
- File:Fotpapa.jpg (139×154)
- File:Muralberroteran.JPG (4000×2666, camera Fujifilm FinePix J40)
- File:Mural la libertad.JPG (4000×3000, camera Fujifilm FinePix J40)
- File:Papá2.jpg (505×364)
- File:Papá3.jpg (4288×3216, camera Fujifilm FinePix AV200)
Mostly small photos without metadata. If camera data exist, then usually different. I suspect real photographer's copyright violation. In addition, artist es:Edmundo Alvarado (born 1930) is still living and his art is protected with copyright, although there is broad freedom of panorama in Venezuela. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dakir mudzakir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Tengkleng.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Tengkleng Solo.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-tengkleng solo terkenal.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-tengkleng solo asli.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-tengkleng kambing.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-tengkleng kambing solo.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Tengkleng Kambing Instan.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-tengkleng asli solo.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Menu Masakan Khas Jawa.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Menu Masakan Hotel Tengkleng Solo.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-melayani pesan tengkleng solo.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Masakan Tradisional Indonesia Mudah.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Masakan Nusantara Tradisional Khas Solo.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Masakan Kuliner Khas Indonesia.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Masakan Khas Nusantara Indonesia.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Masakan Khas Daerah Nusantara Tengkleng Solo.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Masakan indonesia yang mudah.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Masakan Hotel Berbintang Khas Nusantara.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan Tradisional Nusantara Spesialis Kambing.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan Tradisional Jawa Tengah.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan tradisional di indonesia.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan Tradisional Daerah khas jawa.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan Nusantara Indonesia.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan Lokal Indonesia.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan khas nusantara.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan khas daerah nusantara.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan Khas Daerah Jawa.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Makanan Indonesia Tradisional.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Kreasi Masakan indonesia.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-gambar tengkleng.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-gambar tengkleng dlidir.pdf
- File:Pesantengkleng.blogspot.com-Arti Tengkleng.pdf
- File:Peepis-kantongurin.blogspot.com-Alat kesehatan medis kantong urin.pdf
- File:Peepis-kantongurin.blogspot.com-Buang air kecil dengan kantong urin.pdf
- File:Peepis-kantongurin.blogspot.com-Jual perlengkapan haji.pdf
- File:Peepis-kantongurin.blogspot.com-Perlengkapan haji wanita.pdf
- File:Peepis-kantongurin.blogspot.com-Perlengkapan umroh wanita.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.blogspot.com-Jasa layanan Aqiqah Solo dan sekitarnya.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.blogspot.com-Apakah sah aqiqah kambing harga murah Rp 750000.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.blogspot.com-Aqiqah Purwodadi Dengan Kambing Murah.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dakir mudzakir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
- File:Soleh-aqiqah-solo.blogspot.com-Aqiqah Boyolali.pdf
- File:Peepis.com-Nama islam anak laki laki terlengkap.pdf
- File:Peepis.com-Tata Cara Qurban PeepisPeepis.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom. -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dakir mudzakir (talk · contribs)
[edit]A series of *pdf files which are out of COM:SCOPE. Also please look at user's page, it appears to be promotional.
- File:Soleh-aqiqah-semarang.blogspot.co.id-Nama nama yang baik untuk anak lengkap.pdf
- File:Soleh-aqiqah-jogja.blogspot.co.id-Nama dan arti nya islami lengkap.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.blogspot.co.id-Biaya aqiqah anak laki laki istimewa.pdf
- File:Grosir-kain-batik-mudzakir.blogspot.co.id-Grosir Kain batik di Pekalongan.pdf
- File:Dagingkambingdlidir.blogspot.co.id-Halal goat meat in Hawaii USA.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Solo Untuk Anak Anda.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Semarang Dengan Kambing Spesial.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Jogja Dengan Kambing Spesial.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Grobogan Untuk Anak Anda.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Delanggu Paket Komplit.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Boyolali Kambing Spesial.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Ambarawa Untuk Anak Anda.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Layanan Aqiqah Bantul Lengkap harga terjangkau.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Aqiqah solo Terlengkap Dan Terpercaya Solehaqiqah.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Aqiqah Semarang Dengan Kambing Terbaik.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Aqiqah Jogja Untuk Merayakan Momen Spesial Si Buah Hati.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Aqiqah Boyolali Dengan Layanan Terbaik.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Aqiqah Bantul Harga Murah.pdf
- File:Solehaqiqah.org-Aqiqah Anak.pdf
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saiwan kurd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo, the uploader uploaded another one and that second one is in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Presumably the copyrights on these files belong to Hans Eick's heirs. There is no reason to believe that the pseudonymous uploader is one of those heirs. Without OTRS permission, I don't see how we can host these.
- File:Hans Eick, freie Arbeit, um 2000.jpg
- File:Eick Portraet.jpg
- File:Eick Hochhäuser.tif
- File:Eick Guggenheim.tif
- File:Eick Tunnel.tif
- File:Eick Gardine.tif
- File:Eick Flughafen.tif
- File:Eick Dampf.tif
- File:Eick Autobahn.tif
- File:Eick Fotohaus.tif
- File:Eick Logo.tif
Jmabel ! talk 16:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Self-created artwork: out of scope.
- File:Through the Trees Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Space Ice Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Sacred Vines Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Scarlet Rose Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Reeds Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Pink Tulips Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Peacock Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Michael Jackson Tribute Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Into the sky Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Lavender Lace Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Hearts and wings Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Green Lit Pools Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Golden Flower Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Ferris Wheel Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Blue Neon Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Sign Posts Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Purple Pathway Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Pumpkin Spice Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Holiday Wreath Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Green Petals Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Dock of the Bay Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Emerald Path Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Autumn Sunrise Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
- File:Blue Ray Spiritual Art signed by Bonnie Vent.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 23:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Images are used in an advert section of a self-written biography (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnie_Vent) with the following text: "Bonnie Vent is also known as a digital artist and designer of abstract art with a spiritual slant. These pieces are intended to be used in the home or office to create a positive environment. These mandalas can be found at: Bonnie Vent's products and services website." The promotional wording and advert link have only been removed by the COI editor after having been flagged as such. - Takeaway (talk) 00:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 02:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Probably a screen shot. Older versions are found by a simple search (such as here). Mhhossein talk 03:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:21, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Derivative work of drawing by living artist. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:31, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Found here. Does not seem to be an own work. Mhhossein talk 03:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Printmaking Studio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Авторы указанных фото скончались менее 70 лет назад, данные работы не находятся в общественном достоянии, необходимо разрешение наследников.
- File:2006 Gaga Kovenchuk Moulin Rouge-1.jpg
- File:2006 Gaga Kovenchuk Moulin Rouge-2.jpg
- File:1942 Butrova Maria Self-Portrait.jpg
- File:2013 Gaga Kovenchuk-Klop-1.jpg
- File:1927 Alexander Gromov-1.jpg
- File:1919 Adrian Kaplun-1.jpg
- File:Reuven Tupikin.jpg
- File:1940 Butrova Maria-1.jpg
- File:Костров Н Старый сад офорт.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 07:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Chad fan
[edit]Here are both contributions of Chad fan (talk · contribs):
Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Angulitoooo
[edit]Angulitoooo (talk · contribs) uploaded these imahges:
- File:Copa-cablemagico.png
- File:SubLIB.png
- File:Prime-PER.png
- File:Copa-Marlboro.png
- File:Copa-Antel.png
The cups are usually protected with copyright. OTRS-permission is needed from cupmakers, unless they are very old. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Ahmedsaad23
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Ahmedsaad23 (talk · contribs):
Unused personal files, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shailjakant neeraj chaturvedi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not Facebook, personal images are not in COM:SCOPE.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://progressiveissue.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/bernie-with-college-students-235x190.jpg.
- File:YPDA-in-Action04.jpg
- File:CSFB DC.jpg
- File:Tritan For Bernoe.jpg
- File:NIU For Bernie.jpg
- File:Thayer Speaking.png
- File:Thayerspeaking.png
- File:Thayermos.jpg
- File:Thayerbraldeymanning.jpg
- File:Thayerprideparade.jpg
- File:Thayer1.jpg
- File:Protester on Pile of Barricades.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Manoj Ramola 0
[edit]- File:Manoj Ramola (5).JPG
- File:Manoj Ramola.....jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola,..jpg
- File:Manoj ramola1.jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola1 (1).jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola3.jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola4.jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola5.jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola7.jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola07.jpg
- File:Manoj Ramola8.jpg
Personal images, most low in quality, not in use, the uploader hasn't been active since 2014; no potential educational value. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohsinevents (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement for an event service. Out of scope.
- File:Villa Decor in Dubai 07.JPG
- File:Villa Decor in Dubai 06.JPG
- File:Villa Decor in Dubai 05.JPG
- File:Villa Decor in Dubai 04.JPG
- File:Villa Decor in Dubai 02.JPG
- File:Villa Decor in Dubai 03.JPG
- File:Villa Decor in Dubai 01.JPG
- File:Lighting Canopy In Dubai 04.JPG
- File:Lighting Canopy In Dubai 03.JPG
- File:Lighting Canopy In Dubai 02.JPG
- File:Lighting Canopy In Dubai 01.JPG
GeorgHH • talk 19:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No context provided. No model release permission. Not used at Wikipedia FedericoMP (talk) 19:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
delete per user:Josve05a not a free license Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 03:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Photo could be have been taken up until 1946. No longer valid for hosting under PD-Russia. Undelete in 2024. No evidence of date and/or place of first publication. This ship is decommissioned in 1954, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:К-21.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 07:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No information on the architect of this building. Without it, it will be impossible to ascertain the PD status. PD-Russia is no longer a valid licence russavia (talk) 06:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- The architects are Курдиани А. Г. and Лежава Г. А. If the photograph whill be deleted, plesase upload it to Russian Wikipedia as fair-use (the building has been demolished). --Andreykor (talk) 07:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Due to the architects, COM:FOP#Russia applies. Please take this time to upload to local WPs under fair use, as this image will unfortunately be deleted in 7 days. russavia (talk) 07:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- I uploaded the photo to Russian Wikipedia--Andreykor (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Due to the architects, COM:FOP#Russia applies. Please take this time to upload to local WPs under fair use, as this image will unfortunately be deleted in 7 days. russavia (talk) 07:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:FOP#Russia John Vandenberg (chat) 01:24, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Фото 1948 года, автор фото неизвестен, не перешло в общественное достояние. В Российской Федерации если автор произведения (данного фото) неизвестен, то оно переходит в общественное достояние спустя 70 лет с момента обнародования. Фото 1948 года, перейдёт в общественное достояние в 1948+70=2018, те с 1 января 2019 года, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Шаблон:PD-Russia. Dogad75 (talk) 07:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Himacita Jakarta Raya
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Himacita Jakarta Raya (talk · contribs):
- File:Audiensi dengsn pemerintah daerah Cirebon.jpg (960×528)
- File:Buka bersama pengurus dan anggota hima-cita di sekretariat.jpg (960×720, Facebook file?)
- File:Diskusi rutin mingguan.jpg (640×480)
- File:Festifal TK.jpg (960×540, Facebook file?)
- File:Gema Pesantren Ramadahan Hima-cita Jakarta raya.jpg (960×720, Facebook file?)
- File:Kegiatan Bakti sosial Himpunan mahasiswa cirebon-jakarta raya rangkaian acara festival TK.jpg (960×540)
- File:Kunjungan Kerja di media Radar Cirebon dan penyerahan cinderamata kepada radar cirebon.jpg (960×960)
- File:NPWP Organisasi.jpg (960×540)
- File:Serah terima jabatan dari ketua umum Himacita periode 2014 Saudara Nurkholis Mazid kepada Saudara Mubarok.jpg (960×960)
Himacita Jakarta Raya (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading personal photos, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his/her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Organisation logo with no evidence of license. http://www.payra.org/ has an "all rights reserved" notice. BethNaught (talk) 12:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Please check COM:TOO, it's very low in the UK 134.169.182.91 12:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No OTRS-Permission of Photographer Rarotonga2 (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
deleted: this one isn't included in the ticket. Natuur12 (talk) 18:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely the uploader took the original photograph given the date, clarification of authorship and copyright status needed. January (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- I thought that the assumption of good faith was one of the main rules here. Guess not, eh? No I didn't take it, but I do own the copyright, the photo being in my possession after my father's death earlier this year. --Jwslubbock (talk) 01:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Being in possession of the photo does not make you the copyright holder, this normally rests with the photographer or their estate/heirs if they are deceased. January (talk) 09:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Jwslubbock: Please fix the author and source fields in image, otherwise the photo will have to be deleted due to wrong information, which would be a shame. Also, please consider the remarks by January. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, I've asked my family and the photographer was a friend of my father's called Srjda Djukanovic who is 'long since dead', though I have no idea when. There's a footballer with the same name, so Google isn't much help in finding information about obscure photographers. I don't believe he had any children or at least my family do not know that he did. It would seem to me that this is therefore an orphan work. Can anyone advise on what I should do about it given that this is the case? --Jwslubbock (talk) 20:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Jwslubbock: Thank you for all the work you put into this! But unfortunately in that case it will be hard to keep this photo around. Basically the copyright will now belongs to the estate of Mr. Djukanovic, whoever that may be. If there are no heirs the estate is often the state, but this will probably be different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- How annoying. Oh well, I have a million other images of him which I do own the copyright for. I suppose I could apply to the IPO here for an orphan works license so I can get around this total legal mess. If I did find his estate and got someone to release the copyright, how would I prove that to OTRS? --Jwslubbock (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Have a look at OTRS. I am not involved in the process, but I am sure the volunteers over there can help you, although you have to be patient, since they are quite overworked. I am going ahead and will delete this image for now. If you manage to get permission, the image will be restored through the OTRS process. Thank you again! --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:13, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Apple Maps iOS icon.png (t) Josve05a (c) 00:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The user already uploaded screenshots in 2010 (which have been deleted), 5 years later he uploaded new ones (which have to be deleted). 88.76.211.176 00:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
J'étais une proche de Laurent Terzieff et cette photo est une photo personnelle, je ne vois pas en quoi elle constitue une violation des droits d'auteur?!!
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The user already uploaded screenshots in 2010 (which have been deleted), 5 years later he uploaded new ones (which have to be deleted). 88.76.211.176 00:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
J'étais une proche de Laurent Terzieff et cette photo est une photo personnelle, je ne vois pas en quoi elle constitue une violation des droits d'auteur?!!
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The user already uploaded screenshots in 2010 (which have been deleted), 5 years later he uploaded new ones (which have to be deleted). 88.76.211.176 00:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
J'étais une proche de Laurent Terzieff et cette photo est une photo personnelle, je ne vois pas en quoi elle constitue une violation des droits d'auteur?!!
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The user already uploaded screenshots in 2010 (which have been deleted), 5 years later he uploaded new ones (which have to be deleted). 88.76.211.176 00:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
J'étais une proche de Laurent Terzieff et cette photo est une photo personnelle, je ne vois pas en quoi elle constitue une violation des droits d'auteur?!!
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using e.g. {{Licensed-PD}}. (t) Josve05a (c) 03:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using e.g. {{Licensed-PD}}. (t) Josve05a (c) 03:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Obviously I don't own the copyright of the image on the package. Will uploading a low resolution fair use image on Wikipedia work instead? Thomson200 (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- That would depend on English Wikipedia's fair use policy. (t) Josve05a (c) 00:18, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
According to the description in the deleted file File:Cathedrale nd chartres eglise basse046.jpg, this stained glass window was created by Père Couturier in 1946. This refers apparently to the stained glass artist Marie-Alain Couturier who died in 1954. As we have no freedom of panorama in France, we cannot keep this photograph until 1 January 2025 when it could be undeleted. AFBorchert (talk) 06:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Nesmeyanov.jpg, персона скончалась в 1980 году, см https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Несмеянов,_Александр_Николаевич Dogad75 (talk) 06:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I added a photo about the same person for deletion. He was born in 1899 and the photo seems to be made in 1920s; it is not own work. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Сомнительность в авторстве и лицензии, автором указан другой человек, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:MKWik.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 06:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Bad quality file uploaded by well known vandal and copyvioler Darja82/Audrey. We cannot be sure of its copyright status, and btw, too bad quality to be used by the project. Ruthven (msg) 08:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: image is used as part of a header in http://nakkheeran.in/ MKFI (talk) 08:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree information board. Eleassar (t/p) 09:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- I think information board is {{PD-trivial}} as image. --Insider (talk) 09:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete But it seems to me, that this is not trivial image. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Information board is text table ({{PD-text}}) with public trivial designation ({{PD-shape}}). --Insider (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Per Insider. Too simple. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 23:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No OTRS-Permission of Photographer Rarotonga2 (talk) 10:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Diconium
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Diconium (talk · contribs):
- File:Embitel.png
- File:Logo diconium-ohne-unterzeile-orange-web.png
- File:Logo dmc-orange-web.png
- File:DIC-Logo-marketing-lang-pos-RGB.png
Unused textlogos of non-notable companies, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Abba ashfaq
[edit]- File:Abba.jpg (864×1536, camera BlackBerry Z30)
- File:Abba ashfaq.jpg (350×350)
Abba ashfaq (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading two photos about himself, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Abhishek omprakash Mishra
[edit]Here are all contributions of Abhishek omprakash Mishra (talk · contribs):
- File:Abhishek Omprakash Mishra.jpg
- File:Abhishek Omprakash Mishra .jpg (Facebook file?)
- File:Poet Abhishek Omprakash Mishra.jpg
Small unused personal photos without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Ashok Chakradhar
[edit]Here are both contributions of Ashok Chakradhar (talk · contribs):
- File:Ashok Chakradhar.jpg (1100×732)
- File:Ashok Chakradhar Sir 01.jpg (976×892)
Small photos without metadata. They are claimed to be selfies, but I doubt. Probably copyright violation. Real photographers must send OTRS-permission. (But depicted person is notable.) Taivo (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Arexxxandr0
[edit]Here are last remaining contributions of Arexxxandr0 (talk · contribs):
- File:Alexander iUpatov for Harper's Bazaar China.jpg (1160×1160, Facebook file?)
- File:Alexander iUpatov for Harper's Bazaar China 01.jpg (1467×2200, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III)
- File:Alexander iUpatov for X-Factor Ukraine 2016.jpg (640×960)
- File:Alexander iUpatov perfoming song on X-Factor Ukraine.jpg (750×734)
Small photos and mostly without metadata. They are claimed to be selfies, but I doubt. Probably copyright violation. Real photographers must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MosesMoseley
[edit]Here are all contributions of MosesMoseley (talk · contribs):
- File:Moses Moseley by Amy Short.jpg
- File:Moses Moseley photographed by Amy Short.jpg
- File:Moses Moseley photographed by Amy Short photography.jpg
- File:Moses Moseley photographed by Anthony Paderewski.jpg
Not own work, photographer's name is always in filename. OTRS-permission from photographers is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
본인 사진 삭제 요청합니다 Goodbye4ever (talk) 13:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after uploading. Here 1½ months have passed. Beautiful big photo with EXIF. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The photo is located here and on this page it is noted as "© Wiktoria Bosc". There is no evidence of permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: Lynn Goldsmith, Copyright holder © Lynn Goldsmith." No evidence of permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nouman Khan Sherani
[edit]Unused personal pictures. No Google hits except Facebook, etc. No WP articles. Therefore out of scope.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
As informações de autoria estão incorretas. Diego Pereira de Menezes (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:AlexanderWhannell
[edit]- File:Der Weisskunig 59 Detail Soldiers.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 66 Detail Knights and a King.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 64 Detail Maximilian grimacing, holding a dart, with his knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 49 Detail Knights & Bowmen.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 103 Detail Archers.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 80 Detail Maximilian discussing possibly with Englishman.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 102 Detail Philip the Fair discussing with another king, surrounded by knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 108 Detail The Old White King and Young White King sitting side-by-side.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 100 Detail Maximilian (or possibly his son, Philip) riding into a city at the head of knights, holding a scepter, Landsknecht beside.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 94 Detail Philip the Fair riding with knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 80 Detail Maximilian discussing possibly with Englishman.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 83 Detail Maximilian (or probably his son, Philip) riding at the head of knights at a siege.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 69 Detail Maximilian (or probably his son, Philip) holding ceremonial sword.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 67 Detail Landsknecht on their knees, in front of Maximilian.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 64 Detail Maximilian grimacing, holding a dart, with his knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 62 Detail Maximilian (or possibly his son, Philip).jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 67 Detail Maximilian holding spear directed towards Landsknecht.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 58 Detail Maximilian talking to German knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 61 Detail Maximilian (or possibly his son, Philip) at the head of knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 60 Detail Maximilian and soldiers.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 17 Detail Maximilian.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 53 Detail Maximilian (or possibly his son, Philip) holding ceremonial sword.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 41 Detail Maximilian with his knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 24 Detail Maximilian in Hungarian fashion.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 26 Detail Maximilian on horseback in besieged town.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 101 Detail Landsknecht carrying animal.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 71 Detail Landsknecht from behind.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 87 Detail Lone Landsknecht guard.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 48 Detail Landsknecht.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 24 Detail Landsknecht & Hungarians.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 39 Detail Landsknecht.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 33 Detail Landsknecht passing the bodies of hanged soldiers.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 30 Detail Landsknecht.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 96 Detail Knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 93 Detail Gendarme Charging.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 92 Detail Knight.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 66 Detail Knights and a King.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 86 Detail Knights Dismounted.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 49 Detail Knights & Bowmen.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 32 Detail Knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 23 Detail Knight.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 17 Detail Knight.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 109 Detail Landsknecht Battle.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 79 Detail Landsknecht Battle.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 78 Detail Landsknecht Battle.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 76 Detail Landsknecht Battle.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 75 Detail Knights running down soldiers.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 73 Detail Landsknecht Battle.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 72 Detail Landsknecht Battle.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 47 Detail Landsknecht Battle.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 34 Detail Landsknecht Slaying Knights.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 103 Detail Archers.jpg
- File:Der Weisskunig 17 Detail Hussar.jpg
These images were all uploaded by me. I believe they should be deleted because, since uploading them, I have found that they have been partially and fully uploaded on the British Museum website and the Digitale Bibliothek der BSB, respectively. The British Museum also contains details of the images that imply the filenames I gave images, which I made assumptions in making upon uploading, are actually incorrect. While this may seem like it would warrant simply renaming the files; many, if not most, do not have corresponding, English-translated, corrected versions, of which there are some on the British Museum website, and in some books on the subject. Therefore with files being readily available elsewhere, and with misinforming names here, and having been the person who uploaded them in the first place, I would like all the files to be deleted. AlexanderWhannell AlexanderWhannell (talk) 13:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep These are valuable images to have. Problem - like wrong names - can be addressed. The availability elsewhere is no guarantee that those files will stay there and those files are not readily available to Wikimedia and other projects. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Valuable images. - Fma12 (talk) 13:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Sebari & Fma12. --lNeverCry 23:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
3D letter looks complex enough to not fall under {{PD-textlogo}}. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.wkma.uk.com/site/images/instructors/avtandilmikadze.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- This might be genuine, considering the user name. But since it is not used, Delete for out of scope and the PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as duplicate of File:Edouard Vimont (1846-1930) Archimedes death.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Photo of actor with no metadata, small size and claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Igor Igorech (talk · contribs)
[edit]No own work in this gallery despite all being stated to be own work. Images are too old, too variable, too different in style to be the work of one person.
- File:G.Dalgat.jpg
- File:Gamid Dalgat.jpg
- File:DMA1.jpg
- File:DMA KPSS.jpg
- File:Gamid D.jpg
- File:Magomedova Shanum.jpg
- File:Dalgat UB.jpg
- File:GGAВ.jpg
- File:GADJI.jpg
- File:Преподователь Гамид.jpg
- File:Гамид .jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted the two images that are clearly too new to be PD for now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Male-Mls and plays for blackhawks-Kevin Durant -Best player in the Mlsgay 2013-05-19 19-46.jpg
[edit]Image not in use, doesn't appear to have any encyclopedic use and appears to be an insult? If needed, can easily be recreated. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Complex logo takes up more than 1/2 of the image, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Smaller version of File:Live music .jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Photographs from books are "own work" for the photo, but what is needed is the name of the book, the date of the book, the name of the author and so on. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Also affected File:Portret Albert (Wojciech) Szeliga - Potocki.jpg which is a crop from the above. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lokys~plwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these older portraits and text file.
