Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/19

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 19th, 2016

Commons:Deletion requests/File:JAY KHODIYAR ORIGNAL.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted work. The photographer died less than 70 years ago and we (Mary Evans Picture Library) represent the Estate. I would be grateful if you can confirm immediate withdrawal from Wikimedia. Please refer to the metadata quoted on this page! I look forward to hearing from you soon - Tom Gillmor, Head of Content, Mary Evans Picture Library (tom.gillmor@maryevans.com) 92.29.80.31 14:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --Sealle (talk) 16:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google is listed as source, no permission, likely copyrighted. MB298 (talk) 23:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, like nigga, what the fuck are we doing Content is matched via Bloomberg as belonging to "Elizabeth Flores/The Star Tribune via AP Photo". I agree with MB298 - image should be deleted as it is very likely a copyright violation. Ellomate (talk) 01:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Rekt Ellomate (talk) 00:06, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monkdarren (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monkdarren (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 08:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:41, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Micheallamb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.cepamerica.com/CEPAmerica/media/Images/Location%20Pictures/St-Rose-Hospital.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Note that instead of commenting on this deletion discussion, the uploader tried to work around it by uploading File:St Rose Hostpital Part 2.jpg, a duplicate of the same file. LX (talk, contribs) 18:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 19:22, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a puzzling image: it purports to be of a man whose "...most important customers were Queen Victoria and Edward VII." Yet it is claimed as "own work" by someone in 2016. I am unaware of anyone living who was a portraitist during the reign of Queen Victoria, additional clarity on the actual creator of this image is required. I also find difficulty with the appearance of the image, the face seems too modern, the cut line below the beard and at the collar could feature in "bad photoshop examples" pages, and so on. The pixel size in the coat and the face aren't even similar and after reading the en:wiki article and following the references, I wonder if this gent existed at all. In my opinion, if he did exist, this isn't a photograph of him. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • The "own work" claim is clearly nonsense, but it is unfortunately very common for inexperienced editors to choose that option; at least sometimes it is because this scan of the photograph is their own work, and they don't realise that "own work" means that the original photograph was their own work. I don't agree that "The pixel size in the coat and the face aren't even similar", but I do see that there are more prominent jpeg artefacts in the coat than in the face, which looks little suspicious; however, it is difficult to be sure whether that is significant or not, as jpeg artefacts can vary within an image, depending on the local character of the image content. I do agree that the line between the beard and the collar looks suspicious. The only source I can find to confirm that Richard Carroll existed that is not clearly derived from the English Wikipedia article about him is http://caimania.com/en/About-Us-i4.html, and even that one contains content which was included in earlier versions of the Wikipedia article, and which may be derived from it. If, as claimed in the Wikipedia article, he provided jewellery to Queen Victoria and Edward VII, I would have expected to have found more coverage of him. The conclusion of all this is that I think this is probably a hoax, but it is difficult to be totally sure. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think this file should be deleted as a hoax. The biography on English- and Russian-language Wikipedia cites sources which do not in any way support the biography. The sources do not mention Richard Carroll and they do not mention the notional Caiman brand of goldsmithing or jewelry. With the article text composed by Jeweller m thus rendered completely false, any image uploads by the same person should also be considered false. This appears to be a fabricated history, intended to lend a sheen of respectability to a Ukraine-based iPhone cover maker. Binksternet (talk) 05:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I showed my artist/designer/web developer wife this photo and she immediately said it was taken in the 1950s, before I could tell her about this situation. Nobody smiled for the camera back in 1870 when it was supposedly developed. Binksternet (talk) 22:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I hadn't thought of the fact that at that time people didn't smile in photographs, but that is true. (It is completely irrelevant, but just in case anyone who doesn't already know is interested, the reason people didn't smile is that with the very insensitive photographic emulsions available then, very long exposures were needed, and it was impossible to hold a smile for that long.) In addition, further consideration of various issues related to the English Wikipedia article where this file is used have shifted me to being convinced that the while thing is a hoax, so the file should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most probably a hoax. Out of scope (COM:ADVERT). --Sealle (talk) 08:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Верджиния (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship. File:Gulin3.jpg - no metadata, small width. The second file - unusual dimensions, photo from art photosession, it is unusual, I think, that the art professional photographer would upload such photo. File was use in PR-article.

Dmitry89 (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zona Libera Braila (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image not correct NIJO K K (talk) 10:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not relevent 115.248.2.217 04:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dansrugo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 00:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kelly (talk) 08:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality is too low; useless. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 00:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope, we can't see what it is. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:30, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doublon avec une image déja présente que j'ai mis par erreur. Karbanet (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas dans le domaine public - signalé et pas supprimé Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by INeverCry due to previous DR (per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jules Grandjouan). --PierreSelim (talk) 06:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cemoshkupi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Cemoshkupi (Facebook etc. grabber, with similar files deleted)

Gunnex (talk) 08:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (unlikely to be own work). --PierreSelim (talk) 06:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sniperpiper1322 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:34, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smekgwgww (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Probadly derived from elsewhere copyrighted content.

