Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 28th, 2015

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:통일.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ecelan as no permission (No permission since) José Luiz disc 03:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By Spanish law, it's a clear case of {{FoP-Spain}}. It's a painting hanging in a "public space" (a church) in Spain. Are there any specific element in FOP:Spain contradicting it? José Luiz disc 03:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unfortunately, FOP-Spain explicitly does not cover inside public spaces, only covering parques, calles, plazas u otras vías públicas. This can be confirmed in this source. Until Spain changes their Copyright polices, images like this are copyvios in Commons, and have to be deleted. Unfortunately. Darwin Ahoy! 11:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without further info we have to assume the book cover is copyrighted Backiam (talk) 10:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: John Burningham is still alive. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyvio}} taken from http://www.acc.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/web/2013/05/130515-F-XX000-999.jpg without permission or license. .js ((())) 13:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: @.js: please don't use speedy delete templates in DR's. Adding them to the file in question is enough. Steinsplitter (talk) 13:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, wrong licensing (not own work), possible copyvio —MarcoAurelio 13:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam - puppet accounts - gone Herby talk thyme 13:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: withdrawn Krd 15:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Looks more like a screenshot. Besides, out of COM:PS. —MarcoAurelio 13:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 15:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iceland, so the advert means this needs to be deleted 181.90.77.74 15:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. No point to crop, as the rest of the image is out of scope. Yann (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a TV series 'Керемет көч' Domdomegg (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a TV series 'Керемет көч' Domdomegg (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted image, from Fader Magazine: http://www.thefader.com/2015/07/28/grimes-cover-story-interview The Interior (Talk) 19:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deletion, obvious copyvio. Wdwd (talk) 22:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Karte ist keine Eigenentwicklung von User LeroyStehlik sondern von den Homepage http://stadtbus.winterthur.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/Stadtbus/Dateien/2015/1482_Stadt_Winterthur_A4_quer_15_low.pdf herauskopiert. Da die Karte ausserdem mit einem Copyright belegt ist, ist sie für Wikipedia nicht geeignet. Tschubby (talk) 20:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Speedily deleted; obvious case for deletion (copied from copyrighted PDF). Gestumblindi (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElMonologuista (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Because source is copyrighted and professional newspaper image in low size.

