User talk:A1Cafel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:N-C16)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little hint. With all due respect

[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6zaCV4niKk&ab_channel=Yusuf%2FCatStevens

There are people who always manage to turn a good day into a bad day for others. And there are also people like you who make it almost impossible to take further part in this project.

Think about it. Just keep your own problems to yourself and start having a little more respect for others. The world is beautiful, and it's beautiful because there are people who are constructive. I realize this won't even affect you emotionally, but I just wanted to let you know. Hubertl 17:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

good music. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
but rude message. // sikander { talk } 🦖 22:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see sincerity in the message. This account is still tolerated in this project only because it acts like a worm that decomposes garbage, and nothing more. It's a pity that it doesn't focus on the real garbage – copyright violations – but on images related to freedom of panorama. Being autistic like them, I understand their hyperfocus, but I would like them to realize it and start acting constructively instead of being so harassing as they are now. Please note that nominating images to deletion due to violating freedom of panorama is not and has never been the issue with this account. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hubertl, Modern primat, and RodRabelo7: Actually this account is bordering the problem user. We should also face the matter of users with whom interaction is difficult to impossible. -- Blackcat 09:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Blackcat - I noticed the Commons link you provided below. @Hubertl to your point, there is "history" here in a similar link for English Wikipedia, where they were indefinately blocked for "abusing multiple accounts." -- Ooligan (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS Moreover. It's a problem user who abused the patience of administrators. If it were for me I wouldn't have unblocked because they's disrupting the project. 12.26, 14 Ağustos 2024‎ Blackcat (A)
  • i still believe this user is trying to contribute in good manner. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Modern primat: really? Please, tell us how, since it's hard to believe. -- Blackcat 23:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    While I get frustrated by A1Cafel's calls on what to delete and I do believe there is sometimes bias on their part (hopefully unintentional), I do believe that A1Cafel is acting in good faith. I have seen a lot of good work from them. At least on my end I have not seen A1Cafel intentionally trying to bully or troll people. I have only seen A1Cafel make absolutist judgement calls that I would consider on the side of excessive caution rather than in the interest of Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia's mission. Myotus (talk) 20:32, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Save urls of South Africa FoP deletions

[edit]

I have one very important request for you as you are by far the largest nominator for South African Freedom of Panorama deletion requests. Since Freedom of Panorama is included in the Copyright Amendment Bill of 2018, which looks likely to pass into law (though no one knows when), I would like to know if you could please save on commons somewhere a list of all of the South Africa Freedom of Panorama deletion requests you have made? That way, when the bill is finally gazetted into law the Admins can go through the list and undelete them. Thank you, Discott (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Discott: I have added [[Category:South African FOP cases/pending]] to each ZA's FoP nomination. Once the South African Parliament passed the amended FoP law, those images will be undeleted by the admins. So no worry on that. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's perfect. Thank you. --Discott (talk) 09:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I learned something new

[edit]

I didn't know that deletion requests need to be categorized manually, but I now noticed that you've been doing such categorizations. I've used those maintenance categories at least once or twice to get an idea of what could fall under TOO, for example. Very helpful categories. Thanks for keeping track of those things this way :) Nakonana (talk) 13:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I probably should include an example of what I'm talking about haha:[1]. — Nakonana (talk) 13:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Obisk predsednika vlade Roberta Goloba in predsednice Evropske komisije Ursule von der Leyen v Črni na Koroškem. Ogled razstave fotografij o posledicah opustošenja ujme avgusta 2023 v prostorih občine. (53965190461).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 18:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

thumb| Baginda 480 (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to you if the image I uploaded is legal. It was taken at Mahathir Mohamad birth home and is a photo from before 1962 (taken in 1939). Baginda 480 (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Baginda 480: Should be OK because it is already entered PD before the URAA restoration date. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello (2)

[edit]

thumb|

The image has already been repeated. Baginda 480 (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same with this
thumb|
But this image upload in 2019, the other image upload in 2022 Baginda 480 (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Baginda 480: You may use {{Duplicate}} to tag the newer file, and then an admin will merge it. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok thank Baginda 480 (talk) 02:03, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

[edit]
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Presidential portrait of Sadyr Japarov.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello (3)

[edit]

Do you think these categories should be deleted since there are no images in them?

Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1976 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1981 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1982 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1985 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 1990 Category:Mahathir Mohamad in 2009

I might recreate them once I have images from that year. Baginda 480 (talk) 11:10, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Baginda 480: Sure, please put {{SD|G2}} to these categories. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thumb|
为什么这个你两年前创建的又符合版权?(刚才才看了你的简历发现你好像会华语,我就用华语吧我母语是华语) Baginda 480 (talk) 04:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
我是参考这个,我以为这个频道的影片都能上传 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:15, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Baginda 480: You need to pay attention, not every video on the channel has the CC-BY license. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok,我会再学习学习,不会的会问你 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
你可以检查我上传的每个图片,真的麻烦了 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
其实你上传的这只影片如何证明符合版权,因为我找不到相关内容关于版权的 Baginda 480 (talk) 04:23, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Baginda 480: Videos marked with "Creative Commons" at the bottom. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I worried that you may be blocked, as Jeff G. has given you a final warning, and some of the files you uploaded and identified as copyvio is after that. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
谢谢你的担忧,我自己看着办,我会先去多研究版权问题 Baginda 480 (talk) 08:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manif du 1er mai 2023 (52862318686).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 15:09, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BikersForTrump1.RollingThunder.WDC.29May2016 (27672036472).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Therapyisgood (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

