Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2012/12/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![32 File:"The Wire" cast (5662497201).jpg](#File:"The_Wire"_cast_(5662497201).jpg){kind=link}
![34 File:" ताज़ महल ".jpg](#File:"_ताज़_महल_".jpg){kind=link}
![44 File:"Billy Lake Actor".jpg](#File:"Billy_Lake_Actor".jpg){kind=link}
![46 File:"Uljhan".jpg](#File:"Uljhan".jpg){kind=link}
PrIsSy(_)1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_002.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It's a copy of it : File:Eyes_of_a_Female_Jumping_Spider_-_Phidippus_regius_-_Florida_(8177287529).jpg ComputerHotline (talk) 12:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Left as a redirect to the other file Jarekt (talk) 14:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright - http://hachamecha.syncl.jp/ 鳥愚裸婦 (talk) 01:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Not a graph of population... uploader is just trying to have fun at our expense. Funny, but now it's time to delete. Senator2029 05:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
And:
The photograph photographed here is protected by copyright, but it might be considered de minimus Vera (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: No, that is not de minimis, not even close when it's the subject. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:37, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Advertising Andy Dingley (talk) 17:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio book cover. INeverCry 19:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Import error? Rillke(q?) 00:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fastily. Yann (talk) 08:32, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Not useful for any educational purpose. Sreejith K (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Gone. --Denniss (talk) 23:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 03:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:39, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 04:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
no evidence of permission from child and parents; possibly demeaning descripton and file name; girl may be harrassed by peers for this image; = personality rights violation. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
No Freedom of panorama in France (DE: Keine Panoramafreiheit in Frankreich) Heubergen (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: The church is old. Yann (talk) 19:51, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
error, I took the wrong image Lisaa25 (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. Yann (talk) 19:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Project scope Polarlys (talk) 18:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work. Yann (talk) 19:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 19:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work. Yann (talk) 19:58, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:59, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - blurry - no educational value INeverCry 19:30, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:33, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 19:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:01, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:42, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:01, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
possible copyvio - looks like photo of a book page INeverCry 19:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 20:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:32, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 20:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope INeverCry 20:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal picture of user, not in use on a userpage, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 20:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 21:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
sin relevancia Sergio Andres Segovia (talk) 21:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Personal photo (see uploader's username) with no obvious educational use. Its only WMF use is on Indonesian Wiktionary on a page for a word that appears to mean "slug". This, that and the other (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Delete, per nom. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:43, 28 November 2014 (UTC)- Delete, this not yet deleted file here is shown as still existing in a closed deletion request on Meta:WM:RFD#Lala (not the same image, IIRC, only the same name.) –Be..anyone (talk) 04:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 22:36, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a duplicate. My bad, Flickr 2 Commons didn't catch it and neither did I. Muboshgu (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
![21:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Muboshgu-2012-12-20T21:17:00.000Z-File:"The_Wire"_cast_(5662497201).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
![20:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Yann-2012-12-25T20:07:00.000Z-File:"The_Wire"_cast_(5662497201).jpg){kind=link}
Personal picture of user, not in use on a userpage, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 21:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- File:"माँ की ममता 2".jpg
- File:डॉ हरीओम पंवार " THE GREAT".jpg
- File:"इंडियन यूथ ".jpg
- File:"स्वाभिमान".jpg
- File:"देश हमारा ".jpg
- File:"माँ की ममता ".jpg
- File:" प्रीत ".jpg
- File:" वर्तमान भारत ".jpg
- File:" इज़हार ".jpg
- File:" मंजिल मिल ही जाती है ".jpg
- File:" भारत का इतिहास ".jpg
- File:" वीर बनो तुम ".jpg
- File:"आरक्षण किसको दो ?".jpg
- File:" प्रेम-विरह ".jpg
- File:" यादें ".jpg
Érico Wouters msg 23:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
![23:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Érico_Júnior_Wouters-2012-12-20T23:08:00.000Z-File:"_ताज़_महल_".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
![20:08, 25 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Yann-2012-12-25T20:08:00.000Z-File:"_ताज़_महल_".jpg){kind=link}
Text contribution, out of project scope. Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Martin H. (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Personal picture of user, not in use on a userpage, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 22:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Personal picture of user, not in use on a userpage, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 22:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope, pdf biography Traumrune (talk) 22:29, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
violación de privacidad apersonas, no autorizable, imagen explicita, mala calidad Duque Santiago (talk) 22:41, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:09, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Personal picture of user, not in use on a userpage, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Imagen personal subida por una multitítere de wikipedia en español, que usa su PU como facebook. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 23:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Imagen personal de multitítere de wikipedia en español que usa su PU como facebook Laura Fiorucci (talk) 23:42, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Imagen personal de multitítere de Wikipedia en español que usa su PU como facebook Laura Fiorucci (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:12, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