The Photographer (talk) 21:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElMonologuista (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This uploader ElMonologuista uploaded 60 files. 50 have already been deleted. 1 is already subject to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Francisco Visconti Osorio.png. He has been indefblocked for uploading unfree files. Therefore, I suspect these last 9 are also unfree.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:08, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From a quick skim-through, the ones marked {{PD-text}} appear to qualify as such, unless Venezuela has a particularly low TOO. And the flag is probably covered by {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}, despite the likely-spurious CC0 licence.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Odysseus1479. Ruthven (msg) 03:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source larissaluz.com is vocalist's official site, not a free license or GNU compatible site Yanguas (talk) 00:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unless specified the site is copyrighted Anna (Cookie) (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Related English Wikipedia discussions: w:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 8#Template:Privadoygenteism, w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Guntaelgordo. Keφr (keep talk here) 16:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kephir is just now coming off a three-month ban, which was due to his complete and utter unwillingness or inability to modify his behavior in any way in response to the various issues, objections, and concerns that were raised by others -- instead always going full-speed ahead doing yet again exactly and precisely what many had objected to so often. (He received plenty of notice -- the three-month ban was preceded by a one-week ban, and voluminous discussion on the Commons "User problems" noticeboard, leaving aside his user talk page.) I think that in light of all the past history, this current action by User:Kephir doesn't show any degree of "good faith" on his part, and I would strongly recommend that at an absolute minimum, User:Kephir be topic-banned from the "special or fictional flags" area until there's some evidence that he is able to work with others on Commons without stirring up unnecessary friction and turbulence (as opposed to refusing to modify his behavior in the slightest degree, which would seem to betray a certain spiteful and malicious motivation at this point). [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 12:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Related English Wikipedia discussions: w:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 8#Template:Privadoygenteism, w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Guntaelgordo. Keφr (keep talk here) 16:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kephir is just now coming off a three-month ban, which was due to his complete and utter unwillingness or inability to modify his behavior in any way in response to the various issues, objections, and concerns that were raised by others -- instead always going full-speed ahead doing yet again exactly and precisely what many had objected to so often. (He received plenty of notice -- the three-month ban was preceded by a one-week ban, and voluminous discussion on the Commons "User problems" noticeboard, leaving aside his user talk page.) I think that in light of all the past history, this current action by User:Kephir doesn't show any degree of "good faith" on his part, and I would strongly recommend that at an absolute minimum, User:Kephir be topic-banned from the "special or fictional flags" area until there's some evidence that he is able to work with others on Commons without stirring up unnecessary friction and turbulence (as opposed to refusing to modify his behavior in the slightest degree, which would seem to betray a certain spiteful and malicious motivation at this point). [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 12:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description: "My personal fictional flag of my nation". Commons is not a web host. Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 16:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kephir is just now coming off a three-month ban, which was due to his complete and utter unwillingness or inability to modify his behavior in any way in response to the various issues, objections, and concerns that were raised by others -- instead always going full-speed ahead doing yet again exactly and precisely what many had objected to so often. (He received plenty of notice -- the three-month ban was preceded by a one-week ban, and voluminous discussion on the Commons "User problems" noticeboard, leaving aside his user talk page.) I think that in light of all the past history, this current action by User:Kephir doesn't show any degree of "good faith" on his part, and I would strongly recommend that at an absolute minimum, User:Kephir be topic-banned from the "special or fictional flags" area until there's some evidence that he is able to work with others on Commons without stirring up unnecessary friction and turbulence (as opposed to refusing to modify his behavior in the slightest degree, which would seem to betray a certain spiteful and malicious motivation at this point). [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description: "Estado ficticio". Out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 16:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kephir is just now coming off a three-month ban, which was due to his complete and utter unwillingness or inability to modify his behavior in any way in response to the various issues, objections, and concerns that were raised by others -- instead always going full-speed ahead doing yet again exactly and precisely what many had objected to so often. (He received plenty of notice -- the three-month ban was preceded by a one-week ban, and voluminous discussion on the Commons "User problems" noticeboard, leaving aside his user talk page.) I think that in light of all the past history, this current action by User:Kephir doesn't show any degree of "good faith" on his part, and I would strongly recommend that at an absolute minimum, User:Kephir be topic-banned from the "special or fictional flags" area until there's some evidence that he is able to work with others on Commons without stirring up unnecessary friction and turbulence (as opposed to refusing to modify his behavior in the slightest degree, which would seem to betray a certain spiteful and malicious motivation at this point). [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 12:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag; out of COM:SCOPE as not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Keφr (keep talk here) 16:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kephir is just now coming off a three-month ban, which was due to his complete and utter unwillingness or inability to modify his behavior in any way in response to the various issues, objections, and concerns that were raised by others -- instead always going full-speed ahead doing yet again exactly and precisely what many had objected to so often. (He received plenty of notice -- the three-month ban was preceded by a one-week ban, and voluminous discussion on the Commons "User problems" noticeboard, leaving aside his user talk page.) I think that in light of all the past history, this current action by User:Kephir doesn't show any degree of "good faith" on his part, and I would strongly recommend that at an absolute minimum, User:Kephir be topic-banned from the "special or fictional flags" area until there's some evidence that he is able to work with others on Commons without stirring up unnecessary friction and turbulence (as opposed to refusing to modify his behavior in the slightest degree, which would seem to betray a certain spiteful and malicious motivation at this point). [Non-admin closure.] AnonMoos (talk) 12:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most probably grabbed from the internet + quality is so poor I doubt it is within COM:PSMarcoAurelio 13:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:36, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OJCo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement of questionable notability and copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I consider these speedy on a copyright basis Herby talk thyme 16:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is on Flickr with a cc-by-nd license, and such licenses are not allowed on Commons. 66.87.115.215 01:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Thought that a Commercial Use only license was acceptable. Photo has not been modified in the least. And... very interesting that an IP with no prior edits comes out of the blue to find this photo and nom for delete. Very interesting, indeed. At any rate, from everything I read at the listing for the photo on flickr, it was allowable. Winkelvi (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not particularly interesting. Every time I turn on my phone, Sprint assigns me a new IP address. I've been editing Wikipedia for nine years, Commons for only a few. I removed some original research from w:Phil Ochs earlier, and when I went back to see whether my change had been reverted, I noticed that this photo had been added.

