Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/06/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 11th, 2015


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

العب الظامة سبئنيول 41.111.70.30 10:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Speedy close. Nonsense nomination, translates as "Play Zamh Spinaol" Revent (talk) 23:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YO Le potier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:YO Le potier (6 different digicams in use), mostly grabbed from http://csvnvb.free.fr/.

Gunnex (talk) 07:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Quickly deleted as I just quickly deleted similar files uploaded by him before rubin16 (talk) 10:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la foto fue subida por equivocación Karina Villabon (talk) 03:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Túrelio as 'Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file' Revent (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test data. Lemonz (talk) 10:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 46.218.9.198 09:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, though https://twitter.com/cauclert is a better link. Nominating for speedy. Revent (talk) 12:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Done by Dharmadhyaksha Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a press image. Angle lighting, apps on screen are identical. Looks badly upscaled. Justin14 (talk) 11:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Many places on web, including The Houston Chronicle, credited to 'Apple/TNS'. Nominating for speedy as obvious copyvio. Revent (talk) 12:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kategorie aus versehen doppelt angelegt, Großschreibung nim Titel nicht beachtet, Kategorie ist leer. Pauli-Pirat (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please use {{Speedy}} for this kind of housekeeping -- {{Delete}} wastes human and computer resources. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 16:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dovevo creare la Categoria. Ho sbagliato procedura Marica Massaro (talk) 15:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please use {{Speedy}} for routine housekeeping -- {{delete}} wastes human and computer resources. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tell mum everything is ok logo.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Newcastle Airport, N.S.W., Australia (NTL YMLM).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong flipped view. The correct version is File:Alphonse Legros Blessing the Sea.jpg (Source : http://collections.museums-sheffield.org.uk/view/objects/asitem/People@514/0?t:state:flow=7ef8e1bc-f653-4fbd-9505-157719bd0cdd) Chassipress (talk) 14:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the correct version. Pimbrils (talk) 21:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Keep this one since it's older and now fixed, deleted and redirected newer duplicate Revent (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image on non-notable individual Mark Marathon (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Private image shizhao (talk) 07:59, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from http://www.wrockwardinewoodartsacademy.com/ presumably copyright John of Reading (talk) 16:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy, obvious copyvio. Screenshot of webpage, derivative work of many included photographs. Revent (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce que l'auteur de la photo et de cette galette des rois traditionnelle artisanale, à savoir moi-même, demande la suppression du fichier : j,ai changé d'avis concernant ma signature apposée dessus, je ne veux plus que la photo paraisse. Merci. Cire Mz (talk) 18:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy. New, unused, author requested. Was watermarked with email address. Revent (talk) 11:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously part of a photo shooting from 2007 (http://www.rbcasting.com/site/antonioboccia.rb image2) so probably another copyvio from the user 92.73.29.17 21:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy, obvious copyvio as reported. COM:NETCOPYRIGHT Revent (talk) 11:25, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is just a test file before uploading the correct file. It does not show anything. CaptZod (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy. New unused file, uploader request, and useless as noted. Revent (talk) 11:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is just a test file before uploading the correct file. It does not show anything. CaptZod (talk) 21:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy. Uploader request, new unused file, useless as noted. Revent (talk) 11:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists in marge large version (http://ftv01.stbm.it/imgbank/GALLERYXL/R201311/R_EFI_La-pazza-della-porta-accanto.jpg), seems to be part of photo shooting, unlikely that this last photo is not a copyvio. 92.73.29.17 21:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy, obvious copyvio (COM:NETCOPYRIGHT), one of several by same uploader. Revent (talk) 11:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is an earlier version of the correct file. It contains unfortunatelly a mistake. I wouldn't be glad, if someone uses the false scheme, which is about first aid. I hope you understand the importance of the issue. CaptZod (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I consider only the two older files to be deleted. The newest file should stay uploaded. CaptZod (talk) 21:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Older revisions deleted per request. Revent (talk) 12:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want everyone to see that this page has been nominated for deletion, so I updated and uploaded the file again as a new file. This file can be deleted now. Thank you very much in advance. 89.67.242.36 21:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is an update of this file at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pierwsza_pomoc.pdf, so please delete this file. CaptZod (talk) 07:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request, redirected to newer version. Revent (talk) 08:43, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already exist on commons Samuele Madini (talk) 08:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy as a duplicate of File:Bollengo Perno Campanile Romanico.jpg.
@Samuele Madini: in the future you can use {{Duplicate}} for these. Revent (talk) 12:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected to File:Bollengo Perno Campanile Romanico.jpg Sreejith K (talk) 03:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spamming sur wp:fr Havang(nl) (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 12:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Denniss as part of a mass deletion Revent (talk) 03:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain copyright, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Denniss as part of a mass deletion Revent (talk) 03:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not used anymore Färber (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Those redirects exist for a reason, mainly that websites outside the WMF universe may link to files. So it's not so sure if the redirect is really "unused". There is no harm in keeping it, so it is kept. Rosenzweig τ 17:24, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain text file should be directly integrated into projects if relevant Basvb (talk) 00:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Juggler2005 (talk) 02:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: promotional rather than educational Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peannet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional material for DekDee Media, not in scope. Some are obviously copyrighted CD covers, additionally flagged for speedy.