![23:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Érico_Júnior_Wouters-2012-12-20T23:51:00.000Z-File:"Billy_Lake_Actor".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
![20:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Yann-2012-12-25T20:13:00.000Z-File:"Billy_Lake_Actor".jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Érico Wouters msg 23:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Érico Wouters msg 23:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
![23:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Érico_Júnior_Wouters-2012-12-20T23:52:00.000Z-File:"Uljhan".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
![20:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2012/12/20#c-Yann-2012-12-25T20:13:00.000Z-File:"Uljhan".jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Érico Wouters msg 23:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Érico Wouters msg 23:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
PrIsSy(_)1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
PrIsSy(_)1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 23:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
PrIsSy(_)1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
PrIsSy(_)1.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope. Érico Wouters msg 23:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Érico Wouters msg 23:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
EXIF data says (C)2010 {Steve Swope}, all rights reserved Ytoyoda (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:15, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
orphan, low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
orphan, low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
orphan, low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
orphan, low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
orphan, low quality, unclear encyclopedic value Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Image doesn't seem to have a flickr source although it could be from the given flickr account. Just haven't located it there. Leoboudv (talk) 01:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I updated the source. FonsScientiae (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Comment: The uploader is correct. I asked for a new {{Flickrreview}} and the flickr bot has just passed it. So, this DR can be closed as 
Keep. I will remove the DR notice from the image now. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Wrong file description - check ko:파일:문재인.jpg 관인생략 (talk) 02:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Derivative work from a video SamuelFreli (talk) 02:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
More desirable photo here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Revesby_Railway_Station_southern_entrance_broad.jpg Wykymania (talk) 03:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Different angle and crop. Both pictures have their own merit. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 16:30, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
requested by the author
This deletion request was incomplete; now fixed. Avenue (talk) 04:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Courbe démographique de Belle-Ile-en-Mer - 1793-2012.jpg. --Avenue (talk) 04:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
requested by the author
This deletion request was incomplete; now fixed. Avenue (talk) 04:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Courbe démographique de Belle-Ile-en-Mer - 1793-2012.jpg. One difference is that the 2008 graph remains in use. --Avenue (talk) 04:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: In use. INeverCry 00:15, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Brochure it was taken from is copyrighted. Brochure at OldCarBrochuresphoto pageCopyright 1976 page.We hope (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- As the user who transferred this from Wikipedia, I have no objections to deletion. Cloudbound (talk) 23:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Brochure it came from is under copyright. Brochure at OldCarBrochuresphoto ageCopyright 1971 page.We hope (talk) 05:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- As the user who transferred this from Wikipedia, I have no objections to deletion. Cloudbound (talk) 23:44, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:EDSA Shrine 2.jpg; this is a photo of the same work This, that and the other (talk) 06:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- File:Rascacielos del Swedbank, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG
- File:Rascacielos del Swedbank, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 06.JPG
- File:Rascacielos del Swedbank, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 07.JPG
- File:Rascacielos del Swedbank, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 09.JPG
- File:Rascacielos del Swedbank, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 12.JPG
- File:Vistas desde la iglesia de San Pedro, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 03.JPG
- File:Le Sun Stone (Riga).jpg
- File:Parque Kekava, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 08.JPG
- File:Parque Kekava, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 06.JPG
- File:Vistas desde la iglesia de San Pedro, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 22.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FOP in Latvia Vamps (talk) 07:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright www.lagordolasque.com Erikk (talk) 08:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a sports club. Rapsar (talk) 08:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a sports club. Rapsar (talk) 08:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
This file has a PD-70 tag but no proof of the author's date of death. It is reasonably likely that an artist active in 1914 would still be alive in 1942. Dumelow (talk) 08:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted magazines Morning ☼ (talk) 08:42, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Appose deletion. It's an Image of a magazine cover page.Please check other images related to Palam_Kalyanasundaram here Category:Palam_Kalyanasundaram. Also note that the image can be used in Kalyanasundaram's page. As this image is being used for educational purpose might not attract any copyright issues. Please retain this image. ~ Omshivaprakash /talk/Contributions 17:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
There is a duspute on copyright: "This is image is protect by Mike Fisk of Soul Amp (http://soul-amp.com and http://soul-amp.blogspot.com) and can not be used without PERMISSION!! I have no idea who Bfkenny is, but he or she did not have my permission to post this image. - Mike Fisk". I nominated for deletion so we could sort this out. MGA73 (talk) 09:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete: The uploader, Bfkenny, has two copy vio notices on his/her talkpage and very few images on Commons. I doubt one can trust this is own work by him/her in this circumstance. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