      Reading Flickr won't tell you anything about whether a photo is suitable for Commons. Read Commons:CC, especially the (highlighted) last sentence of the first paragraph. This image has a by-nd license on Flickr, and such licenses are not permitted on Commons. That's the bottom line. 66.87.114.197 02:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete, per nominator, ND is not allowed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All right reserved photo. Biplab Anand (Talk) 10:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:::Keep @बिप्लब आनन्द: , I haven't got you well. The problem was that I did not edit the url well so it linked to flickr general page. But I have solved the problem now.-Nyanchoka (talk) 11:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think I misinterpreted the licensing of the image. It was purely unintentional.-Nyanchoka (talk) 11:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All over internet, source defined Biplab Anand (Talk) 08:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 16:58, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work - stolen from http://www.voxmusic.tv/. Also quality is poor due to crappy file format. jdx Re: 15:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 12:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own subpage. No longer needed. Menner (talk) 08:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Req by author. --Achim (talk) 16:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spelling is Ornithogalum pyrenaicum


Deleted: Empty cat & bad name. --Achim (talk) 16:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious image vandalism where a user has edited out Caroline Kennedy's face from File:Caroline Kennedy US State Dept photo.jpg. Should be deleted. SNUGGUMS (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of Copyright. It's the logo of a french TV show, it's not an "own work" ! This user is blocked for one week on WP:FR. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 00:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value, no categories. Flickr-Garbage. WikiCommons is not a private cloud. CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 01:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a severely inaccurate map. Compare to File:Europe religion map.png. Zoupan (talk) 01:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Duplicate, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Noticias magazine 181.117.5.192 05:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam.<!- --> Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. No permission. Yann (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a joke. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photograph, no discernible scope Romania is latin (talk) 12:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No cumple los permisos Carlitoscarlos (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 12:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No cumple los permisos Carlitoscarlos (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 12:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No cumple los permisos Carlitoscarlos (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugo.arg (talk) 16:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No real EXIF data, small file size, no categories, user has had multiple other files deleted. Source=https://myspace.com/bulboxleon/mixes/classic-programa-la-aficion-406455 Domdomegg (talk) 16:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by NahidSultan. Yann (talk) 12:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation from http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2012/sep/01/watch-tv-with-mathew-horne Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, commonly found online, but not free Threeohsix (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Earth images (non-commercial) are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons licences GeoWriter (talk) 16:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Earth images (non-commercial) are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons licences GeoWriter (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Earth images (non-commercial) are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons licences GeoWriter (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google Earth images (non-commercial) are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons licences GeoWriter (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is copyrighted since is made by an author and found on the internet. The license in the page is not correct Fringioα†Ω 17:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a copyrighted image, from pdc.tv (so it can't be his/her own work), the picture used is cut out from a bigger picture and is owned bij the site pdc.tv see the following link: http://www.pdc.tv/di/library/pdc/d1/c1/benito-van-de-pas-european-darts-trophy-pdc-europe_g3v2b5lnvcjizmnseqp9cisz.png?t=-947698265&w=775&h=436&quality=100&cropto=top Ricodol74 (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:34, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.businessinsider.com/gaga-dior-fabien-moreau-2011-4?IR=T 5may2011 Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because source, and Logo is not Text Logo The Photographer (talk) 21:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Thibaut120094. Yann (talk) 12:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of "own work" - I strongly suspect a screen grab from the actual episode; therefore, it is non-free - and so does not belong at Commons Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 22:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A captura de tela está mais ou menos certa, mas não foi retirada do episódio, foi feita por mim. Você deveria pesquisar pelo episódio, vai descobrir que não vai achar essa imagem no episódio.179.154.56.101 10:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty gallery, DR by author. --Achim (talk) 13:37, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image or not, unidentified person without information, just "Pierre en 2009" is not enough, cannot be used this way, out of scope. Bjarlin (talk) 23:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bjarlin: The picture is used on this article on french wikipedia. It is french painter Pierre-Marie Rudelle. --Titlutin (talk) 01:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. It hasn't been in use on 28 December, now it is in use. I couldn't guess on 28 December who the person should be. Then the file just can be renamed and this can be closed. @Titlutin: How is that possible? --Bjarlin (talk) 01:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I will rename this file now, perhaps someone can stop this deletion request then. --Bjarlin (talk) 01:40, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjarlin: No problem, i understand. I don't know how to close this deletion request, i'm not familiar with this procedure. Maybe you should ask on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard ? Or isn't it a deadline for this kind of debate ? --Titlutin (talk) 01:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just reading here. Not so easy, it seems. I've never done this. Maybe I should ask an admin to do it this time. Deadline is 7 days, but here's nothing to discuss anymore, so it can be closed by anyone who knows how to do this. :-) --Bjarlin (talk) 01:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Let's see. --Bjarlin (talk) 02:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Notable person, file in used. Yann (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autor zamieszczając te pliki był w tym momencie niepoczytalny (kłopoty psychiczne). Alanahrae19751975 (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. JuTa 09:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FiReWrAtH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding some files to my previous request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 10:28, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film poster with a notice "Copyright Wavebreaker 2012", OTRS permission would be needed to retain this. January (talk) 17:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email granting permission has been sent to OTRS. (Ticket#: 2015122910001822). The concern is the poster will be deleted before volunteers at OTRS respond. Kindly refrain from edit warring. There is the suggestion you are targeting this particular filmmaker because his work may not appeal to your personal taste. This is not how Wikipedia works. Anupstartcrow (talk) 13:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS received. Darwin Ahoy! 04:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source given as "Own work" with CC license, but the image shows "Fig. 8 Gold sun and moon", so the source for this image must be an unknown published book or article for which the copyright status is unknown. BabelStone (talk) 01:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No OTRS nor reliable permission. Zoupan (talk) 04:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This may be PD, but source site has explicit (c) and we would need to know more about it to keep it as PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We rarely delete images at the request of the uploader and never those that are in use. The license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neotours (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are newspaper or postcard scans; unlikely to be own work.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shmoversdubai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam, out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the Ljubljana Central Market, unfree architecture by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 06:55, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:04, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some inknown un-notable persons, see description Motopark (talk) 07:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some inknown un-notable persons, see description Motopark (talk) 07:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some inknown un-notable persons, see description Motopark (talk) 07:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some inknown un-notable persons, see description Motopark (talk) 07:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fouzia guezoum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree sculpture in the foreground. Eleassar (t/p) 07:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The object is the church. --Ralf Roleček 13:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If the photographer wanted the church, he should have moved a little to the right. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related dewiki article speedy deleted (+ [1]). Gunnex (talk) 09:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 09:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Relatively small, low quality image, probably not suited for general use. Better version available at File:Keukenstuk (bodegón) Rijksmuseum SK-A-2962.jpeg. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please be more careful -- this file was in use, but as you say, the other is better, so I repleaced it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albertkrafik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are claimed to be "own work", but do not look like it. Since this user has already uploaded several copyvios, I'd rather err on the side of caution here. So the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 09:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perez Celis artwork