- File:Antoni Szeliga - Potocki Paryż FOTO.jpg
- File:POTOCKI Z BĘDLEWA - SZELIGA.jpg
- File:Józef Karol Szeliga - Potocki.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This transit map does not look like the own work of the uploader despite that being given as source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
As stated at https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Kolby, this is the work of a living artist, and requires COM:OTRS permission to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This is a clip from a film, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
If the uploader is Mr. Kolby, then this isn't a selfie, and we'd need to know who actually took the picture. If the uploader isn't Mr. Kolby and did take the picture, he can't license the artist's other works as he did here at Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
As stated at https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Kolby, this is the work of a living artist, and requires COM:OTRS permission to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
As stated at https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Kolby, this is the work of a living artist, and requires COM:OTRS permission to retain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The source is given as own work on this screenshot of software which does not appear to be freeware. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Thomas8585: seems to be a single-purpose account, possibly an employee of the software company. Nevertheless we would need OTRS permission to keep this file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ngunza Francisco (talk · contribs)
[edit]Despite licenses, there is no indication of user's own work on any of these images.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Very pixelated, this image does not look like own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:ADVERTising for a gym. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Cjp24 (talk) 15:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Proper source and author is needed for this artwork, it's not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete art is by Ive Šubic (1922-1989). --Sporti (talk) 11:22, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raidillonwatches (talk · contribs)
[edit]Attached to a submission which is noted to read like an advertisement. Notice user name and product name are same.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, confirmed account of the watch manufacturer. The article on frwiki is a catastrophe. Still, I think we can keep the logos as the company and the logos are in scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Hedwig. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of apaprently non-notable entity. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The author of this picture "First World War: Private Fynn, VC, S. W. Borderers Ugo Matania (1888–1979) " died in 1979. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Image metadata states "Photographer, Ignite Images LLC" and "Copyright holder Ignite Images LLC Copyright 2014" and image previously appeared here, here, etc. We've received an OTRS email (link added to description) from purported representative of CCU, but 1) no evidence to substantiate that claim (e.g., generic email domain, no documentation, etc) and copyright holder appears to be Ignite Images LLC, not CCU, anyway. Эlcobbola talk 16:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, possible video crop. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be {{Own work}} as claimed. Crop of image previously uploaded at http://www.kerkida.net/sites/default/files/styles/gallery/public/gallery-images/gm0_3238.jpeg?itok=0WwR_gMd although this version is higher resolution. Storkk (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A photo from a newspaper, which even includes the name of the photographer. There is no evidence of permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of a web page. Unless the page is provided under a free license, derivative works are not allowed Discasto talk 16:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Same reason as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miriam Urkia Euskaltzain urgazlea.png Discasto talk 16:59, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Ginasmith888
[edit]- File:GinaSmith.png
- File:Technology journalist and author Gina Smith in 2014.png
- File:Technology journalist and author Gina Smith.png
The user uploaded photos of herself that are not "own work"; the photographers are not credited or allowed to license their images. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Uploader to flickr does not seem to be author/owner of copyright Discasto talk 17:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This is a duplicate of a SVG file. Just saying.... 107.0.69.23 17:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Looks to me more like a TV or video screenshot, but not like own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 17:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Godady
[edit]The metadata of the first file states "Author Nadun Baduge, Copyright holder: Nadun Baduge Photography (website)." The second file is a crop of the first. There is no evidence of permission to license a copyrighted photo. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather advtisements, potentially, as per File:Hubli Sandbox.png et al, hence imho rather out of scope Wikimedia commons ... but your opinions are asked? Roland zh (talk) 18:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Diagrams by User:Srittau
[edit]Unused PNG diagrams for which nearly identical SVG versions exist. Author's request.
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
imho rather poor quality, missing EXIF data to verify origian, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence im rather out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions? Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This can only be hosted on Commons if the portrait depicted is public domain, information is needed on the date of the painting and identity of the artist to determine this. January (talk) 18:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Artist appears to be Frank_O._Salisbury (d. 1962). Storkk (talk) 18:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:National Liberal Club London
[edit]Photographs of recent portraits which are not in the public domain, UK does not have freedom of panorama for graphic works.
- File:National Liberal Club Baroness Seear portrait.jpg
- File:National Liberal Club portrait of Baroness Robson of Kiddington.jpg
- File:National Liberal Club, London, August 2016 35.jpg
January (talk) 18:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Freedom of panorama states, "OK for 2D 'works of artistic craftsmanship' ". These are commissioned oil paintings by named artists, not simply "graphic works", so FOP would apply in these cases. Recentness is not relevant. Edwardx (talk) 20:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Paintings are one of the specified examples of a graphic work ("Graphic works are defined in Section 4 as any painting ..."). January (talk) 21:04, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
out of date, no longer applies 70.62.88.134 18:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No reason to delete a chart with historical data. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
out of date 70.62.88.134 17:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 00:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MoiraMoira as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://artsound.be/nl Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The logo certainly is a {{PD-Textlogo}}. Is it in scope? 50 employees according to nlwiki. I'd vote for keeps. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Clearly bellow the TOO. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is in pd as the logo is just text, but in scope... just 50 employees is not that much and those 50 employees are for the mother company, not ArtSound itself. Dqfn13 (talk) 11:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Seems the stub on nlwiki isn't going anywhere either. IMHO this logo is out of scope / advert. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Below the TOO, simple logo. - Fma12 (talk) 13:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above - simple logo. --lNeverCry 00:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
logo of not notable company; promo article removed after evaluation on nl-wiki MoiraMoira (talk) 14:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 19:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 19:25, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 19:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
above COM:TOO in the US, is there a similar concept in China? 91.61.47.178 19:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
No FoP in Slovenia Dogad75 (talk) 20:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please, delete. ShockD (talk) 20:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Uploader's request, in use. I am not sure about the copyright status of a certificate like this. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --lNeverCry 00:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
No source that can be verified. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 21:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
image not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Habertix (talk) 22:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Wer ist der Urheber dieses Fotos? Goesseln (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Wer ist der Urheber der Grafik? Goesseln (talk) 23:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Urheber falsch angegeben Goesseln (talk) 23:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Urheber falsch angegeben Goesseln (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Urheber falsch angegeben Goesseln (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Urheber falsch angegeben Goesseln (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of GFDL. Compare artist's web site http://www.rowenaart.com/images/asimov.html which says image is copyrighted. 75.211.92.117 15:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Provisional keep, based on assertion here. An English Wikipedia administrator should review the details of w:en:File talk:AsimovOnThrone.png, to confirm this. Ideally an OTRS ticket confirming this information should be logged, to prevent any future questions about licence. TheFeds 23:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: I undeleted the talk page in question, so that everyone can review it & make a proper decision based on the documentation there. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Provisional keep, Assuming the license can be verified. I'm included to believe the uploader, but if you feel further proof is needed, it should be easy enough to get. Suppafly (talk) 22:59, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- The permission should be send to OTRS. Doesn't the invariant sections make {{GFDL-IS}} unfree? Multichill (talk) 10:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Uploader's Note:
- Fact: Rowena Morrill is a renowned, photorealistic illustrator of science fiction and fantasy works.
- Opinion: Prior to the introduction of the Work in question, the article w:en:Isaac Asimov suffered from a dearth of illustrations, having only miserable photos of the Good Doctor; a correctable insult.
- Fact: Around and about the web, I observed several bootlegged copies of an original painting, "Isaac Asimov", by Ms. Morrill, in various states of shrinkage and recompression. I also observed a much better copy displayed on Ms. Morrill's website, from which place she sells large, high-resolution prints.
- Opinion: I was and am impressed by the lifelike rendering and the appropriateness of the symbolism. As does much art, Ms. Morrill has captured more of her subject than any snapshot.
- Fact: Around and about the web, I observed several bootlegged copies of an original painting, "Isaac Asimov", by Ms. Morrill, in various states of shrinkage and recompression. I also observed a much better copy displayed on Ms. Morrill's website, from which place she sells large, high-resolution prints.
- Fact: I, Xiong Changnian, negotiated via email with the creator, Rowena Morrill, in early 2005 regarding the derivative Work under question. Ms. Morrill was kind enough to grant the license which now appears on File:Isaac Asimov on Throne.png and which I quote here:
- "I, Rowena Morrill, license this image under the GFDL, with an Invariant Section consisting of the words 'Rowena Morrill'. I am the creator of this derivative work, based on an original work of which I am the creator."
- Fact: I, Xiong Changnian, negotiated via email with the creator, Rowena Morrill, in early 2005 regarding the derivative Work under question. Ms. Morrill was kind enough to grant the license which now appears on File:Isaac Asimov on Throne.png and which I quote here:
- Fact: Subsequently, I uploaded the Work under discussion, as received via email from Ms. Morrill, making notice of the license she gave it out under. It should be blatantly obvious to anyone that this license is indeed GFDL with an Invariant Section.
- Opinion: It is therefore disingenuous at best of anyone to suggest or imply, let alone state baldly, that the Work is unlicensed.
- Fact: Subsequently, I uploaded the Work under discussion, as received via email from Ms. Morrill, making notice of the license she gave it out under. It should be blatantly obvious to anyone that this license is indeed GFDL with an Invariant Section.
- Fact: I also inserted the Work into the article, en:Isaac Asimov, giving it pride of place at top right, being the most authentic image available of the subject in the prime of his life.
- Fact: Later, Someone demoted the Work to much further down the page, posting yet another poor-quality digitized snapshot in its place.
- Fact: I also inserted the Work into the article, en:Isaac Asimov, giving it pride of place at top right, being the most authentic image available of the subject in the prime of his life.
- Fact: At some other date, Someone reuploaded the Work to Commons, preserving the license.
- Opinion: The reupload was within the terms of the license granted by Ms. Morrill. It may not have been a particularly wise act, since the copyright policy on commons: has historically been more radical than that on en:.
- Fact: At some other date, Someone reuploaded the Work to Commons, preserving the license.
- Fact: Two years after the upload, another Someone deleted the Work as filed in en:.
- Opinion: The deleter built on the shaky foundation laid by the reuploader. Thus do two careless individuals combine to one fool.
- Fact: Two years after the upload, another Someone deleted the Work as filed in en:.
- Fact: Now, some links to the Work on en: are broken.
- Fact: The Work is a Commons Featured Picture.
- Fact: The Work proved wildly popular, as attested to by its display (almost without exception in pride of place) on dozens of language projects.
- Fact (although it is perhaps a trivial point): The reupload-and-delete combination neatly obscures the fact that I, Xiong, did the hard job of negotiating with Ms. Morrill and obtaining an appropriate license for it.
- Not to slight Ms. Morrill in any way; she was extremely open to licensing but I felt I had to explain carefully exactly what rights she was giving away and how to protect others; and that a simple "Sure!" was an inadequate response for our legal purposes. But for this, she might have inadvertently lost control of the original work. I took care to defend Ms. Morrill's interests while advancing ours and preserving our reputation for fair dealing (such as it is).
- Opinion: While editors like myself spend real time and energy doing unseen dirty work, editors like Someone and Someone bloat their edit count while kicking dirt over their tracks.
- Opinion: The license Ms. Morrill granted to the Work may be too restrictive for commons:. While the political winds have blown quite coldly of late on en:, I believe the license is still acceptable there.
- Fact: The license given does nothing exceptional beyond preserving Ms. Morrill's justly deserved credit for her creation.
- Opinion: I think it is obvious that this project is bent on obliterating credit and reassigning it to those who do not deserve it. In my case, this is a quibble to be overlooked; in Ms. Morrill's, a monstrous fraud.
- Fact: The license given does nothing exceptional beyond preserving Ms. Morrill's justly deserved credit for her creation.
- Fact: If yet another Someone now deletes this Work from commons: then it will be unavailable to all projects, regardless of their copyright policies. Meanwhile, all onwiki evidence of the license grant itself will also be destroyed, including this. Eventually it will not be practical even to assign blame.
- Summary: Someone, Someone, Someone, and Someone have wreaked their terrible, angels-on-pinhead-counting vengance upon Ms. Morrill, myself, and the Good Doctor Asimov. Like repeated floodings of the Nile washing away elegant sculptures, they combine to obliterate the work of the past, leaving only a great heap of mud in its place. This deletion request will complete the destruction, and the destroyers will move on.
- Suggestions:
- 1. If the motion to delete the Work on commons: passes, then I demand that Someone and Someone go around to the 72 projects (by rough count) which don't appear, currently, to have an issue with its copyright status. There, they can upload the Work, together with its license. Thus they are not allowed to vandalize at one stroke 72 wiki pages under cover of process. (I do not insist that I be preserved in history as the primary facilitator; let Someone wear the crown of brass.)
- 2. Although I cannot in good conscience recommend the action, Someone might contact Ms. Morrill and ask for the Invariant Section to be removed. Since the sole effect of doing so is to eliminate the need to give the creator her due mention, I find the idea offensive, although perhaps politically expedient.
- 3. Since public whipping has gone out of style, I suggest that editors carefully review the history of this debacle and consider just how far forward, or back, the various meddling Someones have advanced the causes of Truth, Beauty, Honesty, Utility, or even Efficiency.
- Mmmh, sounds good enough to me... All we really seem to need is someone slightly more versant of copyright policy than me to confirm that the license is valid for Commons. Ingolfson (talk) 10:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Xiong. Great picture. We typically don't allow invariant sections (see {{GFDL-invariants}}), but I don't think that will be a problem in this case.
- It seems the creator is wanting "attribution" rather than an invariant section, and both the GFDL and {{CC-BY}} require attribution. However, perhaps the concern is that this image would be attributed here on Commons, but used on Wikipedia without her name being visible. This is a common problem, because our images are clickable and the attribution is placed on the image page, and we usually accept that as being an acceptable method of attribution for an "online edition". A print edition of Wikipedia would need to attribute it differently.
- An interesting solution to this problem is {{Hiuppo Copyright GFDL}}, which describes how attribution should be displayed, with extra legalese to attempt to ensure that people follow the desires of the author even if they are legally a bit shakey. Do you think that the creator would be happy with that? John Vandenberg (chat) 09:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Commons:Licensing. Reasonable demands for attribution are allowed, and while GFDL invariant sections usually are not, the attribution requested doesn't appear in the actual image, but in side text. This is standard attribution, which Commons allows. -Nard the Bard 22:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Nard the Bard above — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasbfr (talk • contribs)
Kept. shizhao (talk) 01:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Image was deleted by Jim with the rational License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works: No evidence of permission from the painter. However, the file was kept after a DR in 2009. Converting the speedy deletion to a regular DR as requested by Prosfilaes here. Natuur12 (talk) 16:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Jim must have a good explanation. I'd like to read it. If none is provided then I think a procedural Keep is the way to go. --Fæ (talk) 16:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- I don't see anything new added to the discussuion so Keep. Deagol2 (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It looked to me like a speedy for two reasons.
First, I don't see any evidence that Rowena Morill, the painter, has actually given permission -- she is quoted in the file description, but there is no OTRS or evidence that she actually wrote those words. I do understand that the upload to WP:EN was early and that User:Xiong claims to have negotiated the license shown, but we do not generally accept such claims when the uses of the image on the Web all have clear and explicit copyright notices.Second, the license tag is {{GFDL-IS}}, which is not a permitted Commons license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC)- Regarding the statement. That is covered by Commons:Grandfathered old files. Natuur12 (talk) 20:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thank you. However that still doesn't make the license permissible. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:25, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The "Invariant Section" in this file page is the indication of the authorship of the original painting, which should be already granted by GFDL. The deletion request seems to raise a false problem. We may value if another license is more appropriate, but the lawfulness of the presence of the file on Commons seems solid to me. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Well, if it will be kept. The license template has to changed to something valid and (still) accepted on commons. --JuTa 06:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- GFDL License states that "it preserves for the author and publisher a way to get credit for their work". In hypothetical modificated versions of the file, «all of its principal authors, ..., unless they release you from this requirement » (and this is not the case), should be listed on the Title Page.
- In this case, the use of {{GFDL-IS}} was surely a way to strengthen Rowena Morrill's request, which anyway should be fulfilled according to GFDL. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep @Jameslwoodward: Another time write here, don't go with a speedy deletion about this file, it present in a lot of articles in different wikipedia, thanks ;-) I agree with Natuur12 and Harlock81, in this case OTRS has nothing to do: This file was uploaded with e-mail permission before the introduction of OTRS in March 2006; it is a grandfathered old file, and I don't see anything new respect to old thread.--Kirk39 (talk) 16:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Please don't lecture me on complex subjects. A file that has an unacceptable license qualifies as a {{Speedy}}. The license used is clearly tagged as unacceptable at {{GFDL-IS}}. Therefore it was an appropriate speedy.
- Fae commented that if I did not have a good reason, it should be kept, but has not commented on the license issue.
- Natuur12 has not opined one way or the other -- Natuur12 only corrected me on the rule for old files, but has not taken a position on the license.
- Harlock81 has asked to keep the file. He or she has been active for a long time, but has only 1200 edits here. His reasoning is that since the invariant section asks for only what the author would have any way, it does not make the license unacceptable.
- Kirk39 has 185 edits on Commons.
- Deagol2 has only one edit on Commons, the one above.
- JuTa and I both agree that since the license is not acceptable, it must be changed, which would require the consent of the author.
- So, on the one hand we have two highly experienced editors (1,000,000 plus contributions to WMF) who think the license is a problem, two other highly experienced editors who have commented above, but not expressed an opinion on the license issue, and three others who asked to keep the file despite the unacceptable license. Also, while soliciting comments is not forbidden by policy on Commons, it is not our general practice. I must wonder how the three of you came out of the woodwork to comment here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:54, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- It's not too difficult answer your question: after you deleted the file, it:Utente:CommonsDelinker removed it from the articles in which it was present. Anyway, it was also soon restored [3]. A quite strange situation for not to be noted in the Watchlist. So, users which work above all on Wikipedia have been informed about this Deletion request. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- Is it possible to modify the License, as the substantial equivalence in the effects? --Harlock81 (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- "A file that has an unacceptable license qualifies as a {{Speedy}}." That is not true. Policy, COM:SPEEDY, says "Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations." (Emphasis in the original.) This is not a copyright violation. Reason File #4 for speedy deletion on that page is "the recently uploaded content is based on a non-free license, disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works." (Emphasis mine.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:18, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Jim: Why commented I here? Lol, read the answer of Harlock81, if CommonsDelinker come in it.wikipedia to delete this file in a lot of articles of my watchlist about astronomy, and good articles too (for example Tau Ceti and Epsilon Eridani), how i cannot see it?--Kirk39 (talk) 23:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
- It's not too difficult answer your question: after you deleted the file, it:Utente:CommonsDelinker removed it from the articles in which it was present. Anyway, it was also soon restored [3]. A quite strange situation for not to be noted in the Watchlist. So, users which work above all on Wikipedia have been informed about this Deletion request. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Question Just poking the nose in crying foul is not helpful. Nobody WANTS this gone, on the contrary. Did anyone ever thought of contacting the artist? Silence? Thought so. Who volunteers? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- It would be preferable that she is contacted by an user who well knows guidelines of Commons, if necessary. Could it be handled by Commons:OTRS?
- I didn't find her email address on her website. Maybe, it will be necessary to contact her via Facebook. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Invalid license for Commons, if anyone manages to contact the author, the file be restored using the OTRS process. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Has an ad for Harry Potter that takes one third of the picture FedericoMP (talk) 02:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, this is not allowed in source country Argentina. 11:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertising. Affected:
Mhhossein talk 03:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Cannot see how this is a valid deletion request. What specific policy applies here? Not aware of any restriction on photographing shopfronts in the UK. Edwardx (talk) 12:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Advertising is not totally prohibited in Commons. Encyclopedia must be neutral, but Commons is a picture collection and pictures can be non-neutral. Blatant advertising is prohibited, but these are simply photos about shop windows. Source country is UK, which has freedom of panorama for permanently displayed objects. It seems to me, that all things in jewelry store are permanently displayed. But carphone shop has multiple posters, which are not permanent. Some of them are too simple for copyright, one is behind people's heads, but two are better seen. I opened the file in full resolution and it seems to me, that quality of posters are not good even in full resolution. While this is borderline decision, it seems to me, that we can keep the carphone shop too. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: In this case, the designs containing flowers and a woman is clearly a copyrighted work and needs to be licensed. They are not small enough to be considered as Commons:De minimis and hence should be deleted. Regarding the Carphone shop I agree with Taivo. --Mhhossein talk 13:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the jewelery shop window, since graphic elements are not covered by UK FOP. The phone shop ads are incidental and fall under de-minimis. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of Nerio9
[edit]Nerio9 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:
- File:Vesoul Stade René-Hologne 2.jpg
- File:Vesoul Stade René-Hologne 4.jpg
- File:Vesoul Stade René-Hologne 6.jpg
- File:Vesoul Stade René-Hologne 7.jpg
- File:Vesoul Stade René-Hologne 8.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in France. OTRS-permission from architect is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep faudra m'expliquer ce que l'architecture a d'originale.. parce que là j'ai du mal ! Une tribune en béton et un toit métallique : wow ! C'est incroyable ! A.BourgeoisP (talk) 11:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per User:A.BourgeoisP (I think). Nothing original about the building. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation - canadian copyright right law does not cover murals SYSS Mouse (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- This tiled wall is a "work of artistic craftsmanship" and is covered by freedom of panorama in Canada. Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- 2D mruals like this is excluded. SYSS Mouse (talk) 19:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- This wall is part of the original architecture of the station and qualifies as a "work of artistic craftsmanship, that is permanently situated in a public place or building". Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- 2D mruals like this is excluded. SYSS Mouse (talk) 19:03, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, I can not follow the argument that this is part of building. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
No source of base image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep; NasaWorldWind uses the Blue Marble image as a base image. It does seem that NASA intended this image to be used freely by other publications see here. They say that "Also like its predecessor, the new Blue Marble is available free of charge to educators, scientists, museums, businesses, and the public." That certainly sounds like a CC licence to me. All they ask is that "Anyone using or republishing Blue Marble: Next Generation please credit “NASA’s Earth Observatory.”" which needs to be done ASAP. Insertcleverphrasehere (talk) 19:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The description already states "from the free Blue Marble image courtesy of NASA Earth Observatory" - does it need something more? Mikenorton (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- de:Wp My fault! Missed it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Actually you didn't miss it. I added the attribution after this was brought up and looked up the source. You weren't at fault bringing this up as it wasn't properly attributed before this nomination. Its fixed now, so we can probably close this now. Insertcleverphrasehere (talk) 09:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks for that. Mikenorton (talk) 13:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Actually you didn't miss it. I added the attribution after this was brought up and looked up the source. You weren't at fault bringing this up as it wasn't properly attributed before this nomination. Its fixed now, so we can probably close this now. Insertcleverphrasehere (talk) 09:16, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Neutral Does this image take into account recent earthquakes and "new fault systems"? If not then I suggest deletion, and if it does then I suggest keep 9:30:27 20 November 2016 (NZDT) LukeChandlerNZ (talk)
Kept: Issues have been sorted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Modern art without permission from artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Kingdom. To quote "According to Copinger and Skoane James, The expression "open to the public" presumably extends the section to premises to which the public are admitted only on licence or on payment." Mikenorton (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: FOP in the UK per User:Mikenorton. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Dublette von File:Marret Bohn (2).jpg ST ○ 15:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- I don't get it. You are saying it's the same as itself. - Jmabel ! talk 16:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- sorry @Jmabel: --ST ○ 17:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- That makes more sense, but still, they are not duplicates: one is a crop of the other. Perfectly OK to have the original as it came from the camera, plus a crop. - Jmabel ! talk 20:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- sorry @Jmabel: --ST ○ 17:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:45, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
It is unlikely that this transit map was created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Now why would that be unlikely? I did it myself with Adobe illustrator. By looking at the file's history you will see that I was the original uploader and that I changed the original upload quite a few times. Nonetheless I feel flattered that you think that the map is convincing/professional.--MissyWegner (talk) 16:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep may unlikely but not unrealistically. Without any proof or presumptive evidence it's IMO just an ridiculous deletion request. --Flor!an (talk) 12:39, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per User:MissyWegner. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
It is unlikely that the uploader created this transit map. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Info Other version of File:U-Bahn HH Juni 2016.png. See discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:U-Bahn HH Juni 2016.png --Flor!an (talk) 12:44, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: kept per Commons:Deletion requests/File:U-Bahn HH Juni 2016.png. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Most, if not all, of the photographs in this montage are copyrighted. The one bottom middle for example is copyrighted by John Swannell [4] as is the one to its right [5] and the one to its left is a 1984 image by Yousuf Karsh. DrKay (talk) 19:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hellooo ! I took this photograph at the corner of Shankill Road - Belfast, last summer : it' a mural,
painted on a wall, not a montage ! --Pierrette13 (talk) 20:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)- It isn't a mural. They are posters pasted onto board. Also, note (as it states at the top of Category:Murals in Belfast and at Commons:Freedom of panorama#United Kingdom, murals (and posters) are not copyright-free. DrKay (talk) 21:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep Even if we suppose that all of those pictures are copyrighted, how then do we show readers a picture of this well-known mural? I think it has educational and historic value, and it's in use in a Wikipedia article. This situation reminds me, for example, of shrines dedicated to famous cases of people that have been murdered. Some of those shrines might display copyrighted pictures of the victim(s), together with flowers, candles, etc. Sometimes the pictures are very small, yet they are copyrighted (often times taken by relatives of the victims), so where do we draw the line when pictures of murals, shrines, etc., are taken with copyrighted images? I think this image should be kept because I don't see how to draw that line. Dontreader (talk) 21:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Use of very small copyrighted photos as part of shrines is de minimis, i.e. the focus is on the shrine not the picture, which can be pixellated if necessary to avoid any infringement. You can only show this image if you can show fair use. Fair use images are not allowed on commons. DrKay (talk) 21:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, I realized afterwards that this was a photograph of photographs and not handpainted... But it is still a mural in intention of the artist who did it, in my opinion.
