User talk:Patavium

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Patavium!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:18, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Referendum

Ciao! Ma è esattamente ciò che sostengo anche io...cone tinte rosse e blu i risultati d mezzo sembrano tutti viola! Ed è proprio per questo che avevo fatto la mappa utilizzando il verde invece che il rosso...peccato che l'altro tizio non riesca a capirlo!! Se tu ci riesci ti ringrazio!!:) --Gigillo83 (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

There's no reason to falsify the outcome of the Referendum. As long as Cuneo had 51,9% and Rome 49,0%, they should also use similar colors. No reason to use violet in the North and green in the South. We have to be neutral and respect the sources. If we want to show where the "border of the 50%" is, there are other ways - like drawing a simple line.--Sajoch (talk) 09:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

A Cuneo ha vinto la repubblica, a Roma la monarchia, se i dati sono questi. Due risultati totalmente opposti. Mettere una linea divisoria va comunque bene.--Patavium (talk) 22:37, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Risultati totalmente opposti?!? Al 97% erano d'accordo (almeno 49% pro Repubblica e 48% pro Monarchia nei due distretti)!  :-)--Sajoch (talk) 20:53, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Romance_20c_en.png

With this edit you introduced your very POV: "separation of Ladin area not correct". We have to respect the sources - our POV does not matter! The error was already notified by Wento. Please do not ignore sources and other users input!!!--Sajoch (talk) 09:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Sajoch, sei tu che non rispetti le fonti e le interpreti a tuo piacimento. Hai trasformato mocheni e cimbri in tedeschi, mentre al censimento sono tre gruppi separati, hai creato una cartina con l'area retoromanza cancellando Val di Non, Val di Sole e gran parte del Bellunese, riconosciuti come retoromanzi ecc. Ovvio, hai sempre ignorato le fonti.--Patavium (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Ho sempre rispettato le fonti. Se la mappa riflette il contenuto della fonte A, dove non c'è la Val di Non, questa valle anche nella mappa non deve esserci. Se tu invece disponi di una fonte B che elenca anche la Val di Non, bene: fai una mappa separata con la Val di Non - ma non alterare quella che riflette la fonte A - sarebbe falsificazione! Ti consiglio di non insistere ad alterare le cartine aggiungendovi invece ciò che nelle fonti non c'è.--Sajoch (talk) 08:07, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Boh, sei tu che modifichi le cartine a tuo piacimento e non rispetti le fonti. Come in questo caso, dove hai spostato confini e regioni linguistiche di qua e di là.--Patavium (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Guarda, che il confine lingustico passa per Salorno... quindi era corretta la mia versione. Ma su questo non ho voglia di litigare. È invece la colorazione della Val di Non come area ladina (in contrasto con la fonte) che era un falso (peraltro già in precedenza scoperto e corretto da Wento!), e quindi da correggere.--Sajoch (talk) 23:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Non ci siamo proprio.--Patavium (talk) 20:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Cimbrian and Mocheno

hi Patavium,

please refer to the talk page here [1] so that everyone who has been participating or is interested can engage in the discussion. Thank you very much. Gryffindor (talk) 07:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Patavium. No one in the Italian Wiki is interested in this topic so far. The map is in English and our discussions have always taken place in the English Wikipedia, so please post your comments there so that everyone involved can participate, thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 03:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Südtirol nella storia-historisch gewachsen IT.png

File:Südtirol nella storia-historisch gewachsen IT.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 10:16, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Immagini

Per quanto riguarda l'eliminazione da it.wiki io non ho competenza, sono amministratore su Commons e qui parlo dei file su Commons, al più devi vedere su it.wiki. Per quanto riguarda le versioni di file da te dette, un altro amministratore ha eliminato le versioni intermedie. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

No, non è ammesso ricaricarle, è considerato un atteggiamento problematico, in effetti. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Patavium. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Patavium~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Re:File:Referendum_Costituzionale_2016_Vittorie.svg

Ciao, inserirla è perfettamente fattibile. Però ho una remora: il Ministero dell'Interno non distingueva la provincia del Sud Sardegna e l'Area Metropolitana di Cagliari, e di solito mi baso rigidamente sulle loro indicazioni. Forse non hanno ancora recepito le innovazioni, oppure la transizione non è ancora conclusa. Propenderei più per quest'ultima opzione visto che mi pare di capire che è ancora in amministrazione straordinaria e il capoluogo è provvisorio. Magari prova a porre la questione alla Buvette della Politica e vediamo se qualcuno ne sa di più e se c'è consenso. Ciao! --Thern (talk) 13:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)