[edit]

Although there is freedom of Panorama in Argentina (only for buildings), the main subject here is the painting by Pérez Celis, who died in 2008, so this work is under copyright until 2079.

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 10:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello I am Sarah Stern, this picture was released without my authorisation. I would like to delete as soon as possible. Thank you. If you need to contact me, my e-mail is: sarah.m.stern@gmail.com 109.29.129.178 10:19, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if OTRS is involved then I best not get involved. But given the scant details that Thibaut120094 provides, I think we're in the clear on this. Tabercil (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tabercil and Thibaut120094: Commons:Country specific consent requirements#France states : "It is generally recognized both by case law and legal doctrine that consent is implied or not needed for pictures of public figures performing their public functions or activities (not in private life)". Which is exactly the case of an actress making a public appearance at a film festival. An actress appearing at a film festival expects to be photographed and indeed she was facing directly the photographer. JJ Georges (talk) 13:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I think too. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Public person, public event. Only image we have of the subject. Anonymous request. Sorry -- no reason to delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal vanity photo. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 10:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this is a wrong file of Hilda 2015-08-07. Nino Marakot (talk) 10:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I'm not sure what the nom means here, but this is a very small file, probably not usable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation: mk (pdf; Moskovskij Komsomolets), grao.ee. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Needs a license from the painter .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Something trivial without reasonable meaning. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:57, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sathi Baravkar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Uzbekistan Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, as (per Google) the photo seems to be screenshotted somewhere from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYkrJVRhPaE (01.12.2015, by " P3rttiz" = uploader), tagged with "IF YOU ARE THE COPYRIGHT OWNER AND WANT ME TO REMOVE THE VIDEO, PLEASE CONTACT ME AND I WILL DELETE IT WITHIN 24HRS." (see also producer credits at the 1st 30-40s of video). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 12:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photo, no scope can be thought of Romania is latin (talk) 12:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The person seems to be unidentified. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, can't think of any scope for this one Romania is latin (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted sculptures. Unless they are subject to Freedom of Panorama somehow, they should be deleted from commons.