Revent (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Juggler2005 (talk) 02:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kolpkakov nikita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Ukraine.

Juggler2005 (talk) 02:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that The Full Wiki owns rights to this picture. Juggler2005 (talk) 02:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete They do not, "The Full Wiki" is a Wikipedia clone. The image would not have been visible there until it was uploaded here and added to the Wikipedia article. Revent (talk) 07:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per above + considering the The Full Wiki article ("Up to date as of November 16, 2009") the file was uploaded locally at enwiki on 05.11.2009 and deleted in 2011. May be in public domain by other means but relevant info must be provided. Gunnex (talk) 20:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. Juggler2005 (talk) 03:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an album cover. It is obviously not the uploader's own work as claimed. Whpq (talk) 03:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work as claimed. Uploader has made claims of own work for other works which were clear copyright violations. This appears to be a posed publicity photo. Whpq (talk) 03:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 04:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 19:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 04:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Charleseugenehill(restaurant) (talk · contribs)

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Motopark (talk) 12:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rawutagouda.biradar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Rawutagouda.biradar (serial copyright violator) + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tanga in Bijapur.JPG + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Health City Hospital,Bijapur.JPG.

Gunnex (talk) 04:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not using. pls delete NIJO K K (talk) 05:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license on this file is wrong. 2601:981:4001:C744:5989:2B23:A56C:82DE 05:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, clearly incorrect licensing. The source page is http://www.bcdb.com/cartoon/5316-Youre-An-Education and it appears to have belonged to Warner Brothers (and have nothing to do with Ted Turner (who was born the year it was published). Must be assumed to be under copyright, unless a renewal search shows otherwise. Revent (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
After a search, "You're an Education" was registered with a 11/5/1938 copyright, as M9208, and belonged to the Vitaphone Corporation of New York. (It's here) The renewal was filed on 2/17/1966, as R380531, by United Artists Television Inc. (It's here) Sorry, but it's still in copyright until 2034. Delete per COM:SS, undelete in 2034. Revent (talk) 05:53, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 05:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:30, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, per COM:PRP, considering also uploader related Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Srikanth Reddy~commonswiki. Gunnex (talk) 23:27, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality of image Sujay25 (talk) 05:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Indeed. So blurry as to be unidentifiable. Revent (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not using pls delete NIJO K K (talk) 05:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not using. pls delete. NIJO K K (talk) 05:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by J. Zaninović (d. 1946). Eleassar (t/p) 06:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free advertising sign. Eleassar (t/p) 06:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 06:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhaskar61jha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bhaskar61jha (serial copyright violator for Commons:Wiki Loves Food) + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bhaskarf vjlf.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Birthday special cake.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 06:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zelma Galvez Carrillo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YONDY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality personal photos.

Revent (talk) 07:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 08:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a meme, out of scope IMO Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 08:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: modern work by Mirsad Begić. Eleassar (t/p) 08:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by T. Demšar (d. 1997). Eleassar (t/p) 08:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scupture by Charles Dandelin (1920-2001). No FOP in France — Racconish 📥 08:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It isn't Creative Commons file. Edgars2007 (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Latvia (monument erected in 1999) Edgars2007 (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Latvia (monument erected in 1998) Edgars2007 (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Latvia (monument erected in 1980s) Edgars2007 (talk) 09:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Latvia (monument erected in 1991) Edgars2007 (talk) 09:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of File:Nītaures dzirnavas 2000-08-19.jpg Edgars2007 (talk) 09:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublicate of File:Vaiņodes katoļu baznīca 2002-08-25.jpg Edgars2007 (talk) 09:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 09:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake. Kippelboy (talk) 09:47, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free model. Eleassar (t/p) 10:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free model. Eleassar (t/p) 10:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Nymf as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Most likely also a screenshot of some sort, like the other recently uploaded image. rubin16 (talk) 11:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Bazj (talk) 11:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-free sketch (missing OTRS-confirmed permission). Eleassar (t/p) 11:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, missing permission and EXIF, found on many websites, low resolution Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyright status, out of scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, missing permission and EXIF, found on many websites, most likely a copyvio Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PWSH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, missing permission and EXIF, found on other websites, low resolution

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akki12345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, missing permission and EXIF, low resolution, most likely copyvios

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akki12345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 00:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akki12345 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per file name, screenshots from en:VLC media player, unlikely to be own work.

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sacapuntas21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, missing permission and EXIF, found on many websites, low resolution, most likely copyvios

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Majorstoryboard (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted screenshots and logos, unlikely to be own works, missing permission and EXIF, low resolution, most likely copyvios

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. Michael Barera (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IMrTed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lakme123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Lakme123 (copyvio from https://culinarybite.wordpress.com) and with (example) "culinary bite" watermarked photos. Btw, hundreds of copyvios in Category:Images from Wiki Loves Food 2015 for Commons:Wiki Loves Food...

