Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/06/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 10th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is copyrighted. A223.16A (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not big, no metadata, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

George A. Reid appears to have died in 1940, so this is PD in the UK. However, it is not obvious why it should be PD in the US unless it was published in the US simultaneously and not renewed. If deleted, please categorize into Category:Undelete in 2031. Storkk (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy kept, free in source country, URAA as sole deletion reason is not permitted Denniss (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have an SVG of this, SVGs are scalable. Fry1989 eh? 19:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete My guest is that the uploader got the file through a scaled down SVG (notice the extension ".svg.png", which is used by wiki software to render SVG files). Blond (talk) 22:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 01:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG duplicate of an SVG image. Fry1989 eh? 18:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --JuTa 00:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Only used for near cyberbullying on NL wiki. Mbch331 (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Better speedy it. Natuur12 (talk) 20:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal file with no educational purpose ; out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 15:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license at all JuTa 00:02, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Scan of NFL card and not own work LGA talkedits 01:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: All the uploader's files are copyright violations. All deleted. Ed (Edgar181) 16:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не соответсвует правилам сайта Ilia1992 (talk) 06:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted for no permissions 06/15/14.

Deleted: no permissions tag was placed before deletion nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 06:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Cropped from [1], © Jose Perez / Splash News Lupo 21:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Da die Lizens nicht gesichert ist, dr Urheber noch keine 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Güterchronist (talk) 04:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request JuTa 00:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 06:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation (facebook). JuTa 23:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anh cuong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 00:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Articles don't belong on Commons. See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on the web; watermarked to a Russian author; uploader is Tajik, not Russian (I think). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of an image found on the net (see here) LGA talkedits 01:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure what this is, but it appears to fall outside of COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a publication scan. See COM:DW. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 11:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by promotional page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 13:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ad and probable copyvio. Page protected. Yann (talk) 13:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage material Motopark (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement, questionable copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely Flickr washing. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The meta data says public domain by the photographer. No source, the uploader has given it a PD self tag. I'm nominating it to get consensus on how to proceed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

/me is the photographer. Crazy stuff here. --Ordercrazy (talk) 08:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination now that this has been clarified and correct license added! Great to see another one saved! Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, low-quality selfie, non-notable. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW JurgenNL (talk) 09:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown people, seems like a private picture, not linked and the only upload this user has made. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 13:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to unusably low image-quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on the web: http://www.lfpress.com/2012/12/09/plane-carrying-us-mexican-singer-jenni-rivera-is-missing, and unlikely to be own work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 09:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 05:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown man (with eyes "removed"). The picture is not used anywhere. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 09:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, low-quality selfie, non-notable. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 00:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, ~ Nahid Talk 09:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 06:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Note: dead body, potentially disturbing). Appears to be a TV screencap. Some reason that the underlying broadcast is freely licensed is necessary. Storkk (talk) 13:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, unused, with no educational purpose — Racconish ✉ 06:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennylin (talk • contribs) 2014-06-10T06:09:27‎ (UTC)


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image made in "Paint" or similar, does not provide any value to Commons, not linked to anything. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 12:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. --McZusatz (talk) 13:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear scope, also the twitter bird is copyrighted and may not qualify for De Minimis. Fry1989 eh? 03:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I wonder if w:Soren Simonsen and the subject of this photo are the same person. ~ Nahid Talk 10:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, low-quality selfie, non-notable. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Fry1989 eh? 03:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Fry1989 eh? 03:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture with no realistic educational value for Commons. Mippzon (talk) 07:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dennis Frost (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all promotional images outside of COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.--Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 17:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LavleenaS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hari Dev Sat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qqidd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like TV screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qqidd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these images are not under the correct license. They are copyrighted to the original creators. (side note: unclear where COM:TOO applies, although the concept may not even exist in Iran).

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 11:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mysaskia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More low quality penises from a drive-by uploade.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mrpink0815 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All outside of COM:SCOPE. All found on porn sites anyway.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luiczabeth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

due to mistaken upload Ss4akshay (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: accident? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my wish... Tunishbawankule 1591 (talk) 05:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonsolina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Modern text documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement - Google Maps background layer Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Maps_.26_satellite_imagery Avpop (talk) 14:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of displayed poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently installed at this location. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighed election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located here. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper, copyright holder appears to be Newsquest (London). Does not appear de minimis. Storkk (talk) 16:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighed election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located here. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighed election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located here. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighed election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located here. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighed election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located here. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scam/virus enticement (see description). Storkk (talk) 16:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrigheted picture Yger (talk) 16:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a TV screencap. Storkk (talk) 17:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. Storkk (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published on the web, e.g. here... uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamasid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mostly thumb size (100x100, < 4KB). File:Iglesiamoreiras2.jpg (the highest res of all uploads: 375x500px) was grabbed from http://www.pueblos-espana.org/galicia/orense/san+pedro+de+moreiras/Puerta+principal+de+la+Iglesia/ = http://www.pueblos-espana.org/fotos_originales/4/1/4/00199414.jpg (last modified: 01.2008). + 3x .gif's, mysteriously faded. All files related to es:Toén (a city in Spain), were uploaded in a row on 23./24.09.2008 and most likely taken from http://www.toen.es, archived since 07.2008, possibly from http://web.archive.org/web/20080501161806/http://www.toen.es/mapa_turistico/parroquias/moreiras/index.html (6x 100x100px images, as the nominated 6 ones)

Gunnex (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 17:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry logo. Fry1989 eh? 17:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is an SVG version of this logo on Commons. Fry1989 eh? 17:21, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuaudeRua (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - promotional images

INeverCry 17:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a pure text logo ~ Nahid Talk 22:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:PS/UNUSED PERSONAL PHOTO ~ Nahid Talk 22:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Turismof (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status: These images are currently available on Flickr and Panoramio under the license all rights reserved. Despite of having the almost same username (Turismof versus Flickr TURISMO FREGENAL or Panoramio Turismo Fregenal), the Flickr/Panoramio user is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. Permission needed. All files uploaded in 09.2012:


Gunnex (talk) 22:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es liegt keine Erlaubnis der abgebildeten Person vor. Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Info: Nach Löschung wiederhergestellt und auf Commons:Deletion requests/2014/06/10 eingetragen. --тнояsтеn 21:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Die abgebildete Person soll eine E-Mail an COM:OTRS senden. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 13:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nataly Giudici (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 00:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Settaxy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 00:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Can be speedy deleted as well. Unknown person, advertising. Single purpose account. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:44, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahir 777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ahir 777


Gunnex (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMHO 25 years (c) under Egyptian law, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination My bad, I forgot about the fact that Egypt allows 2D reproduction via FOP. Sorry about the hassle. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn Krd 14:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly out of scope: We have no idea who the depicted person is. The caption reads only “me in jersey”. From the logo on the jersey, it seems he might be a player of FC Zenit Čáslav, a Czech football club playing lower-level competitions. But I have no idea how we could identify the exact player, and he most probably does not (and will not) have an article on Wikipedia.

Plus, the author is listed as “Svoboda”, so, this might be a copyvio as well, we have no proof the author agreed with the specified license. Mormegil (talk) 10:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:03, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 11:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded Kopiersperre (talk) 11:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. —DerHexer (Talk) 11:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'm having trouble finding the replacement file. Please make sure the image-description page itself and/or the nom actually links the improved version. DMacks (talk) 13:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per DMacks; anyway no reason to delete, possibly in external use Krd 14:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality Kopiersperre (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also support its deletion :D There is already another file File:Benzoyl group.png, much nicer. --Esmu Igors (talk) 12:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; redirected to replacement file. Krd 14:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BsBsBs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files aren't covered by the original OTRS ticket

rubin16 (talk) 12:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


That ticket DOES refer to the pictures I just uploaded. The ticket was generated in reply to a letter which I had written to Commons on 12/16/2013, after a big batch of previously uploaded pictures was put in question. In pertinent part, the letter did state:

"I hereby affirm that I, Bertel Schmitt, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of: (List of pics) and any and all pictures that are uploaded to commons.Wikipedia.org by user BsBsBs (an alias for Bertel Schmitt) and are flagged as own work of BsBsBs/Bertel Schmitt. "

The pictures above are part of the "any and all."

