User talk:Prof tpms

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Prof tpms!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

overcategorization, some hints

moved from File talk:Kerala RTC.jpg:

Hi User:Prof tpms, no offense, but remarked not for the fist time, that you additionally added empty or miss-leading categories, although your upload(s) already have been categorized; more than a handful has been fixed (two undone, misleading categories speedydelete requested) during my 13/14 Dec-'session'. btw: for new categories, so you're in doubt, imho it's the best way to use category names according to EN-WP, especially yourself started those ;-) Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 00:39, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

as there where further 'over-categorization's, some more have been reverted, no offense, again, but in general, please avoid (massively) over-categorizing, Roland zh (talk) 01:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[moved from my user talk as started here]

Dear Roland, I will take more care in future about over categorization. Regards Prof̠tpms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof tpms (talk • contribs) 02:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Prof tpms, thank you for taking notice. i'm happy to read, and no problem from my side. Kindly regards, Roland zh (talk) 04:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again, ref Category:Kozhikode East, once more 'over-categorisation', see for instance Category:Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode. No offense, and Happy New Year, Roland zh (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Roland zh, New categories are needed to combine insignificant suburbs and villages to logical units like 'Kannur East' and 'Taliparamba West'. Regards, Prof. Manna (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Category:Indian Institute of Management Kozhikodeis only a single campus in the Category:Kozhikode East area. Prof. Manna (talk) 22:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again, new categories are not the problem, for instance over-categorization may mean to add, both Category:Kasaragod and Category:Malik Deenar Juma Masjid (again as of today) to individual files, as well as files that already are part of, for instance, to add the categories of Taliparamba and Taliparamba East, or Kannur, Kappad (individual files of beach, memorial and so on) etc.etc.etc. Please check Commons:Categories, where imho the 'core problem' may be explained much better than i'm able to do, kr Roland zh (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will minimize adding to bigger categories. Smaller categories need more files and they are more searchable. Prof. Manna (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

and, again, p.e. Category:South Malabar (no p.e. EN-wiki, but Category:Malabar Coast) etc, please no single files (same problem as before), instead categorized just by the related districts, bye, Roland zh (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Roland zh, I have understood and accepted you advice that a category should contain more than one pictures. But when I make a new category, I begin with one picture and take a few more seconds to come to the next picture and add it to the same picture. In fact I don't know the other way around: How to create a caategory first and add pictures to it. In that way you end up with empty catgeories and again the same problem. Regards,Prof. Manna (talk) 00:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Prof. Manna, no offense, but you may misunderstood because of my bad English: the 'core' problem is to categorize each/one image by the related category (a village, for instance), and also to add the 'higher-level-category' (the related district, for instance) in the so-called category tree, or an (obviously) misleading category, another village or city or region (South Malabar), for instance. Please see also Commons:Categories. Kindly regards and happy uploading, Roland zh (talk) 20:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Roland zh, I have tried your patience too much. In fact, the Category Tree can be a little confusing when you look at it ambiguously. I will read the help article Commons:Categories thoroughly because I am not in a position to give up categorization altogether. I am very much interested in categories and the kind of work I do needs them badly. But I want to avoid giving trouble to you. With love,

File:V.Lead Library.jpg

File:V.Lead Library.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland zh (talk) 19:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

I looked up your rename requests. New names are very poor. IMHO, it would be better to combine the old name with new suffix. Fore example: "Indian vegetable shop in Gudalur, Nilgiris". If you agree fix new names please. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear (krassotkin), thank you for your kind letter. I agree with you that longer titles are better. Only because there are too many to rename, I went for the shorter ones. Regards, --Prof TPMS (talk) 08:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Can you please fix this? --Orijentolog (talk) 11:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No sir, I don't know how to delete. Prof TPMS (talk) 11:48, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, Orijentolog, I don't know how to delete. Prof TPMS (talk) 11:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is this: I nominated the file, but it doesn't list it well (like files nominated by you and others). I don't know why. So I meant can you use the same process for that file and put given reason? --Orijentolog (talk) 11:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Roland zh will help, please. Prof TPMS (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

no, he can not, and please avoid to give such recommondations, thx and bye, Roland zh (talk) 19:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I asked User:Taivo (admin). Thanks anyway! --Orijentolog (talk) 12:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See you, Orijentolog, Prof TPMS (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable Deletion requests and relocations of Categories

Dear Prof TPMS, it seems you are on vibrant activity within the Wikimedia Commons. Thank you! But to me, most your deletion requests and rearrangement of categories are reckless and lacks sufficient judgement. I would suggest you to refrain from such until enough understanding is acquired on these actions. You are welcome to contact me directly and discuss these by email or phone. With regards, ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) (talk) 16:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again, and in short: I completely agree with ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ)'s judicious request. Please stop these renamings, for instance ml:പയ്യാമ്പലം കടപ്പുറം imho does not mean "Kannur Beach", but Category:Payyambalam Beach, as it was before. From my side, the Malayalam Wikipedia wikis imho are 'the' reference to name Kerala-related categories (so I practiced the past seven years), hence, i'll re-establish that category and probably some others, by spending/loosing again time that i'd preferred to spend for more constructive enhancements in the Wikimedia projects...

