Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/02/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 11th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marcoeloy (talk) 00:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 03:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yann (talk · contribs) fixed the date but there is no evidence which made in the 17th century. Y.haruo (talk) 01:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What Kind of evidence do you need? Do you have any argument to suspect it's not? Kelson (talk) 10:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nonsense DR. Yann (talk) 10:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Addition by locked user (LTA) Crosswiki spam, this file should be deleted so he won't be spam this file everywhere. This deletion request fit with Commons:Deletion policy#Self-promotion or vandalism.2Fattack and Commons:Deletion policy#Not educationally useful --AldNonUcallin?☎ 11:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted By User:Nick.--AldNonUcallin?☎ 11:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not-free copyright screenshot. Zhxy 519 (talk) 11:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For Copyright NAD328 (talk) 12:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 23:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely licence washing from eldiario.es. The original image can be found, several months earlier, in other media (see here). Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CC not compatible Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another eldiario.es license washing. Source is Agencia EFE, a news agency Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: from http://www.ara.cat/especials/eleccionseuropees/PP-Pais-Valencia-nacionalisme-eurodiputat_0_1144685828.html Anna (Cookie) (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful Motopark (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Re-uploaded by serial out of scope PDF uploader. INeverCry 00:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violations by the Flickr author (on bad authors list), review by FlickreviewR.--Crovata (talk) 00:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 06:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Getty Images, check the watermark 太刻薄 (talk) 01:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Yann; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful Motopark (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same as Image:Timg.jpg 广雅 范 16:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Denniss; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the photographer/copyright holder. I didn't agree to have this image used on Wikimedia. The person who uploaded this took it from NPR.org, who did have permission. This should be removed from Wikimedia. 70.36.151.60 19:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by INeverCry; DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

по просьбе автора AVSVEK (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

по просьбе автора AVSVEK (talk) 14:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Deletion nomination had no valid deletion criteria. Ellin Beltz (talk) 09:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

по просьбе автора AVSVEK (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User talk:Amitie 10g The deletion criteria given as "uploader's request" is an invalid deletion nomination criteria. Commons licenses are irrevocable. I'm closing this again, still kept as there is nothing wrong with this file that requires it to be removed. I have also left you a message on your talk page.


Kept again: Deletion nomination has no valid criteria. Commons licenses are irrevocable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

По просьбе автора, т.к. имеется дубликат "О.п. Ботаническая.JPG", используемый в статье AVSVEK (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted The nomination request contains sufficient information to understand the need to delete the duplicate. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparecen personas Thecubillo (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omer2057 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 05:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy closer. -- Geagea (talk) 12:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, content looks promotional, no EXIF Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was uploaded by mistake... Shyam1574 (talk) 11:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Paris 16 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio, modern art work Only a flower pot? Yann (talk) 12:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete This is modern art. If it were an undecorated flower pot on an unremarkable pedestal, I would say keep. However the gilding makes the crafting of the object transformative, so there is no debate to be had about non-uniquely non-customized mass produced utilitarian objects being art or not. The interpretation of the rights of the creator are under French law, which is conservative in this regard. -- (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Fæ. Green Giant (talk) 14:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The jewellery piece itself has been released by the creator, however it is composed of a mass of trademarks and logos. Easily identifiable non-text logos which are vigorously protected include Playboy, McDonalds, Disney and Apple. De minimis might be argued, however I believe this would be countered by the fact that the logos are fundamental to the piece and are for that reason a deliberate focus of the image rather than incidental. (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Fæ. (re opened) Green Giant (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Natuur12: Jee 05:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reopening and sorry for the late responce. Now for the DM-argument. Only a view logo's are copyrighted. We call the MCdonalds logo PD-text for example just like some of they other logo's.
The only logo's that are copyrighted (like the playboy logo for example) are only a small piece of the jewellery and the focus is the jewellery as a whole. Not the copyrighted logo's.
Most logo's are hardly recognizable. Even some of the copyrighted.
For some DR's closed the same way when a part of the object contained copyrighted material see here and here.
When it comes to Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. Only the bullet point from other contextual clues (eg by comparison with a series of uploads by the same uploader) X is the reason for the creation of the file. could count but I doubt it. Natuur12 (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe this is a liminal case, as mentioned in the nomination the logos are fundamental to the work, the "joke" of bling bling being that it is nothing but logos assembled into one object and therefore the creative part of the object is mostly copyrighted material. If this image is kept, then the deminimis guidelines should adopt this as a case book example as it would change our interpretation of how much of an image can be the focus of copyrighted material and still be kept on Commons under a commercial reuse licence.
It may be helpful to attract other views and rationales, perhaps a request for participation on the copyright noticeboard? -- (talk) 13:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We have had several similar prior cases where the entire work was made up of copyrighted magazines, but no single cover was readable. That was kept. In this case, very few of these logos have copyrights -- almost all are PD-textlogo, but both Playboy and Apple stand out as visible and not de minimis, so we must delete it. It's a pity the creator didn't stick to text logos. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Ras67 (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal artwork INeverCry 03:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value - promo image for non-notable group INeverCry 03:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company INeverCry 03:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a book scan. Juggler2005 (talk) 03:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stanslibro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be non-free film images, based on how they are used in ru:Частное пионерское.