This is a recent image. No information about the photographer or the date of publication. Yann (talk) 10:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright? I don't think it is own work. Here http://www.ip-watch.org/2010/02/11/knowledge-access-blooms-in-the-desert-egypt%E2%80%99s-fragile-stake-in-ip/ is even a higher resolution image Wouter (talk) 10:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright? I don't believe this is own work. See for example http://nafsainternationaleducationmarketplace.com/Listing/Company/Education__Internships__Work_Abroad_Programs_by_Region/Middle_East__Africa/1033686 and other hits on Google Wouter (talk) 10:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright? I don't believe this is own work. See for example http://nafsainternationaleducationmarketplace.com/Listing/Company/Education__Internships__Work_Abroad_Programs_by_Region/Middle_East__Africa/1033686 and other hits on Google Wouter (talk) 10:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm not comfortable with this. Altough the Flickr post has the child's name, it is not clear whether this is in a public place or has the permission of the child's parents. Ithink we should be very careful with images of children. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The picture is under the appropriate Creative Commons license, set by the creator and uploader of the image. I see no reason for deletion. FonsScientiae (talk) 22:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm not comfortable with this. Altough the Flickr post has the child's name, it is not clear whether this is in a public place or has the permission of the child's parents. Ithink we should be very careful with images of children. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The picture is under the appropriate Creative Commons license, set by the creator and uploader of the image. I see no reason for deletion. FonsScientiae (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Add this: File:Little gir, brown hair 2.jpg
I'm not comfortable with this. Altough the Flickr post has the child's name, it is not clear whether this is in a public place or has the permission of the child's parents. Ithink we should be very careful with images of children. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The picture is under the appropriate Creative Commons license, set by the creator and uploader of the image. I see no reason for deletion. FonsScientiae (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: I've tagged the image with {{Personality rights}}. But personally I would lean toward Delete because the baby might be the flickr owner's own child. This wasn't an image taken by a foreign tourist which would make it OK. Some parents become very emotional if they see images of their children being sold for a profit on the web. That's just my personal view. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Commons is non-profit project. As for others using the picture for profit, they still will be able to use the photo if we delete it from Commons. It is on Flickr with the license to use it. FonsScientiae (talk) 21:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Kein Urheberrecht erkennbar. 193.30.192.187 12:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Die Brauerei selbst hat uns beauftragt, diesen Bierdeckel einzupflegen. Guidemedia (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Kein Urhberrecht erkennbar, Logo! 193.30.192.187 12:29, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Die Brauerei selbst hat uns beauftragt, diesen Bierdeckel einzupflegen. Guidemedia (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Kein Urheberrecht (Jos. Mumm??), Markenrecht? 193.30.192.187 12:30, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:21, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Grc.pp.ua.png Y206 (talk) 13:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Su-251-86.jpg Y206 (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a football organization. Rapsar (talk) 13:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:22, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 14:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 14:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyvio? Low res, no meta, "famous" subject, uploader with name based on subject... -mattbuck (Talk) 14:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Displays at the Farewell to Arms? exhibition at the Royal Armouries in Leeds (24th June 2010) 002.jpg
[edit]_002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_002.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unclear copyright status on poster Vera (talk) 15:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Angled image of three (rather than one poster). Certain blocks of text, images, could be blanked if needs be. Mtaylor848 (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Having three copyright violations in one picture does not make it any less so –Vera (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Would you prefer an alteration to the work (blanking etc). Mtaylor848 (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't see how pixelating the graphics would keep this file useful. There is little information about the posters in the file description. Are these American posters? If so, these complicated rules might apply. --Vera (talk) 11:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- Would you prefer an alteration to the work (blanking etc). Mtaylor848 (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- Having three copyright violations in one picture does not make it any less so –Vera (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work Vera (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Remove speedy tag. The image is of a screen, the content of the screen is unavoidable, however it has been carefully selected to ensure, no text appears. The content of the screen is incidental to the image and the artwork is difficult to define. Mtaylor848 (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: no FoP in UK for 2D images/artworks INeverCry 00:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The source URL provides no evidence that this was taken by the US government at federal level. It might be in the public domain for some other reason, but the publication history of the photo is unknown. Stefan4 (talk) 16:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 17:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Das Bild zeigt eine Pornodarstellerin namens Nadia Marie (hier ein Bild mit Wasserzeichen) und es erscheint mir nicht wahrscheinlich, dass dieses Bild hier rechtmäßig unter einer Gemeinfrei-Lizenz steht. Friechtle (talk) 17:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This portrait is unlikely to be the own work of the subject as claimed. In addition it appears in many places on the web, so we will need OTRS permission if it is to be kept. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Stefan4 (talk) 17:50, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Stefan4 (talk) 18:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama; In Rooms not in Germany (DE: Panoramafreiheit gilt in Deutschland nicht in Gebäuden) Heubergen (talk) 18:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Switched to Kept: Subjects shown in image are too old to be covered by copyright. INeverCry 17:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Stefan4 (talk) 18:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. Stefan4 (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Forces Libanaises Flag.svg, not in use Antemister (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Feel free to delete it. --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Jumble of logos, some may be copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:33, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Licensed as PD-Old with a date of "1 January 1400" and author unknown, but this is very certainly not a 15th century painting. It looks like a modern painting, and in the absence of an original author or source we cannot assume that it is PD. BabelStone (talk) 19:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Personal picture of user, not in use on a userpage, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 20:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted cover of a book or magazine. Rapsar (talk) 22:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violation - the image likely belongs to the International Cricket Council. The link provided doesn't give permission to reuse. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 22:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio : Building by Jean Nouvel, famous architecte who is still alive ; no Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio : Building by Jean Nouvel, famous architecte who is still alive ; no Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio : Building by Jean Nouvel, famous architecte who is still alive ; no Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio : Building by Jean Nouvel, famous architecte who is still alive ; no Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio : Building by Jean Nouvel, famous architecte who is still alive ; no Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio : Building by Jean Nouvel, famous architecte who is still alive ; no Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyvio : Building by Jean Nouvel, famous architecte who is still alive ; no Freedom of panorama in France Remi Mathis (talk) 23:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope. Érico Wouters msg 23:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Not the work of the federal government. License is invalid. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright www.lagordolasque.com Erikk (talk) 08:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mdann52 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo INeverCry 17:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 19:20, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 19:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused logo - single upload of user with same company name INeverCry 20:06, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional - unused text logo - single upload of user INeverCry 20:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope images
Vera (talk) 16:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnneMarjory (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like collection of promo/fan photos, not own work.
- File:Retaliatorfinalwiki.jpg
- File:RetaliatoryWikipedia.jpg
- File:RetaliatoryBanda.jpg
- File:Primeiro show do retaliatory.jpg
- File:Retaliatory.jpg
- File:Retaliatory2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:45, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Roman Empire, Parc Astérix
[edit]No freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Le defi de Cesar.jpg
- File:Le defi de Cesar2.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 03.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 06.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 12.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I think we can keep File:Parc Asterix 12.jpg. Yann (talk) 19:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: 4 deleted and 1 kept. INeverCry 00:29, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Roman Empire, Parc Astérix
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:Il y a "Le fils d'Asterix", il y aura "Le fist d'Obélix". -ParcAstérix cc @imatpro @alexmi (7644177210).jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 12.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure about the copyright of roller coasters. For File:Il y a "Le fils d'Asterix", il y aura "Le fist d'Obélix". -ParcAstérix cc @imatpro @alexmi (7644177210).jpg I would say Keep because it is an "oldie" carousel, there is just the character of Obelix that we can only see from behind. It may be De Minimis compared to the whole carousel. For File:Parc Asterix 12.jpg, I don't know but if it is possible to keep it also, because I don't know if tracks of a roller coaster are copyrightable. We can see some characters also, but they are small in the picture and may be also considered as De Minimis. Jeriby (talk) 08:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Commons:De minimis#France - Freedom of Panorama "de minimis" exception. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:00, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Parc Asterix 30.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 31.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 32.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 33.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 34.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 36.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 37.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix Moyen-age 1 by http2007.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix Moyen-age 2 by http2007.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix Porte by http2007.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I think we can keep File:Parc Asterix 32.jpg. This is a reproduction of an old design. Yann (talk) 19:54, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Are you saying that it is a faithful reproduction of an old house? My thought was that Parc Astérix has modern houses in old architectural styles. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Many of the buildings are original, but this is not, and it is not complex enough to get a copyright in France. Yann (talk) 14:00, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Are you saying that it is a faithful reproduction of an old house? My thought was that Parc Astérix has modern houses in old architectural styles. --Stefan4 (talk) 19:59, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: All except one. Yann (talk) 11:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Via Antiqua, Parc Astérix
[edit]No freedom of panorama in France. The Manneken Pis statue does not seem to be an entirely faithful reproduction of the one in Belgium.