Gunnex (talk) 10:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SoutheastCoasters (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:SoutheastCoasters (serial copyright violator, multiple digicams & authors involved). Also per user talk and current copyvios: photos taken with a Sony DSC T33 are probadly copyrighted works by "Erik Johnson", and photos taken with a Canon PowerShot SD630 = works by "ParkTrips".

Gunnex (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magdalenakamieniarczyk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree with the nominator. Delete Dudek1337 (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 08:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Also vandalism by needless rotation requests!

Ies (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magdalenakamieniarczyk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magdalenakamieniarczyk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:35, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This same car has been rephotographed in higher quality and resolution here: File:1985 Mitsubishi Sigma (GK) SE station wagon (16347173648).jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sigh. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, useless, no cat, no encyclopedic value, just a test, etc F (talk) 16:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to Jacques Panas, ©Spotter-Aviation-Pibracais Gyrostat (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to Leor Yudelowitz Gyrostat (talk) 16:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to Falcon Aviation Services Gyrostat (talk) 17:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright to Falcon Aviation Services Gyrostat (talk) 17:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

({{http://www.atbookings.com/files/artiest_media/Julia%20van%20der%20Toorn/JuliaZahra_GeenHeld_z-tekst.jpg}} Araser (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping 19 August 2016 INeverCry (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Julia Zahra (2016).jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable selfie of a minor. Is used on a user page and it may be the individual but it should be reviewed and validated if retained. Reguyla (talk) 21:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not "Own work", it's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da_Da_Da 88.76.220.136 23:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete obvious copyvio, Trio is composer of this music Lpele (talk) 21:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-by-NC-SA per source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dandiffendale/8350744625/ Эlcobbola talk 15:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-by-NC-SA per Flickr source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/7945858@N08/8327164549 Эlcobbola talk 15:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-by-NC-SA per Flickr source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/5telios/7375799494 Эlcobbola talk 16:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-by-NC-SA per Flickr source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/7945858@N08/6706221053 Эlcobbola talk 16:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajkumar nano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal unused images, out of Commons:Project scope

Justass (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 20:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unused images, out of Commons:Project scope Justass (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal unused images, out of Commons:Project scope Justass (talk) 20:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khemjira kiatsuranon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal unused images, out of Commons:Project scope

Justass (talk) 20:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dss lee (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal unused images, out of Commons:Project scope

Justass (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 01:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 01:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Alexander Roumega (talk) 01:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, low resolution, bad colors. better File:Thomas de Keyser - Constantijn Huygens and his Clerk - WGA12173.jpg, File:Thomas de Keyser - Portret van Constantijn Huygens en zijn secretaris.jpg Oursana (talk) 02:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from here Sunnya343 (talk) 03:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sunilkumarnz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because wrong image was uploaded うぃき野郎 (talk) 05:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Resurcat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All files uploaded as own under free license. But author is pointed as "Comic Con Saint Petersburg". It is organisation (festival), it can't be copyright holder as I understand. So no real authors, no real source, no real license. Potential copyvio, or as minimum publishing without permisson of real author.

Dmitry89 (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the second time this user has stolen this photo Sunnya343 (talk) 06:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff, and the only contribution of the uploader Pippobuono (talk) 07:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a paint where is no proff to be in public domain. So the photo can't be in free licence. Olivier LPB (talk) 07:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is a logo so not free licence Olivier LPB (talk) 07:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File EXIF shows "© Gennady Kurushin CC BY-NC-ND 4.0". NC/ND licenses are not allowed in Commons. MKFI (talk) 07:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff Pippobuono (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep- I think this would be useful for educational purpose. This would be relevant on some medical related article. Wikicology (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: this doesn't add anything new to all that we have here. --INeverCry 00:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload was unsucessful as horizontal bars appeared on the photo. I will retry when this one is deleted. Ville de Canet-en-Roussillon (talk) 07:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by PNG, unused. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pippobuono as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|com:PENIS, and see Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Penis schlaff.jpg Taivo (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PENIS Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

due to showing a personal organ that may be very annoying Yahoot7 (talk) 14:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion above. --P 1 9 9   15:25, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 08:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source country seems to be Cuba. The file is in public domain in USA as 1913 work (published also in 1913), but what about source country? Who is the artist and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 08:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photo by: Kurt Cuffy". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original is in public domain in USA as 1919 work. Source country Cuba demands 50 years from death and sculptor Mario Kerbel died in 1954, so this lets only photographer's rights. Published in 1978. Is there evidence, that {{PD-US-1978-89}} apply? Taivo (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused template, and there don't appear to be any disestablishments in Antarctica to use it for. Auntof6 (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused template, and there don't appear to be any establishments in Antarctica to use it for. Auntof6 (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, misspelled template Auntof6 (talk) 08:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep (together with template:Antarcticaestablishmentyear and template:Antarcticadisestablishmentyear) No need for re-creating every next time it's needed. J 1982 (talk) 18:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This template is misspelled ("dies" should be "dis"). If it's ever needed, a correctly spelled one could be created, but right now there don't seem to be any disestablishment categories for the Caribbean. --Auntof6 (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork. No FoP in France TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo Ovva olfa (talk) 09:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of scope. Tom-L (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent advertising. No FoP in France. Unsure de minimis can apply here. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of scope. Tom-L (talk) 09:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What do we do with that? Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