Stefan4 (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stanslibro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The artist (w:Feodor Stepanovich Rojankovsky) died in 1970.

Juggler2005 (talk) 03:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pastravul13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional - unused logos of non-notable website

INeverCry 03:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bthingz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 03:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable person INeverCry 03:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 03:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elcheelche (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 04:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lauriane kuaka bola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 04:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 04:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crispotimber (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused promotional images/logos of non-notable company

INeverCry 04:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Crispotimber (talk · contribs)

possible copyvios - small images - appear to be scans - own work doubtful

INeverCry 04:47, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 04:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused promo image - possible copyvio INeverCry 04:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of statistics that could easily be replaced with a wikitable INeverCry 04:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 04:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image/artwork INeverCry 05:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lengocduc93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 05:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable people

INeverCry 05:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 05:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 05:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, hardly a real coat of arms (with 2003 defacing it) Zoupan (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope INeverCry 05:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 05:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 05:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of COM:SCOPE. Eurodyne (talk) 05:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly done fictional coa. Unused, no educational use whatsoever Zoupan (talk) 05:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

in sourcepage will be read Copyright © 2015 All Rights Reserved Motopark (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-existing television channel. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. No related uploads by user/logs. Uploaded in 12.2013 one file was apparently taken from http://www.noticiasvirtuales.com.ar/fotos/historia/ = http://www.noticiasvirtuales.com.ar/fotos/historia/cam_002.jpg (last modified: 08.2013, exif available) Gunnex (talk) 08:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality. unlikely to be used for educational purposes Gbawden (talk) 08:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yolvandy vargas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gunnex (talk) 08:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comunicacion913 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Comunicacion913 (Facebook and http://kolina.org.ar grabber & cropper).

Gunnex (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material, can be written to some wikipedia if needed Motopark (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn‘t look like "own work", but I can't find a reliable source for now. Liangent (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hlopez.crc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work (logos, music, stadiums) : small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Hlopez.crc (serial copyright violator)

Gunnex (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ostrels (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ostrels/logs.

Gunnex (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the painting is surely not in the Public Domain WolfD59 (talk) 10:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of non-notable person, self-promotion. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergioalvarez96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sergioalvarez96. Logos & historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 10:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait of a seemingly non-notable person. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cag350 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions (almost thumbs: from max. 262x353 to min. 112x203), missing EXIF.

Gunnex (talk) 12:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal photo. Brateevsky {talk} 13:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

serves to promote the uploader on enwiki Qwertyus (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image : Commons is not an image hosting website Mike Hayes (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 00:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sageo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely taken during a visit of the musem of Ecuadorian sports club es:Barcelona Sporting Club, these indoor shots of photos (COM:DW, not "own works") from the time when es:Estadio Monumental Isidro Romero Carbo was constructed (taken in 1985—1987) are most likely not covered by {{FoP-Ecuador}}.

Gunnex (talk) 13:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work [1] Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contain a non-free stock photo at page 7 [2]. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this cover is free-licensed. [3] Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File description page for file that does not exist. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File description page for file that does not exist. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File description page for file that does not exist. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created again, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nl-.ogg. Probably this should be salted. GZWDer (talk) 05:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry (unsuccessful upload or just junk? Are problems with VicuñaUploader?) --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res, no exif, unlikely to be own work. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope., self-promotion. Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Div4uk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nudity/porn images of doubtful provenance. No EXIF data. Unlikely to be under a free license.

Yann (talk) 13:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree Thank you, Yann! 114.125.60.93 14:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Many smaller copies on the Net. Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Disciple Of Eternity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small/medium size, no EXIF data, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality worse than File:Volksdorfer Damm 261, Grabstätte Schiefler, Friedhof Hamburg-Bergstedt4.JPG Vitavia (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation - image taken from university page: http://www.klinikazgmu.zp.ua/tip_427.html with strange and doubtful permission translated as "University will not mind"Cap1000 (talk) 15:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Gunnex (talk) 22:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I'm 90% sure this was vandalism. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright belongs to the photographer, not the subject. So even if the uploader is the subject, No Frame Media will have to provide the license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sebastian0921 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Sebastian0921 (serial copyright violator). Mix of unsourced logos (which may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided) and 1x photo of stadium File:Gran Parque Central noche.jpg grabbed somewhere from Internet.

