Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2013/01/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
my signature was removed on this picture, I need you to delete this new version and replace it by the old one please. Thank you! Nassif.seif (talk) 06:12, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I deleted the watermark from this image at the request of another editor posted in the Graphics Workshop as watermarked images are not permitted on Wikipedia. Such information is instead meant to be placed in the image's host page. Centpacrr (talk) 06:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
I made this picture public, but I still need to have the rights to put my name on it as kind of copyright. I am not using this watermark as publicity! just a copyright!
- Please see WP Commons watermarking policy on digital images here Centpacrr (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 10:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
If I am not allowed to keep my signature or my name on this photo so please delete it ! I don't want to share it anymore. Thank you ! Nassif.seif (talk) 03:47, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Free licenses are irrevocable. INeverCry 00:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Please I need to delete this picture, thank you! Nassif.seif (talk) 00:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Why? -mattbuck (Talk) 00:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- I think that the person didn't understand the nature of a free licence. The first deletion request took place within a week of the edit of the picture. It is a wonderful image, but I am wondering if we do the project justice by keeping this image. (Please note, I am not at this time voting delete, but rather I think that this should be discussed.). Sinnamon Girl (talk) 03:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have decided to vote
Delete on this image. But it should be made clear to the uploader that releasing a file under a free licence is in fact not revocable. What that implies is that if somebody were to decide to use that file anywhere on the Web they would be completely free to do that. If somebody would wish to use it in an article on any Wikimedia project they should open an undeletion request, and such a request should be granted. The file may have been released under a free licence as a mistake, but since this mistake wasn't rectified for such a long time, there's nobody to blame for that besides the copyright holder. Lastly, if the person who has removed the watermark will vote keep, arguing that it took effort to remove the watermark, I will reverse my vote. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have decided to vote
- Delete Uploader clearly did not understand that the license allowed their signature to be removed. This should have been courtesy deleted the first time the uploader asked. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 03:37, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Two first closures were totally legitimate. But I looked at Category:Zahlé and we have quite a lot of panoramic views there, included one valued image. Therefore deletion of ZahlePanoramicView.jpg is not a big loss to us. And, actually, this is not a good file: it seems very distorted in middle. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I removed the watermark from this image some time back at the request of another editor posted in the Graphics Workshop as watermarked images are not permitted on Wikipedia. However as the contributor apparently did not understand this WP policy at the time a "courtesy delete" now seems appropriate. Centpacrr (talk) 16:35, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 08:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Podiumsdiskussion auf der Art (F)Air 2012, Messe für zeitgenössische Kunst in Hannover, Resümée, Ausblick, II.jpg
[edit]See ticket:2013010310005418 (accessible for users with OTRS access), per Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany. Due to a misunderstanding between photographer and subject about the extent of permission, both ask for the image to be deleted (and we unfortunately cannot keep it anyway, see said page on consent requirements). —pajz (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per OTRS ticket. --Krd 18:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Elisa Haug, die Künstlerin während ihrer Performance AIR auf der Art (F)Air 2012, Messe für zeitgenössische Kunst in Hannover.jpg
[edit]See ticket:2013010310005418 (accessible for users with OTRS access), per Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany. Due to a misunderstanding between photographer and subject about the extent of permission, both ask for the image to be deleted (and we unfortunately cannot keep it anyway, see said page on consent requirements). —pajz (talk) 18:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per OTRS ticket. --Krd 18:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Elisa Haug, die Künstlerin kurz vor ihrer Performance AIR auf der Art (F)Air 2012, Messe für zeitgenössische Kunst in Hannover.jpg
[edit]See ticket:2013010310005418 (accessible for users with OTRS access), per Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany. Due to a misunderstanding between photographer and subject about the extent of permission, both ask for the image to be deleted (and we unfortunately cannot keep it anyway, see said page on consent requirements). —pajz (talk) 18:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deleted per OTRS ticket. --Krd 18:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia, the photo should not be kept in Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 12:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep - plain socialistic architecture without any copyrightable elements. --Sporti (talk) 13:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination You're probably correct. The rationale here was Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Apartment buildings in Ljubljana (Štepanjsko naselje), however in my opinion these two apartment buildings do not contain a copyrightable element. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: per Sporti McZusatz (talk) 20:21, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom McZusatz (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
The image has a large watermark, unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
