Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 12th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Pantai Serasa.jpg Alan Liefting (talk) 03:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: processed as duplicate Denniss (talk) 07:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Brunei B777 (5755207406).jpg but this one has a copyright lo watermark. Alan Liefting (talk) 03:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Processed as a duplicate russavia (talk) 07:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload not function with device. Twice picture. Use the device http://toolserver.org/~bryan/flickr/upload?username=Richard_Reinhardt Richard Reinhardt (talk) 08:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file description page with no file uploaded Ankry (talk) 20:49, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploaders own work, it is sourced from the net, may be work of the US Gov and as such not protected by copyright but I can't prove that so absent any proof needs to be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 09:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Same file as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Burns, larry.jpg Natuur12 (talk) 09:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded by File:Xylose cyanohydrin reaction.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 10:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept, please renominate once the .svg is fixed Denniss (talk) 22:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Файл не соответствует правилам сайта Ilia1992 (talk) 13:24, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Не соответствует правилам сайта Ilia1992 (talk) 10:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NC license Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source goes to City of Pittsburg site, but there is no information on the copyright status of this image, and the entire page is marked "© 2014 | City Of Pittsburgh ". Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 10:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Secon time that i upload with tool. I think i can never used it.http://toolserver.org/~bryan/flickr/upload?username=Richard_Reinhardt Richard Reinhardt (talk) 16:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file description page with no file uploaded Ankry (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is a fabulous image, it's provenance is unclear. It says "taken by User:Hankwing" but it was uploaded by a different user, given three licenses and labeled "Copyright status (pic one that suits the case)". I this this needs clarification and have nominated it to achieve same. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Except that Hawkwing isn't the same as the uploader, it would be fine. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, they aren't the same, but both of them agree that User:Hankwang is the author. What is the problem? Do you doubt that User:Hankwang is the photographer? Why?--Pere prlpz (talk) 08:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We know that they agree on who the author is. We do not know whether they agree on the licensing terms. This is why someone should check Dutch Wikipedia. Maybe a Dutch Wikipedia sysop such as User:Trijnstel or User:Lymantria could check. --Stefan4 (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:Hankwang lists Dutch as his native language. Dutch Wikipedia claims that there was a file with the same name which was deleted by nl:User:Jelte in October 2005, and the file was uploaded to Commons in May 2005. Maybe that was the same file which wasn't properly marked here? The log on Dutch Wikipedia does not identify an uploader, but a sysop on that project may be able to tell. If that fails, English Wikipedia also lists a file with the same name which was deleted as it was on Commons. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • A quick note: as a steward I'm able to view the deleted revisions on all projects, which is why I can also see them on the English Wikipedia as well (besides the Dutch Wikipedia where I'm also a local admin). Then an answer on your questions:
      As the files were uploaded 10 years ago, the files are apparantly lost in the mean time so I have only access to the text.
      The image on nlWP was uploaded on 24 October 2004 and was a duplicate of the upload on enWP.
      The image on enWP was the original image and was uploaded on 19 October 2004 by Hankwang him/herself.
      Logs:
      (nlWP) 24 okt 2004 14:05 . . Pethan (Overleg | bijdragen | blokkeren) (109 bytes) (Amanita phalloides van en:wikipedia Picture taken by User:Hankwang on 2 Oct 2004 in Southern Sweden. {{GFDL}})
      (enWP) 15:23, 19 October 2004 . . Hankwang (talk | contribs | block) (39 bytes) (Amanita phalloides, poisonous mushroom.)
      Hankwang was the one who added the stuff about the copyright status ("pick one that suits the case") - GFDL or CC-BY.
    • In any case I think this file should be  Kept as long as the confusion is gone. Trijnsteltalk 15:20, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination after fixing the source and adding Trijnstel's comment to the file discussion page. Thank you so very much for the clarity on this image! Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination withdrawn, thanks to you as well, Ellin Beltz! Trijnsteltalk 12:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque quiero eliminar Francaceres23 (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque yo quiero eliminar Francaceres23 (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque es un archivo viejo Francaceres23 (talk) 16:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque es un archivo viejo Francaceres23 (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, out of scope Krd 13:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque yo quero eliminar Francaceres23 (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque es un archivo viejo Francaceres23 (talk) 17:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, out of scope Krd 13:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. Leyo 00:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is displaying some short text. Not used anywhere, not providing value. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 10:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like an advertisement. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, no value for Commons. Mippzon (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal selfie, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 21:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self created(?) logo, not sure for what. Seems out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, no value for Commons, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal profile picture, not linked or used, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 20:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 20:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo montage, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 20:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 00:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems a bit promotional, banner for a website maybe? Not used, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 10:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: personal image Acroterion (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work but no source, so no way to tell if this is licensed correctly although it appears it may be old enough for the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 00:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks professionally posed/shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author name and uploader name have no relationship, no source. User's other upload is of same musician. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