der Grafiker Joop Schöningh hat das "Schild" nach 1970 erfunden, das Urheberrecht dürfte bei ihm sein http://pophistory.hypotheses.org/527 Goesseln (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. BrightRaven (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please note that this image is very similar to other images that belong to the Bikeway_signs_in_Italy category, such as the following images, uploaded in 2015
File:Destra Po map.JPG
Destra Po map
File:Sinistra Po bikeway.JPG
Sinistra Po bikeway
--PrinceMy (talk) 06:33, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, cropped. Uploaded by 1-upload user Librarian1849 (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 23.07.2016. Gunnex (talk) 09:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files test uploads by Kchm123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:V3.pdf

PS: The user is diligent but unfortunately he made very often several versions of the same file for testing!? ↔ User: Perhelion 09:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry 2-4x (speedy) deleted. User temporarily blocked at enwiki (sock pupperty). Gunnex (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better version of the file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. See also related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ujjwal Kumar.jpg Gunnex (talk) 10:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not eligible to PD-textlogo Hercule (talk) 10:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better version of the painting and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 10:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Róbert Berény died in 1953. Hungary has a copyright term of 70 years after the date of death for published works with known authors. This 1919 work is PD in the US, but not in it's source nation. Undelete in 2024.

Reventtalk 10:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Please ensure these images are transferred to projects where they are in use and allowed (such as English Wikipedia, as {{en:Template:PD-US-1923-abroad}}, before deletion. Thanks. Reventtalk 10:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree as the person who asked the question. --jdx Re: 10:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: transfers can be done via temporary undeletion at COM:UDEL if any were missed. --INeverCry 00:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted Now public domain in Hungary too. Abzeronow (talk) 03:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knowmyname (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 07.2016. Considering also File:Indian Military salutes.jpg = grabbed from (example) https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-logic-behind-different-salutes-in-the-Indian-Armed-Forces (2014) = https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9ceade3a9b0431c6c090260f0d73a2e9-c?convert_to_webp=true

Gunnex (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Berkhet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Also per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Uploaded since 04.2016. Considering also File:Ahmet bahadır ilhan ortaokulu.jpg = grabbed & cropped from (example) http://www.ortaokullar.com/ankara/cankaya/ahmet-bahadir-ilhan-ortaokulu/1302 = http://www.ortaokullar.com/uploads/resimler/Ankara/Cankaya/ahmet-bahadir-ilhan-ortaokulu.jpg (last modified: 2014). File:Shaqueel van Persie.jpg = grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/ShaqueelVanPersie/photos/a.431178778331.223107.340496628331/10154328354043332/?type=3&theater (2015)

Gunnex (talk) 10:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlisaShashkova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unusual small dimensions, no metadata. Seems like professional art photos. Probably copyvio.

Dmitry89 (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo —Andrei S. Talk 12:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small width, no metadata. Probably copyvio. Dmitry89 (talk) 12:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poruda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One - nontrivial logo, other - no metadata, small dimensions, potential copyvio.

Dmitry89 (talk) 12:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:06, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yenkhangbach (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.yenleco.com/images/Cable_Ladder_images/cable-ladder-min.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miguel Oliverr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://static.wixstatic.com/media/4e7794_1f88cce7b1b947cab0dc2fdfafbfa292.jpg/v1/fill/w_1157,h_651,al_c,q_90,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01/4e7794_1f88cce7b1b947cab0dc2fdfafbfa292.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KuhrhanB4$ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by KuhrhanB4$ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More out of scope content by uploader of nothing but out-of-scope content/English Wikipedia vanity vandal.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roberto Thomas M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What is copyrights status for municipal symbols in Ecuador?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Roberto Thomas M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sf404 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://xl.skyscrapercity.com/images/headers/2016/07/25.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aser11223344 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.saudiprojects.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/widetest3_0007.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aser11223344 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these small files which seem to be culled from the internet.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel 2

[edit]

COM:DW of logos, games, movies, sculptures and more; COM:PS

Violation of COM:PEOPLE:

--ICCCC (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rjdeadly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Incorrect CC licenses. British museum images are CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 and therefore unacceptable. Links provided below.

Эlcobbola talk 15:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rjdeadly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images taken from Flickr with CC-by-NC-SA licenses; non-commercial restrictions are not acceptable - see COM:L. Links to NC source pages below.

Эlcobbola talk 16:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rjdeadly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of diagrams/maps. No evidence of permission or free license for underlying work. See especially File:Vulci (4).jpg - obvious photo of someone else's map/atlas.

Эlcobbola talk 16:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These are pictures of maps that are on public view at the respective sites.Rjdeadly (talk) 16:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Italy does not have FoP -- see COM:FOP and {{NoFoP-Italy}}. Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Engr.aly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

this is not flickr. personal images not allowed. out of scope of commons.