Gunnex (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 00:35, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quality worse than File:Volksdorfer Damm 261, Grabstätte Schiefler, Friedhof Hamburg-Bergstedt3.JPG Vitavia (talk) 14:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality; already exist File:Liceo Joaquin Suarez Gimnasio 002.jpg with a different angle, but clear and more close view. Ganímedes (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EVNI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:EVNI, ongoing & related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Evanescence integrantes en la actualidad.jpg (@Florn88: ) and especially File:Los fogoneros dh.jpg = all files most likely grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Williamslijpen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data except one, all other uploads deleted as copyvios, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.babeau-seguin.fr/modele/maison-contemporaine/linea/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

подложная лицензия: на сайте-источнике http://www.ochakovo.ru/ явно указан копирайт -- Tomasina (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

подложная лицензия: на сайте-источнике http://www.ochakovo.ru/gallery/ явно указан копирайт -- Tomasina (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

подложная лицензия: на сайте-источнике http://www.ochakovo.ru/wine/ явно указан копирайт -- Tomasina (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Emha (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Josett2004 4 (3 uploads in 08.2013 = 2x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-8DX5GEgKug/maxresdefault.jpg[2] ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия СС не подтверждена -- Tomasina (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия СС не подтверждена -- Tomasina (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Лицензия СС не подтверждена -- Tomasina (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that uploader has the right to release this as public domain. Stifle (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image from http://www.historicaljesusresearchreport.com, as shown on its front page, which links to http://www.historicaljesusresearchreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Proofs-0057.jpeg Dai Pritchard (talk) 17:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

биьрмомобьтб 95.32.143.15 17:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As the person who took the photograph I'm baffled why it would be deleted since it is used in several articles. I can confirm it is my own work. It's annoying to see I made a mistake in the filename but that is hardly a reason for deletion. ProfDEH (talk) 19:18, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason given for deletion. INeverCry 00:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is "own work" as claimed, then it is personal art and therefore out of scope. If, on the otherhand, it came from La Peronista, then it is a copyvio. Either way, we can't keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[copied from an email to User:Jameslwoodward] La Peronista es una agrupación politica como es La Campora qu ustedces lo tienen aprobado en Wikipedia. Si La Campora esta aprobado, por que a La Peronista lo desaprobas, te puse referencia, fuentes y aun asi lo desaprobas quiero que me des el motivo por que no entiendo el por que. Arielbarrionuevo15
[ends]

Unfortunately, Google translate did not do well with that, so I am not sure I can give a better answer than the comment above. Either is it out of scope because it is personal art, or it is a copyright violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An overphotoshopped, unused image with an author name that has no reference to uploader name, possible COM:COPYVIO but out of scope as unused as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was added to a page now deleted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Penny for reason given "blatent hoax", no reason to keep the image it's a personal snap and now unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, very small, no metadata, likely COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a selfie, no indication of user's own work, subject supposedly same as uploader, probable COM:COPYVIO for this photo of a politician. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: Derivative work of poster which fills a substantial portion of this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional material out of COM:SCOPE and probable COM:COPYVIO for illustration. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable COM:COPYVIO, poor quality, image is only part of the size of the upload, no metadata, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:54, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot, no indication of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion by institutional editor Bazj (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatent self-promotion, out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either personal images, which have no place on Commons or a fan-art compendium of photos from somewhere else. In either case, out of COM:SCOPE there is no educational utility in this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lebonah Architecture (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatent self-promotion. Company logo, uploader name same, professional image, out of COM:SCOPE Commons isn't here to promote your business.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work. Smaller size, no metadata, user's other upload was harvested from internet, probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirrezaali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These look like someone rephotographed a poster, not own work and likely COM:COPYVIO.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An obvious rephotograph of another photo, unlikely to be user's own work and hence COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, and lack of data suggest this is not own work of uploader but probable COM:COPYVIO. User's other upload was taken from subject's webpage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigsofttechnologies (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This uploader's name is same as the images they are uploading, which are a series of self-promotional or promotional uploads of a company logo, out of scope for being promotional in nature.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AAO2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Two identical images, claimed to be own work of uploader. The second one clearly shows the watermarks which were removed to make the first one. Not user's own work and likely COM:COPYVIO instead.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there's some inscription across the photo, doubtful authorship; sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own photo of an actor, quite professional, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently some scan, out of scope; sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, doubtful authorship, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused text table with some game characters; sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have uploaded to Wikipedia with fair Use tag, not here Rystheguy (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unusable small size, unused Pibwl (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems out of scope, no category, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some painting with unclear copyright status, author not named Pibwl (talk) 19:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some painting with unclear copyright status, author not named Pibwl (talk) 19:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

part of table of unclear use, no proper description, sole upload - out of scope Pibwl (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in scope, as well as the other upload File:The Yes Girls Events.jpg Pibwl (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Pibwl (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Надя В.