includes big poster whos copyringht are unknown Motopark (talk) 11:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still from a 1943 film. Not in PD per URAA Vensatry (Ping me) 14:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA - URAA is not a valid reason -- Steinsplitter (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no author and no description on this hand-drawn image. In use on one page, but without provenance. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only use of this file is on a user page, if this information were needed for encyclopedic purposes it could be rendered in text. Out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused graphic image without source or author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 00:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page reads "Note: if the screenshot shows any work that is not a direct result of the program code itself, such as a text or graphics that are not part of the program, the license for that work must be indicated separately." in the licenseing section, yet shows album covers all down the right side of the image, which are copyright protected. Nominated as a possible COM:COPYVIO for the Eleanor Rigby Lyrics and the album cover images regardless of the free-ness or non-free-ness of the software itself. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 01:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; dubious claims (removed from English Wikipedia) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, we have better images of calculators, out of scope due to quality Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 02:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work as claimed, but a photograph of another photograph. Unless some satisfactory permission or explanation that the image is in the PD is presented, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 17:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - very blurry, low-quality image - a much better alternative image depicting Bell's Palsy exists: File:Bellspalsy.JPG INeverCry 01:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, no evidence the uploader has rights for it. //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 12 June 2014 13:42 (UTC) 13:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 12 June 2014 21:30 (UTC) 21:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an out-of-scope personal photo. If it's in scope, please explain. "Permission" links to a facebook page that either no longer exists or is not publicly viewable. Jmabel ! talk 05:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW JurgenNL (talk) 08:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of logo of band Enya as seen here here, and superimposed on all their album covers. This is an unused image, and has no source, license or author. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 02:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Competencias Orientador Profesional.jpg, which is in use and was uploaded (a little) previously. When this DR is closed, the surviving image(s) should probably be cropped. Storkk (talk) 11:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image Peripitus (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 03:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 02:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 02:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely cropped & resized from a small res photo, in his original frame available via (example) http://www.enlared.org.bo/archivo/fotos/colcapirhua%20%2815.10.09%29.jpg. A cropped version was published before upload date (10.2011) via http://www.la-razon.com/sociedad/Quillacollo-lanza-programa-oficial-Bicentenario_0_1169883028.html (2010, © LA RAZON) = http://www.la-razon.com/sociedad/Imagen-Municipio-Colcapirhua-Cochabamba-Quillacollo_LRZIMA20100505_0010_3.jpg Gunnex (talk) 12:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 02:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 03:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Promo picture of en:Coldrain , a Japanese rock group, uploaded by 1-upload-user RealRocker (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 21.05.2011, sourced with a (404)-myspace link and attributed/copyrighted to/by "Myspace" = ??? Most likely grabbed from the official Myspace site of band = https://myspace.com/coldrainjapan/photos = https://a4-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/23/97f5aca6c5ac4de0bb9755004df8c4b2/full.jpg (last modified: 2008). Permission via COM:OTRS needed. Gunnex (talk) 12:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of logo of band Enya as seen here here, and superimposed on all their album covers. This is an unused image, and has no source, license or author. Probable COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted videogame character. See here. Storkk (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuera del alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, widely published online: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; unused personal image Lupo 05:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, out of scope, we have better sandwich pictures Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal photo. Obscene gesture. Out of scope. Cjp24 (talk) 09:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How is this useful? See COM:EDUSE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio via (example) http://www.benno-kuppler.de/jesuiten_2006_3_Leiten_lernen.pdf (created 2006, page 13, credit: "Foto: Müller") or grabbed from internet Gunnex (talk) 14:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grmpfff... batch task error. Tagging the file (uploaded by Esejotas (talk · contributions · Statistics) in 2010) with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 14:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal photo. Out of scope. Cjp24 (talk) 09:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently professional band shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image Peripitus (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published e.g. here in 2013. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be uploader's own work, but I have severe doubts that the uploader really photographed this destroyed bridge himself in 1945. Unless a satisfactory permission is presented, the file should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 17:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Uploader is the latest sock of Daffyduck1234, all on whose uploads have been deleted. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.mariechasles.com/medias/album/concert-cabaret-aux-chansons-16novembre2013-100.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably passes COM:TOO and copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 10:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfpromo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kusurija (talk • contribs) 2014-06-10T07:19:23‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie not used on account page Syced (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Poster is a temporary advertisement. JurgenNL (talk) 08:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. No one can do harmful things with my photos. Apdency (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a painting: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the original artist and copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover - copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File inappropriato — Preceding unsigned comment added by SURFENFAUL (talk • contribs) 2014-06-11T17:06:07‎ (UTC)

The same applies to File:Un medico in famiglia 9.jpg. --JuTa 00:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked Pluz Media, making uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work unlikely. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 11:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file with no educational purpose. — Racconish ✉ 11:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have serious doubts about the freedom of use of such a picture, which looks to me very official. Hektor (talk) 10:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover - copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 13:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 13:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, orphaned, unclear accuracy. Leyo 21:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope personal image Peripitus (talk) 11:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:06, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems the uploader has photographed or scanned another person's 1994photo here. Unless he himself is this "Anatolij Bachtin" named as photographer (and can prove it), or a permission is doumented per OTRS, the photo should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 17:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no valid license McZusatz (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Poster is not permanent on this place. JurgenNL (talk) 08:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signed "Dorothy [illegible]" - uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived from Google Earth Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution (the file has been upscaled), lack of metadata and the uploader's history. Should have been part of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by A559sadi. LX (talk, contribs) 18:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been previously published online (e.g. here)... Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived from Google Earth Ю. Данилевский (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits the image thusly: "© Mark Avellino 2014", yet the uploader is Dtevans (talk · contribs). Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.volcadiva.com/affiche.pdf Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 14:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 09:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of a new user whose only contributions have been in violation of COM:ADVERT. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived from Google Earth Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, we have better images of tea bags, out of scope due to quality Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked EBS Ink-Jet Systems - copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 11:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 10:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope — Racconish ✉ 14:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Passes COM:TOO and copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived from Google Earth Ю. Данилевский (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably passes COM:TOO and copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this. Storkk (talk) 10:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked "© Mark Avellino 2014.". Uploader, if you are this person, please confirm via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imdeviprasad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DAMINO (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Those logo's are definatly com:TOO. Non basic shapes, contains creative elements and those logo's are complicated.

Natuur12 (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlylebiz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 91plus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"All right reserved" watermarked on bottom of each image. Additionally, there are scope issues, as they are all unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS and also explain why these images are in our project scope.

Storkk (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aleadriasola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded in a row on 06.01.2013 and related to es:Pingueral, a resort town in Chile:


Gunnex (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comejerwin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Horrorgoogle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gsmooth men (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 03:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ataulton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images - related article w:Antwone Taulton has been deleted 5 times

INeverCry 00:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images; see COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andartedy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 02:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bastan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP. All files uploaded in 2007 and related to places in Spain. The uploader already has some "experiences" with copyrights (not only in Commons, also at eswiki). Today I increased 5 more copyvio-notes to uploader's talk page.  Info Note that some urls using brackets are broken. Copy & paste needed.


Gunnex (talk) 23:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erunise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused collection of personal artworks of non-notable artist - also 1 unused personal image

INeverCry 02:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dgncatherine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very similar images which probably pass COM:TOO and copyright not likely held by uploader. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm this.

Storkk (talk) 11:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DNA Communication (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are ©fr:Dernières Nouvelles d'Alsace. The user name DNA Communication sounds like the uploader is somehow associated with DNA, but we still need a written permission from a DNA-official – otherwise the files must be deleted. See Commons:OTRS for details and instructions.

