Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/10/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 23rd, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: the screenshot from "Titanic" movie. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrights violation - Commons:Licensing §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM! Spamer's adv. Bilderling (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, spamer's contribution. Bilderling (talk) 15:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violaton. JuTa 18:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A4apple77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs (and 1x porn video). No evidence of permissions. Considering also User talk:A4apple77 most likely all grabbed from Internet.

Gunnex (talk) 10:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source sounds like a magazine, the author is listed as the subject's own name. Also looks like a lower quality crop of this image with the same name. Opencooper (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio DMacks (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Marchjuly as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: File uploaded as "own work", but this seems highly unlikely since this is the logo of the police department of a major city. Most likely this is a non-free logo.|source=Image can be seen on the police department's official website

Mayby PD-old or {{PD-US-no notice}}? Natuur12 (talk) 13:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This may be possible given similar discussions I've been involved in about police uniform patches at en:WP:NFCR and COM:VPC. I'd have no objection to changing it to "PD-US-no-notice" if that's the consensus. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-old, as per [1]. Yann (talk) 08:26, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, cf quoted magazine Pippobuono (talk) 07:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 07:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyrightVio Dr-Taher (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, files of Meno55 were mass deleted by Hedwig in Washington. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected flickr-washing. Compare this google search from before flickr uploa date. JuTa 03:04, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily, even if not a recreation. The actual source is a 2009 photoshoot, there is even a video of it on YouTube. --Revent (talk) 08:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. This file was already deleted about ten times and now uploaded again by another sock puppet. I suggest to block the IP behind all the malevolent suck puppets! Ies (talk) 16:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:19, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertising, SPAM, of project scope. This file was already deleted about ten times and now uploaded again by another sock puppet. I strongly suggest to block the IP behind all the malevolent suck puppets! Ies (talk) 17:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No SPAM les future inovation technology uploaded again by selfie no sock puppet. and not's the IP the behind alla the malevolent suck puppets! [User:El elbuna|El elbuna]] (talk) 18:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of multi-deleted advertisement — Racconish ☎ 17:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Thibaut120094 [2] Эlcobbola talk 18:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial advertising, SPAM, of project scope. This file was already deleted more that ten times and now uploaded again by another sock puppet. I strongly suggest to block the IP behind all the malevolent suck puppets! Ies (talk) 16:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Эlcobbola talk 16:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multi deleted — Racconish ☎ 05:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --JuTa 07:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from google plus+ Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Yann Alan (talk) 00:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 10:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Denniss Alan (talk) 00:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted Alan (talk) 00:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of http://www.mercialys.fr/patrimoine-savoir-faire/projets/75-avenue-montaigne-49000-angers/3 Sémhur (talk) 19:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Alan (talk) 00:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thats very unlikely to be own work. Still the name of the company at the lower left corner, professional picture. Druschba 4 (talk) 22:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as copyvio, may be closed. --Druschba 4 (talk) 23:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very unlikely to be own work, very small, professional, user has copyvio-notes, photoshop-exif. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also deleted as copyvio, may be closed here. --Druschba 4 (talk) 23:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://bazar.nikolaev.ua/content/%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%80-%E2%80%9C%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%E2%80%9D-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://vse.mk.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/eS2TnlZ1svY.jpg Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for possibility to rename File:Толковый словарь. Том 2(1) (Даль 1905).djvu Vladis13 (talk) 00:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request Ymblanter (talk) 03:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://mapia.ua/ru/nikolaev/kino/kinoteatr-rodina--52685 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://www.kinomir.mk.ua/photogallery.php?item=46&kid=2 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://www.kinomir.mk.ua/photogallery.php?item=47&kid=2 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://www.kinomir.mk.ua/photogallery.php?item=54&kid=2 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://www.kinomir.mk.ua/kassp.php?kid=2 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://nikolaev-moscow.at.ua/publ/statja_o_nikolaeve/nikolaev_segodnja/kinoteatr_rodina_v_nikolaeve_poluvekovaja_istorija/10-1-0-242 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://vse.mk.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/eS2TnlZ1svY.jpg Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://vse.mk.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/f838N1KOil8.jpg Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (the source is watermarked in the down right corner of the picture). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://vse.mk.ua/item/rodina-nikolaev-kinoteatr Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://vse.mk.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/f838N1KOil8.jpg Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://vse.mk.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1c0boNcoxGM.jpg Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://brony.gallery.ru/watch?ph=AYu-bC7vO Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published before (http://bazar.nikolaev.ua/content/очаковский-военно-исторический-музей-им-ав-суворова) with copyright of K. Dudchenko, not Tatiana Shlyahovaya (the uploader) Tatewaki (talk) 00:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/--sdBHG9d7KE/TcG0ooh1nBI/AAAAAAAAEnU/bLV4KcJEqAM/s640/DSC_0080.jpg Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: mass deleted as copyvio Ymblanter (talk) 03:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of not notable entity. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 03:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata states image is copyrighted, please see a previous deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shellbackin2015.jpg Matt.T (talk) 00:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamesh15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kamesh15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested, this sign is not "on the books" in South Australia. If I find sources for it again I can always re-upload. Fry1989 eh? 03:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image from bollywood hungama.. Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 04:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear source : "photographer"? It was already published so we need an available link to verify if the licensing is ok at the source. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work : very small size witouht EXIF, the only contribution of the uploader. Also can be found here http://liternet.bg/publish14/k_bachkov/index.html --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicenavneet99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nicenavneet99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images. Similar to File:Navneet yadav.jpg.