I have used this ticket successfully with all pictures uploaded after this letter was posted. The ticket is a file reference to this letter. If this is not sufficient, please advise a procedure that assures that problems like these do not repeat. The EXIF data clearly state that these are my pictures.

I am donating quality pictures to the cause. Incidents like these could dampen my future enthusiasm.

BsBsBs (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sorry, I erroneously interpretated OTRS ticket. I kindly ask you to excuse me, I will revert my deletion nominations now. rubin16 (talk) 16:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you. It's OK. Please suggest a procedure that avoids a repeat. BsBsBs (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's just inattentiveness, I don't know how to prevent it :) In case of any questions, you can tell them the same you told me or show this deletion request, for example rubin16 (talk) 17:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Encrypted PDF - not usable for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 12:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion in Swedish. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 13:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naved amaan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Trex2001 (talk) 13:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 14:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

out of project scope Krd 06:54, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 14:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. No one can do harmful things with my photos. Apdency (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This picure doesn't hurt anybody. Apdency (talk) 17:43, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file out of project scope. — Racconish ✉ 15:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal file not in use on a user page. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently installed at this location. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently installed at this location. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Annie Chen is a Taiwanese actress. I doubt this is own work. It looks like a screenshot of a TV programme. BrightRaven (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Probably not own work. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped image coming from "Annie's webcomic". The uploader is probably not the author. Probably a copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It seems that some of these strips might have been published under a compatible CC license. However, the source is not sufficiently indicated therefore we must assume it's copyrighted. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election poster. Death date of poster author unknown. Not old enough to just assume this is PD-old. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tarungehlot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Scope - not clearly educationally useful - selfpromotion

BertSeghers (talk) 15:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promotional images, out of project scope. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tarungehlot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User's raw-text bio, out of scope.

Achim55 (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper cover - Uploader unlikely to be copyright holder. Storkk (talk) 16:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1993 Newspaper. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2011 Newspaper. Not PD-ineligible or PD-1923 as claimed. Storkk (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1963 Newspaper. While {{PD-text}} might apply to sections (perhaps the middle column), I do not believe it applies to the left column or the right column. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque quiero eliminar Francaceres23 (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque yo quiero eliminar Francaceres23 (talk) 17:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque es un archivo viejo Francaceres23 (talk) 16:53, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque es un archivo viejo Francaceres23 (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, out of scope Krd 13:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque yo quero eliminar Francaceres23 (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

porque es un archivo viejo Francaceres23 (talk) 17:39, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request, out of scope Krd 13:58, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test papers presumably copyright the university or the professor. Storkk (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 14:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlikely own work claim ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please note the unusual history of this file. The current version is an unused personal photo, thus out of scope. Some of the previous versions are of too poor quality to be educationally useful and in-scope, but others might be useful and valuable if they are given descriptions and context. Tarawneh (apparently our only Arabic-fluent admin (!)) kindly contacted the uploader and offered help and advice should the uploader wish to re-upload in-scope images. Storkk (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Current version is out of scope, version history is a mess beyond repair. If the other images are in scope, please reupload with proper description and licensing. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded in 01.2013 by 1-upload-user Nimuxvx (talk · contributions · Statistics) and unlikely to be "own work" from 2013. This is a reproduction of a painting, declared to be via es:Carlos Brandt (1875—1964) made by unknown artist. Most likely grabbed from http://familiabrandt.blogspot.de/p/brandt-en-la-historia.html = http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Dko2bQmtxjI/UprQegTW-NI/AAAAAAAAAYY/WIOeBJUiqCc/s1600/Carlos_Brandt.jpg the painting may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided (Venezuela - if it is the source country - has 60 pma). Gunnex (talk) 17:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work, unclear copyright status. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A still from a video - is this really free for use on Wikimedia Commons? Blue Elf (talk) 18:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still of copyrighted video ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of 20th Century Fox logo. Lupo 18:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Derivative work of copyrighted intro, out of project scope. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source [2] only says "do pobrania" (for download), but no license is given. — Kpalion(talk) 19:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I personally wrote to the Curia of Gniezno. The response we got from the Curia of Gniezno that it will be free to use them.KamilQue (talk) 18:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Did they agree to publish the photograph under a free license and is their answer archived in OTRS? — Kpalion(talk) 08:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No free license on website, needs OTRS permission. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source [3] only says "do pobrania" (for download), but no license is given. — Kpalion(talk) 19:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No free license on website, needs OTRS permission. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election posters. FOP does not apply as these are not permanently located at this place. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election posters. FOP does not apply as these are not permanently located here. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This has been already discussed here: Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2014/03/23.--Karsten11 (talk) 10:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are referring to Commons:Deletion requests/Election posters which was closed because too many images were nominated. The closing admin proposed to discuss the images separately. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
According to German law the election posters shown in this image are "de:Beiwerk" (§ 57 UrhG). The aim of the image is, to demonstrate a type of presentation of election posters: Which specific elections posters are shown ist not essential for this meaning.--Karsten11 (talk) 19:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree and do not think that this qualifies as de minimis. If this image is only about the poster wall I would suggest blurring the actual posters. Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 23:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DM does not apply. Krd 13:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of wax figure, U.S. (cf. album at source) -- Asclepias (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 13:51, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piisa2012 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own works"

37.5.4.11 11:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be out of scope per Commons:SCOPE#PDF_and_DjVu_formats. El Grafo (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Survey of the estate of Ralph Beard.jpg should not be included on Wikipedia - please remove asap Toby Lott (talk) 14:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request Krd 17:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, looks professionally shot: uploader's assertion of {{Own}} work in doubt. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:28, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "own work". Archive photo of unknown provenance, used on many websites, for instance here. Lupo 20:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be own work, may bad scan or internet thumbnail, please also see some of the other contributions by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 20:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all of Abhishekvarmak's uploads. Highly unlikely they're all his own work.Indopug (talk) 06:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion Krd 17:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be own work, may scan or internet thumbnail, please also see some of the other contributions by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all of Abhishekvarmak's uploads. Highly unlikely they're all his own work.Indopug (talk) 06:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion Krd 17:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho it may be doubted to be own work, may be scan or internet thumbnail, please also see some of the other contributions by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all of Abhishekvarmak's uploads. Highly unlikely they're all his own work.Indopug (talk) 06:12, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion Krd 17:26, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseeded by File:Acetophenone 200.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 17:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inappropriate format (raster pdf) for structural formula Kopiersperre (talk) 21:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, this is way too close to the original, which does not seem to be free. FunkMonk (talk) 22:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this, and speaking of which, File:Unaysaurus skeletal reconstruction.jpg should be deleted, as it was accidentally uploaded thinking it was from the journal ZooKeys, when it is from the unassociated journal Zootaxa. Reid,iain james (talk) 01:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion Krd 17:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine; picture captures a work that is unlikely to be in public domain. YurB (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:18, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this image was uploaded here on 28 April 2012, I am not convinced that it is uploaders own work. It appears to be cropped from a larger photo which is from a website that claims copyright. However, a google search suggests the image was in use since at least March 2010. Green Giant (talk) 23:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Krd 17:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the band's Facebook profile photo. No evidence of the uploader's ownership. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS needed Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW JurgenNL (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Jurgen,

Ik zou geen reden kunnen bedenken om de foto te verwijderen. De informatieborden staan gewoon aan een pad in het Nationale park De Weerribben. Maar als u meent dat het nodig is de foto te verwijderen, dan doet u dat maar.
Met vriendelijke groet,
--Famberhorst (talk) 17:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dat het bord op een openbare plek staat, maakt het niet meteen vrij van auteursrechten. De tekst en de tekening zijn nog steeds auteursrechtelijk beschermd en daarom (helaas) niet geschikt voor Commons. Zie ook COM:DW. Groet, JurgenNL (talk) 19:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: auteursrechtelijk beschermd Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW JurgenNL (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Jurgen,