El Grafo (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amenorrhea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 00:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FernVock (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 01:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aquiles99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Aquiles99 / logs, most likely video screenshots, for File:The Verdict.png grabbed from (example) a video sequence from http://i.imgur.com/xrsxq.gif (last modified: 2012)

Gunnex (talk) 09:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhon Argumedo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jdwilkins8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads which do not describe the relevance of the subject. See COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rs.perezmarin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 02:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teacozie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own works: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded on 08.09.2010 these are promo pictures of two Australian punk rock bands and were previously published by others:


Gunnex (talk) 08:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Legraet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 01:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Petros foko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 03:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pakomac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. All files uploaded on a row on 26.02.2011 and related to es:Prometeo deportado, a filme from Ecuador released in 2010 (directed by Fernando Mieles). Licensed with {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} or {{Cc-by-3.0}} all files sourced with "Película Prometeo Deportado" / "sitio Web Oficial de la película" etc. = http://www.prometeodeportado.com/ (official site of the film) where I am missing a CC-whatever license. Examples:

Permission via COM:OTRS needed.

Gunnex (talk) 10:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mystiica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 02:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monchucantabro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status:

Considering the other contributions, I assume that all uploads with exif "DSC-S730" are own works. But there are still remaining lots of files which are caracterized by low (Facebook-like) & inconsistent resolutions. A 2nd look might be worth...

Gunnex (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Inkauto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - photo and artworks of non-notable artist

INeverCry 00:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ratherdashing57 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oi Galera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 01:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RajitMedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of performers and the logo of a record company are all of small size, but "professional" style photos, none have metadata.

"Jazz Dhami Official" http://www.umusicindia.com/artists/artistDetails/Domestic/98323 "Amrinder Gill Poser" http://www.choisirunfilm.fr/personne/amrinder-gill-126835.htm "Speed Records" logo that is too complicated to be free "Amringer Gill. png", a much larger version was previously published http://punjwoodplanet.com/amrinder-gill/ "Dr. Zeus Official" has also a larger version, here http://www.chillistars.com/ArtistDetails.aspx?id=78 None are likely to be "own work" of uploader as stated and more likely COM:COPYVIOs.


Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richardwolffe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 03:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trueknightsoul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 02:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackboi01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images; see COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sagitario64 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All are small size, lack metadata, and look professionally shot from a privileged position. Uploader has uploaded other copyright violations, and these probably are as well.

Storkk (talk) 10:58, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sagitario64 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no exif, bad quality. Doubt it's own work by Sagitario64. One of the sources, another

Dudek1337 (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kittelberg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images of non-notable band

INeverCry 03:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Y. Moosa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three text pdf files, each given a different source in the document than in the upload template where they are all three called "own work." Fortunately unused, these screeds are possible COM:COPYVIOs based on reading the text which credits a different author for all three, so not all three can be user's own work. User's other image was speedied as it was stated to have been written in 1995 and the author's name given (but uploaded also under own work).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomheslop3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

INeverCry 00:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 達明偉 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 02:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Narcisao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio Saqib (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 05:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an "own work". In fact stolen from Getty Images http://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/signals-crossed-andys-undercover-skills-are-put-to-the-nachrichtenfoto/102129709 37.5.7.217 21:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio PierreSelim (talk) 06:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better turkey sandwich at File:Turkey sandwich at a diner with French Fries.jpg this is very poor quality Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an unused, low-res personal image. If not, the context is not clear. Jmabel ! talk 05:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, we have better images of sandwiches, out of scope due to quality Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, we have better images of screwdrivers, out of scope due to quality Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 08:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo. Who took the original photo? When and where? Was it published, and if so, when and where? Without such information, copyright status is intedeterminable. Lupo 05:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available on many websites, for instance [1]. Unclear to me whether this is an old painting or a modern image, though I tend to believe it's modern. In any case, not "own work". So: source, author, license? Lupo 06:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 07:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:08, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in South Africa for photographs. LGA talkedits 07:14, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in South Africa for photographs. LGA talkedits 08:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: JurgenNL (talk) 09:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small, promotional picture. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 10:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Could be in scope, but this image isn't own work and too complex to be PD-text. JurgenNL (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test page. Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems like a movie poster or cover, I'm not sure this user created this one? Mippzon (talk) 20:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad image of a pen. Not providing value to Commons. Mippzon (talk) 20:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poster / ad for copyrighted film The Adventurer: The Curse of the Midas Box (2014) Deanlaw (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Romania. Architect Victor Vlad dies less than 70 years ago. //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 12 June 2014 21:30 (UTC) 21:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

album cover, copyrighted Velocitas (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation; see the giant watermark on the right side of the image. The lack of EXIF data is quite sketchy, too. Not the uploader's own work, as he has claimed. CtP (tc) 23:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 18:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 21:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: self promotion. matanya talk 21:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, we have other bottled water (and, just a reminder, product packaging is protected by copyright, so no brand packages should be here anyway, only logos) Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry and bad qulity image of copyrighted material matanya talk 21:40, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is University official logo (http://www.atiso.ru/index.php?lang=en). Possible can be used as "fair use", but not under CC BY-SA 3.0 license. This image not own work.

Regards, Cap1000 (talk) 22:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo can't be under free license matanya talk 21:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:Flag_of_Kurdistan.svg with no uses NikNaks talk - gallery - wikipedia 23:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate lower quality matanya talk 21:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No interest, no use Cjp24 (talk) 03:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:SCOPE matanya talk 21:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan and copyrighted logo. //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 12 June 2014 21:35 (UTC) 21:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: useless logo matanya talk 21:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How is this image in scope? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There's a Wikipedia article on Francis Kenny so that makes it within scope IMO. Doesn't seem to be a copyright violation either, no reason to delete. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just read your talk page, and striking my vote for the moment. Why is this image an obvious copyright violation though? The same image doesn't seem to appear anywhere else on the Internet and the EXIF claims it was taken with a compact camera, probably not what a professional photographer at an award show(?) would use. The only reason I'd imagine this is a copyvio is from the uploader's history. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Whhoops, my bad. Somehow I didn't see it's the F Kenny. Clearly in scope. It might be a (c)vio, it might be taken by the uploader. I'd go with AGF and keep. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: semit-withdrawn DR; photo seems in scope, and no solid argument for CV  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from here and is copyright to the UK government it is not PD in the source country. LGA talkedits 10:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free image, licence "IWM Non Commercial Licence" not compatible with Commons requirements  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Consensus was to delete, but image not deleted as of 6/12/2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ricky_Polston_2014-05-31_20-15.jpg Dwpaul (talk) 14:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by JuTa. Yann (talk) 12:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" without EXIF, also on this site http://www.laradio.com/wherep.htm 37.5.7.217 21:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:58, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a crop of an image already deleted from Commons as a copyright violoation, see "author" in template for link to deleted image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload-user Afax (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 10.07.2009 the photo appears to be previously published via http://dondememeto.com/content/colegio-mayor-santa-cruz-fem = http://dondememeto.com/sites/dondememeto.com/files/images/residencias/if1_entrada.jpg (last modified: 2008).

