User talk:Pierre5018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pierre5018!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File:Fresque-des-Québécois-Frontenac.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, je me suis permis de remettre ton avant-dernière version sur fond transparent. En effet les image en SVG sont préférable sur fond transparent. Si on tient à avoir un fond coloré, cela se passe via HTML à l'affichage de l'image.--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 18:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J4avais mis cette page de côté pour créer toutes les signatures en SVG, mais je vois que tu as bien bosser Clin. Si je peux me permettre un conseil, il est inutile de faire un SVG avec une taille supérieure à 600px en règle générale, car c'est un format vectoriel. De plus, il faut laisser le fond transparent sauf exceptions. J'ai revu certains de tes fichiers pour corriger cela.
Une dernière remarque, mais cela n'est pas trop grave, je trouve que les signatures étant très simple, les fichiers sont très volumineux. Cela dit, ce dernier point n'est pas trop grave. Je trouve ton boulot très bien et je n'ai pas envie de tout refaire pour corriger ce dernier point.--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 18:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:1981-09-02-Avenir-Myriam-Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 21:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canard colvert femelle et ses petits (Lac Archambeault, Qc).webm

[edit]

Hi, I thought you might like to know that I've tagged your video, File:Canard colvert femelle et ses petits (Lac Archambeault, Qc).webm, as Media of the Day for 7 June 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 12:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 80.12.58.23 17:07, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lake Louise 2018-03 ski.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Louise 2018-03 ski.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

[edit]

Dear Pierre5018,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Le Génie du Lac des Deux-Montagnes d'Arthur Guindon

[edit]

Monsieur Pierre5018,

Je viens de prendre connaissance de la diffusion sur Wikicommon d'une oeuvre d'Arthur Guindon, Le Génie du Lac des Deux-Montagnes pour laquelle des droits de reproduction s'appliquent. Je comprends que vous avez pris cette photographie en visitant l'exposition présentée au Séminaire de Saint-Sulpice à l'été 2017. Bien que nous permettions aux visiteurs de prendre des photographies pour usage personnel, comme pour tous les musées, nous n'autorisons pas leur diffusion sur les sites tel que wikicommon. Vous comprendrez que nous devons nous assurer de l'utilisation pertinente des images de nos collections et il semble que l'image haute résolution que vous avez diffusée ici a servie à des fins commerciales soit pour de la reproduction sur vêtements.

https://www.redbubble.com/people/iresist/works/40731297-le-g-nie-du-lac-des-deux-montagnes-original-painting-sulpicien-arthur-guindon-1910-quebec-legend-mythology-hd-high-quality?cat_context=w-dresses&grid_pos=20&p=a-line-dress&rbs=b055c1b5-6736-40fd-9407-4fb7722eb78b&ref=shop_grid&fbclid=IwAR29D9AEZDl644BLkRmFi6u9u6Ojcwol-ohE0fCzb8gIso4VrzO3UiGXkbM

Nous vous demandons donc de bien vouloir retirer cette image afin d'éviter d'autres usages non autorisés. Vous pouvez m'écrire pour discuter de cette situation ou pour toute autre question.

Pascale Bergeron Univers culturel de Saint-Sulpice pbergeron@ucss.ca — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.83.232.197 (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour votre message, j'ai demandé la suppression.--Pierre5018 (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Le Génie du Lac des Deux-Montagnes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

107.159.25.205 18:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guerrier Iroquois.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User-duck (talk) 00:19, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vieille chnoute (1921).png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vieille chnoute (1921).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JuTa.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peinture dans la cathédrale de Gaspé montrant l'arrivée de Jacques Cartier à Gaspé en 1534.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   21:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Monument Monument Félix-Gabriel-Marchand (affiche).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Asclepias (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hôtel de Ville de Montréal, juin 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Disturbing branches in the sky. --Moroder 18:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Agreed. --User:Pierre5018[reply]
Wiĺl erase the branches.
 Info This nomination needs to be properly signed.--Augustgeyler 08:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC) . Signature added, branches removed.[reply]
 Info Dear Pierre5018 thank you for adding a signature. But unfortunately you did not get the syntax right again. There is a bot managing this page here. Wrong syntax will prevent nominations from being processed. I changed your nominations syntax. The signature you added needs to be at the end (after "By User:Pierre5018, not before. So the syntax is:File:Hôtel_de_Ville_de_Montréal,_juin_2024.jpg|{{/Nomination|Montreal City Hall. By [[User:Pierre5018]] --[[User:Pierre5018|Pierre5018]] 20:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC). Addionally you allays need to add your signature to every comment you make, otherwhise nobody can tell who was commenting or voting.--Augustgeyler 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --MB-one 07:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmotte (Montréal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 15:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 15:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Marmotte (Montréal).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marmotte (Montréal).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]