Saqib (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-by-NC-SA per Flickr source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/7945858@N08/6706220887 Эlcobbola talk 16:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-by-NC-SA per Flickr source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dandiffendale/8040889627/ Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Second Uncoming (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos from 'Corpse Party' not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of elements in this collage, all elements need proper source & license prior to compliation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As pointed out on my talk page[4], this user has made several derivatives of images of other licenses and without attribution, which is not acceptable. FunkMonk (talk) 16:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source is "AP" at source given, there is nothing to show that the license is valid. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claim that this is an original image by iPhone is offset by the extreme pixelation and blurryness of the image... Non-credible own work claim. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that it has been released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 Gyrostat (talk) 17:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S132drago 1

[edit]

Unused personal notes, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:20, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DianaCP 1

[edit]

Unused personal notes, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   18:21, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:04, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ProfessorAhmed12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE Commons isn't Facebook, personal images, poorly exposed and non-educational.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ProfessorAhmed12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SELFIE, out of scope.

Thibaut120094 (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariofd14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Mariofd14/logs. Considering also File:Rubendelabarrera.jpg = copyrighted work by "Secundino PŽrez" = grabbed from http://www.diariodeleon.es/noticias/deportes/aspire-valora-ruben-barrera_1069002.html (14.05.2016, "© Copyright EL DIARIO DE LEON S.A.") = http://zetaestaticos.com/leon/img/noticias/1/069/1069002_1.jpg (identical exif)

Gunnex (talk) 21:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selvan1693 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Selvan1693

Gunnex (talk) 21:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better version of the painting and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 10:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Should instad be discussed due to age and its origin in Europe  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better version of the file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 10:46, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of an Israeli museum (as appears on the museum's wall). It cannot be considered free without a specific consent from the museum itself. I don't think it can stay in the Commons for now. Ldorfman (talk) 11:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of an Israeli museum (as appears on the museum's wall). It cannot be considered free without a specific consent from the museum itself. I don't think it can stay in the Commons for now. Ldorfman (talk) 11:28, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I think the nominator is quite likely to know what he's talking about, and a quick look on Street View verified my initial impression from the image... that this is not on the outside of the building. The website indicates the museum was founded in 2009, and is under private ownership, so it seems clear that FoP doesn't apply. Reventtalk 19:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks, Revent. This is indeed a museum dealing with the history of the Israeli banking owned by one of the biggest banks in the country... I visited the place yesterday and the tour-guide explicitly mentioned that he is the bank's employee and that the exhibit was created using this bank's funding. Ldorfman (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mridulch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, nonsensical and frivolous file descriptions, likely copyright violations

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starting manage 1.jpg is most likely from sba.gov. I wasn't able to find copyright information for SBA.gov, and this could possibly be a stock image, as it is used on a few other sites. Even if it's not a copyvio, it's out of scope.
File:Mridzyy.jpg is from shutterstock.com. They are a stock photo site, and their licenses are not compatible with Commons.
File:Magento-Development.png This image appears on multiple websites, including onepagecheckoutextension.com and thug100.com. It's not clear who made it, but here's Magento's license, where the orange logo came from. If this was made in a country with a low threshold of originality and/or Magento's license prohibits use, this can be a copyright violation. It is also out of scope.
File:Ios development.jpg The map in the image comes from 123RF.com. I could not find the background image.
Sunmist (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added one more file. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Similarly to File:Starting manage 1.jpg, it came from sba.gov, but I was able to find the unaltered image at dreamstime.com, another stock photo site. I highly doubt dreamstime.com's licenses are compatible with Commons. www.lifematters.asia probably has a license, but may not own the copyright itself. Sunmist (talk) 12:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it is extremely clear that the uploader does not own the copyright. We have to delete per COM:PRP. No permission and EXIF data in all the files. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 12:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Berthold Werner (talk) 11:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, low quality, not used Berthold Werner (talk) 12:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, not used, no categories Berthold Werner (talk) 12:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation 79.25.61.223 12:03, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist still alive Schlosser67 (talk) 12:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist still alive Schlosser67 (talk) 12:09, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stamps newer than 75 years, artist presumably still alive Schlosser67 (talk) 12:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, small dimensions. Probably copyvio. Dmitry89 (talk) 12:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like non trivial logo. Dmitry89 (talk) 12:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: text logo. --INeverCry 00:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non trivial logo/text. Dmitry89 (talk) 12:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like deriative from File:Monument to Odessa founders 2010.JPG without any link to original. Probably bad copy. Dmitry89 (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No verification that image was released under a free license - image can also be found at subject's Twitter page C.Fred (talk) 12:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    • Mr. Fred thank you Sir. for all you're help. We were able to contact representing agent, and the clubs staff. As an organization that recently gained international fame, its club President has allowed for the distribution of images to allow for a better understanding of the team, players and staff across the globe. We established direct contact, and gather all the necessary sources and information to allow for the legal input of the image into the commons.wikimedia. However, as with many things in life, we have had trouble imputing the correct or perhaps necessary information to allow this image to clear. Please, before deletion, we ask that you allow for us to give you any further information that you might need to clear the image. The club can also issue a direct approval of its image, although they have already stated they were ok with it. We are at you're service, and ready to provide what you ask.
    • In addition, the representing agent stated that the image in the users twitter was in part an effort from the club to set their players up with active social media accounts, such as Twitter, Instagram, snapchat and Facebook to give further access to the players lives, training, and hopefully draw in further interest on a personal level. The imagine imposed onto Twitter was done as a joint venture between player and club for mutual expansion. However, both the Twitter image, and the one imputed into wikicommons that is being debated, are from the same source, a direct link from Miami United Football Club's Official website which we will input in a second post. Furthermore, the Twitter imagine, as seen with the metadata, is clearly distorted or edited, or perhaps degraded due to inability to format or download pixel composition. This imagine is unedited and direct from the clubs official website and not the users twitter.