Most likely the photo was originally grabbed from http://web.archive.org/web/20090725114103/http://www3.uva.es/santacruzm/instalacionesf.html (here the latest archive available from 25.07.2009, see also byline "Junio 2007", "La reproducción parcial o total de los contenidos aquí expuestos debe contar con el permiso del Colegio Mayor Santa Cruz." = permission from Colegio Mayor Santa Cruz needed) = http://web.archive.org/web/20091226180757/http://www3.uva.es/santacruzm/imagenes/if1_entrada.jpg Gunnex (talk) 12:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Lalo recio. This is the last remaining file, uploaded on 20.08.2010, already tagged in 2011 by Túrelio with copyvio (and the "why" as reason was most likely related to "Why you are uploading copyrighted files?", considering also this advice, a copyvio-note now in Japanese). Previously published via (example) http://mexiconomico.blogspot.de/2009/07/el-centro-historico.html (2009) a click on that photo redirects to a 2008 thread http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=666608&page=67. Apparently the original image source is actual 404, considering also the cached version of a 2009 thread of skyscrapercity.com = http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/2018/fototorreoncentrove6.jpg (404) = posted on 09.02.2009 via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=31997780&postcount=314 by "Karlos ALvarez". Gunnex (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: FOP in Spain, therefore, the picture does not need permission to be published in Commons, but with the right sources needed. Also, the file is currently in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Considering also your comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Centro Cívico de San Cristóbal.JPG you're confusing something. Lalo recio is most likely - per above - not the copyright owner of that photo and uploaded it under a free license without permission from the original photographer. Gunnex (talk) 23:34, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Gunnex. Yann (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture is showing a finger in front of the bottom of a bottle, not providing value for Commons. Mippzon (talk) 21:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above: out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of every image used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. No related uploads by user. Uploaded in 2010, 1 part is circulating since 2006 on the internet, considering http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=6962625&postcount=111 (2006, by ZerOne) = http://img332.imageshack.us/img332/8464/cata042rk.jpg or Google. Gunnex (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per Gunnex. Yann (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 20:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 12:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong image format and look like a scan from another photo Morning (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission from a scanned source  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreaforc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings by it:Carlo Romagnoli, died in 1966, no permission from the heirs

37.5.7.217 21:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Undelete in 2037. Yann (talk) 12:56, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nicht verwendbar, weil keine (verwertbaren) Informationen über den Gegenstand zugegeben wurden, Objekt ist ohne nähere Beschreibung nicht identifizierbar (selbst die Angabe des Museums würde ohne Angabe des Typs nicht weiterhelfen) 93.220.96.68 12:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like a troll. You are invited to contribute Yair-haklai (talk) 08:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 12:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo, no evidence that uploader has any rights. //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 12 June 2014 13:19 (UTC) 13:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clear copyvio, logo of a Romania handball club - see logo at official web - Fma12 (talk) 16:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 12:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No date and source of first publication is given (as required by {{PD-AR-Photo}}). Will be in copyright in Argentina if not published before June 19, 1994 and will be copyright in the US if not published before March 1, 1989. Additionally will be copyright in the US if published between 1978 and February 1989 and the publication contained a copyright notice.
Absent proof of when this was published and if necessary, the proof the publication did not have a copyright notice, this should be deleted as per COM:PRP. LGA talkedits 10:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 12:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eric ashun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably personal photos, possibly for hoax content: see en:User talk:Eric ashun and log at en:HI&RH Prince Petsir