No proof of source, date or that it's PD. We hope (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Was uploaded 3 times. The one the uploader seems to have chosen to use is File:My sign in WP.png, so this is unnecessary. Fry1989 eh? 00:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
hi my friend, you can delete it, and sorry that I forget about that. Osamaalsaadi Talk 18:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Was uploaded 3 times. The one the uploader seems to have chosen to use is File:My sign in WP.png, so this is unnecessary. Fry1989 eh? 00:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC) hi my friend, you can delete it, and sorry that I forget about that. Osamaalsaadi Talk 18:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Couldn't have been taken on January 9, 2013, since Bol died in 2010. I've seen this image online before, so I'd need stronger evidence before assuming it's usable. Zagalejo (talk) 02:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Why the image is PD-US? shizhao (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
wrong format and not necessary; there is another file with the same photo File:L. Jańczuk in Zaanse Schans.jpg Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope and unlikely to be "own work" cyrfaw (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. There is no proof of {{Cc-zero}}. Takabeg (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 14:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Armenia
- File:MotherlandmemorialinDC.jpg
- File:24 Апреля 1990г. Первая благотворительная выставка после Спитакского землетрясения.jpg
Takabeg (talk) 04:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
According to w:en:Armenian Earthquake (Sogoyan), it was unveiled in 1990 and authored by Frederic Sogoyan. Still a copyrighted work of art, and the United States has no freedom of panorama for copyrighted works of art in public spaces. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:08, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Soghoyan died in 2019, so the file can be restored in 2090. --Rosenzweig τ 06:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. According to source, Copyright © 2010 Encyclopedia. All Rights Reserved. Takabeg (talk) 04:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Very similar to File:Comedy Central 2011 Logo.png and File:Comedy Central 2011 Logo.svg - also not being used on any wmf wikis Varnent (talk)(COI) 04:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete both PNG files, unless there is some difference I'm not seeing. SVG is the better format for something like this. (I'm assuming that the SVG is an authentic/faithful reproduction of the actual logo, and that it truly is below the threshold of originality as claimed.) -Pete F (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Undeleted: Saibo (Δ∇) 01:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
There is no proof of {{Copyrighted free use}}. Moreover, there is no proof of the fact that the source (Hovik Charkhochyan) is not the copyright holder of this image. Takabeg (talk) 04:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete The author is unknown, but we know what license the author agreed to, and this photo of a guy who died in 1969 was taken in 2012? No. Too many contradictions in the metadata. -Pete F (talk) 20:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope SamuelFreli (talk) 04:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, no clear educational use for this personal picture -Pete F (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
F1 logo repeatedly deleted as a copyvio. Fry1989 eh? 04:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- This logo is better then the prevous one so Im against this getting removed. Daniels Renault Sport (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete If this is indeed an official logo as claimed, an OTRS ticket would need to be filed and resolved to provide assurance of free license. -Pete F (talk) 20:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio. It seems to be taken from book, magazine (newspaper ?). There is no proof of {{PD-self}}. Takabeg (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope and unlikely to be "own work" cyrfaw (talk) 05:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
copyvio. photo from press. ChongDae (talk) 07:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
copyvio. photo from election poster ChongDae (talk) 07:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
copyvio photo from election poster. ChongDae (talk) 07:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
the uploader vandalized the page with a unacceptable likeness of the artist. A more appropriate photo was already submitted and in use. 5 other images of the subject exist in the commons that are acceptable. This one is an example of harrassment, and is a visual & casual slander of the integrity of the artist. PLEASE DELETE the inappropriate photo and REPLACE with one of the 5 uploaded Common jpgs of professional integrity. ToneArmy (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment This looks as though you intended to raise some images for deletion rather than a Commons page. From the nomination, I have no idea what images you refer to, why these might be a problem, or who the uploader is. From the appearance of your complaint, you might be better off writing to OTRS if you believe a set of images on Commons are harassment, or you can re-raise a more appropriate deletion request on one of the images and provide links to the others in that request. Without knowing the issue in more detail, the most appropriate policy to refer to would probably be Photographs of identifiable people. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 08:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Seems too complicated for {{PD-Ineligible}} to me. Lymantria (talk) 08:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Seems too complicated for {{PD-Ineligible}} to me. Lymantria (talk) 08:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope Morning ☼ (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Look like a screenshot from a video, also out of scope Morning ☼ (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope Morning ☼ (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
In my opinion this is slightly more than {{PD-Ineligible}} allows. Lymantria (talk) 08:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
EXIF states that this file can only be used without charge and with attribution in relation to the WDR-television program. By far not free enough for commons. Lymantria (talk) 09:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copied from http://www.biomanantial.com/historia-plantas-medicinales-a-87-es.html Jmvkrecords 