- File:Manneken-pis-Astérix.JPG
- File:Parc Asterix 50.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 51.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 52.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 53.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 54.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 56.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 57.jpg
- File:Parcasterix1.jpg
- File:Parcasterix3.jpg
- File:Via antiqua.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 17:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Goudurix
[edit]No freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Gouderix entrance sign at Parc Asterix.jpg
- File:Goudurix.JPG
- File:Goudurix.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 08.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 26.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 18:01, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Delete File:Gouderix entrance sign at Parc Asterix.jpg but Keep the other files. A standard roller coaster is considered a functional object. 67.87.46.39 23:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Isn't France one of the countries where copyright law doesn't make any difference between functional objects and non-functional objects? --Stefan4 (talk) 23:38, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Funtional objects do not get a copyright in France. Yann (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Funtional objects do not get a copyright in France. Yann (talk) 19:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Goudurix - Parc Astérix
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:Goudurix au Parc Astérix POV onride et offride.webm
- File:Goudurix.JPG
- File:Goudurix.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 08.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 26.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 17:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep because it is the exact same case as above. No reason to delete these. ← Fugitron ‹… ›, 15:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per previous closure. --Jcb (talk) 17:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Vikings, Parc Astérix
[edit]No freedom of panorama in France.
Stefan4 (talk) 18:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Funtional objects do not get a copyright in France. Yann (talk) 19:49, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Lots of low-resolution sports shots, just recently uploaded here but available on several external websites as well. Copyright violation is to be assumed.
- File:Настасич в составе Ман Сити.png
- File:Диего в составе Атлетико.png
- File:Тито Валанова.png
- File:Дзюба в составе сборной.png
- File:Бенитес в Челси.png
- File:Бенитес у руля Челси.png
- File:Мириам Гёсснер на Олимпийских играх в Ванкувере.png
- File:Мириам Гёсснер в 2010 году.png
- File:Гёсснер в сезоне 2011 2012.png
- File:Лионель Месси 16 декабря 2012 года.png
- File:Мириам выиграрывает свою первую гонку.png
A.Savin 18:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ancient Greece, Parc Astérix
[edit]No freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Cheval de Troie.JPG
- File:Le Vol D'Icare at Parc Asterix.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 23.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 24.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 25.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix poubelle.JPG
Stefan4 (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Files in Category:Welcome to Gaul, Parc Astérix
[edit]No freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Parc Asterix 07.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 09.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 10.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 11.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 13.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 14.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 15.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 16.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 17.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 18.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 29.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 38.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 40.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 41.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 42.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 43.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 45.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 46.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 47.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 48.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix 49.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix Arcimboldo by http2007.jpg
- File:Parc Asterix roller-coaster by http2007.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 18:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Portrait photographs made in the 1930s. Unlikely Public Domain, unlikely self-made by the uploader. No infos available on true authors or permission.