Closeapple (talk) 11:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I need to make some edits to the image. Right now this is not good and theres a slight problem i need to crop out. Mudabbirmaajid (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please make changes and upload the next version. Deletion is not necessary in this case.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: image can be overwritten by new upload  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Capture of a historic portrait. No proof that the uploader holds the actual copyright Vensatry (Ping me) 11:00, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file came from an album, and no evidence that the holder had rights to upload, trasnferred file back to enWP  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:21, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing permission Lady Lotus (talk) 12:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: no permission, no evidence that copyright holder, no fair use allowed  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:23, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request : my bad per previous discussions — Racconish ✉ 07:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: contributor request, unused file  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oldbeeg accidently created this in Wikimedia Commons instead of the Wikipedia Oldbeeg (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:24, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solely used for self-promotion (along with personal photo album). This editor is likely part of a checkuser-confirmed en:User:Ajitkrverma sockfest (see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ajitkrverma). DMacks (talk) 05:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded by File:Benzoquinone cyanohydrin reaction.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 10:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 13:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 13:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded (File:AMT.svg) low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 13:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: In the future, please specify the appropriate superior file. (File:N-Methyltryptamine.svg) Ed (Edgar181) 13:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File:N-Ethyltryptamine.svg Ed (Edgar181) 13:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File:DBT.svg Ed (Edgar181) 13:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File:MIPT.svg Ed (Edgar181) 13:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded low quality raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File:DiPT.svg Ed (Edgar181) 13:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseed raster image Kopiersperre (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File:L-tryptophan.svg Ed (Edgar181) 13:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the year on the left side of the column, this sculpture is a recent and thereby copyrighted work. Even after the new law, freedom-of-panorama in Russia covers only buildings, not other works of art. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I felt obliged to make available to Wikipedia this image. In any case, I have the right to put this image in the Russian Wikipedia in accordance with Russian law (freedom of panorama). If you think tselessoobrazny remove this image you can do so.--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted work. FOP does not apply. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:11, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Following on from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monumento conmemorativo Guerra de las Malvinas (Ushuaia).jpg this image used deleted image which either needs to be replaced or the whole needs to be deleted. LGA talkedits 22:30, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Contains unfree image. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a painting on a china plate, no indication about the artist of the painting or when it was. Unless definitive proof is presented that the artist is dead for at least 70 years, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 17:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As there are recognizable shadows of trees, this could probably be an FoP case? --slg (talk) 23:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted artwork. Image does not provide enough context to assess whether FOP applies. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject was born in Vienna, died in Switzerland in 1967. There is no evidence here that this image was ever published, much less published in Switzerland. Also, while I am not at all expert on Swiss law, it seems to me that this is a carefully posed studio portrait and that {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} is not applicable. In order to keep this on Commons, we will need to know the author, the author's date of death, and the date and place of first publication. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:07, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Studio photograph. Unlikely that {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} applies. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright image of artwork on utility box, central aspect of photograph so COM:DM does not apply Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds like an interesting project. It doesn't help much for our purposes, though. Regardless of who commissioned the work, who the artist was, or who might own the rights, the fact is that under the Copyright Act, the work is copyrighted and will be until 50 years after the death of the artist (even if the artist sold the rights). If the artist/City/Bell/the BIA, or whoever it is that holds the rights, has released the work into the public domain, or is freely licensing it in a manner consistent with Commons requirements, then we either need a link to such a release, or written confirmation from the rights holder needs to be sent to OTRS, and the onus is on the uploader or anyone wanting to maintain the image on Commons to provide proof of the release.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I checked those links you provided, and while I might have missed it, I didn't see anything saying that the art is released into the public domain or freely licensed.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I only suggested that a public art project commissioned by the city might not be so clear cut on copyright status. If User:Geo Swan, or anyone else, wishes to investigate further I have given some leads to start. That's all folks! Secondarywaltz (talk) 21:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I remember the fact that we investigated images of those boxes of that project, perhaps two or three years ago. Unfortunately, I don't remember the details and I can't find a page on Commons where it might have been. It might have been on Wikipedia. Or maybe it was someone who asked the question on the Commons IRC channel before uploading and directed us to the external websites for evaluation. Anyway, wherever the discussion took place, if we don't have those photos, it's probably because the result of the discussion turned out to be negative. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted artwork. FOP does not apply as this is a 2D artwork put on a 3D object. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author, therefore no evidence of its being in the PD. --User:G.dallorto (Discussione) 21:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC) User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to File:Brand, Adolf - from - Ulk (Berlin) - 15 november 1907.jpg. --JuTa 09:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unclear copyright status, not old enough to assume PD-old. Not enough evidence provide to assume that this has been published anonymously. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not reasonably useful for the project given that the photographer's finger is in the shot. There are 9 other images of the same scene, taken on the same day, some almost identical to this one, all missing the finger. Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: the finger could be cropped out, but it scarcely seems worth the effort considering that nºs (5) and (7) in the set cover the same scene & POV pretty thoroughly.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:11, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is one of my photos.
Nomination asserts: "There are 9 other images of the same scene, taken on the same day, some almost identical to this one..." In fact this is one of 9 images, taken at the same time, to incorporate into a panorama -- File:Excavation SW corner of College and Spadina, 2014 04 06 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9).jpg The image is required for that panorama. The finger was already cropped by hugins, the panorama stitching program I used. There was no need to crop the finger, and I saw no value in doing so.
Why upload the components to a panorama, when one uploads the panorama? Panorama stitching programs are evolving in usefulness and ease of use. Making the components of a panorama available allows other people who have better panorama stitching skills, or better panorama stitching tools, to use the component images to stitch superior panorama.
I used to think COM:SCOPE said images were in scope if they were in use on a WMF project. It has been pointed out that SCOPE currently says image have to be used on another WMF project. I think this is a mistake, and that images used on the Commons should also be considered in scope.
  • Yes, my finger is captured in one image in this sequence of photos. I make no apology for this.
Construction sites are almost always surrounded by high fences, capturing sequences of images like these typically requires wrapping your camera's wrist strap firmly around your wrist, to try to make sure you don't drop your camera on private property; then finding a gap in the fence wide enough to stick one's arm through.
One tries to move the camera just enough that the resulting images overlap enough that a panorama can be made, while keeping one's arm rigid, so the camera stays in the same spot.
Snapping the images will holding one's camera at arm's length, while nevertheless making it point through a 180 degree arc, without letting depressing the shutter make the camera shake? It is tricky. The photographer generally can't see the viewfinder when snapping the photos.
So I won't be embarrassed if occasionally the images at the edges inadvertently show a finger, a wrist, or an elbow. If I snap an image that contains a finger, wrist or elbow, that isn't useful, of course I won't upload it. However, if a less that ideal image is still a useful part of another image, I won't apologize for uploading it. Even if those images don't technically meet the letter of the criteria of being used on another WMF project, I think they meet the spirit of SCOPE by being used in an image on the Commons. Geo Swan (talk) 08:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to get into a debate with you, because I don't care strongly enough about this image either way, but this is precisely the argument you've made before (we need to keep the image because I stitched it into a panorama), which didn't have much success. And your suggestions about COM:SCOPE have never been accepted around here. Finally, no one asked you to apologize for uploading the image - please don't misconstrue the point of this DR. If you crop out the finger, then I am happy to change my recommendation above, just to save us all this debate again. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since cropping the image will reduce the ability of other people, who are more skilled, or have better tools, to use this set of images to make a new panorama, I am going to decline your suggestion that I crop the finger. Geo Swan (talk) 02:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ok.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete: Out of scope "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose." There is no need to upload every component of a panorama. Some of them might be useful but most have no individual value. This is not a site for jigsaw puzzles. Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - On reviewing what is accepted in Commons, I withdraw my objections and encourage the dedicated contibutor to pause and take that one memorable picture that might be considered notable by the community here, rather than uploading mere fragments. You have the tools and the opportunity to do that. Thank you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Useful as source of the panorama image. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is original enough, thus it's copyrighted //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 12 June 2014 16:53 (UTC) 16:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At least you have an opinion and find it original. Maybe, please extend your expertise and mark it then with the proper PD-Old tag. It is the "Idrottsföreningen Kamraterna" logo dating back to 1895 marked with the word "Norrköping" in the place of the "IFK" and "IFK" in the place of "18¹/²95". Some white elements are transformed to a yellowish brown. In this form it exists since 1897. If this seems difficult, happy deleting. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 10:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I don't see it original enough to be copyrighted. {{PD-textlogo}} for me. Fma12 (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not a simple geometric shape, even includes a gradient. SVG was certainly not created in 1895. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:27, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The addedum to the license makes it appear this image was uploaded to promote photography by this uploader more than to contribute to proejct. It is missing source & author although it might seem that the uploader was the author based on the license claim. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear @Ellin Beltz: , there was only unnecessary "}}" in the description [2], that's why the source & author wasn't displayed properly. The photos from this Amiga X1000 session are unique on Commons and are used in many Wikipedia articles, i.e. [3]. I support Wikipedia and Commons for many years (see my history) and I share my pictures for free on CC BY-SA 3.0 licence. I made a template with an exact credit line, becouse I found out that a lot of people had been using my pictures without any attribution. Most people are to lazy to search for author's name, they just copy picture and make caption like "photo by Wikipedia". There's an exact attribution line to copy in my template and it really works (well, at least in 95 percents ;)). CLI (talk) 18:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No licensing problem. Also template is not promotional. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gustav Renker (1889-1967) was born in Vienna and died in Switzerland. There is no evidence that this image was first published in the United States or that it was first published before 1923. In order to keep this on Commons, we will need to know the author, the author's date of death, and the date and place of first publication. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not old enough to assume PD-old ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:14, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadaten sind falsch. UiiAhlv (talk) 10:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Metadate is wrong" is not a reason to delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is identical to the one on page 2 of this pdf. so it seems to be ©VAG Armaturen GmbH. If the uploader has obtained permission to use the image under a Creative Commons license, we need a copy of that permission forwarded to our support team (see COMMONS:OTRS for details and instructions). El Grafo (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image is a newer version with adapted descriptions. I am allowed to upload pictures for VAG-Armaturen GmbH and I am going to upload more pictures from this company. Is there a possibility to give you one permission for all pictures of one company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armamenta (talk • contribs) 13:43, 12 June 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Armamenta: Thanks for the quick reply, that might indeed be possible. Please get in touch with our support team via permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (or permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org if you prefer german) – they know how to handle things like this and will tell you what needs to be done. (Depending on their work load, this may take a while. In case the file gets deleted meanwhile: Don't worry, it can be restored easily after everything has been sorted out). Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 14:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@El Grafo: Thanks for your help, I will contact the support team.