- And sorry for my English : I'm a French native speaker...
- Do you mean I would be allowed to put this picture on (French) Wikipédia ? Or that I should put it there ?
- I agree with Dontreader : this photograph in connected with the Northern Ireland Loyalist History and points out that Loyalists are more connected with the person of the King or Queen and the British flag than with the British Institutions (as Parliament) or nation. One should consider this as a whole and as a mural in its own right and not as a montage of different pictures. --Pierrette13 (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- In terms of copyright, it doesn't matter whether it is a mural or a poster: Freedom of panorama "does not apply to graphic works - such as a mural or poster - even if they are permanently located in a public place. These cannot be uploaded to Commons without a licence from the copyright holder." DrKay (talk) 17:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment DrKay, I understand the points you are making, but I just can't seem to find copyright law addressing this exact type of situation. Could you please explain how a major stock-photo-collection website is selling a picture of this very same place from a different angle, here [6]? According to your rationale, I guess you believe the author sought and received permission from every single copyright holder of the images of the queen in the photo. To me that seems like a very cumbersome (and expensive) task, not worth the trouble, unless there's an exception in this situation that we are not seeing. Thanks in advance for your explanation. Dontreader (talk) 23:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- That same agency sells photographs that are clearly in the public domain.[7][8] They are interested in making money not in tracking proper copyright ownership. At least Alamy do include a disclaimer: "If you want to use the image commercially , you’ll need to get permission from the model, artist, owner, estate, trademark or brand". But the image has been uploaded here under an incorrect license that allows any use, including commercial, even though we do not own any of the images shown. DrKay (talk) 17:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I find it quite bizarre that a reputable company is apparently selling pictures that they do not own. Your public domain examples seem to be proof of that. Besides, they charge a lot of money, but then there's the disclaimer that you pointed out, meaning that you pay a lot of money in some cases, yet you can't use the pictures commercially until you contact other people. Very strange, in my opinion. Anyway, thanks again for your research and explanation. Dontreader (talk) 18:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- I could have taken this photograph a little further, because I was interested mostly by the link between this mural and the Ulster Loyalist History more than the details of crown or dress... But the wall and name of the district of Shankill Road are very apparent, so in my opinion, it could be appreciated as a local urban landscape... --Pierrette13 (talk) 06:34, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I find it quite bizarre that a reputable company is apparently selling pictures that they do not own. Your public domain examples seem to be proof of that. Besides, they charge a lot of money, but then there's the disclaimer that you pointed out, meaning that you pay a lot of money in some cases, yet you can't use the pictures commercially until you contact other people. Very strange, in my opinion. Anyway, thanks again for your research and explanation. Dontreader (talk) 18:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- That same agency sells photographs that are clearly in the public domain.[7][8] They are interested in making money not in tracking proper copyright ownership. At least Alamy do include a disclaimer: "If you want to use the image commercially , you’ll need to get permission from the model, artist, owner, estate, trademark or brand". But the image has been uploaded here under an incorrect license that allows any use, including commercial, even though we do not own any of the images shown. DrKay (talk) 17:43, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: not covered by UK FOP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This image is an unlabeled, distorted pie chart that is more than two and a half years old unused, and I doubt it could be used legitimately. KSFT (talk) 20:45, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: This is an example of a chart created using Matplotlib, not good enough, but educationaly valuable. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:06, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: We have nearly no other pie charts in Category:SVG created with Matplotlib. We can still delete this when something better comes along. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This name is incorrect and no page linked to this page. Whisper of the heart (talk) 19:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: fixed the redirect, should be good now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:50, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This file shows parts of Kashmir as not belonging to India. This image hurts the sentiments of all Indians and gives a wrong image of India to the world.
This is an incorrect map of India.
Deleted: The region is disputed and this is shown accurately. Green Giant (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
No source. Unknown copyright situation. Where does this map come from? Jcb (talk) 21:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- At filepage: source : Nataraja and User Nataraja on fr.wikipedia. --Insider (talk) 09:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw. But where did Nataraja take the base map from? Jcb (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- It can be own work (very simple map) or based on map in public domain (from Commons). --Insider (talk) 08:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think this is own work, but it may indeed be based on a PD map, e.g. from Commons. But then we have to try to find that source map. Jcb (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Not see any reason not to trust an experienced user of French Wikipedia. Especially since a lot of similar maps in public domain (e. g.). --Insider (talk) 07:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- The map seems to be DW rather than own work, so AGF or not, we need to know where it comes from. Jcb (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Not see any reason not to trust an experienced user of French Wikipedia. Especially since a lot of similar maps in public domain (e. g.). --Insider (talk) 07:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think this is own work, but it may indeed be based on a PD map, e.g. from Commons. But then we have to try to find that source map. Jcb (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- It can be own work (very simple map) or based on map in public domain (from Commons). --Insider (talk) 08:18, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw. But where did Nataraja take the base map from? Jcb (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to doubt the uploader's claim of own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: Kelly Marie Schulze, Copyright holder: Mountain Dog Photography LLC, Copyright status: Copyrighted." No evidence of permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- I'm in correspondence with the copyright holder, and expect this to be resolved shortly.--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Sphilbrick: Any update? --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be restored if/when permission is confirmed thru OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 11:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
With a date of 1894 this is not possible to be own work, a proper source is required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Judging by the account name & the hundreds of uploads, this person is uploading on behalf of the archives of the Palais des Beaux-Arts de Lille. We may need an official statement to that effect if there is any doubt, but it seems pretty clear: uploading a lot of material from that source not otherwise available online. - Jmabel ! talk 05:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: If a GLAM uploads an old work, we need to AGF. I fixed the source. --Yann (talk) 19:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:33, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think we need to go hair spliting here. There are only a few small copies on the web. Most postcards from that area are not signed, and the photographer is unknown. Only a few photographers added their name on it back then. In addition, the photographer was born before 1880, so the odds that he died before 1946 is quite high. Yann (talk) 16:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Unless Jcb can name the photographer, nothing to do here. This DR for an 1899 postcard is extremely pointy, considering the background discussion, hence the speedy. --Fæ (talk) 17:19, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, unless Jcb provides proof of copyvio for this 1899 postcard. If you don't know the copyright situation, then research instead of enforcing other to do that job. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - not sure wat 'area' Yann is talking about, but in the Netherlands most old postcards I have seen have a photographer mentioned at the backside. And 1899 is way too recent to suppose PD-old without authorship information. E.g. Jameslwoodward uses 1886 as a cutoff. I myself would even think of 1876, for a county like the Netherlands, where people of over 90 years old were no exception in 1946. Jcb (talk) 22:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yann is not the only who disagree with your nominations (here are at least four Keep votes). So, if several users disagree with you, who is wrong here? No proof of copyvio, no support for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yann is not the only who disagree with your nominations (here are at least four
Is it time to have a serious discussion about this kind of situation? Here we have an 1899 postcard. It is extremely unlikely that anyone cares about its copyright, but that train of thought is prohibited by PRP. So, we either must prove that the author was anonymous -- which we can't do beyond a significant doubt because we don't have the back of the postcard -- or we must guess that the author died before 1946, which I'm unwilling to do for an 1899 card. I'd like to say Keep for this image, but, being someone who strictly constructs our rules, I must say Delete.
Is it time to adopt a policy that says that any image that is 100 years old, has no known author, and was obviously published, should be OK for Commons? By "obviously published" I mean to include postcards, printed maps, halftones, engravings and the like, but not images scanned from paper photographs.
If we agree here that it would be a useful discussion, then obviously it should not take place here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Jim, Yes, we need to have a consensus about this. I would support such a rule, which is used in the German WP (AFAIK). Regards, Yann (talk) 23:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:NETCOPYRIGHT: I can't open the source but it can be found here in 2015. Below COM:TOO or copyvio?
- If you have to ask, DR it instead of nominating it for speedy deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 13:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion so simple schemas are ineligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Since subway maps have been found to be copyrighted in the past, and since this file is unused and not the best quality, I'm going with the safe option. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:50, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no source (No source since) Yann (talk) 23:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete of course. Author was stated to be 'Onbekend' (=unknown). 1910 is not old enough to suppose copyright to be expired. Jcb (talk) 23:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: This file was restored just today. Unless you provide proof of copyvio arther than enforcing other to provide proof, this and the other DRs of the files restored today is disruptive. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- This DR was not created by me, but after undeletion by Yann, who apparently understood that their is indeed not sufficient source information to keep this file. Jcb (talk) 01:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep --Yann (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Since we do not know who the photographer was, he could easily have lived into the 1960s. We need more relaxed rules on Commons, but as long as we do not have them, we cannot keep this file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PumitasUNAM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXI, Some watermarked.
- File:UNAMGoogle.jpg
- File:HackathonUNAM.jpg
- File:RoboticsUNAM.jpg
- File:UNAMVoliTeam.jpg
- File:DanVargasRemate.jpg
- File:DanPumas.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
All of this is my own work. The watermarks are because I wanted to have recognition of certain photos I took. I can remove the watermark however. Please let me know what is needed to keep these images. Sorry I am new. My duty has been to document the National Autonomous University of Mexico. Any help is appreciated. Thank you very much PumitasUNAM (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep two first files: big photos with EXIF, own work is likely. (Although uploading versions without watermark would be good.) Delete the others and also file:MexicoRioVoli.jpg: small photos without metadata, own work is doubtful. Uploading bigger versions with EXIF will disprove the doubts. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PumitasUNAM (talk · contribs)
[edit]The cameras used and resolutions of these images are different, and I doubt that all these images are made by one user. See COM:PRP. Also one of the images have a Facebook watermark, which is File:UNAMGoogle.jpg, so this adds to my doubt that all these images are not own work. If PumitasUNAM (the uploader of these images) is really the copyright holder/photographer of all these images, they have to send an email to the OTRS.
- File:Volleyball UNAM.jpg (738×420, camera Canon EOS 5D Mark III)
- File:Women Engineers UNAM.jpg (801×342)
- File:Astronomy at UNAM.jpg (599×449)
- File:SAFIRUNAM.jpg (800×578)
- File:DiscoVolado.jpg (960×720)
- File:Eslam UNAM.jpg (960×637, Facebook file?)
- File:UNAM's Vibrotactile Sleeve Art.jpg (960×960)
- File:Media Arts Tech UNAM.jpg (960×645)
- File:WomanT.jpg (924×1548)
File:UNAM he for She.jpg (5472×3080, camera Samsung NX1000)- File:WomenUNAM.jpg (916×1368)
File:HackathonUNAMWomen.jpg (5472×3080, camera Samsung NX1000)File:UNAM Computer Engineering Girl Coder.jpg (3080×5472, camera Samsung NX1000)File:RobotMujerUNAM.jpg (3080×5472, camera Samsung NX1000)- File:Justina.png (950×550)
- File:Justina2.jpg (635×847)
File:UNAMGoogle.jpg (3053×4899, camera Samsung NX1000)File:HackathonUNAM.jpg (5472×3080, camera Samsung NX1000)
★ Poké95 05:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging Taivo, INeverCry, and EugeneZelenko to see what they think, since they are involved in the previous DR above. ★ Poké95 05:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging also Jdx per this diff. ★ Poké95 05:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- I reverted Tortillovsky's edit because of purely technical reason. This was not correct try of (re)opening a DR, it was just clumsy edit of a closed DR. --jdx Re: 06:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- My opinion is as previous: Keep Samsung photos, Delete others. Taivo (talk) 06:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete unless original photos with EXIF and without any post-processing will be provided. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- I sent email with the evidence to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Why is it incorrect to use different devices for the images my account shares on Wikipedia? Why is it incorrect to use filters on the photos I upload to Wikipedia? What would be the best way to avoid being audited in the future? I would prefer to use my time to continue improving Wikipedia instead of proving myself. Right now I spent all day yesterday preparing evidence, and will continue preparing more in the days following. It has become a big time sink. What are the best norms to follow to not have problems in the future? Thank you for your time. PumitasUNAM (talk) 13:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- It is not wrong to use filters nor use different cameras for images. However, most copyright violators take images from the web, which means they take files with different cameras. Unfortunately, the only way to correct this is to follow tne procedure at OTRS. I think stating on your userpage what cameras you use before uploading will help too. And for filters, most copyright violators take images from Facebook and Instagram, and most of the images on social media sites have filters (to look good). To correct this, please upload a version without the filters, to prove that you own the one with filters. We are sorry for the inconvenience, but we are just following policy (COM:L and COM:PRP). Thanks, ★ Poké95 01:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- The picture "File:Volleyball UNAM.jpg" appears on a page which has copyright (2016) privileges [11]; when I compare that picture (taken with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III), to, let’s say, "File:UNAM_he_for_She.jpg" (taken with a Samsung NX1000) it is understandable that questions may arise, not solely because of the cameras that were used. Furthermore, some other photographs uploaded have watermarks from a for-profit corporation (mainly Facebook). Tortillovsky (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanations. I followed procedure that came on OTRS and emailed them. Some of the photos I uploaded to Wikipedia I was not the author but had permission from the school of engineering at UNAM. That is the case of the volleyball photos. Should I remove those photos from Wikipedia and have the author sign the OTRS form? I am putting in this folder below my original images. I did not see any rules that watermarked photos were invalid for Wikipedia. Should I upload all the original images to Wikipedia or is it sufficient to share the folder with the photos? Thanks PumitasUNAM (talk) 20:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Images with watermarks are not invalid. See Commons:Watermarks. Some watermarks are useful (invisible watermarks, such as EXIF metadata), some are annoying (visible watermarks, but they are still allowed), and some are destructive (promotional watermarks). And for those images that you are not the author, yes you have to let the copyright holder of those images to follow the OTRS (they should be the one sending the email and not you, unless if you are an authorised representative for them). And for the original images at Google Drive, I think they are sufficient enough to prove that they are yours (thanks for that). Please upload them here (using the "upload a new version" method, not UploadWizard) on Commons. Thanks, ★ Poké95 23:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Poke. I will work to this for each of the images. I do see your and Tortillovsky's point that watermarks are annoying. I will update with versions without the watermarks or filters, and add the original images in all cases. I will also update my personal profile to state more information about the photos. Would it be easier if all my images are removed and I upload only the original ones? Thanks a lot of your time and clear explanations. I learned a lot during the process. Thanks PumitasUNAM (talk) 13:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- You're welcome. And I don't think it would be easier to remove all your images with filters and watermarks and upload the original ones (it would need an admin action, and it would take time before you could get an admin to do that). It would be better if you overwrite your filtered/watermarked file with the original one (and optionally, revert it to the filtered/watermarked version). If you don't know how overwrite a file, just go to the section named "File history" on your file, then you should find the button "Upload a new version of this file". Click it, then upload the original file. Don't forget to add an upload summary (I believe it will not accept your upload without an upload summary). Thanks, ★ Poké95 00:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. Yes watermarks are annoying. Before, it is encouraged to remove visible watermarks since it deteriorates use, but now, it is no longer encouraged since removing a watermark may lead to legal issues. There are some copyright holders who don't allow removal of their watermarks. But of course, you can remove your own watermarks, since you are the copyright holder anyway. ★ Poké95 00:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! I will work on this hopefully tonight or this weekend. Sorry very much for taking your time. Thank you for explaining everything clearly. I appreciate it greatly. PumitasUNAM (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Poke. I will work to this for each of the images. I do see your and Tortillovsky's point that watermarks are annoying. I will update with versions without the watermarks or filters, and add the original images in all cases. I will also update my personal profile to state more information about the photos. Would it be easier if all my images are removed and I upload only the original ones? Thanks a lot of your time and clear explanations. I learned a lot during the process. Thanks PumitasUNAM (talk) 13:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
- Images with watermarks are not invalid. See Commons:Watermarks. Some watermarks are useful (invisible watermarks, such as EXIF metadata), some are annoying (visible watermarks, but they are still allowed), and some are destructive (promotional watermarks). And for those images that you are not the author, yes you have to let the copyright holder of those images to follow the OTRS (they should be the one sending the email and not you, unless if you are an authorised representative for them). And for the original images at Google Drive, I think they are sufficient enough to prove that they are yours (thanks for that). Please upload them here (using the "upload a new version" method, not UploadWizard) on Commons. Thanks, ★ Poké95 23:59, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- I updated the images below (removed watermark and uploaded higher quality version. Would it be OK to keep these and delete the rest? What is recommended? Thanks
- Sorry for any troubles this causes.