Themightyquill (talk) 12:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry 3x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 12:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of someone elses' live video footage. Seems like copyright infringement to me, but I thought I'd open it up to discussion. Themightyquill (talk) 12:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted sculpture. Unless it's subject to Freedom of Panorama somehow, it should be deleted.

Themightyquill (talk) 12:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of someone else's video presentation featuring multiple copyrighted posters. Seems like copyvio to me. Themightyquill (talk) 12:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original source [2] credits the photo to Flickr, where it has a non-commercial licence. January (talk) 12:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, considering User_talk:سارا_مهدی_نژاد, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The elf overlaid on the image has an unknown copyright status, so best to delete this Romania is latin (talk) 12:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete By principle, the elf can be removed, but the rest of picture has still low quality. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Taivo do you think you might be able to remove the elf without "damaging" the rest of the photo? If so, it could be kept for "snow on trees" or other such subjects. Cheers, Scott 106.68.101.226 17:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, I'm not an artist. Taivo (talk) 17:22, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the Hobbit poster is copyrighted, so need to delete this Romania is latin (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trop grande résolution Grandourse (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

doublon trop grande résolution Grandourse (talk) 13:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason to delete -- this file is only 700kb -- we allow files many times that size. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deletion has been asked by the author as a courtesy (fear of bad derivatives due to the high resolution). Also, no valid permission at the time according to ticket:2016011310000631 Scoopfinder(d) 11:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept We rarely delete images at the request of the subject, and even more rarely when the image is the only one we have of a notable person. This image is properly licensed by its creator. I do not understand "fear of bad derivatives due to the high resolution" -- this is not a particularly high resolution and, in any event, the license covers all resolutions of the image, so even if we delete it, it will still be out there, freely licensed and available. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free packaging. — Racconish ☎ 13:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. But I don't understand. Whats the difference to Category:Jack_Daniel's_whiskey. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The illustration. This label is not text only. — Racconish ☎ 14:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The illustration is a copy of a 110 year old Postcard. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 15:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, IMO. — Racconish ☎ 15:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Even if it is a copy of a 1905 postcard, that is too recent to assume that it is out of copyright. We normally draw that line at around 1885. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: test, out of scope Yann (talk) 13:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doublon trop grande résolution Grandourse (talk) 13:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Small duplicate of File:CHANATH 2014.jpg .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photomontage without encyclopedic worth Kürschner (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of contemporary mural by UnKolorDistinto (from Valparaiso, Chile) located at Myyrmäki railway station in Vantaa, Finland. The mural is not in public domain yet. FOP in FInland for buildings only. Apalsola tc 13:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you look Finnish Copyright Act (404/1961) section 25a point (3) and point(4) you can see that there isn´t any problems with copyright. Mural is permanently at public place and wikipedia is like periodical not commercial usage and mural is not main point of picture of whole railway station. (point 3 section 25a copyright act). It is also legitimate to take and use pictures (also commersial) of buildings with all permanent parts like all artworks witch are permanet part of building (point 4 section 25a copyright act). --Petterin (talk) 15:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1961/en19610404.pdf
You are right, the main point is that the mural is not the main point of the picture of the whole railway station. That is why the picture can be downloaded to Commons. --Abc10 (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(For cross-reference: there is also some discussion ongoing in fi:Wikipedia:Kahvihuone (tekijänoikeudet)#Valokuvat rakennuksista (permanent link) on this topic.)
Please notice that commercial use of the work must be allowed on Commons, so the "Wikipedia is non-commercial usage" reasoning is not valid. And if you think that the mural is not the main part of the image, why is it the only thing you described in the image description?
As I stated in the deletion request, I am aware of the Freedom of Panorama for buildings and if this image is considered just an image of a building, then it should not be deleted. However, I think the mural is very central part of this image, and in such cases images have been deleted before: for example images of the Lyhdynkantajat statues were deleted before 2013 (see 1, 2, 3, 4). (They were later undeleted because the statues entered into public domain in 2013 which is not the case with the mural.) So, I think the question is whether the image really is about the building (would probably be OK) or about the work of art (would probably not be OK). This is the reason I created this deletion request instead of just labeling the image as {{Copyvio}} to get it speedy deleted. ––Apalsola tc 20:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think Finnish Copyright Act (404/1961) is very clear. You can publish picture of whole building with all artwork freely, but thing is maybe different if you publish picture of some datails like Lyhdynkantajat. In my picture you can see whole building from westside.
And I think it was very beneficial to open discuss also at finnish Kahvihuone, because now we know that somebody has already publish picture of mural with wrong information about artists :( --Petterin (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lyhdynkantajat is a separate work of art, which can be moved away from the building (and has been moved for restoration). It is not a part of the building in the same way as a mural. This photograph should be loaded in fi-Wiki and used as described in the Finnish Copyright Act. Or it should be trimmed otherwise.--Htm (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The mural is clearly not de minimis -- that would require that it could be removed without the average viewer noticing the removal. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

