Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![57 File:MS "Stena Nordica" (1979).jpg](#File:MS_"Stena_Nordica"_(1979).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Joseph_Krochk.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
non-free logo, from https://www.neuronup.com/en/ Diannaa (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
license unknown--Ashtray (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This file has been imported from here. The original one is in Indonesian Wikipedia and it is showed here since Dec 26, 2014 --Skyfall (talk) 09:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vijay hamal (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST - unused selfies; see also user contribs (self promotion account). Likely copyvios as uploader is the subject and thus not the photographer, the latter holding the copyright.
- File:Vijay hamal jpg.jpg
- File:Vijay hamal.jpg
Comment This one is used in the main namespace. Would it be possible that it is Faisal Khan? Yann (talk) 12:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Эlcobbola talk 12:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: File:Vijay hamal.jpg is/was technically used on w:Faisal Khan (actor born 1998) purporting to be Khan, but that appears to be vandalism (Vijay hamal ≠ Faisal Khan - this is Khan), but the copyright concern remains either way. Эlcobbola talk 12:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: You are right. I reverted the vandalism on enwiki, and blocked this account for a day. --Yann (talk) 13:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vijay hamal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-portraits used for self-promotion, all out of scope
- File:Vijay hamal 017 copy.jpg
- File:Vijay.hamal.jpg
- File:Vijay hamal1280x720-cKs copy.jpg
- File:Vijayhamal.jpg
- File:Vijay hamal photography.jpg
- File:Vijay hamal.jpg.jpg
Ariadacapo (talk) 11:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete all. I blocked the user for a year. This is his third block, all for uploading out-of-scope files after warnings. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
mistake, intentionally wanted to create Category:Gruen Von Behrens W like wiki (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: empty, req by author. --Achim (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
http://www.coca-cola.dk/brands/coca-cola/coca-cola-light/ 95.41.35.156 18:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyright violation. --Herby talk thyme 08:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Reopenning on UDR request. Ankry (talk) 08:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: While the Coca-Cola logo is clearly PD, some dobts concerning the bottle design may appear. Also. as it is low-res image it might be out of scope. Ankry (talk) 08:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- The photo of the bottle is from the web, and could be copyrighted. (t) Josve05a (c) 08:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Whm, could be a valid reason for deletion, but another photo will not make any difference. Should be a good idea to take another photo anyway. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- The photo of the bottle is from the web, and could be copyrighted. (t) Josve05a (c) 08:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Ankry (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Blurry, unused band photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Rhemanente is unknown to en.wiki and es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Source states: "Erfgoed Leiden en Omstreken". Erfgoed Leiden released some images under a cc-license but apperantly not this one. (See this file for an example of a file that is released) Natuur12 (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Erfgoed Leiden emailed me and stated that this file is under a CC-BY-SA-license. I have sent the email to OTRS. Vysotsky (talk) 10:37, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- ticket:2016022210008195 is the related ticket. Ticket looks valid (though the agent dealing with it hasn't send a "confirmed" message though.) I do wonder, how did you download this image from their website? I tried it with another image yesterday but I failed. Natuur12 (talk) 14:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Permission added to the filepage. BTW, downloading is rather easy: just press "bewaar". Mbch331 (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- ticket:2016022210008195 is the related ticket. Ticket looks valid (though the agent dealing with it hasn't send a "confirmed" message though.) I do wonder, how did you download this image from their website? I tried it with another image yesterday but I failed. Natuur12 (talk) 14:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Thanks Mbch. And I closed the DR as kept. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
copyright, ce logiciel est ma propriété et son code aussi je suis cjl@wbc-france.com l'auteur de ce post est dans l'ilégalité complète34capo (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, screenshot of software with unknown copyright status. Also, Web Business Solutions are unknown to en.wiki, so the company seems to be non-notable. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
No longer needed. Author request Reguyla (talk) 19:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Req by user/author. --Achim (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Author request. Not needed Reguyla (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Req by user/author. --Achim (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Author request. Not needed Reguyla (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Req by user/author. --Achim (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Author request. No longer needed Reguyla (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Req by user/author. --Achim (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Author request. Not needed Reguyla (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Req by user/author. --Achim (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright status: In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.
COM:License laundering by uploading this to their Flickr feed as "No known copyright restriction"
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19897769754).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19897998114).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19898042944).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19898079034).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19899677273).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19899718853).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19899772303).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (19899804903).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20332318280).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20332427958).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20332494278).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20332539510).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20333761989).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20333820289).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20333911139).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20494156256).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20494241326).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20494253196).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20494361636).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20494463456).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20511572112).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20511662892).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20511743112).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20511849002).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20520435445).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20520576035).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20520589875).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20520625825).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20520734545).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20526774121).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20526789691).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20526877591).jpg
- File:The Canadian field-naturalist (1979) (20527053501).jpg
_(19897769754).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19897998114).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19898042944).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19898079034).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19899677273).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19899718853).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19899772303).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19899804903).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20332318280).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20332427958).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20332494278).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20332539510).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20333761989).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20333820289).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20333911139).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20494156256).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20494241326).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20494253196).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20494361636).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20494463456).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20511572112).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20511662892).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20511743112).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20511849002).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20520435445).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20520576035).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20520589875).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20520625825).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20520734545).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20526774121).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20526789691).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20526877591).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20527053501).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Josve05a (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- This appears to fail COM:PRP as we are unable to easily verify the copyright status. License laundering is too strong a description for this case in my view. Unfortunately both the original document and the latest information on the website <http://canadianfieldnaturalist.ca/index.php/cfn/about/editorialPolicies#openAccessPolicy> are unclear about the specific copyright license, so it is actually hard to say whether they intend to keep their historical editions as non-free copyright or not. I have emailed the copyright holder as below. --Fæ (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
ofnc.ca>Date: 23 February 2016 at 12:30
Dear Sirs,
I am a long term volunteer with Wikimedia Commons, the open access website that supports Wikipedia and other open knowledge projects with many millions of media files such as photographs and document scans.
Images from the 1979 edition of the Canadian Field-Naturalist were released on Flickr by the Internet Archive under a "no copyright known" license. These were later imported to Wikimedia Commons as part of our "book plates" project, using the best metadata available with the images.[1][2]
The copyright status of these is under review, and our policy on Wikimedia Commons is to delete files where there is a significant doubt about copyright status, as the images must be either public domain or under a free licence such as CC-BY-SA that may require attribution but imposes no other constraint for reuse. Could you please confirm the copyright license you apply to these historical editions? If you could confirm a CC-BY-SA license applies for editions published before a certain date, then I can ensure that all files are correctly marked with this information.
Links:
- Example Flickr release: https://www.flickr.com/photos/internetarchivebookimages/19897769754/
- Same example with improved metadata and links on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Canadian_field-naturalist_(1979)_(19897769754).jpg
_(19897769754).jpg){kind=link}
Thank you in advance for your help.
[Fae]- I have now had an official email back from the Ottawa Field-Naturalists' Club Publications Committee, they have confirmed that the intended license for past issues of the CFN journal is CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 (these are being scanned by the Biodiversity Heritage Library with a 6-year 'moving wall'). So it is great for open knowledge that the journal is on a free open license and so legitimately hosted by the Internet Archive and BHL, while unfortunate that on Commons we cannot support non-commercial restrictions. Consequently Delete (and mark to undelete in 2049). This, of course, does not apply to editions old enough to be public domain by age.
- A note about this DR has been added to User:Fæ/Project_list/Internet_Archive#Useful_reference_deletion_discussions for future reference. --Fæ (talk) 15:47, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination :(. --Natuur12 (talk) 00:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lil WeenZy
[edit]Despite CC license files have "PLEASE DO NOT USE THESE FILES WITHOUT OUR PERMISSION IF YOU DO WE STRICTLY WILL TAKE ACTION ON IT." message by the uploader which is not compatible with CC license. In addition those 156 files seem very similar low quality, low-resolution images, possibly out of scope. --Jarekt (talk) 04:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nuke 'em from orbit along with the category itself and User:Girish kengar's other uploads. This uploader clearly hasn't got the slightest clue what this project is about. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete personel images out of project scope Ww2censor (talk) 23:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
very poor quality, low res photo of spines, many others here are better Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also, this photo may be a copyright violation, because there is no EXIF metadata present, and the resolution is small. COM:PRP. --★ Poké95 02:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused and provides little descriptive information of a subject we already have files of. Riley Huntley (talk) 02:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope, no use. Riley Huntley (talk) 04:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Low quality and out of scope. Riley Huntley (talk) 04:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrieleBuckis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low resolution selfies without EXIF metadata, out of project scope and possible COM:COPYVIOs.
KurodaSho (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anya Korob (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused personal photos or questionable notability person's photos. Possible COM:COPYVIOs as per small size and no EXIF metadata. COM:PCP.
KurodaSho (talk) 08:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, multiple authors involved, most likely all taken somewhere from Facebook/Internet (source = mostly "Divulgação"/divulgation = grabbed from Internet) and unlikely all {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Uploaded in a row on 21.12.2015 for pt:Sérgio Luiz Santos das Dores who died on 14.12.2015, considering also:
- File:Velório.jpeg --> source: "Folha de São Paulo" = Brazilian newspaper pt:Folha de S.Paulo = http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/en/brazil/2015/12/1720167-homeless-funeral-draws-indigenous-teachers-and-councilmen-to-rios-council-chamber.shtml (17.12.2015, credit: "Ricardo Borges/Folhapress", Copyright Folha de S.Paulo. All rights reserved.)
- File:Presidente-Thiago-Dezan.jpg --> as indicated a copyrighted work by "Thiago Dezan"
- File:Presidente-André-Mantelli-1-960x600.jpg --> as indicated a copyrighted work by "André Mantelli" and grabbed from (example) http://midiacoletiva.org/2387-2/ (15.12.2015, Copyleft © 2015 Uma iniciativa dos coletivos Mariachi & MIC - Mídia Independente Coletiva) or https://www.facebook.com/coletivomariachi/photos/a.635515483254973.1073741867.280853248721200/635515586588296/?type=3&theater (14.12.2015) or https://mamapress.wordpress.com/2015/12/16/morre-o-presidente-da-republica-da-cinelandia-velorio-na-camara-de-vereadores/presidente-andre-mantelli-1-960x600/ (16.12.2015, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
- File:Chargelatuffsmall.jpg --> grabbed from (example) https://www.facebook.com/260528207360293/photos/a.260556810690766.62354.260528207360293/934070906672683/?type=3&theater (14.12.2015). May be in PD by other reasons (considering Carlos Latuff), but relevant info must be provided.
- File:Presidente Pedro-Duarte.jpg --> as indicated a copyrighted work by "Pedro Duarte". Per https://mamapress.wordpress.com/2015/12/16/morre-o-presidente-da-republica-da-cinelandia-velorio-na-camara-de-vereadores/presidente_pedro-duarte/ (16.12.2015, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) credited also to "Foto: Pedro Mendes/ Atelier de Dissidências Criativas"
- File:23 anos.jpg --> grabbed (as indicated) from Facebook.
Multiple permissions needed.
- File:Chargelatuffsmall.jpg
- File:Presidente-Thiago-Dezan.jpg
- File:Presidente Pedro-Duarte.jpg
- File:Velório.jpeg
- File:23 anos.jpg
- File:Presidente-André-Mantelli-1-960x600.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 10:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhijit Sabale (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of scope.
- File:Abhi photobbn.JPG
- File:IMAG0491 1 - Copy.jpg
- File:IMAG0490 - Copy - Copy (2).jpg
- File:IMAG0002 - Copy (2) - Copy.jpg
- File:IMAG0001 - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy.jpg
- File:IMAG0064.jpg
- File:BKd77ufJ 400x400.jpg
- File:001abhi hbgdf.jpg
- File:ABHIJEET SABALE (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Copy.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Random internet images with bogus licenses and no authorship information at source(s) to determine PD status, if any. Uploaded by sock of Albanian Historian, who was indef'ed for copyvios.
- File:Sadik with his sons Uke and Shaban.jpg
- File:Front cover of Leo Freundlichs report.png
- File:Cel Shabani.png
- File:Drawing of Shkurte Sherbeti.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 12:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Random internet images (and two purportedly photographed--i.e. picture of a picture--at a museum) with bogus licenses and no authorship information at source(s) to determine PD status, if any. Uploaded by sock of Albanian Historian, who was indef'ed for copyvios.
- File:Drawing of Ahmet Zeneli.jpg
- File:Photograph of Small Martini Ivezaj.jpg
- File:Malesore "Highlander Woman" dressed in Albanian highlander dress.jpg
- File:Cun Mulaj.png
Эlcobbola talk 12:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:33, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, multiple authors involved but all licensed arbitrarily to be "own works". All files uploaded since 2008 and are (mostly) related to pt:Quissamã, a Brazilian municipality. Most (if not all) uploads are mirrored on uploaders Panoramio http://www.panoramio.com/user/1034442 which is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (mostly ignoring the credits for the original photographers). Considering:
- File:Quissamã - Igreja Matriz.jpg + File:Paty do Alferes.jpg --> 2 "divulgação" [divulgation = grabbed from Internet] photos from 2 official sites of Brazilian municipalities, tagged with {{PD-self}} (even with unknown author) or {{Copyrighted free use provided that}} (on which legal base?)
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 06.jpg (uploaded 08.2008) --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Paulo Noronha" and previoulsy published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/8316522 (03.2008, © All rights reserved by Paulo Noronha)
- File:Jurubatiba - road.jpg (uploaded 08.2008/photoshopped) --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Paulo Noronha" and previoulsy published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/7848708 (02.2008, © All rights reserved by Paulo Noronha)
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mandiqüera 02.jpg (per above) --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Paulo Noronha" and previoulsy published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/9244240 (04.2008, © All rights reserved by Paulo Noronha)
- File:Jurubatiba - Lagoas e bancos de areia.jpg (per above) --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Paulo Noronha" and previoulsy published via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/7848654 (02.2008, © All rights reserved by Paulo Noronha)
- etc. --> nominating all [around 15] files with author = "Paulo Noronha" (mostly, if not all, with EXIF: SONY DSC-S650), including File:Canal Macaé-Campos 10.jpg (most likely also a work by "Paulo Noronha")
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 04.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Goreth Kling"
- File:Fazenda Machadinha - Senzalas.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Beatriz Newmann"
- File:Fazenda Machadinha - Capela.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Beatriz Newmann"
- File:Fazenda Machadinha - Lado.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Beatriz Newmann"
- File:Aldeia de Arcozelo - Casa Grande2.jpg (uploaded 07.2008) --> "own work" but grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5260688 (2007, © All rights reserved by "Jefferson França ")
- File:Aldeia de Arcozelo - Casa Grande.jpg (uploaded 07.2008) --> "own work" but grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5260666 (2007, © All rights reserved by "Jefferson França ")
- File:Aldeia de Arcozelo - Chapel dedicated to slaves.jpg (uploaded 07.2008/photoshopped) --> "own work" but grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5260588 (2007, © All rights reserved by "Jefferson França ")
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã - Máquina a Vapor Estacionária 2.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Sérgio Martire"
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã - Máquina a Vapor Estacionária 1.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Sérgio Martire"
- File:Memorial de Manuel Congo..jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Egeu Laus"
- File:Jongo em machadinha8 adilson dos santos alta.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Adilson dos Santos" and taken from the official site
- File:Quissamã - Jongo in Machadinha Farm 01.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Adilson dos Santos" and taken from the official site
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã baoba 01.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by " Maria Lúcia Mattoso" and grabbed from http://www.overmundo.com.br/guia/casa-de-quissama (2007, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 BR, gallery) = http://www.overmundo.com.br/uploads/guia/multiplas/1187620878_casa02.jpg
- File:Canal Macae Campos 01.jpg (uploaded 06.2008/photoshopped) --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Guilherme de Queirós Mattoso" and grabbed from http://www.overmundo.com.br/guia/canal-campos-macae (2007, CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) = http://www.overmundo.com.br/uploads/guia/img/1192715281_canal_realcapa.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã fundos 01.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Maria Lúcia Mattoso"
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã frente 03.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Maria Lúcia Mattoso"
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mato de Pipa 02.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Sérgio Newman"
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 05.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Sérgio Newman"
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã frente 01.jpg --> (as indicated) taken from official site
- File:Lagoa Feia 01.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Fátima Pacheco" and taken (as indicated) from "Fátima Pacheco website"
- File:Lagoa Feia 02.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Projeto Jurubatiba Sustentável" and taken (as indicated) from "Projeto Jurubatiba Sustentável" = [most likely] http://www.quissama.org, 404, some archives available, no free license visible
- File:Lagoa Feia 03.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Projeto Jurubatiba Sustentável" and taken (as indicated) from "Projeto Jurubatiba Sustentável" (see above)
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 06.jpg (uploaded 06.2008) --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Ana Beatriz" and grabbed from https://picasaweb.google.com/115164305134509562843/LugaresInesquecVeis#5175551443568350338 (© All rights reserved by "Ana Beatriz")
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mato de Pipa 03.jpg --> (as indicated) taken from official site
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 04.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Genilson Pessanha" and taken from official site
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 03.jpg --> (as indicated) taken from official site and copyrighted by "Fundação Dom Cintra" = http://www.domcintra.org.br/ (© 2011 - Fundação Dom Cintra. Todos os direitos reservados)
- File:Jurubatiba - Vista Aérea 05.jpg --> (as indicated) a copyrighted work by "Rômulo Campos" and taken from official site
- etc.
Multiple copyright issues to solve and multiple permissions needed.
Info Sockpuppet involved. Per this request from 2008 ptwiki user Quissamã requested a user name change to "Zephynelsson Von" who in Commons is notorious for Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zephynelsson Von and the red links flooded upload log. Note, that in the mass DR files from "Paulo Noronha" (see above) were also affected.
- File:Quissamã - Igreja Matriz.jpg
- File:Paty do Alferes.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Vegetação de beira de praia.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Lagoa do Paulista.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Praia de Carapebus.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Lagoas e bancos de areia.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - road.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Árvores.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Vegetação de restiinga.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Brejo.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 10.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 09.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 07.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 06.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 05.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 04.jpg
- File:Fazenda Machadinha - Senzalas.jpg
- File:Fazenda Machadinha - Capela.jpg
- File:Fazenda Machadinha - Lado.jpg
- File:Fazenda Machadinha - Frente.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mandiqüera 02.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mandiqüera 01.jpg
- File:Aldeia de Arcozelo - Casa Grande2.jpg
- File:Aldeia de Arcozelo - Casa Grande.jpg
- File:Aldeia de Arcozelo - Chapel dedicated to slaves.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã - Máquina a Vapor Estacionária 2.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã - Máquina a Vapor Estacionária 1.jpg
- File:Memorial de Manuel Congo..jpg
- File:Jongo em machadinha8 adilson dos santos alta.jpg
- File:Quissamã - Jongo in Machadinha Farm 01.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 08.jpg
- File:Jurubatiba - Vista Aérea 05.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã frente 04.jpg
- File:Canal Macaé-Campos 03 (Canal da Cula).jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mato de Pipa 03.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 06.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 05.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 04.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 03.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 02.jpg
- File:Engenho Central de Quissamã 01.jpg
- File:Lagoa Feia 03.jpg
- File:Lagoa Feia 02.jpg
- File:Lagoa Feia 01.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mato de Pipa 02.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Mato de Pipa 01.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã baoba 01.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã fundos 01.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã frente 03.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã frente 02.jpg
- File:Casa da Fazenda Quissamã frente 01.jpg
- File:Canal Macae Campos 02.jpg
- File:Canal Macae Campos 01.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't look like "own work". Miniapolis 14:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader here. Mistakenly transferred this file from enwp, please delete, thanks FastilyClone (talk) 21:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prof.Abhijit Guha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photo and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajan raaz pandey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:BeautyPlus 20160213165342 save.jpg
- File:Rajan raazpandey.jpg
- File:Rajan raaz apndey.jpg
- File:Rajan raaz pandey.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajan raaz pandey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images by non-contributor, see en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajan raaz pandey/Archive.
- File:Tmp 28452-gif 2016031Rajan raaz pandey.gif
- File:Tmp 9207-20141221 123509 001-11886958237.jpg
- File:Tmp 25991-BeautyPlus 20160213165342 save-156636145.jpg
- File:PicsArt 02-22-09.13.09 science exhibition project by rajan raaz pandey.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 10:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Isabelle Vanhaf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from modern art.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal snaps out of COM:SCOPE, family groups at parties.
- File:Мы такие 7.jpg
- File:Мы такие 6.jpg
- File:Мы такие 5.jpg
- File:Мы такие 4.jpeg
- File:Мы такие 3.jpeg
- File:Мы такие 2.jpeg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Elnecio247 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: No reason provided for Speedy, and Google Image Search didn't returned any result for the picture. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The first hit for this name on Google Images is this image on Twitter, which does not have a free license. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Logo of an obscure, non-notable "minecraft server", not in use anywhere, out of project scope. Liance (talk) 00:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Probable copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Logo of an obscure, non-notable "minecraft server", not in use anywhere, out of project scope. Liance (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Logo of an obscure, non-notable "minecraft server", not in use anywhere, out of project scope. Liance (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Not in use anywhere, out of project scope. Liance (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of files found:thumb|آیت الله ساکی - سخنرانی برای رزمندگان اسلام Thatonewikiguy (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Duplicates found :File:صورة شخصية للدكتور عبدالرحمن آل الشيخ - مجدد.jpg Thatonewikiguy (talk) 00:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Subject file is much larger than the duplicate, so I replaced the usage and reversed the deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Duplicates of sources found: مسلسل اكبر كذاب Thatonewikiguy (talk) 00:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: These both appear to be logos without a free license and no notability. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
As the author is unknown, how do we know that they died 70 years ago (1946)? If this was painted in 1910, it's certainly plausable for the author to have lived past 1946. Jolly Janner (talk) 01:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - All works published before 1923 in the US are public domain. I've fixed the incorrect tag. -Zanhe (talk) 06:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It's a painting, so it may or may not have been created before the subject's death in 1924 and, in any event, there is no proof that it was published before 1923. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
poor quality image, not a good representation of books on a shelf, we have better. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation C. Jonel [talk] 02:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This file is not free to use in the US. Public domain for the US is typically 70 years after the death of the author. Jolly Janner (talk) 02:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - It's public domain in China, and WMF no longer deletes URAA images. See Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA. Besides, this image shows a teenage Liang Siyong (or at most early 20s), so it was almost certainly taken in the 1920s (Liang was born in 1904). Its copyright is therefore not restored by URAA and is public domain in the US. -Zanhe (talk) 03:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Could you expand on how it's in the public domain in the US? Being taken in the 1920s isn't really enough. Jolly Janner (talk) 04:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- See Template:PD-1996. URAA only restores US copyright to foreign works whose copyright expired in their home countries after the URAA date (1996 for most countries). For the PRC, only post-1946 works (in reality 1949, because that's when the PRC was established) are affected. The ROC (now on Taiwan, but ruled China until 1949) ratified the URAA in 2002, so only post-1952 works are affected by URAA. -Zanhe (talk) 04:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- How do we know it was first published in China? He studied at Harvard during the 1920s. Jolly Janner (talk) 19:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- He was nobody when studying in the US, and only became famous after working in China. There's no reason to believe it was first published in the US. -Zanhe (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- You don't have to be famous to have a photograph. As you said earlier, he appears to be a teenager or in his early 20s, which was before he apparently became famous. Jolly Janner (talk) 21:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- It's not possible to prove a negative. Absent evidence that it was first published in the US, we must presume that it was first published in his home country, where he spent the vast majority of his life and his entire professional career. -Zanhe (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- He was born in Macau, but shortly exiled to Japan and then studied in the US. He only started a career in China in the 1930s. Based on the assumption that this photo was taken in the 1920s, it was likely first published in Japan or the US. Jolly Janner (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Japan's copyright duration is 50 years, same as China's. He also studied at Tsinghua University in Beijing before going to Harvard. That leaves only the US in question, back to square one. -Zanhe (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- AFAIK, Japan's is 50 years plus the author's life. If Japan does offer the same scenario as China, the file would need to be tagged as such. Jolly Janner (talk) 05:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, only if the author is known, which is not the case here. Besides, he only spent his elementary school years in Japan before returning to China, so this photo was unlikely to have been first published in Japan. So which scenario is more likely: his photo was first published in the US, where he was an ordinary foreign student, or in China, where he was a famous archaeologist? So far there is zero evidence that the photo has ever been published in the US. Even if it had, it would still be public domain unless it had been published with a copyright notice AND the copyright had been renewed after 28 years (see Template:PD-US-not renewed). This is an extremely unlikely scenario. -Zanhe (talk) 05:48, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- He looks so young that it leads me to believe it may have been taken at Harvard. His career in China didn't start until the 1930s and he probably became "famous" some time after this. The fact that he then became famous would perhaps give reason for the original photographer to want to renew its copyright. This photo may or may not be in the public domain. We can't just assume things and hope it isn't. Jolly Janner (talk) 08:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Please stop wasting people's time. You can't just say a Chinese person's photo "may have" been taken in the US, AND someone "may have" published an image of an unknown foreign student in the US, AND "may have" renewed the copyright with the US gov after 28 years. You need to provide evidence. Otherwise you could nominate everything in Category:PD-1996 for deletion, because all of them could have been first published in the US without us knowing. -Zanhe (talk) 18:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as uploader. I do not have the in-depth knowledge Zanhe has, but I uploaded this based on indication of sources (as Zanhe has already expounded) which grant PD-CN status. You may have the best of intentions, but this is quite baseless. Kingoflettuce (talk) 14:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: First, Jolly Janner, your comment:
- "Public domain for the US is typically 70 years after the death of the author."
is only true for works first published after 1978 and then only if the author died after 1977. For earlier works, see File:PD-US table.svg.
Second, Zanhe and JJ have their arguments backwards. If the image was taken in China, then Chinese copyright rules apply and the image is under copyright for fifty years after the death of the photographer. Since no one has proven that the photographer died before 1966, if Chinese law applies, we must assume it is still under copyright.
The quality is so poor that I can't tell if it is a scan of a halftone or not, but, on the other hand, it might have been taken at Harvard and published in a yearbook there. If so, copyright depends on the date. If before 1923, it is PD, if after then it is probably under copyright. I haven't done a full search, but Harvard apparently renews copyrights for its yearbooks.
So, while it is possible that it was published at Harvard before 1923 and therefore PD, the probability is that it was either published at Harvard after that or that it is a Chinese image that may still be under copyright. Note that the burden of proof is on those who would keep an image to prove beyond a significant doubt that the image is free. That has not been done here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: Firstly, your source for the 2010 China copyright law seems to be incorrect, see my response at Template talk:PD-China. Secondly, I found a better version of the same photo on this website. On that version you can clearly read the words "Your love, [Siyong?]", so it's almost certainly from a private family collection. -Zanhe (talk) 17:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Let's assume it is from a private family collection. Then you must show that it was either first published more than fifty years ago or went unpublished for fifty years after creation. He looks to be around 25, so lets say it was taken in 1930. If it was first published in China any time between 1966 and 1980, it is still under copyright. The standard of proof is "significant doubt" which there certainly is in this case. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
CC BY 2.5 doesn't apply to posters on the site (they're not copyright owners), only to movie data. − Meiræ 03:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Obvious vid-cap uploaded by clueless novice editor. Rklawton (talk) 03:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes, User:Rklawton, but we were all "clueless novice editors" once and you haven't learned that we work hard to encourage them, not mock them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Not in public domain in the US. Life of author plus 70 years is required. Jolly Janner (talk) 04:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - see parallel discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liang Siyong.jpg. -Zanhe (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- The rationale is that it was published before 1949 or 1952. We don't know the date this was published, so I don't think it applies. The date the photo was taken isn't the same as the date it was published. Jolly Janner (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- If the first publication date is unknown, then the creation date takes precedence. -Zanhe (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: First, again Jolly Janner, your comment:
- "Not in public domain in the US. Life of author plus 70 years is required"
is not correct, see File:PD-US table.svg. It is also not clear why you think USA law should apply to an image of a Chinese national.
Zanhe, please note that {{PD-China}} has not been revised for the change in law in 2010 -- see Template talk:PD-China. Photographs are now fifty years PMA along with everything else but cinema. Since you have not proven that the photographer died before 1966, we must assume that this is still under copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: Your source for the 2010 China copyright law seems to be incorrect. See my response at Template talk:PD-China. -Zanhe (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed -- we will see. Assuming that the WIPO translation and {{PD CN}} is correct, then you must still prove that this image was either published more than fifty years ago or remained unpublished until fifty years after creation.
- The WP:ZH article tells us that he got his Masters at Harvard in 1930, so it is likely that he married after that. I can't find a birth date for his daughter, so I'll guess it was taken between 1935 and 1954 when he died. That means that you must prove either that it was published before 1966 or not published until at least 1985, probably later. The standard of proof is "significant doubt" which certainly remains the case here. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be a hoax. See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mimsa International Airport for details, please. NearEMPTiness (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Corresponding article deleted as blatant hoax. JohnCD (talk) 21:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
This file had been previously deleted as part of an hoax. It should be deleted again - or clearly labeled as being ficticious. NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Please delete also the affiliated pictures uploaded by the same author. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. Possibly a postcard. 4ing (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. Uploader ha a long history of uploading copyvios. His own photos have significantly lower quality. 4ing (talk) 07:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
![07:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/21#c-4ing-2016-02-21T07:56:00.000Z-File:MS_"Stena_Nordica"_(1979).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Good catch -- this is a scan of a halftone. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
![14:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/02/21#c-Jameslwoodward-2016-02-28T14:01:00.000Z-File:MS_"Stena_Nordica"_(1979).jpg){kind=link}
Unclear copyright status. 2006 stamp from Uruguay which involves 2 copyrights. According to the source http://www.sellospostalesuruguayos.com.br/2013/06/articulo-sobre-filatelia-del-diario-el.html (see also official site) this is a stamp published in 2006 commemorating the first stamp from 1856, which is shown at the top right (see also File:1857 Uruguay Diligencia 60c Mi4.jpg) and is (as indicated) {{PD-Uruguay}}. The most significant part of the stamp (some kind of stagecoach) was designed (see also credit at the stamp) by "Carlos Menck Freire " which is very unlikely {{PD-Uruguay}} (50 pma). Gunnex (talk) 08:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I think you're right. I mistook the author for Juan Ildefonso Blanco (1812-1889), but it seems Blanco was the author of the original 1856 post stamp. Sorry. --Zeroth (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the title page of a book published in New York in 1931. It's not the uploader's own work and there's no indication why it's in the public domain.. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 09:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: According to http://collections.stanford.edu/copyrightrenewals/bin/search/simple it is {{PD-US-not renewed}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BestOrangeSEO (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:BestOrangeSEO).
- File:Best Orange SEO Company.png
- File:Best Orange SEO Logo.png
- File:Best Orange SEO.png
- File:Best Orange Seo.jpg
MER-C 11:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Algod Spain (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional, see description, out of projext scope
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 32.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 31.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 30.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 28.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 29.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 27.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 25.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 26.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 24.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 23.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 22.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 21.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 19.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 20.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 18.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 17.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 16.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 15.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 14.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 13.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 11.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 12.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 10.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 08.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 09.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 07.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 06.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 04.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 05.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 03.JPG
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 02.jpg
- File:Algod Espumoso Wine 01.jpg
Motopark (talk) 11:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 11:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
collected from 3 pictures, not used, need source pictures Motopark (talk) 11:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
picture collection from 4 pictures, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 12:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 11:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by HouseHorror (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope - hoax. Uploaded as part of an attempt to introduce hoax article about a non-existent "Mimsa International Airport". Pictures are actually of other airports such as San Francisco International and Moscow Sheremetyevo.
- File:Emirates at Dhuri Airport.jpg
- File:Dhuri Airport.jpg
- File:The Runway.jpg
- File:Runway of Departure.jpg
- File:Cagro Terminals.jpg
- File:Arrival and Departure Terminal.jpg --copy of http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-25606279/stock-photo-departure-and-arrival-signage-in-airport-with-multiple-languages.html?irgwc=1&tpl=77643-108110&utm_campaign=Idee%20Inc.&utm_source=77643&utm_medium=Affiliate - Shutterstock watermark is visible Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Dhuri International Terminal.jpg
- File:Mimsa International airport control tower.jpg
- File:Mimsa Airport Terminal.jpg
- File:Mimsa International Airport.jpg --Copy of http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/photo/aerial-view-of-san-francisco-international-airport-royalty-free-image/78052714 from Getty Images Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Mimsa International Airport logo.png
- File:Dhuri Logo.png
JohnCD (talk) 12:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all - per Commons:Precautionary principle. Uploads from a blocked hoaxer (on en-Wiki), including several clear copyvios (File:The Runway.jpg is watermarked too), as well as mislabelled images and fake logos. None of the included source, author and license informations are credible. GermanJoe (talk) 09:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acharyainstitutes (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless without descriptions
- File:Ahg2.jpg
- File:Ahg3.jpg
- File:Ahg1.jpg
- File:Celb13.jpg
- File:Celb11.jpg
- File:Celb10.jpg
- File:Celb9.jpg
- File:Celb6.jpg
- File:Celb8.jpg
- File:Celb7.jpg
- File:Celb5.jpg
- File:Celb4.jpg
- File:Celb2.jpg
- File:Celb3.jpg
- File:Celb1.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 13:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acharyainstitutes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional account + promotional uploads + educationally not useful/personal photos
- File:Fbacharya.png
- File:Santhe7.jpg
- File:Santhe4.jpg
- File:Santhe6.jpg
- File:Santhe5.jpg
- File:Santhe2.jpg
- File:Santhe1.jpg
- File:Santhe3.jpg
- File:Kreeda7.jpg
- File:Kreeda5.jpg
- File:Kreeda6.jpg
- File:Kreeda4.jpg
- File:Media6.jpg
- File:Media7.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 04:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acharyainstitutes (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE self promotional/personal photos + COM:GCSD Educationally not useful
- File:Media5.jpg
- File:Habbathon6.jpg
- File:Habbathon7.jpg
- File:Habbathon5.jpg
- File:Ethnic6.jpg
- File:Ethnic7.jpg
- File:Ethnic5.jpg
- File:Ethnic4.jpg
- File:Ethnic3.jpg
- File:Ethnic2222.jpg
- File:Kreeda2.jpg
- File:Kreeda3.jpg
- File:Kreeda1.jpg
- File:MediaCup4.jpg
- File:MediaCup3.jpg
- File:Habba1.jpg
- File:MediaCup2.jpg
- File:MediaCup1.jpg
- File:Habbathon4.jpg
- File:Habbathon3.jpg
- File:Ethnic2.jpg
- File:Habbathon2.jpg
- File:Habbathon1.jpg
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 12:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rhsboysinit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious "own" works
2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 14:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Advocatejoshi (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
- File:Advocate Joshi Bangalore Image.png
- File:Advocate Pradeep Joshi Bangalore 02.jpeg
- File:Advocate Pradeep Joshi Bangalore 01.png
2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 14:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This is an outdated logo. 125.212.123.84 14:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: We keep outdated logos for historical purposes. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from billboard.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
The copyright owner claims via OTRS that the picture is "All rights reserved" which can be seen on Flickr, but the picture has been reviewed by Ww2censor as valid CC-BY 2.0. Was it under another licence before? Should the picture be deleted? Scoopfinder(d) 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Question @Ww2censor: Do you think you might have made a mistake or that the licences changed? --Scoopfinder(d) 15:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking. I do many of these copyright licence reviews and very seldom make any mistakes as I try to be very careful checking. This was quite a long time ago and in the meantime I've probably reviewed several hundred images, so I cannot remember the details. I can only assume the Flickr user changed the licence; they do that you know. Is the copyright owner the same as the Flickr user?. Ww2censor (talk) 22:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Question: when the message was sent to OTRS? Please check the dates before anything. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- 7 February 2016. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- For this reason, it's much better to have bot reviews of files. It's often impossible to prove that the file was freely licensed after a {{Flickr-change-of-license}} if the file was reviewed by a human (unless the human has saved a printout of the file information page on Flickr at the time when the file was reviewed). On the other hand, if the bot reviews the file, then there seems to be more reliable evidence since the bot can't make an error (although I doubt that Puramyun31 and Ww2censor both would make an error). User:Puramyun31, if you want to upload crops of Flickr images to Commons in the future, consider uploading the full-size image (for example using toollabs:flickr2commons) and then wait for the bot review. After that, overwrite the file with your crop of the file.
- Is there something which we can extract from the bot's
size_not_foundmessage? Does the bot returnsize_not_foundregardless of the copyright status on Flickr, or is a different error message returned if the file is listed as unfree on Flickr? --Stefan2 (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep The image was license under cc-by when I uploaded it to Commons, and the FlickreviewR bot was correctly confirmed cc-by licensing itself of the image.("This image was originally posted to Flickr by Tudeau Kevin at http://flickr.com/photos/95843875@N06/14899935350. It was reviewed on 2014-09-10 17:54:37 by the automated bot FlickreviewR....", if not, the bot would put this message. ) cropping is not affect the licensing and in general CC License is irrevocable. --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)- Keep: There are11 other images by the same Flickr user Kevin Tudeau, some of which were reviewed by the FlickreviewR bot and some by reviewers. Without checking them all, they are now all licenced All right reserved. I can only assume Kevin Tudeau has changed his licencing at Flickr so all those images should now be tagged with the {{Flickr-change-of-license}} template. Ww2censor (talk) 11:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: I can attest that it was previously CC-BY 2.0, otherwise I would have listed it for deletion when I came across it. I later uploaded a sister image from the same event, File:Miwa on August 30, 2014-TudeauCropped.jpg, and had it successfully reviewed. --Prosperosity (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep A CC licence once, a CC licence for ever. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. According to the triple check with Prosperosity, Puramyun31 and Ww2censor. The copyright status has surely be changed on Flickr. --Scoopfinder(d) 22:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Per Scoopfinder and COM:LRV. Puramyun31 and Ww2censor are trusted users, I sometimes license review files uploaded by Puramyun31 and the license was always correct. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: A contemporaneous written record, such as the license review template is admissible as proof that the license was changed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
It isn't clear wether the uploader FashionateStore has the rights to post this picture of another person Christophe Beeckmans Gouwenaar (talk) 15:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
The User FashionateStore was a temporary profile of myself (My Companyname is Fashionate). I, Christophe Beeckmans, made this photo myself with my Nikon camera with permission of Kevin Leyers. (Rebel) Kind Regards, --ChristopheBeeckmans (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thibault721 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Video clip and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I see no issue with permission, but seems to be out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nadiya Feliksova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not an own work - scans of still copyrighted photos and a newspaper article. Author was given an explanation about Wikipedia and Wikicommons rules, doesn't oppose them but asked more experienced users to correct her mistakes.
- File:Vasilij Kornijenko Portret 1.jpeg
- File:Vasilij Kornijenko statja 4.jpeg
- File:Vasilij Kornijenko statja 3.jpeg
- File:Vasilij Kornijenko.jpeg
Tatewaki (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/joe-dirt.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anindya1907 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Formerly (mis-)used at en.wikipedia for out of scope purposes not related to project, now speedy-deleted. Without more background detail to indicate what any general-purpose use they might have, these are outwith Commons' educational scope..
- File:Directory Structure.png
- File:Blog hover effect.png
- File:Level 1 mockup.png
- File:Project onhover.png
- File:Level3.png
- File:Level 4.png
- File:Project individual.png
- File:Contact mockup.png
- File:Level 0.png
- File:Level2 mockup.png
- File:Blog.png
- File:Gallery.png
- File:Blog entry.png
- File:Anindya Environment Sugarlabs.png
Ubcule (talk) 16:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Also possible copyvio for a few, poor quality. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:58:49 (UTC)
- Looks fine, although a bit dark. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Some of these files have OTRS, but the problem is that their file templates contain promotional material - specifically about this company and how to contact them. This whole gallery appears more to be promotional/ or / self-promotional than educational. Some files (including the Costa Rican one), have photographer information which does not match uploader and is not OTRS covered. There is the additional difficulty of band logos (including the (C) PINK FLOYD logo) in the corners of the images and possible other copyright violations in the posters themselves.
- File:PAWN presents 3D EDM Festival 26th MAY 2012 at Citizen Bank Park Stadium Parking Lot at Holliday Inn Hotel.jpg
- File:PAWN presents 3d edm festival.jpg
- File:PAWN Movie Theater at City Hall Philadelphia Grand Opening of Dilworth Park and new train station entrance in 2014 b.jpg
- File:PAWN Movie Theater at City Hall Philadelphia Grand Opening of Dilworth Park and new train station entrance in 2014 a.jpg
- File:PAWN Movie Theater at City Hall Philadelphia Grand Opening of Dilworth Park and new train station entrances in 2014.JPG
- File:PAWN presents the Ivory Party with Junior Vasquez 2.jpg
- File:PAWN presents the Ivory Party with Junior Vasquez.jpg
- File:PAWN presents the PEAK Festival 2.jpg
- File:PAWN presents the PEAK Festival.jpg
- File:PAWN laser in Costa Rica at Lake Arenal hIgh rez.jpg
- File:Think Pink Floyd PAWN LASERS at Pennypack Music Festival 2015 Philadelphia (39).jpg
- File:PAWN LASER at Tarara Winery Leesburg Virginia with Think Pink Floyd.jpg
- File:THINK PINK FLOYD BERGEN PAC NJ PAWN LASER (66).jpg
- File:Think Pink Floyd + PAWN LASERS at Bergen PAC in Englewood New Jersey.jpg
- File:PAWN LASER Movie Theater at Wawa Welcome America for the screening of Rocky Balboa at the Philadelphia Museum of Art.JPG
- File:PAWN LASER in Costa Rica at Lake Arenal.jpg
- File:Pawn laser pawn recordings present impact Festival Front.jpg
- File:Impact Festival Front pawn laser pawn recordings present.jpg
- File:In the Beginning Rave The first outdoor electronic dance music festival in america USA close up newspaper advertisement 1993.jpg
- File:In the Beginning Rave The first outdoor electronic dance music festival in America USA full page newspaper advertisement 1993.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Violates COM:ADVERT. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T11:00:54 (UTC)
- Looks like acceptable quality to me. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use, cannot be deleted except for copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:59:04 (UTC)
- Looks like acceptable quality to me. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:58:49 (UTC)
- Looks fine, although a bit dark. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
The source page says "you can use it without copyright sign" but this isn't a CC-licence.--Geiserich77 (talk) 20:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
advertisement, unsupported claim, see Turkish delight
- In which way is this an advertisement? It looks like a photo of a normal shop. Are you saying that the image is being used to advertise the shop? I agree that there is no source on Commons for the claim being made in the description field. The page is currently used on several other projects, and it is possible that there is a source for that claim on one of those projects. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- There is no reliable source for that claim anywhere in Wikipedia. The shop is using this claim to advertise its business.80.244.22.49 11:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: WP editors disagree. The file is in use in several places and therefore cannot be deleted except for copyvio. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Miguelperezreviriego (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seven identical images of a car parked by a building with a telecom pole. No reason to doubt user's own work, but also no reason to have seven identicals. Closing admin please pick one and remove the six others.
- File:Image (60) Ibahernando.JPG
- File:Image (46) Ibahernando.jpg
- File:Image (44) Pósito.jpg
- File:Image (43) Pósito.jpg
- File:Image (40) Real Pósito.jpg
- File:Image (39) Real Pósito.JPG
- File:Image (38) Real Pósito.JPG
_Ibahernando.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ibahernando.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_P%C3%B3sito.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_P%C3%B3sito.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Real_P%C3%B3sito.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Real_P%C3%B3sito.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Real_P%C3%B3sito.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:12, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Keep File:Image (60) Ibahernando.JPG. Remove the rest. --dsprc (talk) 09:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:00, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Miguelperezreviriego (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence any of these images was made by uploader despite all being claimed "own work". Coins, photos, museum photos, maps, historical pictures, stamps, reproductions from books and so on. Variable sizes, no internal consistency and a vast number of cameras on the metadata suggest that these are culls and not own work.
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Juan_Domingo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
s.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_recortado.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_recortado.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_recortada.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Sunua.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_bn.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_bn.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Santa_Amalia.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Culto.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Firmas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cementerio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
comprimida.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
retocada.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
dobletono.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Francisco_Jarr%C3%ADn_y_Moro.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Calle_de_la_Estrella.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_La_congregaci%C3%B3n.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Embarcadero_de_Atocha.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Pedro_Casas_y_Souto.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Puerta_de_acceso.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Boda_de_Cayetano_Pe%C3%B1a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
dobletono.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
dobletono.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
arecortada.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Juan_Domingo_G%C3%B3mez_Bulnes.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_C%C3%A1ndido_Rodr%C3%ADguez.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Plaza.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
recortada.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Emilio_de_la_Vega.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Calle_Hern%C3%A1n_Cort%C3%A9s.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_C%C3%A1ndido_Rodr%C3%ADguez_Gil.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Emilio_de_la_Vega.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Texto.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Arco.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Agust%C3%ADn_Rosas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Se_fueron_todos.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Se_fueron_todos.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Vista_parcial.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_32.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_32.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_32.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hacia_1965.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Hacia_1965.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_54.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_54.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_54.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_54.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cuaderno_54.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Cementerio_Municipal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Degollaci%C3%B3n.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_In%C3%A9dita.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jarro_funerario.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jarro.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Museo_de_C%C3%A1ceres.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Francisco_Tirado.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_L%C3%A1pida_funeraria.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Contrapeso.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Jarros_funerarios.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Calle_de_la_Gonzala.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_C%C3%A1ndido_Rodr%C3%ADguez_Gil.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Parque_municipal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Parque.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Pila_bautismal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Retablo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ermita_de_la_Jara.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alfonso_Rodr%C3%ADguez.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Restauraci%C3%B3n.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Interior_del_templo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Escudo_Carvajal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Escudo_Carvajal.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Escudo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_editada.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tres_Bastos.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_San_Lorenzo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Casa_de_Cultura.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_San_Lorenzo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Dulces.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Calle_Garc%C3%ADa_de_Paredes.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ermita.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Dulces.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Gutierre_de_Vargas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Escudo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Ermita.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Carreteras.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Vaca_Roma.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Torre_del_Reloj.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- According to this and this, the following files:
- File:Estela (6)a.jpg
- File:Estela (27).jpg
- File:Estela (16).jpg
- File:Estela (15)a.JPG
- File:Estela (22).JPG
- File:Estela (24).JPG
- File:Estela (23).jpg
- File:Estela (25).jpg
- File:Estela (20).JPG
- File:Estela (11) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estela (1).JPG
- File:Estela (2) Museo de Cáceres.JPG
- File:Estela (1) Museo de Cáceres.JPG
- File:Estela (3) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estela (4) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estela (5) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estela (1) Inédita.jpg
- File:Estela (10)a.jpg
- File:Estela (9) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estela (7) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estela (6) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Estela (8) Museo de Cáceres.jpg
- File:Ara (8).jpg
- File:Estela (26).jpg
- File:3478 Inscripción.jpg
- File:Estela (2) Jarro.JPG
- File:Estela (4) Jarro funerario.JPG
- are property of Caceres Museum (© Museo de Cáceres). LMLM (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope IngenieroLoco (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Also copyright violation: http://www.farodevigo.es/portada-pontevedra/2014/10/04/ramallo-explica-horas-extras-abonadas/1105572.html --IngenieroLoco (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Nomination of Nelson A. Rockefeller of New York to be Vice President of the United States.jpg
[edit]
unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
File:FMLN Programtic Platform of Poilitical Principles for Formation of a Democratic Revolutionary Government.jpg
[edit]
unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
unused text file, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused text, out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
This is a high–resolution uncensored scan of my government–issued ID with all of the details exposed. It was done by myself and uploaded to Flickr in 2012 as private. At some point, probably recently, the privacy setting for this picture on Flickr was changed from Private to Public. The change was not made by myself, at least not consciously — it was never my intent for this picture to leak, I only kept it on Flickr for my personal, private convenience. It was picked up and uploaded to Commons in December 2015.
I changed the privacy setting back to Private three days ago, when I noticed the leak. Apart from the privacy setting, the image inherited the CC license from my Flickr defaults, which was never meant to apply to it, since it was always meant to be private. It is difficult to investigate the security audit trail with Flickr, since real user support is almost non–existent at Yahoo.
Some of the reasons for the deletion would be:
- possible copyright violation — I never consciously published this picture under a permissive license
- possible privacy violation — I never consciously consented to leaking my photo and ID
- threat of identity theft — this is a currently valid government–issued ID
- there's a good picture of the same type of ID on Commons already — https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pasport_RF.jpg
- courtesy to me as the owner of the picture and the subject of it
--Infofarmer (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Infofarmer as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Image meant to be private on Flickr, marked public inadvertently – fixed now; this is a valid government–issued ID, publication violates privacy. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Winiekosasih (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons isn't your private web host.
- File:David nadeak fotoshoot.jpg
- File:David nadeak tasmania.jpg
- File:David nadeak loneytones.jpg
- File:David nadeak profil.jpg
- File:David Nadeak .jpg.jpg
Sismarinho (talk) 17:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Munchcrime (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused selfies by otherwise non-contributing user. Commons is not your personal webhost.
- File:Woken up.jpg
- File:Afternoon.jpg
- File:C360 2015-01-01-20-32-15-318.jpg
- File:Stroll.jpg
- File:My superman.jpg
- File:I love eqa.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
There is no FOP in France. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Bild ist veraltet und ist in keiner Verwendung. 2003:6:1756:4F06:A14A:DCE3:EE20:A7CA 18:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: In use, no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Bitte das Bild aus commons entfernen (Bernd Heinz, hz310905)
No, file currently in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmedshah786161 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:BeautyPlus 20140923202941 fast.jpg
- File:Ahmed Shah.jpg
- File:BeautyPlus 20140923202924 fast.jpg
- File:BeautyPlus 20140923202958 fast.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:43, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
As of 21 Feb had been in use at self-promo page en:User:Ad.jain002/Anshul jain, but has been removed (and that page in process of being speedied). Non-contributing user, thus personal use not permitted regardless, and this is not usefully in-scope. Ubcule (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
While this doesn't appear to be selfie of uploader himself, the person named doesn't appear to be notable either, and this isn't used for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Translation: "Cute and beautiful", out of scope, unused for personal use (assuming this is a personal image, it's hard to tell) Ubcule (talk) 19:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement for Ali Ben Mussa Graphic Design ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 2 photos of advertisement of his company Civa (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from twitter, in September 2014. Unclear if uploader is actually the author. -- Dual Freq (talk) 19:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; probably an original creation ; nothing to see with the greek goddess Artemis Civa (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Debendra151 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, not in main scope and not currently in use.
Ubcule (talk) 19:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, not usefully in-scope, not currently used for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
What is the copyright status of the background image? Unless it is in the public domain or has been released under a free license we can't use this screenshot. De728631 (talk) 19:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Spam.Ubcule (talk) 19:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Franklin Nathan NYAMSI, Professeur agrégé, Docteur en philosophie de l'Université de Lille3.jpg
[edit]
Apparent selfie. In-scope notability? Not used for personal purposes. (Google translate: " selfie apparente. Dans le champ de notabilité? Non utilisé à des fins personnelles.") Ubcule (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
No indication of in-scope notability, not in-use for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Given Mhlanga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal web host. Images removed from use at en.wikipedia where user's only edits were personal promotion.
- File:Given mhlanga1.jpg
- File:PicsPlay 1395072519821.jpg
- File:Given mhlanga.jpg
- File:Given Mhlanga's latest Picture.jpg
- File:Given Mhlanga.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 20:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out-of-scope selfie not in use for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 20:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image not in use. Ubcule (talk) 20:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Can't find evidence of notability and not currently in use for legitimate personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 20:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 3dprintguy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Is this person or the businesses listed notable? I can't find evidence that they are. (Google auto-translation into Korean "이 사람 또는 기업이 주목할만한 나열되어 있습니까? 나는 그들이 증거를 찾을 수 없습니다.")
- File:Kim Young Kwan 2.jpg
- File:Logo for topanta.png
- File:Logo for barter.gif
- File:Kim Young Kwan.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unclear description ; generic file name ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 20:11, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actormangaldev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons and Wikipedia are not your personal web host.
Self-promotional images from otherwise non-contributing user. One was in use at en.wikipedia, but has been removed (speedy-nominated under db-u5).
- File:Mangaldev, gorakhnath.jpg
- File:Mangal devmumbai.jpg
- File:Mangal dev Jammu.jpg
- File:Mangal Dev.jpg
- File:Mangal dev, sohribagawa.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as p.e. rather thumbnail format and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. thumbnail format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LordMathe2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sorry, but what exactly *is* all this meant to be? Are these representative of the official publications or associations, or just some modified versions the uploader has created for his own amusement? Do we need all these daily mast-headings? Are these licensable as CC-BY-SA-4.0 "own work" as claimed?
At least one is even called "for my use" and isn't in use. In fact, there's no sign that any of them are in use, so we can't even guess what the intent is that way.
Basically, it's not at all clear whether these are usefully in-scope and whether they're legitimate and correctly-licensed. Unless the uploader has something worthwhile to say on the matter, I'd PCP them.
- File:Newspaper section seperator.png
- File:Newspaper header.png
- File:United Russia Party Logo.png
- File:United Russia.png
- File:Links button.png
- File:Newspaper seperator united russia.png
- File:Daily Information Wenesday.png
- File:Daily Information Tuesday.png
- File:Daily Information Thursday.png
- File:Daily Information Sunday.png
- File:Daily Information Saturday.png
- File:Daily Information Monday.png
- File:Daily Information Friday.png
- File:Newspaper Header Tuesday.png
- File:Newspaper Header Monday.png
- File:Newspaper Seperator.png
- File:Newspaper Header Wednesday.png
- File:Newspaper Header Friday.png
- File:Newspaper Header Thursday.png
- File:Newspaper Header Saturday.png
- File:Newspaper seperator.png
- File:Newspaper head.png
- File:German Line sep.jpg
- File:Party newspaper header.jpg
- File:Erepublikproof.jpg
- File:Albanianlineseperate.png
- File:Formyuse.png
Ubcule (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Self-promotional image formerly in use at self-promo page at es.wikipedia, now removed. Ubcule (talk) 20:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope photoshopped nonsense. Ubcule (talk) 20:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Telepescaito.es (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional
- File:Papelón de pescada de Freiduría Reina Victoria.jpg
- File:Cartucho de pavias de Freiduría El Arenal.jpg
- File:Gambas rebozadas de Freiduría Puerta de la Carne.jpg
- File:Chipirones de Freiduría Reina Victoria.jpg
- File:Cartuchos de pescado de Freiduría La Isla.jpg
- File:Freiduría Puerta de la Carne.JPG
- File:Cartuchos de pescado frito de Freiduría Reina Victoria.jpg
- File:Freiduría Reina Victoria.JPG
- File:Freiduría La Isla.JPG
- File:Freiduría El Arenal.JPG
Takeaway (talk) 20:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr.Rajesh B Ghangurde (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative image of (presumed copyrighted) newspaper source.
- File:World Helium Day- Vijaydurg Celebrations, 18th August 2015.i.jpg
- File:World Helium Day- Vijaydurg Celebrations, 18th August 2015.h.jpg
- File:World Helium Day- Vijaydurg Celebrations, 18th August 2015.g.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 20:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused selfie, not useful for any in-scope purposes. Ubcule (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW? Yann (talk) 21:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. You can read the latest version of the Chinese Copyright Law. There is no legal provisions for Derivative works. It should to keep under the Chinese Copyright Law.--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 03:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: See article 10, (5), (6) and (8). . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Stupid file name ; no description (it is the name of the uploader in Russian language) ; Out of project scope, no use Civa (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The user who uploaded this to English Wikipedia only specified {{PD}} without any information about the source or author. The uploader didn't provide any CC or GNU licences. Since no source is available, we can't assume that the file is freely licensed. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused image whose text misrenders (and whose text is the essential content). File:Acetill coa.png by same uploader looks fine and is in use. The 1/2/3/4 pointers make this image only really useful in a certain context or article for which it was written. DMacks (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Generic file name ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Generic file name ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Unclear description and file name ; low quality ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 19:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 19:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Apparent export from high-quality image (uploader cited File:Acetyl-CoA-2D.svg) in lower-quality format (jpg) followed by graphical editing, replaced by File:Acetyl-CoA-2D colored.svg graphical editing of the original. DMacks (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 18:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 19:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 11:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is still alive Shev123 (talk) 11:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I delete also file:Bonbon irisé radiant.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
К удалению предлагается не файл, а локальная страница участника. Чтобы задействовать вместо нее глобальную с мета-вики Victor Manohin (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: user request. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 15:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, +oos. --Wdwd (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 15:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 21:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 15:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 21:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 15:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 15:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alex Praveen Alphonse (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 15:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative of (probably) copyrighted works, probable copyvio. Ubcule (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Derivate work, copyvio, no FoP (billboard). --Wdwd (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Commons don't host selfies. Sismarinho (talk) 15:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused personal photo. --Wdwd (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (commons don't host your private photos).
Sismarinho (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://togbe-afede.com/images/togbe_photo_01.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
unused inferior duplicate of original vector version ↔ User: Perhelion 16:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The picture was photographed by me. There can be no problem with the image right. FredWinkel
Out of project scope. Personal doodling and surely not scientific (wetenschappelijk). De728631 (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://pmindia.gov.in/en/former_pm/shri-gulzari-lal-nanda-2/ not "own work" as claimed Arjayay (talk) 16:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:59:17 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:58:37 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:58:25 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T11:00:44 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T11:00:33 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T11:00:22 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Bad quality contrast is not good — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-16T10:43:11 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
crooked size — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T11:04:45 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-19T16:42:37 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:58:14 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paasikivi (talk • contribs) 2016-02-15T10:57:47 (UTC)
- Keep It's not great, but it's usable. Do we have any images of significantly better quality from that or a nearby viewpoint? Ubcule (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I've uploaded a modified version (horizon fixed and contrast adjusted). I just noticed that it's your own image; perhaps you should mention that when nominating too. Ubcule (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope - unused personal file. --Wdwd (talk) 21:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
_Joseph_Krochk.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Joseph_Krochk.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Pierpao as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: bad pic of non relevant subject. Taivo (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
_Joseph_Krochk.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope - unused personal file. --Wdwd (talk) 21:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
_Joseph_Krochk.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely authorship claims. Appears to have been scanned from a printed publication based on the dithering. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:34, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Insufficient quality to keep on the commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof tpms (talk • contribs) 2016-02-19T13:55:45 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot of a music video, or album cover art; see Google image search (i.e. possible copyright violation - summarily marked as CC-BY-SA and own work). Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Also nominating File:Jala Brat.jpg and File:Jasmin Jala Fazlic.jpg. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
I think that this image should be deleted out of an abundance of caution. Although it doesn't show explicit nudity, it does show a person in a place where they would have an expectation of privacy, with an expression that indicates that they may have been surprised by the photographer's intrusion into their bathroom stall, and a person that may be potentially underage. Given that this was the first image uploaded by a new user, the likelihood that this image was uploaded to harass or embarrass the subject is significant when compared to this likelihood that this image was uploaded to serve an encyclopedic purpose. Ahecht (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Mexx0: If you would like to discuss why this image should be deleted, please feel free to comment here, but don't just erase my comments. Thank you. --Ahecht (talk) 02:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G3. --Wdwd (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Google search does not uncover notability for subject, image not used for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, out of scope and not used for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
this is a copyrighted photograph his website http://www.sudipbose.com/ states Copyright 2016, TheBattleContinues.org Theroadislong (talk) 21:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
DR started as imho rather small thumbnail format, and media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It's not the biggest image, but I don't see how it couldn't be educationally useful -FastilyClone (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2005 and properly categorised. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 22:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader request - 3d art in California - likely US FOP vio INeverCry 22:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DR started as rather very small thumbnail format, and media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep It's not the biggest image, but I don't see how it couldn't be educationally useful -FastilyClone (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uplaoded almost 10 years ago and still useful. No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: I loved the image. Its a cute male domesticated Asian Elephant. Elephants are rarely born in captivity, so this image is extremely useful. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Fry1989 eh? 22:12, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 22:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
copyvio : see the watermark (c) Thomas Rousing Civa (talk) 23:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The license choosen by the author at Flickr prevails over the watermark. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- See new version without watermark. Nick.Pr (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: appropriate license on source; cc-by (and others cc-licenses) are build on copyright. --Wdwd (talk) 22:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Promotional Takeaway (talk) 20:52, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Telepescaito.es. - Takeaway (talk) 21:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Telepescaito.es. --Riley Huntley (talk) 09:30, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Low quality Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Again low quality is not a reason for deletion Oxyman (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Riley Huntley (talk) 00:52, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
PD-shape does not apply, it is also not own work. The question is, is it PD-ineligible!? ↔ User: Perhelion 15:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Neutral I mean the symbol of "Giebelkreuz" is very old and high possible PD-ineligible, so I be near to withdraw my request (after correction of the file-desc). ↔ User: Perhelion 00:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep The so called Giebelkreuz was first used in 1877... so it is PD-old in my opinion. All around the Giebelkreuz is ineligible. So we could keep it. --Wikijunkie (talk) 12:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as PD-ineligible. ↔ User: Perhelion 14:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Wrong licence, it is also not own work. The question is, is it PD-ineligible!? ↔ User: Perhelion 15:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: it is PD-old-70. ↔ User: Perhelion 14:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Not in use anywhere, out of project scope, potential copyvio. Liance (talk) 00:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope --Msaynevirta (talk) 01:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Minecraft is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete I really doubt this unique font text can be considered below the threshold of originality. It just looks too unique. Ww2censor (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- This is a tough one. Sia is Australian by birth, but recently married in the USA. The WP:EN article on the song is not clear where she recorded this work or where this cover was designed -- it was released on both USA and Australian labels. This text is clearly PD in the USA -- there is no copyright on fonts, however complex, there, but it is equally clear that the low Australian ToO would put this under copyright there. I suggest Delete under COM:PRP. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Nadie valora lo que aporto. Propongo eliminar mi propia imagen porque nadie la aprueba. Gracias, Si es posible borrenlo a la brevedad, para que los bibliotecarios no me esten llamando la atención a cada rato. Gracias Loxox (talk) 03:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as per User:Jameslwoodward and self-nomination by uploader (User:Loxox). Furthermore, it is an unused image without any educational value. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
copy of File:Montes Riphaeus (LRO).png with lower resolution and decreased brightness Stas (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Please remove... I own the rights to this image. Thanks. Tedistheman11$ (talk) 12:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, once I have deleted the photo under different name. Small photo without metadata, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Please remove... I own the rights to this image. Thanks. Tedistheman11$ (talk) 12:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:09, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Duplicates found: Бризер Thatonewikiguy (talk) 00:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicated file. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. Out of project scope. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
not a free screenshot, from [1]. FRDian (talk) 05:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of copyrighted website. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
EXIF says "Photo by Louie Juarez", copyright unexplained Ytoyoda (talk) 05:23, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Please verify permission via COM:OTRS. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:57, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion requested by :Josve05a Someone with HE knowledge may be able to find out when this logo was established. 1881 seems possible IMHO. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Missing information and evidence about creation date. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal photo. KurodaSho (talk) 08:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus.
- Not clear that the previous DR is related to this image upload, given the 2014 deletion comment of it being a 'game image'. Checking the filearchive (below) the four prior deletions are all different images.
- This appears a copyvio, but a G4 speedy may be misleading. All files from the same uploader look to have the same problem, but the page name also probably needs to be locked from recreation.
+----------+---------------------------------+ | Date | SHA | +----------+---------------------------------+ | 20141130 | 2odhsjx3mlbcdmevjvyw1bjy3wwbtxp | | 20150216 | ffrm0wzh9tjtwjari3wibplajo3tde6 | | 20160208 | tpt2pb4d8fm46gmrsj4dl2gh2pdnju2 | | 20190903 | 6cz435zkc3ptywjlwah5dgnphemjv3c | +----------+---------------------------------+
- --Fæ (talk) 12:37, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not clear? Same image as File:Rouse.jpg deleted February, 23 2020 à 09:06. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- The SHA1 values do not match, so they are not the same files.
- sm6epq1p8n5gwntsokp00a3seo2ijpd = current File:Alisa.jpg
- 8hyh7jkfso5w0a10broaejhh6704aof = deleted 2020-02-22 File:Rouse.jpg
- @Herbythyme: FYI
- --Fæ (talk) 19:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- Aaah - not going to argue that they are "not the same file" at all. However one is simply a greyscale version of the other file. I would stake some money on the source (likely copyvio) being the same for both these files. I did look carefully before I deleted it. --Herby talk thyme 08:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not clear? Same image as File:Rouse.jpg deleted February, 23 2020 à 09:06. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears to be a copyright violation. Also same as previously deleted images. --Kaldari (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/82743153 names differ. Jim1138 (talk) 09:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Same angle, same trash in same locations, same foam on river. Jim1138 (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
unused image, no particular value with current description and would appear to be a vanity image — billinghurst sDrewth 09:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Il s'agit d'un remplacement d'image par une image Bestoflove69 (talk) 09:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Logo of a company. Highly unlikely that the uploader is the owner. Mr RD (talk) 09:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Obvious PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 23:51, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional - unused logo of non-notable company. MCMLXXXIX 03:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Well there is a PD-USGov , but is that valid here? JuTa 10:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) manages the day to day activities of HRU. [2] Seems to be a work of the US government. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This picture, of a known Israeli professor appears/appeared in several sites (including this one). No OTRS release approval has been received. It has no place in the Commons in this situation. Ldorfman (talk) 10:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission for use must be sent to COM:OTRS/. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Rana Mahfouz). MER-C 11:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Logo of non-notable entity. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cygomezm as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Dallas Buyers Club logo.png — billinghurst sDrewth 13:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, since the new file has not only a lower resolution than the original but also specifies it as a source. While the latter might be acceptable license-wise and would only destroy file history, the lower resolution disqualifies this deletion request. --Patrick87 (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Info: Thsi file does not have transparency, so no duplicate. Both files are in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use, not a duplicate as one file has transparency and the other doesn't. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Own work ? 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 13:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
own work ? 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 13:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
即時削除 利用者ページ1 Wp20120621 (talk) 13:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Fehler bei Angaben Schnittlauchd6 (talk) 13:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Erroneous upload. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:18, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, not sure about personnel work Shev123 (talk) 14:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. Please send permission to COM:OTRS. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This is Rudolf Hess, probably a copyright violation 2003:45:5C6F:1201:F9D0:CE90:7A4E:53DB 15:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:19, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Unused inferior ugly render-copy, seems something like strong PDF compressed, replaced by original vector version: file: Hansa-Gymnasium-Hamburg-Bergedorf-Logo.svg PS: Only usage is the Graphics-Lab for the SVG replacement. ↔ User: Perhelion 15:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Low quality, replaced by superior SVG version. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fried Marek (talk · contribs)
[edit]We already have countless better-quality Google logos uploaded under the correct license. (The CC-BY-SA-4.0 license on these ones is obviously bogus; it's unclear whether this was intended to mislead, whether the uploader simply couldn't be bothered altering the default license or whether there was another reason. However, though I'm sure someone could find the correct rationale for keeping them- probably PD-text- it's not worth our time when we already have this content elsewhere).
Ubcule (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Incorrect license. Better content exists in Category:Google_logos. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
While this file says it's from the Serbian national bank, there's no direct link, only to a main page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- If the bank note is not copyrighted then I see no problem. It is a 2D photo/scan and therefore the photo/scan itself is not eligible for copyright. --MGA73 (talk) 15:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status for the bank note. No information on COM:CUR. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logo according to stated source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stora_Enso.svg. -- Tegel (talk) 18:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted logo. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
No licensing information at source to confirm the license given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely that the images used are created by the government. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Requires COM:OTRS from original photographer to be retained, uploader has helped himself from internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OTRS permission required. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Would require COM:OTRS permission from Eli Reed, there is no indication of free license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OTRS required. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Publicity or promotional upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Inferior, unused copy of File:Venus pentagram.png Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think the point was to translate the yellow caption to Portuguese. Not sure how useful that is... AnonMoos (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Inferior quality, not in use. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Possibly non free. Not used in any project. IngenieroLoco (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of copyrighted software. Not in scope. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
motivi personali Filiz Kapsigay (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Image of non-notable person, out of project scope. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
very bad quality! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Донор (talk • contribs) 2016-02-20T15:16:45 (UTC)
Deleted: Very low quality, out of project scope. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pixeltoo as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright www.koreus.com http://media.koreus.com/free/korimage/animal_ecrase.jpg. The file has been 4 years in Commons and deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete According to tiny eye this image have been published firstly in koreus.com in 2009. This image have been uploaded in 2012 and it contains an icon saying its first provenance (ie koreus).--Pixeltoo (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
FoP-Latvia Dogad75 (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: No COM:FOP in Latvia. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Bild ist qualitativ schlecht und wird nicht mehr benötigt Hz310905 (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim, unclear copyright status. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Anthony and is wife Elva in the garden of Stanley Road during the early 40s around the time he invented Cluedo.jpg
[edit]
Do we have evidence that the uploader had permission to upload it under this license? Ubcule (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Permission needs to be sent to COM:OTRS. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that this particular Anthony Fernando is especially notable, and the quality is dreadful (low-res, phone in way of face). Ubcule (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Personal image not in use on a user page. Also doubtful copyright status: Seems to be a mirror selfie, but description says I took this photo of my friend. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
What is the copyright status of the source image? Ubcule (talk) 19:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- I believe its free.--Mangokeylime (talk) 02:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- That sounds vague. On what basis to you believe it to be free? Ubcule (talk) 11:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. Also, there are many images in the PDF file, probably quite a few copyright violations. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Image tagged as "own work" but it came from http://www.stepmap.com, and per http://www.stepmap.com/hilfe/wie-darf-ich-die-karten-nutzen the file licensing does not appear to be compatible with CC-SA due to restrictions on business usage. Wrh2 (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Stepmap licensing seems to be incompatible with free licenses. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
bad quality, wrong direction, bad name, better version available: File:Luigi Marchesi.jpg Rettinghaus (talk) 19:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad quality, better alternatives are available. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:46, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Unclear description (terre=earth) ; unclear file name ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Out of project scope ; Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear what is depicted here, out of project scope. Also categories suggest this might be art, so we might also have a copyright problem. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:TOO#Common law countries. Home country is India. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
I was about to pass this image until I got a warning that this flickr account is blacklisted. Leoboudv (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by blacklisted. I found it was CC 2.0 licenced on Flickr (at https://www.flickr.com/photos/dullhunk/6052456823 ) so thought that was OK, as I wanted something to illustrate the stairs (one of the key features of the building).Rodw (talk) 07:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Having done a bit more digging I see this user at Commons:Questionable Flickr images, but can't identify why. I note from his blog ( http://duncan.hull.name/ ) that he has presented at a wikipedia conference (that I attended) etc. Has anyone discussed the "blacklisting" with him?Rodw (talk) 08:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Rodw: Account was blacklisted by Rillke in 2012 after Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Duncan.Hull. Revent (talk) 20:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- I think images like https://www.flickr.com/photos/dullhunk/6061907496/ explain why. Revent (talk) 20:44, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanations. I've done some searching and can't find the image elsewhere, but in the light of above would not be distressed if it is deleted.Rodw (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- The account was blacklisted for their derivative works that are sometimes hard to recognize and the covers in it. I think this file could be passed, given it doesn't look like being a photo of a photo or being published before Flickr elsewhere. Please feel free to contact Duncan.Hull (talk · contribs) to sort out these issues (primarily that they can't offer derivative works and covers under CC-By and upload them here). Although not replying to deletion warnings on their talk page, they created requests for undeletion for several of their uploads so chances aren't too bad. -- Rillke(q?) 11:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanations. I've done some searching and can't find the image elsewhere, but in the light of above would not be distressed if it is deleted.Rodw (talk) 08:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Having done a bit more digging I see this user at Commons:Questionable Flickr images, but can't identify why. I note from his blog ( http://duncan.hull.name/ ) that he has presented at a wikipedia conference (that I attended) etc. Has anyone discussed the "blacklisting" with him?Rodw (talk) 08:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Looks okay to me. -- Rillke(q?) 11:35, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing about the photo 'itself' that indicates that it's an issue (no apparent prior publication), however, on Flickr it's in a photoset described as 'photographed from various albums'[3], which leaves me with significant doubt that it's an original photo. Revent (talk) 04:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Flickr user has a history of copyright violations. Deleted based on COM:PRP. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
copyvio suspection (no source, uncertain author...). Here the same picture with better resolution : http://fstatic.bongdaplus.vn/Assets/Media/2015/11/23/41/messi4_c.jpg H4stings (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope - pretty blurry INeverCry 22:51, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad quality, not in use. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This non-free logo is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Doubtful own work claim. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
File:I'm Pretty Sure This is Fort Irwin, California, Taken from Flight from Long Beach to Las Vegas (6027239888).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader request - no realistic COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Bad quality, not in use. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:54, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Overwritten file: two in one. The first file has no source, so the copyright status is unknown. The second file is signed by the author (and thus not anonymous), but the death year of the author is unknown, so the copyright status of that file is also unknown. Stefan2 (talk) 23:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Uploader added {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}} later, which is the license of the source page. But that nearly imposible valid for a 2015 photo. JuTa 10:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I added the Flickr Commons license template. Does that address your concerns? --Digitaleffie (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- keep license accurately reflects source. if you want us to go talk to the Smithsonian about tracking down if this is a work for hire, we can try, but it is not the policy. Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 12:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
The uploader to English Wikipedia is unlikely to have the equipment needed to take satellite photos. For example, few English Wikipedia users own satellites. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- The discussion is at the English WP listing Cush (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: I have requested that the information on the image's provenance and NASA license be applied to the image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
No permission. Dogad75 (talk) 19:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Не могу понять-в чем причина удаления файла? Автор Jeen Roelf Roorda загрузила собственную работу (видно, что это фотография награды на стенде, сквозь стекло), указала права и лицензию (Права GNU, Лицензирование: GNU Free Documentation License, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported). Есть источник, где сказано, что данная награда вручается официально, входит в перечень наградной системы Нидерландов, относится к рыцарским орденам. Artem Ponomarenko (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- GFDL (or any other free license) is not mentioned in the text of permission. Permission has not all necessary terms (see freedomdefined:Definition).
- The award is 3D-work created in 1971, the free status of initial work must be specified. Alex Spade (talk) 10:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Тогда могу предложить на удаление ряд файлов об орденах, которые размещены точно по такой же лицензии, как и этот. К примеру - File:Krzyz Wielki OOP.jpg, File:L'ordre de la République d'Espagne Grootofficier 1932 1939 2.jpg Artem Ponomarenko (talk) 11:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- По данному файлу 2 вопроса: 1. — охраняютмя ли в Нидерландах авторским правом государственные символы и знаки, в том числе государственные награды? 2. — нет разрешения на загрузку в Википедию под свободными лицензиями данного изображения от автора фото Jeen Roelf Roorda (не указано, что данное изображение может использоваться в любых целях, в том числе и коммерческих, и можно создавать создавать производные материалы. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 14:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Ясно. Видимо, проблема только в файла о Нидерландах, потому что аналогичные файлы с аналогичной лицензией о Италии, Польше, Германии - никто не выставляет на удаление. Artem Ponomarenko (talk) 16:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- I find it somewhat difficult to read all this Russian, but the original foto was made in Indonesia by my brother in law Jeen Roorda and his approval to publish it is stated on the page. What kind of extra info do we need to keep the file available? Robert Prummel (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: com:DW because of the medals plus this file requires evidence of permission via com:OTRS. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ribon chair
[edit]No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The designer of these chairs, Pierre Paulin, was dead in 2009.
- File:Pierre Paulin Fauteuil 582 Ribbon Chair 2 Musée des arts décoratifs Paris.jpg
- File:Pierre Paulin Fauteuil 582 Ribbon Chair Musée des arts décoratifs Paris.jpg
Civa (talk) 17:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep FOP is irrelevant — this is nothing like the case of a building or a statue in public space. The question here is not that of "original creation" in the sense of a work of art, but of industrial design. Industrial design which is widely accepted on Commons — think cars. Rama (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Sculpture; U.S. copyright law says utilitarian objects can be copyrighted if they have "sculptural features that can be identified separately from, and are capable of existing independently of, the utilitarian aspects of the article." ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- By your interpretation, cars are sculptures. So your interpretation is, in practice, wrong. Rama (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wrong. Vehicular design features are not capable of existing independently from the utilitarian aspects of the vehicle, because they are the utilitarian aspects. One can argue that this is applied art; applied arts are copyrightable subject matter under French law.] ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- No more nor less than the chair is a utilitarian sitting machine. Rama (talk) 10:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thus, it's applied art, which is eligible under French copyright law. ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, it is industrial design. It is not different from cars, which are accepted. If the chair was applied art, it would entail that cars would be applied art as well, and we would have to suppress all images of French-designed cars and cars photographed in France.
- Incidentally, I think that calling Paulin's work "applied art" is a fundamental misinterpretation: Paulin is one of the foremost representatives of a school of though that aimed at mass-producing high-quality goods for the masses. This is the opposite of applied art, where a unique work of art blends into a utilitarian object. Rama (talk) 08:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thus, it's applied art, which is eligible under French copyright law. ViperSnake151 (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- No more nor less than the chair is a utilitarian sitting machine. Rama (talk) 10:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Wrong. Vehicular design features are not capable of existing independently from the utilitarian aspects of the vehicle, because they are the utilitarian aspects. One can argue that this is applied art; applied arts are copyrightable subject matter under French law.] ViperSnake151 (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- By your interpretation, cars are sculptures. So your interpretation is, in practice, wrong. Rama (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Comment Thèse chairs are artistic ones. Pierre Paulin is an artist who sell expensive his creations. A car is an utilitarian object (except when tuning). --Civa (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Err... from where are you taking this? do you have examples of law or jurisprudence on thresholds of tuning for a car to become a work of art? We are not discussing what we feel would be right, we are discussing what is legal. Rama (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Applied art. In other EU-countries courts ruled that some chairs do have a copyright. (EU-copyright law is harmonised to a certain level). com:TOO lists a French example of a nail clipper which has a copyright. To bad the link doesn't work but based on this we cannot just assume that applied art designed by a well know designer wouldn't meet the treshold of originality in France. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC) PS. For a French examples see here and here. Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
There is no (clear) indication that the YouTube channel is owned by the copyright owners of this television program. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I'm pretty sure this is the official channel.
- Those promo's are published at least one day before they are officially broadcasted on the national television, see for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4j_sqzQQHN4 it's announcing 'this evening 4 dec' but it was published on 3 december on YouTube, this can only be uploaded by an official.
- The brand of NPO is not visible on the right top that you see here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZBqxQN4AHw, so it can't be a television recording or download from uitzendinggemist but should have been uploaded from one of the people from the broadcasting organisation. --Hannolans (talk) 19:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
- The channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpKFj9j4epkEVvjgVJPv4CA has the NTR logo, and copyright NTR and copyright Victor Arnolds (I assume for the photo of Sinterklaas as he works with Sinterklaasjournaal as a photographer, see http://www.victorarnolds.nl/projects) --Hannolans (talk) 19:22, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Seems official, yeah. --James F. (talk) 15:31, 27 March 2016 (UTC)