Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/12/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 13th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no model release Esby (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is basically a mass deletion request.
All files contained in Category:User:esby/Cosplay_photo_without_model_release should be deleted.
Basically there is no model release associated with these photos, so they cannot be used commercially without the model agreement.
This is also specified on my Flickr profile since a lonnnnng time.
They were all imported from my Flickr account with the flickr uploader tool.
Esby (talk) 15:30, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Esby reading of the law is not correct. While it is true that they cannot be used for commercial endorsements, that is not a copyright restriction. They can be used in a variety of other commercial uses, including, for example, bookson cosplay. If Esby's reading were correct, we could not keep any image of a person. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all files in Category:User:esby/Cosplay_photo_without_model_release are concerned. Most of them are unused files.
Reopening the Deletion Request - Consent is mandatory per Commons policy (photographs of identifiable people - Country France) Esby (talk) 00:12, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The images were taken in France, Commons Policy say that Consent is mandatory (see France case in Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Country_specific). Also see Commons:Deletion_policy#Photographs_of_identifiable_people as it is on the list of deletion reasons.
There is no consent for publication on Commons, it does not even exist, so the files in Category:User:esby/Cosplay_photo_without_model_release should be deleted.
Esby (talk) 00:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I think my rather limited interpretation of the law above was probably incorrect. It seems that except for public figures and crowds, any image of a person in France requires permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Many of the clothes are probably copyrighted in France. Just as you can't take photos of copyrighted chairs, you can presumably not take photographs of copyrighted clothes either. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all. That there is no consent of the models does not really matters. This is a non-copyright restriction with which the Commons is not concerned. It is the responsibility of those who want to reuse this pictures for a commercial purpose to obtain the necessary consent. Commons (as well as other Wikimedia projects) itself is not a commercial project and is not affected by this non-copyright restriction. Ruslik (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The French law is stricter than most -- with limited exceptions which do not apply here, any use, commercial or not, of the image of a person in France is unlawful -- simply taking the photograph is unlawful. Therefore our hosting the images is actionable. That is certainly of concern.
Note, also, that our official guideline on the subject requires that Commons obey such laws. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
First, I can not find where that guideline says that the consent for hosting such photos on Commons is mandatory. It only implies that it is desirable. Second, the photos were obviously taken with consent of the models, and I assume that they were published (i.e. made public) with consent of the models (by the same same person - Esby - who nominated them for deletion). Is it necessary for the Commons to have a specific consent for hosting images that have been already lawfully published elsewhere? That guideline is quite unclear with respect of this question. I would not delete these images (after all they have been here for 5 years without any problem) unless there is a specific complaint. Ruslik (talk) 17:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The cited official guideline says:
"An image is unacceptable to Commons if it is illegal, or arguably illegal, in any one or more of: (a) the country in which the photograph was taken; (b) the country from which the image was uploaded; (c) the USA (where Commons images are stored)."
That seems pretty clear to me. French law makes it illegal to take images of identifiable people without their consent. While it may appear obvious to you that the person in the subject image consented, I don't think it passes our "beyond a significant doubt" standard and we certainly have no written evidence of consent. COM:PRP #5 speaks directly to your last sentence:
"...the following are against Commons' aims:
"5. The file is obviously common property. It can be found all over the internet and nobody has complained."
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per Commons:Project scope/Evidence, we need consent and here the photographer already mentioned there is NO CONSENT at all. Jee 02:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note, it is not illegal to take photos of someone, you might ask for consent for taking the picture, which helps in getting the person attention but it is not enough for publication, consent for taking the photograph does not equal to consent for publishing (or using) the photograph somewhere. Such consent has to be written, specific (naming the usage for example) and restricted in time, which is not really compatible to Commons expected usage of the medias... As I said there is no written consent, there is tolerance that such photos will be published on my (personal) websites (tolerance as understanding that's usually how cosplay photographers proceeds in France), but I don't think Commons is to be considered as my 'website'... Most photographs were changed of licence when i discovered those rogue flickr imports, a few hundred were left, due to issues affecting the flickr organiser when 10k photos (or more) needs be selected... I fixed all that were left (manually) this last december... Esby (talk) 19:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Esby, I don't understand:
"Just a note, it is not illegal to take photos of someone..."
At the official guideline cited above, we are told:
"Taking a picture of a person in a public space: Requires consent"
If the law says you need consent to take a picture of someone, then taking a picture without consent breaks the law and is therefore illegal. If it is not illegal to take photos of someone without consent, then our summary of the French law is incorrect and should be changed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My two cents, you are probably right here, in my opinion, the issue is that you cannot really forbid to take a photograph, the 'right to take a photograph' does not intervene much here, at least in a public place, since the issue really comes into play when the photograph is actually published, at least it's the theory. Our guideline are probably ok there. After some thinking, since we deal with published pictures it does not really matter for us at Commons, I believe the important point is that you cannot transform a 'there was consent for taking the photograph' (understand he/she was posing) into a 'there was consent for publication' since there is nothing written. Esby (talk) 23:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Some countries have strict laws where consent is mandatory to take photos of people. In such cases, copyright is not going to initiated if we fire the shutter without consent. Consent to publish and consent to use commercially are different. If we need consent to publish, such works are only suitable for private uses where no publishing is carried out. If consent is required for commercial use, but other uses are allowed; we can host such works with a {{Personality}} warning. Jee 02:48, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --JuTa 19:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template not used PKM (talk) 06:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused template Jarekt (talk) 17:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MIIHNIOI9YDRFRRRREESSFRXDDS 97868IUII6IUUUISZASDDDFR5TRRTTTGFDRTDFGFHGHN 188.100.206.84 13:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalical DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visiting the source site reveals that the given link is not a permanent URL, but searching the catalog for "Atlas Missile 10D" gives the catalog record. No author is given, and there is no indication that this is actually a NASA photo. It does not appear to be contained in the NASA archives, which I have been consulting extensively in the last few days for photos from the Mercury Program. Per COM:PRP, regretfully this needs to go away. Revent (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nom. Further hunting reveals that these are in fact part of the 'Florida Photographic Collection', which is apparently allowable per Template:Image from the Florida Photographic Collection. Revent (talk) 19:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nominator has found correct file information - deletion no longer necessary Nick (talk) 19:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Visiting the source site reveals that the given link is not a permanent URL, but searching the catalog for "Atlas Missile 10D" gives the catalog record. No author is given, and there is no indication that this is actually a NASA photo. It does not appear to be contained in the NASA archives, which I have been consulting extensively in the last few days for photos from the Mercury Program. Per COM:PRP, regretfully this needs to go away. Note that, though not properly marked, this is a derivative work of File:Big Joe 1 on Launch Complex 14 at Cape Canaveral.jpg, which I have also tagged for DR. Revent (talk) 19:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nom. Further hunting reveals that these are in fact part of the 'Florida Photographic Collection', which is apparently allowable per Template:Image from the Florida Photographic Collection. Revent (talk) 19:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nominator has found correct file information - deletion no longer necessary Nick (talk) 19:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to me taken from a TV screen or magazine ابوهايدي (talk) 03:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Speedily Deleted. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Russavia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from a batch upload (I looked though more than 5500 images before i had to stop). Some are in my opinion of very personal nature. Images from holidays, travels, family. They are maybe under a free license and for flickr they are maybe OK. For Commons they are in my opinion not OK. And a lot of images fom the family pets. Hundrets of alwys the same images mostly of cats. The most images of the batch upload are OK - but these images here in my opinion out of scope. We are not the provider of private Webspace. The images are not of educational use and again - some of them are not usable because they are simoply of private nature.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After scanning through all nominated (non-deleted) files, IMO only the following 7 should also be deleted for being a bit too personal/private and thereby out of scope, while all others should remain:
--Túrelio (talk) 07:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: I disgaree with File:How deep? (5225572713).jpg as it can be used to illustrate winter clothing. File:Holly (2539660018).jpg could be used to illustrate that breed of cocker spaniel. File:Negotiations (927097342).jpg can be used to illustrate en:2007 Royal Mail industrial disputes. The other few you've mentioned, sure they could easily go. russavia (talk) 07:11, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any evidence of consent of the depicted in File:Negotiations (927097342).jpg? In my country, such an image used (beyond mere news reporting of a recent event) without consent of the depicted could become quite costly for any re-user. Not sure, how it's in the UK.
About File:Holly (2539660018).jpg: sure, though we have enough images of the same dog already. However, here the dog-image is "spoiled" by the background. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Holly (2539660018).jpg is one of only two photos we have of this breed of dog with people; there's no issue with that photo, its high resolution, reasonably good quality, so we should host it for people to use as they see fit. The Royal Mail strike photo there is no issue with, it complies with COM:IDENT in the UK. russavia (talk) 07:46, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, what's written in Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#United_Kingdom isn't that relaxed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Concur with the sentiment but that what the personality rights template hopes to address. Slap it on any image where there is an identifiable person for the benefit of re-users who could easily fall afoul of this issue. Saffron Blaze (talk) 14:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Too many files for a single nomination. I kept all that remained after several weeks being on the nomination list. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Russavia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images of people, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope

Ies (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Deleted by Uploader. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete Flozc (talk) 22:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Tagged speedy by authors request. Will be deleted soon by an admin. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Site in source has a copyright notice saying: © 2013 SHOE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DLindsley Need something? 22:36, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep So? The logo is text and a very, very simple geometric design. This is simply a {{PD-textlogo}}, which you would know if you'd read the guidelines when you were blocked, yet here you are again making the same spurious and ill-informed deletion requests. --31.6.38.95 22:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I have changed the license to PD-textlogo and added a trademark notice
 Keep per above. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, License changed. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por milesima vez solicito que verifiquen este usuario que en verdad ya se extralimito usando ahora imagenes pornograficas explicitas quien sabe de quien para usar el nombre de otra persona y hacer publicaciones bulgares que aparte de insultar y arruinar y difamar el nombre de una persona que nada tiene que ver con medios publicos, mas indignante es que en Wikimedia no verifiquen el tipo de imagenes que los usuarios como este que se hace llamar mireya lam sube y que no tiene ningun tipo de aporte educacional por favor solicito que se elimine de ingmediato esta imagen y por favor les pido que eliminen este usuario de ingmediato. Mid g17 (talk) 22:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info Estoy solicitando de caracter urgente la eliminacion de esta imagen y del usuario mireya lam y estoy solicitando que alguien por favor me ayude o me indique con quien debo ponerme en contacto ya el uso de un nombre y la imagen de una persona para colocar otras imagenes de este tipo vulgar queriendo hacer pasar ese nombre con esa imagen ya es un delito ya raya en lo incorrecto y solicito el borrado inmediato. Mid g17 (talk) 22:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info pido la eliminacion del usuario Mire D Lam que es autor de esta imagen vulgar, ofensiva, he inapropiada Mid g17 (talk) 23:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info material inapropiado sin relevancia y pornografico Mid g17 (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Inappropriate content probably taken without the depicted person's permission. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Por milesima vez solicito que verifiquen este usuario que en verdad ya se extralimito usando ahora imagenes pornograficas explicitas quien sabe de quien para usar el nombre de otra persona y hacer publicaciones bulgares que aparte de insultar y arruinar y difamar el nombre de una persona que nada tiene que ver con medios publicos, mas indignante es que en Wikimedia no verifiquen el tipo de imagenes que los usuarios como este que se hace llamar mireya lam sube y que no tiene ningun tipo de aporte educacional por favor solicito que se elimine de ingmediato esta imagen y por favor les pido que eliminen este usuario de ingmediato. Mid g17 (talk) 22:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info Aparte de la insistencia en dañar la imagen de esta persona, colocando imagenes que si fueron sacadas de una red social asi como esta y en cambio colocando otras imagenes de pornografia haciendo creer que es la misma y ademas de colocar mensajes estupidos y sin sentido como saludos para mis amigos lindos, como si esta pagina fuera una red social o algo asi estoy ya de verdad pidiendo a quien pueda ayudarme a resolver este problema, ya sea poniendome en contacto directo o de alguna manera para comprobar que este usuario esta suplantando una identidad y no conforme esta dañando la reputacion de una persona.... Les solicito ayuda inmediata. Mid g17 (talk) 22:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Inappropriate content probably taken without the depicted person's permission. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