btw: as from my side very frustrating, I allow to point once again to the section overcategorization, some hints, hence, i'll ignore your recent request on my talk (Kannur East!??!? instead of related college, definitely, no!), as it's again relating the core problem: removing appropriate categories. Please finally try to get familiar with the Categorization model used within Wikimedia Commons, as linked before. Thank you for taking notice, finally regards, Roland zh (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Roland zh, I feel bad in frustrating you and taking your time. Categories are complicated affairs and I understand that it can get messy dealing with them. But I have moved only with caution and in good intention. I have to take a little more caution in future. Thank you for the observations on keeping pictures of lower quality. Please note that I have not deleted pictures but only recommended pictures of very low quality for deletion. Prof TPMS (talk) 01:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding the situation. I would like to let you know that low quality is not a valid reason for deletion every time. For example, if the image is in use or if there are no alternatives available, we will not be deleting those images. Our aim is to help our community and others by storing images and media that in in scope which could be of use anywhere. You may feel certain images are useless, but we never know if others might find it useful. Next time, I will recommend using the templates {{Low quality}} or {{Out of scope}} instead of nominating them for deletion. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Sreejith K, I understand the concerns very well and will keep away from deletions in future. Templates {{Low quality}} or {{Out of scope}} suggested will be sufficient to air my views. --Prof TPMS (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May I submit my humble thanks to all of you in settling this so beautifully. Thank you all! - ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) (talk) 01:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adv. Baburaj Palladan.jpg

File:Adv. Baburaj Palladan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharadadevinagar . Basaveswara nagar.jpg

File:Sharadadevinagar . Basaveswara nagar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland zh (talk) 18:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telecom Layout-1.jpg

File:Telecom Layout-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Srirangapattanam Railway Station.jpg

File:Srirangapattanam Railway Station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 20:47, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madurai 48.jpg

File:Madurai 48.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland zh (talk) 20:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naganahalli RS.jpg

File:Naganahalli RS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 10:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time, stop potentially vandalism

Hi, in short as 'talked about' again and again and again...: stop further potentially vandalism which has been reverted on 22 November 2016, ref [populated places] of Category:Wayanad district, and also Category:St. Angelo Fort et al. Kindly take notice that 'that kind of re-categorization' is imho vandalism, bye for the last time, Roland zh (talk) 19:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment also related Category:Kannur district, Category:Kozhikode district, Category:Malappuram district (Kerala), and also Category:Mysore district and imho Category:Mysore district (Karnataka) et al, in begin to mid-November 2016. btw: please stop wasting our both-sided rare recreational time, thx, Roland zh (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Innu Inland Magazine 2017.jpg

File:Innu Inland Magazine 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nanjumallige. JSS Hostel.jpg

File:Nanjumallige. JSS Hostel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Roland zh (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Checkout my first contribution. PinkSnowfall (talk) 06:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

deletion request

Hi, Please do not request for image deletion unnecessarily like this.--Rameshng (talk) 02:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

like this, and this and this--Rameshng (talk) 02:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Students of Farook College remembers their dead cook Kuttappettan.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Students of Farook College remembers their dead cook Kuttappettan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Students of Farook College remembers their dead cook Kuttappettan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sreejith K (talk) 20:02, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maharajas College, Mysore.webp

File:Maharajas College, Mysore.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: From https://www.clgonline.in/college/sbrr-mahajana-first-grade-college-mysore-HOTEL

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thaloor, Nenmeni (7).jpg

File:Thaloor, Nenmeni (7).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Vijayanrajapuram.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 10:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Prof tpms

Contents

overcategorization, some hints

File:V.Lead Library.jpg

Renaming

Help

Unacceptable Deletion requests and relocations of Categories

File:Adv. Baburaj Palladan.jpg

File:Sharadadevinagar . Basaveswara nagar.jpg

File:Telecom Layout-1.jpg

File:Srirangapattanam Railway Station.jpg

File:Madurai 48.jpg

File:Naganahalli RS.jpg

For the last time, stop potentially vandalism

File:Innu Inland Magazine 2017.jpg

File:Nanjumallige. JSS Hostel.jpg

A cup of tea for you!

deletion request

File tagging File:Students of Farook College remembers their dead cook Kuttappettan.jpg

File:Maharajas College, Mysore.webp

File:Thaloor, Nenmeni (7).jpg

Navigation menu

User talk:Prof tpms

overcategorization, some hints

Renaming

Help

Unacceptable Deletion requests and relocations of Categories

For the last time, stop potentially vandalism

A cup of tea for you!

deletion request

File tagging File:Students of Farook College remembers their dead cook Kuttappettan.jpg

Navigation menu

Search