Ik zou geen reden kunnen bedenken om de foto te verwijderen. De informatieborden staan gewoon aan een pad in het Nationale park De Weerribben. Maar als u meent dat het nodig is de foto te verwijderen, dan doet u dat maar.
Met vriendelijke groet,
--Famberhorst (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dat het bord op een openbare plek staat, maakt het niet meteen vrij van auteursrechten. De tekst en de tekening zijn nog steeds auteursrechtelijk beschermd en daarom (helaas) niet geschikt voor Commons. Zie ook COM:DW. Groet, JurgenNL (talk) 19:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: auteursrechtelijk beschermd Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio http://www.apu.fsin.su/subunit/fpnpk/index.php Bilderling (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AniteSpike (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As far as I can tell, every single one of these works was taken off the internet and given a false license. But we don't do fair use on Commons.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piotr Afanasiev.jpg- my own work and relate to people died more than 70 years ago. These photos are taken from the family archives of the Anisimoffs Family. No licenses for their use can not be. This newspaper clippings almost 100 years ago. : The other photo is taken from the Internet, the source specified. Any falsification of copyright is not and cannot be. This is a public site. "every single one of these works was taken off the internet and given a false license". Your assertion "a false license" is wrong. : Here is a metaphor for your words. A man walks down the street and sees the faces of other people. He has to close his eyes, as they face their copyrights. He don't have to see them, do not have anyone to tell anything about what he saw, he should simply never get out. Only by your rules copyrights are not violated. This is nonsense! : You may do what you like on your private website. I'm nothing for you to write. Bye-Bye--AniteSpike (talk) 16:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Files taken from the internet and no clear evidence that the images have a distributable licence  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gunnex as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio via http://michamperico.tripod.com/id1.html = http://michamperico.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/loadcoffe.jpg (last modified: 2004) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The file description says the photo was taken in 1871, meaning it is most likely PD.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... source country is most likely Guatemala. General copyright term is (today) +75 pma. I do not want to exaggerate but... if we had an author then: 2010 -75 -1* -1871 = 63 = if the original photographer lived more then 62 years after taking this photo, it would be still copyrighted (* if end-of-year-rule applies). As anonymous work (for which I do not known the copyright terms for Guatemala) we need most likely a publication date which might be not 01.07.1871. Many "if" and other eventualities here, I know... Gunnex (talk) 20:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An 1861 photograph in Guatemala by an unknown author (pre 1923), from a work published in English, date unknown, published work unknown. No known copyright law in Guatemala at period, and hard to find out what preceded 2000.

All that said, photograph was taken in 1861, Berne Convention of 1887, to which Guatemala appears to be a signatory, sets 25 years from date of creation for photographs, even if we extend that to 50 or 100 years, still out of copyright. If published in 1923, work out of copyright, if published after 1923, the photograph itself is out of copyright when used.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very similar to File:Abandoned house Kep.jpg, maybe source=wikipedia? LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 06:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: treated as duplicate  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See en:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (film) : this is a picture of Marvin. Can we use pictures of copyrighted characters ? Sammyday (talk) 00:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author given (Fernando Tavolaro) does not match uploader's account name (User:Philippe Gebara) Same situation as with deleted Commons:Deletion requests/File:D. Fares.jpg. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So there is not a match, the author is attributed as required by CC by 2.5, and it doesn't mean that the copyright has not been passed on, or that the author didn't wish for the photograph to be uploaded. It is not a photograph that I can find on the web, so seven years later are we to double guess that arrangement?

I don't find the previous request suitable for determining an authoritative precedent, and only represents an opinion at that time. I would rather that we had a broader discussion on how we manage images uploaded seven years ago under those terms as it was then, and not reinterpret each individually due to a change in culture and rigour. These need to be judged against the legal aspect, of whether there is suitable attribution of copyright. The PRP says significant doubt, and I just see an opinion but no evidence.  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: A variety of images from this uploader with the same problem were deleted in 2007. This one was apparently missed. Policy is clear that when an image's copyright belongs to someone other than the uploader, then we require a license via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author given (Bruno Santana) does not match uploader's account name (User:Philippe Gebara) Same situation as with deleted Commons:Deletion requests/File:D. Fares.jpg. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author given (Boa Esperança/ MG) does not match uploader's account name (User:Philippe Gebara) and appears to be a tourist portal, suggesting the image was copied from the webl. See also deleted Commons:Deletion requests/File:D. Fares.jpg. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strongly doubt this image is 100% own work. The uploader's other files are edited versions of images grabbed from internet. The images in the background are probably non free and they could be beyon de minimis. BrightRaven (talk) 07:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork (flag of non notable micronation). BrightRaven (talk) 07:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not our measure, and looking at http://ibelmun.com/ demonstrates possible use. Tend to keep it, whether I like it or not. Doing no harm, no evident replacement.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On this website, I found: "Íbelmun es un proyecto artístico desarrollado por el Colectivo Belme." Colectivo Belme is totally unknown by Google. So I cannot image any possible use on any Wikimedia project. BrightRaven (talk) 10:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I might have kept it, but as noted, it appears elsewhere on the Web without a free license, so a license via Commons:OTRS will be required to restore it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monogram of non notable heraldic painter Xavier d'Andeville. Out of scope. BrightRaven (talk) 08:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: notability is irrelevant, image is within scope as it can serve a purpose for relevant works  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture of a man driving a car. No realistic value for Commons, out of scope. Mippzon (talk) 08:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, not used picture. Not providing value to Commons. Mippzon (talk) 08:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality picture of an unkown man. Picture not in use. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 08:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upload wrong picture not transparent Richard Reinhardt (talk) 08:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality picture of unkown man, out of scope for Commons? Mippzon (talk) 08:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 09:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 2008 and configured to be sourced from/copyrighted by "UMNG" (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada). Most likely taken somewhere from http://www.umng.edu.co (archived since 2004). Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence provided that the image has been released to the public domain; site does not evidently state work released to public domain or distributable licence.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John quintero villar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: self-created artworks + 1 picture of a non-notable person. Most of the files are not in use. File:El_golem,la_tecnologia..jpg, File:El_alambre_de_puas,_el_fin_de_los_vaqueros..jpg, and File:Samsara..jpg are used on a user page on es-WP, but this user has not made any useful contribution to the project, so they can be deleted too.

BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, I doubt that this is own work as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Size is irrelevant, especially when a wiki is using it. While you have doubts, that is not sufficient for a deletion without further commentary or evidence to the contrary.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Of course size is relevant -- no camera produces images anywhere near this small. If it is actually "own work", as claimed, the uploader could (and should) have uploaded a much larger image. The image appears in a variety of other places on the Web, so that it probably should have been deleted as a {{Speedy}}, but I chose a DR precisely because it is in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you meant as an indicator, not as quality. I reckon it is a screenshot from http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xei5ri_dialogues-5-questions-a-anne-carrie_creation.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence that is own work, and external evidence indicates that it has been taken from a non-free source  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (15 KB, no EXIF) 37.5.4.11 10:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: appears to be a scan from a magazine; poor quality, no provenance  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no Freedom of Panorama in France, and the copyright of the underlying work (mural) lies with the creators. There is no indication that they have licensed their work under a commons-compatible license. Storkk (talk) 10:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bérangère Magaud et Laetitia Cordier ont donné leur accord

[edit]

Bérangère Magaud et Laetitia Cordier sont d'accord pour que leurs œuvres restent sur Wikimédia Commons, et ceci d'autant plus qu'il s'agit d'œuvres éphémères, promises à une prochaine disparition.