- File:WomanT.jpg
- File:Astronomy at UNAM.jpg
- File:UNAM's Vibrotactile Sleeve Art.jpg
- File:WomanT.jpg
- File:UNAM he for She.jpg
- File:WomenUNAM.jpg
- File:HackathonUNAMWomen.jpg
- File:UNAM Computer Engineering Girl Coder.jpg
- File:RobotMujerUNAM.jpg
- File:Justina.png
- File:UNAMGoogle.jpg
- File:Justina.png
- File:Justina2.jpg
- File:UNAMGoogle.jpg
- File:HackathonUNAM.jpg PumitasUNAM (talk) 00:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Are you sure that these are higher quality versions? Because to me they are not. It looks like you just cropped out the watermark and downsampled it. For example, in File:UNAM Computer Engineering Girl Coder.jpg, from the version with the watermark, which has a resolution of 3080x5472 (1.13 MB), it becomes 924x1561 (278 KB), which is lower resolution. Also, when you look at that file in the highest resolution (924x1561), I still see a part of the watermark, just cropped out. The EXIF metadata of that file is also lost. What I am I asking you is to upload the versions before watermarking, not versions where the watermark is cropped out and the image is downsampled. Thanks, ★ Poké95 01:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- I no longer have the original ones. I searched, but could not find them. I changed cities and jobs recently and left a lot behind. Sorry, what do you recommend? I tried to update the ones that I had a similar version with no watermark. Thanks PumitasUNAM (talk) 19:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- I recommend reverting back to the watermarked version, since that one has higher quality (maybe, once I have access to my computer, I can make a lossless crop of it so that the watermark would be removed while the quality is not lost). Well, since my other colleagues above is confident that you are the copyright holder of those Samsung photos, then I will be confident too that you own those Samsung photos. Thanks, ★ Poké95 00:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- I reverted all back to their original files. What next steps would you recommend? Thank you very much for your time. I really appreciate it. Please let me know if I can help you in any way. Sorry about this. PumitasUNAM (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- The files that were taken by cameras other than Samsung should go through the OTRS process. Thanks, ★ Poké95 01:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. I already submitted email and received reply from them. ThanksPumitasUNAM (talk) 03:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Have you received an automated reply after you sent an email to the OTRS? Have you received an OTRS ticket number? If yes (to both questions), please add {{OTRS pending}} on all your files above (except for the Samsung photos, OTRS permission is not needed for them), so that this DR may be closed as kept and our OTRS volunteers will deal with this issue. Thanks, ★ Poké95 03:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- I got human replies. But no number. Sorry about these troubles. I think I learned how to handle photos on Wikipedia better through this.: upload original images and post information about cameras used. Sorry for taking your time in this learning process. Thank you PumitasUNAM (talk) 19:23, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- Human replies? Not automated? I think that's impossible for the OTRS system, since when you send an email to the OTRS, it should reply immediately (which is automated) with the ticket number. If you don't know what ticket number I am talking about, an example of a ticket number is #YEARXXXXXXXXXXXX. Thanks, ★ Poké95 09:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- I got replies from volunteer Andrzej Krzysztofowicz. I cannot find the automated email you mention. Not sure if it went to my spam and is now gone because it happened a few weeks ago. I emailed info-commons@wikimedia.org. Is this the correct address? If it is a lot of hassle I am fine with my photos being deleted and I upload new ones providing context in my profile. Let me know what is easiest. Thank you for your time.PumitasUNAM (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, so that's why you didn't received an automated reply from the OTRS, since you mailed the wrong address. The correct address is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. But I am wondering how you got replies from a volunteer, despite sending to the wrong address. I cannot even ask for the contents of the replies because I am not an OTRS volunteer and OTRS emails must be kept confidential. ★ Poké95 07:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I searched my email for that email you mentioned. I found my ticket number: [Ticket#: 2016102210003961]. I just realized I did email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Got the automatic reply from permissions (in a different thread) and then received an email from a volunteer from the info wikipedia account. I will add that information to the photos of the ticket number. Thank you. Sorry for taking your time with my mistakes. Thanks for all the feedback. PumitasUNAM (talk) 14:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, so that's why you didn't received an automated reply from the OTRS, since you mailed the wrong address. The correct address is permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. But I am wondering how you got replies from a volunteer, despite sending to the wrong address. I cannot even ask for the contents of the replies because I am not an OTRS volunteer and OTRS emails must be kept confidential. ★ Poké95 07:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- I got replies from volunteer Andrzej Krzysztofowicz. I cannot find the automated email you mention. Not sure if it went to my spam and is now gone because it happened a few weeks ago. I emailed info-commons@wikimedia.org. Is this the correct address? If it is a lot of hassle I am fine with my photos being deleted and I upload new ones providing context in my profile. Let me know what is easiest. Thank you for your time.PumitasUNAM (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Human replies? Not automated? I think that's impossible for the OTRS system, since when you send an email to the OTRS, it should reply immediately (which is automated) with the ticket number. If you don't know what ticket number I am talking about, an example of a ticket number is #YEARXXXXXXXXXXXX. Thanks, ★ Poké95 09:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes. I already submitted email and received reply from them. ThanksPumitasUNAM (talk) 03:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- The files that were taken by cameras other than Samsung should go through the OTRS process. Thanks, ★ Poké95 01:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- I reverted all back to their original files. What next steps would you recommend? Thank you very much for your time. I really appreciate it. Please let me know if I can help you in any way. Sorry about this. PumitasUNAM (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- I recommend reverting back to the watermarked version, since that one has higher quality (maybe, once I have access to my computer, I can make a lossless crop of it so that the watermark would be removed while the quality is not lost). Well, since my other colleagues above is confident that you are the copyright holder of those Samsung photos, then I will be confident too that you own those Samsung photos. Thanks, ★ Poké95 00:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Now that there is an OTRS email for this, I propose this should be closed as kept and dealt with an OTRS volunteer. @Taivo, Jameslwoodward, and Tortillovsky: What do you think? Thanks, ★ Poké95 00:26, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Yes. Sorry I am learning. I will prepare an email to Wikipedia Commons showing the evidence. I will also post here updates Thank you very much for your time in this.PumitasUNAM (talk) 12:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- Poké, Template:OTRS ticket is from a gmail account and could, therefore, be anyone. At the very least, I would like to see an OTRS permission from an account that is identifiable to X (I don't give the name in the e-mail for privacy reasons). According to X's personal Web page, that could be any of three universities or the Web page domain. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, nice find, thanks Jim. I was thinking of closing this DR as kept myself, and I am right that I should propose a closure instead. I am not an OTRS volunteer, so I won't see whether the email is from a valid address or not. PumitasUNAM could you solve this issue? As Jim said above, an email from a Gmail account can be anyone and is not verificable. Thanks, ★ Poké95 11:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- *Sorry, I did not understand this thread. Are you asking me to have a username that has my REAL NAME or to have an account that is associated to my WORK EMAIL? and if not, I am INVALID???? I believe I do not even have to give my real name to contribute to Wikipedia. That is actually one of the main reasons why Wikipedia succeeded and other parallel proyects did not. See Mako's work on Almost Wikipedia. How would I generate the TICKET number associated to this, if it was not me? I also gave all the details of what was going on in the emails. As a minority, I do not feel safe stating personal information about myself. I have experienced online harassment. PumitasUNAM (talk) 04:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- No, no, you don't have to give your real name nor any personal information here, and we strongly don't recommend you to do that here. You should do that instead in the OTRS email, since that is private information and it is 100% guaranteed that your information will be kept very private there, only available to our trusted, identified volunteers. Anyway, I saw a related case to this, where a user uses their Gmail account to send an email to the OTRS, and there was no problem with that. Jim, I think we should let the OTRS volunteers (which includes you) deal with this, and close this as kept. If permission is not confirmed after 30 days, this image may be deleted. Thanks, ★ Poké95 12:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- I would rather just keep it open and have PumitasUNAM promptly send another e-mail message to OTRS. I'm sorry for all this, but we do frequently get people who claim they are someone else in order to upload files to Commons that do not belong here. Therefore, we have the OTRS system, where people like you can privately confirm their real name and work. OTRS volunteers should never reveal a real name -- that is why I called you X above -- but at the moment, because the e-mail from X (your real name) came from a gmail account, we have no way of knowing that the person who sent the email is really X. If you send another e-mail to OTRS from a work account, that will be good confirmation. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- where I work has NOTHING to do with my participation on Wikipedia. Who cares even what my real name is? Asking me to link my WORK EMAIL with my Wikipedia editing is wrong. That hurts participation. I can see how having a practice where you require work verification to participate in Wikipedia can mean that many individuals will choose not to do so. Especially minorities, like Women or immigrants, who simply prefer to not cause any problems at their workplace and not have any of their work information linked to activities they do for leisure in their free time. Please show me the rule that says that I can only participate in Wikipedia if I use my work email. I am very very worried if you have been doing this practice because it hurts the participation of the less powerful, of minorities. Sad.PumitasUNAM (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- PumitasUNAM, not only here you’ve made your concerns known regarding inequality;[12] you are not the only one who wants a better world, believe me, and even if Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons "were" ;) imperfect, -not to diminish the importance of equality- that is not the point of discussion here, and it is not the matter at hand or what needs to be resolved at this moment. What I see is your good intention of contributing photographs, yet questions still remain; IMO Jim is a volunteer who is doing his due diligence, and has a legitimate proposal or request; you are always welcome to propose changes, so there is no need to get worked-up or to read subtext that might not even be there. (Not previously mentioned: women and minorities who are self-employed and have their own businesses; immigrants who have others working for them... ). Cheers. Tortillovsky (talk) 02:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Tortillovsky Thanks for the guidance, patience and help. Thank you everyone also. Thanks Poké95 for explaining everything. Greatly appreciated. PumitasUNAM (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- PumitasUNAM, not only here you’ve made your concerns known regarding inequality;[12] you are not the only one who wants a better world, believe me, and even if Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons "were" ;) imperfect, -not to diminish the importance of equality- that is not the point of discussion here, and it is not the matter at hand or what needs to be resolved at this moment. What I see is your good intention of contributing photographs, yet questions still remain; IMO Jim is a volunteer who is doing his due diligence, and has a legitimate proposal or request; you are always welcome to propose changes, so there is no need to get worked-up or to read subtext that might not even be there. (Not previously mentioned: women and minorities who are self-employed and have their own businesses; immigrants who have others working for them... ). Cheers. Tortillovsky (talk) 02:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- where I work has NOTHING to do with my participation on Wikipedia. Who cares even what my real name is? Asking me to link my WORK EMAIL with my Wikipedia editing is wrong. That hurts participation. I can see how having a practice where you require work verification to participate in Wikipedia can mean that many individuals will choose not to do so. Especially minorities, like Women or immigrants, who simply prefer to not cause any problems at their workplace and not have any of their work information linked to activities they do for leisure in their free time. Please show me the rule that says that I can only participate in Wikipedia if I use my work email. I am very very worried if you have been doing this practice because it hurts the participation of the less powerful, of minorities. Sad.PumitasUNAM (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- I would rather just keep it open and have PumitasUNAM promptly send another e-mail message to OTRS. I'm sorry for all this, but we do frequently get people who claim they are someone else in order to upload files to Commons that do not belong here. Therefore, we have the OTRS system, where people like you can privately confirm their real name and work. OTRS volunteers should never reveal a real name -- that is why I called you X above -- but at the moment, because the e-mail from X (your real name) came from a gmail account, we have no way of knowing that the person who sent the email is really X. If you send another e-mail to OTRS from a work account, that will be good confirmation. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- No, no, you don't have to give your real name nor any personal information here, and we strongly don't recommend you to do that here. You should do that instead in the OTRS email, since that is private information and it is 100% guaranteed that your information will be kept very private there, only available to our trusted, identified volunteers. Anyway, I saw a related case to this, where a user uses their Gmail account to send an email to the OTRS, and there was no problem with that. Jim, I think we should let the OTRS volunteers (which includes you) deal with this, and close this as kept. If permission is not confirmed after 30 days, this image may be deleted. Thanks, ★ Poké95 12:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- *Sorry, I did not understand this thread. Are you asking me to have a username that has my REAL NAME or to have an account that is associated to my WORK EMAIL? and if not, I am INVALID???? I believe I do not even have to give my real name to contribute to Wikipedia. That is actually one of the main reasons why Wikipedia succeeded and other parallel proyects did not. See Mako's work on Almost Wikipedia. How would I generate the TICKET number associated to this, if it was not me? I also gave all the details of what was going on in the emails. As a minority, I do not feel safe stating personal information about myself. I have experienced online harassment. PumitasUNAM (talk) 04:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, nice find, thanks Jim. I was thinking of closing this DR as kept myself, and I am right that I should propose a closure instead. I am not an OTRS volunteer, so I won't see whether the email is from a valid address or not. PumitasUNAM could you solve this issue? As Jim said above, an email from a Gmail account can be anyone and is not verificable. Thanks, ★ Poké95 11:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- Poké, Template:OTRS ticket is from a gmail account and could, therefore, be anyone. At the very least, I would like to see an OTRS permission from an account that is identifiable to X (I don't give the name in the e-mail for privacy reasons). According to X's personal Web page, that could be any of three universities or the Web page domain. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
- PumitasUNAM, it seems you misunderstood Jim's comment above. You don't need to use your work email to participate on Wikimedia sites. In fact, you don't have to link your email to your account (it is optional). What Jim's saying above is to use your work email to send an email to the OTRS for verification, not using your work email for participation in Wikimedia sites. Thanks, ★ Poké95 11:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- I think it is wrong to have to use a work email to communicate with OTRS. You are forcing people to link their Wikipedia editing with their professional activities. This can limit people's participation. Especially of newcomers who might make mistakes while editing Wikipedia but they do not want to have any problems at work. Having your editing linked to your job makes the risk of participation high. What if I am editing things related to LGBT, add relevant pictures, but make some mistakes while editing and OTRS contacts me and my employer. Maybe my employer was unaware that I have extensive LGBT knowledge. Maybe because of this I lose my job. I can think of numerous examples where this practice could cause a person problems. I would not risk my job to edit Wikipedia, even though sharing knowledge is important to me. I am new and I know I will make mistakes. Wikipedia is a very complicated community with complex norms. Would I want to risk my job because I am new? NO. This can happen to many individuals. It is sad because this practice of forcing us to communicate with OTRS with a work email will limit the participation of new people who do not know the rules in detail. Also what happens if you don't have a formal job with an email address? You can't defend yourself with OTRS? Are your edits invalid because you are unemployed? What if you are a housewife and just have your personal email? or a person with an illegal job. So you can't share and defend your contributions to Wikipedia because your life is "invalid"? This practice of having to use work emails to communicate with OTRS privileges people with formal jobs who understand the Wikipedia community in detail and are not scared of making a mistake that could cost them their job. This leaves everybody else out of editing Wikipedia and defending their work. That makes me sad. PumitasUNAM (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- (OTRS Agent) PumitasUNAM has sent the requested email from an official address needed to verify their identity. I would like to comment that this is not about a requirement for identification to participate in Wikimedia projects, but instead a need to verify identity solely for the purpose of copyright licensing, and that access to the OTRS system is restricted to volunteers who have signed a confidentiality agreement. I have left a note in the OTRS system asking that you only be communicated with, if needed in the future in relation to this ticket, via your personal email address, and your work email is not 'indexed' by the system in connection to your Wikimedia account. 22:57, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- I think it is wrong to have to use a work email to communicate with OTRS. You are forcing people to link their Wikipedia editing with their professional activities. This can limit people's participation. Especially of newcomers who might make mistakes while editing Wikipedia but they do not want to have any problems at work. Having your editing linked to your job makes the risk of participation high. What if I am editing things related to LGBT, add relevant pictures, but make some mistakes while editing and OTRS contacts me and my employer. Maybe my employer was unaware that I have extensive LGBT knowledge. Maybe because of this I lose my job. I can think of numerous examples where this practice could cause a person problems. I would not risk my job to edit Wikipedia, even though sharing knowledge is important to me. I am new and I know I will make mistakes. Wikipedia is a very complicated community with complex norms. Would I want to risk my job because I am new? NO. This can happen to many individuals. It is sad because this practice of forcing us to communicate with OTRS with a work email will limit the participation of new people who do not know the rules in detail. Also what happens if you don't have a formal job with an email address? You can't defend yourself with OTRS? Are your edits invalid because you are unemployed? What if you are a housewife and just have your personal email? or a person with an illegal job. So you can't share and defend your contributions to Wikipedia because your life is "invalid"? This practice of having to use work emails to communicate with OTRS privileges people with formal jobs who understand the Wikipedia community in detail and are not scared of making a mistake that could cost them their job. This leaves everybody else out of editing Wikipedia and defending their work. That makes me sad. PumitasUNAM (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- PumitasUNAM, a couple of questions about the picture of Daniel Vargas playing with Mexico's national volleyball team[13] … 1) did you take the picture “File:Volleyball UNAM.jpg”?/Are you the copyright holder of the photograph? and 2)have you provided proof that permission has been granted, so it may be used?[14][15] I want to add the template[16] for “personality rights”, and it states that the image has been “freely licensed” or that it is in the “public domain”, so I haven't placed it. Thank you all for all your help and valuable contributions. Tortillovsky (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- I emailed OTRS and explained the issue. I removed the photograph from the article. Sorry if I made mistakes. ThanksPumitasUNAM (talk) 18:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- PumitasUNAM, a couple of questions about the picture of Daniel Vargas playing with Mexico's national volleyball team[13] … 1) did you take the picture “File:Volleyball UNAM.jpg”?/Are you the copyright holder of the photograph? and 2)have you provided proof that permission has been granted, so it may be used?[14][15] I want to add the template[16] for “personality rights”, and it states that the image has been “freely licensed” or that it is in the “public domain”, so I haven't placed it. Thank you all for all your help and valuable contributions. Tortillovsky (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- PumitasUNAM, thanks for your reply. I’m interpreting the removal of the picture from the articles as: no permission has been granted for usage of this photograph; please clarify if this is an incorrect assertion. Thanks. Tortillovsky (talk) 21:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC).
- No. That is incorrect. I emailed OTRS as was requested with clarification. This was a courtesy photo given to us by Federacion Mexicana de Voleibol. What is the best way to state this? From what I understood it is better to have them sign the OTRS form? thanks PumitasUNAM (talk) 20:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- ok. Thanks for the clarification. Tortillovsky (talk) 05:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- No. That is incorrect. I emailed OTRS as was requested with clarification. This was a courtesy photo given to us by Federacion Mexicana de Voleibol. What is the best way to state this? From what I understood it is better to have them sign the OTRS form? thanks PumitasUNAM (talk) 20:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- PumitasUNAM, thanks for your reply. I’m interpreting the removal of the picture from the articles as: no permission has been granted for usage of this photograph; please clarify if this is an incorrect assertion. Thanks. Tortillovsky (talk) 21:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC).
Kept Samsung photos: To move this DR forward, I have marked all Samsung photos as and stroke them from the DR as above. The other photos still need confirmation via an OTRS volunteer. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: the rest per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry I had a big workload. Why are they being deleted? I received email from OTRS. They said I should only deleted the volleyball one. I am doing that now. What nomintation happened?PumitasUNAM (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wellcome DR request for RAMC
[edit]Nominated from a list provided by the Wellcome Library on behalf of the Royal Army Medical Corps (RAMC), the original source of the images. The copyright of the files has been changed by the Wellcome to CC-BY-NC-ND. The list requires a more detailed review and discussion, as some images are public domain by age or otherwise ineligible for a copyright claim by the RAMC. I suggest where there may be a rationale to keep, this is added to the full bulleted list below and there is a presumption that any without comment will be deleted.
As this is a complex mass deletion nomination, I suggest more than the conventional 7 days are allowed before closure, depending on how many volunteers take part in helping to review copyrights. Note that not all photographs or documents in the list were first published in the UK. --Fæ (talk) 22:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Addenda
- The images were uploaded, mostly by me, with CC-BY licenses. As these were incorrect, for any image to be kept, it should be replaced with a public domain license if there is a rationale for one. Possible licenses which have been used include {{PD-UKGov}}, {{PD-old-auto-1996}}, {{PD-UK-unknown}}, {{PD-old-100-1923}}. Please remove images from the maintenance category whenever this is completed.
- Where references of the form RAMC <number> are available, these are catalogued at http://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b19255251. --Fæ (talk) 10:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
File list
[edit]- Al
[edit]- RAMC 738-8 File:"Our Allies" Wellcome L0045172.jpg
- Keep France 1914, unknown photographer, so public domain as copyright has expired. --Fæ (talk) 07:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1287 File:"Sister Pretty departing"; Boer war nurse, c. 1900 Wellcome L0024927.jpg
- Keep Dated by the RAMC as circa.1900, we can do a little better. Sister Pretty appears in an edition of The Lancet, August 1900, in a report received 13th August 1900. This states that Sister Pretty (and two other nurses) were leaving Africa after Pretty's convalescence from enteric fever (typhoid). This gives a likely date of July 1900 for the photograph or more conservatively July/August 1900. The photographer is unknown so copyright expired by 1950 (or earlier) under the pre-1996 50 year rule. --Fæ (talk) 08:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 866 File:'A futurist's impression; The receiving hall' Wellcome L0046113.jpg
- Keep Lithograph by Christopher R. W. Nevinson (d. October 7, 1946), made while he was hospital staff. The print was in 1915, published in a gazette that it is unlikely that the RAMC legally represents. This is either already public domain by the 70 year rule, or it will be on 1st January 2017. I don't believe deletion and undeletion a couple of months later is worth it for a hypothetical issue of a scan of a 1915 publication. --Fæ (talk) 10:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1218-1 File:'Back from the Trenches' Wellcome L0045305.jpg
- Keep 1917 press photo cut & pasted from newspaper print in a scrapbook, unknown photographer. Public domain by age. The added-value of simple handwritten signatures and dates is not copyrightable under UK law. --Fæ (talk) 10:50, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 801-22 File:'Muniment Collection' Wellcome L0027267.jpg
- Keep Unknown photographer, possibly a press photo, 1916. PD by age. --Fæ (talk) 11:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 866 File:'Night Arrival of Wounded' Wellcome L0046107.jpg
- Keep per #L0046113; lithograph by Nevinson. --Fæ (talk) 11:12, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1882 File:'Shell Shock'; image from 'The Fourth' magazine Wellcome L0046100.jpg
- Question J.P.D. Hewitt does not appear in the IWM collections or anywhere obvious as a war artist. However this drawing by him when resident in hospital in 1916, has been republished in a couple of books in recent times as an important early depiction of shell shock. The death date of the artist is not in the Wellcome catalogue. --Fæ (talk) 11:26, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1660-2 File:13th Field Ambulance and Drivers, 1939 Wellcome L0028814.jpg
- Keep Unknown photographer, dated 1939, so public domain per the 70 year rule. --Fæ (talk) 11:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1992-1 File:17th Field Ambulance Wellcome L0027210.jpg
- Keep Unknown photographer, dated 1918, so public domain per the 70 year rule. --Fæ (talk) 11:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1267-2 File:20th Company, RAMC, at Military Hospital, Tidworth, Wilts Wellcome L0047743.jpg
- Keep 1937, photographers were Gale & Polden, who were subject to a takeover in 1981. Public domain as copyright expired under the 70 year rule, based on an anonymous photographer. --Fæ (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1273-6 File:3 x watercolour sketches entitled 'Cape of Good Hope' Wellcome L0047913.jpg
- Keep 1867 publication, clearly PD. The artist died in 1918 at the grand age of 84. --Fæ (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1273-6 File:3 x watercolour sketches; 'Malay' 'Kaffir Woman' 'Hottentot' Wellcome L0047914.jpg
- Keep per #L0047913. --Fæ (talk) 12:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1017 File:33 Company RAMC Sergeants' Mess; Major Webberley's photos. Wellcome L0024930.jpg
- Question No date given, though from the style it may have been taken around the WW1 period, and it's unclear if Webberley is the photographer or a collector. --Fæ (talk) 19:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1779 File:3rd Division Field Hygiene Section, RAMC Wellcome L0024133.jpg
- Delete Date given as 30s and 40s and unknown photographer. However there is a reference to Operation Shoveller in Jordan, which is contradictory as this was in 1970. Sufficient doubt for copyright to be a concern, unless more information turns up. --Fæ (talk) 19:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- It is indeed Operation Shoveller from 1970. The photograph dates to ~4th October 1970, when the 3rd Division Field Hygiene Section were deployed on "Environmental sanitary tasks and assistance to the local public health system". 8 personnel, three Land Rovers and two trailers were delivered from Cyprus to Amman by Hercules C-130. There's an article in the Journal of the RAMC describing that one photograph, available at doi: 10.1136/jramc-117-02-04 should anybody be interested. Nick (talk) 16:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep 1915, anonymous photographer so PD by age. --Fæ (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- File:67th General Hospital Jeanne D'Arc, N.Africa Wellcome L0028952.jpg
- Delete 1943, credited to "Griffin" with no other information. --Fæ (talk) 12:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- File:67th General Hospital Jeanne D'Arc, N.Africa Wellcome L0028953.jpg
- Delete per #L0028952. --Fæ (talk) 12:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- File:67th General Hospital Jeanne D'Arc, N.Africa Wellcome L0028954.jpg
- Delete 1945, per #L0028952. --Fæ (talk) 12:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 545 File:A Field Kitchen during World War One Wellcome L0038437.jpg