--ghouston (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be own work by the uploader. Probably out of scope. Stefan4 (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Possibly unfree. Stefan4 (talk) 06:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Possibly not own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 06:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused gibberish of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 06:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Автобиография на Иван Иванов1879-1966
Дами и Господа,

предлагам на вашето внимание сайта на Иван Иванов създаден от мен.Аз сам правнучка на художника и създадох сайта в съгласие и по молба на майка ми и баба ми ,негова единствена дъщерия. http://www.ivan-ivanov-art.com/


Deleted: out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Presumably unfree. Stefan4 (talk) 06:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Святослав М (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work by the uploader. Out of project scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 06:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Святослав М (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prodiglid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These don't seem to be own work by the uploader.

Stefan4 (talk) 06:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Prodiglid (talk)

I'm working in this company) All of this files you can find on http://www.pelec.ru/en/faq .

Then see COM:OTRS. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Please contact COM:OTRS. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariansorin66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Photos are present at http://www.infoghidromania.com/foto-manastirea-pasarea.html and http://www.infoghidromania.com/parc_carol_bucuresti.html without any note suggesting they are free. The website has even watermarked them.

Andrei S. Talk 18:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. Can't be own and free. Bilderling (talk) 10:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence that it's free-licensed Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logos of non-notable companies are out of project scope. Rapsody Yachts are unknown to en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably screenshots (PNG), no source, no permission.

Yann (talk) 10:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope anyway Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 10:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam del on DE Nolispanmo 10:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image by another person, almost certainly a copyright violation. KDS4444 (talk) 10:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, several copies on the Net, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a screenshot from a television or film recording. As such, it is a copyright violation. KDS4444 (talk) 10:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of photo of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", this is unused and therefore likely out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, probable professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, very prominent watermark Wouter (talk) 12:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is pure advertising. Not an image that is relevant to be be used by others. Wouter (talk) 12:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is pure advertising. Not an image that is relevant to be be used by others. Wouter (talk) 12:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is pure advertising. Not an image that is relevant to be be used by others. Wouter (talk) 12:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikicambui (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small pictures without EXIF data + old pictures + scans of various documents without source, unlikely to be own works. Some of these might be OK, but proper source + license needed.

Yann (talk) 12:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused self-made drawings, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 12:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 13:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violation. But depicted person is borderline notable (married with person, who has article in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 13:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Isn't it copyrighted screenshot? Taivo (talk) 13:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is. Please use {{Copyvio}} next time :) Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no date, no source Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan, no source, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no date, no source Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shahaab gh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

EXIF says "COPYRIGHT 2015. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED".

Yann (talk) 13:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Certainly not own work, no source, invalid license. Might be old enough, but more info needed. Yann (talk) 13:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no source Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of a derivated work (pumpkin) of copyrighted characters (smurfs). The licence is valid only for the photo not for the smurfs on it. Too prominent for de minimis. Ras67 (talk) 13:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of deleted Image:Poster27.jpg, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Poster27.jpg Liliana-60 (talk) 13:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted toys, too many for de minimis. Ras67 (talk) 13:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears here: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/business/business-news/images-show-panoramic-view-clock-9698838 Unlikely that this is the uploader's own work. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: please use {{Copyvio}} next time Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private video album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CJBush03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rmolinaj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valmir Istogu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty gallery 최광모 (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nirajdrewa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not Flickr. Personal photos of non-notable teenager, with no edits on any subject but himself. Some were used in deleted pages en:User:Nirajdrewa, en:Niraj Bharadwaj and en:Niraj dwivedi.

JohnCD (talk) 17:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daropaz74 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope : unused personal images

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lapiapaez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio, the both images can be found here http://lapiapaez.com/

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oltermann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Cover book, inside image book, promotional image of the artist. All unlikely to be own works.

--Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vwbeetle boy~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Watermark of file two contains a different name than the uploader for example.

Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itsmetahny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 19:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete – With a reverse image Google search I was able to find all of these posted online before they were uploaded here, these are almost certainly copyright violations. If they are not, at the very least as works previously published elsewhere without a free license, we'd need permission via COM:OTRS. —RP88 (talk) 19:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yafethd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspaper or book scans, no source, no permission.