Je, soussigné, Bérangère Magaud, autorise la publication dans Wikicommons des photos relatives à l’aménagement de l’îlot Square du Géant - Hôtel de Châteaucreux, à Saint-Étienne, sous réserve que je sois explicitement identifiée en tant qu’auteur. Fait à Montpellier. le, 16 06 2014 Pour valoir ce que de droit. Bérangère Magaud Berangere.magaud@gmail.com For fans of Globish, the next mail letters provide, the desired permissions, formally. You can check with authors whose mailboxes are
lesdixchats cordier as lesdixchats@hotmail.com, berangere.magaud@gmail.com
For a popular culture,
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


email contents
<big>'''Voici les courriers et les autorisations formelle échangés à cette occasion :'''</big>

De: Daniel VILLAFRUELA 
Objet: Complement Info !
Date: 1 février 2014 07:14
À: lesdixchats cordier lesdixchats@hotmail.com, berangere.magaud@gmail.com
Bonjour !
Moi je n’ai découvert la signature que lorsque j’ai enlevé les poteaux avec photoshop !
Pour compléter l’article sur le quartier de Châteaucreux sur Wikipédia mieux vaut que vous y
soyez référencées comme créateurs (Les petites boîtes à votre nom à l’item Auteur).
Pour bien faire il faudrait que vous completassiez les rubriques en rouge :
{{Creator
| Name = Bérangère Magaud
| Alternative names =
| Nationality = {{Nationality |French|f}}
| Gender = Female
| Occupation = {{LangSwitch |en=Graphics and Design in urban planning |es =Gráficos y
Diseño en urbanismo |fr=Graphisme et Design en urbanisme}} Vous pouvez compléter ou
reformuler ...
| Description ={{LangSwitch|en=Management and creation of cultural projects in public space.
|es=Gestión y creación de proyectos culturales en el espacio público. |fr=Gestion et création de
projets culturels et artistiques dans l’espace public.}} Vous pouvez compléter ou reformuler ...
| Birthdate = {{date |1986| 04 |06}}
| Birthloc =
| Deathdate = -
| Deathloc = -
| Workperiod = {{date |2011| juin |JJ}} - ...
| Workloc = 15 RUE DES CAVES - 63200 Yssac-la-Tourette
| Image = Un autoportrait, un Logo? … ou pas! (le logo ne vieillit pas ! quoique …)
| Sortkey = Magaud Bérangère
| Homecat = [[Category: Bérangère Magaud]]
| Option = {{{1|}}} <!-- Do not modify -->
| Linkback = Category: Magaud Bérangère www.berangeremagaud.com
| Authority =
| Wikidata =
}}
{{Creator
| Name = Lae$$a%Cordier
| Alternative names = lesdixchats , Læ$$a%Cordier
| Nationality = {{Nationality |French|f}}
| Gender = Female
| Occupation = {{LangSwitch |en=Graphics and Design in urban planning |es =Gráficos y
Diseño en urbanismo |fr=Graphisme et Design en urbanisme}} compléter ou reformuler ...
| Description ={{LangSwitch|en=Management and creation of cultural projects in public space.
|es=Gestión y creación de proyectos culturales en el espacio público. |fr=Gestion et création de
projets culturels dans l’espace public.}} Vous pouvez compléter ou reformuler ...
| Birthdate = {{date |AAAA| MM |JJ}}
| Birthloc =
| Deathdate = -
| Deathloc = -
| Workperiod = {{date |AAAA| MM |JJ}} - ...
| Workloc =
| Workloc =
lesdixchats.com
| Image = Une photo de l’artiste, un tencats ? … ou pas, selon sa volonté !
| Sortkey = Magaud Bérangère
| Homecat = [[Category: Lae$$a%Cordier]]
| Option = {{{1|}}} <!-- Do not modify -->
| Linkback = Category:Cordier%Lae$$a
| Authority =
| Wikidata =
}}
Ensuite vous pourrez mettre à jour vos informations, en cliquant sur le petit crayon qui apparaît à
côté de votre nom.
Merci
D.V.

Le 29 janv. 2014 à 20:59, lesdixchats cordier <lesdixchats@hotmail.com> a écrit :
Pas de soucis. je n'avais pas eu connaissance de cette signature...
Et toi Bérangère ?
Merci en tout cas d'avoir fait la démarche de nous contacter pour solliciter notre autorisation de
diffusion.
Bien à vous,
Laëtitia
From: D. VILLAFRUELA
Subject: Re: Au Bar des Dix Chatst !...
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:06:22 +0100
To: lesdixchats@hotmail.com
C’est fait ! Mais pour un simple passant, la signature qui m’a permis de vous retrouver laissait à
penser qu’il s’agissait du site de Bérangère …
<Saint Étienne-LesDixChats-Bérangère Magaud-20140127.jpg>
Pour l’équité, le fichier sera renommé en Saint Étienne-Bar de l'Hôtel de Châteaucreux-
20140127.jpg
Avec toute mes excuses.
D.V.

Le 29 janv. 2014 à 18:51, lesdixchats cordier <lesdixchats@hotmail.com> a écrit :
'<big>''Bonsoir,
je suis laetitia cordier, alias lesdixchats, graphiste indépendante. Ce n'est pas un
collectif.
Bérangère, graphiste indépendante également, m'a accompagné dans la
réalisation de cette oeuvre.
Nous en sommes les 2 auteurs.
Vous avez l'autorisation que cette photo reste sur Wikimedia commons
mais il faudra avant tout modifier le nom de l'auteur :
Bérangère Magaud & Laëtitia Cordier
Par avance merci
laetitia cordier
www.lesdixchats.com'''</big>


From: d.villafruela
Subject: Au Bar des Dix Chatst !...
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:44:41 +0100
To: lesdixchats@hotmail.com
Bonsoir
Jai photographié, le bar des dix chats, oeuvre de Bérangère Magaud, au gré de
mes promenades.
Le quartier subit de profond changements, et pour garder la mémoire de ce qui va
disparaître j’ai commencé à ajouter quelques photos.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saint_Étienn
e-Hôtel_de_Châteaucreux-Bar_des_Dix_Chats-
20140127.jpg
J’ai renseigné la documentation de la photo, en tant
qu’oeuvre d’art éphémère, mais comme Bérangère
a signé son oeuvre, j’aurais besoin de son
autorisation pour que la photo reste sur Wikimedia
commons.
Du coup je n’ai pas continué plus avant.
Finalement, ce bar va nous manquer …
D.V.


<big>'''et pour la seconde'''</big> :