Evidence: File 1) User's Twitter Page https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BsCjQ_TCUAAb9r0.jpg:large

File 2) Direct link to non-public Miami United FC Offical Team Website, Official Player Roster Individual Pictures (http://miamiunitedsoccer.com/) provided by the clubs staff upon contacting registered agent of the individual in place.

http://miamiunitedsoccer.com/wp-content/gallery/2014-team-roster/MIAMI-UNITED-16.jpg

The representing agent of the user is said to be in the works to allow for the users twitter image to also be granted free distribution rights under copy right law. So essentially we are getting cleared to use image from the professional representing club, its president, the representing players agent, and soon the players twitter(although not the direct imagine, not the link on this upload) will also allow for free distribution of the image.

    • We had imputed the direct link provided by Miami United Football Club's staff, to the players official team picture on its official website. Something that is hidden from search or public, yet provided to us in order to set up a direct link to the players official team picture in the official team roster. The link itself was removed by Mr. Fred because we believe that we uploaded it wrong, into the description of the player, under the image itself. Because of the wrong format Mr. Fred deleted the link which provided direct connection between commons image and the Clubs provided link. We will re-insert the link of the player and team page back into the image, yet in proper format. If anything is out of place, please let us know. The link given to us by MUFC President Roberto Sacca is the following:

http://miamiunitedsoccer.com/wp-content/gallery/2014-team-roster/MIAMI-UNITED-16.jpg


    • Representing agent established contact with club and player. We received confirmation that Clubs staff just inserted copyright distribution freedom under "Attribution 4.0 International Free Culture License: Free to share under Attribution terms. Must give appropriate credit in providing link" directly on the users twitter page to remove any issues with the continuously references to Twitter, even though the image itself is directly drawn from the Teams official webpage.

Deleted: OTRS permission from copyright holder required. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of Wikipedia sockpuppeteer/spammer. McGeddon (talk) 13:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Twitter headquarters, San Francisco.jpg, not complying with licence terms Gyrostat (talk) 13:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This JPG twitter logo uploaded today is not a duplicate because it's a raster file, but still redundant to File:Logo of Twitter.svg. Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

more redundant to File:Twitterのロゴ.jpg ,  Speedy delete ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 06:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Twitter sf hq.jpg, not complying with licence terms Gyrostat (talk) 13:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:25, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Best quality available at Portrait of Gabriel Andral.jpg Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 13:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The rights are reserved in the source Vensatry (Ping me) 13:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portrait is the half of the size of the photo and not just a detail. So the picture can be considered has a copyvio because of the portrait. Olivier LPB (talk) 13:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Everything was sent (OTRS person and paintings) to polish editors Kontrola (talk) 13:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreement has been received. Polimerek (talk) 18:25, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Polimerek does the authorization is for the painting in the photo, and if it is that, can we cropped just the painting for an other file ? Olivier LPB (talk) 20:47, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS recieved. --INeverCry 00:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doublon avec Une minute de silence Brest2016 02.jpg Gaëlle FILY (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www-tc.pbs.org/latino-americans/media/filer_public_thumbnails/filer_public/b9/7f/b97f1573-d964-48e2-b535-aa27a8ae1bd3/nelly.jpg__1024x768_q85_crop_upscale.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by Nipponese Dog Calvero Pyrusca (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doublon de https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:La_grande_hermine.jpg Gaëlle FILY (talk) 14:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 19:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image all over the internet: [5] - highly unlikely the uploader took it. GRuban (talk) 20:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Derived from a (reverted) historic version of File:Stephanakert skyline.jpg, uploaded by Edward Ambarden (talk · contributions · Statistics), a serial copyright violator = unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP. Gunnex (talk) 20:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. Uploaded by Preacher lad (talk · contributions · Statistics), a serial copyright violator. Gunnex (talk) 20:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Doubtful this is done by an individual submitter given the proximity to the individual and the background. Reguyla (talk) 21:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. In use on the Ben Kurland article at EnWP and might meet fair use rationale but it doesn't appear to meet Commons policy. Reguyla (talk) 21:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for 3D art in the USA. Kelly (talk) 21:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from Himalayan Airlines, see here Sunnya343 (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader of the photo appears to be Salina Nakarmi, brand officer at Himalaya Airlines (see this article). However I don't believe she is the one actually taking the photos, thus she cannot upload them unless she gets permission (which is not indicated). See these three deletion requests: here, here and here. Sunnya343 (talk) 16:55, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es existiert ein besseres (bearbetetes) Foto Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Without some clue as to which photograph you think is better, there is no way to compare this image to any other. I do not see a duplicate of this image in your uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
the File:Geschwister-Scholl-Weg Ruhland Heldenhain mit Kreuz westwärts 2.jpg is better from photographs (my) opinion (more expressive - contrast, effect, force ...). Friendly greetings --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable PD rationale. This doesn't look like a "simple geometric shape" to me. We don't seem to have any information on the threshold of originality in the Dominican Republic. Unless there is some evidence that the threshold is unusually high, we really need to assume that this is above it. LX (talk, contribs) 21:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality picture of a car, over 290 images of the same model available. Cloverleaf II (talk) 21:44, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot of a video, can the uploader proof that he is the creator of this? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is NOT work by the uploader. It is a copy of an advertisement by Steinway & Sons. On http://eu.steinway.com/fileadmin/user_upload/steinway-piano-buyers-guide.pdf (page 2) is an example of the advertisement. The image on Commons should be deleted. SimpleSimpleSimple (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not selfmade, no source. May be PD old. FunkMonk (talk) 23:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. FunkMonk (talk) 23:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused really small image of ROTC color guard, might well be from DoD, but so small and of such low quality that it's unlikely to get used. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