A kind request - please stay away from my Flickr and refrain from importing files the moment I release them. I see you uploaded files while I was already prepping them to upload. Thank you. I hope for your cooperation. Meanwhile, reconsider your deletion request, while you upload protest banners. Labrang (talk) 06:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you really don't want others to import from Your Flickr stream, why don't you choose a license that is forbidden on Commons, then you upload the work as your own work? --A1Cafel (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And while I am at it - why do you upload a rather pointless photo like this - File:Preparations for government orchestrated event (53684050396).jpg? Or do you just use some automated algorythm to transfer snatch all license applicable photos into commons, regardless their actual value? Is that how it works? Labrang (talk) 07:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's the filename automatically generated by F2C. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:17, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly the problem. Mass-import just because you can. Mind you, what's the difference according to you between this photo and this photo Labrang (talk) 09:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have blurred the copyrighted element.--A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You did not when you uploaded it initially. Do I understand you correctly you now confess to violation of the rules that you apply to others?
Mind you - this derivative act takes away the whole purpose [message] of the banner - so please consider to have the photo deleted altogether, if that particular element makes it a copyright violation. Thank you. Labrang (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And please, indicate what is the element in the other image that you nominated that is the problematic part? Labrang (talk) 09:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The boots, and the icon of Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How are the boots and the face (a drawing, not a photo) protected work? And again, please delete the other photo with the crocodile and ivanishvili. This takes away the entire purpose of the banner. This is more vandalizing than helping anything. Labrang (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And please, confess you applied rules to me (3:46) that you deliberately did not apply to yourself (3:42). Labrang (talk) 10:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for any inconvenience. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least that is clear. And the boots and the face (a drawing, not a photo) are not protected work. They are just a private drawing similarly to wall graffiti. Wall graffiti in Georgia - we have plenty of. Labrang (talk) 10:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sub reaction

[edit]

""If you really don't want others to import from Your Flickr stream, why don't you choose a license that is forbidden on Commons, then you upload the work as your own work?" - that was not my message. I was preparing SOME photos to be transferred and indeed had uploaded some extra photos to my Flickr and adjusted the license appropriately - so in that case there was nothing wrong with that as such, except for the fact that I took a break from the screen and overnight you transferred the photos, while I was prepping them already in Commons with different file names - only a few hours after I had them uploaded to Flickr / changed license. This feels like prying. Also, as result, there are now some duplicates. Do you sniff Flickr and snatch any photo that you see the minute it is released under a lower license? The fact that a photo is adjusted to a lower license doesn't OBLIGE you to upload them the minute they are released. Right? Labrang (talk) 10:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded those photos 12 hours after your license change, not "minute" right? Also such photos are easily search on Flickr, and it is unfair to blame me "prying" Flickr stream. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:21, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever the case, it simply feels that way. Regardless how easy it is to find such photos in Flickr. I have noticed various Commons people pry on Flickr and upload whatever they can without checking the actual (additional) value for Commons. Not saying that is the case here - although your eagerness to upload whatever is free license, while at the same time also looking for whatever you can nominate for deletion seems to make you sloppy for what you upload yourself. Anyways, have a nice day. Labrang (talk) 11:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Protest Tbilisi 21 April 2024 (53987798696).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Labrang (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#A1Cafel and hostile behaviour towards Flickr original sources. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

I've tagged it, so that you can see which thread it is out of the multiple already there about your behaviour. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gaussian blurs

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:CICLOP_Building_(Bucharest)_interior_with_artwork_blurred.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=926530944 : there is nothing wrong with adding the maintenance category "Category:Censored by lack of FOP" (though I find its name contentious: do we also consider all copyright protection "censorship"?), but please do not remove Category:Gaussian blurs to avoid copyright infringement when you do so. - Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. --A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:20231201 Dubai Foto Oficial COP28-cortesia COP281462 (53368110066).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021-02-21 15-47-12 ILCE-7C DSC03177 (50970191586).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.163.69.3 09:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

您好

[edit]

这个影片在youtube

DmQaJVcWC4

SATU HARI DI HARI Raya (feat. Tun Dr Siti Hasmah)

我能上传吗,影片是有creative common的,但是因为有音乐,所以我不确定可不可以上载 Baginda 480 (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Baginda 480: If you have doubt, don't upload it. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:19, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument aux morts des Armées de Champagne

[edit]
@A1Cafel: Bonjour, Savez-vous remettre en place toutes ces photos que vous fîtes supprimer en septembre 2023. L'on peut envisager de les remettre en place à partir du 1er janvier 2025 à 0H00 (c'est bientôt)
Hello, do you know how to put back all those photos that you had deleted in September 2023. We can consider to put them back in place from January 1, 2025 at 0h00 (it is soon)
Hallo, wissen Sie, wie man all diese Fotos wieder einfügt, die Sie im September 2023 löschen ließen. Es kann in Betracht gezogen werden, sie ab dem 1. Januar 2025 um 0h00 (es ist bald)
Здравствуйте, вы знаете, как вернуть все те фотографии, которые вы удалили в сентябре 2023 года. Мы можем рассмотреть их обратно на место с 1 января 2025 года в 0h00 (это скоро)

193.248.144.185 08:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are already marked with "Undelete in 2025". Once the time is arrived, an admin will restore them, so no worry about it. --A1Cafel (talk) 08:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

[edit]

I submitted your 5 duplicates today for speedy deletion: