Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
_и_внешней_(внизу)_планеты_системы_HD_33793.jpg){kind=link}
methyl)methanamine.png){kind=link}
silane.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![158 File:Greg "Mortgages" Meola.jpg](#File:Greg_"Mortgages"_Meola.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![241 File:Cover Art "Respiro".jpg](#File:Cover_Art_"Respiro".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg/Series){kind=link}
_at_Birdworld_01.jpg/Series){kind=link}
Per COM:SCOPE. Extraordinarily low-quality image. Unfixably dark, noisy, extremely low-resolution. Appears to have been poorly photoshopped to remove the penis. Just not a useful picture. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion jdx Re: 01:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping -- single image gallery. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by an high school studenmt in the middle of a Wikipedia training - just t "found on google"... hence, the picture is from another site - copyrighted. Please delete (I explained it to the student) Ldorfman (talk) 07:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture was uploaded by an high school studenmt in the middle of a Wikipedia training - just t "found on google"... hence, the picture copyrighted. Please delete (I explained it to the student) Ldorfman (talk) 08:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 11:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julio Gutierrez Lima (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julio Gutierrez Lima (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope. Advertisment / promotional stuff with no educational value.
- File:BT Team GIF.gif
- File:BT Pride GIF.gif
- File:BT Change GIF.gif
- File:BT customer GIF.gif
- File:BT honesty GIF.gif
Zaccarias (talk) 16:45, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 20:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
I think that " Wikipedia can use this picture" is not enough to be a valid licence. Besides it seems to be a blog entry title, not a licence. jdx Re: 01:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
What should the website say about the pictures so you guys will have a proper permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haroonazizi (talk • contribs)
Deleted, from the model's Facebook page. Thuresson (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Magnus (talk) 10:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom. --★ Poké95 10:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedied--KTo288 (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Magnus (talk) 10:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. --★ Poké95 10:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedied--KTo288 (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Used to create a hoax on fr wikipedia: fr:Utilisateur:Xnorman1337/Brouillon (I deleted it). Jules78120 (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Created by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Uploaded by banned user Lagermeister2016 (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Created by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Create by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy keep: Pre-block upload, and the blocked user is not the original uploader of the uncropped version. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:10, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Invalid DR from user already blocked. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Uploaded by banned user Lagermeister2016 (talk) 16:16, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded by a banned user Jive Turkey Jones (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
File uploaded by banned editor Nikkithenose (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Uploaded by banned user Lagermeister2016 (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Look file description. This is not own work. OTRS-permission from photographer Maurizio Carà is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment I nominated it for speedy deletion, it's a copyvio from here (and fairly out of scope, by the way, it is about a self-publishing writer) --Lucas (msg) 07:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:SA DIE DE SA SARDINIA.pdf
Already used on many websites http://christophedalstein.com/ http://www.construisons-europacity.com/la-chronique-de-christophe-dalstein/ (watermarked © EuropaCity) etc. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Not "Own work". Copyright holder Chihab Hentati © 2013
Seems to be a corrupt file. Does this display an image, and if so, in what browser? Steel1943 (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Info: Not corrupted but malformed and with embedded JPEG (logo seems bellow the TOO). The solution is re-exporting to pure SVG. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Pure SVG uploaded. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Delete violation manifeste de droit d'auteur Logo de marque non libre de droit KAPour les intimes 22:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:12, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep according to COM:TOO.Florentyna (talk) 11:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Auguel (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope ad (cf. COM:SCOPE : "Advertising/promotional material does not advance Commons' aims"). — Racconish ☎ 13:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded this advertisment as it gives videomaterial about this trademark. It's normally hard to find advertisements that are distributed under Creative Commons. It gives the possibiliy to illustrate the trademark and gives an impression of advertisments of this decade. I would also like to upload advertisments of the 60's, 70's for an historic view but from that time periods advertisments are not licensed under creative commons --Hannolans (talk) 20:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination, having found an article on Caramel Pictures on the English WP. — Racconish ☎ 08:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept
No evidence the file is free. ɱ (talk) 22:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Ɱ, click on "More" next to the byline at https://vimeo.com/146224076 to verify the license. (My videos are usually license reviewed within 24 hours so if you would have waited a little longer someone would have saved you the bother) czar 22:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Clearly CC-BY-3.0 at source. I've passed the license review. INeverCry 05:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per request. --Jcb (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope ad (cf. COM:SCOPE : "Advertising/promotional material does not advance Commons' aims"). — Racconish ☎ 13:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use, and per previous DR resolved as kept. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Use on user pager or talk page does not prove EV (in particular, the "use" on the English WP talk is simply the uploader's comment : "Here's some amazing chocolate footage, if you can figure out what to do with it"...). Previous DR addressed only the license. — Racconish ☎ 16:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination, having found an article on Caramel Pictures on the English WP. — Racconish ☎ 08:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept
Out of scope ad (cf. COM:SCOPE : "Advertising/promotional material does not advance Commons' aims"). — Racconish ☎ 13:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded this because it gives an impression of advertising of Carlsberg beer and commercials of this decade. It is not meant to promote alcohol or beer. Carlsberg is a famous beer and we don't have many advertisments due to copyright. This is a rare commercial that is licensed under Creative Commons. We have also other advertisments of companies: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Advertising_by_company --Hannolans (talk) 20:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination, having found an article on Caramel Pictures on the English WP. — Racconish ☎ 08:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept
Out of scope ad (cf. COM:SCOPE : "Advertising/promotional material does not advance Commons' aims"). — Racconish ☎ 13:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination, having found an article on Caramel Pictures on the English WP. — Racconish ☎ 08:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Commons:Deletion requests/File:آقا ميرزا صالح فاموری داماد.png: Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
possible copyright violation 92.4.96.96 15:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by ~riley: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
These pictures are IMHO out of project scope. I see no educational value of the "normal" pictures of this man, the "artistic" versions are the uploader's own art and also out of scope!
- File:Nude Man, cropped, close up in studio, displaying a straight penis.jpg
- File:Nude Man, from behind, crouching displaying anal detail.jpg
- File:Nude Man seated, with erect penis in profile.jpg
- File:Nude Man posing with scarf and cock&ball strap.jpg
- File:Nude Man in profile, with erect penis and tied cock&balls.jpg
- File:Nude man from behind, tonemapped.tif
- File:Nude Man, profile in winter.jpg
- File:Nude Man from behind.jpg
- File:Nude Man, Full frontal, with weight on one leg.jpg
- File:Nude Man in shadows.jpg
- File:Nude Man, full frontal, arms akimbo.jpg
- File:Nude Man in a corner.jpg
- File:Nude man, cropped displaying a nice uncut penis.jpg
- File:Nude man, from behind, close up.jpg
- File:Nude Man, full frontal looking sideways.jpg
- File:Nude Man, full frontal.jpg
- File:Nude man kneeling.jpg
- File:Nude male sitting. Pencil Drawing with FotoSketcher.jpg
- File:Nude Male sitting, pencil drawing with 'Snap Art 3'.jpg
- File:Nude Male with hands on hips and large penis. Painted with 'Dynamic Auto Painter'.jpg
- File:Nude Male with legs spread, painted with 'Dynamic Auto Painter'.jpg
- File:Nude Male standing with swollen penis, B&W, retro.jpg
- File:Nude Male on stairs, painted with 'Dynamic Auto Painter'.jpg
- File:Male nude reclining, shaved penis, selective colour.jpg
- File:Male Nude sitting. Digitally drawn with 'Snap Art 3'.jpg
- File:Male Nude sitting. Painted with 'Snap Art 3'.jpg
- File:Nude Male, retro style, with matching scarf and cock & ball ring.jpg
- File:Nude male sitting, with prominent penis.jpg
- File:Nude male, digital artwork.jpg
- File:Nude male impasto impressionist.jpg
- File:Nude male-Pencil.jpg
- File:INude male standing pose.jpg
- File:Nude male lifeart pose.jpg
- File:'Charcoal' Self Portrait.jpg
- File:Nude male in cap & gloves.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:Tony nude in The Algarve.jpg
- File:Tony nude at Calshot.jpg
- File:Tony, nude in Fuerteventura.jpg
FDMS 4 21:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 09:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Admittedly false assertion of "own work"; see poster's excuses in en.wikipedia. Orange Mike | Talk 05:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
How can we correct it? I can provide whatever is required. It would be a good idea to help the editor and guide him, here.Abhinav619 (talk) 06:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- It is a book cover, so the copyright probably lies with the publisher. Abhinav619 do you either own the copyright, or have permission from the holder to re-use it here (and by extension, to allow anyone anywhere to use or re-use it for whatever purpose they wish)? CrowTalk 21:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info: Permission received at OTRS. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: Thanks! Did you put the right tag on the image, or is the received permission indeed not-sufficient? CrowTalk 21:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Awaiting for confirmation from copyright holder(s). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I, or someone else, can remove the UN info from the map, if necessary. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I, or someone else, can remove the UN info from the map, if necessary. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I, or someone else, can remove the UN info from the map, if necessary. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- On the UN website, it says:
UN maps are open source material and you can use them in your work or for making your own map. We request however that you delete the UN name and reference number upon any modification to the map. Content of your map will be your responsibility. You can state in your publication if you wish something like: based on UN map…
- That seems to me that they are indeed in the public domain. Why would there even be a license template named {{UN map}} if they were not?
--RaviC (talk) 13:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I, or someone else, can remove the UN info from the map, if necessary. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Hi Oompahloompah2016, can you explain what you mean? Category:UN maps has many such similar maps. The original source of this map is the Supplement to a Survey of Palestine (Jerusalem: Government Printer, June 1947); see File:Survey of Palestine 1946.jpg, which is public domain under the UK's Open Government Licence. It was subsequently published as United Nations map no. 93(b) in August 1950, which is this version.
- Also pinging @Zero0000: who is more knowledgable that I am on these matters.