Extended content

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  •  Keep any images listed here uploaded by me. This bot mass deletion based on a category makes proper review unnecessarily complex, and is a way of bypassing the normal DR process. -- (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Betty Ages photo. It's worrying that crosswiki photos like this are being unthinkingly deleted out of process. Please stop creating these crazy large automatic DRs for potentially controversial in scope images. -- (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files which are in use on other projects must not be deleted, please remove from this DR before considering any action. An example is the photograph of Arnab Roy Chowdhury. This DR is obviously hastily prepared using automation rather than actually looking at the images nominated. -- (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: You really want to create dozens of thousands single DRs for all personal files, hosted on Commons? /St1995 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before talking about the number of DRs, you should check if there is really a need for a deletion. Then, some of these may not be in scope, but that has to be decided on individual basis. A mass DR of hundreds of images is not the right way to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The files, as this automatic and massive DR of files of different authors, provinances, scopes (or lack of) and sources is itself out of scope. So  Delete this category as out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private playground of someone, wasting other peoples time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
  • The problem is not in this category. @Apocheir: Please do not add files in this category which may be notable for Commons. This cat is only for personal files! /St1995 21:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Can someone enlighten me what is a Unused personal file, as i tought it was about out pf scope images of people, but it seems that it includes images of cars, logos (and several others logos by the way). Tm (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Speaking as someone who's been adding a lot of files to this category lately... My conception of "personal file" includes not just pictures of the users, but pictures of the user's friends and family, promotional material for the user's musical projects, logos of the user's personal business, or anything else that is really only of interest to the uploader. Basically anything where someone's trying to use Commons as their own personal photo hosting site. There was no definition of "personal file" on the category, so it's up to individual interpretation. That said, as I stated on the Talk page, I was under the impression that there would be some sort of automated review before those files were nominated for deletion. At the very least, someone needs to clean out the files that are in use! -Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now, and created separate DRs for individual files or groups thereof, based on some actual work. And, per Tm,  delete this useless and nonsensical category. It may be necessary to discuss long to reach an understanding of what a “personal image” is: One’s gut feeling is not enough. -- Tuválkin 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think there is nothing wrong with the category in and of itself, but I would ask that someone please delete two files that I uploaded with regards to Alessandro Safina and Laura Maria Calefeteanu. I am very new here and did not read the policy on public domain photos closely enough. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. GrammerCracker96 (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment While this discussion is continuing (?) here, the DR template has been removed from the relevant page. If a majority is against these mass deletions, simply close this discussion so we can DR the files (those which are here I mean) individually or for uploader. In this situation the process is stalled and that is not correct. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - note that there are a significant number of copyvios (more than 1/3)- a few are kept (from user who made a few useful contributions, or image in scope). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal images that are of no educational use.