A.Savin 18:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 19:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 19:59, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by David R Merry (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 19:35, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brailiadffg (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 19:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:00, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilgimilgi (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 19:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 19:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:01, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stunners Gangsters (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
INeverCry 20:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
possible copyvios - 12 copies of same low-quality image with website watermark
- File:NiñaUr.JPG
- File:NiñasLuz.JPG
- File:Niñas.JPG
- File:NiñasUrus.JPG
- File:Uruschipaya.JPG
- File:Urus.JPG
- File:NiñasUr.jpg
- File:NiñasUru.jpg
- File:Niñas1.jpg
- File:Ninaschipaya1.JPG
- File:Uruchipaya.jpg
- File:Ninaschipayas.jpg
INeverCry 20:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ollie bilson (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - promotional images
- File:The Genii Group.jpg
- File:Genii logo tagline grey-300dpi.jpg
- File:Genii Business Exchange logo.jpg
INeverCry 20:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
possible copyvios - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:Wallpaper DH.jpg
- File:Monumento Fco Corona.jpg
- File:Escudo de Sinaloa.jpg
- File:DH.jpg
- File:WDH.jpg
INeverCry 20:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 07:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ziddirazan (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:49, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Isntthatrightbutt
[edit]Personal picture of user, not in use on a userpage, out of project scope.
Martin H. (talk) 20:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:06, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Small file with no EXIF and own work claim is doubtful. I think this file should be deleted as per COM:PRP. Rapsar (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
this map is based on outdated data and contains several errors - see discussion Sajoch (talk) 08:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- We should keep the map. It is not outdated, it contains no errors. Minorities in Trentino are protected according the territorial principle, not to the personal one (this applies to South Tyrol). Gryffindor's map shows the protected, officially recognized area (full color) and distinguishes it from the areas where people declare to be Ladin but this has no practical effects (stripes). As the Ladin, Mocheno, and Cimbrian area did not change at all, this map is still valid. And it is better and more informative than this map File:Language_distribution_Trentino_2011.png, which is not correct, as it mixes Cimbrian and Mocheno with German.--Patavium (talk) 21:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
This map exhibits several problems:
- it is outdated: census data of 2011 is available
- Solander and Nones are colored blue like Ladin, while it is disputed whether those dialecs could be considered ladin dialects at all
- Mocheno and Cimbrian use different colors, while it is well-known, that both are dialects of the German language
- in the Sole valley hardly anyone declared "Ladin" at the Census (less than 2%), so it shouldn't be colored at all
- some communes in south-east are colored yellow, while there's no noteworthy number of native Cimbrian speakers
- there are striped areas around Fassa and Mocheno valley, which aren't backed up by any source
As a new map already exists (File:Language_distribution_Trentino_2011.png), this one should be deleted.--Sajoch (talk) 21:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- The new maps created by Sajoch are wrong. Cimbrian and Mocheno are different languages, German is quite distant from them. They have different ortography, different pronounciation, different teaching at school, different media etc.
- This map is perfect as long as Nones territory is not officially recognized. When this happens, we will change from stripes to full colour.
- It is Sajochs map that is not backed by any source.--Patavium (talk) 21:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- This is a specific request to delete a single map. Please don't deviate to other images (which are correct btw).--Sajoch (talk) 22:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- This map is correct and cannot be substituted with your wrong maps.--Patavium (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- If User:Sajoch says the map is wrong, then I am fine with that, it can be deleted and replaced with his maps. Gryffindor (talk) 12:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- This map is correct and cannot be substituted with your wrong maps.--Patavium (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- This is a specific request to delete a single map. Please don't deviate to other images (which are correct btw).--Sajoch (talk) 22:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Policy requires that Commons Admins do not make decisions on which historical maps to keep. We leave that to WP editors. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
It's not own work, but a screenshot from 1:04 in this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=29i6P_n99Uw. Don't know whether Sea Shepherd releases it's videos in PD, otherwise it's a copyvio Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- I guess the video has the usual Youtube-license and not a CC one? (Sorry, I can't check that myself since the video is blocked in Germany). However, it doesen't look like they usually use free licenses or release media into PD: seashepherd.org/copyright.html. --El Grafo (talk) 14:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete it if you wish. If you think it somehow 'violates' something, not a big deal. i was trying to improve your article with a much newer photo than what Wiki had. i'm a Sea Shepherd land-duties volunteer. i was standing right beside the engineer... he with his camera, and i with mine. Would you like to see some of the other photos i'd taken that day? It was April 7th of 2011 and i believe the gentleman's name was Sam. Note: A screen capture would not have the quality of my photo nor the internal time/date tag (added by iq145 on discussion page)