- Oncenawhile (talk) 11:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Don't delete. I see no merit in this deletion request, which ignores the general licence on UN maps. (Since it is not modified there is no need to remove the logo.) Historical maps are not "obsolete" either, they are historical, and there is no relevant issue regarding this map. Final, though it isn't actually needed here, Oncenawhile is correct that this is a map produced by the British government and as such is beyond doubt in the public domain under UK Crown Copyright law. Zero0000 (talk) 12:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I, or someone else, can remove the UN info from the map, if necessary. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I, or someone else, can remove the UN info from the map, if necessary. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Obsolete UN map uploaded under incorrect PD template in opposition to UN usage policy. NB: These derivative of UN copyright maps are not in Public Domain, so neither they nor any further derivated works which remove UN logo and UN reference can be hosted at Wikimedia Commons under any circumstances because COM:L. This map must be speedy delete. Also by UN usage policy linking to and referencing the underlying UN maps is not permitted. Oompahloompah2016 (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. I, or someone else, can remove the UN info from the map, if necessary. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-UN-map. --Timeshifter (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Socks should go back to their drawer. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Лицензия под сомнением, так как в переписке OTRS выяснилось, что фото из семейного архива, автор фото и дата создания неизвестны. Фото перенесено в русскоязычный раздел Википедии Dogad75 (talk) 06:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info Please see Ticket:2016052210012577 (in Russian). --sasha (krassotkin) 08:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC) + diff = Keep. --sasha (krassotkin) 21:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Просьба администраторов снять файл с удаления в связи с вновь открывшимися обстоятельствами. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 21:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader claims the author is unknown. Found at [1] (uploaded not later than October 21, 2004). Uploaded locally as FU. --Sealle (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Oedipus Rex translation by Ian Johnston of Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 16:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
_%D0%B8_%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%88%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B9_(%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B7%D1%83)_%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B_%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8B_HD_33793.jpg){kind=link}
_%D0%B8_%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%88%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B9_(%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B7%D1%83)_%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%8B_%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BC%D1%8B_HD_33793.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In my opinion wrong license. The file is eligible for copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: the license is indeed wrong, changed from PD-textlogo into PD-ineligible. --Jcb (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused one of several PNG and SVG with same layout choices in Category:Pyrocatechol DMacks (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, low graphical (resolution) and chemical (bond geometry) quality. Category:Chlorogenic acids has better. DMacks (talk) 05:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Globally replaced by TeX code. Leyo 08:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Beta-Eucaine.png. Leyo 08:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused, with layout problems (overlapped groups for no geometrically-useful reason). Have several other structures of this chemical in Category:Organosiloxanes DMacks (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
methyl)methanamine.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
methyl)methanamine.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unusable due to overlapping atom labels; orphaned. Leyo 21:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
methyl)methanamine.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
methyl)methanamine.png){kind=link}
Unusable due to overlapping atom labels; orphaned. Leyo 21:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
silane.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
silane.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unusable due to overlapping atom labels; orphaned. Leyo 21:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
silane.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
silane.png){kind=link}
Label at the bottom cut off; orphaned. Leyo 21:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Unusable due to overlapping atom labels; orphaned. Leyo 21:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect structure for Trp residue (I confirmed that SciFinder in fact does *not* have the displayed form). User:Baoilleach supplied File:Bombesin skeletal.svg as corrected replacement, and I replaced all uses with that. DMacks (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this tiny image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this tiny unused thumbnail image of a man. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
No need to keep this image, we have much better images of the Mona Lisa in Commons Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused blue blob, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Commons is not a social media site. See our project scope.
- File:Web logo f.png
- File:Km sharif.gif
- File:Km sharif n.gif
- File:Web logo n.png
- File:Designed ks.gif
- File:Animation ks.gif
- File:Ks design by sharif.png
- File:Animated sharif.gif
- File:KM Shariful Islam Sayeed.jpg
- File:KM Shariful Islam.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Commons is not a social media site. See our project scope.
- File:Mohiuddin my brother.jpg
- File:Km sharif.jpg
- File:Kazi mohiuddin.jpg
- File:My own facecommand.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Newspaper clippings; not own work.
- File:Tina Woodley Newspaper 003.pdf
- File:Tina Woodley Newspaper 002.pdf
- File:Tina Woodley Newspaper 001.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Tina Woodley Newspaper 004.pdf
- File:Tina Woodley 005.jpg
- File:Tina Woodley 004.jpg
- File:Tina Woodley 003.jpg
- File:Tina Woodley 002.jpg
- File:Tina Woodley 001.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Porco dio99998 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
FDMS 4 22:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 22:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
non-trivial corporate logo, no evidence uploader has authority for a free license BethNaught (talk) 08:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
[[Category:{{subst:delete2|image=File:Zaruratwala logo.jpg]]
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:LOGO ECGC.png
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:LOGO-DF.jpg
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
This stamp is obviously not "own work" as claimed. Commons:Stamps/Public domain does not give any guidance on Nepal.Without evidence that Nepalese stamps are PD, we cannot keep it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 11:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejandraaaimeth (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.
- File:Esmi.jpg
- File:Sarelpez.png
- File:CAMSJES.jpg
- File:Wd tabuladores2.jpg
- File:ZXE.jpg
- File:DASXCW.gif
- File:WQDDFS.gif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotion jdx Re: 01:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Misekhanglimbu . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete: Article en:Sajan Limbu was deleted on 22 May. --Achim (talk) 18:49, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No free licence Borowskki (talk) 02:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Kershaw~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these drawings, small sizes.
- File:Unit USA unknown.png
- File:Unit USA RPatterson.png
- File:Unit USA IMcDowell.png
- File:Unit USA WScott.png
- File:Unit USA BFButler.png
- File:Unit USA GBMcClellan.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
No source of base image which has been extensively photoshopped. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rokoshamtech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional Uploads by a user whose other images were speedied.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --★ Poké95 08:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jenesaispasmoi (talk · contribs)
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Contains non-free pictures from TV Wcam (talk) 04:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Small photo (only 136×194 pixels), no metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sajanlimbu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.
Also note that a WP:EN page on this person has been deleted fro lack of notability -- see Sajan Limbu.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Screenshots of software which seems to be proprietary. Also includes aerial/satellite imagery. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input Table 2.JPG
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 10.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input Table 1.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 9.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 8.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 7.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 6.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 5.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 4.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 3.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 2.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Data Input 1.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Network Objects 7.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Network Objects 6.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Network Objects 5.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Network Objects 4.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Network Objects 2.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Network Objects 3.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Network Objects 1.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 11.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 12.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 10.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 9.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 7.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 8.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 6.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 5.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 4.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 3.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 2.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Controller Programming 1.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Layout 6.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Layout 5.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Layout 4.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Layout 3.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Layout 1.jpg
- File:Vissim Intersection Traffic Signal Layout 2.jpg
- File:VISSIM Intersection Simulation.jpg
- File:Pedestrian Obstacles Yellow Dashed.jpg
- File:Pedestrian Ramps Areas Red Dashed.jpg
- File:Pedestrian Crosswalk Links Red Dashed.jpg
- File:Pedestrian Store Areas Red Dashed.jpg
- File:Pedestrian Sidewalk Areas Red Dashed.jpg
- File:VISSIM Parking Routes Add Parking Vehicle Routes.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Copy&Paste Parking Space Links 4.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Copy&Paste Parking Space Links 3.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Copy&Paste Parking Space Links 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Copy&Paste Parking Space Links 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Add Real Parking Lot 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Add Connectors.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Add Real Parking Lot 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Add Links 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Add Links 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Parking Geometric Network Define Parking Time Distribution.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Traffic Data Input Add Route From Platform.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Traffic Data Input Place Transit Line 4.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Traffic Data Input Place Transit Line 3.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Traffic Data Input Place Transit Line 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Traffic Data Input Place Transit Line 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Place Transit Stop 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Place Transit Stop 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Add Platform Edge.JPG
- File:VISSIM Transit Network Objects Public Transport Lines 1.jpg
- File:VISSIM Transit Network Objects Public Transport Stops.jpg
- File:VISSIM Transit Network Objects Public Transport Lines 2.jpg
- File:VISSIM Bicycle Traffic Data Input Add Bikes to Vehicle Compositions.jpg
- File:VISSIM Bicycle Traffic Data Input Place Bicycle Routes 1.jpg
- File:VISSIM Bicycle Traffic Data Input Place Bicycle Routes 2.jpg
- File:VISSIM Bicycle Geometric Network Design Create Bike Lane Links 2.jpg
- File:VISSIM Bicycle Geometric Network Design Create Bike Lane Links 1.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation Travel Times.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation Output File.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation Parameters.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation Import Excel 1.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation Import Excel 2.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation Import Excel 4.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation Import Excel 3.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Route 1.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Route 2.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Route 5.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Route 4.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Route 3.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Input.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Compositions.jpg
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Obstacles 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Obstacles 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Ramps 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Ramps 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Model Conflict Areas.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Crosswalk Links 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Crosswalk Links 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Store Area 2.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Store Area 1.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Area.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Time Distribution.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Sidewalk Areas.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Base File.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Example.JPG
- File:VISSIM Pedestrian Network Objects.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Lane Change Parameters.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-CC1 Headway Time.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-CC0 Standstill Distance.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-CC2 Following Variation.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Default and Suggested Wiedemann 99 Parameters.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Wiedemann 74 Parameters.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Wiedemann 99 Parameters.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Link Behavior Type.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Observation and Simulation Line Chart.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Example of GEH calculations.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-GEH values and Acceptance Targets.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-GEH (Geoffrey E. Havers).JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Convert Text to Columns Wizard.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Extracted Simulation Data from VISSIM.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Text to Columns (.att).JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Running a Simulation.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Evaluation and Simulation Configuration.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Data Collection Measurements Attributes.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Data Collection Measurements with Filters.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Simulation Parameters.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Evaluation Configuration.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Data Collection Measurements.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Adding Data Collection Points.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Finalized Vehicle Routing Volumes.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Excel RelFlow Volumes.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Defining Multiple Vehicle Routes.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Adding Vehicle Routes.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Finalized Volume Data.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Vehicle Inputs and PeMS Volume Data.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Time Intervals.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Custom Speed Distribution.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Desired Speed Distribution.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Google speed limit.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Vehicle Composition.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-PeMS.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Toggle Background Maps and Images.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Link and Connectors.jpg
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Spline Before and After.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Link Points and Spline.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Link Options.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Adding a New Link.JPG
- File:VISSIM Tutorial-Background Maps.JPG
- File:VISSIM - Stitching Images Together.JPG
- File:VISSIM - Setting the Scale.JPG
- File:VISSIM - Adding a Background Image.JPG
- File:Network Settings - Units.jpg
- File:VISSIM Interface.jpg
- File:Network Objects.jpg
- File:Customize Toolbars.jpg
- File:Save As Type.jpg
- File:Smart-Signal-Sample Data.PNG
- File:Smart-Signal-Fig2.PNG
- File:Smart-Signal-Fig1.PNG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Taiwanplas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising
Wcam (talk) 15:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal images with unknown educational purpose, out of scope.
Wcam (talk) 15:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arshadkhannsui (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope (no mainspace user contribs).
- File:Arshad Khan Youth Leader.jpg
- File:Arshad Khan Online.jpg
- File:Arshad Khan.jpg
- File:Youth icon Arshad Khan Indian National Congress.jpg
- File:Youth icon Arshad Khan Congress leader.jpg
- File:Youth icon Arshad.jpg
- File:Youth icon Arshad Khan Congress.jpg
- File:Youth icon Arshad Khan Indian.jpg
FDMS 4 16:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dhana Suryaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
FDMS 4 17:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yeshwanth S A (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (no mainspace contribs).
FDMS 4 17:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 22:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Porco dio99998 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative work of copyrighted content / out of scope.
FDMS 4 22:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 22:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 22:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content (screenshot). FDMS 4 22:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. A Public Domain mark license means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 05:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 23 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. A Public Domain mark license means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 05:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 23 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
- With respect to COM:PENIS: We don't need 14 images of this same person's genitals from a variety of angles. All are pretty low quality, badly photographed (most have focus problems), provide no context other than a shot of the groin or anogenital region, aggressive/confrontational framing. Additionally, most of these were spammed to a variety of categories, and use extremely common or meaningless file names, suggesting this uploader's intention in uploading the image was not to aid Commons' educational mission.
- With respect to COM:PRP: This user was blocked for repetitive uploading of copyrighted images despite warnings. His entire catalog of uploads is tainted by this. Many of these images lack EXIF data, and some have false or strangely incorrect EXIF data. One, for instance, has Google listed in "software used". Another claims to have been taken by an EOS 1100D, but the information box says 1970, and the image was uploaded via Android.
- File:Flaccid penis 3.jpg
- File:Male anus 3.jpg
- File:Penis ejaculation 2.jpg
- File:Flaccid penis 2.jpg
- File:Flaccid penis.jpg
- File:Penis ejaculation.jpg
- File:Penis flaccid 2.jpg
- File:Penis semi erected.jpg
- File:Male anus 2.jpg
- File:Penis erection 2.jpg
- File:Penis erection.jpg
- File:Penis glans 2.jpg
- File:Penis glans.jpg
- File:Human penis erected.jpg
—/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tidemammoth (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs ... catalog pages of ivory products all claimed as own work, but bearing overprinting and other indications of prior publication. These are small size, low quality images, that appear to be uploaded for promotional purposes. Notice the promotional lingo (and contact information) in the descriptions.
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Swimming Turtles Carving (37642).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted "Four Standing Owls On Tree" Carving 37609.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted "Woolly Mammoth & Baby" Carving 37645.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Monkey Mother & Baby In Bamboo Carving 37598.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Three Chinese Lucky Gods With Ladies And Kids Whole Tusk Carving 37727.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese Fairies & 8 Immortal Figerine Carving (37735).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Romance of Three Kingdoms Warrior and Battle Field Figurine Tusk Carving 33457.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Romance of Three Kingdoms Warrior and Battle Field Figurine Tusk Carving, backside 33457-6.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Netsuke Standing Rhino Carving N4575.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Netsuke Three Dolphins Carving N4587.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Netsuke Woolly Mammoth & Baby Carving N4647.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory SAMURIA BLOWING CLARION Carving (37236).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Ocean Aquarium Tusk Carving (37444).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese 12 Zodiac Animal Carving 37499.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted "Rabbit Mother with 6 Babies" Carving 37517.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese Beauty Scenery Tusk Carving (37539).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted "Polar Bears Catching Fish" Carving 37606.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Elephant Mother With 2 Babies Carving 37604.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Woolly Mammoth Mother & Baby Carving 37670.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted "5 Panda" Carving 37466.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese 12 Zodiac Animals Tusk Carving (37718).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted " Zodiac Dragon" Whole Tusk Carving 37715.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese 12 Zodiac Animal Large Whole Tusk Carving (37720).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese Happy Kids Whole Tusk Carving (37733).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese Fairies & 8 Immortal Tusk Carving (37544) Rare Huge.JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Animals In Jungle Large Whole Tusk Carving (37721).JPG
- File:Mammoth Ivory Handcrafted Chinese People In Village Large Whole Tusk Carving (37726).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Rare_Huge.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination,likely photo copyvios, DW of artworks, advertising, it's a kind of cumul. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
No indicaiton of user's own work on this Facebook sized black and white headshot of a guy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
This image looks more like a catalog shot than user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:53, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that any of these images are own work of the uploader, variable sizes, subjects, white balances and three pictures no camera, the other two are from two different cameras.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnonGlobalm12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these variably sized images is own work of uploader, only one has useful metadata.
- File:Ben Bays & Aeileon Aidan5.JPG
- File:Aeileon Mesmerize Photo.jpg
- File:Trials and Tribulations.jpg
- File:Jupiter Rueda de Leon.jpg
- File:Aeileon El Padrino of the Free Age Movement.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EMPRESAS KADISTU (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that any of these images is own work of uploader. Many seem to be promotional, variable sizes, no sources, etc. Looks more like a collection of images than own work of uploader.
- File:TECNOLOGÍA.jpg
- File:Reciclaje de tecnología.jpg
- File:Reciclaje de raee.jpg
- File:EMPRESAS DE RECICLAJE RAEE.jpg
- File:Empresas Kadistu.jpg
- File:Empresas kadistu.jpg
- File:RESIDUOS ELECTRÓNICOS.jpg
- File:CÓDIGOS SAGRADOS DE REGALO.png
- File:CÓDIGOS SAGRADOS.png
- File:SOPORTE INFORMÁTICO A EMPRESAS.jpg
- File:RECICLA EL PC EN DESUSO DE TÚ OFICINA.jpg
- File:Empresas Kadistu (Reciclaje de tecnología) Raee.jpg
- File:Walkman main (1).jpg
- File:MINI PC.jpg
- File:RECICLAJE DE TECNOLOGÍA.jpg
- File:KADISTU.jpg
- File:EMPRESAS KADISTU.jpg
_Raee.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this very small image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album. Uploader has done nothing but upload images of themselves. ★ Poké95 01:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. A Public Domain mark license means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 05:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Then someone should note this is not an acceptable license in the Flickr2Commons tool to avoid this issue. Froggerlaura (talk) 05:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping....08:56, 1 June 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Exaggerator (26886510780).jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 08:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Personal snapshot not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unsharp, unidentifiable Mhohner (talk) 08:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unsharp, unidentifiable Mhohner (talk) 08:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality personal photo with no evidence of permission and not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality unused personal photo not realistically useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo not realistically useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo not realistically useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality unused personal photo not realistically useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality unused personal photo not realistically useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Self-created artwork used for self-promotion without obvious educational use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality personal snapshot not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality unused selfie shot not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotional artwork not useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality unused selfie-shot not useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Signed image Fremen (talk) 09:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Low quality unused personal photo not otherwise useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality personal snapshot not useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Personal artwork not useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo not useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Very doubtful that this is actually "own work" as claimed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Jerson Rosales Lostaunau
[edit]
Three unused selfie-shots by a new user no longer active on the Commons, the files not useful for any educational purpose. – Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, user's only upload, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - image with clearly vandal purpose. Tatewaki (talk) 13:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
official movie poster, unlikely "own work" 92.73.25.135 17:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
official movie poster, unlikely "own work" 92.73.25.135 17:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 17:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 17:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete I was about to nominate it for deletion. I have no objection. --KCVelaga(CotRoIN) Talk 02:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
personal photo? not used Avron (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
personal photo? not used Avron (talk) 18:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
![18:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/23#c-Avron-2016-05-23T18:28:00.000Z-File:Greg_"Mortgages"_Meola.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
![01:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/23#c-Ellin_Beltz-2016-06-03T01:12:00.000Z-File:Greg_"Mortgages"_Meola.jpg){kind=link}
personal photo? not used Avron (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 18:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 18:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liverecordsfans (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
FDMS 4 19:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 19:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Selft promotion, low quality and out of scope The Photographer (talk) 19:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
scaledown duplicate of File:Si logo positiv rgb.png Louperivois Ψ @ 20:14, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Scaledown duplicate of File:Si logo positiv rgb.png Louperivois Ψ @ 20:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused, scaledown equialent of File:Si logo positiv rgb.png Louperivois Ψ @ 20:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Subject is uploader, claims "own work", but this is not a slefie. Also, article on the subject has been removed from WP:EN for lack of notability . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Thibaut120094: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:DJ DrAmACiDe-C.E.O. of 5TH UNIVERSE HOUSE©EST.2011 (SMALLER PIC).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Nirul Kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.
Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Misekhanglimbu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Subject article has been removed from WP:EN for lack of notability. Copyright not clear.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JocoOnline (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of the notability of the subject/s of these images, nor of the own work of the uploader, it all looks copied.
- File:JoBeDeVilFirm.png
- File:AbrahamAstacioatZove.jpg
- File:Abraham Astacio Firm.png
- File:JoBe De'Vil.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- also copy file:Humberto Monroy (1968).jpg
- also redirect file:Humo en 1968.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Historical photo, own work is in doubt. OTRS-permission from real photographer (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Own work claim, but it's not a selfie. Taken from http://www.thebeatmurderer.nl/wp-content/gallery/Gallery/thumbs/thumbs_Nick_Luypen_Fotografie_06.jpg Photographer http://www.nickluypen.nl/ Agora (talk) 08:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer must confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded from someone else's Facebook page, no evidence of licensing or permission Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unused self-promotion artwork not otherwise useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, scope and copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 09:55, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality personal snapshot not useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Roxy Music
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Waifs and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bryan Ferry, these files were uploaded from Eva Rinaldi's Flickr stream but the EXIF says that the copyright holder is Marek Jezierski. I don't doubt that she has access to these photos but only Marek can license them for re-use. Some of these files were previously tagged as copyvios but that was removed with various reasonings but none that answer the question of whether Marek has licensed them.
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476686730).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476686738).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476686744).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476686750).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476702674).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476702678).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476737386).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476737392).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476737396).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476737402).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476737408).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476737416).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476751776).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476751784).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476751792).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476751796).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476751798).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC (5476751808).jpg
- File:Roxy Music - Bryan Ferry (5475970623).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476066399).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476066403).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476066415).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476066429).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476066433).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476066437).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476626830).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476626848).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC BRYAN FERRY (5476626864).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC LIVE ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE SYDNEY (5476778212).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC LIVE ENTERTAINMENT CENTRE SYDNEY (5476778220).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC LIVE SYDNEY (5476196227).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC LIVE SYDNEY (5476196231).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC LIVE SYDNEY (5476196233).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
FredWalsh (talk) 11:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination... Marek Jezierski must confirm the license via COM:OTRS, or Eva Rinaldi must confirm to OTRS that these were works for hire. --Storkk (talk) 09:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works: small size, no EXIF data, 2 obvious copyvios deleted.
- File:Hippodrome de Vesoul 2.jpg
- File:Hippodrome de Vesoul.jpg
- File:Vesoul - Mairie portail.jpg
- File:Confracourt - Eglise.jpg
- File:Alain Chrétien en juin 2015.jpg
- File:Lac de Vaivre - Plage 2.jpg
- File:Ludolac 3.jpg
- File:Eurosérum - Port-sur-Saône.jpg
- File:Vesoul - Mairie entrée 2.jpg
- File:Place de la République de Vesoul - Nuit.jpg
- File:Vesoul - Mairie entrée.jpg
- File:Ludolac 2.jpg
- File:Lac de Vaivre - Plage.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je suis l'auteur de toute ces photos. Je les ai transférer sur Commons il y a déjà un petit moment. 90.13.37.246 13:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Pourriez-vous 1. vous loguer et signer vos messages, 2. importer les images originales avec les données EXIF, ou envoyer une permission écrite formelle via COM:OTRS/fr ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Je ne comprends pas comment il faut importer les images avec les données EXIF. Elles n'apparaissent pas ? Je me suis peut-être trompé dans l'importation. Cordialement. Sdljdqsli (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sdljdqsli : Non, il n'y a pas de données EXIF, et ces fichiers sont très petits. Ils ont été spécialement réduits pour être utilisés sur Internet, ce qui fait penser qu'ils sont une violation de droits d'auteurs. Le mieux est d'importer les images sans les retoucher, comme elles sont sorties de l'appareil photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Je peux vous assurer que j'ai bien prise ces photos. D'ailleurs, si je me souviens bien vous m'aviez certifié, lorsque que je commençais à importer des images sur Commons, que ma méthode d'importation était bonne que tout était réglementaire. Cordialement. Sdljdqsli (talk) 18:21, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sdljdqsli : Non, il n'y a pas de données EXIF, et ces fichiers sont très petits. Ils ont été spécialement réduits pour être utilisés sur Internet, ce qui fait penser qu'ils sont une violation de droits d'auteurs. Le mieux est d'importer les images sans les retoucher, comme elles sont sorties de l'appareil photo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:53, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- Je ne comprends pas comment il faut importer les images avec les données EXIF. Elles n'apparaissent pas ? Je me suis peut-être trompé dans l'importation. Cordialement. Sdljdqsli (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Pourriez-vous 1. vous loguer et signer vos messages, 2. importer les images originales avec les données EXIF, ou envoyer une permission écrite formelle via COM:OTRS/fr ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS confirmation needed. --Storkk (talk) 09:59, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Andy Mackay
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Waifs and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bryan Ferry, these files were uploaded from Eva Rinaldi's Flickr stream but the EXIF says that the copyright holder is Marek Jezierski. I don't doubt that she has access to these photos but only Marek can license them for re-use. These files were previously tagged as copyvios but that was removed with various reasonings but none that answer the question of whether Marek has licensed them.
- File:Andy Mackay (5475970609).jpg
- File:Andy Mackay (5476001291).jpg
- File:Andy Mackay and Jorja Chalmers (5475970609).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
FredWalsh (talk) 12:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:OTRS-confirmation needed. --Storkk (talk) 10:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Phil Manzanera
[edit]Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Waifs and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Bryan Ferry, these files were uploaded from Eva Rinaldi's Flickr stream but the EXIF says that the copyright holder is Marek Jezierski. I don't doubt that she has access to these photos but only Marek can license them for re-use. Some of these files were previously tagged as copyvios but that was removed with various reasonings but none that answer the question of whether Marek has licensed them.
- File:Phil Manzanera (5475970595).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5475970601).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476001261).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476001269).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476001281).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476001287).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476196237).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476221411).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476686756).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476686764).jpg
- File:Phil Manzanera (5476702670).jpg
- File:PhilManzaneraFeb2011.jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC LIVE SYDNEY (5476196243).jpg
- File:ROXY MUSIC LIVE SYDNEY (5476196251).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
FredWalsh (talk) 12:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS-confirmation needed. --Storkk (talk) 10:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Trafalgar Square in art
[edit]Flickr uploader is not copyright holder, no evidence for PD.
- File:Trafalgar Square (20298045354).jpg
- File:Trafalgar Square (14578435435).jpg
- File:Trafalgar Square (16485535934).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 13:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: First and third per nomination, and I have added them their respective "Undelete in ..." categories (2022 and 2050). Kept middle file, which is by William Matthison (died 1926) so is {{PD-old-80}}. --Storkk (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Flickr user is not copyright holder, no evidence for licence.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 13:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr user is not copyright holder, no evidence for PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Almost certainly by ETW Dennis, who died in 1923: {{PD-old-90}}. --Storkk (talk) 10:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It doesn't appear as though this photo of Mr. Price is from when he was aged 25 or younger. Further, the uploader provides no date by which to judge public domain eligibility. — Fourthords | =/\= | 20:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Exact Date Unknown
[edit]
This photo was found with no date specified on it or its original album. EmmeDave (talk) 20:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - not PD-1923, unknown date, unknown author -> probable copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 10:29, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
The author of this picture is Anthony Baus who is a living person. OTRS-permission from the author is needed. Y.haruo (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Piccadilly Circus before 1940
[edit]Flickr user is not copyright holder, no evidence for PD.
- File:Pall Mall (14702452793).jpg
- File:Piccadilly Circus (14757035473).jpg
- File:Piccadilly Circus (15186853992).jpg
- File:Waterloo Place (16926392151).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 17:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: second and fourth, and added to their respective undeletion categories (2043 and 2037). Kept first and third after fixing relevant information. --Storkk (talk) 11:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Okeyes (WMF) (talk · contribs)
[edit]MediaWiki screenshots which don't provide attribution to the software authors or information about the software license.
- File:DeletionFlyout.png
- File:MarkAsReviewedFlyout.png
- File:PagesFeedInfoFlyout.png
- File:NewPagesFeedMetadata.png
- File:NewPagesFeedFilters.png
- File:SNPScreenshot.png
BethNaught (talk) 20:02, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: fixable errors in the file description page should be fixed rather than deleting the files. --Jcb (talk) 12:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Howief (WMF) (talk · contribs)
[edit]More WMF screenshots failing to provide attribution or license information for MediaWiki.
- File:Usability beta feedback survey.jpg
- File:Usability beta opt-out survey.jpg
- File:Beta feedback survey.jpg
BethNaught (talk) 20:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: fixable errors in the file description page should be fixed rather than deleting the files. --Jcb (talk) 12:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steven (WMF) (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files all suffer from at least one of the following deficiencies:
- MediaWiki and the GPL is not attributed.
- Texts of screenshotted articles are not specifically attributed, or the the description is not precise enough.
- Authors and licenses of the included images are not provided.
Not every image has all of these problems. Some use a "Wikipedia uses CC-BY-SA 3.0, MediaWiki is GPL" tag; this is OK, but it would be better to provide a (preferably perma-) link to the article, and this doesn't work at all when a screenshot include an image. I have literally reviewed all of this user's uploads, so I will admit in advance I may have made a few mistakes.
- File:Sign-up-and-save mockup.png
- File:Screenshot of recommendations flyout on beta labs.png
- File:Recommendations flyout.webm
- File:Post-edit recommendations.webm
- File:Task suggestions flyout.png
- File:Task suggestions flyout mock one.png
- File:Task suggestions flyout mock two.png
- File:Edit-saved-suggest-02.png
- File:Keep Going Post-edit (1).png
- File:Edit-saved-suggest-06-07.png
- File:GuidedTour usability test 6.webm
- File:GuidedTour usability test 5.webm
- File:GuidedTour usability test 4.webm
- File:GuidedTour usability test 3.webm
- File:GuidedTour usability test 2.webm
- File:GuidedTour usability test 1.webm
- File:Firstedit guidedtour.webm
- File:GettingStarted on Jesus article.png
- File:Screenshot of German Wikipedia pre edit tour.png
- File:Screenshot of Italian Wikipedia pre edit tour.png
- File:Screenshot of French Wikipedia post edit tour.png
- File:Screenshot of German Wikipedia post edit tour.png
- File:Screenshot 2014-04-29 of Massimo Vignelli article.png
- File:Screenshot of Polish Wikipedia with new typography.PNG
- File:Wikipedia Linux screenshot new typography in Firefox.png
- File:Screenshot of MediaWiki in Chrome with new typography.png
- File:Anonymous Invite Wireframe 5.png
- File:Anonymous Invite Wireframe 2.png
- File:Screenshot 2014-02-11 of GettingStarted on Main Page.png
- File:Screenshot 2014-02-11 of GettingStarted on Sea.png
- File:Screenshot 2013-11-01 of first edit tour.png
- File:Screenshot 2013-11-01 of gettingStartedReturn.png
- File:GettingStartedOnRedirect Test Clip F.webm
- File:GettingStartedOnRedirect Test Clip C.webm
- File:GettingStartedOnRedirect Test Clip D.webm
- File:GettingStartedOnRedirect Test Clip A.webm
- File:GettingStartedOnRedirect Test Clip B.webm
- File:GettingStartedUserTest-GreenProgressBar-5.webm
- File:GettingStartedUserTest-GreenProgressBar-6.webm
- File:GettingStarted blue progress bar-3.webm
- File:GettingStarted blue progress bar-2.webm
- File:GettingStarted blue progress bar-1.webm
- File:GettingStarted blue progress bar-4.webm
- File:GettingStartedUserTest-GreenProgressBar-4.webm
- File:GettingStartedUserTest-GreenProgressBar-2.webm
- File:GettingStartedUserTest-GreenProgressBar-3.webm
- File:GettingStartedUserTest-GreenProgressBar-1.webm
- File:ACUX-Onboarding-Step1.png
- File:ACUX-Onboarding-Step2.png
- File:Notifications with popups test B.webm
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted prototype v3 add links.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted prototype v3 clarification.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted prototype v3 guider step four.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted prototype v3 guider step three.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted prototype v3 guider step two.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted prototype v3 spelling and grammar.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted prototype v3 plus guider step 1.png
- File:GettingStarted v2 user test B.webmsd.webm
- File:GettingStarted v2 user test A.webmsd.webm
- File:GuidedTour user test A.webmsd.webm
- File:GuidedTour user test B.webmsd.webm
- File:GetStartedLink.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted Save step.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted tour Preview step.png
- File:Screenshot of GettingStarted tour Edit step.png
- File:GettingStarted user test 3.webm
- File:GettingStarted user test 2.webm
- File:GettingStarted user test 1.webm
- File:Screenshot of edit count milestone F feedback.png
- File:Screenshot of edit count milestone E feedback.png
- File:Screenshot of edit count milestone D feedback.png
- File:Screenshot of edit count milestone C feedback.png
- File:Screenshot of edit count milestone B feedback.png
- File:Screenshot of edit count milestone A feedback.png
- File:Posteditfeedback-historical-2-gold-sticker.png
- File:Posteditfeedback-confirmation-final.png
- File:Posteditfeedback-gratitude-final.png
.png){kind=link}
BethNaught (talk) 20:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: fixable errors in the file description page should be fixed rather than deleting the files. --Jcb (talk) 12:04, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Olivier LPB (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, sadly. --Platonides (talk) 17:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image has been copy/pasted from the company's website and even though it's just text and some generic shapes I'm pretty sure the combination thereof is a violation of copyright rules. Primefac (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused image per nomination. --Platonides (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Deleted: speedy deleted, obvious copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - advertisement. --ghouston (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 04:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Roland zh,
Yes, I have took this photograph & hence i would like to request you to please remove deletion request for my file अजित कडकडे.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ameyadhamankar (talk • contribs) 11:13, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as per uploader's assertion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
very low quality/resolution better File:Sandro botticelli e bottega, madonna col bambino e san giovannino in un tondo, 1490-1500 ca. 01.JPG Oursana (talk) 07:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and merged/redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. In addition. Baca n Rola is not mentioned in es.wiki, so here is a notability problem also. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. In addition, Rosselot Sur is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki, so here is a notability problem also. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-trivial corporate logo, no evidence of proper authorisation. Uploaded for spam purposes. BethNaught (talk) 08:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Chinese dragers-Rijksmuseum RP-F-F80097.jpeg. Same resolution, same source, but lacking full color profile. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect file. Correct is file:Justin Bieber - Purpose World Tour.svg. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I need to delete this because I uploaded a new version of it (here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:White_horse_in_Zaouia_d%27Ifrane_03.jpg) Mohamed Haddi (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:White horse in Zaouia d'Ifrane 03.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. In addition, Planetary Design is not mentioned in en.wiki, so the logo is probably out of project scope also. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
brand logo Papuass (talk) 13:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
hoax deleted on fr wiki Florn (talk) 13:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The "permission" page only allows for the downloading for free of the image. It doesn't, nor has it ever, mention commercial use, derivatives, redistribution, etc. Lhmartin (talk) 13:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I am in contact with the photographer and I have asked them to put a CC licencing statement on the website to make the licencing more clear. They said they would do this, so if and when done this DR can be withdrawn. Lhmartin (talk) 18:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info: Lhmartin has been Globally blocked. Please be careful when dealing withy this file. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination The photographer has now updated their website to include a statement of CC-BY 4.0 licencing and the file page has been updated accordingly. XR728 (talk) 08:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, license review successful. --Wdwd (talk) 19:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Photo of non-notable "Social Media Personality", used in deleted en:User:Nickalus211/sandbox JohnCD (talk) 14:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
and File:UPHOTO 20151011 082210.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Wcam (talk) 15:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Too blurry to be of any use. See non-blurry but similar image File:Merqala Tangier Morocco 02.jpg Takeaway (talk) 16:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (no constructive mainspace contribs). FDMS 4 17:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actorvishaloberoi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:VishalOberoi Actor.jpg
- File:VishalOberoiActor.jpg
- File:Vishal Oberoi Actor.jpg
- File:Vishal Oberoi.jpg
- File:Love U Mr.Yamraj.jpg
- File:Vishal's signature.png
FDMS 4 17:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, self promotional images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' and thumbnail format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 02:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 02:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Recent architecture by the french architect Albert Constantin (still alive). JeanBono (talk) 07:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This is derivative work of copyrighted book cover. Per it.wiki the book was first published in 1939 and translated into Italian in 1994. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (cover artist or publishing house) is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. The school was founded in 1961, so the logo is not old. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Claimed as "Photo property of the NSW Parliament." on English Wikipedia, Where did this ACTUALLY come from? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- It does come from the Parliament [2], but is not a free image. Frickeg (talk) 12:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Raphaël Didjaman is the central subject of this image. User:Raphaël Didjaman is the uploader who claimed it is "own work". If they are the same person, that cannot be correct. If they are not the same person, then the uploader must follow our policy on user names that are the names of notable people. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Found here: http://www.whoguides.com/who-invented-concrete. Low resolution, no exif data, possible copyvio. 4ing (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
GIF duplicate of File:WappenLiezen.png Fränsmer (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
JPG duplicate of File:WappenLiezen.png Fränsmer (talk) 11:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete; while there is no copyright law in Mauritania, reproduction of copyright works is forbidden - see Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Mauritania (I've just updated the WIPO url links that were broken). Ww2censor (talk) 12:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The Mauritanian stamp is not a very important illustration for my text on Italo Balboo. It can be deleted and replace by this link to a ICAO page on this specific topic. http://www.icao.int/secretariat/postalhistory/tcc_montreal_salutes_general_balbo.pdf
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielhbordeleau (talk • contribs) 05:22, 24 May 2016
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
I could not find license on source site. No evidence for CC-license. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect and very different version in comparison with the official coat of arms (File:AUT Mattersburg COA.svg). In opposition to the official coat of arms this one does not show a vine knife. Fränsmer (talk) 13:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This version has no source, is sheer fantasy and misleading. -- MaxxL - talk 18:36, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect and very different version in comparison with the official coat of arms (File:AUT Mattersburg COA.svg). In opposition to the official coat of arms this one does not show a vine knife. Fränsmer (talk) 13:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This version has no source, is sheer fantasy and misleading. -- MaxxL - talk 18:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr user is not the copyright holder, no proof of PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Tending Keep looks like a press advert of the 1900s (from the lack of motors). Aren't we wasting our time pursuing such stuff? I'm sure the inheritors of the copyright couldn't care less. Johnbod (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- That we can probably get away with it is utterly irrelevant. If we do not respect copyright how can we ask people and institutions release their media freely? -mattbuck (Talk) 18:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 19:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
seems to have been scanned Florn (talk) 14:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The map was not scanned but made with Paint. I actually created this one, because the first one was not appropriate.--Captain Thor (talk) 15:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- OK, I've just found that it derives from File:Map of territorial growth 1775.jpg. It would have been much simpler to indicate it from the outset. Could you correct the source and license please? Florn (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 20:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
seems to have been scanned Florn (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The map was takened from the 1895 Atlas on the United States by the Rand McNally Corporation.--Captain Thor (talk) 15:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Really? After investigation, I found that it derives from File:USA Territorial Growth 1790.jpg. Could you correct the source and license please? Florn (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 20:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
src = https://f4.bcbits.com/img/0006924046_10.jpg Wdwd (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
![14:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/23#c-Wdwd-2016-05-23T14:20:00.000Z-File:Cover_Art_"Respiro".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
![20:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/23#c-INeverCry-2016-06-28T20:01:00.000Z-File:Cover_Art_"Respiro".jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://thedividedera.com/images/tom-transparent.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --★ Poké95 22:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZDu6HRWcAAeZAV.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://galeri8.uludagsozluk.com/458/velev-ki-ibneyim-mitinginden-kareler_631773.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://imgim.com/nam%C4%B1ktatl%C4%B1s%C4%B1.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/570067024353570816/KasjLCnK.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate , test بدارين (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate , test بدارين (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate , test بدارين (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate , test بدارين (talk) 15:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
wrong author, useless edit of File:Delphi 6.png Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
wrong author and/or licence Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:04, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Deformed version of the original logo https://www.glyfx.com/useruploads/images/guides/logo_delphi.gif --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
No metadata, small size, looks professional and is sourced as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr user has a long history of uploading images for which they are not the copyright holder, no evidence for PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr user has a long history of uploading images for which they are not the copyright holder, COM:PRP. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Yes, I think although this is released under CC-BY-SA on Flickr, that user is breaching copyright as it looks like a scan of a 1972 film poster, although I am not sure. Domdomegg (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- It certainly isn't a film poster - it contains a displayed film poster, for Pulp, along with other advertisments, but this does not affect its status. Johnbod (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Identical image to this with "unknown" author was previously deleted. There is no metadata on this small image and no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
VOA photo after June 2013 is non-commercial use only. Wcam (talk) 18:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started, nevertheless i like it, to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' small-size format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 18:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly a headshot for autographs Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Likely copyvio. --Nick (talk) 19:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
сомнительная лицензия Olglagol (talk) 19:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:14, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elpocaco1986 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE images of nudity. Not in use, easily replaced, low photographic quality (poor focus, poor sharpness, blown out highlights in places), confrontational framing, no context other than a perianal region. Generally unremarkable images of the male anus. Commons isn't a private image repository.
—/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 20:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 21:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' small-sized format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Senyera del nacionalisme valencià.svg. Fry1989 eh? 21:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 21:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Gig > Aire trapeze decoupage.png > Trapeze aire decoupage.svg Pdebart (talk) 08:10, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:57, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright infringement Cdang (talk) 08:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
The image is just simple text. However, the text was probably drawn by hand, it is not just typing with a standard font; the layout and the colours were chosen by purpose. This is an original artistic creation IMHO, but I admit this can be disputed.
Cdang (talk) 08:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - This image doesn't look hand-drawn. Stencils might have been used, or text blocks were used to ink the whole title of the song. Never mind that; the typeface/font looks too simple to be copyrighted. If you are arguing threshold of originality, there's not a chance for it to be copyrighted in the United States. I'm sure it falls below UK's own originality threshold. --George Ho (talk) 09:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Ditto above. Centpacrr (talk) 04:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - not PD-textlogo, faded background picture - Jcb (talk) 16:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete/Copy to WP - Looking at other images of this cover I see that the background should probably be flat white, but I agree with Cdang that the text was probably drawn by hand. I had resized the image in an attempt to save it from being deleted, but I realized since that even fair-use isn't allowed on Commons. The most that we could possibly achieve by potentially flouting copyright law would be to have an image that's just over twice the size, but still with very little detail. In article space it will look identical. It's hardly worth the risk. nagualdesign 21:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I've had a go at restoring the image, based on references. It's a bit sloppy round the edges. It would actually benefit from resizing at this point. nagualdesign 21:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - below the threshold of originality and consisting of exclusively typeface. MB298 (talk) 00:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Were you referring to the US's or the UK's originality line, MB298? --George Ho (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- @George Ho: U.S. MB298 (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- What about the UK one, MB298? --George Ho (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- @George Ho: I understand that the UK's threshold is significantly lower than the US's; and given that the cover was published in the UK; it is likely it was created there as well, however there is no way to tell for sure. Like Storkk, I thought the cover was an American work for the reasons stated. MB298 (talk) 18:50, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- What about the UK one, MB298? --George Ho (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- @George Ho: U.S. MB298 (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Were you referring to the US's or the UK's originality line, MB298? --George Ho (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
{{vk}} Neither typefaces nor hand calligraphy are copyrightable in the US. Storkk (talk) 09:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- What about the UK's threshold of originality, Storkk, which is very low at the level of the Edge magazine logo? --George Ho (talk) 23:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. I was basing my opinion on the assumption that it was an American work, since Philip Bailey is an American artist, and the record label Columbia Records is an American company... I missed the fact that this is specifically the UK cover, though... It doesn't seem much less complex than the Edge logo, but I don't know enough about UK TOO to make that judgement with any confidence. I've struck my vk above. Storkk (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- What about the UK's threshold of originality, Storkk, which is very low at the level of the Edge magazine logo? --George Ho (talk) 23:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Handwritten text is no different from printed text: neither one is copyrightable unless you have enough of it that the words themselves are copyrightable. Either way, the graphical representation of the words is problem-free, and it's absurd to suggest that UK law permits anyone to copyright "Philip Bailey & Phil Collins Easy Lover A4915". Nyttend (talk) 17:46, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Simple text. --INeverCry 17:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Construction division harmonique.gif > Construction division harmonique.png Pdebart (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect and very different version in comparison with the official coat of arms (File:AUT Sankt Poelten COA.svg) Fränsmer (talk) 13:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Trapezoid hauteur.png Trapezoid altitude.svg Pdebart (talk) 13:45, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
possible copyright violation 92.4.96.96 19:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: (c) 2015 Eric Millette, All Rights reserved per EXIF. --INeverCry 18:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence at source for Creative Commons licensing. — Fourthords | =/\= | 20:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of source, text only. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
It is now File:Percolating time.tif inner source, with typography, writing words so on, I think, it is now found at there, isn´t it? Category:Images created by Oliver Castaño Mallorca 01:35,24 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Not in use in any Wikimedia project. Deleted on the following ground from COM:SCOPE: "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose". Thuresson (talk) 19:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format (maybe a scan?), but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 04:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Roland zh This picture was taken for CD cover and is free from any copyright violation. Hence request you to withdraw your nomination for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milindc (talk • contribs)
- Considering all the facts of the case but this this deletion request tips the scales to deletion. Thuresson (talk) 19:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 19:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Axe orthique - 2.png non utilisé Pdebart (talk) 06:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Kept. This is a file redirect to an existing file as per Help:File redirect.
Kept, Thuresson (talk) 19:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
This picture should be copyright violation. It seems to have been taken from the following site and trimmed. http://mil.huanqiu.com/photo_china/2015-09/2796463.html Ootsuka02 (talk) 07:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Objection: The comment at the bottom of the webpage indicates the photo is not published by the website. It appears to be a user-created image.--DreamLiner (talk) 03:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted. The photo was first uploaded with the watermark cropped off. There is no reason why a legitimate copyright owner would take his or her own photos from a web site to upload them to Commons. Thuresson (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Im Zuge der Entfernung der Personen aus dem anderen Bild, haben wir diese dargestellte Person über die Veröffentlichung des Bildes gefragt. Das Bild wurde ohne seine Erlaubnis hochgeladen und er wünscht, dass das Bild von Wikipedia entfernt wird. Rhellik (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Kept. Not a reason for deletion. This is obviously an arranged setting with a boxer in front of some heavy machinery in an electrical plant, looking into the camera. If Wikipedia should use this photo or not is not a matter that can be decided here. Thuresson (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept, Thuresson (talk) 20:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
motivos personales del autor Silvio.triana marinillo (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- "Personal reasons" is not a reason for deletion of a photo of a 18th century church in Colombia. But the photo is out of focus and File:Capilla de Jesus Nazareno-Nave Central.JPG is taken at the same place and in focus. Thuresson (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
seems to have been scanned from a newspaper Florn (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- I took these photos back in 2002 and gave them to the local newspaper. I had lost them, but I had kept a copy of the newspaper. I also made arrangements with the Mayor of Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to bring it back home to Canada after it was struck by a barge and had sunk. However, I did not have the $40,000 needed to get it out of the water.--Captain Thor (talk) 02:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of authorship. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
seems to have been scanned from a newspaper Florn (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- I took these photos back in 2002 and gave them to the local newspaper. I had lost them, but I had kept a copy of the newspaper. I also made arrangements with the Mayor of Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to bring it back home to Canada after it was struck by a barge and had sunk. However, I did not have the $40,000 needed to get it out of the water.--Captain Thor (talk) 02:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of authorship. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Wandbild von 1979, Foto nicht von einem öffentlichen Ort gemacht Derbrauni (talk) 06:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Beide Treppenhäuser, das östliche und das westliche, mit ihren unter Denkmalschutz stehenden Wandbildern sind öffentlich zugänglich. Das Gebäude des Festspielhauses an sich ist heute ein Theater. Die Treppenhäuser sind erweiterter Teil des Foyers. Vor, während oder nach der Aufführung kann man sich dort aufhalten, ohne eine Eintrittskarte zu besitzen. Das Restaurant im Haus hat sogar ab Mittags geöffnet. Da es die Sanitärräume im Haus benutzt, reicht ein Restaurantbesuch, um in die Treppenhäuser zu gelangen. So gesehen, würde ich schon sagen, dass ich die Fotos an einem und von einem öffentlichen Ort gemacht habe. Aber ich bin bei diesem Thema nicht sattelfest. Wenn ihr das Bild löschen wollt, werde ich nicht depressiv werden.--Goldchinese (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- PS: Warum hat dieses Foto keinen identischen Löschantrag? File:Dresden Hellerau - Festspielhaus Innen, Foto Christoph Münch.jpg--Goldchinese (talk) 19:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Goldchinese. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Wandbild von 1979, Foto nicht von einem öffentlichen Platz aus aufgenommen. Derbrauni (talk) 06:56, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Beide Treppenhäuser, das östliche und das westliche, mit ihren unter Denkmalschutz stehenden Wandbildern sind öffentlich zugänglich. Das Gebäude des Festspielhauses an sich ist heute ein Theater. Die Treppenhäuser sind erweiterter Teil des Foyers. Vor, während oder nach der Aufführung kann man sich dort aufhalten, ohne eine Eintrittskarte zu besitzen. Das Restaurant im Haus hat sogar ab Mittags geöffnet. Da es die Sanitärräume im Haus benutzt, reicht ein Restaurantbesuch, um in die Treppenhäuser zu gelangen. So gesehen, würde ich schon sagen, dass ich die Fotos an einem und von einem öffentlichen Ort gemacht habe. Aber ich bin bei diesem Thema nicht sattelfest. Wenn ihr das Bild löschen wollt, werde ich nicht depressiv werden.--Goldchinese (talk) 18:57, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- PS: Warum hat dieses Foto keinen identischen Löschantrag? File:Dresden Hellerau - Festspielhaus Innen, Foto Christoph Münch.jpg--Goldchinese (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Goldchinese. --Jcb (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
As per Jcb's suggestion at the end of this discussion, I'm starting this new request as I think that the decision to keep the image was made in error. There is no freedom of panorama for interior spaces in Germany and this also applies to public interior spaces. To quote from German Wikipedia's very thorough article on the subject, as I already did on Jcb's talk page: "Nicht von der Schrankenbestimmung erfasst sind nach einhelliger Auffassung des Schrifttums Aufnahmen und Darstellungen von Werken in Innenräumen auch von öffentlichen Gebäuden wie Museen, öffentlichen Sammlungen, Kirchen oder Behörden" seems to be pretty clear to me (and it's truly comprehensively referenced with legal literature). My attempt at translating into English: "According to the unanimous view in literature, the limitation [of copyright, i.e. FoP] doesn't apply to works in interior spaces of public buildings such as museums, public collections, churches, or civil services". Deleting this image would also follow existing practice on Commons with deletion decisions such as in Commons:Deletion requests/Interior of Elbphilharmonie. As far as I can see, it's nearly universally accepted that there's no FoP for interior spaces in Germany, with just places of traffic such as railway stations or airports being the subject of some debate (not applicable here, and even then the majority of legal commentaries apparently denies FoP for railway station halls etc.) Pinging also Pajz, our FoP expert. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Gestumblindi is right. If you consider the design of the interior wall a part of the building itself, section 59 of the German Copyright Act would be inapplicable in first place, see subsection 1, 2nd sentence: "In the case of buildings, this authorisation shall only extend to the exterior view." If you don't, it is inapplicable because works inside interior rooms of buildings are not covered under section 59, even if the building stands open to the public, because the work is not located "in public roads and ways or public squares". See de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium „öffentlich“, para 4, and Vogel in Schricker/Loewenheim, Urheberrecht, 4th ed. 2010, § 59 rec. 7: "This [i.e., section 59] covers the facade of a building as a whole and in detail, or an artistically designed gate to a garden, not however the rear of a house and its interior rooms (entry halls, staircases, ballrooms, interior courtyards, etc.), irrespective of whether the houses are private or publicly accessible public buildings (theaters, court houses, administrative buildings, etc.), or works inside interior rooms, such as a sculpture in the entry hall of a university, or a wall painting in the lobby of a theater." (This is not controversial.) — Pajz (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Wenn das Foto hier nicht sein darf, dann muss es gelöscht werden. Damit habe ich kein Problem. Aber bedeutet die sich hier andeutende Begründung nicht, dass auch alle Dateien jüngeren Datums aus der Category:Interiors of opera houses in Germany gelöscht werden müssen? Was ist mit der Semperoper in ihrer Interieur-Fassung von 1985? Oder mit Category:Interiors of shops in Germany? (Besonders toll: BVB Fan Welt 04.jpg) Das ist nur mal so als Verständnisfrage ohne Hintergedanken gemeint.
- If the picture is not ok, the delete it. No problem! But if it will be deletetd following the explanatory statement, made by Gestumblindi, is it not necessary, to delete all filesin recent times from the Category:Interiors of opera houses in Germany? What is with pictures from the Semperoper interior after 1985? Or with pictures of Interiors of shops in Germany?--Goldchinese (talk) 18:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Goldchinese: (I'm writing in English as Commons' lingua franca, for the benefit of readers and potential discussion participants who don't speak German) - Yes, there are several pictures of modern interiors in Category:Interiors of opera houses in Germany that should probably be deleted as well. Not all of them, of course: Category:Interior of Markgräfliches Opernhaus shows Baroque, 18th century interiors which aren't protected by copyright. Files such as File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-75965-0001, Leipzig, Opernhaus, Probe Franz Konwitschny.jpg are also most likely fine - focussing on a person, not on the architecture or other elements of art. We will have to discuss and probably delete quite a few of them in due time, but there are many special circumstances to consider. For example, the Bundesarchiv (German Federal Archives) photos may be a special case, as the cooperation agreement with Wikimedia Germany asserts that the Federal Archives owns sufficient rights to be able to grant a free license. On the other hand, we had to delete some Bundesarchiv photos nevertheless, as it turned out that in some cases there were oversights (e.g. photos of newspapers). Anyway, there have already been many deletions of similar cases, see Category:German FOP cases/deleted (and that category contains only a selection, often requests aren't categorized after deletion). Gestumblindi (talk) 20:27, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- we have over 36 million images on Commons. My best estimate is that several hundred thousand -- around 1% -- should be deleted, so it is never valid to point at other examples. If you see other examples, please tag them fro deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from copyright holder Jacob B Murphy is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Jacob B Murphy did not shoot this photo. The photographer and copyright owner is 69th street (me). For what ever reason the Meta Data showing Jacob B Murphy is completley incorrect. Matter of fact the camera was not even a Nikon and the photo was shot at the Marathon in Tempe AZ for PF Changs in 2008-2009. Please do not delete this photo and please find a way for the METAdata to post correct. I have the original file on a hard drive and can post it if necessary. http://www.mag.nation19.com/team.php (Says my name)
On http://www.jbm.photo/faq/ page it shows Jacob B Murphy is located in California and is a wedding photographer. I shoot for Nation19 occasionally and I live and work in Scottsdale AZ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69thstreet (talk • contribs)
- @69thstreet: One way to solve this would be that you uploaded the original file with the same file name as this ("Upload a new version of this file"). Thuresson (talk) 20:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Check Youtube. Nine seconds into the film, it says © COPYRIGHT BY CLAN CELENTANO FILMS 1974. {{PD-1996}} can only be used for works which fell out of copyright in the United States for some reason before 1 March 1989, but this film never fell out of copyright in the United States because it had a valid copyright notice. Fails Commons:Subsisting copyright. Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The user Cavarrone See here please
write this : Strongest possible keep, images of Italian films produced in Italy before 1976 are explicitly permitted under PD-Italy. They are SPECIFICALLY included in the "simple photographs" chapter (articles 87-92). For the record, not the nom's responsability, but the current wording of the template is quite misleading as the Italian law never says "the simple photography must not have artistic merit or reflections of photographer creativity or personality" (something, if we were in WP, I would call an original research) and particularly Art. 2, § 7 do not talk about "work of photographic ART" but about a more neutral "photographic works" ("opere fotografiche" in Italian). The Italian law is also extremely precise in what should be considered a simple photograph and what is a photographic work: Art. 2, § 7 expressely refers to articles 87-92 (ai sensi delle norme del Capo V del Titolo II, "Diritti relativi alle fotografie" i.e. "Rights related to photographs"), and namely in the article 87 includes film screenshot. Not by chance Italian Wikipedia also uses a template PD-Italia-Film for film --screenshots. Regards Adri08 (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Files on Commons must be free in both the United States and the source country. You have used two templates: {{PD-Italy}} for the Italian part, and {{PD-1996}} for the United States part. Unfortunately, {{PD-1996}} does not apply here.
- {{PD-1996}} has two requirements:
- The work must have fallen out of copyright in the United States for some reason before 1996. This film had a valid copyright notice, so it didn't fall out of copyright in the United States before 1996. See Commons:Subsisting copyright.
- The work must be in the public domain in the source country on 1 January 1996. The screenshot was in the public domain on this date, but the film as a whole was not. To make it more complicated, Italian law and United States law define 'work' differently. Under Italian law, the film is a work but the individual screenshots are not works. Under United States law, the entire film including its screenshots constitutes a work. See COM:URAA.
- Since United States law seems to be heavily dependent on the word 'work', and since this word is defined differently in the United States and Italy, I'm not sure exactly how United States law handles screenshots like this or whether United States law says that requirement #2 is satisfied or not. However, as requirement #1 isn't satisfied, it's clear that this screenshot is copyrighted in the United States (but not in Italy). --Stefan2 (talk) 13:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, i erased {{PD-1996}} --Regards--Adri08 (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- That doesn't solve the problem as the file is still unfree in the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment, last time I nominated a PD-Italy for deletion, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Corleone 1978.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amori miei 1978.jpg, two open-and-shut cases where URAA clearly applied without ambiguity about which is the "work" subjected to copyright protection (both the film works and the relevant film frames were copyrighted in the source country on 1 January 1996), to my surprise the closer kept the images as "WMF policy is that we do not enforce URAA", citing in his talk page Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA as the background for his decision. There are similar outcomes scattered here and there, some of them in Category:URAA-related deletion requests/kept, eg. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patrick Abercrombie, 1945.png where the affected file was kept citing Legal/Wikimedia Server Location and Free Knowledge as background. According to such outcomes, I think we should tag them as Template:Not-PD-US-URAA and be careful to not use them in en.wikipedia. --Cavarrone (talk) 06:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- No comment on the merits, just making a note for crosswiki editors like m that this file is shadowed on enwiki by another file and there is a tag there that should be removed if this file is deleted.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: non-USA work. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Uploading probably related to ##Wikivillages of Cameroon writing contest in French and English, possibly by the (unexperienced) author himself. Some explanations might be useful in this case. Thank you. Ji-Elle (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
This photograph represents in whole part a painting. Though it is not a faithful reproduction, it cleary infringes the copyrights of the painter. If the uploader has the rights of the painting, an email must be sent to permissions. Otherwise I believe this should be deleted. ~~ ∫uℂρЭℝ0υĜe (ㅜαλ2𐤊) 16:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is not only painting, it is a diorama of 3D object, of the Communication gallery of the Birla Industrial & Technological Museum, under the Ministry of Culture, Govt. of India. It was a public exhibition at the public place, so the file falls under the ‘Freedom of Panorama’ in India. -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have added the (FoP-India) tag also.-- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 11:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: this is mainly a 2D reproduction of a 2D painting. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Pd-simple? Steinsplitter (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
This 4-minute video contains a few seconds of an organizational logo, which is non-free. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- not sure if this should be deleted I requested this video from the American Chemical Society, got a license release, and uploaded it. There are some community concerns about the logo in it. I nominated this for deletion to get community opinion and set a precedent. I raised this issue at Commons pump and other places linked to that page. Different people gave different opinions about whether logos can appear in videos.
- Videos contain all sorts of imagery. This one contains a non-free logo of the video's creator at the end. The file was licensed and uploaded with the understanding that the logo at the end was Commons:De minimis, and could be allowed in the file despite being non-free content. I indicated at the time of upload that the logo was non-free.
- What do others think? Are videos with prominent non-free logos disallowed on Commons? Does the presentation of this logo cross the line from de minimis to become an element of the media for which copyright must be released? Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Just cut these few seconds. --Leyo 20:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It is seven seconds, and I've altered the link above to show them. The five-second clip makes the logo less prominent -- it is the initial couple of seconds when it is very much "in your face". See this article and this pdf. Clearly the defence of de minimis in a video relies on the copyright material being incidental and in the background. If this logo was out-of-focus and on the wall behind the guy being filmed, for example. But here the logo is deliberately included and the entire purpose of that segment is to display the logo clearly to the viewer so they acknowledge the work of the ACS. That's the purpose of the logo and the purpose of its inclusion in this video. Therefore this copyright work cannot be said to be de minimis. The video must be deleted and replaced with one that does not include the logo animation (my understanding of copyright violations is that it is not good enough to simply upload a new version while retaining the infringing material in an old version). IANAL. -- Colin (talk) 09:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- The "Copyright Infringement in Videos" paper is insightful. It discusses copyrighted art which is shown in videos, talking about "right of display". It says, "Courts generally agree that the showing of the copyrighted work on video is not 'de minimus'". I am not sure if that means that every second of a video should be considered independently for the purposes of de minimus. With images in Commons, if a copyrighted work is less than 5% of the total image (or any arbitrary small amount), then I think that could contribute to a de minimis rationale that the Commons community might accept. I am not aware of any comparable discussion in video. The paper does present the amount of time that a copyrighted work is present in a video as a contributing factor for determining fair use. This makes me wonder about "fair use" in Commons - often it is said that fair use is not allowed, but de minimis" is a sort of fair use, right? This paper could be supporting evidence for deleting this video. I would like any other option, if anyone else has one. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- No, de minimis is not "a sort of fair use". The former is literally that "the law does not concern itself with trifles". Fair use concerns the circumstances of the usage (commentary, newspaper report, etc) of a normally copyright work, and the usage is certainly not incidental or minor. I don't think the 5% figure appears anywhere in law or policy. The papers mention the short duration that the work is featured, but I don't think making the total film longer (and thus smaller percentage) would have any factor in copyright -- it is just making the point that the usage is a tiny part of the whole. Nobody says 5% is ok but 6% is not. Ultimately, it is all down to some judge to decide, and really takes legal experts to anticipate any ruling. With this video, it isn't the length of time that is relevant, it is the fact that the sequence consists of nothing but the logo expanding to fill the screen and animate. So for that section of the video, there is nothing except the copyright work. Hardly incidental. -- Colin (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Colin I do not know how to articulate the difference between fair use and de minimis, but I interpret the paper you presented to say that there is a spectrum of judgement from one to another. The paper seems to suggest that when remixers wish to incidentally include copyrighted works in a new work, then de minimis is a great rationale when it works, but fair use is a level of use beyond de minimis that might serve the same purpose, and beyond that a need for licensing might happen. The paper seems to say that if a copyrighted work is in the background of a video, and it is not clear, and not prominent, then it could be de minimis use. If the video were made differently and the copyrighted work in the background were more prominent for more time in a clearer more prominent way, then there is some line that is crossed that could either be infringement or fair use. The paper you shared seems to say that there can be doubt whether a remixer is using a copyrighted work on a de minimis rationale or a fair use rationale.
- The 5% is arbitrary. Copyright judges on Wikimedia Commons often say something like, "this copyright image is only a small part of the new work, so it is de minimis..." I think that 5% is a good approximation of how Commons judges decide these things but as you say, no one articulates the rules which are supposed to be unspoken. I have never seen a copyrighted image fill 20% of a Commons upload and be judged as de minimis, so I think the real percentage is lower than that, and 5% seems like a fair guess to me based on the examples at Commons:De minimis taking up about 5% of the total image space.
- It seems like you are saying that every frame in a video is considered independently for copyright. I am not sure about that - at the frame level of videos all sorts of copyrighted works might be seen and I think that level of scrutiny has never been intended. The paper you presented describes right of display and things like time, prominence, and clarity are among the factors considered for infringement. Logos like this one are always going to have the highest possible prominence and clarity anywhere that works are traditionally signed. I am just not sure what amount of scrutiny should be applied to videos. There is not a precedent on Commons of taking note that if a video is uploaded, then the copyrightable elements are noted. Maybe there can be no de minimis in video, and maybe either Commons allows fair use in video or it does not. The example in the paper talks about a quilt in the background of a video which has fair use of a quilt. Right now, I am not sure if Commons would allow that. Fair use in a Commons file seems different to me than a Commons file being used with a fair use rationale, which would never be allowed. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- There isn't a "difference" between "fair use" and "de minimis" any more than there is a difference between apples and income tax. They are different concepts yet both nouns. You know, there's a pretty good encyclopaedia on the internet if you aren't sure what something means. I forget what's it's called :-). You are taking completely the wrong approach in thinking 20% this or 5% that. It just absolutely doesn't work that way. Take an example. A man loves a woman and they decide to get married. What's the threshold? 50% love, 85% love, or just that they love each other a lot. Stop trying to deconstruct this into numbers or analyse it -- there are no rules only judgements. It certainly isn't just about how much space a subject takes up in an image or time in a video. I'm not saying "every frame in a video is considered independently for copyright". The logo sequence was deliberately crafted, animated and inserted into the video in order for the viewer to be fully aware of the branding. It's hard to think of a less "de minimis" use of a copyright element than this. There is no "Fair use in a Commons file". Bluerasberry, I'm beginning to wonder if you are trolling this discussion, as this is like wack-a-mole where one weird idea is answered only for an even weirder one to be suggested or proposed. Ultimately, Commons is not an educational resource on the law, and I am not a lawyer. Please, if you are confused about the law wrt things you upload (and for which you, as uploader, are legally responsible for) then please talk to a real lawyer. -- Colin (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- No, de minimis is not "a sort of fair use". The former is literally that "the law does not concern itself with trifles". Fair use concerns the circumstances of the usage (commentary, newspaper report, etc) of a normally copyright work, and the usage is certainly not incidental or minor. I don't think the 5% figure appears anywhere in law or policy. The papers mention the short duration that the work is featured, but I don't think making the total film longer (and thus smaller percentage) would have any factor in copyright -- it is just making the point that the usage is a tiny part of the whole. Nobody says 5% is ok but 6% is not. Ultimately, it is all down to some judge to decide, and really takes legal experts to anticipate any ruling. With this video, it isn't the length of time that is relevant, it is the fact that the sequence consists of nothing but the logo expanding to fill the screen and animate. So for that section of the video, there is nothing except the copyright work. Hardly incidental. -- Colin (talk) 14:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- The "Copyright Infringement in Videos" paper is insightful. It discusses copyrighted art which is shown in videos, talking about "right of display". It says, "Courts generally agree that the showing of the copyrighted work on video is not 'de minimus'". I am not sure if that means that every second of a video should be considered independently for the purposes of de minimus. With images in Commons, if a copyrighted work is less than 5% of the total image (or any arbitrary small amount), then I think that could contribute to a de minimis rationale that the Commons community might accept. I am not aware of any comparable discussion in video. The paper does present the amount of time that a copyrighted work is present in a video as a contributing factor for determining fair use. This makes me wonder about "fair use" in Commons - often it is said that fair use is not allowed, but de minimis" is a sort of fair use, right? This paper could be supporting evidence for deleting this video. I would like any other option, if anyone else has one. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info: New version provided via email, and uploaded under File:American Chemical Society - What Chemists Do - Nathan Allen.webm (I prefferred
VP8VP9 instead of Theora due it provides better quality at lower filesize). Delete this file and Redirect to the new one. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted and redirected. --INeverCry 17:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Permission or source not valid because although this image is PD-old, the photograph or scan was performed by Venezuelatuya. More information see Commons:Deletion requests/VenezuelaTuya (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Since when scanning a public domain painting is considered a copyvio? And, in any case is anything but clear that this procedure was performed by VenezuelaTuya in the first place, for example, the bulk of the information from that site is actually from the Diccionario de Historia de Venezuela by Fundación Polar. The actual procedure would be to find the real source of the painting, not make a faux claim that is a copyvio. --Oscar_. (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Scanning or digitalization procedure like a photography of a painting could be copyrighted, The digitization process is a work of someone who often means altering even the original public domain source work. --The Photographer (talk) 11:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Sweat of the brow - reproduction of 2d PD work. --INeverCry 17:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
Permission or source not valid because although this image is PD-old, the photograph or scan was performed by Venezuelatuya. More information see Commons:Deletion requests/VenezuelaTuya The Photographer (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per no Sweat of the brow in US - reproduction of 2d PD work. --INeverCry 17:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
URV, es liegt keine Freigabe des Bildautors vor Sternrenette (talk) 21:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC) Es handelt sich offenbar um ein Bild des Pharmaherstellers Zoetis, für das keine Freigabe besteht.--Sternrenette (talk) 21:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
URV, dieses Bild wurde offensichtlich von der Homepage des Pharmaherstellers Zoetis kopiert (https://www.zoetis.de) Sternrenette (talk) 21:05, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
URV, Urheber ist der Pharmakonzern Zoetis, eine Freigabe liegt offensichtlich nicht vor Sternrenette (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
URV, Einverständnis des Urhebers (Pharmakonzern Zoetis) liegt nicht vor Sternrenette (talk) 21:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
URV, Urhebers ist der Pharmakonzern Zoetis Sternrenette (talk) 21:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
URV, als Urheber ist der Üharmakonzern Zoetis angegeben, in den Metadaten ist als Fotograf Andrew Dunsmore angegeben Sternrenette (talk) 21:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:58, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
replaced by other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 21:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
.svg/Series&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg/Series&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
replaced by other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 21:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
.svg/Series){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
.svg/Series){kind=link}
URV, Urheber ist der Pharmakonzern Zoetis Sternrenette (talk) 21:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
URV, Urheber ist der Pharmakonzern Zoetis Sternrenette (talk) 21:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 17:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
replaced by other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 21:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
_at_Birdworld_01.jpg/Series&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_Birdworld_01.jpg/Series&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
replaced by other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
_at_Birdworld_01.jpg/Series){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
_at_Birdworld_01.jpg/Series){kind=link}
replaced by other versions template Domdomegg (talk) 21:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:00, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