 Keep I think this fits fine under Category:Holi in the United States and other categories. It doesn't need to be a personal file. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This has been cropped so that it's just an image of the sign, not a personal image. In scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most per nomination, kept a few which are in use/could be potentially used. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not meet project scope, COM:PEOPLE smial (talk) 00:24, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of project scope, 3rd class work of a 3rd class snapshooter. --Eva K. is evil 02:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete No educational or encyclopedic value --KS aus F (talk) 14:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Work by notable photographer so seems likely to have an educational value and as a photographer I would expect anyone who poses for him to not have any expectation of privacy so I don't consider this image to be an unreasonable intrusion. It doesn't appear that the individual is really identifiable anyway. Adambro (talk) 14:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Image made with a top of the line camera. Shutter time 1/8 second, but no motional blurring. The model is posing, for a photographer who is making a living of selling his work, so COM:PEOPLE does not apply. Subject not recognizable anyway. Sexual content is not automatically out of scope, and it would be preferable to have images by a professional and notable photographer rather than the stuff submitted from anonymous single-use accounts. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepAs Pieter Kuiper puts it, intentionally blurry face un recognisable model, nothing in COM:PEOPLE allows deleting this image. Vagina and fingers are focused, so it may fall within scope.--Javier ME (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Abigor talk 05:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture is not useful for encyclopedias Toni Müller (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:28, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keith Richards 1871 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from political poster.

I personally took this photo myself and it is NOT copyrighted.

File:2009 Liberty Union Party Campaign Poster.jpg
2009 Vermont Liberty Union Party Campaign Poster

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE jdx Re: 14:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubon avec https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brest_2016_-_20160717-041_Granvillaise_%26_Cancalaise.jpg Gaëlle FILY (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographie non libre Bounè rodzo (talk) 14:48, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubon avec https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brest_2016_-_Loth_Lori%C3%ABn_-_003.jpg Gaëlle FILY (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image visiblement copyrightée (selon les métadonnées: © Chris Blaser) Bounè rodzo (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilyakharlamov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:39, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilyakharlamov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, personal images.

Дима Г (talk) 05:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork. No permission. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not in use, out of Commons scoep. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-by-NC-SA per Flickr source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/7945858@N08/8046769822 Эlcobbola talk 16:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source or evidence of permission from "Carole Raddato". Uploader has uploaded dozens of copyvios under mistaken belief that NC licenses are okay-- see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rjdeadly--suspect this may be the same. Эlcobbola talk 16:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Found here, and license is okay, but this is a duplicate of File:Roman bridge on the road from Forum Traiani to Othoca, 1st century BC - 1st century AD, Tramatza, Sardinia (16773140041).jpg, which is alreadly properly licensed, credited and sourced. Delete this as a duplicate. Эlcobbola talk 16:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works without attribution, the little yellow forklift is all over the internet, here's one example... http://miamidadeequipments.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/yale-forklifts.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication of user's own work on this image, metadata is only photoshop. It is unused on Commons and COM:PRP based on user's other copyrighted uploads which have been nominated for deletion, or deleted as well as deleted by speedy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image looks like it came from the web or a catalog, no metadata to show user's own work. Image is not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'd like to nominate this for deletion based on a comment added to the description field previously: " The 82d Fighter Group was NOT part of TAC. It was an SAC organization. This photo's origins are suspicious, in that I have scanned the original Kodachrome thanks to the cooperation of ex-82d pilot Bob Fogg. I suspect the image was pirated (from my website) and the information here regarding the aircraft being TAC resources is inaccurate. Regards, Tom Hildreth ANG Wing Historian-ret" Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, the complainant's website is this and the photo there is this. The Commons file (transferred from Wikipedia) is smaller and cropped. So, the complaint (which must date from 2007 or 2008, before the file was transferred to Commons) is plausible. On the other hand, the Wikipedia uploader wrote that his copy was from a book, which he says sourced the photo from the USAF Historical Research Agency. Since the photo is from the late 1940s and the complainant obtained his copy from someone else, it's not impossible that a copy was also in the source mentioned by the uploader. The book seems to exist. The original uploader is blocked. There's also the question of the status tag, if the photo was taken by an employee or not. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A long pdf document full of unattributed images, the *pdf format is out of COM:SCOPE, but the major problem is COM:COPYVIOs on all the unattributed photos. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Historical photos may be in public domain by other means but relevant info (proper author/date of creation or first disclosure/country of creation information) must be provided to determine copyrights status. Per (uploader related) Commons:Deletion requests/File:SRAS AppalaNaidu.png Gunnex (talk) 17:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, false color image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, false color image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of unidentified white flowers, no description, no author, no source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of very little educational interest because no description, no location ; no author, no source ; generic name Civa (talk) 10:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We can afford to keep it as someone will identify the bug.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Five years after it was said "someone would identify the bug" no one has. The image is still not in use and would apear to be non-educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is insufficient information on this file to know if it is covered by the license. The subject is Australian. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The photograph is of a WWI era Australian army personnel. Photographs taken before 1955 in Australia are in the PD I believe (en:Copyright_expiration_in_Australia), and is most likely to apply here. But as we don't know for sure where the photo was taken any number of country copyrights could apply. I'm a bit surprised that there isn't more information in the description field - can someone check the deleted file to see if I forgot to copy the rest of the info? Thanks -- Deadstar (msg) 19:14, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author = "Bouslama Boutheyna " but there is no way to verify that, or to know if the permission is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 17:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page serves no educational purpose and clearly was created nearly 10 years ago (when many people didn't know enough about the internet) by someone who wanted to advertise their blueberries for sale. 96.50.13.152 17:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: good quality and in use. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Public domain status is highly dubious. The uploader claimed PD because the photo is taken before or in 1934. For PD, it needs to have passed 70 years since the death of the owner (a real person) of the photo. Said Nursi, the subject of the photo, died in 1960, so 56 years ago. The owner of this photo might be for instance a student of his and one of his favorite students died in 2012. Bulgu (talk) 17:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is the YouTube Vatican channel, which is not CC-BY-SA Py4nf (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry image, user's only contribution... no description, no source, no author... unlikely to have accurate license. Image looks to be copied from some website not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