Intra Talk 09:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Used in the official website of Gaziosmanpaşa municipality before 12 July 2012. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 09:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Recent, copyrighted sculpture in the US, which has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for non-buildings. Thereby a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smithsonian Air and Space.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Recent, copyrighted sculpture in the US, which has no freedom-of-panorama exemption for non-buildings. Thereby a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Likely to be considered a copyviolating derivative. See also: Commons:Currency#Euro. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Finland 2012 Helene Schjerfbeck.jpg
- File:Malta 2012 Majority Representation.jpg
- File:France 2012 Abbé Pierre,jpg.jpg
- File:Portugal 2012 Guimaraes.jpg
- File:Belgium 2012 Queen Elisabeth Competition.jpg
- File:San Marino.2012 Euro Coins 2002-2012.jpg
- File:Luxemburg 2012 Guillaume IV.jpg
- File:Spain 2012 Burgos Cathedral.jpg
- File:Germany 2012 Neuschwanstein Bavaria.jpg
- File:Italy 2012 Giovanni Pascoli.jpg
- File:2 Euro Monaco 2012 Autonomy.jpg
- Speedy Delete: The uploader has recently uploaded 34 coin images. I am going through and tagging all that are copyright violations as such for speedy deletion. I've asked the uploader to stop uploading such images and directed them to read Commons:Currency. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Despite multiple warnings, the user continues to upload copyrighted coin images. I've requested he be blocked. See Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#User:Gerd.Seyffert. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader is blocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- He uploaded 39 Euro coin images. I've tagged 38 of them for speedy deletions, including all the ones in the above list EXCEPT File:Finland 2012 Helene Schjerfbeck.jpg. This image is in fact free license, per Commons:Currency#Finland which while equivocal, is usually interpreted here as being that national sides of their Euro coins are available under a free license. This is not carte blanche, but it generally applies unless the artwork expressed on the national side is derivative of a copyrighted work. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've speedy deleted all but the Finland one. INeverCry 18:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Finland file kept - others deleted. INeverCry 00:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Work of artist http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfredo_Protti who died only in 1949; thereby still copyrighted til end of 2019. Requires valid permission from heirs or deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Same problem with: File:Protti2.JPG
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
No reason for the “Mac OS X Snow Leopard” picture being free. I don’t think it has a chance to be considered de-minimis. The photo could be cropped or edited to remove it. AVRS (talk) 10:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
This map is totally false. See this as reference. Si Gam (talk) 10:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Jsem autorem obrázku a přeji si jej smazat, protože bude před¨veden na jiný účet wikipedia commons. Fotozetor (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal art - out of scope . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
A PUF. The blogpost is of an earlier date than that of upload on Commons. Newbie uploader. Lovy Singhal (talk) 11:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, only upload of user, likely copyvio Morning ☼ (talk) 12:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Built in 1999 according to the plan by Janez Gomboc, still living.[1] Nominated per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 12:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Modern architecture; per COM:FOP#Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 12:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted drawing; no Commons-suitable FOP in Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 12:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted sculpture; no Commons-suitable freedom of panorama in Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 12:45, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Downscaled unused duplicate. (User: Billinghurst says file-type mismatch, s. COM:Dupe, but anyway) JPG has always lower quality for this image-type (extra sharpening is not necessary here). -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 13:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
I've inserted wrong copyright information when I've uploaded the image NickZangus (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Curve and unclear picture. Thank you יעל י (talk) 13:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Curve and unclear picture. Thank you יעל י (talk) 13:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Curve and unclear picture. Thank you יעל י (talk) 13:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Labelled as "The file is copyrighted and used with permission". Checking the source link, we can see that it is indeed copyrighted, but it isn't used with permission. The source only allows non-commercial use and prohibits derivative works. —Andrei S. Talk 14:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- File:Brandt-Kennedy.jpg
- File:Linkoln-birthplace.jpg
- File:Student Protest.jpg
- File:Embassy berlin5.jpg
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
This file contains the copyrighted music Hayk (talk) 14:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Picture of non-notable band. See: [2] BrightRaven (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Per this [3], a claim has been made that this image is a copyright violation. Acroterion (talk) 15:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Per this [4], a claim has been made that this image is a copyright violation Acroterion (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Available at [5] from http://vishalkandukuri.com/photo-gallery.html
We of course can't say who actually owns copyright of that image, most probably not the owner of the vishalkandukuri.com website so it may still be the uploader.