zu alt, um von einem lebenden Fotografen zu sein Ralf Roleček 13:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uncategorized flickr garbage without educational value. The plastic character in the foreground might be copyrighted as toy. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original photo from fotka.pl (here reupload on wiocha.pl: http://img.wiocha.pl/images/5/f/5f798cc5944d6e0a1ceff46a18881990.jpg) is probably copyrighted, user changed only a face of person. Muri (talk) 13:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dup with another 최광모 (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedcom of Panorama in Iceland Ralf Roleček 13:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedcom of Panorama in Iceland Ralf Roleček 13:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]




Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedcom of Panorama in Iceland Ralf Roleček 13:40, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]




Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndreasKostakis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, considering also File:Adrian Ross Duncan.gif (uploaded 12.2015, 165 x 165 px) = most likely grabbed from (example) http://wow.dk/05_astrologers/adrian.htm = http://wow.dk/05_astrologers/img/adrian2014-B.gif (last modified: 2014) and File:PeterHallberg.png (uploaded 2010, 126 x 126 px), most likely taken somewhere from (as indicated) http://www.texaspoker.dk (Copyright © Texaspoker.dk 2005-2015) and for which mysteriously a higher res image via http://www.pokernet.dk/i/upload/images/u_6806791341833056.jpg is available.

Gunnex (talk) 13:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The summary suggests the source is SBS Belgium, i.e. SBS Broadcasting, and this image is "© SBS Belgium" (it can also be found here), but there is no link to prove the image can be used and under what licence. ErikvanB (talk) 13:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal rights Kippelboy (talk) 14:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree --Enric (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie screenshot, not own work. Yann (talk) 14:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: this is unlikely because this upload of the same image claims the source and author are the subject of the image - one of them is false and if this were the uploader's own work it would be likely to have metadata which is missing from both. Ww2censor (talk) 14:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is Alejandra Bekerman but says author is Claudio Morales. Not "own work" as claimed. Also use it in a promo page. Regards. Ganímedes (talk) 15:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is Alejandra Bekerman but says author is Claudio Morales. Not "own work" as claimed. Also use it in a promo page. Regards. Ganímedes (talk) 15:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal tourist image 41.89.96.14 15:46, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Flickr garbage without educational value. WikiCommons is not a personal cloud for private snapshots. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Threeohsix (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Threeohsix (talk) 16:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that was created by a Federal employee as part of official duties, invalidating public domain status. State university employees are not federal government employees. Animalparty (talk) 16:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Threeohsix (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Threeohsix (talk) 16:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonidruss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wesdarou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cityinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/cantley-quebec-3.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think that we have any use for this. See COM:SCOPE. The copyright tag is also incorrect, technically making this a copyvio. Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There's a good reason we don;t have any others like this -- it has no educational use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by はぐるま (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by はぐるま (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by はぐるま (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, unclear copyright status, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 17:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown notability, unclear authorship Pibwl (talk) 17:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laguvendran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BrajnaBhadra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Policy does not allow this use for PDF. Tables should be set in wiki markup, not images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, artistic photo, unclear authorship Pibwl (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:23, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to the related OTRS ticket, the document is intended to be used in plwikibooks. However, it seems to be CC-BY-NC-SA licensed, so it is copyvio. Ankry (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, along with File:Class blog example.jpg, File:Wedding Family.jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 18:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CoimbraRecords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Signatures and photo-shopped picture without educational value, probably self-promotional of the uploader imaginary recording company