Yann (talk) 10:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 14:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a clearly modern sign. No indication that the original is out of copyright. Storkk (talk) 10:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not copyright holder. I suspect scopyright violation. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and COM:PRP Alan (talk) 14:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

não está de acordo com os padrões DebbyCatty (talk) 12:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PS, com:PRP, COM:FU, COM:L Alan (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

não está de acordo com os padrões DebbyCatty (talk) 12:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PS, com:PRP, COM:FU, COM:L Alan (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lenin Monument by Sergey Evseev, he died 1959. Not COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing, image is a derivative work. Ras67 (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lenin Monument by Sergey Evseev, he died 1959. Not COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing, image is a derivative work. Ras67 (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lenin Monument by Sergey Evseev, he died 1959. Not COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing, image is a derivative work. Ras67 (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lenin Monument by Sergey Evseev, he died 1959. Not COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing, image is a derivative work. Ras67 (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lenin Monument by Sergey Evseev, he died 1959. Not COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing, image is a derivative work. Ras67 (talk) 13:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by KDS4444 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.kazimierz-dolny.pl/image/5114/widget-gallery-scrollable/top5.jpg Yann (talk) 13:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have sent a message to the email account given on the home page asking if someone at that site recently uploaded some images to Commons, we shall see. KDS4444 (talk) 13:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission?? Alan (talk) 15:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These certificates are made by private companies, copyright line is usually listed at the bottom, but is cropped off the image. Photo taken by uploader, but the certificate is not own work and can not be CC-SA-3.0. -- Dual Freq (talk) 13:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability used only on user page. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mundo Universus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a government work. Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan4 (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Greece :-( Geraki TLG 15:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of image located at http://www.kazimierz-dolny.pl/turystyka -KDS4444 (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Webpage owner and uploader likely the same person. That has to be confirmed through the procedure documented at Commons:OTRS. --JuTa 19:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Have sent a message to the email account given on the home page asking if someone at that site recently uploaded some images to Commons, we shall see. Good guess, though. KDS4444 (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permission? Alan (talk) 15:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Greece :-( Geraki TLG 15:17, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Greece :-( Geraki TLG 15:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo from the European Parliament. Not "own work" Hektor (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per com:PRP Alan (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be free. Bilderling (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom, COM:PS, com:PRP, COM:FU, COM:L Alan (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark (unnecessary upload) Biplab Anand (Talk) 15:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@बिप्लब आनन्द: not only watermark but also copyvio content. visit here. This file is out of Com scope.

Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Rapsar (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PS, com:PRP, COM:FU, COM:L Alan (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Copyrighted facebook content https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=547636048607834&set=p.547636048607834&type=1&theater --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Alan (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional Motopark (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional Motopark (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, very small size, the only contribution of the user --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of the German flag. Fry1989 eh? 18:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable person for article that is likely to be speedy deleted per A7 Kethrus 2 (talk) 18:41, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: now unused & per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tangzijian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 19:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PS, com:PRP, COM:FU, COM:L Alan (talk) 15:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Currency#Macedonia. JuTa 20:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Currency#Macedonia JuTa 20:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Currency#India JuTa 20:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for artworks in the U.S. JuTa 20:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Used in deleted attack page. JohnCD (talk) 20:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:06, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajashreeshendre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 21:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

6 files uploaded by Rajashreeshendre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

batch of six unused files, rather small-sized and partially potentially copyright (one personality) right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??

Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is a case of Flickrwashing. The paper it comes from is from 2002, way too young to be in the public domain without an explicit statement by the author Vera (talk) 21:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest this is linked to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bulletin of the Natural Histort Museum. Geology series (1996) (20485927112).jpg. -- (talk) 07:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from here: http://www.walesonline.co.uk/business/business-news/swanseas-universitys-new-450m-bay-10094158 Ytoyoda (talk) 22:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely belongs to Swansea Uplands RUFC: https://twitter.com/UplandsRFC/status/647728016412536833 Ytoyoda (talk) 22:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same picture found here: http://www.enjoygower.com/index.cfm Ytoyoda (talk) 22:24, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same pic found here, authorship not explained: http://www.walesnationalairshow.com/information/visitor-information/ Ytoyoda (talk) 22:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded by sockpuppet who created en:Gerricc, which is up for A7 speedy deletion. Image not needed and is unlikely to be used in another article. Kethrus 2 (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, as well as the user's other uploads to en.wiki, show that the image is the property of the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. My opinion is that the pics are not the user's own work. Diannaa (talk) 23:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other images with similar issues uploaded by this user:


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not adhere to the project scope. It is not educational, not useful and it is not used in other sister projects. It cannot be, as its purpose is only to see how laws can be bent before being broken. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not adhere to the project scope. It is not educational, not useful and it is not used in other sister projects. It cannot be, as its purpose is only to see how laws can be bent before being broken. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The windows logo cant be free to use, its not just a "simple geometrical shape" Hangsna (talk) 12:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly unfree. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not adhere to the project scope. It is not educational, not useful and it is not used in other sister projects. It cannot be, as its purpose is only to see how laws can be bent before being broken. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not adhere to the project scope. It is not educational, not useful and it is not used in other sister projects. It cannot be, as its purpose is only to see how laws can be bent before being broken. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader offers no proof that this is not copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Magog Alan (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this is the work of a Federal employee William S. Saturn (talk) 04:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom and com:PRP Alan (talk) 15:25, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that image was taken by a federal government employee William S. Saturn (talk) 04:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per com:PRP Alan (talk) 15:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License provided is not valid. This is a logo for a presidential campaign, not a work of the Federal government. William S. Saturn (talk) 04:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 06:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 06:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is it? Out of project scope? Gazille is unknown to en.wiki and en.wiktionary. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Stefan Alan (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use Category:HMS Trossö (A264) instead. Saftgurka (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty Alan (talk) 15:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:UA, this model is likely subject to US copyright. Robert.Allen (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Perhaps, I dont understand the rule very well (I am French). But, if you want to follow this rule, you have to put Deletion Request for all the photos of models on Commons : models of buildings, vehicles, and so on. Except of course the very old ones or those with an authorization of the author or his heirs (if any). --Tangopaso (talk) 09:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This area is rather hazy to me. I believe pictures of models which are used for like miniature golf are OK, because these have utility, so can't be copyrighted. Scale models of airplanes and ships are usually copyrightable (I think). --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Are you saying that we can't delete one copyright violation until we identify and delete all copyright violations on Commons? I'm afraid that's not how it works. en:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. LX (talk, contribs) 21:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I took a look at COM:UA. It does say that "(in many cases) toys and models do not have utilitarian aspects and therefore in the US (where Commons is hosted) such objects are generally copyrighted as works of fine art." This work is designed and exhibited in France. I have some questions:
  • 1. Would this COM:UA protection apply to this image, which is of a work designed and exhibited in France? If so, does this have to do with Commons being hosted in the U.S.?
  • 2. What is the relevant French law on models? Does this affect the eligibility status of this image?
  • 3. Is there a possible utilitarian purpose to this model? Does the supporting text (any marker or plaque) give explanations/reasons why the model is being exhibited?
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. United States law is simple: you ignore whether something is copyrightable in the source country and only use United States rules. See [3]: toys are usually considered to be utilitarian in Japan and are therefore ineligible for copyright in Japan. Japanese toys are nevertheless protected by copyright in the United States, where they are not considered to be utilitarian.
  2. COM:UA is all about United States law. Other countries may use a different definition of "utilitarian" or may protect utilitarian objects in the same way as non-utilitarian objects. French law is simple: you only need to consider whether something meets the threshold of originality, without trying to find out whether the thing is utilitarian or not. See for example [4] (also mentioned below) where photographs of clearly utilitarian furniture violated the copyright of the furniture.
  3. Whether there are utilitarian purposes or not (which I doubte) only affects United States law but not French law.
Note that COM:L requires the picture to be free in both France and the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I went to the Louvre this monday morning and I took this photo showing visitors looking at the model to imagine the whole castle. In the medieval Louvre, the remaining parts of the castle are only 2 walls (with towers). And of course, only in their underground part. The model is useful to imagine the whole castle. So it has an educational purpose. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't a picture like this be OK, by something called de minimus (?), i.e., the model happens to be in the picture but is not its main focus? Also, the model is for sure an educational tool, so it has utility and we might be able to argue this allows us to keep the pic, at least under US law. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This would not de minimis per guidelines in our de minimis policy (it is categorized as the model, the model is referenced in the file name, the model is referenced in the description) and per common sense (it is clear the model's inclusion is deliberate and an intended focus per file name, description, etc.) Being educational is not relevant utility as contemplated by the useful article exemption. For example, the copyright office routinely grants copyright registrations to "educational" models (quick examples from the models essay: The Human lung / VA0000038063 (1979), The Human ear / VA0000038058 (1979), Rhesus monkey brain / RE0000197751 (1984)). Эlcobbola talk 21:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This is very different. The chairs in the lawsuit are artistic and were created by Le Corbusier who was the greatest French architect in the 20th century. The model of castle is a re-creation from books and drawings. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Both LC2 and LC4 look fairly simple to me. I assume that the castle re-creation required the person who re-created it to make decisions about various things where the old sources were incomplete. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per this Alan (talk) 15:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of personality rights. This lady is not a notable person. JanneSzy (talk) 23:40, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. tagged with pr Alan (talk) 15:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue "Flore" by Marcel Gimond (1894-1961). No freedom of panorama in France. The other statues behind could be de minimis. Ras67 (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue "Les oiseaux" by Louis Brasseur (1878-1960). No freedom of panorama in France. The other statue "Les Jardins" by Robert Couturier (1905-2008) (copyrighted till 2079) could be de minimis. Ras67 (talk) 15:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR. Derivative work of Suruga Bank trophy, established in 2008 and therefore copyrighted. Also doubtful "own work" as stated: small size, no EXIF data. - Fma12 (talk) 16:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New file, JPG copy of File:PZU Logo RGB Zusatz.svg. Sebari (talk) 16:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 15:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use Category:HMS Norrtälje (R133) instead. Saftgurka (talk) 18:38, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: empty Alan (talk) 15:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published at lower resolution here in 2004. Evidence of ownership/permission needed. January (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per com:PRP Alan (talk) 16:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Аня375 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos apparently were taken from the internet and uploaded under a Creative Commons license without permission.