Amalthea 15:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
An unfree logotype Yger (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Author is en:Alexandra Pregel (d 1984) and Russia has no freedom of panorama. Rd232 (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Looks a lot like a stock photo. A larger version, for example: http://www.tapeciarnia.pl/tapety/normalne/40871_choinka.jpg. Quibik (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a rugby club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football club. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 17:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
"Post of Russia" is not the author of the painting on the postcard. Authorship of the painting is needed (and given the subject's dates, the painting is probably still in copyright). Rd232 (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
the sculpture may be PD-old, but the photo is not, and {{PD-Art}} does not apply. The photograph appears copyrighted at source. Rd232 (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
The image was uploaded from Flickr, where is CC-BY, but there is not information about it original author. The uploader of the original image to Flick says in her web site that "My main sources are museums, comercial archives, state archives, personal collections, librarys and art gallerys around the world". We don't know exactly who was the original author of the image, who has the rights of it, so despite what Flickr says, we don't know if it is a free image. HrAd (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. info@avellanosa.es is the email of the original source. From reading her site: http://www.avellanosa.es/about.html it seems she is aware of copyright issues. The Template:Flickr-no known copyright restrictions states four points that it could fall under.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, the flickr user is collecting photos from other sources but has no rights to license this works. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juan Carlos y su padre.jpg. --Martin H. (talk) 01:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. The image is/was in use on an self promoting article on en:wiki en:User:LENDEH KEMOKAI. This page got deleted due to only promotional purposes High Contrast (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Promotional. — ΛΧΣ21 17:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Trademark logo, in my opinion it is not in the public domain, it contains original authorship and doesn't consist of consist of information that is common property. HrAd (talk) 18:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Fictional logo under copyright http://www.guud.tv/images/clients/logo-antena3.png used by a vandal in ro:wiki fictive articles. Ionutzmovie (talk) 08:40, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Despite that this file was used by a vandal, this is the actual logo of Antena 3, and currently in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Amitie 10g, the vandal used it rampantly for duplicates of the ro:Antena 3 article (in order to mock it), which represents different Romanian channel, as you can see in that logo. The vandal at our Wiki uses to create a lot of fake logos for Romanian TV channes, and after he realised that all his logos will be deleted, he started migrating to commons. From here we cannot stop him adding fake logos. I saw the logo for that Spanish channel and it was orange, not grey.Ionutzmovie (talk) 11:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per previous DR. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
No FOP in Ukraine, relief unlikely to be out of copyright Rd232 (talk) 18:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Author's date of death is unknown, but he was born in 1893 and lived to at least 1939. This means this 1926 photo is probably in copyright in either Ukraine, the US (because of COM:URAA) or both. Rd232 (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Picture of non-notable people, BrightRaven (talk) 18:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality, {{BadJPG}}, better alternatives available: File:DET.png, File:Diethyltryptamine.svg. Leyo 19:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It's unused and with the equivalent, but higher quality, alternatives this file is unneeded Ed (Edgar181) 12:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, better version available: File:DET-3d-sticks.png. Leyo 19:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and also apparent incorrect (non-tetrahedral) geometry at the methyl on one of the ethyl groups (see annotation). DMacks (talk) 05:42, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- The image was made from a MOL file from Drugbank and Pubchem and is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StormBringer (talk • contribs)
- Link please? The only sourcing I see in the image-description is GPS coordinates (?). DMacks (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I found http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB01460.mol, but it does not contain the H at all, and it's the coordinates of them that I dispute (added by some other program that did not use realistic settings?). DMacks (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Link please? The only sourcing I see in the image-description is GPS coordinates (?). DMacks (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: The geometry of the chemical structure is definitely misleading, as described above. Ed (Edgar181) 12:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - only link is to AFC declined for lack of notability INeverCry 19:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Virtually identical to 
. Leyo 19:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: It's an unused lower resolution equivalent. Ed (Edgar181) 12:51, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Low quality, better alternatives in Category:Malonic acid. Leyo 19:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - blurry - no educational value INeverCry 19:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
With a stain and the uneven border, this black and white photograph doesn't seem like an own work from 2007 to me. Eleassar (t/p) 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think that leaving this picture will make any harm despite unknown origin or wrong licence. --ModriDirkac (talk) 20:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but the precautionary principle is an official policy here. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - single upload of user INeverCry 19:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Apparently, Freedom of Panorama does not apply in Argentina for sculptures. Lobo (howl?) 20:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Really Own work? Orhaned anyway. Leyo 20:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced. Leyo 20:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
The claim that this logo of a private school is in the public domain because "Official Logo" doesn't make sense. --Lambiam 20:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 20:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
A PUF. Image freely available on the internet with slightly better resolutions. For example, this one. Uploader has history. Lovy Singhal (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
personal art, nonsense . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:24, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
complex copyrighted logo INeverCry 20:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo. Commons is not Facebook. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Personal photo. Commons is not Facebook. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 20:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