- kept 1914-18, anonymous photographer so PD by age. --Ruthven (msg) 22:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 2005 File:A pictorial history of the Royal Army Medical Corps Wellcome L0027214.jpg
- Keep WW1 photograph during active service, recording Frontline casualty evacuation. PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 2005 File:A pictorial history of the Royal Army Medical Corps Wellcome L0027215.jpg
- Keep WW1 photograph during active service, recording Frontline casualty evacuation. PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 2005 File:A pictorial history of the Royal Army Medical Corps Wellcome L0027216.jpg
- Keep WW1 photograph during active service, recording Frontline casualty evacuation. PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 2005 File:A pictorial history of the Royal Army Medical Corps Wellcome L0046811.jpg
- Delete Apparent archivist notes, typewritten. There are likely to have been created by Keith Leonard, Museum Technician of the RAMC Museum, after 1960. --Fæ (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Al - Au
[edit]- RAMC 850 File:Album belonging to Lieutenant Colonel G.W.G. Hughes, RAMC. Wellcome L0023433.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Album of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028919.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Album of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028920.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Album of Sergeant George Charles Maidment. Wellcome L0028918.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Album of Sergeant George Charles Maidment. Wellcome L0028921.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:An Indian Doolie Wellcome L0029552.jpg
- RAMC 738-10 File:An operating theatre . Wellcome L0025831.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Archiefold & co, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034379.jpg
- RAMC 446-13 File:Army Medical Services. Wellcome L0027268.jpg
- RAMC 1139 File:Army surgical staff, Calcutta 1861. Wellcome L0019767.jpg
- File:Artemisia annua, Artemisinin, ACTs and Malaria Control in Africa- Tradition, Science and Public Policy.pdf
- RAMC 2089-1 File:Arterial injuries, wounds, RAMC 2089-1 Wellcome L0024700.jpg
- RAMC 2089-1 File:Arterial injuries, wounds, RAMC 2089-1 Wellcome L0024702.jpg
- RAMC 2089-1 File:Arterial injuries, wounds, RAMC 2089-1 Wellcome L0024703.jpg
- File:Audtor General report Canada1946.pdf
- File:Australian despatch rider at Gallipoli Wellcome L0045171.jpg
B
[edit]- RAMC 1746-1 File:Back of a postcard photo of G E Essex and regiment taken 1917 Wellcome L0051445.jpg
- RAMC 1746-1 File:Back of a postcard photograph of G E Essex and regiment Wellcome L0051447.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Back of postcard showing an operating theatre Wellcome L0063685.jpg
- RAMC 1916-2 File:Band of the Royal Army Medical Corp. Hastings. Wellcome L0046806.jpg
- delete photographer died 1954 undelete 2025 [17] Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- RAMC 801-22 File:Base - general hospital Wellcome L0024139.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Base - general hospital, Mytchett Collection Wellcome L0024159.jpg
- RAMC 1197-1 File:Base School of Sanitation, Salonika Wellcome L0038435.jpg
- RAMC 1015-5 File:Belfry of Ypres Wellcome L0049544.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Benjamin Disraeli Margarison of Richmond, Virginia. Wellcome L0025832.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Benjamin Disraeli Margerison photographic album. Wellcome L0025593.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Benjamin Disraeli Margerison photographic album. Wellcome L0025594.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Benjamin Disraeli Margerison photographic album. Wellcome L0025595.jpg
- File:Bethulie Bridge; RAMC O-S-35-738-2 Wellcome L0022429.jpg
- RAMC 1259-2 File:Black soldier with nurse Wellcome L0045173.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Blood transfusion Wellcome L0024143.jpg
- Keep Archive date gives maximum possible age of 1960 and subject appears WW2 period. As an army photograph PD-UKGov applies for photographs created before 1957. --Fæ (talk) 07:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Blueprints of a field stretcher. Wellcome L0028053.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Boer Doctors Wellcome L0029547.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Boer Doctors, RAMC; 1533-1-2 Wellcome L0023810.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Breakspear going to Hospital, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034382.jpg
- RAMC 522 File:Brig.-Gen. R. Griffith & staff, 1886 Wellcome L0051202.jpg
- RAMC 374 File:British army medical staff in Malta hospital records Wellcome L0025858.jpg
- RAMC 374 File:British army medical staff in Malta hospital records Wellcome L0025859.jpg
- RAMC 374 File:British army medical staff in Malta hospital records Wellcome L0025860.jpg
- RAMC 374 File:British army medical staff in Malta hospital reports Wellcome L0025856.jpg
- RAMC 374 File:British army medical staff in Malta hospital reports Wellcome L0025857.jpg
- RAMC 2014 File:British Army Water Purification Wellcome L0027067.jpg
- RAMC 2014 File:British Army; Water Chlorination lorry. Wellcome L0027068.jpg
- RAMC 1924-10 File:British Guns and 39th Casualty Clearing Station... Wellcome L0072101.jpg
- RAMC 1924-10 File:British Guns and 39th Casualty Clearing Station... Wellcome L0072102.jpg
- RAMC 1405 File:British Militarty Hospital, RAMC; 1405 Wellcome L0024136.jpg
- RAMC 1744 File:British Military Hospital, Rinteln, West Germany Wellcome L0024163.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Burgher Scouts Wellcome L0029546.jpg
- File:Burning and Looting; RAMC O-S-35-738-5 Wellcome L0022431.jpg
C
[edit]- RAMC 1259-3 File:C. O. & James, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034381.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Camp inspection Wellcome L0024145.jpg
- RAMC 466-48 File:Campaign against syphilis, 1943-44; poster Wellcome L0025270.jpg
- RAMC 466-48 File:Campaign against syphilis, 1943-44; poster Wellcome L0050379.jpg
- RAMC 1656 File:Captain James Crawford Kennedy Wellcome L0023275.jpg
- RAMC 1856-1 File:Cartoon 'Check your calculations Jones...' Wellcome L0030832.jpg
- RAMC 1856-1 File:Cartoon 'Damn thing's shorting somewhere' Wellcome L0030830.jpg
- RAMC 1856-1 File:Cartoon 'They're discussing your case now' Wellcome L0030831.jpg
- RAMC 1127-1 File:Cartoon showing a nurse trying to massage a male patient Wellcome L0046097.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoon showing; 'A patient's point of view' Wellcome L0046114.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoon; 'Labour-Saving devices (continued)' Wellcome L0046117.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoon; 'On Coming Round' Wellcome L0046116.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoon; 'Some little-known departments of the 3rd L.G.H' Wellcome L0046111.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoon; 'The things we hope to see - if the war lasts...' Wellcome L0046108.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoons; '3rd LGH labour-saving devices...' Wellcome L0046115.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoons; 'A Day at the 3rd LGH' Wellcome L0046109.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Cartoons; 'An army in training; exercises of the RAMC...' Wellcome L0046110.jpg
- RAMC 2014 File:Case Water Testing Sterilisation 1917 Pattern. Wellcome L0027064.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Casualties on stretchers Wellcome L0024141.jpg
- RAMC 389-3 File:Certificate to Captain John Smith McCombe Wellcome L0046126.jpg
- RAMC 1444-8 File:Christmas card from George Yates Wellcome L0063428.jpg
- RAMC 1015-5 File:Christmas Postcard Wellcome L0049547.jpg
- RAMC 1015-5 File:Christmas Postcard Wellcome L0049548.jpg
- RAMC 1015-5 File:Church of St Martin Wellcome L0049545.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Cockrell, Wilson & co, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034380.jpg
- RAMC 1168 File:Col. A. M. Davies Wellcome L0025685.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Col. W Johnston (from Prof E. Parkes' Album) Wellcome L0031904.jpg
- RAMC 358 File:Collection of cuttings re the war in South Africa, 1899-1902 Wellcome L0023817.jpg
- RAMC 358 File:Collection of cuttings re the war in South Africa, 1899-1902 Wellcome L0023818.jpg
- File:Commandant Potgeiter, killed in action, RAMC O-S-35-738-3 Wellcome L0022428.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Company Cook house, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034375.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Company of men, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034383.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Completed iron blockhouse Wellcome L0029556.jpg
D
[edit]- RAMC 1259-3 File:Dannatt I. Officer, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034377.jpg
- RAMC 397 File:Diagram of a respirator used to filter and purify air Wellcome L0041517.jpg
- RAMC 397 File:Diagram of an experimental ventilation system Wellcome L0041516.jpg
- RAMC 761-1 File:Diagram of litter to carry 2 patients Wellcome L0045236.jpg
- RAMC 761-1 File:Diagram of litters and travois Wellcome L0045235.jpg
- RAMC 1767-4 File:Diagram of oil cooker for 125 men Wellcome L0068377.jpg
- RAMC 480-3 File:Diagram plan of Number 6 General Hospital Wellcome L0025598.jpg
- RAMC 589 File:Diagram showing system of evacuation of wounded Wellcome L0045238.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028910.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028911.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028912.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028914.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028915.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028916.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment Wellcome L0028917.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of Sergeant George Charles Maidment. Wellcome L0028913.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Diary of the Seige of Ladysmith Wellcome L0026463.jpg
- RAMC 1011-1 File:Diary of the Seige of Ladysmith, South Africa. Wellcome L0021294.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Dir. Gen. JTC Ross (from Prof. E. Parkes' al Wellcome L0031905.jpg
- RAMC 391-3 File:Disposition & troop movements during charge of Light Brigade Wellcome L0049880.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Doctor and a group of Greek children at Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034233.jpg
- RAMC 466-3 File:Doctors in training Wellcome L0044175.jpg
- RAMC 466-3 File:Doctors in training Wellcome L0044176.jpg
- File:Dr. Hisakichi Tokida Wellcome L0023361.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Dr. James Barry's headstone., Kensal Green Cemetery Wellcome L0022262.jpg
- Keep Catalogue entry http://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b18358925 gives a maximum date of 1899 for the photograph. Barry died in 1865, so the possibly date of the photograph is 1865-1899. The photographer is not given, so PD-UK-unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 592 File:Dracaena Tessellata Wellcome L0049834.jpg
- RAMC 866 File:Drawing of 'An Anzac Convalescent' Wellcome L0046112.jpg
- RAMC 516 File:Drawing of a man in 18th century costume Wellcome L0067862.jpg
- RAMC 603 File:Drawing of Essex Farm, RAMC-603 (Vol. 2) Wellcome L0074440.jpg
- Keep Before 1917, part of plans for Battle of the Somme. PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 07:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 2002 File:Drawing, "Recruiting Office" Wellcome L0023555.jpg
E
[edit]- RAMC 1259-3 File:E. L. G. and Doctor in a train at Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034232.jpg
- File:Edgar Wallace c1900.jpg
- Keep The image is taken between 1898 and 1902 by an unknown photographer. out of copyright both in the source country and in the U.S. Materialscientist (talk) 22:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1924-20 File:England amateur football team of 1914 Wellcome L0019776.jpg
- RAMC 1015-5 File:English Infantry Wellcome L0049546.jpg
- RAMC 761-1 File:Evacuation diagram Wellcome L0045237.jpg
- RAMC 446-18 File:Extracts from the proceedings of a court of enquiry Wellcome L0027269.jpg
- RAMC 446-18 File:Extracts from the proceedings of a court of enquiry. Wellcome L0027270.jpg
- RAMC 446-18 File:Extracts from the proceedings of a court of enquiry. Wellcome L0027271.jpg
- RAMC 446-18 File:Extracts from the proceedings of a court of enquiry. Wellcome L0027272.jpg
F
[edit]- File:F. Nightingale, Notes on hospitals. Wellcome L0023807.jpg
- File:Farm Burning; RAMC O-S-35-738-5 Wellcome L0022432.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Field ambulance Removing the patient after surgical attention Wellcome L0046104.jpg
- RAMC 466-48 File:File re venereal disease amongst Allied troops in Italy. Wellcome L0023970.jpg
- RAMC 1924-19 File:Football programme for the match between France and England Wellcome L0019777.jpg
- RAMC 1444-8 File:Front of a Christmas card from George Yates Wellcome L0063427.jpg
G
[edit]- RAMC 1759-7 File:General George James Guthrie Wellcome L0044570.jpg
- Keep Artwork created in 1863, so under UK law the work must be public domain and the photograph can be considered a faithful reproduction. --Fæ (talk) 23:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 362 File:General ground plan of the British Hospital at Arenkoi Wellcome L0025485.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:General hospital, ward, The Mytchett Collection Wellcome L0024158.jpg
- RAMC 516 File:George Bruce's notes Wellcome L0068868.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:George MacDonald by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023575.jpg
- RAMC 1444-10 File:George Yates army demobilisation certificate Wellcome L0063424.jpg
- RAMC 1444-10 File:George Yates army demobilisation certificate Wellcome L0063425.jpg
- RAMC 703 File:Grandstand at Colombo Racecourse Wellcome L0051047.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Greek children playing in the street, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034231.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Greek Priest and Villager, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034229.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Greek villagers at H. Q. Billet, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034230.jpg
- RAMC 1701-3 File:Group of patients at Whamcliff, 1919. Wellcome L0030461.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Group photo of 28 Motor Ambulance Convoy, Rawalpindi, India. Wellcome L0030438.jpg
- RAMC 1444-4 File:Group photograph of 1st Home Counties ... Wellcome L0063414.jpg
- RAMC 1444-4 File:Group photograph of 1st Home Counties ... Wellcome L0063415.jpg
- RAMC 1444-2 File:Group photograph of 67th (T) Home Counties ... Wellcome L0063410.jpg
- RAMC 1444-2 File:Group photograph of 67th (T) Home Counties ... Wellcome L0063412.jpg
- RAMC 1444-3 File:Group photograph of K section... Wellcome L0063413.jpg
- RAMC 1246 File:Group photograph of some of the staff, St. George's Hospital Wellcome L0064611.jpg
- RAMC 1444-5 File:Group photograph of the Sanitary Section football team Wellcome L0063416.jpg
- File:Group photograph possibly taken near the race course, Columbo Wellcome L0048624.jpg
- File:Group photograph possibly taken near the race course, Columbo Wellcome L0048625.jpg
- RAMC 2064-1 File:Group photograph-Junior and Senior officers Wellcome L0051792.jpg
- RAMC 2064-1 File:Group Photograph-Junior and Senior Officers Wellcome L0051793.jpg
- RAMC 2064-1 File:Group Photograph-Junior Officers Wellcome L0051794.jpg
- RAMC 2064-1 File:Group Photograph-Junior Officers Wellcome L0051795.jpg
- RAMC 2064-8 File:Group photograph-Radiographer classes Wellcome L0051797.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Group photographs Wellcome L0050803.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Group photographs Wellcome L0050804.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Group photographs Wellcome L0051791.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Gun in Bush Wellcome L0029548.jpg
H
[edit]- RAMC 1259-3 File:H. Q. Billet, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034378.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:William Hartgill by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023576.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Head Quarters. mess moving to mound, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034384.jpg
- RAMC 651-3 File:Health Hints; RAMC; 651-3 Wellcome L0024824.jpg
- RAMC 651-3 File:Health Quiz, RAMC; 651-3 Wellcome L0024826.jpg
- RAMC 990 File:Home Counties Field Ambulance. Wellcome L0030462.jpg
- RAMC 2014 File:Horrocks Steriliser (semi-diagrammatic) Wellcome L0027063.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Howitzer blown up at Ladysmith (above) Wellcome L0029557.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Howitzer blown up at Ladysmith (below) Wellcome L0029558.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Hugh William Cairns by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023568.jpg
- RAMC 389-2 File:Humane Soc. Certificate to Captain John Smith McCombe Wellcome L0046128.jpg
- RAMC 557 File:Huts, No. 1 General Hospital, Wynburg. Wellcome L0034440.jpg
I
[edit]- RAMC 222 File:Illuminated poems in Persian. Wellcome L0027565.jpg
- keep c. 1850 work = PD-old Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- RAMC 222 File:Illuminated poems in Persian. Wellcome L0027566.jpg
- keep c. 1850 work = PD-old Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- RAMC 801-22 File:Illustration of uniform of a Sergeant, Army Hospital Corps Wellcome L0025703.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:INSTITUTIONS; Medical staff of Gibraltar Wellcome L0032205.jpg
- RAMC 397 File:Instructions on the preparation of Edwards' Preserved Potato Wellcome L0068378.jpg
- Keep Bruce died in 1931. PD-old-auto-1996 applies. --Fæ (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 738 File:Interior of Raadzaal, Bloemfontein; Boer War Wellcome L0024965.jpg
- RAMC 738 File:Interior of Raadzaal; 5th stationary hospital, March 1900 Wellcome L0024966.jpg
J
[edit]- RAMC 801-6 File:James Barry, with his dog, Psyche, and his servant Wellcome L0020605.jpg
- Keep PD-70 applies. Photograph taken in 1860s by photographers recorded elsewhere as "Adolphe Duperly and Sons". The last known photographs taken by the photography firm are recorded as c.1920, though these are unlikely to have been by the same active photographer, but their descendents. --Fæ (talk) 20:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Joseph Fayrer RAMC 198
[edit]The following 3 images are from RAMC 198, described as 7 volumes (numbered 5-11) of Sir Joseph Fayrer's "notes of interesting cases in the Medical College & Hospital (at Calcutta)", in chronological order and are dated 1862-1871. Joseph Fayrer died in 1907.
- RAMC 198-5 File:Joseph Fayrer's casebook showing patient with nasal polypi Wellcome L0045485.jpg
- Keep PD-100 applies. --Fæ (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 198-5 File:Joseph Fayrer's casebook showing patient with nasal polypi Wellcome L0045486.jpg
- Keep PD-100 applies. --Fæ (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 198-5 File:Joseph Fayrer's casebook showing patient with nasal polypi Wellcome L0045487.jpg
- Keep PD-100 applies. --Fæ (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
K
[edit]- RAMC 1647-1 File:King George Hospital, ward (c. 1915-1918) Wellcome L0024172.jpg
- RAMC 1647-1 File:King George Hospital, ward (c. 1915-1918) Wellcome L0024173.jpg
L
[edit]- RAMC 801-22 File:Laboratory work, Mytchett Collection Wellcome L0024150.jpg
- RAMC 801-14 File:Lance Corporal JJ Farmer, VC (in civilian clothes). Wellcome L0027775.jpg
- RAMC 801-14 File:Lance Corporal JJ Farmer, VC. Wellcome L0027774.jpg
- File:Letitia Fairfield (1885-1978) Wellcome L0034542.jpg
- File:Letitia Fairfield (1885-1978) Wellcome L0034543.jpg
- File:Letitia Fairfield (1885-1978) Wellcome L0034544.jpg
- RAMC 1759-5 File:Letter from General Guthrie to his daughter, Anne Guthrie Wellcome L0047662.jpg
- RAMC 1425 File:Lieutenant Colonel Arthur C. Devereux in front of pyramids Wellcome L0024166.jpg
- RAMC 2081 File:Lieutenant Colonel H. T. Minden Wilson's photograph album. Wellcome L0023194.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Lieutenant Colonel J. Courtenay Haslett with staff in India Wellcome L0023436.jpg
- File:Lieutenant General Sir Alfred Keogh Wellcome L0023326.jpg
- RAMC 1924-10 File:Lieutenant-Colonel Herbert Mark Prince Wellcome L0028534.jpg
- RAMC 1924-1 File:Lieutenant-Colonel Herbert Mark Prince Wellcome L0028535.jpg
- RAMC 1924 File:Lieutenant-Colonel Herbert Mark Prince. Wellcome L0028532.jpg
- RAMC 1924-10 File:Lieutenant-Colonel Herbert Mark Prince. Wellcome L0028533.jpg
- RAMC 1924-1 File:Lieutenant-Colonel Herbert Mark Prince. Wellcome L0028536.jpg
- RAMC 480-4 File:Loose photographs; pictures of the South African campaign Wellcome L0020956.jpg
- RAMC 480-4 File:Loose photographs; pictures of the South African campaign. Wellcome L0020957.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Looting a farmhouse Wellcome L0029551.jpg
- RAMC 1224 File:Lt. J.F. Ford and Bugler J.F. Ford, Egypt, 1915 Wellcome L0024923.jpg
M
[edit]- RAMC 1259-1 File:Machine Gun Post Wellcome L0045179.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Major General Leo Poole by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023569.jpg
- RAMC 843 File:Major J.M. Adam outside his tent; WW2 Wellcome L0024974.jpg
- File:Major John Lindsay Leckie Wellcome L0071548.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Major John Waring Belcher Wellcome L0025700.jpg
- RAMC 738 File:Major Tucky and Nurses; Boer War Wellcome L0024967.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Making an iron blockhouse (1) Wellcome L0029554.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Making an iron blockhouse (2) Wellcome L0029555.jpg
- RAMC 1138-1 File:Map of 'South African Republic' Wellcome L0021298.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Medical officer of Army Medical Staff. Wellcome L0025701.jpg
- RAMC 2005 File:Medical staff corps band, 1897 Wellcome L0046808.jpg
- RAMC 2005 File:Medical staff corps. Royal parade. Aldershot. Wellcome L0046807.jpg
- RAMC 1924-1 File:Memorabilia of Lieutenant-Colonel Herbert Mark Prince Wellcome L0028537.jpg
- RAMC 801-7 File:Memorabilia of the Royal Victoria Hospital, Netley. Wellcome L0023198.jpg
- Keep -1944, photographer unknown, PD-UK-unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 09:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 651-3 File:Message on Malaria prevention; RAMC; 651-3 Wellcome L0024825.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Middlemiss, facial wound, plastic surgery Wellcome L0024847.jpg
- Delete →
- RAMC 760 File:Middlemiss, facial wound, plastic surgery Wellcome L0024848.jpg
- Delete →
- RAMC 760 File:Middlemiss, facial wound, plastic surgery Wellcome L0024849.jpg
- Delete →
- RAMC 760 File:Middlemiss, facial wound, plastic surgery Wellcome L0068049.jpg
- Delete possibly Albert Norman, d.1964 depending on whether alternative identification of photographer can be demonstrated. --Fæ (talk) 09:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050826.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050827.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050828.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050829.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050830.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050831.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050832.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050833.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050834.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Miscellaneous photographs Wellcome L0050835.jpg
- File:Mobile bacteriological laboratory, exterior. Wellcome L0022452.jpg
- File:Mobile bacteriological laboratory, interior Wellcome L0022453.jpg
- File:Mobile bacteriological laboratory, interior. Wellcome L0022454.jpg
- RAMC 545 File:Models of infected and non-infected villages Wellcome L0038436.jpg
- RAMC 1444-10 File:Movement order 99th Sanitary Section, for George Yates Wellcome L0063426.jpg
N
[edit]- RAMC 739-18 File:National Service Medical Boards Wellcome L0050234.jpg
- RAMC 739-18 File:National Service Medical Boards Wellcome L0050235.jpg
- RAMC 2005 File:Netley Hospital - view from the Solent Wellcome L0063193.jpg
- RAMC 1523 File:Netley Military Hospital, 1910. Wellcome L0027938.jpg
- RAMC 1523 File:Netley Military Hospital, 1910. Wellcome L0027939.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:No. 1 Stationary Hospital at Ladysmith; Boer War Wellcome L0024935.jpg
- RAMC 1286-1 File:No. 2 Stationary Hospital, Rouen, France; W.W.I Wellcome L0024924.jpg
- Keep -1918, unknown photographer, PD-UK-unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 557 File:No. 3 General Hospital, Roundesbush Wellcome L0034438.jpg
- RAMC 738-7 File:No. 5 General Hospital at Rouen Wellcome L0027213.jpg
- Keep -1918, taken by Archer, army photographer, PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 738-8 File:No. 5 General Hospital at Rouen, First World War Wellcome L0027265.jpg
- RAMC 738-8 File:No. 5 General Hospital at Rouen, First World War. Wellcome L0027212.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:No.1 General Hospital, Cambridge. Wellcome L0027211.jpg
- RAMC 96 File:Notes by surgeons J. Hennen & C. Bell Wellcome L0048457.jpg
- RAMC 1759-5 File:Notes regarding General Guthrie's wishes for his funeral Wellcome L0047663.jpg
- File:NTP‐CERHR Expert Panel Report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of fluoxetine.pdf
O
[edit]- RAMC 522 File:Officers of Mogaung Expedition, 1886 Wellcome L0051201.jpg
- RAMC 1966 File:Official opening of RAMC, (1981?) Wellcome L0024148.jpg
- File:On the Velt, RAMC O-S-35-738-5 Wellcome L0022434.jpg
- RAMC 738-10 File:Operating theatre. Wellcome L0025830.jpg
- RAMC 1538 File:Out of the battle; boy blowing a bugle Wellcome L0024132.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Oversize Group Photograph. Wellcome L0027266.jpg
Pa - Pe
[edit]- RAMC 1533-1 File:Pack mule with medical panniers Wellcome L0029553.jpg
- RAMC 557 File:Palace of Justice, Irish Hospital, Pretoria Wellcome L0038210.jpg
- RAMC 1673-4 File:Papers and souvenirs of Corporal Walter Percy Bray Wellcome L0050218.jpg
- RAMC 1673-4 File:Papers and souvenirs of Corporal Walter Percy Bray Wellcome L0050219.jpg
- RAMC 380-3 File:Papers and souvenirs of Major General Sir Maurice Holt. Wellcome L0023258.jpg
- RAMC 380-3 File:Papers and souvenirs of Major General Sir Maurice Holt. Wellcome L0023259.jpg
- RAMC 1269-6 File:Papers and souvenirs of R.S.M. Charles Edward Lister Wellcome L0023118.jpg
- RAMC 542-12 File:Parade of Field Ambulance units, France (?) Wellcome L0037307.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Patient paralysed by gunshot wound. Wellcome L0025837.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Patient with many wounds. Wellcome L0025840.jpg
- RAMC 567 File:Pellagra cases chart Wellcome L0034046.jpg
- RAMC 592 File:Periploca Mauritiana Wellcome L0049836.jpg
- RAMC 2014 File:Petrol Tin Carrier for Water Cart. Wellcome L0027065.jpg
Ph
[edit]- RAMC 557 File:Photograph Album belonging to Constance Louisa Agg. Wellcome L0021028.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026827.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026828.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026829.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026830.jpg
- RAMC 1899 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026831.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026832.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026834.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026835.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026836.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026837.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026838.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026839.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026860.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph album of Boer War 1899-1900. Wellcome L0026861.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph Album of Boer War RAMC 1011-2 Wellcome L0021290.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph Album of Boer War RAMC 1011-2 Wellcome L0021291.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph Album of Boer War RAMC 1011-2 Wellcome L0021292.jpg
- RAMC 1011-2 File:Photograph Album of Boer Wellcome L0022584.jpg
- RAMC 778 File:Photograph album; Army Medical Rehabilitation Unit. Wellcome L0021027.jpg
- RAMC 738-11 File:Photograph Collection of Lieutenant Colonel J.S. Archer, RAMC Wellcome L0023195.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph from the roof, showing Waterloo Bridge Wellcome L0060822.jpg
- RAMC 594-2 File:Photograph of 'Bob-a-timers', Cyprus Wellcome L0072107.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Photograph of a painting of Dr James Barry Wellcome L0020315.jpg
- RAMC 594-2 File:Photograph of a Venitian relic, Famagusta Wellcome L0072104.jpg
- RAMC 594-2 File:Photograph of an ancient gateway, Famagusta Wellcome L0072103.jpg
- RAMC 1608 File:Photograph of British Military Hospital Officers, RMAC; 1608 Wellcome L0025439.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph of camel with stretcher carrier. Wellcome L0023605.jpg
- RAMC 1746-4 File:Photograph of G E Essex and firemen colleagues Wellcome L0051448.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph of hospital steamer. Wellcome L0023604.jpg
- RAMC 542-12 File:Photograph of Medical Officers at a Field Hospital Wellcome L0037308.jpg
- RAMC 557 File:Photograph of No 2 General hospital Wellcome L0067282.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Photograph of nursing staff on board H.M.H.S Dongola Wellcome L0049035.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Photograph of nursing staff on board H.M.H.S Dongola Wellcome L0049037.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Photograph of nursing staff on board H.M.H.S Dongola Wellcome L0049038.jpg
- RAMC 738-11 File:Photograph of self-inflicted wounds Wellcome L0074529.jpg
- RAMC 738-11 File:Photograph of self-inflicted wounds Wellcome L0074530.jpg
- RAMC 738-11 File:Photograph of self-inflicted wounds Wellcome L0074531.jpg
- RAMC 1534-9 File:Photograph of Sergeant Frank Wheatley, RAMC Wellcome L0063196.jpg
- RAMC 524-14 File:Photograph of Sir Thomas Longmore standing Wellcome L0025801.jpg
- RAMC 594-2 File:Photograph of Storm Clouds in Nicosia, Cyprus Wellcome L0072106.jpg
- RAMC 1491 File:Photograph of tented hospital. Wellcome L0023606.jpg
- RAMC 2015 File:Photograph of the RAMC band Wellcome L0051783.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph of the roof garden with huts Wellcome L0060821.jpg
- RAMC 1352 File:Photograph of the staff of the Military Hospital Wellcome L0030308.jpg
- RAMC 557 File:Photograph of three nurses in South Africa during Boer War Wellcome L0038211.jpg
- RAMC 594-2 File:Photograph showing a Bird's eye view of Nicosia.. Wellcome L0072105.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph showing a ward, with patients in bed or on chairs Wellcome L0060826.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph showing an operating theatre Wellcome L0060825.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph showing patients in early model cars Wellcome L0060827.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph showing Staff Nurses Wellcome L0060823.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph showing the roof garden Wellcome L0060820.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Photograph, Matron and Gordon serving dinner Wellcome L0049036.jpg
- RAMC 1267-1 File:Photograph, No. 32 Company, RAMC, at Headquarters, Malaya Wellcome L0047742.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph; "Dispensing Staff outside the store" Wellcome L0060819.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph; "Hospital Records Office Ground Floor..." Wellcome L0060824.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph; "The Matron, Floor Sisters. Ward Sisters ..." Wellcome L0060817.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph; "These are all Voluntary Aid Nurses..." Wellcome L0060818.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; 'Boeren brandwacht', Boer Picker. Wellcome L0021296.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; 'Long Tom', RAMC; 801-22-3 Wellcome L0021295.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Photograph; 'Motor Hospital' Wellcome L0046105.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Photograph; 'Open-air treatment at the Coulter hospital' Wellcome L0046106.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; 17th Field Ambulance. Wellcome L0023607.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; ambulances at a reception tent Wellcome L0022276.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Photograph; Dr. James Barry with negro servant and dog. Wellcome L0022267.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Photograph; field surgery in the Dardanelles, 1915 Wellcome L0008871.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph; Group picture of orderlies Wellcome L0060828.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph; Group shot of medical staff Wellcome L0060829.jpg