[edit]

Unclear license. User looks like not copyright owner, as per information from user (see author on files page), copyright owner is 傅先生後代 --Cap1000 (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and/or most likely Flickrwashing. Uploaded 07.11.2014 by Rodtico21 (talk · contributions · Statistics), transferred from Flickr user "Rodtico21" who uploaded the file at Flickr on same day = https://www.flickr.com/photos/44979762@N03/15109077974/. Photo shows es:Juan Rafael Chacón (1894—1982), a Costa Rican sculptor. Gunnex (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per above, nominating also:

Gunnex (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not {{PD-ineligible}} as tagged. Source and author given as Steven Erlanger (the person pictured) so COM:OTRS permission would be needed to keep this. January (talk) 20:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted art of 2Pac. 1989 20:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description says "portada", i.e. "cover". Most covers are unfree. There is also no indication that this cover is in scope for Commons. Stefan4 (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake. reffered to sandbox. And I had not done this a friend thought it was stupid. please delete it. thank you Outacite (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

talk page of a removed file Dinosaur918 (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

talk page of a removed file Dinosaur918 (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Eventually related: Category:Sockpuppets of Karmanghia. Gunnex (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free derivative works from Tartu Art School project

[edit]

These portraits from Tartu Art School project are derivatives of photographs. I see some other WikiArS project clearly stating that a portrait must not be based on a single photograph, but here in this project several portraits fail to meet this requirement and hence they are likely copyright violations. Following portaits are based on photographs which copyright hasn't expired (less than 70 years old or less than 70 years since author's death). Probably there's more, at the moment I didn't look through most of them.

--84.50.7.230 21:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Pibwl (talk) 22:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; own photo of a photo Pibwl (talk) 22:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal? photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 22:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution (Facebook), missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering user logs. The file is most likely cropped: I already tagged this file in 01.2014 as copyvio, considering the full frame available via http://www.selecciondeguatemala.net/2012/06/la-previa-guatemala-estados-unidos_12.html (2012, 2014 Futbol Guatemala . All rights reserved, the link now redirects to selecciondeguatemala.net) = http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-GmJ49-MelgM/T9exdR2zTII/AAAAAAAAO4s/YNIItKIXlsg/s1600/206139_10150830212150496_48909640495_10002528_1622476370_n.jpg but due to minimal different details I reverted my edit. Anyway: The uploader shoud be able to upload the original high res version. Gunnex (talk) 22:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ouf of scope own artwork Pibwl (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, also File:Paul Rodriguez Muñoz.jpg Pibwl (talk) 22:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also

Possible invalid OTRS ticket Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, not an easy one and due to a lot of OTRS stuff details here will be limited. Ticket 2012111610010344 has the permission. Ticket 2015020710010999 complains that the copyright has been violated.
It does seem to me that the author Ron Blakey thought that he was given permission for non-commercial, which is mentioned several times in 2012111610010344. There is a forwarded e-mail from him where he used a one line permission which was suggested to him by the Original Poster :-"I release the Mollewide Plate Tectonic Maps found at http://cpgeosystems.com/mollglobe.html under GFDL and CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported.", nowhere does he acknowledge that he understands that this will be commercial - when another e-mail was sent to him with our standard pre-filled in consent form for him to send back, no reply was ever received. As far as I can see we have never received any e-mail direct from Ron Blakey. Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I also note that there is an older ticket 2008042810027415 where the OTRS ticket was bogus - see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:LatePermianGlobal.jpg - again when asked, Ron Blakey never replied. So I cannot be sure if the e-mail address we see is even valid. Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to come up and go away on a regular basis with these maps. I thought a previous deletion request resolved it. I can't see the OTRS tickets, but maybe there's something in #2012062510008957 for File:Afrotarsiidae comparison & biogeography.jpg. I know this derivative was nominated for deletion once because of Blakey's maps, but then things got cleared up. <sigh> ... I just wish someone would explain to Blakey that he's not likely to make any money off these maps and that non-commercial licenses only hurt the sharing of science. – Maky « talk » 07:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing in 2012062510008957 from Ron Blakey - that ticket just covers the items on top of the map, the map being allegedly CC-BY-SA already (in fact as I said above, we have never actually received an e-mail direct from him). Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:16, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The critical issue is whether the 2012 email discussions at #2012111610010344 resulted in a valid release being given. The November 2012 email that is being relied on is a one-liner which 'approves' a CC licence using the exact words that were suggested by the agent. But there is previous correspondence which to my mind makes it obvious that the person sending that email did not understand the consequences of what would have to be agreed to. I do not think there has ever been informed consent. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 08:58, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom and Michael Maggs. INeverCry 01:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor image with no context. This is from a balcony of my friends house. Debasish Dey (talk) 22:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Stefan. INeverCry 01:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Travelbound (talk · contribs)

[edit]

description doesn't fit the picture. out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (MAIL?) 06:52, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Said Murtrex Hiron (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please see our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Berthold Bartosch is dead in 1968. Copyright violation. 82.120.32.208 23:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. See also Commons:Collages. No related uploads by user. Gunnex (talk) 23:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly in scope, but lacking proof of permission, and the uploader has no contributions on any project, so I'm not sure which page this could be used on. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