De: lesdixchats cordier lesdixchats@hotmail.com
Objet: RE: Complement Info !
Date: 1 février 2014 10:26
À: Daniel VILLAFRUELA d.villafruela@me.com
Un#vrai#detec,ve#alors#!#On#s'est#mises#d'accord#avec#Bérangère.#la#signature#sera#rec,fiée
avec#l'ajout#de#mon#nom#à#côté#du#sien.#En#fait#ce#n'est#pas#elle#qui#l'avait#apposé#mais#un#des
membres#du#collec,f#d'architectes#qui#a#réalisé#la#concep,on#de#la#place#du#géant.#Il#s'est#un
peu#emmêlé#les#pinceaux#on#va#dire...
Bien#à#vous,
bon#week#end
From:#d.villafruela
Subject:#Complement#Info#!
Date:#Sat,#1#Feb#2014#07:14:17#+0100
To:#lesdixchats@hotmail.com;#berangere.magaud@gmail.com
Bonjour#!
Moi#je#n’ai#découvert#la#signature#que#lorsque#j’ai#enlevé#les#poteaux#avec#photoshop#!#
Pour#compléter#l’ar,cle#sur#le#quar,er#de#Châteaucreux#sur#Wikipédia#mieux#vaut#que#vous#y
soyez#référencées#comme#créateurs#(Les#pe,tes#boîtes#à#votre#nom#à#l’item#Auteur).
Pour#bien#faire#il#faudrait#que#vous#completassiez#les#rubriques#en#rouge#:
{{Creator
#|#Name##############=##Bérangère#Magaud
#|#Alterna,ve#names#=#
#|#Na,onality#######=#{{Na,onality#|French|f}}
#|#Gender#############=#Female#
#|#Occupa,on#######=#{{LangSwitch#|en=Graphics#and#Design#in#urban#planning#|es#=Gráficos#y
Diseño#en#urbanismo#|fr=Graphisme#et#Design#en#urbanisme}}#Vous#pouvez#compléter#ou
reformuler#...
#|#Descrip,on#######={{LangSwitch|en=Management#and#crea,on#of#cultural#projects#in#public
space.#|es=Ges,ón#y#creación#de#proyectos#culturales#en#el#espacio#público.#|fr=Ges,on#et
créa,on#de#projets#culturels#dans#l’espace#public.}}##Vous#pouvez#compléter#ou#reformuler#...
#|#Birthdate###########=##{{date#|AAAA|#MM#|JJ}}#
|#Birthloc#############=#
#|#Deathdate#########=##p#
#|#Deathloc############=##p
#|#Workperiod########=#{{date#|AAAA|#MM#|JJ}}#p#...
| Workloc = 15 RUE DES CAVES - 63200 Yssac-la-Tourette
#|#Image#############=###Un#autoportrait,#un#Logo?#…#ou#pas!##(le#logo#ne#vieillit#pas#!#quoique#…)
#|#Sortkey###########=####Magaud#Bérangère#
#|#Homecat##########=##[[Category:#Bérangère#Magaud]]
#|#Op,on##############=#{{{1|}}}#<!pp#Do#not#modify#pp>
#|#Linkback##########=#Category:#Magaud#Bérangère
#|#Authority##########=#
#|#Wikidata##########=#
}}
Bonjour#!
Moi#je#n’ai#découvert#la#signature#que#lorsque#j’ai#enlevé#les#poteaux#avec#photoshop#!#
Pour#compléter#l’ar,cle#sur#le#quar,er#de#Châteaucreux#sur#Wikipédia#mieux#vaut#que#vous#y
soyez#référencées#comme#créateurs#(Les#pe,tes#boîtes#à#votre#nom#à#l’item#Auteur).
Pour#bien#faire#il#faudrait#que#vous#completassiez#les#rubriques#en#rouge#:
{{Creator
#|#Name##############=##Bérangère#Magaud
Alterna,ve#names#=#
Na,onality#######=#{{Na,onality#|French|f}}
#|#Gender#############=#Female#
#|#Occupa,on#######=#{{LangSwitch#|en=Graphics#and#Design#in#urban#planning#|es#=Gráficos#y
Diseño#en#urbanismo#|fr=Graphisme#et#Design#en#urbanisme}}#Vous#pouvez#compléter#ou
reformuler#...
#|#Descrip,on#######={{LangSwitch|en=Management#and#crea,on#of#cultural#projects#in#public
space.#|es=Ges,ón#y#creación#de#proyectos#culturales#en#el#espacio#público.#|fr=Ges,on#et
créa,on#de#projets#culturels#dans#l’espace#public.}}##Vous#pouvez#compléter#ou#reformuler#...
Birthdate###########=##{{date#|AAAA|#MM#|JJ}}#
|#Birthloc#############=#
Deathdate#########=##p#
Deathloc############=##p
#|#Workperiod########=#{{date#|AAAA|#MM#|JJ}}#p#...
| Workloc = 15 RUE DES CAVES - 63200 Yssac-la-Tourette
#|#Image#############=###Un#autoportrait,#un#Logo?#…#ou#pas!##(le#logo#ne#vieillit#pas#!#quoique#…)
#|#Homecat##########=##[[Category:#Bérangère#Magaud]]
#|#Op,on##############=#{{{1|}}}#<!pp#Do#not#modify#pp>
#|#Name##############=##Læ,,a#Cordier
Alterna,ve#names#=#lesdixchats#,##Læ,,a#Cordier
#|#Na,onality#######=#{{Na,onality#|French|f}}
#|#Gender#############=#Female
##|#Occupa,on#######=#{{LangSwitch#|en=Graphics#and#Design#in#urban#planning#|es#=Gráficos#y
Diseño#en#urbanismo#|fr=Graphisme#et#Design#en#urbanisme}}#compléter#ou#reformuler#...
#|#Descrip,on#######={{LangSwitch|en=Management#and#crea,on#of#cultural#projects#in#public
space.#|es=Ges,ón#y#creación#de#proyectos#culturales#en#el#espacio#público.#|fr=Ges,on#et
créa,on#de#projets#culturels#dans#l’espace#public.}}##Vous#pouvez#compléter#ou#reformuler#...
#|#Birthdate###########=##{{date#|1981|07#|26}}#
#|#Birthloc#############=#
#|#Deathdate#########=##p
#|#Deathloc############=##p
#|#Workperiod########=#{{since#date#|2006|#06}}#p#...
#|#Workloc###########=###
###############################lesdixchats.com
#|#Image#############=###Mon#Laboratoire#Mobile#en#pièce#jointe#(avec#lequel#a#été#réalisé#le#mur)#+
logo#(au#choix)
#|#Sortkey###########=####Magaud#Bérangère#
#|#Homecat###########=##[[Category:#Lae,,a#Cordier]]
Développer le message
#|#Homecat###########=##[[Category:#Lae,,a#Cordier]]
#|#Op,on##############=#{{{1|}}}#<!pp#Do#not#modify#pp>
#|#Linkback##########=#Category:Cordier#Lae,,a
#|#Authority#########=#
#|#Wikidata##########=#
}}
Ensuite#vous#pourrez#me|re#à#jour#vos#informa,ons,#en#cliquant#sur#le#pe,t#crayon#qui
apparaît#à#côté#de#votre#nom.
Merci
D.V.

'''Le#29#janv.#2014#à#20:59,#lesdixchats#cordier#<lesdixchats@hotmail.com>#a#écrit#:
'''Pas#de#soucis.#je#n'avais#pas#eu#connaissance#de#ce|e#signature...
Et#toi#Bérangère#?
Merci#en#tout#cas#d'avoir#fait#la#démarche#de#nous#contacter#pour#solliciter#notre
autorisa,on#de#diffusion.
Bien#à#vous,
'''Laëtitia
'''From:#d.villafruela
Subject:#Re:#Au#Bar#des#Dix#Chatst#!...
Date:#Wed,#29#Jan#2014#20:06:22#+0100
To:#lesdixchats@hotmail.com
C’est#fait#!##Mais#pour#un#simple#passant,#la#signature#qui#m’a#permis#de#vous
retrouver#laissait#à#penser#qu’il#s’agissait#du#site#de#Bérangère#…#
<Saint#É,ennepLesDixChatspBérangère#Magaudp20140127.jpg>
Pour#l’équité,#le#fichier#sera#renommé#en#Saint#É,ennepBar#de#l'Hôtel#de
Châteaucreuxp20140127.jpg
Avec#toute#mes#excuses.
D.V.

Le#29#janv.#2014#à#18:51,#lesdixchats#cordier#<lesdixchats@hotmail.com>#a#écrit#:
Bonsoir,#
je#suis#lae,,a#cordier,#alias#lesdixchats,#graphiste#indépendante.#Ce
n'est#pas#un#collec,f.#
Bérangère,#graphiste#indépendante#également,#m'a#accompagné
dans#la#réalisa,on#de#ce|e#oeuvre.
Nous#en#sommes#les#2#auteurs.
Vous#avez#l'autorisa,on#que#ce|e#photo#reste#sur#Wikimedia
commons mais il faudra avant tout modifier le
nom de l'auteur#:
Bérangère#Magaud#&#Laë,,a#Cordier
Par#avance#merci
lae,,a#cordier
www.lesdixchats.com
From:#d.villafruela@me.com
Subject:#Au#Bar#des#Dix#Chatst#!...
}}
Ensuite#vous#pourrez#me|re#à#jour#vos#informa,ons,#en#cliquant#sur#le#pe,t#crayon#qui
apparaît#à#côté#de#votre#nom.
Merci
D.V.

Le#29#janv.#2014#à#20:59,#lesdixchats#cordier#<lesdixchats@hotmail.com>#a#écrit#:
Pas#de#soucis.#je#n'avais#pas#eu#connaissance#de#ce|e#signature...
Et#toi#Bérangère#?
Merci#en#tout#cas#d'avoir#fait#la#démarche#de#nous#contacter#pour#solliciter#notre
autorisa,on#de#diffusion.
Bien#à#vous,
Laë,,a
From:#d.villafruela
Subject:#Re:#Au#Bar#des#Dix#Chatst#!...
Date:#Wed,#29#Jan#2014#20:06:22#+0100
To:#lesdixchats@hotmail.com
C’est#fait#!##Mais#pour#un#simple#passant,#la#signature#qui#m’a#permis#de#vous
retrouver#laissait#à#penser#qu’il#s’agissait#du#site#de#Bérangère#…#
<Saint#É,ennepLesDixChatspBérangère#Magaudp20140127.jpg>
Pour#l’équité,#le#fichier#sera#renommé#en#Saint#É,ennepBar#de#l'Hôtel#de
Châteaucreuxp20140127.jpg
Avec#toute#mes#excuses.
D.V.