Gunnex (talk) 15:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Good faith upload, but copyvio Andy Mabbett (talk) 16:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be promotional in nature rather than educational Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected OS/2-Software. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, above COM:TOO.--Wdwd (talk) 17:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Madhab Parmanik / logs = 3 uploads on 09.06.2015 = 2x copyvio Gunnex (talk) 17:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swatinandy89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. All files Commons:Wiki Loves Food photos uploaded in a row on 07.06.2015.

Gunnex (talk) 17:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but as well for File:SEETA SAREE IMPRINT-Hampi-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (1).jpg and File:SEETA SAREE IMPRINT-Hampi-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (2).jpg : missing exif, very poor quality, not in use and imho no "educational worth" etc > out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 20:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no offence, but as well for File:SEETA SAREE IMPRINT-Hampi-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (1).jpg and File:SEETA SAREE IMPRINT-Hampi-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (2).jpg : missing exif, very poor quality, not in use and imho no "educational worth" etc > out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 20:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

once again, no offence, as per File:SEETA SAREE IMPRINT-Hampi-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (1).jpg and File:SEETA SAREE IMPRINT-Hampi-Dr. Murali Mohan Gurram (2).jpg : missing exif, very poor quality, alternatives available, and imho no "educational worth" etc > out of scope, Roland zh (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 20:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously taken from walmart website, as seen in the lower left watermark. Binksternet (talk) 20:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TransCity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, promo shots for en:Suzanna Lubrano uploaded in a row on 23.11.2011 (and simultaneously uploaded on Flickr, © by "TransCity"), considering also:


Gunnex (talk) 20:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France. Recent building.

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality, other pics of subject avbl Uli Elch (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" is most probably a lie since this is only part of an old photo with Sofia Loren (http://corrieredelmezzogiorno.corriere.it/napoli/notizie/spettacoli/2012/11-maggio-2012/furia-festa-ultimo-onesti-201140233066.shtml) 92.73.29.17 20:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This site attributes the full image as "Giacomo Furia and Sophia Loren in L'Oro di Napoli directed by Vittorio De Sica, 1954". 'Own work' is obviously incorrect. Revent (talk) 11:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture was on the page of a 2013 festival (http://www.mitreofilmfestival.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=24&Itemid=131) and obviously after that copied to Commons. Since this user had a lot of copyvios, this is probably another one 92.73.29.17 21:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern sculptures or monuments. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Памятники на территории Молдовы имеют свободную лицензию, в данном файле File:Памятник Александру Невскому в Бендерах.jpg она указана, смысл тогда FOP, если Вы же не соблюдаете его. Законы Республики Молдова не нарушены и соблюдены, о чем свидетельствует лицензия. Согласно статьи 28 молдавского закона об авторском праве и смежных правах, допускается без согласия автора или иного обладателя авторского права и без выплаты вознаграждения использование произведений, таких как произведения архитектуры или скульптуры, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения. Плюс Вы ссылаетесь на Россию, но изучите внимательно географию, город Бендеры - Молдавия (Приднестровье), причем тут COM:FOP#Russia?.--Kodru (talk) 06:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 07:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Yann (talk) 21:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 2007. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - this image is derivative work, see COM:DW. Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 2010. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative work, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of a larger official picture (e.g. http://www.campanianotizie.com/cultura-e-spetacoli/caserta/105473-caserta-eduardo-tartaglia-e-veronica-mazza-ospiti-de-qil-salotto-a-teatroq.html) Probably copyvio. 92.73.29.17 21:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete http://www.veronicamazza.it/ is probably the original source. Indeed, quite likely stolen from the web. Revent (talk) 11:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern sculptures or monuments. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Vuchetich, he died in 1974. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:39, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violations: images lack authorization for use of free (CC/PD licensing) from the heirs of the artwork author Yevgeny Vuchetich (d. 1974). Also, there is no commercial FOP in Russia for public artworks still in copyright. None of the images here pass de minimis: the sculpture forms intentional elements in the images instead of accessory or incidental inclusion, which means cropping or blurring diminishes the usability of the images significantly.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Will be undeleted in 2049 (74+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 10:16, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Isaak Brodsky, he died 2011. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Vera Mukhina, she died 1953. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:49, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument established in 1997. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not clear copyright status, as this is a reproduction Pibwl (talk) 21:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. Monument by Nikolai Tomsky, he died 1984. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:07, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepСм. [1]
[2] памятник 1938 года. 70 лет давно прошли :-)
Во-первых, подписывайтесь. Во-вторых, правила русской Википедии на Викискладе не действуют. В третьих, 70 лет следует отсчитывать со дня смерти автора, т.е. в данном случае они истекут в 2054 году, и с 2055 года все произведения скульптора Николая Томского будут в общественном достоянии. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete an identical resolution image is found on this webpage but appears to be copyright and has no verification of being freely licenced. Ww2censor (talk) 22:11, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom, although the image and the enwiki article seems to have some promotional intentions and the copyright holder might be interested in sending permission.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, all other files deleted as copyvios, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purely text content, apparent autobiography. Not in scope. Revent (talk) 22:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork. Not in scope. Revent (talk) 22:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hiloding (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 22:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hiloding (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvio. Collection of images from the internet. Even with URL legend! File:커세어k95.PNG > [3] > [4]