- RAMC 720 File:Photograph; Group shot of medical staff Wellcome L0060830.jpg
- RAMC 801 File:Photograph; Hospital Review Wellcome L0023608.jpg
- RAMC 534 File:Photograph; Inscription on Captain M. L. Hughes' grave. Wellcome L0021293.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; men and military equipment Wellcome L0022278.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; men bearing a wounded man on a stretcher. Wellcome L0022280.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; men carrying a full stretcher Wellcome L0022279.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; men preparing stretchers Wellcome L0022275.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; portrait of Commander General L. Botha Wellcome L0021297.jpg
- RAMC 1724-6 File:Photograph; Royal Herbet Hospital Woowich Ward. Wellcome L0028759.jpg
- RAMC 1656 File:Photograph; Surgeon Captain Matthew Louis Hughes Wellcome L0023276.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Photograph; two ambulances at camp; anon., Wellcome L0022277.jpg
- RAMC 594-3 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023565.jpg
- RAMC 594-3 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023567.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023570.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023573.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023574.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023578.jpg
- RAMC 594-1 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0024305.jpg
- RAMC 594-2 File:Photographs by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0024306.jpg
- RAMC 1081-1 File:Photographs from Gallipoli Peninsula Wellcome L0051884.jpg
- RAMC 1081-1 File:Photographs from Gallipoli Peninsula Wellcome L0051885.jpg
- RAMC 1081-1 File:Photographs from Gallipoli Peninsula Wellcome L0051886.jpg
- RAMC 1081-1 File:Photographs from Gallipoli Peninsula Wellcome L0051887.jpg
- RAMC 1707 File:Photographs of Edgar Wallace Wellcome L0069902.jpg
- RAMC 1707 File:Photographs of Edgar Wallace Wellcome L0069903.jpg
- RAMC 635 File:Photographs of General Hospitals etc. during the Boer War. Wellcome L0023814.jpg
- RAMC 635 File:Photographs of General Hospitals etc. from the Boer War. Wellcome L0023815.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050805.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050806.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050807.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050808.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050809.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050810.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050811.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050812.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050813.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050814.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050815.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050816.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Photographs of groups and exercises Wellcome L0050817.jpg
- RAMC 1496-15 File:Photographs of official events attended by Talbot Wellcome L0024177.jpg
Pl - Q
[edit]- RAMC 466-8 File:Plan of general arrangement No. 30 CCS Wellcome L0044173.jpg
- RAMC 466-8 File:Plan of No 1 Casualty Clearing Station Wellcome L0044174.jpg
- RAMC 598-1 File:Plan of operating theatre bloc. Wellcome L0028849.jpg
- RAMC 603 File:Plans and sketches of dressing stations and aid posts Wellcome L0068068.jpg
- RAMC 603 File:Plans and sketches of dressing stations and aid posts Wellcome L0068069.jpg
- RAMC 603 File:Plans and sketches of dressing stations and aid posts Wellcome L0068070.jpg
- RAMC 2014 File:Plans of trenches showing sanitary arrangements. Wellcome L0027061.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Plastic surgery, 1917-1919 Wellcome L0030135.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Plastic surgery, 1917-1919 Wellcome L0030136.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Plastic surgery, 1917-1919 Wellcome L0030137.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Plastic surgery, 1917-1919 Wellcome L0030138.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Plastic surgery, 1917-1919 Wellcome L0030139.jpg
- RAMC 1168 File:Portrait of Col. R.H. Firth C.B. Wellcome L0027574.jpg
- RAMC 1168 File:Portrait of Col. W.WO. Beveridge. Wellcome L0027570.jpg
- RAMC 1946 File:Portrait of Colonel H Hendley Wellcome L0051790.jpg
- RAMC 26 File:Portrait of Colonel H.E.R. James Wellcome L0021374.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Portrait of Dr. James Barry Wellcome L0022263.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Portrait of Dr. James Barry Wellcome L0022264.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Portrait of Dr. James Barry Wellcome L0022268.jpg
- RAMC 1168 File:Portrait of E.A. Parkes. Wellcome L0027569.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Portrait of James Barry Wellcome L0022265.jpg
- RAMC 1168 File:Portrait of Lt. Col. J.L. Notter. Wellcome L0027573.jpg
- RAMC 1168 File:Portrait of Lt. Col. P.S. Lelean C.B., C.M.G. Wellcome L0027572.jpg
- RAMC 1799 File:Portrait of Sir Alfred Keogh, 1919-20 Wellcome L0030286.jpg
- RAMC 273-9 File:Portrait of Surgeon General Woolfryes Wellcome L0025706.jpg
- RAMC 1168 File:Portrait of Surgeon Major F.S.B. de Chaumont F.R.S. Wellcome L0027571.jpg
- RAMC 1991 File:Portrait photograph of Lady Mary Bruce Wellcome L0044610.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050818.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050819.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050820.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050821.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050822.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050823.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050824.jpg
- RAMC 1520-11 File:Portraits of soldiers Wellcome L0050825.jpg
- RAMC 1444-8 File:Postcard of Bombay showing 3 views Wellcome L0063422.jpg
- RAMC 1746-1 File:Postcard photograph of G E Essex and regiment taken 1917 Wellcome L0051444.jpg
- RAMC 1746-1 File:Postcard photograph of G E Essex and regiment Wellcome L0051446.jpg
- RAMC 1647 File:Postcard photograph; hospital entrance, inquiry office Wellcome L0060816.jpg
- RAMC 1647 File:Postcard photograph; orderlies in administration office Wellcome L0060814.jpg
- RAMC 1647 File:Postcard photograph; orderlies in store room Wellcome L0060815.jpg
- RAMC 1647 File:Postcard photograph; orderlies standing in store rooms Wellcome L0060813.jpg
- RAMC 380-4 File:Postcard, the Royal Herbert Hospital, Major M. Holt. Wellcome L0024931.jpg
- RAMC 2018 File:Postcard; 1st Eastern General Hospital, Cambridge Wellcome L0023197.jpg
- RAMC 2018 File:Postcard; 1st Eastern General Hospital, Cambridge. Wellcome L0023196.jpg
- RAMC 1642 File:POW's in Germany Wellcome L0034566.jpg
- RAMC 850 File:Pre-printed notification of news of hospitalization Wellcome L0027209.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Princess Patricia of Connaught visiting wounded Canadians Wellcome L0046103.jpg
- File:Printed souvenir messages Wellcome L0048622.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Professor Florey visits M.E. to lecture on Penicillin. Wellcome L0023579.jpg
- RAMC 624 File:Punch, January 13, 1915; Advertisement Wellcome L0023033.jpg
- RAMC 1486 File:Queen Mary's Military Hospital, 1917 Wellcome L0024180.jpg
RAMC 95
[edit]Sir Charles Bell's watercolours of wounds sustained by soldiers at the Battle of Waterloo, June 1815. Published 1836, so public domain by age. Default to Keep. --Fæ (talk) 09:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-16 File:Arm shattered, Voultz, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0028901.jpg- kept as below --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-14 File:Cannon shot wound to arm, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0028900.jpg - Keep Bell died in 1842. PD-old-auto-1923. --Fæ (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-17 File:Gunshot fracture of the leg, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0028902.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-11 File:Gunshot wound to arm, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0028899.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-9 File:Sabre wound to abdomen, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0028898.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95 File:Soldier with bandaged head Wellcome L0019711.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-10 File:Soldier with bandaged head, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0029940.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-1 File:Soldier with head & facial injuries, C. Bell Wellcome L0029936.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-4 File:Soldier with head wound, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0029938.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-7 File:Soldier with neck wound, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0029937.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-5 File:Two examples of eye wounds, by Charles Bell Wellcome L0029939.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:29, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-15 File:Water colour by Sir Charles Bell Wellcome L0022541.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-13 File:Watercolour of wounded soldier, Waterloo, 1815 Wellcome L0022539.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-1 File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022542.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-7 File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022543.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-8 File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022544.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-4 File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022548.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-5 File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022549.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-6 File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022551.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-10 File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022554.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-12 File:Watercolour; arm wound; by Sir Charles Bell, 1815 Wellcome L0022545.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-17 File:Watercolour; leg wound; by Sir Charles Bell Wellcome L0022550.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-2 File:Watercolour; soldier suffering from a head Wellcome L0022555.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-2 File:Watercolour; soldier suffering from a head Wellcome L0064784.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-9 File:Watercolour; soldier suffering from a stomach wound Wellcome L0022547.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-3 File:Watercolour; soldier suffering from head and facial injuries. Wellcome L0022540.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-16 File:Watercolour; soldier with left arm missing Wellcome L0022552.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-14 File:Watercolour; soldier with right arm missing Wellcome L0022546.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 95-11 File:Watercolour; wounded soldier Wellcome L0022553.jpg - Sir w:Charles Bell died 1842. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:45, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
RAMC 594
[edit]Category:Photographs by Sidney Smith (physician) Photographs which are part of archive RAMC 594/4, were taken between 1942-1944 and are part of 4 volumes of photographs which can be considered taken during his wartime service and property of the UK Ministry of Information / Crown. They are described as "Subjects include places, customs and archaeology as well as colleagues, casualties and victims of tropical diseases, mainly smallpox and leprosy."
- RAMC 594-4 File:RAMC 594-4, Findlay & Adler, Jerusalem Wellcome L0024838.jpg
- Keep PD-UKGov. --Fæ (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 594-4 File:RAMC 594-4, Findlay, Kligler and Little Wellcome L0024839.jpg
- Keep PD-UKGov. --Fæ (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
RAMC 730
[edit]RAMC 730 Album of photographs of 34 (1/1 West Lancashire) Casualty Clearing Hospital, RAMC Territorial Force, on the Western Front, 1914-1919. Photographer unidentified. Series may be marked as PD-UK-Unknown, however as there has been no assertion of prior publication, RAMC publication rights may apply. Delete per COM:PRP. Ref http://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b1962623
- File:"A serious case ward" Wellcome L0030463.jpg
- File:"In the operating theatre" Wellcome L0030464.jpg
- File:"Theatre and serious wards" Wellcome L0030465.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of 34 Casualty Clearing Hospital Wellcome L0030302.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of 34 Casualty Clearing Hospital Wellcome L0030303.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of 34 Casualty Clearing Hospital Wellcome L0030304.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of 34 Casualty Clearing Hospital Wellcome L0030305.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of 34 Casualty Clearing Hospital Wellcome L0030306.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of 34 Casualty Clearing Hospital Wellcome L0030307.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of 34 Casualty Clearing Hospital Wellcome L0030460.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029671.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029672.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029673.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029674.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029675.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029676.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029677.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029678.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029679.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029680.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029681.jpg
- File:Photo album of 34 (1-1) West Lancashire Wellcome L0029682.jpg
- File:Private Scott, a hair dresser Wellcome L0045178.jpg
RAMC 738
[edit]RAMC 738 is described as Photograph collection of Lieutenant Colonel G.J.S. Archer, RAMC, 1900-1916.
- RAMC 738-9 is an "Album of photographs of No. 40 Field Ambulance at Gallipoli during the First World War", 1915. There is no evidence that these were part of military reports, or that the photographs were taken as part of Archer's duties. We currently have no death date for Archer, however The London Gazette states:
- ROYAL ARMY MEDICAL CORPS. Lt.-Col. G. J. S. Archer, M.B., having attained the age limit of liability to recall, ceases to belong to the Res. of Off. 15th Nov. 1929. I do not know what that age limit was, but it is possible he went on to survive until after 1945 (70 years ago).
- Delete per COM:PRP unless more information becomes available. --Fæ (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:RAMC 738-9 Ships moored in Mudros Bay Wellcome L0031211.jpg
- File:Turkish prisoners at Gallipoli Wellcome L0045170.jpg
- File:Two soldiers outside a tent at Gallipoli Wellcome L0045174.jpg
- File:WW1; dressing station at Gallipoli, 1915 Wellcome L0024988.jpg
- File:WW1; field ambulance at Gallipoli, 1915 Wellcome L0024989.jpg
- RAMC 738 File:WW1, instructions to soldiers from Kitchener, 1914 Wellcome L0024992.jpg
- RAMC 738 File:WW1; advice to soldiers, from Kitchener, 1914 Wellcome L0024991.jpg
- RAMC 738 File:WW1; Gallipoli; embarking the wounded Wellcome L0024987.jpg
- RAMC 738 File:WW1; landing troops on mine sweeper Wellcome L0024986.jpg
- RAMC 738 File:WW1; military medicine, Rouen; rescue dog Wellcome L0024985.jpg
- RAMC 738-7 File:WW1; men at no. 5 stationary hospital, Rouen Wellcome L0024980.jpg
- RAMC 738-7 File:WW1; military medicine, Rouen; rescue dogs Wellcome L0024984.jpg
- RAMC 738-7 File:WW1; officers at no. 5 stationary hospital, Rouen Wellcome L0024982.jpg
- RAMC 738-7 File:WW1; stationary hospital, Rouen; "chargers" watering horses Wellcome L0024981.jpg
- RAMC 738-7 File:WW1; surgery division at no. 5 stationary hospital, Rouen Wellcome L0024983.jpg
- RAMC 738-8 File:WWI, Rouen; no. 5 stationary hospital Wellcome L0024969.jpg
- RAMC 738-8 File:WWI; nurse and patient outside stationary hospital, Rouen Wellcome L0024968.jpg
- RAMC 738-8 File:WWI; stationary hospital in Rouen, general view Wellcome L0024970.jpg
RAMC 760
[edit]RAMC 760 Photographs taken between 1916 and 1918 wartime plastic surgery photographs credited to Albert Norman. It now seems likely that this was Albert Norman, later to be first secretary of the Institute of Biomedical Science, who died in 1964. All photographs must be a Delete, unless marked otherwise below, as potentially under copyright and with a valid NC-ND restriction. --Fæ (talk) 20:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:2 albums of photographs of plastic surgery Wellcome L0068243.jpg
- Keep These are the basic covers only, so copyright ineligible on the presumption that the modern Wellcome photographer is not claiming separate copyright (this has not happened once in the track record of 100,000+ images from the Wellcome). --Fæ (talk) 11:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- File:2 albums of photographs of plastic surgery Wellcome L0068244.jpg
- Keep This is the holding box, so the same rationale as L0068243 above applies. --Fæ (talk) 11:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- File:2 albums of photographs of plastic surgery Wellcome L0068245.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044677.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044678.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044679.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044680.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044681.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044682.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044683.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044684.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044685.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044686.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044687.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044688.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044689.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044690.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044691.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044692.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044693.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044694.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044695.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044696.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044697.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044698.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044699.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044700.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044701.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044702.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044703.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044704.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044705.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044706.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044707.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044708.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044709.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044710.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044711.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044712.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044713.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044714.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044715.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044716.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044717.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044718.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044719.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044720.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044721.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044722.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044723.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044724.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044725.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044726.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044754.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044755.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044756.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044757.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044758.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044759.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044760.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044761.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044762.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044763.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044764.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044765.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044766.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044767.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044768.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044769.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044770.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044771.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044772.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044773.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044774.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044775.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044776.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044777.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044778.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044779.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044780.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044781.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044782.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044783.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044784.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044785.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044786.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044787.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044788.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044789.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044790.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044791.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044792.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044793.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044794.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044795.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044796.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044797.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044798.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044799.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044800.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044801.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044802.jpg
- File:Album of photographs of plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0044803.jpg
- File:Chronic movements due to shell shock. Wellcome L0025839.jpg
- File:CMAC; RAMC 760 Wellcome L0025838.jpg
RAMC 801
[edit]- RAMC 801-22-30 is described as "Official war photographs of field ambulance equipment and tents, casualty evacuation and blood transfusions (in North-West Europe)" and dated 1944. Keep as PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 11:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 801-22-31 RAMC/801/22/31 is described as "Official war photographs of casualty evacuation and operating theatre in the Middle East", 1942. Keep PD-UKGov. --Fæ (talk) 11:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 801-22-33 described as "Set of photographs mounted on card, of base hospitals, advance dressing stations etc.", c.1939-1945. As with others in folders in the same part of the archive, these are photographs taken as part of official reports, so were MOI/Crown property. Keep PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 11:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 801-22-34 Keep x 17 - this album has a record at the Wellcome catalogue and viewer dating all photos as 1944. The album "Set of photographs of casualties, treatment, etc. (in North West Europe)" is from the same source, apparently unknown photographer. The backs of the photographs have been scanned and some have annotations, possibly contemporary, which confirm the title given. Consequently the licence for all the following images can be replaced with {{PD-UK-unknown}}. Though we cannot confirm that the photographer was official, it is highly unlikely that these photographs were taken by a private individual rather than on army business, so it may be argued that the narrower PD-UKGov license applies. --Fæ (talk) 14:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Advanced dressing station, Wellcome L0031179.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Casualties being helped to di Wellcome L0031176.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Doctor and nurse treating a Wellcome L0031169.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Doctor locating soldier on a Wellcome L0031183.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Field ambulance Wellcome L0031174.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 House converted into a milita Wellcome L0031173.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Operation being performed Wellcome L0031168.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Patient being loaded into air Wellcome L0031178.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Patient being put into an amb Wellcome L0031170.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Patient ready for evacuation Wellcome L0031180.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Patients with head injuries Wellcome L0031177.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Row of wounded soldiers on st Wellcome L0031166.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 The little extra comfort for Wellcome L0031167.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Three wounded soldiers Wellcome L0031171.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Wounded soldier being aided Wellcome L0031181.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Wounded soldier being carried Wellcome L0031175.jpg
- File:RAMC 801-22-34 Wounded soldiers being loaded Wellcome L0031182.jpg
RAMC 838
[edit]This album was taken in 1915, during the Dardanelles campaign. I have been unable to find a death date for Pearson, though in 1915 as Captain of HMHS Dongola he would probably have been over 30 at that time. Some photographs in the album may not have been taken by Pearson.
The four photographs below are all of active service members and one of a military disembarkation in Gallipoli, so based on their content, a license of {{PD-UKGov}} seems justified, in the absence of a death date for the photographer, or certainty that the photographer was Pearson himself.
- File:RAMC 838, Captain J. Pearson, Photo album Wellcome L0032625.jpg
- Keep PD-UKGov as above. --Fæ (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:RAMC 838, Captain J. Pearson, Photoalbum Wellcome L0032626.jpg
- Keep PD-UKGov as above. --Fæ (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:RAMC 838, Photoalbum of J. Pearson Wellcome L0032627.jpg
- Keep PD-UKGov as above. --Fæ (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:"Matron and Gordon" serving dinner Wellcome L0020268.jpg Keep as above. --Fæ (talk) 12:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 838 File:5th Royal Scots disembarking from 'Dongola' Wellcome L0045176.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Captain J. Pearson's photograph, 1915 Wellcome L0023813.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Captain J. Pearson's photographs, 1915 Wellcome L0023812.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:CMAC;RAMC 838, Keogh Barracks, Ash Vale, nr. Wellcome L0031735.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Disembarking patients at Alexandria Wellcome L0020269.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Firing Trench Wellcome L0045177.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:French troops embarking (?) Wellcome L0020270.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:H.M.H.S. Aquitania, detail Wellcome L0020267.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:H.M.H.S. Dongola Wellcome L0020266.jpg
RAMC 844
[edit]Several photographs of the Officer's Mess in Singapore. No photographer is named, however as the date is only given as "1950's", copyright should be conservatively calculated from 1959. Consequently these are a Delete, with undeletion scheduled for 2029. --Fæ (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:RAMC Officer's Mess, Singapore, 1950's. Wellcome L0026885.jpg
- File:RAMC Officer's Mess, Singapore, 1950's. Wellcome L0026886.jpg
- File:RAMC Officer's Mess, Singapore, 1950's. Wellcome L0026887.jpg
- File:RAMC Officer's Mess, Singapore, 1950's. Wellcome L0026888.jpg
- File:RAMC Officer's Mess, Singapore, 1950's. Wellcome L0026889.jpg
- File:RAMC Officer's Mess, Singapore, 1950's. Wellcome L0026890.jpg
RAMC 962
[edit]Frank Ernest Morley: certificates and papers , Album of photographs of the RAMC in Limerick, Ireland, and in the Middle East during the First World War. Being a collection of papers, it is unclear if Morley was the photographer. As Morley is shown in some of the photographs, there must be a presumption that in those cases the photographer is unknown, despite Morley being the credited generic author in the archive record. For official records and travel documents, these may be safely assessed as expired Crown copyright. Keep/delete decisions here are conservative as Morley's date of death has yet to be determined. As a significant number of Morley's service papers are available at http://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b18413249 (not all on Commons), further research should be able to provide a verifiable date of death. --Fæ (talk) 12:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:A group of men Wellcome L0049054.jpg Keep Unlikely that Morley was the photographer, based on the album he is likely to be in the photograph, keep as unknown.
- File:A group of soldiers Wellcome L0049055.jpg Keep Unlikely that Morely was the photographer, based on the album he is likely to be in the photograph, keep as unknown.
- File:A ship at night Wellcome L0049053.jpg Delete Morely may have taken this photograph.
- File:Fives Court Wellcome L0049052.jpg Delete Morely may have taken this photograph.
- File:George Street, Limerick Wellcome L0049050.jpg Delete Morely may have taken this photograph.
- File:Group of soldiers Wellcome L0049051.jpg Keep Morely is in this photograph.
- File:On Parade Wellcome L0049048.jpg Delete Morely may have taken this photograph.
- File:On Parade Wellcome L0049049.jpg Delete Morely may have taken this photograph.
RAMC 1187
[edit]- RAMC 1187 File:Ambulance car being lowered from flight deck; Suez crisis Wellcome L0024925.jpg
- Keep 60 years old, published in 1956. However this is a photograph for an official report of the British Army Medical Services, consequently Crown property which has copyright for 50 years after it was created, copyright now expired. PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 06:58, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1187 File:Suez Crisis; invasion of Egypt, ambulance car Wellcome L0024933.jpg
- Keep PD-UKGov, as above. --Fæ (talk) 12:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
RAMC 1237
[edit]- RAMC 1237-2 From the description the "scrapbook" of photographs may not have been official, so it is uncertain whether this would have been Crown property. If there is a claim of publication rights that can be supported, the license of PD-UK-unknown may be overruled. Delete per COM:PRP. --Fæ (talk) 11:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
RAMC 1242
[edit]RAMC 1242 Sir David Bruce's lantern slides. 1883-c.1918. Bruce died in 1931. As the slides were made for public presentations, they are considered published before 1918 and public domain as of 2001. Default of Keep for all items listed below, one suitable license would be {{PD-old-auto-1996}} with deathyear=1931. --Fæ (talk) 12:00, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:'Goat-herd milking, Malta', David Bruce. Wellcome L0020991.jpg 1907 photograph, one of several by Bruce held by the Wellcome. The nature of this collection indicates the photographer was David Bruce (microbiologist) who died in 1931 (aged 76). Public domain by age, the same rationale applies to the others in this series listed below. A full list of those held by the Wellcome is at this search report, only a subset have yet been released on Commons.