Deleted: Will be restored if OTRS comes through. I hope it does, this is a nice illustration. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadaten sind falsch. UiiAhlv (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "Metadate is wrong" is not a reason to delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


PD-Yugoslavia/PD-SCGGov photos uploaded by Kos93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Copyvios uploaded by User:Kos93.

{{PD-Yugoslavia}} is not really a licensing template, and it should never be used alone (it's emphasied in bold in the template actually), so basically PD-Yugoslavia-only pictures have no license at all. Of course it many cases it can be replaced with {{PD-SCGGov}}.

{{PD-SCGGov}} template claims that

Official materials of state authorities or materials published by any other person or institution which do public function.

are free. This sounds ambigous. Do photos like above falls under the scope of the template? The problem wasn't discussed on Commons, I've found only two discussions in sr-wiki about the issue: sr:Википедија:Слике и медији са спорним статусом#НБСхолКП.JPG, sr:Корисник:Мирослав Ћика/Архива2#Војне слике. In short -- Wikimedia Serbia tried to get some legal interpretation of it, but didn't succeed, users unsure about the meaning of the law, and tend to interpret it in more strict sense. There is a comment on Template talk:PD-SCGGov from BokicaK, a Serbian user, who thinks that current use of the template on Commons is overly broad and is pretty confident "that law describe something that is written on paper, not images".

Moreover, most of the picture are essentially unsourced. So, I think these files should be deleted, unless it will be proven that 1) {{PD-SCGGov}} is applicable in this case. 2) these picture will be properly sourced.

{{PD-Yugoslavia}} alone
{{PD-Yugoslavia}} and {{PD-user-w}}
{{PD-Yugoslavia}} and {{PD-Croatia}}
{{PD-SCGGov}} alone
{{PD-SRBGov}} alone

Trycatch (talk) 23:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why u do a DR, when u don't have any attempt to delete them?--Sanandros (talk) 05:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What? Sorry, don't understand you. --Trycatch (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
u suggest to use another license and for that we don't need DR--Sanandros (talk) 18:53, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My poing is that {{PD-SCGGov}} could be added to many of PD-Yugoslavia photos (many of them already have PD-SCGGov template), but the pictures should be deleted anyway, because PD-SCGGov is not applicable here. --Trycatch (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I saw already a lot of them with an additional PD-Tag and would like to ask u to sort them out and if they have any copyright problems to discuss them in a different DR. The DR right now looks for me too chaotic.--Sanandros (talk) 13:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Additional tags are {{PD-SCGGov}} (that's why I wrote the whole paragraph about it) and {{PD-Croatia}} (obviously irrelevant, giving that all the files were created _after_ 1949). Tags are slightly different, but the pictures and the problem are similar -- I don't see a single reason why recent Yugoslavian/Serbian military photos without explicit permission from the copyright holder can be kept. --Trycatch (talk) 13:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes these who r scggov should be discussed diffrentliy and these who r pd croatia should also be discussed diffrently cause u will mix a lot of information in one DR. All pics with different tags are ruled under different laws or do you realy want to collect all these infromations of all these pics together? It needs just for one pic some time to check if it is ruled under the pd croatia tag and other users will have a lot of different opinion on different pics.--Sanandros (talk) 20:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I sorted the files according to their license. Hope it helps. --MGA73 (talk) 20:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK thx i will check them later.--Sanandros (talk) 05:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trycatch, you are doing a witch hunt against User:Kos93. --188.104.125.206 18:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:An-26 sfrj.jpg, File:JRVpilots.jpg, File:JRV Thunderjet.jpg, File:M-14pl jrv.jpg, File:Mig-21m jrv.JPG, File:Myanmar g-4 super galeb.jpg, File:Orao.jpg, File:Oraoprot1 v.jpg, File:Osa Missile Boats.jpg All these files (which i just shortly checked) have pretty specified sources so it should be dealt differently than these which r just said that they r from the YAF... Plz split the DR in diffrent DRs--Sanandros (talk) 10:17, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
@Sanandros. I am not going to split the DR, frankly I don't see a single reason to do it. I think it would be better for everybody finally to discuss the pictures and the arguments for deletion (e.g. to find _any_ reason why _any_ pictures from the bulk could be kept), instead of endless discussions about the DR procedure and other irrelevant things. What about the "pretty" sources -- do you seriously call "sources" like "Yugoslav Peoples Army - JNA" or "Originally from en.wikipedia; description page is/was [1]." (while the original description from en-wiki was just == Licensing == {{PD-self}}) pretty? Well, they are neither pretty nor verifiable. --Trycatch (talk) 11:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close and renominate. The discussion above makes me think that there are multiple situations for these images — many of them seem to be suitable and not covered by the nominator's statement due to the presence of other licenses, so a mass nomination isn't appropriate. Please drop the nomination on some of them and renominate the rest, or nominate each group of images separately. Nyttend (talk) 21:16, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kos93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Smaller duplicates of File:IK_104P_VS1.jpg, not needed to have four gigantic files of same photo by same uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well those three are not the same photos, if you zoom on registration plates of buses, they have P-2233 (IK_104P_VS1.jpg), P-2229 (IK_104P_VS2.jpg), P-2230 (K_104P_VS3.jpg), and P-2103 (IK_104P_VS4.jpg) registrations. Also on IK_104P_VS1.jpg you can notice blue-white-red strips on front of bus. If you need to delete photos, please do not delete all 3 of them, leave the IK_104P_VS2.jpg to have images of two visual different models of IK-104P bus operated by Serbian Army. --Kos93 (talk) 20:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