YouTube/TV Aparecida images do not seem to have a CC-BY-SA license Py4nf (talk) 17:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is blurry, and a better version exists: File:Beccafumi Palazzo Pubblico 02.JPG. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok for me --Sailko (talk) 18:24, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ANURAG4652 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense uploads, private child images. Obviously not images of an officer or director as claimed in the fake articles in which the images are used.

Ies (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable fuzzy image. Plenty of better images of electric motors. P 1 9 9   17:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable fuzzy indoor picture. Superseded by many better apartment pics. P 1 9 9   18:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor naming NRuiz (WMF) (talk) 18:10, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: moved. --INeverCry 00:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not PD until 6 January 2023, 70 years after the death of the owner Bulgu (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not look like own work.Similar to http://www.gobiernu.cw/web/site.nsf/ecc5d2e719785a47042577d8005c2b4c/dcb5338ecad10acc04257a3a006ba424/$FILE/Steenrijk.pdf Tekstman (talk) 18:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of scope Bjarlin (talk) 18:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per "The best picture of the Rochester Hills flag I could find" Gunnex (talk) 18:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a family tree of a telenovela, likely copyvios of individual images. P 1 9 9   18:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a family tree of a telenovela, likely copyvios of individual images. P 1 9 9   18:43, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 19:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation, see metadata: Designerin, BVBK, Design: Rosemarie Böhmchen Migebert (talk) 19:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per "Promotional Image of Devin" and file title Gunnex (talk) 19:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

Extended content

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  •  Keep any images listed here uploaded by me. This bot mass deletion based on a category makes proper review unnecessarily complex, and is a way of bypassing the normal DR process. -- (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Betty Ages photo. It's worrying that crosswiki photos like this are being unthinkingly deleted out of process. Please stop creating these crazy large automatic DRs for potentially controversial in scope images. -- (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files which are in use on other projects must not be deleted, please remove from this DR before considering any action. An example is the photograph of Arnab Roy Chowdhury. This DR is obviously hastily prepared using automation rather than actually looking at the images nominated. -- (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: You really want to create dozens of thousands single DRs for all personal files, hosted on Commons? /St1995 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before talking about the number of DRs, you should check if there is really a need for a deletion. Then, some of these may not be in scope, but that has to be decided on individual basis. A mass DR of hundreds of images is not the right way to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The files, as this automatic and massive DR of files of different authors, provinances, scopes (or lack of) and sources is itself out of scope. So  Delete this category as out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private playground of someone, wasting other peoples time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
  • The problem is not in this category. @Apocheir: Please do not add files in this category which may be notable for Commons. This cat is only for personal files! /St1995 21:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Can someone enlighten me what is a Unused personal file, as i tought it was about out pf scope images of people, but it seems that it includes images of cars, logos (and several others logos by the way). Tm (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Speaking as someone who's been adding a lot of files to this category lately... My conception of "personal file" includes not just pictures of the users, but pictures of the user's friends and family, promotional material for the user's musical projects, logos of the user's personal business, or anything else that is really only of interest to the uploader. Basically anything where someone's trying to use Commons as their own personal photo hosting site. There was no definition of "personal file" on the category, so it's up to individual interpretation. That said, as I stated on the Talk page, I was under the impression that there would be some sort of automated review before those files were nominated for deletion. At the very least, someone needs to clean out the files that are in use! -Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now, and created separate DRs for individual files or groups thereof, based on some actual work. And, per Tm,  delete this useless and nonsensical category. It may be necessary to discuss long to reach an understanding of what a “personal image” is: One’s gut feeling is not enough. -- Tuválkin 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think there is nothing wrong with the category in and of itself, but I would ask that someone please delete two files that I uploaded with regards to Alessandro Safina and Laura Maria Calefeteanu. I am very new here and did not read the policy on public domain photos closely enough. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. GrammerCracker96 (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment While this discussion is continuing (?) here, the DR template has been removed from the relevant page. If a majority is against these mass deletions, simply close this discussion so we can DR the files (those which are here I mean) individually or for uploader. In this situation the process is stalled and that is not correct. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - note that there are a significant number of copyvios (more than 1/3)- a few are kept (from user who made a few useful contributions, or image in scope). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal images that are of no educational use.

 Keep I think this fits fine under Category:Holi in the United States and other categories. It doesn't need to be a personal file. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This has been cropped so that it's just an image of the sign, not a personal image. In scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most per nomination, kept a few which are in use/could be potentially used. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]