Threeohsix (talk) 18:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader acknowledged that he did not create the drawing. It was Manuel de Abreu Castelo-Branco, which died in 1957, so it only becomes free in 2027 Threeohsix (talk) 18:14, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 18:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not really an image, but a random snippet of a table of statistics. Choess (talk) 18:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 18:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of publishing before 1923. Seattle (talk) 18:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The original photo is dated 1921. You can see the date in the high resolution here In addition the Darlington collection was donated to the University of Pittsburgh Archives and Service center after the death of Mr. Darlington in in 1918. The copyright is indeed expired. I thought you would like the photo. It adds to the article. Best Regards,
Barbara (WVS) (talk) 00:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Barbara. I do like the photo, and it would add to the article. Unfortunately, and this is the way I read copyright law, which might of course be totally wrong, to fall into the public domain, the image would have to be published somewhere (i.e in a book, newspaper, etc.) before 1923. The photo is dates from 1921, but that doesn't mean it was published before 1923. I can't find evidence of publishing before 1923. If you can, definitely update the file and let me know. Thanks again.
As a side, anonymous unpublished works (which this would be, unless you can identify the photographer) taken after January 1, 1896 are under copyright. Unpublished works with a known photographer are under copyright for life of the author plus seventy years. Seattle (talk) 00:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence of publication before 1923, therefore probably under copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is an old file. I do not want it to appear on commons. Haini Ancuta (talk) 18:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a reason to delete .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complete copy of a Times article, and a copied postcard with no information as to why this postcard would be PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Under UK copyright law:
For literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works:
70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the last remaining author of the work dies.
If the author is unknown, copyright will last for 70 years from end of the calendar year in which the work was created, although if it is made available to the public during that time, (by publication, authorized performance, broadcast, exhibition, etc.), then the duration will be 70 years from the end of the year that the work was first made available.
In our case the author is unknown, the photograph was published in 1917 by the The Times (UK). So it entered the public domain in 1987. So we go with {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}? + {{PD-1923}} for US Rybkovich (talk) 02:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The fact that the photographer and writer are unknown to us does not make them actually unknown. It is very likely that the Times archives would tell us who the photographer and writer were. In order to keep the image, it must be proven that the photographer died before 1946; similarly the text. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fabiano Morisco Jacinto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images / no quite notable people : out of scope :

Derivatives :

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the description "screenshot of Fabien Ara" is an issue. Unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photomontage : lack of sources Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description say this is a real US patent cover and then says it the uploader's own work. If the uploader is the cover's copyright holder we need some OTRS evidence of that. Hop on Bananas (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Corrected license tag .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted packaging Didym (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted packaging Didym (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted packaging Didym (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted packaging Didym (talk) 21:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted packaging Didym (talk) 21:44, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyrighted image of Becky G, many findings in the net, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Probable source is [3]. Yann (talk) 18:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 19:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is yousuf, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:28, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is yousuf, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is yousuf, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is yousuf, no permission. Yann (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: derivative of copyrighted artwork on faceplate. Not de minimis as the intent is to show the artwork. ViperSnake151 (talk) 19:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of scope, with watermarks Pippobuono (talk) 19:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal photos, selfies Pippobuono (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : no quite notable people, the article about the people have been deleted [4] Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, not usde, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal photos, not used Pippobuono (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright from http://www.bhmpics.com/view-meteor_earth_crash-1280x1024.html, no EXIF, small image, cropped weirdly, new user Domdomegg (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. LX (talk, contribs) 21:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needless low-quality raster version of File:Flag of Peru.svg. LX (talk, contribs) 21:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sowmya3PEP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the nature of the images and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused logo of non-notable company. January (talk) 22:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free picture image non libre de droits http://etudiant.aujourdhui.fr/etudiant/info/toutes-les-grandes-ecoles-veulent-ressembler-a-des-universites.html Tiraden (talk) 22:22, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope Alan (talk) 22:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dies ist offenbar ein Scan eines Pressefotos. Ohne Einwilligung des tatsächlichen Fotografen darf das Bild nicht hochgeladen werden. De728631 (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also jetzt mal langsam: Das Bild stammt aus einem Buch, dessen Verfasser mir die Veröffentlichung des Bildes auf WIkipedia ausdrücklich erlaubt hat!!