non-free image - copyright violation - no clear source listed
Image information lists Alex Jones (the subject of the photo) as the author, and says it was (taken by (h)is own crew.) It claims a fair use rational, and then also states that the image is non-copyrighted (Fair Use non-Copywrited.) The image source is listed as “Source=Alex Jones at Ottawa Bilderberg 2006” which means?, so no usable source is given. The account that uploaded the image is IrFactor, an account that was blocked in April of 2009, so there is no way to get additional information. It appears that the image was grabbed from one of Alex Jones’ websites in 2008 and that it was then and still is under legal copyright. There is no indication that IrFactor owned the rights to the photo, and/or was in a position to wave the copyright. The copyright would still be held by Alex Jones as it was apparently taken by a member of his team for use on one or more of his websites. Brimba (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- you can see the same photo here [6] (slide #18) on a web site owned by Jones, used to promote his move "Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement", so it's a clear case of copyright violation. Brimba (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 20:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 20:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - no educational value INeverCry 21:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
We have a better version of this file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 21:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
We have a better version of this file and this one is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 21:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
No information about the photographer, no permission. See also Commons:Help desk#File:Walter Genewein.jpg. Yann (talk) 21:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - it says self-portrait so photographer is pl:Walter Genewein (d 1974) and judging by the WP article and this Telegraph piece the photos were not published until at least 1987, and probably in Germany. So still in copyright. Rd232 (talk) 01:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - ... and the claim of "own work" for this casts doubt on every upload on this account. - Jmabel ! talk 01:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted comic character, FOP does not apply since the figure was intalled for a comics festival, not permanently. Lobo (howl?) 21:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
There were some other related deletion requests, like:
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Asterix Coruna 2011.jpg
Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mafalda_Coruna_2011.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tintin Coruna 2011.jpg Lobo (howl?) 21:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 21:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Lion design appears to be meet threshold of originality, making this either a derivative work of a presumably copyrighted logo or a free but inaccurate logo. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyvio. According to the source, the copyright is reserved. There is no proof of {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Takabeg (talk) 22:23, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 22:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Collage which includes a deleted image (File:Monte grave Yerablur.jpg). Takabeg (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per Takabeg.--Rapsar (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I replaced the removed image with a free one.--Yerevanci (talk) 21:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: RevDel in the history of the version containing the unfree picture. Kept last version PierreSelim (talk) 09:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Edition A & B includes copyrighted image. They should be deleted. Takabeg (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Kept - old revisions hidden and current version replaced by the previous version as no source was added for the new image. --Denniss (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Work by Max Czeike (1879-1945);[7] still copyrighted. No Commons-suitable freedom of panorama in Slovenia (see COM:FOP#Slovenia). Eleassar (t/p) 22:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Eagle design appears to exceed the threshold of originality making this a derivative work of the presumably copyrighted design of the actual jumper as seen at e.g. http://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/mandurah/collectables/west-coast-eagles-chris-judd-signed-2004-brownlow-jersey-jumper/1010595038 . VernoWhitney (talk) 22:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. Fry1989 eh? 23:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
No scope. The Russian website for MTV uses the international logo, and according to news reports MTV Russia is shutting down in the Spring. Fry1989 eh? 23:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:50, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
duplicate image of File:Ashura.JPG MehdiTalk 18:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
author's request, no usage, low quality Ivar (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 22:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. & What do you think of File:Karapete Khacho, Kurdish Singer from Armenia.jpg ? Takabeg (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Per uncontested DR. MBisanz talk 17:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
The background is a copyrighted photograph; per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not suitable for Commons. Eleassar (t/p) 18:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- What copyrighted photograph? You mean the reflection? — Yerpo Eh? 10:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Is it a reflection? To me, it doesn't look so. Is there any other image to verify this? --Eleassar (t/p) 11:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Haven't found any, but come on, have you ever seen a marble plaque with a background image? And why on earth would there be an image of a brick wall partially obscured by branches? It's an ordinary polished marble slab, with texture and all. — Yerpo Eh? 12:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for pointing this out. I've found another image of the plaque that confirms this.[8] I withdraw my nomination --Eleassar (t/p) 12:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for pointing this out. I've found another image of the plaque that confirms this.[8]
- This is a reflection. If I am not wrong is that plate on Ljubljanska cesta 23. There is Skladišče humanitarne pomoči OZ Rdečega križa Maribor. The red building stands across the street, near Second Grammar School. --Irena Plahuta (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Is it a marble plaque or some other material? Due to a reflection, it could also be metal. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'll take a picture. Today. Just for you. --Irena Plahuta (talk) 12:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 22:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Here are photos:
-
Zid humanitarnega skladišča -
Plošča -
Plošča - bližje -
Srednja zdravstvena šola Maribor -
Srednja zdravstena šola (levo) in humanitarno skladišče (desno). -
Skladišče in drevo pred njim