solicito la eliminacion de este usuario, por suplantacion de identidad ya que ademas de usar el nombre de otra persona tambien utilizo este medio para publicar imagenes personales de la persona a la cual a robado la identidad, por favor les suplico que verifiquen y eliminen a este usuario de su red ya que ninguna de las imagenes es de ayuda educativa en ningun sentido, solamente un robo de identidad con fines de desprestigio. Mid g17 (talk) 22:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Info Anteriormente ya habia solicitado la eliminacion de este archivo debido a que este usuario ha utilizado imagenes personales de otra persona y las publico en esta pagina, las cuales tambien solicite que fueran borradas, esta persona esta suplantando la identidad de Mireya Lam usando las imagenes que fueron robadas de una cuenta personal y su nombre para dañar tanto la imagen personal de esta persona, como a nivel social suplantando su identidad para hacer publicaciones que en nada colaboran o siguen las normas de ayuda, informacion util o ningun tipo de colaboracion educativa, ademas las imagenes que este usuario ha compartido no representan ningun aporte a los usuarios y al contrario resultan inapropiadas para su uso en esta pagina, al contrario las usa para dañar la imagen de una persona que no tiene nada que ver con un ambiente publico y que por lo tanto no representa ninguna ayuda o aporte y es por eso que espero puedan tomar las medidas necesarias para borrar este archivo lo antes posible por favor. Gracias. Mid g17 (talk) 09:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info Por favor estoy solicitando la eliminacion de este usuario, por favor verifiquen lo que este usuario sube ya reporte muchisimas veces este problema pero hoy ya se paso de la raya colocando imagenes pornograficas y vulgares con el nombre mireya lam, les pido por favor hacer algo ya que son imagenes inapropiadas. Mid g17 (talk) 23:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info usurpacion de identidad Mid g17 (talk) 00:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Notice Please stop requesting deletion of this TP. Talk pages are rarely deleted. See this link for the Wiki policy concerning this. If there is specific informtion concerning you that you wish to have removed, please view this ESPANOL page and follow the instruction there. Thanks EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:49, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, We don't delete talk page. Yann (talk) 13:23, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   04:36, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn. Notable person, see en:Eleanor Mary Anne Glynn. --P 1 9 9   04:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Nominator withdrew the nomination. Subject is notable and image is used on en.wiki EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO, http://baubles4you.com/gallery ... http://baubles4you.com/media/rokgallery/e/ecebff9f-bb23-4001-f42b-4086f022ccaa/b31cd9fe-e4ca-4c86-fb2e-2bfed98a0cf6.jpg ... promotional image see commentary under "other information"... "i sell this and similar products...." Out of COM:SCOPE Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator. Copyrighted and out of project scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside the Project scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 16:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by User:Alan. JuTa 16:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
   {{[[Template:Delete
   |Delete
   ]]|reason=the wrong species name. already erecta|subpage=Category:Thunbergia reecta|day=13|month=December|year=2014}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by தகவலுழவன் (talk • contribs) 2014-12-13T08:59:35‎ (UTC)

Deleted: by User:Fastily JuTa 16:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nano9725 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Other uploads by this uploader have been deleted for being copyvios. No EXIF, low res, etc indicate these are too.

russavia (talk) 10:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Images can be found on many websites and they lack EXIF data. Copyright status is unclear as well. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:37, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Remember, lack of EXIF is no reason for agrueing. I.e. postprocessing may destroy EXIF from camera and replace it by some others. --Gomera-b (talk) 12:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photo of a photo - who took the original photo and copyright status unknown Christopher Fynn (talk)) 10:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore - This seems to be an Instagram type effect - as there is also another version of the photo. (Though I don't know why this one is on Commons) Christopher Fynn (talk)) 18:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is better to follow "Extensive manipulations must be clearly described in the image text" for a better understanding. Chances that some one use the "crop tool" to remove the frame in future, and then it will become in COM:SCOPE. Jee 03:14, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From the photographer: It's not a photo of a photo - just a filter on my original photo.