No good reason to keep 4 copies of the same image -FASTILY 09:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images/unused images of non-notable people/groups of people

INeverCry 03:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentFile:Aarons-CustomerCore-1000StoreCelebration-7402 (10929000135).jpg is now in use at w:Hair#Curly hair – Wdchk (talk) 03:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment – Given that so many of these nominated images are now in use within Wikipedia articles, it appears that the nominator has simply nominated for deletion most, if not all, of the images within the Category "Unidentified people" without regard for their content or possible usefulness for educational purposes. More care needs to be taken before nominating files for deletion, and mass nominations such as this one should be discouraged. ̴̴̴̴

̽ <bɾ>

  • Oppose – Little or no attempt has been made by the nominator to determine if any of the listed files may have an educational purpose, and in fact most of these files do have educational value, and many of these files are now in use within Wikipedia articles. The nominator is attempting a mass-deletion of files based solely on the fact that each was listed in the category “unidentified people”, despite the fact that many of the above files are mis-categorized because the people in many of the files are identified. The indiscriminate culling of files based on nothing more than categorization (or mis-categorization as the case may be) is not acceptable. Dolovis (talk), 15 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Delete to the Aarons-CustomerCore images, they serve no educative process, and that Dolovis has gone and added that rubbish to articles to try and justify their usage/etention is somewhere between ridiculous, and a disappointing abuse. The others, really do we have to step through a non-thematic compilation of images and try to provide an opinion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:2tone SG Dallas Shoot.jpg for licensing/impersonation problems (either it is uploaders own work and they are impersonating the subject, or it is someone elses work and the subject hasn't provided evidence of authors permission).
 Delete the entire Aarons-CustomerCore-1000StoreCelebration collection because these are out of scope and have been added to articles with tenuous links - this sort of photo stream is more appropriate to the company website or You-Twit-Face,
 Keep File:Actstrange1.jpg because it does fit into the article it has been added to but needs a description,
 Delete all the ones from File:Adima Porträtfoto.jpg to File:By MuRaT11.jpg as unused and/or out-of-scope (including the ones added to articles in a rather weak attempt to provide EDUSE's),
 Delete File:Capo (Rapper).jpg because although it is in use at de-wiki, it is of questionable copyright status based on this Google search limited to similar images before 1 October 2012,
 Delete all the ones from File:Cardan.jpg to File:Djwars.JPG as unused and out-of-scope images. Green Giant (talk) 01:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: one kept, rest deleted as blatantly out of Commons' scope FASTILY 09:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

images of unknown persons - not in use - no educational value (no COM:EDUSE)

CoCoCounty97 (talk) 00:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified ladies lamenting Keopuolani's death.jpg is in use.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A historical image from the US National Archives of President Franklin Roosevelt's funeral is of "no educational value" because the people pictured are not identified? It seems pretty clear the files nominated here haven't been individually considered, and this seems kind of disruptive. Dominic (talk) 01:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hanxu 2.JPG is obviously identified.--維基小霸王 (talk) 01:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is an insane number of mutually unrelated images to take up in a single request. That said, on the four images of mine I see among those nominated:
Disruptive, as Dominic wrote above, appears to be an appropriate chracterisation of this mass deletion request. Concerning the three files made and uploaded by me (1, 2, 3): They are part of a concert gallery, Category:Manu Delago Handmade (Popfest 2014). I'd rather not believe, that images of musicians are not welcome here, because only the bandleader has an article (yet). --Tsui (talk) 01:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hotel Bristol dinner.jpg is clearly identified, and is in use on dewiki. I'd  Keep on principle since the nominator has failed to properly check to see whether the files that have been put in this category actually meet the criteria specified in the DR. Overeager deletionism of historically valid images in use on Wikimedia projects benefits nobody. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at a few of these, more or less at random:
I propose a speedy close and keep. If some of these merit deletion, let's see them nominated in some reasonable manner. - Jmabel ! talk 01:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with all above, speedy close and keep. Nom clearly hasn't done their homework. My 4 that are listed are historic and clear enough that historians would be able to identify whom they seek.
 Keep Clearly a sloppy, disruptive and verging on vandalism DR. The files uploade by me (as others) are clearly educational and in scope:

Images of movie premieres: File:Dreamgirls Premiere (366221052).jpg File:Miss Potter Premiere (313202507).jpg File:Miss Potter Premiere (313202986).jpg File:P1090527 (155443143).jpg File:Wolfgang Petersen - Poseidon Premiere 5.jpg

Closing ceremony of the 2015 Military World Games File:Cerimônia de Encerramento (22218092771).jpg