Air_2012,_Messe_für_zeitgenössische_Kunst_in_Hannover,_Resümée,_Ausblick,_II.jpg){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_für_zeitgenössische_Kunst_in_Hannover.jpg){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_für_zeitgenössische_Kunst_in_Hannover.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_f%C3%BCr_zeitgen%C3%B6ssische_Kunst_in_Hannover,_Res%C3%BCm%C3%A9e,_Ausblick,_II.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_f%C3%BCr_zeitgen%C3%B6ssische_Kunst_in_Hannover,_Res%C3%BCm%C3%A9e,_Ausblick,_II.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_f%C3%BCr_zeitgen%C3%B6ssische_Kunst_in_Hannover.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_f%C3%BCr_zeitgen%C3%B6ssische_Kunst_in_Hannover.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_f%C3%BCr_zeitgen%C3%B6ssische_Kunst_in_Hannover.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Air_2012,_Messe_f%C3%BCr_zeitgen%C3%B6ssische_Kunst_in_Hannover.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[5]](http://vishalkandukuri.com/images/67.jpg){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.PNG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[8]](http://www.politikis.si/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/simcik.jpg){kind=link}
--Irena Plahuta (talk) 08:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
No proof that it's from Capitol or from 1968. We hope (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- We have no link re: where it came from, no proof that it's from 1968 or that it's PD. We hope (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Photo came from here. We hope (talk) 00:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 21:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
because it to be change AZIZI (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: Noy a valid DR reason. INeverCry 21:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official flag (you can se the true flag in the official page of Riodike (http://riodikefc.blogspot.com/p/institucion.html)Fmln93 (talk) 04:07, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I agree with you--Laln93 (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – So upload the new version. It is not clear why it should be deleted.—Bill william comptonTalk 04:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official emblem you can se the true emblem in the official page of Riodike (http://riodikefc.blogspot.com/p/institucion.html)Fmln93 (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I agree with you--Laln93 (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep– I've reverted to appropriate version.—Bill william comptonTalk 04:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official shorts Fmln93 (talk) 04:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Upload the new version. It seems implausible to delete old version when it can easily be retained in the file's history.—Bill william comptonTalk 05:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official socks Fmln93 (talk) 04:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Upload the new version. It seems implausible to delete old version when it can easily be retained in the file's history.—Bill william comptonTalk 05:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official flag (you can se the true flag in the official page of Riodike (http://riodikefc.blogspot.com/p/institucion.html) Fmln93 (talk) 04:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Upload the new version. It seems implausible to delete old version when it can easily be retained in the file's history.—Bill william comptonTalk 05:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official flag Fmln93 (talk) 04:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Upload the new version. It seems implausible to delete old version when it can easily be retained in the file's history.—Bill william comptonTalk 05:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official t-shirt Fmln93 (talk) 04:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Upload the new version. It seems implausible to delete old version when it can easily be retained in the file's history.—Bill william comptonTalk 05:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official kit, you can see the true kit in the official page of Riodike (http://riodikefc.blogspot.com/p/institucion.html) Fmln93 (talk) 04:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I agree with you--Laln93 (talk) 04:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Upload the new version. It seems implausible to delete old version when it can easily be retained in the file's history.—Bill william comptonTalk 05:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Because it is an older version of the Riodike's official kit (you can se that the emblem its not the correct) Fmln93 (talk) 04:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – Upload the new version. It seems implausible to delete old version when it can easily be retained in the file's history.—Bill william comptonTalk 05:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 19:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:58, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small files with no EXIF and own work claims are doubtful. This file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 09:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files of User:ASDFG1974
[edit]- File:Mövchen Taube.jpg, replaced with File:Oriental frill(Black laced blondinette).jpg
- File:Thüringer Flügeltaube.jpg, replaced with File:Thüringer Flügeltaube rot.jpg
- File:Elsterpurzler Taube.jpg replaced in projects
- File:Perückentaube.jpg replaced
- File:Pfautaube.jpg replaced
- File:Indische Pfautaube.jpg replaced
- File:Orientalische Rollertaube.jpg, replaced with File:Oriental roller(grizzle).jpg
- File:Kropftaube.jpg
- File:Show Racertaube.jpg, replace after deletion with File:American show racer(blue chequer).jpg
- File:Genter Kropftaube.jpg
- File:Gaditanotaube.jpg, replaced with File:Gaditano cropper(brown spangle).jpg
- File:Langschnäbler.jpg
- File:Kelebek Taube.jpg only picture of the breed
- File:Granadinotaube.jpg, replaced with File:Granadino cropper(dun splash).jpg
- File:Deutsche Schautaube.jpg
- File:Csapostaube.jpg
- File:Carrier Taube.jpg, replaced with File:English carrier(blue bar).jpg
- File:Bursa Rollertaube.jpg only picture of the breed
- File:Bijeljina Roller.jpg only picture of the breed
- File:Altholländische Kapuziener.jpg replaced
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Reasons for deletion request: Selbst kopiert
- I was not able to identify the source of suspected copyright violations above. Some time ago I found the yet deleted images of User:ASDFG1974 File:Gimpeltaube.jpg, File:Weisskopf Trommeltaube.jpg, File:Thüringer Schildtaube.jpg, File:Sächsische Mönchtaube.jpg, File:Sächsische Schwalbentaube.jpg and File:Dresdener Trommeltaube.jpg in: Hartmann, Das Taubenbuch, 1986 amazon (some of the mentioned photographers are still working)
- Please replace File:Show Racertaube.jpg after deletion with File:American show racer(blue chequer).jpg --PigeonIP (talk) 12:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mirna (town)
[edit]Some of my photos from Mirna that I don't think really belong to Commons, due to the lack of Commons-suitable freedom of panorama in Slovenia.
- File:Mirna - knjižnica.jpg - I withdraw my nomination; probably too simple to be copyrightable.
- File:Mirna - Osnovna šola Mirna.jpg
- File:Mirna - pošta.jpg
- File:Mirna - pri Francki 1.jpg - the canopy and the left side of the building are modern
- File:Mirna - zdravstvena postaja.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 12:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Bridges in Category:Sevnica
[edit]Modern bridge, completed in 1938 according to the plan by Edo Premk. The engineer's year of death is unknown, but there's no reason to assume that he died before 1945. There's no Commons-suitable freedom of panorama in Slovenia (see COM:FOP#Slovenia).