 Kept, Withdrawn. Jee 03:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, there's no evidence that this the uploader's work. See http://www.theplace2.ru/photos/William-Levy-md4829/pic-552007.html. Second, and related to the first, how can the camera data show that the picture was taken in 2010 and yet the picture is supposedly of an interview that took place in 2014? Bbb23 (talk) 01:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 06:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soledad Marquez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 01:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per above. Green Giant (talk) 01:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either personal artwork (out of scope) or art by an unidentified artist (permission missing). No context to make it educational. P 1 9 9   03:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either personal artwork (out of scope) or art by an unidentified artist (permission missing). No context to make it educational. P 1 9 9   03:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either personal artwork (out of scope) or art by an unidentified artist (permission missing). No context to make it educational. P 1 9 9   03:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BaySide (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
and File:Instant software riches.pdf

Out of project scope and questionable copyright status of document Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

solicito la eliminacion de este usuario y solicito la eliminacion definitiva de las imagenes que esta persona ha subido usando ademas de una imagen extraida de un perfil privado, ahora tambien ha colocado una imagen totalmente vulgar y pornografica que hasta donde he podido verificar en la informacion de wikimedia commons no es el tipo de imagenes y tampoco el tipo de informacion que esta para ayudar a los usuarios y que por supuesto no tiene ningun fineducativo, este acoso y suplantacion de identidad ya se convirtio en un delito y solicito que verifiquen por favor Mid g17 (talk) 23:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, User page of indeffed user. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just looks like a random-ish pattern. Not sure what it has to do with ultraviolet rays. This, that and the other (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 11:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found elsewhere in the web and unlikely to be own work. Green Giant (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raju vamsharaj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private images, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep couple of black person. the type of photos, the clothes, the context and the subjects they give me a sense of tradition, anthropology, customs and usages of people culturally different from me (for example). Hoping not to be misunderstood (my English is not perfect): if I wanted a photograph, a classic, a cliché, to be put on a page that talks about a descriptive and accurate entrar culture without too much detail of it, I would use this photo.--Pava (talk) 08:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant (talk) 01:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot contain non-free content. Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, unsure what you mean by the non-free content in the screenshot.
I uploaded it in order to replace the one that was previously shown here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softpedia as it was low quality and had been resized without preserving the AR, resulting in a deformed image.
This is the file I'm talking about http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Softpedia&diff=prev&oldid=634461456#mediaviewer/File:Softpedia_updated.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.136.178.213 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 13 December 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Commons don't accept fair use content, please upload this screenshot to the English Wikipedia like the one you linked, thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, thanks. I'll upload it there and delete this file shortly. --Sorinb2014 (talk) 18:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete based in "© 2001 - 2014 Softpedia. All rights reserved. Softpedia® and the Softpedia® logo are registered trademarks of SoftNews NET SRL". –Be..anyone (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Fair use images not allowed on Commons. Green Giant (talk) 01:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermarks indicate that this has been copied from some website. Stefan4 (talk) 17:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Stefan. Green Giant (talk) 01:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1930 German photograph, no information about the author. Without any info about the author, this photo is too recent to be kept at Commons: The author could well have lived beyond 1943, which would mean the image is still protected. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 01:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that the Flickr user is the copyright holder. 4ing (talk) 19:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright does not belong to the Flickr user. Green Giant (talk) 12:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely that the Flickr user is the copyright owner. 4ing (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright does not belong to the Flickr user. Green Giant (talk) 12:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the frst time, this guy tries to place his promotional images on Commons. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 11:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this can be considered a "text logo". 4ing (talk) 23:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Complex logo. Needs to be licensed before it can be hosted on Commons. Green Giant (talk) 12:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1925 German photo from the archive of an art institute, clearly not "own work" as claimed. The photographer could have been alive after that for decades, so the image could very well still be protected. Without further info: Delete the image per COM:PCP. Rosenzweig τ 23:44, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP. We need details of the original author. Green Giant (talk) 12:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The German architect Hans Herkommer (1887–1856) is given as the author of this drawing, which means it is still protected by copyright till the end of 2026. Rosenzweig τ 23:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Rosenzweig, I assume you meant 1956, otherwise he died before he was born. Green Giant (talk) 12:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1924 German drawing from the archive of an art institute, clearly not "own work" as claimed. The artist could have been alive after that for decades, so the image could very well still be protected. Without further info: Delete the image per COM:PCP. Rosenzweig τ 23:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP. We need details about the author of the underlying work. Green Giant (talk) 12:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 1932 drawing and a 1935 photograph of a German church, scanned from books. No photographers or artists are named. These photographers/artists could have been alive after that for decades, so the images could very well still be protected. Without further info: Delete the images per COM:PCP.

Rosenzweig τ 23:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP. The author must be widely unknown, not just unknown to the uploader. Green Giant (talk) 12:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from a Facebook page which has since been taken down. No evidence that the licensing information is genuine. It seems unlikely that the Moroccan armed forces publish content under an open license on a private individual's facebook page. bobrayner (talk) 23:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP. Green Giant (talk) 12:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old photos of a German church, scanned from postcards or books, no photographers mentioned. No date mentioned at all or one as recent as 1960. The photographers were either definitely alive after 1943 or could well have been, so the images are or very well could be still protected. Without further info: Delete the images per COM:PCP.

Rosenzweig τ 23:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP. Unclear copyright status, unlikely to be own work by uploader. Green Giant (talk) 11:43, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in Commons scope, please review COM:SCOPE EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 02:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khaled T-Max (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope.

