User talk:Muri 91

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Muri 91!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Rolling stock clasification

Hi! Please realize that Czech rail transport operators haven't their own systems of rolling stock classification. There are no "Leo Express classes" or "RegioJet classes" or "Viamont classes" or "AWT classes" of rolling stock. There exist an unified national classification system which originates in the system of ČSD/ČD and now (since 1995) is administered by the state authority (Drážní úřad). --ŠJů (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Kategoryzowanie pojazdów

Ja w tym nic złego nie widzę. W Category:Ships by IMO number jest nie tysiąc a prawie jedenaście i pół tysiąca podkategorii. W Category:Aircraft by registration jest nawet nie tysiąc, nie dziesięć, nie dwadzieścia, a aż 47 729 (czterdzieści siedem tysięcy siedemset dwadzieścia dziewięć podkategorii). A w czym są lepsze statki i samoloty od pociągów i tramwajów? Zwiadowca ²¹ 21:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:A4 Stokłosy - budowa stacji, 1986-11 (1).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A4 Stokłosy - budowa stacji, 1986-11 (1).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:A4 Stokłosy - budowa stacji, 1986-11 (2).jpg
• File:A5 Ursynów - budowa stacji, 1986-04.jpg
• File:A5 Ursynów - budowa stacji, 1986-06.jpg
• File:B5 Stokłosy-Ursynów - budowa tunelu, 1986-11.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Jakub, Wszystkie pliki na Commons potrzebują licencji. Przeczytaj COM:LIC lub COM:CT. Napisz do mnie jeśli coś jest niezrozumiale. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Muri 91. You have new messages at Jarekt#Zdj.C4.99cia_budowy_I_linii_metra_w_Warszawie_.28licencja.29's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jarekt (talk) 21:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Rolling stock of Arriva RP

Zastanawiam się, czemu VT są w tej kategorii zamiast mieć swoją? Nie to, żebym miał pretensje lecz chciałbym wiedzieć więcej. Chyba, że jeszcze nie zdążyłeś kategorii zrobić. Ciacho5 (talk) 07:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ym5+Yp25+Ys47, IPS Tabor, 2008-04-19.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ym5+Yp25+Ys47, IPS Tabor, 2008-04-19.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Re: Zdjęcia z YouTube

Przyznam, że nie widzę nigdzie, żeby użytkownik zaznaczył to wideo jako będące na licencji CC. Z drugiej strony, nie bardzo się orientuję, gdzie takiej informacji szukać. Zasadniczo nie zajmuję się weryfikacją licencji na commons. Ankry (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Dlaczego zaraz administratorów? Sugeruję na przyszłość poszukać tu. Ankry (talk) 17:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:EN94-40 - wnętrze.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:EN94-40 - wnętrze.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Ww2censor (talk) 14:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Muri 91,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Warszawa Ochota - budynek dworca, 1963.jpg

File:Warszawa Ochota - budynek dworca, 1963.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dd1495 (talk) 08:14, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Moderus Gamma LF 01 AC

Category:Moderus Gamma LF 01 AC

Tutaj będę wrzucał zdjęcia, nazwa modelu na podstawie tabliczki przy tramwaju Kapsuglan (talk) 13:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:SŽ_315/311

Category:SŽ_315/311 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

2A00:EE2:500:7500:9C5A:D85:2277:A86C 15:53, 12 August 2017 (UTC)