Le#29#janv.#2014#à#18:51,#lesdixchats#cordier#<lesdixchats@hotmail.com>#a#écrit#:
Bonsoir,#
je#suis#lae,,a#cordier,#alias#lesdixchats,#graphiste#indépendante.#Ce
n'est#pas#un#collec,f.#
Bérangère,#graphiste#indépendante#également,#m'a#accompagné
dans#la#réalisa,on#de#ce|e#oeuvre.
Nous#en#sommes#les#2#auteurs.
Vous#avez#l'autorisa,on#que#ce|e#photo#reste#sur#Wikimedia
commons mais il faudra avant tout modifier le
nom de l'auteur#:
Bérangère#Magaud#&#Laë,,a#Cordier
Par#avance#merci
lae,,a#cordier
Développer le message


De: Daniel VILLAFRUELA
Objet: Complement Info !
Date: 1 février 2014 07:14
À: lesdixchats cordier lesdixchats@hotmail.com, berangere.magaud@gmail.com
Bonjour !
Moi je n’ai découvert la signature que lorsque j’ai enlevé les poteaux avec photoshop !
Pour compléter l’article sur le quartier de Châteaucreux sur Wikipédia mieux vaut que vous y
soyez référencées comme créateurs (Les petites boîtes à votre nom à l’item Auteur).
Pour bien faire il faudrait que vous completassiez les rubriques en rouge :
{{Creator
| Name = Bérangère Magaud
| Alternative names =
| Nationality = {{Nationality |French|f}}
| Gender = Female
| Occupation = {{LangSwitch |en=Graphics and Design in urban planning |es =Gráficos y
Diseño en urbanismo |fr=Graphisme et Design en urbanisme}} Vous pouvez compléter ou
reformuler ...
| Description ={{LangSwitch|en=Management and creation of cultural projects in public space.
|es=Gestión y creación de proyectos culturales en el espacio público. |fr=Gestion et création de
projets culturels dans l’espace public.}} Vous pouvez compléter ou reformuler ...
| Birthdate = {{date |AAAA| MM |JJ}}
| Birthloc =
| Deathdate = -
| Deathloc = -
| Workperiod = {{date |AAAA| MM |JJ}} - ...
| Workloc = 15 RUE DES CAVES - 63200 Yssac-la-Tourette
| Image = Un autoportrait, un Logo? … ou pas! (le logo ne vieillit pas ! quoique …)
| Sortkey = Magaud Bérangère
| Homecat = [[Category: Bérangère Magaud]]
| Option = {{{1|}}} <!-- Do not modify -->
| Linkback = Category: Magaud Bérangère
| Authority =
| Wikidata =
}}
{{Creator
| Name = Lae,,a#Cordier
| Alternative names = lesdixchats , Læ,,a#Cordier
| Nationality = {{Nationality |French|f}}
| Gender = Female
| Occupation = {{LangSwitch |en=Graphics and Design in urban planning |es =Gráficos y
Diseño en urbanismo |fr=Graphisme et Design en urbanisme}} compléter ou reformuler ...
| Description ={{LangSwitch|en=Management and creation of cultural projects in public space.
|es=Gestión y creación de proyectos culturales en el espacio público. |fr=Gestion et création de
projets culturels dans l’espace public.}} Vous pouvez compléter ou reformuler ...
| Birthdate = {{date |AAAA| MM |JJ}}
| Birthloc =
| Deathdate = -
| Deathloc = -
| Workperiod = {{date |AAAA| MM |JJ}} - ...
| Workloc =
| Workloc =
lesdixchats.com
| Image = Une photo de l’artiste, un tencats ? … ou pas, selon sa volonté !
| Sortkey = Magaud Bérangère
| Homecat = [[Category: Lae,,a#Cordier]]
| Option = {{{1|}}} <!-- Do not modify -->
| Linkback = Category:Cordier#Lae,,a
| Authority =
| Wikidata =
}}
Ensuite vous pourrez mettre à jour vos informations, en cliquant sur le petit crayon qui apparaît à
côté de votre nom.
Merci
D.V.
Le 29 janv. 2014 à 20:59, lesdixchats cordier <lesdixchats@hotmail.com> a écrit :
Pas de soucis. je n'avais pas eu connaissance de cette signature...
Et toi Bérangère ?
Merci en tout cas d'avoir fait la démarche de nous contacter pour solliciter notre autorisation de
diffusion.
Bien à vous,
Laëtitia

From: d.villafruela
Subject: Re: Au Bar des Dix Chatst !...
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:06:22 +0100
To: lesdixchats@hotmail.com
C’est fait ! Mais pour un simple passant, la signature qui m’a permis de vous retrouver laissait à
penser qu’il s’agissait du site de Bérangère …
<Saint Étienne-LesDixChats-Bérangère Magaud-20140127.jpg>
Pour l’équité, le fichier sera renommé en Saint Étienne-Bar de l'Hôtel de Châteaucreux-
20140127.jpg
Avec toute mes excuses.
D.V.

Le 29 janv. 2014 à 18:51, lesdixchats cordier <lesdixchats@hotmail.com> a écrit :
'''Bonsoir,
je suis laetitia cordier, alias lesdixchats, graphiste indépendante. Ce n'est pas un
collectif.
Bérangère, graphiste indépendante également, m'a accompagné dans la
réalisation de cette oeuvre.
Nous en sommes les 2 auteurs.
Vous avez l'autorisation que cette photo reste sur Wikimedia commons
mais il faudra avant tout modifier le nom de l'auteur :
Bérangère Magaud & Laëtitia Cordier
Par avance merci
laetitia cordier
www.lesdixchats.com

'''From: d.villafruela
Subject: Au Bar des Dix Chatst !...
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:44:41 +0100
To: lesdixchats@hotmail.com
Bonsoir
Jai photographié, le bar des dix chats, oeuvre de Bérangère Magaud, au gré de
mes promenades.
Le quartier subit de profond changements, et pour garder la mémoire de ce qui va
disparaître j’ai commencé à ajouter quelques photos.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saint_Étienn
e-Hôtel_de_Châteaucreux-Bar_des_Dix_Chats-
20140127.jpg
J’ai renseigné la documentation de la photo, en tant
qu’oeuvre d’art éphémère, mais comme Bérangère
a signé son oeuvre, j’aurais besoin de son
autorisation pour que la photo reste sur Wikimedia
commons.
Du coup je n’ai pas continué plus avant.
Finalement, ce bar va nous manquer …
D.V.
 Comment - Hi Daniel! Please forgive me for {{Collapse}}ing the above for readability and management. There are two potential problems: 1) I see no mention of a free license. As far as I can tell, they say only "Vous avez l'autorisation que cette photo reste sur Wikimedia commons", i.e. they say it can stay on commons - but I can't see a license. Do they understand that their work can be used commercially as long as the user abides by the license? 2) Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS... pasting email threads here is not good practice, and can't be properly verified and logged. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 13:02, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Que de complication pour une oeuvre qui aura disparu à la fin de l'année ! J'ai fait le nécessaire auprès de Laetitia et de Bérangère pour qu'elles confiment/infirment leur autorisation.
Dura lex, sed lex !<br.>
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The language above does not consitute an accelptable license for Commons. In order to restore this, we will require a license from each of the creators, using the procedure at Commons:OTRS,. There is also the question of whether this serves an educationalpurpose -- I think not, but others may disagree. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no EXIF date. Author is said to be David Joseph (not the uploader). Source is said to be Metropolis Magazine. There is no permission, so it is probably a copyvio. BrightRaven (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Information indicates from a non-free source, no evidence of own work  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 37.5.4.11 11:58, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Frame from one of various youtube clips (e.g. here). Not clear that uploader is the copyright holder or that this is otherwise freely licensed. Storkk (talk) 12:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a derivative of the photo on the held-up poster. No evidence that this photo is also under a free license. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a derivative of the 2 photos on this poster. No evidence that these photos were also released under a free license. As the poster is hardly a permanent installation, it is not covered by Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Spain. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder appears to be a Roberto Gabriele. There is no indication that the uploader is this person. Uploader, if you are the copyright holder, please confirm this via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright belongs to Marco Lo Russo in which it holds any right of use. Roberto Gabriele is the author of the photo. I hope that the misunderstanding is cleared up. MetalJaco (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MetalJaco: ... The copyright holder should confirm that the file is freely licensed (for example, someone could in theory use it for advertising) by following the instructions on COM:OTRS. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 19:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be out of scope per Commons:SCOPE#PDF_and_DjVu_formats El Grafo (talk) 12:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:AMH-6700-KB Gezicht op de slag om stad San Salvador in de Allerheiligenbaai tussen Nederlanders en Portugezen in 1624.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:52, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: treated as {{duplicate}}  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exremely small profile picture, not used anywhere. Picture is uploaders only contribution. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 12:57, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, and without context not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of scope. Storkk (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, only file uploaded by contributor. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is out of scope: it is a personnal proposal for modifying the administrative divisions of China based on ethno-linguistic consideration. The uploader spams various Wikipedias with this image: he adds this map in numerous articles about China. I have withdrawn this image from various articles in FR-WP and someone else did the same in DE-WP. BrightRaven (talk) 13:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: While I sympathize with the problem, policy is clear that we cannot simply delete an image that is in use in a variety of articles on four different WPs. It is up to the WPs, not Commons to police their content. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable, afaict it is one user's fantasy for a possible future, not anything that has been published or referenced in any way. 170.213.22.187 23:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use, thus in scope. --Achim55 (talk) 07:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a newspaper from May 2014. Not clear why this would be freely licensable. Storkk (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2014 (UTC) --[reply]