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Self promotion. Green Giant (talk) 14:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have got permission from via email Creativediary (talk)

No evidence of permission. Buxtehude (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. The burden of proof lies with the uploader. Please read COM:OTRS and ask the copyright holder to send a license statement to Wikimedia. Green Giant (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it's cropped from this poster [1]. Juggler2005 (talk) 15:47, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agreed. Green Giant (talk) 14:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mobin jokar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: One file deleted. Watermark says "copyvio". Green Giant (talk) 14:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nanomicrotech (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused texts document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be exactly the kind of script lettering which the Austrian supreme court decided was copyrighted in two different cases. See COM:TOO#Austria. Stefan4 (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2014 (UTC)  Delete out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:07, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RonaldoRG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs and video clips. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screencap, copyvio, would fail NFCC1 on Wikipedia to begin with ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of free license. Green Giant (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 13:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of why this would be public domain. The website cited is copyrighted. See [2]. Taketa (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 13:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ubaid kareem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo's.

Buxtehude (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ubaid kareem (talk · contribs)

[edit]

bad quality/likely copyvios/out of scope

/St1995 23:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork. Buxtehude (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Found elsewhere on the web. Unlikely to be own work. Green Giant (talk) 13:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 13:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 16:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 堀江 公人 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I agree, kimito horie.


These seem to be out of scope. A few of them are in use at b:es:Usuario:Isc, but it seems that the page is meant to use other, completely different, files originally hosted on b:es: but deleted there in 2006 (see b:es:Special:Log).

Stefan4 (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Stefan. Green Giant (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto ziet er uit als een scan uit een tijdschrift. ernstige twijfel of dit dan ook eigen werk is. Meerdervoort (talk) 14:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard Drost (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those images, all uploaded by the same person have different problems. Some are clear print screens, others contain suspicious watermarks and others have EXIF data that indicates that those files are indeed copyright violations because they are credited to somebody else. Also, it would be pretty unique if one person took all those images. At file File:Bob de Vries.jpg the uploader even admits that he has taken the image from twitter, no evidence of permission here. And another image, already nominated here looks like a scan. It is very unlikely that the uploader is the real copyright holder of all those images and the PCP should apply.

Natuur12 (talk) 14:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP. Green Giant (talk) 14:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:47, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not useful for our projects. GeorgHHtalk   16:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Per Buxtehude and Jim. Green Giant (talk) 14:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please see our project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:48, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We already have plenty of penis pics. Green Giant (talk) 14:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another low quality penis picture Ies (talk) 14:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo has been nominated for deletion twice already and has been deleted twice. Reuploaded 1/22/2019. Mjrmtg (talk) 12:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nude Genital! Not enough information and wrong picture please delete Fishermansfriend2 (talk) 15:22, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete random low quality dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission (see file name), own work? Buxtehude (talk) 14:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of permission. Please read COM:OTRS. Green Giant (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:31, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of release into public domain. Buxtehude (talk) 14:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fair use images are not allowed in Commons. Green Giant (talk) 14:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. Buxtehude (talk) 14:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fair use images are not allowed on Commons. Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:44, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from: http://www.fivb.org/visasp/ShowImage.aspx?No=200718846&maxsize=500 Ytoyoda (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from: http://todoelfutbolensandiego.blogspot.com/2012/05/basquet-liga-sur.html Ytoyoda (talk) 04:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted 7 files uploaded by user, per COM:NOTHOST. Green Giant (talk) 15:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomvis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photo, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thierry76240 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be out of scope.

Stefan4 (talk) 12:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. Green Giant (talk) 15:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found on tineye http://www.tineye.com/search/7012564065c6c7a7180f4e1a20c9c316989580f2/?pluginver=chrome-1.1.4 Mjrmtg (talk) 12:31, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom, bogus info. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per above. Green Giant (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this photo is Central Press via Getty Images. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Getty images are rarely if ever released under free licenses. Green Giant (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable promotional image. Out of scope. P 1 9 9   04:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominate duplicate image:


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable tiny snippet, no context to make it educational. P 1 9 9   04:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 07:44, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 14:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Sarfraz szk2.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is of much too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose. It's out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely copyright violation given the low resolution, lack of metadata, filename, and the fact that every single one of the user's other uploads were blatant copyright violations with false authorship claims. LX (talk, contribs) 08:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de téléchargment, fichier incorrect. O.M.HH.M.O 09:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:25, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - appears to be screenshot of a broadcast video (see logo in upper right of photo) Christopher Fynn (talk)) 10:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for viewing this. You are right. Sorry, I did not see it was a live webcast. With kind regards, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zayn Geyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 11:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope, no gang signs Mjrmtg (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't check the revision history carefully enough at the time when I transferred this file to Commons. Now I notice that the author never agreed with publishing the file under GFDL nor any other free license. Pikne 10:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not delete until the image has been restored at Estonian Wikipedia, unless they don't accept fair use. Green Giant (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We don't accept fair use nor any other exemptions that could cover this image. We will restore the image once the original uploader has replied and agreed with free license on Estonian Wikipedia. Pikne 15:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free image, not taken before 1969 Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Juggler2005 (talk) 16:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG available as File:Denmark road sign E43.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete – It cound't find it, because it wasen't in the right category. --Laketown (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is factually wrong. The German-speaking population of South Tyrol and adjacent parts of Northern Italy are not Austrians. They are Tyroleans and may be regarded (by some) as ethnic Germans, but they are definitely not Austrians. The file is not used by any article anyway. RJFF (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Not used, poor quality anyway, should be in PNG. Yann (talk) 15:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has already been deleted as its copyright status cannot be assertained. Image is clearly a commercial one. Image has been re-uploaded on 1st December despite the deletion. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 18:37, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasoning as in this DR, this is most likely a fake logo. Fry1989 eh? 18:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Not used. Yann (talk) 15:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasoning as in this DR, this is most likely a fake logo. Fry1989 eh? 18:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality personal image Basvb (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In spite of 20minutos claims, this is an obvious screenshot of the series and therefore, 20minutos is not the owner of the copyright. 20minutos' poor copyright track can be seen in Category:20minutos.es related deletion requests Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The information given suggests that the source country is the UK, so applicable copyright term would be 70 years per {{PD-UK-unknown}}, not 50 as stated on the licensing tag. It is also tagged {{Copyrighted free use}} but there is no evidence that this applies. January (talk) 11:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Artistcritic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused photos of band of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   04:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: text only, out of scope Ezarateesteban 13:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leandro Estaga Da Taylo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs and video clips. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Magog the Ogre. DR closed by Josve05a (talk) 22:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incohérences dans la présentation ; texte des légendes illisible. O.M.HH.M.O 08:44, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused broken image MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statement at source "Images for public use" is not specific enough to support the public domain/copyrighted free use claims. January (talk) 11:15, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The statement is neither a clear licence nor a release to the public domain. MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not look selfmade, is dissimilar to other images by user. FunkMonk (talk) 14:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. Signature is not of uploader MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope in my eyes - educational use should be where? Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A cat on shoulders, let's see a reliable attitude of the animal face to face with the person who approaches him. An pet on shoulders determines a familiar behavior, and the expression of a real trust. In what and who should be this picture against the principles of an informative project, or educational? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isasza (talk • contribs)