Informal meeting of the EU competitiveness and telecommunications ministers File:Informal meeting of competitiveness and telecommunications ministers. Arrival and welcome Delegate (35856017401).jpg File:Informal meeting of competitiveness and telecommunications ministers. Arrival and welcome Delegate (35988640145).jpg

Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation

File:Επίσκεψη ΥΦΥΠΕΞ Κ. Γεροντόπουλου στο Ερεβάν της Αρμενίας (11355064175).jpg

Brazilian Senate

File:Solenidades. Homenagens (21768451894).jpg

In a few words, all in scope and sloppyly nominated for deletion. Tm (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It seems that this vandal as nominated thousands of images, in this DR and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unidentified men. Speedy close all of them and was blocked as a possible sockpuppet of a former prolific user. True or not, this Drs are pure vandalism, so better not waste peoples time with this actions. Tm (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There are other things in many of those photographs than just people. I am fine with deletion of few useless images but such large DR seems like waste of time. --Jarekt (talk) 02:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep and re-nominate in smaller batches, preferably less than 25 at a time. Artix Kreiger (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. File:Nickfalcon.jpg is in uses in en:w:Nick Fallon (as can be seen on the image page); apparently shows notable person in scope, though uploader unfortunately neglected to put a proper text description on Commons. Seems a sloppy mass deletion request done without checking usefulness/use of individual images. I suggest closing the batch as kept as too much useful would be lost. Individual images or more thoughtfully/carefully selected sets of images may be resubmitted for deletion request; this batch is too large and diverse. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • [4] - a notable in scope person in a notable location; another person in the photo is not identified, so the nomination states "images of unknown persons - not in use - no educational value". This nomination is simply irresponsible and completely inappropriate. "Category:Unknown persons" is *NOT* an inherent reason to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEPT per Artix Kreiger and other comments above. Inappropriate and irresponsibly sloppy mass deletion request. (This is a decision on the mass deletion listing; individual images may be relisted.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CSD F10 personal photos of non-notable people.

RZuo (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as no source (No source since) McZusatz (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Because it is a signature of an individual with no source given in the file description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per com:SIG. --McZusatz (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment COM:SIG does not address the incorrect license on this image. Without source, it is impossible to tell if it fits the qualifications or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No valid source or licence tag. Happy to undelete if these can be supplied. Stifle (talk) 08:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#United Kingdom -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure I understand the reason for deletion. These seem to be 3D works which are fine for FOP. Or are you arguing that the paint job is a 2D work that is not covered by FOP? IMHO the paint job is part of the 3D work and as such is fine. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, sorry. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 23.jpg says that these are likely temporary. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FOP is not engaged as the works are not permanently installed. Stifle (talk) 08:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image will enter the PD on January 1 2016, its author having dead in 1945. --User:G.dallorto (Discussione) 21:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC) User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is out of copyright in the US but not in its country of origin, then it might be possible to move the image to the English language Wikipedia. --Gazebo (talk) 14:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible for an administrator to use the {{PD-US-1923-abroad-delete}} template to move this image to certain local wikis until 2016 comes around? --Gazebo (talk) 05:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Will be PD 1.1.2016 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David O'Brian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files have various indications of author, all different from the uploader's username, but all are claimed as "own work". Clarification is needed who created them; a simple confirmation that the uploader is the photographer should suffice as I couldn't find them elsewhere.

darkweasel94 14:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darkweasel94!

I hope this is the right way to respond to your deletion request. x) I'm not the photographer of those photos, the people which I entered as authors are (Helmut Portele and Klemens Kudrna). Those two are members of the Wiener Tramwaymuseum and gave me the photos to use them freely for the association. As far as I'm aware both don't have a wiki-account and since the association requested me to enter a proper wiki-entry, I uploaded those pictures. I know that the revision of my entry (Wiener Tramwaymuseum) got also flagged for copyright infringement and the right holder already mailed the required text to Wikipedia. What's needed for those photos to stay?

btw. As you can see the two files "Operating Vehicles" are essentially the same. Just the better one has better quality. I first tried to re-upload the second one over the first upload, which failed. Then I tried to delete my first upload, which doesn't seem to be possible that easy (even for the uploader). So in the end I uploaded the picture a second time, which is obviously a quite messy solution. So I wouldn't mind if the file "Operating Vehicles of the Wiener Tramwaymuseum at Speising.jpg" would be deleted, because it's the same as "Operating Vehicles of the Wiener Tramwaymuseum at Speising better.jpg" just worse.

Sorry for messing around, but I'm very new to wiki as an author/content-provider.

Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by David O'Brian (talk • contribs) (copied from talk page by darkweasel94)

Hi David, thanks for your reply! If you can get the photographers to send notices of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (in English) or permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (in German; not to both), then we can keep them. You can find templates for permission notices at Commons:Email_templates#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_inquiries (English) and Commons:Emailvorlagen#Einverst.C3.A4ndniserkl.C3.A4rung_.28Rechte-Inhaber.29 (German). It needs to contain the filenames on Commons, a statement that the person sending the email is the copyright holder, and a statement that they release it under a free license (such as the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, which you chose), so that anyone can copy, modify and distribute the image freely. More information can be found at COM:OTRS.
It may take some time to get a response there, and it may be that the file meanwhile gets deleted, but it can be restored when a valid email arrives (and when that happens, the file will be tagged accordingly). Thanks for your cooperation, I hope we can get a valid permission, because they're good photos! (BTW, as I've already said on the talk page, if it's easier for you to write in German, we can certainly do so.) darkweasel94 15:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, ok, dann auf Deutsch ;)
1) Danke furs kopieren. Habe auf der anderen Seite nun unsere beiden Einträge gelöscht, da sie wohl nicht doppelt sein müssen.
2) Werde mich darum kümmern, dass die Einverständniserklärung (auf Deutsch) geschickt wird.
3) Bezüglich des doppelten uploads: Wenn ich nun die Einverständniserklärung nur für das "better" Bild zukommen lasse, dann lost sich das Problem von selbst. Sehe ich das richtig? :D
Auf jeden Fall Danke für deine Unterstützung und es freut mich, dass die Fotos gefallen. liebe Grüße David O'Brian - 07:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: If you are the uploader, please have the copyright holder contact COM:OTRS to get these restored FASTILY 01:29, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]