 Keep This is trivial newspaper cover, image is alike as much other files here. 5 min search: File:Guardian.JPG; File:Krimskoe_vremia.jpg; File:Lisboa_-_Newspapers_(1261040258).jpg; File:Lloyd's_List_Australian_Weekly,_Front_Cover,_Issue_1,_Monday,_30_August_1993.jpg; File:Fiji_Times_cover.JPG; File:2007_newsstand_Valencia_Spain_466381960.jpg; File:Izdateli_Erzian_Mastor.JPG; File:Vestnik_front_page.jpg etc...

{{PD-ineligible}} {{PD-text}}

Regards, Cap1000 (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I've nominated a few of those as well. Others appear de minimis to me. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The argument is nonsense. The image alone clearly has a copyright. Other Stuff Exists is never a reason to keep something. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad version of this file (.jpg, not .png). MacQtosh (talk) 13:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[4] <- this is new, correct version MacQtosh (talk) 13:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wyrrax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of historical photos and book covers. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Добрий день, я онук Миколи Сома, ці світлини взяті з домашнього архіву, музика також, а відео взято з моєї сторінки на Ютубі, де вже більше року воно монетизоване без зауважень від "Content ID". То я виходить правоприємник цих матеріалів, чи якось так :)
Пишіть, якщо треба надати якісь докази, або змінити щось у ліцензіях, я на Вікіпедії нещодавно, усіх нюансів не знаю.
Wyrrax (talk) 14:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Трохи розібрався
Я вислав листа на адресу permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, де доклав деякі документи, що свідчать що я є онуком Миколи Сома та можу викладати ці матеріали під ліцензією PD-heirs
Мені власноруч змінити ліцензійні теги до цих сканів на PD-heirs, чи треба чекати відповіді адмінів?
Чи буде достатньо для медіа-файлів ліцензії Youtube CC-BY?
Wyrrax (talk) 19:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The copyright to the images belongs to their photographers or their heirs, not to you, as an heir of their subject. The musical works have two copyrights -- music and lyrics. As the lyricist's grandson, you may own one of the them. In order to restore these, we will need licenses using Commons:OTRS from the photographers or their heirs, and from all of the heirs of the lyricist and the music writer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture should be regarded as a "photographic work", because it is taken from a fictional film. Since this film was produced in 1961, copyright rules still applies. Stigfinnare (talk) 14:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Duktig pojk. Filmindustrin tackar dig säkert för ditt nit. Ha de //--Bulver (talk) 14:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted election posters. FOP does not apply as those are not permanently installed at these locations. The posters in image #4 might qualify as DM but since the entire point of the image is to illustrate the election posters I'm unsure whether we can claim DM here. IMHO all of the images would be fine if the posters are simply blurred.

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. 5 - OK. But all the others are clrearly not centered to only an election poster. I don't see a cause for a deletion. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcus Cyron: If the others are not intended to highlight the content of the election poster (in context of its surrounding, of course) then I think we could simply blur the poster and avoid the possible copyright infringement. Would that be okay for you? Regards, --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 20:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: three, deleted two. The three were DM. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the record: 1, 2 and 4 were kept, 3 and 5 deleted. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 11:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of advertisement on building and election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently installed at this location. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a close call, but I think they are past DM. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, the National Geographic Society renewed their copyright on this map in 1964. If deleted, please categorize into Category:Undelete in 2033. Storkk (talk) 15:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Election poster from the 1930s. Anonymous copyright tag does not apply as the work was published with author information which is unfortunately unreadable due to the small resolution. Not old enough to simply assume PD-old. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Man könnte auch bei der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Nachfrage halten... Peter.Joachim@fes.de --Kresspahl (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted election poster. No reason to assume that this should not meet the threshold of originality. Not old enough to just assume PD-old. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighed election poster. FOP does not apply as this is not permanently located here. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a portrait of Robert Dudley, not of Henry Grey. Falkebln (talk) 18:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a reason to delete. Please use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 2011 by Beto8417 (talk · contributions · Statistics) the (cropped) photo is printed on page 10 of http://74.81.84.244:8080/comesa/archivos/Sinergia20.pdf ("Revista de Comunicación Interna de COMESA Diciembre 2008", created: 2008, last modified: 2009). Permission from COMESA and/or the related photographer needed. Gunnex (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating also:

Gunnex (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is out of date and has been replaced by a more appropriate one Dogonthegrass (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Picture is in scope, though it may now be historic. Please document it appropriate as time, and contents.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from [5]. Shows a construction made 1939/1940. Not "own work". No photographer mentioned at external website, but might be determinable by asking the site owner/author of the article at the external site. Lupo 19:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still missing a free license for the X-ray images …    FDMS  4    23:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not convinced that the x-rays are ineligible for copyright; they should be treated as photographs of the physician who took them. --Krd 17:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I see no reason why X-rays do not have a copyright. There is nothing in the law which specifies the wavelength of light forming a copyrightable photographic image. That copyright belongs to the person (physician or technician) who took the images, or, more probably, to the institution for which he works. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apekshababy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all personal images and out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some photos are "out of the project scope", but as I told it at the users discussion-page, some of the photos are in our educational focus, they show individuel persons of course, and traditional or religious ceremonies as well! We have to distinguish beetween the photos, which can illustrate possible or existing Wikipedia-articles about that traditions – and the others.
If we look to the photos: In File:Baby is named after 6 day of born.png a ritual naming-ceremony is the issue: The uploader writes: "A traditoinal ritul is to name the baby after six day of his/her born. A barber and prist must name the baby after colouring the nails of baby" ("A traditional ritual is to name the baby after six days of his/her birth. A barber and a priest must name the baby, after colouring the nails of the baby"), the new born baby is now part of the community, no longer a "wild individuum". Maybe there is a wikipedia-article about that ritual, where the photos could illustrate that. A similar baby-photo in Category:Children of Nepal is File:Dasain Celebration of Life.jpg, which is used in a ja-wp-article, linked to en:Dasain. And if we look to File:Suva bibaha.png, where "bibaha" leads us to article en:Ihi (= Bel bibaha), where you can read about "Suvarna" and "Hindu marriage" traditions in Nepal. So it is plausibel, that the wedding-ritual of the photo (and in File:Traditional arranged mirrage.png, File:Girl in weding dress.png, File:Mirrage cerimony.png ...) is very similar to the other marriages, shown in Category:Marriage in Nepal. We should be glad, that user Apekshababy want to share that photos in Commons! And a "mass deletion request" for all that files in Category:Marriage by country is not a good idea.
Okay, in File:떼디서너러 비바허.png we miss a better description. The uploader (or friends) should add the country, region and something about the religion or tradition – it is not necessary to tell the exact location, village or city, or more about the persons.