I agree with Isasza. --Micione (talk) 23:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Potential to be educational, broadly construed MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a work of the federal government, it is a copyrighted work of the state of Ohio source is http://www.governor.ohio.gov/About/LtGovernorTaylor.aspx Roseohioresident (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. JuTa 12:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a real television channel logo. The 2 is taken from Noway's TV 2. Fry1989 eh? 18:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In use. Yann (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In use means nothing when it's an obvious fake. You know this, and you have been admonished for this in the past. Stop behaving like "in use" is the be all and end all excuse for DRs. Fry1989 eh? 16:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete fake logo. Alan (talk) 20:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I haven't been able to find any reference stating it's a real logo. Therefore, it lack any educative use and should be deleted. --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:48, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion russavia (talk) 01:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source/author. Kelly (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect structure: H instead of CH3 Cjp24 (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect structure: H instead of CH3 Cjp24 (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misplaced arrow; no use Cjp24 (talk) 13:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ambiguous structure; no use Cjp24 (talk) 13:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ambiguous structure; no use Cjp24 (talk) 13:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ambiguous structure; no use Cjp24 (talk) 13:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation Meysam (talk) 16:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 06:20, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lubiesque (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:COIN and Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet, coins are 3D and thus require permission from the photographer independent for the status of the coin itself. No free licenses at the sources of these coin images.

Эlcobbola talk 16:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lubiesque (talk · contribs)

[edit]

German photographs from 1915 or ca. 1920, taken from Ebay. No information about the respective authors. Without any info about authors, those photos are too recent to be kept at Commons, the autors could well have lived beyond 1943, which would mean the images are still protected. The files should be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 09:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source is a NASA discussion forum, but no evidence that this is a NASA photo. Searching Google images doesn't show any other copies with attribution. Probably a NASA or US Air Force photo, but can't find any proof. Regretfully, this needs to get zapped. Revent (talk) 09:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This guy seems to be dead today. Any more (relevant) informations? 91.65.49.11 10:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SyOuO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unknown places or buildingsm, see description, need better information what place are in the picture also better category needed, commons are not web-hostto unknown pictures

Motopark (talk) 11:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Fairly good photos of interesting subjects. These files should be renamed, categorized, and be described, but not deleted. --Sebari (talk) 21:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep At least some can be identified. I'm pretty sure that File:Voyage17.JPG is Category:Old Town Square (Prague). (but I feel more comfortable if someone with local knowledge can confirm.) whym (talk) 10:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so I've taken the pain out of this one and identified most of them using TinEye/google search. If someone can help with no. 5 (a three masted ship, likely in Italy) I've added categories, I hope someone can check that these are correct and rename files accordingly. And yes I hope that next time user will give more information! Thanks & happy holidays. -- Deadstar (msg) 16:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I renamed all files that hadn't been renamed yet and identified two more images. Only the church interior image is still unidentified. --Sebari (talk) 13:36, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 14:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is factually wrong. The German-speaking population of South Tyrol and adjacent parts of Northern Italy are not Austrians. They are Tyroleans and may be regarded (by some) as ethnic Germans, but they are definitely not Austrians. RJFF (talk) 16:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Poor quality, should be on PNG. However it is used. Could you replace it please? Yann (talk) 15:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is factually wrong: The SCO and the SADC are not military alliances. The AU PSC may have a military component, but it is not a coherent military alliance in the proper sense either. NATO and ESDP are distinct alliances, their membership overlaps partially, but not totally and they have separate structures. Depicting them in the same color is misleading. Finally, this file is not used by in any article anyway. Bujo (talk) 16:56, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:33, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright.gov says the film was renewed. We hope (talk) 17:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Type of Work: Motion Picture
  • Registration Number / Date: RE0000351954 / 1987-10-26
  • Renewal registration for: LP0000014517 / 1959-06-19
  • Title: Curse of the undead; motion picture. By Universal Pictures Company, Inc.
  • Copyright Claimant: Universal City Studios, Inc. (PWH)
  • Variant title: Curse of the undead
  • Names: Universal Pictures Company, Inc. Universal City Studios, Inc.