Meisam (talk) 22:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted three dimensional art in United States where there is no freedom of panorama. The exact date of construction must be after the Brianhe (talk) 22:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted three dimensional art in United States where there is no freedom of panorama. The exact date of construction must be after the subject of the memorial died in 2001 [5] Brianhe (talk) 22:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Strakhov (talk) 23:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not verify the license. I did not see any license at source site, but the site is overall commercial. This is the uploader's only contribution.
Я не смог проверить лицензию. Сайт прохождения фотографии не даёт никакую лицензию. Без доказательства, что фотограф разрешает эту фотографию свободно использовать, нужно её удалить. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not verify the license. Small photo without metadata, source link is dead. The uploader is not author, but claims to be copyright holder. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-res ("large" file, but pixelated) and difficult to read the key charges; have tons of higher quality examples of mechanism of Category:Wharton reaction; also note that en:hydrazone formation does not require strong-acid catalyst to initiate. DMacks (talk) 12:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And:

which is higher-quality image of same idea I think, but has all sorts of mis-placed text and missing charges, making it chemically incorrect. DMacks (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frandolce (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographs of artworks by a living artist. The uploader might be the artist, but an OTRS ticket is necessary to keep those files.

BrightRaven (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality: this appears to be a scan from some unstated source (note stray dots, and apparent grey-scale of presumably originally colored "H2NNH2"). Unused: I created File:Drimanes Wharton reaction.png to replace it. DMacks (talk) 13:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And:

which is same ideas, but with text layout problems and chemically incorrect coloring of some atoms ("O" in "OH" of third structure should still be blue as in second structure rather than orange). DMacks (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused layout mess, with no obvious use-case. Appears to be PNG result of mis-rendered SVG ("Me" misplaced from its bond, text overlapping itself) DMacks (talk) 13:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertorials outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:22, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotion, out of scope. see all uploads of https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListFiles&user=Discoverlogo&ilshowall=1 Atlasowa (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 13:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you did not read what I wrote as a source: "Own work from files of commons". It means that I collect all photos from Commons. You may just ask and I will put these pictures there. I already did it. So, are you agree with me that now we may keep this collage? --Interfase (talk) 14:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Collage now fully sourced. INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Llefty Hernaiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremy allan white (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TranHoa1202 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Good faith upload, but copyvio Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Good faith upload, but copyvio Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Good faith upload, but copyvio Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julio Leon7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JpmYoendi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eric Rios (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fyllhy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Navir255 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The subject seems to be es:Iván Sahir Gómez. He might be notable, since the article in eswiki has not been challenged. I would say  Keep except if the article in eswiki is deleted.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message in es:Wikipedia:Café/Archivo/Ayuda/Actual#Iván_Sahir_G.C3.B3mez.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Borrado en eswiki por no enciclopédico, gracias por el aviso.--Yeza (talk) 21:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Article has been deleted. INeverCry 01:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elnar Derozo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:19, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 2 kept, other deleted George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Elnar Derozo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 07:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a lot of unfree DVD covers Pibwl (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the image or its author is over 100 years old, PD claim unsupported. Underbar dk (talk) 18:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD claim unsupported, author information missing, image is unlikely to be over 100 years old (seems like a Chinese textbook illustration). Underbar dk (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD claim unsupported, author information missing, image is unlikely to be over 100 years old (seems like a Chinese textbook illustration). Underbar dk (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD claim unsupported, author information missing, image is unlikely to be over 100 years old (seems like a Chinese textbook illustration). Underbar dk (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD claim unsupported, author information missing, image is unlikely to be over 100 years old (seems like a Chinese textbook illustration). Yanked off pinterest. Underbar dk (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD claim unsupported, author information missing, image is unlikely to be over 100 years old (seems like a Chinese textbook illustration). Underbar dk (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD claim unsupported, author information missing, image is unlikely to be over 100 years old (seems like a Chinese textbook illustration). Underbar dk (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused equivalent of File:Buchner five membered ring expansion new.png except it has incorrect geometry at the central N DMacks (talk) 19:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

that has same unused/bad-geometry situation. DMacks (talk) 19:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing scope and permission. Fry1989 eh? 19:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of SVG flag. Fry1989 eh? 19:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double copy - Fenerli1978 (talk) 22:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied as duplicate.
@Fenerli1978: You can use the {{Duplicate}} template for this purpose. Revent (talk) 23:07, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Duplicate that has been already processed as duplicate :) PierreSelim (talk) 06:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Er is geen bestandsgebruik en .PNG werkt niet BT1985 (talk) 01:02/14:48 , 11 June 2015 (UTC)


Kept: Per Stefan4, keeping the file and renaming to lowercase. PierreSelim (talk) 06:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images contain an artwork that are protected by copyright. This is modern sculptures or monuments. Authors are still alive or after death in less than 70 years. Not COM:FOP, see COM:FOP#Russia. Wrong licensing - all images is derivative works, see COM:DW.