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination : copyvio --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 09:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously published http://forum.speeed.com/?t=32006150 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. I think, that Magog is right, but the file has been in Commons 5 years and it is used, so it deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio : found here (12/12/2004) http://www.athletic.net/TrackAndField/School.aspx?SchoolID=18976 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect and misleading version of file:Suomen ilmavoimien tunnus ja lentomerkki 1918-1945.svg. Msaynevirta (talk) 12:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Correct file exists. --Kwasura (talk) 04:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Suomen lentomerkki: colour is silver, not white. --FAF Flags (talk) 12:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This is the original badge. And here is the picture of it from the Finnish Air Force web page. See for yourself how different it is from the file that you are advocating. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 13:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This or this is the right badge? Honourably, --FAF Flags (talk) 20:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This file has still different crown compared to both of those pins. Also, the inner lines of the wings seem to end too soon and are too thick. --Msaynevirta (talk) 22:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Crown? No, it is the uprising heraldic rose with petals, design by Akseli Gallen-Kallela 1918. Honourably, --FAF Flags (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you take a look at all those three pins, any of them don't definitely have the same kind of heraldic rose that you've used in this file. --Msaynevirta (talk) 06:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment FAF Flags is a suspected sockpuppet of WPK~commonswiki, and has been blocked indefinitely. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 07:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution, probably not own work as claimed, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, previously published ex: http://www.corps-ames.ch/ --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work is copyrighted both as a sculpture and as a literary work. All of these images infringe on one copyright or the other. Most of them infringe on both. Although this could be solved by getting OTRS permission from the sculptor and the author of the text, the "designer" is anonymous, so that seems unlikely.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  • My apologies for the infringement, although I have a hard time believing it's an issue, considering there are photos of this monument all over the internet. I'm new to Wikipedia and being a contributor, so this is part of the learning curve, I guess. If they have to be deleted, then it is what it is. Do I perform the deletion myself or is that up to a webmaster? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KiltedEditor71 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 14 January 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]
No need to apologize -- the ins and outs of copyright law confused most of us at the start, and we're all still learning. I'm sorry that a new user is greeted by having most of his first uploads nominated for deletion -- I hope that will not discourage you from continuing here.
Unfortunately the Internet pretty much ignores copyright issues, particularly with respect to derivative works, so it sets a bad example. Commons is dedicated to being a repository of images that are truly free and available for any use.
An Administrator will close this discussion after seven days and take whatever action he or she thinks appropriate, guided by the community's comments. Deletion and restoration is reserved for Admins, so there is nothing more required of you. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 02:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Unfortunately they must be deleted. Because the images are derivative work without permission from the artist, I have moved one image File:Guidestones hdr.jpg to the enwiki and reduced the resolution to comply with the enwiki non-free policy. It is named as w:File:Georgia Guidestones-lowres.jpg and is used the infobox image to identify the monument. Ww2censor (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PerJim. Natuur12 (talk) 17:28, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aus Versehen falsches Foto hochgeladen. Dae-Lang (talk) 12:03, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author request deletion of inadvertently uploaded own image Wdwd (talk) 22:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by File:Marcell Nemes Versteigerung 1931.jpg Goesseln (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate -- Geagea (talk) 23:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Portland, Oregon seal.svg

[edit]

See COM:SEAL. This is not an edict, it's a coat of arms. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Too old. Fry1989 eh? 21:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, original design is in PD. Alan (talk) 11:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License tag no clear. If the picture was "taken" in the 50s in México, it's still copyrighted. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:HIRTLE Alan (talk) 11:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject of photo is a fare chart with drawings too complex for PD-geom. The flickr user did not have the permissions to license this as claimed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 11:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is superceded by an SVG file, whose contents are from the same source, but more up-to-date. Not used anymore. Demmo (talk) 20:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per com:PS, in use Alan (talk) 11:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The car has nothing special except for its unusual color. This implicates the use as an official Fed German Army vehicle, but this type of car is not in use there. On top, the picture is not complete nor very good; front and back is cropped for no obvious reason other than to conceal the (wrong) license plate. 91.221.58.29 05:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

and what ist the reason for deletion? --Zollernalb (talk) 14:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion Krd 16:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan4 (talk) 06:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC) ¬¬[reply]