- File:Sava v Sevnici.jpg
- File:Sevnica - žel. most čez Savo, vlak - sepia.jpg
- File:Sevnica - žel. most čez Savo, vlak.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 13:12, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carmen yoya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator --cyrfaw (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sindhura shalom (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:The Circuit.jpg
- File:Anirudh with actor Dhanush.jpg
- File:At IIT Sarang'12.jpg
- File:Anirudh performing for Zinx.jpg
INeverCry 19:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BlazeMeter (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos - only uploads of user with company name
INeverCry 19:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal images.
Jespinos (talk) 19:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
INeverCry 19:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Unused files of unknown subject. This looks a bit like some internal data for some organization (Caf?)
Sebari (talk) 05:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
2 Deleted, 2 Kept. Yann (talk) 16:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Skinymexico (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional logos - unused
INeverCry 19:44, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- О.К. --Valeriy10f (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Это не свободная лицензия - нет свободы редактирования и коммерческого использования. — Redboston 19:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- О.К. --Valeriy10f (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FawazIbrahim (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:Fawaz Ibrahim One Direction Justin bieber Cody Simpson Justin Mahone.JPG
- File:Fawaz Ibrahim illuminati.jpg
- File:Fawaz Ibrahim photo.jpg
- File:Fawaz Ibrahim 666.jpg
- File:Fawaz Ibrahim (dr Dre).jpg
- File:Fawaz Ibrahim.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 20:06, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete... appart if it's used for profile pages. If some files are kept, some should be renamed (inappropriate words such as "illuminati" or "dr Dre") --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sarahhamann (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos - single uploads of user
INeverCry 20:11, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Public-disorder (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional - unused text logos - only uploads of user
INeverCry 20:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Érico Wouters msg 00:39, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Probable copyvio. This is the derivative work of copyrighted image which was posted to Panoramio on 2011/01/13 by hovik95 (possibly he/she is the same person as User:Hovik95). Takabeg (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep yes sir, me and hovik95 are the same person and that's my panoramio account. Is there any way I can prove that? --Yerevanci (talk) 21:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- You can write here something with that account right now :)--Rapsar (talk) 22:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I forgot its password, but even better I changed the picture's license on Panoramio. You can check it now [9] .--Yerevanci (talk) 00:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment User:Hovik95 was blocked with an expiry time of indefinite by reason of "Copyright violations only". Now do you admit that you are one of sockpuppeteer of User:Hovik95 ? Takabeg (talk) 01:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- The last conribution of Hovik95 was made on May 15, 2010, while the user was blocked on July 17, 2011, more than a year after the user's inactivity, suggesting the user didn't even have access to their password when any of their files were nominated for deletion to make comments nor defend themselves, and was blocked while not having uploaded anything for more than a year. Makes no sense at all, especially considering not all uploads of the user were copyvio. I'd suggest using {{Unblock}} but that doesn't make much sense if the user doesn't even remember the password. Chaojoker (talk) 07:06, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept: The license over at Panoramio was changed, which solves the issue entirely. Badseed talk 06:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
No proof of source, date, or that it is PD. We hope (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- A screen shoot from James Bond 007, Dr. No (1962) --Tarawneh (talk) 01:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Previously discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Dr. No Bikini... -- AnonMoos (talk) 11:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 02:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that this is a Soviet government work. Rd232 (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Same photograph File:AlyoshaJaparidze.jpg. Geagea (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like it - and that gives us a date of 1911. Assuming publication 1911 or soon after, that means the files may qualify under point 2 of {{PD-Russia}} - if the work is really anonymous. (Plus {{PD-1923}} for the US.) Rd232 (talk) 23:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 06:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
PD-old is not good when author is unknown and there is no good information to back up the claim. Could be {{PD-Denmark50}} if taken in Denmark. MGA73 (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi! Why, this foto removed before 1930 ? (McOwkin 19:09, 18 January 2012 (UTC)).
