User talk:Юрій Булка

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Юрій Булка!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

TUSC token fab22f31eaa4a1b8cda9fe17b1194317

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Юрій Булка!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Wikimeetup-Lviv Conservatory-2011 10 13-01.jpg was uncategorized on 14 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:37, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

File:А1+шанувальниці.JPG

You are listed as the photographer. You might wish to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:А1+шанувальниці.JPG. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:24, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Lysenko-Valse of farewell.ogg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:19, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wikimeetup-Kyiv-2013-12-05-225556.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikimeetup-Kyiv-2013-12-05-225556.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wikimeetup-Kyiv-2013-12-05-225705.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikimeetup-Kyiv-2013-12-05-225705.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yann (talk) 20:13, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Since these photos were taken on my camera by other person (w:uk:User:Sergento) we decided that I will upload it and the author of the photo will add the license tag on it. --YurB (talk) 20:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Юрій Булка⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Юрій Булка,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Ravel files

Hello, unfortunately I've had to mark your Ravel uploads for speedy deletion, per Commons:Deletion requests/Music of Ravel. Graham87 (talk) 13:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I just noticed this undeletion discussion; never mind. Graham87 (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

відео

Привіт! Чи відео звідси - File:Asaf at ZIK.jpg? Добре було б, щоб хоч десь лінк був, ну, звістно, якщо телекомпанія не завантажить на Коммонз. Хоча, аж раптом вони погодяться завантажити на Вікісховище відеофайл? ;-0 Дякую! ;-)--Nickispeaki (talk) 04:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

На коммонс звісно нереально, але воно є на їхньому ютюбі: Керівник програм фонду "Вікімедіа" про подачу інформації в українській та російській "Вікіпедіях" --YurB (talk) 06:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

My apologies

I just noticed that I very unfairly berated you in an edit summary here.

I'm very embarrassed, and sorry. The extremely stupid error was mine, in not closing a tag, and my reaction to your edit was completely inexcusable. I truly apologise. Begoon - talk 11:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

No problem:) --Yuriy Bulka (talk) 11:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being so understanding. Begoon - talk 11:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ua-gov-licenses-infographic.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ua-gov-licenses-infographic.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Oops, I forgot to add the license tag. Fixed. --Yuriy Bulka (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Need some help in translation!

Hello Yuri, could you enlighten me regarding what this article says about the performer of this piece you uploaded? I can't seem to run it through Google Translate! We need to have some basic details about the pianist for COM:FSC. It would be beyond excellent if you could assist us! Cheers :) ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

File:Ladies&gents.JPG

Unfortunately, your tagging of that image left it unclear as to what you were claiming is non-free, and so is not useful in that form... AnonMoos (talk) 14:14, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi AnonMoos. The author of the photo is not the author of the object on the photo, so in order to release that as public domain, we need permission from Manfred Wolff-Plottegg, the architect. It seems to be an important part of the work by Plottegg. --Yuriy Bulka (talk) 15:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, but the simple arrangement of the sans-serif font characters ",l," and "()" falls far below the threshold of originality, and is not copyrightable in itself... AnonMoos (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

AnonMoos, I'm sort of playing devil's advocate here, but while just using ",l," and "()" in isolation is trivial and rather not copyrightable, creating a door handle in the shape of these characters and in this particular context (used to represent man's and woman's bathroom) of this color, size, material, etc. may be considered a creative work. Let's say I've seen this on commons and decided to create the same in my own cafe, would that hold up in court, if the author sued? I'm not sure. To me this doesn't seem like obviously trivial and non-creative. --Yuriy Bulka (talk) 18:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

It's more than dubious enough that adding a "No permission" template to the image description page of this one particular file is not really useful. If you really want it deleted, start an ordinary deletion nomination page where such issues can be discussed... AnonMoos (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)