I realize my first draft was unacceptable. I do not see that my edited reply received. In my edited reply I removed all emotional content. I believe the first true windproof umbrella is worth noting. Knock offs can be seen round the world. It was number one on the PGA golf tour for many years. The patent has expired. I have no commercial agenda.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by SOUTH MAUI INVENTOR (talk • contribs) 12:20, 13 February 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: US Patents after March 1, 1989 are copyrighted. There is no evidence of permission here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly done fictional coa. Unused, no educational use whatsoever Zoupan (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a personal userpage image, it would be allowable. Otherwise harmless but useless. AnonMoos (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional coa, but in reality a yellow Cross on white background... Unused, no educational use whatsoever. Zoupan (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue of Liberty New York Las Vegas.jpg, this image should be deleted also. A replica of the Statue of Liberty was erected in 1997 at the time of the hotel's opening in Las Vegas. Freedom of panorama doesn't apply to sculptures in the US. George Ho (talk) 08:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for other images at Category:Liberty Statue (New York, New York hotel). --George Ho (talk) 08:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 82.245.172.92 11:20, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But... it seems that the contributor is the artist. So now ?--Sammyday (talk) 23:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No, that is unproven. THe contributer's user name is the same as the artist's pseudonym. Identiy theft is common here, so policy requires that the artist provide a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Jens_Zimmermann_by_Olympics.png, there has been no release for the Olympic rings / IOC logo for this portrait. It is unknown if the photographer gave an explicit release for this derived image, as this is not part of the OTRS correspondence. (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, as the right owner of this picture, I clarify, that the picture was made during the Olympic Games in Sochi. Me as well as Jens Zimmermann (on the image) took part in these Games. The logo of Olympic Games are the same logo as millions of others and protected by the same international principes. Thus, picture of a person with Olympic logo background is nothing more than a new workpeace, which rights (material and intellectual) belongs to photographeк with no reason to discuss legal basis of blurred Olympic logo on the piece of intellectual property. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimafinic (talk • contribs) 12:14, 11 February 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi, please refer to Commons:De minimis. I agree the logo is blurred, however it is the majority of the photograph and this framing was deliberately chosen by the photographer and so must be considered fundamental to the image, as well as the sharp portrait on the right hand side. -- (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would worry about contradicting http://registration.olympic.org/en/faq/detail/id/25. -- (talk) 01:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm sure it's "a mark protected around the world," but see COM:Trademarks. — Pajz (talk) 01:51, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Dimafinic: Just to clarify this point, if by irrevocably releasing this image for free commercial use on Commons, you have broken any agreement or are misusing IOC trademarks, then Wikimedia, the Commons project and us unpaid volunteers accept no liability for your actions. My understanding is that any Olympics participant or event ticket holder, agrees to comply with IOC rules as part of their contract/agreement. Once the image is in use on other Wikimedia projects it will be unlikely that a courtesy deletion will be accepted. Thanks -- (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We have well over 100 images of the Olympic Rings, see Category:Olympic rings .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WestCoastMusketeer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photos from the Fred Goodwill Collection at sharehistory.org have a CC licence

Please check this link http://sharehistory.org/janes/uploads/348-townscape At the bottom, it says 'This item has been licensed for reuse under the Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Creative Commons Licence'

Tucks cards, such as

The Tucks Post cards also have CC Licensing, Please see this link http://www.tuckdb.org/faq#data The images on TuckDB Ephemera and TuckDB Postcards are of items / postcards created before 1928 putting them in the public domain. You are free to use them as you see fit. We request that you attribute your use of images on TuckDB but it is not required by law.

The data or information about each card on TuckDB Ephemera and TuckDB Postcards is licensed under cc by-sa and it is required that you attribute your use back to TuckDB.

Pictures by J H Furneaux (1895), such as

Some files such as above are taken from wiki.fibis.org Please see http://wiki.fibis.org/index.php/Main_Page By using this site, you agree we can set and use cookies. For more details of these cookies and how to disable them, see our cookie policy. All images in Fibiwiki are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License unless stated otherwise.

Some files such as

taken from http://arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com.au/2011/11/rare-photographs-of-bangalore-part-i.html Which has http://arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com/ by http://arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Based on a work at arjunpuriinqatar.blogspot.com.

Kindly do not delete any of the files, as I have individually checked all files satisfy requirements, either they have CC 3.0 or Copyright expired

Please contact me if you have any more queries "WestCoastMusketeer (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)"[reply]



Historical photos and paintings. Most likely in public domain, but definitely not Creative Commons.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

rather  Support DR, as  Comment 'postcards' imho may be protected by copyright issues, p.e. in the country i live, Roland zh (talk) 07:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Commont2: there's absolutely no need to overwhelming p.e. "Historical images of India" and p.e. "Bangalore in the 1890" --instead of categorizing just p.e. "1890 in Bangalore"-- as well as the related EN-WP articles, thx, Roland zh (talk) 08:23, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: NC licenses, as mentioned in several places above, are not acceptable on Commons. The sentence "The images on TuckDB Ephemera and TuckDB Postcards are of items / postcards created before 1928 putting them in the public domain." makes little sense -- the correct date is 1923 and PD status is not triggered by the date of creation, as it says here, but by publication in the USA. It is certainly possible that one or more of these is out of copyright, but that will have to be proven on a case by case basis. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, not own work. Image taken from here: http://kiokushin.kz/?p=512 Cap1000 (talk) 15:39, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation, not own work. Image taken from here: http://kiokushin.kz/?p=512 Cap1000 (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cap1000, I'm Akhmetster the author of this file! I gave them http://kiokushin.kz/?p=512 my file, they are my teammates of karate club Dodjo 72. So if You want to violate of copyright You should read this!