--Fæ (talk) 10:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC) - File:Corporal Cantolo. Wellcome L0022669.jpg Keep david bruce died 1931 [18] Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- File:Cow, Nagana Wellcome L0022653.jpg Keep david bruce died 1931 [19] Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- File:David Bruce; Graphs Wellcome L0020994.jpg Keep david bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- File:David Bruce; map; 'Civil population' Wellcome L0020993.jpg Keep david bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- File:Dellaguffa camp, Ubombo Wellcome L0022675.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Experiemental dogs, Zululand Wellcome L0022654.jpgkept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:First camp after Eshowe, old road. Wellcome L0022668.jpgkept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Goats at Port Real Wellcome L0045092.jpg Keep Bruce died 1931. PD-old-auto-1996. --Fæ (talk) 08:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Graph of Malta Fever in the Garrison Wellcome L0045093.jpgkept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Horse, Nagana Wellcome L0022652.jpg Keep Bruce died 1931. PD-old-auto-1996. --Fæ (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Iinterior of Mr. Finley's hut, Ubomobo. Wellcome L0022665.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Inconconi camp, Ubombo Wellcome L0022673.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Induna of courtpolice, Ubombo Wellcome L0022671.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Interior of Mr. Lyle's hut. Wellcome L0022666.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Native dance, Ubombo Wellcome L0022677.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Photograph, Malta-fever patient. Wellcome L0020992.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Pool at Skeluni camp, Ubombo - fly country. Wellcome L0022674.jpg Keep david bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge
- File:Private Angelo Wellcome L0022670.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Sir David Bruce; 'Our first shooting camp' Wellcome L0022672.jpg Keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Sir David Bruce; leopard at tent door. Wellcome L0022676.jpg Keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Sir David Bruce; temperature chart of dog, Nagana Wellcome L0022679.jpg Keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, inside our hut; RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021208.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, Mr. Lyle's hut; RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021206.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, our hut (Ubombo); RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021202.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, our nearset neighbour, Ubombo; RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021204.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, pool at bottom of Ubombo; RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021207.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, the back of our hut (Ubombo); RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021203.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, top of Ubombo; RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021201.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis, view from top of Ubombo; RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021205.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Trypanosomiasis; magistrates hut RAMC 1242 Wellcome L0021200.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Tsetse fly, Zululand Wellcome L0022651.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Ubombo Fly Country map. Wellcome L0022678.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:View from first camp Wellcome L0022667.jpg kept as above --Ruthven (msg) 23:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Szeliga_-_Potocki.jpg){kind=link}
![213 File:"Signingsmorgen".jpg](#File:"Signingsmorgen".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![217 File:"Frigjøringskongene".jpg](#File:"Frigjøringskongene".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![262 File:Dietmar Josef Zapf, Aus der Serie "Etna", Rom 08-1983.jpg](#File:Dietmar_Josef_Zapf,_Aus_der_Serie_"Etna",_Rom_08-1983.jpg){kind=link}
![263 File:Dietmar Josef Zapf, Aus der Serie "Etna", Rom 09-1983.jpg](#File:Dietmar_Josef_Zapf,_Aus_der_Serie_"Etna",_Rom_09-1983.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_riding_into_a_city_at_the_head_of_knights,_holding_a_scepter,_Landsknecht_beside.jpg){kind=link}
_riding_at_the_head_of_knights_at_a_siege.jpg){kind=link}
_holding_ceremonial_sword.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_at_the_head_of_knights.jpg){kind=link}
_holding_ceremonial_sword.jpg){kind=link}
_Archimedes_death.jpg){kind=link}
_Szeliga_-_Potocki.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Szeliga_-_Potocki.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Szeliga_-_Potocki.jpg){kind=link}
_Szeliga_-_Potocki.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Szeliga_-_Potocki.jpg){kind=link}
![15:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-Ellin_Beltz-2016-11-14T15:46:00.000Z-File:"Signingsmorgen".jpg){kind=link}
![23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-INeverCry-2016-11-20T23:58:00.000Z-File:"Signingsmorgen".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![15:48, 14 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-Ellin_Beltz-2016-11-14T15:48:00.000Z-File:"Frigjøringskongene".jpg){kind=link}
![23:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-INeverCry-2016-11-20T23:58:00.000Z-File:"Frigjøringskongene".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![23:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-Goesseln-2016-11-14T23:03:00.000Z-File:Dietmar_Josef_Zapf,_Aus_der_Serie_"Etna",_Rom_08-1983.jpg){kind=link}
![00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-INeverCry-2016-11-21T00:06:00.000Z-File:Dietmar_Josef_Zapf,_Aus_der_Serie_"Etna",_Rom_08-1983.jpg){kind=link}
![23:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-Goesseln-2016-11-14T23:03:00.000Z-File:Dietmar_Josef_Zapf,_Aus_der_Serie_"Etna",_Rom_09-1983.jpg){kind=link}
![00:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/14#c-INeverCry-2016-11-21T00:06:00.000Z-File:Dietmar_Josef_Zapf,_Aus_der_Serie_"Etna",_Rom_09-1983.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
%27_Wellcome_L0046117.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0031904.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0074440.jpg){kind=link}
_Home_Counties_..._Wellcome_L0063410.jpg){kind=link}
_Home_Counties_..._Wellcome_L0063412.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0027063.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0029557.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0029558.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0067873.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0067874.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0067875.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0024172.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0024173.jpg){kind=link}
._Wellcome_L0027775.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0034542.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0034543.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0034544.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0029554.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0029555.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0024148.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0037307.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029671.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029672.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029673.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029674.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029675.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029676.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029677.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029678.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029679.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029680.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029681.jpg){kind=link}
_West_Lancashire_Wellcome_L0029682.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0020270.jpg){kind=link}
;_RAMC_1242_Wellcome_L0021202.jpg){kind=link}
;_RAMC_1242_Wellcome_L0021203.jpg){kind=link}
RAMC 1580
[edit]Colonel M.M. MacEwan's records of the medical services of No.6 Airborn Division and 16 Parachute Field Ambulance (No.1 Airborn Division). Report made in 1944 as part of the Colonel's duties, consequently PD-UKGov applies. Default to Keep. --Fæ (talk) 10:49, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Container Loads Wellcome L0048336.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048354.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048355.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048356.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048357.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048358.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048359.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048360.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048361.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048362.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048363.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048364.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048365.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Contents of medical packs... Wellcome L0048366.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Haversack Loads 2. (S.II) Wellcome L0048339.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Haversack Loads 3 Wellcome L0048340.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Haversack Loads 4. (C.1) Wellcome L0048341.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Haversack Loads I. - S.1. Wellcome L0048338.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Persoanl Loads - containers Wellcome L0048349.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads (medical) 2 Wellcome L0048346.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads (medical) 3 Wellcome L0048347.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads (medical) 4 Wellcome L0048348.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads (medical) Wellcome L0048345.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads - containers Wellcome L0048350.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads - containers Wellcome L0048351.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads - containers Wellcome L0048352.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads - containers Wellcome L0048353.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads Wellcome L0048334.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads Wellcome L0048343.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Personal Loads Wellcome L0048344.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Stretcher Combination Wellcome L0048342.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Trolley Loads Wellcome L0048335.jpg
- RAMC 1580-5 File:Trolley, provisional only Wellcome L0048337.jpg
_Wellcome_L0048339.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0048341.jpg){kind=link}
_2_Wellcome_L0048346.jpg){kind=link}
_3_Wellcome_L0048347.jpg){kind=link}
_4_Wellcome_L0048348.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0048345.jpg){kind=link}
RAMC 1637
[edit]- Category:RAMC 1637-6 RAMC/1637/6 Two photographs of casualty transport by jeep, France 1944.
- File:Muniments Collection Wellcome L0029461.jpg Keep PD-EU-Anonymous and PD-UKGov applies as this was taken by an unnamed soldier in France as part of their duties. A Tineye search shows this photograph has been used on a D-Day commemorative postcard, though I have been unable to find a high resolution version to refer to. --Fæ (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Muniments Collection Wellcome L0029461.jpg
RAMC 1752
[edit]Category:RAMC 1752-2 Lieutenant Colonel John H. Plumridge's collection of photographs of casualty evacuation for his book Hospital ships and ambulance trains (London: Seeley, 1975), and notes, correspondence and drafts for other works. The photographers vary and any that may be out of copyright that were collected for publication in 1975, however some can be found published elsewhere such as by the U.S. National Museum of Medicine (medicalmuseum.mil) and would not have been uniquely collected or discovered by Plumridge. Deposit with the RAMC was in 1985. Those that were published or made available to the public before 1991, can have no secondary claim of publication rights. Copyright for each image requires separate assessment.
- File:Carriage of the wounded in he trenches in World War One Wellcome L0030197.jpg Keep WW1, no named photographer, PD-UK-Unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Casualties at the Dardanelles, 1915 Wellcome L0023816.jpg Keep WW1, no named photographer, PD-UK-Unknown. --Fæ (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Casualties Wellcome L0024179.jpg Keep Dardanelles Campaign makes this 1915. Apparent official photograph of casualties being evacuated, PD-UKGov applies, if not then PD-UK-Unknown can be justified. --Fæ (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Horse railway ambulance transport Wellcome L0030196.jpg Keep 1916 removing casualties from the battlefield, unknown photographer. Photograph undoubtedly taken as part of Army duties. PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Netley coach Wellcome L0070596.jpg Plumridge's photograph, no year given. Delete Plumridge's date of death is not given, presumably between 1975-85. --Fæ (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Orderlies receiving dinner, ambulance train Wellcome L0024178.jpg Keep No named photographer, taken during Dardanelles, making this c.1915. PD-UK-Unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:RAMC; Stretcher cases being carried on railway, 1917 Wellcome L0030199.jpg Keep 1917, unknown photographer. Based on subject taken during evacuating casualties from the battlefield, this is doubtless an official army photograph for reporting purposes. PD-UKGov applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Stretcher cases, Dardanelles Wellcome L0024181.jpg Keep Alternative print of L0023816 above. --Fæ (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:The 'Queries' (concert party) - A J Smith & J H Plumridge Wellcome L0046446.jpg Keep WW1 period, no known photographer. PD-UK-Unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:WWI; The 'Queries' rehearsing at Cavazzalta Wellcome L0046447.jpg Keep Publication c.1916, no known photographer. PD-UK-Unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
_-_A_J_Smith_%26_J_H_Plumridge_Wellcome_L0046446.jpg){kind=link}
RAMC 1801 Belsen Concentration Camp
[edit]Described as "Papers of Major Allen Percival Prior, RAMC, with further material re the liberation of Belsen Concentration Camp, Germany, in 1945, collected by Colonel Ethelwald E. Vella". Ref http://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b1865857x. Note that some parts of this collection are distressing images of Nazi concentration camp victims, and should be treated with due care.
In terms of copyright, unless other assertions are made, photographs taken by Allied forces of the concentration camps or their activities during camp liberation have high potential educational value and may be considered official military reports, as a rationale that any were 'personal' photographs would appear unsupportable. Consequently the photographs by RAMC soldiers can be reasoned to be MOI/Crown property and {{PD-UKGov}} may be used as a default. --Fæ (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- 1801/1/6 search
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp and Glyn-Hughes Wellcome L0029080.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp victims lying on the ground Wellcome L0029071EB.jpg
- Keep PD-UKGov applies, copyright expired. --Fæ (talk) 07:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029068.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029069.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029070.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029071.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029072.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029074.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029075.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029076.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029078.jpg Keep as above.
- Delete this one brings nothing educational, a poor photo~of a common jeep. Pibwl (talk) 14:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Pibwl: I was interested to see your comment. Checking over this photograph shows me that this is of Lt.-Col. Spencer, who in the 1980s claimed to have been the first Allied soldier to enter Belsen. As far as I'm aware this is the only photograph we have with Spencer identified, so has educational value even if not great quality. This photograph was taken at the Belsen concentration camp in 1945. This photograph was taken as part of the record during liberation of the camp, and has no verifiable named photographer. For these reasons it should be a Keep on the basis that either PD-UK-Unknown or expired Crown copyright must apply. In general all photographs of the Belsen camp liberation should default to being considered of educational value, simply for the value of having as full a record as possible for public access. --Fæ (talk) 15:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was looking at the jeep, and the camp (which is not visible). I didn't know the person. I withdraw my vote then. Pibwl (talk) 15:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- Addendum, I now spot others of Spencer, however the few alternates we have will all remain of high educational value. --Fæ (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Pibwl: I was interested to see your comment. Checking over this photograph shows me that this is of Lt.-Col. Spencer, who in the 1980s claimed to have been the first Allied soldier to enter Belsen. As far as I'm aware this is the only photograph we have with Spencer identified, so has educational value even if not great quality. This photograph was taken at the Belsen concentration camp in 1945. This photograph was taken as part of the record during liberation of the camp, and has no verifiable named photographer. For these reasons it should be a
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029079.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029081.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029082.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029083.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029085.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029086.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029087.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp. Wellcome L0029084.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Group photo of London Medical students who went to Belsen Wellcome L0029073.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Group of Westminster hospital students who worked at Belsen Wellcome L0029074EB.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Guy's Hospital medical students who went to Belsen Wellcome L0029073EB.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Medical students at Belsen in coverted hospital ward Wellcome L0029077.jpg Keep as above.
The reports in 1801/1/8 are post-mortem reports for camp victims. The images are of poor quality, possibly carbon copies based on the signatures looking sharp compared to the typed text. As official reports these were Crown copyright, now expired. --Fæ (talk) 06:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- 1801/1/8 search
- File:Papers of Major Allen Percival Prior, 1945 Wellcome L0028336.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Papers of Major Allen Percival Prior, 1945 Wellcome L0028337.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Papers of Major Allen Percival Prior, 1945 Wellcome L0028338.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Papers of Major Allen Percival Prior, 1945 Wellcome L0028339.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Papers of Major Allen Percival Prior, 1945 Wellcome L0028340.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Papers of Major Allen Percival Prior, 1945 Wellcome L0028341.jpg Keep as above.
- File:Papers of Major General Sir Ernest Cowell Wellcome L0023434.jpg Keep as above.
RAMC 1218 Belsen Concentration Camp
[edit]There is some overlap with RAMC 1801. This may be as some official photographs were widely copied and retained in different collections.
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029088.jpg Keep as RAMC 1801. --Fæ (talk) 07:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Belsen Concentration Camp Wellcome L0029089.jpg Keep as RAMC 1801. --Fæ (talk) 07:10, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
RAMC 2046
[edit] Keep Scans of pages from "Report on the medical topography and statistics of the Presidency Division of the Madras (India) Army, including Fort St. George and its dependencies, within the limits of the Supreme Court", 1842. Public domain by age and as an official army report, can be considered expired Crown copyright with no claim of publication rights possible. --Fæ (talk) 10:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Plan of Madras General Hospital Wellcome L0026303.jpg
- File:Plan of the town of Madras Wellcome L0026304.jpg
RAMC 2064
[edit]Based on http://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b19380574, RAMC 2046/9 has an archive creation date of 1964, however the items are described as "Miscellaneous photographs, including display re Army Dental Corps, 1936, the staff and cadets of the RAMC OCTU in Middle East Forces, Egypt, 1944, and Kenya Independence celebrations".
- RAMC 2064-9 File:RAMC 2064-9, Barracks chapel Wellcome L0031534.jpg
- Delete No date is available for this photograph. Though the other dates in 2064/9 are 1936-1944, the reference to the Kenya Independence celebrations means there must be photographs dating from 1962.
- RAMC 2064-9 File:RAMC 2064-9, two photographs of dental corps Wellcome L0031536.jpg
- Keep photographs of the dental display dated as 1936, unknown photographer, so PD-UK-unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 2064-9 File:RAMC 2064-9, two photographs of dental corps Wellcome L0031538.jpg
- Keep photographs of the dental display dated as 1936, unknown photographer, so PD-UK-unknown applies. --Fæ (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
RAMC
[edit]- RAMC 2005 File:RAMC band "Note the Hats" Wellcome L0046809.jpg
- RAMC 2015 File:RAMC band 1952 Wellcome L0046804.jpg
- RAMC 2005 File:RAMC band Wellcome L0046810.jpg
- RAMC 2015 File:RAMC band. R,H & E, Powell, Fleet Wellcome L0046803.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:RAMC Boer Prisoners Wellcome L0029549.jpg
- RAMC 1109-2 File:RAMC sketch; 'Smile! Da n you, smile!!!' Wellcome L0028213.jpg
- RAMC 1980-5 File:RAMC, Crookham camp, Aldershot, Hampshire Wellcome L0024155.jpg
- RAMC 1017 File:RAMC, Royal Herbert Hospital, Woolwich, 1928 Wellcome L0024926.jpg
- File:RAMC; Dr. Shunkishi Saito Wellcome L0023360.jpg
Re - Royal
[edit]- RAMC 801-22 File:Regimental Medical Officer. Wellcome L0025702.jpg
- RAMC 1937 File:Remembrance Day Memorial, Isle of Wight Wellcome L0024149.jpg
- RAMC 1444-8 File:Reverse of postcard with greeting Wellcome L0063423.jpg
- RAMC 1444-2 File:Reverse of postcard, with message home Wellcome L0063411.jpg
- RAMC 1246 File:Reverse side of postcard (L0064611) Wellcome L0064612.jpg
- RAMC 592 File:Ricinus Communis Wellcome L0049835.jpg
- RAMC 594-4 File:Ritchie Russell by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023577.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:RMAC 801-22-33 Medical Officers tend the wou Wellcome L0031164.jpg
- RAMC 165 File:Royal Army Medical Corps seating plan, 1920 Wellcome L0031561.jpg
- RAMC 801-7 File:Royal Army Medical Corps, Netley Hospital Wellcome L0029592.jpg
- RAMC 801-7 File:Royal Army Medical Corps, Netley Hospital Wellcome L0029593.jpg
- RAMC 537 File:Royal Army Medical Corps. Wellcome L0030231.jpg
- RAMC 537 File:Royal Army Medical Corps. Wellcome L0030232.jpg
- RAMC 793-4 File:Royal Army Medical Corps; Hospital in Malta Wellcome L0025686.jpg
- Keep →
- RAMC 793-4 File:Royal Army Medical Corps; Hospital in Malta Wellcome L0025687.jpg
- Keep →
- RAMC 793-4 File:Royal Army Medical Corps; Hospital in Malta Wellcome L0025688.jpg
- Keep →
- RAMC 793-4 File:Royal Army Medical Corps; Hospital in Malta Wellcome L0025689.jpg
- Keep →
- RAMC 793-4 File:Royal Army Medical Corps; Hospital in Mata Wellcome L0025690.jpg
- Keep 1906, no named photographer, PD-UK-unknown applies (Malta under British law in 1906). --Fæ (talk) 10:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 801-7 File:Royal Army Medical Corps; Netley Hospital Wellcome L0029591.jpg
- RAMC 1091-2 File:Royal Army Muniment Collection Netley Hospital. Wellcome L0029595.jpg
- RAMC 1091-2 File:Royal Army Muniment Collection Netley Hospital. Wellcome L0029596.jpg
- RAMC 1724-6 File:Royal Herbert Hospital Woolwich Entrance Gate. Wellcome L0028758.jpg
- RAMC 380-4 File:Royal Herbert Hospital, Woolwich Wellcome L0050102.jpg
- RAMC 380-4 File:Royal Herbert Hospital, Woolwich Wellcome L0050103.jpg
- RAMC 1477 File:Royal Herbert Hospital, Woolwich; visit of Queen Victoria Wellcome L0024165.jpg
- RAMC 1533-1 File:Royal Scots being helped over a drift Wellcome L0029550.jpg
- RAMC 801-7 File:Royal Victoria Hospital Netley, from print Wellcome L0030288.jpg
_Wellcome_L0064612.jpg){kind=link}
S
[edit]- RAMC 2084 File:S.S. Cicilia Hospital Ship, circa 1914-15 Wellcome L0020265.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Saban, shrapnel wound to face and treatment Wellcome L0024845.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Saban, shrapnel wound to face and treatment Wellcome L0024846.jpg
- RAMC 1882 File:Satire; war-wounded rehabilitation Wellcome L0023556.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Scenes at Cliveden and Coulter Hospitals Wellcome L0027208.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Scenes at one of the London Military Hospitals and the Zoo. Wellcome L0027206.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Scenes at one of the London Military Hospitals. Wellcome L0027207.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Scenes on the highway of suffering... Wellcome L0027205.jpg
- RAMC 1405 File:Scrap book of Major Clifford Goulty. Wellcome L0029709.jpg
- RAMC 738-11 File:Self inflicted wounds. Wellcome L0025826.jpg
- RAMC 738-11 File:Self inflicted wounds. Wellcome L0025827.jpg
- RAMC 738-11 File:Self inflicted wounds. Wellcome L0025828.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Series of photographs 'Scenes on the highway of suffering' Wellcome L0046102.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Sgt. Butcher, facial wounds, plastic surgery Wellcome L0024842.jpg
- Delete #Album RAMC 760 --Fæ (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 760 File:Sgt. Butcher, facial wounds, plastic surgery Wellcome L0024843.jpg
- Delete #Album RAMC 760 --Fæ (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 760 File:Sgt. Butcher, facial wounds, plastic surgery Wellcome L0024844.jpg
- Delete #Album RAMC 760 --Fæ (talk) 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1640-3 File:Singapore; Christmas dinner, 1930. Wellcome L0026892.jpg
- RAMC 596 File:Sir David Bruce's photograph album Wellcome L0022647.jpg
- keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 596 File:Sir David Bruce's photograph album Wellcome L0022648.jpg
- keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 596 File:Sir David Bruce's photograph album. Wellcome L0022646.jpg
- keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 596 File:Sir David Bruce's, photograph album, Zululand 1894-1896. Wellcome L0022650.jpg
- keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 596 File:Sir David Bruce, photograph album, Zululand 1894-1896 Wellcome L0022649.jpg
- keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1675-8 File:Sir David Bruce, Ubombo, Zululand. Wellcome L0028656.jpg
- keep Bruce died 1931 Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 15:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 397 File:Sir John Hall's papers; map of Turkey Wellcome L0026305.jpg
- RAMC 524-14 File:Sir John McNeill Wellcome L0024699.jpg
- RAMC 1139 File:Sir T. Longmore's papers, Crimean War; winter 1855-6 Wellcome L0025765.jpg
- RAMC 1139 File:Sir T. Longmore's papers; Crimean War, 1855-6 Wellcome L0025766.jpg
- RAMC 1139 File:Sir T. Longmore's papers; hospital camp of 19th regiment Wellcome L0025802.jpg
- RAMC 1181 File:Sir Thomas Crawford Wellcome L0023327.jpg
- RAMC 524-14 File:Sir William Mackinnon Wellcome L0040787.jpg
- RAMC 838 File:Sisters Fife, Grigor and Robertson Wellcome L0045175.jpg
- RAMC 557 File:Sisters of No. 2 General Hospital, Wynburg Wellcome L0034441.jpg
- RAMC 557 File:Sisters of No. 2 General Hospital, Wynburg Wellcome L0034442.jpg
- RAMC 1139 File:Sketch of excision of upper 1-2 of arm of a Corporal Wellcome L0029730.jpg
Keep x 21, {{PD-UKGov}} applies. --Fæ (talk) 11:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068071.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068072.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068073.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068074.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068075.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068076.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068077.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068078.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068079.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068080.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068081.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068082.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068083.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068084.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068085.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068086.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068087.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068088.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068089.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068090.jpg
- File:Sketch plans by Lance Corporals S.T. Smith and A.R. Watt Wellcome L0068091.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:Sketch; Dr. James Barry Wellcome L0022269.jpg
- RAMC 1444-7 File:Snapshot of group of 8 soldiers in front of trees Wellcome L0063418.jpg
- RAMC 1444-7 File:Snapshot of group of 9 soldiers in front of palm trees Wellcome L0063419.jpg
- RAMC 801 File:Soldier holding transfusion bottle Wellcome L0023911.jpg
- RAMC 1109-3 File:Souvenirs of Percy B. Spurgin; cartoon on innoculation. Wellcome L0023273.jpg
- RAMC 1109-2 File:Souvenirs of Percy B. Spurgin; cartoon. Wellcome L0023274.jpg
- File:Souvenirs of RAMC service of P. Roberts and K. Roberts. Wellcome L0023811.jpg
- RAMC 2064-9 File:Staff and cadets of the RAMC OCTU MEF, 1944 Wellcome L0031599.jpg
- RAMC 438-3 File:Staff Sargeant JH Gibbons on horseback. Wellcome L0027460.jpg
- RAMC 438-3 File:Staff Sargeant JH Gibbons. Wellcome L0027458.jpg
- RAMC 1444-10 File:Statement as to disability on demobilization Wellcome L0063429.jpg
- RAMC 1444-10 File:Statement as to disability on demobilization Wellcome L0063430.jpg
- RAMC 635 File:Steward's store, 20 General Hospital, Boer War Wellcome L0024932.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Stretcher bearers unloading casualties Wellcome L0024144.jpg
- RAMC 850 File:Sugical ward, 17 Casualty Clearing Station. Wellcome L0030194.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Gen. Holloway (from Prof.E. Parkes alb Wellcome L0031894.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Gen. JA Woolfryes (from Prof. E Parkes Wellcome L0031898.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. HH Stokes (from Prof. E Parkes' album) Wellcome L0031912.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj N. Alcock (from Prof E. Parkes Wellcome L0031901.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. B Connolly (from Prof. E Parkes' Wellcome L0031906.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. BC Kerr(from Prof E Parkes'album) Wellcome L0031917.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. CJL Bushe(from Prof E Parkes'alb Wellcome L0031916.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. DF de Hodgson (from Prof. E Parke Wellcome L0031909.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. E Ward (from Prof. E Parkes'album Wellcome L0031914.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. ECR Ward (from Prof. E Parkes' al Wellcome L0031907.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. GE Dobson (from Prof E Parkes'alb Wellcome L0031915.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. H Comerford (from Prof. E Parkes' Wellcome L0031913.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. J Fitzmaurice (from Prof. E Parke Wellcome L0031910.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. J O'Reilly (from Prof E. Parkes Wellcome L0031899.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. JB Wilson (from Prof E. Parkes Wellcome L0031902.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. JD Edge (from Prof. E Parkes' al Wellcome L0031908.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. RN Mally (from Prof. E. Parkes al Wellcome L0031896.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. T Babington (from Prof. E Parkes Wellcome L0031911.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. WE Saunders (from Prof E. Parkes Wellcome L0031900.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj. Wills (from Prof. E. Parkes album Wellcome L0031897.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Maj.GH le Mottee ( Prof.E. Parkes albu Wellcome L0031895.jpg
- RAMC 273 File:Surg. Naj. D Renton (from Prof E. Parkes Wellcome L0031903.jpg
_Wellcome_L0031912.jpg){kind=link}
_Wellcome_L0031917.jpg){kind=link}
T
[edit]- RAMC 1640-3 File:Tanglin Barracks, Singapore, 1930. Wellcome L0026891.jpg
- RAMC 389-1 File:Testimonial to Captain John Smith McCombe Wellcome L0046127.jpg
- RAMC 603 File:Text to accompany drawing of Essex Farm, RAMC-603 (Vol. 2) Wellcome L0074441.jpg
- File:Th Raadzaal Hospital; RAMC O-S-35-738-5 Wellcome L0022433.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:The "Massage Exercise Room" Wellcome L0025842.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:The "Victory Group" Wellcome L0025841.jpg
- RAMC 801-6 File:The back of a photograph of James Barry Wellcome L0046129.jpg
- RAMC 945-4 File:The Bulletin, March 1917; cartoon. Wellcome L0023022.jpg
- File:The front square, Trinity; RAMC O-S-35-738-5 Wellcome L0022430.jpg
- RAMC 1405 File:The Golden Book, RAMC; 1405 Wellcome L0024134.jpg
- RAMC 438-3 File:The grave of Staff Sargeant JH Gibbons. c. 1901. Wellcome L0027459.jpg
- RAMC 1675-11 File:The Great Ward of the Station Hospital, Malta, circa 1906 Wellcome L0023272.jpg
- Keep Either David Bruce d.1931 or Kennedy d.1944 were the photographer, PD-old-70-1996 applies. --Fæ (talk) 10:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- RAMC 1127-1 File:The Knight of the Swabs Wellcome L0046095.jpg
- RAMC 1274-3 File:The papers of Major General Oswald McSheey Wellcome L0026189.jpg
- RAMC 1274-4 File:The papers of Major General Oswald McSheey Wellcome L0026190.jpg
- RAMC 397 File:The papers of Sir John Hall Wellcome L0026497.jpg
- RAMC 945-5 File:The RAMC Magazine, June 15 1917; cartoon Wellcome L0023023.jpg
- RAMC 945-5 File:The RAMC Magazine, May 4 1917; canrtoon Wellcome L0023024.jpg
- RAMC 1197-1 File:The School of Sanitation, Blackpool Wellcome L0038438.jpg
- RAMC 1127-1 File:The Snappers Snapped - nurses taking photos Wellcome L0046094.jpg
- RAMC 479 File:The Wipers Times, issue cover April 1916 Wellcome L0031563.jpg
- RAMC 479 File:The Wipers Times, issue cover December 1916 Wellcome L0031565.jpg
- RAMC 479 File:The Wipers Times, issue cover March 1916 Wellcome L0031562.jpg
- RAMC 479 File:The Wipers Times, issue cover May 1916 Wellcome L0031564.jpg
- File:The Wonderboom Tree, RAMC O-S-31-557 Wellcome L0022435.jpg
- RAMC 801-22 File:Transfusion Wellcome L0024142.jpg
- RAMC 760 File:Trench feet. Wellcome L0025834.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022655.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022656.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022657.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022658.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022659.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022660.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022661.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022662.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022663.jpg
- RAMC 1242 File:Trypanosomes Wellcome L0022664.jpg
- RAMC 1139 File:Two documents, from a medical department, circa 1850 Wellcome L0023755.jpg
- RAMC 1139 File:Two documents, from a medical department, circa 1850 Wellcome L0023756.jpg
- RAMC 1218-1 File:Two men in steelhelmets c1917 Wellcome L0029994.jpg
_Wellcome_L0074441.jpg){kind=link}
U - V
[edit]- RAMC 1444-6 File:Uncaptioned group photograph of 12 men, mostly in uniform Wellcome L0063417.jpg
- RAMC 1405 File:Unit dance, RAMC; 1405 Wellcome L0024135.jpg
- RAMC 557 File:Unloading Hospital Train Wellcome L0034439.jpg
- RAMC 1259-3 File:Vaughan. Transport, Katerini, Greece Wellcome L0034376.jpg
- RAMC 801-8 File:View of Chatham Harbour, showing Fort Pitt, Wellcome L0038373.jpg
- RAMC 592 File:Vinca Rosea Wellcome L0049837.jpg
- RAMC 1608 File:Visit of by Brigadier B.M. Gordon, RMAC; 1608 Wellcome L0025441.jpg
W
[edit]- RAMC 594-4 File:Leslie John Witts by Brigadier Sidney Smith Wellcome L0023571.jpg
- RAMC 1762-2 File:Wounded being carried from a British Hospital Ship Wellcome L0030198.jpg
- RAMC 1765 File:Wounded men crossing the Channel Wellcome L0027204.jpg
- File:WW1 Plastic surgery cases Wellcome L0068050.jpg
- RAMC 843 File:WW2; regimental aid posts and weapon pits, Korea Wellcome L0024972.jpg
- RAMC 843 File:WW2; regimental aid posts and weapon pits, Korea Wellcome L0024973.jpg
- RAMC 843 File:WW2; regimental aid posts and weapon pits, Korea Wellcome L0024975.jpg
- RAMC 1015-5 File:Xmas Greetings Wellcome L0049549.jpg
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the whole idea of a non revocable license is that it's, well, non revocable. The ones I checked, even had a valid license in the EXIF. If there is a good explanation for an individual file why the original CC license would be invalid, create a DR for that file with a valid explanation. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wellcome DR request for RAMC
[edit]The Wellcome Library have corrected the source for the images to CC-BY-NC-ND after their donor requested the correction. The current licenses of CC-BY on the images are invalid and not supported by the declared copyright holder. This deletion request is raised on behalf of the the Wellcome Library based on a list supplied by them. There were 991 images found to be currently hosted on Commons when the list was reviewed. Refer to the detail and addenda of the previous nomination.