  Bob "Al"  Walker

Wrestling Accomplishments 1979 Bronze Medalist HWT Greco Roman World Championship 1979 1st HWT Greco Roman Cerro Pelado Tournament in Cuba 1979 3rd HWT Freestyle Cerro Pelado Tournament in Cuba 1978 National Champion HWT AAU Sambo 1977 National Champion HWT AAU Sambo 1977 National Champion HWT AAU Greco Roman 1977 Silver Medalist HWT Pan Am Greco Roman Championship 1976 Alternate HWT USA Olympic Greco Roman Wrestling Team 1976 2nd HWT Greco Roman Olympic Trials 1975 SEC HWT Champion; University of Alabama 1975 Champion HWT Southern Open 1975 Champion HWT Sunshine Open 1974 SEC HWT Champion; University of Alabama 1973 SEC HWT Champion; University of Alabama 1973 3rd 220# National AAU Greco Roman Championship Open Division 1973 Champion 220# Junior National Greco Roman Championship 1971 3rd HWT CIF Southern Section; Fountain Valley High School; Fountain Valley CA 1971 National Champion 191# AAU National Greco Roman; Named Outstanding Wrestler 1970 National Champion 191# USWF Greco Roman

Team Memberships 1975-1979 Athletes in Action; Long Beach, CA

         1979  HWT Greco Roman World Team Member
         1978  AIA/USA Team Member Iran and Poland Tour
         1977  USA Team Member to Tbilisi USSR and Poland
         1977  AIA/USA Team Member Iran and Bulgaria Tour

1971-1975 University of Alabama Wrestling Team

         1973  Greco Roman Junior World Team Member

1968-1971 Fountain Valley High School, CA

Administrative Wrestling Accomplishments 1988-2001 USA Wrestling Board: Area Director and State Chairman • USA Wrestling State Chairman of the Year 1998 • Chairman: Committee of State Organizations Southeast Region 1995-2000 Chairman of FAWA (Florida USA Wrestling) • Implemented Coaches Training after earning a USA Wrestling Bronze Level Certification. • Relocated State Tournaments from High Schools to Convention Centers and Arenas. • Participation grew to over 1,000 entries for the State Championship. • Wrestling was started in underdeveloped areas. • Produced Statewide Newsletter promoting Events and recognizing athletes. • Worked with Tampa 2012 attempting to bring the Olympic Games to Florida. • Hosted the Greco World Team Trials. • Southeastern Representative to the USA Wrestling Committee of State Organizations. 1985 Founded World Class Wrestling Club • 300+ Members; Won 5 State Championships, Over 100 Individual State Championships State 1999-2002 National Wrestling Hall of Fame Florida Chapter Board of Directors • Cofounder/Vice President of Board of Directors for the NWHOF Florida Chapter. • Developed and implemented the nomination process. 1979-1983 Head Wrestling Coach Seminole High School

Wrestling Honors 2015 Inducted into the California Wrestling Hall of Fame 2003 Inducted into the Florida Chapter of the National Wrestling Hall of Fame


Deleted: Per nomination, also there was a drawing on the pdf, no evidence the pdf itself and the drawing are free nor notable --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The building to the left if Yubileynaya hotel. It was designed by Georgiy Benediktov (Russian:Георгий Бенедиктов; 1916-1992) and Vladimir Nacharov (Russian: Владимир Начаров, b. 1927). Jarash (talk) 09:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Photo of architecture : no FOP in Belarus --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not own work as claimed, but comes from archiv, and file description lets me suggest, that it is even copyrighted. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed (or proof, that the file is not protected with copyright). Taivo (talk) 10:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This artist picture was made by private and was used in the 70ies for a folder The copyright is win ( acronym of the Artist) All these rights were passed to MA Jakob(registered within BILDRECHT) which is the only holder of the artist rights and owner of the WINart Archive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjpress (talk • contribs)

So copyright holder is Winartarchiv, uploader is Mjpress. OTRS-permission from Winantarchiv is still needed. For example proof, that Mjpress is representative of Winantarchiv. Taivo (talk) 21:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Taivo: if uploader is not the photographer we need an OTRS permission --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is superceded by another SVG file, which appears to be just cleaned-up version. This one is not used. The author should have probably overwritten this file in-place, but since he didn't, this earlier version should be deleted. Demmo (talk) 20:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by File:Population 1950-2050 selected countries.svg. P 1 9 9   15:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nominate for deletion. These photos have been taken secretly and published without my permission. 93.106.0.16 16:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We can see an IP number only, so you should at least tell us who you are. --Achim (talk) 17:42, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that a picture taken of a performer at a public occasion like a writer performing at a book fair can be published without a special permission being asked. It may be different if she or he is walking around there as a private person. --Annelis (talk)(I have forgotten how to sign properly. Annelis)