Deleted: Appears elsewhere on the web, therefore requires license via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a newer version SandHills (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded newer, more legible version SandHills (talk) 23:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spelling error, replaced with correct spelling SandHills (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. INeverCry 01:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hdetorcy (talk · contribs) fixed the date but there is no evidence which made during the object's lifetime. Y.haruo (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC) @Y.haruo: J'ai indiqué la page Internet de l'Académie Française où se trouve cette image sans indication d'année ni du peintre. Il s'agit d'un portrait d'un academicien du 18°s, visiblement réalisé depuis plus de 70 ans. Quel est le problème ? --Hdetorcy (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Old engraving. No reason to delete. Yann (talk) 13:36, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Redzinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not useful. See COM:EDUSE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Redzinho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 04:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from : http://www.jeanlouiscouturier.com/content/show/29-Robert+GOUTE.php Trizek from FR 09:38, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cette photo se trouve également dans les archives de la Fédération sportive et culturelle de France dont Robert Goute fut un dirigeant notoire. Celle-ci m'a autorisée à importer sur Commons tout document emprunté à ses archives à fin d'illustrer les articles pouvant la concerner comme en témoignent les attachés de nombreuses demandes OTRS relatives à des fichiers conservés à la suite de ces demandes après avoir été mis en cause ci-dessus. J'ai certes utilisé un raccourci contestable en considérant que ma manipulation pour n'user que d'une partie de cette photo qui entrait dans le cadre de cette autorisation pouvait m'éviter la lourdeur d'une démarche OTRS de plus. Désolé ... et bon courage.--Claude PIARD (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Merci d'envoyer une permission. La photo pourra être restaurée quand la permission sera reçue. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Paris 16 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio, modern art work Yann (talk) 11:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any art work here, only 2 roles of metalic mesh. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No transformation of the mass produced product, nor artistic configuration. It is hard to tell if this is an installation, or something left to one side for the caretaker to pick up. Educational value as a picture of some metal mesh in a roll though. -- (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Fae. Yann (talk) 13:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:View of Ariccia LACMA M.2007.34.jpg. Metadata now merged. PatHadley (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The first uploud of the gallerix.ru - image is the first, the other is second. Therefore, the latter upload has to be deleted (This method of upward loading is unacceptable). --Trzęsacz (talk) 13:33, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate. Yann (talk) 13:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by K-iczn as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.e-room.tv/ Stefan4 (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 13:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously tagged {{No permission since}}, but I can't see any reason not to believe that this is the uploader's own work. El Grafo (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Photo is my own work of a celebrity at a public festival. I sent OTRS by email. Tuluqaruk (talk) 16:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OTRS received ticket:2015021110016921 --Sphilbrick (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sphilbrick, it is an account confirmation too per this. So please confirm his user page too to avoid the need of further tickets. Jee 17:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm not following this. I do not know what "confirm his user page" means. I see some discussion suggesting that once the user name is associated with a real name, it will not be necessary to send further OTRS permission requests, which sounds like a good idea, but I don't know about it.--Sphilbrick (talk) 23:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:OTRS#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_OTRS.3F #3. (eg: User:Charliesamuels) Jee 03:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission received. Yann (talk) 13:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michele Bassi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk copyvio upload from Messina sock; Even if some images may actually be PD, they have no source to substantiate claim; no AGF afforded to this user.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Agata di Sebastiano. --2A02:810D:1080:23D8:10E1:5CFD:D912:1C1F 20:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Files already deleted. Yann (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: are they?? See Special:ListFiles/Michele_Bassi --2A02:810D:1080:23D8:B935:59B3:97FD:FE2C 20:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The remaining files have metadata, and I can't find copies on the web. If you have further info, please provide them in a new DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a mistake. Please leave the best picture Nixnubix (talk) 21:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made a mistake. Four other versions are existing Nixnubix (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Yann (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Alex (talk) 09:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase el alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copied from Facebook. Yann (talk) 13:56, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: This design is copyrighted by Apple (see https://emojipedia.org/dizzy-face/ for reference). ~ nicolas (talk) 15:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. {{PD-textlogo}}? Yann (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Looks PD-txtlogo to me. Fry1989 eh? 21:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-text logo Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:46, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. {{PD-textlogo}}? Yann (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Logo with simple geometrical shapes. PD-textlogo. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RuEsMaxim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 03:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - no similar photos were found --A1 (talk) 10:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source is Wikimapia. --Sebari (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No free license at source. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License washing. The owner of the copyright is Europa Press, a news agency Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since there is a lack of freedom of panorama in USA a photo of sculpture is not free. This sculpture is in Montana, which apparently is in USA and it was created in 2013. Fair use could apply - but not here. Perhaps the artist will release rights to photograph, but there is no evidence for this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graeme Bartlett (talk • contribs) 20:49, 11 February 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: It is possible for either myself or the photographer to contact the sculptor and ask. He could contact you via the OTRS system. However, I am not familiar enough with the issues here to know precisely what rights he has to grant for photos to be used. Can you clarify what specifically we need to ask him for? Also, how much time can you give us to do this? Thanks. Montanabw (talk) 01:48, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I have reached out directly to Jim Dolan on this via email asking him for permission to use photographs of his sculptures and the ORTS process we'd follow to acquire that permission. Time will tell. --Mike Cline (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Dolan has agreed to give permission so I'll be initiating the OTRS process today. --Mike Cline (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The OTRS template has been sent to Dolan for his submission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org for the four different Bleu Horses images.--Mike Cline (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This can be restored if the sculptor actually sends a license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Architect Architect has died in 1975, his assistant in 2005. --BaseSat (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BaseSat (talk) 18:19, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Получил сегодня по телефону согласие на использование фотографий этого здания от Вадима Борисовича Жежерина, сына Бориса Петровича Жежерина, одного из архитекторов—соавторов здания. Разрешение «по форме» готовлю --AMY (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Просьба ещё несколько дней не удалять файлы. От Вадима Борисовича Жежерина разрешение будет в ближайшие дни, он сейчас сильно занят и попросил небольшую отсрочку. --AMY (talk) 14:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{PermissionOTRS|2015022810011636}}