 Keep Authors died more than 70 years ago, supposed.--Odessey (talk) 21:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are wrong. This monument by Matvey Manizer, he died 1966. His work is the public domain since 2037. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sadly, no FOP in Russia for statues PierreSelim (talk) 06:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Скульптура на фоне неба.JPG the statue is {{PD-RusEmpire}} --PierreSelim (talk) 06:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File using obsolete {{PD-USGov-NARA}}. Not clear if it is an USGov work. Any other reasons why it could be in the public domain? Jarekt (talk) 13:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of nominating it for deletion you could have just fixed it. I'll go put the right template in now ...

It should be {{PD-USGov-POTUS}}. Evrik (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment {{PD-USGov-POTUS}} is fine if the author is the "White House Photographer". I noticed you added "White House Photographer" as authors of all those files but can you point to where you got that information? --Jarekt (talk) 16:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • They were all from the 1998 edition of the White House Website, which is why they are all now at NARA.
http://clinton2.nara.gov/Initiatives/OneAmerica/america.html

That's the Rose Garden in the background. Evrik (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I guess you are right set of photographs taken in Rose Garden and placed on White House website are very likely taken by Government employee, probably "White House Photographer". --Jarekt (talk) 19:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 15:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France and Jean Nouvel is not dead

— Racconish 📥 20:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

on external views, he has only made the top of the building, the walls was built in 1831. Prométhée33 (talk) 06:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Which external view do you have in mind ? — Racconish 📥 08:50, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The entire building can't be subject to copyright, on all exterior pictures (like [[:]]), Jean Nouvel has only made the canopy , the facades are constructed in 1831 (by Antoine-Marie Chenavard and Jean-Marie Pollet). I think we should clarify it with the model {{NoFoP-France}} on this pictures, as with File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons.jpg. Others (internal views ) could be transferred on local wikipedias. Prométhée33 (talk) 15:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I beg to disagree. The whole visual aspect is the result of the restructuration by Nouvel, hailed as such by many sources. In any case, COM:PP should apply. I could agree with you on views of the walls only. — Racconish 📥 15:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's not clear to me where the text at Template talk:NoFoP-France#Exception comes from (added by User:Micheletb in 2007), but the part "est telle qu'elle interdit en pratique de distinguer les deux éléments et spécialement de reproduire les bâtiments historiques sans montrer partie des aménagements modernes" (as it is impossible in practice to distinguish between the two elements and specially reproduce historic buildings without showing some modern amenities) seems to describe the situation with the Opéra de Lyon perfectly. This bulk deletion request seems to overreach. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
With reference to the "Place des Terreaux jurisprudence [6], which boils down to de minimis, I point out that my request targets only isolated views of the opera, not all files in the category. What file(s) would you suggest to keep ? — Racconish 📥 08:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If interior views are to be considered differently, then these fall in that class:

-- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree for file:Jean nouvel - opera-lyon.jpg. Not for the others, where the restructuration is a major part of the image. — Racconish 📥 21:39, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Yann. This clarifies the discussion. — Racconish 📥 17:44, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted the rest of the images, where the new part of the building is prominent Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep According to Commons:Collages the photos for collages must:

  • Be attributed.
  • Have compatible licenses.

The author in Flickr page claims own work an licenses the image under a free license - own work for all needed to make the photo, just like any other free image in Flickr. Therefore both requirements are fulfilled. The only reason to delete would be challenging the own work claim in the photos, and such challenge should be based any evidence. If you can find any of these photos in another source that makes it unlikely the own work claim, then delete. If you can't, then we should keep the mosaic.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this image is a lower res version of File:Mosaicpeopleindiafromflickr.jpg - Peripitus (talk) 06:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There is a very good chance to believe that all parts of this collage are indeed own works by Flickr user "John Haslam" + still in cc-by-2.0, considering also:
1st row
2nd row
3rd row
4th row
5th row
All photos found in this album. I corrected both files suggesting an additional {{Flickrreview}} for the individual parts. Gunnex (talk) 21:18, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is a silly nomination so please be more thoughtful when making nominations. All the images have sources, are freely licenced and there is no requirement I have ever seen that they must all be uploaded first to the commons before making a collage. File:Collage Rome.jpg is one way of doing it and this is another. I've given it a good Flickr review. Ww2censor (talk) 08:28, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I believe the free licence is correct. The top left image at least is by the same flickr user (see here) and is correctly and freely licensed. Commons:Collages is a guideline for creating the collages here, not a bright line about collages create by others from their own images - Peripitus (talk) 06:44, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep According to Commons:Collages the photos for collages must:
  • Be attributed.
  • Have compatible licenses.
The author in Flickr page claims own work an licenses the image under a free license - own work for all needed to make the photo, just like any other free image in Flickr. Therefore both requirements are fulfilled. The only reason to delete would be challenging the own work claim in the photos, and such challenge should be based any evidence. If you can find any of these photos in another source that makes it unlikely the own work claim, then delete. If you can't, then we should keep the mosaic.
Furthermore, findings of the images in the author's Flickr account make it more clear that there is no reason to challenge the "own work" claim - at least, not more than any other own work image in Commons or Flickr.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep There is a very good chance to believe that all parts of this collage are indeed own works by Flickr user "John Haslam" + still in cc-by-2.0, considering also:
1st row
2nd row
3rd row
4th row
5th row
All photos found in this album. I corrected the file suggesting an additional {{Flickrreview}} for the individual parts. See also duplicate Commons:Deletion requests/File:Many faces of India.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 23:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion above. There's no evidence that this is copyvio. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep According to Commons:Collages the photos for collages must:

  • Be attributed.
  • Have compatible licenses.

The author in Flickr page claims own work an licenses the image under a free license - own work for all needed to make the photo, just like any other free image in Flickr. Therefore both requirements are fulfilled. The only reason to delete would be challenging the own work claim in the photos, and such challenge should be based any evidence. If you can find any of these photos in another source that makes it unlikely the own work claim, then delete. If you can't, then we should keep the mosaic.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete / permission needed: Per info at Flickr the collage (uploaded 2013) is composed by images from http://www.gerdspriess.de/unvergessliche%20Fluege/hanoi-vientiane/hanoi-vientiane.html =

The site is maintained by © "Gerd Spriess" who appears to be NOT the Flickr user "manhhai". Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 22:59, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion above. 4 images without permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:25, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gunjan Sarojwal Kumar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 06:01, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google Image Search does not work for this kind of works (Facebook). The best way is to require a reupload in higher res including meta-data, what I am hereby doing (@Gunjan Sarojwal Kumar: ).
PS: Forgot to mention. Uploads in a row on 10.06.2016 related to Commons:Wiki Loves Food (currently +/- 6200 files). Copyvio tagged only by me in the last 20 hours: 300-450 files. See also Commons talk:Wiki Loves Food#copyrights violation Gunnex (talk) 20:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's been my experience that images that have been copied from Facebook, normally always show up somewhere else too on the internet. If this had just been one image, I could have understood your suspicion. But in this case there are 15 images that do not show up anywhere else, which makes it quite unlikely that they would have been copied from the internet. - Takeaway (talk) 21:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"(...) that images that have been copied from Facebook, normally always show up somewhere else". No, not "normally". It depends (but I do not want to go into detail). Anyway, I left a message to the uploader to check this discussion and hopefully he/she reads also the request to reupload one or more files in higher res etc. (in the original frame, please, because some of these uploads appears to be cropped). We need also - per COM:Collages - all parts of the collage File:Amristari Fish Fries.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 21:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the elongated building - Ljubljana Central Market - is work by J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 06:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This is not about the elongated building - Ljubljana Central Market, but river with Cathedral. If this is egligable for deleting, so is at least one more on Lubljana page. Or to ask, how much of building can be seen to be OK ?? Here is less than a half of it. --Mile (talk) 06:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


On Ljubljana page also, BTC city tower, made few years ago ? --Mile (talk) 06:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not about how much of the building is visible, but whether the image shows copyrightable parts of the building and whether the depicted copyrighted architecture takes a very prominent (key) place in the image. Here, both criteria are met. --Eleassar (t/p)

So there are not any rules, but up to your judgement. --Mile (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is the judgement of editors here to propose a file for deletion, and of administrators to eventually delete or keep them.
For some guidance, you may have a look at COM:DM#Guidance: this would qualify as 'very unlikely de minimis': "Copyrighted work X is a key part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work radically different, but potentially still useful." --Eleassar (t/p) 12:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