- And the cloud in the top-right corner looks different too. --El Grafo (talk) 12:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Comment That screenshot is from the wrong video frame. I took one from YouTube's low definition 360 pixel wide FLV, resized to 606 wide and cropped the bottom and the match is much closer, remarkably close in fact, see [1] (an imgur link). I tried a manual blink comparator method and had difficulty determining whether the only differences were the Jpeg artifacting from the camera version (I saw no artifacts in the video frame). There were slight differences in the colour response, but I noticed similar differences among YouTube's various versions of this video. I also noticed the exact frames vary among the YouTube versions, this frame is missed in the 720p MP4 and 1080p versions for example. Nevertheless, I would accept the uploader's word in this case, although a higher resolution upload would have helped detect the parallax difference. -84user (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As above. (The video license is Standard Youtube). I can see how it could easily be mistaken for a frame from the video because the camera position seems to be the same --moogsi(blah) 14:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete After looking at the evidence above I will change my appraisal. The uploader agrees to delete if there is a problem. It would be nice if he could upload in higher rez and include camera exif. It seems my youtube screen shot is higher rez than his camera image, 1920x1087 vs 606 x329. I had cropped off the youtube bar on bottom.--Canoe1967 (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Unclear as to when this diagram was published, so possibly not PD. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- The train it is on and relates to was introduced in 1938, so it almost certainly dates from no later than that year (I'll ask for expert opinion though). The information about when anonymous works are in the public domain I can find on Commons contradicts itself suggesting either 50 or 70 years after publication. In the first case this has likely been PD since at least 1988, in the latter case since 2008 (meaning it wasn't OK when I uploaded the file in 2005 but is now). Thryduulf (talk) 00:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- My thought is it is probably PD, but we all know that trains made in the 1980s are still regularly getting new safety posters, so would be good to have confirmation. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:27, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- True, but this isn't a safety notice - it's an informational notice for the train operator. The only time it would change would be when the location of emergency equipment changed - the only plausible time for that would be a refurbishment. Thryduulf (talk) 07:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- The middle diagram is described as "3 car unit with U.N.D.M.", and the top car of that diagram also shows "U.N.D.M.". The car type UNDM (Uncoupling Non-Driving Motor) was first approved by London Transport in July 1950. 70 UNDMs were then built as part of the 1949 Tube Stock order, which always ran with the 1938 Tube Stock fleet; and a further 22 were converted from existing cars of 1938 Stock, the last conversion being carried out in 1953. The 1938/1949 Stock UNDMs were all withdrawn by 1974. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 11:55, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- More: the first UNDM (car nos. 30023 & 31000) were delivered 16 November 1951, and the type began to enter service in February 1952. Since the diagram will have been publically visible no earlier than February 1952, then if publication+50 applies, that's February 2002; but if publication+70 applies, that's not until February 2022. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 15:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- True, but this isn't a safety notice - it's an informational notice for the train operator. The only time it would change would be when the location of emergency equipment changed - the only plausible time for that would be a refurbishment. Thryduulf (talk) 07:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- My thought is it is probably PD, but we all know that trains made in the 1980s are still regularly getting new safety posters, so would be good to have confirmation. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:27, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: I think it's a Crown Copyright, therefore fifty years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mrovirma as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: no rights INeverCry 23:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Kept: An 1884 image is barely old enough for me to assume that the author has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Keep I think this can be fixed by simply flipping it horizontally. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour et merci de votre attention,
il est également essentiel de changer le titre et les auteurs de cette image :
Felix clément a écrit "...l’autre a été fait par Quenedey au moyen du physionotrace. On s’est servi de ce dernier à cause de son exactitude p.219.
Le dessin de Quenedey réalisé en 1809 se trouve ici sur Gallica.
"Servi" indique qu’un nouveau portrait a été dessiné pour le livre. De fait il est précisé en titre : "Ouvrage illustré de 44 portraits gravés à l’eau-forte par Masson, Deblois et Massard et de 3 reproductions héliographiques d’anciennes gravures [2]" (dont ne fait pas partie celle de Dalayrac).
En résumé après avoir inversé le profil, il faut corriger : "portrait de Dalayrac, d’après un dessin de Quenedey, et/ou par Masson, Deblois et Massard."