Kept: Permission from architect was given. Anatoliy (talk) 08:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not the photo in the title and the RCE link - a mistake, or we are fooled here 94.213.39.2 09:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The RCE files have some titles+descriptions not matching the images, fixing it seems better than deletion to me. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've renamed the file to a more correct indication. Basvb (talk) 13:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Renamed Natuur12 (talk) 21:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cinematografist

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request --Cinematografist (talk) 12:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC) These images were all uploaded by User:Cinematografist. I believe they should be deleted because [they are old version of images, mention no license and they create confusion]. Cinematografist (talk) 12:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Everything seems to be done here? Natuur12 (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader had made a deletion request Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is going to by published in the article: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magazyn_Student%C3%B3w_Semestr - so it should be kept, and no deleted WiktorPelent (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)WiktorPelent[reply]

Please include it in the article then. After that  Keep. --Sebari (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:47, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to eldiario.es license, CC-BY-SA No se aplica a los contenidos [...] publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados (that is, "does not apply to contents [...] published by eldiario.es from third-parties when they are signed"). The picture is indeed signed by Marta Jara and nothing allows to determine whether Marta Jara is or not a third-party (although Marta Jara seemed to be a member of the publico.es staff, I haven't been able to find any information regarding the status of Ms. Jara with regard to eldiario.es) Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The usual eldiario.es license washing. The source, though Europa Press, seems to be in the Academa Valenciana de la Llengua (AVL), with unknown licensing conditions. Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.eldiario.es/politica/Familiares-allegados-Rosalia-Mera-Coruna_0_165183602.html, no approval NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 14:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I now see that the publication actually seems to publish its works under a CC licence. Should be reviewed by a Spanish speaking admin. --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 17:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file have a CC license. All the contents from eldiario.es are free.--R65898 17:47, 24 may 2014 (UTC)


Kept: Apperantly okey Natuur12 (talk) 10:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another eldiario.es license washing. The image is a crop of one of the image listed here. It clearly states
EFE/Alberto Martín.
Fotografía de archivo del 9 de julio de 2003 de la empresaria gallega Rosalía Mera Goyenechea
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:58, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per this new arguments likely not okay. Natuur12 (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

eldiario.es is not the owner of the copyright but EFE (a news agency) Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Together with:

As far as I can tell, these logotypes does not contain a common, ordinary typeface (font), but the unique one. And as obviously it is simple, it's at the same time far beyond simple geometric figures, therefore is a subject of copyrights and should be rmeoved from Commons. Masur (talk) 15:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how you are going to proof that all these category:Software logos (SVG) do not contain a unique typeface. It might look like Arial and Times New Roman, but that doesn't mean it's really that simple. The same is true for the opposite. You might think the south park logo is unique, but for me it's a combination of the official south park font and a lord of the rings typeface. Both are widely available on the internet. All these fonts are copyrighted. When does a font become too much copyrighted for commons? -- Qafgbxvghnx (talk) 10:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
So, COM:PCP? Masur (talk) 07:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say no. Commons:Threshold of originality#Logos and flags lists several cases that may not be eligible for deletion requests. If you take a look at the new Fantasyland and Sonic Generations case, I'd say these logos above are in the same category. So keep. -- Qafgbxvghnx (talk) 10:21, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I noted 4 above which are PD-textlogo. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The ones I kept might be below TOO. At least they need seperate DR's Natuur12 (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1989 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.aphotoeditor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/edition-logo.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2009/06/11/edition-one-studios-makes-books-for-photographers/&h=232&w=328&tbnid=Cs7nOFZDCVGz5M&zoom=1&tbnh=185&tbnw=262&usg=__5p0eM6eK4At-5rFAwSUBU_gdCkE=&docid=4G2nfpD5n9pJMM {{PD-textlogo}}? Yann (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This one likely not imho Natuur12 (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Main building's authors died in 1958 and 1961, the suburban station (the one with the clock-tower) was built in 1954—1955, and southern station (the bluish building) and northern platforms building are relatively recent. --BaseSat (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BaseSat (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I'm really tired of these no-FoP related marginal deletion requests based on thin law with neither complainant, nor the state showing any intention in the last 50 years of stopping anyone from publishing their holiday photos, or even putting professional photos on the front of magazines or post-cards. I am not saying that the rationale is incorrect but I do believe these are pointy liminal technical deletions when buildings are as well photographed, published and as unremarkable as this. Were there a legal case precedent, or an architect or state department that cared, this would be entirely different for me. Show me a small sign of any sort that an architect cares about their additions to the building being freely photographed, and I would vote to delete immediately. -- (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Моя фотография - Kiev7938.JPG - была загружена в рамках украинской части конкурса "Вики любит памятники" с использованием соотстветствующего загрузочного шаблона. Информацию о загрузке именно в рамках конкурса можно увидеть на странице этой фотографии. Украинская сторона в лице жюри конкурса не предъявила никаких претензий к фотографии. Я искренне не понимаю, почему претензии возникают сейчас. Мне кажется, логично для начала обратиться с претензиями к тем людям, которые отвечали за формирование конкурсных (загрузочных) списков, а не к юзерам, которые руководствовались этими списками, отправляя фотографии на конкурс. Пишу уже второй подобный комментарий, первый был здесь: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Simferopol_Railway_Station "Вчера газовая камера, сегодня газовая камера - голова начинает болеть" (с) Жванецкий Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's the law -- if you don't like it, change the law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Привокзальная площадь, Киев - 2.jpg, File:Привокзальная площадь, Киев - 5.jpg, File:Kiev7938.JPG have permission from architect, so I restore them.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Kyiv-Pasazhyrskyi_Railway_Station: no FOP in Ukraine.

Kulmalukko (talk) 19:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More files from eldiario.es

[edit]

According to this, the image source is EFE a news agency. eldiario.es is not the owner of the copyright Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the source that I used, eldiario.es, didn't credit it correctly. The file must be deleted. Thanks Discastro!, --Elisardojm (talk) 02:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I added all the files from the same site (eldiario.es) to the list. I can see that the site releasing there files under {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} but they not mentioning an author and it doesn't seems like the photographed the files by themselves and the files can found in the net. We can't trust this source as a free source. -- Geagea (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Gregorio-Moran-presentacion-cura-mandarines.jpg and File:Entrevista exclusiva a Hervé Falciani en español - eldiario.es.webm. Unlike the other files, these are materials created for interviews carried out by eldiario.es journalists (the Gregorio Morán one was uploaded by me and I verified both the poor quality of the image and the fact that it was illustrated an original eldiario.es content... I also looked for the picture in Google Images and Tineye, with no success). The same happens with the Falciani interview. It's again an original eldiario.es interview and therefore there's not reason to think it's from other source. CC-BY-SA license is correct in, at least, those cases. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 17:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Keep also File:Expectativa de voto - España 2015.png. It's clearly an original content. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 17:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the author in this file? Does they claim that they own the rights about the files in the site? -- Geagea (talk) 17:33, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, their license conditions state that their own contents are licensed under CC-BY (or CC-BY-SA, I don't remember now). The problem is that, in general, they have an inconsistent way of attribution. Therefore, most of the content they host and show with no attribution is not actually theirs, but from news agencies. I've been the one that have tagged most of the images listed in the DR as copyright violations, but also I've found some that are clearly theirs (mainly because of the conditions under which the content was generated). For instance, File:Gregorio-Moran-presentacion-cura-mandarines.jpg is a low quality image that is illustrating an interview held with Gregorio Morán by eldiario.es journalists. The image shows exactly the whereabouts of Gregorio Morán in the alleged interview (the presentation of his work). So I have no reason to think that the image is not from eldiario.es. The same happens with the Falciani video, as it's a video in which eldiario.es journalists have an interview with Falciani. To sum up, generally speaking, eldiario.es must be regarded as un unreliable and listed in Commons:Problematic sources, but it doesn't mean that any picture from eldiario.es must be deleted. Only those being proven (or likely) copyvios. That's not the case in the three concrete cases I'm pointing at. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 13:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You done good job as image reviewer and I would also vote as keep the files you have mentioned per your argument for each case. But this site hosting files from elsewhere in the net without credit them or even without mentioning the fact that they are not the owners. -- Geagea (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Delete Only if proven copyvio.--Coentor (talk) 09:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Delete all per discussion, including the template since this template is way to tricky and people rely on those templates. I kept the files mentioned by Discasto. Natuur12 (talk) 22:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]