The previous deletion request has a list that is still considered active and has been worked on since the last preemptive closure. For the original correspondence with the Wellcome Library, refer to ticket:2016090610022455. I have had later correspondence with the Library since the ticket was created, but have not added to the record as the Wellcome are discussing this deletion request internally. For background on administrator Jcb's closure, refer to Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_59#Admin_support_needed_for_Wellcome_Library_request, the consequences being that the maintenance category was re-added to the images after Jcb's removal and deletion of the category.
Given the majority of views in the admin noticeboard discussion, it would be inappropriate for closure of this second deletion request, or for any sysop action on these images to be taken by Jcb.
Please refer to the previous list in the last deletion request. There is no need for a second list in this deletion request, or a list to be duplicated and maintained elsewhere, and comments on specific images should continue to be added here, even though the DR is marked as closed. Any images reviewed and as a consequence having the licenses changed to public domain, should be removed from the maintenance category. At the time of this nomination there are 921 images still requiring review or deletion and these images have been templated with this second nomination. --Fæ (talk) 10:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Defer to WMF legal as way beyond the pay grade for COM:DR.
- There are two obvious potential judgements for this group, but deciding between them is beyond COM:DR.
- These are old images, obviously PD through age
- A contemporary corporate body is making a claim of a non-free licence over them.
- WMF's response to this is to either advocate the PD-through-age position, against the clear wishes of a corporate donor. Or else to delete the lot as non-free. That is a serious choice to make, not one we can make here. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- WMF legal can step in if they wish, they are not under our control. The decision that can be made, and fairly easily, in this DR is whether there can be a credible claim of publication rights for individual images. Where this is reasonable the image should be deleted, where the opposite is true, then the image licence can be replaced with a public domain one.
- At the current time, nobody is claiming any 'sweat of the brow' deletion rationale, or any other claim that might end up needing WMF legal to consider take-down notices. Hopefully that will be avoided, especially considering the images are of relatively low resolution and quality rather than archive or research quality. As the images being marked as keep appear to have been published or made available to the public either well before 25 years ago, or by people or organizations that were not the RAMC, neither claims of publication rights nor sweat of the brow are likely to stand up to scrutiny.
- However IANAL, and as I am the uploader for most of these, I'll inform WMF legal of the DR. --Fæ (talk) 10:31, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Keep cc licenses are non revocable. It's just like I take a picture of the sweets box and release it under this license! --173.55.239.44 14:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- No license has been revoked. The original license has been found to be invalid. Commons cannot host images on an invalid license, so the licenses need to be replaced or the images deleted. --Fæ (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This DR is still very poorly worded. My understanding after reading this page and that archived discussion is that 1. Royal Army Medical Corps (RAMC) claims copyright for these works. They supposed to have agreed with Wellcome Library to publish these works with a CC BY 4.0 license which now turned out to be wrong. It seems we blindly trust Wellcome Library here. Why? Why our volunteers are not verifying the accuracy of the information before a bulk upload like this as it is clear that Wellcome Library is not the copyright holder? Jee 15:38, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- The Wellcome Library maintain internal records of archive donors and associated release documentation, these records were used to validate copyright before the original 100,000 historic medical images for public release were changed to CC-BY (before 2014 they had a NC restriction). I have never had access to the list (it is not a public record), nor been part of how the judgement was made, nor do I know whether the original donors for every released image were approached. However with such large numbers involved and a range of different types of donors to their archives, human error is a certainty rather than a possibility. The fact here is that the Wellcome are helping with housekeeping licenses where a mistake has been made, and that is something to be encouraged for Commons' long term reliability, rather than resisted or turned into a source of embarrassment. --Fæ (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- (There is no resistance or attempt for embarrassment. Just asking some doubts as many of us can't see the private discussion (OTRS).) So my understanding is that Wellcome Library acknowledged that there is mistake in this case from their side. But in most other cases, we still can trust them. If this is the truth, I've no problem to accept. But if it repeats, we need to change our procedure to contacting the copyright holder directly and record it under OTRS as a must. Here, in this case, I support the deletion of all files affecting this mistake. Please remove the files you think that they are PD as we can't keep this discussion for a long time. Otherwise we can restore them later when we have time. Jee 16:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- The Wellcome Library maintain internal records of archive donors and associated release documentation, these records were used to validate copyright before the original 100,000 historic medical images for public release were changed to CC-BY (before 2014 they had a NC restriction). I have never had access to the list (it is not a public record), nor been part of how the judgement was made, nor do I know whether the original donors for every released image were approached. However with such large numbers involved and a range of different types of donors to their archives, human error is a certainty rather than a possibility. The fact here is that the Wellcome are helping with housekeeping licenses where a mistake has been made, and that is something to be encouraged for Commons' long term reliability, rather than resisted or turned into a source of embarrassment. --Fæ (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Question - Are all files that have been identified as PD already excluded from the category? Now the DR has a valid rationale (in contrary to the previous DR), this seems to be the most important remaining question - Jcb (talk) 15:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Previously answered at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_59#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:Wellcome_DR_request_for_RAMC, where you requested administrator action against me for raising this DR. --Fæ (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- At the moment you wrote that you had filtered them out, the category still contained all 923 files. Now it's a bit less, so please tell me have all PD files been excluded from the category? (by the way, I requested to deal with the 'situation', not to hit some admin button against you. Please stop taking everything personal. I try to work with facts. You can agree or disagree with what I write, but please don't see everything as a personal vendetta against you.) Jcb (talk) 16:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Previously answered at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_59#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:Wellcome_DR_request_for_RAMC, where you requested administrator action against me for raising this DR. --Fæ (talk) 15:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- I responded with a statement of fact. Please close the thread you created on COM:AN which is intended for requests for "administrator's intervention", before creating secondary discussions that appear increasingly pointy.
- At the current time there is no more to say here, apart from quoting the nomination which you have described as a valid rationale, "Any images reviewed and as a consequence having the licenses changed to public domain, should be removed from the maintenance category." --Fæ (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for now. In contradiction with the statement of nominator, the nomination still contains files that have been identified as PD, e.g. File:Sir David Bruce's, photograph album, Zululand 1894-1896. Wellcome L0022650.jpg and File:Watercolour, wounded soldier at Waterloo Wellcome L0022544.jpg. This DR of almost 900 files, of which a part already has been identified as PD, is unmanagable this way. This should have been sorted out before renomination. Jcb (talk) 20:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- No contradiction, the numbers in the maintenance category will reduce as long as public domain licences replace the incorrect CC-BY licenses during the life of this deletion request. This is exactly what the nomination text means with "Any images reviewed and as a consequence having the licenses changed to public domain, should be removed from the maintenance category." Deletion requests are not resolved before they are opened, that is not how a consensus on Commons works.
- With regard to the examples, I do not direct the edits of Slowking4, Revent or yourself. As you used your sysop tools to block my accounts for attempting to re-add the maintenance category because you stated it was disruptive diff, it is hardly a surprize that it was not maintained, no doubt there are contributors that might help, were there not on-going threats of administrator action.
- If you keep on insisting that we cannot have community discussion using the open process of deletion requests, then the outcome must be to delete all the images per COM:PRP and COM:L, as the current stated license of CC-BY is incorrect and misleads reusers. --Fæ (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep those which are PD, delete the rest — per nom., obviously. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: In other news, it is Monday, so it’s Fæ bashing day. Or is that Tuesday? Ah, silly me: Everyday is Fæ bashing day, and every reason is a good excuse, even something so ludicrous as the implicit accusation that Fæ wants PD content to be deleted. Where were these zealous defenders when serial vandal Fastily wreacked havoc in Commons with his admin-bit powered deletionist agenda? Where are they when everybody and their dog can have all kinds of Commons content deleted (incl. PD-old items) on a whim just by filing a DR and then “win the lotto” when it’s closed by a deletionist admin? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment While it is certainly true that a CC license is not revocable, this is not that simple.
- OTRS ticket:2016090610022455 is ambiguous. It says "We have had to change the rights on a group of images and consequently they need to be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- That could mean either of two things:
- The RAMC has changed its mind about the licensing of the images and, although they authorized the CC-BY license originally, now they want to use a CC-BY-NC-ND, or
- The original document transferring the images authorized only a CC-BY-NC-ND license and the Wellcome Library erred in using the CC-BY license.
- If the first is the case, then the Wellcome and the RAMC need to be reminded that a CC-BY license is irrevocable -- when you issue an irrevocable license, you had better be careful, because you can't take it back for any reason.
- If the second is correct, then the Wellcome had no right to use the CC-BY license and therefore it is not valid. If Smith issues an irrevocable license to works whose copyright belongs to Brown, such a license is valid only if Brown has authorized it. In that case the question of irrevocability doesn't come up because the license wasn't valid from the start.
- Therefore, in order to close this, we need to ask the Wellcome which situation is correct. Fæ, you are the contact person here -- please do that and add the response to the OTRS ticket. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Question: Please explain more precisely why Wellcome wants to delete the Public Accounts of Canada, digitized in the collection of the Library and archives of Canada from a copy of the University of Toronto. Or why Wellcome even cares about that file with which apparently it has nothing to do? -- Asclepias (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: The nomination begins with the statement "Nominated from a list provided by the Wellcome Library on behalf of the Royal Army Medical Corps (RAMC)". But one wonders how the RAMC or Wellcome made that list. Wellcome's claim that the RAMC claims a copyright, for example, on "File:Artemisia annua, Artemisinin, ACTs and Malaria Control in Africa- Tradition, Science and Public Policy.pdf" and "File:Audtor General report Canada1946.pdf" is not believable. (And those two examples are just from looking at files beginning with "A" in the list.) Apparently, someone merely wrote the word "Wellcome" in a search engine and copied the result including everything that contains that word, even if it never had anything to do with images and even less with the RAMC. This list is abusive. This would suggest a "keep" for the nomination. And Wellcome or someone else should make a list that could be taken seriously. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'll be trying to work on this over the next few days. It seems likely that the non-PD RAMC collection requires deletion. There are still a few files that are clearly PD, so this will take some time and thought. I'll leave the ones I'm unsure of in the category, and add {{Disputed}} just to show I've touched them. Storkk (talk) 09:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Storkk, I think that is premature -- see my comment of October 15 above. We need to know the reason behind this change in license, because, as I explain above, one possibility is valid and the other is not, and the OTRS message is ambiguous. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: There is a comment in the OTRS ticket amounting to "of course some should be kept since they are actually CC-BY-SA" which leads me to believe that it is likely that the error was Wellcome's. In either case, absent clarification (and none seems forthcoming), I believe we have to acquiesce to Wellcome's request and delete on PRP grounds. Storkk (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- (obviously only those that might conceivably be covered by the RAMC's valid NC-ND license.) Storkk (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Why acquiesce to a request that may or may not be valid? Clarifying the situation will probably embarrass someone, but we're looking both at a lot of work in doing the necessary sorting and deletion and at a loss of perhaps 1,000 images. I agree that PRP would require deletion if there were no way to clarify the situation, but I don't believe it requires us to take action on a request that is ambiguous and maybe invalid when it should be very easy for Wellcome to fully explain the situation. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- While I understand your stance, I see four possibilities:
- the images were actually CC-BY and Wellcome will tell us this
- they are actually NC-ND and Wellcome will tell us (in their view, again)
- they are CC-BY and we have no further clarification
- they are NC-ND and no further clarification
- Case #1 is the only possibility that allows us to keep and distribute RAMC's copyrighted work, and as the months wear on post their request for us to delete the images, it seems optimistic at best. Storkk (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I disagree with your classification. "Actually NC-ND" is not meaningful to me. The question is the terms of RAMC's original donation. If it was NC-ND, then Wellcome's putting a CC-BY tag on the images was invalid, and we indeed must delete. If, on the other hand, RAMC changed their mind, then Wellcome's use of CC-BY was valid and irrevocable. For me, that's the question, and it is one that Wellcome can and should answer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- "Actually" meaning the original terms. I agree that we wouldn't need to delete if the original terms were CC-BY and Wellcome clarifies this. Failing the first is a legal obligation to delete, failing the second is a procedural obligation to delete under PRP. I see clarification as necessary to keep, rather than to delete. Storkk (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Case #1 is where it started, see the CC-BY 4.0 license in the EXIF. The most likely is that they are trying to revoke their initial release, which is not allowed. Until we receive a very good explanation to the contrary, we have enough reason to assume the initial license to be valid. With this DR, Fae seems to be acting on behalf of Wellcome rather than as a member of the Commons community, which would be a problematic conflict of interests. Jcb (talk) 16:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Wellcome's EXIF is irrelevant if Wellcome mistakenly released RAMC's images under an incorrect license, because Wellcome applied the EXIF. Storkk (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Also, regardless of that, since Wellcome is the copyright holder of zero of the images here, Wellcome can neither license the files nor revoke their nonexistent license. They are simply passing on RAMC's license. Storkk (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- If they did their release in error, they are responsible for that, not we. It's their responsibility to come up with a proper explanation. Without such an explanation, I see no need to delete these files. Jcb (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, Wellcome made a mistake, one which impacts a third party's copyrights. They have tried to mitigate that mistake by contacting us to remove the files... while I agree that it would be fantastic to have a detailed summary of what exactly happened, I'm not sure we are in a position to demand that. We are quite possibly (and I'd say quite probably) currently releasing a third party's copyrighted work under a more permissive license than they ever released it as. And we have been told about it. Perhaps we can bar Wellcome images in the future that aren't PD or that they didn't create... but that's a different discussion. In any case, there are still a large number of clearly PD works in the maintenance category. For now, I'll work on those, since there is obviously no consensus to delete among admins at the moment. I would respectfully suggest that any admin that closes this DR as keep has a responsibility to reach out to Wellcome for an explanation and re-nominate depending on the answer, because their contacting us in August regarding this mistake has IMO shifted the onus substantially. Storkk (talk) 16:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Also, @Jameslwoodward and Jcb: could you explain exactly what you see is the difference between this case and a regular case of Flickrwashing? The only differences that I see are that: a) they contacted us to report the error and b) they are a significant GLAM source ... which, while it should not gain them any procedural favors or exceptions, neither should it somehow prejudice us the other way... I guess what I'm asking is why are you requiring them to <hyperbole ahead!> grovel </hyperbole> about their mistake, when we all routinely delete Flickrwashed images without a second thought? Perhaps I'm being shortsighted, but I don't see it. Storkk (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- As I said above, the OTRS message is ambiguous. I don't need anyone to grovel, but, it may be their mistake or RAMC's change of mind. To repeat, the message says:
- "We have had to change the rights on a group of images and consequently they need to be removed from Wikimedia Commons."
- That could mean either of two things:
- 1)The RAMC has changed its mind about the licensing of the images and, although they authorized the CC-BY license originally, now they want to use a CC-BY-NC-ND, or
- 2)The original document transferring the images authorized only a CC-BY-NC-ND license and the Wellcome Library erred in using the CC-BY license.
- In the first case, we keep them because the RAMC can't change its mind on an irrevocable license. In the second, the CC-BY license was invalid, so we must delete. Most of the discussion above assumes that the Wellcome made a mistake, and while that may well be correct, the message doesn't say that. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:29, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- I did understand your point (see my further breakdown into four distinct situations above), I just seem to disagree both with your apparent assessment of the relative likelihood of the possibilities and with what our default position should be. Storkk (talk) 17:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- As I said above, the OTRS message is ambiguous. I don't need anyone to grovel, but, it may be their mistake or RAMC's change of mind. To repeat, the message says:
- If they did their release in error, they are responsible for that, not we. It's their responsibility to come up with a proper explanation. Without such an explanation, I see no need to delete these files. Jcb (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I disagree with your classification. "Actually NC-ND" is not meaningful to me. The question is the terms of RAMC's original donation. If it was NC-ND, then Wellcome's putting a CC-BY tag on the images was invalid, and we indeed must delete. If, on the other hand, RAMC changed their mind, then Wellcome's use of CC-BY was valid and irrevocable. For me, that's the question, and it is one that Wellcome can and should answer. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- While I understand your stance, I see four possibilities:
- Why acquiesce to a request that may or may not be valid? Clarifying the situation will probably embarrass someone, but we're looking both at a lot of work in doing the necessary sorting and deletion and at a loss of perhaps 1,000 images. I agree that PRP would require deletion if there were no way to clarify the situation, but I don't believe it requires us to take action on a request that is ambiguous and maybe invalid when it should be very easy for Wellcome to fully explain the situation. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Storkk, I think that is premature -- see my comment of October 15 above. We need to know the reason behind this change in license, because, as I explain above, one possibility is valid and the other is not, and the OTRS message is ambiguous. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- ping Fæ & Storkk, Is there anything new on this, or is this just waiting for a close? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- I stopped working on them after reaching the impasse with Jcb and Jim above. I still think we should delete many of them, since I think it vanishingly unlikely that we will get clarification, and absent clarification specifically that RAMC are trying to change a validly applied license, I think this should be treated similarly to Flickrwashing. However after I stated I would not delete over their objections, it seemed like a huge waste of time to work on them just to fiddle with their categories. Storkk (talk) 16:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- I think we should simply leave them. As I have said several times, I think it is entirely reasonable to insist on clarity when we are asked to delete images that had a CC-BY license on them. If Wellcome comes back again with a request to delete, we should ask them to clarify the reason as discussed above. If they don't come back, we leave them. Since Ellin is not involved, perhaps she would be good enough to make a decision. If she decides to delete, I would be happy to help with the effort. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- I would completely agree with such a keep for now closure. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- If this is closed as keep, we should probably consider restoring those I already deleted (I think all the redlinks above are mine) for consistency. I still think it is a mistake, so do not wish to do it myself. Storkk (talk) 18:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Procedural close per discussion, no consensus for deletion. --Krd 17:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)