Tja, das Urheberrecht in Deutschland ist nicht übertragbar und der Verfasser eines Werkes, das ebenfalls nur dieses Foto benutzt, hat in der Hinsicht leider gar nichts zu sagen. Wir brauchen, wie schon erwähnt, eine direkte Freigabe durch den Fotografen bzw. dessen Erben. De728631 (talk) 23:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Außerdem reicht eine Erlaubnis zur Nutzung in Wikipedia allein nicht aus. Die Wikipedia und Commons haben den Anspruch, dass alle hochgeladenen Dateien für jedermann frei benutzbar sein müssen, und zwar auch außerhalb von Wikipedia. Der Urheber des Fotos müsste also einer Lizenz zustimmen, die kommerzielle Weiterverwendung und Bearbeitungen seines Bildes erlaubt, z. B. Creative Commons International 4.0. Falls dieser Buchautor zufällig auch der Fotograf ist, wäre das natürlich ok, aber sonst ist das Bild hier leider nicht zu gebrauchen. De728631 (talk) 19:22, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass dies schon ein bisschen in die Kategorie "Machtspielchen" fällt, wo jetzt halt jemand so einem - vermeintlichen - Neuling zeigen muss, wo's hier langgeht. Alle Achtung! Aber ehrlich gesagt: ob das so wichtig ist mit dem Bild - ich meine: außer für den 'Picture-Killer' ?? Mir jedenfalls nicht. Spielen wir halt noch ein bisschen.

Mit Machtspielchen hat das hier nichts zu tun, dann hätte ich die Datei auch gleich selbst löschen können. Hier geht es darum, die Urheberrechte des Fotografen zu schützen und uns eine mögliche Löschaufforderung des Fotografen zu ersparen. Immerhin leben einige Anwaltskanzleien recht gut von Abmahnungen. Ich versuche hier lediglich die Herkunft des Bildes zweifelsfrei und konstruktiv zu klären. Und die Beweislast liegt nun mal bei dem, der die Datei hochgeladen hat. De728631 (talk) 20:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work of uploader. File is non-free on Wikipedia. Cloudbound (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-authorized cap from "Colostro" short film Yanguas (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work of the uploader. Cloudbound (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

High resolution company logo which was being used in a spam user page / article draft on English Wikipedia (now deleted). No proof of that the uploader really owns this and we don't want it anyway. DanielRigal (talk) 11:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

weil der Veranstalter das verbreiten von Fotos vom Konzert untersagt ! Stefan Rittershaus (talk) 11:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex to be PD-textologo IMHO. Regards. Ganímedes (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 15:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:18, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work - stolen form http://krdp.fm. Also quality is poor due to crappy file format. jdx Re: 15:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:07, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but DR started to verify claimed 'own work' (newspaper scan?), but imho primarly commercial advertisements, Roland zh (talk) 17:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, along with rest of uploads File:Pai-marca-dagua.jpg, File:Sebastián Bravo Salazar.jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:20, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio taken from File:Symbols of Religions.JPG(473px) without proper credit/licensing, no use for Commons to have the same file twice. .js ((())) 13:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Krd: jetzt nicht mehr in use, bitte nun löschen. :) --.js ((())) 22:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 07:51, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. jdx Re: 15:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: textlogo Krd 17:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value. I don't think we need so many almost identical images of this contest.

Yann (talk) 15:43, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion Krd 17:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Out of scope}} Sreejith K (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vandalism from file:Semfac01.png Pippobuono (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 17:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]