I don't understand why a copyright owner would need permission from an IP number to upload photos. Thuresson (talk) 22:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 22:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering the misnaming of one of the subjects and that the uploader has also uploaded a 9/11 photo "they" took I don't find the licensing convincing WereSpielChequers (talk) 15:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from TV documentary Our Queen. Thuresson (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering the misnaming of one of their other uploads I don't find the licensing convincing WereSpielChequers (talk) 15:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is not credible. Thuresson (talk) 22:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 22:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of personality rights of at least three FORD workers who may be identified.Jörg Hofmann is the only notable person on the photo. All others are not. JanneSzy (talk) 22:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ausreichend andere Personen auf dem Foto; weiterhin hat man damit zu rechnen, das wenn einen Person, die im öffentlichen Interesse steht, immers Fotos gemacht werden; es ist mit einer normale Kammera gemacht worden, also nicht "nice to have" Foto--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is no right not to be identified. Use Template:Personality rights if you are concerned about how the photo can be used. Thuresson (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Thuresson (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SEAL. This is not an edict, it's a coat of arms. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader offers no proof that this seal is not copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Created in the 1980s, no copyright registered with U.S. Copyright Office. No records listed. Therefore, public domain. Illegitimate Barrister 01:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PEr above Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader offers no proof that this image was not copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Created in the 1980s, no copyright registered with U.S. Copyright Office. No records listed on the USCO's website when they were searched for. Therefore, it is in the public domain. Exactly what it says on the licensing template. Illegitimate Barrister 01:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PEr above Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader offers no proof that this was not copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Created in the 1980s, no copyright registered with U.S. Copyright Office. No records listed. Therefore, public domain. Illegitimate Barrister 01:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PEr above Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyvio. Unclear source : is this drawing an own work? have it been already published? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright violation! The work was created in 1991 and given to Doug Padilla, my father, who owns the drawing and is represented in the drawing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.219.209.67 (talk • contribs)
That's nice, but we need the permission from the drawer. He/She is the sole copyright owner, not you or your father! Please send the drawer's permision to OTRS. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 14:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is labeled copyright Marine Photo & Publishing Company 1954. No evidence this is CC-SA-3.0. Company still exists,[6] no evidence copyright was not renewed. -- Dual Freq (talk) 11:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This my copy from participation in Blue Ridge's first line crossing ceremony on it's maiden voyage to Rio in 1971. This is not a blank copy of the companies product. If it has any value, it's representative of certificates from that time period, date, location and CO. Plankownerblueridge (talk) 23:14, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is a derivative work of a copyrighted certificate, clearly marked Copyright Marine Photo & Publishing Company 1954. It does not matter if it is blank or not, the base certificate is marked copyrighted. Unless there is some other reason for it being PD, like the underlying image is not sufficiently original to be allowed copyright. Either way, it is not properly licensed as own work / CC-SA-3.0. --Dual Freq (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The copyright have been renewed http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=7&ti=1,7&Search%5FArg=tiffany%20publishing&Search%5FCode=NALL&CNT=25&PID=C56aPLbS3WJwtkHeLTXsLK60vjsbH&SEQ=20151106125918&SID=2 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is labelled copyright 1956 Tiffany Publishing Company. Company still exists,[7] no evidence that copyright was not renewed or that this is CC-SA-3.0 -- Dual Freq (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This my copy from participation in Blue Ridge's commissioning ceremony in Philly, 14 Nov 1971. This is not a blank copy of the company's product. If it has any value, it's representative of certificates from that time period, date, and CO. It even contains the ship's seal. Plankownerblueridge (talk) 23:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a derivative work of the original copyrighted certificate, it can't be your own work because you didn't draw the certificate, which is clearly marked Copyright 1956 Tiffany Publishing Company. --Dual Freq (talk) 00:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The copyright have been renewed http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=18&ti=1,18&Search%5FArg=tiffany%20publishing&Search%5FCode=NALL&CNT=25&PID=C56aPLbS3WJwtkHeLTXsLK60vjsbH&SEQ=20151106125918&SID=2 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivitive work containing apparently non-free images. NPO Mash and KB Arsenal are USSR state companies. -- Dual Freq (talk) 11:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The graphic is mine, using pics in the Russian links of their historical US-A program, that I used in another blog to tie the links that talk to the features and history that I was involved with while in the Navy. I assumed that Russian government pics were similar to US government pics for legal use. Plankownerblueridge (talk) 23:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably copyrighted for 50 years after publication. See Template:PD-Soviet. Thuresson (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unlike works of emplyees of United States goverment, works of employees of the Russian/Soviet goverment are eligible for copyright protection. —RP88 (talk) 09:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I find Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Hazal_Kaya.jpg_OTRS_permission more persuasive than the ticket, and believe the agent at the time was lied to. I have re-opened the ticket and asked for clarification; if it ever comes, this can be undeleted. Storkk (talk) 12:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Storkk, OTRS permission unpersuasive. —RP88 (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Дами и господа, предлагам на вашето внимание сайта на художника Иван Иванов ,на които сам изложила неговата фотография.Аз сам собственичка на фотографията на Иван Иванов и съм създала неговия сайт,тъй като съм негова правнучка и наследница. http://www.ivan-ivanov-art.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Барбра (talk • contribs) 16:18, 23 October 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Without additional information, COM:PRP policy favors deletion. Even if the uploader, as claimed above, is an heir of Ivan Ivanov (1879-1966), we need permission not from the subject of the photo but instead from the photographer (or his or her heirs) or evidence that the photo is in the public domain (but Bulgaria has a copyright term of life+70 years, so its quite possible that photographer's copyright has not expired). Process at COM:OTRS can be used to undelete the photo if evidence of permission is available.—RP88 (talk) 10:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source says: Credit & Copyright: Ken Crawford. No evidence of permission either 177.142.125.180 18:09, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. I'd like to know why The Herald thought that a CC-by-sa-3.0 license was appropriate for this when there's zero evidence of the image being licensed as such. Huntster (t @ c) 22:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Herald did apparently obtain a permission for File:Veil Nebula - NGC6960.jpg by the same author a couple of months before this was uploaded. I have no idea if this is covered, though. LX (talk, contribs) 11:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence of a release under a free licence, therefore deleting under COM:PRP. odder (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
загружен новый более полный информацией файл в лучшем качестве
Artemka (talk) 15:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: keep old .gif Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