Cordialement. --Fguinard 02:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour, Peut-on conclure que vous acceptez la conservation de ce fichier ? En effet, il suffirait donc de corriger et de compléter les informations dans sa page de description et de demander un changement de son titre par le modèle Template:Rename. Vu votre bonne connaissance du sujet, vous seriez probablement mieux placé que quiconque pour le faire avec exactitude et à la satisfaction générale. Cela dit, par ailleurs, cette gravure semble être la même que celle qui a été (ré?)utilisée dans une autre impression dont vous avez téléversé l'image dans le fichier File:Nicolas Dalayrac par Quenedey..jpg en lui donnant le titre «Nicolas Dalayrac par Quenedey» ainsi que la description «Réalisé avec un physionotrace» (et en donnant comme auteur la «Bibliothèque nationale de France»). Si la description de la gravure est erronée dans le fichier File:Dalayrac dessin de Quenedey.jpg, elle l'est probablement aussi dans le fichier File:Nicolas Dalayrac par Quenedey..jpg, puisque le dessin de Quenedey au physionagraphe semble être l'image reproduite dans un autre fichier que vous avez aussi téléversé sous le nom File:Nicolas Dalayrac par Edme Quenedey, d'après le physionotrace 1809.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour et infiniment merci de votre réponse.
Effectivement très jeune dans le monde de Wikipedia et encore plus jeune dans celui de W Commons et de leurs sources il est indispensable que je reprenne les points de vue à valider ou non.
1- La demande de suppression du fichier a déjà été argumentée ici.
Certes, après inversion, l’utilisation du modèle Template:Rename permettrait de changer le titre du fichier exposé et parait une bonne solution puisque la résolution de l’image est très bonne. Mais restent les problèmes
de la description,
de la date,
des auteurs
et le problème du copyright pour lequel je n’ai aucune compétence ; ainsi ne pas porter la légende DALAYRAC modifie le document original.
2 - Un autre fichier File:Nicolas Dalayrac par Quenedey..jpg sur W Commons pose comme vous le soulignez beaucoup de problèmes (il s'agissait d'une de mes premières importations) :
le titre qui devrait être : Dalayrac d’après Quenedey [et non Dalayrac par Quenedey],
et l’on devrait porter beaucoup d'autres modifications :
Description Français : Réalisé d’après Quenedey [et non avec un physionotrace par Quenedey]. Profil droit. English: Right profile
Date 1870(publication) [et non 1801]
Source ark:/12148/btv1b77205530
Auteurs Masson, Deblois et Massard [et non Bibliothèque nationale de France]
Donc de la même façon il faudrait : soit en demander la suppression,soit en corriger les items.
Quel est votre avis ?
L‘ensemble n’est pas purement spéculatif ; l’idée est de disposer rapidement dans W Commons pour Dalayrac de fichiers aussi conformes que possible aux originaux. Cette première approche réalisée (un troisième fichier pose problème) l’article pourra être illustré. Pour d’autres chapitres éventuellement à venir, Commons constituerait une base fiable.
Cordialement. --Fguinard 22:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)- Bonjour, grâce à votre vigilance les premières corrections ont été apportées à File:Nicolas Dalayrac par Quenedey..jpg devenu «Nicolas Dalayrac d'après Quenedey». J'ai retiré ce fichier de l'article car il reste la copie du portait premier que j'ai retenu Nicolas Dalayrac par Edme Quenedey, d'après le physionotrace 1809.jpg. Il reste donc toujours le point 1 : la demande de suppression. Cordialement. --Fguinard 22:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Bonjour et infiniment merci de votre réponse.
Commons:Superseded images policy: PAR is the author, and PAR believes that this image should be deleted. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 14:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Sure. I believe this image will be automatically replaced with the better image using bots. -- Sundar (talk) 15:43, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Superseded images policy: PAR is the author, and PAR believes that this image should be deleted. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Superseded images policy: Author's request. Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Morning ☼ (talk) 06:44, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
I've applied {{PD-US-record}} here (it was {{PD}} originally), but the whole state-common-law-copyright situation is rather complex, and I'm not entirely convinced of the validity of the template itself. One additional question here is whether the (federal) copyright in the songwriting has expired, separate from the copyright in the sound recording; Hurt died in 1966. Rd232 (talk) 17:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Question The rule is that all files on Commons have to be free in the United States. Do we require them to be free in all parts of the United States or only in the state where the servers are located and/or the state where the Wikimedia Foundation's office is located? The copyright status for sound recordings seems to differ from state to state. Also, it seems that no one really has investigated how it works. Should we try nominating the template for deletion first and see what happens after that? --Stefan4 (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 23:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)