Copyrights for films are usually renewed. However, auxiliary material such as posters and publicity photographs have separate copyright. I have searched the online copyright records, and did not find a renewal for the poster itself. You also need to be aware that copyright law is different for artworks published before 1964 than it is for later work. Basically, posters published in 1964 or thereafter still have copyright protection. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 06:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PEr above Natuur12 (talk) 14:34, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasoning as in this DR, this is most likely a fake logo. Fry1989 eh? 18:54, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In use. Yann (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In use means nothing when it's an obvious fake. You know this, and you have been admonished for this in the past. Stop behaving like "in use" is the be all and end all excuse for DRs. Fry1989 eh? 16:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of a logo created by the Harris County Toll Road Authority. Graphic was mistakenly uploaded as {{PD-MUTCD}}, however this is not the same as the Interstate Highway shield in the MUCTD. Imzadi 1979  20:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copied from a Bosnian blog, but there's no reason to believe that this is copyright-exempt under Serbian law bobrayner (talk) 20:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gandvik as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unused, low quality copy of this file. This is not exact the same picture, so no duplicate, and no quelifies for Speedy deletion. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File has been here since 2010 no need to delete Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a German church that existed from 1903 to 1967. Certainly not own work from 2014 as stated, no information about the actual date and author. Without further info, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 23:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by individuals to 20minutos.es (2)

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by individuals to 20minutos.es --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:42, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures from 20minutos.es with byline "ARCHIVO". Same byline Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 23:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture with errors Cjp24 (talk) 23:55, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cjp24, what are the errors? Green Giant (talk) 12:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Two arrows are incorrect, especially. Imprecise title. File replaced by File:D-Erythorbic acid - Deprotonation equilibrium.svg. --Cjp24 (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like it was taken from the SOS Recording website at some point. They have a 2014 copyright notice on it. We hope (talk) 01:16, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per EoRdE6 Krd 12:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also looks like it came from the SOS Recording website. We hope (talk) 01:20, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • There's a 2014 copyright notice on the site. The galleries are here. The file description says SOS Recording, the photo quality is good but small as if it came from a website. We hope (talk) 01:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I agree it is similar, but after looking through the provided gallery I don't think its a copyvio. There are two pictures of the pictured person on that website, but are obviously taken with a much better camera and from a different angle. I would say this is just a picture taken by a fan in the crowd. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!)

Kept: per EoRdE6 Krd 12:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{delete|duplicato}} Davidedidio (talk) 07:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no duplicate found Krd 12:52, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{delete|duplicato}} Davidedidio (talk) 07:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no duplicate found Krd 12:53, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by P199 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image has been uploaded and deleted already several times (under various names). It is a derivative of a mural that is not free under Canada's COM:FOP. Yann (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:Yann#Suppresson image Frontenac. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Voici le message que m'a transmis la Direction des affaires administratives, Commission de la Capitale Nationale, Québec, au sujet des Droits, le jeudi 27 novembre 2014 à 09:27 Objet: RE: Fresque des Québécois - Droits d'auteur ..."J’ai une bonne nouvelle pour vous : L’atelier CitéCréation et la SODEC m’ont écrit ce matin… Vous pouvez utiliser la photographie de la Fresque des Québécois pour votre site. Par contre, le crédit suivant doit obligatoirement être mentionné :La Fresque des Québécois, Conçue et réalisée par les peintres muralistes de CitéCréation www.citecreation .fr Signé: Technicienne en gestion des documents et de l’iconographie Direction des affaires administratives Commission de la Capitale Nationale, Québec.

Le motif initial ne s'applique pas car la licence n'est pas en vertu de la liberé de panorama, mais en vertu de l'accord des autorités et des artistes créateurs de la murale.


Je vous demande donc de retirer la demande de suppression.

Merci --Pierre5018 (talk) 19:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. COM:OTRS required to keep the image. Krd 12:50, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. I doubt this is the uploader's "own work" and it's not clear whether this is in the public domain, because the work isn't older than 70 years just yet if it was made in 1945. Mathonius (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • This portrait photo is made in order of J. Wiersma around 1945 for a membership card from a resistance movement. He died 1979 and as oldest son, in the Dutch Portrait Law it is possible for me to use this portrait photo, I am allowed to duplicate it and place it in publications when the name of the original photographer is know, I have to mention him, but I don't know his name. Portrait Law, article 19 and 20. When you talk about the fact that the photo is not older than 70 years. Copyright law is that you can only use a photograph 70 years after the photographer died. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John-Wiersma (talk • contribs)

I had a talk with the legal department at my work. They say that I have the right to publicize this Photo. (what's in a name: to make it public!!!)They also mention that de photo is almost 70 years old, its not an artistic photo, its not a photo picturing someone famous, its not an commercial article, how likely is it that the copyright holder will react and claims this Photo. The chance that this can happen is ZERO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John-Wiersma (talk • contribs)

  • The heirs own the copyright if it was not transferred during the author's lifetime so they can release the work under a free license but we need confirmation (evidence of permission) via OTRS anyways. Natuur12 (talk) 20:42, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hang on. You both seem to be talking about the surviving relatives of the man in the picture, whereas the law obviously refers to the photographer's (i.e. the copyright holder's) heirs. The photographer may still be alive (he could be 90), and when he dies his wife and/or children will probably own the copyright and we'll have to wait for another 70 years before the work becomes available in the public domain. Who owns the physical picture — the piece of paper — is totally irrelevant. So you either have to find the photographer, or his heirs, or wait for another 90 years to be on the safe side. Alternatively, you could mention on the page that everything possible has been done to trace the legal copyright owners, but that they couldn't be found, and that they can get in touch if they feel injustice has been done to them. In that case we treat the picture as an orphan work. But I don't know if this can be done on Commons and it seems a bit weird to me. ErikvanB (talk) 07:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 12:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Non-notable band George Chernilevsky talk 09:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ZooFari: No license for more than seven days.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 14:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Green Giant (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