имеется значительно более полный и уточненный векторный файл Artemka (talk) 12:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept The reasons given for these two DRs are not valid reasons for deleting a file from Commons. Note also that the file is in use and therefore cannot be deleted except for copyvio. Please do not nominate this file again. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern redesign of a historical coat of arms; work by Jožko Šavli (d. 2011). According to the historian Andrej Pleterski, it differs significantly from the historical one.[8]

Eleassar (t/p) 12:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Two of these three files were already kept here. See also this archived discussion. And about cited article: Andrej Pleterski doesn't actually claim modern redesign differs significantly from the historical one; he claims the modern redesign was established without authentic historical background and the only visible differences between old and modern COA are in details. See this comparison. MZaplotnik (edits) 11:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pleterski stated: "it must be emphasized that this Šavli's design does not have much in common with that coat of arms by Spanheim, which is evident in details. Šavli's panter is more chichi, wild, fuming, angry; it is therefore a modern construction that tries to establish an artificial connection with some seemingly feisty and famous past, however, which did not actually happen." (Poudariti velja, da ta Šavlijev dizajn nima veliko zveze s tistim spanheimskim grbom, kar vidimo v podrobnostih. Šavlijev panter je bolj načičkan, divji, pihajoč, jezen; gre torej za novodobno tvorbo, ki poskuša vzpostavljati umetno povezavo z neko navidezno bojevito ter slavno preteklostjo, ki pa je dejansko ni bilo). --Eleassar (t/p) 17:14, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, probably I am the most appropriate person to close the request. After Eleassar showed, that the panther is copyrighted, it is not suitable for Commons until 2082. Taivo (talk) 17:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't see a CC license on the source website, and the uploader on the source website is certainly not the copyright holder of this material. Eusebius (talk) 22:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://beeldengeluidwiki.nl/index.php/Beeld_en_Geluid_wiki:Info Here you find the licensing info. This all comes from a Dutch broadcasting community. Edoderoo (talk) 07:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"A Dutch broadcasting community"? Who has copyright over this material, and thus is entitled to release it under a CC licence? I guess it is the broadcasting company, which one is it and when did they gave permission to release? --Eusebius (talk) 08:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  KeepIs a offical site from a dutch archive, its licensed:
  • Bij hergebruik of verspreiding dient de gebruiker de licentievoorwaarden van dit werk kenbaar te maken aan derden. De beste manier om dit te doen is door middel van een link naar deze webpagina: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/nl/
So please close as keep, if we are going to make the discussion about if the archive has the rights we could delete the fotothek and other archives also. Huib talk 09:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why, the Fotothek are also unsourced pictures released under CC by master students? --Eusebius (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, Fotothek is also a archive like bundesarchive that release the material under a free license, why nominate for deletion when a Dutch Archive decides to do so also ? Huib talk 12:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, hum...Because the image does not come from their archive but from an external contributor?? --Eusebius (talk) 14:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't uploaded by a external contributor, its uploaded by a staff member according to the userpage. So its just a picture from a archive placed online, why delete? Huib talk 14:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
She was an intern, but you're probably right anyway. --Eusebius (talk) 15:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have spoken (onwiki on beeldengeluidwiki) with Rene Koenders, those images are released to be used with a free CC-by-SA license, this license is clearly put on their website, so their should be no issue at all and this image should be kept for us to be used on wikipedia. They have many many more pictures we are still missing on the Dutch wikipedia (and maybe on other language projects as well), so this site can be a nice resource for wikipedia in the near future. Edoderoo (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have also come across an image from that website (File:WillemRuis.JPG) - would it be worth creating a template stating that it came from there etc, as I believe (like Edoderoo) that the site could be a very good resource for commons. (Please feel free to paste comment to more useful location). -- Deadstar (msg) 10:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the WillemRuis image myself. It would for sure be a good idea to create a template, as I plan to take over like a picture a day from there ... or more, if I get the time for it. Edoderoo (talk) 22:32, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - released on a free license by the site of the archives of Dutch Public Service broadcasting (non-admin closure). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Qwertyus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Beeld en Geluid's license terms state that CC BY-SA 3.0 only applies to photos that explicitly carry a notice to this effect in their description. That is not the case for this picture. Yann (talk) 11:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Village pump#License problem with files taken from Beeld en Geluid (NL Institute for Sound and Vision). Qwertyus (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted - unclear copyright status. --JuTa 20:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]