OK, delete it. If violation. Its better to know imidiately, since was planing to nominate it for Feautered. No problem. --Mile (talk) 19:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: NoFoP-Slovenia. Not Com:DM - Cathedral could have been avoided easily. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:33, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado para corregir otro, ahora he subido la imagen al otro archivo como nueva versión, así que este no sirve para nada. Beaordepe (talk) 06:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per above. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously copy of File:Herb-Kamp-Lintfort.jpg and not used Färber (talk) 07:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy deletion as a duplicate. @Färber: In the future you can use {{Duplicate}} for these cases. Revent (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Now a redirect. INeverCry 23:17, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BrightRaven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The artist died in 2013. No permission. I am not sure this is original enough to get a copyright. Yann (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If it is not, then a large part of abstract art is not protected by copyright. BrightRaven (talk) 12:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was a discussion here about that. Probably that most of Category:Gene Davis is not covered by copyright. It may depend on which law is used. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per COM:PRP. INeverCry 23:23, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Build in 1935 so very probably under copyright of the architect (+ no FOP in France) VIGNERON (talk) 11:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The architect is not indicated in the Mérimée database (see here). So we can't prove that the author is not dead enough (died before 1941). Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It's a photo of a building. And what is seen of the building does not have originality. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC) I withdraw that. It's listed as historical building, so it is considered to have interest. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • "no originality" is your personal opinion; the formal threshold applied here is far lower. There was an instance when a photo of a plain concrete column (that's right, an upright concrete slab and little else except trees and skyes) was deleted because it belonged to a building designed by a banned architect. NVO (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Donc je fais quoi ? Je pense qu'il est préférable de supprimer la photo dans le doute. Pouvez-vous m'expliquer les démarches à suivre pour le faire ? Je ne suis pas encore familiarisé avec le fonctionnement du site. Valolo 10:47, 7 septembre 2011
    Pas d'inquiétudes, cette page est justement celle où l'on demande puis exécute (ou non) la suppression. Avant d'effectuer la suppression, connais-tu le nom de l'architecte ou bien pourrais-tu faire quelque recherche ? Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • L'édifice a toujours appartenu à la STAO, une entreprise historique de transport, avant d'être acheté dernièrement par Bouygues. Un projet immobilier va y voir le jour mais les parties classées (la façade et la rotonde intérieure de style art-déco) seront conservées. Je ne connais pas l'architecte de cet édifice et les recherches effectuées sur internet sont infructueuses. Je continue les recherches ... Valolo 14:08, 7 septembre 2011

Kept: No originality, architecte unknown. Yann (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The reasons for the closure above need to be reviewed. The fact that we do not know the architect is irrelevant for a 1935 building -- we cannot simply assume he died before 1945 and he is surely actually known -- his signature will be on the plans on file in the local building depatment. The building is unusual, even for art deco -- note the detailing to the left of the doors and the decorative plinth above. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep If the architect is unknown, the copyright expires 58 years after the construction (50 + 8 years for war extension), so it is also free of the URAA. In addition to that, there is no real architectural feature here. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, I assume that in France, as in the USA, and most other countries, before you build a building, you must file a set of drawings with the local building office, pay a fee and receive a building permit. Those drawings must be signed by the licensed architect who is responsible for them and for the construction of the building. They are kept on file indefinitely -- typically long after the copyright has expired. Unless France is very different in this respect, the architect of a modern building is never unknown. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It may be like that NOW, but in 1935? Not so sure... Yann (talk) 17:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mid 19th century in most countries, certainly by 1935, see Building code. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Jim/COM:PRP. INeverCry 23:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image, blurred cars. Piece of house. Out of SCOPE. We have a lot of better images of same street in Category:Tverskaya_Street_in_Moscow Shakko (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INeverCry 23:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken by Otto Frank, who died in 1980. Yann (talk) 13:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To my knowledge images that are in the public domain (which includes museums) are free to use. However, if there has been a violation of copyright I agree to delete the picture Chenspec (talk) 18:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It would be sorrowful to delete the picture, because I am convinced, that is not what Otto Frank, Anne Frank's father would have wanted. Lotje (talk) 05:10, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 23:28, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pantyboyntights (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE

--Mdann52talk to me! 19:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I can't find anything equivalent in Category:Males in female underwear or Category:Men wearing tights.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. INeverCry 23:31, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pantyboyntights (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I still can't find anything equivalent in Category:Males in female underwear or Category:Men wearing tights.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Pere pripz, but 2 files are  deleted as Facebook files. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Parental_Advisory_label.svg, also the licensing information on this page is incorrect as the label was not created by a US government official, but by the RIAA. I believe it may be best to delete this image, since the duplicate image licensing information is more appropriate. WWB Too (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WWB Too: Bitmap originals of SVGs are generally not deleted (though consensus may differ) as it often causes crosswiki drama.... suggest you simply fix the licensing. Revent (talk) 11:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Revent, that makes sense. I'll do that instead. WWB Too (talk) 18:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now a redirect. INeverCry 23:35, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subí por error el archivo, quiero que eliminen la foto. Lugo Wonka (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 23:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published https://mexico.as.com/mexico/2019/12/17/tikitakas/1576546407_006091.html Ytoyoda (talk) 03:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo with false license. Juggler2005 (talk) 03:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Images appear to be from here. Revent (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
According to aspect of subjects, the photographs were taken about a century ago and very likely in India and therefore they are in Public Domain in India since about 1960 (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#India says 50 years after creation for pre-1958 photographs).--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Pere prlpz: Quite likely, yes, but the information on the file page (unless it's clarified in the Arabic text) is grossly incorrect. Revent (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, but incorrect information is a reason to delete the information, not to delete a public domain image.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Superseded by File:Jagatjit Singh and Anita Delgado.jpg. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this is not covered by Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Turkey as the election display is clearly a temporary installation. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I differ, it is covered. It is not even a work of art, but a simple poster used as election propaganda material. Where I am now there were similar posters on the ground in streets, before municipal workers collected them and put them in garbage containers. --E4024 (talk) 08:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If the copyright law of Turkey is not totally different from other countries, then the portrait photo on the poster is a copyrighted work. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We have the same problem with File:Anatolia Party election propaganda 2015.png, File:Liberal Democratic Party (Turkey) - Orkun Köksoy Poster (cropped).JPG, File:HDP 2015 general election poster.jpg, File:VP election poster 2015 general election Turkey.jpg, File:Felicity Party poster 2015 general election Turkey.jpg and File:AKP election poster 2015 general election Turkey.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep'em all. No problem. --E4024 (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, if there is a copyright problem with election posters then I am more than happy to identify all the ones I uploaded to made the deletion process easier. Nub Cake (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Nub Cake rules is writing Art. 40. Works of fine arts permanently placed on public streets, avenues or squares may be reproduced by drawings, graphics, photographs and the like, distributed, shown by projection in public premises or broadcast by radio or similar means. For architectural works, this freedom is only valid for the exterior form. Regards, Fenerli1978 (talk) 20:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for citing the above linked §. The problem in this case results from the condition permanently, as election poster are not permanently installed in the public. Thereby I wonder about your keep-vote. --Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Túrelio, this type of poster sometimes staying years on the wall. I am seeing 2 years old election posters in city. What is the permanently time? 1 month, 2 years, 100 years? Regards, Fenerli1978 (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the condition of "permanently installed" (which is included in the freedom-of-panorama provision of the copyright laws of most countries) is indeed sometimes a point of discussion, see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Permanent_vs_temporary. However, Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters states that posters are usually not considered to be permanently installed.
Anyway, as this discussion might have consequences for a number of photos of elections-posters from Turkey, I would recommend you to involve some :tr users who have a formal legal education (lawyers or alike) and experience in actual court decisions in Turkey. As the latter is what counts more than our educated guesses. --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep --Cobija (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep --Fenerli1978 (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No copyright issue. A picture taken for the elections. --i.е. v-mail 01:25, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ...must be kept in a permanent way. ...end of lifetime / decay. => End of life for election posters = end of election. After that it's trash. Covered by FOP. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ras67 as duplicate (dup) of File:Rosetta's Philae drill.jpg.

Not identical, the colors have been altered on the other version. Discuss. Revent (talk) 14:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not an exact duplicate. We can keep both. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ras67 as duplicate (dup) of File:Rosetta's Philae on Comet 67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko.jpg

Not a duplicate, the colors have been altered on the other version. Discuss. Revent (talk) 14:46, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Yes, slightly different colors, but ultimately no reason to have both images. Colors of the pre-existing version are superior, in my opinion. Huntster (t @ c) 12:07, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Colors are very different, one is almost in graytones. We should keep both Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:42, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ras67 as duplicate (dup) of File:Rosetta's Philae touchdown.jpg Revent (talk) 14:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a duplicate, the colors have been altered on the other version. Discuss. Revent (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That i've mentioned, that is a duplicate from the 1st version. Somebody has improved the colors, the greenish original is still existing in the file versions which is identical with this one! --Ras67 (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Ras67: Not disagreeing, just since the current versions aren't identical, they aren't speedy targets and need a DR. Otherwise it would just be a matter of which version I like more. People might want to keep both. Revent (talk) 15:24, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I think we should keep both versions. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:43, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unclear copyright status (this is a reproduction). Same for File:Bankiet „rebeliantów” wydany przez Glaoui w 1953r. - Rabat - 004417n.jpg Pibwl (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Photographs in Morocco are PD 50 years after publication. These 62 years old images are very likely to have been published shortly after being taken. On the other hand, the text could be newer or from other countries and per precautionary principle it should be cropped out.
Btw, the second image doesn't have the mandatory deletion template.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cropped. PD. Keep Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das ist NICHT das Haus von Wäscher, Joseph! 2003:63:AF4A:985C:7822:49EE:F36C:349A 09:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sondern? Nachweis? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Renamed to Unnaer Str 39 in Werl, Info, and Categories updated. Keeper Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:46, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture by S. Rohrman (d. 1973).[7] Eleassar (t/p) 07:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A major part of the image is occupied by the building (which is coincidentally named "The Republic Administration"), and cropping it out would significantly alter the composition and the connotations of the image. Therefore, not de minimis. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Photo is not about architecture. Builduing is insignificant and hardly recognisable.--MZaplotnik (edits) 04:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The building is very easily recognisable, because the image shows almost its entire front facade, and the image would be radically different without it. --Eleassar (t/p) 06:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel there are too much building show, you can crop most of it without touching the banner.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:30, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid the specific architectural elements of this building can't be cropped out without cropping the banner itself. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
They can't be cropped out 100% but they can be cropped out until being De Minimis.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No matter how do I try to crop it (unless I crop also part of the banner), the building is never de minimis. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:40, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Eleassar and Pere prlpz: I rotated the image so I could crop more. Ok? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's ok. Good job. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:26, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good job.--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: INeverCry 16:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]