In Category:Children of Nepal there are 88 photos, babies only a few! But to keep some of the other baby photos above, the description should be better – it is true that I cannot understand what the photographer wants to tell with the photos.

Typing errors or a scarce description are not a reason for deletion! rename the photos correctly, please. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 10:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We have literally millions of photographs, and many of the subjects you've mentioned at higher quality. If you can find a use for these images, be my guest. Otherwise, they remain someone just treating Commons as a photo album. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Photos in the linked categories above? or for redlink-Categories like Category:Construction in Nepal? (the two house-photos: it's true it is a private house – but how many photos about construction-traditions in Nepal are in Commons?). And it seems to me, he/she is an active photographer in Nepal, maybe a new one of the few Commons-Users in Nepal! Ask Category:User ne (only 25!) for translation, or tell Apekshababy that possibility? --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 06:49, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept some, and I mostly agreed with comments about those that may have educational value. They do seriously need maintenance as their value in their current status is severely limited with Commons scope. If they are not tidied, I envisage that they will be back for deletion, and it would be hard to disregard a second nomination if maintenance is not undertaken.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apekshababy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope unused files with doubtful copyright status (small sizes, png format, no EXIF)

/St1995 15:39, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:58, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jarekt as no license (No license since)... but I do not understand the nomination. User has a series of photos all with same camera, etc. I think perhaps this tag may be in error unless I am missing something on this image and not on the others. Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file is missing a license and all other files of this uploader use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}{{Wiki Loves Earth 2014|ua}}. I assume it is an simple mistake of a new user and would just add the license and say that it is based on the other uploads. BTW, no license template says that the uploader has a week to fix the problem before file is deleted. That is not "speedy-deletion" you mentioned in the edit comment. --Jarekt (talk) 03:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never said you called for speedy, what I said is that it is not eligible for speedy, and I am moving it to deletion nomination. I personally would just add the tag as you say, I assume it's a newbie mistake, but by moving it here, gets an extra week for the uploader to reply (if they are still active) and more time for other editors to comment/fix it, as well as to be sure that (as said above) I am not missing something. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Still no license Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple typography should be typeset, not presented as an image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this should be kept. I was just considering how I might possibly use it, when I saw this request. Though I myself might only use it in one or two places I can presently think of doing so, as with many other svg images of other symbols, the symbolical image here could be useful in some articles, even if not very many. There is no need to delete it. ~ Kalki·· 12:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As in the other image, it serves an illustrative and referential role on its respective article at an upscaled resolution. I strongly disagree on the grounds that I see no violation of policy. Thank you. --Immanuel Thoughtmaker (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot stress enough that default typsets do not allow for the infinite scaling this .svg image allows. As this image is, it will not only benefit relevant articles but people who require such an image of this symbolic logic with infinite resolution. --Immanuel Thoughtmaker (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Simple typography should be typeset, not presented as an image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:50, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It serves an illustrative and referential role on its respective article at an upscaled resolution. I strongly disagree on the grounds that I see no violation of policy. Thank you. --Immanuel Thoughtmaker (talk) 20:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot stress enough that default typsets do not allow for the infinite scaling this .svg image allows. As this image is, it will not only benefit relevant articles but people who require such an image of this symbolic logic with infinite resolution. --Immanuel Thoughtmaker (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images are part of a LoC collection. The copyright information page for this collection states: Posters in this collection were published before 1923 and are therefore in the public domain in the United States. There is no explanation why these should be PD in Germany. As these images are only about 100 years old they are not sufficiently old to assume that they are PD-old in Germany. Since Commons requires media to be free in both the US and their source country these need to be deleted for not being free in their country of origin (Germany).

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa sostituita da una in formato svg e con grafica unificata (File:Firenze mappa tranvia.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe. Friedrichstrasse (talk) 20:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on work by Thordeman, who died 1990. 83.254.245.201 23:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good reason to suspect this one-interest IP - that User:Pieter Kuiper is back on this one. The ideas are Thordeman from text in his book. The drawing is nothing whatsoever like his. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Apperanly okey Natuur12 (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture seems corrupt, not linked to anything. Out of scope? Mippzon (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me, nice neck. Toss of the coin about out of scope, though if penises are fine, presumably so are necks. Leaning to keep.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 21:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mappa sostituita da una in formato svg e con grafica unificata (File:Firenze mappa tranvia.svg). Friedrichstrasse (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beto8417 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Beto8417 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carlos Morales Gil.jpg (3 files). Additional infos:

It appears that Beto8417 is (or was) an assistent of Moisés Calderón Abbo and had access to some historic photographic material (without clearing the copyrights) considering that he forced an corresponding entry at eswiki which was deleted twice. Considering this, I presume that File:Moisés Calderón.jpg (not nominated, taken with a BlackBerry 9700), may be own work.

The rest of the uploads were made before he turned his interest to Moisés Calderón Abbo and are related to Mexican people related to [youth] education ("Pilar Mendiola Fernandez") and engineering ("Gustavo Hernández"):


Gunnex (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not enough details are mentioned regarding the file and it appears in another site with no details there either ([6]). Seems to be a copyrights violation. Ldorfman (talk) 11:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image is from my own private collection.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Huddyhuddy (talk • contribs)
Then please add more details about it in the file's information like who took it and is the visa itself owned by you? Also, how come it got to the other site? Ldorfman (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is a travel document, not a created, artistic work, with the application of standard government words, or other information to explain the nature of the visa. I doubt copyright comes into play. Extra information is important to reflect the historical document, to put it into context, and provide the educative aspect.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I disagree. The lion in the background, on the passport page itself, has or had a copyright. Depending on what country the passport is from, that copyright may or may not still be in effect. I don't think any of the visa stamps passes the ToO. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Jim Natuur12 (talk) 21:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sugihara_visa.jpg. Yann (talk) 11:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 1913 work. It is signed "Poplawski 1913", but Poplawski is the subject so it is not clear if he is also the artist. 1913 is certainly too recent to assume that the author has been dead for 70 years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • artist is Antoine PROTOPAZZI dit PAZZI né en Grèce en 1897, mort à Paris en 1934 (dead in Paris in 1934). Il travailla en France ou il fut actif entre 1920 et 1934. Il exposa au Salon de l’Araignée. Il travailla pour les journaux illustrés ”le journal”, “Gringoire”, “Fantasio”, etc ... --Alain Schneider (talk) 09:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-old ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 14:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  1. no source
  2. unclear if this ship is in fact the Preussen. See DE-wiki file talk

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked the author to add the source of the scan. It is evident that the scan is from a published work, and that detail should be available. One would think that if it is from a published work that it has a reasonable chance of being correct information. Please allow time for contributor to make that update.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment No problem - let's wait. I'd rather keep the file. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as there was no further reaction of the uploader Krd 15:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Greta Sellberg died 1946 according to http://www.lexikonettamanda.se/show.php?aid=16180 83.254.245.201 23:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there User:Pieter Kuiper! Aren't you blocked? Anyway, who new? I assumed she died much earlier. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS I don't mind someone finding an error of mine - always glad to be corrected - but if as I expect it's our old antagonist at work again here, that I do object to. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


@Jameslwoodward: Can you please document your reasoning. This is not the work of the author, it is a title page of the work, usually through the publisher and a typographer.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever created it -- the author, possibly, or some third party hired by the publisher -- it was done in 1911, which is far too late to assume that the creator died before 1944. The page has significant artistic elements, so it is far over the ToO. It's signed in the lower right corner, so it was not anonymous, although the creator might be hard to discover 103 years later. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
According to the book itself (all) the graphic design was by the named Ms Sellberg who the nominating IP claims died in 1946. Border case, in that case, and 2 years on the wrong side of it. Sorry - I had sincerely assumed otherwise! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private images of a party in Glasgow - out of scope

JuTa 22:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 09:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]