- Keep with {{PD-Denmark50}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:19, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Keep with {{PD-Denmark50}}. /Jssfrk (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
A 1930 non-US photo of unknown authorship must be assumed to be in copyright unless there is information to the contrary. We certainly can't apply {{PD-old}}, which claims the author died 70 years ago. Rd232 (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I see now the previous discussion recommending {{PD-Denmark50}} (which wasn't implemented). I've added it and also PD-1996 to cover US copyright status. Unless anyone has any objections, the DR can be closed early. Rd232 (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment One of the requirements for {{PD-1996}} is that the photo must have been published somewhere before 1 March 1989. Has the photo been published before that date? If not, it needs to comply with {{PD-US-unpublished}}, which it currently doesn't do. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well it's a 1930 photo, in not great quality (so suggesting it's not a recent scan from the negative/print); publication before 1989 is a reasonable assumption. Possibly a bigger issue with PD-1996 here is the need to assume that Denmark is the source country. If it isn't, then the work may still be in copyright in the source country. Rd232 (talk) 23:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
FOP country of origin. The creator is from the Netherlands, this image was taken in Belgium. We want to use it in an article at en:wp but want to confirm its status first. Com:FOP Canoe1967 (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I am going to withdraw my nomination. Utilitarian object so it is not eligable for copyright protection.--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Kept, Canoe1967 (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
It seems very strange to me that any rubber duckie might be called utilitarian, and certainly this huge one has no use other than producing smiles. It will qualify as sculpture and have a copyright in every country with which I am familiar. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Comment The page Utilitarian objects protected by copyright suggests that utilitarian objects are protected by copyright in the Netherlands, so if that is the source country, then it is probably protected by copyright regardless of whether it is utilitarian or not. The photo was taken in Belgium, but the duck seems to be filled with air. It should be fairly easy to transport the duck between the Netherlands and Belgium if you remove the air, so the source country might be the Netherlands, given the country of the designer. I don't know whether utilitarian objects are protected by copyright in Belgium. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. Should I just tag as copyvio then? We wanted to make sure before we put it in a bunch of articles.--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Canoe1967, no. We use {{Copyvio}} only for obvious cases. Our rules explicitly forbid putting a {{Copyvio}} on an image that has gone through a DR, as that casts a serious doubt over whether the copyvio is obvious. While this is obvious to me, it is not so to everybody. If I had thought it qualified for {{Copyvio}} treatment, I would have simply blown it way, rather than starting this DR. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Stefan, I don't understand your comment. I don't think there can be any question that it is utilitarian -- as I said above, it has no use other than to make people smile. I can't imagine any country where it would not be protected. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:59, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- What I meant is that it might not matter whether the duck is utilitarian or not. That said, I'm not sure why a giant rubber duck would be more utilitarian than a Barbie doll, and we know that Barbie dolls are protected by copyright at least in the United States. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:25, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm afraid that I thought that the discussion of whether or not utilitarian objects have a copyright was a distraction from the main question.
- By the way, there's an implicit question above as to which laws might apply -- the country of origin of the object or the country in which the object was when the photograph was made. I think I can safely say that we always use the country in which the photograph was made -- see for example, Category:Alexander Calder American sculptor, American fabrication, but the only images we have are from countries that have FOP for sculpture. Or, even more to the point, Category:Non-Violence (sculpture), where we have kept the Knotted Gun sculpture in FOP countries and deleted the same work in the USA (see Commons:Deletion requests/UN Art Collection).
- . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Jim, are you saying that FOP applies to the country the object was in when the photo was taken and not the country of origin? Btw this duck has photos on flickr from China as well, so I assume it is deflated before transport. The main issue is deciding whether it is utilitarian or not in the country the photo was taken in? I assume that no country has FOP for temporary display.--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- If FOP applies in the country of photography, then Commons doesn't seem to care about the copyright status of the underlying work in the source country. I'm not sure if this approach is correct. In principle, this means that you can upload an image of any artistic work, such as a book cover or a film poster. Just bring the work to China, put it in a public place outdoors and then you can upload a photo of it as {{FoP-China}}. If the work is too big to bring to China (e.g. Atomium), instead bring a photo to China, and take a photo of the photo. There's no need to bother about getting any permission from the photographer since {{FoP-China}} doesn't require that. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Jim, are you saying that FOP applies to the country the object was in when the photo was taken and not the country of origin? Btw this duck has photos on flickr from China as well, so I assume it is deflated before transport. The main issue is deciding whether it is utilitarian or not in the country the photo was taken in? I assume that no country has FOP for temporary display.--Canoe1967 (talk) 16:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- No, Stefan,that won't work. Taking an infringing copy to an FOP country leaves you with a DW of an infringement. We've faced this issue with several cartoon characters that were photographed in FOP countries where it was clear that the objects photographed were not authorized by the copyright holder.
- I'm not saying that our policy with Calder's work in Germany or the Knotted Gun is correct, just that it is what we do. I don't think anyone knows what a US judge would do if a Commons image of a Calder work in Germany was challenged by Calder's heirs. My guess is that the judge would honor the German rule, because that's the logical thing to do -- if Calder had wanted to avoid the problem, it could have been dealt with in the sales contract. Others will disagree.
- @User:Canoe1967 -- I don't utility is an issue at all -- as I have said now three times, I can't imagine a court calling this giant rubber duckie a utilitarian object. It's legally a sculpture and will get the same protection given to Calder or Henry Moore. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I uploaded this image for the page Friendly Floatees. This mummie duckie is a tribute for them. --0ne, Two, Three (talk) 18:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. We may yet email the sculptor to get an image with a free licence. He may go for it if he has or wants articles in the wp on him.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:03, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY (TALK) 06:36, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