I do not think a law and template covering German governement "statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment " should be used for ship images Jarekt (talk) 02:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

§ 5 Amtliche Werke

(1) .... (2)" Das gleiche gilt für andere amtliche Werke, die im amtlichen Interesse zur allgemeinen Kenntnisnahme veröffentlicht worden sind, mit der Einschränkung, daß die Bestimmungen über Änderungsverbot und Quellenangabe in § 62 Abs. 1 bis 3 und § 63 Abs. 1 und 2 entsprechend anzuwenden sind."
If an German official institution publishes or helps to publish to to a certain theme provided papers, others materials given to one person, scientist, journalist have to be given to all interested
Thomas Menzel: Die sieben Schulfregatten (Klasse 138) der Bundesmarine is "im amtlichen Interesse zur allgemeinen Kenntnisnahme veröffentlicht worden" --Erb34 (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC) PS: a bit complicated to discuss a german law question in an other language !![reply]

I have to add, that cannot understand Jarekt interrest in deletion off the picture;

the german legal situation of official pictures is identical for all pictures which doesn´t show persons. --Erb34 (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The template is intended for government statutes, ordinances, official decrees or judgments. The photos are not found anywhere on the linked document and we cannot simply assume that they form part of an official document. I have also deleted a duplicate file of File:F216 Scheer.jpg (located at File:Schulfregatte Hipper (F214).jpg, claimed as own work but unlikely). Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mützig-Quand on est très bière.jpg.

I don't belive, that the archive had teh right to put this image from 1960 in the PD - see also "The commercial use of these contents is subject to payment and covered by a license.". Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a public domain image (not all images on Gallica are, I agree) as it is stated. Just click on Informations détaillées (on the right) [4], or on the title and there you can read Droits : Domaine public. The Bibliothèque nationale et universitaire de Strasbourg and Gallica are highly reliable organizations... Ji-Elle (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The picture can't be in public domain. Gallica says "illustrator Marcel Germon, 1960". If he was alive in 1960, he can't be dead for more than 70 years ;). Traumrune (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that's not the issue. Gallica has some recent works which rights were release by the copyright holder (ex: Category:Mahabharata by Peter Brook, Category:Roger Pic). So the issue is "Is it probable that Marcel Germon release the right of this work?" We usually trust Gallica on this matter. I changed the license to match the claim by Gallica. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That is, unfortunately, the classic question with Gallica, who doesn't provide a rationale for the copyright status in the notices. Sometimes, it is possible to figure out a rationale, based on the number of years, to conclude to PD-old or PD-anonymous-EU, for example. Or when documentary evidence is found for PD-author, as in the case of Roger Pic. But in the absence of explanation, the users of Gallica are left to guess if the public domain mention might be plausible or if it is a mistake. Some cases may look too implausible to be kept on Commons per the precautionary principle. In other cases, where we can't find a documented explanation but where the PD mention might be plausible, some files are tagged with PD-BNF. The images of the Mutzig advertisements are from the collection of nine images of the Strasbourg Library, where the acquisition history or explanation of copyrights doesn't seem to be provided. Why Gallica reproduces only two of the nine images and tags those two images as PD is not known. It could be speculated that perhaps Germon released his rights to those two images, but if there is no source telling so, it would be only unsourced speculation, and that should not be enough for Commons to state PD-author as if it were proven. In this situation where it is unclear, if Commons decides to keep the file, it would be better to use the more cautious and non-committal tag PD-BNF, which basically carries the idea that we don't know why the BNF tagged it as PD, although it is possible that reasons exist for it to be more plausible than not. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Asclepias' argument tilts the balance. There is no evidence beyond the BNF data that Germon did release 2 of 9 images as PD. Why these 2 images and not the other 7? Deleted under COM:PRP but if there is evidence to support the PD status, feel free to restore. Green Giant (talk) 23:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mutzig-La bière d'Alsace brassée en milieu naturel.jpg

I don't belive, that the archive had teh right to put this image from 1960 in the PD - see also "The commercial use of these contents is subject to payment and covered by a license.". Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a public domain image (not all images on Gallica are, I agree) as it is stated. Just click on Informations détaillées (on the right) [5], or on the title and there you can read Droits : Domaine public. The Bibliothèque nationale et universitaire de Strasbourg and Gallica are highly reliable organizations... Ji-Elle (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The picture can't be in public domain. Gallica says "illustrator Marcel Germon, 1960". If he was alive in 1960, he can't be dead for more than 70 years ;). Traumrune (talk) 19:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that's not the issue. Gallica has some recent works which rights were release by the copyright holder (ex: Category:Mahabharata by Peter Brook, Category:Roger Pic). So the issue is "Is it probable that Marcel Germon release the right of this work?" We usually trust Gallica on this matter. I changed the license to match the claim by Gallica. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Asclepias' argument, in the related DR linked by Marcus, tilts the balance. There is no evidence beyond the BNF data that Germon did release 2 of 9 images as PD. Why these 2 images and not the other 7? Deleted under COM:PRP but if there is evidence to support the PD status, feel free to restore. Green Giant (talk) 23:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]